Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pericarditis

Pericarditis is the inflammation of the pericardium, a thin, double-layered sac of tissue that surrounds and protects the heart while containing a small amount of lubricating fluid to minimize friction between the heart and surrounding structures. This condition most commonly manifests as acute pericarditis, with symptoms lasting less than 4–6 weeks, though it can also be chronic (lasting more than 3 months), incessant (4–6 weeks to 3 months despite treatment), or recurrent (returning after a symptom-free period of at least 4 weeks). It affects an estimated 0.03% of the general population annually, with a higher incidence in males aged 16–65 years, and up to 15–30% of cases may recur. The hallmark symptom of pericarditis is sharp, stabbing , typically located in the middle or left side of the chest, which often worsens with , deep breathing, or lying down and improves when sitting upright and leaning forward. Additional symptoms may include , low-grade fever, , , dry , and swelling in the legs or abdomen due to fluid retention. In some cases, a —a or sound heard during a physical exam—may indicate the inflamed layers rubbing against each other. Pericarditis has a wide range of potential causes, with up to 90% of cases classified as idiopathic (unknown origin). Infectious etiologies are common, particularly viral infections such as , , or more recently (with an incidence of about 1.5% in affected patients), as well as bacterial causes like or fungal and parasitic infections in immunocompromised individuals. Noninfectious triggers include autoimmune disorders (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus or ), post-heart attack complications (), trauma or injury to the chest, malignancies, from , , and certain medications such as , , checkpoint inhibitors, or mRNA vaccines. If untreated, pericarditis can lead to serious complications, including (fluid accumulation in the pericardial sac), (a life-threatening of the heart due to excessive fluid buildup), or (scarring and thickening of the that restricts heart filling). Diagnosis typically involves (ECG) showing characteristic changes, to detect effusion, blood tests for inflammation markers like , and sometimes imaging such as chest X-rays or MRI. Management focuses on addressing the underlying cause and relieving symptoms, often with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or as first-line therapy, while severe or recurrent cases may require corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, or for fluid drainage.

Overview

Definition

Pericarditis is defined as inflammation of the pericardium, the thin, sac-like membrane that envelops the heart and consists of two layers: the visceral layer adherent to the heart and the parietal layer lining the fibrous sac. This inflammatory process can result in friction between the pericardial layers during heartbeats or accumulation of fluid within the pericardial space, potentially leading to complications such as pericardial effusion. The condition was first described in ancient Greece by Hippocrates around 400 BCE, who noted the presence of fluid around the heart in cases of inflammation, marking an early recognition of pericardial pathology. Modern diagnostic criteria and classification were established by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in its 2015 guidelines on pericardial diseases, which emphasized clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and laboratory features for diagnosis; these were further refined in subsequent ESC updates, including the 2025 guidelines on inflammatory myocardial and pericardial syndromes that integrate patient-oriented frameworks for acute and recurrent forms. Pericarditis is distinguished from related conditions such as , which involves of the heart muscle (myocardium), and pleuritis, which affects the pleural lining of the lungs, primarily by its location-specific involvement of the pericardial sac rather than deeper cardiac tissues or thoracic membranes. This localization underscores the pericardium's role as a protective barrier, though detailed anatomical functions are beyond the scope of this definition.

Anatomy and Physiology of the Pericardium

The pericardium is a double-layered fibroserous sac that encloses the heart and the proximal portions of the great vessels, providing structural support within the mediastinum. It consists of an outer fibrous layer and an inner serous layer. The fibrous pericardium is a tough, inelastic sheet primarily composed of collagen fibers with some elastin, forming a conical structure that anchors the heart to surrounding structures such as the sternum via sternopericardial ligaments, the diaphragm, and the vertebral column. This layer prevents excessive cardiac motion and maintains the heart's position during physical activity. The serous pericardium, in contrast, is a thin, transparent divided into parietal and visceral components, separated by the . The parietal layer lines the inner surface of the fibrous , while the visceral layer, also known as the epicardium, adheres directly to the heart's surface and reflects over the great vessels to form the parietal layer. Between these layers lies the pericardial space, which normally contains 15 to 50 mL of rich in and proteins, serving as a to minimize during cardiac contractions and relaxations. This is produced by mesothelial cells on both serous layers and is continuously absorbed, maintaining a delicate balance. Physiologically, the pericardium fulfills several critical roles in cardiac function. It offers mechanical protection against external trauma and infection by acting as a barrier, while also limiting acute distension of the heart chambers to optimize filling pressures and enhance interactions between cardiac chambers during the . Additionally, the pericardium equalizes external forces on the heart and provides a lubricated that facilitates smooth movement of the heart within the . These functions collectively contribute to efficient and pressure-volume relationships in the heart. The receives its blood supply primarily from the pericardiophrenic arteries, which are branches of the internal thoracic arteries, along with contributions from the descending and musculophrenic arteries. These vessels form a that supplies the fibrous and parietal layers, though the structure remains relatively avascular overall. Innervation is provided mainly by the phrenic nerves, which convey sensory fibers to the fibrous and parietal serous pericardium, responsible for pain sensation referred to the shoulder or neck; the visceral layer, however, lacks sensory innervation and is insensitive to pain.

Pathophysiology

Mechanisms of Inflammation

Pericarditis involves an inflammatory cascade typically triggered by antigens or to the pericardial tissue, which activates resident immune cells such as mast cells and macrophages, leading to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines including interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). These cytokines amplify the response by recruiting circulating neutrophils and monocytes to the site, where they infiltrate the pericardial layers and contribute to local tissue damage through the release of and proteases. Concurrently, the inflammatory milieu promotes endothelial activation and deposition, forming a fibrinous that characterizes and can lead to the "bread-and-butter" appearance on gross pathology. The influx of inflammatory cells and cytokines increases in the pericardial microvasculature, allowing plasma proteins and fluid to leak into the pericardial space and form an , which may be serous, fibrinous, or hemorrhagic depending on the severity. This fluid accumulation is governed by Starling forces, which dictate transcapillary fluid exchange across the pericardial capillaries; the net fluid movement J_v is described by the equation J_v = K_f \left[ (P_c - P_i) - \sigma (\pi_c - \pi_i) \right], where K_f is the hydraulic conductivity coefficient, P_c and P_i are capillary and interstitial hydrostatic pressures, \sigma is the reflection coefficient for proteins, and \pi_c and \pi_i are capillary and interstitial oncotic pressures, respectively. In pericarditis, elevated hydrostatic pressure from inflammation disrupts this balance, favoring efflux and resulting in an ultrafiltrate of plasma enriched with inflammatory mediators, while impaired lymphatic drainage exacerbates the buildup. In cases where the inflammation persists unresolved, the process transitions to a fibrotic phase driven by anti-inflammatory cytokines such as transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), which stimulates pericardial fibroblasts to produce extracellular matrix components like and . This leads to pericardial thickening, adhesions between visceral and parietal layers, and potentially constrictive if becomes extensive, impairing diastolic filling.

Types of Pericardial Involvement

Pericarditis is classified morphologically based on the pathological features of pericardial involvement, which influence clinical presentation and potential complications. Dry, or fibrinous, pericarditis represents an early inflammatory stage characterized by fibrin deposition on the pericardial surfaces without significant fluid accumulation, often producing a characteristic pericardial friction rub audible on auscultation. Effusive pericarditis involves the accumulation of fluid in the pericardial space, which can be serous, hemorrhagic, chylous, or purulent, and may progress to tamponade if the effusion is large and rapid. Constrictive pericarditis develops from chronic leading to pericardial and adhesions, resulting in a thickened, rigid that restricts diastolic filling of the heart chambers and impairs . This form is rare in idiopathic cases (less than 1%) but more common in infectious etiologies like or bacterial infections (up to 30%). Effusive-constrictive pericarditis combines features of both effusive and constrictive types, where coexists with underlying visceral pericardial constriction; elevated intrapericardial pressure persists even after drainage, often manifesting with hemodynamic signs such as respiratory variation in ventricular interdependence. Temporally, pericarditis is categorized by duration and pattern of symptoms to guide and . Acute pericarditis lasts less than 4 weeks and is the most common form, typically resolving with anti-inflammatory therapy but recurring in 15-30% of cases. Subacute pericarditis persists from 4 weeks to 3 months, often as an incessant variant with ongoing low-grade . pericarditis extends beyond 3 months, frequently associated with persistent or progression to . Recurrent pericarditis is defined by a new episode following a symptom-free interval of at least 4-6 weeks after resolution of the prior attack. Among specific entities, purulent pericarditis is a severe effusive form caused by bacterial , featuring pus-like fluid in the pericardial space and carrying a high of approximately 40% even with treatment, primarily due to complications like or . Neoplastic pericarditis typically presents as a malignant from tumor infiltration or , often hemorrhagic and associated with advanced cancers such as or , leading to rapid hemodynamic compromise in affected patients.

Clinical Presentation

Signs and Symptoms

The hallmark symptom of is sharp, pleuritic , often located in the center or left side of the chest, that worsens with , coughing, or and improves with sitting upright and leaning forward. This pain is frequently pleuritic due to involvement of the adjacent pleura and may radiate to the neck, shoulders, or specifically to the trapezius ridge, reflecting irritation of the that innervates the . Associated symptoms include dyspnea, which arises particularly in the presence of a compressing the lungs or heart; low-grade fever; fatigue or a general sense of weakness; dry cough; and . In severe cases leading to , patients may exhibit Beck's triad, characterized by , distended jugular veins, and muffled , alongside profound dyspnea and . Symptom variations occur depending on the underlying ; for instance, post-viral pericarditis typically manifests 2 to 3 weeks after resolution of the initial respiratory . In chronic forms, particularly those associated with large pericardial effusions, 10% to 50% of cases may be , discovered incidentally during evaluation for other conditions.

Physical Examination Findings

The physical examination in patients with pericarditis begins with assessment of , often revealing as a common finding due to the inflammatory response and associated pain or hemodynamic effects. This is typically present in the majority of acute cases and serves as an early indicator of systemic involvement. The hallmark auscultatory finding is the , a high-pitched, scratchy, or leathery sound generated by the inflamed pericardial layers rubbing against each other. This rub is classically triphasic, with components corresponding to ventricular , early diastolic filling, and atrial (presystole), though it may be biphasic or monophasic depending on the phase of . It is best heard with the patient leaning forward and breath held in expiration, typically over the left lower sternal border in the third or fourth . The rub's presence often correlates with the patient's reported sharp, pleuritic that worsens with . Despite its specificity approaching 100% for , the has limited sensitivity, detected in only 30% to 50% of cases, and is often transient, requiring repeated for identification. In complicated cases such as , additional findings include , defined as an exaggerated drop in systolic greater than 10 mmHg during , resulting from impaired cardiac filling. This sign has a sensitivity exceeding 80% for in the context of . For , is usually elevated, reflecting impaired right heart filling and systemic venous congestion, though it may be normal in early stages.

Etiology

Infectious Causes

Infectious causes account for a significant proportion of pericarditis cases, with etiologies being the most prevalent. pericarditis is the most common identifiable infectious cause and, together with presumed (idiopathic) cases, accounts for approximately 80-90% of acute cases; it is often preceded by an . Common pathogens include coxsackieviruses A and B, echoviruses, influenza viruses, and (), which has been associated with pericarditis in approximately 1% of hospitalized cases. These infections are more frequent in otherwise healthy individuals and may present with prodromal symptoms such as fever and myalgias before pericardial involvement. Bacterial pericarditis is uncommon, comprising less than 1% of all cases, and is associated with high morbidity due to its purulent nature. It predominantly affects immunocompromised patients, those with underlying cardiac conditions, or individuals post-thoracic surgery, where direct extension or hematogenous spread leads to pericardial pus accumulation. Key pathogens include Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae, which provoke severe systemic symptoms including high fever, sepsis, and rapid progression to tamponade if untreated. Early antibiotic therapy and drainage are critical, as mortality remains elevated without intervention. Other infectious agents, though rarer, include fungal and mycobacterial pathogens, particularly in specific geographic or host contexts. Fungal pericarditis, such as that caused by , occurs in endemic regions like the Ohio River Valley and is linked to inhalation of fungal spores, leading to mediastinal granulomas that irritate the ; it complicates 5-10% of acute cases. Mycobacterial pericarditis, primarily due to , accounts for 50-70% of cases in developing countries, particularly large effusions and constrictive forms, and can progress to in about 30% of untreated patients, often via hematogenous dissemination in immunocompromised hosts. Transmission occurs through airborne droplets, with pericardial involvement manifesting as effusion or fibrosis in high-TB-burden areas. Data as of 2023 (with similar low rates reported through 2025) highlight a rare association between mRNA vaccines and pericarditis, with incidence rates of approximately 1-2 per million doses, primarily in young males; this appears linked to an immune-mediated response rather than direct viral .

Noninfectious Causes

Noninfectious causes of pericarditis include autoimmune disorders, post-cardiac injury syndromes, metabolic conditions such as , neoplastic processes, drug reactions, , , and idiopathic origins. These etiologies account for approximately 15-20% of all pericarditis cases, with the remainder often attributed to infectious or unidentified factors. Autoimmune diseases represent a significant noninfectious trigger, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In SLE, pericarditis manifests in up to 25% of patients, often as part of multisystem involvement, while in RA, it occurs in 10-50% of cases, though many are subclinical effusions detected via imaging. Rheumatic etiologies contribute to 2-7% of presentations and around 10% of recurrent cases overall. Post-cardiac injury syndromes encompass early post-myocardial infarction (MI) pericarditis and Dressler syndrome. Early post-MI pericarditis arises 1-5 days after transmural infarction, with an incidence of less than 5% in the reperfusion era, typically due to direct inflammatory extension from the infarcted myocardium. Dressler syndrome, an autoimmune-mediated response, develops 2-3 weeks post-MI or cardiac surgery, historically affecting 5-7% of MI patients but now rare (<1%) owing to timely revascularization and antiplatelet therapies. Uremic pericarditis occurs in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), linked to accumulation and . Its prevalence has declined from 3-41% historically to 5-20% in patients, and below 5% in recent decades with optimized ; untreated cases may affect 10-20%, often featuring hemorrhagic effusions and reduced pleuritic pain. Neoplastic pericarditis, accounting for 5-10% of cases, typically results from metastatic invasion rather than primary cardiac tumors. Common primaries include and cancers, leading to progressive effusions over weeks and a high risk of . Drug-induced pericarditis arises from hypersensitivity or lupus-like reactions to agents such as , isoniazid, , and immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., nivolumab, ). These cases remain uncommon but are increasingly recognized with use. Idiopathic pericarditis constitutes 80-90% of acute cases in clinical practice, particularly those with a viral-like presentation where extensive evaluation yields no identifiable cause; it is often presumed post-viral and requires no further testing absent red flags.

Diagnosis

Clinical Evaluation

The clinical evaluation of pericarditis begins with a detailed history to identify characteristic features suggestive of the condition. Patients often describe sharp, pleuritic that is exacerbated by lying and relieved by sitting forward or leaning ahead, typically located centrally or left precordial and potentially radiating to the ridge. Inquiring about recent infections, such as upper respiratory or gastrointestinal illnesses, post-myocardial infarction status, recent , or is essential, as these are common precipitants. Systemic symptoms like low-grade fever, , or myalgias may accompany the , particularly in idiopathic or cases. The diagnosis of acute pericarditis is primarily clinical and relies on the 2025 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, which define definite acute pericarditis as a suggestive clinical presentation (e.g., pleuritic chest pain) plus at least one of the following: a pericardial friction rub, characteristic electrocardiographic (ECG) changes (e.g., PR depression or widespread ST-segment elevation), elevated inflammatory biomarkers (e.g., C-reactive protein [CRP]), or new/worsening pericardial effusion or evidence of pericardial inflammation on imaging (e.g., cardiac magnetic resonance [CMR]). Possible pericarditis is diagnosed with the clinical presentation plus exactly one additional criterion. While ECG and effusion assessment are supportive, the history and physical examination form the initial foundation for suspicion. During , for a —a superficial, scratchy, or leathery sound best heard at the left sternal border with the patient leaning forward—can confirm suspicion when present, though it is transient and detected in only about one-third of cases. Integrating these findings with history allows for risk stratification; high-risk features include fever exceeding 38°C, subacute symptom onset over more than 48 hours, or signs of such as , jugular venous distention, or , which warrant urgent evaluation and potential hospitalization. Differential diagnosis is guided by history to exclude life-threatening mimics. For , absence of arm or jaw radiation, lack of exertional onset, and positional relief favor pericarditis over ischemic pain. is considered in patients with sudden dyspnea, , or risk factors like recent immobility or , while is suspected with abrupt, tearing pain radiating to the back, often in hypertensive individuals.

Laboratory Investigations

Laboratory investigations are essential for supporting the of pericarditis, assessing disease severity, and identifying potential underlying causes, particularly through blood tests and biomarkers of inflammation and cardiac involvement. Inflammatory markers, including (CRP) and (ESR), are elevated in approximately 75-90% of patients with , with high-sensitivity CRP levels rising in about 76% of cases at presentation. A CRP greater than 3 mg/L provides supportive evidence for the in the majority of patients. Cardiac levels are elevated in 30-50% of cases, often reflecting myocardial involvement in myopericarditis. Leukocytosis with a predominance of polymorphonuclear cells is frequently observed in bacterial pericarditis, indicating systemic infection. For suspected autoimmune etiologies, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, testing for antinuclear antibody (ANA) and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies is indicated to confirm the underlying condition. Pericardiocentesis, when clinically indicated such as in cases of large effusion or suspected purulent pericarditis, allows for pericardial fluid analysis, including cell count (typically lymphocytic in viral or idiopathic cases, neutrophilic in bacterial), Gram stain, culture, and cytology to identify infectious or malignant causes. Recent guidelines highlight the utility of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in pericardial diseases; levels exceeding 300 pg/mL assist in differentiating from and are associated with poorer in constrictive cases.

Imaging and Electrocardiography

plays a central role in supporting the of , with characteristic changes observed in approximately 50-60% of cases. The hallmark finding is diffuse ST-segment elevation across multiple leads (typically excluding aVR and V1), exhibiting a upward morphology and rarely exceeding 5 mm in amplitude. Concurrent PR-segment is often present in leads such as , aVF, and V4-V6, with reciprocal PR elevation in aVR, reflecting atrial involvement. These abnormalities evolve through four distinct stages over days to weeks: Stage 1 involves acute ST elevation and PR ; Stage 2 features resolution of ST and PR segments with T-wave flattening; Stage 3 shows diffuse T-wave inversion following ST normalization; and Stage 4 marks return to baseline or persistent T-wave changes. The specificity of these ECG patterns, particularly when distinguishing pericarditis from acute , ranges from 70-80%, aided by the absence of reciprocal ST and Q-wave development. Chest radiography is a initial imaging tool but lacks sensitivity for uncomplicated pericarditis, appearing normal in the absence of significant . In cases with moderate to large , it reveals an enlarged, globular cardiac silhouette, often described as a "water-bottle" due to fluid accumulation. This finding is nonspecific, as it can occur in other conditions like , but prompts further evaluation when present. Transthoracic echocardiography is the first-line imaging modality for confirming pericardial effusion and assessing its clinical impact in suspected pericarditis. It quantifies effusion size—categorized as trivial (<10 mm), small (10-20 mm), moderate (20-30 mm), or large (>30 mm at end-diastole)—and determines if it is circumferential or loculated, while evaluating fluid characteristics (e.g., anechoic for transudative). Signs of cardiac tamponade include right atrial collapse persisting beyond one-third of the cardiac cycle (highly sensitive and specific) and right ventricular diastolic collapse, both indicating elevated intrapericardial pressure. For suspected constrictive pericarditis, Doppler interrogation reveals a septal "bounce" due to abrupt ventricular filling and exaggerated respiratory variations in mitral (≥25% decrease in E velocity on inspiration) and tricuspid inflows (≥40% increase on inspiration). These features provide functional insights complementing structural assessment. The 2025 ESC guidelines emphasize the role of CMR in cases where diagnosis is uncertain, detecting pericardial inflammation via edema (T2-weighted) or late gadolinium enhancement. Advanced imaging with computed tomography () and cardiac magnetic resonance (MRI) is reserved for cases where echocardiography is inconclusive or etiology requires elucidation, such as suspected neoplastic or infectious causes. Multidetector CT offers high-resolution depiction of pericardial thickening, calcifications (suggestive of chronic constriction), and masses like tumors or metastases, with excellent sensitivity for loculated effusions. MRI provides superior soft-tissue contrast for inflammation detection via late gadolinium enhancement, which highlights pericardial hyperemia and fibrosis, and T2-weighted sequences for edema; pericardial thickness exceeding 4 mm with enhancement supports active disease. Both modalities aid in identifying underlying etiologies, such as malignancy or post-traumatic changes, guiding targeted management.

Management

Pharmacological Treatment

The pharmacological management of pericarditis primarily focuses on anti-inflammatory therapies for idiopathic or viral cases, with targeted antimicrobial treatment for identified infectious etiologies. First-line treatment for acute pericarditis consists of high-dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as aspirin at 650–1000 mg every 6–8 hours or ibuprofen at 600–800 mg every 8 hours, administered for 1–2 weeks followed by a gradual taper based on symptom resolution and normalization of inflammatory markers. Colchicine is recommended as an adjunct to NSAIDs at a dose of 0.5 mg once or twice daily (adjusted for body weight <70 kg), continued for 3 months in acute cases, to accelerate symptom resolution and reduce the risk of incessant or recurrent pericarditis by approximately 50%. In patients with multiple recurrences despite NSAIDs, adding reduces further episodes by about 50% relative to , as demonstrated in the CORP-2 trial. For recurrent pericarditis refractory to NSAIDs and , or in corticosteroid-dependent cases, anti-IL-1 therapies such as (100 mg/day subcutaneously) or are recommended (Class I, LOE A), with evidence showing reduced recurrences. Corticosteroids, such as at 0.2–0.5 mg/kg/day with slow tapering over 2–4 weeks or longer, are reserved for cases with contraindications to NSAIDs (e.g., gastrointestinal or renal issues), autoimmune-associated pericarditis, or failure of first-line therapies; however, their use is associated with a higher of recurrence compared to NSAIDs plus . For infectious pericarditis, treatment targets the underlying alongside supportive therapy if tolerated. Bacterial pericarditis requires broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics (e.g., plus ) initially, narrowed based on culture results and sensitivities, often for 4–6 weeks. pericarditis typically receives supportive care without routine antivirals unless a specific like or is confirmed, in which case agents such as acyclovir or antiretrovirals are used. In idiopathic cases, pharmacological approaches are prioritized over invasive options to minimize complications.

Interventional and Surgical Approaches

Interventional and surgical approaches are reserved for severe, refractory, or complicated cases of pericarditis, such as those involving significant , , recurrent needs, or constrictive physiology unresponsive to medical management. Pericardiocentesis involves ultrasound-guided needle aspiration of , primarily indicated for large effusions causing hemodynamic compromise or . This procedure, typically performed at the bedside or in a catheterization , allows for rapid decompression and fluid analysis to guide etiology-specific therapy, with a often left in place for continuous if needed. Technical success exceeds 90% with echocardiographic guidance, and it provides therapeutic relief in the majority of cases, though complications such as laceration or occur in 4-10%. For recurrent effusions or purulent pericarditis where is insufficient or repeated, a or surgical is employed to create a pleuro-pericardial communication, facilitating ongoing into the pleural or peritoneal space. This subxiphoid or lateral approach enables pericardial for diagnostic yield and is particularly useful in infectious or neoplastic cases to prevent loculation and recurrence. Outcomes demonstrate reduced need for reintervention compared to methods alone, with low morbidity in appropriately selected patients. Pericardiectomy serves as the definitive for chronic , involving complete excision of the thickened, fibrotic —often including the visceral layer—to restore cardiac filling and alleviate diastolic restriction. Performed via with or without , it is recommended for persistent symptoms despite 3-6 months of anti-inflammatory therapy. Operative mortality ranges from 5-10%, influenced by factors like and preoperative right , while 70-90% of survivors experience significant symptom improvement and enhanced functional status.00262-3/fulltext) Recent advancements emphasize minimally invasive techniques, such as (VATS), for creation or partial pericardiectomy in select non-constrictive cases. Introduced more widely in the early 2020s, VATS reduces incision size, operative time, and postoperative recovery compared to open , with equivalent drainage efficacy and lower pain scores in preliminary series. These approaches are gaining adoption for recurrent effusions, particularly in patients with comorbidities limiting open surgery.

Epidemiology and Prognosis

Incidence and Demographics

Pericarditis accounts for approximately 0.1% to 0.2% of all hospital admissions worldwide, with an estimated incidence of 27 cases per 100,000 individuals annually in Western populations. The condition predominantly affects males, with a male-to-female ratio of about 2:1, and peaks in incidence among individuals aged 20 to 50 years, though it can occur across all age groups. Regional variations in etiology influence overall patterns; in developing regions such as and parts of , tuberculous pericarditis predominates, comprising 50% to 70% or more of cases due to high tuberculosis prevalence. In contrast, developed countries report that 80% to 90% of cases are idiopathic or presumed post-viral, reflecting lower infectious burdens. Key risk factors include infection, which historically elevated the odds of pericardial involvement—in the pre-antiretroviral therapy era, up to 11% annual incidence in advanced stages compared to near-zero in early infection; with modern antiretroviral therapy, rates have significantly decreased.—and post-myocardial infarction status, where early pericarditis occurred in 10% to 20% of cases in the pre-reperfusion therapy era.

Outcomes and Recurrence

The prognosis for is generally favorable, with 70-90% of cases resolving without significant complications or recurrences following appropriate . Symptoms typically abate within 1-3 weeks under anti-inflammatory therapy, such as NSAIDs and , allowing most patients to achieve complete recovery. Overall mortality remains low at less than 1% for idiopathic cases, reflecting the self-limiting nature of the condition in the absence of underlying . However, outcomes vary by etiology; bacterial pericarditis carries a treated of approximately 40%, primarily due to complications like and , while neoplastic pericarditis is associated with 15-40% mortality, often driven by the progressive underlying . Recurrence represents the most common complication, affecting 15-30% of patients within 18 months of the initial episode. This risk rises to about 50% in cases not treated with alongside NSAIDs, as demonstrated in randomized trials showing significant reduction in relapse rates with its addition. Key predictors of recurrence include elevated (CRP) levels at presentation, which correlate with persistent and higher relapse likelihood, and prior use, which nearly triples the risk through potential rebound effects. In the long term, untreated chronic pericarditis can progress to in 10-20% of cases, leading to impaired cardiac filling and symptoms that may necessitate surgical intervention. Recent data on vaccine-associated pericarditis, particularly following mRNA vaccines, indicate a highly benign course, with approximately 95% of cases achieving full resolution without sequelae, underscoring the transient nature of this . Overall, early identification of risk factors and adherence to guideline-directed therapy, including , substantially improve long-term outcomes and minimize recurrence burden.