Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Solvay process

The Solvay process, also called the ammonia-soda process, is an industrial chemical synthesis route for producing (soda ash) from , , , and (), developed by Belgian industrialist in 1861. Central to the method is the of ammoniated to selectively precipitate due to its lower compared to , followed by of the bicarbonate to and regeneration of via reaction with slaked derived from . This cyclic operation achieves near-complete ammonia recovery, rendering the process economically viable and far superior to the prior in efficiency, cost, and reduced emissions of pollutants like . Commercially operational from the 1860s after initial plant setbacks including an explosion, it powered expansive growth in industries reliant on soda ash, such as glassmaking and detergents, and remains a cornerstone of synthetic production despite competition from natural mining. Key limitations include substantial energy demands for heating and CO2 generation, alongside byproduct disposal challenges, which have spurred innovations like process modifications for carbon capture integration.

History

Invention and Early Challenges

The Solvay process, a method for manufacturing (soda ash) via the ammoniation of followed by , was devised by , a 23-year-old Belgian , in 1861 while employed at his uncle's plant. Solvay's innovation built on prior theoretical proposals for an ammonia-soda route but addressed unresolved practical barriers, such as efficient precipitation and recycling of , which had thwarted earlier attempts by chemists including Henri Sainte-Claire Deville. He filed an initial patent for the process on March 15, 1861—the day before his birthday—describing the use of , , and to yield , which could then be calcined to soda ash. This approach promised lower energy use and waste compared to the dominant , which relied on and produced byproducts. Initial implementation faced severe technical setbacks. Solvay's first experimental plant, operational in 1861, produced soda ash briefly before an destroyed it, likely due to uncontrolled pressures in the carbonation towers. Undeterred, he secured loans from family members to reconstruct the facility, confronting ongoing issues with equipment , inconsistent temperature regulation, and suboptimal yields that reduced overall . These challenges stemmed from the process's to precise of reaction conditions, including and gas flows, which demanded novel engineering solutions absent in prior small-scale trials. In 1863, Solvay partnered with his brother to establish Solvay & Cie as a , incorporating capital from family and local investors to fund a at Couillet, . Economic pressures mounted from high startup costs and skepticism among investors accustomed to the established Leblanc method, compelling iterative refinements through the mid-1860s. Production stabilized by 1869, with output tripling after optimizations in filtration and kiln operations, enabling the process to demonstrate viability at scale despite initial yields below theoretical maxima due to side reactions forming insoluble impurities. This period of trial-and-error underscored the causal link between tuning and commercial success, as Solvay's focus on integrated recycling minimized losses that had doomed predecessors.

Commercialization and Expansion

![Solvay plant in New York along the Erie Canal]float-right The Solvay process achieved initial commercialization through the establishment of the first industrial-scale plant in Couillet, Belgium, in 1863 by Ernest and Alfred Solvay. Despite early technical challenges, including inefficiencies in ammonia recovery and process optimization, the plant began soda ash production by late 1864, demonstrating the method's viability over the energy-intensive Leblanc process. By 1865, operations stabilized, producing sodium carbonate at lower costs and with reduced waste, enabling the company to secure markets in the glass and soap industries local to the Charleroi region. Expansion accelerated in the 1870s as the Solvays licensed the technology abroad and constructed additional facilities. In 1874, a larger plant opened in , increasing production capacity and accessing Lorraine's salt deposits. That same year, British chemist Ludwig Mond acquired rights for the , establishing the first Solvay plant in , , after refining the process for local conditions between 1873 and 1880. Further plants followed in and by the late 1870s, with a facility in , , operational by 1883, leveraging vast mineral resources near the . Entry into the marked a pivotal phase of global scaling. In 1881, the Solvay Process Company, formed under license from the Solvays, commenced operations at its , plant—the first in the Americas—benefiting from proximity to deposits and the for limestone transport. This facility rapidly expanded, incorporating innovations like elevated railways for raw materials by 1880, and by the 1890s, Solvay-process plants dominated global soda ash output, supplanting older methods due to economic efficiencies. The international network grew to encompass over a dozen sites by 1900, solidifying the process's industrial preeminence.

Global Adoption and Long-Term Dominance

The Solvay process rapidly expanded beyond its origins in Belgium following the successful operation of the first commercial plant in Couillet in 1863, which demonstrated superior efficiency over the Leblanc process through cheaper raw materials like brine and limestone, ammonia recycling, and reduced waste primarily limited to calcium chloride. By the late 19th century, Ernest Solvay licensed the technology across Europe, establishing plants in France, Germany, and Austria-Hungary, where it displaced the energy-intensive and polluting Leblanc method, which generated multiple byproducts including hydrogen chloride gas. This European dominance was driven by the process's lower operational costs—estimated at half those of Leblanc—and its scalability, enabling production of high-purity soda ash essential for glass, soap, and chemical industries. International adoption accelerated in the 1880s with the formation of the Solvay Process Company in the United States, which built its inaugural plant in , in 1884, leveraging local salt springs and limestone deposits along the to commence soda ash production at an initial capacity of approximately 20 tons per day. Expansion continued to via partnerships like Lubimoff Solvay & Cie, and by 1914, the Solvay group operated around 32 plants worldwide, producing nearly 2 million tons of alkalis annually and employing 25,000 workers, solidifying its position as the largest chemical enterprise globally. The process's technical advantages, including continuous operation and near-complete recovery (over 98% efficiency), ensured economic viability in regions lacking natural deposits, facilitating adoption in non-European markets despite initial high capital costs for plant construction. Long-term dominance persisted into the 20th and 21st centuries as the Solvay process captured 70-75% of global soda ash , with synthetic via this method reaching 42 million metric tons out of 59 million total in 2021, even as natural mining grew in areas like . Its resilience stems from adaptability to low-cost sources and integration with downstream industries, though challenges like and CO2 emissions have prompted modern optimizations, including carbon capture pilots. In , expansion lagged until the mid-20th century, with early in established in 1975, but the process now underpins much of China's synthetic , which accounts for about 50% of worldwide . Despite from trona-based methods in resource-rich regions, the Solvay process's established and advantages maintain its preeminence for versatile, high-volume soda ash supply.

Chemical Principles

Raw Materials and Stoichiometry

The principal raw materials for the Solvay process are , sourced as from underground deposits and concentrated to 300-315 g/L, and obtained from high-purity quarried with silica content below 3% and iron/aluminum oxides under 1.5%. functions as a recyclable , with initial introduction and minor make-up additions to offset process losses of 1-5%, while supports brine preparation and aqueous reactions. The net stoichiometry of the process, reflecting the overall material transformation excluding recycled components, is given by the balanced equation 2 NaCl + CaCO₃ → Na₂CO₃ + CaCl₂. This relation indicates that two moles of sodium chloride and one mole of calcium carbonate yield one mole of sodium carbonate and one mole of calcium chloride as byproduct. In practice, the process achieves near-stoichiometric conversion of sodium chloride to sodium carbonate, with calcium carbonate fully decomposed to provide necessary carbon dioxide and lime for ammonia recovery. The recycling of ammonia ensures minimal net consumption beyond the primary inputs, enhancing resource efficiency.

Core Reactions and Thermodynamics

The Solvay process relies on a series of interconnected chemical reactions that convert inexpensive raw materials— from and from —into , with serving as a catalyst that is nearly completely recycled. The key carbonation reaction occurs in ammoniated saturated with : \ce{NaCl + NH3 + CO2 + H2O -> NaHCO3 + NH4Cl}. (NaHCO₃) precipitates selectively due to its reduced in the concentrated (approximately 4 g/L at 15–20°C), which shifts the equilibrium forward per and provides the thermodynamic driving force for this otherwise marginally favorable step. ![{\displaystyle {\ce {NaCl + CO2 + NH3 + H2O -> NaHCO3 + NH4Cl}}}}(./assets/5db96af11b47c11ac1cb9ec6acec2441c439da74.svg)[center] The precipitated NaHCO₃ is then thermally decomposed in a calciner at 150–200°C: \ce{2 NaHCO3 -> Na2CO3 + H2O + CO2}, yielding anhydrous sodium carbonate (soda ash) and recycling CO₂ for reuse in carbonation; this endothermic step (ΔH ≈ +135 kJ/mol) requires external heating but is efficient due to the low decomposition temperature compared to direct alternatives. The CO₂ originates from the endothermic calcination of limestone at approximately 900°C: \ce{CaCO3 -> CaO + CO2} (ΔH ≈ +178 kJ/mol), which supplies both CO₂ and quicklime (CaO). Ammonia recovery follows via slaking and metathesis: \ce{CaO + H2O -> Ca(OH)2} followed by \ce{Ca(OH)2 + 2 NH4Cl -> 2 NH3 + CaCl2 + 2 H2O}, regenerating gaseous NH₃ for recycling (recovery efficiency >99% in modern plants) and producing calcium chloride as a byproduct. Thermodynamically, the overall stoichiometry \ce{2 NaCl + CaCO3 -> Na2CO3 + CaCl2} is endergonic (ΔG° > 0, equilibrium constant K ≈ 10^{-10} at standard conditions), rendering direct synthesis impractical without energy input or separation. The process circumvents this by coupling precipitation-driven equilibria and recycle loops, where the low solubility of NaHCO₃ (K_sp effectively lowered by from NaCl) decreases product concentrations, making ΔG < 0 for the carbonation step under process conditions; ammonia enhances CO₂ solubility as ammonium carbamate intermediates, further favoring forward kinetics. Energy balance is dominated by calcination (≈70% of total input, often from fossil fuels), but recycling minimizes makeup chemicals, achieving near-theoretical yields with atom economy of about 48.8% for Na₂CO₃ based on input masses. ![{\displaystyle {\ce {CaCO3 -> CO2 + CaO}}}}(./assets/02570980797f72f805086129a262d2aef94f300f.svg)[center]

Process Steps

Brine Preparation and Purification

The preparation of brine in the Solvay process begins with the dissolution of sodium chloride, typically sourced from underground rock salt deposits, in fresh water to produce a saturated solution containing approximately 26-30% NaCl by weight, equivalent to about 300 g/L. This concentration ensures maximal sodium ion availability for subsequent reactions while minimizing water volume in downstream processing. Crude brine often contains impurities such as calcium chloride (CaCl₂), magnesium chloride (MgCl₂), calcium sulfate (CaSO₄), and trace heavy metals, which must be removed to prevent precipitation of unwanted solids during carbonation, filter clogging, or reduced process efficiency. Purification commences with the sequential addition of recycled soda ash (Na₂CO₃) and (Ca(OH)₂) to the under controlled and , typically around 40-50°C, to selectively precipitate divalent cations. Soda ash reacts with dissolved calcium ions to form insoluble :
Ca²⁺ + CO₃²⁻ → CaCO₃ (s),
which settles rapidly due to its low solubility (Ksp ≈ 3.8 × 10⁻⁹ at 25°C). Excess then targets magnesium ions:
Mg²⁺ + 2OH⁻ → Mg(OH)₂ (s),
with exhibiting even lower solubility (Ksp ≈ 5.6 × 10⁻¹²), ensuring near-complete removal to levels below 0.1 ppm to avoid interference in absorption. The mixture is allowed to settle in large clarifiers, where precipitates form that is periodically removed, followed by through sand or vacuum filters to achieve brine clarity with under 5 NTU.
Sulfate ions, if present from gypsum impurities in the salt, are addressed by adding (BaCl₂) to form precipitate:
SO₄²⁻ + Ba²⁺ → BaSO₄ (s) (Ksp ≈ 1.1 × 10⁻¹⁰),
though this step is often minimized due to costs, with levels tolerated up to 100-200 if downstream impacts are negligible. Additional polishing may involve mild treatment with and in a washer tower to remove residual organics or silica, enhancing overall purity to over 99.5% NaCl equivalent. The purified , now free of interfering ions, is stored in agitated tanks to prevent recrystallization before transfer to the ammoniation stage, with the entire purification consuming about 1-2% of the plant's soda ash output in reagents. This step is critical for yield optimization, as unremoved calcium or magnesium can reduce precipitation efficiency by up to 10-15%.

Ammoniation and Carbonation

In the ammoniation step, purified brine saturated with sodium chloride (typically 20-28% NaCl by weight) is treated with gaseous ammonia recycled from downstream processes, achieving an ammonia concentration of approximately 5-7% in solution at ambient temperatures around 25-30°C. This forms ammoniacal brine, where ammonia partially reacts with water to generate ammonium hydroxide, facilitating the subsequent reaction by increasing the solution's basicity and enabling selective precipitation. The absorption occurs in absorption towers or direct sparging systems, with ammonia uptake driven by its high solubility in brine (up to 80-100 g/L under standard conditions), minimizing losses to off-gas. The carbonation step follows immediately in specialized carbonating towers, where gas—derived from the of —is introduced countercurrently from the base while ammoniated flows downward from the top. These towers, typically 22-25 meters tall and 1.6-2.5 meters in diameter, feature perforated plates or mushroom-shaped baffles to promote intimate gas-liquid contact and uniform distribution, ensuring efficient . The reaction proceeds as:
\ce{NaCl + NH3 + CO2 + H2O -> NaHCO3 v + NH4Cl}
yielding crystals that precipitate due to their reduced (about 9 g/100 mL at 20°C) in the ammonium chloride-rich liquor, governed by the and Le Chatelier's principle shifting equilibrium toward the solid phase. Operating temperatures are maintained at 15-35°C via cooling jackets or evaporative cooling to optimize precipitation yield (typically 80-90% conversion of NaCl to NaHCO3), with CO2 controlled at 1-2 atm to avoid excessive formation.
The precipitated sodium bicarbonate, appearing as fine crystals or mud (containing 10-15% solids by volume), settles to the tower base and is drawn off as a for downstream , while the mother liquor—rich in and unreacted salts—proceeds to ammonia recovery. This step's efficiency hinges on precise control of (around 8-9) and CO2 flow rates (1.2-1.5 times stoichiometric), preventing side reactions like formation that could reduce selectivity. Modern implementations often employ multiple towers in series for staged carbonation, enhancing overall NaHCO3 purity to 99% before .

Precipitation, Filtration, and Calcination

In the step of the Solvay process, gas is introduced into the ammoniated solution within carbonation towers, leading to the formation and selective of (NaHCO₃) as a solid. The reaction proceeds as: NaCl + NH₃ + CO₂ + H₂O → NaHCO₃ (s) + NH₄Cl (aq). This is driven by the low of NaHCO₃ in the aqueous medium at reduced s, typically maintained below 15°C, while ammonium chloride remains dissolved due to its higher . The process exploits the inverse behavior of NaHCO₃, which decreases with decreasing , enabling efficient separation from the liquor. The precipitated NaHCO₃ crystals are then separated from the mother liquor containing NH₄Cl via , commonly using continuous rotary vacuum filters to achieve high throughput and nearly pure solids. The is washed with cold water or dilute to remove adhering impurities such as salts, minimizing losses of and improving product purity, with yields approaching 90-95% based on the sodium content. Subsequently, the filtered NaHCO₃ undergoes in rotary kilns or fluidized-bed calciners at temperatures between 150°C and 200°C, decomposing according to: 2 NaHCO₃ → Na₂CO₃ + CO₂ + H₂O. This releases and , the latter of which is recycled back to the carbonation stage, while anhydrous (Na₂CO₃), or soda ash, is collected as the final product in either light or dense form depending on the calcination conditions and particle . The process operates under controlled heating to ensure complete decomposition without excessive energy input, contributing to the overall efficiency of the Solvay method.

Ammonia Recovery and Recycling

The mother liquor from sodium bicarbonate filtration, rich in (NH₄Cl), is directed to an ammonia recovery unit where it reacts with —formed by slaking quicklime (CaO) derived from limestone . This step regenerates for reuse, as its high cost relative to soda would render the process uneconomical without near-complete . The proceeds as follows:

The equivalent form using slaked is \ce{Ca(OH)2 + 2NH4Cl -> 2NH3 + CaCl2 + 2H2O}.
In the recovery tower or still, the mixture is heated to drive off gas, which is then cooled and absorbed into purified or water, forming ammoniated liquor that recirculates to the ammoniation stage. The resulting solution is discharged as a , often utilized in applications like de-icing or dust control, though its low value has historically posed disposal challenges. This closed-loop minimizes ammonia consumption to small makeup quantities compensating for losses via volatilization or inefficiencies. The efficiency of recovery, typically exceeding 95% in commercial operations, underpins the Solvay process's dominance since the late , enabling ash production costs below those of earlier Leblanc methods while leveraging inexpensive and . Minor losses necessitate ongoing process optimizations, such as improved and absorption towers, to sustain economic margins.

Industrial Implementation

Plant Design and Scale-Up

Ernest Solvay achieved the first successful industrial scale-up of the ammonia-soda process, constructing the inaugural plant in Couillet, Belgium, starting in 1863 after patenting the method in 1861 and refining equipment designs via a second patent that year focused on practical operations. Prior attempts, such as those by H.G. Dyas and J. Hemming on Fresnel's concept, failed to reach commercial viability despite lab success, primarily due to unresolved engineering hurdles in continuous processing and cost efficiency. Solvay's plant transitioned to full operation by 1865, leveraging a continuous four-step cycle with ammonia recycling to produce soda ash at lower costs than the LeBlanc process, enabling rapid expansion and output growth. Solvay process plants feature an integrated layout optimizing material and flows, with dedicated units for purification via tanks and chemical precipitants to remove impurities like calcium and magnesium; lime kilns operating at 950–1100 °C for to supply CO₂ and quicklime; multi-stage carbonation towers employing countercurrent gas-liquid contact for ; systems such as drums or rotary presses; kilns for converting NaHCO₃ to Na₂CO₃; and columns where quicklime reacts with to recover vapor. This closed-loop design minimizes external inputs beyond , , and , with equipment constructed from corrosion-resistant alloys or linings to withstand ammoniacal and chlorides. Proximity to wells and deposits dictates , as in the original Couillet facility amid Charleroi's industrial basin. Scaling to industrial capacities necessitated addressing mass transfer limitations in carbonation towers through baffles and staged compartments ensuring uniform mixing and selective NaHCO₃ crystallization with low co-precipitation of impurities, alongside efficient CO₂ compression and scrubbing to maximize utilization. Modern plants, designed for outputs from 200,000 to over 1.5 million metric tons of soda ash per year, incorporate heat recovery from kiln exhausts for ammonia distillation and process steam generation, alongside automated controls for pH, temperature, and flow rates to sustain yields exceeding theoretical stoichiometry. Initial Couillet expansions involved duplicating towers and filtration capacity, while contemporary engineering employs process simulation for hydraulic design, preventing channeling or flooding that could degrade product purity below 99%.

Energy and Resource Efficiency

The Solvay process requires approximately 13.6 GJ of per metric ton of soda ash produced, primarily for the endothermic of to quicklime and the subsequent heating steps in recovery and . This energy demand equates to roughly 3,778 kWh per ton, with the majority—over 60%—attributed to the operating at temperatures around 900–1,000°C to drive the reaction CaCO₃ → CaO + CO₂. consumption is comparatively lower, typically under 200 kWh per ton, mainly for pumps, , and in towers. Resource efficiency stems from the near-complete of , achieving recovery rates exceeding 99% through the of quicklime with (2 NH₄Cl + CaO → 2 NH₃ + CaCl₂ + H₂O), which minimizes raw material losses and operational costs. (NaCl) and (CaCO₃) inputs are stoichiometrically efficient, with theoretical yields approaching 0.94 tons of Na₂CO₃ per of NaCl and 0.72 tons per of CaCO₃, though practical efficiencies reach 85–90% due to purification losses and side reactions. usage is optimized via in preparation and washing, averaging 1–2 m³ per of product in modern plants, though and streams represent inefficiencies. Compared to the obsolete , the Solvay method reduces energy intensity by 50–70% and eliminates HCl byproduct generation, enhancing overall resource utilization by converting low-value inputs into high-purity soda ash with as the primary waste. Recent industrial advancements, such as the e.Solvay variant introduced in pilot testing around , incorporate electrochemical enhancements and heat integration to cut energy use by 20% and enable partial substitution of fossil fuels with renewables, though widespread adoption remains limited as of 2025. These modifications leverage membrane technologies for concentration, reducing thermal inputs in evaporation steps while maintaining compatibility with existing infrastructure.

Economic Aspects

Cost Structure and Advantages

The cost structure of the Solvay process is characterized by low expenses, dominated by abundant and inexpensive feedstocks such as brine and , which constitute a minor fraction of total operating costs compared to utilities. inputs, primarily for limestone calcination, carbonation heating, and ammonia , represent the largest expenditure, with modern plants consuming 6 to 10 per metric ton of . for plant infrastructure, including reactors, filters, and columns, are amortized over high volumes, while labor and add incrementally. These elements yield production costs competitive with natural trona mining in regions lacking deposits, estimated at approximately 132 USD per metric ton of soda ash under optimal conditions with access to low-cost energy and feedstocks. The process's advantages stem from efficient , which recovers most of the reagent and curtails chemical replenishment needs, alongside the avoidance of expensive waste disposal inherent in prior methods like the . This closed-loop design, combined with byproduct sales for applications such as road de-icing, enhances overall profitability and scalability for large-scale operations.

Market Impact and Production Statistics

In 2024, global soda ash production reached an estimated 73 million metric tons, with synthetic methods—primarily the Solvay process—accounting for the majority of output. In 2021, Solvay process production specifically totaled 42 million tons out of 59 million tons globally, representing approximately 71% of supply. This synthetic dominance persists despite growth in natural trona-based production, which benefits from lower extraction costs in regions like the but remains constrained by deposit locations. China led production with 36 million tons in 2024, predominantly via the Solvay process, followed by and the , together comprising 81% of worldwide capacity. U.S. output, estimated at 11 million tons in 2023, relies heavily on trona mining, valued at $1.9 billion domestically. The Solvay process's prevalence in and supports flexible, deposit-independent manufacturing, mitigating supply risks from variability and enabling consistent delivery to high-demand sectors like and detergents. The process's market impact derives from its scalability using ubiquitous brine and limestone, which historically displaced costlier alternatives and continues to underpin a valued at over $20 billion in 2024. While natural methods have gained share—projected to reach 22% by 2028 due to cost advantages—Solvay's established ensures its enduring role in volume-driven markets.

Byproducts and Utilization

Calcium Chloride Production and Applications

In the Solvay process, (CaCl₂) is generated as the primary byproduct during the ammonia recovery stage. Quicklime (CaO), derived from limestone , reacts with (NH₄Cl) from the initial ammoniation step to liberate for , yielding in aqueous form according to the : 2NH₄Cl + CaO → 2NH₃ + CaCl₂ + H₂O. The resulting CaCl₂ is typically evaporated to concentrate it, and in operations, it may be further processed into flakes, pellets, or liquor for sale. This byproduct arises stoichiometrically from the overall process converting and into , with the Solvay method contributing 15–20% of global CaCl₂ supply. Calcium chloride from the Solvay process is valued for its hygroscopic properties, , and ability to depress freezing points, enabling diverse applications. In road maintenance, it serves as a de-icing agent by lowering water's freezing temperature and as a dust suppressant on surfaces, accounting for approximately 55% of U.S. consumption in these roles. In , it accelerates setting by promoting hydration, particularly in cold weather. Further uses include oilfield operations, where it modifies drilling fluid rheology; pulp and paper production for process chemicals; water treatment formulations; and fertilizer co-formulants in plant nutrition. In agriculture and food sectors, it acts as a foliar to prevent deficiencies in crops like apples and tomatoes, and as a firming agent, , or coagulant in cheese-making and other processed foods. While these applications utilize significant quantities, excess production often leads to discharge in some facilities, though efforts focus on maximizing recovery for market sale.

Other Outputs and Waste Streams

In addition to , the Solvay process generates various waste streams primarily from purification and stages, including effluents and solid sludges containing impurities. purification involves precipitating impurities such as calcium, magnesium, and iron from crude salt solutions using soda ash or , resulting in sludges composed mainly of , , and other insoluble compounds; these solids are typically dewatered and disposed of in landfills or sedimentation ponds, contributing to localized and contamination risks if not managed properly. Distillation wastewater from ammonia recovery contains residual salts like (approximately 56 kg/m³) alongside minor (112 kg/m³ in post-distillation liquid), with the bulk being (956 kg/m³); this is often discharged into waterways, elevating local and potentially harming aquatic ecosystems through increased and sodium ion concentrations. Solid distillation wastes, formed from suspended particles in these streams, settle as upon disposal, exhibiting higher environmental than dissolved solutions due to their insolubility and potential for of from raw materials. Minor outputs include trace impurities like sulfates or organic contaminants from raw , which may form additional sludges during ; these are not commercially recovered and add to overall volume, with historical disposal practices in sites like Solvay, , leading to substantial increases in adjacent water bodies from accumulated ionic pollutants. Modern plants mitigate these through partial or , but large-scale operations still produce millions of tons annually, underscoring the process's inherent intensity beyond the primary calcium chloride stream.

Environmental Considerations

Emissions and Resource Consumption

The Solvay process emits substantial quantities of , with approximately 1 of CO₂ released per of soda ash produced, arising from calcination (CaCO₃ → CaO + CO₂) and the of fuels for heat. This includes direct emissions of 200–300 kg CO₂ per vented to the atmosphere, alongside indirect emissions from energy inputs. Minor emissions of can occur from incomplete in the ammoniation and recovery steps, though efficiency exceeds 99% in optimized plants, limiting releases to trace levels. Resource consumption is dominated by raw materials, including 1.6–1.7 tonnes of (typically as ) and 1.1 tonnes of per tonne of soda ash, with serving as a recycled carrier rather than a net input. Energy demands are high, ranging from 6 to 10 per tonne of product in contemporary facilities, primarily for heating brines, generating , and evaporating solutions. Water usage supports dissolution, reaction media, and cooling towers, often requiring systems to curb freshwater withdrawal, as unrecycled discharges contribute to local hydrological strain. The process yields calcium chloride as an unavoidable byproduct, at rates of about 0.9–1.4 tonnes per tonne of soda ash, which, if not repurposed for applications like de-icing or dust control, results in waste streams that elevate chloride and calcium levels in disposal sites, exacerbating salinity in groundwater and soils. This output represents a resource inefficiency, as the chloride is non-recoverable in the core chemistry, diverting materials from value-added uses.

Comparative Efficiency Versus Historical Alternatives

The Leblanc process, developed by Nicolas Leblanc in 1791, represented the dominant industrial method for soda ash production prior to the Solvay process, converting , , , and through a series of high-temperature reactions including sulfate formation, carbon to black ash, and . This batch-oriented approach suffered from low material efficiency, with substantial losses to byproducts such as 5.5 tons of gas and 7 tons of calcium sulfide per 8 tons of soda ash produced, exacerbating operational costs and environmental burdens through emissions that required mitigation or venting. In comparison, the Solvay process, operational from 1863 onward, improved resource efficiency via -carbon dioxide cycling for precipitation, minimizing raw material waste beyond the primary output (approximately 1.5 tons per ton of soda ash) and enabling near-complete ammonia recovery exceeding 98% in optimized systems. Energy efficiency favored the Solvay process due to its continuous flow design and reduced heating demands, with modern implementations consuming 6-10 per metric ton of soda ash, primarily from limestone at 1050-1100°C. The , reliant on multiple coal-fired reductions and evaporations, incurred higher thermal inputs without benefits, contributing to its economic displacement as Solvay variants lowered overall needs by streamlining reactions and byproduct handling. By , the Solvay process accounted for 95% of global soda ash output, underscoring its superior scalability and yield effectiveness over Leblanc's inefficient, pollution-intensive framework. Earlier pre-industrial methods, such as extracting from wood ashes or kelp combustion, yielded negligible quantities—typically under 1 per of forest annually—and were supplanted by Leblanc for scale but ultimately by Solvay for viable efficiency, as the latter avoided organic sourcing's variability and low carbonate purity. Solvay's advantages extended to lower dependency, eliminating Leblanc's costly and corrosive intermediate production, thus enhancing net process yields and reducing emissions like HCl that plagued historical alternatives.

Criticisms and Real-World Impacts

The Solvay process generates substantial (CaCl₂) waste, approximately 10 cubic meters of liquid and solid waste per metric ton of soda ash produced, which poses significant disposal challenges due to limited commercial applications for the . This waste, primarily a concentrated CaCl₂ , has historically led to and through of calcium and ions, elevating levels and disrupting local ecosystems. In regions without viable utilization markets, such as road de-icing or dust control, excess CaCl₂ accumulates in waste beds, exacerbating long-term environmental liabilities. Energy intensity represents another key criticism, with the process requiring extensive heating for limestone calcination at 900–1100°C and ammonia recovery, consuming roughly three times the energy of trona-based natural soda ash extraction. It emits about 1 metric ton of CO₂ per metric ton of soda ash, primarily from fuel combustion for steam generation, compared to 0.3–0.7 metric tons for trona mining, rendering it less competitive amid rising carbon pricing—e.g., Europe's emissions trading scheme imposes costs of around $106 per ton of CO₂, adding millions annually to plant operations. Additionally, the process demands 4–5 times more water per ton than trona methods, straining resources in water-scarce areas. Real-world impacts include severe localized pollution, as seen at the former Solvay Process Company site near , , where waste beds from operations starting in 1884 substantially increased lake via calcium and runoff, contributing to its designation as one of the most polluted lakes in the United States. A 1943 waste bed breach released 40,000 tons of material, including calcium compounds, flooding nearby areas and amplifying contamination. Similar issues occurred in Rosignano, , where CaCl₂ disposal has raised and ecological concerns, prompting scrutiny of synthetic soda ash expansion despite its dominance in global production (about 75% of 64 million metric tons in 2022). These cases highlight how unmitigated waste has imposed remediation burdens, including cleanups, outweighing short-term economic benefits in affected communities.

Recent Developments

Technological Innovations

In recent decades, optimizations to the Solvay process have emphasized and process intensification. Modern facilities integrate heat exchangers to recapture from exothermic reactions, such as ammonia recovery, achieving up to 30% reductions in consumption compared to 19th-century designs. Advanced distributed control systems (DCS) and enable real-time monitoring of variables like purity and , minimizing losses to below 0.1% and boosting overall yield to over 95%. These enhancements, implemented in plants since the , stem from refinements rather than fundamental chemistry changes. Solvay introduced the e.Solvay electrochemical variant in 2022, replacing thermal of with electrolytic processing to generate directly. This approach eliminates CO2 release from limestone decomposition, targets 50% lower energy use through electricity substitution for heat, and recycles calcium byproducts without discharge. Pilot testing demonstrated feasibility for scaling to industrial levels, with projected operational costs competitive against natural mining due to reduced raw material needs. A 2025 study outlined an operando-electrified Solvay protocol, integrating electrochemical CO2 reduction and synthesis in a single reactor to bypass multi-stage separations. Operating at ambient conditions with renewable , it achieves 80% faradaic efficiency for formation, potentially slashing by 40% versus conventional setups through simplified . This innovation addresses thermodynamic inefficiencies in traditional gas-liquid absorptions, though awaits validation beyond lab-scale. Hybrid integrations, such as coupling modified Solvay cycles with for CO2 mineralization, have emerged in since 2024. provides reactive calcium to precipitate from ammoniated , recovering 70-85% of input CO2 while valorizing ; lab trials yielded 90 g/L concentrations under optimized and temperature controls. These adaptations enhance circularity but require site-specific sourcing to maintain process .

Sustainability Enhancements and CO2 Strategies

has developed the e.Solvay process, an electrochemical innovation to the traditional Solvay method that substitutes fossil fuel-dependent kilns with renewable -powered for recovery, yielding 50% lower CO2 emissions alongside 20% reductions in , , and use, and a 30% cut in consumption with minimized residues. A pilot-scale module became operational at the company's Soda Ash R&I facilities in 2025, supporting broader goals of 30% emission reductions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2050 through phased elimination and European plant conversions. Complementary energy transitions at production sites include substitution for , as at the plant where waste wood chips achieve 65% CO2 cuts, and conversions like at , averting 280 kilotons of CO2 annually. Regenerative and further trim emissions by up to 40% at facilities such as Rosignano. These measures, backed by €48 million investments, target scope 1 and 2 reductions while preserving process efficiency. Direct CO2 capture strategies leverage the process's ammonia streams: a 2025 pilot integrates undiluted condensates from recovery towers to absorb CO2 from tail gases, capturing 634 kg/h at 120 kPa with 5.89 MJ/kg regeneration energy, minimizing ammonia slip via integration and enabling patented scalability. 3 mitigation includes biogenic CO2 sourcing from at the Dombasle plant, offsetting 4,000 tons annually in soda ash and bicarbonate output. Research explores modified Solvay variants for , such as integrating flue gases to sequester CO2 into , potentially serving as for hard-to-abate sectors, though commercial adoption remains pending validation. Partnerships, including with Compact Membrane Systems, advance membrane-based capture to decarbonize residual streams. These enhancements collectively address the process's inherent limestone calcination emissions, estimated at 0.7-1 ton CO2 per ton soda ash in conventional operations, prioritizing empirical retrofits over unproven alternatives.

References

  1. [1]
    Making the Process | Science History Institute
    Dec 5, 2011 · In 1861 Solvay's first plant began producing soda—and then exploded. He borrowed money from family members to rebuild. Despite equipment ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  2. [2]
    Our History - Pioneering Times (1863-1885) | Solvay
    Just a day before his 23rd birthday, Ernest Solvay patented a process producing soda ash with salt, ammonia and carbonic acid. This first patent was voided, as ...
  3. [3]
    Carbon-Negative Production of Soda Ash: Process Development ...
    In the 19th century, the Leblanc process was replaced by the Solvay process, which was technically and economically superior and less polluting. In recent ...
  4. [4]
    Can synthetic soda ash survive? | C&EN Global Enterprise
    Feb 27, 2023 · The Solvay process has a problem, however: it is extremely energy intensive, releasing large amounts of carbon dioxide and generating ...
  5. [5]
    Operando-electrified solvay process | Nature Communications
    Oct 14, 2025 · Guided by octet rule, here we embed eight-electron nitrogen chemistry into Solvay process, maximizing local alkalines generation for CO2 ...
  6. [6]
    Ernest Gaston Joseph Solvay, a prestigious example of a scientific ...
    Apr 1, 2016 · Solvay solved the practical problems of conducting the ammonia-soda process on a large scale, unaware that many chemists had tried and failed to ...
  7. [7]
    Soda & Reforms. The 150th Anniversary of Solvay. - Science in the net
    May 7, 2013 · Ernest Solvay (Rebecq, 1838 – Bruxelles, 1922) was issued the first patent for a process of making soda (sodium carbonate) on April 15, ...<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Solvay process - chemeurope.com
    In 1874, the Solvays expanded their facilities with a new, larger plant at Nancy, France. In the same year, Ludwig Mond visited Solvay in Belgium and ...
  9. [9]
    Our History - Overview - Solvay
    After difficult years of technical uncertainties, Solvay embarked on a rapid international expansion, building plants in the whole industrialized world. In 1900 ...1863-1885 · 2008-2023 · 1914-1949 · 1885-1914Missing: first | Show results with:first
  10. [10]
    Difference Between Leblanc and Solvay Process
    Sep 16, 2020 · The key difference between Leblanc and Solvay process is that the starting materials in the Solvay process are more cost-effective than the ...Missing: dominant | Show results with:dominant
  11. [11]
    Our History - Consolidation of Power (1885-1914) | Solvay
    Consolidation of power. Solvay was at the forefront of the first industrial globalization that took place at the end of the 19th century.
  12. [12]
    Soda ash, Solvay style - ACS Publications
    After the original Solvay patents expired, several other U.S. plants based on the ammonia–soda process were started up, all told making about 350,000 t in 1900.
  13. [13]
    Leblanc process - chemeurope.com
    The only waste product of this Solvay process was calcium chloride, and so it was both more economical and less polluting than the Leblanc method ...
  14. [14]
    A Blast from the Past – Solvay Paperboard - VIP Structures
    Initially built in Solvay in 1884, the Solvay Process Company chemical plant in Solvay was the first to manufacture soda ash in the US and would become the ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    Can synthetic soda ash survive? - C&EN - American Chemical Society
    Feb 26, 2023 · And Solvay's process is still the dominant production technology. Around three-quarters of the 64 million metric tons (t) of soda ash produced ...
  17. [17]
    Changes in Synthetic Soda Ash Production and Its Consequences ...
    Jul 11, 2022 · Global soda ash production in 2021 was 59 Tg, of which 17 Tg was mine production and 42 Tg was typical Solvay process production. The output ...
  18. [18]
    Carbon capture pilot study in Solvay soda ash process - ScienceDirect
    Feb 15, 2025 · Traditionally, the Solvay process used for its production is highly energy-intensive and emits significant amounts of CO₂.
  19. [19]
    SolvayView Details | Feature Stories | InvestKOREA(ENG)
    Oct 14, 2020 · The first Solvay production site in Korea was built and established in 1975. It was among the pioneers of foreign investors at that time in the ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Soda Ash: When Will Demand Catch Up to New Capacity?
    Sep 18, 2025 · Today, mainland China accounts for some 50% of global soda ash demand and production. Global soda ash demand has been driven by new energy ...
  21. [21]
    Soda Ash Market Size & Share | Global Forecast From 2016 to 2036
    Jul 26, 2024 · ... Solvay process and Hou process are widely used for the production of soda ash. ... ash accounts for around 70% of the global soda ash production ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Continuous process of sodium bicarbonate production by Solvay ...
    stoichiometric equation basic raw materials for the production of soda ash are: sodium chloride and calcium carbonate: 2NaCl + CaCO3 → Na2CO3 + CaCl2. In ...
  23. [23]
    None
    ### Summary of Raw Materials for Solvay Process
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Applications of Stoichiometry
    The Solvay process is an important commercial method of preparing sodium carbonate. In the first step of this process, ammonia, water and carbon dioxide react ...
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    Thermodynamics and equilibria of the Solvay process | Resource
    A worksheet with questions on the thermodynamics and acid-base aspects of the Solvay process and the uses of the products.
  27. [27]
    Sodium carbonate - The Essential Chemical Industry
    Figure 2 Different stages of the Solvay process. (1) Ammoniation of brine. Ammonia gas is absorbed in concentrated brine to give a solution containing both ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Soda Ash ( Sodium carbonate) Manufacture - WordPress.com
    The only major inputs to the Solvay process are salt, limestone and thermal energy, and its only major byproduct is calcium chloride, which is sold as road ...Missing: outputs | Show results with:outputs
  29. [29]
    VARIOUS CHEMICAL PROCESSES PRODUCTION OF SODA ASH ...
    Brine is usually purified by a lime soda treatment where the magnesium is precipitated with Ca (OH)2 (milk of lime) and the calcium is precipitated with soda ...
  30. [30]
    Solvay Process for Producing Sodium Carbonate
    1) Purification of Brine · Ca2+(aq) + CO32-(aq) → CaCO3(s) · Mg2+(aq) + 2OH-(aq) → Mg(OH)2(s) · 2) Ammoniation of Brine · 3) Carbonation of Ammoniated Brine · CaCO3 ...
  31. [31]
    Cleaner production in the Solvay Process: general strategies and ...
    ... Solvay Process. In Ebensee, milk of lime was added to a mixture of 10% mother liquor and 90% crude brine in the first step of the purification of brine.
  32. [32]
    US4115219A - Brine purification process - Google Patents
    This invention relates to the purification of sodium chloride brines and, more specifically, to an improved process for purification of sodium chloride brines.
  33. [33]
    Solvay Process | History, Chemical Compounds & Stages - Lesson
    In the 1860s, a Belgian chemist and industrialist, Ernest Gaston Joseph Solvay (1838-1922), developed the ammonia-soda process for the manufacturing of sodium ...
  34. [34]
    The Ammonia Soda Process - Lenntech
    1) NaCl +NH3 +H20 +CO2= NH4Cl +NaHC03• 2) 2 NHlJl +Ca(OH)2 = CaC12+2 H20 +2 ... solution, carrying the sodium bicarbonate in suspension, is drawn out and filtered ...
  35. [35]
    Chemical Technology – Solvay Process- Process Description-PFD ...
    Jan 17, 2017 · Overall reaction of ammoniation of brine and then treatment of carbon dioxide to ammoniated brine is as under. 2NaCl + 2H2O +2NH3 + 2CO2 ...
  36. [36]
    Solvay Process Steps, Equations, Advantages & Uses Explained
    Rating 4.2 (373,000) Devised by Ernest Solvay in 1861, the process drastically replaced older methods, such as the Le Blanc process, for large-scale production of sodium carbonate.
  37. [37]
    Solvay process - InfoPlease
    ... (sodium bicarbonate) if the temperature is maintained below 15℃. The sodium hydrogen carbonate is filtered off and heated to produce sodium carbonate. The ...Missing: precipitation | Show results with:precipitation
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Part 4 Manufacturing sodium carbonate by the Solvay process
    At low temperatures the sodium hydrogencarbonate is much less soluble than ammonium chloride and crystallises out. This moves the equilibrium in the Solvay.
  39. [39]
    A New Process for the Recovery of Ammonia from Ammoniated High ...
    Sep 7, 2021 · The recovery method is based on the Solvay process by adding calcium oxide without the need of high energy input.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Jason Taylor - LearnChemE
    Despite numerous efforts, the two scientists were not able to scale-up their process. A Belgian industrial chemist, Ernest Solvay, began working on the scale-up ...Missing: design | Show results with:design
  41. [41]
    Carbon-Negative Production of Soda Ash: Process Development ...
    May 30, 2025 · (5) The Solvay process cyclically uses ammonia to promote the formation of sodium bicarbonate, which is later transformed in sodium carbonate.
  42. [42]
    Toward sustainable soda ash production: A critical review on eco ...
    The calcination of limestone in lime kilns represents around 30 % of the total cost of soda ash production using the Solvay process [91,117,118]. Sodium ...
  43. [43]
    Breakdown of total capital investment of soda ash plant (Solvay...
    Five different manufacturing methods are outlined. The two main manufacturing methods (the Solvay and Dual processes) are examined in detail. The technical ...Missing: scale- | Show results with:scale-
  44. [44]
    Solvay and ENOWA plan to build first carbon-neutral soda ash plant
    Dec 12, 2023 · The partners aim to start 500,000 tons soda ash nameplate capacity by 2030 which would gradually increase up to 1.5 million tons by 2035, with ...
  45. [45]
    WO2015194963A1 - Process for producing soda ash - Google Patents
    However, the energy consumption of the Solvay process is 13,6 GJ/ton of soda ash (source: EU Commission : "Reference document on Best Available Techniques for ...
  46. [46]
    Soda Ash Production with Low Energy Consumption Using Proton ...
    Therefore, the energy consumption in soda ash production can be reduced to 5.32 GJ/ton soda ash, a decrease of about 60.9% compared with the Solvay Process.
  47. [47]
    Inventing the Solvay Soda Ash Process… Again!
    Oct 14, 2025 · In 1863, Ernest Solvay invented a radically new industrial process for the production of soda ash. · Soda ash is a vital component in glass ...Missing: date early
  48. [48]
    Cleaner production in the Solvay Process: general strategies and ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · In this paper, all sources of waste from the Solvay Process and their environmental impact are reviewed and possible applications are discussed.<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    5.13: Industrial Chemical Reactions - The Solvay Process
    Mar 16, 2021 · This page discusses the Solvay process for producing sodium bicarbonate and sodium carbonate, essential for industries like glassmaking.Missing: early challenges
  50. [50]
    Comparison of cash costs per tonne of soda ash across regions ...
    Production costs of one tonne of soda ash in the US (trona process), Western Europe (Solvay process) and China (Solvay and Hou processes) are compared in ...
  51. [51]
    Use case – Blue Capsule Technology
    The Solvay process is particularly energy-intensive, requiring 6 to 10 GJ per tonne of sodium carbonate in modern plants. This consumption is mainly ...
  52. [52]
    The manufacture of soda ash in the Arabian Gulf - ScienceDirect
    The Solvay and Dual processes are estimated to produce soda ash at a cost of 132 and 144 $ /ton respectively. These production costs compare favourably against ...
  53. [53]
    Sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate: production processes ...
    Dec 16, 2024 · [1] The Solvay process allows partial recycling of the ammonia used, helping to reduce its impact on production costs. Considering the way it is ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  54. [54]
  55. [55]
    How the Soda Ash Market is Evolving Amid Growth and Challenges?
    Mar 12, 2025 · According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), global soda ash production reached approximately 73 million metric tons in 2024 ...
  56. [56]
    SODA ASH - Mineral Commodity Summaries 2024 - USGS.gov
    Domestic Production and Use: The total value of domestic soda ash (sodium carbonate) produced in 2023 was an estimated $1.9 billion1 and the quantity produced ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] SODA ASH - USGS.gov
    Together, China, Turkey, and the. United States accounted for 81% of global soda ash production in 2024. In mid-2023, China expanded its production capacity ...
  58. [58]
    SODA ASH - Mining Engineering Online - Official Publication of SME
    Domestic production of soda ash (sodium carbonate) in 2023 was estimated to be 11 Mt, slightly less than in 2022, for a total market value of $1.9 billion.Missing: process | Show results with:process
  59. [59]
    Soda Ash Market Size to Surpass USD 26.67 Billion by 2034
    May 7, 2025 · The global soda ash market size was estimated at USD 20.04 billion in 2024 and is predicted to increase from USD 20.62 billion in 2025 to ...
  60. [60]
    A global overview of the soda ash market - Glass International
    Sep 25, 2024 · Its share of the world total is forecast to reach 22% by 2028. Natural soda ash production is typically much lower cost than synthetic. As ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] 2021 Calcium Chloride - Technical Report
    Mar 25, 2021 · The invention of the Solvay process to produce sodium carbonate. 225 resulted in calcium chloride as a by-product (Solvay, 1887). When the ...
  62. [62]
    CASO® TECHNICAL FLAKES - Solvay
    CASO® TECHNICAL FLAKES is a synthetic calcium chloride of mineral origin intended for technical uses. It is manufactured by Solvay's Process for Soda-Ash.
  63. [63]
    Studies on the utilization of post-distillation liquid from Solvay ...
    Apr 8, 2019 · The main components of the post-distillation liquid are water (956 kg/m3 of waste stream), calcium chloride (112 kg/m3) and sodium chloride (56 ...<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    [PDF] EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019 1
    2.1 Process description​​ On average, 200–300 kg CO2 are vented into the atmosphere per tonne of soda ash produced. A more detailed description of the soda ash ...
  65. [65]
    A new process for the capture of CO2 and reduction of water salinity
    Jun 1, 2017 · A new process for CO 2 capture and water desalination has been developed. It is based on a Modified Solvay process without using ammonia.
  66. [66]
    How to do more with less (water) - Solvay
    Jun 30, 2020 · The second lever to reduce Solvay's consumption of freshwater is recycling. This means installing hefty installations to clean and re-use water ...
  67. [67]
    An Ultimate Guide To Soda Ash | Niran Chemical
    Feb 24, 2025 · By-product Handling: The Solvay process produces calcium chloride as a by-product, which must be managed properly to prevent environmental harm.
  68. [68]
    Onondaga Lake's tumultuous past and its strides toward a safer future
    Jun 6, 2024 · The company dumped mercury-contaminated waste into the lake until its closure in 1986. "It is themost polluted lake in the United States," said ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  69. [69]
    Former Allied Chemical Plant on Willis Ave. - Onondaga Lake
    Oct 12, 2006 · These waste beds have led to water pollution, principally by calcium and chlorine ions. The waste beds in Solvay, New York substantially ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  70. [70]
    Changes in Synthetic Soda Ash Production and Its Consequences ...
    Jul 11, 2022 · The efficiency of the carbonization process is improved by increasing the carbonization rate and the speed of the process can be increased by ...
  71. [71]
    Solvay is reinventing its soda ash process and targets zero ...
    Sep 6, 2022 · Solvay's researchers and engineers have invented a new method to produce soda ash, achieving three revolutionary improvements in the process ...
  72. [72]
    Integration of Modified Solvay Process for Sodium Bicarbonate ...
    Jan 16, 2024 · This study presents an innovative integration of steelmaking slag with the modified Solvay process for sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO 3 ) synthesis from saline ...
  73. [73]
    Solvay Soda Ash takes two giant steps towards carbon neutrality
    Nov 28, 2022 · It introduces three revolutionary improvements to our current Solvay process: 50% less CO2 emissions; 20% less energy and natural resources ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  74. [74]
  75. [75]
    Solvay reduces scope 3 emissions in soda ash and bicarbonate ...
    Jul 23, 2025 · Biogenic CO2 sourcing from Air Products at Solvay's Dombasle plant cuts emissions by 4,000 tons annually. Solvay has taken a new step to reduce ...
  76. [76]
    Solvay partners with Compact Membrane Systems on a ...
    Aug 2, 2023 · The Group's investment in Compact Membrane Systems (CMS) will help advance efforts to tackle climate change using carbon capture technologies.