Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tiger team

A tiger team is a specialized, cross-functional assembly of elite experts, often drawn from diverse disciplines, tasked with rapidly investigating and resolving a specific, high-stakes problem under intense time constraints. The term, evoking the ferocity and agility of a tiger, originated in contexts for testing defenses with unconventional tactics and was first documented in a 1964 technical paper on , which described such teams as comprising "undomesticated and uninhibited technical specialists" unconstrained by standard procedures. It achieved widespread recognition during NASA's mission in 1970, when a tiger team at Mission Control improvised engineering solutions—such as adapting scrubbers—to avert disaster and enable the crew's safe return, demonstrating the model's efficacy in averting catastrophe through first-principles ingenuity. In contemporary applications, tiger teams extend beyond to cybersecurity, where they function as ethical hackers conducting penetration tests to expose system weaknesses; business operations, for accelerating product troubleshooting; and government initiatives, such as addressing backlogs. While praised for fostering innovation outside bureaucratic silos, their intensive, temporary nature can strain resources and personnel, underscoring the need for precise deployment in truly existential challenges.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Definition

A tiger team is a small, cross-functional group of highly skilled specialists assembled temporarily to tackle a specific, complex problem or critical issue, often requiring innovative and rapid solutions. These teams draw members from diverse expertise areas, such as , , and operations, to enable multidisciplinary approaches that bypass standard organizational silos. Key to their effectiveness is operational , enabling quick without extensive approval processes, alongside a for aggressive, outcome-focused tactics akin to predatory . In practice, tiger teams emphasize empirical testing and of real-world stressors to identify vulnerabilities or devise fixes, prioritizing results over procedural norms. The concept emerged in applications during the 1960s and 1970s, where elite units simulated enemy threats to harden defenses, before extending to technical domains.

Key Operational Traits

Tiger teams operate as small, agile units, generally limited to a handful of members to preserve speed and focus, rather than large hierarchies that could introduce delays. Members are selected for their elite expertise and cross-functional backgrounds, drawing from disciplines such as , operations, and analysis to provide multifaceted insights into complex problems. This composition enables the team to address issues that span organizational silos, leveraging diverse skills to minimize knowledge gaps. A core trait is high operational autonomy, with teams granted broad decision-making authority by senior sponsors to bypass routine bureaucratic processes and respond decisively to time-sensitive crises. This independence fosters rapid iteration and creative problem-solving, often employing methods like root cause identification, hypothesis testing, and collaborative brainstorming to challenge assumptions and innovate beyond conventional approaches. Temporality defines their structure, as teams form for specific, high-stakes objectives—such as system failures or emergent threats—and dissolve upon resolution, ensuring concentrated effort without long-term overhead. This ephemeral nature, combined with a mandate for precision and documentation of outcomes, positions tiger teams for targeted impact in scenarios where standard protocols prove inadequate.

Historical Origins

Military and Early Usage

The term "tiger team" originated in the United States military during the , denoting a compact group of elite specialists convened to tackle pressing, high-priority challenges through aggressive, focused problem-solving. This usage drew from the of a tiger's predatory , applied to teams that operated with speed, , and interdisciplinary expertise to penetrate issues or vulnerabilities in systems, equipment, or operations. In naval contexts, tiger teams were particularly prominent for addressing urgent engineering and maintenance demands. The U.S. Navy assembled such teams for rapid repairs and turnaround projects on vessels, enabling swift restoration of amid operational pressures. During the era, shipyards including dispatched tiger teams internationally to support allied facilities or execute on-site fixes for naval assets, underscoring their utility in sustaining fleet capabilities under time-sensitive constraints. These early implementations prioritized temporary, ad-hoc formations over permanent structures, fostering by bypassing bureaucratic layers and leveraging diverse skills for decisive outcomes. Such teams exemplified causal approaches to failure modes, emphasizing empirical testing and real-world adaptation in high-stakes environments like weapons systems evaluation or logistical crises, though documentation from the period remains sparse and primarily anecdotal in secondary accounts.

Popularization in Space Exploration

The tiger team approach was integrated into 's operations to confront urgent, multifaceted technical hurdles in , drawing on its military precedents for assembling elite, cross-disciplinary experts. By the late 1960s, utilized such groups to dissect anomalies in systems and protocols, emphasizing rapid integration of personnel from , other field centers, contractors, and external specialists. This method proved essential for the high-reliability demands of the , where failures could be catastrophic. The model's prominence in space exploration surged with its deployment during the Apollo 13 mission crisis on April 13, 1970, following the rupture of an oxygen tank in the service module, which crippled life support and propulsion systems for astronauts James Lovell, , and John Swigert. Flight director directed the formation of multiple tiger teams at Mission Control in and sites including North American Aviation's facilities, tasking them with simulating conditions using mockups and spare parts to engineer survival strategies. Key innovations included jury-rigging a by adapting command module squares into the 's circular slots, conserving limited power by deactivating nonessential systems, and plotting a using the Aquarius as a "lifeboat" for the April 17 splashdown in the . These efforts, executed amid oxygen scarcity and freezing temperatures aboard the , averted loss of life and underscored the tiger team's capacity for creative, evidence-driven improvisation under temporal constraints. The resolution, hailed as a "successful " in NASA's post-mission analysis, cemented the tiger team's reputation as a cornerstone of space mission recovery, influencing subsequent protocols for anomaly resolution across programs like the and . Official debriefs and engineering reviews documented the teams' multidisciplinary dynamics—encompassing propulsion, environmental control, and guidance experts—as pivotal to causal diagnosis and verifiable fixes, fostering institutional adoption despite the approach's resource intensity. This visibility extended beyond through declassified reports and technical literature, establishing tiger teams as synonymous with resilient problem-solving in extraterrestrial environments.

