Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Rocketdyne F-1

The Rocketdyne F-1 is a liquid-fueled developed by the American aerospace company Rocketdyne, renowned as the most powerful single-chamber liquid-propellant engine ever flown, which powered the first stage of NASA's rocket during the . It employs a , burning refined petroleum ( ) and () as propellants to generate 1,522,000 pounds-force (6,770 kilonewtons) of thrust at and 1,748,000 pounds-force (7,770 kN) in vacuum, with specific impulses of 265 seconds and 304 seconds, respectively. Standing 18.5 feet (5.6 meters) tall and weighing 18,500 pounds (8,400 kilograms) dry, the engine features a robust assembly rated at 55,000 brake horsepower (41 MW) that delivers propellants at a combined rate of 42,500 gallons (161,000 liters) per minute. Development of the F-1 originated in 1955 when the U.S. contracted Rocketdyne to design a high-thrust engine exceeding 1 million pounds-force, initially for potential applications, amid competition with the . In January 1959, following the and early Soviet space successes like Sputnik, the agency assumed oversight of the project to support ambitious lunar missions, accelerating testing to address combustion instability challenges that had plagued early prototypes. The first full-thrust, long-duration static fire test succeeded on May 26, 1962, at , validating the design after iterative improvements in injector technology and structural integrity. By 1963, production engines were ready, with over 65 units manufactured for flight and testing, each undergoing rigorous qualification firings totaling up to 192 seconds to simulate mission profiles. In operational use, five F-1 engines were clustered on the Saturn V's first stage, collectively producing 7.5 million pounds-force (33,400 ) of to propel the 6.5-million-pound (2,950-metric-ton) vehicle off the at , achieving an altitude of 40 miles (64 kilometers) and a downrange distance of 50 miles (80 kilometers) at Mach 7 before staging. This configuration enabled all crewed Apollo lunar missions from in 1968 through in 1972, as well as the launch in 1973, demonstrating unmatched reliability with zero in-flight failures across 13 launches. The F-1's engineering feats, including its scalable injector design and system, influenced subsequent heavy-lift engine developments, though the program ended with the Saturn V's retirement, leaving a legacy of propulsion innovation for .

Development History

Origins in the 1950s

In the mid-1950s, the U.S. initiated efforts to develop high-thrust rocket engines exceeding 1 million pounds-force (lbf) to power heavy-lift launch vehicles derived from (ICBM) technology, aiming to support advanced military payloads and potential space missions. Rocketdyne, a leading propulsion contractor, was selected to design such an engine, resulting in the initial conception of the F-1 as part of this ambitious program. By June 1958, the renewed its contract with Rocketdyne under an advanced booster development effort, elevating the thrust requirement to 1.5 million lbf to meet demands for super-heavy launch capabilities, such as those envisioned for ICBM-derived super boosters. With the establishment of in October 1958, oversight and funding transitioned to the agency. The early F-1 design drew heavily from Rocketdyne's prior experience with kerosene-based engines, particularly the XLR-79 developed for the Navaho supersonic program in the early 1950s and the H-1 engine derived from Thor and ICBM boosters. These influences guided the adoption of (a refined ) and () as propellants, chosen for their high energy density, storability, and demonstrated reliability in high-performance applications, marking a shift from earlier alcohol-oxidizer combinations. Key personnel at Rocketdyne included Robert Biggs, who served as the lead development engineer during the initial phases, overseeing conceptual layout and subsystem integration. NASA's provided technical oversight, with engineers collaborating closely on requirements definition to align the engine with emerging lunar mission goals. By 1959, following the contract award, specific performance targets were established: a sea-level of 1.5 million lbf and an initial chamber goal of 1,125 pounds per (), representing a significant scale-up from contemporary engines to enable unprecedented capacities.

Design Challenges and Testing

The development of the Rocketdyne F-1 engine faced significant obstacles, primarily centered on , which manifested as destructive acoustic waves and oscillations in the during early testing. From its initial firings in 1960 at , the engine exhibited severe , culminating in the catastrophic destruction of a full-scale test unit in July 1962 due to these acoustic disturbances. This issue, characterized by rapid fluctuations that could shred the face and chamber walls, prompted an intensive research effort known as Project First, involving approximately 2,000 full-scale corrective experiments to diagnose and mitigate the problem. Engineers addressed the instability through iterative redesigns, including the addition of radial baffles to the injector plate to disrupt tangential acoustic modes and prevent wave propagation across the chamber. These anti-vibration devices, combined with refined propellant mixing patterns, were validated using specialized simulation tests that intentionally induced failure conditions to measure stability margins. A pivotal incident occurred in June 1962, when an F-1 test engine exploded just 0.5 seconds after ignition, attributed to combustion instability that ruptured high-pressure fuel lines in an oxygen-rich environment; this led to multiple redesign iterations of the injector and chamber assembly. Parallel challenges arose in developing the F-1's turbopump, a critical component in its open gas-generator cycle that required delivering massive propellant flows—25,000 gallons per minute of liquid oxygen and 15,600 gallons per minute of RP-1—while operating at high speeds of 5,500 rpm and producing 55,000 horsepower. Balancing efficiency, cavitation resistance, and structural integrity under these extreme conditions demanded extensive subscale and full-scale validations to ensure reliable startup and sustained operation without pump surge or bearing failures. Testing progressed incrementally at Edwards Air Force Base, with the first complete experimental F-1 engine fired in June 1961, initially achieving thrust levels around 1.3 million pounds force in short-duration runs. By May 26, 1962, the first full-thrust, long-duration test successfully demonstrated 1.5 million pounds force for the rated burn time, marking a key milestone after addressing early anomalies. Over the development period through 1964, Rocketdyne conducted more than 3,200 full-scale firings across numerous prototype engines, culminating in NASA certification of the F-1 design in late 1964 after rigorous validation of stability and performance.

Qualification for Apollo Program

Following the establishment of the Apollo program in 1961, oversight of the Rocketdyne F-1 engine transitioned from the U.S. Air Force to , with the (MSFC) assuming primary responsibility for qualification reviews and ensuring compatibility with the launch vehicle. This shift aligned the engine's development with 's manned lunar landing goals, emphasizing rigorous testing under MSFC's technical direction to meet human-rated standards. Full-scale vehicle integration tests focused on the first stage, featuring a clustered configuration of five F-1 engines to simulate operational conditions. Initial static firings occurred at MSFC's test stands in , where early cluster demonstrations validated thrust vector control and propellant flow dynamics among the engines. Subsequent firings shifted to the Mississippi Test Facility (now ) for noise mitigation, with full-duration burns exceeding 150 seconds to confirm structural integrity and performance under maximum loads; pre-flight integration and checkout preparations, including engine installations, were conducted at (KSC) to ready stages for launch. The F-1 achieved formal flight certification in December 1964 after completing qualification tests that demonstrated reliability exceeding 99% for crewed missions. Post-certification, reliability enhancements included the implementation of redundant ignition sequences for the gas generator and main chamber, using parallel hypergolic start systems to prevent startup failures, alongside stringent quality control measures such as non-destructive inspections and materials traceability to address combustion instability risks identified in earlier development. These improvements ensured the engine's robustness in the clustered array, where the failure of any single unit would not compromise overall stage performance. To enhance margins for launch aborts, the F-1's thrust was uprated from the original 1.5 million pounds-force (lbf) to 1.522 million lbf per engine following the mission in 1967, providing an additional 110,000 lbf total for the stage and improved ascent profiles during contingency scenarios. This modification maintained stable operation while increasing payload capacity without requiring hardware redesigns beyond injector tuning. Production ramped up significantly after , transitioning from developmental prototypes to flight-certified units by , enabling the assembly of the first operational vehicles. Rocketdyne manufactured 65 flight-qualified F-1 engines, each subjected to individual calibration and full-duration tests, with the overall program documenting approximately 65 key developmental firings that accumulated over 100,000 seconds of total burn time to verify endurance and consistency.

Technical Design

Core Components and Architecture

The Rocketdyne F-1 engine utilizes an , employing (refined petroleum) as fuel and (LOX) as oxidizer to achieve its massive output. In this architecture, a dedicated combusts a small portion of the propellants to drive the turbopumps, with the resulting exhaust vented overboard rather than contributing to main , enabling reliable at high power levels. This cycle delivers a of 265 seconds at , balancing efficiency with the simplicity required for the Saturn V's demanding first-stage requirements. Key structural elements include the bell nozzle, thrust chamber, and gimbal mount system. The bell nozzle features an expandable divergent section measuring 12 feet in diameter at the exit, optimized for sea-level exhaust expansion to maximize thrust while minimizing weight. The thrust chamber, formed from regeneratively cooled tubes welded from Inconel alloy, withstands combustion temperatures exceeding 5,000°F and chamber pressures around 982 psia (67.7 bar), channeling the propellants into efficient combustion. Attached to the vehicle via a gimbal mount, the engine allows ±6.5 degrees of vectoring in pitch and yaw for flight control, actuated by hydraulic servos. Central to the propellant delivery is the turbopump assembly, comprising separate LOX and RP-1 units mounted on a common shaft driven by the gas-generator . The LOX supplies approximately 25,000 gallons per minute at high pressure, while the RP-1 unit handles 15,600 gallons per minute, ensuring rapid feed to the . These pumps are powered by dual preburners operating at around 550 , where fuel-rich combustion generates hot gases to spin the at up to 5,500 rpm, producing 53,000 horsepower collectively. The plate, positioned at the head end of the thrust chamber, incorporates a impingement pattern with approximately 2,800 orifices (1,428 for oxidizer and 1,404 for fuel) arranged in circular rings divided into 13 baffled compartments to atomize and mix the propellants uniformly. This configuration promotes rapid and , preventing acoustic instabilities by controlling droplet size and distribution. Operating at an oxidizer-to-fuel ratio of 2.27:1, the sustains the high-energy reaction necessary for the engine's 1.5 million pounds of . In its complete form, the F-1 stands 18.5 feet tall from injector face to nozzle exit, with the bell expanding to a 12-foot , and maintains a dry weight of 18,500 pounds to facilitate integration into the Saturn V's stage.

Ignition and Operation Procedures

The ignition and operation procedures for the Rocketdyne F-1 engine relied on a hypergolic start system to ensure reliable initiation in the high-stakes environment of the Saturn V first stage. Pre-ignition preparations involved arming the engines and injecting a mixture of triethylaluminum and (TEA-TEB), a pyrophoric fluid that spontaneously ignites upon contact with (). This igniter fluid, consisting of approximately 85% and 15% triethylaluminum, was stored in dedicated cartridges and delivered to the and to initiate combustion without external spark sources. The startup sequence began with the Terminal Countdown Sequencer sending start commands at approximately T-8.9 seconds before liftoff, staggered across the five engines to manage structural loads—engine #5 at T-6.52 seconds, engines #1 and #3 at T-6.23 and T-6.07 seconds, and engines #2 and #4 at T-5.97 and T-5.95 seconds. Upon command, TEA-TEB was injected, igniting the propellants in the chamber and ; this initial drove the , which accelerated from rest to full speed of about 5,500 RPM within roughly 2 seconds, powered first by gaseous nitrogen and then by the gas generator's turbine. Propellant flow— fuel and —ramped up as the reached operational speed, with main fuel valves opening once chamber pressure exceeded 20 , leading to stable and full buildup in approximately 1.2 seconds. During operation, the engines were monitored through redundant systems tracking chamber , which stabilized at around 982 psia to confirm "Thrust OK" status for each engine, along with actuator performance for thrust vector control. The Launch Vehicle Digital Computer and flight crew observed these via dashboard indicators, such as the LV ENGINES lights, ensuring no anomalies in rise or . Safety protocols included tolerance limits for excursions to detect potential instabilities early. Post-ignition shutdown was commanded via closure of the main valves, halting flow to the and . The center shut down first at T+2 minutes 15.2 seconds to mitigate forces, while the four outboard engines continued until depletion at T+2 minutes 41.6 seconds, after which separated the stage; deflector features in the design helped mitigate risks of hard starts or residual during cutoff. Ground handling procedures emphasized cryogenic safety and thermal management, including chill-down of supply lines during loading at T-6 hours 27 minutes to prevent , and pre-loading of at T-15 hours for auxiliary cooling to facilitate smooth ignition. The nozzle extension employed cooling with to protect against thermal loads during operation.

Performance Specifications

The Rocketdyne F-1 engine, as deployed in production models for the Saturn V's stage, generated a thrust of 1,522,000 lbf (6,770 kN), which increased to 1,748,000 lbf (7,770 kN) in conditions due to the nozzle's optimizing exhaust velocity at altitude. This performance was achieved through a that powered turbopumps to deliver high flow rates while maintaining stable . Key operational metrics for the F-1 are summarized below:
ParameterValue (Sea Level)Value (Vacuum)
Thrust1,522,000 lbf1,748,000 lbf
Specific Impulse265 s304 s
Propellant Mass Flow Rate5,737 lb/s5,737 lb/s
Chamber Pressure (nominal)67.7 (982 psia)N/A
Nozzle Expansion Ratio16:116:1
These specifications enabled the engine to operate reliably during missions, with a typical burn time of 150-168 seconds, during which the five-engine cluster in the stage provided the total delta-v contribution of approximately 2.4 km/s to reach initial ascent velocity. The values reflect the engine's efficiency in converting energy to , with the figure accounting for atmospheric back-pressure and the figure benefiting from full expansion. Efficiency was influenced by design choices to mitigate operational limits, such as throat erosion, which constrained maximum durations to prevent material degradation under extreme heat fluxes exceeding 100 BTU/in²-s in the throat region. Acoustic damping features, including baffles and resonant cavities in the , were critical for , suppressing high-frequency oscillations that could otherwise lead to destructive by absorbing pressure waves and reducing amplitude by up to 50% during testing. The 16:1 provided altitude compensation, balancing performance with efficiency to minimize losses during the ascent phase.

Variants and Upgrades

F-1A Post-Apollo Enhancements

Following the success of the , Rocketdyne initiated development of the F-1A variant in the late under sponsorship to enhance the original F-1 engine's performance for potential post-Apollo launch vehicles. The primary goals were to increase while improving reliability and extending operational life, addressing limitations observed in the base F-1's and combustion stability. This uprated design aimed to support advanced missions requiring greater payload capacity, building on the F-1's established sea-level of 1,522,000 pounds-force (lbf). Key enhancements in the F-1A included a redesigned that enabled a increase to 1.8 million lbf at , achieved through optimized mixing to maintain at higher flow rates. The was upgraded with improved materials and a redesigned to reduce operational speeds, enhancing and allowing for longer burn durations without excessive wear. These modifications were intended to overall engine reliability for reusable or extended-mission applications, with the reaching about 2.05 million lbf and improved to 306 seconds. Testing of the F-1A prototypes occurred through static firings, where engines demonstrated stable operation during burns exceeding 200 seconds, validating the upgrades under simulated flight conditions. Two F-1A engines were ultimately produced by Rocketdyne, but none underwent due to shifting priorities. Intended for applications such as orbital workshop follow-on missions and as strap-on boosters for early concepts, the program was canceled in the mid-1970s amid budget constraints and the transition to the Space Shuttle as the primary U.S. launch system.

F-1B Booster Proposal

In the early 2010s, following the cancellation of NASA's and the initiation of the (SLS) development, and proposed the F-1B as a modernized liquid-propellant booster engine to replace the program's five-segment solid rocket boosters for SLS Block 2 configurations. The initiative, formally submitted in 2012, sought to leverage existing heritage F-1 components and salvaged engines from Apollo-era stages to achieve cost-effective development while targeting a sea-level of 1.7 to 2.0 million pounds-force per engine, enabling two F-1B engines per booster for enhanced payload capacity to lunar or Mars trajectories. This effort was part of NASA's Advanced Booster and , which awarded contracts for preliminary studies and demonstrations to evaluate liquid-fueled options against solid alternatives. Key design adaptations for the F-1B focused on updating the original F-1 architecture for contemporary standards and SLS integration, including the use of such as carbon composites for the extension to reduce and improve , replacement of analog hydraulic systems with digital electronic controls for improved reliability and throttleability, and modifications to the and interfaces for compatibility with Block 2's cryogenic core stage and upper stages. These changes aimed to maintain the using and propellants while addressing obsolescence in legacy parts, with the overall booster concept dubbed "Pyrios" to support evolved SLS missions beyond initial Block 1 flights. Testing plans included hot-fire demonstrations of salvaged F-1 components to validate modernization, beginning with a successful gas generator test in January 2013 at NASA's , which produced approximately 31,000 pounds of and confirmed . Further efforts involved assembling a full-scale powerhead and conducting single-engine hot-fires using refurbished hardware, with preliminary design reviews completed for the and upgrades by mid-2013. However, was halted in 2014 amid budget constraints and 's decision to prioritize existing core engines and five-segment solid rocket boosters for evolution, deeming liquid booster options like the F-1B too costly and risky for near-term schedules despite their potential for higher performance. Compared to the original F-1, which delivered 1.5 million pounds-force of at a chamber of 70 (1,015 psia), the F-1B targeted a 20% thrust increase to approximately 1.8 million pounds-force through elevated chamber to 85 (1,232 psia), enabled by modern materials and refined designs for greater flow without altering the core geometry significantly. As of 2025, the F-1B project remains inactive, with technical data and test artifacts archived at for potential reuse in future heavy-lift vehicle concepts, though no funded revival efforts are underway.

Production and Operational Use

Manufacturing Locations

The Rocketdyne F-1 engines were primarily assembled at the company's main production facility in Canoga Park, California, where the complex integration of components into complete engines occurred during the 1960s. This site served as the central hub for final assembly of the 65 flight-qualified engines and additional spares produced for the ; Rocketdyne ultimately delivered 98 production F-1 engines to , including the 65 used in flight and spares for testing and contingencies. Engines were then shipped to testing facilities, including Rocketdyne's site in , for full-duration hot-fire verification prior to delivery to . Key components were sourced through a specialized managed by Rocketdyne, a division of . The thrust chambers, constructed from Inconel X-750 alloy tubes for high-temperature , were fabricated at Rocketdyne's facilities, with hydraulic forming and processes ensuring structural integrity. Turbopumps, critical for delivering propellants at rates exceeding 15,000 gallons per minute, were designed and manufactured in-house by Rocketdyne engineers to meet the engine's demanding performance requirements. Production ramped up following NASA's March 1964 contract award to Rocketdyne for 76 F-1 engines at a target cost of $158.4 million, with peak activity from 1963 to 1969 involving thousands of workers across , , and roles at the Canoga Park plant. A subsequent 1966 contract covered 30 additional engines and support at approximately $133 million total, reflecting in serial production. The program demanded rigorous , incorporating non-destructive testing methods such as inspections introduced in the mid-1960s to detect defects in welds and castings, achieving near-100% examination rates for critical components after process refinements in 1964. Following the conclusion of Apollo production in 1969, the Canoga Park facility shifted focus to other rocket programs, with limited efforts on F-1 derivatives like the F-1A in the early 2010s before the site's closure and razing in 2016.

Deployment in Saturn V Missions

The S-IC first stage of the Saturn V rocket utilized five Rocketdyne F-1 engines arranged in a pentagonal cluster, with one fixed center engine and four gimbaled outer engines for thrust vector control, collectively delivering approximately 7.5 million lbf of thrust at liftoff to propel the vehicle from the launch pad. These engines powered all 13 launches from November 1967 to May 1973, encompassing Apollo missions 4 through 17 and the 1 orbital workshop deployment, for a total of 65 F-1 engines flown without any in-flight failures, demonstrating exceptional reliability in operational use. In the mission, the F-1 cluster encountered minor thrust vector control issues stemming from pogo oscillations and unexpected thrust fluctuations after the initial two minutes of burn, which induced vehicle vibrations but did not compromise overall ascent; these were addressed through guidance software modifications to enhance stability compensation in subsequent missions. The standard S-IC burn profile lasted about 150 seconds for Apollo missions, during which the F-1 engines accelerated the vehicle to contribute approximately 63 km (39 miles) of altitude gain before cutoff; for Skylab 1, the burn followed the standard profile of about 160 seconds to deliver the uncrewed payload to . Following burnout, the stage, including its F-1 engines, was separated at approximately 61 km altitude via retro-rockets and pyrotechnics, allowing it to fall ballistically and impact Ocean downrange to ensure safe clearance from the ascending upper stages.

Legacy and Preservation

Engine Recovery Efforts

Following the 13 launches of the rocket during the and the mission, the first stages—each powered by five F-1 engines—were intentionally jettisoned into Ocean about 8 minutes after liftoff to shed mass. This resulted in 65 F-1 engines sinking to the seafloor, scattered across a large area in Ocean, with search efforts covering approximately 300 square kilometers (116 square miles) due to atmospheric reentry dynamics, stage separation, and high-velocity water impacts that caused components to disperse. In 2011, Amazon founder launched a privately funded expedition through to locate and retrieve these historic engines, employing advanced to map potential sites across the broad impact zones. The search intensified in 2012, confirming the presence of F-1 components from multiple Apollo missions, and culminated in a 2013 recovery operation using remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) deployed from support ships. Over three weeks at sea, the team retrieved major components—including thrust chambers, injectors, gas generators, turbines, and manifolds—sufficient to reconstruct two complete engines, from the , , and missions, at depths of approximately 4 kilometers (14,000 feet). These artifacts, weighing over 11,300 kilograms in total, were remarkably preserved despite decades underwater, though analysis later revealed surface corrosion, from marine organisms, and sediment accumulation. The recovery effort presented formidable technical challenges, including extreme pressures at depth, turbulent currents that complicated ROV and , and the risk of further damage during extraction from entangled debris fields. Bezos coordinated closely with from the outset, sharing expedition plans and securing agency blessings for the operation in . Upon retrieval, the components were offered to , which accepted ownership of select pieces in for scientific examination and public exhibition; engineers at the (MSFC) disassembled one assembly, confirming the integrity of critical internal elements like turbopumps and combustion chambers amid external degradation. No additional targeted recoveries have been reported as of November 2025. The operations sparked ethical discussions regarding the salvage of U.S. government-owned space artifacts in , where claims of ownership under the and intersected with imperatives for historical preservation. Bezos emphasized returning the items to to honor their public legacy, avoiding commercial exploitation and ensuring their role in educating future generations about Apollo engineering achievements.

Current Locations and Modern Relevance

Several complete Rocketdyne F-1 engines survive today, primarily as part of preserved rockets and standalone exhibits in museums across the . Three full-scale vehicles are on public display, each incorporating five authentic F-1 engines from the Apollo era, for a total of 15 engines at the in , Johnson Space Center's Rocket Park in Houston, Texas, and the U.S. Space & Rocket Center in . Additional complete examples include an early prototype at the 's , which underwent conservation in 2019, and engines at the in . Recovered components from ocean-floor expeditions have contributed to preservation efforts, with parts from Apollo 11's F-1 engines conserved and displayed following ' 2013 recovery project; these artifacts, including thrust chambers, are exhibited at the in , , and the in . Unused spare engines and test articles, numbering around five complete units, have been repurposed for mockups, such as those exploring F-1B upgrades during NASA's early studies. In modern rocketry, the F-1's design principles—particularly its for high-thrust, LOX/RP-1 propulsion—offer valuable lessons in scaling large liquid-fueled engines, influencing developments like Blue Origin's engine for the launcher, which adopts a comparable for reliable, high-output performance. Similarly, SpaceX's program draws on the F-1's clustered engine configuration for its 33 engines, applying scalability insights to enable Mars mission requiring massive payload capacities. NASA continues to reference F-1 data in studies for heavy-lift scalability, supporting and beyond-Mars objectives. As of 2025, active production of F-1 engines has ceased since the Apollo program's end, with focusing on successors like the ; however, digital models and simulations replicate F-1 behavior for performance analysis and potential heritage-inspired designs. The F-1's legacy extends to cultural and educational spheres, where it symbolizes Apollo-era ingenuity and is prominently featured in media such as the film , documentaries on history, and curricula exploring rocketry fundamentals.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Waking a Giant: Bringing the Saturn F-1 Engine Back to Life
    Propellants: LOX and RP. • Thrust:1,522,000 lbf sea level; 1,748,200 lbf vacuum. • Specific Impulse: 265.4 sea level; 304.1 vacuum.
  2. [2]
    F-1 Rocket Engine | National Air and Space Museum
    The F-1's 2,500-pound turbopump pumped in the propellants at 42,500 gallons per minute. This engine was constructed in 1963 by the Rocketdyne Division of ...
  3. [3]
    Rocket Propulsion Evolution: 8.13 F-1, One Second
    Jun 23, 2021 · Each engine stood 18.5 feet tall and weighed 18,500 lb, as much as a loaded school bus. The F-1 was designed to run for only 163 seconds. If you ...
  4. [4]
    A New View of the Rocketdyne F-1 Engine
    Nov 2, 2022 · In January 1959, NASA contracted with Rocketdyne to continue developing the F-1. Work had to move quickly, given early Soviet successes in ...
  5. [5]
    1st Full-Thrust, Long-Duration F-1 Engine Test - May 26, 1962 - NASA
    May 29, 2019 · The first full-thrust, long-duration F-1 engine test was successfully conducted. The F-1 engine was developed by Rocketdyne under the direction of NASA's ...
  6. [6]
    Rocketdyne - F-1 Saturn V First Stage Engine
    The F-1 engine was used in a cluster of five on the first stage, and that was the only power during the first stage. It took the Apollo launch vehicle, which ...
  7. [7]
    1958 Chronology
    1958 December 17 - . Launch Vehicle: Saturn V. Rocketdyne gets contract to develop F-1 engine. - . Nation: USA. Program: Apollo. NASA awarded contract to ...
  8. [8]
    LR79
    Rocketdyne LOx/Kerosene rocket engine family. Designed for booster applications. Originally evolved in the Navaho program into the most powerful available Lox/ ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Robert Biggs
    The highest thing going at the time had 150,000 pounds of thrust. Rocketdyne's thought was the new engine might be needed for a ballistic missile, not that it ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Remembering the Giants: Apollo Rocket Propulsion Development
    Robert “Bob” Biggs worked forty-seven years at. Rocketdyne, and spent nine years as lead development engineer and development project engineer on the F-1.Missing: 133A | Show results with:133A
  11. [11]
    Rocket Propulsion Evolution: 8.11 - F-1 Engine
    May 13, 2021 · Rocketdyne spent the first year of F-1 development gradually increasing its thrust, aiming at a 1,522,000 lbT rating. Seven times, or about 10% ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
  12. [12]
    Solving Combustion Instability and Saving America's First Trips to ...
    Jul 12, 2019 · Dividers -- called baffles -- were added to the F-1 engine injector plate to stabilize the engine and solve the destructive problem of combustion instability.
  13. [13]
    Glenn Impact on the Apollo Program - NASA
    Apr 3, 2024 · From its first firing in 1960, the F–1 suffered from combustion instability. This eventually led to the destruction of an entire engine in July ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Comprehensive Review of Liquid-Propellant Combustion ...
    Of approximately 3200 full-scale tests performed during development of the F-1 engine, about 2000 were conducted during Project First. Fourteen basic ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Ideas Into Hardware - NASA
    In June 1962, the explosion of the F-1 engine within half a second after ignition was blamed on combustion insta- bility. The problem placed the entire ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    In 1959 Rocketdyne began work on the F-1, which at 1.5 million pounds thrust, would eventually power the first stage of the Saturn V Moon rocket and hold the ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] marshall space flight center, f-1 engine static test haer al-129-l - Loc
    Glennan, Administrator for NASA had filed an official request to the Secretary of the Air Force for. Rocketdyne to begin development of "a 1500 K thrust engine.Missing: 1950s oversight<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    55 Years Ago: First Saturn V Stage Tested in Mississippi Facility
    Apr 26, 2021 · The first static test firings of the S-IC stages took place at MSFC, but due to the tremendous noise of the stage's five F-1 engines, generating ...Missing: 65 | Show results with:65
  19. [19]
    Rocket Propulsion Evolution: 8.13 - F-1 Operation
    May 13, 2021 · Overview. The F-1 took about five seconds to start using tank head pressure only. GSE-furnished hydraulic pressure initiated a pressure ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] 19750012398.pdf - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
    This document is a monograph on "Turbopump Systems for Liquid Rocket Engines," organizing design knowledge and establishing design guidance.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] LIQUID ROCKETENGINE CENTRIFUGALFLOWTURBOPUMPS
    This monograph,. "Liquid. Rocket. Engine. Centrifugal. Flow Turbopumps", was prepared under the direction of Howard. W. Douglass, Chief, Design Criteria ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Saturn V Step-by-Step | NASA
    Jan 5, 2025 · APPENDIX B - STARTING THE F-1 ENGINE. The Saturn V first stage (S-IC) was powered by five Rocketdyne F-1 engines. Each engine contained a ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] acoustic igniter parametric study for liquid propellant rocket engine ...
    Sep 5, 2024 · Rocketdyne F-1 engine TEA-TEB cartridge [5] ... The total amount of TEA-. TEB is 403±10 grams. The cartridge is 46 cm long and 2-3/8 in ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Saturn 5 launch vehicle flight evaluation report: AS-506, Apollo 11 ...
    Vehicle mass at S-IC ignition is. 2,941,221 kilograms (6,484,282 Ibm). The S-IC stage powered flight is approximately 161 seconds; the S-II stage provides ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Liquid Rocket Engine Nozzles - NASA Technical Reports Server
    The F-1 actual thrust vector must fall within. 0.60 in. of the gimbal center and be within 0° 30' of the engine centerline. Closer tolerances on throat ...Missing: 12.5 | Show results with:12.5
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Comprehensive Review of Liquid-Propellant Combustion ...
    ... F-1 engine received complete quali- fication for manned missions. The two principal objectives of the program were to develop a dynamically stable F-1 engine.
  27. [27]
    A mighty thunderous silence: The Saturn F-1 engine after Apollo
    Jun 3, 2019 · Rocketdyne delivered 98 production engines to NASA, of which 65 were launched. A total of 56 equivalent development engines were tested.
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    F-1 Major Configuration Change Points - heroicrelics.org
    There have been six F-1 major configurations starting with the pre-production R&D engines. The following gives the major features for each configuration.Missing: targets | Show results with:targets
  30. [30]
    How does the efficiency of the Rocketdyne F-1A compare to the F-1?
    Dec 17, 2016 · Vacuum performance of the F-1A increased specific impulse to 306.2s with a 2.484:1 O:F ratio, resulting in a thrust increase to 2,054,500 pounds ...What was the maximum thrust of the Rocketdyne F-1 engine?Why does a rocket engine provide more thrust in a vacuum than in ...More results from space.stackexchange.comMissing: injector | Show results with:injector
  31. [31]
    [PDF] NASA Space Launch System
    • Dynetics Modernized F-1 Engine and Cryotank Cost Risk Reduction: (1) F-1B engine: hot-fired heritage gas generator (GG); produced F-1. GG injector ...
  32. [32]
    Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, Dynetics Propose SLS Boosters Based ...
    Apr 30, 2012 · The F-1 is a kerosene-fueled engine capable of producing 1.5 million pounds of thrust at sea level, about 75 percent more thrust than the Soviet ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] IAC-13,A5.4-D2.8,2x17626 NASA'S SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM
    engine, with the results informing research into a modernized F-1B engine that could be a candidate for an advanced liquid-fuel booster for SLS (Fig. IV) ...
  34. [34]
    New F-1B rocket engine upgrades Apollo-era design with 1.8M lbs ...
    Apr 14, 2013 · It's about a 1.8 million pound thrust engine, and if you look at the F-1A specs, it's going to be about the same.” “This is even after ditching ...
  35. [35]
    Burning thunder - The Space Review
    Nov 25, 2013 · Several F-1A engines were built and tested as a follow-on to the F-1 engine. The new engine would be capable of 8 million newtons (1.8 million ...
  36. [36]
    World's Most Powerful Engine Blazes Path for Space Launch ...
    Jan 24, 2013 · NASA resurrected the world's most powerful rocket engine ever flown – the mighty F-1 that powered the Saturn V rocket- and test fired it's gas generator today.
  37. [37]
    Solid fuel boosters, not liquid, will likely launch NASA's giant SLS ...
    May 14, 2015 · The launch vehicle's initial scheduled launch date has slipped several times and currently is targeted for somewhere around November 2018; the ...
  38. [38]
    Rocketdyne Canoga Park plant (and F-1 display) - collectSPACE.com
    Oct 1, 2013 · ... Canoga Park factory where the massive engines were assembled in the 1960s to Aerojet Rocketdyne's facility in Chatsworth, California. The ...
  39. [39]
    Rocketdyne - Waco History
    Since 1942, scientists, engineers, and production workers have been at work in McGregor, Texas, helping win wars, achieve spaceflights, and work towards lunar ...
  40. [40]
    F-1 Engine Thrust Chamber - heroicrelics.org
    The F-1 thrust chamber uses a primary tube brazed to two secondary tubes, with brazed joints sealing combustion gasses. The jacket and bands bear the primary ...Missing: targets 1959
  41. [41]
    Rocket Engine Turbo Pump, Cutaway, F-1
    The F-1 turbo pump was used in the Saturn V's first stage, pumping 42,500 gallons per minute of propellants. It was donated to the Smithsonian in 1975.Missing: 15000 5500 preburners 550 psi
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Overstatement Of Contract Target Costs For Fl Rocket Engines For ...
    In November 1966, NASA awarded a second cost-plus- incentive-fee contract to Rocketdyne for 30 F-l engines and support services. The target cost was about $133 ...Missing: workers | Show results with:workers
  43. [43]
    [PDF] OR-14 176 NDE - NASA Technical Reports Server
    By the end of World War II, the "big five" NDE methods (liquid penetrant testing, magnetic particle testing, ultrasonic testing, eddy current testing, and x-ray ...
  44. [44]
    Rocketdyne plant that built world's most powerful rocket engines ...
    Aug 27, 2016 · The 61-year-old Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power plant in Canoga Park, once home to tens of thousands of San Fernando Valley scientists, engineers and engine ...Missing: assembly | Show results with:assembly
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Saturn V Stage I (S-IC) Overview - NASA Technical Reports Server
    five First Stage F1 engines. ❑ Also stored televised pictures from fueling ... valves & purge the F-1 engines. O b. dC t lP. S t. To Vent and. Relief Valves.Missing: delta- | Show results with:delta-
  46. [46]
    A Landmark Rocket Sent Humanity to the Moon - ASME
    Jan 27, 2025 · Those 13 missions required a total of 65 F-1 engines, which all proved 100 percent reliable. ... engines made for the Apollo program, along with ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    NASA's Mighty Saturn V Moon Rocket Explained (Infographic) - Space
    Nov 9, 2012 · A total of 13 Saturn V rockets were launched from 1967 until 1973, carrying Apollo missions as well as the Skylab space station. Every part ...
  48. [48]
    The Day the Saturn V Almost Failed: 50 Years Since Apollo 6
    Apr 1, 2018 · For the first two minutes, the five F-1 engines on the first stage burned normally, but then experienced peculiar thrust fluctuations, which ...
  49. [49]
    Saturn V
    The most feasible, lowest development cost improvement would have used upgraded F-1 motors, an S- IC first stage stretch, modest upgrades to the J-2 upper stage ...
  50. [50]
    The Apollo F-1 Engine Recovery Project - Explorer Consulting
    At exactly 8.9 seconds later, the multi-stage rocket lifted off, propelled toward the heavens by five F-1 engines, each generating more than 1.5 million pounds ...
  51. [51]
    F-1 Engine Recovery - Bezos Expeditions
    Remote Operated Vehicles recovering Apollo F-1 engines three miles beneath the Atlantic. We're bringing home enough major components to fashion displays of two ...Missing: SpaceX | Show results with:SpaceX
  52. [52]
    Apollo rocket engines recovered by Bezos team - BBC News
    Mar 21, 2013 · After three weeks at sea, the Bezos Expeditions team recovered two such engines using remotely-operated vehicles.
  53. [53]
    Jeff Bezos Recovers Apollo Rocket Engines From Deep Ocean
    Mar 20, 2013 · A team organized by Jeff Bezos spent three weeks fishing at sea to recover the corroded F-1 engines, which sat more than 4 kilometers below the surface of the ...
  54. [54]
    How My Lab Pieced Together a Forgotten Part of an Apollo Rocket
    and had been resting on the Atlantic Ocean ...Missing: scattered 500 square miles
  55. [55]
    Moon rocket engines recovered from bottom of Atlantic ocean
    Mar 20, 2013 · Billionaire Bezos uses robots to raise F-1 engines after 40 years underwater.Missing: disassembly | Show results with:disassembly
  56. [56]
    Apollo F-1 rocket engines raised off ocean floor by Amazon CEO
    Mar 20, 2013 · "Nearly one year ago, Jeff Bezos shared with us his plans to recover F-1 engines," said NASA administrator Charles Bolden in a statement that ...
  57. [57]
    Thrust Chamber, Rocket Engine, Liquid Fuel, F-1 (Recovered)
    The F-1 engine was the powerhouse of the first stage of the Saturn V rocket that launched the Apollo lunar missions. The thrust chamber was located near the ...
  58. [58]
    NASA Blesses Amazon CEO's F-1 Engine Recovery Effort
    Apr 9, 2012 · Bezos said that the engine recovery effort will be privately financed, foregoing public funding. Despite his investment, which some salvage ...Missing: total | Show results with:total
  59. [59]
    How NASA brought the monstrous F-1 “moon rocket” engine back to ...
    Apr 14, 2013 · Repeated testing revealed that the problem was caused by the burning plume of propellent rotating as it combusted in the nozzle.Missing: bomb | Show results with:bomb<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    Saturn V at George W.S. Abbey Rocket Park - Space Center Houston
    In total, 13 Saturn V rockets launched into space. The Saturn V rocket stands 363 feet tall and has dazzled viewers since its first un-crewed takeoff, the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Saturn V Hall - U.S. Space & Rocket Center
    Experience a jaw-dropping encounter with a real Saturn V rocket – one of only three in the world, in the Saturn V Hall of the Davidson Center for Space ...
  62. [62]
    KSC F-1 Engine Prototype - EverGreene
    The F-1 Engine currently on display at the Kennedy Space Center Rocket Garden is an early Rocketdyne prototype. In 2019, EverGreene was contracted to conduct ...
  63. [63]
    Apollo | The Museum of Flight
    An acclaimed exhibit capturing the drama of the Space Race to the Moon. Features the largest display of the F-1 rocket engines that launched Apollo 12 and 16.Missing: Rocketdyne | Show results with:Rocketdyne
  64. [64]
    Vince Capone Presented on Apollo F-1 Engine Recovery at the ...
    Now the remains of the famous Apollo missions have been conserved and are on display at the Cosmosphere International SciEd Center and Space Museum in ...
  65. [65]
    Engines | Blue Origin
    Our family of engines is powering the next generation of rockets for commercial, civil, national security and human spaceflight.Explore BE-4 · Explore BE-3PM · Explore BE-7 · Explore BE-3U
  66. [66]
    Is SpaceX's Raptor engine the king of rocket engines?
    May 25, 2019 · SpaceX's new Raptor engine is a methane fueled full flow staged combustion cycle engine and it's so hard to develop, no engine like this has ...
  67. [67]
    Rocketdyne F-1 Rocket Development | Boeing Classics - YouTube
    Jan 22, 2025 · F-1 is the most powerful U.S. rocket engine to be placed in production. Developed at Conoga Park, California, by Rocketdyne, a division of ...