Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Open borders

Open borders is a policy proposal advocating the complete elimination of immigration restrictions, permitting individuals to freely cross international borders and reside or work in any country without government-imposed barriers. Economists such as Bryan Caplan and Michael Clemens argue that implementing open borders would dramatically enhance global prosperity by enabling labor mobility from low-productivity to high-productivity regions, with estimates indicating potential net gains equivalent to more than doubling world GDP through reallocation of human resources.^[1] This position draws on first-principles economic reasoning akin to free trade in goods, positing that barriers to human movement inefficiently hinder voluntary exchanges and specialization.^[2] However, empirical analyses reveal significant controversies, including evidence from George Borjas that influxes of low-skilled immigrants depress wages for similarly skilled native workers by 3-5% per decade in the United States, alongside fiscal costs where less-educated immigrants generate net burdens on public finances exceeding $300 billion annually when accounting for descendants.^[3]^[4] Critics further contend that unrestricted migration could exacerbate security risks, strain welfare systems incompatible with free entry, and disrupt social cohesion without assimilation mechanisms, as observed in partial liberalizations like the European Union's post-2004 expansions where short-term wage pressures emerged despite overall gains.^[5] No sovereign state has adopted fully open borders, though intra-regional approximations exist, underscoring the tension between theoretical efficiencies and practical governance challenges.

Definition and Principles

Core Definition

Open borders refers to a policy framework that eliminates restrictions on the cross-border movement of individuals, allowing people to enter, reside, and work in any country without requiring visas, passports, or other immigration controls.^[6] This approach treats international migration akin to domestic mobility within a nation, where barriers to internal movement are minimal or nonexistent, extending such freedom globally. Proponents, including economists, argue it would enable labor to flow to opportunities without government-imposed limits, potentially increasing global economic output by permitting workers to relocate from low-productivity to high-productivity regions.^[7] In practice, open borders would dismantle systems of border enforcement, deportation, and entry quotas, applying only universal legal standards—such as prohibitions on violence or theft—to all persons regardless of origin.^[6] Unlike partial measures like visa waivers or regional agreements (e.g., the Schengen Area's freedom of movement among European Union members), full open borders entail no nationality-based distinctions in residency or employment rights.^[7] No sovereign state currently implements unrestricted open borders worldwide, though historical precedents include brief periods of lax controls, such as the U.S.-Canada border before the 1924 Immigration Act imposed quotas.^[6] The concept originates from libertarian and classical liberal thought, emphasizing individual rights to travel and associate freely, but it contrasts sharply with prevailing national policies that prioritize controlled inflows to manage population, security, and welfare demands.^[7] Empirical modeling by advocates suggests that removing barriers could double world GDP through migration gains, based on observed wage disparities and productivity differences across borders, though such projections assume no secondary effects like institutional strain.^[7] Critics contend this overlooks causal links between unrestricted entry and domestic resource competition, but the core definition remains centered on the absence of coercive state restrictions on human mobility.^[6]

Key Principles and Variants

The core principle of open borders holds that individuals possess a fundamental right to freedom of movement across national boundaries, unrestricted by state-imposed barriers, paralleling the freedoms of internal migration, association, and commerce within sovereign territories. This view posits that borders, as arbitrary geopolitical constructs, lack moral legitimacy for coercively preventing voluntary human interactions, such as employment or residence, and their enforcement relies on physical force like barriers, surveillance, and detention.^[8]^[7] Proponents, including philosopher Joseph Carens, argue that such restrictions violate basic liberal commitments to equality and liberty, as birthplace alone should not determine access to opportunities, much like historical serfdom tied people to land.^[9] Economically, the principle invokes comparative advantage and market efficiency, asserting that permitting labor mobility allocates human capital to its highest-value uses, thereby boosting global productivity and reducing poverty; econometric models estimate that fully open borders could double world GDP, with gains accruing disproportionately to low-income migrants through wage convergence.^[10]^[11] This rationale extends first-principles reasoning from free trade agreements, where goods and capital flow unimpeded, to people, critiquing immigration controls as protectionist distortions that benefit native insiders at the expense of global outsiders.^[7] Variants of open borders advocacy diverge in their normative foundations while converging on dismantling entry restrictions. Libertarian variants, rooted in the non-aggression principle, treat border controls as illegitimate initiations of force by states against peaceful individuals seeking mutual benefit, aligning with classical liberal thinkers like Robert Nozick who prioritize negative liberty over collective claims to territory.^[11]^[12] Utilitarian variants emphasize consequentialist outcomes, calculating that unrestricted migration maximizes aggregate welfare by alleviating inefficiencies in labor markets and humanitarian crises, though they may tolerate targeted interventions if net utility demands it—such as temporary pauses during economic shocks.^[11] Egalitarian or cosmopolitan variants, advanced by figures like Carens, frame open borders as a corrective to birth-based lottery injustices, promoting global moral equality where states function as clubs open to joiners rather than exclusionary clubs, potentially integrating with international human rights frameworks.^[9]^[8] These approaches sometimes hybridize, as in "keyhole solutions" proposed by economist Bryan Caplan, which advocate core openness but pair it with mechanisms like opt-out welfare vouchers to address fiscal concerns without blanket closures.^[7]

Historical Context

Early Philosophical Roots

Philosophical arguments favoring unrestricted or minimally restricted human movement emerged during the Enlightenment, drawing on natural rights, individual liberty, and analogies to free trade. Thinkers critiqued state-imposed barriers as artificial impediments to personal autonomy and economic efficiency, akin to mercantilist restrictions on goods. While not explicitly advocating the abolition of borders, these ideas challenged the legitimacy of arbitrary exclusions, positing that individuals possess a presumptive right to migrate in pursuit of self-improvement and mutual benefit.^[13] Adam Smith provided an early economic rationale in An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), condemning laws that confined laborers to specific parishes or regions. He described such regulations as counterproductive, arguing they prevented workers from deploying their skills where most productive, thereby stifling competition, elevating local wages artificially in some areas while depressing overall prosperity. Smith extended this logic to international contexts, viewing migration controls as extensions of protectionist policies that benefited entrenched interests at the expense of universal gains from labor mobility.^[14] Immanuel Kant contributed a moral dimension in Toward Perpetual Peace (1795), articulating a "cosmopolitan right" to hospitality. This entitled peaceful foreigners to temporary access for commerce or refuge, grounded in humanity's shared earth and the need for global intercourse to prevent conflict. Kant emphasized, however, that this right was provisional: hosts could refuse permanent settlement if it risked societal overburden or cultural disruption, reflecting his recognition of state sovereignty and practical limits on unconditional openness.^[15] John Locke and Emer de Vattel also lent support, with Locke implying in his Second Treatise of Government (1689) that liberty includes the freedom to depart oppressive conditions and seek property elsewhere, while Vattel's The Law of Nations (1758) affirmed a natural right to emigrate but allowed states to deny entry based on capacity. These positions, rooted in natural law, influenced classical liberal views that borders should not infringe core freedoms absent compelling justification, though none endorsed unlimited influxes indifferent to host burdens.^[16]