Applications Across Domains

Cybersecurity and Penetration Testing

In cybersecurity, a tiger team consists of a small, group of specialists tasked with simulating real-world attacks to identify vulnerabilities in an organization's networks, systems, and applications through rigorous testing. These teams operate with explicit , mimicking adversarial tactics to expose weaknesses before malicious actors can exploit them, thereby enabling defensive improvements. Unlike routine audits, tiger teams emphasize aggressive, creative probing to defeat security measures, often drawing on expertise in ethical hacking, exploit development, and social engineering. The concept originated in the late 1960s when the U.S. Department of Defense assembled —named after units—to test the resilience of early computer networks against unauthorized attempts. These efforts marked the inception of structured testing, focusing on empirical evaluation of system defenses amid growing concerns over data breaches in environments. By the , such teams had evolved to incorporate formalized methodologies, influenced by pioneers like James P. Anderson, who advocated for proactive assessments in reports. Tiger teams employ a phased mirroring modern testing frameworks, beginning with to gather intelligence on targets, followed by scanning, attempts, and post-breach to assess potential impacts. Members collaborate cross-functionally, leveraging tools for , , and while adhering to to avoid operational disruption. This approach prioritizes causal identification of failure points, such as misconfigurations or weak , over theoretical modeling, yielding actionable reports with exploit proofs. Distinguished from red teams by their ad-hoc, problem-specific focus rather than ongoing adversarial emulation, tiger teams in cybersecurity remain relevant for rapid-response hunts, as seen in contemporary services offering targeted testing to mature postures. Their effectiveness stems from high-caliber personnel and minimal , though success depends on organizational buy-in for implementing findings.

Military and Defense Operations

In military and defense contexts, tiger teams consist of multidisciplinary experts assembled for rapid, intensive problem-solving to address operational vulnerabilities, streamline processes, or respond to crises, often employing aggressive tactics akin to penetration units. The approach originated within the , where such teams were initially formed in the 1970s by the to confront complex, time-sensitive challenges with dedicated focus and minimal . These groups prioritize cross-functional collaboration, bypassing standard hierarchies to deliver actionable solutions under duress, drawing from military traditions of specialized task forces for testing defenses or executing high-stakes missions. The U.S. Department of Defense () has frequently deployed tiger teams for (FMS) reforms, exemplified by a 2023 initiative that produced recommendations across six categories to expedite arms transfers and reduce export barriers, addressing chronic delays in ally support. In December 2023, established a dedicated tiger team to accelerate weapons deliveries to , circumventing routine procedures amid escalating regional demands and enabling faster integration of U.S. munitions into active operations. Similarly, a tiger team in 2023 targeted administrative burdens, such as survey overloads on personnel, by involving representatives from the , , and military departments to devise efficiency plans. Operational examples include the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command's 2014 tiger team, led by the chief of staff, which analyzed survey data on resource allocation and crafted a corrective action plan to enhance command effectiveness. In geopolitical responses, a tiger team developed a playbook for U.S. actions in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, focusing on coordinated interagency strategies to counter aggression through targeted support mechanisms. Within defense agencies like the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, tiger teams have bridged directorates to refine field operation strategies, eliminating silos and aligning missions for improved industrial security and access controls. These applications underscore tiger teams' role in fostering agility amid fiscal constraints and evolving threats, though their ad hoc nature demands precise scoping to avoid resource dilution.

Business, Engineering, and Crisis Management

In settings, tiger teams are assembled to drive strategic shifts, such as agile adoption or competitive countermeasures. Systems created a corporate Agile Tiger Team in the mid-2010s to guide business units and groups through agile methodology transitions, addressing barriers like cultural resistance and process integration. Separately, in 2011, deployed a tiger team specifically to counter market encroachments by , focusing on retaining customers through targeted intelligence and response strategies. In contexts, tiger teams support and optimization in high-complexity , often involving cross-disciplinary expertise to mitigate risks outside routine operations. For IT outsourcing initiatives, a tiger team typically includes a , account manager, service operations manager, and representative to expedite issue resolution from inception through , emphasizing concurrent problem-solving akin to methodologies. Research on highlights tiger teams' role in reactive , where multidisciplinary groups conduct intensive workshops to diagnose systemic failures in -heavy endeavors like information systems development. Crisis management applications leverage tiger teams for urgent interventions in operational breakdowns or launch failures, granting them autonomy to prioritize existential threats. After the Healthcare.gov website's malfunction-plagued debut on October 1, 2013, which overwhelmed servers and blocked user access, the convened a tiger team in mid-October to overhaul the platform's core functions, implementing daily scrums and protocols to restore viability within weeks. In broader corporate turnarounds, tiger teams have been employed historically, as at in prior decades, to evaluate distressed tech operations and execute recovery plans amid revenue declines and market pressures. These deployments underscore the approach's emphasis on speed and expertise over hierarchical delays, though success hinges on clear mandates and executive backing.

Notable Examples and Case Studies

Apollo 13 Mission

The mission, NASA's third planned lunar landing, launched at 2:13 p.m. EST on April 11, 1970, from Kennedy Space Center's Launch Complex 39A, carrying astronauts James A. Lovell Jr. as commander, John L. Swigert Jr. as command module pilot, and Fred W. Haise Jr. as lunar module pilot. Intended to explore the Fra Mauro highlands, the mission encountered disaster approximately 56 hours after liftoff when oxygen tank No. 2 in the service module ruptured due to a combination of manufacturing defects and operational stresses, including a faulty heater and cryogenic boil-off testing that damaged internal components. This explosion depleted the service module's oxygen supply within minutes, severed electrical power, and damaged the propulsion system, forcing the crew to shut down the command module and retreat to the lunar module Aquarius as a makeshift lifeboat for the return trajectory. NASA's Mission Control in immediately activated tiger teams—specialized, cross-disciplinary groups of elite engineers, scientists, and technicians operating outside standard hierarchies to focus on urgent problem-solving—under the leadership of White Team flight director . These teams, working in shifts around the clock, prioritized from telemetry data to address cascading failures: conserving limited electrical power by deactivating non-essential systems in Aquarius, managing thermal extremes through passive spacecraft orientation, and executing precise midcourse corrections using the lunar module's descent engine to loop around the Moon and align for reentry. Kranz's tiger teams enforced rigorous procedures, such as "work the problem" directives that emphasized empirical verification over assumptions, enabling rapid iteration on solutions like trajectory recalculations that adjusted the free-return path by about 1.5 degrees to avoid excessive skip-out from 's atmosphere. A critical challenge resolved by the tiger teams was the incompatibility between command and lunar module carbon dioxide scrubber canisters, which threatened lethal CO2 buildup as the crew conserved Aquarius's limited supply. simulators replicated the environment, where teams devised and tested an adapter—"the "—fashioned from plastic bags, cardboard, suit hoses, and to mate square lunar module canisters with the command module's round ports, a design prototyped in under 15 minutes and uplinked to the crew for assembly during the CO2 crisis peak on April 15. Additional tiger team efforts included procedures for safely powering up Odyssey post-lunar module jettison, verifying thruster functionality despite debris risks, and guiding deployment for . The crew reentered and splashed down safely in the at 12:07 p.m. EST on April 17, 1970, approximately 142 hours after launch, with the tiger teams' interventions credited for preventing mission loss without hardware modifications. This response highlighted the tiger team's value in high-stakes , where interdisciplinary expertise and first-principles testing turned a near-fatal anomaly into a "successful failure" that informed subsequent Apollo safety protocols.

Department of Defense Initiatives

The Department of Defense has employed tiger teams across various operational and administrative challenges, leveraging their interdisciplinary expertise to diagnose systemic issues and recommend actionable reforms. One prominent initiative was the (FMS) Tiger Team, established by Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III in August 2022 to address longstanding inefficiencies in the U.S. transfer of defense articles and services to allies and partners. The team identified six key "pressure points" in the FMS process, including delays in case development, contracting bottlenecks, and interagency coordination gaps, drawing on prior reform efforts, feedback from allies, , and internal reviews. In June 2023, Austin approved the team's tasking memo, which outlined comprehensive recommendations to streamline workflows, enhance data analytics for predictive , and prioritize high-value cases, aiming to reduce processing times while maintaining and standards. In cybersecurity and network defense, tiger teams have been proposed and implemented to bolster offensive and defensive capabilities. A 2017 Defense Science Board report recommended forming specialized tiger teams to accelerate the acquisition of scalable offensive cyber tools, addressing gaps in and deployment against evolving threats. Complementing this, the U.S. Navy's 2015 implementation plan for the Cybersecurity Campaign Plan incorporated tiger team structures to execute prioritized actions, such as assessments and mitigation strategies across the DoD Information Network, ensuring alignment with broader directives to operate and defend military networks. These efforts emphasized cross-functional collaboration among engineers, operators, and analysts to simulate adversarial tactics and harden systems preemptively. Tiger teams have also supported internal efficiency and quality-of-life improvements within components. In 2022, the U.S. Army deployed tiger teams for barrack inspections to identify and remediate substandard living conditions for soldiers, focusing on structural deficiencies, maintenance backlogs, and issues at installations nationwide. Similarly, the Space and Missile Defense Command utilized a tiger team in 2014 to conduct a comprehensive process review, targeting redundancies in acquisition and sustainment workflows to enhance operational readiness. These initiatives underscore the 's reliance on tiger teams for targeted, high-impact interventions in both strategic and tactical domains, often yielding measurable outcomes in policy refinement and resource optimization.

