Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pereh

The Pereh (Hebrew: פרא, meaning "wild") is an anti-tank guided carrier developed for the () and designed to mimic the appearance of a standard for operational . Built on the of the 5 tank—a locally modified variant of the American M48/ Patton series—the vehicle features an enlarged turret housing a vertical launcher for twelve Spike-NLOS (also known as Tamuz) anti-tank missiles, with a non-functional dummy 105mm gun barrel to preserve its tank-like . Introduced in the 1980s following heavy armored losses in the 1973 , the Pereh enabled long-range precision engagements up to 25 kilometers while integrating seamlessly with tank formations, its existence maintained as a closely guarded secret until official in 2015. Operated by a crew of four—including a , driver, and two missile operators—from the Artillery Corps, it provided standoff strike capability against enemy armor and fortifications, contributing to Israel's qualitative military edge through innovative and firepower. The system was phased out of service in 2017, replaced by more advanced platforms, though its prolonged secrecy underscored effective operational security in doctrine.

Design and Characteristics

Physical Configuration

The Pereh utilizes the hull of the Magach 5 tank, an Israeli-upgraded variant of the medium tank, providing a robust base for tracked mobility and armor. The hull measures approximately 6.5 meters in length, 3.6 meters in width, and 2.95 meters in height in its standard configuration, though modifications may alter these slightly; it is fitted with explosive reactive armor (ERA) modules across vulnerable surfaces to enhance protection against shaped-charge warheads. The superstructure features an enlarged designed to conceal a pop-up launcher array capable of deploying twelve Rafael Spike-NLOS (Non-Line-of-Sight) anti-tank guided missiles, each with a range exceeding 25 kilometers. This includes a non-functional protruding forward to simulate a conventional , facilitating operational deception; the missile launcher elevates from the rear during firing sequences, enabling 360-degree engagement while a rear-mounted curved supports . The overall vehicle weight is estimated at around 50 tons, balancing firepower with battlefield maneuverability. Propulsion is provided by a (General Dynamics) AVDS-1790-2D air-cooled V12 diesel engine delivering 900 horsepower, driving a conventional transmission for speeds up to 48 kilometers per hour on roads and operational range of approximately 500 kilometers with internal fuel. Suspension consists of torsion bars inherited from the M48 design, supporting the vehicle's mass across six road wheels per side. Crew accommodations are limited to a compartment for three to four operators, with periscopes and limited vision blocks for under .

Armament and Guidance Systems

The Pereh missile carrier's primary armament consists of 12 Spike-NLOS anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs), designated Tamuz in Israeli service, housed in a pop-up launcher concealed within an enlarged atop the 5 hull. This configuration allows the vehicle to masquerade as a conventional while deploying missiles vertically for launch, with roof panels retracting to expose the ordnance. The Spike-NLOS missiles feature a tandem (HEAT) warhead capable of defeating modern armored vehicles, including reactive armor, and have a maximum range of approximately 25 kilometers. Guidance for the Spike-NLOS employs a hybrid electro-optical combining capability with man-in-the-loop control via a two-way fiber-optic or radio-frequency datalink. The missile is equipped with an imaging infrared (IIR) seeker and daytime (CCD) camera, enabling autonomous in direct-fire modes or remote operator guidance for non-line-of-sight engagements, where the operator receives video feed to adjust trajectory mid-flight. This versatility supports over terrain obstacles or against hidden targets, with the 's precision derived from advanced image processing algorithms for target lock-on. Secondary armament includes two 7.62 mm machine guns for close-range defense against threats, though the forward-facing 105 mm is non-functional and serves solely as . The missile launchers incorporate passive night-vision compatibility, allowing operations in low-light conditions without compromising . Overall, the armament prioritizes standoff precision strikes, leveraging the Spike-NLOS's extended range and guidance flexibility to engage enemy armor from concealed positions.

Mobility, Protection, and Crew

The Pereh employs a tracked based on the 5, a modernized variant, with six dual road wheels per side and for enhanced cross-country performance. It is powered by a AVDS-1790-2D 12-cylinder air-cooled delivering 750 horsepower, enabling a maximum road speed of 50 km/h and an operational range of 480 km. This allows integration with main armored forces while facilitating rapid repositioning for missile launches. Protection relies on the inherited steel armor of the Magach hull, supplemented by explosive reactive armor (ERA) on the frontal arc and side skirt plates to counter shaped-charge warheads. Additional frontal glacis reinforcement provides resilience against kinetic threats, though the modified turret—enlarged to conceal up to 12 missiles—features comparatively lighter armor to balance weight constraints. The design prioritizes deception, mimicking a standard tank to evade targeted strikes, over comprehensive heavy armor. A crew of four operates the Pereh: commander, gunner (for ), loader, and driver. Positioned within the and , they utilize electro-optical systems for beyond-line-of-sight targeting, with the loader managing missile reloading from internal storage. This setup supports sustained missions while minimizing exposure.

Development and Production

Historical Context and Rationale

The Pereh missile carrier emerged from Israel's military lessons during the Yom Kippur War, in which Arab armored forces—primarily Egyptian and Syrian tanks—nearly overwhelmed defenses through massed assaults, exposing vulnerabilities in direct tank engagements and the limitations of short-range anti-tank weapons. This conflict, fought from to 25, 1973, resulted in heavy losses despite eventual victories, prompting a doctrinal shift toward standoff precision strikes to neutralize numerically superior enemy armor before close-range combat. Experiences in the further underscored the evolving threats from advanced enemy tanks, reinforcing the need for integrated, mobile anti-tank systems within armored formations. The rationale for the Pereh centered on deploying long-range guided missiles from a heavily armored, tracked to enhance survivability and against fortified armored threats, moving beyond vulnerable towed or air-delivered options. Developed in the alongside the Tamuz (later Spike-NLOS) , the system addressed the requirement for a "" capability with electro-optical guidance and tandem-warhead penetration to defeat reactive armor, enabling engagements at distances up to 25 kilometers. By basing the design on the tank hull—a modified M48/ variant—the achieved deception through visual similarity to standard , preserving operational secrecy while leveraging existing for rapid mobility and protection. Strategically, the Pereh filled a gap in Israel's armored by providing assault-breaker capacity against concentrated formations, allowing units to deliver salvos of up to 12 missiles from concealed positions without exposing crews to immediate counterfire. This approach prioritized causal effectiveness in , where intelligence-driven, precision anti-armor strikes could disrupt enemy advances, informed by post-war analyses emphasizing armored mobility over static defenses. The system's secrecy until its partial revelation in 2015 reflected broader practices of concealing capabilities to maintain tactical surprise against regional adversaries.

Engineering Development Process

The engineering development of the Pereh commenced in the early 1980s under , paralleling the maturation of the Tamuz missile (later designated Spike-NLOS), to address vulnerabilities against massed armored threats revealed in the 1973 and . Engineers prioritized a standoff anti-tank platform capable of beyond-line-of-sight engagements, leveraging electro-optical guidance for ranges up to 25 km with tandem warheads. The core process involved converting surplus 5 main battle tanks—upgraded variants of the U.S. chassis—retaining the hull's sloped armor, , and Continental AVDS-1790-2D diesel engine (delivering 750–900 hp for 50 km/h mobility across varied terrain). The underwent extensive redesign: its structure was enlarged to house a battery of 12 missiles in a rear , with a retractable launcher mechanism deploying from the aft section for vertical launch, complemented by large access doors for rapid reloading under combat conditions. A non-functional dummy gun barrel was affixed to the front, alongside cosmetic fittings, to replicate the silhouette of operational tanks like the or series, thereby enabling seamless integration into armored formations while concealing the missile armament. Fire control integration focused on compatibility between the missile's command-link and the vehicle's stabilized , supporting 360-degree traversal and via mast-mounted sensors for over-the-horizon firing. Ancillary s included and remote 7.62 mm machine guns for , smoke grenade dischargers for evasion, and reinforced frontal armor to enhance crew survivability (typically reduced to three personnel operating remotely). Local industry handled production, yielding dozens to hundreds of units in classified facilities, with operational testing emphasizing , endurance, and tactics to multiply anti-tank effects beyond traditional gun-armed vehicles. The program's nature delayed public disclosure until 2015, underscoring engineering trade-offs favoring strategic surprise over overt capabilities.

Production and Secrecy

The Pereh was produced by converting hulls of older 5 main battle tanks, which involved removing the original and installing a reinforced superstructure housing up to 12 NLOS () anti-tank guided missiles behind a dummy facade to mimic a standard tank silhouette. These modifications occurred during the , aligning with the introduction of the Tammuz missile into service in 1981. The precise quantity of Pereh vehicles manufactured remains undisclosed, reflecting ongoing classification of production details. Secrecy was integral to the Pereh's design and deployment, achieved through visual as a conventional and operational restrictions limiting its movement to integrated armored formations to evade scrutiny. The system operated without public acknowledgment for over three decades, with initial unauthorized photographs emerging in 2013 and formal declassification occurring in 2015 amid its phase-out. Official confirmation followed its retirement in 2017, by which time stricter controls on classified imagery had been imposed on personnel to prevent leaks, as evidenced by disciplinary actions against soldiers posting images online. This veil of deception preserved tactical surprise against adversaries during engagements in and .

Operational History

Service Introduction and Early Use

The Pereh entered service with the in the early 1980s, initially armed with Tamuz anti-tank guided missiles and designed for covert long-range engagements against armored threats. Its development drew from combat experiences in the 1973 and , emphasizing the need for mobile, standoff anti-tank capabilities to counter massed enemy armor formations. Approximately 40 units were produced, operated under strict secrecy that concealed their true armament—a dummy atop a 5 chassis masking up to 12 ready-to-fire missiles. Early operational details remain sparse due to classification, with public acknowledgment only occurring upon retirement in 2017. The first reported combat use took place in 2005, when Pereh vehicles returned fire against Palestinian militants in the , demonstrating their role in border defense and rapid response. This was followed by deployment in the 2006 Second Lebanon War, where the system supported ground operations by engaging positions at extended ranges, exploiting its electro-optical guidance for precision strikes while preserving tactical surprise through visual deception.

Combat Deployments

The Pereh missile carrier entered combat during the Second Lebanon War in July–August 2006, where Israeli Defense Forces platforms launched 527 Spike-NLOS missiles against positions, providing long-range precision fire support from standoff distances of up to 25 kilometers. Images of the vehicle in operational areas surfaced online during the conflict but were promptly suppressed by Israeli military censors to maintain secrecy. Subsequent deployments included Operation Cast Lead in the from December 2008 to January 2009, in which Pereh units expended 122 missiles targeting infrastructure and fighters, leveraging the system's electro-optical guidance for urban engagements. The vehicle was routinely positioned along Israel's northern border with for border security and rapid response roles, enabling engagements of distant threats without exposing crews to . In Operation Protective Edge from July to August 2014, the Pereh fired 120 missiles, focusing on high-value targets such as command posts and launch sites amid dense urban terrain, where its tank-like camouflage aided survivability against anti-tank threats. These operations demonstrated the platform's versatility beyond traditional anti-armor roles, incorporating strikes on fortified structures and personnel, though specific tactical outcomes remain classified.

Retirement and Decommissioning

The Pereh missile carrier was retired from active service with the in 2017, marking the end of its operational deployment after approximately three decades of secretive use. This retirement coincided with the broader phase-out of the 's aging tank fleet, on which the Pereh's chassis was based, rendering maintenance increasingly challenging as spare parts for the 1950s-era M48 hull became scarce and the vehicle's disguised appearance less viable amid fleet modernization. The decommissioning process followed the vehicle's public revelation in May 2015, when images of the Pereh—previously classified—surfaced online, prompting official acknowledgment by authorities. While exact numbers of units decommissioned remain undisclosed due to the program's historical secrecy, reports indicate the did not pursue direct replacements with identical configurations, potentially shifting toward integrated missile systems on newer platforms like the tank or dedicated artillery vehicles. It remains uncertain whether the Pereh concept of a camouflaged, high-capacity launcher will influence future acquisitions, as no successor has been publicly confirmed.

Strategic Role and Evaluation

Tactical and Operational Advantages

The Pereh's primary tactical advantage stemmed from its deceptive design, which mimicked the appearance of a standard , allowing it to infiltrate enemy lines undetected and launch surprise salvos without revealing its true capabilities until engagement. This , featuring a faux with a dummy , enabled the to operate seamlessly within armored formations, exploiting enemy assumptions about conventional threats. Equipped with 12 non-line-of-sight (NLOS) anti-tank guided missiles in a 360-degree traversable launcher, the Pereh provided standoff engagement capabilities up to 25 kilometers, far exceeding typical ranges and allowing crews to neutralize high-value targets like enemy armor or fortifications from relative safety. The missiles' electro-optical guidance, combined with tandem-charge (HEAT) warheads, ensured precision strikes against modern armored vehicles, including those with reactive armor, while supporting both direct and top-attack profiles. Auxiliary features like smoke grenade launchers and dual 7.62mm machine guns further enhanced crew survivability during repositioning or close defense. Operationally, the Pereh's tank-derived chassis—offering cross-country mobility at speeds up to 55 km/h and an operational range of 450 km—facilitated integration into (IDF) maneuver units, amplifying armored offensives by delivering indirect, long-range fire support without compromising formation cohesion. This design addressed vulnerabilities exposed in prior conflicts, such as the 1973 , by providing a robust platform capable of overmatching adversary anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs) and supporting deeper battlefield strikes. Its deployment since the mid-1980s, including along the border, underscored its role in enhancing IDF tactical flexibility and deterrence through concealed precision firepower.

Limitations and Criticisms

The Pereh's reliance on a modified 5 tank chassis, derived from the 1950s-era , imposed significant mobility constraints compared to contemporary armored vehicles, with a top speed limited to approximately 48 km/h and vulnerability to modern anti-tank threats due to outdated armor schemes lacking advanced composite or reactive protections. This aging platform contributed to demands, exacerbating logistical burdens as Magach fleets were phased out, ultimately leading to the system's retirement in 2017. Lacking any genuine direct-fire capability, the Pereh featured only a dummy gun barrel for , rendering it ineffective in close-quarters engagements or against where its Spike-NLOS missiles—while capable of non-line-of-sight strikes up to 25-32 km—could not be rapidly reloaded or fired in high-volume scenarios without exposing the launchers. Critics have noted this design's to an overburdened swordsman, prioritizing long-range precision over versatility and thus limiting tactical maneuverability in fluid battles where enemies might close distances quickly. The fixed capacity of 12 missiles further constrained sustained operations, requiring resupply under potentially hazardous conditions. Operationally, the Pereh's secrecy, while initially advantageous, became a liability post-declassification in 2015 following inadvertent exposures, alerting adversaries like to its profile and potentially diminishing its surprise factor in future conflicts. Some analyses question the chassis choice for a long-range system, arguing that a lighter, more agile platform could have better matched the Spike NLOS's standoff capabilities without the pretense of tank-like durability, which proved illusory against evolving threats. No verified exist, suggesting limited real-world validation of its niche role amid IDF shifts toward integrated drone and precision-guided munitions.

Legacy and Influence on IDF Doctrine

The Pereh missile carrier, operational from the mid-1980s until its retirement around 2017, exemplified the Israel Defense Forces' (IDF) post-Yom Kippur War emphasis on standoff anti-tank capabilities to counter massed armored threats, influencing a doctrinal pivot toward precision-guided munitions integrated into mobile, deceptive platforms. Developed in response to the 1973 war's lessons, where Egyptian and Syrian tank formations nearly overwhelmed Israeli defenses, the Pereh's design—housing up to 12 Tamuz (later Spike-NLOS) missiles in a turret mimicking a Magach tank's silhouette—enabled long-range (up to 25 km) engagements from concealed positions, reducing exposure of forward units and prioritizing "assault breaker" tactics over direct tank-on-tank combat. This approach reinforced IDF operational doctrine's core tenets of initiative, deception, and synergy, as the Pereh operated within armored brigades to deliver support, allowing tanks like the to exploit breakthroughs while minimizing attrition from enemy ATGMs and artillery. Its deployment in major conflicts, including the and subsequent operations, validated the efficacy of vehicle-integrated, electro-optically guided missiles for deep strikes, contributing to a broader shift away from quantity-based armor defenses toward quality-driven, technology-enabled precision warfare. The system's secrecy until underscored the 's preference for asymmetric surprises, a echoed in later doctrines emphasizing fusion and rapid, low-signature fires to disrupt adversary concentrations before close engagement. In the long term, the Pereh's legacy informed IDF adaptations to evolving threats, such as and proliferated anti-tank systems, by promoting modular missile platforms on diverse chassis (e.g., subsequent integrations on APCs and drones), which enhanced maneuver forces' lethality without dedicated units. Retirement aligned with advancements in active protection systems like on tanks, obviating some standalone carrier needs, yet the doctrinal imprint persists in training emphases on standoff precision and camouflage, ensuring armored maneuvers retain offensive edge against numerically superior foes. This evolution reflects causal realism in strategy: empirical combat data from 1973 onward drove hardware innovations that sustained qualitative superiority, rather than mirroring adversaries' quantitative builds.

References

  1. [1]
    Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) Carrier - Pereh - Military Factory
    "The Pereh missile carrier of the Israeli Army was built atop the framework of the earlier Magach 5 MBT series, itself formed from the American M48 tank.".
  2. [2]
    Pereh: An Israeli Guided Missile Carrier—Disguised as a Tank
    ### Summary of Pereh's Historical Background and Rationale
  3. [3]
    Pereh | Weaponsystems.net
    The Pereh is an Israeli tank destroyer disguised as a tank, using Spike-NLOS missiles with a dummy cannon, and is based on a Magach 5 chassis.
  4. [4]
    פלטפורמת שיגור טילי תמוז ייחודית ומטעה – טנק ה"פרא" נחשף - Israel Defense
    Jul 15, 2015 · הפרא הינו כלי משוריין המבוסס על תובת המג"ח (M60 פאטון) האמריקאי, שמצויד בצריח מוגדל המכיל משגר טילי תמוז (ספייק NLOS בייצור רפאל) בעל 12 קנים.
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    טנק הפרא - התשובה הישראלית לשריון הרוסי - Israel Defense
    Oct 1, 2015 · טנק הפרא מבוסס על מג"ח M60 שמצויד בצריח מוגדל המכיל משגר טילי תמוז (ספייק NLOS) בעל 12 קנים. הצוות כולל 4 אנשים. מפקד, נהג ו2 כוונים של הטיל.
  7. [7]
    Pereh (Wild) - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jan 31, 2016 · Pereh features a sizable turret with a fake gun barrel, intended to hid its true mission of launching Tamuz ATGMs (also known as Spike.)Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  8. [8]
    SPIKE™ NLOS 6 Generation of Pin-Point Precision Missile - Rafael
    RAFAEL's SPIKE NLOS is a 6th Gen, pin-point precision-guided missile with up to 50 km range, offering real-time tactical intelligence and mission ...Missing: Pereh | Show results with:Pereh
  9. [9]
    Israeli 'Pereh' anti-tank missile carrier revealed...
    Jul 22, 2015 · A missile carrier robust to operate with the main armored force but with enough range to overmatch opposing ATGMs and perhaps even some artillery support.<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Israeli missile tank Pereh - Military Review
    Feb 4, 2016 · According to experts, “Onagr” is a formidable force, it is designed to hit stationary and well-protected mobile targets of the enemy. The ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    Israeli Troops Caught Posting Pictures of Classified Hardware
    Aug 1, 2018 · ... secret armored vehicles including the Pereh missile-armed tank. One possibility is that the “tank” was a new unmanned ground vehicle, or drone.
  13. [13]
    IDF | Tank and AFV News
    The Pere's first operational use was not until 2005, when it returned fire on Palestinian attackers in the Gaza Strip. It then participated in the July ...
  14. [14]
    The “Pere” Tank is Exposed - Israel Defense
    Sep 14, 2015 · Subsequently, it was employed operationally in the Second Lebanon War of 2006 (during which “Pere” platforms launched 527 missiles), in ...
  15. [15]
    Israel disguised missile launcher as a tank | The Times of Israel
    Jul 23, 2015 · In areas such as Israel's hilly northern border with Lebanon, the Pereh was regularly used to take out targets and provide fire support from ...
  16. [16]
    IDF retires Pereh Missile Carrier “Tank” - Tank and AFV News
    Feb 23, 2017 · Israeli military websites are confirming that the IDF has retired the Pereh Missile Carrier. This weapons system is based on the hull of an M48 ...
  17. [17]
    Pereh: An Israeli Guided Missile Carrier—Disguised as a Tank
    Aug 19, 2020 · The Pereh was an Israeli guided missile carrier—disguised as a tank. This clever design was actually based around a tank hull, the older Magach ...