20th-Century Developments and Advocacy

The 20th century marked a pivotal shift in global migration policies, transitioning from relatively permissive pre-World War I arrangements to widespread border controls, followed by selective liberalizations amid Cold War dynamics and economic arguments. World War I catalyzed the normalization of passport and visa requirements, which John Maynard Keynes and other contemporaries identified as eroding prior freedoms of movement across Europe and beyond, driven by security concerns and national mobilization needs. In the United States, this culminated in the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924, which imposed numerical limits based on national origins from the 1890 census, drastically reducing annual inflows from over 800,000 in the early 1920s to under 300,000 by decade's end, explicitly aiming to preserve ethnic composition.^[17]^[18] These measures reflected nativist pressures, eugenics-influenced fears of "inferior" stocks, and labor market protections, setting a precedent for state sovereignty over entry that contrasted with 19th-century de facto openness.^[19] Post-World War II developments introduced partial reversals, influenced by humanitarian imperatives and anti-colonial momentum. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 affirmed freedom of movement within states and the right to leave one's country, though it stopped short of endorsing unrestricted cross-border entry, prioritizing state discretion. In Europe, decolonization and economic integration efforts foreshadowed intra-regional openness, as seen in the 1957 Treaty of Rome establishing the European Economic Community, which evolved toward labor mobility provisions. The U.S. McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 retained quotas but ended racial exclusions, while the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act—championed by President Lyndon B. Johnson—abolished national origins quotas entirely, replacing them with a system favoring family reunification (74% of visas) and skilled labor, resulting in immigrant numbers rising from 9.6 million in 1970 to 31.1 million by 2000.^[18] This reform, enacted amid civil rights momentum, tripled legal immigration levels over prior decades but maintained caps and preferences, reflecting a controlled expansion rather than abolition of borders.^[20] Intellectual advocacy for unrestricted borders emerged marginally, often from anarchist and libertarian fringes skeptical of state power. Early in the century, anarchists like Emma Goldman decried deportations and restrictions as tools of authoritarian control; deported herself in 1919 under the Alien Act for anti-draft activism, she later lamented in 1934 how wars had confined refugees to "penitentiaries" by curtailing free movement, viewing borders as artificial barriers to human solidarity.^[21] Mid-century libertarians, including initial positions from Murray Rothbard, aligned open migration with property rights and free markets, arguing that absent welfare distortions, labor mobility would enhance prosperity without coercion.^[22] By the late 20th century, philosophical arguments gained traction: political theorist Joseph Carens, in his 1987 essay "Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders," contended from liberal egalitarian premises that immigration restrictions akin to feudal serfdom, morally indefensible as they arbitrarily deny opportunity based on birthplace, though he acknowledged practical tensions with welfare systems.^[23] Economist Julian Simon similarly advocated in works like his 1990 book The Economic Consequences of Immigration, positing net gains from population inflows via innovation and labor, countering restrictionist claims with data on historical U.S. assimilation. These views remained outliers, challenged by state-centric realists emphasizing security and fiscal burdens, yet laid groundwork for 21st-century debates.^[18]

Theoretical Arguments in Favor

Economic Rationales

Proponents of open borders argue that unrestricted labor mobility extends the principles of free trade to factors of production, enabling workers to relocate from low-productivity to high-productivity regions, thereby optimizing global resource allocation and maximizing total output.^[7] This rationale draws from neoclassical economics, where barriers to migration distort labor markets akin to tariffs on goods, preventing gains from comparative advantage and specialization.^[24] Economists like Bryan Caplan contend that geographic immobility traps human capital in underutilized environments, suppressing innovation and entrepreneurship that flourish when diverse talents converge in advanced economies.^[25] Empirical modeling supports substantial aggregate gains, with migration economist Michael Clemens estimating that fully liberalizing international labor flows could boost global GDP by 67 to 147 percent, as workers shift to sectors and locations yielding higher marginal returns—effects driven largely by place-based productivity premiums rather than innate skill differences.^[24] These projections derive from place-to-place wage gaps observed in data, such as Mexican workers earning fivefold more in the U.S. than domestically, implying untapped "trillion-dollar bills" left on the sidewalk by restrictions.^[24] Clemens's analysis, grounded in historical migration episodes like post-World War II Europe, attributes over 90 percent of the benefits to emigrants themselves, with native-born workers experiencing minimal displacement due to labor complementarity in skill-intensive economies.^[24] Additional rationales highlight dynamic effects, including remittances that lifted 35 million people out of poverty in developing countries by 2015 via transfers exceeding foreign aid, and immigrant-driven innovation, as evidenced by 25 percent of U.S. patents from 1976 to 2010 involving foreign-born inventors. Caplan further posits that open borders would eradicate absolute global poverty by enabling self-sorting into opportunity-rich locales, with market mechanisms—such as employer-sponsored visas—mitigating any localized wage pressures through rapid adjustment.^[26] These arguments prioritize efficiency over redistribution, positing that border liberalization, like trade liberalization, yields Pareto improvements when paired with targeted domestic policies.^[27]

Moral and Libertarian Justifications

Moral justifications for open borders emphasize the inherent human right to freedom of movement, positing that arbitrary national boundaries lack ethical legitimacy to restrict peaceful individuals from seeking better opportunities. Philosopher Michael Huemer argues that immigration restrictions constitute a prima facie violation of potential immigrants' rights, as they impose coercive harm without sufficient justification, akin to wrongful aggression against individuals based solely on birthplace.^[28] This view holds that states have no special moral authority to exclude non-aggressive foreigners, as such exclusions fail common ethical tests like consent, self-defense, or associative rights, which do not extend to blanket prohibitions on entry.^[29] Proponents further contend that closed borders perpetuate global inequality by trapping people in suboptimal conditions, denying them the liberty to migrate where they can most productively contribute and flourish.^[11] Libertarian arguments frame open borders as a direct application of the non-aggression principle, under which individuals possess the right to move freely and engage in voluntary transactions across geographic lines, free from state-initiated force. Immigration controls, enforced through violence or threat thereof, infringe on this liberty and the property rights of citizens who wish to hire, trade with, or associate with immigrants.^[30] Economists and philosophers like Bryan Caplan advocate for open borders on grounds that they align with libertarian ideals of maximizing individual autonomy and economic freedom, rejecting state monopolies on territorial access that distort voluntary associations.^[31] In a stateless or minimal-state framework, private property norms would govern entry, allowing owners to decide associations without collective democratic overrides, thereby rendering national borders morally superfluous for non-criminal migrants.^[32] These justifications acknowledge potential exceptions, such as barring those with communicable diseases or criminal histories, but maintain that broad restrictions exceed ethical bounds, prioritizing individual rights over collective preferences. Critics within libertarian circles, often citing welfare state distortions, argue for qualified openness, yet core proponents insist that true libertarianism demands unrestricted migration absent aggression.^[33] Empirical considerations, while secondary to deontological claims, reinforce the case by highlighting how barriers harm both migrants and host economies through reduced gains from trade.^[34]

Theoretical Arguments Against

National Sovereignty and Security Imperatives

National sovereignty fundamentally encompasses a state's exclusive authority to control its territory, including the right to regulate entry and exit to safeguard its political community and citizenry from external threats. This principle, rooted in the Westphalian system of international relations, posits that without enforceable borders, a nation cannot maintain its distinct identity, enforce laws uniformly, or fulfill its primary obligation to protect inhabitants from harm. Open borders policies, by contrast, would erode this authority, allowing unrestricted ingress that undermines the state's capacity to vet entrants and prioritize the welfare of existing members over potential newcomers. Philosophers such as Ryan Pevnick argue that sovereignty includes "associative ownership" of the political community, justifying restrictions to preserve the associative ties and mutual obligations among citizens.^[35] From a security perspective, unsecured borders heighten vulnerabilities to terrorism and espionage, as evidenced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data showing a surge in encounters with individuals on the terrorist watchlist. In fiscal year 2023, CBP recorded 172 such encounters at the southwest land border, a record high representing a 72% increase from prior years, with non-U.S. citizens involved in 169 cases.^[36]^[37] Since January 2021, at least 1.7 million "gotaways"—individuals evading apprehension—have crossed the U.S. southern border, posing unknown national security risks including potential terrorists or operatives from adversarial states. These lapses enable adversarial actors, such as cartels or state-sponsored networks, to exploit porous frontiers for smuggling weapons, precursors for chemical weapons, or personnel intent on sabotage. Beyond terrorism, open borders facilitate elevated involvement in transnational organized crime, with noncitizens comprising nearly half of federal criminal prosecutions in 2018, including charges for drug trafficking, murder, and kidnapping.^[38] While aggregate studies indicate undocumented immigrants have lower overall conviction rates than U.S.-born citizens for certain offenses, federal data highlight disproportionate noncitizen roles in border-related crimes like human smuggling and fentanyl trafficking, which contributed to over 70,000 U.S. overdose deaths in 2023.^[39]^[40] Cartels, empowered by unchecked migration flows, have militarized border regions, using migrants as diversions to overwhelm enforcement and advance operations that destabilize communities and strain resources.^[41] These dynamics illustrate how relinquishing border control compromises a state's monopoly on legitimate violence, inviting chaos that erodes public trust and operational sovereignty.

