Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Scarf joint

A scarf joint, also known as a or scarph joint, is a method of joining two members end to end, commonly used in , , and other fields such as composites, by cutting complementary tapered or angled profiles on their ends, which overlap and are secured with , fasteners, or pegs to form a longer, structurally sound member. This method increases the effective length of beams or boards beyond the available dimensions while distributing loads across a larger surface area compared to a simple . Historically, scarf joints have been employed for centuries in construction, dating back to bridges and , where they were used to join timbers in roofs, floors, and structural elements when longer pieces were unavailable. Designs by figures such as and incorporated advanced variants for enhanced load-bearing capacity, and the joints remained prevalent in European heritage buildings like churches and castles until the advent of modern glued-laminated timber in the . In traditional and boatbuilding, scarf joints provided durable connections for hull components, gunnels, and trim on vessels such as sailboats and canoes. Common types include the simple half-lap scarf, which involves cutting half the depth of each timber for a basic overlap; the stop-splayed scarf, featuring a long angled face with a stop and often teeth or pegs for tension resistance; the , using a centerpiece and slots secured by pegs; and the pegged bladed variant, which adds metal plates or screws for reinforcement in high-stress areas like roof trusses. These joints typically use of 30 degrees or less for structural applications to maximize overlap—often four times the timber depth, with common slope ratios ranging from 1:4 for basic applications to 1:12 or steeper for high-strength needs—and glue surface, though 45-degree cuts suffice for less critical uses like . In modern engineering, scarf joints are valued in for extending spans in trusses, sill plates, and beams, though their capacity is generally about 33% of a solid timber's due to fiber interruption in and zones. They are positioned away from high-stress points, such as midway between supports or over posts, and often augmented with mechanical connectors like screws or dowels to improve and prevent failures perpendicular to the . Beyond , similar principles apply in other fields, such as repairing rods or composite materials, but timber remains the primary context.

Fundamentals

Definition

A scarf joint, also referred to as a scarph joint, is a of connecting two pieces of end to end in , , or other fabrication processes by cutting complementary tapered or angled surfaces on their abutting ends, enabling them to overlap and create a longer, continuous member. The joint's geometric configuration involves beveling the ends to form sloping faces that interlock, with the taper typically following a ratio of 1:8 to 1:12—meaning the length of the scarf is eight to twelve times the thickness of the —for achieving optimal load-bearing capacity in applications like timber construction. Unlike a , where the square-cut ends of two pieces are simply placed in direct with minimal or no overlap, the scarf joint requires precise material removal along the ends to generate an extended bonding surface, thereby increasing the area for adhesives, fasteners, or welds. This design distinguishes it from simpler end-to-end connections by prioritizing enhanced through the overlapping geometry. The term "scarf" originates from the Old Norse "skarfr," denoting an end piece of a board cut obliquely or on the bias, which entered Middle English as "skarph" to describe a notched or beveled cut in timber, eventually applying to the full joint form. In profile, a basic scarf joint presents a straight bevel with uniform tapering on both members, while more complex variants feature a hooked shape, incorporating a projecting notch or step on one end that interlocks with a corresponding recess on the other for improved tensile hold.

Purpose and Basic Mechanics

Scarf joints serve several primary purposes in and , including extending the effective length of timber pieces when individual boards or beams are insufficient for the required span, repairing damaged or deteriorated sections by removing affected material and splicing in replacements, and creating a visually seamless appearance in applications like structural beams or furniture where enhances . At their core, scarf joints function by creating an angled between two pieces, enabling load transfer primarily through forces parallel to the plane and (bearing) perpendicular to it along the sloped surface. This angled overlap substantially increases the bonding area relative to a , distributing stresses more gradually and reducing peak concentrations at the connection. In scenarios, the mechanics allow forces to be shared by deforming both joint halves equally via and bearing, or by direct transmission across the in tension and zones. The advantages of this design include superior tensile and resistance compared to end-to-end abutting methods, owing to the that promotes even load sharing and greater contact surface for adhesives or fasteners, while also providing a smooth, continuous profile ideal for exposed elements in furniture or architectural features. Common ratios, such as 1:8 or 1:10, are employed to optimize these benefits without excessive material use. In principle, however, scarf joints demand exact alignment during fabrication to avoid misalignment-induced weak points or uneven stress distribution; they also perform poorly under high-torsion loads without reinforcement such as pegs or wedges to resist twisting.

Historical Development

Ancient and Medieval Origins

The earliest documented use of scarf joints appears in ancient , where they were employed to planks in vessels dating back to approximately 2500 BC, as evidenced by the construction techniques observed in the solar boat discovered at . This method allowed for the extension of hull lengths using tapered overlaps secured by mortises, tenons, and lashing, enabling the creation of stable, elongated structures without metal fasteners. In the era, scarf joints evolved for use in timber infrastructure, particularly in construction during the AD, where stop-splayed variants—known as "bolt of lightning" joints—connected beams to achieve longitudinal strength in spans over rivers and valleys. These joints featured interlocking splayed faces with wedges or keys, providing resistance to forces in load-bearing applications, as seen in archaeological remnants of wooden pilings and frameworks from Roman engineering projects. During the medieval period in , from the 12th to 15th centuries, scarf joints became integral to timber-framed buildings, including the s of cathedrals and great halls, where they joined purlins, sills, and principal rafters to form expansive, durable trusses without compromising structural integrity. A notable example is the 14th-century of in , featuring complex splayed and tabled scarf joints documented in contemporary carpentry practices, which supported one of the largest clear spans of the era at over 21 meters. Similarly, in Viking around the 9th to 11th centuries, scarf joints facilitated hull extensions in longships by overlapping and timbers with riveted fastenings to enhance flexibility and seaworthiness. Cultural adaptations of scarf joints also emerged in Asian , particularly in temple from the onward, where variations like the splayed scarf with pegs were used in roof framing to join beams without . These joints emphasized tapered interlocks and wooden dowels to distribute loads evenly, reflecting a tradition of earthquake-resistant design in wooden architecture.

Evolution in Modern Contexts

During the (14th–17th centuries), scarf joints advanced in European architecture, with designs by figures such as and incorporating sophisticated variants for improved load-bearing in roofs and structural elements. These innovations built on medieval techniques, emphasizing profiles to enhance strength in timber-limited contexts. The introduction of steam-powered sawmills during the revolutionized timber processing, enabling more precise and efficient cuts that improved the fabrication of scarf joints for extended structural members in large-scale construction projects. This technological shift supported the use of scarf joints in infrastructure elements, such as timber beams reinforced with early iron and components to enhance load-bearing capacity in industrial buildings and transportation-related structures. In the , scarf joints were adapted for high-performance applications, particularly in aircraft construction during , where they were employed in the wing spars of the bomber to join and timber components effectively under dynamic loads. Similarly, in naval , scarf joints remained essential for creating seamless, strong connections in wooden hulls and decks, leveraging adhesives and mechanical fasteners to withstand marine stresses in vessels built through the mid-century. The U.S. Forest Products Laboratory conducted key experiments on glued scarf joints during this period, evaluating their structural integrity for engineered timber products and contributing to advancements in joint efficiency. Following 1950, standardization efforts codified scarf joint design in building regulations, with Eurocode 5 providing guidelines on slope ratios and shear capacities for glued timber connections to ensure reliability in modern . This era also saw a revival of scarf joints in , driven by renewed interest in traditional with green materials like , minimizing metal use and promoting resource-efficient repairs in eco-conscious designs. Scarf joints have since been briefly referenced in the restoration of historical structures to maintain authenticity.

Types and Variations

Simple Scarf Joints

Simple scarf joints represent the most basic configurations for extending timber lengths in , relying on straightforward tapered cuts without additional reinforcements. The plain bevel scarf, also known as a nibbed scarf, involves creating matching diagonal planes on the ends of two timber pieces, often with small nibs or protrusions for precise alignment during assembly. These joints are typically cut at a ratio of 1:8, meaning the length of the taper is eight times the thickness of the material, providing a balance of overlap for glue while maintaining ease of fabrication. In low-load applications, such as repairing or extending furniture legs, the joint is secured with glue or , exposing long-grain surfaces for improved bonding over end-grain . A variation, the hooked scarf joint, introduces a slight curve or notch at the tapered end to enhance shear resistance without requiring wedges or keys. This geometry allows the hooked portions to interlock mildly, distributing loads more evenly across the joint interface in axial directions. Like the plain bevel, it maintains a similar 1:8 slope but adds the notch for subtle mechanical interlock, making it suitable for basic timber extensions in non-critical structural elements. These simple scarf joints are commonly fabricated from softwoods such as , which offer workable and affordability for general tasks. The overlap length for the taper can be calculated as the material thickness divided by the of the ; for a 1:8 , this yields an of approximately 7.1 degrees, resulting in an overlap of eight times the thickness (e.g., 8 inches for 1-inch-thick ). Such joints have been referenced in historical for extending beams, though modern uses prioritize simplicity in non-demanding scenarios. The primary advantages of simple scarf joints include their ease of cutting with basic tools like a tablesaw or , requiring minimal skill for alignment and . However, they are limited to applications involving or loads, achieving typically under 50% of the strength of due to the reduced cross-sectional area at the joint. This makes them ideal for decorative or lightly loaded elements but unsuitable for high-stress environments without further enhancement.

Complex and Reinforced Variations

Complex scarf joints incorporate additional geometric features beyond simple bevels to improve resistance to specific loads, particularly and in structural timbers. The stop-splayed scarf joint features angled faces meeting at a vertical stop, which provides enhanced resistance to by limiting slippage along the joint plane, making it suitable for beams under loads. This design has historical roots in medieval , where it was used to form composite beams in flexural elements like rafters and tie beams. A variant, the tabled stop-splayed scarf, includes horizontal shelves or tables on the angled faces to further increase transfer and stability, often seen in load-bearing applications. Wedged or keyed scarf joints enhance tensile strength by inserting wooden or metal keys perpendicular to the , which lock the members together and distribute stresses more evenly. These keys, typically made from harder woods like , are driven into slots to tighten the assembly, improving overall and capacity to withstand . In testing, such reinforced have demonstrated moment capacities approaching 33% of timber equivalents, with often occurring via in the keys rather than the primary . Modern adaptations of scarf joints often integrate reinforcements for products. Finger-jointed scarfs, consisting of interlocking series of short bevels, are widely employed in production to extend panel lengths, achieving up to 75% of clear wood strength when using slopes of 1:10 to 1:16 and waterproof adhesives. Specific historical and contemporary examples illustrate these variations' versatility. The bladed scarf, with protruding tongues or blades along the joint faces for added resistance, appears in medieval roofs, such as those in 13th- to 15th-century English structures, where it connected purlins and wall plates effectively under perpendicular loads. In seismic-prone areas, stop-splayed scarfs reinforced with pins or timber pegs boost and , with experimental results showing increased and load capacity, aiding the of traditional timber frames.

Construction Methods

Cutting and Fitting Techniques

The preparation of a scarf joint begins with precise marking and layout to ensure the mating surfaces align properly and achieve the desired slope . A bevel gauge is used to set , typically corresponding to a 1:8 to 1:12 for general applications, which equates to approximately 4-7 degrees depending on the material thickness; for instance, a 1:10 yields about 5.7 degrees. Lines are then scribed along the wood grain using a marking or , starting from the edge and extending across the face to define the taper boundaries, ensuring the scribed lines are perpendicular to the board's edge for accuracy. Cutting methods vary between traditional hand tools and modern power tools to create the tapered surfaces. With hand tools, a rip saw is employed for the initial along the scribed line, followed by a to refine the bevel and achieve a smooth taper; chisels may be used for paring in tight spots or adjusting the angle. For power tools, a equipped with a custom secures the workpiece at the predetermined angle, allowing for straight, repeatable cuts; alternatively, a power hand or provides high precision for complex or repetitive tasks, with the router following a programmed path based on the layout. In both approaches, the cut depth typically spans 8-12 times the material thickness to accommodate the slope without weakening the surrounding wood. The fitting process involves dry assembly to verify and make final adjustments before permanent joining. The cut pieces are brought together without to check for gaps, ensuring the surfaces mate flush across the entire taper; any high spots are removed by paring with a sharp or fine planing, working progressively from the edges inward to maintain flatness. Considerations for wood movement, such as end-grain swelling due to , are addressed by allowing a slight clearance during initial fitting and testing the joint under light clamping pressure. A or confirms even contact, with adjustments continuing until the joint aligns without rocking. Safety and precision tips emphasize consistent execution to maximize joint integrity. Always secure the workpiece firmly to prevent slippage during cutting, and use sharp tools to minimize tear-out and ensure clean edges; for power tools, employ dust extraction and protective gear to mitigate risks from fine particles. Maintain uniform taper depth by frequently measuring against the lines, aiming for a surface flatness within 0.005 inches to promote even stress distribution; practicing on scrap material helps refine technique and avoids errors on final pieces.

Fastening and Assembly

Once the scarfed surfaces have been prepared and fitted, securing the joint typically begins with to create a strong, continuous connection. In modern , polyvinyl acetate (PVA) glues, such as Titebond, are commonly applied for their ease of use and strong bonding on long-grain surfaces, while epoxies are preferred for high-stress applications like boatbuilding due to their gap-filling properties and durability in moist environments. Historically, animal glues—derived from in hides, bones, or hooves—were heated to approximately 60°C (140°F) in a glue pot to achieve a brushable consistency before application, allowing for reversible joints that could be disassembled with steam if needed. Mechanical fasteners provide additional reinforcement, particularly in load-bearing or traditional constructions where adhesives alone may not suffice. Nails or screws are often driven through the overlap at staggered intervals to compress the joint without splitting the wood, while dowels inserted perpendicularly enhance shear resistance. In some cases, wedges are hammered into pre-cut slots within the scarf to draw the pieces tightly together, creating compression and preventing slippage during assembly; this method is especially useful in timber framing. Reinforced variations, such as those in structural beams, may incorporate specialized fasteners like clinched copper rivets for enhanced hold. The assembly sequence emphasizes precise alignment and controlled pressure to ensure intimate contact. After applying to both surfaces, the pieces are overlapped and aligned using temporary braces or straightedges to maintain straightness, then clamped to apply even pressure—typically 100-150 for PVA glue-ups on softwoods, adjusted higher for denser materials. Clamps are spaced 8-10 inches apart and tightened gradually to avoid starving the joint of glue, with excess wiped away immediately for cleaner results. Finishing the assembled joint involves smoothing for aesthetic and functional integration. Once the adhesive has cured—usually 24 hours for PVA or —the is planed flush using a hand plane or power planer to level the surface, followed by sanding with progressively finer grits to achieve a seamless blend, particularly in visible applications like furniture or paneling.

Mechanical Properties

Strength Factors

The strength of a scarf joint is profoundly influenced by geometric factors, particularly the slope angle, which affects the distribution of across the bondline. Shallower angles minimize the risk of splitting by reducing peak shear concentrations and promoting more uniform load transfer, as τ varies with sin(α) cos(α), where α is the scarf angle. Longer overlaps, achieved with shallower angles, enhance resistance to tensile separation by increasing the bonded surface area. Material properties play a critical role in scarf joint performance, with wood grain orientation being paramount. Aligning the grain parallel to the slope maximizes longitudinal tensile strength, leveraging the orthotropic nature of wood where fiber direction resists forces most effectively along the grain. Moisture content significantly impacts glue bond integrity; levels above 14% hinder adhesive curing and promote overpenetration, while below 6% impairs wetting, with an ideal range of 8-12% ensuring optimal penetration and bond durability for exterior applications. Under axial loads, scarf joints excel in and , achieving up to 80% of the parent material's strength for ratios around 12:1, due to efficient alignment with the . However, they exhibit reduced capacity in without , as eccentric loading induces peel stresses that compromise the bondline. Common failure modes include under loading, where interfacial stresses exceed adhesive cohesion, and long-term in adhesives, leading to progressive deformation under sustained loads as fluctuations exacerbate viscoelastic relaxation. Reinforcement options, such as mechanical fasteners, can mitigate these vulnerabilities in high-bending scenarios.

Testing and Reinforcement

Experimental methods for assessing the performance of scarf joints primarily involve standardized shear testing and computational simulations to evaluate load-bearing capacity and failure modes. The is widely used to determine the of bonds in glued scarf joints through loading, providing data on bond integrity under axial forces. This approach has been applied in studies of wooden scarf joints to measure ultimate shear capacities and compare them against solid timber benchmarks. Complementing physical tests, finite element analysis (FEA) simulations model distributions within scarf joints, revealing peak concentrations at interfaces and optimizing joint geometries for reduced singularity effects. Reinforcement techniques enhance scarf joint durability, particularly in high-load applications, by addressing and tensile weaknesses. For timber beams under significant , metal fish plates—flat plates bolted across the joint—distribute loads and prevent slippage, a method commonly employed in bridge repairs. In modern composite materials, fiber-reinforced polymer () wraps, such as carbon fiber sheets, are applied over scarf joints to improve tensile strength and resistance by encasing the interface and mitigating crack propagation. Performance evaluations indicate that reinforced scarf joints can achieve substantial strength recovery relative to . Tests on glued-laminated timber scarf joints with appropriate slopes demonstrate efficiencies exceeding 90% of bending strength, with some configurations reaching near-equivalent . Standards ensure reliable scarf joint implementation in timber structures, incorporating factors like environmental exposure and dynamic loads. Compliance with ISO 12579 governs adhesive use in timber joints, specifying performance criteria for shear and peel under varying conditions, including cyclic loading relevant to seismic zones. Seismic testing protocols, such as monotonic and cyclic lateral load applications, assess reinforced scarf joints' and energy dissipation, confirming their viability in earthquake-prone regions.

Applications

In Woodworking and Carpentry

In carpentry, scarf joints are commonly employed to extend rafters in roof framing, allowing for longer spans by joining shorter timbers end-to-end while maintaining and load distribution. This technique is particularly useful in traditional where solid lengths are unavailable, as seen in historical log buildings where scarf splices integrate seamlessly into roof assemblies. Additionally, scarf joints facilitate repairs to , such as damaged legs or tabletops, by cutting angled bevels on defective sections and bonding new pieces with glue, preserving the original aesthetic and functionality without visible seams. In specialized , scarf joints play a key role in boatbuilding for extensions, where ratios of 6:1 to 8:1 are recommended to achieve sufficient strength, often exceeding 65% of solid timber efficiency when bonded with . Similarly, in instrument making, they enable seamless attachment of guitar necks to headstocks by cutting a precise 15-degree through a thick blank, gluing the components, and planing for a smooth transition that enhances both durability and playability. Contemporary applications emphasize , with scarf joints integral to glued laminated (glulam) beams in eco-friendly buildings, where they connect segments to form renewable, low-energy structures capable of spanning up to 43 meters while storing carbon. In mass production of like laminated veneer lumber (LVL), scarf joints bond veneers with melamine-formaldehyde resin, producing long panels up to 24 meters for structural elements in industrial projects, optimizing resource use and strength. Case studies highlight practical implementation, such as the of 16th-century-equivalent timber structures like barns, where stop-splayed joints with keys replicate historical methods to repair flexural elements in ground beams or roofs, balancing preservation and integrity. In custom cabinetry, joints create invisible end-to-end connections in wide panels or moldings by angling cuts for maximum glue surface, ensuring a clean, professional finish in high-end installations.

In Other Engineering Fields

In , scarf joints are employed in processes to join components, particularly in structural applications where beveled edges allow for better fusion and stress distribution. For instance, utilizes scarf configurations to connect aluminum alloys in engineering structures, achieving optimal force and torque at scarf angles around 60 degrees compared to square butt joints. In construction, while butt welds predominate, scarf joints have been explored for splicing steel beams to enhance joint integrity under load, though they require precise preparation to avoid weaknesses. scarf joints find application in ornamental , where beveled ends of wrought-iron pieces are heated and joined with spelter to create decorative elements like bases and acanthus leaves, ensuring clean, strong bonds without excessive material distortion. In , scarf joints are widely used in composite materials to repair and assemble skins, offering a flush surface that minimizes aerodynamic and weight penalties. Layered scarf repairs in (CFRP) for structures employ tapered geometries to distribute shear and peel stresses uniformly, with design methodologies based on elastic-plastic finite element analysis recommending maximum scarf angles derived from strain criteria to optimize load capacity while removing minimal parent material. This approach enhances repair efficiency, reducing patch size and overall weight by up to 20-30% in some configurations compared to bolted patches. Historically, the utilized scarf joints in its wing spars, where glued scarfs connected wooden members, though failures occurred in hot climates due to degradation, prompting reinforcements like additional cover strips. In , scarf joints facilitate splicing in structures, such as beams and columns, by beveling ends at angles like 45 degrees and securing with prestressed bolts and to transfer , , and axial forces. These joints achieve 34-50% of the of monolithic sections when properly reinforced with embedded and anchorage details, as demonstrated in tests on portal frames and ends, making them suitable for factory-built elements in buildings and bridges. Scarf-like overlaps in splicing within mimic this by extending bars at angled interfaces to improve bond and , though couplers often for high-load zones. Naval architecture employs scarf joints for repairing ship s, especially in composite laminates, to restore structural integrity after damage like or fiber breakage. The technique involves tapering the damaged area and bonding a matching with , ensuring seamless integration that maintains hull strength and watertightness; this method has been rigorously tested for applications, outperforming simple patches in resistance. In wooden or hybrid hulls, scarf repairs overlap beveled planks to distribute loads evenly, a practice refined in boatbuilding for longevity under stresses. Emerging applications of scarf joints in additive manufacturing leverage to create beveled interfaces in polymer structures, such as ABS, PETG, and , bonded adhesively to assemble larger components beyond printer build volumes. Studies show tensile strengths up to 4.16 kN for scarf joints at 28.9-degree angles using epoxies like Araldite 2015, enabling robust custom parts like prosthetic limbs where seamless, lightweight joins enhance fit and durability. In seismic retrofitting, stop-splayed scarf joints in hybrid timber-steel frames are reinforced with timber pegs or steel pins to improve capacity and energy dissipation, with experimental tests confirming their reliability under cyclic loads as an alternative to adhesives in earthquake-prone regions.

References

  1. [1]
    What's a Scarf Joint? - Woodworking | Blog | Videos | Plans | How To
    Nov 22, 2005 · A scarf joint is a long, tapered, angled butt joint used to connect ends of long boards, creating a strong, longer piece.Missing: definition engineering
  2. [2]
    What is a Scarf Joint Used For? - Hamill Creek Timber Homes
    Jun 15, 2020 · A scarf joint joins two pieces of wood when they are not long enough, to cover a span longer than the length of your timbers.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    Historical scarf and splice carpentry joints: state of the art - Nature
    Oct 20, 2020 · A stop-splayed scarf joint (described inter alia in [11,12,13,14]) was a sophisticated form of joining elements lengthwise. However, it was ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Testing Scarf Joints in Bending - Fire Tower Engineered Timber
    Of course, the scarf joint by its nature interrupts the wood fibers in both the compression and tension zones of the assembled beam. Interruption of fibers in ...
  5. [5]
    SCARF jOINTS - Bamboo Rod Works
    Scarf joints are used to extend material length, often for repairing fractured bamboo rod sections, and are defined by the joint length relative to material ...
  6. [6]
    The Strength of Scarf Joints - WoodenBoat
    The efficiency of scarfs ranges from 65 percent of the strength of solid timber for a 4:1 ratio and up to 95 percent for a 20:1 ratio.Missing: geometry etymology
  7. [7]
    What is & How to Make Butt Joint? - M.T. Copeland Technologies
    Jan 19, 2022 · A butt joint is a type of wood joint used to connect two pieces of wood to each other at a corner (typically 90 degrees).
  8. [8]
    SCARF JOINT definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
    a lapped joint between two pieces of timber made by notching or grooving the ends and strapping, bolting, or gluing the two pieces together.
  9. [9]
    Scarf - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Scarf originates from Old North French escarpe (1550s) meaning a silk band worn across the body, and Old Norse skarfr (13c.) meaning a carpentry joint; ...
  10. [10]
    Scarf Joints: An Additive to Timbercraft Design
    Jul 23, 2025 · Hooked or Lapped Scarf: Features a notch or step to resist pulling apart, common in structural timberwork. Tabled Scarf: Includes interlocking “ ...
  11. [11]
    Making Scarf Joints - Woodworking | Blog | Videos | Plans | How To
    Jul 8, 2008 · The usual formula for the length/thickness ration (slope) is 8 to 1. Making the scarf longer adds little strength, but short scarfs will fail — ...
  12. [12]
    VI. Scarf Joints | PDF | Bending | Truss - Scribd
    minor torsion loads. Spiral grain in an unseasoned member causes twisting as it dries. A scarf joint that is not capable of resisting twisting will open up ...
  13. [13]
    The Construction of the Khufu I Vessel (c.2566 BC): a Re‐Evaluation
    Aug 6, 2025 · A re-evaluation of the published reports on the Khufu I vessel suggests: first, Egyptian boatwrights used as much of a plank's original width and length as ...
  14. [14]
    Experimental Investigations of Timber Beams with Stop-Splayed ...
    Mar 21, 2020 · Stop-splayed scarf joints ('Bolt of lightning') were used in ancient times, for example, in the Roman construction of bridges, and later, in ...Missing: 1st | Show results with:1st
  15. [15]
    Encyclopaedia of English Medieval Carpentry | S to Z
    Scarf: Joint used to connect timbers longitudinally, most often found in purlins, wall plates and sills. Scarfs vary enormously in complexity, and some of the ...
  16. [16]
    Keel and stem - Vikingeskibsmuseet
    The keel and stems are joined using scarf joints which are fastened with three iron rivets each. ... All about the Viking Ship. All about the Viking Ship · The ...
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    7 Things You Need to Know About Japanese Joinery - Japan Objects
    Aug 20, 2021 · Joints with wooden pegs are often used in scarf joints to attach two pieces end to end to make a longer piece of wood. However, both types can ...
  19. [19]
    (PDF) Joining techniques in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century ...
    Nov 12, 2018 · This paper provides an overview of the joining techniques used in Belgian timber roof structures during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.Missing: sleepers | Show results with:sleepers
  20. [20]
    de Havilland Mosquito - 211 Squadron RAF
    ... joint defects, and no lifting of wing skins. Further investigation in India identified two main defects: the wing spar scarf joints, and the spar boom joints ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Finger-Jointed Wood Products. - DTIC
    Jul 23, 1981 · U.S. Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Report. 1622. 63 ... Glued scarf and finger joints for structural timber. Information.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Manual for the design of timber building structures to Eurocode 5
    Fig 6.6 Common types of glued timber joint a) Scarf joint b) Stressed skin panel c) Box beam d) Gusset plates e) Vertical finger joint f) I-joist. Page 179 ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Structural Performance of Traditional Oak Tension & Scarf Joints
    Jun 5, 2008 · Scarf Joint Introduction​​ A scarf joint can be defined as, a joint for splicing timbers together end to end in order to create a longer member ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    How to Make Scarf Joints - Rockler
    Jul 20, 2020 · How to repair table legs and other long parts with a simple joint. Do you have a table leg or another piece that has damage, a defect or user ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Clapboard Scarf Joint - Woodworking Network
    Feb 28, 2020 · Material = 5" Pine Clapboards; 2-1/4" scarf joint. Looking for any ideas for a mechanical way to make these scarf joints.
  27. [27]
    Making a Proper Scarf Joint - Boat Building Joinery
    The concept of a scarf joint isn't complicated. It is a simple matter of of cutting a ramp on the wood which has a run of 8 times the rise.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Wood Handbook--Chapter 11--Glued Structural Members
    Effect of End Joints on Strength—Both fingerjoints and scarf joints can be manufactured with adequate strength for use in structural glulam. Adequacy is ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Finger-Jointed Wood Products
    Plain scarf joints have been evaluated extensively on this basis. With a slope of about 1 to 20, a flat enough scarf can attain tensile. 3 ...
  30. [30]
    Structural behaviour of stop-splayed scarf joint reinforced with timber ...
    Feb 1, 2021 · In this study, stop-splayed scarf joints behaviour before and after reinforcement with steel pins or timber pegs is experimentally investigated.
  31. [31]
    Scarf Bevel Cutting - John's Nautical and Boatbuilding Page
    A better way to cut a scarf joint: 1. Using scrap plywood that is at least 2 feet long, and the same width as the 'real' plywood that will go into your boat.
  32. [32]
    How do you cut scarf joints in planks? - The WoodenBoat Forum
    Oct 30, 2011 · I recently found a great way to cut scarf joints to make frame repairs using a 20 grit disk on a grinder - very quick and accurate on a 1 1/2" x 1 1/4" oak ...
  33. [33]
    Titebond III Ultimate Wood Glue
    Required Clamping Pressure: Enough to bring joints tightly together (generally, 100-150 psi for softwoods, 125-175 psi for medium woods and 175-250 psi for ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] A Brief Survey of Wood Adhesives - Purdue Extension
    They are heated in glue pots to about 60° C (144° F) to reduce their viscosity to a level where they can be applied. Some animal glues are sold in ...
  35. [35]
    8 ways to make end-to-end joints that hold - WOOD Magazine
    Bevel-cut scarf joints ... By cutting ends at an angle before joining them, you expose more long grain for a better bond. The sharper the angle, the larger and ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Woodworking-Joints.pdf
    There is plenty of glue surface area and the joint will be strong, but screws or dowels as reinforcement will help the joint to resist side forces. Another ...
  37. [37]
    Scarf Joint With A Wedge
    ### Summary of Using Wedges in Scarf Joints for Assembly and Fastening
  38. [38]
    Joining 2 pieces of wood using Scarf joints. - Christine DeMerchant
    Scarf joints are used to join 2 pieces of wood usually to lengthen one. There are several methods of scarfing and otherwise joining wood for boatbuilding.<|control11|><|separator|>
  39. [39]
    (PDF) Loading capacity determination of the wooden scarf joint
    Jul 14, 2025 · The paper describes the complete derivation of the theoretical bonded scarf joint loading capacity and the construction of the Mohr's circle ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
  40. [40]
    [PDF] CHAPTER 5 STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR OF JOINTS - eng . lbl . gov
    adhesive, which requires the minimum value of overlap length given in Equation 5.2.2.7(a). ... For a scarf joint, standard stress transformation relationships ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Mechanical Properties of Wood - Forest Products Laboratory
    Fatigue strength is the same for a scarf joint in tension as for tension parallel to the grain, but a little lower for a finger joint in tension. Fatigue ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Chapter 9--Adhesive Bonding of Wood Materials
    The strength of adhesive bonds to wood increases with wood density up to a range of 0.7 to 0.8 g/cm3 (43.7 to 49.9 lb/ft3). (moisture content 12%). Above this ...
  43. [43]
    Loading capacity determination of the wooden scarf joint
    Jun 30, 2009 · ASTM (1994): ASTM D905-94 Standard Test Method for Strength Properties of Adhesive Bonds in Shear by Compression Loading. ASTM International ...
  44. [44]
    Plane stress analysis of a scarf joint - ScienceDirect
    The stress distribution in a scarf joint, with arbitrary angle of scarf, is analyzed as a two dimensional elasticity problem in plane stress.
  45. [45]
    FHWA-HRT-04-098-Chapter 14. Connections-Covered Bridge ...
    Apr 23, 2012 · The simplest fish plates are two steel plates, through-bolted to the two members (see figure 112). This is a common repair method, but it is ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] SCARF JOINTS IN GLUED LAMINATED TIMBER OF PARICÁ
    The scarf joint proved to be an alternative for use in glulam beams of paricá, as it presents stiffness and strength comparable with those of beams without a.
  47. [47]
    8. A Now-Lost 14th-Century Aisled Base-Cruck Building
    The timbers of the arcade- plate, which supported the rafters of the roof, were joined on both sides with scarf joints. These were splayed with sallied ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Preservation Briefs 26 - National Park Service
    "scarf" joints or square-cut "half-lap" joints (Fig. 19). The splice is secured to the severed log by angling lag screws or bolts through the upper and ...
  49. [49]
    Cutting the Scarf Joint - Eric Schaefer Guitars
    Oct 31, 2016 · A scarf joint is made by cutting a 15-degree angle in the wood, then the headstock is glued to the neck blank. The cut is made carefully by ...Missing: woodworking | Show results with:woodworking
  50. [50]
    Laminated veneer lumber (LVL) - Wood products - Stora Enso
    Laminated veneer lumber (LVL) is a mass timber product that is twice as strong as steel in proportion to weight. It provides an ideal solution when strength ...