Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Science as a Vocation

"Science as a Vocation" (German: Wissenschaft als Beruf) is a lecture delivered by the German sociologist and economist Max Weber on 7 November 1917 in Munich to an audience of students, later published in 1919, in which he dissects the professional realities, ethical demands, and inherent limitations of scientific inquiry as a modern occupation. Weber portrays science not as a source of ultimate wisdom or moral guidance but as a disciplined pursuit of factual clarity amid the progressive "disenchantment of the world," where rational explanation supplants mystical beliefs, yet fails to resolve existential questions of value and purpose. Central to the lecture is Weber's distinction between science as a personal Beruf—a calling requiring passionate to truth and —and its institutional embodiment in bureaucratic , where , , and routine often erode individual . He warns aspiring scholars of the harsh realities: the probabilistic nature of scientific progress, the ethical imperative of value-neutral analysis despite inevitable personal biases, and the risk of charlatanism when passion yields to expediency. These themes underscore 's capacity to illuminate means-ends relations and debunk illusions, but its inability to dictate ends, compelling individuals to confront life's meaninglessness through resolute personal choice. The lecture's enduring influence lies in its prescient critique of academic professionalization and the , shaping debates on the demarcation of facts from values and the personal costs of intellectual labor in rationalized societies. Weber's unflinching —rooted in empirical observation of Wilhelmine Germany's academic upheavals—rejects romanticized views of , insisting instead on commitment amid inevitable of values.

Historical Context

Delivery and Publication Details

Max Weber delivered the lecture "Wissenschaft als Beruf" on November 7, 1917, in , , as the first in a series titled Geistige Arbeit als Beruf organized by the Freistudentischer Bund, a group of independent students. The audience consisted primarily of students amid the intellectual and social disruptions of , with the event aimed at discussing intellectual work as a profession. The text of the lecture was published posthumously—no, Weber died June 1920, published 1919—in 1919 by Duncker & Humblot in and as part of the collection Geistige Arbeit als Beruf: Vier Vorträge vor dem Freistudentischen Bund. This edition reproduced the spoken content with minimal revisions by Weber, preserving its original rhetorical style. Later inclusions appeared in Weber's Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre in 1922. The publication occurred while Weber was still active academically, though his health was declining.

Post-World War I Intellectual Environment

The of November 11, 1918, ended but ushered in profound instability in , marked by the November Revolution that overthrew the monarchy and led to the proclamation of the on November 9, 1918. This period saw violent upheavals, including the in January 1919 and the short-lived in during April-May 1919, amid hyper-partisan politics and economic distress from war debts and demobilization. Intellectuals, many of whom had initially supported the war as a cultural renewal, confronted widespread disillusionment with liberal and positivist assumptions that had promised rational progress through and . The , signed on June 28, 1919, exacerbated this turmoil by imposing territorial losses, military restrictions, and reparations totaling 132 billion gold marks on , fostering resentment and a sense of national humiliation. In academic circles, universities strained under funding shortages and ideological fractures, with returning soldiers and students demanding practical reorientation over traditional (cultural education), amid debates on science's societal role. Max Weber's "Science as a Vocation," first lectured in in late 1917 but republished and redelivered in in 1919, entered this milieu as a sober assessment of science's professionalization and limits, countering romanticized views of as a redemptive force. Post-war intellectual discourse reflected a "crisis of science" in Germany, where wartime applications of technology—such as chemical weapons and industrialized killing—undermined faith in scientific rationalism as inherently progressive or value-providing. Weber highlighted the "disenchantment of the world" (Entzauberung der Welt), arguing that clarified means but not ultimate ends, resonating with thinkers grappling with historicism's and the failure of pre-war . This amplified Weber's emphasis on personal ethical commitment amid bureaucratic , as universities faced "Americanization"—prioritizing utility and funding over autonomous inquiry—while broader cultural pessimism questioned 's capacity to restore meaning after the catastrophe of industrialized war.

Weber's Motivations and Audience

Max Weber delivered the lecture Wissenschaft als Beruf ("Science as a Vocation") on November 7, 1917, at the University of Munich, following an invitation from the Freistudentischer Bund, a organization advocating for specialized training over broader formation. The audience consisted primarily of navigating the disruptions of , including wartime , resource shortages, and emerging political uncertainties that questioned traditional career paths and societal roles. Weber's motivations included providing pragmatic guidance on intellectual pursuits amid these challenges, explicitly warning prospective scholars of the precarious economic and professional conditions in , such as limited appointments and the shift toward bureaucratic . He emphasized that demanded a personal Beruf—a calling rooted in passion and discipline—rather than external rewards or utilitarian outcomes, aiming to temper romanticized views of scientific work prevalent among youth disillusioned by . This reflected Weber's broader intent to delineate 's intrinsic value while critiquing its inability to furnish ultimate meaning in a "disenchanted" modern world. Intellectually, Weber sought to counter contemporaneous trends like the "" of universities, which prioritized and over autonomous inquiry, and to underscore the ethical imperatives of scientific amid materialism's rise. His of the aligned with his recent resumption of public engagement after health-related , positioning the as a sober intervention in debates on during a period when students grappled with science's societal purpose post-religious decline.

Lecture Structure and Summary

Opening on Vocation and Profession

opens his 1918 lecture by framing "science as a " (Wissenschaft als Beruf), deliberately emphasizing a pedantic approach over inspirational guidance for life choices. He asserts that political economists, including himself, prioritize precision, stating, "we political economists possess a certain pedantic streak that I should like to retain." This sets the tone for a realistic assessment rather than romanticized advice, warning that only those inherently called to methodical intellectual labor can sustain a scholarly . Weber contrasts modern occupational selection, driven by calculated economic prospects such as salary and job security, with historical views where one's path was often seen as predestined by fate or divine will. In contemporary academia, aspiring scientists must endure extensive specialized training, obtain certifications like the Habilitation, and compete fiercely for scarce permanent positions, often delaying financial stability into one's forties. He underscores that science demands not mere technical proficiency but a profound, enduring passion for precision and dispassionate analysis, without which the profession becomes untenable drudgery. This distinction between —entailing bureaucratic routines, administrative burdens, and material incentives—and —as an inner imperative for truth-seeking amid inevitable personal and societal —forms the lecture's foundational tension. Weber cautions that the scholarly life offers no guaranteed or , only incremental clarification of factual realities, requiring resolute from those who choose it.

Progression of Arguments

Weber initiates his argument by examining the external conditions shaping science as a vocation, detailing the material realities of academic careers in early 20th-century and contrasting them with the American system. He describes the German Privatdozent pathway, which offered no initial salary and required personal financial support, alongside emerging bureaucratization trends that curtailed assistants' independence, likening universities to "state capitalist" enterprises. This foundation underscores the profession's demands, transitioning to the role of chance and mediocrity in professorial selection, where Weber compares academic appointments to unpredictable processes like papal elections, emphasizing misalignments between scholarly expertise and prowess. Shifting inward, Weber delineates the personal calling inherent to scientific pursuit, positing as indispensable for genuine advancement, driven by unpredictable bursts of akin yet distinct from artistic . He stresses that scientific progresses and obsoletes, demanding relentless to drudgery over charismatic , thereby building toward science's existential role amid disillusionment with prior illusions of ultimate truth, divine , or salvific . The argument progresses to the disenchantment of the world through rationalization, where demystifies natural forces but fails to address Tolstoy's query—"What shall we do and how shall we live?"—revealing its inability to furnish ultimate meaning or resolve value conflicts between spheres like and goodness. Weber advocates scholarly neutrality in value judgments, confining to clarifying means-ends relations and consequences, not prescribing ends, which necessitates personal, decisive commitment to one's chosen "gods" or demons in a prophetless era. This culminates in the vocation's essence: self-clarification through rigorous method, devoid of salvific pretense, demanding intellectual integrity amid inevitable personal costs.

Concluding Remarks on Personal Commitment

In the concluding remarks of his lecture, underscores that pursuing demands an unyielding personal commitment, akin to a profound inner calling that transcends mere professional routine. He argues that true scientific endeavor requires "passionate ," as "nothing is worthy of man as man unless he can pursue it with passionate ." This commitment manifests as an almost demonic possession, where the individual must obey "the demon who holds the fibers of his very life," compelling relentless focus amid the vocation's hardships, including bureaucratic constraints and the Sisyphean nature of incremental progress. Weber emphasizes intellectual as central to this personal stake, insisting that bear an ethical to provide clarity without succumbing to illusions of ultimate through . Despite science's of the world—stripping away mystical meanings—it serves self-clarification for those who choose it, but only for individuals capable of enduring its demands without expecting charismatic rewards or worldly acclaim. This vocation, delivered in on January 28, 1919, to students navigating post-war disillusionment, portrays commitment not as heroic glamour but as sober, resilient dedication to truth-seeking, where personal fortitude determines one's capacity to persist. Ultimately, Weber frames this commitment as a deliberate, existential : one must affirm science's path "Nevertheless!" in the face of its limitations, forging meaning through disciplined labor rather than deriving it from the activity itself. This resonates with his broader ethic of , where the scientist's personal resolve upholds causal rigor and empirical fidelity against temptations of or expediency.

Core Arguments and Themes

The Professionalization of Science

The professionalization of in early 20th-century transformed scientific inquiry from a secondary pursuit of independent scholars or amateurs into a formalized, salaried occupation embedded within state bureaucracies and universities. Rooted in Wilhelm von Humboldt's 1810 reforms, which established the ideal of uniting teaching () with original investigation (), this shift created dedicated infrastructure including endowed chairs, laboratories, and mandatory credentials like the (promoted around 1810) and (a post-doctoral qualification for independent lecturing rights). By the 1870s, German institutions dominated global scientific output, exemplified by Justus Liebig's 1820s laboratory model at , which standardized chemical training and research as professional apprenticeships. This era saw integrate with and state needs, fostering professional societies, peer-reviewed journals, and salaried roles that supplanted or private funding. Max Weber, in his 1917 Munich lecture, portrayed professional science as a vocation (Beruf) demanding total devotion amid institutional rigidity and hyper-specialization. He emphasized that "only by strict specialization can the scientific worker become fully conscious... that he has achieved something that will endure," as the volume of knowledge rendered generalism obsolete and tied individual efforts to incremental progress within vast apparatuses. In Germany, entry required a PhD dissertation, followed by habilitation for venia legendi (permission to teach), leading to the Privatdozent role—an unpaid position dependent on student fees and senior faculty approval, with advancement to tenured professorships governed by arbitrary "calls" (Berufung) rather than merit alone. Weber likened this to the artisan's displacement by factory labor, noting scientists' growing separation from tools of production (e.g., libraries, labs) in favor of bureaucratic oversight by state departments or foundations. Bureaucratization intensified career precariousness, with Weber observing parallels to emerging American models of fixed-salary assistants under performance audits, amid German universities' drift toward "state capitalist" enterprises reliant on enrollments and grants. Professionals faced dual mandates as scholars and teachers, navigating competition where "the question whether or not such a Privatdozent... will ever succeed in moving into the position of a full professor... is simply a hazard." This structure, while enabling rationalized progress, bred disillusionment, as transient contributions and administrative demands eroded autonomy, compelling Weber to counsel only those with an inner "calling" to persist.

Limits of Scientific Knowledge

Weber posits that scientific knowledge cannot furnish answers to existential questions of purpose, such as "What shall we do and how shall we live?", which he identifies as the paramount concern for , drawing on Leo Tolstoy's critique to underscore 's silence on such matters. This limitation arises because operates within the domain of factual causation and technical control over phenomena, enabling mastery of life through rational means but offering no guidance on whether or why such mastery ought to be pursued. For instance, elucidates the conditions necessary for technical dominance over nature, yet it presupposes rather than justifies the value of pursuing such knowledge, rendering it incapable of validating its own foundational assumptions about truth-seeking. Epistemologically, Weber emphasizes the provisional character of scientific achievements, noting that every discovery or is destined to , with current understandings likely to be superseded within decades—ten, twenty, or fifty years—by subsequent advancements. This endless implies no endpoint of absolute certainty; scientific constitutes merely a segment of millennia-long , but it yields no comprehensive or final truths about , as methodologies and paradigms remain subject to revision and falsification. Consequently, fosters by eradicating magical or prophetic explanations of the world, replacing them with calculable , yet it provides no salvific or redemptive insight to compensate for the retreat of transcendent values into private or interpersonal bonds. Furthermore, scientific knowledge encounters boundaries in resolving conflicts among irreducible value spheres—such as those between aesthetic beauty, ethical goodness, or intellectual truth—since empirical methods cannot adjudicate their relative worth or harmonize their tensions. Weber illustrates this by observing that , while clarifying factual means to valued ends, abstains from prescribing the ends themselves, thereby confining its utility to instrumental without encroaching on normative or ontological domains beyond empirical . These constraints highlight 's role as a tool for demystification and , but not as a for ultimate meaning, positioning it as intellectually indispensable yet existentially insufficient.

Intellectual Integrity and Passion

In Max Weber's 1917 lecture, pursuing science as a vocation demands an inner calling marked by profound , described as a "strange " essential for enduring the rigors of specialized , without which individuals lack the necessary devotion and should pursue other paths. This passion manifests not as fleeting but as a disciplined commitment to methodical work amid , where scientific insights arise unpredictably and demand persistent labor despite potential obscurity or rejection. Weber emphasized that only those gripped by this drive can sustain the "thousands of years" of silence before meaningful contributions emerge, underscoring the vocational aspect as a personal predisposition rather than mere professional training. Complementing this passion is the requirement of intellectual , which Weber positioned as the singular virtue in settings, compelling scientists to prioritize factual rigor over personal convictions or charismatic appeals. He warned against " ," where scholars impose value judgments under the guise of , insisting instead on self-restraint to avoid distorting empirical analysis with subjective ideals. This demands in methodological limits and to the era's demand for salvific pronouncements, as neither legitimizes ultimate values nor supplants religious or ethical orientations. The interplay of and necessitates sacrifices, including resignation to the provisional nature of scientific achievements, which Weber noted are inevitably surpassed as knowledge advances—a shared fate scientists must embrace as their goal rather than lament as personal . Vocational thus involves forgoing illusions of permanence or heroic , focusing instead on incremental clarification amid specialization's narrowing demands, where routine toil supplants romantic . This dual orientation—fervent dedication tempered by scrupulous honesty—defines the ethical core of scientific work, guarding against delusion while fueling progress.

Bureaucracy and Academic Life

In "Science as a Vocation," depicted the profession as deeply intertwined with structures, particularly within the German university system of the early , where scholars operated within hierarchical institutions funded and regulated by the state. Large institutes functioned akin to "state capitalist enterprises," with assistants wholly dependent on state-provided resources and subordinate to institute directors in a manner comparable to factory workers under . This dependency extended to access to laboratories, libraries, and other tools essential for , underscoring the bureaucratized allocation of means that constrained individual autonomy despite the intellectual demands of the . Weber highlighted the precarious career trajectory in , beginning with the —a rigorous qualification for lecturing as a —followed by years of unpaid or fee-dependent teaching with no guaranteed salary. Progression to a full professorship or institute directorship relied heavily on "" rather than merit alone, as appointments were influenced by political connections, , and limited openings; he noted, "I know of hardly any career on where plays such a role." In contrast, the American system offered fixed but modest salaries to junior faculty, yet imposed heavy teaching burdens prescribed by administrative officials, further limiting time for original research and reinforcing bureaucratic oversight. Administrative pressures compounded these structural constraints, as German universities tied Privatdozenten compensation to student enrollments, incentivizing popular lecturing over scholarly depth and fostering competition among instructors. Weber characterized the entire academic endeavor as an "utter gamble," demanding not only intellectual but resilience against institutional mediocrity, arbitrary decisions, and the of personal agency by routine bureaucratic demands. This bureaucratization, while enabling and rational , clashed with the charismatic, devotion-driven ideal of as a calling, prefiguring broader processes of rationalization that subordinated individual creativity to systemic imperatives.

Philosophical Implications

Disenchantment of the World

In Max Weber's 1918 lecture "Science as a Vocation," the concept of the Entzauberung der Welt—translated as the "disenchantment of the world"—describes the progressive rationalization of , wherein supplants traditional religious and magical interpretations of reality with impersonal, calculable causal mechanisms. Weber characterizes this as "the fate of our times," marked by intellectualization that eliminates "mysterious incalculable forces" in favor of mastery through calculation, a process accelerated by the advancement of since . Unlike pre-modern eras where natural phenomena invoked spirits, miracles, or , demands empirical verification and disallows supernatural explanations, rendering the devoid of inherent or prescriptive meaning. This manifests through 's specialization and bureaucratization, which Weber illustrates by noting how ancient civilizations once sought "magical means" for practical ends like or warfare, but modern replaces these with technical rationalization—predictable, replicable procedures stripped of ritual or . For instance, prophetic of the , once claimed by religious figures, yields to via statistical models, yet offers no ultimate "" from , only incremental control over means. Weber emphasizes that this shift, while enabling technological dominance, erodes the where ultimate values derive from cosmic order, forcing individuals to confront a , value-free amenable to but not to normative justification. The implications for scientific vocation are profound: researchers must accept operating within this disenchanted framework, pursuing truth through rigorous, dispassionate method without expecting science to restore meaning or resolve existential voids left by its own demystification. Weber warns that attempts to infuse science with salvific purpose—such as utopian engineering or ethical prophecy—contradict its essence, as disenchantment precludes any scientific basis for "why" questions of value, confining it to "how" inquiries of causation. This process, ongoing since the Scientific Revolution's empirical turn in the , underscores science's role not as a redeemer but as an agent of , where in correlates inversely with perceived sacrality in the natural order.

Fact-Value Distinction

In "Science as a Vocation," delivered on November 7, 1917, at the University of Munich, Max Weber articulates the fact-value distinction as a fundamental limit of scientific inquiry, emphasizing that empirical science addresses "what is" through verifiable causal relations but cannot prescribe "what ought to be." He contends that science provides technical knowledge on means-ends calculations—for instance, determining the most efficient method to achieve a given goal—but ultimate validation of the goal itself requires extra-scientific judgment rooted in personal values or ethical commitments. This separation, central to Weber's methodological individualism, prevents science from serving as a source of normative authority, as any attempt to derive values from facts would conflate descriptive analysis with prescriptive advocacy. Weber illustrates the distinction with historical examples, such as the shift from prophetic to rational , where science demystifies natural phenomena (e.g., explaining lightning as electrical discharge rather than divine wrath) but leaves unresolved whether such explanations diminish human significance or purpose. He warns that scientists who overstep into value judgments risk intellectual dishonesty, as their discipline lacks tools to adjudicate competing ethical systems; instead, science clarifies consequences, allowing actors to confront the "devil's bargain" of their choices. This restraint aligns with Weber's broader Wertfreiheit (value-freedom) principle, which demands that research findings remain neutral, though the choice of research problems inevitably reflects the investigator's value-laden interests in cultural relevance. The vocational implication is profound: aspiring scientists must embrace this boundary to maintain integrity, recognizing that passion for truth-seeking yields incremental certainties amid provisional knowledge, but no eternal verities or salvific truths. Weber contrasts this with earlier eras when science intertwined with or metaphysics, arguing that modern specialization renders such syntheses untenable, compelling individuals to select values autonomously outside scientific discourse. Critics, including later philosophers like , have noted that while the distinction safeguards objectivity, it presupposes a sharp is-ought divide that may undervalue science's indirect influence on values through . Nonetheless, Weber's framework endures as a caution against , insisting that vocational commitment demands lucid acknowledgment of science's domain.

Science's Inability to Provide Ultimate Meaning

In his 1917 lecture "Science as a Vocation," contends that , rooted in empirical causation and rational clarification, cannot furnish ultimate meaning or resolve questions of existential purpose, as it operates strictly within the domain of verifiable facts rather than normative prescriptions. Weber delineates a sharp fact-value distinction, asserting that while science elucidates "what is" through controlled observation and logical inference—such as the predictable outcomes of physical laws or historical sequences—it offers no criteria for adjudicating "what ought to be," which demands irrational commitment to clashing ultimate values like bravery in the face of death or pacifist non-resistance. This incapacity stems from science's presupposition of value-neutrality in methodology; it presupposes ends (e.g., pursuit of truth) but cannot substantiate their intrinsic worth against alternatives, leaving such validation to individual conviction unsupported by empirical proof. Weber illustrates science's limits by contrasting ancient philosophical ideals, where knowledge of the good equated to its possession, with modern rationalization's "," which demystifies natural phenomena but exposes a "" of incompatible gods—each vying for allegiance without scientific resolution. For example, scientific calculation can optimize technical efficiency, as in engineering a or forecasting economic trends, yet it cannot decree whether such pursuits serve a higher or merely perpetuate instrumental devoid of redemptive significance. Scholars analyzing Weber's framework reinforce that this boundary preserves intellectual integrity, preventing science from degenerating into ideological , though it risks fostering if misconstrued as a comprehensive . Ultimately, Weber maintains that demands for to yield ultimate meaning—such as from or eternal truths—betray a misunderstanding of its vocational essence: laborious, provisional advancement amid inevitable obsolescence, not prophetic . Those seeking consolation must turn inward or to non-rational sources, confronting conflicts without empirical arbitration, as clarifies options but enforces no among them. This view, drawn from Weber's confrontation with post-Enlightenment , underscores 's ethical modesty: it combats illusions through dispassionate scrutiny but abdicates authority over the "one and only way" to human flourishing.

Criticisms and Controversies

Early Contemporary Responses

The publication of Max Weber's "Wissenschaft als Beruf" in 1919 elicited prompt debate among German academics, reflecting tensions over the professionalization and ethical demands of scientific work amid post-World War I disillusionment. A key early response was the 1920 volume Der Beruf der Wissenschaft, co-authored by Arthur Salz, , and Erich von Kahler, which mounted extended critiques against Weber's depiction of science as a disenchanted, bureaucratic pursuit devoid of ultimate meaning. Heinrich Rickert, a neo-Kantian philosopher and Weber's colleague, observed in 1920 that Weber's forthright style in articulating the vocation of science often provoked immediate contradiction, heightening risks of misinterpretation among readers. Ernst Curtius, a classicist, echoed this by faulting Weber's analysis as overly personal and narrow, fixating on the mechanistic aspects of natural sciences while sidelining humanistic disciplines. Defenses emerged alongside critiques; theologian and historian , in 1921, countered that detractors such as Salz and Curtius had distorted Weber's arguments into caricatures, overlooking the lecture's nuanced emphasis on intellectual integrity amid . These exchanges highlighted broader Weimar-era concerns about science's role in a rationalized world, with critics often charging Weber with undue regarding value-neutral and charismatic in .

Charges of Relativism and Nihilism

Critics of Max Weber's "Science as a Vocation" have frequently accused his framework of fostering by positing an irresolvable " of values," wherein competing ethical spheres—such as those of , , and —lack a rational arbiter for ultimate adjudication. This perspective, articulated in the 1919 lecture, holds that modern rationalization fragments values into autonomous domains without hierarchical resolution, which detractors interpret as denying objective moral truths in favor of subjective or cultural equivalence. Conservative scholars, in particular, contend that Weber's insistence on value-freedom in scientific inquiry undermines the possibility of grounding in transcendent norms, reducing it to a descriptive enterprise indifferent to normative . The charge of nihilism stems from Weber's explicit disavowal of science's capacity to furnish ultimate meaning or prescribe life-orienting ends, leaving individuals to confront a "disenchanted" world devoid of inherent purpose. Opponents argue this voids traditional anchors like divine order or metaphysical certainties, compelling a heroic but ultimately futile personal commitment to chosen values amid inevitable clashes, which echoes Nietzschean abyss-staring without affirmative resolution. Such critiques, often from theologico-political standpoints, frame Weber's vocational ethic—demanding intellectual integrity and dispassionate clarity—as a ethic suited to existential void rather than genuine . These accusations persist despite Weber's qualifiers, such as his rejection of quietist resignation and emphasis on value-clarity as a bulwark against dogmatism; critics maintain that his empirical diagnosis of value-pluralism empirically confirms relativism's triumph in secular modernity without prescriptive escape. Empirical studies of value conflicts in policy domains, like or , lend circumstantial support to Weber's observations but intensify debates over whether they necessitate nihilistic implications or merely demand pragmatic adjudication.

Critiques from Traditionalist and Religious Perspectives

Traditionalist critiques of Weber's conception of science as a vocation portray it as emblematic of modernity's spiritual abdication, where specialized rational inquiry supplants integral, hierarchical knowledge rooted in perennial tradition. Thinkers in this school, such as , contended that modern science's emphasis on empirical measurement and mechanistic explanation constitutes a "reign of quantity," inverting traditional metaphysics that unified with qualitative, sacred principles of reality. Guénon viewed this shift not as an inexorable "fate" akin to Weber's but as a deliberate historical deviation from primordial wisdom, recoverable through into esoteric doctrines that transcend vocational specialization. Julius Evola extended similar reservations, decrying scientific as a tool of egalitarian mass culture that erodes aristocratic spiritual sovereignty; in his framework, true demands metaphysical differentiation and heroic , not the bureaucratic "" Weber attributed to scientific calling. Religious perspectives, particularly from , challenge Weber's delineation of science's limits by asserting that ultimate meaning derives from , rendering a partial rather than total condition. Critics argue that Weber's overlooks faith's capacity to imbue scientific endeavor with transcendent purpose, as exemplified in scriptural mandates for over ( 1:28), where empirical inquiry serves rather than supplants theological . For instance, panentheistic theologians posit that God's in the undoes Weberian separation, allowing science to participate in re-enchantment by revealing divine order rather than stripping mystery; this counters Weber's prognosis of irreversible intellectualization with a relational where scientific facts cohere within sacred values. , interpreting Weber through a religious sociological lens, affirmed that science's vocational constraints underscore its inadequacy to supplant classical-religious traditions in cultivating holistic human fulfillment, as these traditions integrate rational clarity with ethical and spiritual depth. Such critiques maintain that Weber's resignation to polytheistic value conflicts neglects monotheistic absolutes, fostering where discerns causal primacy in divine will over probabilistic scientific models. Empirical persistence of adherence—evidenced by global surveys showing over 80% self-identification with traditions as of 2020—empirically rebuts disenchantment's totality, suggesting science's vocational allure coexists with, rather than eclipses, sacred callings.

Reception and Influence

Impact on Sociology and Philosophy of Science

Weber's conception of science as a specialized vocation requiring Wertfreiheit (value-freedom) profoundly shaped the sociology of science by establishing norms for objective inquiry amid institutional pressures. Robert K. Merton, a foundational figure in the field, drew on Weber's emphasis on rationalization and bureaucratic specialization in academia to articulate the ethos of modern science, including norms such as universalism (judgments based on merit), communism (communal sharing of knowledge), disinterestedness, and organized skepticism. Merton's 1942 analysis of these norms positioned science as a social institution resistant to external values, echoing Weber's 1917 lecture where scientific progress demands dispassionate methodological rigor despite personal commitments guiding research topics. This framework facilitated empirical studies of scientific communities, such as Merton's examination of reward systems and priority disputes, treating science not as an abstract pursuit but as embedded in vocational structures. In the sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK), Weber's ideas provided a counterpoint to constructivist tendencies, underscoring that while social factors influence scientific choice and context, factual claims must adhere to evidential standards independent of values. SSK scholars, emerging in the 1970s, critiqued Mertonian functionalism partly inherited from Weber, arguing for stronger contingency in knowledge production, yet Weber's insistence on science's disenchanting rationality—progressing through falsification and specialization without ultimate meaning—framed debates on whether scientific consensus derives from epistemic merit or negotiation. His lecture anticipated analyses of science's internal pluralism, where competing paradigms coexist without resolution, influencing empirical sociologies that map credentialism and peer review as vocational mechanisms rather than guarantors of truth. Philosophically, Weber's fact-value distinction, articulated in the lecture as science clarifying means-ends relations but incapable of prescribing values, reinforced in the , challenging holistic or teleological views prevalent in early 20th-century thought. This principle of value neutrality, where scientists must bracket ethical judgments in empirical analysis, became a cornerstone for demarcating scientific from normative discourse, impacting logical empiricists like who sought to purge metaphysics from verifiable claims. It also provoked critiques in , such as those questioning whether value-laden problem selection undermines purported neutrality, yet Weber's causal realism—prioritizing observable regularities over speculative essences—aligned with emerging falsificationism, as in Karl Popper's 1934 , by emphasizing testable hypotheses over inductive confirmation. Later, philosophers like engaged Weber's limits of , arguing that extends beyond instrumental reason, though Weber's vocational pessimism—science's inability to furnish existential orientation—prefigured existentialist turns in against naive progressivism.

Applications to Modern Academia

Weber's conception of science as a demanding vocation, requiring intellectual passion and ethical commitment amid bureaucratic rationalization, manifests in contemporary through intensified and institutional pressures that often prioritize administrative and metric-driven outputs over substantive . In U.S. universities, the proliferation of administrative roles has outpaced growth, with full-time administrators increasing by 369% from 1975 to 2011 compared to a 23% rise in full-time , diverting resources from and toward compliance and oversight functions. This bureaucratic expansion echoes Weber's warnings about the "" of rationalization, where vocational dedication to truth-seeking is subordinated to procedural imperatives, such as grant applications and regulatory adherence, reducing the time scholars devote to core scientific pursuits. The "" imperative, a hallmark of modern academic careers, amplifies Weber's emphasis on relentless intellectual labor but undermines its quality by incentivizing volume over rigor, contributing to phenomena like the and rising retractions. For instance, pressures tied to tenure, promotions, and institutional rankings have led to an "avalanche of low-quality research," with studies linking this culture to perverse incentives that favor incremental, safe findings over paradigm-shifting work. Weber anticipated such fragmentation, portraying the as a narrow specialist destined for obsolescence without broader ethical grounding, yet today's metrics—such as citation counts and h-indices—exacerbate this by commodifying knowledge production, often at the expense of causal depth or empirical fidelity. Ideological conformity in further deviates from Weber's value-free , as dominant left-leaning orientations—evident in faculty political ratios ranging from 6:1 to 15:1 Democrat-to-Republican across disciplines—foster environments where nonconforming views face hiring barriers or , compromising research neutrality. Practices like mandatory (DEI) statements in faculty evaluations serve as ideological filters, with evaluators penalizing statements lacking emphasis on , , or , thereby enforcing homogeneity that stifles diverse hypotheses and causal analyses. This , prevalent in institutions with historically progressive leanings, parallels Weber's critique of science's inability to arbitrate ultimate values, yet inverts it by subordinating factual inquiry to prescriptive norms, eroding 's claim to disenchanted .

Enduring Debates in Scientific Practice

One central enduring debate concerns the feasibility of value-free science, or Wertfreiheit, as articulated by Weber, who maintained that scientific inquiry must abstain from prescribing ultimate values while clarifying the logical and empirical consequences of different value commitments. Critics, however, contend that values inevitably infiltrate scientific practice through choices in problem selection, methodological assumptions, and data interpretation, rendering pure neutrality unattainable in fields like social sciences where researcher ideologies shape hypotheses. This tension persists, as evidenced by empirical studies showing that political homogeneity in academia—where surveys indicate over 90% of social scientists self-identify as left-leaning—correlates with skewed research outputs favoring certain policy conclusions, such as in economics and psychology. Another ongoing contention revolves around the personal and institutional demands of scientific amid bureaucratization, where Weber foresaw specialization yielding incremental truths but fostering and ethical quandaries for practitioners committed to . In contemporary settings, this manifests in debates over integrity under funding pressures and publish-or-perish incentives, exemplified by the in and , where meta-analyses reveal that fewer than half of landmark studies reproduce reliably, prompting calls for renewed emphasis on Weberian rigor over careerist expediency. Proponents of in science argue for integrating personal responsibility—such as and —into Weber's framework to counteract these systemic distortions, ensuring the vocation retains its "spirit" despite rationalized structures. Debates also endure regarding science's boundaries versus , where Weber cautioned against expecting science to supplant value judgments or provide existential meaning, yet modern advocates sometimes extend empirical methods into ethical domains, as in utilitarian or climate policy modeling. underscores risks: peer-reviewed analyses indicate ideological biases amplify in fields like , where dissenting empirical findings face higher rejection rates, challenging Weber's ideal of dispassionate clarification. These discussions highlight causal pathways from institutional to selective evidence appraisal, urging reforms like diverse hiring to preserve science's truth-seeking core.

Translations and Scholarly Editions

Major English Translations

The earliest prominent English translation of 's "Wissenschaft als Beruf" was rendered by H.H. Gerth and , appearing in their 1946 anthology From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, published by . This version titled the lecture "Science as a Vocation" and presented it alongside other Weberian texts, facilitating its widespread dissemination in Anglo-American and curricula during the mid-20th century. Gerth and Mills' rendering emphasized interpretive accessibility, though later critics noted occasional liberties in phrasing to convey Weber's idiomatic German style to English readers. A more literal and scholarly translation emerged in 2004 with Rodney Livingstone's version in The Vocation Lectures, edited by and Tracy B. Strong and issued by Hackett Publishing Company. Livingstone retained the title "Science as a Vocation" but prioritized precision in Weber's complex terminology, such as Entzauberung () and Beruf ( or calling), arguing for fidelity to the original's philosophical nuance over fluid prose. This edition includes extensive editorial apparatus, including notes on textual variants from the 1919 German first edition, making it a standard for contemporary academic use. Subsequent translations have explored alternative renderings of Beruf to highlight its dual connotations of profession and divine calling, as in Gordon C. Wells' 2009 version in Max Weber's Complete Writings on and Political s, published by Algora , which opts for "Science as a Profession and a ." Scholarly comparisons of these editions, including Gerth/Mills, Livingstone, and others, reveal divergences in capturing Weber's ironic tone and references to Lutheran theology, with Livingstone generally praised for balancing readability and accuracy. These translations have shaped interpretive debates, as variances in wording influence readings of Weber's views on science's limits and ethical demands.

Variations in Interpretation Across Languages

The translation of Max Weber's 1917 lecture "Wissenschaft als Beruf," first published in 1919, into various languages has introduced interpretive nuances stemming from linguistic choices for key terms like (broadly denoting systematic intellectual inquiry, encompassing natural sciences, , and social sciences) and (connoting both and a quasi-religious calling or ). These choices influence whether the text is read as emphasizing bureaucratic rationalization and institutional constraints on or as underscoring personal ethical commitment and passion amid modern . Scholarly analysis highlights that such variations can render Weber's voice "protean," with translations reflecting translators' interpretive priorities rather than uniform fidelity to the original . In English, at least five major translations exist, including the influential 1946 version by Hans H. Gerth and , which popularized "Science as a Vocation" and preserved the Beruf as "" to evoke Weber's Protestant ethic themes of inner-worldly and . Subsequent renderings, such as those by Edward Shils (1958) and Rodney Livingstone (2004), diverge in phrasing passages on scientific progress's limits and the "struggle of the gods" in , sometimes amplifying a tone of resignation toward specialization's dehumanizing effects or, conversely, ethical imperatives for intellectual integrity. These differences affect readings of Weber's critique of science's inability to provide ultimate meaning, with "" implying sacrificial versus "" stressing careerist and external organization. For instance, variations in translating Entzauberung () and Wertfreiheit (value-freedom) can shift emphasis from inevitable cultural loss to disciplined methodological restraint, influencing philosophical interpretations in Anglo-American . French translations, such as Julien Freund's 1959 rendition in Le savant et le politique ("La science comme une vocation"), retain the "vocation" framing, aligning closely with the German's dual sense of Beruf and facilitating interpretations that link science to existential responsibility in a secular age. However, comparative studies note fewer documented variants than in English, with French editions prioritizing philosophical accessibility over literalism, potentially softening Weber's stark realism about science's progressive yet illusory promises. In Romance languages like Spanish ("La ciencia como vocación") and Italian ("La scienza come professione"), titles often blend "vocation" and "profession," mirroring Beruf's ambiguity and leading to hybrid readings that balance personal calling with modern academia's rationalized structures, though explicit cross-linguistic debates remain sparse. Overall, while English translations exhibit the most analyzed divergences—driven by multiple editions and Anglo-Saxon emphases on —non-English versions tend toward standardized renderings that preserve Weber's tension between science's demystifying power and the scientist's need for self-chosen values. These linguistic filters underscore how translations mediate Weber's warnings against romanticizing science, yet they rarely alter core claims empirically verified in his original, such as the increasing rendering comprehensive mastery unattainable by the early 20th century. Limited cross-language suggests that interpretive arises more from contextual receptions than translational errors, with English variants disproportionately shaping global discourse due to their volume and influence in .

References

  1. [1]
    Max Weber's “Science as a Vocation”: Context, Genesis, Structure
    Jul 26, 2018 · The lectures dealt with science and with politics, two central themes for Weber. The first, given to German students on 7 November 1917, is ...
  2. [2]
    Wissenschaft als Beruf : Max Weber (1864-1920) - Internet Archive
    Nov 13, 2020 · Wissenschaft als Beruf, Geistige Arbeit als Beruf, Vier Vorträge vor dem Freistudentischem Bund, München und Leipzig Verlag von Duncker & Humblot (1919)
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Science as a Vocation - CRASSH
    The products of science can undoubtedly remain important for a long time, as “objects of pleasure" because of their artistic quali- ties, or as a means of ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Weber's Science as a Vocation - Scholars at Harvard
    This essay situates Weber's 1917 lecture Science as a Vocation in relevant historical contexts. The first context is thought about the changing nature of the ...
  5. [5]
    Max Weber - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Aug 24, 2007 · “Science as a Vocation” in From Max Weber. –––, 1920/1946. “The ... Max Weber: Modernisation as Passive Revolution, A Gramscian Analysis, Max ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Max Weber, “Science as a Vocation” 'Wissenschaft als Beruf,' from ...
    Max Weber, “Science as a Vocation”. 'Wissenschaft als Beruf,' from Gesammlte Aufsaetze zur Wissenschaftslehre (Tubingen,. 1922), pp. 524‐55.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  7. [7]
    [49]Editorischer Bericht - MWG digital
    „Wissenschaft als Beruf“ ist aus einem Vortrag hervorgegangen, den Max Weber im Rahmen einer Vortragsreihe mit dem Titel „Geistige Arbeit als Beruf“ am 7.
  8. [8]
    The Vocation Lectures | The Ted K Archive
    The lecture “Science as a Vocation” was delivered on November 7, 1917, some fourteen months before the presentation of “Politics as a Vocation,” in a war-weary— ...
  9. [9]
    Deutsches Textarchiv – Weber, Max: Wissenschaft als Beruf. In
    Weber, Max: Wissenschaft als Beruf. In: Geistige Arbeit als Beruf. Vier Vorträge vor dem Freistudentischen Bund. Erster Vortrag. München, 1919. Bild: 0001 ...
  10. [10]
    https://brill.com/display/book/9789401210775/B9789401210775-s004.pdf
  11. [11]
    Erich Wittenberg | 12 | The Crisis of Science in Germany in 1919 | Eri
    The life and work of Max Weber is pitted with flaws, disfigured by yawning absences; none the less, the contributions he made to the progress of scholarship ...
  12. [12]
    Introduction: Max Weber's Science as a Vocation as a Political Failure
    May 25, 2019 · What can science do for us? Can it tell us how we should act? How do material conditions shape scientific work and scholars' lives?Missing: themes | Show results with:themes<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Science as a calling and as a profession: The wider setting in ...
    1. Title page of Max Weber, Wissenschaft als Beruf, 1919 (first published version). Source: Wikipedia Commons. Public domain.
  14. [14]
    Weber-Science-as-a-Vocation.pdf
    No information is available for this page. · Learn why
  15. [15]
    Between “Bildung” and “Wissenschaft”: The 19th-Century German ...
    Aug 6, 2019 · Without a doubt, the most influential concept in German university history is that of the “unity of teaching and research”.
  16. [16]
    The Rise of Academic Laboratory Science: Chemistry and the ...
    Sep 23, 2021 · This chapter seeks to understand the context and sequelae of Justus Liebig's model for university research and teaching.<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    The Transformation of the Physical Sciences into Professions During ...
    During the nineteenth century four key elements came together to allow science to become a profession: 1) creation of salaried positions for work within a ...
  18. [18]
    One Hundred Years of Bureaucratization of Academic Science
    Jun 22, 2021 · He argued that a calling for science is critical for sustaining scientific work. Using Weber's arguments for science as a vocation as a lens, in ...
  19. [19]
    A disenchanted world: Max Weber on magic and modernity
    Mar 15, 2023 · In Science as a Vocation (MWG: I/17, 109) Weber famously characterizes disenchantment as a product of “intellectualization” ( ...
  20. [20]
    The Meaning of 'Wertfreiheit' - jstor
    Max Weber's most extensive and definitive exposition of the postulate of 'Werifreiheit' can be found in the Logos of 1917 under the title Der Sinn der ...
  21. [21]
    The Scientific Significance of Max Weber's “Wertfreiheit”:
    Aug 6, 2025 · The concept of Wertfreiheit demands the rigorous separation of theoretical perception from practical value-judgment in the social sciences.
  22. [22]
    Max Weber's “Science as a Vocation” - David Labaree
    Jul 29, 2019 · Below are some key points that arise in the lecture and some issues you might want to consider while reading it: Science can clarify choices ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Myth and the Meaning of Science as a Vocation
    In 1918, Max Weber concluded that science could not posit values, and those values which science operates in accordance with were imposed on it, thus ...
  24. [24]
    Science as a Vocation | News
    Aug 12, 2016 · Among philosophers, this view is often known as the fact/value distinction: though science can reveal facts about the world – how fast a steel ...
  25. [25]
    Afterword on Social Epistemology's Special Issue on 100 Years of ...
    Mar 16, 2020 · Max Weber's 'Science as a Vocation' caused considerable controversy in the early 1920s across German academe. Significant critics weighed in ...Missing: concluding | Show results with:concluding<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Value freedom and polytheism (Chapter 2) - Max Weber in Politics ...
    As Wolfgang Schluchter has noted, Weber was especially criticized for his insistence on the ineluctable polytheism of modern life.
  27. [27]
    Max Weber and his conservative critics: Social science and the ...
    May 27, 2022 · Influential critics have argued that this amounts to relativism, or even nihilism ... Tribe K (2018) Max Weber's “science as a vocation”: Context, ...
  28. [28]
    Max Weber and his conservative critics: Social science and the ...
    Influential critics have argued that this amounts to relativism, or even nihilism ... Tribe K (2018) Max Weber's "science as a vocation": Context, genesis, ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Martyn Hammersley MAX WEBER, SCIENCE, AND THE PROBLEM ...
    In this paper I have examined what is perhaps the most fundamental challenge to Weber's conception of social science as a vocation, one that is devoted to the ...
  30. [30]
    PANENTHEISM AND THE UNDOING OF DISENCHANTMENT | Zygon
    Though apparently a modern and anti‐religious phenomenon, disenchantment is actually, Weber ... Max Weber's “Science as a Vocation.” London, UK: Unwin Hyman.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Untitled - Pacific Lutheran University
    Max Weber's great essay "Science as a Vocation" shows us why science cannot replace the classical tradition as the basis for the education of the whole ...
  32. [32]
    Robert King Merton as Prodigy - The Sociological Review
    Oct 21, 2017 · His influential essay ' Puritanism, Pietism and Science ' (PPS), showed just what he meant when it came to Max Weber. Merton knew his Weber. But ...
  33. [33]
    Science and the Social Order
    Mar 14, 2022 · Forty-three years ago Max Weber observed that “the belief in the value of scientific truth is not derived from nature but is a product of ...
  34. [34]
    Merton's sociology of science - Understanding Society
    Dec 17, 2009 · Robert Merton was one of the giants of American sociology. One of his core contributions had to do with his efforts to define the subject ...Missing: Max | Show results with:Max
  35. [35]
    [PDF] HERE AND EVERYWHERE: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge
    The sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) is one of the profession's most marginal specialties, yet its objects of inquiry, its modes of inquiry, ...
  36. [36]
    The Social Study of Science before Kuhn - ResearchGate
    Apr 24, 2015 · (1958) which undermined the notion of raw observational data, that it came into its own. Weber's “Science as a Vocation”. The “political ...
  37. [37]
    2.3E: Value Neutrality in Sociological Research - Social Sci LibreTexts
    Feb 19, 2021 · Value neutrality, as described by Max Weber, is the duty of sociologists to identify and acknowledge their own values and overcome their ...
  38. [38]
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2025.2493966
  39. [39]
    Administration grows, faculty shrinks. Again. - The Review
    Jun 12, 2023 · Nevertheless, he concludes, “on the whole, the growth in the number of administrators and their salaries exceeded these needs.” No one ...
  40. [40]
    Publish or perish: Where are we heading? - PMC - NIH
    In conclusion, publication is a fact of life and vital to growth of science and career progression. ... We must stop the avalanche of low-quality research.
  41. [41]
    The 'publish or perish' mentality is fuelling research paper retractions
    Oct 3, 2024 · The 'publish or perish' mentality, tied to university rankings and career advancement, leads to pressure to publish, causing increased ...
  42. [42]
    'Publish or perish' evolutionary pressures shape scientific publishing ...
    Sep 12, 2025 · Culture shapes everything people do, not least scientific practice – how scientists decide what questions to ask and how to answer them.
  43. [43]
    Homogenous: The Political Affiliations of Elite Liberal Arts College ...
    In Gallup Republican states, the D:R ratio is 6.6:1 while in Gallup Democratic states the ratio is 15.8:1.
  44. [44]
    Partisan Professors | American Enterprise Institute - AEI
    These data show that university faculty are overwhelmingly on the political left, across all disciplines, and the proportion of left-leaning faculty has ...
  45. [45]
    An Ideological Screening Tool? DEI Statements Do Matter for ...
    Mar 25, 2025 · The results demonstrate that faculty exhibit a clear preference for DEI statements discussing race/ethnicity and gender and rate lower those ...
  46. [46]
    Clarity, Value Conflict, and Academic Politics: Weber's “Science as a ...
    Jun 23, 2020 · Weber's is an investigation into the nature of the scientist's calling or vocation, given the disenchantment of the world.
  47. [47]
    Max Weber's Postulate of "Freedom" from Value Judgments
    Weber's postulate means social science can't dictate which ends to choose, but it makes values part of scientific consideration, not mere relativism.
  48. [48]
    Political Biases in Academia | Psychology Today
    May 29, 2020 · A list of mostly peer-reviewed articles and academic books and chapters addressing the problem of political bias in academia.
  49. [49]
    Scientists' political donations reflect polarization in academia
    Jun 11, 2023 · Our analysis of individual political donations confirms that the vast majority of scientists who contribute have supported Democratic candidates.
  50. [50]
    The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and ...
    Jul 25, 2023 · In this Perspective, we reframe this 'crisis' through the lens of a credibility revolution, focusing on positive structural, procedural and community-driven ...
  51. [51]
    How to Be a Responsible Scientist. The Virtues in Max Weber's ...
    Dec 3, 2020 · This article argues that a virtue ethical framework can be integrated into Weber's position to strengthen the appeal for the scientist's responsibility.<|control11|><|separator|>
  52. [52]
    [PDF] In Defense of Scientism
    Scientism is the thesis that all cognitive problems concerning the world are best tackled adopting the scientific approach, also called 'the spirit of ...
  53. [53]
    The Hidden Influence of Political Bias on Academic Economics
    Jan 13, 2025 · Lack of political diversity in academia can heavily skew the research landscape, leading to some political perspectives being wholly ...
  54. [54]
    Political Bias in Academia Evidence from a Broader Institutional ...
    Jul 22, 2025 · Previous work has shown Democratic professors are more likely to give similar grades to all students than Republican ones.
  55. [55]
    From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology - Taylor & Francis eBooks
    May 1, 2014 · Gerth, H.H., & Wright Mills, C. (Eds.). (1948). From Max Weber ... Science as a Vocation. Title. Abstract. part |2 pages. PART II: POWER.
  56. [56]
    Max Weber: Science As A Vocation | PDF - Scribd
    Rating 5.0 (2) Max Weber: Science As a Vocation - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Published as "Wissenschaft als Beruf," ...
  57. [57]
    Versions of Vocation: Max Weber's 'Wissenschaft als Beruf' in ... - jstor
    1994 (1919). 'wissenschaft als beruf', in Wissenschaft als Beruf/Politik als. Beruf, edited by w.J. Mommsen and w. schluchter, 71-111.<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Max Weber's Complete Writings on Academic and Political Vocations
    30-day returnsWeber made many significant interpretations of both academic and political vocations in his two lectures on Science as a Vocation (Wissenschaft als Beruf, 1917) ...
  59. [59]
    Max Weber's <i>'Wissenschaft als Beruf'</i> in Translation
    Jan 1, 2022 · Expanding on prior discussion of the perils in translating the work of Max Weber, this paper compares five English versions of 'Science as a ...
  60. [60]
    Max Weber and/in French Sociology: A Book Review - jstor
    Politik, als Beruf and Wissenschaft als Beruf dates back to 1959. At that time, a large number of Weber's writings had been translated into English, and ...Missing: differences | Show results with:differences
  61. [61]
    An Exploratory Analysis of Secondary Literature on Max Weber ...
    ... translation of Weber's Wissenschaft als Beruf and Poli- tik als Beruf: Gerth and Mills' introductory biography of Weber and Julien Freund's essay, 'German ...Missing: variations across