Welfare State Compatibility Issues

The presence of a generous welfare state creates fundamental tensions with open borders policies, as unrestricted migration incentivizes movement toward jurisdictions offering extensive public benefits, education, healthcare, and housing subsidies, often regardless of economic productivity. Economists like Milton Friedman have argued that free immigration cannot coexist with such systems, positing that open borders would rapidly overwhelm fiscal resources by attracting low-skilled migrants whose lifetime contributions in taxes fail to offset consumption of services.^[42] This "welfare magnet" hypothesis is supported by empirical patterns where immigrants disproportionately select destinations with higher benefit generosity, even after controlling for wages and networks, leading to elevated public expenditures per capita.^[43] Fiscal impact analyses consistently reveal net costs for first-generation, low-skilled immigrants in welfare-oriented economies. A comprehensive National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report estimates that such immigrants impose a lifetime net fiscal burden of approximately $300,000 or more per person at the federal level in the United States, driven by higher usage of state and local services like education and Medicaid, which exceed tax revenues.^[44] Harvard economist George Borjas's research corroborates this, calculating that immigrant households in the U.S. generate annual net deficits through mechanisms like reduced native wages (lowering overall tax bases) and direct benefit claims, with low-education cohorts costing tens of thousands per household yearly.^[45] In Europe, similar dynamics prevail: a 2025 Manhattan Institute update projects that low-skilled immigration substitutes against native low-wage workers, amplifying welfare payouts while curtailing tax inflows, with aggregate U.S.-style deficits scaling to billions in EU contexts.^[46] These effects compound over generations if skill selectivity remains absent, as second-generation outcomes often inherit parental disadvantages without fully closing fiscal gaps.^[44] Real-world welfare states have responded to these pressures by curtailing either immigration or benefits, underscoring practical incompatibility. Sweden, with one of Europe's most expansive systems, experienced acute strain post-2015 migrant influx, as non-Western immigrants utilized welfare at rates 2-3 times higher than natives, contributing to a 2017 policy pivot restricting family reunifications and benefits for new arrivals amid rising public debt and service backlogs.^[47] Denmark implemented "ghetto laws" in 2018, slashing child benefits and integration allowances for non-Western migrants to deter low-contribution inflows, explicitly citing fiscal sustainability.^[43] Under open borders, such ad hoc restrictions would prove insufficient against global population pressures—over 5 billion people in lower-income nations—potentially necessitating welfare contraction or collapse, as projected in models where benefit-eligible migration surges could double public spending within decades absent border controls.^[48] Critics of the magnet thesis, often from pro-immigration think tanks, contend indirect benefits like innovation or native labor complementarity offset costs, estimating modest annual gains of $700-2,100 per low-skilled U.S. immigrant via induced native employment.^[49] However, these claims rely on narrow assumptions excluding full intergenerational liabilities and state-level burdens, which peer-reviewed aggregates refute as dominant in high-welfare settings; for instance, Borjas's decompositions show direct fiscal drains persisting even after netting dynamic effects.^[45] Mainstream media and academic sources, frequently aligned with expansionist views, underemphasize these deficits due to institutional preferences for permissive policies, yet raw data from tax-benefit microsimulations affirm the core causal tension: open mobility erodes the redistributive viability of welfare by diluting contributor-to-recipient ratios.^[50]

Empirical Evidence on Impacts

Economic Effects: Growth Versus Costs

Theoretical economic models suggest that fully open borders could generate substantial global GDP gains by allowing labor to move to more productive locations, with estimates indicating net benefits comparable to a worldwide growth miracle that more than doubles output in destination countries.^[51] These projections, derived from static migration cost frameworks, attribute gains to increased specialization, knowledge diffusion, and scale economies, potentially lifting billions out of poverty through remittances and origin-country spillovers.^[51] However, such models often abstract from real-world frictions like institutional mismatches and assume no welfare state distortions, which empirical contexts reveal as significant caveats. Empirical studies on partial immigration liberalization consistently show aggregate GDP expansion in host economies, primarily through enlarged labor forces, entrepreneurship, and complementary skill inputs that enhance native productivity. For instance, a one-percentage-point rise in immigrant share correlates with roughly 1.9% higher state-level gross state product in the U.S., though per-capita GDP effects are smaller or negative due to population dilution.^[52] Recent U.S. data from 2021–2024 indicate that immigration surges added $0.9 trillion to federal revenues over a decade via taxes and labor contributions, while also spurring mandatory spending increases, yielding a net deficit reduction in baseline projections.^[53] High-skilled inflows particularly drive innovation and long-term growth, as evidenced by patent surges and firm expansions in immigrant-heavy sectors.^[54] Countervailing costs manifest in labor market displacements, where influxes of low-skilled migrants depress wages for comparable native workers by 0–5% over decades, with effects concentrated among high-school dropouts and prior residents in gateway areas.^[55] ^[56] Spatial and skill-based analyses confirm natives respond by upgrading occupations or relocating, mitigating average impacts but exacerbating inequality at the lower wage distribution.^[57] These dynamics intensify under rapid, unskilled surges, as seen in historical U.S. episodes like the 1920s restrictions, which raised low-skilled wages by curbing supply pressures.^[58] Fiscal burdens further tilt the balance against unrestricted openness in welfare-heavy regimes, where low-skilled and unauthorized immigrants impose net lifetime costs—averaging $68,000 per unlawful entrant in the U.S.—through education, healthcare, and benefit usage exceeding tax contributions.^[46] Peer-reviewed syntheses affirm that while high-skilled migrants yield positive fiscal returns, overall immigration's budgetary impact remains small or negative for unskilled cohorts, amplifying deficits amid aging native populations.^[59] ^[54] In advanced economies, these costs strain public goods without proportional per-capita growth, underscoring compatibility challenges between open borders and expansive redistribution systems.^[60]

Security and Crime Outcomes

In jurisdictions with relatively permissive immigration enforcement, empirical data indicate elevated involvement of non-citizens, particularly undocumented migrants and recent asylum seekers, in certain violent crimes compared to native populations. A peer-reviewed analysis of Swedish crime data from 2000–2017 found that foreign-born individuals, representing approximately 20% of the population by 2020, comprised 58% of suspects for total crimes on reasonable grounds, with overrepresentation in murder, manslaughter, and sexual offenses; nearly two-thirds of convicted rapists were first- or second-generation immigrants.^[61]^[62] In Germany, following the 2015–2016 influx of over one million asylum seekers, violent crime rose by about 10%, with more than 90% of the increase attributed to young male refugees, including disproportionate shares of sexual assaults and robberies; causal studies confirm a lagged effect, with crime rates unaffected in the arrival year but increasing thereafter.^[63]^[64] U.S. data present a more contested picture, with overall immigrant crime rates often reported as lower than natives', yet specific subsets reveal higher risks. Texas Department of Public Safety records from 2013–2022 show undocumented immigrants convicted of homicide at 2.2 per 100,000, below the native rate of 3.0, but analyses of the same dataset highlight undocumented overrepresentation in homicides and sexual assaults relative to their 6% population share, potentially understated by deportations removing recidivists and incomplete status verification.^[65]^[66] U.S. Customs and Border Protection reported apprehending over 15,000 criminal non-citizens in FY2024 alone, many with prior convictions for homicide, assault, and drug trafficking, underscoring how porous borders facilitate entry of offenders who evade initial screening.^[67] These patterns suggest that open borders, by eliminating vetting, would amplify criminal inflows, as evidenced by "gotaways"—unapprehended border crossers estimated at over 1.5 million since FY2021—who include unknown proportions of fugitives.^[68] Beyond conventional crime, open borders pose acute national security threats via unchecked terrorism and espionage risks. U.S. Border Patrol encountered 385 individuals on the terrorist watchlist at the southwest border from FY2021 through mid-FY2024, with at least 99 released into the interior pending proceedings, including nationals from Iran, Syria, and Yemen; such hits represent a fraction of potential undetected entries under full openness.^[68]^[69] Cross-national studies link migration from high-terrorism-origin countries to elevated attack risks in destinations, as migrants serve as conduits for radical networks; for instance, econometric models show positive transmission effects where inflows from terrorist-prone states correlate with subsequent domestic incidents.^[70] Absent barriers, causal realism dictates heightened vulnerability to state actors exploiting mass movements for infiltration, as seen in historical breaches where lax controls enabled non-state threats like the 2015–2016 European attacks involving irregular migrants.^[71] Pro-immigration sources often minimize these linkages by aggregating legal and illegal flows or emphasizing overall low incidence, yet granular data from enforcement agencies reveal systemic undercounting of status-specific threats.^[72] Empirical studies indicate that rapid increases in ethnic diversity, as would occur under open borders policies permitting unrestricted mass migration, correlate with diminished social trust and civic engagement. Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam's analysis of over 30,000 U.S. respondents found that in more diverse communities, residents exhibit lower levels of trust toward both neighbors and strangers, reduced volunteering, and less participation in community organizations, a phenomenon termed "hunkering down."^[73] This effect persists even after controlling for socioeconomic factors, suggesting a causal link between diversity and short-term erosion of social capital.^[74] In European contexts, high immigration levels have similarly fostered parallel societies where cultural norms diverge from host populations, hindering integration. In Germany, the influx of over one million asylum seekers during the 2015-2016 migration wave contributed to the emergence of enclaves with competing legal and social customs, including sharia-influenced councils handling civil disputes in the UK and elsewhere.^[75] Swedish data reveal persistent segregation in immigrant-heavy suburbs like Malmö's Rosengård, where low assimilation rates among non-Western migrants—particularly those from Muslim-majority countries—have led to higher interpersonal distrust and reduced intergroup contact.^[76] Official statistics from the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention show that foreign-born individuals and their children account for disproportionate shares of certain crimes, exacerbating native perceptions of cultural incompatibility and straining cohesion.^[77] Cultural dynamics under such conditions often involve resistance to host values, with low-skilled immigrants from distant cultural backgrounds exhibiting slower assimilation trajectories. Longitudinal European surveys demonstrate that second-generation migrants from Middle Eastern and African origins retain stronger ties to origin-country norms, including attitudes toward gender roles and authority, compared to European natives, impeding shared civic identity formation.^[78] This is compounded by spatial segregation: micro-level studies in Western Europe link residential ethnic diversity to reduced generalized trust, as residents withdraw from public spaces and informal networks.^[79] While some research notes potential long-term adaptation if diversity stabilizes gradually, open borders' scale—potentially millions annually without selection—would likely overwhelm assimilation mechanisms, perpetuating fragmentation rather than fostering unity.^[80] Proponents of open borders, such as economist Bryan Caplan, argue that cultural exchange could enrich societies over time, but empirical counterevidence from high-immigration episodes underscores risks of balkanization, where subgroup loyalties supersede national bonds.^[81] In Sweden, for instance, public attitudes toward immigration have hardened amid visible failures in value convergence, with surveys showing declining support for multiculturalism as cohesion indicators like neighborhood trust fall.^[82] These patterns align with first-principles expectations: human social cohesion relies on shared norms and reciprocity, which mass inflows from incompatible value systems disrupt, often yielding lower overall welfare than selective policies.^[83]

Real-World Examples and Outcomes

Partial Open Border Zones

The Schengen Area exemplifies a partial open border zone, comprising 29 European states as of 2024 where internal border controls were progressively eliminated starting in 1985 under the Schengen Agreement, enabling passport-free travel for citizens and lawful residents across a population of approximately 420 million. This arrangement has demonstrably enhanced economic integration, with empirical estimates indicating that its dismantlement could reduce intra-area trade by 10-20% due to frictions in labor mobility and commerce.^[84] Travel volumes have surged, supporting tourism and services sectors, while harmonized external border management via Frontex has aimed to contain irregular entries.^[85] Security challenges have nonetheless eroded the zone's functionality, as evidenced by repeated temporary reintroductions of internal controls; for instance, amid the 2015-2016 migrant influx exceeding 1 million arrivals, multiple states reinstated checks, a pattern persisting into 2025 amid geopolitical strains and irregular migration flows.^[86] Cross-border crime, including organized smuggling networks, has risen in border regions, with German-Polish frontiers reporting heightened insecurity perceptions linked to unchecked movement.^[87] Critics attribute these outcomes to the tension between free internal transit and uneven enforcement of external barriers, resulting in asymmetric burdens on frontline states like Greece and Italy.^[88] The Trans-Tasman Travel Arrangement between Australia and New Zealand, operational since 1973, constitutes a bilateral partial open border zone permitting citizens unrestricted entry, residence, and employment rights without visas, alongside mutual qualification recognition. This has facilitated labor flows, with over 600,000 New Zealanders residing in Australia as of recent counts, bolstering sectors such as construction and healthcare through seasonal and permanent migration. Economic analyses highlight net gains from integrated markets, including reduced transaction costs and enhanced productivity via skill matching.^[89] Fiscal and welfare strains have emerged, however, as Australian taxpayers subsidize services for non-contributing migrants, prompting policy adjustments like 2017 restrictions on New Zealanders' benefit access after four years of residency. Net migration imbalances favor outflows from New Zealand, exacerbating domestic skill shortages there while raising Australian concerns over housing pressures in cities like Sydney.^[90] India's open border with Nepal, formalized by the 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship and spanning 1,751 kilometers without routine checks, functions as a longstanding partial zone enabling visa-free movement for trade, work, and family ties between populations sharing ethnic and linguistic bonds. Annual cross-border trade exceeds $8 billion, with Nepal exporting electricity and herbs while importing Indian machinery and fuel, fostering interdependence that has sustained Nepal's economy amid landlocked constraints. Nepali migrants in India remit billions, supporting rural households.^[91] The arrangement's porosity has amplified security vulnerabilities, facilitating arms trafficking, counterfeit currency circulation, and militant infiltration; for example, groups like the Khalistan Liberation Force have exploited it for logistics, contributing to incidents in Indian border states. Human trafficking networks prey on vulnerable populations, with thousands of women and children reportedly moved annually for exploitation.^[92] These risks have spurred demands for fencing or biometrics, though cultural proximity and treaty obligations hinder closure, illustrating causal trade-offs between economic fluidity and sovereign control.^[93]

High-Immigration Policy Failures

Sweden's asylum policies, which granted refuge to 162,877 applicants in 2015 alone—the highest per capita rate in the European Union—exemplified high-immigration approaches but yielded integration shortfalls.^[94] By 2023, non-Western immigrants exhibited unemployment rates exceeding 20%, compared to under 5% for native Swedes, straining the generous welfare system with net fiscal costs estimated at 1-2% of GDP annually for low-skilled cohorts.^[95] Crime statistics further underscored failures: foreign-born individuals, comprising 20% of the population, accounted for over 50% of suspects in lethal violence cases by 2022, correlating with a surge in gang-related shootings that positioned Sweden as Europe's leader in per capita gun homicides.^[96] These outcomes prompted policy reversals, including tightened borders and deportations, as acknowledged in government statements recognizing societal disruptions from unchecked inflows.^[97] Germany's 2015 decision to suspend Dublin regulations and accept over 1 million asylum seekers, primarily from Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq, imposed substantial economic burdens. Integration efforts faltered, with only 50% of 2015-2016 arrivals employed by 2022, yielding net fiscal deficits of €20-30 billion yearly due to welfare dependencies and language barriers.^[98] Crime data from the Federal Criminal Police Office revealed non-Germans (12% of population) as suspects in 41% of violent crimes by 2023, including the Cologne New Year's Eve 2015-2016 assaults involving over 1,200 women victimized by migrant groups, which exposed vetting and cultural assimilation gaps.^[99] Public backlash manifested in the Alternative for Germany party's electoral gains, reflecting perceived policy overreach amid persistent parallel societies in urban enclaves.^[100] In the United Kingdom, net migration exceeding 700,000 annually since 2022 exacerbated pressures on infrastructure. Housing shortages intensified, with immigrants occupying disproportionate social housing shares despite lower homeownership rates, contributing to a deficit of 4.3 million units by 2023 as population growth outpaced construction.^[101] The National Health Service faced compounded strain, with waiting lists surpassing 7.6 million in 2024, partly attributable to higher per capita healthcare utilization among recent non-EU migrants reliant on public services.^[102] Social cohesion eroded in high-immigration locales, evidenced by riots and segregation patterns, as noted in governmental analyses linking rapid demographic shifts to weakened community ties.^[103] These cases illustrate recurrent patterns in high-immigration regimes: initial humanitarian impulses yielding fiscal drains, elevated criminality from unvetted or unintegrated cohorts, and societal fractures, often underreported in academia due to prevailing ideological preferences for open policies. Empirical reviews confirm that lax enforcement correlates with such disequilibria, absent robust selection mechanisms.^[104]

Contemporary Debates and Policy Realities

Recent Global Developments (2020s)

In the early 2020s, the COVID-19 pandemic prompted widespread border closures globally, temporarily halting irregular migration flows and exposing vulnerabilities in open-border advocacy by demonstrating the feasibility of rapid enforcement measures.^[105] By 2021, however, surges resumed, with the United States recording over 1.7 million southwest land border encounters in fiscal year 2021, escalating to peaks exceeding 2.4 million annually by 2022-2023 amid relaxed enforcement under the Biden administration.^[106] These developments, coupled with humanitarian and security strains, fueled political backlash, exemplified by the 2024 U.S. presidential election where immigration became a pivotal issue, leading to stricter policies post-inauguration.^[107] By mid-2025, U.S. border encounters plummeted to historic lows, with July 2025 detections at approximately 4,600— a 91.8% decline from July 2024—and overall apprehensions reaching levels not seen since 1970.^[108]^[109] This shift resulted from reinstated restrictions, expanded biometrics, heightened deportations, and bilateral agreements with Mexico, reducing unauthorized entries by nearly 50% in early 2025 compared to 2021.^[110]^[111] Similar trends emerged in Europe, where irregular arrivals fell to 280,000 in 2023 from 2015 peaks, driven by the EU's New Pact on Migration and Asylum, which emphasized external border controls, rapid returns, and burden-sharing among member states.^[112] Countries like Hungary and Sweden adopted tougher stances, with Sweden recording fewer asylum applications after policy reversals from prior open-door approaches.^[113] Worldwide, anti-immigration policy shifts accelerated, with Canada tightening work permit eligibility and Australia maintaining stringent offshore processing amid public concerns over integration costs.^[114] The rise of enforcement-oriented governments, including in the U.S. and parts of Europe, reflected empirical evidence of fiscal burdens and security risks from unchecked inflows, as unauthorized immigrant populations reached 14 million in the U.S. by 2023.^[115] These changes underscored a retreat from de facto open-border experiments, prioritizing sovereignty and capacity limits over unrestricted mobility.^[116]

Feasibility and Alternatives

Implementing open borders on a national scale faces significant logistical, security, and infrastructural barriers, as evidenced by historical precedents where initially permissive policies were abandoned due to overwhelming inflows and resultant strains. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, countries including the United States, Canada, Australia, Argentina, and Brazil actively encouraged immigration but reversed course through quotas and restrictions by the 1920s, driven by concerns over labor market saturation, wage suppression, and social integration challenges that eroded public support.^[117] These reversals highlight a pattern: unrestricted entry leads to rapid demographic shifts that exceed administrative capacities for vetting entrants, with modern estimates suggesting billions could migrate under fully open regimes, far outpacing any conceivable border processing infrastructure.^[118] Security feasibility is further compromised by the inability to conduct comprehensive background checks, health screenings, or identity verifications at mass scales, increasing risks of unvetted criminal elements or disease vectors entering undetected. For instance, even partial border relaxations, such as those in the European Union's Schengen Area, have prompted secondary movements and enforcement gaps that strain internal security resources, underscoring how open external borders amplify vulnerabilities in interconnected systems.^[119] Health infrastructure challenges compound this, as unchecked mass mobility could facilitate rapid spread of infectious diseases without quarantine or vaccination mandates, a risk amplified in welfare states where public health systems bear the costs.^[120] Economic models projecting gains from open borders often abstract away these frictions, assuming frictionless adjustment and ignoring fiscal burdens from sudden population surges on housing, transportation, and services, which empirical border management data indicate would collapse under volume.^[121] Alternatives to open borders emphasize selective, managed migration frameworks that capture labor mobility benefits while mitigating risks through criteria-based entry. Points-based systems, pioneered by Canada in 1967 and Australia in 1979, allocate visas based on skills, education, language proficiency, and employability, yielding higher integration success: in Australia, points-tested migrants exhibit strong employment outcomes and contribute disproportionately to innovation without broad wage depression.^[122]^[123] Canada's system similarly prioritizes economic contributions, with adjustments over time improving labor market matches and reducing dependency on public services, though it requires ongoing calibration to avoid skill mismatches.^[124] Guest worker programs offer another controlled pathway, providing temporary visas tied to specific labor shortages, as seen in U.S. H-2A and H-2B programs admitting hundreds of thousands annually for agriculture and seasonal work. These reduce unauthorized entries by legalizing demand-driven flows—historical expansions correlated with lower illegal crossings—while limiting permanent settlement to prevent cultural or fiscal overload, though they demand safeguards against employer exploitation to ensure worker protections.^[125]^[126] Circular migration models, blending temporary stays with return incentives, further balance needs by fostering remittances and skill transfers to origin countries without indefinite residency claims.^[127] Such alternatives, grounded in verifiable labor gaps rather than unrestricted access, sustain economic gains—estimated at trillions globally from moderated mobility—while preserving sovereign control over security and cohesion.^[128]

References

[1]
[PDF] Radical Case for Open Borders - Columbia Law School Blogs
Aug 27, 2020 · Open borders will thus grow the world economy. By how much? The most serious review of the academic evidence concludes that unrestricted ...
[2]
The Economic Case for Opening America's Borders - Hillsdale College
Open borders in goods – or free trade – allows physical resources to flow where they can be deployed most productively for their highest and best use. Likewise, ...Missing: "peer | Show results with:"peer
[3]
Trillion Dollar Bills on the Sidewalk: The Borjas Critique - Econlib
Jul 16, 2014 · George Borjas' new Immigration Economics contains the first intellectually serious critique of the increasingly mainstream view that open ...
[4]
Economic and Fiscal Impact of Immigration | National Academies
The new report looks how immigration may affect wages and income of native-born US workers, the labor market, and fiscal health at the federal, state, and ...Missing: borders empirical
[5]
[PDF] The Fiscal Impact of Immigration - Cato Institute
Jul 23, 2014 · The fiscal impact of radically liberalized immigration or open borders would be determined by the government's fiscal policy. Even if the ...
[6]
Forget the Wall Already, It's Time for the U.S. to Have Open Borders
Jul 31, 2018 · The solution to America's immigration problems is open borders, under which the United States imposes no immigration restrictions at all.
[7]
Open Borders: A Long-read Q&A with Bryan Caplan
Nov 29, 2019 · The key idea of open borders is the idea that anyone can take a job anywhere. You're free to live and work in any country you want.Missing: advocacy Clemens
[8]
Joseph Carens | Politics, Principles, and Open Borders
Mar 30, 2021 · These are some basic, unavoidable facts: We have to use overt force to prevent people from moving. We need borders with barriers and guards with ...
[9]
Should There Be Open Borders? - UC San Diego Today
Apr 18, 2019 · “Immigrants and their descendants are entitled to expect that they will have equal access to social, economic and political opportunities, and ...
[10]
Open Borders for Inclusive Prosperity - Aspen Institute
Jan 25, 2021 · Open borders significantly increase global wealth. It is a rare example of a public policy that improves the well-being of practically everyone.<|separator|>
[11]
Immigration - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
May 10, 2010 · The cosmopolitan egalitarian case for open borders combines the core moral insight that all human beings, whether they are compatriots or ...<|separator|>
[12]
Why Open Borders? - Free Migration Project
Open borders are supported by libertarian, left, and faith-based moral arguments, economic benefits, and practical benefits for migrants, sending and receiving ...
[13]
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-mono/10.4324/9781315638300-1/introduction-harald-bauder
[14]
Freedom of movement and the police state to be - Econlib
Dec 13, 2019 · In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith deplores how restraining competition hinders workmen in their efforts to employ “the strength and dexterity ...
[15]
Kant's Cosmopolitan Law: World Citizenship for a Global Order
Sep 27, 2011 · He argues that states and individuals have the right to attempt to establish relations with other states and their citizens, but not a right to ...
[16]
The Right to Leave - | Lapham's Quarterly
Even other Enlightenment thinkers sympathetic to the idea of open migration, such as the political philosopher John Locke and the legal theorist Emmerich de ...
[17]
Open border - Wikipedia
An open border is a border that enables free movement of people (and often of goods) between jurisdictions with no restrictions on movementTypes of borders · Political debate · Examples of open borders
[18]
The Immigration Act of 1924 (The Johnson-Reed Act)
The 1924 Act limited immigration via quotas based on 1890 census, excluded Asians, and aimed to preserve U.S. homogeneity.
[19]
A Brief History of U.S. Immigration Policy from the Colonial Period to ...
Aug 3, 2021 · During the early 1900s, many Progressives argued that immigrants impeded the achievement of an ideal society, committed crimes, and abused ...
[20]
A Century Later, Restrictive 1924 U.S. Immigration Law Has ...
May 15, 2024 · The Immigration Act of 1924 shaped the US population over the course of the 20th century, greatly restricting immigration.
[21]
Historical Overview of Immigration Policy
US immigration policy shifted from open immigration in the 1800s to national-origins quotas, then to a preference system in 1965, and the 1980s Refugee Act. ...
[22]
The Tragedy of the Political Exiles - Marxists Internet Archive
The war for democracy and the advent of the left and right dictatorships destroyed whatever freedom of movement political refugees had formerly enjoyed. ... Emma ...
[23]
Libertarians Can Believe in Borders - Law & Liberty
Oct 27, 2015 · Apparently as a libertarian, I believe that countries should not limit entrance and exit across geographic boundaries.
[24]
Aliens and Citizens: - The Case for Open Borders - Joseph H. Carens
Many poor and oppressed people wish to leave their countries of origin in the third world to come to affluent Western societies. This essay argues that.
[25]
Economics and Emigration: Trillion-Dollar Bills on the Sidewalk?
Aug 19, 2011 · Pecuniary externalities are a near-universal feature of economic decisions. In standard economic analysis, they offer no welfare justification ...
[26]
The Economic Case For Open Borders - Forbes
Jan 19, 2021 · A central argument made by Caplan is that developed countries often have the infrastructure, the networks, and the resources to enable ...
[27]
Open Borders: The Science and Ethics of Immigration - Amazon.com
30-day returnsBut economist Bryan Caplan adds a new, compelling perspective to the immigration debate: He argues that opening all borders could eliminate absolute poverty ...
[28]
Exploring the economic argument for a return to open US borders
Jun 16, 2021 · Bryan Caplan: Right now, immigration laws are trapping enormous amounts of human talent in low-productivity countries.
[29]
Is There a Right to Immigrate?
My strategy is to argue, first, that immigration restriction is at least a prima facie violation of the rights of potential immigrants.
[30]
Michael Huemer, Is There a Right to Immigrate? - PhilPapers
Immigration restrictions violate the prima facie right of potential immigrants not to be subject to harmful coercion.
[31]
The Libertarian Argument for Open Borders
Oct 16, 2014 · Libertarians should support open borders, with possible exceptions for the exclusion of convicted criminals and people carrying disease.
[32]
Bryan Caplan | Open Borders: The Case
Bryan Caplan is a libertarian economics professor at George Mason University. He is a passionate advocate of open borders on both libertarian and humanitarian ...
[33]
[PDF] Only libertarianism can provide a robust justification for open borders
Apr 21, 2022 · The paper argues that only libertarianism can justify open borders, as it vindicates immigration as a human right, unlike other theories.
[34]
3 The Libertarian Case for Open Borders - Oxford Academic
This chapter examines the libertarian case for open borders, with particular emphasis on how restrictive immigration legislation limits the rights of insiders.
[35]
Immigrants benefit the United States - Libertarian Party
“Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders,” the Libertarian Party platform states.
[36]
Immigration and the Constraints of Justice: Between Open Borders ...
In support of this position Pevnick offers his "associative ownership" theory -- not a general theory of sovereignty, but an account of an aspect of sovereignty ...
[37]
Stats and Summaries | U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Sep 17, 2025 · The Border Enforcement Statistics page provides data on apprehensions, findings of inadmissibility, recidivism, and arrests of criminal noncitizens at the ...CBP Enforcement Statistics · CBP Public Data Portal · Nationwide EncountersMissing: watchlist 2023-2025
[38]
Terrorists Crossing the US Border? Rising Numbers Explained (1)
Jun 17, 2024 · The US Border Patrol reported 172 encounters in fiscal 2023 of people whose names appeared on the federal government's official list of known or suspected ...<|separator|>
[39]
Federal Report Shows Open Borders Bring Increased Crimes and ...
Almost half of all of the criminals prosecuted in federal courts in 2018 were aliens, charged with crimes ranging from drug trafficking to murder to kidnapping.
[40]
Comparing crime rates between undocumented immigrants, legal ...
Dec 7, 2020 · Any individual deemed “illegal” by the DHS is considered to be an undocumented immigrant. Legal immigrants comprise three groups: those ...
[41]
Joe Biden's Immigration Policies Are a National Security Threat
Nov 21, 2021 · An open border is a serious national security risk. Open borders, where illegal aliens can cross with relative impunity, invite criminal ...
[42]
Border Security
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), a DHS component, is one of the world's largest law enforcement organizations and the United States' first unified ...Small Vessel Security · Trusted Traveler Programs · Measuring Effectiveness · Trade
[43]
A Graphic Case For Open Borders - Hoover Institution
Nov 14, 2019 · A graphic case for open borders. Brian Caplan makes muscular arguments for immigration. Wednesday, November 13, 2019 6 min read.
[44]
Immigration and the welfare state | Oxford Review of Economic Policy
Jun 6, 2025 · This article examines the empirical evidence surrounding three key questions: first, whether generous welfare systems attract immigrants disproportionately.
[45]
New Report Assesses the Economic and Fiscal Consequences of ...
Sep 21, 2016 · In terms of fiscal impacts, first-generation immigrants are more costly to governments, mainly at the state and local levels, than are the ...<|separator|>
[46]
Know the flow | George Borjas - Harvard University
If the total tax rate (including federal, state, and local taxes) was 30 per cent, immigrant households paid about $85.4 billion in taxes. The calculation thus ...
[47]
https://www.economist.com/europe/2017/06/08/immigration-is-changing-the-swedish-welfare-state
[48]
Immigration is changing the Swedish welfare state - The Economist
Jun 8, 2017 · But it touched on a real problem: large-scale immigration is putting a strain on Sweden's welfare system. Sweden has long been admired for its ...
[49]
Look to Milton: Open borders and the welfare state
But in practice, pursuit of these dual libertarian goals of opening borders and ending the redistributionist welfare state often leads to contradictions.
[50]
The Indirect Fiscal Benefits of Low-Skilled Immigration
An empirical quantification for the United States reveals an indirect fiscal benefit for one average low-skilled immigrant of roughly $750 annually.
[51]
The Lifetime Fiscal Impact of Immigrants - Manhattan Institute
Sep 19, 2024 · All immigrants who did not complete high school cost the federal government $300,000 or more, and all immigrants without a bachelor's degree ...
[52]
[PDF] Open Borders - National Bureau of Economic Research
Open borders also affect the incentive to invest in human capital; in a more general treatment, one would not take the numbers of skilled and unskilled workers ...
[53]
[PDF] Immigration and Economic Growth
Despite the contentious policy debate over immigration, only a handful of studies study the empirical link between immigration and long-term growth. ... Borjas, ...Missing: open | Show results with:open
[54]
Effects of the Immigration Surge on the Federal Budget and the ...
Jul 23, 2024 · The increase in immigration boosts federal revenues as well as mandatory spending and interest on the debt in CBO's baseline projections, lowering deficits.
[55]
[PDF] Economic Impacts of Immigration: A Survey
This paper surveys economic impacts of immigration, including its magnitude, immigrant assimilation, effects on natives, public finances, and emerging topics.
[56]
What Immigration Means For U.S. Employment and Wages | Brookings
In particular, some estimates suggest that immigration has reduced the wages of low-skilled workers and college graduates. This research, shown by the blue ...
[57]
[PDF] Do immigrant workers depress the wages of native workers?
Immigration has a very small effect on the average wages of native workers. There is little evidence of immigration lowering wages of less educated native ...
[58]
5 Employment and Wage Impacts of Immigration: Empirical Evidence
Further, where the availability of low-skilled immigrants at lower wages allows businesses to expand, total employment will rise. Wage and employment effects ...
[59]
[PDF] Immigration Restrictions and the Wages of Low-Skilled Labor
Abstract. This paper examines how the U.S. immigration restrictions of the 1920s affected the wages of low-skilled workers using newly digitized annual wage ...
[60]
[PDF] The fiscal impact of immigration on the advanced economies
Highly skilled migrants contribute fiscally, while unskilled may impose a net cost. Overall, the fiscal contribution of immigration is small, with positive and ...
[61]
[PDF] The fiscal impact of immigration - A review of the evidence - ODI
In host countries, migrants can fill important labour gaps, contribute to public service delivery and increase government revenues through taxes and social.
[62]
(PDF) Migrants and Crime in Sweden in the Twenty-First Century
Based on 33 per cent of the population (2017), 58 per cent of those suspect for total crime on reasonable grounds are migrants. Regarding murder, manslaughter ...
[63]
Nearly two thirds of convicted rapists in Sweden are migrants or ...
Jan 18, 2025 · Almost two-thirds of those convicted of rape in Sweden are first- or second-generation immigrants.
[64]
Violent crime rises in Germany and is attributed to refugees | Reuters
Jan 3, 2018 · Violent crime rose by about 10 percent in 2015 and 2016, a study showed. It attributed more than 90 percent of that to young male refugees.
[65]
Do refugees impact crime? Causal evidence from large-scale ...
Our results indicate that crime rates were not affected during the year of refugee arrival, but there was an increase in crime rates one year later.
[66]
New Cato Research Shows That Illegal Immigrants Are Less Likely ...
Jun 26, 2024 · Over the ten years from 2013 to 2022, the homicide conviction rate in Texas for illegal immigrants was 2.2 per 100,000, compared to 3.0 per ...
[67]
Misuse of Texas Data Understates Illegal Immigrant Criminality
Oct 11, 2022 · The DPS data suggests that illegal immigrants in Texas are convicted of homicide and sexual assault at higher rates than the state average.
[68]
Criminal Alien Statistics | U.S. Customs and Border Protection
The following is a summary of US Border Patrol enforcement actions related to arrests of criminal aliens for Fiscal Years 2017 - 2025.FY 2024 · FY 2023 · FY 2021
[69]
Fiscal Year 2024 Ends With Nearly 3 Million Inadmissible ...
Oct 24, 2024 · 385 illegal aliens on the terrorist watchlist have been apprehended between ports of entry at the Southwest border since FY2021. Encounters at ...
[70]
House Judiciary: Biden-Harris Admin Has Released 'At Least' 99 ...
Aug 8, 2024 · According to CBP's “Enforcement Statistics” web page, Border Patrol agents have apprehended 94 aliens on the terrorist watchlist in the first ...
[71]
Does Immigration Induce Terrorism? | The Journal of Politics
The results suggest that migrants stemming from terrorist-prone states moving to another country are indeed an important vehicle through which terrorism does ...
[72]
Undocumented immigration and terrorism: Is there a connection?
... Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. The GTD is an open-source database of terrorist attacks (both domestic and international) from around the ...
[73]
Explainer: Immigrants and Crime in the United States
... Immigrants and the US-born, 1870-2020, March 2024; Proceedings of the National Academy of Social Sciences, Comparing Crime Rates Between Undocumented Immigrants ...
[74]
The Downside of Diversity
A Harvard political scientist finds that diversity hurts civic life. What happens when a liberal scholar unearths an inconvenient truth?
[75]
Does Diversity Create Distrust? - Scientific American
Nov 29, 2016 · In 2007 the Harvard professor Robert Putnam published a paper that appeared to challenge the benefits of living in a racially diverse society.
[76]
[PDF] mass migration in europe: assimilation, integration, and security ...
May 23, 2018 · there are separate minorities, where we set up parallel societies. And the problem with the issue of toleration is that when you push it to ...<|separator|>
[77]
Immigration without Assimilation Endangers Europe's Future
Oct 6, 2023 · Mass migration has also fueled social chaos, including jihadist terrorism, and rising levels of crime, including mass sexual violence ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[78]
Judy Asks: Is Migration Europe's Achilles Heel?
Nov 24, 2022 · On the internal front, most countries failed to integrate migrants and prevent the creation of parallel societies. In recent years, even the ...
[79]
Dimensions of Migrant Integration in Western Europe - PMC
In this paper, we give a comprehensive description of long-term migrant integration in Western Europe to investigate theories of migrant assimilation and ...
[80]
Ethnic Diversity and Social Trust: Evidence from the Micro-Context
We argue that residential exposure to ethnic diversity reduces social trust. Previous within-country analyses of the relationship between contextual ethnic ...Research Design · Analysis · Appendix
[81]
Immigration Diversity and Social Cohesion - Migration Observatory
Dec 13, 2019 · The empirical evidence from the US suggests a negative relationship between diversity and cohesion. The evidence from the UK and rest of Europe ...
[82]
Immigrant influx and social cohesion erosion
Mar 24, 2014 · The present analysis finds some evidence for a negative relationship between immigration and volunteering from the Current Population Survey 2004–2008 ...
[83]
Diversity Barometer 2020: Attitudes towards Immigration and Ethnic ...
Extreme attitudes towards ethnic diversity risk increasing polarization and tensions between different groups in the Swedish population, which in turn may ...
[84]
Immigration, diversity and trust: the competing and intersecting role ...
Jan 21, 2022 · Empirical evidence on the effect of language on social cohesion is limited, and what evidence exists is somewhat mixed, with some studies ...
[85]
In defence of open borders: Why Schengen remains valuable
Jun 15, 2016 · If Schengen were abolished, the same report predicts, intra-Schengen trade would drop by 10-20%. Similarly, a German study calculated that ...
[86]
Schengen: enlargement of Europe's border-free area | Topics
Jun 25, 2024 · Schengen, the EU's passport-free travel area, covers 29 countries. Read on to learn which countries are members and who is likely to join next.
[87]
'Half-dead' Schengen limps on amid increased migration anxiety
Aug 13, 2025 · Despite a decline in irregular migration, EU member states are extending temporary border controls amid geopolitical tensions and political ...
[88]
Full article: Schengen Borders as Lines that Continue to Separate ...
Feb 23, 2022 · Especially cross-border crime and (feelings of) insecurity due to “open” borders are virulently discussed topics in the German–Polish border ...
[89]
Border controls in Europe undermine the Schengen Area and the ...
Sep 16, 2025 · At the time of writing, the Schengen Area is experiencing continued border controls and stricter EU migration policies. Countries like Germany, ...
[90]
[PDF] D People movement - The Treasury New Zealand
This paper assesses the impacts and implications of unrestricted travel and an open labour market across the Tasman. The first section provides an overview of.
[91]
Trans-Tasman Bubble: A Bubble Worth Popping? - Public Policy Club
Jul 24, 2021 · Two critical arguments for the travel bubble that have been highlighted is its potential to boost the economy and tourism industry, and its ...
[92]
Krishnadev Asked: Why does India have an open border with Nepal?
An open border has also allowed many Nepalese citizens to find employment in India and Indians to open business ventures in Nepal. Facebook X ...
[93]
An Analysis of Security Concerns Arising From Indo-Nepal Open ...
Nov 25, 2022 · By bringing in illegal operations like money laundering, human trafficking, drug smuggling, and arms trafficking, among others, an open border ...
[94]
How an open India-Nepal border poses a challenge for India - OpIndia
Sep 11, 2025 · Threats of smuggling, crime, infiltration and terrorism endanger the open border. In this report, we explain the India-Nepal relations in detail ...
[95]
Sweden: By Turns Welcoming and Restrictive in its Immigration Policy
Dec 6, 2018 · Although Swedish integration policy has fared well compared to other EU countries, the country nonetheless faces persistent integration problems ...Missing: costs | Show results with:costs
[96]
Sweden faces a crisis because of flood of immigrants - GIS Reports
Feb 9, 2024 · The Scandinavian nation of 10.6 million people is facing a national crisis because of its failure to successfully integrate record numbers of immigrants.
[97]
https://www.government.se/speeches/2022/10/statement-of-government-policy/
[98]
Statement of Government Policy
Oct 18, 2022 · ... policy, with the aim of finding serious solutions to Sweden's major societal problems. ... cost of energy policy failures – must be eliminated.
[99]
Germany's Syrian Refugee Integration Experiment
Sep 6, 2018 · “Merkel says Germany must learn from its 'guest worker' mistakes for refugee crisis,” Reuters, September 9, 2015, https://www.nytimes.com ...
[100]
[PDF] The 2015 Migrant Crisis: An Impact to Germany? - Scholars Crossing
Feb 3, 2023 · ... failures in current immigration policies as the Migrant Crisis set a precedent and an influx of migrants is likely to occur again. Third, it ...
[101]
Between hope and illusion | OSW Centre for Eastern Studies
Jan 8, 2024 · The conviction that the state is excessively burdened and lacks agency, combined with the immigrants' failure to integrate and the street riots ...
[102]
Pressure on Healthcare, Schools, Roads and Trains
Jul 18, 2019 · Claims that migrants are less likely to occupy social housing than the UK-born population are highly misleading. 'Immigration may reduce access ...
[103]
Population Growth: Impact of Immigration - Hansard - UK Parliament
Jun 27, 2023 · It is not just housing that is at breaking point. Our public services are also creaking under the strain of mass immigration. Take the NHS ...
[104]
[PDF] the impacts of migration on social cohesion and integration - gov.uk
The impacts of immigration have been felt in areas ranging from jobs, education and housing through to language, diet and the arts. The combined social ...
[105]
The Rise of Sweden Democrats: Islam, Populism and the End of ...
Mar 25, 2020 · ... Sweden. Sweden Democrats do not believe that problems of crime or integration stem primarily from failures of socioeconomic policy or government ...The 2015 Refugee Crisis · Violence · Strains On Welfare And...Missing: costs | Show results with:costs
[106]
Top 10 Migration Issues of 2020 | migrationpolicy.org
In 2020 the COVID-19 pandemic brought a sweeping halt to global migration and mobility, leading to far-reaching consequences for migrants and countries.Issue No. 1: Covid-19... · Issue No. 2: 2020 Deals... · Issue No. 5: Persistent...
[107]
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/100-days-of-immigration-under-the-second-trump-administration/
[108]
100 days of immigration under the second Trump administration
Border flows have continued to fall in early 2025, with authorities allowing almost no humanitarian migrants to cross the border, as can be seen in the most ...
[109]
How many illegal crossings are attempted at the US-Mexico border ...
About 4.6K attempted crossings were detected in July 2025, 91.8% fewer than in July 2024. These attempted crossings, sometimes referred to as “encounters,” ...Missing: terror watchlist
[110]
Illegal US-Mexico border crossings hit lowest level in over 50 years
Oct 7, 2025 · It is the lowest number of apprehensions since 1970, when border patrol agents stopped 202,000 people crossing the US-Mexico border unlawfully.
[111]
The Trump Administration Moves to Reinstate Restrictions on Legal ...
Aug 18, 2025 · The Trump Administration Moves to Reinstate Restrictions on Legal Immigration Proposed in First Term · Expanded biometrics & surveillance: · New ...
[112]
FACT SHEET: DHS Has Taken Unprecedented Steps Resulting in a ...
Jan 17, 2025 · In the first half of January 2025, Border Patrol encounters are nearly 50 percent lower than at the same point in January 2021.<|separator|>
[113]
Response to the migration crisis and force majeure situations
Total irregular arrivals to the EU have dropped from 1.04 million in 2015 to 0.28 million in 2023. The breakdown per migratory route in 2024 is as follows:.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[114]
Migrant crisis: How Europe went from Merkel's 'We can do it ... - BBC
Sep 3, 2025 · So far this year a total of 96,200 asylum seekers have been recorded arriving. So can tough new controls really further bring down the numbers ...Asylum Applications To... · Hungary's Tough Stance · A Changing SwedenMissing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[115]
Global Immigration Trends and Highlights - January to March 2025
The US passed stricter border security and deportation measures, and Canada tightened work permit eligibility for certain applicants. These changes signal a ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[116]
Record 14 Million Unauthorized Immigrants Lived in the US in 2023
Aug 21, 2025 · Another 1.0 million migrants encountered by U.S. Border Patrol were released into the U.S., typically with orders to appear in immigration court ...
[117]
[PDF] ICMPD Migration Outlook 2025
Jan 19, 2025 · Key migration issues in 2025 include growing global displacement, uncertain European trends, restrictive policies, and the impact of the second ...
[118]
How Open Borders Died in Five Countries - Econlib
Oct 10, 2018 · During the last half of the 19th century , many countries competed to attract immigrants. All of them eventually reversed course, ...
[119]
When Do Open Borders Make Economic Sense? - Kellogg Insight
Mar 2, 2020 · When the government can levy different taxes, the researchers find, the optimal policy is still to have open borders. A more realistic scenario ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[120]
The role of open borders and cross-border cooperation in regional ...
Nov 13, 2020 · This paper estimates the impacts of opening of borders and intensity of cross-border cooperation (CBC) on regional growth across European border regions.
[121]
A border health crisis at the United States-Mexico border: an urgent ...
This highlights that the new border infrastructure not only led to increased morbidity and mortality but resulted in an increased resource burden on the U.S. ...
[122]
[PDF] The New Economic Case for Migration Restrictions: An Assessment
The new “epidemi- ological” argument against “open borders” relies on hypothetical deleterious impacts on productivity in the host country from “too many ...
[123]
Canada's Long-Standing Openness to Immigr.. | migrationpolicy.org
Jun 24, 2025 · This shift culminated in the 1967 introduction of the points system, which assessed applicants on education, language, work experience, and age.
[124]
The Australian points-based system: what is it and what would its ...
Jul 22, 2019 · Employment outcomes for points-tested migrants in Australia have been relatively good, however.
[125]
ARCHIVED – Labour Market Outcomes for Migrant Professionals
Mar 6, 2020 · In Canada 65% of degree-qualified 1996-2001 arrivals had secured work by 2001, compared to 62% of migrants holding post-secondary diplomas. In ...
[126]
U.S. Temporary Foreign Worker Visa Programs
U.S. Temporary Foreign Worker Visa Programs ... The United States accepts hundreds of thousands of foreign workers each year in a variety of industries.
[127]
How Guest Workers Affect Illegal Immigration | Cato Institute
Dec 1, 2022 · This analysis tracks the history of guest worker programs and their rules as a policy to manage migration flows from Mexico.
[128]
Rethinking border enforcement, permanent and circular migration
In this paper, we develop a theory of circular and permanent migration as an alternative setup in which to assess the effects of border enforcement.
[129]
[PDF] Open Borders in the European Union and Beyond: Migration Flows ...
They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2017 by John ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition