Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Single-sideband modulation

Single-sideband modulation () is an technique that transmits only one of the two s generated by the modulating signal while suppressing the and the other , resulting in a more efficient use of spectrum and power compared to conventional (AM). This method halves the required for transmission—typically around 3 kHz for voice signals versus 6 kHz for full AM—while maintaining the same information content, making it particularly suitable for long-distance communication where is limited. SSB signals can be either upper (USB), where frequencies above the are transmitted, or lower (LSB), where those below are used, with the choice often depending on the frequency band and application. The principle behind SSB involves generating a double-sideband suppressed-carrier (DSB-SC) signal first, then applying a sharp to isolate one , as described in the filter method of . Mathematically, the SSB signal can be expressed as s(t) = m(t) \cos(\omega_c t) \pm \hat{m}(t) \sin(\omega_c t), where m(t) is the modulating signal, \hat{m}(t) is its , and \omega_c is the carrier angular frequency; the plus or minus sign selects the upper or lower . At the receiver, a , often called a (BFO), reinserts the carrier to demodulate the signal back to audio. This process enhances the by approximately 3 dB over DSB due to the concentrated power in half the bandwidth. Invented theoretically by John R. Carson in through of continuous-wave , was first patented for practical use in to multiplex multiple calls over a single circuit. Early prototypes were developed by engineers like Raymond A. Heising at in the 1920s, demonstrating transmission and reception for wireline applications. By the mid-20th century, became the standard for high-frequency () radio communications, including , military, aviation, and services, due to its advantages in power efficiency—up to 50% savings over AM by eliminating the carrier—and resistance to noise and fading. Today, it remains widely used in these domains, though digital alternatives are increasingly adopted for broadband applications.

Fundamentals

Basic Concept

Single-sideband modulation (SSB) is a form of that transmits only one of the two sidebands produced by the modulating signal while suppressing the and the unused sideband, thereby achieving a bandwidth reduction of approximately 50% compared to conventional double-sideband (DSB-AM). This efficiency arises because the two sidebands in standard AM carry redundant information, allowing SSB to convey the same data using half the spectral space. In SSB, the original modulating signal—such as an audio for voice transmission or a stream—is faithfully reproduced in the transmitted , preserving the full information content and fidelity without introducing additional distortion or loss. This makes SSB particularly valuable for applications requiring minimal spectral occupancy, as it minimizes with adjacent channels while maintaining clear signal recovery at the through reinsertion of a local . Visually, a conventional AM signal features a central flanked by symmetric upper and lower s, each extending to a width equal to the highest component of the modulating signal (e.g., 3 kHz for voice audio). In contrast, an shows only one —either the upper or lower—shifted relative to the suppressed position, resulting in a narrower overall that matches the modulating signal's range. The choice between upper sideband (USB) and lower sideband (LSB) depends on convention and frequency band: USB transmits the frequencies above the suppressed carrier, commonly used for professional and communications at and above 10 MHz, while LSB transmits frequencies below the carrier and is standard for voice signals below 10 MHz by long-standing convention. SSB's development was motivated by the need to save in increasingly congested allocations during the early .

Comparison to Other Modulations

Single-sideband (SSB) modulation offers significant bandwidth savings compared to double-sideband (DSB-AM), requiring only about 3 kHz for typical voice signals versus the 6 kHz needed for DSB-AM due to the suppression of one and the . In terms of power efficiency, SSB directs all transmitted power to the information-carrying , whereas DSB-AM wastes approximately 66% of the power on the at full modulation depth, limiting useful efficiency to a maximum of 33%. SSB also provides advantages in and rejection, achieving a higher by concentrating energy within a narrower , which reduces the ingress of thermal compared to the wider DSB-AM spectrum. Additionally, SSB exhibits lower susceptibility to selective fading than DSB-AM, as the absence of redundant sidebands and minimizes from frequency-dependent in paths. Despite these benefits, SSB generation and reception demand greater complexity than simple DSB-AM, involving precise filtering or phase-shifting circuits for sideband suppression and requiring coherent demodulation with accurate carrier recovery to avoid distortion. The following table summarizes key comparisons across , DSB-AM, (FM), and (QAM) for voice or equivalent applications, focusing on , power efficiency, and susceptibility:
ModulationBandwidth (example for voice)Power EfficiencySusceptibility to Fading
SSB~3 kHzHigh (all power in signal)Low (reduced selective )
DSB-AM~6 kHzLow (~33% max useful)High ( and selective)
~200 kHz (broadcast channel)Medium (constant envelope, efficient amplification)Low (immune to )
QAM (e.g., 16-QAM digital equivalent)Variable (~3 kHz for voice-equivalent)Medium (requires linear amplifiers, variable envelope)High (sensitive to / variations without )

Historical Development

Early Concepts

The origins of single-sideband (SSB) modulation trace back to the early theoretical understanding of (AM) in the 1910s, when researchers began to dissect the spectral components of modulated signals. Within the , sidebands were first formally recognized through mathematical analysis around 1913, with engineer Carl R. Englund documenting their existence in a 1914 notebook entry via trigonometric decomposition of the process. This recognition built on earlier experimental demonstrations, such as those by A. Mayer in 1875 and theoretical explanations by Lord Rayleigh in 1894, but it was the AM context that highlighted their role in voice transmission efficiency. Conceptual proposals for suppressing one sideband to conserve emerged in radio literature before the 1920s, driven by the need to optimize in applications. In December 1915, John R. Carson, a at AT&T's Engineering Department, proposed selective transmission through purely analytical means, demonstrating that a single could convey the full intelligence of the original signal without the carrier or the other . Carson's idea, detailed in U.S. Patent 1,449,382 (filed December 1, 1915, granted March 27, 1923), emphasized filter-based suppression to halve the bandwidth required for AM signals, addressing growing congestion in wireline and early wireless channels. Earlier hints appeared in 1914 reports by R. A. Heising, who explored band-limiting filters for transmission within . These early concepts were influenced by the demands of and for efficient spectrum use, particularly intensified during (1914–1918), when strained available frequencies. The war's extensive deployment of by navies and armies underscored the limitations of double-sideband AM, prompting research into multiplexed channels for simultaneous voice and transmissions over shared bands. Bell System experiments, including high-power tests at Arlington in 1915, reflected this urgency, as engineers like H. D. Arnold sought ways to tune selectively to one for clearer, more economical long-distance amid wartime spectrum scarcity.

Key Milestones and Adoption

The concept of single-sideband (SSB) modulation was first formalized in 1915 when John R. Carson, working at , filed a U.S. describing a method to transmit signals using only one and suppressing the to improve efficiency in circuits. This foundational work laid the theoretical groundwork for suppressing unnecessary components, more effective use of for . In the late 1920s, practical implementation advanced with R.V.L. Hartley's 1928 patent for a filtering-based system to generate SSB signals, which allowed for the selective suppression of one sideband during modulation. By 1927, had established the first transoceanic New York-to-London circuit using SSB suppressed-carrier techniques, demonstrating reliable long-distance voice communication over limited power and constraints. Advancements accelerated in the at Bell Laboratories, where engineers developed short-wave SSB systems optimized for . In , F.A. Polkinghorn and N.F. Schlaack detailed a reduced-carrier SSB transmitter operating at short-wave frequencies in the 5–20 MHz range, which achieved successful one-way transmissions across with improved signal quality and reduced compared to double-sideband methods. These demonstrations paved the way for commercial deployment, with approximately 50 global SSB circuits in operation by the late for international voice services. During , SSB saw significant military adoption for secure and efficient communications, particularly in multichannel systems linking the continental to overseas armed forces, including teletypewriter and speech channels resistant to jamming and fading. The U.S. Navy had experimented with SSB as early as but expanded its use during WWII for and high-frequency voice links, prioritizing economy in wartime operations. Post-1945 of these technologies accelerated civilian applications, as surplus knowledge and equipment from military developments became available, spurring innovation in and radio. In the post-war era, operators drove SSB's popularization through experimentation, with the first U.S. SSB stations active by 1947 at Stanford's W6YX and over 300 stations operational by 1953, including the inaugural two-way 75-meter transatlantic SSB contact. The FCC facilitated this growth by authorizing regular SSB emissions in bands during the mid-1950s, aligning with band plans that encouraged efficient use; by 1955, the first SSB DX Century Club (DXCC) awards were issued, marking widespread acceptance. Military endorsement further boosted adoption, as the U.S. standardized SSB in 1957 for B-52 bomber communications following tests by General . The 1960s and 1970s marked a transition to more accessible SSB equipment, with the introduction of vacuum-tube transceivers like the 1960 Collins KWM-2 paving the way for later solid-state models in the late 1970s, such as the Icom IC-720A in 1978, which reduced size and power needs through integrated circuits. By the 1980s, integrated circuits enabled affordable, compact SSB transceivers from manufacturers like Icom and Yaesu, dropping prices below $1,000 and making SSB the dominant mode for high-frequency (HF) amateur and marine radio, with global adoption exceeding millions of units. SSB's rollout extended to civilian telephony and point-to-point international services, where and others used it in the for efficient voice channels over limited links. In radio, SSB gained traction in the 1970s for point-to-point shortwave services, providing clearer, power-efficient transmissions for international communications, solidifying its role in global infrastructure.

Theoretical Foundation

Mathematical Formulation

The standard (AM) signal can be expressed in the time domain as s(t) = A [1 + m(t)] \cos(\omega_c t), where A is the carrier amplitude, m(t) is the signal with |m(t)| \leq 1, and \omega_c is the . In the , the of this AM signal reveals a component at \omega_c and two s: the upper (USB) centered around \omega_c + \omega_m and the lower (LSB) centered around \omega_c - \omega_m, where \omega_m represents frequencies in the signal's . Single-sideband (SSB) modulation generates a signal containing only one of these sidebands, achieved mathematically using the of the message signal m(t), denoted \hat{m}(t). The USB signal is given by s_{USB}(t) = m(t) \cos(\omega_c t) - \hat{m}(t) \sin(\omega_c t), while the LSB signal is s_{LSB}(t) = m(t) \cos(\omega_c t) + \hat{m}(t) \sin(\omega_c t). The \hat{m}(t) is defined as the principal value integral \hat{m}(t) = \frac{1}{\pi} \mathrm{P.V.} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{m(\tau)}{t - \tau} \, d\tau, which in the corresponds to a phase shift of -90^\circ for positive frequencies and +90^\circ for negative frequencies, effectively suppressing one when combined with the carrier modulation. This transform plays a crucial role in phase-shift methods for SSB generation by creating the quadrature component needed to cancel the unwanted . The power (PSD) of an SSB signal occupies a bandwidth of W (the message signal's bandwidth), compared to $2W for conventional AM, resulting in a 50% bandwidth reduction while preserving the same and power efficiency.

Sideband Generation and Analysis

In single-sideband (SSB) modulation, separation typically involves generating a double-sideband suppressed- (DSB-SC) signal and then applying a to isolate the desired while attenuating the and the opposite . This filtering process demands high selectivity, as the sidebands are closely adjacent to the frequency, requiring filters with steep characteristics to prevent overlap and ensure . For effective separation, the filter must provide sufficient , typically contributing 20-30 toward the total system suppression exceeding 40 for the unwanted and 50-60 for the , often necessitating or filters with factors as low as 1.5 (ratio of 60 to 6 bandwidths) to maintain sharp transitions without distorting low-frequency components of the message signal. Frequency translation in SSB occurs as the modulating signal's spectrum is shifted by the carrier frequency, placing the desired sideband at f_c + f_m for upper sideband (USB) or f_c - f_m for lower sideband (LSB), where f_c is the carrier and f_m is the message frequency. For voice communications, the typical audio band of 300–3000 Hz translates to a USB spectrum from f_c + 300 Hz to f_c + 3000 Hz, preserving intelligibility while occupying minimal bandwidth; this shift is achieved through multi-stage modulation and filtering to translate the baseband efficiently to the desired RF band, such as from an intermediate frequency of 100 kHz to a final carrier of 10 MHz. Distortion in SSB generation arises primarily from imperfections in the used in phasing methods, where the transform ideally provides a 90-degree shift across all frequencies to cancel the unwanted . Imperfect s, due to non-ideal phase-shift networks, introduce distortion by failing to maintain precise , resulting in residual unwanted components that manifest as audio artifacts like shifts and incomplete suppression. This degrades audio fidelity, particularly for signals, as low-level distortions near the band edges (e.g., below 300 Hz) can cause muffled or unnatural sound reproduction, with suppression errors exceeding 40 leading to noticeable intelligibility loss. In high-power amplifiers, nonlinear effects such as AM-PM conversion exacerbate by causing spectral regrowth, where the suppressed and re-emerge due to compression and phase nonlinearity. This regrowth generates products that spread into adjacent channels, increasing emissions and reducing signal purity; for SSB voice transmission, operating near saturation can regenerate up to 20–30 of the unwanted , necessitating linear with levels below 40 to maintain .

Modulation Techniques

Filter-Based Methods

Filter-based methods for generating single-sideband (SSB) modulation involve first producing a double-sideband suppressed- (DSB-SC) signal through balanced of the audio input with a carrier, followed by the application of a sharp to isolate one while attenuating the other. This approach typically operates at an (IF) around 9 MHz for voice signals, where the filter's is designed to be approximately 2-3 kHz wide to accommodate the audio spectrum from 300 Hz to 3 kHz, ensuring effective sideband separation. Achieving sufficient sideband isolation, often greater than 40 , necessitates high-quality factor () filters with steep characteristics to suppress the unwanted sideband without distorting the desired one. In the , early implementations relied on mechanical filters and inductor-capacitor () networks, often incorporating crystals for enhanced stability and selectivity in rigs. Mechanical filters, constructed with vibrating elements like nickel rods or ceramic discs coupled through air gaps or couplers, provided fixed narrow passbands suitable for at low IF frequencies such as 455 kHz, though they were bulky and primarily used in . filters, simpler and more tunable, consisted of multiple resonant circuits to approximate the required bandpass response, but they suffered from lower Q values (typically 50-100) compared to crystals. crystal ladder filters, pioneered in this era with matched HC-49 or FT-243 crystals operating at 8-9 MHz, became a staple in rigs like Heathkit models, offering Q factors exceeding 10,000 for precise selection and minimal drift (1-2 Hz per minute). These analog filter-based techniques offer simplicity in hardware for applications, requiring fewer components than alternative methods and providing adequate suppression (up to dB) when properly aligned. However, they exhibit disadvantages such as poor performance near the carrier frequency, where the filter's group delay variation—arising from non-linear in high-order designs—can introduce audio and transient smearing in speech signals. Contemporary hybrid transceivers, such as those from Yaesu and Icom, integrate for adaptive equalization and alongside analog crystal filters to mitigate group delay issues, enhancing overall selectivity in operation without fully replacing analog components.

Phase-Shift Methods

Phase-shift methods for generating single-sideband () signals rely on precise phase relationships to cancel the unwanted through destructive , rather than filtering. This approach, pioneered by V. L. Hartley in 1924, involves splitting the modulating into in-phase and components using a 90-degree phase-shift network, typically implemented with all-pass filters that provide a constant phase lag across the voice frequency band (approximately 300–3000 Hz). In the classic Hartley modulator configuration, two balanced modulators—often constructed using diode rings or transistor pairs—are employed. The in-phase audio modulates a signal, while the quadrature audio (shifted by -90 degrees) modulates a shifted by +90 degrees; the outputs are then summed (for upper ) or differenced (for lower ) to achieve suppression. The phase-shift network for the audio signal uses cascaded all-pass filters to approximate the , ensuring the quadrature relationship holds over the , while a simple or network suffices for the 90-degree shift due to its single frequency. This method is particularly effective for voice communications in , where broadband phase accuracy is more critical than filtering. However, performance is sensitive to component mismatches in the phase shifters and balanced modulators, which can result in leakage or incomplete cancellation; typical suppression levels range from 40 to 60 for the unwanted and in well-balanced analog implementations. Modern variants utilize operational amplifiers (op-amps) to realize the balanced modulators and phase-shift networks, offering improved balance and adjustability through active circuitry that reduces sensitivity to passive component tolerances. For instance, op-amp-based all-pass filters provide more precise signals, enhancing suppression ratios beyond 50 dB in integrated designs suitable for low-power exciters.

Digital and Hybrid Methods

The Weaver modulator, proposed by Donald K. Weaver in , provides an efficient approach for generating single-sideband () signals by employing two low-pass filters tuned to half the carrier frequency, followed by mixing stages. The process begins with the input split into in-phase (I) and (Q) components, each downconverted using multipliers with a at the audio band's (f₀), shifting the spectrum to . Low-pass filters with a cutoff of (f_h - f_l)/2, where f_h and f_l are the upper and lower audio frequencies, attenuate unwanted components, simplifying requirements compared to sharp bandpass filters in analog methods. A second mixing stage, using oscillators at f₀ + f_h, upconverts the signals; adding the paths yields the upper (USB), while subtracting produces the lower (LSB), enabling digital implementation with reduced hardware complexity. Digital signal processing (DSP) advancements have enabled precise SSB generation through techniques like the implemented via (FIR) filters. In this method, the real-valued audio signal is passed through an FIR er, which imparts a -90° shift to positive frequencies and +90° to negative frequencies, creating a component. The is then formed by combining the original (cosine) and transformed (sine) parts; low-pass filtering isolates one sideband, and modulation onto a completes the SSB signal. This FIR approach, often designed with odd symmetry and windowing for finite taps, is commonly realized in software-defined radios (SDRs) using field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) or general-purpose processors. For example, implements SSB via complex FIR bandpass filters that pass positive frequencies (300–3500 Hz for USB) while attenuating negatives, with optional FFT-based filtering for efficient in block processing. Hybrid methods combine analog preprocessing with digital refinement to address imperfections in real-world systems. Analog low-pass or filters may precondition the input signal before analog-to-digital conversion, after which applies corrections such as phase equalization or suppression to mitigate distortions from analog components. This integration leverages analog simplicity for initial stages while using precision for final SSB isolation, as seen in modern SDR architectures. These digital and hybrid techniques offer key advantages, including high flexibility in filter design and bandwidth adjustment, alongside lower implementation costs through software reconfiguration rather than custom analog hardware. In amateur radio, the Icom IC-7300 exemplifies this with its DSP-based SSB modulation, where the FPGA processes baseband audio into a digital RF signal, enabling adjustable selectivity and noise reduction for enhanced performance at an accessible price point.

Demodulation

Synchronous Detection

Synchronous detection serves as the primary technique for single-sideband (SSB) suppressed-carrier signals, relying on a precisely synchronized in both and phase to the suppressed to accurately recover the message. This method, also known as coherent , employs a that performs multiplication of the incoming SSB signal with the synchronized local replica, effectively translating the back to frequencies. The output contains the desired message along with high-frequency terms at twice the , which are subsequently removed by a with a cutoff matching the message , yielding the original modulating signal m(t). The mathematical basis for this recovery process can be expressed as follows. For an upper-sideband SSB signal s(t) = \frac{A_c}{2} m(t) \cos(\omega_c t) - \frac{A_c}{2} \hat{m}(t) \sin(\omega_c t), where \hat{m}(t) is the Hilbert transform of m(t) and A_c is the carrier amplitude, the product detector multiplies s(t) by $2 \cos(\omega_c t), producing: r(t) = \frac{A_c m(t)}{2} \left[1 + \cos(2\omega_c t)\right] - \frac{A_c \hat{m}(t)}{2} \sin(2\omega_c t) Applying a low-pass filter eliminates the terms at $2\omega_c, resulting in the recovered signal \frac{A_c}{2} m(t) under ideal synchronization conditions with zero phase error. This formulation assumes perfect carrier reinsertion; any phase mismatch introduces distortion, underscoring the need for robust synchronization mechanisms. Achieving synchronization poses significant challenges due to the absence of the carrier in standard SSB transmissions. One established method involves transmitting a low-power pilot tone at the carrier frequency alongside the SSB signal, which the receiver extracts using narrowband filters to phase-lock the local oscillator. These filters, often implemented as digital resonators with poles near the carrier frequency, narrow the effective bandwidth to isolate the pilot while rejecting noise and modulation artifacts. For carrier-suppressed SSB without a pilot, self-tracking loops such as the enable blind synchronization by exploiting the structure of the received signal. Developed by John P. Costas in 1956, the generates in-phase and quadrature versions of the signal, multiplies them to form a phase error signal, and uses a loop filter with a to iteratively align the local carrier . This feedback mechanism converges to the correct , allowing effective product detection even in noisy environments, and has become a foundational technique for SSB due to its simplicity and performance. In modern digital software-defined radio (SDR) receivers, synchronous detection benefits from advanced digital synchronization methods, including phase-locked loops (PLLs) and numerical implementations of the , which perform frequency and phase corrections in the . These digital approaches use discrete-time to track offsets introduced by Doppler shifts or oscillator instabilities, often integrating with fast transform-based estimation for initial acquisition before fine-tuning via the loop. Such techniques enhance robustness in SDR platforms, enabling real-time of SSB signals with minimal hardware while maintaining high fidelity in diverse applications like and .

Envelope and Other Detection Methods

In reduced-carrier single-sideband (SSB-RC) modulation, a portion of the signal is intentionally retained alongside the to enable simpler techniques. This partial allows detection using basic detectors to approximately recover the voice signal by following the amplitude variations of the composite waveform. Such detectors are particularly suitable for voice communications where exact fidelity is less critical than simplicity and low cost, as the retained —typically reduced by 6 to 20 relative to —provides sufficient reference for the to track the without complete suppression-induced . However, the degree of carrier reduction directly influences non-linear during detection; greater reductions lead to increased from the components interfering with the . Asynchronous demodulation methods offer alternatives to envelope detection for suppressed-carrier SSB, avoiding the need for precise carrier synchronization while mitigating some distortion issues. The Weaver demodulator, introduced in , employs a two-stage mixing process: the incoming SSB signal is first mixed with quadrature local oscillators tuned to the suppressed carrier frequency, followed by low-pass filtering to shift the audio spectrum, and then a second mixing stage with low-frequency (e.g., 500-1000 Hz) quadrature oscillators centered in the audio passband, with final low-pass filtering to produce the baseband output. This structure mirrors the Weaver modulation technique and tolerates moderate frequency offsets better than simple product detection, making it suitable for practical receivers without phase-locked loops. Another approach involves using FM discriminators for frequency-translated SSB signals, where the sideband deviations are interpreted as frequency variations; injecting a weak carrier at the receiver converts the SSB into an approximate FM-like signal that the discriminator can recover, though this is limited to narrowband voice and requires careful alignment. These non-synchronous methods inherently introduce limitations compared to coherent detection, primarily due to sensitivity to frequency and phase errors. Without carrier synchronization, offsets in the local oscillator frequency cause a pitch shift in the recovered audio, resulting in the characteristic "Donald Duck" effect where speech sounds artificially high- or low-pitched and garbled. Distortion increases with offset magnitude, often degrading intelligibility for offsets exceeding approximately 150-200 Hz in voice bands. In digital receivers, adaptive filtering techniques address this by estimating the carrier frequency blindly, without pilot tones; for instance, algorithms based on comb filtering or least-mean-squares adaptation identify harmonic structures in the SSB signal to recover the suppressed carrier phase and frequency, enabling robust demodulation in noisy environments.

Variants and Extensions

Vestigial Sideband

Vestigial sideband (VSB) modulation is an amplitude modulation technique that transmits the full desired sideband along with a partial remnant, or vestige, of the opposite sideband, serving as a practical compromise between bandwidth conservation and filter complexity. This partial suppression avoids the need for extremely sharp filters required in full single-sideband (SSB) modulation while reducing spectrum usage compared to double-sideband (DSB) methods. In VSB, the vestige typically occupies a narrow band immediately adjacent to the carrier frequency, enabling the retention of essential low-frequency signal components that would otherwise be distorted by complete sideband elimination. VSB signals are generated by first producing a DSB or conventional AM modulated , then applying an asymmetric to attenuate most of one while preserving the vestige. The incorporates a Nyquist slope in the transition region to ensure minimal from overlapping sidebands; this slope provides a controlled amplitude such that the combined response of the upper and lower sidebands in the vestigial area approximates a flat , preserving . For example, in the NTSC analog television standard, the vestige extends 1.25 MHz below the video , with the full upper spanning 4.2 MHz, allowing a 4.2 MHz video to fit within a 6 MHz allocation. This approach was standardized in 1941 following NTSC recommendations to the FCC, prioritizing efficient use of limited broadcast spectrum for video transmission. The primary application of VSB lies in analog broadcast television, where it effectively handles the wide and significant low-frequency content of video signals, such as information, without introducing excessive distortion. By retaining the vestige, VSB maintains compatibility with simpler receiver architectures that use detection, unlike full SSB which demands more precise synchronous . Relative to conventional AM, VSB offers substantial bandwidth savings—occupying roughly 1.25 to 1.3 times the message instead of twice—while providing superior efficiency over DSB for spectrum-constrained environments like terrestrial TV broadcasting.

Suppressed and Reduced Carrier Forms

Single-sideband suppressed-carrier (SSB-SC) modulation transmits only one sideband without the signal, achieved through balanced modulators that eliminate the component. This form maximizes power efficiency by directing all transmitted power to the information-bearing sideband, avoiding the inefficiency of transmission in conventional . requires synchronous detection with a locally reinserted , typically using product or coherent detectors, which demands high-frequency (e.g., within 100 Hz for voice signals) to prevent . suppression levels are typically 35-45 or greater to minimize . Reduced-carrier single-sideband (RC-SSB) modulation includes a low-level pilot , usually 10-20 below the power (equivalent to about 6-12 reduction relative to ), to facilitate without full overhead. The pilot enables (AFC), automatic volume control (AVC), and simpler , reducing sensitivity to compared to fully suppressed variants. This configuration offers a compromise in power usage, with the consuming a small (around 6% at 12 reduction) while aiding compatibility with envelope detection in some receivers. Full-carrier single-sideband (FC-SSB), also known as compatible single-sideband (CSSB), transmits one sideband alongside a full-strength , typically 4-6 dB below , allowing detection with standard AM envelope detectors for . This rare variant sacrifices much of the spectrum and power efficiency gains of , as the consumes significant power (up to 50% or more in some configurations), similar to double-sideband AM. It was developed to enable use in existing AM broadcast and receiver infrastructures without requiring specialized equipment. The primary trade-offs among these forms center on power efficiency, receiver complexity, and compatibility. SSB-SC provides the highest efficiency and bandwidth savings—up to three times that of full-carrier AM for the same peak power—but necessitates precise carrier reinsertion, increasing receiver complexity and susceptibility to phase errors or noise. RC-SSB mitigates some complexity by using the pilot for synchronization, at the cost of modest power loss, making it suitable for transitional or fading-prone environments. FC-SSB prioritizes simplicity and AM interoperability but undermines SSB's core advantages, limiting its adoption. In military applications, SSB-SC dominates for long-range HF point-to-point communications due to spectrum efficiency in crowded bands, while commercial broadcasting has explored RC-SSB for improved reception quality in HF systems.

Specialized Forms (eSSB, ACSSB, CESSB)

Extended single-sideband (eSSB) is a variant of SSB modulation that utilizes a wider audio , typically ranging from 6 to 9 kHz, to enable high-fidelity audio transmission in applications. This expanded supports fuller and , reducing the dynamic compression artifacts that degrade audio quality in standard SSB systems limited to about 2.4-2.8 kHz. By allowing less aggressive processing, eSSB minimizes distortion while enhancing intelligibility over long distances. However, eSSB remains controversial in circles due to its wider potentially interfering with adjacent signals in crowded bands, leading to FCC advisories against excessive use. Amplitude-companded single-sideband (ACSSB) incorporates pre-emphasis and of the audio signal before modulation to preserve in noisy or fading channels. Developed at in the 1970s for mobile radio , ACSSB applies amplitude compression at the transmitter and expansion at the receiver, improving subjective speech quality at low signal-to-noise ratios. Field trials in the 1970s and 1980s, including VHF land-mobile experiments, demonstrated its effectiveness for over links, with significant performance gains in subjective listening tests compared to uncompanded SSB. Controlled-envelope single-sideband (CESSB) employs digital envelope shaping to limit peak amplitudes in the signal, mimicking aspects of AM envelope while suppressing the carrier and unused sideband for bandwidth efficiency. This technique compensates for overshoots inherent in SSB generation, reducing envelope peaks from up to 59% to as low as 1.6% through clipping and filtering. By producing a cleaner transmission envelope, CESSB decreases and increases average transmitted power by approximately 2.5 over standard SSB with automatic level control, without introducing . External processing implementations allow compatibility with various transceivers, enhancing QRP performance and signal clarity in crowded bands.

Applications and Standards

Amateur Radio Usage

In amateur radio, single-sideband (SSB) modulation serves as the primary voice communication mode on high-frequency (HF) bands due to its bandwidth efficiency and power utilization, enabling reliable contacts over long distances. Operators adhere to a longstanding convention for sideband selection: upper sideband (USB) is used for all frequencies above 10 MHz, including the 20-meter band spanning 14.000 to 14.350 MHz, while lower sideband (LSB) is employed for voice below 10 MHz, such as on the 80-meter (3.500 to 4.000 MHz) and 40-meter (7.000 to 7.300 MHz) bands. This practice simplifies equipment design and minimizes interference by standardizing suppressed sideband usage across global amateur allocations. SSB's advantages shine in (long-distance) operations, contests, and nets, where its suppression of the and one concentrates transmitted power into a narrower of approximately 2.4 to 3 kHz, allowing signals to propagate farther with less power compared to full-carrier AM. In contests like the ARRL International DX Contest, facilitates rapid exchanges of signal reports and callsigns, often yielding thousands of contacts per event under varying ionospheric conditions. Similarly, nets, such as the popular 75-meter morning nets, rely on its clarity for group discussions among operators separated by continents, with typical setups using 100-watt transceivers to achieve global reach during peak solar cycles. Common equipment for SSB includes hybrid transceivers like the classic Yaesu FT-101 series from the 1970s, which integrate SSB, CW, and AM modes with built-in filters for sideband selection and deliver approximately 100 W PEP output for robust HF performance. Modern equivalents, such as the Icom IC-7300, build on this foundation with digital signal processing for cleaner audio and easier tuning. In the 2020s, these SSB-capable rigs have integrated seamlessly with digital modes for weak-signal work; for instance, FT4 and FT8 protocols—developed for rapid, low-power contacts—use the transceiver's USB output connected via sound card interfaces to software like WSJT-X, enabling decodes at signal-to-noise ratios as low as -24 dB and supporting DXpeditions in remote areas.

ITU Designations and Broadcasting

The (ITU) defines emission designations for single-sideband (SSB) modulation in Appendix 1 of the Radio Regulations, classifying them based on carrier characteristics and modulating signal type. For SSB with full carrier, the designation is H (e.g., H3E for single-channel analog ); for SSB with reduced or variable-level carrier, it is R (e.g., R3E); and for SSB with suppressed carrier, it is J (e.g., J3E, formerly denoted as A3J in pre-1982 notations). These symbols form part of a multi-character code that also specifies necessary and type, ensuring standardized identification for and compatibility. In HF broadcasting applications, SSB enables more efficient spectrum utilization than traditional double-sideband amplitude modulation by transmitting only one sideband and optionally suppressing the carrier, thereby reducing bandwidth requirements by approximately 50% and concentrating power in the audio signal for better signal-to-noise ratios over long distances. This efficiency supports greater spectrum sharing among international broadcasters in crowded HF bands (3-30 MHz). ITU Recommendation BS.640-3 outlines a specific SSB system for HF broadcasting, specifying an audio-frequency bandwidth up to 4.5 kHz (with –3 dB limits), a carrier frequency tolerance of 5 Hz, and receiver requirements for suppressed-carrier demodulation to maintain audio quality. Although full-scale adoption has been limited due to the need for specialized receivers, SSB has been trialed in shortwave international services since the 1980s to address spectrum congestion, with discussions at the time highlighting its potential for significant power savings compared to full-carrier AM. Regulatory frameworks under the allocate HF bands exclusively or shared for broadcasting (e.g., 5.9-10.1 MHz, 13.57-13.87 MHz), with seasonal planning via Article 12 to coordinate schedules and minimize interference through high-frequency circuit planning. For SSB operations, band plans recommend selection—typically lower (LSB) below 10 MHz and upper (USB) above—to align with ionospheric patterns and reduce in shared allocations with fixed and mobile services. These measures ensure equitable access and interference protection, as enforced through ITU coordination procedures. In the 2020s, broadcasting has shifted toward digital hybrid systems like () for shortwave, which integrate robust error correction and multiplexed services within narrower bandwidths (e.g., 4.5-20 kHz for ), offering spectrum efficiencies surpassing analog while enabling with legacy AM signals. These standards, ratified by ITU in 2001 and updated through World Radiocommunication Conferences, address ongoing spectrum demands without relying on elements but building on its efficiency principles for global coverage.

References

  1. [1]
    What is SSB: Single Sideband Modulation - Electronics Notes
    Single sideband modulation, SSB is the main modulation format used for analogue voice transmission for two way radio communication on the HF portion of the ...
  2. [2]
    Introduction to Single-Sideband Modulation: The Filter Method
    Mar 30, 2025 · This article will cover the filter method, which involves generating a DSB-SC signal and then filtering out the unwanted sideband.
  3. [3]
    John R. Carson - Engineering and Technology History Wiki
    Feb 11, 2019 · In 1915, in invented the single-side modulation. This technology allowed for the transmission of multiple telephone calls simultaneously within ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Chapter 7 Single-Sideband Modulation (SSB) and Frequency ...
    In single-sideband (SSB) modulation only the upper sideband or the lower sideband is transmitted. Thus, SSB modulation requires half the bandwidth of AM or ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Lecture 6: Modulators, Receivers, AM, and SSB
    Oct 5, 2021 · The modulation index of the modulated signal is defined by µ = mp A Larger modulation index reduces power but makes demodulation harder. ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] SSB - part 2 - Comparison with AM and FM systems - Navy Radio
    spectrum and power economy and because it is less susceptible to the effects of selective fading and interference than is AM. The principal advantages of SSB.<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    None
    ### Comparison of SSB and FM Modulation
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Other Modulation Techniques - CAP, QAM, DMT - University of Toronto
    pulse shaping filters with multilevel inputs, and. • While QAM and single sideband have same spectrum efficiency, QAM does not need a phase splitter. • ...
  9. [9]
    Optimizing adaptive modulation technique using standard ... - Nature
    Aug 21, 2025 · High-order modulation schemes like QAM are susceptible to interference, distortion, noise, and multipath fading, requiring a high SINR for ...
  10. [10]
    None
    ### Summary of Early Concepts of Single-Sideband Transmission Before 1920
  11. [11]
    Military communication - WWI, 1940, Technology - Britannica
    During World War I, wireless telegraph communication was employed extensively by the navies of the world and had a major influence on the character of naval ...
  12. [12]
    US1449382A - Method and means for signaling with high-frequency ...
    1,449,382. v J. R. CARSON. METHOD AND MEANS FOR SIGNALING WITH HIGH FREQUENCY WAVES. I FILED DEC. 1, 1915- 3 SHEETSSHEET ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] John Renshaw Carson:Modulation's - Electronic Design
    Carson for two major contributions to commu- nications technology: the invention of single-sideband (SSB) modulation and his rule for estimating frequency.
  14. [14]
    US1666206A - Modulation system - Google Patents
    The present invention relates only to the production of a single side band Wave, without regard to the presence or absence of an unmodulated Carrier component.
  15. [15]
    BSTJ 14: 3. July 1935: A Single-Sideband Short-Wave System for ...
    Jan 19, 2013 · July 1935: A Single-Sideband Short-Wave System for Transatlantic Telephony. (Polkinghorn, F.A.; Schlaack, N.F.). Publication date: 1935 ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Single-sidebands in Communication Systems - Navy Radio
    Sideband, suppressed carrier transmission provides a means of obtaining economy of spectrum, savings in power and reduction of selective fading.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Amateur Radio and the Rise of SSB - ARRL
    Carson's invention, which involved the use of filters to remove a carrier and one sideband while passing the other through, was patented in England that same ...Missing: proposals pre-
  18. [18]
    Ham radio since 1957 - N6NB
    By the mid-1960s several manufacturers were making all-solid-state transceivers (radios that have a transmitter and a receiver in one box). Although some still ...
  19. [19]
    Classic SSB HF Radios- '70s to '80s - eHam.net
    Apr 22, 2002 · The IC-720A was available in the very early 1980s. Performance was improved with a noise floor of -133dB, DDR of 138dB and an IMDDR of about ...Missing: affordable | Show results with:affordable
  20. [20]
    [PDF] PICTUREPHONE Service-A New Way of Communicating
    When the special prefix, #, is dialed, indicating a. Picturephone call, the talking path is established by the two-wire telephone switch, and a path is.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Single Sideband Communications - NAVSHIPS 93224 - Navy Radio
    There are various forms of pulse-modulation systems, such as pulse-amplitude modulation. (PAM) , pulse-code modulation (PCM) , pulse duration modulation (PDM) ...Missing: declassification | Show results with:declassification
  22. [22]
    [PDF] The Hilbert Transform - University of Toronto
    Thus we see that single-sideband modulation can be regarded and implemented as a form of quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), with the modulating signal g ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Linear Modulation Techniques - UCCS Faculty Sites
    Improves the low-frequency response and allows DC to pass undistorted. 3. Has bandwidth efficiency advantages over DSB or AM, similar to that of SSB. ECE 5625 ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Collins-Training-Manual-Single-Sideband-1959.pdf
    This manual covers the fundamentals of single sideband, including its introduction, historical development, and basic functional units of transmitting and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Lecture-3 Amplitude Modulation: Single Side Band (SSB) Modulation
    Consider that we desire to generate an SSB signal with a carrier of 10 MHz and the baseband signal consists of voice signal occupying frequency band 300 Hz to ...Missing: 300-3000 | Show results with:300-3000
  26. [26]
    The Phasing Method and Hilbert Transforms for Single-Sideband ...
    Apr 13, 2025 · SSB modulation improves bandwidth efficiency by eliminating either the upper or lower sideband. Learn about the circuits and mathematics ...Missing: distortion imperfect
  27. [27]
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1088916
  28. [28]
    [PDF] CRYSTAL SETS TO SIDEBAND - F6GLZ
    Although the oscillation is mechanical, it also acts as though it were oscillating electrically. Quartz crystals act like a series L-C circuit. They are ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] July 1953 - World Radio History
    Because the filter method is used for reducing the un- wanted sideband or "image" in a receiver, we will first consider this method as applying to transmitters.
  30. [30]
    A History of Crystal Filters - IEEE UFFC
    In the mid 1950's new designs were developed for “intermediate-bandwidth” filters which covered the bandwidth region between the earlier narrowband and wideband ...Missing: modulation rigs
  31. [31]
    [PDF] CHAPTER 8 ANALOG FILTERS
    If the filter does not have the same delay for the various waveform components, then “envelope delay” will occur and the output wave will be distorted. Linear ...
  32. [32]
    High-performance HF transceiver design: A ham's perspective - EDN
    May 3, 2012 · Selectivity can be achieved by analog filtering (usually multi-pole crystal lattice filters), DSP, or a combination of the two. ... hybrid analog/ ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Crystal Ladder Filters for All - ARRL
    For an SSB filter, we suggest that you use crystals within the range 4 to 11 MHz for a first attempt. These are cheap and readily available because they are ...Missing: analog DSP
  34. [34]
    Understanding the 'Phasing Method' of Single Sideband ...
    Aug 8, 2012 · Some people call Figure A-1(a) a "Hartley modulator." A specific SSB generation example is given in Figure A-1(b).
  35. [35]
    3.1: Introduction - Engineering LibreTexts
    Mar 21, 2021 · 1 : Hartley modulator implementing singlesideband suppressed-carrier (SSB-SC) modulation. The “ 90 ∘ ” blocks shift the phase of the signal by ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Fundamentals_of_Single_Side_...
    Audio filtering is not required because the highly selective filtering which takes place in the SSB generator attenuates the unnecessary frequencies below 300 ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Single Sideband (SSB) - Zimmer Web Pages
    SSB uses radio spectrum efficiently: for a given message signal, only half as much bandwidth is occupied by the modulated carrier (compared with DSB or AM). SSB ...Missing: power | Show results with:power
  38. [38]
    Phasing Type SSB Exciter by Harry Lythall - SM0VPO
    Each audio signal has a phase lag of 90 degrees from the previous output. These four AF signals are required for the balanced modulator which generates the SSB.
  39. [39]
    Introduction to Weaver's Method for SSB Signal Generation
    May 11, 2025 · Learn about the Weaver modulator, an RF circuit that improves on older forms of SSB modulation by removing the need for either sharp bandpass filters or ...
  40. [40]
    Add the Hilbert Transformer to Your DSP Toolkit, Part 1
    Nov 22, 2022 · In Part 1 of this article, I'll define the Hilbert Transformer, examine the spectrum it creates, and provide some examples of its use.<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Simulation example: Single Sideband transceiver - GNU Radio Wiki
    Jul 20, 2025 · This tutorial explains how a Single Sideband (SSB) signal can be generated and received. The transmitter and receiver use the filter method.Flowgraph · Transmitter section
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Weaver SSB Modulation/Demodulation - A Tutorial
    Feb 18, 2017 · Weaver 1 proposed a new modulation scheme for single-sideband-suppressed- carrier (SSB) generation. The Weaver Method (also known as the Third ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] DIGITAL METHOD OF SSB MODULATION
    The key advantages of digital signal synthesis are noise resistance, fast processing, simple adjustment, flexibility, low cost. The key disadvantages are ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] IC-7300 User Evaluation & Test Report - DX Engineering
    Apr 14, 2016 · NR (noise reduction): The DSP NR is very effective. In SSB mode, the maximum noise reduction occurs at an NR control setting of 10. As NR level ...
  45. [45]
    Synchronous Communications | IEEE Journals & Magazine
    Synchronous Communications | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore ... John P. Costas. All Authors. Sign In or Purchase. 160. Cites in. Papers. 11. Cites in.
  46. [46]
    Synchronization | PySDR: A Guide to SDR and DSP using Python
    The Costas Loop will remove the frequency offset while also fixing any phase offset. The energy is aligned with the I axis. Frequency is just a change in phase ...
  47. [47]
    47 CFR § 73.757 - System specifications for single-sideband (SSB ...
    When the carrier reduction relative to peak envelope power is 6 dB, an equivalent SSB emission is one giving the same audio-frequency signal-to-noise ratio at ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Characteristics of single-sideband systems in HF broadcasting - ITU
    Dec 31, 2015 · AM-based signals can be detected by two different methods; with conventional envelope detection or by mixing the input signal with an internally.
  49. [49]
    How does injecting a carrier allow a FM receiver to demodulate SSB?
    Mar 20, 2022 · In the video, he demonstrates that by transmitting a very weak CW carrier, the FM radio is able to demodulate SSB signals.Why needs a carrier signal on receiver (SSB)SSB demodulation - Amateur Radio Stack ExchangeMore results from ham.stackexchange.com
  50. [50]
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1169422
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Lecture 7: More AM Modulation Methods
    Oct 10, 2021 · ▷ VSB signals turn up in many different places. ▷ The analog TV system NTSC used VSB to save bandwidth. ▷ VSB is widely used in Magnetic ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] 47 CFR Ch. I (10–1–18 Edition) § 73.682 - GovInfo
    Vestigial sideband transmission. A sys- tem of transmission wherein one of ... (2) The visual carrier frequency shall be nominally 1.25 MHz above the lower.
  53. [53]
    Paper - The Vestigial Sideband and Other Tribulations
    In 1941, NTSC recommended standards to FCC that specified vestigial sideband amplitude modulation in order to squeeze a 4MHz video signal in to a 6MHz channel.Missing: bandwidth Nyquist slope
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Single Sideband Radio Communications
    This training course on single sideband radio communications has been prepared to meet specific requirements within the Pacific. Missile Range. The original ...
  55. [55]
    None
    ### Summary of SSB Transmission Characteristics (Rec. ITU-R BS.640-3)
  56. [56]
    https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/bs/R-REC-BS.640-3-199710-W!!PDF-E.pdf
  57. [57]
    eSSB Extended Single Sideband - NU9N.com
    eSSB is Extended Single Sideband, exceeding standard 2.9kHz SSB at 3kHz to support high fidelity audio, starting at 3kHz.
  58. [58]
    Extended SSB Audio (eSSB) | Leveling up your Amateur Radio audio
    Jun 18, 2021 · Extended Single Side Band (eSSB) is any J3E SSB transmission that exceeds the audio bandwidth of standard or traditional 2.9kHz SSB J3E ...
  59. [59]
    Use of Amplitude Compandored SSB in Mobile Radio Bands
    Use of Amplitude Compandored SSB in Mobile Radio Bands: a Progress Report PB 80-215 791. Authors, Stanford University. Stanford Electronics Laboratories.
  60. [60]
    Subjective performance of amplitude companding in SSB mobile radio systems | Electronics Letters
    ### Summary of Content from https://digital-library.theiet.org/doi/abs/10.1049/el:19810597
  61. [61]
    Experiments on ACSSB land mobile satellite communications | IEEE ...
    The performance of a land mobile earth station using the amplitude companded single sideband (ACSSB) modulation technique, and results of field experiments ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Controlled Envelope Single Sideband - ARRL
    Nov 4, 2014 · Figure 11 shows a Weaver modulator for generation of SSB baseband signals from incoming peak-limited audio. The folding frequency for a 300 to ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] External Processing for Controlled Envelope Single Sideband - ARRL
    CESSB is a way of controlling the inevitable RF envelope overshoots caused by the Hilbert Transform. These Hilbert. Transform overshoots occur regardless of the ...Missing: interference | Show results with:interference
  64. [64]
    Understanding Single Sideband (SSB) - Ham Radio School
    Dec 26, 2021 · As the name implies, single sideband mode utilizes only one of the two AM sidebands and also suppresses the carrier frequency in transmission.
  65. [65]
    LSB or USB? - MDARC
    Your radio will use either the upper sideband (USB) or the lower sideband (LSB) for a particular contact. You can legally use either on any frequency band.Missing: modulation | Show results with:modulation
  66. [66]
    AB9IL.net: Amateur Radio Single Sideband on WebSDRs
    Jun 24, 2025 · SSB offers efficient use of bandwidth and power, making it ideal for long-distance communication. Traditionally, SSB listening required a ...
  67. [67]
    Reviews For: Yaesu FT-101E - eHam.net
    The FT-101E is a Transceiver that every collector should have in his shack. Its a true classic that has co-written the amateur radio history of the 1970s and ...
  68. [68]
    Digital Data Modes - ARRL
    FT8 - In 2025 it is by far the most popular digital mode for award chasing and working DX. It is described in this news story. The WSJT-X software can be ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] APPENDIX 1 (REV.WRC-12) Classification of emissions and ... - ITU
    1.2.1) Double-sideband. A. 1.2.2) Single-sideband, full carrier. H. 1.2.3) Single-sideband, reduced or variable level carrier. R. 1.2.4) Single-sideband, ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] ITU Emission Designators - ComReg
    May 8, 2008 · Double-sideband. A. Single-sideband, full carrier. H. Single-sideband, reduced or variable level carrier. R. Single-sideband, suppressed carrier.
  71. [71]
    SSB Broadcast | RadioDiscussions
    Jun 10, 2025 · Back in the 1980s there was a lot of chatter about shortwave broadcasters adopting SSB to replace AM modulation. Never happened; a major issue ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  72. [72]
    https://www.comreg.ie/media/dlm_uploads/2015/12/ComReg0834.pdf
  73. [73]
    DRM Benefits - Digital Radio Mondiale
    Digital Radio (DRM) is the universal, openly standardised digital broadcasting system for all broadcasting frequencies below and above 30 MHz, including LW ...Missing: SSB | Show results with:SSB