Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Crosswind

A crosswind is a wind component that blows perpendicular to the intended direction of travel. In meteorological terms, it arises when ambient winds are at an angle to the path of motion, requiring compensation for drift to maintain directional control. This phenomenon is distinct from headwinds or tailwinds, as it primarily affects lateral stability rather than forward . Crosswinds pose challenges to various modes of , requiring adjustments in operations that may affect efficiency, , and route . In flight, the primary aerodynamic effect is to deflect the in the direction of the wind, with remaining dependent on . During , crosswinds can lead to hazards such as veering off the or loss of control if the crosswind component exceeds the aircraft's demonstrated limits, which vary by model—typically ranging from 25 to 40 knots (29 to 46 km/h) for commercial jets. Crosswinds influence , , automotive racing, and pedestrian stability in high winds, with their role in transportation safety driving research into wind prediction and design improvements. Regulatory bodies like the FAA and EASA set crosswind guidelines based on empirical data to prevent accidents, with historical incidents highlighting the need for training in gusty conditions.

Fundamentals

Definition

A crosswind is defined as any wind that has a perpendicular component relative to the direction of travel or intended path, irrespective of any concurrent parallel component along that path. This perpendicular aspect distinguishes it as a lateral influence on motion, applicable across various domains of transportation and navigation. Wind velocity can be resolved into these parallel and perpendicular components for analysis, though detailed decomposition is addressed elsewhere. The term "crosswind" emerged in the early , drawing from nautical and terminology to describe winds crossing a vessel's or aircraft's course. Its first documented uses appear around , coinciding with the rapid development of powered flight and formalized practices. Prior general references to "cross-winds" date to the late in , but the modern specialized sense solidified in transportation contexts during this period. Crosswinds differ fundamentally from headwinds and tailwinds, which act along the line of travel: a headwind blows directly opposite to the path, increasing relative speed and resistance, while a tailwind blows from behind, reducing it. In contrast, the crosswind's effect stems exclusively from its sideways , as illustrated in the following conceptual diagram where the intended path is horizontal:
Intended Path →
     |
Wind Vector (diagonal)
     |
     ↓ [Perpendicular](/page/Perpendicular) (Crosswind) Component
Parallel (Head/Tail) Component →
This vector resolution highlights the crosswind's unique lateral nature. In practical contexts, a crosswind arises when ambient deviates from the alignment of a in , requiring pilots to adjust for the sideways push during takeoff or . Similarly, for ground vehicles like automobiles, it manifests relative to the road's , potentially influencing without altering forward speed directly. These examples underscore the term's broad applicability to any directed motion encountering non-aligned winds.

Physical Principles

A crosswind exerts a lateral on a moving object due to the perpendicular component of airflow relative to its direction of travel, inducing sideslip and generating yaw moments that can alter . This lateral arises from the transfer of air molecules impacting the object's side, creating a net pressure imbalance across its surface. In , this manifests as a sideslip \beta, defined as the angle between the object's longitudinal and the relative wind , which produces asymmetric aerodynamic loading. For instance, in or , the resulting yaw moment N can be approximated as N = C_n \cdot q \cdot S \cdot b \cdot \beta, where C_n is the yawing moment , q is , S is reference area, b is , and \beta quantifies the sideslip induced by the crosswind. Aerodynamically, crosswind-induced pressure differences stem from variations in airflow velocity around the object, governed by , which states that an increase in fluid speed corresponds to a decrease in static along a streamline: P + \frac{1}{2} \rho V^2 + \rho g h = \constant, where P is , \rho is , V is , g is , and h is . In crosswind conditions, the relative wind's perpendicular component accelerates flow over one side while stagnating it on the other, lowering on the windward side and increasing it leeward, thereby amplifying the lateral force and yaw tendency. The yaw angle, or heading deviation from the track, interacts with sideslip to further influence these dynamics, as the effective in the lateral plane shifts the center of . The crosswind component v_c is derived from vector decomposition of the wind velocity relative to the travel direction. Consider the wind velocity \vec{v_w} with v_w at an \theta to the direction of motion \hat{d} (a ). The component parallel to \hat{d} is v_w \cos \theta, and the perpendicular (crosswind) component is obtained via the sine : \vec{v_c} = \vec{v_w} - ( \vec{v_w} \cdot \hat{d} ) \hat{d} The simplifies to v_c = v_w \sin \theta, representing the effective sideways wind speed that drives sideslip and forces. This trigonometric relation follows from the of resolution in the plane perpendicular to travel. Environmental factors amplify crosswind effects through modifications to patterns. Terrain features, such as hills or urban structures, channel winds via the , accelerating crosswinds and intensifying pressure gradients, while flat or open areas allow uniform flow. At higher altitudes, the wind gradient—where speed increases logarithmically with height due to reduced surface friction—escalates crosswind strength, as described by the power law profile v(z) = v_r (z / z_r)^\alpha, with \alpha \approx 0.14 for neutral stability. Gusts introduce turbulent fluctuations, superimposing rapid velocity changes on steady crosswinds, which exacerbate unsteady aerodynamic loads and moments through shear layers.

Measurement and Assessment

Instruments and Techniques

The primary instruments for detecting and quantifying crosswinds are anemometers, which measure wind speed, and wind vanes, which determine relative to a fixed reference such as a or path. These devices together allow for the resolution of wind vectors into crosswind and headwind/tailwind components by combining speed and directional data. In and meteorological applications, anemometers and wind vanes are integrated into automated systems like the Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS), which provides surface wind reports at airports, including gusts and variability essential for crosswind assessment. The historical development of these instruments traces back to mechanical designs in the , with the cup anemometer—featuring rotating hemispherical cups to gauge speed—first invented in 1846 by Irish astronomer John Thomas Romney Robinson. Early wind vanes, often simple pivoting arrows, complemented these by indicating direction, forming the basis for manual wind observations in weather stations. Post-World War II advancements shifted toward electronic sensors, enabling automated recording and higher precision; for instance, pressure-plate and hot-wire anemometers emerged in the mid-20th century, transitioning from purely mechanical to electromechanical systems for broader deployment in networks. This evolution facilitated continuous monitoring, reducing human error in crosswind data collection at critical sites like airfields. Advanced techniques for remote sensing of crosswinds, particularly wind shear and gusts, include Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) systems, which use laser pulses to profile wind fields up to several kilometers away without physical contact. Doppler LIDAR, a subtype, measures radial wind velocities via backscattered light from aerosols, offering high-resolution data for aviation safety by detecting microscale crosswind variations. Similarly, Doppler radar employs microwave pulses to estimate wind speeds and directions through the Doppler shift of echoes from precipitation or particulates, enabling the mapping of gust fronts and shear zones that contribute to crosswind hazards. In aviation, pilot reports (PIREPs) serve as a complementary observational method, where pilots relay encountered wind conditions, including crosswind intensities during approach, to air traffic control for real-time dissemination. Calibration and accuracy standards for these instruments are governed by the (WMO), ensuring reliable crosswind estimation. Anemometers must undergo periodic calibration traceable to international standards, typically annually, to maintain performance across wind speeds. WMO guidelines specify accuracy of ±0.5 m/s for wind speeds below 5 m/s and better than ±10% for speeds above 5 m/s, up to 35 m/s, and ±5° for direction, with error margins influenced by site factors like obstructions (limited to <10% impact on speed). These standards apply to both mechanical and electronic sensors in systems like AWOS, where deviations can propagate to crosswind calculations, emphasizing the need for exposure at 10 m over open .

Calculation Methods

Crosswind magnitude and direction are typically calculated by resolving the total wind vector into components perpendicular (crosswind) and parallel (headwind or tailwind) to the intended path, such as a runway or road heading. This process relies on basic vector trigonometry, where the crosswind component v_c is given by v_c = v_w \sin(\theta) and the parallel component v_p = v_w \cos(\theta), with v_w as the wind speed and \theta as the angle between the wind direction and the path heading. To apply this, first determine the wind direction and speed from meteorological data, often obtained via anemometers or weather reports, then compute the angular difference \theta from the path's magnetic heading. For a step-by-step example in , consider a oriented at 090° (east) with a reported from 120° at 20 knots. The angle \theta is 120° - 90° = 30°. Thus, v_c = 20 \sin(30^\circ) = 20 \times 0.5 = 10 knots crosswind from the right, and v_p = 20 \cos(30^\circ) = 20 \times 0.866 = 17.3 knots headwind. In a ground vehicle scenario, such as a aligned at 000° (north) with from 270° at 15 knots, \theta = 90^\circ, yielding v_c = 15 \sin(90^\circ) = 15 knots full crosswind and v_p = 15 \cos(90^\circ) = 0 knots parallel component. These calculations assume the wind direction is relative to true or magnetic north, adjusted as needed for local variation. In variable wind conditions, gust factor adjustments modify the steady-state calculation to account for turbulence. The gust factor is the difference between peak gust speed and steady wind speed; for crosswind assessments, pilots often use the gust speed in the trigonometric formulas to estimate maximum components conservatively. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends adding half the gust factor to approach speeds in gusty conditions. For crosswind limits, demonstrated values are for steady winds, typically 15-25 knots for many commercial aircraft; pilots conservatively account for gusts by using the gust speed in component calculations. For instance, if winds are 10 knots steady gusting to 20 knots (\theta = 45^\circ), the adjusted crosswind might use 15 knots (steady plus half gust) in v_c = 15 \sin(45^\circ) \approx 10.6 knots. Software tools automate these computations for real-time use. Aviation applications like integrate wind data with runway or route headings to output crosswind and headwind components via the trigonometric method, often displaying them on approach charts or en route maps. Meteorological software, such as those from the , supports similar models for broader forecasting, while vehicle navigation systems combine GPS-derived headings with wind inputs for dynamic crosswind estimates on roads. Steady-state wind models underlying these calculations assume constant speed and direction, which introduces errors in turbulent environments where gusts can exceed 10 knots above steady values, leading to underestimation of peak crosswind forces. In such conditions, the models fail to capture rapid directional shifts or , potentially resulting in 20-30% deviation from actual components during operations.

Effects on Transportation

Aviation Impacts

Crosswinds pose significant challenges to aircraft operations, particularly during the critical phases of , where they can induce lateral forces that complicate directional control and increase the risk of deviations from the centerline. These effects are most pronounced when the wind component perpendicular to the exceeds certain thresholds, potentially leading to excursions or structural stresses on the . In , crosswinds are assessed by their component relative to the orientation, with pilots required to demonstrate proficiency in handling them within established limits to ensure . Aerodynamically, crosswinds during create asymmetric , as the upwind experiences higher relative , potentially causing it to lift and induce a roll toward the downwind side if not corrected. This asymmetry, combined with the need for techniques like crabbing or sideslipping to align the , heightens the risk of wingtip , where the low or engine pod contacts the due to excessive or drift. Directional loss is another primary concern, as the crosswind exerts a yawing moment that can overwhelm authority, especially at low speeds near , leading to veer-off or loss of alignment with the . These effects demand precise and inputs to maintain stability, with aerodynamic limitations preventing safe operations beyond demonstrated crosswind components. Aircraft manufacturers establish specific crosswind limits based on , which serve as operational guidelines rather than absolute prohibitions. For instance, the 737-800 has a demonstrated maximum crosswind component of 33 knots on a dry , reducing to 27 knots on a surface, beyond which is not recommended without special considerations. Regulatory bodies like the (FAA) and the (EASA) mandate that transport-category aircraft demonstrate safe controllability in at least 20 knots of dry-runway crosswind (15 knots ) during , ensuring compliance with airworthiness standards under 14 CFR § 25.237 and equivalent requirements. These limits account for factors such as surface condition and aircraft configuration, with operators often applying additional margins for safety. A notable historical incident illustrating crosswind-related risks occurred on August 2, 1985, with , a Lockheed L-1011 approaching . The aircraft encountered severe from a microburst, which included a significant crosswind component exceeding 30 knots, leading to a sudden loss of and altitude during . The (NTSB) determined the probable cause as the flight crew's decision to penetrate the storm despite warnings, compounded by the inability to detect the microburst's outflow winds, which generated rapid shifts in wind direction and speed; this event resulted in 135 fatalities and prompted FAA mandates for detection systems on airliners. Contributing factors included inadequate thunderstorm avoidance procedures and the limitations of onboard at the time, highlighting the dangers of undetected crosswind variations within convective activity. In terms of performance, crosswind conditions degrade by necessitating higher inputs and potential heading deviations, which can extend required lengths to accommodate drift and ensure safe margins during . For example, pilots may need to into the wind, increasing the effective usage and sometimes requiring longer runways to achieve full acceleration without veering. Additionally, these conditions can lead to inefficiencies, as sustained crosswinds en route subtly increase through minor adjustments in track and groundspeed, while ground operations may involve higher settings for directional , elevating overall consumption during affected flights. Such degradations underscore the importance of precise wind assessments to minimize operational disruptions.

Ground and Maritime Effects

Crosswinds exert significant forces on land-based vehicles, primarily through aerodynamic side loads that induce sway and compromise lateral stability. In automotive contexts, these forces can cause vehicles to deviate from their intended path, with studies showing that gusts lead to increased lateral displacement and yaw angles, heightening the risk of lane departure. High-sided vehicles, such as trucks and vans, face elevated rollover risks due to their higher center of gravity and larger side areas exposed to wind; for instance, modeling indicates that trucks experience a 76% greater rollover propensity at 40 mph crosswinds compared to 20 mph, particularly when navigating curves. Highway incidents underscore these dangers, as crosswind gusts have contributed to multiple collisions involving commercial vehicles drifting into adjacent lanes or overturning, often exacerbated by open terrains like bridges or deserts. Rail systems are particularly vulnerable to crosswinds on curved tracks, where the combination of centrifugal forces and lateral wind loads can elevate derailment potential by reducing wheel- contact . Research demonstrates that crosswinds acting from the outer side of a at low speeds can decrease running safety, increasing the derailment coefficient as the vehicle negotiates the bend. Case studies of wind-affected rail operations highlight this risk, with simulations showing that unsteady gusts on curved sections amplify lateral accelerations, potentially leading to flange climb in high-speed trains. Exposed routes, such as coastal or elevated tracks, amplify these effects, where wind speeds above critical thresholds can force speed reductions to maintain . In environments, crosswinds induce heeling—lateral tilting due to uneven pressure on the and —and drifting, or , which pushes sideways off course. For , these forces arise from wind acting on sails and , creating a sideways component that must be countered by the or ; excessive heeling can reduce maneuverability and speed, while drift angles increase with wind intensity, impacting upwind performance. Large ships in confined areas like ports or canals face similar issues, as demonstrated by the 2021 grounding of the in the , where gusts up to 35 knots contributed to the 's deviation from the channel, leading to a bow-stern wedging that blocked global trade routes for days. and designs incorporate thresholds to mitigate these effects, with typical safe operating limits for vehicles around 20-30 mph crosswinds, beyond which speed reductions are advised based on aerodynamic profiles and ; for trucks, winds exceeding 40 mph often necessitate caution or halts to prevent rollover.

Mitigation and Handling

Aviation Techniques

Pilots employ established techniques to manage crosswinds during , primarily the and sideslip methods, to ensure safe alignment with the and minimize drift. In the method, the is angled into the wind during the approach to maintain a straight , with the nose pointed slightly offset from the centerline; as the nears , the pilot applies to decrab, aligning the with the while using s to counteract any residual drift. This transition typically occurs during the , just before wheels contact the , preventing side loads on the . The sideslip, or wing-low method, involves banking the into the wind with input to lower the upwind wing, while opposite keeps the nose aligned with the ; the bank angle is adjusted throughout the approach to track the centerline, increasing as decreases, and occurs on the upwind main first. Both techniques can be combined, such as crabbing on final and transitioning to a sideslip near , depending on strength and type. For takeoffs in crosswinds, pilots apply and inputs to counter drift and maintain from the initial roll. At the start of the takeoff roll, full deflection into is used to keep the upwind down and prevent lift-off , while maintains a straight path along the centerline. As airspeed builds and ailerons gain effectiveness, the deflection is gradually reduced toward neutral, with adjustments to compensate for any yaw from the crosswind; higher takeoff speeds may be selected to provide additional margin, particularly in gusty conditions. After liftoff, the wings are leveled, allowing the to naturally into the wind, and climb is continued with coordinated inputs to track the desired heading. Training for crosswind proficiency is integral to pilot , often conducted in simulators to replicate varying wind conditions without risk. The (FAA) requires private pilot applicants to demonstrate knowledge of crosswind effects and skills in applying during takeoffs and landings, as outlined in the Airman Certification Standards (ACS), though specific wind speeds are not mandated for checkrides—if no crosswind is present, evaluation occurs orally. Simulator programs emphasize repeated practice, with recommendations from organizations like the Society of Aviation and Flight Educators (SAFE) for logging at least 10 landings in 10-knot crosswinds to build competency before . As of 2025, advanced flight simulators incorporate AI-driven real-time gust modeling to enhance crosswind training efficacy. Modern aircraft incorporate technological aids to assist with crosswind management, enhancing pilot and automation. Head-up displays (HUDs) project critical flight data, such as flight path and drift angles, directly into the pilot's forward view, allowing real-time monitoring and correction during approach without diverting attention from the environment. systems in transport category aircraft automatically compensate for crosswinds by adjusting and inputs during Category III instrument approaches, typically certified for limits up to 25-30 knots depending on the model and conditions, though pilots must monitor and be prepared for manual intervention if winds exceed capabilities.

Strategies in Other Domains

In ground transportation, strategies for mitigating crosswind effects on cars and light emphasize both driver actions and vehicle design optimizations. Drivers are advised to maintain a firm two-handed on the , reduce speed to minimize lateral forces, and apply gentle corrective inputs to counteract gusts, thereby reducing yaw and roll responses. analyses highlight that lowering the center of , increasing vehicle mass and yaw , and extending the enhance stability by damping crosswind-induced motions, with forward CoG shifts showing the highest impact on reducing . Additionally, optimizing cornering and roll parameters, such as increasing roll , further minimizes lateral deviations during high-speed travel. For heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) like trucks, aerodynamic modifications are primary countermeasures to reduce overturning moments and side forces from crosswinds. Trailer shape alterations, including rounded or inclined corners, can decrease overturning moments by up to 24.75% and side forces by 20.14%, albeit with minor load capacity reductions of about 0.59%. Installing vortex generators on trailer leading edges suppresses , yielding modest reductions in overturning moments (up to 2.14%) with negligible effects on side forces. Passive devices, such as side and top fairings in configurations like "DEH," further mitigate risks by cutting overturning moments by 7.5-8% and side forces by 5.82-9.53%. Infrastructure aids, including roadside wind barriers and bridge-edge fences, also prove effective in shielding vehicles from gusts. In , particularly for high-speed s, crosswind mitigation focuses on aerodynamic enhancements and environmental controls to prevent or overturning. Optimizing train body shapes, such as streamlined profiles and contours, reduces side and lift forces, while vortex generators on surfaces enhance anti-rolling performance by disrupting adverse flow patterns. structures at track edges, including solid or porous barriers, attenuate gust impacts, with studies showing reduced unsteady responses at windbreak ends through tailored designs. Active control systems, like adjustable underbody panels, dynamically counter yaw moments, complementing passive measures for operational under yaw angles up to 90°. Calibration of models in simulations ensures accurate prediction and design, meeting standards like EN 14067-6:2018+A1:2022 with errors below 15%. For domains, ship handling in crosswinds prioritizes predictive planning and propulsion adjustments to manage and drift during maneuvering. In ports and waterways, captains employ small-angle alterations rather than sharp turns, aligning headings to use the ship's against wind-induced pivoting, where the pivot point shifts forward during or aft during sternway. Thrusters and rudders provide precise corrections, especially for berthing in crosswinds exceeding 10 m/s, with bow thrusters countering winds to maintain . For larger vessels, tugs assist in holding position or adjusting to shift the wind of effort, reducing susceptibility; quantitative models based on AIS data inform by accounting for wind's outsized influence on angles compared to speed over ground. Shape optimizations, like windshields on container ships, further minimize in winds during transit.

References

  1. [1]
    Crosswind and runway orientation - WindRose PRO
    A crosswind is any wind that is blowing perpendicular to a direction. In aviation, a crosswind is the component of wind that is blowing across the runway ...Missing: definition meteorology
  2. [2]
    Crosswind and Aviation Safety - Hong Kong Observatory
    Aug 26, 2022 · Crosswinds are winds that blow from the side. As an example, for departing or landing aircraft, winds blowing across the runway are crosswinds( ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    UBC ATSC113 crosswinds and headwinds
    May 18, 2025 · A wind from the side is called a crosswind. Winds from both the right and left are called crosswinds. In aircraft in flight, cross winds are ...Missing: definition meteorology
  4. [4]
    Crosswinds and Their Effect on Flight – Part One: Enroute Impacts
    Aug 5, 2015 · Crosswinds are winds that come at an angle to your aircraft in flight and on approach/takeoff, and they can impact your flight operations, fuel burn, and ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    Cross Winds
    The chief effect of the cross wind is to deflect the flight path in the direction of the wind. The aerodynamic lift force depends on the airspeed and is not ...
  6. [6]
    Cross Wind Takeoff Hazards and Techniques - SKYbrary
    Wind, wake and turbulence induced by obstacles may affect the handling and performance of aircraft during both takeoff and landing. Aircraft are, in general, ...
  7. [7]
    Understanding Crosswind Landings: Takeoffs and Landings
    Oct 31, 2021 · Crosswind landings are often overlooked during flight training and cause many accidents every year, primarily due to pilot error.
  8. [8]
    Windy Flight Operations - AOPA
    On crosswind landings especially, it is critical that you continue to make control inputs and stay situationaly aware of what is going on.
  9. [9]
    Crosswind - Wikipedia
    A crosswind is any wind that has a perpendicular component to the line or direction of travel. This affects the aerodynamics of many forms of transport.Missing: precise meteorology
  10. [10]
    CROSSWIND Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    Nov 3, 2025 · The meaning of CROSSWIND is a wind blowing in a direction not parallel to a course (as of an airplane).
  11. [11]
    cross-wind, n. meanings, etymology and more
    The earliest known use of the noun cross-wind is in the late 1600s. OED's earliest evidence for cross-wind is from 1678, in a translation by Roger L'Estrange, ...
  12. [12]
    Winds: Headwinds, Tailwinds, and Crosswinds - Unacademy
    Tailwind pushes the plane's tail, headwind blows opposite to the plane, and crosswind blows perpendicular to the path of travel.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Windshear and Turbulence What are 'headwind', 'tailwind' and ...
    Headwind is wind blowing towards the aircraft, tailwind is from behind, and crosswind is from the side. Windshear is a change in headwind or tailwind.
  14. [14]
    Aviation Winds Types Explained: A Pilot's In-Depth Guide
    A crosswind blows across your intended flight path, being most critical during the takeoff and landing phases. Effects: It will try to push your aeroplane ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Aerodynamic characteristics of vehicle bodies at crosswind ...
    For this slender vehicle, the long pitching- and yawing-moment arms result in minimizing the effect of aerodynamic pitching moment and yawing moment.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] 6. Aerodynamic Moments - Robert F. Stengel
    Yawing Moment due to Sideslip Angle. N ≈. ∂Cn. ∂β. ρV2. 2. ⎛. ⎝⎜. ⎞. ⎠⎟. Sb•β = Cnβ. qSb•β. ▫ Side force contributions times respective moment arms i Non ...
  17. [17]
    Bernoulli and Newton | Glenn Research Center - NASA
    Nov 13, 2024 · If we know the correct velocity distribution, we can use Bernoulli's equation to get the pressure, then use the pressure to determine the force.
  18. [18]
    Crosswind and Headwind calculation | IVAO Documentation Library
    Crosswind speed = wind speed × sin ( α ); Headwind speed (or tailwind) = wind speed × cos ( α ). As the 'sine' and 'cosine' mathematical functions are quite ...Missing: v_c = v_w theta
  19. [19]
    Crosswind circuit | aviation.govt.nz
    A crosswind circuit involves a wind at an angle to the runway, requiring the aircraft to be aligned with the runway before touchdown, and the aircraft will ...
  20. [20]
    Numerical study on vehicle stability under crosswind conditions on ...
    Jul 2, 2025 · According to previous research results, a wind direction angle of 120° has the greatest impact on vehicle stability; therefore, a uniform wind ...
  21. [21]
    Comparative analysis of the effect of crosswind speed and direction ...
    Dec 12, 2024 · Crosswind speed in nature typically increases exponentially with height, a phenomenon in aerodynamics research.Missing: altitude | Show results with:altitude
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Criteria for crosswind variations during approach and touchdown at ...
    The environment influences anemometer readings and gust factors, and this was recognised and quantified more than 40 years ago (see e.g. [12, 13]), followed ...
  23. [23]
    Weather Instruments
    Measuring Winds An anemometer measures wind speed; A wind vane measures wind direction. Measuring Humidity A hygrometer measures humidity. Measuring ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS)
    The rotating cup anemometer and the simple wind vane are the principal indicators of wind speed and direction. Until the mid 1940s, the electrical contacting ...
  26. [26]
    Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) - Aeroclass.org
    Nov 4, 2021 · There are two standard sensors to measure wind, which are the traditional anemometer and wind vane. Mechanical wind sensors are still used in ...
  27. [27]
    History of the Anemometer Wind Vane - ThoughtCo
    Apr 4, 2017 · The first mechanical anemometer was invented in 1450 by Leon Battista Alberti. The hemispherical cup anemometer was invented in 1846 by John ...
  28. [28]
    The Evolution of Weather Sensors Over Time - R. M. Young Company
    Early sensors used simple tools, then barometers and anemometers. 20th century saw radar, and now modern sensors are digital, more accurate, and versatile.Missing: 19th | Show results with:19th
  29. [29]
    Methodology for obtaining wind gusts using Doppler lidar - Suomi
    Apr 19, 2017 · Doppler lidars can then be used to measure wind gusts in regions and heights where traditional meteorological mast measurements are not ...Missing: radar shear
  30. [30]
    WindTracer | Lockheed Martin
    WindTracer light detection and ranging (LIDAR) is a remarkable wind and aerosol measurement technology used worldwide to improve aviation safety and efficiency.
  31. [31]
    Using and Understanding Doppler Radar - National Weather Service
    Doppler radar uses the Doppler shift, a phase change in reflected energy, to measure the velocity of objects, like raindrops, and estimate wind speed.
  32. [32]
    Pilot Report (PIREP) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    A Pilot Report or PIREP is a report of the actual weather conditions as encountered by an aircraft in flight.Missing: crosswind | Show results with:crosswind
  33. [33]
    How To File A Pilot Report (PIREP) - Boldmethod
    Feb 16, 2017 · Winds Aloft: Report winds in knots if you're able to estimate or report them from a glass cockpit display. Give a cardinal wind directions like ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Guide to Instruments and Methods of Observation - WMO Library
    The ISO 19011 standard provides the guidance on auditing the quality management system. All these standards are described in more detail in the related ...Missing: margins | Show results with:margins
  35. [35]
    Assessment of a New Anemometry System for the Met Office's ...
    Current World Meteorological Organization (WMO) guidelines (WMO 2008) for the measurement of wind speed and direction state that an accuracy for horizontal ...
  36. [36]
    Calculating A Crosswind Component | Angle of Attack
    Oct 22, 2022 · The formula to find out a crosswind component is: Crosswind Component= Wind Speed (V) x Sin (Wind Angle). Here is what each term means. Wind ...Missing: v_c = v_w theta
  37. [37]
    Calculate Crosswind in Your Head - Minnesota Flyer
    Aug 1, 2018 · ... Theta (Θ), the wind speed V and the crosswind component CW. (See Figure 3) CW = V * SIN (Θ). You can easily determine the trigonometric Sine ...
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
    Crosswind Calculator - AeroToolbox
    The AeroToolbox crosswind calculator can be used to quickly determine the parallel and crosswind components of the wind relative to the runway.
  40. [40]
    Crosswind Landings - AOPA
    The most commonly taught crosswind landing technique is the cross-control, or wing-low landing. The pilot slips the airplane to the runway with just enough ...What's What · Downdrafts, Shears, And... · Limits For LandingMissing: definition meteorology
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3C) - Chapter 9
    In gusty air, no more than one-half the gust factor is added. An excessive amount of airspeed could result in a touchdown too far from the runway threshold ...
  42. [42]
    Why Add Half The Gust Factor On Windy Day Landings? - Boldmethod
    When you're dealing with a gusty day, the FAA recommends that you add half the gust factor to your final approach speed. For example, if the winds are ...
  43. [43]
    What's Your Limit For Landing In Gusty Winds? - Boldmethod
    When you're dealing with a gusty day, the FAA recommends that you add half the gust factor to your final approach speed. ... crosswind for landing, which ...
  44. [44]
    Why does the crosswind component look incorrect?
    Oct 16, 2024 · As the wind is nearly aligned with the runway, ForeFlight correctly reports no crosswind, which matches the flight computer calculation.Missing: software | Show results with:software
  45. [45]
    Crosswind Considerations - Aviation Safety Magazine
    Oct 29, 2019 · The FAA, safety authorities and instructors recommend, firmly, scratching a flight if the gust factor approaches 10 knots above the steady-state ...
  46. [46]
    Strong Gusty Crosswinds - Flight Safety Foundation
    May 2, 2013 · Crosswind-related regulations originated in a period from a few years after World War II to 1978, when demonstrated crosswind in airworthiness- ...
  47. [47]
    Understanding How Crosswinds Impact Aircraft - AN Aviation Services
    Jun 17, 2024 · When an aircraft encounters crosswinds, it experiences sideways forces that can affect its stability, control, and performance.Types Of Winds In Aviation · How Do Pilots Deal With... · Correcting Crosswind...Missing: meteorology | Show results with:meteorology
  48. [48]
    What are the Maximum Wind Limits for a Commercial Jet Aircraft?
    On a dry runway, a Boeing 737-800 has a maximum allowable crosswind component of approximately 33kts. For taking off on a wet runway it's about 27kts. The ...
  49. [49]
    14 CFR § 25.237 - Wind velocities. - Law.Cornell.Edu
    (1) A 90-degree cross component of wind velocity, demonstrated to be safe for takeoff and landing, must be established for dry runways and must be at least 20 ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] EASA-2011-08-Near-ground-wind-gust-detection.pdf
    For a few aircraft types the crosswind demonstration flight test reports were ... There are various physical principles that can be used to measure wind speed.<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Delta Air Lines Flight 191 - NTSB
    Aug 15, 1986 · The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable causes of the accident were the flightcrew's decision to initiate and ...
  52. [52]
    Delta Flight 191 Incident at DFW Airport - National Weather Service
    Investigators also cited the aircrafts lack of ability to detect wind shear as a contributing cause. In 1988, the Federal Aviation Administration ordered ...Missing: crosswind | Show results with:crosswind
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3C) - Chapter 12
    A reduction in power too late causes the airplane to float down the runway. Crosswind component is another factor to be considered in the degree of flap ...
  54. [54]
    Technique - Crosswind takeoffs - AOPA
    Apr 5, 2013 · 1. Aileron into the wind. Start the takeoff roll with the aileron deflected fully into the wind. Do this regardless of the wind strength.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Private Pilot for Airplane Category ACS
    The FAA created FAA-G-ACS-2, Airman Certification Standards Companion Guide for Pilots, to provide guidance considered relevant and useful to the community. The ...
  56. [56]
    Crosswind Archives - Aviation Ideas and Discussion!
    Jun 28, 2025 · SAFE recommends all private-level flight applicants should have trained and logged at least 10 landings with 10 knots of crosswind.
  57. [57]
    Head Up Display (HUD) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    A HUD projects key flight data onto a screen in front of the pilot's forward vision, appearing far out, so the pilot doesn't need to change eye focus.Missing: aids | Show results with:aids
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Airbus Crosswind Development and Certification
    Feb 15, 2013 · Historically, there were two methods of computation. For early certifica- tions, ATC tower winds were used to assess the level of crosswind ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    High speed driving stability of road vehicles under crosswinds
    Crosswinds affect vehicle driving stability and their influence increase with driving speed. To improve high speed driving stability, interdisciplinary research ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Driving stability of passenger vehicles under crosswinds
    The objectives of this research project are to increase the knowledge on driving stability performance of passenger vehicles and to understand how virtual ...
  61. [61]
  62. [62]
    Crosswind-induced aero-performance deterioration of a vehicle ...
    Jan 2, 2025 · The placement of wind barriers along the roadside has proven to be a practical measure in mitigating the decline in aerodynamic performance ...
  63. [63]
    Mitigation of crosswind effects on high-speed trains using vortex ...
    Jul 26, 2024 · Vortex generators can enhance the operational safety of high-speed trains and offer effective anti-rolling performance.
  64. [64]
    Full article: Mitigating crosswind effect on high-speed trains by active ...
    The current research efforts to mitigate crosswind effects on high-speed trains mainly focus on designing various windproof facilities and optimizing the shape ...
  65. [65]
    CFD Study of High-Speed Train in Crosswinds for Large Yaw ... - MDPI
    Sep 7, 2022 · Crosswind action on a train poses a risk of vehicle overturning or derailment. The risk is elevated not only when wind speed is high, but also ...Missing: strategies | Show results with:strategies
  66. [66]
  67. [67]
    EFFECT OF WIND ON SHIP HANDLING - Marine Teacher
    When berthing with strong crosswinds, or attempting to stop and hold in a narrow channel, it is best to plan well ahead as such a ship can prove very difficult ...Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques