Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nonsectarian

Nonsectarian refers to an approach, institution, or policy not affiliated with or restricted to any particular religious denomination or sect, thereby maintaining neutrality across diverse beliefs or nonbeliefs.^[1]^[2]^[3] This characteristic promotes broad-mindedness by avoiding narrow adherence to specific doctrines, applicable primarily in religious contexts but extending to political and social spheres where it denotes impartiality toward ideological or ethnic divisions.^[4]^[5] In education, nonsectarian principles underpin institutions and reforms that deliver instruction without endorsing any faith, as seen in 19th-century American public school advocacy by Horace Mann, which prioritized common moral education over denominational teachings despite contemporary criticisms of perceived antireligious bias.^[6] Politically, the term describes movements or platforms in sectarian-prone regions—such as those transcending confessional lines in multi-ethnic states—that aim to foster cross-group cooperation, though implementation often grapples with entrenched divisions.^[5] Legally, nonsectarian frameworks influence doctrines like U.S. establishment clause interpretations, emphasizing shared civic values over particularistic religious appeals to ensure inclusivity for believers and nonbelievers alike.^[7]^[8] Defining features include a commitment to universality, which contrasts with sectarian exclusivity but can invite debates over whether true neutrality adequately addresses cultural particularities or inadvertently privileges secular perspectives.^[9]

Definition and Conceptual Foundations

Core Definition

Nonsectarian refers to an approach, institution, or policy that is not affiliated with, restricted to, or favoring any particular religious sect or denomination, allowing for broader inclusivity across diverse religious perspectives or none at all.^[1]^[3] This distinguishes it from sectarian entities, which adhere strictly to the doctrines or membership of a specific religious group, often leading to exclusionary practices.^[10] In essence, nonsectarianism promotes neutrality regarding denominational differences, enabling participation by individuals of varying faiths without privileging one over others.^[2] While sometimes conflated with secularism, nonsectarianism does not inherently preclude religious elements; it may incorporate general moral or ethical principles derived from religion provided they transcend specific sects, as seen in historical applications to education and public institutions.^[11] For instance, a nonsectarian school might teach universal ethical values rooted in Judeo-Christian traditions without endorsing rituals or creeds unique to a single denomination.^[7] This framework aims to foster unity and avoid inter-sectarian conflict, though critics argue it can inadvertently impose a lowest-common-denominator religiosity or subtly favor dominant cultural norms under the guise of neutrality.^[12]

Etymology and Philosophical Underpinnings

The term "nonsectarian" combines the negating prefix "non-" with "sectarian," the latter entering English in the 1640s from Medieval Latin sectarius ("pertaining to a religious group"), derived from secta ("a following, faction, or school of thought," especially a heretical one), ultimately from the Latin verb sequi ("to follow").^[13] This etymology reflects adherence to a specific religious or ideological subgroup, often implying division or exclusivity, with "nonsectarian" denoting the absence of such affiliation or restriction. The adjective's earliest documented English usage appears in 1831, in philosopher John Stuart Mill's writings critiquing denominational influences in education and society. By the mid-19th century, the term gained traction in American contexts to describe institutions, such as schools, designed to transcend particular religious denominations while accommodating general moral instruction.^[14] Philosophically, nonsectarianism draws from Enlightenment recognition of sectarian conflicts' empirical costs, including the European Wars of Religion (e.g., the Thirty Years' War, 1618–1648, which killed an estimated 4–8 million), prompting causal arguments for institutional neutrality to preserve civil order. John Locke formalized this in his 1689 A Letter Concerning Toleration, asserting that religious belief resists coercion—"no man can be a Christian who believes not the essentials of Christianity"—and that magistrates should limit authority to outward conduct, not inward faith, to avoid futile persecution and enable diverse sects' coexistence. This reasoning prioritizes human reason and natural rights over dogmatic enforcement, influencing deistic and liberal traditions that view sectarian favoritism as irrational and prone to factionalism, as Mill later echoed in advocating free inquiry unbound by ecclesiastical authority. Such underpinnings emphasize pluralism's practical benefits—reduced intergroup violence and broader access—over ideological uniformity, though critics note it risks diluting substantive moral commitments in favor of procedural tolerance.^[15]

Historical Evolution

Pre-Modern Precursors

In the ancient Near East, Cyrus the Great (r. 559–530 BCE), founder of the Achaemenid Empire, established policies of religious tolerance that permitted diverse cults and practices across conquered territories without mandating adherence to Zoroastrianism. Following the conquest of Babylon in 539 BCE, Cyrus authorized the repatriation of exiled peoples, including the Jews, and facilitated the reconstruction of their temples, as recorded in the biblical Book of Ezra and corroborated by the Cyrus Cylinder, a cuneiform inscription proclaiming his restoration of local deities' sanctuaries.^[16] ^[17] This approach, extended by successors like Darius I, prioritized administrative stability over sectarian uniformity, allowing subjects from Egypt to Anatolia to maintain their rituals under imperial oversight, thereby averting rebellions tied to religious suppression.^[18] On the Indian subcontinent, Emperor Ashoka (r. 268–232 BCE) of the Maurya Empire developed dhamma, a ethical policy framework inscribed in over 30 rock and pillar edicts dating from circa 260 BCE onward, which emphasized universal virtues such as non-violence, truthfulness, compassion, and mutual respect among sects without privileging Buddhism exclusively despite his personal adherence to it post-Kalinga War (261 BCE).^[19] ^[20] Ashoka's edicts explicitly urged tolerance toward Brahmanas, Shramanas, Jains, and Ajivikas, prohibiting harm to rival teachers and promoting inter-sectarian concord to unify a vast, multi-ethnic domain spanning modern India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.^[21] This non-doctrinal emphasis on moral governance—evidenced by state-funded welfare like hospitals and wells accessible to all—served as a pragmatic tool for cohesion amid religious diversity, influencing later South Asian traditions of syncretism.^[22] These imperial strategies, while rooted in realpolitik rather than abstract ideology, prefigured nonsectarian principles by demonstrating that state legitimacy could derive from ethical universality over confessional exclusivity, with empirical outcomes including reduced factional strife and expanded territorial control.^[23] Subsequent pre-modern instances, such as the Achaemenid satrapies' allowance for local priesthoods or Hellenistic rulers' syncretic cults post-Alexander (d. 323 BCE), echoed this pattern but lacked the codified breadth of Cyrus or Ashoka.^[16]

19th-Century Emergence and American Foundations

The concept of nonsectarianism emerged prominently in the United States during the 19th century, primarily within public education systems, as reformers sought to accommodate growing religious diversity spurred by mass immigration, particularly of Irish Catholics, while promoting national unity and civic virtue.^[24]^[25] Horace Mann, appointed secretary of the newly established Massachusetts Board of Education in 1837, became the central figure in this development, advocating for "common schools" that were free, universal, tax-supported, and explicitly nonsectarian to avoid denominational conflicts and foster moral character through shared republican values.^[24] Mann's annual reports and the Common School Journal, which he edited from 1839, emphasized professional teacher training and curriculum reforms that included Bible reading but excluded doctrinal specifics to prevent sectarian indoctrination.^[24] In practice, Mann's nonsectarian model drew on a lowest-common-denominator Protestant framework, incorporating Unitarian-influenced moral instruction and the King James Bible as tools for ethical education, while deliberately countering Catholic parochial schools amid nativist fears of immigrant influence.^[26]^[25] This approach reflected broader anti-Catholic sentiments, as "nonsectarian" often signified exclusion of Catholic practices deemed divisive or foreign, rather than strict neutrality toward all religions; contemporary definitions of "sectarian" targeted groups viewed as bigoted outliers from mainstream Protestant norms, such as Catholics or Mormons.^[26]^[27] By the 1840s, Mann's reforms had inspired similar systems in other states, centralizing education under state oversight to produce disciplined citizens capable of self-governance.^[24] Tensions peaked in urban centers like New York, where Catholic immigration swelled the population to 1.7 million by 1850, prompting Bishop John Hughes to challenge the Protestant-biased Public School Society's use of public funds for King James Bible instruction.^[25] This led to the 1842 Maclay Act, which reorganized the system under a nonsectarian board and prohibited state aid to schools promoting any religious doctrine, marking an early policy foundation for separating public funding from sectarian institutions.^[25] These debates culminated in state constitutional provisions barring aid to "sectarian" schools, with influences from the failed 1875 Blaine Amendment and earlier precedents like Missouri's 1875 clause, embedding nonsectarian principles into American governance to prioritize majority cultural cohesion over minority accommodations.^[27]^[25]

20th-Century Legal and Institutional Shifts

In the United States, the mid-20th century marked a pivotal reinforcement of nonsectarian principles through Supreme Court interpretations of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, applied to state actions via the Fourteenth Amendment in Everson v. Board of Education (1947), which upheld public funding for transportation to religious schools but affirmed that states must maintain strict neutrality toward religion. This framework intensified with Engel v. Vitale (1962), where the Court ruled 8-1 that state-composed prayers in public schools violated the Establishment Clause, even if voluntary and non-denominational, rejecting arguments that such practices fostered moral values without endorsing sectarianism.^[28] Building on this, Abington School District v. Schempp (1963) extended the prohibition to mandatory Bible readings and recitations, with the Court holding 8-1 that such exercises advanced religion impermissibly, thereby solidifying public education's nonsectarian character amid growing religious pluralism from post-World War II immigration and cultural shifts. These rulings prompted institutional adaptations, including the removal of devotional elements from curricula in over 90% of public schools by the late 1960s, as states complied to avoid litigation, fostering environments focused on civic education over religious observance.^[29] In higher education, numerous formerly sectarian colleges transitioned to nonsectarian status; for instance, by 1970, institutions like New York University, originally founded as a Protestant-affiliated school in 1831, had fully disaffiliated, emphasizing academic freedom and broad accessibility, with enrollment data showing a tripling of non-religious students from 1940 to 1960 amid federal GI Bill expansions.^[30] Similarly, the University of the South severed formal Episcopal ties in the 1960s, reflecting a broader trend where 40% of Protestant-founded liberal arts colleges reduced denominational control by mid-century to attract diverse funding and students.^[31] Government policy further entrenched nonsectarianism through legislation like the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which allocated $1.3 billion in federal aid exclusively to public and nonsectarian private schools, excluding direct subsidies to religiously affiliated ones under the Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) test requiring secular purpose, primary effect neither advancing nor inhibiting religion, and avoidance of excessive entanglement. This test, applied in over 30 cases by 2000, curtailed voucher programs and chaplaincies in public settings, though critics noted it sometimes imposed de facto secularism; empirical reviews indicate it reduced religious influence in 75% of challenged programs.^[32] Internationally, analogous shifts occurred in France with reinforced laïcité laws post-1905 separation, but U.S. developments uniquely emphasized judicial enforcement, correlating with a 15% decline in reported school religious activities from 1960 to 1980 per national surveys.^[33]

Institutional Applications

In Education

Nonsectarian education encompasses schooling systems and institutions that operate without affiliation to or promotion of any particular religious denomination, emphasizing neutrality toward religious doctrines to accommodate diverse beliefs or none at all. In the United States, this approach dominates public K-12 education, where federal and state laws prohibit government-sponsored religious instruction or activities to prevent establishment of religion. Private nonsectarian schools, distinct from parochial or sectarian counterparts, develop curricula independent of religious influence, often prioritizing secular academic standards while remaining tuition-based and unaffiliated with public funding mandates.^[34]^[35] The historical roots of nonsectarian education in America trace to the 19th-century common school movement, led by reformers like Horace Mann, who advocated for publicly funded schools teaching a generic moral framework derived from Protestant principles but stripped of denominational specifics to foster social cohesion amid immigration-driven religious pluralism. By the mid-1800s, states like Massachusetts enacted laws requiring nonsectarian instruction, aiming to avoid sectarian conflicts that had previously fragmented local schooling. This model expanded nationwide, with public enrollment reaching over 90% of students by the early 20th century, supported by compulsory attendance laws that reinforced uniform, religion-neutral curricula focused on literacy, civics, and basic sciences.^[26]^[11] Legally, the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, interpreted through Supreme Court rulings such as Engel v. Vitale (1962), mandates strict nonsectarianism in public schools by barring state-sponsored prayer or devotional activities, ensuring no endorsement of religion occurs on public grounds. Subsequent decisions, including Abington School District v. Schempp (1963), extended this to prohibit Bible reading or other devotional practices, prioritizing equal access for nonbelievers and minority faiths. However, recent rulings like Carson v. Makin (2022) have permitted state tuition assistance programs to include religious schools if criteria are neutral, challenging prior exclusions of sectarian institutions from public funds while upholding nonsectarian public operations.^[9]^[36] Empirically, nonsectarian public systems have enabled broad access, educating approximately 50 million students annually with standardized testing and outcomes showing average graduation rates around 86% in 2022, though disparities persist by socioeconomic factors rather than religious affiliation. Proponents argue this neutrality promotes inclusivity, reducing interfaith tensions and allowing focus on empirical skills, as evidenced by higher civic participation metrics in diverse urban districts. Critics, drawing from longitudinal data, contend it correlates with moral relativism and declining religious adherence, with studies indicating sectarian private schools often achieve superior academic results—such as 95%+ graduation rates in Catholic systems—and better preparation for family stability compared to public averages. Nonsectarian private schools, charging median tuitions of $19,590 in 2020-21, serve about 5% of students and emphasize rigorous, faith-neutral programs but face enrollment pressures from rising homeschooling trends post-2020.^[12]^[37]

In Government and Public Policy

Nonsectarian principles in government and public policy primarily derive from the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, ratified on December 15, 1791, which prohibits Congress from making laws "respecting an establishment of religion," interpreted to require governmental neutrality toward religious sects by neither advancing nor inhibiting religion. This framework mandates that public policies, such as funding allocations and ceremonial practices, avoid preferential treatment of any denomination, ensuring decisions rest on secular rationales rather than theological endorsements. For instance, federal guidelines on religious expression in public schools emphasize that while student-led prayer is protected under the Free Exercise Clause, government-sponsored devotional activities, like mandatory recitations, violate nonsectarian neutrality.^[38] In education funding, nonsectarian policies historically restricted public aid to religiously affiliated institutions to prevent indirect establishment, as seen in state tuition assistance programs excluding sectarian schools.^[39] However, U.S. Supreme Court rulings have curtailed such exclusions when aid programs are otherwise neutral and generally available, ruling in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue (June 30, 2020) that disqualifying religious schools from a scholarship program solely due to their sectarian status discriminates against religion in violation of the Free Exercise Clause. Similarly, Carson v. Makin (June 21, 2022) invalidated Maine's nonsectarian requirement for a tuition program serving remote areas, holding that excluding religious schools from neutral benefits burdens free exercise without a compelling nonsectarian justification. These decisions reflect a judicial shift prioritizing anti-discrimination over strict nonestablishment, allowing public funds to flow to religious entities if distributed without regard to sectarian affiliation.^[40] Public policy applications extend to ceremonial and administrative practices, where nonsectarian neutrality permits inclusive religious expression absent coercion or endorsement. In Town of Greece v. Galloway (May 5, 2014), the Court upheld sectarian legislative prayers at town meetings, provided they invite diverse invocation givers and do not proselytize or coerce participation, viewing such traditions as compatible with historical practices rather than governmental favoritism.^[41] Conversely, policies like optional oaths without mandatory religious affirmations uphold nonsectarianism by accommodating belief without compelling conformity.^[42] Empirical surveys indicate broad public support for this balanced separation, with 55% of U.S. adults favoring policies preventing government favoritism toward any faith.^[43] Recent cases, such as Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (June 27, 2022), further affirm that public employees' private religious conduct, like post-game prayers, does not breach neutrality if unaffiliated with official duties.^[44] Nonsectarian approaches in religious organizations facilitate cooperation across denominational lines by emphasizing shared ethical or moral objectives over specific doctrinal commitments. The Woman's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU), founded on November 19, 1874, in Cleveland, Ohio, exemplifies this model as the oldest voluntary nonsectarian women's organization, drawing members from various Protestant denominations to advocate against alcohol consumption without privileging any single sect's theology.^[45] Similarly, the International Religious Liberty Association (IRLA), established in 1986, functions as a nonsectarian entity uniting representatives from diverse faiths to promote global religious freedom, avoiding advocacy tied to particular religious hierarchies.^[46] In social organizations, nonsectarian structures enable inclusive membership and activities detached from sectarian affiliations, often focusing on mutual aid, ethics, and community service. Fraternal orders such as Freemasonry, formalized with the establishment of the Grand Lodge of England on June 24, 1717, require belief in a Supreme Being but maintain a nonsectarian policy, permitting participation by adherents of Judaism, Christianity, and other monotheistic traditions without endorsing specific religious rites.^[47] Rotary International, founded on February 23, 1905, in Chicago, Illinois, by Paul Harris, incorporates a nonsectarian ethical framework through its Four-Way Test—assessing truth, fairness, goodwill, and benefit to all—applied in over 46,000 clubs worldwide as of 2023, fostering business and humanitarian networks irrespective of religious background.^[48] Other service-oriented groups, including the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks and the Loyal Order of Moose, operate similarly as nonsectarian fraternal bodies, providing insurance, charity, and social support to members from varied faiths.^[49] These nonsectarian models in religious and social organizations have supported empirical outcomes such as enhanced intergroup understanding and reduced prejudice. Studies on interfaith dialogue initiatives, akin to nonsectarian religious collaborations, demonstrate positive shifts in participants' knowledge of other worldviews and attitudes toward out-groups, with meta-analyses indicating small to moderate effect sizes on tolerance metrics.^[50] In social contexts, nonsectarian fraternal involvement correlates with higher civic engagement, as evidenced by Rotary's global polio eradication efforts, which vaccinated over 2.5 billion children since 1988 through partnerships unbound by religious constraints.^[48] However, such structures can necessitate compromises on ritual or moral specificity, potentially limiting depth in faith-based cohesion compared to sectarian counterparts.^[51]

Empirical Benefits and Achievements

Fostering Inclusivity and Access

Nonsectarian policies in public education systems have facilitated broader access for religious minorities by ensuring that curricula and practices do not privilege any particular denomination, allowing students from diverse backgrounds to participate without coercion or exclusion. In the United States, where public schools are required to maintain nonsectarian status under state constitutions and federal precedents, this neutrality has enabled the enrollment of students from Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, and other non-Protestant communities, particularly during waves of immigration in the late 19th and early 20th centuries when sectarian Protestant instruction previously deterred minority participation.^[11] Empirical data from diverse urban districts show that such environments correlate with higher attendance rates among religious minorities compared to exclusively sectarian alternatives, as families perceive reduced risk of doctrinal imposition.^[52] Programs incorporating neutral, comparative instruction on world religions within nonsectarian frameworks further enhance inclusivity by promoting interfaith understanding and reducing intergroup tensions. A notable example is the Modesto, California, public school district's world religions course implemented in 1997, which exposed students to major faiths including Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam without endorsement; post-implementation surveys by researchers Emile Lester and Patrick S. Roberts documented significant increases in both active tolerance (willingness to engage positively with other faiths) and passive tolerance (respect for differing beliefs), alongside a decline in religiously motivated harassment incidents.^[53] Similarly, longitudinal studies on interfaith exposure in neutral educational settings, such as those analyzing over 3,100 college students via the Interfaith Diversity Experiences and Attitudes Longitudinal Survey, reveal that structured encounters with diverse religious perspectives improve attitudes toward religious others, fostering environments where minority students report greater sense of belonging and access to extracurricular and social opportunities.^[54] In governmental and social organizations, nonsectarian mandates underpin equal access to public services and civic participation, exemplified by church-state separation principles that prevent majority religions from dominating policy or employment. This framework has empirically supported religious pluralism, as evidenced by the United States' high levels of religious diversity— with no single faith comprising more than 70% of the population and robust growth in minority groups like Muslims and Hindus—attributed in part to protections against sectarian control that encourage free exercise without state favoritism.^[55]^[56] Such policies have historically expanded access for minorities, as seen in reduced barriers to public office and welfare programs for non-dominant sects, contrasting with eras or regions where sectarian preferences limited participation.^[57]

Evidence from Institutional Performance

In politically divided societies, non-sectarian governance structures have empirically enhanced institutional stability and democratic functionality. A 2023 study by Agarin and Jarrett analyzed non-sectarian (cross-segmental) parties across Northern Ireland, Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Lebanon, and South Tyrol, determining that these entities outperform sectarian counterparts by promoting moderation, reducing polarization, and facilitating intergroup cooperation on policy matters. Success was gauged not merely by electoral gains but by legislative influence and agenda-setting, such as the Alliance Party of Northern Ireland's role—becoming the third-largest party in the 2022 Assembly elections—in bridging unionist-nationalist divides to advance shared priorities like reproductive rights and environmental policy.^[58] This approach mitigates zero-sum sectarian competition, yielding more effective power-sharing and representation in consociational systems. In educational settings, non-sectarian institutions deliver civic education outcomes on par with sectarian ones, often without embedding doctrinal biases that could hinder diverse student engagement. Analysis of 2016 International Civic and Citizenship Study data from 2,647 Dutch secondary students across 123 schools revealed no significant variances in civic knowledge between public (typically non-sectarian), non-religious private, and religious private schools.^[59] Religious schools, particularly orthodox Protestant ones, exhibited strengths in expected electoral participation but lower endorsement of gender equality (coefficient b = -3.32, p < 0.01), while non-sectarian models supported consistent, neutral competencies adaptable to pluralistic societies.^[59] Such equivalence, adjusted for socioeconomic and religious factors, underscores non-sectarian frameworks' capacity to sustain performance in citizenship skills amid demographic diversity.^[59]

Criticisms, Drawbacks, and Controversies

Erosion of Religious Identity and Moral Frameworks

Nonsectarian policies in public institutions, particularly education, have coincided with a marked decline in religious identification in the United States. According to Pew Research Center's 2023-24 Religious Landscape Study, the share of U.S. adults identifying as Christian fell from 78% in 2007 to 62%, with religiously unaffiliated individuals rising to 29%.^[60] This trend correlates with the expansion of secular education systems, where nonsectarian mandates limit religious expression and instruction, thereby reducing exposure to faith traditions during formative years.^[61] Higher levels of formal education, often delivered in nonsectarian environments, are associated with lower rates of religious belief, absolute certainty in God, and daily prayer practices.^[62] Critics contend that landmark decisions enforcing nonsectarian neutrality, such as Engel v. Vitale (1962), which prohibited state-composed prayers in public schools, initiated a broader removal of religious elements from civic life, contributing to weakened religious socialization.^[63] The ruling elicited backlash from religious groups, who argued it undermined communal faith practices without empirical evidence of coercion, fostering an environment where subsequent generations receive minimal reinforcement of inherited religious identities.^[64] Empirical patterns show that individuals raised in secularized settings exhibit "religious residue" from childhood exposure but lower overall adherence compared to those in religiously integrated contexts.^[65] Parallel to this erosion, nonsectarian frameworks have been linked by observers to a rise in moral relativism, diluting traditional religious absolutes. Surveys indicate that 58% of American adults believe individuals determine their own moral right and wrong, reflecting a shift away from divinely sourced ethics.^[66] Among younger cohorts, moral relativism predominates, with only 10% of Generation Z strongly rejecting the notion that moral standards evolve with societal norms.^[67] Pew data further reveals that 68% of Americans view morality as achievable without belief in God, a perspective more prevalent in secularized public spheres.^[68] Proponents of religious critiques, including sociologists examining secularization, argue that nonsectarian neutrality effectively promotes a default secular worldview, eroding moral frameworks grounded in transcendent authority and replacing them with subjective or culturally contingent norms.^[69] This substitution is evident in public policy and education, where avoidance of sectarian content leaves voids filled by relativistic ethics, as seen in declining perceptions of absolute moral truths across demographics.^[70] While causal links remain debated, the temporal alignment between intensified nonsectarian enforcement post-mid-20th century and these shifts underscores concerns over long-term societal cohesion.^[71]

Legal Disputes Over Neutrality and Discrimination

In the United States, legal challenges have frequently arisen under the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause, where policies enforcing religious neutrality in public institutions are contested as permitting or enabling discrimination against religious adherents. In Employment Division v. Smith (1990), the Supreme Court held that neutral, generally applicable laws do not violate free exercise rights even if they incidentally burden religious practices, such as Oregon's prohibition on peyote use that affected Native American rituals; this ruling was criticized for allowing governments to impose secular neutrality without accommodating religion, effectively discriminating against minority faiths unless they secured legislative exemptions. Subsequent legislation like the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993 sought to restore stricter scrutiny, but disputes persisted, as seen in Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal (2006), where the Court applied RFRA to invalidate a neutral federal drug policy's application to a religious group's sacramental use of a hallucinogen, highlighting tensions between uniformity and faith-based claims. More recent cases underscore how nonsectarian neutrality in public accommodations and services can mask animus toward religion, leading to successful discrimination claims. In Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018), the Court ruled 7-2 that Colorado's enforcement of anti-discrimination laws against a baker refusing to create a cake for a same-sex wedding lacked impartiality due to commissioners' derogatory statements about the baker's faith, violating neutrality principles under both Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses; Justice Kennedy's opinion emphasized that hostility to religion undermines claims of evenhandedness. Similarly, Fulton v. City of Philadelphia (2021) invalidated the city's termination of a Catholic foster care agency's contract for declining to certify same-sex couples, as the policy's exceptions for secular reasons revealed it was not generally applicable or neutral, thus discriminating against religious operators. These decisions illustrate a judicial trend post-2017 toward scrutinizing whether neutrality policies are pretextual, with the Court in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (2022) further rejecting suppression of a coach's private post-game prayers as incompatible with neutrality that permits personal religious expression without endorsement. In Europe, disputes over state neutrality often center on bans on religious symbols in public spheres, framed under equality directives but challenged as indirect discrimination. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Achbita v. G4S Secure Solutions (2017) upheld an employer's blanket prohibition on visible religious, philosophical, or political symbols to maintain a neutral corporate image, ruling it did not constitute direct discrimination if applied consistently; however, critics argued this privileges secular norms and disproportionately burdens visible religious practices like Islamic headscarves or Sikh turbans. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has similarly balanced neutrality with rights in cases like S.A.S. v. France (2014), endorsing a burqa ban in public spaces for "living together" under margin of appreciation, yet dissenting opinions and subsequent advocacy highlighted discriminatory impacts on Muslim women, with empirical data showing higher scrutiny of Islamic symbols over Christian ones in laïcité-enforcing states like France.^[72] Recent shifts, as in Commune d'Ans (2024 ECJ preliminary ruling), suggest evolving scrutiny where neutrality policies excluding religious dress in private sectors may veer into prohibited discrimination absent proportionate justification, reflecting ongoing causal tensions between institutional secularism and religious pluralism. These transatlantic disputes reveal a pattern where nonsectarian mandates, intended to avoid favoritism, empirically favor irreligion by requiring religious individuals to conform or forgo participation, prompting courts to demand evidence of genuine neutrality rather than rote exclusion; for instance, U.S. data from the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty tracked over 50 victories in accommodation cases from 2017-2023, often overturning neutral-on-paper policies applied selectively against orthodox believers. In contexts like education and employment, such policies have led to measurable disparities, with studies indicating religious minorities face higher rejection rates in neutral public programs excluding faith-based providers, as in Maine's tuition assistance invalidated in Carson v. Makin (2022) for disqualifying sectarian schools despite parental choice.^[73] Proponents of strict neutrality cite avoidance of coercion, but judicial outcomes increasingly attribute discriminatory effects to failures in evenhanded application, underscoring causal realism in how abstract neutrality can entrench secular dominance.

Replacement with Secular Ideologies

Critics of nonsectarian policies contend that efforts to maintain institutional neutrality toward religious sects inadvertently privilege secular worldviews, effectively replacing traditional religious moral and ethical frameworks with alternative ideologies rooted in materialism, humanism, or progressive norms. This substitution is said to occur because nonsectarianism, by excluding sectarian religious instruction, creates a vacuum filled by state-endorsed rationalism that favors non-religious reasoning over faith-based perspectives, thereby imposing a de facto ideological uniformity.^[74]^[75] For instance, in public education systems, the removal of religious elements—such as prayer or creationist teachings—has led to curricula emphasizing secular humanism, which promotes naturalistic ethics and human-centered values as normative, often without acknowledging their philosophical underpinnings as contestable ideologies akin to religion.^[76] In governmental and policy contexts, nonsectarian mandates have been criticized for advancing secularism as an ideology that limits religious influence while embedding assumptions of public reason derived from Enlightenment rationalism, which critics argue discriminates against comprehensive religious doctrines by deeming them irrational or privatized.^[77] This dynamic is evident in policies like France's laïcité, where strict separation enforces a secular public sphere that some analysts describe as replacing Catholic moral authority with republican ideals functioning as a civil religion, complete with obligatory civic rituals and exclusion of dissenting religious expressions.^[78] Similarly, in the United States, post-1960s Supreme Court decisions secularizing public institutions—such as Engel v. Vitale (1962), which prohibited state-sponsored prayer—coincided with the rise of federally influenced educational standards promoting values like multiculturalism and gender equity, which conservative scholars argue constitute a new orthodoxy supplanting Judeo-Christian ethics with relativistic or activist frameworks.^[79] Empirical observations support claims of this replacement's consequences, including declining religious adherence in secularized institutions correlated with the ascendancy of identity-based ideologies that mimic religious fervor, such as compelled speech on social justice issues or DEI mandates in nonsectarian universities.^[80] Proponents of this critique, including thinkers like Charles Taylor, highlight "subtraction stories" in secular narratives that portray religion as an overlay on innate secular humanity, ignoring how secular ideologies impose their own teleological visions of progress and human flourishing.^[81] While secular advocates maintain this shift enhances pluralism by avoiding sectarian favoritism, detractors warn it fosters intolerance toward residual religious viewpoints, as seen in legal challenges where nonsectarian neutrality is invoked to bar faith-based dissent from prevailing secular norms on topics like bioethics or family structure.^[82] These developments underscore a causal pattern wherein nonsectarian exclusion of religion does not yield pure neutrality but elevates secular paradigms to dominant status, potentially eroding diverse moral pluralism in favor of homogenized ideological conformity.

Contemporary Developments and Debates

Recent Legal Challenges

In May 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 in a case involving the St. Isidore of Seville Virtual Catholic School, effectively upholding the Oklahoma Supreme Court's ruling that public charter schools must remain nonsectarian under state law, thereby blocking the nation's first explicitly religious public charter school.^[83] The Oklahoma court had determined that approving the Catholic-affiliated school would violate constitutional prohibitions on government establishment of religion, as charter schools receive public funding and operate as state actors.^[84] This decision reinforced nonsectarian requirements for publicly funded educational institutions, despite arguments from proponents that excluding religious providers discriminates under the Free Exercise Clause.^[85] Conversely, in June 2025, the Supreme Court ruled in Mahmoud v. Taylor that public schools violate the Free Exercise Clause by denying parental opt-outs from instructional materials conflicting with sincerely held religious beliefs, as occurred in Montgomery County, Maryland, where families sought exemptions from certain history and literature curricula.^[86] The 6-3 decision mandated accommodations for religious objections to otherwise nonsectarian content, limiting schools' ability to enforce uniform secular curricula without exceptions and highlighting tensions between educational neutrality and individual religious freedoms.^[87] Critics, including some education advocates, argued this could fragment nonsectarian public instruction, while supporters viewed it as correcting prior overreach in mandating exposure to contested materials.^[88] In Europe, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) upheld enforcement of religious neutrality in public schools through bans on visible religious symbols. In a September 2024 ruling on the Belgian headscarf prohibition, the ECtHR affirmed that state-imposed restrictions in compulsory education settings serve legitimate aims of preserving pedagogical neutrality and social cohesion, rejecting claims of indirect discrimination under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights.^[89] The court emphasized that such policies apply equally to all religions, avoiding favoritism, though applicants contended they disproportionately burden minority faiths.^[90] This aligns with prior ECtHR precedents, such as Dahlab v. Switzerland (2001), extended to student attire, prioritizing institutional nonsectarianism over individual expression in state-funded environments.^[91]

Global Variations and Alternatives

In countries with established secular frameworks, such as France and the United States, nonsectarian policies in social organizations emphasize strict neutrality, barring public institutions from endorsing any religious sect and requiring organizations receiving state support to maintain impartiality toward beliefs.^[92] France's laïcité principle, codified in 1905, extends this to social entities like schools and charities, prohibiting religious symbols in public functions to foster civic unity.^[92] In contrast, Nordic nations like Denmark retain vestiges of confessional ties through state-supported Lutheran churches but increasingly apply nonsectarian standards to broader social organizations, with 2021 data showing moderate government restrictions on religion compared to global medians.^[93] In religiously divided societies of the Middle East, such as Lebanon, nonsectarian approaches emerge as civic movements challenging entrenched sectarian power-sharing, where political offices are constitutionally allocated by religious affiliation—e.g., the president must be Maronite Christian, the prime minister Sunni Muslim, and the speaker Shiite Muslim.^[94] Protests in summer 2015, triggered by inadequate waste management, evolved into cross-sectarian demands for governance reform, uniting diverse groups against patronage networks tied to sects but ultimately curtailed by elite interventions without yielding systemic change.^[95] Similar dynamics appear in Iraq, where 2019 demonstrations framed as nonsectarian opposed corrupt sectarian leadership, though they faced repression and failed to dismantle confessional quotas established post-2003.^[95] Alternatives to nonsectarian models include confessional systems, prevalent in Lebanon and parts of post-conflict Bosnia, where social and political organizations allocate roles by sect to ensure representation but often perpetuate divisions and inefficiency.^[94] In education, confessional religious instruction persists in some European contexts, such as Germany, where states negotiate with churches for faith-specific curricula, contrasting with non-confessional shifts elsewhere that prioritize impartial information on religions to avoid indoctrination.^[96] Another variant is state-endorsed multifaith accommodation, as in Canada or India, where nonsectarian public neutrality coexists with subsidized sectarian schools or personal laws, though India's approach has faced criticism for enabling communal tensions despite its 1950 constitutional secularism.^[92] These models highlight trade-offs: confessionalism stabilizes short-term representation in fractured societies but risks entrenching identity politics, while nonsectarian alternatives demand robust civic institutions to bridge divides.^[95]

References

[1]
NONSECTARIAN Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Sep 20, 2025 · The meaning of NONSECTARIAN is not having a sectarian character : not affiliated with or restricted to a particular religious group.
[2]
NONSECTARIAN definition | Cambridge English Dictionary
not connected with any specific religion: About 1,500 students attend 23 nonsectarian private schools. (Definition of nonsectarian from the Cambridge Academic ...
[3]
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/nonsectarian
[4]
NONSECTARIAN definition in American English - Collins Dictionary
adjective not narrow-minded, esp as a result of rigid adherence to a particular sect; broad-minded.
[5]
Nonsectarian - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms - Vocabulary.com
You can describe something as nonsectarian if it's not connected or affiliated with any particular religious or political belief.
[6]
Horace Mann | The First Amendment Encyclopedia
Jan 1, 2009 · Mann's non-sectarian approach to public education was criticized at the time (and is still viewed by some today) as hostile to religion and ...
[7]
[PDF] Nonestablishment Under God? The Nonsectarian Principle
A nonsectarian approach would emphasize and appeal to what different “sects”. 11. Smith: Published by Digital USD, 2004. Page 13. 11 share with each other and ...
[8]
[PDF] Nonestablishment under God - The Nonsectarian Principle
A nonsectarian approach would emphasize and appeal to what different "sects" share with each other and with nonreligious parties and perspectives.
[9]
[PDF] Passing of Nonsectarianism - NDLScholarship
-Examples of beliefs and practices peculiar in this way to particular religious groups are the Lutheran doctrine of justification by faith alone, the Catholic ...
[10]
non-sectarian, adj. meanings, etymology and more
OED's earliest evidence for non-sectarian is from 1831, in the writing of John Stuart Mill, philosopher, economist, and advocate of women's rights. non ...
[11]
The Rise of Nonsectarian Public Education - Oxford Academic
This chapter traces the rise of nonsectarian education in America. It describes the original impulse for a religious-moral basis for public education and how ...
[12]
The 250-year American experiment in non-sectarian education has ...
Sep 2, 2024 · Our public education system has not only undermined religion in the United States, it has replaced religion with socio-political ideology.
[13]
Sectarian - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating in the 1640s from Medieval Latin sectarius, meaning "pertaining to a religious group," sectarian refers to attachment to a sect, often implying ...
[14]
[PDF] The Ideal of Nonsectarianism
Common Sense philosophy, following in the tradition of Sir Francis Bacon and the inductive scientific method, posited that moral truths are self-evident, and ...
[15]
https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1203&context=vlr
[16]
Cyrus the Great and Religious Tolerance
Most importantly Cyrus introduced a different approach and attitude towards religious tolerance in the region.
[17]
The story behind the Cyrus Cylinder | Features - Al Jazeera
Apr 25, 2013 · It was a tolerance that was expressed here by Cyrus towards other religions. So, basically for many cultures and peoples in this sphere in the ...
[18]
Cyrus the Great; The Father and Liberator - Cais-Soas
religious tolerance, cultural pluralism, and the liberation of subjugated peoples — continue to resonate.<|separator|>
[19]
Ashoka's Dhamma: Principles, Edicts & Relevance - The Study IAS
Aug 8, 2025 · Ashoka's Dhamma policy was developed to address the empire's religious and cultural diversity, seeking to minimise conflicts and establish a ...
[20]
Emperor Ashoka's edicts prove that he valued secularism and non ...
Feb 9, 2024 · Another important aspect of Ashoka's dhamma was the inculcation of mutual respect and concord among people belonging to different religious ...
[21]
Ashoka's Dhamma: A Practical Approach of Life
May 6, 2025 · Ashoka was a patron of Buddha's doctrine and was responsible for raising Buddhism from the status of a local sectarian creed of eastern India ...
[22]
[PDF] Emperor Ashoka and His Policy of Dhamma-A Critical Study
He wanted that the people of world must follow the path of truth, love and non-violence is the days of its greatness & glory.
[23]
What is 'Dhamma'?: A Religious Policy by Ashoka the Great (2/2)
Jul 23, 2020 · Ashoka has described Dhamma as compromising a great number of virtues like truth, compassion, liberality, purity and minimum number of sins.
[24]
Horace Mann And The Creation Of The Common School
Dec 10, 2017 · Horace Mann (1796-1859), “The Father of the Common School Movement,” was the foremost proponent of education reform in antebellum America.
[25]
[PDF] Church and State Debates in Nineteenth Century New York
The Catholic population in America increased rapidly during the nineteenth century, in large part due to immigration. With 1.7 million members by 1850 ( ...
[26]
Horace Mann and the Irony of Secular Education - Acton Institute
Aug 28, 2023 · But the real key was that public education had to be nonsectarian, by which he meant above all “non-Catholic.” Though not a thoroughgoing ...
[27]
Why Nineteenth Century Bans on “Sectarian” Aid Are Facially ...
Jan 8, 2018 · Sectarian is principally a nineteenth century code word for “Catholic,” so the intent behind such provisions was to discriminate among religions ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
[28]
Engel v. Vitale | 370 U.S. 421 (1962)
Engel v. Vitale: The state cannot hold prayers in public schools, even if it is not required and not tied to a particular religion.
[29]
Religion in the Public Schools | Pew Research Center
Oct 3, 2019 · Vitale (1962), the Supreme Court held that the Establishment Clause prohibited the recitation of a school-sponsored prayer in public schools.
[30]
[PDF] The Passing of Nonsectarianism - NDLScholarship
-Examples of beliefs and practices peculiar in this way to particular religious groups are the Lutheran doctrine of justification by faith alone, the Catholic ...
[31]
The Disaffiliation of American Religious Colleges and ... - SSHA2025
Furthermore, case studies reveal that the process of disaffiliation unfolded differently for schools controlled by different Protestant religious traditions.
[32]
Interpretation: The Establishment Clause | Constitution Center
The Establishment Clause provides a legal framework for resolving disagreements about the public role of religion in our increasingly pluralistic republic.Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
[33]
How the Supreme Court Is Dismantling the Separation of Church ...
Oct 6, 2025 · Chief Justice John Roberts' court is actively eroding the separation of church and state, breaking with centuries of First Amendment ...Missing: non | Show results with:non
[34]
Secular vs. Sectarian Schools - Education Bug
One way of categorizing kinds of schools is by whether they are secular (sometimes called non-sectarian) or sectarian. This article explains some of the key ...
[35]
Definition: What Is A Nonsectarian School? As You Browse Private ...
A nonsectarian school is a private school that functions and has developed curriculum officially independent of religious orientation and influence.
[36]
State Tuition Assistance Program Limited to “Nonsectarian” Schools ...
Jul 28, 2022 · The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided Carson v. Makin, a case involving a state subsidy for private and public secondary schools.
[37]
The U.S. Private School Market: An Explainer
Apr 16, 2025 · Catholic schools charged the least tuition, on average, at $9,720 per year in 2020-21 , compared with nonsectarian schools, which charge $19,590 ...Missing: sectarian | Show results with:sectarian
[38]
Guidance on Constitutionally Protected Prayer and Religious ...
The purpose of this updated guidance is to provide information on the current state of the law concerning religious expression in public schools.
[39]
Maine's “Nonsectarian” School Choice Policy… - Frost Brown Todd
Sep 30, 2022 · Under state law, these families would qualify for tuition assistance to attend “nonsectarian” schools only. The parents challenged Maine's law ...
[40]
Carson v. Makin and the Dwindling Twilight of the Establishment ...
Jun 23, 2022 · Categorical discrimination against a person or entity because of religious identity presumptively violates the Free Exercise Clause.
[41]
Town of Greece v. Galloway | 572 U.S. 565 (2014)
Town of Greece v. Galloway: It is constitutional for a town council to hold a sectarian prayer at the start of a meeting.<|control11|><|separator|>
[42]
Separation of Church & State History (U.S. National Park Service)
Apr 1, 2025 · The First Amendment prevents congress from creating or establishing a religion, and thereby prevents the power of the government from expanding ...
[43]
In U.S., Far More Support Than Oppose Separation of Church and ...
Oct 28, 2021 · Overall, more than half of U.S. adults (55%) express clear support for the principle of separation of church and state when measured this way.
[44]
[PDF] 21-418 Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. (06/27/2022)
Jun 27, 2022 · The Court's precedents permit a plaintiff to demonstrate a free exercise violation multiple ways, including by showing that a gov- ernment ...
[45]
Woman's Christian Temperance Union - Social Welfare History Project
The WCTU, founded in 1874, was a religious group combating alcohol's influence, and is the oldest non-sectarian woman's organization, still active today.
[46]
Religious Liberty | Adventist.org
IRLA is a non-sectarian organization supporting religious freedom around the world. The first organization of its kind, IRLA brings together representatives ...
[47]
Full text of "A dictionary of secret and other societies : comprising ...
... nonsectarian organizations interested in and supporting boys' and girls ... Modern Order of Praetorians This is a fraternal insurance society similar to the ...<|separator|>
[48]
History and Philosophy of Rotary International, and My Personal ...
Apr 26, 2024 · The Rotary website states that “the Four-Way Test is a nonpartisan and nonsectarian ethical guide for Rotarians to use for their personal and ...
[49]
Jews and Freemasons -- a not-so-secret brotherhood - J Weekly
Sep 10, 2003 · Here are a number of other nonsectarian organizations that many Jews belong to: * The Benevolent and Protective Order. of Elks. * The Loyal ...
[50]
Full article: Evaluating the learning outcomes of interfaith initiatives
The review of the initiatives' outcomes indicates that interfaith initiatives can positively impact participants' knowledge about other worldviews, ...
[51]
Odd Fellowship, Religion, and Compromise - Heart in Hand
Mar 24, 2019 · Further, some Odd Fellows argue the Code of Laws clearly declares we are nonsectarian. Others say it doesn't matter when religion came into the ...
[52]
Keep Religious Diversity in Public Education | Baker Institute
Sep 23, 2024 · This approach establishes a level playing field for all religious communities, which is especially important for a public school population ...
[53]
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuplr/vol31/iss1/14
[54]
How College Shapes Students' Views Of Other Faiths
Aug 23, 2025 · We examined data from more than 3,100 students at 112 colleges, using the Interfaith Diversity Experiences and Attitudes Longitudinal Survey.
[55]
https://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/
[56]
Far from being anti-religion, church-state separation is the best ...
Apr 15, 2025 · Church-state separation ensures the independence of faith communities and makes religion vital. Houses of worship in America long ago proved ...<|separator|>
[57]
Separation of Church and State: Definition, History and More
In addition to the First Amendment, each state has separated religion from government, providing protections for religious liberty in their state constitutions.
[58]
Non-sectarian parties improve democracy and social stability, study ...
Jan 16, 2024 · Non-sectarian political parties help to make divided societies more stable and improve the quality of the democratic process, a new study says.
[59]
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2203393
[60]
Decline of Christianity in the U.S. Has Slowed, May Have Leveled Off
Feb 26, 2025 · The latest RLS, fielded over seven months in 2023-24, finds that 62% of U.S. adults identify as Christians. That is a decline of 9 percentage ...Executive summary · Religious Landscape Study · Chapter 24 · Chapter 7
[61]
What's driving the decline of religion in America? Secular education
Jun 12, 2020 · The decline of religion in America is linked to the expansion of secular education, which shapes children's worldviews and reduces religious ...
[62]
In America, Does More Education Equal Less Religion?
Apr 26, 2017 · Highly educated Americans also are less inclined than others to say they believe in God with absolute certainty and to pray on a daily basis.
[63]
Facts and Case Summary - Engel v. Vitale - United States Courts
Facts and case summary for Engel v. Vitale, 370 US 421 (1962) School-sponsored prayer in public schools is unconstitutional.
[64]
Engel v. Vitale | Research Starters - EBSCO
Engel v. Vitale sparked significant debate and backlash from conservative religious groups, illustrating the contentious nature of religion in public life.
[65]
Religious residue: The impact of childhood religious socialization on ...
Oct 27, 2022 · Disaffiliates are consistently more religious than lifelong nones due to religious residue from childhood, with greater residue found among those who were more ...
[66]
https://answersingenesis.org/morality/moral-truth-its-up-to-you/
[67]
Moral relativism is the 'majority opinion' of Gen Z, new study reveals
Jan 30, 2021 · Just 10% of young people surveyed “strongly disagree” that what is “morally right and wrong changes over time, based on society.” Morrow ...
[68]
21. Religion and views of right and wrong
Feb 26, 2025 · The survey finds that 68% of Americans say it is possible to be moral and have good values without believing in God. Just 30% say it is necessary to believe in ...
[69]
The Decline of Religion – Q & A with Steve Bruce
The secularization thesis argues that a series of specific changes (not the passage of time) undermines religion. Large parts of the world are not yet ...
[70]
Survey Reveals Significant Shifts in Faith Allegiance and Growing ...
May 2, 2025 · A new report based on data from the American Worldview Inventory 2025 reveals in just five years a sharp decline of Christian affiliation.<|separator|>
[71]
Moral Issues | Gallup Historical Trends
In May 2025, 2% rated moral values as excellent, 17% as good, 36% as only fair, 44% as poor, and 1% had no opinion.
[72]
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145466
[73]
[PDF] 20-1088 Carson v. Makin (06/21/2022) - Supreme Court
Jun 21, 2022 · And like the daycare center in Trin- ity Lutheran, the religious schools in this case are disqualified from this generally available benefit “ ...
[74]
The case against secularism - Oxford Academic
Secularism pretends to be neutral, they say, but in separating religion from politics it is not neutral. It implicitly favours non-religious ways of reasoning, ...
[75]
The Powerful Religion of Secularism | CACE
Oct 22, 2014 · The secularist paradigm is a drive to replace one faith perspective with another – with the religion of secularism which demands sole and ...
[76]
[PDF] Secular Humanism and Education - Scholar Commons
The relationship between religion and public education is increasingly the source of controversy in legislative, educational, and judicial forums. What ...
[77]
Secularism and Religion | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
Jan 25, 2019 · Critics of exclusivist secularism commonly argue that the public reason criteria advocated by thinkers such as Rawls is unfairly restrictive, ...
[78]
https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-663
[79]
The Secularization of American Education - Oxford Academic
This chapter argues that the secularization of public education in the United States is partly the unintended result of the secularization of the larger ...
[80]
Why Aren't We Paying Attention? Religion and Politics in Everyday Life
Nov 3, 2018 · Contemporary sociology has assumed that American institutions (if not individuals) have become so secular that they are shielded from religious ...
[81]
Secularization Theory's Differentiation Problem: Revisiting the ...
Taylor critiques “subtraction stories” in which “the underlying features of human nature” are regarded as having always been essentially secular, but long ...Missing: nonsectarian | Show results with:nonsectarian
[82]
Debating secularism: A liberal cosmopolitan perspective - PMC
Mar 2, 2023 · In the classical notion of secularism, privatization of religion is an essential component of freedom and equality between citizens, ...
[83]
Split Supreme Court blocks first religious charter school in Oklahoma
May 22, 2025 · The Supreme Court on Thursday morning left in place a ruling by the Oklahoma Supreme Court rejecting an effort by a Catholic virtual charter school.
[84]
US supreme court blocks religious charter school in split ruling
May 22, 2025 · The lower court found that the proposed school would violate the US constitution's first amendment limits on government involvement in religion.Missing: sectarianism | Show results with:sectarianism
[85]
Supreme Court deadlocks 4-4, preserving ban on nation's first ...
May 22, 2025 · Oklahoma will not be able to launch the nation's first religious public charter school after the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 Thursday.
[86]
Free Exercise of Religion at School: The Supreme Court's Mahmoud ...
Sep 5, 2025 · On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Mahmoud v. Taylor, a case addressing the application of the First Amendment's Free ...
[87]
Supreme Court Requires Religious Opt-Outs from Secular Lessons ...
Jun 30, 2025 · The US Supreme Court ruled today in Mahmoud v. Taylor that Montgomery County Public Schools must allow opt-outs from any lessons that parents believe will ...
[88]
What the Supreme Court Ruled on Freedom of Religion
Aug 25, 2025 · Can the state limit parental rights or define religion? The Court strengthens protections for faith in key rulings.
[89]
ECtHR's Veil of Ignorance: Intersectionality and Indirect ... - EJIL: Talk!
Sep 13, 2024 · The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment concerning Belgium's Hijab (Headscarf) ban on wearing visible religious symbols in Schools.
[90]
The European Court of Human Rights Upholds Ban on Visible ...
Jun 11, 2024 · The ECHR held that the prohibition on students wearing visible religious symbols in the name of educational neutrality does not in itself violate Article 9.
[91]
DAHLAB v. SWITZERLAND - HUDOC - The Council of Europe
The impugned decision is fully in accordance with the principle of denominational neutrality in schools, a principle that seeks both to protect the religious ...
[92]
What can the U.S. learn from how other countries balance church ...
May 9, 2017 · From mandated school prayer to the prohibition of prayer in public schools, from prohibiting the teaching of evolution to requiring the teaching ...
[93]
Globally, government restrictions on religion peaked in 2021; social ...
Mar 5, 2024 · In 2021, the global median level of government restrictions on religion was 3.0 on the Government Restrictions Index – up from 2.8 in 2020.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
[94]
https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-808
[95]
[PDF] SECTS AND CITIZENS IN LEBANON AND IRAQ
These demonstrations were framed as nonsectarian, civic responses to deteriorating conditions and corrupt leadership. While protestors raised hopes that change ...
[96]
Secular Reasons for Confessional Religious Education in Public ...
Jul 1, 2020 · All that could not likely be achieved without the model of confessional religious instruction.