Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nobel Peace Prize

The Nobel Peace Prize is one of five awards established by the 1895 will of Swedish chemist and engineer Alfred Bernhard Nobel, who allocated a portion of his fortune to recognize contributions to humanity, with the peace prize specifically honoring efforts toward "fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Unlike the other prizes administered by Swedish institutions, the peace prize is awarded by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, a five-member body appointed by the Norwegian Parliament (Storting), reflecting Nobel's designation of Norway—then in personal union with Sweden—for this role due to its emerging tradition of neutrality and arbitration. First conferred in 1901 jointly to humanitarian Henry Dunant, founder of the International Red Cross, and French pacifist Frédéric Passy, the prize has since been granted to 111 individuals and 25 organizations as of 2024, often for advancements in disarmament, conflict mediation, and human rights frameworks that align with its founding criteria. The award's prestige stems from its capacity to spotlight empirical progress in reducing global conflict, such as nuclear non-proliferation treaties and international tribunals, yet its selection process— involving confidential nominations from qualified experts and a deliberative vote—has engendered defining controversies due to the inherent subjectivity in evaluating "peace" amid contemporaneous . Critics, including analyses of historical decisions, argue that the committee's choices frequently prioritize symbolic gestures or align with foreign policy preferences over verifiable causal impacts on lasting stability, as evidenced by awards to figures like alongside leaders despite ongoing violence, or to shortly after his inauguration before substantive peace achievements. This politicization, compounded by the committee's ties to Norway's parliament and occasional deviations from Nobel's explicit anti-militarism focus, underscores a tension between aspirational idealism and rigorous outcome-based assessment, with some laureates' post-award actions involving escalated conflicts highlighting the prize's limitations in enforcing causal commitments to peace.

Alfred Nobel's Background and Will

was born on 21 October 1833 in , , to parents , an inventor and industrialist, and . The family faced financial hardship following Immanuel's bankruptcy in 1833, prompting a relocation to , , in 1842, where Alfred received private tutoring and became fluent in five languages by age 17. He later studied chemistry in under T. Jules Pelouze and conducted experiments with , an unstable explosive discovered by . Nobel's breakthrough came in 1867 when he patented , a safer explosive created by absorbing into kieselguhr (), enabling controlled detonation for industrial use. This invention, along with later developments like blasting gelatin (1875) and (1887), fueled the growth of his explosives empire, including the establishment of over 90 factories across , , and by the 1890s. Despite its civil engineering benefits, 's military potential earned Nobel the moniker "merchant of death" following a premature in 1888 that lamented his role in warfare, an event that reportedly influenced his later philanthropic intentions. A 1864 at the family factory killed five workers, including Nobel's younger brother , underscoring the risks inherent in his pursuits. On 27 November 1895, Nobel executed his last in , bequeathing the majority of his estate—estimated at 31 million Swedish kronor (equivalent to about 250 million USD today)—to fund annual prizes recognizing exceptional contributions in physics, , or , , and . The will stipulated that the prizes be awarded by specific Swedish institutions for the scientific and literary categories: the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for physics and , and the for . The prize, however, was uniquely designated for administration by a persons elected by the Norwegian (parliament), to honor those who "have done the most or best to advance fellowship amongst the nations, to reduce standing armies or to promote peace congresses." Nobel provided no explicit rationale for entrusting the peace prize to a Norwegian body while assigning the others to Swedish entities, despite Norway's with until 1905 and its limited independent at the time. The will's execution faced family opposition and legal challenges, delaying implementation until 1900, with the first prizes conferred on 10 December 1901, the fifth anniversary of Nobel's death in , , on 10 December 1896.

Norwegian Nobel Committee's Establishment

The Norwegian Nobel Committee was established by the Norwegian Storting (parliament) in 1897 to award the Nobel Peace Prize, as directed by the will of Alfred Bernhard Nobel. Nobel, a Swedish inventor and industrialist, signed his final will on November 27, 1895, in Paris, stipulating that the Peace Prize be conferred annually by "a committee of five persons to be elected by the Norwegian Storting" to those who had "done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Following Nobel's death on December 10, 1896, the Storting promptly organized the committee to implement this provision, with the first prize awarded in 1901. Nobel's selection of the Norwegian for the Peace Prize, in contrast to institutions for the other prizes, has prompted various explanations, though none are conclusively verified. Possible factors include Norway's of neutrality, its push for of the Swedish-Norwegian union, or personal influences from Norwegian figures such as pacifist Björnstjerne Björnson, but Nobel provided no explicit rationale. The committee consists of five members appointed by the to mirror the parliament's partisan composition, serving terms initially aligned with parliamentary elections but later standardized to six years for continuity. To support its deliberative function, the Norwegian Nobel Institute was founded on February 1, 1904, by the , providing research assistance and maintaining archives for nomination evaluations. This structure has endured, with the committee operating independently while rooted in parliamentary election, ensuring the Peace Prize's administration reflects Norway's democratic processes as Nobel intended.

Selection Mechanisms

Nomination Eligibility and Process

Eligibility for the Nobel Peace Prize extends to any living individual or currently active or that has made notable contributions to between nations, reduction of standing armies, or promotion of peace congresses, in accordance with Alfred Nobel's will. Self-nominations are prohibited, as are nominations by close family members or individuals with close personal or economic ties to the candidate. Deceased individuals are ineligible, though posthumous awards have occurred in rare cases prior to confirmation of death, such as Rafael Angel Caldera in 1973 before the announcement. Qualified nominators are restricted to a defined set of categories to ensure expertise in relevant fields, including:
  • Members of national assemblies and governments, as well as members of the Inter-Parliamentary Union.
  • Members of the Permanent Court of Arbitration and the International Court of Justice.
  • University professors, rectors, or directors in history, social sciences, philosophy, law, theology, or religion, along with professors emeriti in these disciplines.
  • Directors of peace research institutes or foreign policy institutes approved by the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
  • Former Nobel Peace Prize laureates, members of the current Norwegian Nobel Committee, or former advisors to the committee.
No formal invitation is required for eligible nominators to submit a proposal, distinguishing the Peace Prize process from other Nobel categories. The nomination process commences annually in September with the availability of an online submission form on the Nobel Peace Prize website, culminating in a deadline of January 31 at midnight Central European Time. Submissions must include the nominee's name, a brief justification, and supporting documentation, preferably via the digital form; late nominations are typically deferred to the following year. All nominations remain strictly confidential, with disclosure prohibited until 50 years after the award year, preventing public campaigns or lobbying that could influence the committee. For the 2025 prize, 338 candidates were nominated, comprising 244 individuals and 94 organizations, illustrating the volume handled annually without prior vetting of submissions.

Committee Deliberations and Final Decision

The , composed of five members elected by the for staggered six-year terms, holds sole responsibility for selecting the Nobel Peace Prize . Deliberations occur in strict , with all details, assessments, and discussions kept confidential for 50 years to shield the process from external pressures. Following the annual deadline of 31 for nominations, the committee secretary organizes the submitted proposals, which number in the hundreds and come from qualified nominators such as academics, parliamentarians, and past laureates. The five members then review these, often commissioning confidential reports from Norwegian and international experts in relevant fields to evaluate candidates' contributions to among nations, reduction of standing armies, or promotion of congresses as outlined in Alfred Nobel's will. These advisory inputs inform but do not bind the committee, which applies its independent judgment. Meetings commence in spring and intensify through summer, with the weighing candidates against Nobel's criteria amid diverse viewpoints among members, who represent Norway's but deliberate without party affiliations influencing votes. Consensus is preferred but not required; a suffices for the final decision, typically reached at the last meeting between mid-August and late September. The chair announces the selected —up to three individuals or organizations—on the first Friday of , accompanied by a press statement justifying the choice based on the committee's assessment of the award's impact on global peace efforts. No appeals or revisions occur post-announcement, with the prize formally conferred on 10 December in .

Prize Specifications

Award Ceremony and Presentation

The Nobel Peace Prize award ceremony occurs annually on December 10, coinciding with the anniversary of Alfred Nobel's death in 1896. Unlike the other Nobel Prizes presented in , the Peace Prize ceremony is held in , , reflecting the stipulation in Nobel's will for the prize to be administered by a appointed by the Norwegian Parliament. Since 1990, the event has taken place at , following earlier ceremonies from 1947 to 1989 at the University of Oslo's Atrium. The ceremony begins with musical performances and an address by the Chairman of the , who explains the rationale for the selection and praises the laureate's contributions to peace. The Chairman then presents the Nobel medal and diploma to the laureate or laureates onstage, in the presence of the King of , members of the , the , government officials, and parliamentary representatives. The presentation symbolizes recognition of efforts toward fraternity among nations, reduction of standing armies, or promotion of peace congresses, as outlined in Nobel's will. Following the presentation, the laureate delivers the Nobel Lecture, a formal address elaborating on their work and vision for peace, delivered directly after receiving the award. The event concludes with additional music and applause, after which attendees proceed to related festivities, including a banquet and the . Attendance is by invitation only, with the ceremony broadcast internationally to emphasize its global significance.

Medal, Diploma, and Monetary Components

The Nobel Peace Prize medal is cast in 18-carat gold and measures approximately 66 millimeters in diameter. Designed in 1901 by Norwegian sculptor , with engraving assistance from Swedish artist Erik Lindberg, the obverse features a profile relief portrait of encircled by his name and lifespan dates (1833–1896). The reverse depicts three nude male figures linking arms in a fraternal embrace, symbolizing international solidarity, with the inscription "Pro pace et fraternitate gentium" ("For the peace and brotherhood of nations") and an . This design distinguishes the Peace Prize medal from those of the other Nobel categories, emphasizing themes of unity over individual scientific or literary achievement. The accompanying is a unique document, hand-crafted annually and presented alongside the during the ceremony on December 10. It incorporates original artwork commissioned from a contemporary Norwegian artist, tailored to reflect the laureate's contributions, such as symbolic motifs related to their peace efforts. The text certifies the award, cites the laureate's specific achievements, and invokes Alfred Nobel's will, ensuring each serves as a personalized testament to the recipient's work in fostering peace. The monetary component, funded by the Nobel Foundation's endowment, totals 11 million Swedish kronor (approximately 1.1 million USD as of October 2025) for a single , divided equally among up to three recipients if shared. This amount, unchanged from 2023, derives from investment returns on Nobel's original bequest and adjusts periodically based on financial performance, though it has remained stable amid recent economic pressures. The prize money is disbursed post-ceremony, with no restrictions on its use, though often redirect portions to peace-related causes.

Award History

Inception and Pre-World War I Awards

The Nobel Peace Prize originated from the will of Swedish inventor and industrialist Alfred Nobel, signed on November 27, 1895, in Paris, which allocated the bulk of his estate—approximately 31 million Swedish kronor, equivalent to about 250 million USD today—to fund annual prizes in five categories, including peace. Nobel specified that the peace prize be awarded by a committee of five persons elected by the Norwegian Storting (parliament), reflecting Norway's then-neutral status and historical advocacy for international arbitration amid its union with Sweden. Following Nobel's death on December 10, 1896, initial resistance from his family and legal challenges delayed implementation, but the was established by the on April 26, 1897, with its first members including prominent figures like Jørgen Løvland and former Otto Blehr. The committee's inaugural deliberations began in 1900, leading to the first awards across all categories on December 10, 1901—the fifth anniversary of Nobel's death—in for the peace prize. The 1901 peace prize was shared equally between Swiss humanitarian Jean Henri Dunant, founder of the International Committee of the Red Cross and initiator of the , and French pacifist , who established the first peace society and promoted arbitration treaties. Subsequent pre-World War I awards emphasized international arbitration, peace organizations, and humanitarian diplomacy: No peace prize was awarded in 1914, as the outbreak of prompted the committee to withhold recognition amid escalating conflict. These early selections prioritized tangible efforts in , , and institutional frameworks for conflict resolution, aligning closely with Nobel's intent for "fraternity between nations."

Interwar, World War II, and Early Cold War Periods

The saw Nobel Peace Prizes awarded primarily to advocates of international cooperation, , and treaties aimed at preventing recurrence of global conflict following . Léon Bourgeois received the 1920 prize for his role in promoting the of Nations as French foreign minister. In 1921, and Christian Lange were honored for their work in and , with Branting advancing disarmament efforts and Lange chronicling peace movements. Fridtjof Nansen's 1922 award recognized his relief operations and the system for stateless persons displaced by the war. Subsequent prizes in 1925 to and acknowledged the guaranteeing post-Versailles borders and the restructuring German reparations to stabilize Europe economically. and shared the 1926 prize for negotiating Locarno, though Stresemann's efforts occurred amid Germany's internal political turmoil under the . The 1927 award to Ferdinand Buisson and Ludwig Quidde highlighted pacifist activism against militarism in France and Germany, respectively. Frank B. Kellogg's 1929 prize was for the Kellogg-Briand Pact, a multilateral renunciation of war signed by 62 nations, despite lacking enforcement mechanisms. and received the 1931 award for promoting internationalism and women's peace advocacy through organizations like the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom. No prizes were given from 1932 to 1934, reflecting the deepening global depression and rising authoritarianism. Carl von Ossietzky's 1935 award to the imprisoned German journalist and pacifist drew international against Nazi persecution, positioning the prize as a critique of aggression, though it strained Norwegian-German relations. Carlos Saavedra Lamas won in 1936 for mediating the between and and chairing the 's Committee on Arbitration. Awards ceased again from 1937 to 1939 as loomed, underscoring the limitations of interwar diplomacy amid appeasement policies and Axis expansion.
YearLaureate(s)Rationale
1920Léon BourgeoisPromotion of
1921, Christian Lange and peace history
1922Refugee aid and disarmament advocacy
1925, and reparations plan
1926, negotiations
1927Ferdinand Buisson, Ludwig Quidde against militarism
1929Kellogg-Briand Pact
1931, International congresses for peace
1935Exposure of German rearmament
1936Carlos Saavedra Lamas mediation
During , no prizes were awarded from 1940 to 1943 due to the global conflict's disruption of deliberations and travel, with funds reserved per Nobel's will. The 1944 prize went to the International Committee of the Red Cross for its wartime humanitarian operations, including prisoner aid and neutrality enforcement amid Axis and Allied bombings. In the early era, prizes shifted toward postwar reconstruction, , and institutional building to counter ideological divisions. received the 1945 award as U.S. for co-founding the , facilitating the 1944 despite his exclusion of the from early discussions on structure. Critics noted Hull's domestic role in Japanese American internment as incompatible with peace ideals, though the committee emphasized his international contributions. and John Raleigh Mott shared the 1946 prize for lifelong internationalist efforts, with Balch co-founding peace leagues and Mott organizing student Christian movements for global reconciliation. The 1947 award to the (Friends Service Council and ) recognized their neutral relief work during and after both world wars, aiding victims without political alignment. No prize in 1948, as the committee found no suitable candidate amid escalating East-West tensions. John Boyd Orr's 1949 award honored his leadership of the UN in addressing postwar hunger as a peace prerequisite. , in 1950, was the first Black laureate, cited for UN securing armistice agreements in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Léon Jouhaux's 1951 prize acknowledged his efforts bridging labor disputes and international solidarity post-liberation. received 1952 for philosophy applied in African medical missions promoting human dignity amid colonial transitions. George C. Marshall's 1953 award was for the European Recovery Program (), which disbursed $13 billion in aid from 1948 to 1952, rebuilding 16 nations' economies and forestalling communist insurgencies through U.S.-led stabilization. These selections reflected pragmatic focus on and to mitigate rivalry, though some viewed them as aligning with Western containment strategies.

Late Cold War and Post-Cold War Developments

In the late era, from the through 1990, Nobel Peace Prize selections reflected efforts, struggles against totalitarian regimes, and initiatives amid superpower rivalry. The 1973 award to and recognized the intended to cease hostilities in , though Thọ declined it, citing unresolved fighting, and the agreement collapsed within months, with over 58,000 additional U.S. casualties post-accord until 1975. The decision sparked immediate backlash, including resignations from two members who decried Kissinger's prior authorization of massive bombings in and , which killed an estimated 50,000-150,000 civilians and destabilized the region, facilitating the Khmer Rouge's rise. Awards in the 1980s emphasized anti-nuclear advocacy and support for dissidents, as in the 1982 prize to and Alfonso García Robles for promoting disarmament treaties like the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and the 1985 recognition of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War for alerting publics to atomic devastation risks. Lech Wałęsa's 1983 prize honored Solidarity's to Polish communism, galvanizing an reforms, while the 1989 award to the spotlighted Tibet's plight under Chinese rule. The 1990 prize to credited his reforms and withdrawal from for averting violent dissolution, enabling without war, though it preceded the Soviet Union's 1991 breakup and subsequent regional conflicts. Post-Cold War prizes, beginning in 1991, pivoted to ethnic reconciliation, democratic transitions, and multilateralism, yet frequently encountered scrutiny for honoring figures whose contributions proved ephemeral or whose records included violence. The 1993 award to and marked apartheid's end in via negotiated power transfer, averting civil war and establishing multiracial elections on April 27, 1994, with Mandela's ANC securing 62.6% of votes. Conversely, the 1994 prize to , , and for the , which outlined Palestinian self-governance and mutual recognition, faced condemnation for overlooking Arafat's leadership of PLO attacks killing over 1,000 Israelis since 1967; the process unraveled after Rabin's 1995 assassination, yielding the Second Intifada with 1,000+ Israeli and 3,000+ Palestinian deaths by 2005. Later selections underscored humanitarian and institutional roles, such as the 2001 award to the and for revitalizing against and terrorism post-9/11, and the 2002 honor to for post-presidency mediations, including the 1994 North Korea framework averting famine-driven escalation and in 25 nations. The 2009 prize to , granted nine months into his term, praised his diplomacy and nuclear reduction pledges, like the 2010 treaty capping U.S.-Russian warheads at 1,550 each; however, it drew criticism for prematurity, as Obama later authorized 542 drone strikes killing 2,200-4,000 militants and civilians by 2016, exceeding Bush's totals, and failed to close Guantanamo or resolve . These choices illustrate a broadening of "peace" to encompass aspirational ideals, often prioritizing endorsement of Western-aligned reforms over enduring conflict resolution, with empirical outcomes varying widely.

