Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pseudanthium

A pseudanthium (plural: ) is an that resembles a single flower, composed of multiple small flowers or florets aggregated in a compact structure that mimics the form and function of a solitary blossom. This floral typically involves a central reproductive core surrounded by peripheral showy elements, such as enlarged ray florets or colorful bracts, which enhance attraction. Pseudanthia occur in at least 41 families of angiosperms, with prominent examples in the (such as sunflowers and daisies, where capitula feature ray and disk florets), (e.g., the cyathia of species), and (umbels resembling flat-topped flowers). Evolutionarily, pseudanthia have arisen independently across major angiosperm lineages multiple times, often through the co-option of floral identity genes and developmental constraints, promoting reproductive success by deceiving pollinators into treating the cluster as one large, rewarding flower. These structures represent a key innovation in , balancing miniaturization of individual flowers with collective display to optimize efficiency in diverse ecological contexts.

Definition and Morphology

Definition

A pseudanthium is an inflorescence composed of multiple small flowers, known as florets, aggregated in a way that mimics the appearance and function of a single flower. This structure, often referred to as a "false flower," derives its name from the Greek words pseudo (false) and anthos (flower), with the term "pseudanzio" first introduced by botanist Federico Delpino in 1889 to describe such deceptive floral units. Unlike a true solitary flower, which consists of a single set of reproductive organs enclosed within a unified , a pseudanthium is multiflowered and relies on the collective display of its florets to attract pollinators and facilitate reproduction as a cohesive unit. This distinction highlights the evolutionary adaptation where the evolves flower-like traits, blurring the boundary between individual flowers and higher-order structures. Pseudanthia are generally characterized by a central reproductive core surrounded by peripheral showy elements that enhance attraction, though the specific forms vary across families. For example, in , this typically includes central disc florets, which are fertile and tubular in shape and responsible for primary reproductive functions, surrounded by peripheral ray florets that are often petal-like and serve for visual display, though they may be sterile or fertile depending on the . In other families, such as , the showy periphery may consist of colorful bracts or nectar glands rather than ray florets. Functionally, the pseudanthium operates as a single unit, increasing efficiency by presenting a larger, more conspicuous target to pollinators despite its composite nature, as exemplified in the capitulum of the family. This integrated role has been emphasized in foundational works, such as Wilhelm Troll's definitions of pseudanthia as flower-like inflorescences in and 1964.

Key Structural Features

The pseudanthium is characterized by a composite structure where multiple florets are aggregated on a common platform, mimicking a single flower through specialized anatomical components that vary by family. Central to this organization in many cases is the involucre, a cup-shaped array of bracts that encloses and protects the developing florets while often providing visual cues to pollinators through colorful or petaloid modifications. In families like , the involucre consists of imbricate phyllaries arranged in multiple series, varying from 5 to over 50 in number, which collectively form a protective envelope around the inflorescence. The receptacle serves as the enlarged apical portion of the that bears the florets, acting as the foundational for their attachment and often featuring chaffy scales or paleae in to provide additional support and separation between florets. These scales, when present, are thin, membranous structures subtending each floret, contributing to the compact, head-like appearance of the pseudanthium. The receptacle's shape ranges from flat to convex or conical, facilitating the dense packing essential for the pseudanthium's deceptive floral mimicry. In pseudanthia, florets are typically of two main types: hermaphroditic disc florets and zygomorphic ray florets, representing a division of labor where the center focuses on and the on attraction. florets, located centrally, possess actinomorphic corollas fused into tubular structures with five equal lobes, enabling bisexual through functional stamens and carpels. In contrast, ray florets occupy the , featuring strap-shaped (ligulate) corollas that extend into showy, petal-like laminae, often pistillate or sterile to enhance attraction. This dimorphic arrangement optimizes both and visual display in such pseudanthia, though other families exhibit different floret or structure variations. The pappus represents a modified structure crowning the florets, particularly in , where it manifests as hairs, bristles, scales, or awns that facilitate by wind or adhesion. These appendages persist on the mature fruit, varying in form—such as plumose bristles in species like —to suit specific dispersal strategies. Following , the inferior ovaries of the florets develop into fruits, which are dry, indehiscent, single-seeded structures often technically termed cypselae in due to their fused pericarp and seed coat. These achenes are typically ribbed or winged, with the pappus attached at the apex, ensuring efficient propagation of the plant.

Capitulum

The capitulum represents the primary and most widespread form of pseudanthium, characterized as a compact, flat or convex consisting of numerous sessile florets aggregated on a dilated receptacle and subtended by an involucre of bracts. This structure is emblematic of the family, where it functions as a composite flower head that mimics a single bloom to enhance attraction. The florets are typically bisexual and tubular at the base, with variations in shape contributing to the overall diversity. Capitula exhibit two main variations based on floret composition: homogamous, featuring all florets of a single type (either all disc or all ligulate), and heterogamous, with mixed floret types including both ray and disc forms. Homogamous capitula, such as those in thistles (Cirsium spp.), consist exclusively of disc florets, which are tubular and radially symmetric, promoting self-pollination or wind dispersal in some cases. In contrast, heterogamous capitula, like those in sunflowers, combine peripheral ray florets—strap-shaped and often brightly colored—with central disc florets, optimizing visual appeal and nectar access for insects. Further classification of capitula includes radiate, discoid, and ligulate forms, determined by the presence and morphology of ray florets. Radiate capitula feature an outer ring of ray florets surrounding inner disc florets, as seen in Helianthus annuus (common sunflower), where the yellow, petal-like rays contrast with the dense cluster of brownish-red disc florets in the center. Discoid capitula lack ray florets entirely, presenting only tubular disc florets across the head. Ligulate capitula, conversely, comprise solely ligulate (ray-like) florets, exemplified by Taraxacum officinale (dandelion), whose head is formed of up to 250 yellow, strap-shaped florets that collectively resemble a single large flower. These configurations underscore the adaptive versatility of the capitulum within Asteraceae.

Umbellate Pseudanthia and Similar Forms

Umbellate pseudanthia in represent a form where a compact of small flowers on a conical receptacle is subtended by an involucre of petaloid bracts, mimicking a single blossom. This occurs in the family, particularly within the subfamily Apioideae, where complex pseudanthia develop through flower-like conditions and spatial constraints that promote ray flower differentiation and compact architecture. For instance, species like exhibit these structures, with an involucre of petaloid bracts surrounding a central of small fertile flowers, presenting a dome-shaped profile that contrasts with the flatter capitulum. In the , the exemplifies another distinct pseudanthial variant, forming a cup-shaped involucre that houses a single central flower surrounded by multiple reduced flowers and conspicuous nectar-secreting glands, with extreme reduction of component flowers to naked reproductive organs without typical . Examples include and E. fulgens, where the cyathium's glandular appendages and bracts attract pollinators, emphasizing functional mimicry over morphological complexity. Umbellate pseudanthia in the Calyceraceae further illustrate structural diversity, featuring flattened, condensed umbels that closely resemble capitula through tight aggregation of flowers on a common receptacle, often subtended by an involucre of bracts. These inflorescences, known as cephaloids, retain a terminal flower and peripheral cymose units (typically 2–7 flowers each), resulting in a head-like appearance adapted for efficiency. Representative such as Boopis anthemoides and Nastanthus patagonicus demonstrate this form, where the lack of extensive floral sets them apart from the more specialized disc-ray organization of capitula, yet achieves similar deceptive floral mimicry. Within the , certain genera exhibit condensed cymes that function as pseudanthia by forming compact, flower-resembling clusters through reduction of internodes and branching. In Boea, for example, the inflorescences often appear as tight, subumbellate units with paired or few-flowered cymes that collectively mimic a single bloom, supported by opposite leaves and axillary positioning. This configuration, seen across species like B. hygrometrica, highlights synorganization where the cyme's contraction enhances pollinator attraction without evolving a true head structure.

Synorganization in Pseudanthia

Synorganization in pseudanthia refers to the evolutionary coordination of multiple floral organs, florets, and bracts into a cohesive unit that functionally mimics a single flower, enhancing efficiency through integrated and display. This process unifies disparate elements, such as ray florets and central disk florets, into a synorganized structure where peripheral parts attract pollinators while central ones provide rewards. The genetic basis of synorganization involves homeotic gene shifts, particularly shifts in the expression of genes that alter floret identity and morphology to create division of labor. For instance, SEPALLATA-like genes (e.g., GRCD4 and GRCD5 in hybrida) regulate development and determinacy, with down-regulation leading to homeotic conversions of s to - or leaf-like structures. Similarly, class B genes like APETALA3 and PISTILLATA orthologs are heterotopically expressed in s to promote their enlargement into petaloid forms, as observed in various pseudanthial families. Developmental stages of synorganization commence with the initiation of bracts from specialized floral unit s (FUMs), which establish a flower-like framework. This is followed by floret clustering through and , where peripheral florets differentiate into forms and central ones into disk types, resulting in an integrated display of colorful perianth-like structures and rewards. In Apioideae pseudanthia, for example, involucral bracts arise simultaneously with floret primordia under spatial constraints, promoting zygomorphic patterns that enhance the unified appearance. Unlike simple aggregation of independent flowers, synorganization produces morphological fusion-like effects without actual fusion, driven by identity changes and functional specialization that create a pseudanthium as a novel evolutionary module. This distinction underscores the coordinated, non-random integration that elevates pseudanthia beyond mere clustering.

Occurrence Across Families

Asteraceae

The family, also known as Compositae, is one of the largest and most diverse groups of flowering plants, encompassing over 25,000 distributed across approximately 1,700 genera, with the capitulum representing the characteristic pseudanthium that defines the family. This type, consisting of numerous small florets aggregated into a compact head, enables efficient and , contributing to the family's ecological success. Asteraceae exhibits extraordinary morphological and ecological diversity, spanning from diminutive weedy annuals like dandelions (), which thrive in disturbed habitats, to robust perennial ornamentals such as dahlias ( spp.), prized for their showy blooms. The family achieves a near-cosmopolitan distribution, present on every continent except , and occupies a wide array of habitats from arid deserts to temperate meadows. Several species hold substantial economic value in , , and . Key crops include leafy greens like (Lactuca sativa) and root vegetables such as (Cichorium intybus), which are cultivated globally for food production. Ornamental varieties, including (Chrysanthemum spp.), are extensively grown for and garden displays. Medicinally, plants like (Matricaria chamomilla) are widely used for their calming and effects in teas and extracts. Pseudanthium structure varies across Asteraceae subfamilies, reflecting adaptive diversification. The Asteroideae, comprising the majority of species, typically forms radiate capitula featuring colorful peripheral ray florets surrounding central tubular disc florets, enhancing visual attractants for pollinators. Conversely, the Carduoideae subfamily often produces discoid heads with only disc florets, as observed in spiny, thistle-like genera, which prioritize defensive traits over petaloid displays.

Other Families with Pseudanthia

Pseudanthia occur sporadically in numerous plant families beyond , often as isolated evolutionary innovations rather than defining family traits, highlighting driven by similar selective pressures for enhanced efficiency. This has arisen independently in at least 41 angiosperm families across major lineages, where multiflowered units mimic solitary flowers through modifications like enlarged bracts or condensed arrangements. In Calyceraceae, a small family of about 60 species closely related to , pseudanthia manifest as capitulum-like heads composed of numerous tiny, sessile flowers aggregated on a flattened receptacle, superficially resembling the composite heads of their relatives but with distinct floral morphology. These structures evolved convergently, providing insights into the developmental origins of flower-like inflorescences in the broader order. Myrtaceae, a large family encompassing eucalypts and allies, features pseudanthia in the monotypic genus Actinodium, where species like A. cunninghamii exhibit a unique proliferating head. In this arrangement, fertile flowers are surrounded by ray-like bracts formed from proximal short shoots and white prophylls, creating a daisy-like appearance that functions as a single unit. This likely involves regulation by CYCLOIDEA-like genes, underscoring genetic convergence with other pseudanthial forms. The showcase pseudanthia in the form of cyathia within the genus , where a cup-shaped involucre encloses a single central female flower and multiple reduced male flowers, mimicking a bisexual flower for attraction. Examples include E. milii and E. fulgens, with colorful stipular excrescences enhancing the deceptive floral display, a strategy termed pseudo-pseudanthia due to the layered . This structure represents a highly derived that blurs organ-flower boundaries, evolving convergently to optimize nectar-seeking behavior in . Additional examples include , where genera like (e.g., V. opulus) form condensed cymes that aggregate into umbel-like pseudanthia with enlarged peripheral florets, lacking full aggregation but resembling solitary flowers. Such convergent forms in over 40 families illustrate the repeated co-option of developmental pathways for pseudanthial , often involving enlargement or floral reduction to achieve functional equivalence to true flowers.

Evolutionary and Functional Aspects

Evolutionary Origins

Pseudanthia have arisen multiple times through across angiosperms, with the earliest well-documented occurrence in the family during the , approximately 50 million years ago. Fossil evidence from deposits, particularly , reveals the oldest confirmed capitula— heads characteristic of pseudanthia—in Middle Eocene sediments, indicating a rapid diversification of the family shortly after its origin in southern . These fossils, including well-preserved and associated , suggest that pseudanthia evolved from simpler structures through genetic and developmental shifts that condensed multiple flowers into a single, flower-mimicking unit. At the molecular level, the evolution of pseudanthia in involved the co-option and duplication of conserved floral identity genes, such as LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1), which normally specify individual flower development but were repurposed to pattern the capitulum as a whole. Duplications in genes, including AP1 homologs, and subsequent subfunctionalization enabled the specialization of florets within the pseudanthium, allowing ray and disc florets to adopt distinct roles while maintaining an overall flower-like architecture. Whole-genome duplications in early lineages further facilitated these genetic innovations, providing raw material for the regulatory rewiring that transformed raceme-like inflorescences into compact pseudanthia. Synorganization, the coordinated development of floral organs and bracts, played a key role in this process by integrating the pseudanthium's components into a unified structure. Parallel evolution of pseudanthia has occurred independently in other families, such as Calyceraceae and , driven by similar selective pressures from s that favor compact, attractive inflorescences. In Calyceraceae, sister to , capitulum-like pseudanthia evolved through comparable condensation of thyrses, as evidenced by comparative morphological and phylogenetic studies, highlighting a shared developmental pathway despite divergent lineages. Similarly, in , genera like Actinodium exhibit unique pseudanthia where proximal branches mimic ray florets around central fertile flowers, representing a convergent strategy to enhance attraction without direct to forms. These instances underscore the repeated co-option of ancient genetic modules across angiosperms to achieve pseudanthial morphology under -mediated selection.

Pollination and Adaptive Benefits

Pseudanthia facilitate pollination by presenting an enlarged, flower-like display that attracts a diverse array of pollinators, including bees, butterflies, and birds, through enhanced visual and olfactory cues such as colorful ray florets and scent-producing glands. In Asteraceae species, the capitulum acts as a single pollination unit, concentrating pollinator visits on multiple small florets simultaneously, which increases pollen transfer efficiency compared to solitary flowers. For instance, the sunflower (Helianthus annuus) pseudanthium draws multiple insect visitors per head, primarily bees seeking nectar and pollen, thereby boosting cross-pollination rates. This structure also reduces geitonogamy—self-pollination between flowers on the same plant—through temporal separation in floret receptivity, where outer ray florets mature earlier than inner disc florets, promoting outcrossing. Beyond , pseudanthia confer adaptive benefits in by integrating specialized structures like the pappus, a crown of bristles or scales on achenes (cypselae) in , which aids wind-mediated long-distance dispersal. These adaptations allow to travel farther than those from dispersed solitary flowers, enhancing colonization of open habitats. Achenes are often equipped with hooks or barbs for epizoochory, hitchhiking on , further diversifying dispersal vectors within the same . The dense packing of florets into a compact head protects developing from herbivory, as tough bracts shield the interior while ray florets deter browsers. Overall, these features yield higher in pseudanthia-bearing plants, particularly in resource-limited or exposed environments, by amplifying signals for attraction and optimizing for production. In high-elevation like Cremanthodium campanulatum, nodding capitula further improve and dispersal under windy conditions, demonstrating the ecological versatility of pseudanthia. This functional integration supports the evolutionary convergence of pseudanthia across angiosperm families as a strategy for survival in diverse habitats.

Historical Development

Etymology and Terminology

The term "pseudanthium" originates from the Greek words pseudo- (false) and anthos (flower), combined with the Latin suffix -ium, literally meaning "false flower" to describe inflorescences that mimic solitary flowers. It was coined in 1889 by Italian botanist Federico Delpino as "pseudanzio" in his work on pollination biology, distinguishing contracted multiflowered units from true solitary flowers (euanzia). The Latinized form "pseudanthium" gained broader adoption in botanical literature shortly thereafter, reflecting its emphasis on the deceptive floral appearance of such structures. Related terminology includes "capitulum," derived from Latin capitulum meaning "little head," which specifically denotes the compact, head-like typical of the family. "Anthodium," a for capitulum in early usage, stems from New Latin, based on anthōdēs (flower-like), from anthos (flower) + -ōdēs (resembling), and was originally employed by in 1770 to describe the involucre of . In common parlance, these structures are often simply called "flower heads," a descriptive term highlighting their overall visual resemblance to individual blooms. Early botanical descriptions referred to these as "compound flowers" or flos compositus, a phrase introduced by in 1682 to capture their multifaceted nature. Over time, terminology evolved from these informal labels toward more precise classifications, influenced by advancements in and studies; for instance, von Wettstein in 1907 extended "pseudanthium" to reproductive units, broadening its conceptual scope. This standardization occurred in modern following the Linnaean era, where terms like capitulum and were formalized to differentiate types based on and , facilitating clearer phylogenetic and ecological analyses. Wilhelm Troll's 1928 refinements further solidified "pseudanthium" as a key descriptor for flower-like across angiosperms.

Discovery and Scientific Recognition

The earliest observations of composite floral structures, resembling what would later be termed pseudanthia, date back to naturalists. , in the 4th century BCE, recognized early plant assemblages including precursors to the in his Enquiry into Plants, laying foundational groundwork for recognizing pseudanthia as distinct from simple flowers, though without the terminological precision of later . These early accounts laid foundational groundwork for recognizing pseudanthia as distinct from simple flowers, though without the terminological precision of later . In the 18th century, advanced the scientific recognition of pseudanthia by explicitly noting the composite nature of sunflower () heads, which mimic single flowers but comprise numerous florets. In his Philosophia Botanica (1751) and (1753), Linnaeus grouped these under the class Syngenesia, identifying 785 species and establishing the family as Compositae based on fused anthers, a key synapomorphy. This classification highlighted the deceptive unity of pseudanthia, influencing subsequent taxonomic efforts. The 19th century saw further formalization through the work of , who in the contributed to the of the term "capitulum," in use since the , for these composite inflorescences in his monumental Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis (1836–1837). De Candolle's detailed monograph on cataloged over 8,500 species, emphasizing morphological variations in capitula and integrating ecological observations to refine their systematic placement. Twentieth-century research expanded on evolutionary dimensions, with Sherwin Carlquist's studies in the 1970s exploring and ecological strategies in Compositae inflorescences, such as in the genus Lipochaeta, linking pseudanthial structures to environmental adaptations like pollination efficiency. Molecular phylogenetic analyses in the further illuminated these patterns, confirming of pseudanthia through resolved family-wide trees that revealed multiple independent origins beyond . Prior to the , studies largely centered on pseudanthia, leaving gaps in understanding non- forms; however, post-2020 genomic investigations, including phylogenomic reconstructions in , have addressed these by demonstrating at least 36 independent origins and 46 reversals of pseudanthia, driven by developmental gene expansions and spatial constraints.

References

  1. [1]
    Pseudanthia in angiosperms: a review - PMC - PubMed Central
    Pseudanthia or 'false flowers' are multiflowered units that resemble solitary flowers in form and function. Over the last century the term 'pseudanthium' ...
  2. [2]
    Asteraceae - FNA - Flora of North America
    Jan 31, 2022 · Ray florets have zygomorphic corollas with laminae; the laminae may be showy (as in some species of Helianthus) or inconspicuous (as in some ...Missing: pseudanthium | Show results with:pseudanthium
  3. [3]
    Pseudanthium - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Pseudanthium refers to a floral structure composed of numerous small individual flowers (florets), where the outer flowers resemble petals and are called ray ...
  4. [4]
    Development and evolution of the Asteraceae capitulum - Zhang
    Feb 15, 2024 · In an Asteraceae capitulum, the individual florets emerge on the surface of a receptacle in an iconic spiral arrangement (phyllotaxis, to be ...
  5. [5]
    My favourite flowering image: a capitulum of Asteraceae - PMC
    The composite inflorescence, capitulum, or flower head in Asteraceae assembles multiple flowers into a single, highly compressed structure. It is a very ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] ASTERACEAE
    Diagnostics: Recognized by the capitulate inflorescences, flowers with inferior ovary and fruits with highly modified calyx into pappus. Although Asteraceae is ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] 3 , AND JORGE F. S. FERREIRA - USDA ARS
    1A ). Character- istic of the Asteraceae, each capitulum contains two floret types: (1) marginal ray florets, which are pistillate, and (2) central disk ...
  8. [8]
    ASTERACEAE/COMPOSITAE (aster family) - Ohio Plants
    The inflorescence is a head that looks like as single flower, composed of tiny flowers inserted on a common receptacle. The flowers are bi-or unisexual, ...Missing: pseudanthium disc florets
  9. [9]
    Anatomy and Morphology of Sunflower - Seiler - 1997 - ACSESS
    Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) can be distinguished from all other cultivated plants by its single stem with a conspicuously large inflorescence.
  10. [10]
    Taraxacum officinale complex (dandelion) | CABI Compendium
    The capitulum is composed of up to 250 ligulate, perfect, yellow florets (Holm et al., 1997), which usually have coloured stripes below. Each floret has a ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    [PDF] A REVISION OF BOEA (GESNERIACEAE)
    Plants of Boea are mostly caulescent with well-defined internodes between leaf pairs, or alternatively, tightly clustered leaves along the apical part of the ...Missing: condensed | Show results with:condensed
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Classification of Compositae
    The Compositae (Asteraceae) family is nested high in the Angiosperm ... There are 1600—1700 genera distributed around the globe except for Antarctica.
  18. [18]
    Asteraceae
    Inflorescence consists of several small flowers, called florets, that are crowded together, sessile, on a receptacle. This inflorescence is often mistaken for a ...Missing: pseudanthium | Show results with:pseudanthium
  19. [19]
    The Plants of the Asteraceae Family as Agents in the Protection of ...
    Mar 16, 2021 · The Asteraceae family is one of the largest flowering plant families, with over 1600 genera and 2500 species worldwide.
  20. [20]
    A Brief Overview of the Compositae, Lettuce and Sunflower
    Apr 29, 2022 · The Compositae contains over 40 economically important species including food (lettuce, Jerusalem artichoke), oil (sunflower, safflower), ...
  21. [21]
    Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.): An overview - PMC - NIH
    Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) is a well-known medicinal plant species from the Asteraceae family often referred to as the “star among medicinal species.”
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Early evolution of the angiosperm clade Asteraceae in the ... - PNAS
    To date, the oldest fossil confidently assigned to Asteraceae is from the Middle Eocene of Patagonia. It consists of an inflorescence and associated pollen ...
  24. [24]
    An extinct Eocene taxon of the daisy family (Asteraceae)
    This is the first fossil genus of Asteraceae based on an outstandingly preserved capitulescence that might represent the ancestor of Mutisioideae–Carduoideae.
  25. [25]
    Nuclear phylogenomics of Asteraceae with increased sampling ...
    Jun 10, 2024 · Molecular evolutionary analyses support the likely contribution of duplications of MADS-box and TCP floral regulatory genes to innovations in ...
  26. [26]
    Flower heads in Asteraceae—recruitment of conserved ...
    Jul 1, 2018 · The key morphological innovation that has been associated with the evolutionary success of Asteraceae is the unique head-like inflorescence, ...
  27. [27]
    (PDF) Evolutionary origin of the Asteraceae capitulum - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · ... pseudanthium). In. contrast, fl owers in Calyceraceae infl orescences remained. poorly differentiated, although there is some fl oral ...
  28. [28]
    The unique pseudanthium of Actinodium (Myrtaceae) - EvoDevo
    Mar 1, 2013 · (Figure 1A, B) is characterized by showy, head-like inflorescences that at first glance appear very similar to those of the sunflower family ...Missing: botany | Show results with:botany
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    capitulum - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
    Etymology. Borrowed from Latin capitulum. Doublet of chapiter and chapter. Noun. capitulum (plural capitulums or capitula). (botany) A densely clustered ...
  32. [32]
    ANTHODIUM Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    Word History. Etymology. New Latin, from Greek anthōdēs flowerlike (from anth- anth- entry 1 + -eidēs -oid) ...Missing: botany | Show results with:botany
  33. [33]
    [PDF] University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton
    These were one of the earliest assemblages of plants to be recognised (e.g. Theophrastus, c. 300 B.C.) and though they are the largest of dicotyledonous ...
  34. [34]
    The Composites – In the Garden - Botany In Context
    The alternative entry takes you to anything that isn't purely ligulate, leading to a couplet contrasting “Capitula radiate” versus “Capitula discoid”. Radiate ...
  35. [35]
    Evolution and Adaptive Radiation in Lipochaeta (Compositae ... - jstor
    The purpose of this paper is to discuss the origin of Lip- ochaeta and indicate evolutionary and adaptive trends within the genus. ORIGIN. The series of ...
  36. [36]
    (PDF) Molecular Control of Inflorescence Development in Asteraceae
    Aug 6, 2025 · Molecular evolutionary analyses reveal that residues in the conserved domains were the targets of positive selection following gene duplication.