Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a collaborative project to create and maintain a free, editable geographic database of the world, relying on volunteer contributions to map features such as roads, buildings, and points of interest. Founded in 2004 by in the as an alternative to proprietary mapping services that restricted data access and reuse, the initiative draws inspiration from open-source models like to crowdsource location data via GPS tracking, aerial imagery, fieldwork, and imported public datasets. The core data structure consists of nodes, ways, and relations annotated with tags defining attributes like road types or building functions, stored in a vector format that supports detailed querying and rendering. Licensed under the (ODbL) since 2012, OSM data mandates attribution to contributors and requires for substantial derivative works, enabling widespread integration into applications while preserving communal ownership. This framework has facilitated usage in apps, tools, and systems, with the database powering services from independent developers to integrations by entities like . Over two decades, OSM has expanded to cover virtually all inhabited areas globally, with particular strengths in developing regions where commercial maps lag, amassing contributions from millions of users and enabling innovations like rapid humanitarian mapping during crises. However, growth has sparked debates over data quality inconsistencies from unvetted imports, governance strains from corporate-funded editing campaigns, and tensions between volunteer purity and pragmatic alliances with tech firms providing infrastructure or bulk data. These dynamics underscore OSM's evolution as a resilient yet contested commons, prioritizing empirical verification through community audits over centralized control.

History

Founding and Initial Launch (2004–2005)

OpenStreetMap was founded by , a student at , who registered the project's domain and initiated development in July 2004 to create a free, editable world map as an open alternative to proprietary datasets dominated by entities like the UK's , which imposed high costs and restrictive licenses on digital geographic information. Coast's motivation stemmed from the absence of openly licensed, community-maintainable map data, drawing inspiration from collaborative models like Wikipedia but applied to geospatial content, emphasizing volunteer contributions over commercial control. The project officially launched on August 10, 2004, with initial focus on the , particularly , where began collecting data using a GPS receiver mounted on a to trace roads and paths manually. Early data entry relied exclusively on GPS traces uploaded to the nascent website, eschewing automated imports to ensure originality and adherence to open licensing from the outset; the first street was recorded on December 11, 2004, marking the initial substantive edit. This hands-on approach prioritized verifiable, ground-truthed information, with contributors noting locations and features during fieldwork before digitizing them via basic editing tools. By late 2005, the project had attracted around 1,000 registered users, reflecting gradual community uptake driven by online announcements and word-of-mouth among mapping enthusiasts frustrated with locked data ecosystems. Initial growth remained modest, centered on urban areas in the UK, as volunteers experimented with rendering maps from raw GPS data, laying groundwork for scalable crowdsourcing without institutional backing.

Early Expansion and Technical Foundations (2006–2010)

Following the initial launch, OpenStreetMap experienced rapid volunteer-driven expansion from 2006 onward, with contributors organizing mapping parties and collecting GPS traces to build street networks primarily in and . By mid-2006, the project had formalized institutional support through the establishment of the on August 22, which aimed to promote free geospatial data distribution and sustain development amid growing participation. This period saw the introduction of aerial imagery from Yahoo! in 2007, enabling armchair mapping by tracing satellite photos over GPS data, which accelerated coverage beyond direct fieldwork. Contributor numbers surged, reflecting organic growth fueled by open licensing and community events, with registered users reaching approximately 200,000 by January 2010 and 250,000 by April. Technical foundations solidified through key software advancements, beginning with the release of JOSM (Java OpenStreetMap Editor) version 1.0 on January 22, 2006, an offline desktop application offering advanced features like layer management and plugin extensibility for complex edits. Later that year, Potlatch 1, a browser-based editor developed by Richard Fairhurst, debuted in mid-2006 as the project's first default online editing tool, simplifying contributions by allowing direct tracing and tagging without downloads. These tools addressed early limitations of the basic editor, enabling scalable data ingestion while maintaining the primitive-based model of nodes, ways, and relations. API evolution underpinned these tools' functionality, with version 0.5 deployed on October 7, 2007, introducing ways composed of ordered nodes (replacing segments) and improved versioning for during collaborative edits. This upgrade supported larger-scale uploads and better , though it required editor adaptations. By April 2009, API v0.6 further enhanced capabilities with changesets for batched modifications, GPS trace integration refinements, and support for complex features like routes, forming the core protocol still in use today. These developments, coupled with guidelines against bulk imports to preserve volunteer-sourced authenticity, established OSM's flexible, extensible schema emphasizing empirical tracing over automated derivation. Data volume grew exponentially, with analyses showing street network completeness approaching proprietary maps in select regions by 2010.

Institutionalization and Global Growth (2011–2020)

During the early 2010s, OpenStreetMap underwent significant institutional maturation, highlighted by the adoption of the (ODbL) on September 12, 2012, which replaced the prior Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license and introduced share-alike requirements for derivative databases to better protect the project's data integrity while facilitating commercial reuse. This change, approved after extensive community consultation, addressed vulnerabilities in the old licensing model that had allowed unchecked data extraction without reciprocal contributions, thereby incentivizing sustained input from users and organizations. The (OSMF), established in 2006 but gaining operational momentum in this era, formalized structures such as working groups for licensing, communication, and data quality, which coordinated global efforts and mediated disputes over imports and edits. User base expansion accelerated markedly, with registered contributors reaching 500,000 by November 29, 2011, and surpassing 1 million by January 6, 2013, reflecting broader adoption driven by improved tools and apps. By spring 2015, the community had grown to 2 million users, and cumulative edits hit the 20 millionth changeset on January 14, 2014, indicating a surge in mapping activity that filled gaps in map coverage, particularly in rural and developing regions. This period also saw the internationalization of annual State of the Map conferences, with the 2012 event in marking a shift toward non-European hosts and fostering cross-cultural collaboration among mappers. Global reach expanded through humanitarian applications and corporate integrations, as the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT), formalized post-2010 Haiti response, mobilized remote mapping for disasters including in the (2013) and the Nepal earthquake (2015), adding millions of features like buildings and roads to aid recovery efforts. Companies such as and Telenav joined as OSMF corporate members starting around 2013, contributing server resources, imagery, and edits in exchange for access, which boosted infrastructure scalability and encouraged professional-grade contributions without compromising volunteer primacy. By November 8, 2018, registered users exceeded 5 million, with disproportionate growth in , , and due to low-cost GPS tools and local training initiatives that democratized mapping in data-scarce areas.

Contemporary Developments and Challenges (2021–Present)

The OpenStreetMap community has sustained annual international conferences through the State of the Map series, with the 2022 event held in , , from August 19–21, followed by the 2024 conference in , , on September 6–8, emphasizing global participation and regional mapping advancements. In 2025, the event shifted to , , highlighting growth, with calls for posters and tickets promoting community-driven presentations on mapping progress and tools. Parallel regional gatherings, such as State of the Map US in 2024 and 2025, focused on domestic contributions, including grants for camera deployments to enhance imagery coverage. Software ecosystem enhancements persisted, exemplified by the Engineering Working Group's 2025 microgrant program funding volunteer projects to bolster the OSM platform, alongside tools like OSM Latest Changes for monitoring recent edits within defined boundaries. OSM's utility expanded in humanitarian and rapid-response contexts, with increased adoption for mapping informal transport routes in developing regions, supported by OSMF blog discussions on quick-update capabilities. International outreach grew, including presentations at the 2024 UNMaps conference and 2025 UN Open Source Week, addressing among UN entities and maintainers. Persistent challenges include inconsistencies inherent to crowdsourced contributions, with studies from revealing heterogeneous completeness and positional inaccuracies in OSM road networks, particularly in less-mapped areas. relies on volunteer tools like JOSM validators and MapRoulette challenges to address tagging errors, routing issues, and import conflicts, yet unresolved mapping schemes and mechanical edit disputes continue to degrade usability. Community forums highlight concerns over erroneous bulk edits and , exacerbating debates on edit verification amid volunteer . Legal and political pressures mounted, with the OSMF addressing threats over disputed territories in map data and preparing for post-Brexit database protections in the UK, alongside GDPR compliance updates. Sustainability strains the volunteer model, as manual labor struggles against commercial competitors' scale, prompting discussions on financial transparency and security hiring in 2024–2025 board minutes and general meetings. Licensing inquiries, such as for third-party imagery like footpath.ai, underscore ongoing efforts to maintain open data obligations amid evolving contributions.

Data Model and Standards

Core Data Elements and Geometry

OpenStreetMap's consists of three primary elements: , ways, and relations, which collectively represent geographic features through points, lines, and complex polygons. serve as the fundamental building blocks, each defined by a , latitude, and longitude coordinates in the WGS 84 datum, optionally augmented with key-value tags for attributes such as names or types. These enable precise point geometries, suitable for features like individual trees, benches, or traffic signals. Ways construct linear geometries by sequencing two or more nodes, forming either open paths for and or closed loops that delineate boundaries for buildings and lakes. A way's geometry is derived from the ordered connection of its constituent nodes, with closure indicated when the first and last nodes coincide, though OpenStreetMap lacks a native primitive and instead relies on tagged closed ways or relations for area representation. This approach allows ways to model both polyline and boundary features flexibly, with over 1.5 billion ways contributing to the database as of recent analyses. Relations extend the model to handle multifaceted geometries and relationships, comprising an ordered list of member —nodes, ways, or other —each assigned a , such as outer or inner for multipolygons. For instance, multipolygon relations assemble multiple ways to define complex areas like enclaves or administrative boundaries, resolving issues that single closed ways cannot address, such as disjoint components. This relational structure supports advanced geometries beyond simple points and lines, including routes and turn restrictions, while maintaining the model's emphasis on without predefined schemas. All share common attributes like timestamps, version numbers, and user identifiers to track edits and ensure .

Flexible Tagging and Schema Flexibility

OpenStreetMap's data model utilizes a tagging system composed of key-value pairs attached to primitive elements—nodes, ways, and relations—to encode attributes of geographic features. Each tag follows the format key=value, where keys identify categories such as highway or building, and values specify details like residential or yes. This structure stores descriptive metadata as unstructured text strings, avoiding a fixed relational schema. The absence of a predefined enables schema flexibility, permitting contributors to introduce tags for novel or context-specific attributes without modifying the underlying database or requiring approval from a central authority prior to use. Tags evolve organically as a , with initial adoption occurring through practical mapping before community documentation and standardization via proposals on the OpenStreetMap . For instance, the , established by 2006, has supported the proliferation of over 100,000 unique tag combinations by accommodating bottom-up extensions for features like ratings or seasonal changes. This flexibility facilitates representation of real-world complexity, such as varying local naming conventions or attributes like access details, which rigid schemas in systems often omit. Empirical assessments highlight how the system's adaptability has enabled rapid global coverage expansion, with tags adapting to diverse environments from urban infrastructure to remote trails. However, the unconstrained nature introduces challenges, including inconsistent usage—such as multiple tags for synonymous concepts—and difficulties for applications, which rely on community-maintained conventions and validation tools to mitigate . Proposals for tag governance emphasize documentation over enforcement, with deprecated or synonymous tags persisting in legacy data, underscoring the between evolvability and uniformity. Studies on evolution reveal patterns where usage precedes formalization, driving model resilience but necessitating ongoing curation to preserve across the over 10 million registered contributors as of 2023.

Licensing Evolution and Open Data Obligations

OpenStreetMap data was initially licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 (CC-BY-SA 2.0) license from its founding in , which required attribution to contributors and mandated that derivative works be shared under the same terms. This license, however, was designed primarily for creative works rather than factual databases, leading to ambiguities in enforcing database rights and applying share-alike provisions to substantial data derivatives. In 2009, the OpenStreetMap Foundation's License Working Group proposed transitioning to the (ODbL), a database-specific license developed by the , which OSMF members approved with 89% support among participants. The switch addressed CC-BY-SA's shortcomings by providing clearer definitions for database protection, improved share-alike mechanisms for modified datasets, and better compatibility with principles, following extensive community consultation and legal review over two years. The change took effect on September 12, 2012, with the first ODbL-licensed planet file released two days later; pre-2012 contributions remained under CC-BY-SA unless contributors opted in, while non-assenting data—about 1% of the total—was redacted to comply with the new Contributor Terms. Under ODbL, users must attribute OpenStreetMap and its contributors in any public conveyance of the database or derivative works, including intact copyright notices and a license statement such as "Contains information from OpenStreetMap, which is made available here under the Open Database License." Share-alike obligations apply specifically to derivative databases—those involving substantial extraction, re-utilization, or modification of OSM contents—requiring such databases to be licensed under ODbL or a compatible open license when publicly used. In contrast, produced works (e.g., rendered maps or visualizations queried from the data) trigger only attribution, not share-alike, allowing freer downstream applications without mandating source data release. This distinction preserves the openness of factual data while preventing proprietary lock-in of substantially derived datasets, though it has prompted debates on enforcement thresholds for "substantial" changes.

Mapping Processes

Primary Data Collection Techniques

OpenStreetMap's primary relies on volunteer contributors gathering original geographic information through field-based methods, emphasizing direct and to ensure accuracy over remote derivation. These techniques prioritize ground-truth data, such as paths, points of interest, and attributes that may not be discernible from alone. The core method involves recording GPS tracks using handheld receivers, smartphones, or tablets to log precise paths of roads, trails, and boundaries. Contributors activate devices to achieve satellite fixes, set high-frequency (e.g., every second), and disable road-snapping features to capture raw trajectories, often while noting supplementary details like signage or landmarks via waypoints. Tracks are exported in GPX format and uploaded to OpenStreetMap's server for integration into editing tools like JOSM, where they guide the creation of ways and nodes. Handheld GPS units, such as models, offer extended battery life (over 24 hours) and ruggedness for prolonged surveys, while apps like GPS Logger enable similar with geotagged photos or audio notes for . Field surveys complement GPS by capturing non-linear features, such as building outlines or amenities, through on-site verification. Techniques include manual note-taking on printable atlases generated via Field Papers, which produce georeferenced sheets with barcodes for post-survey digitization, or voice recordings synchronized with GPS logs for efficient documentation during walks or bike rides. and video, timestamped and geotagged, provide evidence for points of interest, with tools like OSMTracker () combining location data with custom forms for structured input. Mobile applications facilitate rapid, on-the-spot collection by prompting users for specific verifications, such as house numbers or pathway types, via gamified "quests." Apps like StreetComplete allow users to contribute during routine travel, automatically uploading validated data to align with OSM's schema. These methods ensure high-fidelity input but require cross-verification against multiple traces or photos to mitigate GPS inaccuracies, typically within 5-10 meters under open skies. Best practices include pre-survey planning to focus on unmapped areas and post-collection alignment in desktop editors for quality control.

Editing Software and Contributor Tools

OpenStreetMap editing primarily relies on the editor for browser-based contributions and JOSM for advanced desktop editing. The editor, a application integrated into the OpenStreetMap website, prioritizes simplicity and accessibility for novice users performing routine updates like adding points of interest or tracing roads from . Developed with funding from the , it handles basic geometry creation—nodes, ways, and relations—while enforcing data validation to prevent common errors such as invalid tags or duplicate features. JOSM, a standalone application requiring Java 11 or later, offers extensibility through plugins for tasks like importing GPX tracks, aligning aerial imagery, and batch-processing large datasets, making it suitable for experienced contributors handling complex edits across extensive areas. Contributor tools extend editing to mobile devices, enabling field-based data capture. StreetComplete, an application, facilitates contributions via interactive "quests" that prompt users to answer specific questions about nearby features—such as verifying house numbers or surface types—without requiring prior OpenStreetMap knowledge, thereby streamlining tag completion for incomplete objects. Vespucci serves as a full-featured editor, supporting direct manipulation of OSM primitives, , and integration with GPS for precise placement during surveys. , a app with an OSM , allows users to add or modify points of interest and notes directly from mobile devices, often leveraging device sensors for location accuracy. These tools adhere to OpenStreetMap's , ensuring edits conform to the project's XML-based format and tagging conventions, with uploads managed through calls to the central database. JOSM's plugin ecosystem, for instance, includes validators for conflict detection and remote control interfaces for scripted workflows, enhancing efficiency for bulk operations. Mobile apps like Every Door further support cross-platform ( and ) object creation and polygon drawing, often with building outline presets derived from satellite views. Overall, the diversity of these software options accommodates varying contributor expertise, from casual field mappers to systematic data importers, fostering sustained database growth through specialized functionalities.

Verification and Quality Management Practices

OpenStreetMap's verification and quality management rely on a decentralized model emphasizing contributor self-policing, automated detection tools, and community intervention rather than centralized moderation. Edits are committed directly to the live database, with initial validation occurring through editor software that flags potential errors prior to upload, such as geometric inconsistencies or tagging violations. Post-upload, depends on volunteer monitoring of changesets and the application of third-party analysis tools to identify anomalies like duplicated nodes or unconnected ways. This approach stems from the project's open-editing ethos, where no pre-approval is required, but persistent issues trigger community-driven corrections or escalations to the Data Working Group for disputes involving or mechanical edits. Core tools for quality management include the Java OpenStreetMap Editor (JOSM), which integrates a plugin to detect and auto-fix errors such as overlapping ways, self-intersecting polygons, and schema mismatches during sessions. Complementing this, Osmose employs analyses to scan the global dataset for issues, categorizing them by severity and providing web-based interfaces for mappers to review and resolve flagged elements, such as misplaced tags or outdated attributions. Additional platforms like OSMCha enable changeset analytics to spot unusual patterns indicative of low-quality imports, while Atlas and MapRoulette gamify error hunting through crowdsourced challenges. These tools collectively address intrinsic quality dimensions, including logical consistency and positional accuracy, though their effectiveness varies by region due to uneven contributor density. In structured mapping campaigns, such as those via the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team's Tasking Manager, validation follows a multi-step protocol: initial mapper submissions are reviewed by experienced validators who cross-check against imagery or ground surveys, fix inaccuracies, and provide feedback before marking tasks complete. This includes four phases—pre-mapping guidelines, intra-task peer review, post-mapping audits, and final usability checks—ensuring data suitability for crisis response, as implemented during the 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquake efforts. guidelines, enforced via talk pages and reversion capabilities, further mitigate risks like mechanical edit errors, with the Data Working Group intervening in escalated cases of suspected or widespread disruption since its formalization around 2009. Despite these mechanisms, remains heterogeneous, with denser urban areas benefiting from higher scrutiny compared to remote regions. Apps like StreetComplete enhance verification through mobile quests that prompt users to confirm or add details like house numbers via on-site photos, integrating crowdsourced ground-truthing into routine improvement. Overall, these practices prioritize over uniformity, leveraging open-source tooling and volunteer expertise to sustain amid millions of annual edits.

Community Dynamics

Volunteer Participation Patterns

OpenStreetMap's volunteer participation exhibits a long-tail distribution, with a vast pool of occasional contributors overshadowed by a committed core handling the majority of sustained edits. As of May 2020, the project had surpassed 6.5 million registered users, growing to over 10 million by early 2025, though only a fraction remain active beyond initial engagement. By March 2018, one million users had made at least one edit, reflecting cumulative growth amid high initial dropout rates. Annual active mappers, defined by substantive contributions, have stabilized at approximately 250,000 over the past three years ending in 2025, indicating steady but not accelerating participation volumes. Daily active contributors peaked at records like 1,019 in May 2020, driven partly by humanitarian surges, yet new registrations declined notably by about 20% in 2022 compared to prior years. Retention patterns reveal pronounced churn, particularly among newcomers: studies of urban show 48% to 63% of contributors across sampled cities cease activity after their first day, rarely returning for further edits. Humanitarian mapping cohorts exhibit similarly low persistence, with most first-time participants disengaging within days unless supported by or prior experience, though experienced mappers demonstrate higher longevity. Despite this, the project's persists through decreasing contributor turnover times and a self-replenishing core, averting overall decline as of 2024 analyses. Coordination practices, such as mapathons or events, modestly boost short-term retention but fail to substantially alter long-term dropout trends without targeted interventions like phased training. Demographically, mappers skew heavily male and technically proficient, as evidenced by U.S. community surveys acknowledging underrepresentation of women and diverse ethnic groups. Geographically, contributions concentrate in high-income regions, with local mappers comprising a small fraction—often under 10% in analyzed areas—despite their critical role in verifying place-specific details; this fosters coverage biases favoring and over developing contexts. Participation surges episodically via events like State of the Map conferences or crisis responses, yet baseline activity relies on hobbyist persistence rather than broad demographic appeal.

Governance via OpenStreetMap Foundation

The (OSMF), incorporated on 21 August 2006 as a in , functions as a not-for-profit entity dedicated to supporting the OpenStreetMap project without exerting direct control over its editable map data. Its core responsibilities include maintaining critical infrastructure such as the project's servers—hosted across locations including , Bytemark, , and —and the domain www.openstreetmap.org, alongside promoting the growth and dissemination of freely editable geographic information. The OSMF ensures legal safeguards against liabilities like claims, deriving authority from its , which outline its non-profit status and commitment to principles. Governance centers on a board of directors, typically comprising seven members elected annually by OSMF members and associate members via single transferable vote in electronic elections held around December. Membership requires an annual fee of £15 for standard participants, though exemptions apply to active mappers based on verifiable contributions, fostering broad volunteer engagement while funding operations through fees and donations. The board appoints officers—including a chairperson, secretary, and treasurer—and delegates operational tasks to specialized working groups, such as the Data Working Group for vandalism mitigation and dispute resolution, the Engineering Working Group for technical infrastructure, and the Licensing Working Group for compliance enforcement. These groups, staffed by volunteers, operate with board-granted autonomy to address issues like data imports and quality assurance without centralizing editorial decisions. Annual general meetings, conducted online since , enable member input on strategic directions, though the board retains executive authority over expenditures and partnerships. This structure balances decentralized editing—where contributors retain sovereignty over data modifications—with centralized oversight of non-editorial elements, such as trademark protection for the OpenStreetMap name and logo. constraints, reliant on modest membership dues and sporadic corporate sponsorships, have prompted periodic appeals for donations to sustain server costs exceeding £100,000 annually in recent years. Criticisms of the model include perceptions of limited board diversity and slow response to emerging challenges like large-scale data imports, though empirical audits of outputs demonstrate effective handling of thousands of disputes yearly without toward institutional actors.

Integration of Commercial and Institutional Actors

Major technology companies have integrated OpenStreetMap (OSM) data into their products and services, leveraging its open licensing for applications such as navigation, location-based features, and geospatial analysis. For instance, Apple incorporates OSM data into Apple Maps for rendering and routing functionalities, while Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta utilize it as a foundational dataset for mapping tools and services. These integrations require compliance with the Open Database License (ODbL), which mandates attribution and share-alike obligations for derived databases, ensuring that improvements from commercial uses can potentially benefit the broader OSM ecosystem. Commercial actors also contribute directly to OSM through editing, data donations, and infrastructure support. has historically provided aerial imagery via for mapping verification, and companies like employ teams to update OSM with business locations and pathways, enhancing data freshness in urban areas. Similarly, (AWS) participates in collaborative initiatives like Maps, which builds on OSM data to create standardized global map layers for developers. These efforts have accelerated in regions with high commercial interest, though they raise questions among volunteers about the influence of profit-driven edits on community-driven priorities. Institutional involvement includes partnerships with governments, nonprofits, and academic entities that support OSM for public good applications. The Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT) collaborates with organizations like the United Nations for crisis mapping, integrating institutional data imports during disasters to aid response efforts. Universities such as the University of Cambridge and University of Southampton contribute through research-driven edits and tool development, often focusing on specialized datasets like transportation networks. Government agencies, including the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), partner with OSM US on initiatives like trail stewardship to improve recreational mapping accuracy. The OpenStreetMap Foundation (OSMF) facilitates commercial and institutional integration via its Corporate Membership program, which as of 2025 includes sponsors at varying levels providing financial support for server infrastructure and events. Notable members include at the strategic level and silver-tier contributors like Niantic and , whose dues—ranging from thousands to tens of thousands annually—fund core operations without granting editorial control. This model balances resource influx with community governance, though OSMF guidelines emphasize transparency in corporate contributions to mitigate risks of .

Applications and Integrations

OpenStreetMap (OSM) data underpins numerous systems by supplying a detailed, editable of roadways, paths, and transit networks, which algorithms analyze to determine optimal paths based on factors such as distance, estimated travel time, and mode-specific constraints like turn restrictions or vehicle types. These systems preprocess OSM's data—comprising nodes, ways, and relations—into traversable graphs, enabling real-time or offline direction computation without reliance on centralized servers. This approach contrasts with closed mapping services by permitting customization, such as prioritizing scenic routes or integrating local traffic rules, though accuracy depends on the completeness of community-tagged attributes like maximum speeds or one-way designations. Key open-source routing engines drive much of this functionality. The (OSRM), designed specifically for OSM, excels in high-speed car , capable of processing queries across continental scales in milliseconds by employing for graph preprocessing. , implemented in , supports multimodal applications including foot, , and routing, with optimizations for efficiency suitable for devices and servers; its Directions API handles worldwide OSM-derived routes and includes route optimization for fleets, potentially reducing fuel costs by up to 30%. , another OSM-focused engine, extends capabilities to include time-dependent and isochrone generation, powering services that compute travel time matrices for . Mobile and embedded applications leverage these engines for practical . OsmAnd, an and app, delivers offline using pre-downloaded OSM extracts, supplemented by online backends like GraphHopper or OSRM for dynamic adjustments, supporting profiles for cars, bikes, and pedestrians with voice-guided turn-by-turn instructions. GPS devices integrate OSM datasets directly, allowing users to load custom maps via tools that convert OSM files into device-compatible formats, ensuring up-to-date coverage in regions where updates lag. In automotive contexts, converted OSM data enables in systems supporting imports, though compatibility varies by hardware, with tools like Mapwel facilitating batch conversions for units. These integrations promote independence from , as evidenced by widespread adoption in vehicles and recreational GPS units tracking via GPX formats aligned with OSM schemas.

Humanitarian Mapping Initiatives

The , established in 2010, coordinates volunteer efforts to generate and refine OSM data for crisis response, leveraging and remote to support aid organizations in over 94 countries. HOT activations enable rapid digitization of , roads, and buildings in disaster zones, with tools like the Tasking Manager distributing tasks to thousands of contributors worldwide. For instance, following the January 12, 2010, , OSM volunteers produced detailed maps of within days, aiding search-and-rescue and for entities including the and Red Cross, marking the first large-scale demonstration of crowdsourced in disaster management. The Missing Maps project, launched in 2014 by in collaboration with the , , and other NGOs, focuses on preemptively mapping underserved regions in the Global South to build baseline data for and response planning. By October 2025, the initiative has mobilized volunteers to add features covering millions of people in crisis-prone areas, such as and , enabling better-targeted interventions for epidemics, floods, and conflicts. These maps have supported and economic development beyond immediate relief, with data integrated into platforms used by humanitarian agencies for needs assessments. Recent activations illustrate OSM's operational scale: in response to the September 2023 and Libya floods, approximately 1,600 mappers contributed over 220,000 buildings and 5,000 kilometers of roads, with data shared via the UN's Humanitarian Data Exchange for real-time aid coordination. Similarly, post-Hurricane Maria in 2017, U.S. agencies like FEMA utilized OSM building footprints for damage evaluation and resource allocation in . HOT's efforts, funded partly through grants aiming to engage one million volunteers for one billion at-risk individuals, emphasize open-source tools and local capacity-building to sustain amid challenges like incomplete coverage in remote areas.

Geospatial Analysis and Research Uses

OpenStreetMap (OSM) data enables geospatial analysis by providing structured vector datasets of roads, buildings, points of interest (POIs), and tags, which researchers import into GIS platforms like for querying, visualization, and modeling. This open dataset supports empirical studies on spatial patterns without proprietary restrictions, though its volunteered nature requires validation against for accuracy. In urban morphology research, OSM-derived street networks and building footprints yield metrics such as road density, block sizes, and building volume estimates, allowing cross-city comparisons of form and function. For example, a 2017 analysis processed OSM data for over 90 European and North American cities to compute indicators like street network entropy and fractal dimension, revealing correlations with urban density and accessibility. Similarly, time-series OSM POI data has been used to detect urban change dynamics, with a 2019 study validating coverage against authoritative sources to model commercial and residential shifts in Tel Aviv, achieving 80-90% accuracy in trend detection. Accessibility studies leverage OSM pedestrian paths, sidewalks, and amenity tags to quantify and service proximity. A 2022 global assessment integrated OSM with EU-OECD urban boundaries to compare intra-city indices, finding higher values in dense centers versus sprawling North ones, with OSM enabling scalable computation across 1,000+ cities. Building from OSM attributes supports and ; a 2024 dataset derived from OSM polygons classified over 10 million structures in the contiguous U.S., aiding traffic and models by estimating occupancy from tag heuristics like "building=residential." Spatio-temporal frameworks like the OpenStreetMap History Database (OSHDB) facilitate longitudinal analysis of data evolution, querying over 100 billion historical snapshots to track urban expansion toward . A applied this to 10,000+ cities, revealing OSM's completeness grew from 20% to 60% for built-up areas between 2010 and 2020, with rural biases persisting due to contributor density. Environmental extracts OSM for modeling, as in a 2022 approach using volunteered tags to train classifiers for urban expansion mapping over 30 years, reducing reliance on data costs. These applications underscore OSM's utility in hypothesis-driven , tempered by needs for quality auditing.

Niche and Emerging Applications

OpenStreetMap data supports niche applications in , particularly , where it provides , roads, and building footprints for realistic virtual environments. has incorporated OSM line data for official scenery generation since November 2013, enabling detailed procedural landscapes. Similarly, X-Plane blends OSM-derived roads with other sources to construct 3D scenery, enhancing flight path accuracy. leverages OSM for building placements and heights, though errors in OSM data, such as inflated building dimensions from mistaken edits, have occasionally propagated into the simulation, highlighting dependencies. In focused on transportation and , OSM furnishes real-world like streets, bus stops, fields, and landmarks, fostering immersive simulations. City Bus Manager by PeDePe uses OSM to model passenger flows influenced by schools and districts, simulating realistic urban transit operations. Global Farmer from Thera Bytes allows players to input postal codes for location-specific farms, incorporating OSM buildings and terrain for personalized narratives, as demonstrated at 2024. These integrations capitalize on OSM's crowdsourced detail to create engaging, relatable gameplay without proprietary mapping costs. Emerging uses extend to (AR) and , where OSM facilitates spatial awareness in interactive and autonomous systems. AR applications overlay OSM points of interest (POIs) onto live camera views for real-time discovery, aiding and semantic-enhanced . In , automated systems convert architectural CAD files into hierarchical topometric OSM formats for indoor robot , supporting semantic in confined spaces. Indoor mapping represents a niche expansion of OSM beyond outdoor features, enabling applications in building navigation and environmental assessment. Specialized tagging schemes capture floor plans and room connectivity, powering tools like Itinerary for multi-modal transit including indoor routes. OSM data also informs environmental exposure studies, correlating land use tags with pollution or green space metrics for health impact modeling.

Criticisms and Limitations

Accuracy Deficiencies and Regional Biases

OpenStreetMap's crowd-sourced model results in variable positional accuracy, often stemming from GPS errors and manual inconsistencies, with errors reported as low as 1.57 in tested areas but degrading in regions with sparse contributions. Attribute accuracy suffers from incomplete tagging, such as missing road speeds or building usages, leading to topological errors like disconnected networks or duplicated features, which automated tools detect but fail to fully resolve without volunteer intervention. deficiencies are pronounced for points of interest and non-road features, where empirical assessments reveal gaps in rural and low-density areas, exacerbated by reliance on volunteer-submitted aerial imagery alignments that introduce offsets up to several . Regional biases manifest in stark disparities tied to contributor density, with and exhibiting near-complete road networks—over 80% globally for streets, but with achieving higher attribute richness—while and parts of show building footprint completeness below 20% in over 30 countries. This unevenness correlates with human development indices, as mapping activity concentrates in high-income regions due to greater and volunteer participation, resulting in underrepresentation of informal settlements and rural in the Global South. Studies confirm that centers in developed nations surpass 80% building completeness in 16% of global urban populations, yet small towns and peripheral areas lag, perpetuating inequalities that affect applications like . Humanitarian mapping campaigns mitigate some gaps but cannot fully counteract the systemic volunteer skew toward affluent locales.

Conflicts Over Edits and Political Disputes

OpenStreetMap experiences conflicts over edits primarily in politically disputed territories, where mappers contest , delineations, and feature classifications based on differing national or ideological perspectives. These disputes, often termed edit wars, involve repeated reversions of changes lacking and adherence to established guidelines. Such conflicts are infrequent but tend to cluster around geopolitical flashpoints, driven by mappers prioritizing claims over empirical verification. To mitigate and promote neutrality, OpenStreetMap adheres to the "" principle, which mandates verifiable physical realities and local usage—such as street signs for place names or effective control for administrative boundaries—irrespective of legal disputes or . Primary names use the "name" tag for predominant local usage, with alternatives appended via language-specific tags like "name:tr" or "name:el"; borders reflect control with one primary , enabling downstream map providers to overlay alternatives; and features like airports are tagged by function rather than contested status. This approach discourages deletions motivated by and favors notes or descriptions for contextual disputes, though enforcement relies on volunteer . The platform's inaugural edit war occurred in November 2007 in , a region divided since 1974, where one mapper tagged villages with primary Turkish names (e.g., Ozanköy) and secondary Greek names (e.g., Kazaphani), only for another to revert to Greek primaries, sparking debate on the mailing list without immediate formal resolution but highlighting the need for multilingual tagging. Similar patterns emerged in in 2011, involving warring over internal administrative borders amid ethnic tensions. During the 2022 , coordinated appeals urged restraint on sovereignty edits, emphasizing ground-truth data over wartime alterations. In October 2023, following the attack on , anonymous users deleted Tel Aviv's map data, prompting repeated restorations by defenders and subsequent account blocks, illustrating vandalism disguised as political correction. Resolution typically involves the Data Working Group intervening to revert non-compliant edits, suspend disruptive accounts, or facilitate discussions, though persistent ideological —evident in studies showing disputed areas attract more participants and divergent edit histories—challenges the volunteer-driven model's scalability. Geopolitical pressures have occasionally escalated to legal threats against the , underscoring the tension between open editing and state sensitivities. Despite these frictions, the on-the-ground rule has preserved in most cases by privileging observable facts over abstract claims.

Concerns Regarding Corporate Dominance and Data Imports

Corporate involvement in OpenStreetMap has grown significantly since around 2014, with companies such as Apple, , , and conducting millions of edits focused on roads and buildings, often through automated or bulk processes. For instance, Apple editors alone accounted for 3.94 million edits across , while contributed 4.48 million, dominating road edits in active areas at up to 70% of changes. This scale has prompted concerns among volunteers that corporate priorities—such as enhancing services—may overshadow -driven mapping, potentially biasing data toward commercially valuable features like urban in the North. A survey indicated 43% opposition to paid , highlighting tensions over and the risk of mishaps, as seen in Grab's 2018 edits in that sparked local disputes. Bulk data imports, frequently executed by corporations or governments to accelerate coverage, have repeatedly compromised and . The absence of robust pre-import review mechanisms allows errors to propagate without detection, while the lack of persistent identifiers for features hinders updates, leading to failures and outdated information that volunteers must manually rectify. Notable cases include the U.S. road from Census Bureau data around 2007–2009, which bootstrapped American coverage but introduced widespread inaccuracies in geometries, alignments, and attributes, necessitating ongoing fixup efforts and eroding trust in imports overall. Similarly, Japan's 2011 KSJ2 caused node duplications, disrupting consistency, and Russia's 2016 Moscow address yielded unverifiable, stale building outlines from sources like atlas.mos.ru. Corporate-led imports amplify these risks through high-volume automation, often prioritizing speed over verification. Facebook's AI-assisted road tracing, tested in regions like since 2017, has faced backlash for instances such as unannounced, erroneous data additions in that violated import guidelines and automated edits codes of conduct. has similarly cautioned against indiscriminate AI-generated imports, emphasizing they should not overwrite manual contributions without scrutiny to preserve . Such practices reduce local mappers' sense of ownership, complicate error correction by entangling imported and organic data, and foster community divisions, as bulk efforts can flood databases with low-fidelity elements harder to audit than hand-crafted ones. Analyses of large imports reveal they boost raw volume but introduce heterogeneity that challenges OSM's usability, underscoring the need for stricter protocols to balance acceleration with sustainability.

Broader Impact

Disruptions to Proprietary Mapping Dominance

OpenStreetMap's open licensing model, which permits free use, modification, and distribution under the , has undermined the control exerted by dominant providers like and HERE by supplying a viable alternative dataset for global mapping needs. This accessibility circumvents high licensing costs and restrictive terms associated with services, empowering developers, businesses, and applications to integrate comprehensive mapping without . As a result, OSM has facilitated the rise of independent mapping platforms and reduced in the geospatial market, particularly for high-volume users facing escalating API fees from incumbents. Concrete instances illustrate this shift: in August 2012, Craigslist embedded data in its apartment listings across select U.S. cities like and the Bay Area, supplanting maps to deliver location context at no additional expense amid growing usage volumes. Similarly, in January 2023, German car-sharing operator Stadtmobil transitioned its booking platform's cartography from to OpenStreetMap, emphasizing enhanced and operational independence from third-party providers. These moves highlight OSM's appeal for cost-sensitive operations, where alternatives impose per-query charges that scale unfavorably with traffic—Craigslist, for instance, handles billions of page views monthly, rendering overages prohibitive at rates around $0.50 per thousand excess loads. OSM's data also underpins competitive services that erode proprietary market shares in developer ecosystems. , reliant on OSM as its core layer, offers customizable APIs that have attracted adopters seeking alternatives to ' 61.3% dominance, securing approximately 4.5% market penetration among mapping technologies as of 2021 through superior flexibility in styling and pricing. Major entities further amplify this disruption via partial integrations: incorporates OSM contributions for roads, paths, and other primitives, as acknowledged in its data attributions, supplementing in-house collections to bolster coverage without full proprietary dependency. , meanwhile, utilizes OSM for pedestrian navigation enhancements and internal routing models, actively contributing edits for driveways, parking aisles, and urban walkability since at least 2018 to refine real-time operations beyond vendor-supplied data. Such integrations not only diversify supply chains but also compel proprietary providers to confront open alternatives that prioritize community-driven updates over centralized curation.

Advancements in Open Data Ecosystems

![Diagram of OpenStreetMap components][float-right] OpenStreetMap has advanced ecosystems by pioneering a collaborative, crowdsourced model for geospatial information, enabling global contributors to build and maintain a comprehensive, freely accessible database since its in 2004. This volunteered geographic information (VGI) approach has demonstrated the feasibility of large-scale, community-driven data production, influencing other initiatives by emphasizing attribution, licensing, and iterative improvement. The project's adoption of the (ODbL) in September 2012 marked a key innovation, providing a legal framework for database derivatives that requires sharing substantial changes under the same terms, thus promoting sustainable reuse and preventing proprietary lock-in. The scale of OSM's data ecosystem underscores its impact, with over 10 million registered users and approximately 10 billion nodes as of August 2025, reflecting sustained growth in contributions and data volume. This expansion has been facilitated by integrations with governmental and organizational data imports, enhancing coverage in under-mapped regions and exemplifying how platforms can incorporate diverse sources while maintaining community governance. Tools such as the Overpass API for querying and editors like JOSM and have standardized data access and editing, fostering an interoperable ecosystem compatible with open standards for geospatial software. OSM's tagging schema has evolved into an informal for feature representation, allowing flexible yet consistent encoding of real-world elements, which supports advanced applications from to . By 2024, corporate and institutional contributions, including from entities like and Apple, have accelerated data enrichment, though this has also highlighted the need for balanced participation to mitigate in efforts. These developments have positioned OSM as a foundational layer in broader ecosystems, powering humanitarian responses via platforms like the Humanitarian Data and inspiring initiatives such as Maps for scalable open .

Empirical Evaluations of Utility and Shortcomings

Empirical assessments of OpenStreetMap (OSM) data utility reveal substantial global coverage in road networks, with one analysis estimating over 80% completeness for roads across countries using comparative methods against and official datasets as of 2017. Building footprint data, however, averages 21% completeness worldwide as of 2024, with higher rates in and exceeding 50% in select regions, enabling reliable use in geospatial research and where data density supports it. In urban centers, approximately 16% of the global urban population resides in areas where OSM building data surpasses 80% completeness, facilitating applications like modeling and economic analysis. Positional accuracy evaluations indicate variability, with some studies finding OSM geocoding results equal to or exceeding commercial providers like in specific European contexts, attributed to community-driven refinements in densely mapped areas. Utility in tasks, such as automated sample generation for building detection, has been demonstrated through integration with models, yielding high-quality outputs from OSM primitives despite inherent noise. Systematic reviews confirm OSM's thematic and topological consistency supports niche research, though application-specific quality filters are often required for robustness. Shortcomings emerge prominently in spatial heterogeneity, where data quality favors high-income, urbanized regions over rural or low-income areas, leading to underrepresentation and positional errors exceeding 10-20 meters in less-contributed zones. Building completeness lags below 20% in 75% of global cities, exacerbating biases tied to contributor demographics and socio-economic factors, which persist despite temporal improvements from 2015-2020. Empirical evidence highlights intrinsic issues like missing roads, attribute inaccuracies, and lack of formalized review processes, complicating applications and reducing reliability for real-time navigation without supplementary validation. Comparative studies underscore divergences from proprietary maps like , where OSM exhibits gaps in amenity coverage and update consistency, though it offers greater detail in volunteered regions. Overall, crowd-sourced nature yields uneven fitness-for-use, necessitating hybrid approaches with authoritative data for assessments.

References

  1. [1]
    Learn more about OpenStreetMap.
    OpenStreetMap provides map data for thousands of websites, mobile apps, and hardware devices, built by a community of mappers and is open data.Acceptable Use Policy · Blog · ThanksMissing: official | Show results with:official
  2. [2]
    What is the history of OSM? - Welcome to OpenStreetMap
    OpenStreetMap was founded in the UK in 2004 by Steve Coast, and taken up by a community of map enthusiasts who wanted a free and open source of data.
  3. [3]
    One man decided to take on Google Maps; 20 years later ...
    Aug 10, 2024 · OpenStreetMap is the handiwork of Steve Coast (pictured above), a University College London “dropout” (Coast's own words) who has since gone on ...
  4. [4]
    Map features - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    OpenStreetMap represents physical features on the ground (eg, roads or buildings) using tags attached to its basic data structures (its nodes, ways, and ...
  5. [5]
    Licence/Licence and Legal FAQ - OpenStreetMap Foundation
    Jul 28, 2023 · 1. Using OSM Data 2. Contributing Data to OpenStreetMap 3. What should I do if I believe OpenStreetMap is infringing my copyright?
  6. [6]
    OpenStreetMap Charts a Controversial New Direction - Bloomberg
    Feb 19, 2021 · As Apple, Facebook, Amazon and other private companies play larger roles in OpenStreetMap, some volunteers worry that the open-source ...
  7. [7]
    Why OpenStreetMap is in Serious Trouble — Emacsen's Blog
    Feb 16, 2018 · One of the most significant technical problems with OSM is the lack of a review model, that is for a change to the map to be staged and then ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  8. [8]
    Happy Birthday OpenStreetMap – Celebrating 20 Years
    On August 9, 2004, Steve Coast, then a physics student at University College London, took the first step towards revolutionizing the world of mapping by ...
  9. [9]
    First Street and First Editing Applet - Happy Birthday OpenStreetMap
    2004 - First Street and First Editing Applet​​ On December 11, 2004, Steve Coast announced that the first street had been entered into OpenStreetMap. From the ...Missing: data | Show results with:data
  10. [10]
    MapCarte 103/365: OpenStreetMap by Steve Coast, 2004
    Apr 13, 2014 · Users collected data using GPS receivers and made notes then uploaded the points of interest and tracklogs to the OpenStreetMap web site (www.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] OpenStreetMap: Its History, Data Structure, License and Ecosystem
    Jun 29, 2017 · ▫ Aug 2004: founded by Steve Coast (since that time working for different companies). ▫ Dec 2005: 1000 User. ▫ March 2006: Osmarender.
  12. [12]
    Happy Birthday, OpenStreetMap! | TomTom Newsroom
    Aug 9, 2021 · OpenStreetMap project began in 2004 and brought with it a revolution ... Steve Coast is the founder of OpenStreetMap and is now a Vice ...Missing: 2005 | Show results with:2005
  13. [13]
    (PDF) The emergence and evolution of OpenStreetMap: A cellular ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · The main objective of this paper is to monitor the evolutional pattern of OSM and predict potential future states through a cellular automata (CA) model.
  14. [14]
    200k+ OSM users! - OpenStreetMap Blog
    OSM has cleared 200,000 users (see the stats page)! You can also check out more stats on the wiki. This entry was posted in Uncategorized on ...
  15. [15]
    Today is the day: 250,000 contributors - OpenStreetMap Blog
    Apr 19, 2010 · Mon Apr 19 00:00:07 +0100 2010. Number of users 249955. Sure. It's an arbitrary milestone. Not every registrant contributes a lot of data. One ...
  16. [16]
    josmeditor's Diary | JOSM reaches version 10000 in its 10th year
    Mar 16, 2016 · This symbolic milestone occurs a few weeks after the 10th birthday of JOSM 1.0, which was released on January 22nd, 2006 (yep, back in time, ...
  17. [17]
    Potlatch, OSM's First Default Editor - Happy Birthday OpenStreetMap
    Potlatch 1, originally an Adobe Flash-based map editor, was designed by Richard Fairhurst and released mid 2006.Missing: JOSM development
  18. [18]
    OpenStreetMap history for intrinsic quality assessment: Is OSM up-to ...
    Sep 9, 2019 · ... OSM API version 0.5 in late 2007 [45]. The impact is this time very limited, due to the relatively low number of OSM nodes, ways and ...
  19. [19]
    User- and Data development of OpenStreetMap (2005-2010) 1
    The results presented show that OpenStreetMap is a very fast growing and expanding project. The amount of data collected by volunteers in Germany has been ...
  20. [20]
    OpenStreetMap data license is ODbL
    Sep 12, 2012 · As of 9am (UK time), today, 12 September 2012, OpenStreetMap is now licensed under the Open Database Licence.
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    OpenStreetMap Foundation
    Jun 11, 2025 · The OpenStreetMap Foundation is an international not-for-profit organization supporting, but not controlling, the OpenStreetMap Project.Membership · About · Contact · Officers & BoardMissing: institutionalization 2011-2020
  23. [23]
    History of OpenStreetMap
    The OpenStreetMap project was founded in 2004 in the United Kingdom and has since grown into one of the largest open data projects on the Internet.Project history · Database history · Timeline
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    The evolution of humanitarian mapping within the OpenStreetMap ...
    Feb 4, 2021 · In the past 10 years, the collaborative maps of OpenStreetMap (OSM) have been used to support humanitarian efforts around the world as well ...
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    State of the Map
    State of the Map 2024. Nairobi, Kenya & Online. 6th to 8th September 2024. State of the Map 2022. Florence, Italy & Online. 19th to 21st August 2022. State of ...
  29. [29]
    State of the Map 2024 - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    State of the Map 2024 took place in Nairobi and online on 6-8 September 2024. Check the official website: 2024.stateofthemap.org
  30. [30]
    June | 2025 - OpenStreetMap Blog
    Jun 14, 2025 · Tickets are now available for State of the Map 2025 in Manila! Get ready for an incredible experience to connect, learn, and celebrate OpenStreetMap!
  31. [31]
    State of the Map US 2024 - OpenStreetMap US
    State of the Map US is the largest gathering of OpenStreetMap and open mapping community members from across the country.
  32. [32]
    News Archive | OpenStreetMap US
    News Archive ; Mapper Highlight: OSM US & Mapillary Camera Grant Recipients Oct 2, 2025 ; It's time for Mapping USA 2026! Sep 25, 2025 ; The OSM US Tileservice is ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    The 2025 OpenStreetMap EWG Microgrant Program
    Jul 12, 2025 · This program is designed to support community members working on software projects that strengthen the OSM platform and ecosystem.
  34. [34]
    OSM Latest Changes - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Aug 6, 2025 · OSM Latest Changes is a web application that helps to check recent OSM changes within a certain cartographic boundary, for example your home town.
  35. [35]
    OpenStreetMap Blog | Supporting the OpenStreetMap project
    ### Summary of OpenStreetMap Historical Events and Technical Developments (2006–2010)
  36. [36]
    OpenStreetMap at the UNMaps Conference 2024
    Jun 18, 2024 · The UNMaps conference brings together the GIS experts from the different entities of the UN, which was about a hundred participants in 2024.
  37. [37]
    OpenStreetMap at UN Open Source Week
    Sep 2, 2025 · A few steps away, I joined open source maintainers from around the world as we discussed our challenges in internationalizing our projects and ...
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
    Quality assurance - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Sep 13, 2025 · Quality Assurance tools help lead to better quality of OSM data. Often, the tools achieve this by providing a list of bugs in the data.Bug reporting tools · Error detection tools · Visualization tools · Monitoring tools
  40. [40]
    Mapping issues - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Dec 19, 2024 · OSM has a number of major broken, conflicting, and incomplete tagging schemes and mapping methods that have not been solved yet via a Proposal. ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    Board/Minutes/2025-02 - OpenStreetMap Foundation
    Feb 27, 2025 · Following concerns about poor legal protections of the OSM database in the UK following the UK exit from the EU the OSMFoundation has been ...Missing: 2021-2025 | Show results with:2021-2025
  43. [43]
    Handling Legal and Political Challenges - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Apr 15, 2025 · The OSMF sometimes receives legal threats or faces political pressure due to controversial topics or disputed territories in the map data.Missing: 2021-2025 | Show results with:2021-2025
  44. [44]
    Legal - OpenStreetMap Blog
    Nov 25, 2023 · EU countries should adopt CC-0 licensing to maximise the benefits and usability of open data–including by OpenStreetMap.Missing: global partnerships
  45. [45]
    Followup questions to 2025 GM - OpenStreetMap Community Forum
    Sep 14, 2025 · security consultant: the OSMF employed a security consultant for an undeclared period during 2024. · financials: it remains difficult, not to say ...
  46. [46]
    Licensing Working Group/Minutes/2025-01-13
    Jan 13, 2025 · Hi OSM Legal Team,. I'm reaching out to discuss the licensing of footpath.ai imagery for use with OpenStreetMap. We've adopted the following ...
  47. [47]
    Elements - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Jul 27, 2025 · A relation is a multi-purpose data structure that documents a relationship between two or more data elements (nodes, ways, and/or other ...Node · Way · Relation · Common attributes
  48. [48]
    Node - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Jul 31, 2025 · A node is one of the core elements in the OpenStreetMap data model. It consists of a single point in space defined by its latitude, longitude and node id.
  49. [49]
    3 Ways to get OpenStreetMap(OSM) Data - Geoapify
    May 24, 2022 · What are nodes, ways, and relations in OSM? These are the core data structures in OSM: - Node: A single geographic point (e.g., a tree or bench) ...
  50. [50]
    Area - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Aug 3, 2025 · An area (or filled polygon) is a two-dimensional object bounded by one or more linear ways and marked by appropriate tags.Missing: points lines
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Evolution of the OSM Data Model - OpenStreetMap Foundation
    OSM stores geographic features in Objects (or sometimes called Elements). The current OSM data model knows three types of Objects: Nodes, Ways, and Relations.
  52. [52]
    Relation - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Jul 31, 2025 · Relations are structured collections of objects – nodes, ways and other relations. Along with nodes and ways, they are one of the three core data elements of ...
  53. [53]
    The Data Model of OpenStreetMap - Overpass API
    The semantical data of OpenStreetMap are encoded in short bits of text, called tags. Tags always consist of a key and a value. Each object can have for each key ...
  54. [54]
    Tags - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Feb 27, 2025 · A tag consists of two items, a key and a value. Tags describe specific features of map elements (nodes, ways, or relations) or changesets.OpenStreetMap Tags Editor · Category:Tags · Synonymous tags · Discardable tagsMissing: flexible | Show results with:flexible
  55. [55]
    What are tags in OpenStreetMap? - DataMonkey
    Feb 18, 2025 · The tag system in OpenStreetMap offers many advantages. It's extremely flexible and makes it possible to map almost anything that's relevant to ...
  56. [56]
    Full article: The OpenStreetMap folksonomy and its evolution
    Sep 18, 2017 · This article treats the OSM folksonomy and how it evolves over time. We have found evidence that tags usually are first used in the OSM data ...
  57. [57]
    Study on the Evolution of the OSM Data Model - Jochen Topf
    Aug 15, 2022 · In the last months I have been working on a study commissioned by the EWG about ideas to improve the OSM data model.
  58. [58]
    OpenStreetMap and its use as open data | GEOG 585
    OSM was conceived in 2004, and pretty much 10 years later reached two million registered users . Although only a fraction of these are frequent map editors, the ...Missing: initial launch
  59. [59]
    Isn't the OSM tagging scheme is too difficult?(OSM 태그 체계에 대하여)
    Mar 19, 2023 · Because of the freedom and flexibility of OSM, people who edit it end up tagging different things with the same thing, and that makes it harder ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] The OpenStreetMap folksonomy and its evolution
    Evolution of the folksonomy​​ The OSM folksonomy is evolving over time – it is extended and modified by the use of new tags during the contribution of data. As ...
  61. [61]
    Open Database License - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Jun 17, 2025 · Before 12 September 2012 OpenStreetMap was using the CC-BY-SA 2.0 license. The change to ODbL was made for multiple reasons and followed a ...
  62. [62]
    Licence/About The Licence Change - OpenStreetMap Foundation
    Jul 26, 2022 · In 2012 the OpenStreetMap project moved to a new licence, known as the Open Database License (ODbL) replacing the former Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 2.0 licence.
  63. [63]
  64. [64]
    Pick your mapping technique - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Sep 10, 2024 · There are two categories of mapping techniques: Armchair Mapping and Outdoor Mapping. Armchair techniques rely on information collected by other mappers.
  65. [65]
    Recording GPS tracks - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Aug 22, 2022 · The most useful for OpenStreetMap listed below. Hand-held receiver. These are small devices which are used to record track logs. Many also ...
  66. [66]
    Mapping techniques - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    May 12, 2023 · See also. Pick your mapping technique · Mapillary/Data collection with Mapillary · Editors · Mapping Tricks and tips · Recording GPS tracks ...Missing: survey | Show results with:survey
  67. [67]
    openstreetmap/iD: The easy-to-use OpenStreetMap editor ... - GitHub
    iD is a JavaScript OpenStreetMap editor. It's intentionally simple. It lets you do the most basic tasks while not breaking other people's data.
  68. [68]
    iD
    iD is open source. Start contributing on GitHub. A project for OpenStreetMap funded by The Knight Foundation; Released under the ISC License.
  69. [69]
    JOSM - OpenStreetMap.de
    Jun 6, 2024 · JOSM is an extensible editor for ​OpenStreetMap (OSM) written in ​Java 11+. It supports loading GPX tracks, background imagery, and OSM data ...Download · Josm (log) · Wiki · Timeline
  70. [70]
    Easy to use OpenStreetMap editor for Android - GitHub
    StreetComplete is an easy to use editor of OpenStreetMap data available for Android. It can be used without any OpenStreetMap-specific knowledge.Missing: OsmAnd | Show results with:OsmAnd
  71. [71]
  72. [72]
    OpenStreetMap Editing - OsmAnd
    With OsmAnd and the OSM editing plugin, you can easily contribute your own information to OpenStreetMap.org, such as to create or modify POIs, add or comment ...Missing: tools StreetComplete
  73. [73]
    Editors - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    JOSM is a highly expandable standalone Java desktop application which allows editing more data at once, using more advanced tools and direct access to data ...
  74. [74]
    Check your OpenStreetMap edits with the JOSM Validator | by Mapbox
    Mar 16, 2016 · OpenStreetMap's power editor JOSM comes with a built-in Validator that helps you ensure your changes are bug free before you upload them to the map.
  75. [75]
    Using Existing Open Source Tools to Validate OpenStreetMap Data
    Nov 30, 2018 · MapRules · Osmose (OpenStreetMap Oversight Engine) · JOSM plugins & validation tools · Maproulette · QA Tiles · OSMCha · Atlas Checks ...
  76. [76]
    Data Working Group - OpenStreetMap Foundation
    Jul 25, 2025 · One of the OSMF working groups, the Data Working Group mainly concerns itself with: the resolution of issues in copyright violation, disputes, ...
  77. [77]
    5.2. Validating with JOSM - HOT Toolbox
    JOSM provides a built-in validator that checks and fixes invalid map data called Validation Tools. ... Understand how to validate OSM data using JOSM; Understand ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] A Comprehensive Framework for Intrinsic OpenStreetMap Quality ...
    Data Quality Management, Istanbul, Turkey van Exel M, Dias E, and Fruijtier ... OpenStreetMap 2013a OpenStreetMap Import Catalogue. WWW document, http ...
  79. [79]
    HOT's Approach to OSM Data Validation for Earthquake Response ...
    Mar 17, 2023 · We have a four step validation process to ensure that the data created for emergencies like the current Turkey and Syria earthquake response is fit for use.
  80. [80]
  81. [81]
    Foundation - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Sep 10, 2025 · The OpenStreetMap Foundation (OSMF; the Foundation) supports the OpenStreetMap project, primarily by hosting and developing the infrastructure on which the ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  82. [82]
  83. [83]
    Working Groups - OpenStreetMap Foundation
    Feb 19, 2024 · Data Working Group · Resolution of issues in copyright violation, disputes, vandalism, and bots, beyond the normal means of the community.
  84. [84]
    How is “Core Software” governance managed in OpenStreetMap ...
    Jun 19, 2025 · Many other parts of OSM have developed well-defined governance (e.g., board elections or tag approvals). But software governance remains largely ...<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    Who uses OpenStreetMap? - Welcome Mat
    There are many ways to use OpenStreetMap: as a basemap, using the OSM data for routing or navigation, using OSM data for GIS analysis, such as planning or ...
  86. [86]
    How Facebook, Apple and Microsoft are contributing to an openly ...
    Aug 14, 2018 · Multinational organisations are collaborating in the open to build an openly licensed map of the world: OpenStreetMap. Here's what we've learned so far.<|separator|>
  87. [87]
  88. [88]
    Meta, Microsoft and Amazon release open map dataset to rival ...
    Jul 26, 2023 · A group formed by Meta, Microsoft, Amazon and TomTom is releasing data that could enable developers to build their own maps.<|control11|><|separator|>
  89. [89]
    Partner with us | Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team
    HOT collaborates with a wide range of organizations to leverage open source tools and join resources to generate crucial data.Missing: institutions | Show results with:institutions
  90. [90]
    Universities - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Dec 8, 2024 · University of Cambridge · University of Georgia · University of New Mexico · University of the Philippines Los Baños · University of Southampton.
  91. [91]
    Through its Trails Stewardship Initiative, OpenStreetMap US is ...
    OpenStreetMap US (OSM US), a national nonprofit organization, formed the Trails Working Group in December 2021 to address the environmental and safety issues.
  92. [92]
    Corporate Members - OpenStreetMap Foundation
    Oct 6, 2025 · OpenStreetMap receives contributions from companies who contribute both time and money to help ensure site stability, maintain and improve ...
  93. [93]
    Eight New Companies Joined the OSM Corporate Membership ...
    Feb 7, 2025 · Five new names now appear as supporters at the Silver giving level: global gaming and AR company Niantic, QGIS, calimoto, Mapy.cz, and ioki.
  94. [94]
    OSM Foundation Announces New Membership Guidelines for ...
    Sep 8, 2023 · OSM Foundation Announces New Membership Guidelines for Corporate Sponsorship · A Tradition of Supporting OSM with Tools, Editing, Sponsorship, ...
  95. [95]
    OpenStreetMap Routing and Directions: Pros And Cons - Geoapify
    Jan 18, 2022 · In this post, we'll focus on OpenStreetMap Routing (or Directions) and see if you can and why you should choose it for your business.
  96. [96]
    GraphHopper Directions API with Route Optimization
    A fast Directions API with world wide data from OpenStreetMap and route optimization. Stay independent and flexible.Open Source · Pricing · Maps · GraphHopper Directions API<|separator|>
  97. [97]
    Routing with OSRM and GraphHopper - Geofabrik
    Both make use of state-of-the-art routing algorithms and can compute routes across Europe within milliseconds.Missing: OsmAnd | Show results with:OsmAnd
  98. [98]
    valhalla/valhalla: Open Source Routing Engine for OpenStreetMap
    Valhalla is an open source routing engine and accompanying libraries for use with OpenStreetMap data. Valhalla also includes tools like time+distance matrix ...Valhalla · Issues 736 · Pull requests 90 · Discussions
  99. [99]
    Online routing - OsmAnd
    Online routing can be enabled in Navigation type section of the Navigation settings of the selected Profile. In OsmAnd there are two predefined online routing ...
  100. [100]
    What is OpenStreetMap? | Garmin Customer Support
    OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a detailed map dataset used in Garmin products, developed by community mappers, and is an open data source.
  101. [101]
    OpenStreetMap download, conversion of OSM map for Garmin GPS
    Mapwel allows to download freeware OpenStreetMap files and convert them into routable maps for Garmin GPS units.<|control11|><|separator|>
  102. [102]
    What We Do | Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team
    HOT creates map data for disaster management, maps vulnerable areas, enables partners to use OpenStreetMap, and develops open-source mapping tools.
  103. [103]
    Projects | Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team
    HOT is an international team dedicated to humanitarian action and community development through open mapping.Missing: 2011-2020 | Show results with:2011-2020
  104. [104]
    4 Years On, Looking Back at OpenStreetMap Response to the Haiti ...
    Oct 29, 2014 · The value of OpenStreetMap as a collaborative and open-data platform to disaster risk management was first demonstrated in Haiti. Since then the ...
  105. [105]
    Missing Maps
    Missing Maps is an open, collaborative project in which you can help to map ... OpenStreetMap Team (one of the founders of Missing Maps) can help support ...AboutField Mapping
  106. [106]
    Missing Maps project | Doctors Without Borders - USA
    Missing Maps is being run through OpenStreetMap, which guarantees that the data collected and the maps that come from it are free, accessible and without ...
  107. [107]
    Helping Put People on the Map - JPMorganChase
    Going beyond disaster relief, the maps created by the Missing Maps program will ultimately serve as a resource that drives urban planning and economic growth in ...
  108. [108]
    Update on disaster response activations for Morocco and Libya
    Sep 20, 2023 · OSM communities and partners responded with 1,600 mappers creating ~220,000 buildings and ~5,000km of roads. Data is available via OCHA’s HDX. ...
  109. [109]
    OpenStreetMap for Emergency Preparedness in the US
    Jun 24, 2021 · Following Hurricane Maria in 2017, FEMA and the American Red Cross utilized OpenStreetMap building data to provide individual assistance and on ...
  110. [110]
    Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team - The Audacious Project
    HOT will engage one million volunteers to map places home to one billion people living in poverty or at high risk of disaster.
  111. [111]
    OpenStreetMap (OSM) – Spatial Analysis - Carleton College
    Apr 15, 2025 · It is the most comprehensive source of volunteered geographic information. OSM is a great resource for open, rights-free geographic data.
  112. [112]
    OSHDB: a framework for spatio-temporal analysis of OpenStreetMap ...
    Apr 8, 2019 · OSM data is used in many public, private and commercial areas, e.g., traffic management and logistics, civil protection and disaster management, ...
  113. [113]
    Urban Form Analysis with OpenStreetMap Data - Geoff Boeing
    Apr 11, 2017 · OpenStreetMap offers a useful new data repository for walkability studies, urban form modeling, and computational urban design.
  114. [114]
    Using OpenStreetMap point-of-interest data to model urban change ...
    Feb 25, 2019 · This work studies the accuracy, coverage, and trend worthiness of POI data. We assess the accuracy and coverage using another VGI source that utilizes ...
  115. [115]
    Utilizing OpenStreetMap data to measure and compare pedestrian ...
    Apr 12, 2022 · Given that, in this paper we use OpenStreetMap (OSM) data and integrate the EU and OECD definition of cities to create comparable global ...Versions · Abstract · Downloads
  116. [116]
    An OpenStreetMap derived building classification dataset for the ...
    Nov 9, 2024 · Building classification is crucial for population estimation, traffic planning, urban planning, and emergency response applications.
  117. [117]
    A spatio-temporal analysis investigating completeness and ... - Nature
    Jul 6, 2023 · OpenStreetMap (OSM) has evolved as a popular dataset for global urban analyses, such as assessing progress towards the Sustainable ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  118. [118]
    Time-series land cover mapping and urban expansion analysis ...
    We proposed a novel time-series large-scale mapping approach that obtains high-quality training samples from OpenStreetMap volunteered data and transfers them ...2. Study Area And Datasets · 3. Methodology · 3.1. Remote Sensing Data...<|separator|>
  119. [119]
    (PDF) Exploring Urban Form Through Openstreetmap Data: A Visual ...
    Sep 3, 2020 · This chapter introduces OpenStreetMap—a crowd-sourced, worldwide mapping project and geospatial data repository—to illustrate its usefulness in ...
  120. [120]
    FlightGear - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Oct 29, 2024 · FlightGear is an open source flight simulator. Since November 2013, the official scenery of the simulator makes use of OSM line data.
  121. [121]
    X-Plane - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Aug 16, 2025 · X-Plane is flight simulator software. They use OpenStreetMap data to create parts of their 3D scenery (such as roads) blended in with various other sources.
  122. [122]
    Microsoft Flight Simulator's Data Insanity Spawns Enormous ...
    Aug 21, 2020 · The OpenStreetMap project is an excellent example of how powerful crowdsourced data can be, but that's not to say the system is perfect.
  123. [123]
    Real-world map data is helping make better games about farms and ...
    May 25, 2025 · Games like City Bus Manager and Global Farmer are using real-world mapping data from OpenStreetMap for more realistic simulations.
  124. [124]
    An augmented reality based tool for contribution to OpenStreetMap
    The amalgam of augmented reality and device ubiquity can assist users in mapping new Points Of Interest (POI) in their vicinity. This paper discusses a ...
  125. [125]
    Generation of Indoor Open Street Maps for Robot Navigation ... - arXiv
    Jul 1, 2025 · This paper presents a complete and automated system for converting architectural Computer-Aided Design (CAD) files into a hierarchical topometric OpenStreetMap ...
  126. [126]
    Indoor building mapping in OSM - Volker Krause
    Jun 28, 2025 · And while indoor mapping is a somewhat niche topic in OSM still, there's applications such as Itinerary and Transitous making use of that ...
  127. [127]
    Using Open Street Map Data in Environmental Exposure ...
    Nov 1, 2018 · We conclude by suggesting that OSM data can be used reliably in environmental assessment studies. Keywords: OpenStreetMap, exposure assessment, ...Missing: niche | Show results with:niche
  128. [128]
    [PDF] TESTING THE POSITIONAL ACCURACY OF OPENSTREETMAP ...
    fluences, e.g. the technological bias like the accuracy of the GPS-receiver ... Testing the positional accuracy of OpenStreetMap data for mapping applications.
  129. [129]
    [PDF] Assessing the Topological Consistency of Crowdsourced ...
    This makes map data more vulnerable to errors and incomplete coverage. Nonetheless, OpenStreetMap demonstrates the increasing relevance of open and crowd- ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  130. [130]
    [PDF] How good is OpenStreetMap information - University College London
    Under this comparison, the OSM dataset is providing coverage for 24.5% out of the total area that is covered by Meridian. Figure 5 provides an overview of the ...<|separator|>
  131. [131]
    The world's user-generated road map is more than 80% complete
    Our results show that in many parts of the world, OpenStreetMap (OSM) already fills that niche, and that about 42% of countries in the world are more than 95% ...
  132. [132]
    Assessing OSM building completeness for almost 13000 cities globally
    Dec 19, 2022 · In terms of the national scale ( Figure 2 b and Appendix A), the OSM building completeness is lower than 20% for 31 out of the 162 countries.
  133. [133]
    Exercise 02: Analysing Bias and Inequalities in OSM
    Overall, mapping in OSM was strongly biased towards regions with very high Human Development Index. ... This exercise will investigate the global spatial ...
  134. [134]
    The evolution of humanitarian mapping within the OpenStreetMap ...
    Overall, mapping in OSM was strongly biased towards regions with very high Human Development Index. However, humanitarian mapping efforts had a different ...<|separator|>
  135. [135]
    Edit Wars in OpenStreetMap - Emacsen's Blog
    Jan 17, 2014 · Edit wars in OSM are rare, usually political, and occur about every six months or longer. They require at least two parties and are infrequent.
  136. [136]
    [PDF] Information for officials and diplomats of countries and entities with ...
    If a civilian airport in a disputed territory is clearly functioning as such, then that is how it is described in OpenStreetMap, irrespective of its legal.
  137. [137]
    OSMs first edit war - OpenStreetMap Blog
    Nov 12, 2007 · Live in a disputed area like the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus? How should you name your streets when major governments near you disagree?
  138. [138]
    Ukrainian OSM Community appeal re edits of OSM data during ...
    Apr 5, 2022 · Ukrainian OSM Community appeal re edits of OSM data during Russian-Ukrainian war. On behalf of the OSM Ukraine in connection with Russia's ...
  139. [139]
    Saboteurs Successfully Erase Tel Aviv Off the Maps - Haaretz
    Oct 23, 2023 · OpenStreetMap has seen editing wars where users repeatedly restored the deleted sections of the map and blocked the users who were deleting them.
  140. [140]
    Assessing Mapper Conflict in OpenStreetMap Using the Delphi ...
    Apr 23, 2023 · Studies of mapper conflict in OpenStreetMap (OSM) have focused exclusively on cartographic vandalism and its effect on data quality.
  141. [141]
    How geopolitical conflict shapes the mass-produced online map
    Geopolitical conflicts shape online maps through customization, tailored to local laws, and ambiguity, by adding or omitting information in sensitive areas.
  142. [142]
    Corporate Editors in the Evolving Landscape of OpenStreetMap
    In this article, we explore the influence these corporate editors are having on the map by first considering the history of corporate involvement in the ...
  143. [143]
    Import/Past Problems - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Jul 30, 2024 · Past OSM imports have created problems at a variety of levels, including data and community, among others. This page is designed to outline a few case studies.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  144. [144]
    TIGER - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Oct 16, 2025 · However, while the import helped kickstart OSM data in the US, it also brought a plethora of problems with data inaccuracy, some of which ...Status · History · Updates
  145. [145]
    Facebook AI-Assisted Road Tracing - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Controversy. Facebook “imported lots of bad data in Egypt without telling anyone, ignoring the Automated Edits code of conduct or import guidelines. The data ...Missing: imports | Show results with:imports
  146. [146]
    AI-generated buildings in OpenStreetMap: frequency of use and ...
    AI-assisted mapping is an innovative approach to data production in OpenStreetMap (OSM), designed to add new buildings to maps using advanced editing tools.
  147. [147]
    Analysing the Impact of Large Data Imports in OpenStreetMap - MDPI
    In this study, large data imports are defined as imports which add a proportionally large amount of data to OSM compared to the number of elements before the ...
  148. [148]
    Mapbox Vs Google Maps VS OpenStreetMap : Best Mapping API ...
    Rating 4.9 (2,014) Aug 25, 2021 · Mapbox - 4.46% market share, 159,618 domains; Google Places - 4.15% market share, 148,445 domains; Leaflet – 3.71% market share, 132,883 domains ...Google Maps Alternatives for... · Price Comparison: Google...
  149. [149]
    Craigslist is on board: OpenStreetMap soars to new heights
    Aug 28, 2012 · Last week, Craigslist added OpenStreetMap data to its apartment listings, providing some much-needed geographic context to its site.
  150. [150]
    OpenStreetMap - neue Karten-Optik - Stadtmobil Blog
    Jan 30, 2023 · Mit OpenstreetMap haben wir jetzt eine neue Karten-Optik unserer Buchungsoberfläche eingeführt. Statt Google Maps jetzt OpenstreetMap, ...<|separator|>
  151. [151]
    Why does Craigslist use OpenStreetMaps instead of Google Maps ...
    Oct 28, 2012 · Cost was probably a significant consideration. Google maps overages currently run about $0.50/CPM in excess of 25,000 free daily map loads ...
  152. [152]
    Mapbox vs. Google Maps: Choosing a Map API - Acropolium
    May 16, 2025 · Google Maps holds a dominant 61.3% market share, while Mapbox accounts for just 0.9%, highlighting the vast difference in adoption. When ...Google Maps API Review · Mapbox API Review · Choosing Between Google...
  153. [153]
    Acknowledgements - Apple
    The traffic incidents feature in Apple Maps uses incidents data from TomTom (along with other data). ... data (c) OpenStreetMap contributors under the Open ...
  154. [154]
    Uber-OSM/Global - GitHub
    We at Uber are planning to explore and contribute to OpenStreetMap in various places across the globe. We do not plan to make any large-scale, machine-generated ...
  155. [155]
    [PDF] A Review of OpenStreetMap Data - Ubiquity Press
    OpenStreetMap, geodata, open data, Volunteered Geographic Information. (VGI). 1 Introduction. The OpenStreetMap (OSM) project was founded in 2004 and has now ...
  156. [156]
    Stats - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Contribution percentage by user (2009-2010)​​ Note this is historic data from 2009, a point in time when OSM contained less that 15% of what it contains at the ...
  157. [157]
    [PDF] Sustainability in OpenStreetMap - World Bank Documents & Reports
    The world of OpenStreetMap is unique, and its impacts in the long term, beyond short projects or use in development and humanitarianism is still.
  158. [158]
    OpenStreetMap | Sovereign Tech Agency
    OpenStreetMap is at the core of the global open mapping ecosystem. Its freely available geospatial data power countless applications across industries, making ...
  159. [159]
    Open source maps and open data help humanitarian response
    Mar 24, 2023 · The OSM data is shared on the Humanitarian Data Exchange and is used to develop information management (IM) products for decision-makers.
  160. [160]
    What does Overture Maps mean for OpenStreetMap and the future ...
    Jan 14, 2025 · The potential risks posed by Overture Maps · Corporate influence on open data · Data ownership and licensing · Concerns over data usage.
  161. [161]
    The world's user-generated road map is more than 80% complete
    In this paper, we use two complementary, independent methods to assess the completeness of OSM road data in each country in the world. First, we undertake a ...
  162. [162]
    Analysis of OSM building data completeness using new data – HeiGIT
    Aug 27, 2024 · Worldwide building completeness in OSM is 21% on average, with some regions above 50% and others between 7-17%. From 2023-2024, average  ...Missing: evaluation | Show results with:evaluation
  163. [163]
    A spatio-temporal analysis investigating completeness ... - PubMed
    Jul 6, 2023 · For 1,848 urban centres (16% of the urban population), OSM building footprint data exceeds 80% completeness, but completeness remains lower than ...
  164. [164]
    [PDF] Comparative Spatial Analysis of Positional Accuracy of ... - gis.Point
    On the example of a well mapped German city this paper analyzes the positional accuracy of OpenStreetMap and ... logical bias like the accuracy of the GPS ...
  165. [165]
    Automatic generation of high-quality building samples using ...
    Recent studies have explored the use of OpenStreetMap (OSM) data for sample generation to enhance deep learning-based building extraction. Given the inherent ...
  166. [166]
    Systematic Literature Review of Data Quality Within OpenStreetMap
    Apr 2, 2022 · Studies have examined different aspects of OSM data quality completeness, logical and topological consistency, as well as positional and them ...
  167. [167]
    How do contributions of organizations impact data inequality in ...
    This study examines the influence of contributions made by organizations, which have notably risen within the OSM community, on data inequality.
  168. [168]
    [PDF] OpenStreetMap: Challenges and Opportunities in Machine Learning ...
    Jul 13, 2020 · OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a community-based, editable map service with heterogeneous data quality. Challenges include missing roads and inaccurate ...
  169. [169]
    The Divergent Geographies of Urban Amenities: A Data Comparison ...
    This study examines the epistemological and technical consequences of relying on two dominant yet divergent platforms—OpenStreetMap (OSM) and Google Maps ...
  170. [170]
    Ten Years of OpenStreetMap Project: Have We Addressed Data ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The goal of this paper is to present a comprehensive overview of the quality assurance of OSM data. In addition, the credibility of open source ...