Substance of very high concern
Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) are chemical substances identified under Article 57 of the European Union's REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 as having the potential to cause serious and often irreversible effects on human health or the environment.[1] These include substances classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic for reproduction (CMR) in categories 1A or 1B according to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation; persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) substances; very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB) substances; or other substances presenting an equivalent level of concern due to their intrinsic properties.[2] The identification of SVHCs is managed by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), which maintains the Candidate List of such substances following a proposal, dossier evaluation, and public consultation process.[3] Inclusion on the Candidate List imposes obligations on manufacturers, importers, and suppliers, such as notifying ECHA if SVHCs are present in articles above 0.1% weight by weight and providing information to recipients or consumers upon request.[4] Prioritized SVHCs may advance to the Authorisation List (Annex XIV of REACH), where their intentional use requires explicit authorization from the European Commission after demonstrating adequate control, socio-economic benefits outweighing risks, and no suitable alternatives.[3] This mechanism aims to ensure progressive substitution with safer alternatives while allowing continued use under strict conditions until review dates.[5] SVHC designation under REACH, effective since 2007, reflects a precautionary approach to chemical management, prioritizing empirical hazard data over mere exposure assumptions to mitigate long-term causal risks from bioaccumulation or genotoxicity.[6] As of recent updates, the Candidate List comprises over 200 substances, spanning industrial chemicals, flame retardants, and phthalates, with ongoing additions based on scientific evidence from peer-reviewed studies and regulatory assessments.[7] The process has spurred innovation in chemical substitution but also generated debate over regulatory burdens on industry, though empirical evaluations confirm its role in reducing identified high-risk exposures without broad evidence of systemic economic distortion.[8]
Legal and Historical Context
Origins in REACH Regulation
The concept of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) originated within the European Union's REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, adopted by the European Parliament and Council on 18 December 2006 and entering into force on 1 June 2007.[9][10] REACH established a comprehensive framework for registering, evaluating, authorizing, and restricting chemicals to protect human health and the environment while promoting chemical innovation, addressing gaps in prior directives by placing the burden on industry to prove safety.[6] The SVHC mechanism forms the core of REACH's authorization process under Title VII, targeting substances with the most severe and often irreversible risks, such as carcinogenicity or environmental persistence, to enable their phase-out or controlled use through substitution with safer alternatives.[1] Article 57 of REACH defines SVHC criteria, encompassing substances classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic, or reprotoxic (CMR) in category 1A or 1B under harmonized classifications; persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) substances; very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB) substances; or those of equivalent concern due to serious effects not adequately captured by other criteria, as determined by the European Commission.[11][12] This provision empowered Member States Competent Authorities or the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)—created by REACH to administer the regulation—to propose identifications via dossiers under Annex XV, subject to public consultation and review by the Member State Committee.[1] The framework's intent was causal risk management: SVHCs on the Candidate List trigger immediate obligations like supply chain notifications under Article 33, with potential advancement to Annex XIV for mandatory authorization, requiring applicants to demonstrate adequate risk control or societal necessity outweighing hazards.[6] Implementation began promptly after REACH's entry into force, with ECHA publishing the inaugural Candidate List on 28 October 2008, comprising 15 SVHCs such as 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene (musk xylene) and hexabromocyclododecane, selected for properties like PBT or vPvB based on available data.[13] This list has since expanded biannually through evidence-based proposals, reflecting REACH's adaptive evolution to incorporate emerging scientific assessments, though critics from industry sectors have noted the process's reliance on precautionary identifications that may overestimate risks absent full causal data.[7] The SVHC origins thus mark a paradigm shift from reactive to proactive chemical regulation, prioritizing empirical hazard evidence over mere exposure assumptions.[1]Evolution and Key Milestones
The concept of substances of very high concern (SVHCs) evolved from the foundational framework established in the REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, which entered into force on 1 June 2007 and tasked the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) with identifying chemicals posing severe risks to human health or the environment. Initial efforts focused on substances meeting criteria under Article 57, such as carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, reproductive toxicity (CMR categories 1A or 1B), persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity (PBT/vPvB), or equivalent concern.[1] The first Candidate List of SVHCs was published by ECHA on 28 October 2008, containing 15 substances, marking the operational start of the SVHC identification process and triggering supply chain notification duties under REACH Article 33.[13] Subsequent updates occurred approximately biannually, expanding the list through Member State proposals, public consultations, and Member State Committee consensus, with progressive inclusions reflecting growing scientific evidence on hazards like endocrine disruption.[14] A pivotal advancement came on 21 February 2011, when the first six SVHCs—5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene (musk xylene), 4,4'-diaminodiphenylmethane (MDA), hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD), bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), and dibutyl phthalate (DBP)—were added to REACH Annex XIV, initiating the authorisation regime requiring applicants to prove safe use or socio-economic benefits outweighing risks.[15] In 2013, ECHA introduced the SVHC Roadmap to 2020, a collaborative initiative with Member States and the European Commission to systematically prioritize and identify SVHCs from high-tonnage chemicals, dispersively used substances, and those in consumer articles, aiming to include all relevant known SVHCs in the Candidate List by 2020.[16] The Roadmap accelerated listings by targeting specific substance groups, such as polymers and siloxanes, and integrating risk management options analysis, resulting in over 100 additions during its tenure and enhanced transparency via annual progress reports.[17] Post-2020, the framework extended its scope with ongoing emphases on emerging concerns like non-threshold endocrine disruptors and nanomaterials, evidenced by continued biannual updates and refined dossier requirements to address scientific uncertainties while maintaining rigorous evidence-based identification.[16] By October 2025, the Candidate List had reached 250 substances, underscoring the iterative evolution toward comprehensive risk mitigation without halting chemical innovation.[18]Definition and Criteria
Intrinsic Properties Defining SVHC
Substances of very high concern (SVHC) are defined under Article 57 of the REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 by specific intrinsic properties that indicate severe, often irreversible risks to human health or the environment. These properties encompass three primary categories: carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or toxicity to reproduction (CMR); persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity (PBT); and very high persistence and bioaccumulation (vPvB).[1] These criteria focus on inherent chemical characteristics assessed through standardized testing and classification protocols, independent of exposure scenarios or use conditions.[3] The CMR category includes substances classified as carcinogenic (causing cancer), mutagenic (damaging genetic material), or reprotoxic (impairing fertility or fetal development) in Category 1A or 1B under the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Category 1A denotes known effects in humans based on epidemiological data or compelling animal evidence, while 1B relies on sufficient animal data or other strong evidence.[1] Harmonized classifications under CLP are established by the European Commission via Annex VI, with over 200 substances listed as CMR 1A/1B as of 2025, though self-classifications by notifiers can also trigger SVHC identification if substantiated. PBT substances meet all three criteria outlined in Annex XIII of REACH: persistence (P), indicated by slow environmental degradation (e.g., half-life exceeding 60 days in marine water, 180 days in soil); bioaccumulation (B), measured by bioconcentration factor (BCF) greater than 500 in aquatic organisms or high octanol-water partition coefficient (log Kow > 4.5); and toxicity (T), evidenced by acute or chronic aquatic toxicity thresholds (e.g., EC50 or NOEC < 0.01 mg/L) or CMR classification.[1] These properties lead to long-term accumulation in ecosystems and food chains, amplifying risks even at low release levels; as of 2025, fewer than 20 PBT substances are on the SVHC Candidate List due to stringent assessment requirements.[7] vPvB substances exhibit extreme persistence and bioaccumulation, with thresholds in Annex XIII stricter than PBT: degradation half-life >60 days across multiple compartments for very persistent (vP), and BCF >5,000 or equivalent for very bioaccumulative (vB).[1] Toxicity is presumed for vPvB due to their inherent potential for widespread, irreversible environmental contamination, as seen in substances like decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE), listed in 2012 for these traits despite debates over degradation pathways.[7] Identification relies on experimental data or quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) models when testing is infeasible, ensuring focus on causal mechanisms of harm rather than probabilistic modeling alone.[19]Equivalent Level of Concern Category
The equivalent level of concern (ELoC) category under the REACH regulation refers to substances identified pursuant to Article 57(f), which applies to chemicals for which there is scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment, giving rise to an equivalent level of concern to those meeting the criteria in Article 57(a)-(e), such as carcinogens, mutagens, reprotoxics (CMRs), persistent bioaccumulative toxics (PBTs), or very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB) substances.[3] This provision enables the inclusion of substances with hazards not captured by predefined thresholds, such as endocrine-disrupting properties or other mechanisms causing widespread, non-threshold effects comparable in severity to CMRs or PBT/vPvB risks.[1][19] Identification under Article 57(f) requires a case-by-case evaluation, where proposers—typically EU Member States or the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)—must submit a dossier per Annex XV demonstrating equivalence through weight-of-evidence analysis, including data on hazard profiles, exposure potential, and risk management feasibility.[3] Unlike CMR or PBT/vPvB categories, no fixed quantitative criteria exist; instead, equivalence is argued based on scientific plausibility of serious, irreversible effects, often drawing analogies to benchmark hazards like those of known CMRs, with considerations for persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity potency, and societal impacts.[1][19] For instance, endocrine disruptors may qualify if evidence shows interference with hormonal systems leading to developmental or reproductive harms akin to reprotoxicants, even absent formal CMR classification.[3][20] The ELoC process involves public consultation for at least 45 days, followed by review by ECHA's Member State Committee (MSC), which seeks consensus on the substance's inclusion in the Candidate List; if no agreement, the issue may escalate to the European Commission.[3] As of October 2025, examples of substances identified under Article 57(f) include 4-tert-octylphenol (added January 2013 for environmental endocrine disruption), 1,4-dioxane (added June 2021 for probable serious human health effects), and certain perfluorinated compounds like ammonium perfluorohexanoate (added July 2022 for human health concerns), reflecting applications in areas such as surfactants, solvents, and coatings where alternatives are limited.[7][1] These identifications prioritize substances with diffuse exposure risks, underscoring the category's role in addressing uncertainties in long-term, low-dose toxicities not fitting rigid REACH thresholds.[19]Identification and Listing Process
Role of ECHA and Member States
The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) serves as the central coordinator for the identification of substances of very high concern (SVHCs) under the REACH Regulation, managing the Candidate List and facilitating the evaluation process. ECHA publishes proposals for SVHC identification on its website, conducts public consultations to gather stakeholder comments—typically lasting around 45 days—and responds to relevant feedback alongside the proposing entity. Following consultation, ECHA forwards the dossier and comments to the Member State Committee (MSC) for review, and upon consensus agreement that a substance meets SVHC criteria under Article 57 of REACH, ECHA adds it to the Candidate List.[1][21] EU Member States, through their Competent Authorities, play a primary role in initiating SVHC proposals by preparing detailed dossiers in accordance with Annex XV of REACH, which must demonstrate that the substance fulfills criteria such as carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, reproductive toxicity, persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity, or equivalent levels of concern. Member States submit these dossiers to ECHA during designated windows, such as February 1 or August 1 annually, and may respond to consultation comments to refine their case. The MSC, comprising representatives from all Member States, evaluates proposals by consensus, ensuring identification requires unanimous agreement among members that the SVHC properties are adequately substantiated.[1][21] This collaborative framework balances national expertise in chemical risk assessment with ECHA's administrative oversight, though consensus requirements can delay listings if disagreements arise over data sufficiency or hazard classification. Member States may also request ECHA to prepare dossiers on their behalf under specific Commission directives, enhancing efficiency for complex cases.[1]Procedure for Candidate List Updates
The procedure for updating the Candidate List under REACH is outlined in Article 59, which establishes a structured process for identifying substances meeting the criteria in Article 57 as substances of very high concern (SVHC).[22] Proposals to add a substance originate from Member State Competent Authorities or from the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), the latter acting at the request of the European Commission.[1] The proposer submits an Annex XV dossier containing detailed information on the substance's identity, intrinsic properties (such as carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, reproductive toxicity, persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity, or equivalent levels of concern), and justification for SVHC classification.[1] Upon receipt, ECHA publishes the proposed dossier on its website and opens a public consultation period, typically lasting 45 days, to solicit comments from stakeholders on the substance's chemical identity, hazardous properties, known uses, and potential risks to human health or the environment.[1] Comments must be submitted by the specified deadline (23:59 Helsinki time, Eastern European Time), and late submissions are not considered. ECHA reviews all timely comments, responds to them, and forwards relevant ones—along with the dossier—to the Member State Committee (MSC), a body comprising representatives from EU Member States.[1] The MSC then evaluates the proposal to determine if the substance qualifies as an SVHC, aiming for unanimous agreement within a defined timeframe, such as 30 days following the consultation phase.[22] If consensus is achieved, ECHA includes the substance in the Candidate List. In cases of disagreement among MSC members, the process escalates: ECHA may incorporate the MSC's non-unanimous opinion, or the European Commission may draft a formal proposal for decision under the comitology procedure per Article 133(3) of REACH, typically within three months.[22] ECHA's Executive Director holds authority to finalize the identification in practice when MSC consensus is absent, ensuring decisions are based on scientific evidence.[1] Once a substance is identified as an SVHC, ECHA publishes the updated Candidate List on its website without delay, triggering immediate supply chain obligations such as notification requirements for articles containing the substance above 0.1% weight by weight.[22] The process emphasizes transparency, with non-confidential comments made publicly available, though submitters may request confidentiality for business-sensitive information if justified. Updates to the list occur as proposals are processed, often resulting in additions one to two times per year, reflecting ongoing evaluations rather than a fixed schedule.[1]Recent Additions and Trends (2024-2025)
In 2024, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) conducted an unusually frequent three updates to the Candidate List of substances of very high concern (SVHC), adding a total of seven new entries. On January 23, five substances were included due to their persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) or very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB) properties, or respiratory sensitizing effects, bringing the total to 237.[23] The June 27 update added one substance, Bis(α,α-dimethylbenzyl) peroxide, classified for its explosive properties and equivalent level of concern, increasing the list to 241. A rare third update on November 7 incorporated triphenyl phosphate, a flame retardant used in plastics and textiles, due to its reproductive toxicity, elevating the total to 242.[24][25] Early 2025 saw continued expansion, with ECHA adding five new SVHCs on an unspecified January date, alongside one entry update, reaching 247 substances; these inclusions targeted chemicals with endocrine-disrupting or carcinogenic risks in consumer applications.[26] The June 25 update further added three substances—1,1,1,3,5,5,5-heptamethyl-3-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]trisiloxane and decamethyltetrasiloxane (both siloxanes with vPvB properties used in cosmetics and lubricants), and Reactive Brown 51 (a textile dye with mutagenic potential)—bringing the list to 250.[18][27] No further additions were recorded through October 2025, though public consultations for potential 33rd updates proposed additional candidates like n-hexane earlier in the year.[28] Trends from 2024-2025 reflect heightened ECHA focus on persistent organosilicon compounds, flame retardants, and industrial dyes, driven by evidence of long-term environmental accumulation and human health endpoints like reproductive and genetic damage, as substantiated in Member State Committee consensus dossiers.[29] The accelerated update cadence in 2024, including an off-schedule November addition, indicates procedural flexibility to address emerging hazard data amid supply chain notifications exceeding 25,000 for prior entries, underscoring causal links between SVHC persistence and bioaccumulation risks over precautionary expansions without direct empirical rebuttal.[30] This period's 13 net additions (excluding updates) represent about 5% list growth, prioritizing substances with verifiable intrinsic hazards over broader chemical classes, though critiques note potential overreach in equivalent concern designations lacking uniform quantitative thresholds.[31]Obligations and Consequences
Immediate Supply Chain Duties
Under the REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, inclusion of a substance on the Candidate List as a substance of very high concern (SVHC) triggers immediate communication obligations for suppliers along the supply chain, without requiring prior authorization or restriction. Suppliers of articles containing an SVHC in a concentration above 0.1% weight by weight (w/w) must provide recipients—such as downstream users or distributors—with sufficient information to enable safe handling, use, and disposal of the article. This includes details on the SVHC's identity, concentration, and safe use measures, ensuring that risks to human health and the environment are adequately managed from the point of listing.[6] For mixtures containing an SVHC above 0.1% w/w, suppliers are required to include the substance's name and classification in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) under Section 3, regardless of whether the mixture meets other notification thresholds. This duty applies immediately upon listing and persists unless the substance is removed or concentrations fall below the threshold. Distributors must pass on this information without delay, fostering transparency across professional supply chains. Failure to comply can result in enforcement actions by national authorities, including fines, though penalties vary by member state; for instance, Germany's Federal Environment Agency has issued guidance emphasizing proactive SDS updates post-listing. Consumer-facing obligations add a layer of downstream accountability: if an article contains an SVHC above 0.1% w/w and a consumer requests information within 45 days of supply, the supplier must disclose the SVHC's presence, safe use instructions, and waste management advice. This provision, effective since REACH's implementation in 2007, aims to empower end-users but has been critiqued for administrative burdens on small suppliers, as evidenced by a 2019 ECHA compliance check revealing only 60% adherence among sampled importers. No prior ECHA approval is needed for these communications, distinguishing them from authorization processes, though suppliers may notify ECHA voluntarily for listed SVHCs in articles exceeding one tonne per producer per year if destined for the EU market.[7] These duties incentivize early substitution but do not prohibit SVHC use, allowing continued market presence pending further regulatory steps. Empirical data from ECHA's 2023 reporting indicates over 5,000 notifications of SVHCs in articles since 2011, highlighting widespread implementation, though underreporting persists due to threshold ambiguities in complex supply chains.Pathways to Authorization or Restriction
Substances identified as SVHCs and added to the REACH Candidate List may proceed to the authorisation pathway by being recommended for inclusion in Annex XIV, where their manufacture, placing on the market, or use becomes subject to prior authorisation after a specified sunset date.[3] This pathway targets SVHCs to ensure risks are adequately controlled or phased out, with ECHA or a Member State proposing prioritisation based on criteria such as production volume exceeding 1 tonne per year, number of uses, availability of alternatives, and substitution progress.[3] The European Commission decides on inclusion following opinions from ECHA's Committees for Risk Assessment (RAC) and Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC), typically setting a review period of 12 years and transitional periods of 18 months to 5 years before the sunset date. Applications for authorisation must demonstrate that risks are controlled to a level as low as reasonably achievable, that socio-economic benefits outweigh risks, and include a substitution plan if alternatives exist; approvals are granted for specific uses and durations, often conditional on monitoring or R&D commitments.[32] Alternatively, SVHCs may enter the restriction pathway under Annex XVII if their risks cannot be adequately managed through other REACH processes, leading to prohibitions or conditions on manufacture, market placement, or use for specified applications.[33] Member States or ECHA initiate proposals, supported by a dossier evaluating risk, alternatives, and socio-economic impacts, which RAC and SEAC assess before forwarding opinions to the Commission.[33] The Commission adopts restrictions via comitology, with entry into force typically 18 months later unless specified otherwise, as seen in cases like perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) derivatives restricted from 4 July 2020 due to persistent bioaccumulative risks.[34] Unlike authorisation, restrictions apply broadly without individual applications, aiming for outright bans or limits (e.g., concentration thresholds below 0.1% in mixtures), and have been applied to over 1,300 entries in Annex XVII as of 2023, including SVHCs like certain phthalates in consumer articles.[34] The choice between pathways depends on use patterns: authorisation suits ongoing, controlled uses where substitution is feasible but not immediate, while restrictions target dispersive or uncontrolled exposures requiring uniform bans.[3] For instance, bisphenol A, identified as an SVHC in June 2017 for endocrine disruption, has faced restriction proposals for thermal paper uses since 2023, bypassing full authorisation due to widespread low-level exposure risks.[3] Both processes encourage innovation in safer alternatives, but authorisation imposes higher compliance burdens on applicants, with only 12 substances authorised as of 2024, reflecting stringent criteria.[35] Empirical data indicate restrictions often precede or parallel SVHC listing for urgent hazards, as with decaBDE restricted in electrical equipment from 2019 despite later SVHC status in 2023.[34]Compliance Costs and Enforcement
Compliance with SVHC obligations under REACH imposes direct costs on manufacturers, importers, and suppliers, primarily through requirements to identify, notify, and communicate the presence of listed substances exceeding 0.1% by weight in articles or mixtures. Verification typically involves supplier declarations, material inventories, and analytical testing, with package testing for up to 174 SVHCs costing around $995 per sample, scaling higher for complex products requiring multiple tests. Administrative burdens include notifying the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) within six months if annual production or import exceeds one tonne and SVHC concentration surpasses 0.1%, as well as informing downstream users and consumers upon request under Article 33. These tasks demand ongoing supply chain mapping and record-keeping, with costs amplified for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) due to limited resources for compliance software or legal expertise; broader REACH implementation, encompassing SVHC duties, totals approximately €2.5 billion annually across EU businesses. Substitution efforts, often prompted by candidate list inclusion, add further expenses if viable alternatives require reformulation or re-testing, though empirical data on isolated SVHC-driven substitution costs remains sparse. Enforcement of SVHC requirements falls to national competent authorities in EU Member States, coordinated via ECHA's Forum for Exchange of Information on Enforcement, which conducts targeted projects such as inspections of imported articles for SVHC reporting. Non-compliance, including failure to disclose SVHC presence or submit notifications, triggers administrative or criminal penalties that vary by jurisdiction; for example, Germany levies fines up to €50,000 for untimely SVHC information provision, while France imposes similar maximums, and some states allow up to €375,000 for registration-related infringements or imprisonment for gross negligence endangering health. EU-wide initiatives have uncovered persistent issues, with 35% of inspected safety data sheets non-compliant in recent checks and earlier projects finding 15% of chemicals lacking proper registration. Enforcement inconsistencies across Member States—stricter in nations like Germany and the Netherlands, laxer elsewhere—can undermine uniform application, though coordinated actions have increased inspections on high-risk imports since 2023.Composition of the Candidate List
Overview of Listed Substances
The Candidate List of substances of very high concern (SVHCs) under the EU REACH regulation identifies chemicals that meet specific criteria for potential serious and often irreversible effects on human health or the environment, as outlined in Article 57 of REACH.[1] These include substances classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic for reproduction (CMR) in Categories 1A or 1B under the CLP Regulation; persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) substances; very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB) substances; or those giving rise to an equivalent level of concern, such as endocrine disruptors affecting human health or the environment.[1] Identification relies on hazard properties rather than exposure or risk assessments, prioritizing intrinsic dangers like long-term persistence in ecosystems or genotoxicity.[1] As of June 2025, the Candidate List contains 250 entries, encompassing individual substances, groups of isomers, or mixtures proposed for prioritization under REACH authorization procedures.[18] Additions occur biannually following Member State Committee consensus, with the most recent update on June 25, 2025, incorporating three new entries, including bisphenol AF (CAS 1477-55-0) for reproductive toxicity and n-hexane (CAS 110-54-3) for equivalent concern due to neurotoxicity.[18] Earlier in 2025, five substances were added on January 21, reflecting ongoing evaluations of chemicals in widespread use, such as those in polymers, lubricants, and consumer goods.[7] The list's growth from 235 entries in late 2023 to 250 by mid-2025 indicates accelerating inclusions, driven by data from registrations and targeted assessments.[18] SVHCs span diverse chemical classes, including phthalates, flame retardants, heavy metal compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), often integral to industrial applications like electronics, textiles, and construction materials.[36] Reproductive toxicants represent a significant portion, alongside persistent environmental hazards; for instance, approximately 20-25% qualify under CMR criteria, while PBT/vPvB account for another substantial share due to their resistance to degradation and biomagnification potential.[1] Endocrine disruptors, added via the "equivalent concern" pathway since 2010 updates, comprise about 4-5% but have increased with expanded evidence requirements under Article 57(f).[1] Listing does not ban substances outright but triggers supply chain notifications for concentrations above 0.1% by weight in articles, emphasizing transparency over immediate prohibition.[7]Examples of Key SVHCs and Their Uses
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP, CAS No. 117-81-7), added to the Candidate List on 19 December 2010 due to its toxic effects on reproduction (category 1B), functions primarily as a plasticizer in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) to impart flexibility. It is incorporated at concentrations up to 40% in products including electrical cables, flooring, medical devices such as blood bags and tubing, and consumer goods like toys and packaging.[37] Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD, CAS No. 25637-99-4), included on 19 December 2012 for its persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) properties, serves as an additive flame retardant. Its main applications involve expanded polystyrene (EPS) and extruded polystyrene (XPS) foams for thermal insulation in construction, accounting for over 90% of its use, alongside treatments for textiles, upholstery, and electronic enclosures.[38][39] Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA, CAS No. 335-67-1), listed on 19 December 2012 and its related substances on 27 June 2018 owing to PBT characteristics and equivalent concern for reproductive toxicity, acts as a surfactant and processing aid in fluoropolymer manufacturing. Key uses encompass production of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for non-stick coatings, aqueous film-forming foams for firefighting, and surface treatments providing water, oil, and stain repellency in textiles and paper products.[40][41] Bisphenol A (BPA, CAS No. 80-05-7), designated an SVHC on 12 January 2017 and upheld by the EU Court of Justice in March 2023 for endocrine-disrupting properties affecting human health, is a fundamental building block in polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. It enables rigid, transparent materials for applications such as reusable bottles, eyewear lenses, and protective linings in food and beverage cans, as well as pipelines and automotive components, with global production exceeding 10 million tonnes annually as of recent estimates.[42][43] Lead sulfochromate yellow (C.I. Pigment Yellow 34, CAS No. 1344-37-2), added on 19 December 2013 for carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic effects, provides a bright yellow pigmentation. It is applied in solvent-based paints, industrial coatings, plastics, and printing inks, particularly for durable color in road markings and high-performance finishes where lightfastness is required.[44][45]| Substance | CAS No. | Primary Uses | SVHC Criteria (Date Added) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEHP | 117-81-7 | PVC plasticizer in cables, medical devices, flooring | Reprotoxic (2010) |
| HBCDD | 25637-99-4 | Flame retardant in polystyrene foams, textiles | PBT (2012)[38] |
| PFOA | 335-67-1 | Surfactant in fluoropolymers, firefighting foams | PBT, reprotoxic (2012)[40] |
| BPA | 80-05-7 | Monomer in polycarbonates, epoxy resins for cans, pipes | Endocrine disruptor (2017)[42] |
| Lead sulfochromate yellow | 1344-37-2 | Pigment in paints, coatings, inks | CMR (2013)[44] |