Controversies and Interpretations

Alignment with Nobel's Stated Intentions

Alfred Nobel's will, signed on November 27, 1895, specified that the Peace Prize should be awarded annually to "the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." This formulation emphasized concrete international efforts to foster diplomatic harmony, limit military buildup, and support multilateral assemblies aimed at preventing conflict. The , tasked with selections since Nobel designated Norwegian parliamentarians for this role, has interpreted these criteria with significant latitude, leading to debates over fidelity to the founder's explicit directives. Early awards demonstrated closer alignment, such as the 1901 prize to for establishing the International Red Cross, which promoted humanitarian fraternity amid wars between nations. Similarly, the 1910 award to Permanent International Peace Bureau recognized advocacy for peace congresses, directly echoing Nobel's third criterion. Disarmament-focused prizes, like Linus Pauling's 1962 recognition for anti-nuclear testing campaigns aimed at reducing arsenals, also fit the reduction of standing armies intent. These selections prioritized verifiable contributions to interstate reconciliation and military restraint, consistent with Nobel's emphasis on empirical toward . However, numerous later awards have diverged by incorporating broader concepts like , , and environmental advocacy, which extend beyond Nobel's tripartite focus. For instance, the 1977 prize to honored work against torture and political imprisonment, primarily domestic injustices rather than inter-nation fraternity or armament limits. The 2007 award to and the IPCC for awareness addressed ecological threats but lacked direct ties to army reductions or peace assemblies. Critics, including Norwegian lawyer Fredrik Heffermehl, contend this pattern represents a systemic deviation, arguing that only about 10% of prizes strictly adhere to Nobel's criteria, with the committee substituting vague "peace-building" for specified mechanisms. Such expansions, while arguably advancing a wider ethos, undermine causal links to Nobel's vision of targeted and , as evidenced by the committee's own categorization including unrelated areas like . The committee defends its approach as adapting to evolving global challenges while honoring the will's spirit, yet legal challenges and scholarly analyses highlight interpretive overreach, with Nobel's text providing no mandate for intra-state or non-military issues. Instances like the prize to , awarded for "extraordinary efforts" amid ongoing conflicts and without notable achievements, exemplify premature or aspirational grants misaligned with demonstrable outcomes in Nobel's domains. This flexibility has enabled political signaling but eroded claims of rigorous adherence, as the original intent prioritized measurable interstate de-escalation over symbolic gestures.

Instances of Political Influence in Selections

The , composed of members appointed by Norway's parliament and often including active or former politicians, has faced accusations of injecting political considerations into its selections, reflecting the body's ties to national and international agendas. This structure, established since 1897 with initial members as prominent political figures, enables influences from contemporary , including a noted tilt toward Western or Eurocentric perspectives in choices. In 1973, the prize was awarded to and Le Duc Tho for negotiating the ceasefire in , yet the decision drew immediate backlash due to Kissinger's role in escalating the war through secret bombings in and , which contributed to regional instability. Le Duc Tho declined the award, and two committee members resigned in protest, highlighting perceptions of the selection as rewarding U.S. foreign policy amid ongoing conflict. The 1994 award to , , and for the was criticized for overlooking Arafat's leadership of the , which had orchestrated terrorist attacks including the 1972 Munich Olympics massacre and numerous suicide bombings. Despite the accords' aim for mutual recognition, subsequent violence and Arafat's rejection of peace offers in 2000 fueled arguments that the prize prematurely legitimized a figure with a history of armed struggle, serving diplomatic optics over sustained peace. Barack Obama's 2009 prize, granted less than nine months into his presidency for "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy," exemplified premature political signaling, as the committee cited his multilateral approach and vision before substantive outcomes. Geir Lundestad, the committee's secretary, later admitted the award failed to spur hoped-for advancements and was a misjudgment, amid Obama's expansions of drone strikes and military engagements in and . Critics viewed it as an endorsement of Obama's election as a counter to the preceding U.S. administration, rather than verifiable peace achievements. The 2012 award to the for fostering peace and democracy in post-war Europe occurred during the , prompting claims it functioned as a political morale booster amid internal divisions and protests, particularly in where it met derision. The timing aligned with efforts to reinforce EU integration, underscoring how selections can advance supranational political goals over immediate .

Specific Awards Drawing Widespread Criticism

The 1973 Nobel Peace Prize, shared by U.S. and North Vietnamese negotiator Le Duc Tho for the ending direct U.S. involvement in the , provoked immediate and enduring outrage. Critics highlighted Kissinger's role in authorizing secret bombings of , which killed tens of thousands and destabilized the region, contributing to the Khmer Rouge's rise. Le Duc Tho declined the award, citing the absence of genuine peace in , while two members resigned in protest against Kissinger's selection. In 1994, the prize went to Palestine Liberation Organization chairman , alongside Israeli Prime Minister and Foreign Minister , for the aiming to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Widespread condemnation focused on Arafat's history of sponsoring , including PLO-orchestrated attacks that killed hundreds of civilians during his . A Norwegian member resigned, deeming Arafat "unworthy" due to his unbroken ties to violence despite the accords. Subsequent failures of the , marked by renewed and Arafat's rejection of offers at in 2000, amplified retrospective critiques of the award as premature endorsement of a figure uncommitted to non-violent resolution. The 2009 award to U.S. President , just nine months into his term, for "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international " elicited global derision for its perceived prematurity and lack of concrete achievements. The Nobel secretary later admitted the prize failed to spur Obama toward the hoped-for , as U.S. drone strikes and military engagements in and escalated under his administration. Obama himself acknowledged not deserving the honor, citing insufficient accomplishments to join past laureates' ranks. Critics across political spectra, including former committee members, viewed it as politically motivated signaling rather than recognition of verifiable peace advancements.

Criticisms of the Institution

Systemic Biases and Selection Flaws

The , responsible for selecting Peace Prize laureates, consists of five members appointed by Norway's (parliament), typically drawn from former parliamentarians and reflecting the body's political composition, which has long been dominated by center-left parties such as and the Socialist Left. This structure introduces systemic ideological tilt, as evidenced by the committee's historical preference for awards aligning with social democratic principles, including multilateral institutions and advocacy, often at the expense of realist approaches emphasizing or military deterrence. Critics argue this composition fosters a against conservative or strength-based efforts, with the committee's left-leaning majority—acknowledged even in analyses noting occasional conservative inclusions—prioritizing aspirational over empirically verified . Selection flaws are compounded by the process's opacity, including secret nominations from over 300 qualified categories and deliberations shielded from public scrutiny for 50 years, which limits accountability and enables politically motivated choices without immediate recourse. Empirical patterns reveal a Eurocentric and pro-Western bias, with 45 of 111 individual laureates (as of 2024) hailing from or , disproportionately favoring figures and organizations promoting internationalist agendas like the (awarded 2001 despite ongoing operational failures in and elsewhere) or the (2012), while sidelining non-Western or anti-imperialist movements. This selectivity often rewards premature or symbolic gestures—such as Barack Obama's 2009 award for "extraordinary efforts" in mere months into his presidency, prior to substantive outcomes—over sustained causal impacts on peace, reflecting an ideological preference for detached from verifiable results. Further flaws manifest in inconsistent application of Alfred Nobel's intent to honor "fraternity between nations" through concrete or , as the committee recurrently overlooks omissions of leaders achieving peace via decisive action, such as those facilitating the in 2020, amid a pattern favoring pacifist rhetoric. Sources highlighting these biases, including analyses from non-mainstream outlets skeptical of institutional neutrality, underscore how the small committee size amplifies individual worldviews, leading to awards later undermined by laureates' actions, like Yasser Arafat's (1994) involvement in ongoing violence post-prize. While the committee maintains procedural independence, the absence of ideological diversity—Norway's parliament lacking robust conservative representation—perpetuates a causal loop where selections reinforce prevailing elite consensus rather than rigorously evaluating peace's empirical foundations.

Notable Omissions of Potential Laureates

was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize five times between 1937 and 1948, yet never received the award, marking one of the most prominent omissions in the prize's history. His 1937 nomination by Norwegian parliamentarian Ole Colbjørnsen highlighted Gandhi's non-violent resistance against British rule in , but the committee deemed his approach insufficiently aligned with organized peace efforts. Subsequent nominations in 1938, 1939, 1947, and 1948 followed similar patterns, with the final one arriving days before his on January 30, 1948; the committee opted not to award the prize that year, citing no suitable living candidate, though posthumous consideration was debated but rejected per Alfred Nobel's will stipulating living recipients. Analyses of the omission point to multiple factors, including the Norwegian Nobel Committee's preference for candidates advancing institutionalized diplomacy over grassroots non-violence, as Gandhi's methods lacked endorsement from major governments and risked alienating colonial powers like during his active years. Internal committee discussions, declassified after 50 years, revealed concerns that awarding Gandhi in 1947 or 1948 could exacerbate Hindu-Muslim tensions amid India's violence, despite his efforts to quell riots. This decision has been critiqued for prioritizing geopolitical stability over recognizing non-violent , with the official later acknowledging Gandhi as "the missing laureate" whose exclusion symbolized a gap in honoring unconventional peace advocacy. Other notable potential laureates include , nominated multiple times for her human rights advocacy, including drafting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, but overlooked amid postwar focus on European diplomacy and possible domestic U.S. political sensitivities. Her omission underscores the committee's historical emphasis on state-level actors over individual humanitarian influencers, though no official rationale was disclosed due to nomination secrecy rules. Additional figures like , nominated 1945–1946 for wartime leadership and Atlantic alliance-building, were bypassed in favor of , reflecting preferences for over unilateral Allied efforts. These cases illustrate recurring patterns where nominations exceeding dozens for some candidates failed to yield awards, often due to the subjective interpretation of Nobel's will amid contemporary politics.

Reception and Long-Term Impact

Acclaimed Contributions to Global Peace

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize three times (1917, 1944, and 1963, the latter jointly with Red Cross societies) for its impartial humanitarian efforts during major conflicts, including visiting over 120,000 prisoners during and facilitating aid to millions in , which reduced unnecessary suffering and supported negotiations by maintaining neutral channels for communication between belligerents. These actions, grounded in the , established standards for protecting non-combatants and wounded soldiers, contributing to a framework that has limited the scope of violence in subsequent wars through enforced neutrality and relief operations. Norman Borlaug's 1970 Nobel Peace Prize recognized his development of high-yielding, disease-resistant strains that tripled production in , , and during the , averting predicted famines that threatened hundreds of millions and stabilizing governments prone to unrest from shortages. By addressing root causes of conflict such as resource scarcity, Borlaug's is estimated to have saved over one billion lives from , fostering and reducing incentives for migration-driven or scarcity-induced in developing regions. Desmond Tutu's 1984 prize honored his non-violent advocacy against , including international economic boycotts and leadership in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission post-1994, which facilitated South Africa's bloodless transition to and prevented a potential that analysts estimated could have killed millions. Similarly, 's 1964 award for pioneering non-violent civil rights tactics in the United States influenced global movements, such as anti-colonial struggles in and , by demonstrating that systemic injustice could be dismantled without widespread violence, thereby modeling peaceful reform over revolutionary upheaval. The and Secretary-General shared the 2001 prize for revitalizing multilateral and expanding peacekeeping operations, which since 1948 have deployed in over 70 missions involving more than 100,000 personnel at peak, successfully mediating ceasefires and stabilizing post-conflict zones like (1999-2002) and (2003), where troop presence deterred renewed fighting and enabled democratic transitions. These efforts underscore the prize's role in bolstering institutions that enforce , reducing the frequency of interstate wars through preventive and sanctions enforcement.

Debates on Efficacy and Legacy

Critics of the Nobel Peace Prize contend that its efficacy in fostering lasting peace is minimal, as the award frequently honors aspirational efforts rather than demonstrable outcomes, with limited causal impact on global conflicts. A 2009 scholarly analysis by Ronald R. Krebs and Jennifer K. Lobasz examined historical cases and found scant evidence that the prize advances laureates' causes or reduces violence, arguing that it often serves rhetorical purposes without altering entrenched geopolitical realities..pdf) For instance, the 1994 award to , , and for the coincided with the subsequent eruption of the Second Intifada in 2000, which claimed over 1,000 Israeli and 3,000 Palestinian lives by 2005, undermining claims of enduring pacification. Similarly, Barack Obama's 2009 prize, granted nine months into his presidency for "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international ," preceded escalated U.S. engagements in and the expansion of drone strikes, which by 2016 had resulted in an estimated 2,200-3,500 civilian deaths according to Bureau of Investigative Journalism data, prompting debates over whether the honor incentivized restraint or merely symbolic gestures. Proponents counter that the prize exerts subtle, long-term influence by amplifying voices and mobilizing resources, though empirical substantiation remains elusive. Defenders, including members, assert that awards like the 2015 prize to the contributed to stabilizing post-Arab Spring transitions, averting broader regional chaos as Tunisia adopted a new in 2014. However, a 2017 assessment in highlighted that such successes are outliers, with the prize more often failing to deter aggression—as seen in the 1973 award to amid ongoing bombings that killed tens of thousands—or to enforce commitments, as with the 1994 award's unfulfilled promises. Quantitative analyses of post-award conflict trends, such as those tracking interstate wars via the dataset, show no statistically significant decline attributable to Nobel selections, suggesting the institution's role is predominantly rather than transformative. The legacy of the Nobel Peace Prize is thus contested, with its prestige eroded by perceived politicization and inconsistent results, fostering cynicism about international awards as tools for genuine reconciliation. Since 1901, over 140 laureates have been named, yet persistent global conflicts—like the ongoing despite awards to figures such as in 2021—underscore a disconnect between intent and impact, as noted in critiques from the International Peace Institute. This has led to calls for reform, including posthumous awards to mitigate risks of honoring figures later implicated in violence, though the committee's structure, dominated by Norwegian parliamentarians since 1897, resists such changes. While the prize has undeniably spotlighted abuses and —evident in the enduring of laureates like , whose 2014 award amplified global education advocacy—its legacy is one of symbolic over empirical efficacy, prompting scholars to question whether Alfred Nobel's vision of fraternity among nations has been diluted by subjective selections.

References

  1. [1]
    Alfred Nobel's will - Nobel Prize
    The interest is to be divided into five equal parts and distributed as follows: one part to the person who made the most important discovery or invention in the ...
  2. [2]
    Nobel Peace Prize
    ### Summary of the Nobel Peace Prize
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    Controversies and criticisms - NobelPrize.org
    Jun 29, 2000 · The Nobel Peace Prize has frequently caused controversy. One reason is that many Laureates have been contemporary and highly controversial political actors.
  5. [5]
    How Politics Hijacked the Nobel Peace Prize
    Jul 1, 2025 · This subjectivity has rendered the award vulnerable to criticism, especially when it appears to be bestowed more for symbolic or strategic ...
  6. [6]
    Behind the scenes of the Nobel Peace Prize - NobelPrize.org
    He points out three criteria for the peace prize. It is reduction of standing armies, it is contributing to peace congresses and fraternity between nations.
  7. [7]
    The man behind the Prize – Alfred Nobel - NobelPrize.org
    Alfred Nobel signed his last will in Paris on 27 November 1895. He specified that the bulk of his fortune should be divided into five parts and to be used for ...The will · Alfred Nobel's life and work · His life and work · Life and Philosophy
  8. [8]
    How Dynamite Spawned the Nobel Prizes - McGill University
    Oct 8, 2021 · Nobel was born in Sweden but spent his early years in St. Petersburg in Russia where his inventor father had set up a small business developing ...
  9. [9]
    Full text of Alfred Nobel´s will - NobelPrize.org
    The interest is to be divided into five equal parts and distributed as follows: one part to the person who made the most important discovery or invention in the ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  10. [10]
    The Norwegian Nobel Committee - NobelPrize.org
    By the terms of Alfred Nobel's will the Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded by the Norwegian Nobel Committee since 1901. Alfred Nobel left no explanation as to ...
  11. [11]
    Why Norway? - Nobel Peace Prize
    No one knows for sure why Alfred Nobel wanted the Peace Prize in particular to be awarded by a Norwegian committee - or what prompted him to include Norway in ...
  12. [12]
    Norwegian Nobel Committee - Nobel Peace Prize
    The Norwegian Nobel Committee was established by the Norwegian Storting in 1897, tasked with selecting Nobel Peace Prize laureates.
  13. [13]
    The Norwegian Nobel Committee and Institute | Nobel Peace Center
    The Norwegian Nobel Institute was established 1 February, 1904, tasked with supporting the Nobel Committee in its review of nominations and candidates for the ...
  14. [14]
    The Norwegian Nobel Committee - NobelPrize.org
    The Norwegian Nobel Committee awards the Nobel Peace Prize, appointed by the Storting, with members serving six-year terms.
  15. [15]
    Nomination and selection of Nobel Peace Prize laureates
    A nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize may be submitted by any person who meets the nomination criteria. A letter of invitation to submit is not required.
  16. [16]
    Nomination - Nobel Peace Prize
    All living persons and active organizations or institutions are eligible candidates for the Nobel Peace Prize. What is considered a valid nomination is defined ...The nomination process · Criteria for nominators · Confidentiality
  17. [17]
    Criteria for nominators - Nobel Peace Prize
    University professors, professors emeriti and associate professors of history, social sciences, law, philosophy, theology, and religion; university rectors and ...
  18. [18]
    The nomination process - Nobel Peace Prize
    In practice, the nomination process lasts from mid-October, when the submission form is posted, till the deadline on 31. January. The nominations are carefully ...
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    What to know about the Nobel Peace Prize - NPR
    Oct 9, 2025 · On Friday, the Norwegian Nobel Committee will announce the winner. The committee says the award goes to the person or organization that has ...
  21. [21]
    The Nobel Peace Prize award ceremony 2024 - NobelPrize.org
    The Nobel Peace Prize award ceremony took place in Oslo City Hall on 10 December – the anniversary of Alfred Nobel's death.
  22. [22]
    Nobel Peace Prize celebrations
    The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded on December 10 in a formal ceremony at the Oslo City Hall. The laureate is presented with the Nobel medal and diploma, and is ...
  23. [23]
    Facts on the Nobel Peace Prize
    Dec 10, 2024 · In Stockholm, the lectures are presented days before the Nobel Prize Award Ceremony. In Oslo, the Nobel Laureates deliver their lectures during ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Award ceremony - Nobel Peace Prize
    The laureate is presented with the Nobel medal and diploma, and is asked to deliver a Nobel lecture. Seated on the podium are the Laureate, the Nobel Committee ...
  25. [25]
    The Nobel Peace Prize - Oslo, Norway 10 December
    Dec 10, 2024 · During the award ceremony on 10 December, the laureate usually delivers their Nobel Peace Lecture. Attendance is by invitation only.
  26. [26]
    The medal - Nobel Peace Prize
    The Peace Prize Medal was designed by one of Norway's greatest artists, the sculptor Gustav Vigeland, assisted by the Swedish engraver Erik Lindberg. It is the ...
  27. [27]
    The story behind the Nobel Peace Prize Medal - Vigeland museet
    Vigeland was invited to design the medal, which features three men holding each other, Alfred Nobel's portrait, and the inscription "Pro pacing a fraternitate ...Missing: design | Show results with:design
  28. [28]
    Nobel Prize medal - Wikipedia
    The recipients also receive a diploma that details their achievements, and a monetary award from the Nobel Foundation. ... The voting members of the Royal Swedish ...
  29. [29]
    The diploma - Nobel Peace Prize
    The diploma presented with the medal at the award ceremony on 10 December features original artwork by a contemporary Norwegian artist.
  30. [30]
    The 2021 Nobel Peace Prize diploma
    When Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov accept the Nobel Peace Prize in December, they will receive a gold medal and diploma adorned by a piece of art.
  31. [31]
    Nobel Prizes & laureates
    The prize money​​ The current amount is at SEK 11 million per full Nobel Prize. A Nobel Prize can be awarded to up to three laureates who share the prize money. ...
  32. [32]
    How much prize money do Nobel laureates receive? | World News
    Oct 10, 2025 · The prize money for 2025 is 11 million Swedish kronor. This prize money was the same in 2023 and 2024, while it was SEK 10 million in 2022.<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Alfred Nobel's will - Nobel Peace Prize
    On November 27, 1895, in Paris, Alfred Bernhard Nobel signed his will. After his death in December 1896, many people tensely awaited the publication of the ...
  34. [34]
    History - Nobel Peace Prize
    Norwegian Nobel Committee ... Alfred Nobel's will declared that the Nobel Peace Prize was to be awarded by a committee of five persons selected by the Norwegian ...
  35. [35]
    All Nobel Peace Prizes - NobelPrize.org
    The Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded 106 times to 143 Nobel Prize laureates between 1901 and 2025, 112 individuals and 31 organisations.
  36. [36]
    Facts on the Nobel Peace Prizes - NobelPrize.org
    Oct 5, 2009 · Royal nominees: Tsar Nikolai II (1901), Prince Carl of Sweden (1919), King Albert I of Belgium (1922), Emperor Haile Selassi of Ethiopia (1938) ...
  37. [37]
    The Nobel Peace Prize 1944 - NobelPrize.org
    ... criteria as outlined in the will of Alfred Nobel. According to the Nobel Foundation's statutes, the Nobel Prize can in such a case be reserved until the ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Why does the Nobel Peace Prize often stir controversy? - Al Jazeera
    Oct 6, 2022 · The prize committee has been accused of being politically motivated, subjective and sometimes basing the award on aspiration rather than achievements.
  39. [39]
    Mikhail Gorbachev changed history, but was wrong about ties to West
    Aug 31, 2022 · He is seen in the West as an architect of reform who created the conditions for the end of the Cold War in 1991 - a time of deep tensions ...
  40. [40]
    7 Nobel Prize Scandals | Britannica
    Oct 13, 2025 · Slights, questionable winners, and perceived conflicts of interest are among the controversies that have beset the prizes.
  41. [41]
    Jimmy Carter – Facts - NobelPrize.org
    Former President Jimmy Carter was awarded the Peace Prize for undertaking peace negotiations, campaigning for human rights, and working for social welfare.
  42. [42]
    Surprise Nobel for Obama Stirs Praise and Doubts
    Oct 9, 2009 · Former President Jimmy Carter won in 2002 for his efforts over decades to spread peace and development. Mr. Carter called the award to Mr.
  43. [43]
    Nobel Peace Prizes: The Inside Story - The Globalist
    Sep 6, 2025 · Theodore Roosevelt was awarded the Peace Prize in 1906 in recognition of his efforts to broker a peaceful end to the Russo-Japanese War. The ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
  44. [44]
    Swedes clear Nobel Committee - Norway's News in English
    Mar 8, 2012 · ... Nobel Peace Prize. The Oslo lawyer who has complained for years that ... Heffermehl believes such prizes are not in line with Nobel's intentions.
  45. [45]
    About the Nobel Peace Prize
    The Peace Prize has principally been awarded to honour efforts in four main areas: arms control and disarmament, peace negotiation, democracy and human rights.
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
    War and Peace: Clash of the Nobels - Hoover Institution
    Oct 9, 2009 · Alfred Nobel's will was vague in defining the contours of his Peace Prize, directing that it be given to those (he envisioned multiple winners) ...
  48. [48]
    Kissinger: A war criminal with a Nobel Peace Prize - Al Jazeera
    Dec 2, 2023 · Kissinger was seen as the architect of the United States efforts to contain the Soviet Union and communist influence around the world. To ...
  49. [49]
    Henry Kissinger – Speed read - NobelPrize.org
    Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, jointly with Le Duc Tho, for negotiating a ceasefire in Vietnam in 1973.
  50. [50]
    The worst man ever to win the Nobel Peace Prize | The Times of Israel
    Mar 31, 2012 · In my view, Arafat is the worst man ever to win the Nobel Peace Prize, unless it's Le Duc Tho (a hard-liner even within a totalitarian ...
  51. [51]
    Nobel Peace Prize - the controversial winners – DW – 10/06/2017
    A terrorist with a Nobel Peace Prize. There was uproar in 1994 when Palestine Liberation Organization chief Yasser Arafat along with Israeli Prime Minister ...
  52. [52]
    What to know about the most controversial Nobel Peace Prize wins
    Oct 9, 2025 · Kristiansen called Arafat the “world's most prominent terrorist” and said his past was “too tainted with violence, terrorism and bloodshed” for ...
  53. [53]
    The Nobel Peace Prize 2009 - Press release - NobelPrize.org
    The Committee endorses Obama's appeal that “Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges.” Oslo, ...
  54. [54]
    Nobel secretary regrets Obama peace prize - BBC News
    Sep 17, 2015 · Awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to US President Barack Obama in 2009 failed to achieve what the committee hoped it would, its ex-secretary has said.
  55. [55]
    Revoke Obama's Nobel Peace Prize - Cato Institute
    May 20, 2016 · After eight years of continuous warfare, the Nobel Committee should take another unprecedented action: It should revoke Obama's peace prize and demand ...
  56. [56]
    European Union's Nobel peace prize win greeted with joy and derision
    Oct 12, 2012 · Oslo committee focuses on union's historical role in ending conflict, but Eurosceptics and many Greeks react with scorn.<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Reaction To The EU's Nobel Peace Prize - CONCORD Europe
    Oct 12, 2012 · As usual it's quite a 'political' decision from the Nobel jury, coming at a time of when the EU is amidst of crisis.
  58. [58]
    The 1973 Nobel Peace Prize was the most controversial in history
    Oct 11, 2024 · His critics argue that Kissinger's policies exacerbated violence, particularly in Southeast Asia. Under his watch, the US launched devastating ...
  59. [59]
    Henry Kissinger - Top 10 Nobel Prize Controversies - TIME
    Oct 7, 2011 · Once called "the most controversial to date," the decision to award the Nobel Peace Prize to Henry Kissinger in 1973 was fraught with debate.Missing: interwar period<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    Yasser Arafat - Top 10 Nobel Prize Controversies - TIME
    Oct 7, 2011 · As for his efforts toward fraternity in the Middle East: an uneasy relationship with Hamas, allegations of corruption and an aversion to ...
  61. [61]
    Why Barack Obama was particularly unsuited to live up to the ideals ...
    Oct 11, 2019 · A decade ago, in October 2009, Barack Obama learned that he had won the Nobel Peace Prize. He was uncomfortable with the award, saying that ...
  62. [62]
    Obama's Nobel Peace Prize - Sabato's Crystal Ball
    Oct 9, 2009 · The Prize is not an unalloyed plus, however. Even to Obama supporters, the award seems ridiculously premature. To give him the prize for a few ...
  63. [63]
    The failure of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee - Asia Times
    Oct 10, 2025 · The committee, tilted to the left but with a couple of more conservative members, is composed of Norwegians who are involved in politics and “ ...
  64. [64]
    Nobel Peace Prize: A Political Tool to Reward Pro-Western Ideology
    Oct 11, 2025 · Figures such as Henry Kissinger (1973) and Barack Obama (2009) are telling examples. Kissinger's award, given despite his direct involvement in ...
  65. [65]
    The political wars of the Nobel Peace Prize - Chatham House
    Sep 28, 2022 · The controversial winners include politicians untested by power or those attempting to solve intractable ethnic conflicts. Aung San Suu Kyi won ...
  66. [66]
    Top 10 Nobel Peace Prize Embarrassments - AEI
    Sep 28, 2017 · Winners of that coveted award get a credential to opine on issues of war and peace and diplomacy and politics on the world stage. In both ...
  67. [67]
    Mahatma Gandhi, the missing laureate - NobelPrize.org
    Dec 1, 1999 · Mahatma Gandhi, the missing laureate ... Mohandas Gandhi (1869-1948) has become the strongest symbol of non-violence in the 20th century. It is ...
  68. [68]
    Nomination Peace 1948 6-5 - NobelPrize.org
    Nomination for Nobel Peace Prize. Year: 1948. Number: 6 - 5. Nominee: Name: Mahatma Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Gender: M. Year, Birth: 1869.
  69. [69]
    Mahatma Gandhi Never Received Nobel Peace Prize. Panel ... - NDTV
    Oct 2, 2023 · He was nominated in 1937, 1938, 1939, 1947 and, finally, a few days before he was assassinated in January 1948. Failure to give the prize to ...
  70. [70]
    Why Mahatma Gandhi never won Nobel Peace despite being ... - Mint
    Oct 2, 2023 · Mahatma Gandhi never received the Nobel Peace Prize due to his non-conformity to the committee's criteria and reservations about his pacifist stance.
  71. [71]
    Why was Mahatma Gandhi never awarded the Nobel Peace Prize?
    Oct 2, 2023 · The reasons behind this omission are complex and multifaceted. One of the primary issues was that Mahatma Gandhi did not fit into the ...
  72. [72]
    10 People Who Should Have Won the Nobel Prize But Didn't
    Oct 20, 2023 · Rosalind Franklin · Dmitri Mendeleev · Lisa Meitner · Jonas Salk · Albert Schatz · Mahatma Gandhi · Stephen Hawking · Eleanor Roosevelt.
  73. [73]
    Nobel Peace Prize: They didn't win, either - CNN
    Oct 10, 2014 · Indian independence leader Mahatma Gandhi is widely recognized as one of the most-snubbed nominees. His name is virtually synonymous with peace.
  74. [74]
    Controversies in Selecting Nobel Laureates - PubMed Central - NIH
    Jul 31, 2022 · In 1948, a peace prize was not awarded, and the Nobel Committee indicated that there was no suitable “living candidate” in that year. This ...Missing: interwar | Show results with:interwar
  75. [75]
    The Greatest Nobel Prize Snubs - Everything Everywhere Daily
    Gandhi never won the Nobel Peace Prize despite being nominated five times and widely regarded as one of the greatest champions of nonviolent resistance in ...
  76. [76]
    International Committee of the Red Cross - Nobel Prize
    The International Committee of the Red Cross was declared the winner of the Peace Prize both in 1917 and in 1944. The main reason was its efforts during the two ...
  77. [77]
    The Red Cross: three-time recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize
    Oct 30, 2003 · The International Committee of the Red Cross was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1917, 1944 and 1963 – on the third occasion jointly with the League of Red ...
  78. [78]
    Norman Borlaug – Speed read - NobelPrize.org
    Norman Borlaug was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his contribution to increasing food supply worldwide through the Green Revolution.
  79. [79]
    About Norman Borlaug - The World Food Prize
    In 1970 Norman E. Borlaug was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for a lifetime of work to feed a hungry world. Although a scientist with outstanding contributions, ...
  80. [80]
    The Green Revolution: Norman Borlaug and the Race to Fight ... - PBS
    Apr 22, 2025 · Borlaug's wildly successful efforts to increase crop yields came to be known as the “Green Revolution” and earned him the Nobel Peace Prize in ...
  81. [81]
    Desmond Tutu – Speed read - NobelPrize.org
    Desmond Tutu was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his role as a unifying leader figure in the non-violent campaign against Apartheid in South Africa.
  82. [82]
    Desmond Tutu | Biography, Facts, & Nobel Peace Prize | Britannica
    Oct 3, 2025 · South African Anglican cleric who in 1984 received the Nobel Prize for Peace for his role in the opposition to apartheid in South Africa.
  83. [83]
    Martin Luther King Jr. – Speed read - NobelPrize.org
    Martin Luther King Jr. was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his non-violent struggle for civil rights in the United States.Missing: global | Show results with:global
  84. [84]
    A right to freedom – Martin Luther King, Jr - Nobel Prize Museum
    The Nobel Prize helped reinforce Martin Luther King's international reputation and involvement.Missing: global | Show results with:global
  85. [85]
    The Nobel Peace Prize 2001 - NobelPrize.org
    The Nobel Peace Prize 2001 was awarded jointly to United Nations (UN) and Kofi Annan for their work for a better organized and more peaceful world.
  86. [86]
    Nobel Peace Prize | United Nations
    The Peace Prize was to be awarded to the person who had done most for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies.Missing: early | Show results with:early
  87. [87]
    Press release - The Nobel Peace Prize 2001 - NobelPrize.org
    The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 2001, in two equal portions, to the United Nations (UN) and to its Secretary- ...
  88. [88]
    Why the Nobel Peace Prize brings little peace - The Conversation
    Oct 6, 2017 · Aung San Suu Kyi · Nuclear weapons · Yasser Arafat · Nelson Mandela · Malala Yousafzai · Shimon Peres · Yitzhak Rabin · Nobel Peace Prize ...
  89. [89]
    The Prestige of Peace: The Nobel Prize in Context
    Nov 6, 2019 · Dr. Toje explained that since the first Nobel Peace Prize was awarded in 1901, there has been an ongoing debate about how to interpret the ...
  90. [90]
    A Peace Prize Nobel would have liked - Chr. Michelsen Institute
    Oct 10, 2025 · Critics argued that these prizes were based more on hope than achievement. In contrast, awards to Kim Dae-jung, Jimmy Carter, Martti Ahtisaari, ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy