Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Roof knocking

Roof knocking, also known as "knock on the roof," is a warning tactic utilized by the () in which small, low-yield, non-lethal munitions—typically delivered via or —are fired onto the of a building identified as a military target to signal occupants to evacuate before a larger strike. The procedure aims to separate combatants from civilians in densely populated urban environments, such as , where non-state actors like frequently embed military assets within civilian infrastructure. The tactic emerged during Israeli military operations in Gaza toward the end of 2008, with formalized use by the (IAF) in 2009 as part of efforts to comply with international humanitarian law's distinction principle by providing feasible warnings prior to attacks. It has since been employed in subsequent conflicts, including Operations Pillar of Defense (2012) and Protective Edge (2014), often alongside other mitigation measures like phone calls, text messages, and leaflet drops to targeted areas. Proponents, including Israeli military analysts, argue it represents an innovative adaptation to challenges, where precise intelligence indicates human shields or weapons storage in civilian structures, potentially enabling evacuations that preserve non-combatant lives without compromising operational security. Despite its intent, roof knocking remains highly controversial, with critics questioning its effectiveness and compliance with requirements under . inquiries, such as the 2015 report on Operation Protective Edge, have concluded that the impacts often generate confusion rather than clear evacuation signals, citing instances where residents mistook the initial blasts for the main attack or lacked time and safe routes to flee amid ongoing hostilities. Legal scholars have debated whether it qualifies as a legitimate or veers into an impermissible method of warfare, particularly if the "knock" itself risks harm without sufficient advance notice or verification of civilian presence. Empirical assessments of its impact on casualty ratios are limited and contested; while procedures incorporate it within broader targeting protocols that have drawn interest from other militaries, including the U.S. , aggregate data on operations show persistently high civilian death tolls, attributable in part to the tactical environment's inherent difficulties rather than isolated failures. Such critiques must be weighed against potential institutional biases in reporting entities like the UN, which have faced accusations of disproportionate focus on one in asymmetric conflicts.

Definition and Purpose

Tactical Description

Roof knocking, also known as "knock on the roof," is a warning tactic utilized by the () whereby a low-yield munition is directed at the roof of a structure designated as a military objective to signal impending airstrikes and prompt civilian evacuation. The procedure aims to provide an audible and visible alert in densely populated urban settings, where distinguishing combatants from non-combatants poses significant challenges, by creating a loud impact with minimal structural damage to the building itself. This method supplements prior notifications, such as automated phone calls in urging occupants to leave within specified intervals, often 5 to 30 minutes, and is employed only after intelligence confirms the presence of militants or weapons within the target. The execution involves aerial delivery, typically via unmanned drones or fighter jets like F-15s, using precision-guided, small-caliber air-to-surface munitions designed for limited explosive effect. One such device is the "" missile, produced by , featuring a 15-kilogram , a total weight of approximately 30 kilograms, and a range of up to 20 kilometers; it is targeted to strike a corner of the or detonate in mid-air to generate and rather than widespread destruction. IDF surveillance assets, including drones, monitor the site post-impact to verify evacuation before authorizing the follow-on strike with heavier against the embedded threat. While described by the IDF as non-lethal, the munition's explosive nature can result in localized damage or injury, though it is calibrated to avoid collapsing the structure or causing mass casualties. This tactic emerged as an adaptation for aerial operations in environments lacking ground forces for direct warnings, drawing from earlier practices like the "neighbor procedure" but refined for remote execution to comply with precautions against incidental civilian harm. It is selectively applied when other warning mechanisms, such as leaflets or calls, prove insufficient due to non-compliance or interference, with assessments indicating its use in targeted buildings to deter human shielding by militants.

Objectives in Urban Warfare

In urban warfare, characterized by high-density civilian populations and adversaries embedding military assets within residential structures, roof knocking serves as a precautionary measure to warn non-combatants of imminent strikes on legitimate military targets. The (IDF) deploy low-yield, non-lethal munitions—typically weighing around 20-40 kg—onto building rooftops to generate audible alerts, affording occupants approximately 10-15 minutes to evacuate before a precision-guided follow-up strike. This tactic addresses the challenges of distinction under (IHL), where and allied groups in have systematically used civilian homes for weapons storage, command posts, and launch sites, complicating efforts to isolate combatants. A core objective is minimizing civilian casualties and , enabling the to prosecute high-value targets—such as launchers or terrorist operatives—while adhering to assessments that weigh anticipated military advantage against foreseeable harm. In operations like those in since 2008, this has involved thousands of such warnings annually, integrated with intelligence-driven targeting to verify target validity and civilian presence via . Proponents, including analyses, argue it reflects operational restraint rooted in ethical imperatives, reducing potential deaths in scenarios where adversaries exploit human shields by preventing or discouraging evacuations. Additionally, roof knocking fulfills IHL's requirement for effective advance warnings when feasible, serving as of precautionary efforts in legal scrutiny post-conflict. Unlike verbal or telephonic alerts, which can be intercepted or ignored, the physical impact ensures immediacy in chaotic environments, though its success depends on recipients' ability to act amid disrupted communications and psychological operations by foes. This method has influenced U.S. military considerations for similar asymmetric fights, prioritizing tactical over indiscriminate to preserve force legitimacy.

Historical Development

Origins in IDF Operations

The roof knocking tactic, involving the firing of a low-yield munition or warning projectile onto the roof of a targeted building to alert occupants prior to a larger strike, was first developed and employed by the during Operation Cast Lead in , which commenced on December 27, 2008. This operation responded to Hamas rocket fire from civilian areas, creating operational challenges in distinguishing military targets from protected sites under . The method emerged improvisationally in joint operations centers as a means to mitigate civilian harm when initial verbal warnings via phone calls—drawing from Shin Bet-compiled lists of building owners—proved insufficient, such as when residents remained in place potentially as human shields. The initial application occurred in the early days of the operation, targeting a residential house used for and storage, where a small-caliber air-to-surface munition was deployed on the after evacuation warnings to prompt departure without causing significant structural damage or casualties. Over the three-week campaign, the tactic was applied dozens of times alongside other measures, including over 2.5 million leaflets and 165,000 phone calls, as the struck more than 170 targets on the first day alone. It built on prior warning practices, such as the "neighbor procedure" used in the and adaptations from the 1970s in involving non-lethal munitions against Palestinian Liberation Organization positions in civilian zones, but roof knocking represented a targeted evolution for dense urban environments like . Subsequent refinements included collaboration with to develop the "" missile for precise, low-impact roof strikes, enhancing reliability in follow-on operations. assessments indicated the method's effectiveness in preventing civilian injuries and deaths during Cast Lead, though external critiques, including from the , noted instances of confusion among recipients regarding the warning's intent and limited evacuation windows.

Adoption and Use by the US Military

The military adopted the roof knocking tactic, inspired by Defense Forces practices observed since , as part of efforts to mitigate civilian casualties during airstrikes against the (ISIS). On April 5, 2016, in , , U.S. forces employed the method for the first time publicly documented, targeting an ISIS finance operative's cash storage facility containing approximately $150 million. A missile was configured for an airburst over the building's roof to serve as a non-lethal , prompting evacuation of observed civilians, including a woman and children. Maj. Gen. Peter E. Gersten, deputy commander for operations and intelligence in , confirmed the tactic's integration into U.S. operational procedures, stating it was used "to ensure that she and the children were out of the building" and could be applied in future strikes. Despite the warning, the woman returned to the structure before the follow-on precision-guided bomb detonated, resulting in her death alongside the targeted figure. This incident occurred amid broader U.S. air campaign casualties, with at least 41 civilian deaths reported since 2014, highlighting the tactic's partial success in prompting temporary evacuation but failure to prevent re-entry. The adoption aligned with U.S. interpretations of , emphasizing feasible precautions to reduce harm, as outlined in the Department of Defense Law of War Manual. While U.S. forces continued other warning measures like leaflets and calls in and , roof knocking represented a novel precision adaptation for urban environments, though its employment appears limited to this initial case without subsequent high-profile uses reported. Gersten noted observation of procedures, underscoring cross-alliance tactical exchange, but outcomes underscored challenges in ensuring sustained compliance amid ongoing threats.

Technical Implementation

Methods and Devices Employed

The primary method of roof knocking entails the precise aerial delivery of a small, low-yield to the roof of a building identified as harboring militants or weaponry, serving as an audible and physical alert to occupants. The (IDF), through its (IAF), utilizes manned aircraft such as F-15 fighter jets or Apache attack helicopters to launch or drop these munitions, ensuring accuracy via precision-guided systems to minimize unintended damage. This approach was first systematically implemented during Operation Cast Lead in late 2008, with the device detonating on impact to produce a loud and shockwave calibrated for rather than destruction. Devices employed are typically non-penetrating, low-impact warheads with explosive yields equivalent to 10-25 pounds of material, often derived from modified air-to-surface missiles like the or bespoke warning projectiles designed for superficial contact. These munitions feature reduced charges compared to standard , prioritizing noise and vibration over fragmentation or to avoid structural collapse or immediate casualties, though their use requires real-time intelligence and for targeting. In select operations, alternatives such as low-charge artillery shells or mortars have been adapted for similar effects, but aerial delivery predominates due to superior precision in urban environments. Implementation follows a sequenced : post-intelligence of a target, the warning device is fired, allowing 10-15 minutes for observed egress—verified via drones or —before authorization for the primary strike, if evacuation occurs. This tactical integration emphasizes proportionality under , with the documenting over 10,000 such warnings in operations since 2009 to facilitate flight from harm.

Integration with Other Warning Measures

The (IDF) employ roof knocking as part of a broader, multi-layered civilian warning protocol during urban operations in , which includes preliminary broad-area alerts via leaflets and radio broadcasts, followed by targeted notifications such as phone calls and text messages. This sequence aims to maximize evacuation opportunities while accounting for limitations like disrupted communications or Hamas-imposed restrictions on civilian movement. For instance, during operations, the IDF has distributed millions of leaflets—over 2.5 million in Operation Cast Lead (2008–2009)—designating no-go zones before escalating to personalized warnings. Roof knocking specifically serves as an escalatory measure when initial warnings prove insufficient or infeasible, such as in cases where residents lack access to phones or ignore prior alerts amid dense urban environments. According to analyses of practices, this tactic is reserved for structures identified as military objectives after standard methods like automated calls or have been attempted but not resulted in evacuation. In the 2021 Gaza conflict, for example, warnings combined text messages and phone calls with roof knocks on targeted buildings, providing a tangible auditory and visual cue to supplement digital or broadcast methods that might be jammed or disbelieved. Integration enhances overall warning efficacy by leveraging diverse channels to overcome adversary tactics, including Hamas's alleged use of human shields and prevention of evacuations, though empirical assessments indicate variable compliance rates influenced by these factors. In the 2023–2024 Israel-Hamas war, the issued thousands of phone calls, texts, and leaflets alongside roof knocking, demonstrating a tiered approach where the latter acts as a localized, non-lethal prompt for immediate egress when broader alerts fail to clear areas. This combination reflects adaptations from earlier operations, prioritizing redundancy to mitigate risks in .

Applications in Conflicts

Early Gaza Operations (2008-2014)

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) first employed roof knocking during Operation Cast Lead, launched on December 27, 2008, against Hamas targets in the Gaza Strip following escalated rocket fire from the territory. This tactic involved firing a small, non-lethal munition—typically a mortar round or low-yield explosive—onto the roof of a targeted building to signal impending strikes, allowing time for occupants to evacuate. The procedure was applied selectively to structures housing militants or weapons, amid dense urban environments where Hamas embedded military assets among civilians, as documented in IDF operational reviews. Over the 22-day operation, which ended in a unilateral ceasefire on January 18, 2009, roof knocking contributed to efforts to mitigate civilian exposure, though Palestinian sources reported instances where warnings were ignored or evacuations hindered by ongoing combat. In Operation Pillar of Defense, initiated on November 14, 2012, to halt rocket barrages from Gaza, the IDF expanded roof knocking as part of broader warning protocols, including phone calls and leaflets. The eight-day campaign targeted over 1,500 Hamas and Islamic Jihad sites, with roof knocks used on residential-adjacent buildings to prompt evacuations before precision airstrikes. IDF assessments indicated the tactic's role in reducing unintended casualties, despite challenges from militants urging civilians to remain as shields, a pattern observed in video footage and post-operation analyses. The operation resulted in approximately 150 Palestinian deaths, predominantly combatants per Israeli figures, with civilian tolls attributed partly to non-compliance with warnings. Roof knocking saw extensive application during Operation Protective Edge, from July 8 to August 26, 2014, in response to intensified tunneling and rocket attacks. The conducted over 5,600 airstrikes, employing the tactic on hundreds of structures, often followed by a 10-15 minute evacuation window before heavier munitions. Official Israeli evaluations concluded it was "highly effective" in averting civilian injuries, with data showing thousands warned across Gaza's urban zones, though tactics—including booby-trapping escape routes and public directives to disregard alerts—complicated outcomes. The conflict yielded around 2,100 Palestinian fatalities, with estimates classifying two-thirds as militants; critics from groups cited cases of failed evacuations, but reports emphasized the tactic's evidentiary success in populated areas.

2023 Israel-Hamas War and Subsequent Developments

During the 2023 Israel-Hamas War, which began on , 2023, following Hamas's attack on southern Israel, the (IDF) employed roof knocking as one of several civilian warning measures prior to airstrikes on targeted buildings in , though its application was significantly curtailed compared to prior operations. Roof knocking involved firing a small, non-lethal munition—typically a low-explosive device—at the roof of a structure to signal imminent danger and prompt evacuation, often in conjunction with phone calls, text messages, and leaflets dropped over . The reported using such tactics to target command centers, tunnels, and weapons caches embedded in civilian areas, aiming to balance with efforts to reduce casualties amid 's practice of operating from populated zones. Within hours of the assault, high command rendered roof knocking optional rather than mandatory for strikes, reflecting a rapid adjustment to the conflict's intensity and 's tactics, including the use of human shields and rapid repositioning of fighters. This shift contributed to a broader reduction in pre-strike warnings, with the prioritizing speed to neutralize time-sensitive threats, as militants frequently exploited delay windows to evade capture or disperse. Despite the decrease, isolated instances persisted; for example, military observers noted continued integration of roof knocks with other alerts in select operations through mid-2024, particularly when indicated civilian presence in targeted vicinities. In subsequent phases of the war, extending into 2024 and 2025, roof knocking's role evolved amid prolonged ground operations and Hamas's entrenchment in urban densities like and . The emphasized that such warnings were deployed selectively when practicable, often after initial phone or digital alerts failed due to disrupted communications or Hamas interference, such as directives to civilians to ignore evacuations. Empirical assessments from military analyses indicate that while roof knocking provided audible cues in dense environments, its effectiveness was hampered by factors including shock from the initial blast potentially impeding flight, Hamas's exploitation of warning periods for ambushes, and overall siege conditions limiting safe evacuation routes. No comprehensive data quantifies exact roof knocking instances post-October 2023, but reports highlight its supplementary use alongside over 70,000 prior warnings via calls and texts by late 2023, underscoring a tactical pivot toward precision munitions and real-time intelligence over standardized alerts.

Effectiveness and Empirical Outcomes

Evidence of Civilian Protection

The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) assessed roof knocking as highly effective during Operation Protective Edge (July–August 2014), stating in the operation's official report that the tactic prevented many civilian injuries and deaths by delivering an audible warning via a low-yield , allowing residents time to evacuate targeted buildings. This evaluation was based on operational data from strikes where the procedure prompted departures from structures housing infrastructure, such as tunnel entrances, without subsequent civilian fatalities in those specific sites when warnings were followed. Security analyses have corroborated the tactic's role in civilian harm mitigation under Gaza's conditions of dense population and Hamas control over communications, arguing it provides a reliable, non-electronic mechanism that adversaries cannot easily jam or ignore en masse. For instance, during the May 2021 escalation, roof knocking preceded the strike on the al-Jalaa tower—housing media offices and allegedly intelligence facilities—enabling occupants, including foreign journalists, to exit safely minutes before the main bombardment on May 15. In the 2023 Israel-Hamas War, the IDF expanded warning protocols incorporating roof knocking alongside phone calls and leaflets, applying it to thousands of sites to signal imminent strikes on militant positions embedded in civilian areas; operational reviews indicated instances of successful evacuations, though aggregate casualty data remains contested due to Hamas's reported figures and tactics like human shielding. The procedure's empirical value lies in its causal link to reduced harm in heeded cases, as evidenced by post-strike assessments showing empty or partially evacuated buildings where the knock occurred, contrasting with un-warned targets.

Challenges Posed by Adversary Tactics

has systematically exploited the interval between roof knocking warnings and subsequent strikes to reposition military assets, including weapons caches and operatives, thereby diminishing the tactic's ability to neutralize threats effectively. During Operation Protective Edge in 2014, such warnings provided with time to evacuate personnel from targeted sites, such as command facilities embedded in civilian structures like Shifa Hospital, allowing the group to preserve operational capacity. Similar patterns persisted in later conflicts, where the advance notice enabled militants to relocate via tunnel networks or disperse rocket launchers from residential areas, complicating precise targeting and prolonging engagements. A core challenge arises from directives that actively prevent or reverse civilian evacuations, coercing populations to remain as human shields and thereby undermining the protective intent of warnings. On October 13, 2023, instructed northern residents to disregard IDF evacuation orders ahead of ground operations, explicitly to shield fighters by maximizing civilian exposure. In 2014, spokesmen, including Sami Abu Zuhri, publicly encouraged Gazans to act as shields around militant homes and sites, claiming proven in deterring strikes; the group also deployed paid operatives to block neighborhood exits post-warning. These measures, coupled with framing warnings as psychological ploys, resulted in surges of civilians gathering on rooftops or returning to targeted buildings, as observed in prior operations like 2006. Such adversary countermeasures create operational dilemmas, forcing attackers to cancel up to half of planned airstrikes when civilians fail to evacuate, thus sustaining infrastructure at the cost of extended conflict and heightened risks to non-combatants who are impeded from fleeing. In response, the rendered roof knocking optional within hours of the , 2023, assault, reflecting adaptations to curb exploitation amid dense urban embedding of military assets. Empirical outcomes from these dynamics include documented instances of munitions storage in evacuated or warned sites, such as rockets in schools uncovered post-2014 warnings, illustrating how delays aid enemy fortification.

Controversies and Criticisms

Claims of Ineffectiveness or Harm

Critics, including Human Rights Council-commissioned inquiries, have contended that roof knocking provides insufficient warning time for civilians to evacuate, rendering it ineffective in mitigating casualties. The 2015 report by the independent commission of inquiry on the 2014 conflict, chaired by Doudou Diène, concluded that the tactic "is not effective" absent complementary measures like phone calls or leaflets, as the interval between the knock and subsequent strike—often 5 to —frequently proves too brief for safe egress amid dense urban conditions and restricted mobility. Similarly, the 2009 Goldstone Report on the same year's operations described warnings, including roof knocking, as inconsistent and inadequate, noting instances where civilians remained in targeted structures due to confusion or disbelief in the signals. Human rights organizations have echoed these assessments, arguing that the method's reliance on non-explosive munitions creates auditory or structural cues that many residents fail to interpret as imminent threats, particularly in repeated conflict cycles where fatigue or directives to disregard warnings prevail. , in its analysis of 2014 strikes, documented cases where roof knocks preceded attacks without verifiable evacuations, attributing persistence of civilian deaths to the tactic's failure to convey clear, actionable intent. , an Israeli human rights group, has reported that between 2008 and 2014, hundreds of civilians died in warned buildings, suggesting roof knocking does not reliably reduce harm in -controlled areas where escape routes are contested or absent. Claims of direct harm from the knocking devices themselves center on rare but documented lethal incidents. In July 2018, two Palestinian teenagers, aged 15 and 16, were killed in when a warning munition struck their home's roof, an event investigated by the (IDF) as an operational failure but defended by military officials as an aberration in an otherwise non-lethal protocol. Critics, including , have highlighted such cases to argue that even "low-yield" projectiles pose risks of , structural collapse, or misfires, potentially violating precautions against foreseeable civilian injury under . Additionally, reports from Gaza-based witnesses describe secondary harms like induced panic leading to injuries during hasty evacuations or crowd surges, though empirical quantification remains limited by contested data from Hamas-administered health authorities. These claims persist despite IDF assertions of minimal collateral from warnings, underscoring debates over the tactic's net utility in asymmetric .

Accusations of Psychological Warfare

Critics have accused Israel's roof knocking tactic of functioning primarily as a form of intended to instill widespread fear and demoralize the civilian population in , rather than genuinely mitigating harm during airstrikes. Legal scholar Janina Dill contended in 2014 that the method, by using explosive devices to "communicate" warnings, aims to "spread terror among the civilian population," potentially breaching international humanitarian law's prohibition on terrorizing civilians. This view posits that the explosive impact and unpredictability of the "knock"—often delivered via small missiles from drones—creates and , exacerbating beyond any purported protective intent. Palestinian analysts have echoed these claims, arguing that roof knocking inflicts "immense " not only on targeted households but on entire neighborhoods, serving as disguised as humanitarian effort. In a analysis, commentators Malaka Shwaikh and Shaymaa Ziara described the tactic as "colonial " that presents forces as caring while actually deploying lethal missiles that have caused deaths, such as the 2018 incident killing two children misidentified as a . They assert it justifies broader attacks by creating a false of restraint, with the explosive "knock" functioning as a prelude to destruction that heightens dread and displacement without ensuring safe evacuation in densely populated areas. Such accusations gained prominence during operations like Protective Edge in 2014, where observers noted the tactic's "terrifying character" amid reports of incomplete warnings and secondary explosions harming evacuees. Journalists and activists have further characterized it as psychological terror, citing the constant threat of follow-up strikes that condition populations to live in perpetual anxiety, akin to broader psyops strategies. These critiques, often from sources skeptical of Israeli military claims, emphasize empirical instances where the practice failed to prevent casualties while amplifying fear, though proponents counter that it adheres to warning obligations under the .

Legal and Ethical Dimensions

Compliance with International Humanitarian Law

Roof knocking, as practiced by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), involves the use of low-yield, non-explosive or minimally destructive munitions dropped on the roofs of targeted structures to signal imminent strikes on verified military objectives, thereby fulfilling the IHL requirement under Article 57 of Additional Protocol I to take "all feasible precautions" to minimize incidental civilian harm. This tactic is typically deployed as a final warning when prior methods, such as phone calls or leaflets, have been ignored or proven impracticable due to operational constraints or adversary interference, demonstrating an intent to distinguish between combatants and civilians consistent with the principle of distinction. Legal analyses affirm that such warnings, while not explicitly mandated by treaty law, advance the object and purpose of precautions by providing audible and tactile alerts that enable civilian evacuation, provided the warning itself causes no excessive collateral damage relative to the anticipated military advantage. The practice aligns with by reducing expected civilian casualties through advance notice, as the initial "knock" employs munitions calibrated to produce noise and vibration without structural collapse or fatalities, thereby avoiding independent violations of IHL's ban on indiscriminate attacks. However, compliance is assessed on a case-by-case basis: if the roof knock results in verifiable civilian injuries disproportionate to its warning function, or if insufficient time is allotted for safe egress—typically minutes based on protocols—it could undermine the precaution's legality. Critics, including reports from , have questioned its clarity and efficacy as a communicative tool, arguing it may confuse recipients or fail to convey specific evacuation instructions, potentially eroding the feasibility standard. Nonetheless, military legal scholarship maintains that roof knocking exceeds baseline IHL obligations in asymmetric , where adversaries exploit civilian presence, by offering a tangible, non-digital resilient to communication disruptions. In operations such as those during the 2023 Israel-Hamas War, the IDF's integration of roof knocking into a multi-layered warning system—preceded by intelligence assessments confirming civilian presence—has been cited as evidence of systematic adherence to precautionary duties, contrasting with non-state actors' failure to issue warnings. Empirical reviews by experts like John Spencer highlight its role in mitigating harm beyond what IHL strictly requires, though high overall casualty ratios in dense environments prompt scrutiny of whether precautions were sufficiently iterative or adaptive to evolving threats. IHL does not demand perfect outcomes but verifiable efforts; thus, documented instances of evacuation following knocks support compliance claims, while unheeded warnings due to human shielding tactics shift responsibility under the rules on effective advance warnings.

Perspectives from Military and Human Rights Analyses

Military analysts have characterized roof knocking as an innovative tactic that exceeds the requirements of (IHL) by providing tangible warnings in densely populated urban environments where embeds military assets among civilians. The (IDF) reported in its 2014 Gaza operation assessment that the method was highly effective, averting numerous civilian injuries and deaths by prompting evacuations prior to precision strikes on targeted structures. Experts from institutions like the U.S. Academy's Lieber note that roof knocking is deployed selectively—only against confirmed military objectives after other warnings prove impractical or ignored—aligning with IHL's emphasis on feasible precautions to mitigate civilian harm without unduly endangering attacking forces. From a perspective, organizations such as and have contended that roof knocking fails to constitute an adequate warning under IHL, arguing it provides insufficient time or clarity for civilians to evacuate safely, particularly in high-density areas with limited escape routes. A 2015 United Nations report on the 2014 conflict analyzed specific incidents and concluded that the tactic did not reliably minimize casualties, citing cases where the initial impact injured or killed residents, including two boys in a 2018 strike as documented by field investigations. Critics from these groups further assert that the practice's brevity—often mere minutes between the knock and follow-up strike—undermines its protective intent, especially when tactics, such as blocking exits or issuing counter-orders, complicate evacuations, though such analyses frequently rely on unverified local reports prone to manipulation by adversarial actors.

References

  1. [1]
    Knock-on-the-Roof: The U.S. Air Force's New Tactic
    May 9, 2016 · A “knock-on-the-roof” is a long-standing Israeli Air Force (IAF) procedure that dates back to the end of 2008.
  2. [2]
    Israeli Civilian Harm Mitigation in Gaza: Gold Standard or Fool's Gold?
    Mar 12, 2024 · And third, the IDF employs “roof knocking,” using a small, non-destructive munition on the roof of a structure to create a noise and warn ...Missing: tactic | Show results with:tactic
  3. [3]
    How is the IDF Minimizing Harm to Civilians in Gaza?
    “Roof knocking” is when the IAF targets a building with a loud but non-lethal bomb that warns civilians that they are in the vicinity of a weapons cache or ...
  4. [4]
    The Practice of "Roof Knocking" from the Perspective of International ...
    Israel first employed the practice of “roof knocking,” whereby warning shots are fired at the roof of a building defined as a military target, ...
  5. [5]
    The Practice of “Roof Knocking” from the Perspective of International ...
    Jan 6, 2022 · This article argues that the practice is an effective and necessary cautionary measure, given the unique circumstances that characterize warfare in the Gaza ...
  6. [6]
    Israeli military's 'knock on roof' warnings criticized - CNN
    Jul 15, 2014 · The Israeli Air Force developed the technique in 2009 as a way to warn civilians in Gaza to leave buildings it has identified as locations where ...
  7. [7]
    How the IDF invented 'Roof Knocking', the tactic that saves lives in ...
    Mar 25, 2021 · It would be remembered as one of the more complicated evacuations in IDF history. Once the tank had fired its shell, Hamas terrorists opened ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  8. [8]
    UN Report Finds: Israel's 'Roof-knock' Warning No Way to Prevent ...
    Jun 23, 2015 · The commission concluded that 'roof-knocks' cannot be considered an effective warning given the confusion they often cause to building residents.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    U.N.: Israeli 'Roof-Knocks' Did Not Provide Effective Warning to ...
    Jun 22, 2015 · A new United Nations report concludes that roof-knocks were not an effective method of warning civilians of an incoming strike.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Knock on the Roof: Legitimate Warning or Method of Warfare?
    "Knock on the roof" involves dropping non-explosive munitions before air strikes to warn civilians of an imminent attack, encouraging evacuation.
  11. [11]
    Israel – Hamas 2023 Symposium – The IDF, Hamas, and the Duty to ...
    Oct 27, 2023 · Yet roof knocking is only employed when the building is a military objective, and other warnings have been ignored or are impracticable. Most ...
  12. [12]
    How Does the IDF Minimize Harm to Palestinian Civilians?
    4. Roof Knocking: “Roof knocking” is when the IAF targets a building with a loud but non-lethal bomb that warns civilians that they are in the vicinity of a ...Missing: devices | Show results with:devices<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    US Warplanes Adopt Israeli 'Knock on The Roof' Tactic | Military.com
    Apr 26, 2016 · The US has adopted an Israeli tactic called a "knock operation," or "roof knocking," before airstrikes in the overall effort to limit civilian casualties.
  14. [14]
    U.S. military used 'roof knock' tactic in Iraq to try to warn civilians ...
    Apr 26, 2016 · The United States borrowed an Israeli military tactic known as "roof knocking" to try to warn civilians before it dropped a bomb targeting Islamic State ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  15. [15]
    US tries, fails to mimic Israeli 'roof-knock' bomb warning in Iraq
    Apr 26, 2016 · The US military employed an Israeli technique, albeit unsuccessfully, of warning civilians prior to an airstrike, known as “roof-knocking,” in the Islamic ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Innovations to Undermine Airpower in the Gaza Strip - Royal Air Force
    The debate surrounding Israel's 'knock on the roof' procedure reflects the severity of the challenge. Developed in 2009, a smaller, typically 25lb hellfire ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Israeli Targeting: A Legal Appraisal
    the “knock on the roof” technique employed to warn Palestinian civilians of an impending strike . Operation PROTECTIVE EDGE invites an examination of one ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Assessing Israeli Military Effectiveness - DTIC
    In order to work around this dilemma, the IDF adopted a technique they referred to as “roof knocking” ... roof knocking” was utilized when attacking a building ...
  19. [19]
    'Roof knocking': Israel warning system under scrutiny in Gaza conflict
    May 20, 2021 · The Israeli military has been calling residents, sending them text messages, dropping flyers or firing low-yield bombs onto roofs since its war ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Hamas' use of human shields in Gaza
    The IDF employs the practice of “roof knocking” to warn residents prior to an attack, in an attempt to minimise civilian casualties. Surge in the use of human ...
  21. [21]
    On The Ground In Gaza: What I Saw Of Israel's Military Operations
    Jul 31, 2024 · Thousands of phone calls, texts, leaflets, as well as roof-knocking (dropping small munitions on top of buildings) are some of the warnings the ...
  22. [22]
    Israel/Gaza, Operation Cast Lead | How does law protect in war?
    (b) Warning shots delivered to roofs. The Mission is doubtful whether roof-knocking should be understood as a warning as such. In the context of a large ...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Israel's 'roof knocking' in Gaza | Environment News - Al Jazeera
    Dec 4, 2012 · Al Jazeera investigates Israeli practice of firing warning shots at homes before blowing them up.Missing: Pillar Defense
  24. [24]
    Israel/Palestine, Operation Protective Edge (Gaza, 13 June
    While “roof knockings,” like other kinetic means, may be imperfect, IDF assessments show that the employment of “roof knocking” was highly effective, preventing ...
  25. [25]
    Tough Questions About Gaza Answered - American Jewish Committee
    Feb 26, 2024 · Israel has used a practice called "roof knocking" where non-explosive munitions are fired at a target building to warn occupants to evacuate ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    IDF loosened rules of engagement after Oct. 7, allowing more ...
    Dec 26, 2024 · The Israeli military significantly loosened its rules of engagement in the wake of the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack, letting officers approve striking targets ...
  27. [27]
    Israel Loosened Its Rules to Bomb Hamas Fighters, Killing Many ...
    Dec 26, 2024 · From the first day of the war, Israel significantly reduced its use of so-called roof knocks, or warning shots that give civilians time to flee ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Correcting the Record on the IDF and Lethal Targeting - JINSA
    Jan 16, 2025 · Educating the public on the procedures implemented by professional armed forces to balance the needs of military necessity with the imperative ...
  29. [29]
    Roof-Knocking Tactic: A Lawful and Effective Warning Technique ...
    Aug 10, 2020 · Roof-knocking is a new warfare practice of initially dropping small bombs on the roof of civilian buildings, where there may be civilians and combatants.Missing: IDF history
  30. [30]
    [PDF] 2014 Gaza War Assessment: | JINSA
    Mar 3, 2015 · Many wars have been waged against unconventional adversaries willing to kill their opponent's civilians and hide among their own. Misinformation ...
  31. [31]
    https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/hamas-tells-gaza-residents-stay-home-israel-ground-offensive-looms-2023-10-13/
  32. [32]
    https://www.memri.org/tv/hamas-spokesman-encourages-gazans-serve-human-shields-its-been-proven-effective
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Hamas's Human Shield Strategy in Gaza | Henry Jackson Society
    May 4, 2025 · Hamas has deliberately and systematically exploited Gaza's civilian infrastructure to shield its military assets from attack by the Israel ...
  34. [34]
    https://www.unrwa.org/newsroom/press-releases/unrwa-strongly-condemns-placement-rockets-school
  35. [35]
    Israeli 'Warning' Shot Killed Two Boys in Gaza, Rights Groups Say
    Dec 17, 2018 · It said that Israel's Military Advocate General was examining that failure. But it defended the roof-knocking tactic, insisting it ...
  36. [36]
    Taking Page from Israel War Tactics, US Military Employs ...
    Apr 27, 2016 · "Based on its findings, the commission concludes that the 'roof-knocking' technique is not effective, in particular if not combined with other ...
  37. [37]
    https://opiniojuris.org/2014/07/30/guest-post-israels-use-law-warnings-gaza/
  38. [38]
    Roof Knocking and the Problem of Talking With Bombs - Just Security
    May 31, 2016 · The upshot is that “roof knocking” may allow powerful military actors to increase, rather than decrease, civilian casualties. The most ...
  39. [39]
    Adding insult to injury: Israel's 'Roof Knocking' is colonial propaganda
    May 19, 2021 · This is the practice of dropping drone missiles on the roof of targeted civilian homes, which Israel claims is to warn them of imminent bombing so they can ...Missing: origins IDF
  40. [40]
    Knock on the Roof: Legitimate Warning or Method of Warfare?
    Nov 2, 2017 · This article aims to address the practice of using a 'knock on the roof' as a warning before air-strikes are launched in order to mitigate civilian casualties ...