Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Stump speech

A stump speech is a standardized political address delivered repeatedly by candidates during election campaigns, serving as a core communication tool to convey key policy positions, biographical elements, and appeals to voter priorities across multiple venues.^[1]^[2] The term originated in the early 19th century American frontier, particularly in Kentucky and Tennessee newspapers around 1820, where it described public political oratory conducted from improvised platforms like tree stumps due to the lack of formal stages in rural areas.^[3]^[4] This practice reflected the era's decentralized campaigning, with politicians "stumping" — traveling extensively to rally support through direct, often vigorous speeches tailored to local audiences yet repeatable in form.^[5] Over time, stump speeches evolved into structured routines essential for building name recognition and momentum, as seen in historical campaigns like Harry Truman's 1948 whistle-stop tour, where such addresses helped mobilize grassroots enthusiasm despite polling deficits.^[6] Their defining characteristic lies in balancing consistency for efficiency with adaptability for context, enabling candidates to refine messaging based on audience feedback while maintaining a cohesive narrative.^[7]

Etymology and Origins

Etymology

The term stump speech first appeared in print in 1820, documented in newspapers from Kentucky and Tennessee, where it described public political oratory delivered from an improvised platform in frontier areas lacking formal stages.^[3] This usage derived from the literal practice of speakers standing atop a tree stump—a convenient, natural elevation—to address assembled crowds, thereby enabling accessible discourse in rural or undeveloped settings.^[8]^[4] The phrase's etymological roots trace to the broader adoption of "stump" as a noun for such a speaking platform, with an antecedent example from a 1817 Pennsylvania newspaper referring to a "stump" erected for political addresses.^[8] By the mid-19th century, stump speech had standardized to denote a candidate's rehearsed, repeatable campaign address, delivered verbatim across multiple stops to efficiently convey core messages to diverse audiences.^[2]^[5]

Historical Origins in American Frontier Politics

The practice of stump speaking originated in the early 19th century amid the expansion of American frontier settlements, where political candidates delivered orations from tree stumps in cleared lands lacking formal platforms or structures.^[3] These improvised elevations provided orators with height to be seen and heard over assembled crowds in rural clearings, often shaded by remaining foliage, as land was actively being prepared for agriculture.^[2] The method suited the sparse amenities of newly settled regions, enabling impromptu gatherings without reliance on established venues.^[9] The term "stump speech" entered printed usage in 1820 through newspapers in Kentucky and Tennessee, frontier states pivotal to early western expansion.^[3] An early instance appeared in the Knoxville Register on June 27, 1820, describing a West Tennessee candidate's public address in this style.^[9] In Kentucky, the raucous oratory form gained prominence by the late 1820s, as recounted by observers like John Reynolds, who noted its perfection among local speakers traveling to engage distant audiences.^[2] This approach arose from the causal demands of frontier geography and demographics: vast territories required candidates to traverse by horseback, repeating core messages across isolated communities where newspapers and centralized media were scarce.^[9] By facilitating unmediated interaction, stump speaking democratized access to political discourse, allowing aspirants to connect directly with common settlers in areas beyond elite urban centers.^[2] The standardization of speeches for efficiency addressed the logistical challenges of covering multiple stops, marking an adaptation to the participatory ethos emerging in post-Revolutionary America.^[3]

Historical Development

Early 19th-Century Use in U.S. Elections

Stump speeches gained prominence in U.S. elections during the antebellum period as parties responded to broader voter enfranchisement among white males. By the 1820s, many states eliminated property qualifications for voting, expanding the electorate and prompting campaigns to engage directly with ordinary citizens through informal, repetitive oratory at local gatherings.^[10] This marked a departure from earlier senatorial traditions that deemed personal campaigning undignified, with surrogates initially filling the role of delivering frontier-style addresses to mobilize support.^[11] The 1828 presidential contest between Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams exemplified this evolution, as Jackson's Democratic allies organized rallies featuring stump speeches by surrogates that emphasized populist themes and criticized Adams's elitism.^[12] Voter turnout jumped from 27% in 1824 to 58% in 1828, reflecting heightened participation that correlated with increased use of such public appeals.^[13] In 1840, William Henry Harrison's Whig campaign against Martin Van Buren amplified stump speaking through the "Log Cabin and Hard Cider" theme, where surrogates delivered standardized speeches portraying Harrison as a man of the people during widespread frontier-style events.^[14] Turnout peaked at 80%, underscoring how expanded suffrage in the 1830s—granting voting rights to nearly all white adult males—drove the proliferation of documented stump tours to reach newly enfranchised voters.^[13]^[15]

Expansion in the 19th and Early 20th Centuries

The mid-19th-century expansion of railroad networks, which grew from approximately 3,000 miles of track in 1840 to over 30,000 miles by 1860, enabled political speakers to traverse states more efficiently, institutionalizing stump speeches as a core campaign tool amid rising voter participation and party competition.^[16] This infrastructure shift linked rural and urban audiences, allowing orators to deliver standardized messages on issues like slavery and economic policy, with party organizations coordinating tours to maximize reach. Abraham Lincoln exemplified this adaptation during his 1858 U.S. Senate campaign in Illinois, traveling by rail to deliver repeated addresses critiquing the Kansas-Nebraska Act and popular sovereignty, refining arguments for broader dissemination despite the formal debate format.^[17]^[18] Following the Civil War, stump speeches solidified within Reconstruction-era and Gilded Age elections, where professionalized party machines deployed surrogates to rally voters on reconstruction policies, tariffs, and corruption amid rapid industrialization that swelled the electorate to over 10 million eligible voters by 1880.^[19] In the 1880 presidential contest, orator Frederick Douglass stumped for Republican James Garfield in locations like Muncie, Indiana, emphasizing emancipation's gains and party loyalty to counter Democratic resurgence.^[20] Similarly, the 1884 campaign saw Democratic surrogates highlight Grover Cleveland's gubernatorial record of vetoing extravagant spending—over 300 bills in two years—and tariff reform for economic realism, aiding his narrow victory by framing Republicans as beholden to special interests.^[21] Into the early 20th century, despite radio's emergence—exemplified by Warren G. Harding's pioneering 1922 broadcast from the Lincoln Memorial dedication—live stump speeches endured as candidates sought visceral voter connections amid growing national media.^[22] Harding, during his 1920 front-porch campaign and presidency, conducted informal outdoor addresses, such as those in 1921, to convey accessibility and normalcy, preserving the personal rapport railroads had amplified decades earlier even as electronic alternatives loomed.^[6] This persistence underscored stump speaking's role in political professionalization, bridging frontier improvisation with organized, issue-driven appeals.

Evolution in the Modern Era (Post-1945)

In the post-World War II period, television's rise enabled stump speeches to extend beyond physical venues, allowing candidates to repeat core messages to mass audiences while preserving elements of live engagement. Dwight D. Eisenhower's 1952 campaign pioneered this shift, employing televised addresses and spots alongside traditional stumping to convey themes of leadership and reform, reaching an estimated 40 million households by election day.^[23] This hybrid approach mitigated the logistical demands of frontier-era repetition, using broadcast efficiency to amplify direct voter appeals without diluting the rhetorical immediacy of in-person delivery. John F. Kennedy advanced this adaptation in 1960, integrating live stump speeches with national television exposure, including the landmark debates viewed by over 66 million people for the first installment on September 26.^[24] His energetic rally performances, often broadcast or summarized on air, emphasized youth and progress, enabling causal dissemination of ideas that bypassed selective print media filters and directly influenced public perception of candidate vitality. Ronald Reagan elevated stump speech precision in the 1980s, delivering concise, principle-driven repetitions centered on limited government, tax cuts, and anti-regulatory stances during his successful presidential bid.^[25] These efforts correlated with heightened voter mobilization, as Reagan garnered 43.9 million votes (50.7% of the total) and a 10-point margin over incumbent Jimmy Carter, with turnout reaching 52.6% amid economic discontent that his messaging effectively harnessed.^[26] From the 2010s onward, digital platforms hybridized stump speeches further, with Donald Trump's 2016 rallies serving as extended, improvisational orations amplified via social media to circumvent traditional media gatekeeping often critiqued for institutional biases.^[27] Holding over 100 such events, Trump repeated motifs of economic nationalism and immigration control to crowds averaging 5,000-30,000, with online clips generating billions of views and views. Empirical studies link these rallies to localized turnout boosts of 2-3% in host counties for Republican voters, underscoring adaptation to fragmented media landscapes.^[28]

Characteristics and Techniques

Core Elements of a Stump Speech

A stump speech generally follows a structured format to maximize persuasion, drawing on principles of audience engagement where initial rapport leads to message reinforcement and decisive action. Core components include an opening that establishes personal connection, a reiterated central thesis on policy or values, contrasts with alternatives, and a concluding mobilization effort. This sequence leverages cognitive patterns observed in effective communication, prioritizing clarity and repetition over novelty to embed ideas in listeners' minds.^[29] The introduction typically features a personal backstory or "origin story," occupying 10-15% of the speech's duration to foster relatability by linking the candidate's experiences to audience challenges. This element humanizes the speaker, revealing motivations rooted in shared values rather than a mere resume recitation, thereby building trust through narrative empathy before delving into substantive claims.^[29] At the core lies the reiterated policy priorities or ideological framework, such as emphasizing economic freedom against government overreach, repeated strategically to exploit the illusory truth effect—wherein familiarity from recurrence enhances perceived validity, even for complex propositions, as demonstrated in psychological experiments on statement repetition. This section constitutes the bulk of the speech, framing solutions to identified problems like regulatory burdens or fiscal imbalances, with empirical patterns from campaign analyses showing that such reinforcement aids voter retention of key themes over single exposures.^[30]^[29] Contrasts with opponents follow, grounded in verifiable policy critiques—such as disparities in economic outcomes under differing administrations—while eschewing personal ad hominem attacks to maintain focus on causal differences in approaches. This differentiation sharpens the candidate's vision without alienating undecided listeners, aligning with rhetorical strategies that highlight stakes through evidence-based comparisons rather than unsubstantiated rhetoric.^[31] The speech culminates in a call to action, specifying immediate steps like voting on a given date or volunteering, to convert passive hearing into active support. Overall length averages 15-30 minutes for rally settings, calibrated to human attention spans where engagement peaks around 20 minutes before cognitive fatigue sets in, per studies on public address efficacy.^[29]^[32]

Rhetorical and Delivery Strategies

Anecdotes in stump speeches facilitate audience engagement by inducing narrative transportation, a cognitive state in which listeners immerse themselves in the recounted events, temporarily suspending critical evaluation and heightening receptivity to the embedded message. This mechanism, rooted in focused attention and emotional absorption, counters cognitive resistance more effectively than abstract arguments, as immersion aligns mental imagery with the speaker's perspective.^[33]^[34] Humor complements anecdotes by lowering psychological defenses and enhancing message retention through associative linkages that exploit pattern recognition in human cognition. Rhetorical humor in political discourse often employs self-deprecation or irony to humanize the speaker, creating affective bonds that sustain attention amid informational overload.^[35] Repetition of signature phrases reinforces thematic consistency, capitalizing on the primacy of recency effects in memory consolidation to embed ideas despite environmental distractions like crowd noise or media fragmentation. Ronald Reagan, for instance, iteratively invoked variations of "government is the problem" across 1982 campaign events, embedding anti-regulatory causality in listeners' recall frameworks.^[36]^[37] Delivery adapts to contextual demands, with amplified vocal dynamics and gestural emphasis in rally settings to synchronize collective arousal, versus subdued pacing and direct eye contact in town halls to mirror interpersonal reciprocity. Empirical analyses of over 100 U.S. presidential campaign speeches demonstrate that deviations in prosody—such as pitch variance and tempo—modulate perceived authenticity and emotional congruence, thereby channeling audience focus toward intended causal narratives.^[38]

Usage in Campaigns

Primary Role in U.S. Political Campaigns

Stump speeches constitute the tactical core of U.S. political campaigns, enabling candidates to repeatedly articulate their platform through direct, unfiltered interaction with voters at rallies, town halls, and other events. This format allows for mass repetition of key messages, fostering familiarity and enthusiasm among supporters while adapting minimally to local contexts. In primaries and general elections, candidates deliver hundreds of such speeches to build momentum, with schedules intensifying in swing states where electoral margins are narrow. For instance, in the 2024 cycle, the major-party presidential and vice-presidential candidates collectively conducted 261 in-person events from their conventions through Election Day, many centered on stump-style addresses.^[39] A primary function is circumventing intermediary media channels, which often apply skeptical or adversarial framing to conservative or populist rhetoric. By speaking directly to audiences, candidates like Donald Trump in 2016 and 2024 conveyed narratives—such as economic nationalism or immigration enforcement—without editorial dilution, appealing to bases skeptical of institutional press credibility. This unmediated approach mobilizes attendees who may distrust filtered reporting, as evidenced by analyses of rally dynamics emphasizing direct appeals to "the people" over elite gatekeepers.^[40] Empirical studies affirm a causal connection between stump speech events and voter behavior, particularly turnout among core supporters. Research examining presidential rallies from 2008 to 2016 found that Trump's 2016 appearances increased turnout intentions by 5.1 percentage points overall, rising to 10 percentage points among strong Republicans, with effects concentrated in swing states and persisting briefly post-event to aid base mobilization. Similar patterns held for late-cycle events boosting total votes, underscoring stump speeches' role in converting enthusiasm into ballots rather than persuading undecideds.^[28] These dynamics highlight the speeches' irreplaceable value in high-stakes races, where digital alternatives cannot replicate live crowd energy for grassroots activation.

Adaptations and Equivalents in Other Countries

In the United Kingdom, the term "hustings" refers to public meetings or speeches where candidates address voters during election campaigns, serving as a functional equivalent to the American stump speech, though often more formalized and tied to local constituency events rather than extensive national tours.^[41] These gatherings emphasize direct interaction but occur within a shorter campaign period, typically two to six weeks, constrained by parliamentary election laws that limit overall spending and duration compared to U.S. practices.^[42] Parliamentary systems in countries like Canada and Australia feature leader-led campaign tours with repeated speeches akin to stumping, yet these prioritize party platforms and legislative achievements over individualized personal stories, reflecting fusion of executive and legislative powers where voter choice centers on parliamentarians rather than a separate executive head. In Canada, for instance, prime ministerial candidates deliver "stump speeches" at rallies, but these integrate critiques of the opponent's record in office, as seen in Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's 2025 addresses focusing on policy reversals rather than biographical appeals.^[43] Australian campaigns similarly involve oratory in everyday settings to connect with voters, but empirical analyses show less standardization due to preferential voting systems that reward coalition-building over solo candidate charisma.^[44] In India, equivalents manifest as large-scale rally harangues by party leaders, mobilizing masses through repetitive messaging on regional grievances or national development, but these lack the U.S. stump's scripted consistency, often escalating into inflammatory rhetoric amid weaker regulatory enforcement on campaign speech. Such events, drawing tens of thousands, contrast with democratic norms by frequently incorporating divisive appeals, as documented in Election Commission notices against major parties during the 2024 general election for violations involving communal targeting.^[45] Party-centric structures further dilute individual candidate focus, with rallies serving hierarchical mobilization rather than grassroots persuasion. Authoritarian regimes exhibit few genuine equivalents, as direct, unscripted public oratory is curtailed by state control over media and assembly, prioritizing regime propaganda over competitive voter outreach; for example, opposition figures face suppression of free speech, limiting analogous campaigning to controlled state broadcasts that echo ruling narratives without genuine contestation.^[46] This contrasts with open democratic environments, where legal protections enable iterative, candidate-driven rhetoric, though data from global indices show authoritarian contexts correlating with higher censorship of political expression during electoral periods.^[47]

Notable Examples and Impact

Iconic U.S. Stump Speeches

The Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858 represented proto-stump speeches through their series of public, fact-intensive confrontations on the expansion of slavery, held across seven Illinois venues from August 21 to October 15. Abraham Lincoln challenged Stephen Douglas's support for popular sovereignty under the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, arguing it morally equated to endorsing slavery's growth. Douglas defended territorial self-determination while accusing Lincoln of abolitionism. Despite Douglas securing reelection to the Senate with 53.4% of the vote on January 5, 1859, Lincoln's performances garnered national attention, facilitating his Republican presidential nomination on May 18, 1860, and victory in the November election.^[48]^[49]^[50] Ronald Reagan's 1980 campaign stump speeches prominently featured the refrain "Are you better off than you were four years ago?", deployed to highlight economic malaise under Jimmy Carter, including stagflation with inflation peaking at 13.5% in 1980 and unemployment averaging 7.1% that year. Reagan contrasted this with his proposals for supply-side tax reductions and reduced regulation to spur growth, framing the question as a direct empirical assessment of incumbent performance. The line, originating in rally addresses and amplified in the October 28 debate, resonated amid GDP contraction of 0.3% in 1980, aiding Reagan's capture of 50.7% of the popular vote on November 4.^[51]^[52]^[53] Donald Trump's 2016 stump speeches, delivered in rally formats averaging over 10,000 attendees per event, centered on the "Make America Great Again" slogan while stressing immigration enforcement via border security and trade renegotiations to address deficits exceeding $500 billion annually with China. These addresses critiqued open borders contributing to wage suppression and unfair deals eroding manufacturing jobs, lost at 5 million since 2000. Polling data showed Trump leading by 20-30 points among voters prioritizing immigration reduction, correlating with his wins in Rust Belt states where trade concerns prevailed, securing 304 electoral votes on November 8.^[54]^[55]^[56]^[57]

Influence on Voter Perception and Election Outcomes

Stump speeches, through their repetitive emphasis on core themes, contribute to shaping voter perceptions by reinforcing candidate branding and issue associations, thereby enhancing recall among audiences exposed to multiple iterations. Empirical analyses of campaign rhetoric indicate that consistent messaging in such speeches fosters stronger partisan identification and emotional engagement, particularly when delivered in person, as opposed to mediated formats. For instance, Barack Obama's frequent invocation of "Hope and Change" across 2008 stump speeches aligned with heightened youth voter enthusiasm, correlating with a youth turnout rate of approximately 51%—the highest in over a decade—and 66% support for Obama among those under 30, compared to 48% in 2004.^[58] ^[59] This mobilization effect stemmed from direct appeals that resonated with demographic groups historically underrepresented in voting, demonstrating how rhetorical repetition can prime perceptual frames favoring the candidate's narrative over competing media interpretations. Quantitative studies further link intensive stumping to measurable shifts in election outcomes, particularly in battleground contexts where marginal gains prove decisive. A National Bureau of Economic Research analysis of presidential rallies—including stump speeches—from 2008 to 2016 found that Donald Trump's 2016 appearances in swing states boosted his vote intention by 4.3 to 8.7 percentage points among Republicans and increased actual Republican vote shares by up to 6.9% in proximate media markets, alongside a 6% rise in total turnout.^[40] These effects, while short-lived (typically under a week), were localized but amplified in close races, underscoring causal pathways from speech delivery to behavioral changes like heightened turnout among partisans. Similar patterns emerge in earlier cycles, where candidate visits yielded small but statistically significant vote share uplifts of 1-2% in targeted states, per models accounting for endogeneity in appearance scheduling.^[60] In cases of polling discrepancies, stump speeches via rallies have evidenced their utility in countering potentially biased or incomplete mediated narratives by directly mobilizing latent support. During the 2016 election, Trump's extensive stumping generated rally attendances far exceeding poll-implied enthusiasm, which underestimated his support due to nonresponse biases among his base; post-hoc analyses revealed that this direct engagement helped turn out voters overlooked by surveys, contributing to narrow victories in states like Michigan and Pennsylvania where margins hovered below 1%.^[61] ^[62] Such outcomes highlight how unfiltered speech delivery can validate perceptual realities diverging from mainstream polling aggregates, often influenced by institutional sampling limitations, thereby influencing final tallies through base consolidation rather than broad persuasion.^[40]

Effectiveness, Criticisms, and Debates

Empirical Evidence of Effectiveness

Empirical analyses of presidential campaign appearances, including stump speeches and rallies, indicate modest but positive effects on voter mobilization. A study examining rallies by Donald Trump and other candidates from 2008 onward found that such events increased the hosting candidate's county-level vote share by approximately 1-3 percentage points and boosted turnout among core supporters, with effects persisting into subsequent elections like 2020.^[40] These outcomes stem from direct enthusiasm generation, as geocoded voter data revealed heightened participation in rally vicinities without relying on mediated channels like media amplification.^[40] Historical precedents underscore similar mobilization gains from personal appeals. The 1840 William Henry Harrison campaign, featuring widespread stump speaking and mass gatherings, coincided with a voter turnout rate of 80.2 percent—the highest in U.S. presidential history at the time—driven by novel direct engagement tactics that expanded participation beyond urban elites.^[63] This surge reflects causal mechanisms like localized persuasion and social proof, unfiltered by intermediaries, though attribution is confounded by concurrent innovations such as party organization.^[63] In terms of resource allocation, stump speeches demonstrate cost advantages over advertising. Television and digital ads exert negligible influence on vote choice, with experimental exposure yielding shifts under 0.5 percentage points even in high-volume battleground contexts.^[64] ^[65] Personal appearances, by contrast, incur lower marginal costs per event—often leveraging volunteer logistics—and yield measurable returns in base activation and recruitment, as evidenced by elevated volunteer mobilization in rally-heavy cycles like 2020, where direct candidate interaction correlated with sustained grassroots efforts.^[40] Recent cycles affirm high returns in volunteer generation. Data from 2020 and 2024 organizing efforts highlight rallies as efficient conduits for converting attendee enthusiasm into field operations, with campaigns reporting amplified door-knocking and phone-banking outputs post-event, outperforming ad-driven appeals in fostering sustained commitment.^[66] This edge arises from unscripted, observable candidate resolve, enabling voters to assess traits like fiscal discipline through live scrutiny, though effects remain confined to persuadable subsets rather than broad persuasion.^[40]

Criticisms Regarding Authenticity and Manipulation

Critics argue that the formulaic repetition inherent in stump speeches undermines their authenticity, as audiences perceive rehearsed anecdotes and phrases as contrived rather than spontaneous. A 2019 empirical study in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology demonstrated that self-repetition in narratives reduces observer ratings of performer genuineness, with participants viewing repeated stories as less sincere across multiple exposures, a dynamic applicable to politicians recycling core messages at numerous events.^[67] This critique posits that such scripting prioritizes rote delivery over genuine engagement, potentially alienating discerning voters who value unfiltered candor. Despite these perceptions, research on rhetorical devices shows moderate repetition bolsters persuasion by enhancing retention and credibility, as messages repeated three times garnered higher trust scores than novel or over-repeated ones in experimental settings with political statements.^[68] Detractors counter that this effectiveness stems from manipulative reinforcement rather than truth, allowing speakers to embed simplified narratives without scrutiny, though audience testing via repeated exposure often reveals discernment of unsubstantiated claims over time. Stump speeches face accusations of enabling distortion through oversimplification and emotional appeals, risking demagoguery by framing opponents in stark, unnuanced terms to rally bases. For instance, during Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, mainstream media outlets characterized his rallies and speeches as "dark and divisive," emphasizing inflammatory rhetoric over policy details like trade protectionism.^[69] Such portrayals, however, reflect systemic biases in journalistic institutions, where coverage of Trump was 91% negative according to a Harvard Kennedy School analysis of major outlets' 2016 election reporting, often amplifying flaws in conservative messaging while minimizing equivalent tactics from opponents.^[70] This selective amplification ignores empirical voter resonance with conservative themes, as evidenced by Trump's victory in key states where stump speech emphases on immigration and economic displacement correlated with shifts in working-class support, per post-election polling data.^[71] Critics from right-leaning perspectives contend that mainstream dismissal of these elements as manipulative overlooks their role in highlighting policy inconsistencies, such as unaddressed wage stagnation, fostering a realism that counters elite narratives rather than mere distortion. Yet, the format's potential for unchecked repetition raises valid concerns about entrenching partial truths, particularly when media echo chambers reinforce partisan interpretations without balanced fact-checking.

References

[1]
Stump Speech - Political Dictionary
A stump speech is a speech that a politician makes again and again as they travel to different places during a campaign.
[2]
Definition of Stump Speech - ThoughtCo
May 11, 2025 · The term stump speech became popular in the early 1800s and referred to a style of raucous political speech found along the frontier.
[3]
Stump speech - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
### Etymology Entry for "Stump Speech"
[4]
The Reason Why Some Political Addresses Are Called “Stump ...
Aug 6, 2024 · Every election season, U.S. presidential candidates hit the campaign trail to deliver what's known as a stump speech. So what exactly is it, ...
[5]
The Early American Origins of Political Terms - JSTOR Daily
Oct 27, 2014 · What does stump speech and pork barrel mean? A short lexicon of American political terms.
[6]
Stump Speeches - National Museum of American History
Stump speaking is often a major part of a president's re-election campaign. In 1948, on a train called the Presidential Special, Harry Truman took to the rails.
[7]
Stump speeches – Trail to the Voting Booth - Online Exhibitions
The stump speech is one of the oldest methods of direct campaigning in U.S. politics. In the early days of the Republic, political candidates would address ...Missing: term origin history<|separator|>
[8]
The Grammarphobia Blog: Are you stumped?
Jan 16, 2023 · Q: What is the origin of the term “stump” in the political sense? (X stumps for Candidate Y; Z gives a stump speech.) A: The short answer is ...
[9]
The Reason Why Some Political Addresses Are Called “Stump Speeches”
### Summary of "Stump Speech" Origin
[10]
The Expansion of Democracy during the Jacksonian Era
... Stump Speaking reflect changes that occurred in American politics between the 1820s and 1850s? If you want to bring the discussion into the twentieth century ...Missing: frontier | Show results with:frontier
[11]
The Presidential Candidate, Then and Now
The style of campaigning for president has changed from reticence in the 19th century to enthusiastic public stumping in the 20th century.
[12]
The Early History of U.S. Presidential Campaigns — History is Now ...
Parades, rallies, and stump speeches by surrogates were followed on Election Day by voter drives in taverns and on the streets. Partisan newspapers were another ...<|separator|>
[13]
Voter Participation in Presidential Elections, 1824–1928 - InfoPlease
For voter participation 1930–1996, see Participation in Elections for President and U.S. Representatives, 1930–1996Year% Voter ...
[14]
The Election of 1840 - Martin Van Buren National Historic Site (U.S. ...
Dec 16, 2020 · The 1840 Presidential Election in the United States represented a major shift in political campaigns. Whig Party candidate William Henry ...Missing: stump | Show results with:stump
[15]
Andrew Jackson: The American Franchise | Miller Center
The party that Andrew Jackson founded during his presidency called itself the American Democracy. In those same years, changes in electoral rules and campaign ...
[16]
Railroads in the Late 19th Century - Library of Congress
By 1900, much of the nation's railroad system was in place. The railroad opened the way for the settlement of the West, provided new economic opportunities.Missing: stump speaking
[17]
Peoria Speech, October 16, 1854 - Lincoln Home National Historic ...
Apr 10, 2015 · In this speech Abraham Lincoln explained his objections to the Kansas-Nebraska Act and resurrected his political career.
[18]
Cooper Union Address - Abraham Lincoln Online
The carefully crafted speech examined the views of the 39 signers of the Constitution. Lincoln noted that at least 21 of them -- a majority -- believed Congress ...Missing: proliferation 19th
[19]
Elections from 1876 to 1920 | Virginia Museum of History & Culture
Almost 78 percent of eligible voters cast their ballot in 1880. The election was close with Garfield receiving the electoral vote by 214 to 143, despite getting ...<|separator|>
[20]
Bygone Muncie Gilded Age politics Frederick Douglass's 2nd visit
Sep 11, 2020 · In 1880, the abolitionist, editor, and orator Frederick Douglass stopped in Muncie on Sept. 8 to stump for James Garfield and Indiana's Republican candidate ...
[21]
Grover Cleveland: Campaigns and Elections - Miller Center
Grover Cleveland carried four advantages into the 1884 presidential campaign. First, his battles with Tammany Hall had won the support of middle-class voters ...Missing: stump | Show results with:stump
[22]
Warren G. Harding becomes the first president to be heard on the ...
On May 30, 1922, President Warren G. Harding becomes the first president to have his voice transmitted by radio while addressing a crowd at the dedication ...
[23]
The Presidency in the Television Era | Miller Center
The 1952 election marked the first time that presidential candidates turned to television to communicate their message to voters.
[24]
September 26, 1960 Debate Transcript - CPD
September 26, 1960. The First Kennedy-Nixon Presidential Debate. HOWARD K. SMITH, MODERATOR: Good evening. The television and radio stations of the United ...
[25]
Major Pre-Presidential Speeches, 1964-1980 | Ronald Reagan
For text of the Presidential Speeches, click on the title of the speech. Click on 'Downloadable mp4' to view Ronald Reagan giving a specific speech.
[26]
1980 | The American Presidency Project
Electoral Vote, Popular Vote. Presidential, Vice Presidential. Republican, election party winner, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, 489, 90.9%, 43,904,153, 50.7%.
[27]
Inside Donald Trump's Stump Speech, Annotated - NPR
Sep 15, 2016 · In his stump speech, Donald Trump brings the energy and spends a lot of time talking about core issues like illegal immigration and trade as ...
[28]
The Effects of Presidential Campaign Rallies on Voter Behavior ...
Oct 29, 2020 · ... rallies. We do this by studying the effect of campaign rallies held by Donald Trump and other U.S. Presidential candidates since 2008. To ...
[29]
Stump Speech: The Ultimate Speechwriting Guide
Jan 2, 2020 · Stump speech writing is an art. Writing a persuasive campaign speech is a way for campaigns to articulate a contrastive message, ...
[30]
The effects of repetition frequency on the illusory truth effect - NIH
May 13, 2021 · Repeated information is often perceived as more truthful than new information. This finding is known as the illusory truth effect.
[31]
Anatomy of a Stump Speech
### Summary of Common Elements of Stump Speeches
[32]
The 20-Minute Rule for Great Public Speaking — On Attention ...
Apr 11, 2016 · It is true that audience attention spans aren't necessarily great. In fact, the average attention span among people who listen to speeches ...Missing: stump political rallies
[33]
[PDF] The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives
Transportation was proposed as a mechanism whereby narratives can affect beliefs. Defined as absorp- tion into a story, transportation entails ...
[34]
Narrative transportation: How stories shape how we see ourselves ...
Narrative transportation is an experience in which all of one's mental processes (i.e., attention, emotion, and imagery) are concentrated on the events ...
[35]
[PDF] a theory of rhetorical humor in american political discourse - DRUM
He did not laugh when I told him on my first day in grad school that I wanted to write a dissertation about humor. Gaines possess a powerful intellect that made ...
[36]
Remarks and a Question-and-Answer Session via Satellite to ...
Oct 14, 1982 · And they can't see that over these past decades, government is not the answer to the problems; government is the problem. So, this election is ...Missing: stump repetition
[37]
Inaugural Address (1981) - Teaching American History
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From time to time we've been tempted to believe that ...Missing: stump repetition
[38]
How Tone of Voice and Delivery Shape Presidential Campaigns
Sep 17, 2024 · Knox and his co-authors pored over 100 U.S. presidential campaign speeches to understand the impact of these non-verbal cues. Their findings ...
[39]
Presidential campaign events in 2024 - FairVote
Oct 31, 2024 · FairVote tracked every event featuring the Democratic and Republican candidates for president and vice president between the party conventions and Election Day.
[40]
[PDF] The Effects of Presidential Campaign Rallies on Voter Behavior ...
Oct 1, 2020 · We do this by studying the effect of campaign rallies held by. Donald Trump and other U.S. Presidential candidates since 2008. To measure the ...
[41]
A.Word.A.Day--hustings - Wordsmith.org
Hustings is the British equivalent of the US word stump. Originally, campaigning politicians conveniently used the stump of a large tree to stand on and to ...
[42]
hustings and stumping - Separated by a Common Language
I've heard the word husting(s) at previous British election times, but this time felt the need to look it up. Wikipedia tells me: A husting (called a stump in ...
[43]
Canada election 2015: What exactly is a 'stump' speech? | CBC News
and why they matter so much in a federal election campaign.
[44]
On the Stump: Campaign Oratory and Democracy in the United ...
giving speeches to ordinary voters in everyday language and settings — is an established feature of modern democracy.
[45]
Full article: Campaign rallies and political meaning-making
Aug 21, 2023 · Election campaign rallies are hubs of activity. In the crowd, hawkers sell refreshments, activists shepherd attendees and security form ...
[46]
Quigley Delivers Floor Speech on Rise of Authoritarianism
Nov 4, 2021 · ... and immigrant communities; and suppression of free speech, a free media, and political opposition. Despite Orban's assault on global democratic ...
[47]
Dangerous Speech in 2023
Dec 22, 2023 · Dangerous speech flourished in 2023, stoked by wars (political and cultural) and vocal authoritarian leaders around the world.
[48]
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates 1st Debate - Teaching American History
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 helped boost Lincoln's nationwide name recognition and foreshadowed the presidential election of 1860, in which both men ran ...
[49]
Abraham Lincoln to Stephen A. Douglas, 29 July 1858
While the immediate effect of the debates was the reelection of Douglas, the long-term results were the opposite. Lincoln was catapulted to national prominence, ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
[50]
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates and the Campaign of 1860
Douglas agreed to an unprecedented series of debates held in towns across Illinois focusing on the issue of slavery. Although Douglas was re-elected, Lincoln ...
[51]
29. The Triumph of the Right | THE AMERICAN YAWP
Jun 7, 2013 · Reagan did so during their only debate by appearing calm and amiable. “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” he asked the ...
[52]
Is The 'Better Off' Question The Right One? : NPR
Are you better off than you were four years ago? That's the question first posed by Ronald Reagan in 1980, and one that Republicans are again using as one ...
[53]
[PDF] Fiscal Policy, Monetary Policy, and the Carter Presidency
Unemployment, which had fallen through- out the Carter years from 6.9 percent in 1977 to 5.8 percent in 1979, rose sharply in. 1980 to 7 percent. While ...
[54]
Donald Trump's size fixation - POLITICO
Sep 25, 2015 · He's obsessed with his crowds. It's a sign of an unfiltered candidate focused on the most conspicuous indicators of success.
[55]
Donald Trump breathes fire in immigration speech - BBC News
Sep 1, 2016 · Mr Trump eschewed calls for moderation and modulation, and instead delivered - no, shouted - the kind of red-meat populist stemwinder that powered him through ...<|separator|>
[56]
Immigration Policy Opinion and the 2016 Presidential Vote
Dec 4, 2017 · The polarization of immigration along party lines is not something that began with the 2016 election cycle, nor with Trump's announcement ...
[57]
Trump Paradox: How Immigration and Trade Affected White Voting ...
Apr 29, 2021 · Anti-immigrant Attitudes and Racial Resentments. An alternative to the economic interests explanation for Trump's support is arguments for the ...
[58]
Young Voters in the 2008 Election | Pew Research Center
Nov 13, 2008 · 66% of those under age 30 voted for Barack Obama making the disparity between young voters and other age groups larger than in any presidential election since ...
[59]
Obama Draws Record Number Young People - NPR
Jan 4, 2008 · Illinois Sen. Barack Obama won the Democratic caucus in Iowa Thursday night in large part because of the support of young people.
[60]
The Impact of State Campaign Appearances in Presidential Elections
PDF | Travel, stump speeches, and pressing-the-flesh make up a large part of any presidential electoral campaign. Obviously, candidates feel that their.
[61]
Why 2016 election polls missed their mark | Pew Research Center
Nov 9, 2016 · Supporters of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton watch televised coverage of the U.S. presidential election at Comet Tavern in the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[62]
What went wrong with polls in 2016? Can we trust them now?
Nov 3, 2020 · National polls showed his opponent, Hillary Clinton, leading the race up until the election. Even the Clinton campaign was confident she would win.
[63]
William Harrison: The American Franchise | Miller Center
The election of 1840 solidified many of the factors Andrew Jackson had introduced into the electoral equation: politics as entertainment, the emerging ...
[64]
Political ads have little persuasive power | Yale News
Sep 2, 2020 · In a new Yale co-led study focusing the 2016 presidential campaign, television ads were found to have virtually no influence on how people ...
[65]
The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of ... - NIH
Sep 2, 2020 · To evaluate heterogeneity, we repeated an experiment weekly in real time using 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign advertisements. We ...
[66]
Biden team launches organizing pilot project in Wisconsin and Arizona
Oct 13, 2023 · The 2024 reelection effort is focused on recruiting large numbers of volunteers to use their own relationships to spread the Biden message ...Missing: rally | Show results with:rally<|control11|><|separator|>
[67]
Twice-told Tales: Self-repetition Decreases Observer Assessments ...
People often engage in self-repetition-repeating the same story, joke, or presentation across different audiences. While behaving consistently has generally ...
[68]
Effects of Message Repetition and Negativity on Credibility ...
This study investigates whether message negativity contributes to this boomerang effect and whether the interaction of credibility and negativity influences ...Missing: empirical effectiveness speeches retention
[69]
Trump's 'dark and divisive' rhetoric energizes base but risks losing ...
Jul 6, 2020 · President Donald Trump continued his divisive political strategy on Monday, raising new questions about whether it would work as polls showed him falling ...
[70]
News Coverage of the 2016 General Election: How the Press Failed ...
Dec 7, 2016 · A new report from Harvard Kennedy School's Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy analyzes news coverage during the 2016 ...
[71]
Two views on media coverage of 2016 - Brookings Institution
Aug 29, 2016 · Whether it's the free advertising at every newspaper, cable news channel and news-oriented blog credited with propelling Donald Trump; whether ...