Corporate and Academic Implementations

In corporate contexts, tiger teams facilitate rapid problem-solving in IT transformations and operational efficiencies. NIBCO, Inc., a U.S.-based manufacturer of valves and pipe fittings with $460 million in annual revenues, assembled a TIGER team in the mid-1990s to evaluate and implement software across its 10 plants using a "" approach, bypassing phased rollout in favor of simultaneous deployment. The team, comprising directors from , , materials, and production, configured the $17 million system over 15 months to align with core objectives, minimizing customizations despite risks of disruption. Healthcare organizations have deployed tiger teams to eliminate process bottlenecks and boost financial performance. One nonprofit optimized operating room access by scheduling, relocating routine procedures, and investing $100,000 in , yielding over $5 million in margin growth and doubling capacity within two months. A Midwest multi-hospital system analyzed electronic records to streamline behavioral discharges and insurer authorizations, resulting in about 10% margin improvement alongside better flow. In the Northeast, a regional provider consolidated scheduling into dashboards and formed weekly cross-functional groups, clearing a exceeding 5,000 gastrointestinal cases and elevating on-time procedure starts from 41% to 85%. Academic institutions adapt tiger teams for pedagogical enhancement and institutional strategy. implemented a two-student tiger team—one each from electrical and —in its 2023 engineering design course to combat project "stuckness," offering peer consultations, , and back-channel support across teams, which improved progress during critical phases despite initial role ambiguity and occasional resistance. At the , tiger teams of approximately 5-6 domain experts, led by senior sponsors, develop strategic ventures to reconcile academic priorities with financial models, delivering concise reports with case analyses, business plans, impact evaluations, and phased roadmaps for executive review and decisions.

Benefits and Criticisms

Proven Achievements and Effectiveness

Tiger teams have demonstrated effectiveness in high-pressure environments requiring rapid problem-solving and expert integration. At NASA's Engineering and Safety Center (NESC), established in 2004, tiger teams comprising multidisciplinary experts have resolved complex technical issues, such as system anomalies and structural integrity assessments, by leveraging diverse experiences to identify root causes and recommend mitigations that prevented potential mission failures. This approach has yielded institutional successes, including enhanced reliability in hardware through iterative assessments completed within compressed timelines. In military and defense applications, tiger teams have driven tangible process improvements. A 2022 U.S. Department of Defense tiger team tasked with optimizing (FMS) delivered recommendations across six categories, including streamlined technology release reviews and expanded industrial base capacity; by August 2024, implementations had established the Capabilities and Priorities Integration Board and accelerated acquisition support, contributing to faster arms transfers to allies. Similarly, in , a U.S. "Tiger Team" ahead of the developed a "break glass" playbook outlining responses, which informed policy decisions and resource allocation amid geopolitical crisis. Within cybersecurity, tiger teams originated in the as specialized groups simulating adversarial attacks to expose vulnerabilities in early computer networks, enabling preemptive fortifications that evolved into modern red teaming practices and bolstered defense against real-world threats. In business and engineering, case-specific outcomes include healthcare tiger teams that dismantled thousands of procedural backlogs, restoring operational efficiency and margin growth by targeting bottlenecks with cross-functional expertise. These instances highlight tiger teams' capacity for decisive action, though broader empirical quantification of success rates compared to conventional teams relies largely on institutional reports rather than large-scale controlled studies.

Limitations and Potential Risks

Tiger teams, while effective for urgent, high-impact problems, demand significant resources, including elite personnel pulled from core operations, which can strain organizational capacity and prove inefficient for routine or smaller-scale issues. For instance, their resource-intensive nature makes them unsuitable for projects lacking the scale to justify the , as assembling and sustaining such teams diverts and that could support broader initiatives. This limitation is evident in contexts like , where tiger teams excel in complex, large endeavors but falter in less demanding scenarios due to disproportionate costs. The high-pressure environment of tiger teams often leads to member and elevated turnover, as sustained intense focus without robust support mechanisms erodes participant . Engagements characterized by rapid deadlines and adversarial simulations, common in cybersecurity or response, exacerbate , potentially compromising long-term team and institutional knowledge retention. Without clear strategic direction and defined expectations, these teams risk misalignment, where ambiguous goals result in unfocused efforts or suboptimal outcomes. Organizationally, tiger teams can disrupt existing workflows by creating parallel structures that foster resentment, a two-tier , or an of performance masking underlying systemic deficiencies. This approach may sideline regular teams, leading to knowledge silos, mismatched cadences with ongoing operations, and internal that hinder integration of findings post-mission. In government assessments, such as U.S. Department of Energy tiger team evaluations from the early 1990s, facilities often failed to fully implement corrective actions on identified vulnerabilities, highlighting risks of incomplete follow-through and persistent gaps despite initial breakthroughs. A key lies in over-reliance on tiger teams as a , which may neglect preventive measures or holistic , leaving organizations vulnerable to recurring threats. While they address acute crises, they do not substitute for sustained cultural or process reforms, potentially amplifying dangers if used reactively without embedding lessons into standard protocols. In domains like or , failure to scale tiger team insights across the can result in isolated successes amid broader inefficiencies.

Evolution and Contemporary Relevance

Shifts from Traditional to Modern Contexts

The tiger team concept, originating in the U.S. military and contexts, emphasized temporary assemblies of elite specialists to resolve acute, high-risk technical failures in hardware and operations, such as malfunctions requiring immediate, unorthodox solutions. These early implementations prioritized raw expertise and autonomy over bureaucratic processes, often in isolated, government-controlled environments where failure carried existential stakes, like mission survival. By the , the model shifted toward cybersecurity applications within and agencies, where teams simulated adversarial intrusions to probe system weaknesses, transitioning from physical diagnostics to proactive vulnerability assessments in emerging digital networks. This reflected the growing primacy of systems in , with tiger teams functioning as ethical hackers to expose flaws before real threats exploited them, diverging from reactive crisis response to anticipatory testing. In the 1990s and 2000s, adoption extended to corporate and engineering sectors beyond government silos, adapting the framework for profit-driven challenges like supply chain disruptions, product development delays, and regulatory compliance hurdles. Private entities reoriented tiger teams toward cross-functional integration, blending technical prowess with business acumen to accelerate outcomes in competitive markets, often within shorter timelines dictated by market dynamics rather than mission imperatives. Unlike traditional iterations reliant on siloed experts, modern variants incorporate iterative feedback loops akin to agile methodologies, enabling scalable application to software scalability issues or operational inefficiencies. This broadening has diluted some original intensity, as corporate tiger teams navigate internal politics and resource constraints, yet it has amplified versatility, with documented uses in industries from energy to software by the , yielding measurable gains in problem resolution speed—such as reducing project troubleshooting cycles by up to 50% in select implementations. The shift underscores a causal pivot from state-sponsored, existential threats to enterprise-level agility, where empirical success metrics increasingly validate the approach amid pervasive technological disruption.

Integration with Emerging Technologies

Tiger teams are increasingly utilized in the deployment of () systems, particularly to address the complexities of generative experimentation and integration. These teams typically comprise cross-functional experts in , , , and ethical considerations to rapidly , test, and scale solutions amid regulatory and technical uncertainties. For example, in November 2023, consulting firm Kearney recommended forming specialized tiger teams for generative , emphasizing their role in overcoming data silos and ensuring model reliability through iterative sprints. In academic and research settings, tiger teams facilitate strategic planning for and advancements. Stony Brook University's Artificial Intelligence Tiger Team, led by computer science Steven Skiena, produced a final report in the early 2020s outlining recommendations for autonomy, machine learning infrastructure, and ethical AI governance, influencing institutional investments in computational resources. Similarly, the U.S. (CISA) convened a tiger team in 2023–2024 to develop use cases and standards for Software Bills of Materials (SBOMs) tailored to AI systems, aiming to enhance transparency and vulnerability management in AI deployments. Health care applications demonstrate tiger teams' adaptability to AI policy challenges. In July 2025, the Coalition for Health AI () launched a tiger team to establish best practices for using in verifying work requirements, focusing on accuracy, bias mitigation, and privacy safeguards amid potential automation of eligibility determinations. The , San Francisco's Versa AI Tiger Team, comprising over 50 multidisciplinary members, earned the Gold AI Impact Award at the 2025 UC Tech Awards for advancing AI-driven clinical workflows and research informatics. Integration extends to quantum computing preparedness, where tiger teams assess cryptographic risks and infrastructure needs. Kyndryl established a Quantum Tiger Team by September 2024 to collaborate with partners like on post-quantum encryption strategies, simulating threats to classical systems and prototyping hybrid quantum-safe architectures. In standards bodies, the NIEM Business Architecture Committee's Emerging Technologies Tiger Team (ET3), initiated in May 2018, evaluated , , and interoperability for information exchange frameworks, producing guidelines updated through 2018 face-to-face reviews. Blockchain applications remain niche but include teams for secure and transactive systems. A 2023 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory report detailed a "" team developing templates on platforms like and Fabric for energy trading, prioritizing fault-tolerant architectures to mitigate oracle dependencies and delays. These efforts underscore teams' value in bridging legacy processes with decentralized technologies, though challenges persist without broader empirical validation.

References

  1. [1]
    What is a Tiger Team Approach? - Connext Technology Blog
    Tiger Teams are highly skilled, hand-picked groups of people who are tenacious about problem solving. While the term originated at NASA, and the most famous ...
  2. [2]
    Tiger teams: What they are and when to use them - Tempo Software
    The term "tiger team" originated at NASA during the Apollo space missions – most notably, the Apollo 13 mission in 1970, when a tiger team worked from the ...
  3. [3]
    Bizspeak: On your company's 'tiger team' of undomesticated ...
    Sep 14, 2021 · The term tiger team initially appeared in a 1964 technical paper titled Program Management in Design and Development, and was used to ...
  4. [4]
    Tiger Team - HOT Idioms
    May 20, 2023 · Origin: The term tiger team is a US military reference from World War II referring to elite forces to test defenses. The term was made ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    DCSA 'tiger team' digs into growing background investigations backlog
    Nov 22, 2024 · A Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency “tiger team” is moving to address an increase in the backlog of security clearance background investigations.<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    The Case Against Tiger Teams: When External Product Teams Work ...
    Aug 11, 2023 · A tiger team is a specialized, cross-functional group brought together to investigate and solve a specific critical problem or issue. The term ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  8. [8]
    tiger team - NASA Lessons Learned
    A NASA "tiger team" is an integrated group of scientists and engineers from various NASA centers and outside, used to solve complex technical problems.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  9. [9]
    Understanding the Tiger Team Approach | Lucidchart Blog
    A tiger team is a specialized, cross-functional team brought together to solve or investigate a specific problem or critical issue.
  10. [10]
    Tiger Teams: How to Act Fast and Stay Nimble [2025] - Asana
    Feb 16, 2025 · Tiger teams are small, cross-functional groups of specialists who can stay nimble and make decisions without being bogged down by too many stakeholders.When should you use a tiger... · Who should be on your tiger...
  11. [11]
    What is a tiger team? - Optimizely
    Tiger teams are cross-functional groups that come together to solve complex, high-stake challenges quickly and effectively.benefits of the tiger team... · Tiger team best practices: 6 for...
  12. [12]
    What is a tiger team, and should your company have one?
    A tiger team is a select technical team tasked with addressing specific, often intricate problems.
  13. [13]
    Tiger Team Explained: What It Is and How It Helps with Critical Issues
    Nov 29, 2024 · The term “tiger team” is derived from its origin in the military and gained prominence through NASA's deployment of a tiger team during the ...
  14. [14]
    What is a Tiger Team and Why is the Opportunity Valuable?
    Aug 15, 2020 · A tiger team is a small team of experts assembled to solve specific and complex problems, often when existing structures are not suited.
  15. [15]
    Tiger Teams - Ninety
    A Tiger Team is a small group of people tasked with solving or investigating an organizational problem or opportunity within a specified period of time.Context · Five Key Questions Every... · Core Disciplines of Tiger TeamsMissing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  16. [16]
    Want to win big? Call in a tiger team - Washington Technology
    Aug 6, 2009 · “When the Navy needed some quick turnaround work or repairs, they would assemble a tiger team,” Ballard said. “The connotation was that it ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  17. [17]
    Tiger Team Throughout the Cold War Mare Island Naval Shipyard ...
    Sep 4, 2023 · Tiger Team Throughout the Cold War Mare Island Naval Shipyard sent Tiger Teams around the world to either assist other shipyards or to ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  18. [18]
    Form effective tiger teams for critical problem solving - Appfire
    Aug 27, 2024 · Whatever the context, the common thread is that a tiger team is swift, decisive, highly skilled, deeply cross-functional, and narrowly focused ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  19. [19]
    Apollo 13 - NASA
    On April 11, 1970, the powerful Saturn V rocket carrying the Apollo 13 mission launched from Kennedy Space Center propelling astronauts Jim Lovell, Fred Haise, ...Mission Details · The Successful Failure · Houston, We’ve Had a Problem
  20. [20]
    The history of penetration testing - Infosec Institute
    Jul 7, 2019 · So-called tiger teams, named after specialized military teams, were formed in the late 1960s to test the ability of computer networks to resist ...
  21. [21]
    A Brief History of Penetration Testing - Astra Security Blog
    Oct 3, 2025 · The job of the Tiger Teams was to examine computer networks to find security vulnerabilities. There, you have the first penetration tests and ...
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    What Is Penetration Testing & Why Is It Important? - CovertSwarm
    Jul 4, 2023 · Cybersecurity penetration testing traces back to the 1960s when the US Air Force conducted 'tiger team' security tests. Security experts ...
  24. [24]
    History of Pentest as a Service (PTaaS) - Cobalt.io
    Nov 17, 2021 · 1900s. James P. Anderson was one of the early pioneers of penetration testing, dating back to the 1970s when fully securing computer systems ...
  25. [25]
    A Brief History of Penetration Testing: From Tiger Teams to PTaaS
    Jun 19, 2025 · This article traces the history of penetration testing from its military and intelligence roots in the 1960s to its formalisation through U.S. ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  26. [26]
    Unleash the Tiger: Fast, Smart, and Targeted Cybersecurity Testing ...
    Jun 19, 2025 · Trustwave is taking a leap forward with the introduction of Tiger Team Testing, designed to deliver rapid, targeted results at a lower cost.
  27. [27]
    Tiger team versus red team? - Information Security Stack Exchange
    Feb 15, 2012 · Tiger team - Same as red team, however is a older term of the attacking/opposition side of an engagement. White team - The team that establishes ...Missing: cybersecurity | Show results with:cybersecurity
  28. [28]
    Ethical Intruders: From Tiger Teams In The 1970's To Today's AI ...
    Feb 19, 2025 · We explore the evolution of cybersecurity through key moments, from the first “tiger teams” in the 1970s to today's AI-powered security solutions.Missing: usage | Show results with:usage
  29. [29]
    What is Tiger Team | Glossary - CyberGhost VPN
    The concept of Tiger Teams originated in the military, particularly within the United States Armed Forces. Initially formed to address complex problems swiftly ...
  30. [30]
    Tiger Team Recommendations Aim to Optimize Foreign Military Sales
    Jun 13, 2023 · A tiger team delivered a variety of recommendations, which fall into six broad categories, on how to improve the foreign military sales ...Missing: earliest documented<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Pentagon Taps “Tiger Team” to Rush Weapons to Israel - The Intercept
    Dec 14, 2023 · In addition to a special mechanism to sell weapons to Israel, the Pentagon created a “Tiger Team” to help rush the arms sales.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] dod survey burden - tiger team action plan - OPA.mil
    TAB B is a table summarizing each recommendation that is detailed in the action plan. • The Tiger Team was comprised of members from the Defense Manpower Data ...
  33. [33]
    Tiger Team roars through SMDC | Article | The United States Army
    Apr 30, 2014 · "The Tiger Team reflects a commitment from the commanding general to improve workforce relations across the command," said Col. Dewey A. Granger ...
  34. [34]
    The Russia-Ukraine “Tiger Team” - Project MUSE
    Mar 28, 2024 · This chapter tells the story, drawing on my experience leading the “Tiger Team” charged with developing the playbook that guided the US response.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] OCIO develops long-term strategy to support field operations
    known as the “Tiger Team” initiative. The Tiger Teams provide guidance and informal discussions on current changes in processes using real time examples and ...
  36. [36]
    Pentagon Targets Foreign Military Sales Reforms
    Aug 4, 2023 · The second tiger team recommendation is to enable efficient reviews and reduce barriers to export control approvals for key technologies. The ...
  37. [37]
    Managing the transition to the new agile business and product ...
    To address this challenge, Cisco established a dedicated corporate Agile Tiger Team (ATT) to assist business units and engineering teams making the transition.
  38. [38]
    Cisco once created a 'Tiger Team' to attack a hated rival
    Aug 17, 2017 · So back in 2011, in order to keep Arista from nabbing any more business from Cisco's customers, Cisco set up the "Tiger Team," a group focused ...
  39. [39]
    TIGER Teams on Outsourcing Projects - PMI
    The TIGER team, an integrated team of subject matter experts, streamlines the outsourcing project from concept to closure.
  40. [40]
    Project Troubleshooting: Tiger Teams for Reactive Risk Management
    Aug 7, 2025 · A case study of a global company employing several teams ... Crisis Management in Information System Projects: Lessons of a Case Study.
  41. [41]
    Obama: HealthCare.gov's Product Is Good but the Cash Register's ...
    The White House has recruited a tiger team to fix the ailing online health insurance marketplace.
  42. [42]
    The art of a successful tech company turnaround - CIO
    Sep 25, 2015 · I used to run what we called a Tiger Team at IBM decades ago, which ... When assessing or doing a turnaround the key elements to remember are that ...
  43. [43]
    Apollo 13: Mission Details - NASA
    Jul 8, 2009 · Apollo 13 was supposed to land in the Fra Mauro area. An explosion on board forced Apollo 13 to circle the moon without landing.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] APOLLO 13 MISSION REPORT SEPTEMBER 1970 - NASA
    The Apollo 13 mission, planned as a lunar landing in the Fra Mauro area, was aborted because of an abrupt loss of service module cryogenic.
  45. [45]
    Apollo 13 Lunar Journal : Mission Summary - NASA
    Jan 4, 2006 · The first two Apollo crews landed out on the smooth lunar mare, the lava seas that formed relatively late in the Moon's history.
  46. [46]
    Apollo 13 Flight Journal - Day 6, part 1: Packing Up - NASA
    Apr 27, 2020 · Apollo 13. pics/a13-patch.jpg. Day 6, part 1 ... The young mission controller was currently involved in Gene Kranz's special Tiger team ...
  47. [47]
    Apollo 13: The Successful Failure - NASA
    Apr 6, 2020 · The Apollo 13 mission was to be the third lunar landing in the program before an on board explosion forced the mission to circle the Moon without landing.
  48. [48]
    Department of Defense Unveils Comprehensive Recommendations ...
    Jun 13, 2023 · Austin III approved a tasking memo from the Department of Defense (DoD) Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Tiger Team that highlights six key FMS ...
  49. [49]
    Tiger Team Recommendations Aim to Optimize Foreign Military Sales
    Jun 13, 2023 · Tiger Team Recommendations Aim to Optimize Foreign Military Sales ... US Department of Defense · USD Research & Engineering · USD Policy · USD ...
  50. [50]
    Department of Defense Unveils Comprehensive Recommendations ...
    Jun 13, 2023 · Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III approved a tasking memo from the Department of Defense (DoD) Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Tiger Team ...
  51. [51]
    Pentagon Advisers Want Cyber 'Tiger Teams,' More Authorities for ...
    Mar 2, 2017 · The proposed tiger team would “develop options and recommendations for improved and accelerated acquisition of scalable offensive cyber ...
  52. [52]
    NAVY IMPLEMENTATION OF DOD CYBERSECURITY CAMPAIGN ...
    Sep 15, 2025 · ... TIGER TEAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/19AUG15// NARR/REF A IS THE DOD ... Department of Defense (DoD) Information Network (DoDIN) while ...
  53. [53]
    Tiger Team inspections work to improve Soldier's living conditions
    Aug 16, 2022 · mil website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States. ... Tiger Team inspections work to improve ...
  54. [54]
    "NIBCO'S “BIG BANG”" by Carol V. Brown and Iris Vessey
    This case study can be used to demonstrate the tradeoffs between Big Bang versus slower ERP implementation approaches that allow time for organizational ...
  55. [55]
    (PDF) CASE STUDY III-5 NIBCO's "Big Bang": An SAP Implementation
    This case study explores the challenges and strategies involved in NIBCO, Inc.'s ambitious "big bang" SAP R/3 implementation across multiple plants and ...
  56. [56]
    Tiger Teams: Driving Margin Growth by Eliminating Hospital ...
    The following three case studies show how these teams accomplish their goals. ... Strategy and finance partnered to build the business case for shifting volume.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Implementing a Tiger Team in a Capstone Design Course
    Jun 25, 2023 · This in-depth case-study of the experience of implementing a tiger team draws on observations from students, faculty, the tiger team members,.
  58. [58]
    Tiger Teams | Strategic Planning - William & Mary
    It has high potential to align academic and financial models so as to enhance excellence · It warrants dedicated research because it could have strategic impact ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  59. [59]
    A Year in, DOD Racks Up Wins for Foreign Military Sales
    Aug 8, 2024 · Since then, the department scored wins by implementing four tiger team recommendations: establishment of the CPIB; creation of the Defense ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  60. [60]
    Innovative Solutions with Tiger Teams: A Deep Dive - PM Column
    A cybersecurity tiger team is a specialized and task-oriented group assembled to address and strengthen an organization's cybersecurity defenses.Missing: usage | Show results with:usage
  61. [61]
    What is a Tiger Team and How to Use Them - Indeed
    Nov 22, 2024 · A tiger team is a specialized group of experts from across the company that can come together quickly to tackle a problem.
  62. [62]
    The Tiger Team Trap: Why Special Teams Aren't the Answer (and ...
    The Tiger Team trap is that it creates an illusion of superior performance without addressing the underlying issues.Missing: proven | Show results with:proven
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Corrective Actions on Tiger Teams' Find.ings
    Mar 25, 1993 · As of. ,January 1993, the office's third analysis of the last 19 Tiger Team assessments was being printed. The office also installed a Tiger ...Missing: troubleshooting | Show results with:troubleshooting
  64. [64]
    Create the Right Type of Crisis Management Team - Gartner
    Mar 25, 2020 · The two teams collaborate on planning: The tiger team takes a first pass to identify procedures, and the SWAT team assesses their feasibility ...
  65. [65]
  66. [66]
    Think Small, Win Big: The Secret Sauce of Tiger Teams - Forbes
    Aug 28, 2024 · A tiger team refers to a small, highly skilled group of specialists assembled to solve a specific, high-stakes problem or to tackle a critical project.Missing: earliest | Show results with:earliest
  67. [67]
    [PDF] MODERN TIGER TEAMS: - Future of Energy Initiative
    Dec 21, 2004 · The phrase Tiger Team became synonymous with a temporary expert problem-solving team. Traditional Tiger Teams are an ad-hoc small group of ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Standing up tiger teams to tackle generative AI complexity | Kearney
    Nov 15, 2023 · Originally coined by NASA, the term tiger team refers to a group of experts assigned to identify and fix complex problems.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  69. [69]
    Artificial Intelligence | Tiger Teams - Stony Brook University
    Artificial Intelligence Tiger Team Final Report. Team Members. Steven Skiena, Computer Science (Lead). Tahsin Kurc, Biomedical Informatics. Susan Brennan ...
  70. [70]
    aibom-squad/SBOM-for-AI-Tiger-Team - GitHub
    Use cases and recommendations to operationalize Software Bills of Materials (SBOMs) for Artificial Intelligence (AI). CISA SBOM for AI Tiger Team. Version ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    CHAI convenes team to explore AI for Medicaid work requirements
    Jul 21, 2025 · The tiger team will develop best practices for the use of AI in ... Coalition for Health AI (CHAI) Artificial Intelligence Centers for ...
  72. [72]
    NEWS: The UCSF Versa AI Tiger Team Wins the Gold AI Impact ...
    Jul 24, 2025 · The UCSF Versa AI Tiger team, with more than 50 team members across a range of specialties, won the Gold AI Impact Award at the 2025 UC Tech ...
  73. [73]
    Kyndryl and Nokia partner for quantum computing - LinkedIn
    Sep 9, 2024 · Kyndryl and Nokia partner for quantum computing ... Great article! Our Kyndryl Quantum Tiger Team is ready to go deeper into #QuantumComputing ...
  74. [74]
    NBAC Kicks Off Emerging Technologies Tiger Team | NIEMOpen ...
    The NIEM Business Architecture Committee (NBAC) will kick off an Emerging Technologies Tiger Team (ET3) on Thursday, May 17, 2018, 1-2pm (US - Eastern).
  75. [75]
    [PDF] NBAC ET3 F2F Update (Oct 2018) sml - NIEM GitHub
    NBAC Emerging Technologies Tiger Team. (ET3). NBAC ... Technology Overview: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning ... Tiger Team. Review. NBAC Review.
  76. [76]
    [PDF] Smart Contract Architectures and Templates for Blockchain-based ...
    In particular, the “Tiger” team, developed the Transactive Energy Abstract ... Common blockchain implementations include Ethereum and Hyperledger fabric.