Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Trusted Execution Technology

Trusted Execution Technology (TXT, formerly known as LaGrande Technology) is a hardware-based security technology developed by Corporation, consisting of extensions integrated into Intel processors and chipsets to enhance platform protection against software-based attacks. It provides a measured launch environment and protected execution mechanisms that ensure the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data by isolating applications in secure spaces shielded from malicious software. At its core, Intel TXT establishes a dynamic root of trust during system initialization, leveraging cryptographic measurements to verify the integrity of platform components such as the BIOS, firmware, hypervisor, and operating system before they execute. This process, known as measured launch, uses a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) to store Platform Configuration Registers (PCRs) that capture hash values of these components, allowing remote attestation to confirm a "known good" configuration. Key architectural elements include Authenticated Code Modules (ACMs), which are digitally signed, immutable code segments executed in a protected processor mode called System Management Mode (SMM), and the SINIT ACM specifically responsible for resetting the platform and initiating the secure launch sequence. By building on Intel Virtualization Technology (VT), TXT enables the creation of isolated virtual machines and execution environments, reducing the Trusted Computing Base (TCB) and mitigating threats like rootkits that target the boot process or runtime integrity. Introduced in 2007 with technology for client platforms, TXT was extended to servers in 2010 alongside the processor 5600 series to harden virtualized data centers against attacks on hypervisors and , supporting compliance with standards such as PCI-DSS and HIPAA through features like late launch for event-triggered security initialization. Its application was further extended to mobile platforms thereafter, including digital office environments, where it safeguards business-critical applications and enables secure remote access. Despite its robust defenses, TXT requires compatible hardware, support, and software stacks like Trusted Boot (tboot) for full functionality, and it complements other security measures such as Secure Boot rather than replacing them.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

Trusted Execution Technology (TXT), developed by , is a set of hardware extensions integrated into x86 processors and chipsets that enable the creation of a (TEE) designed to protect the and of code and data during execution. This technology establishes a secure foundation by isolating sensitive operations from potential tampering, ensuring that only verified software components are loaded into the protected environment. The primary purposes of Intel TXT include preventing software-based attacks such as malware, rootkits, and hypervisor exploits by verifying the platform's state prior to launching critical code, thereby mitigating risks from compromised or operating systems. It facilitates secure processes and remote attestation, allowing systems to prove their trustworthiness to external parties through cryptographic mechanisms. By enforcing a from hardware initialization, TXT addresses vulnerabilities inherent in traditional operating system and firmware loading sequences. Originally introduced to bolster enterprise-grade security in digital office environments, TXT was aimed at hardening platforms against emerging threats in virtualized and networked settings, with initial support in client systems via technology in 2007. Key benefits include hardware-enforced isolation that shields applications and data from or OS-level compromises, alongside cryptographic attestation for compliance verification in regulated industries. These features provide scalable protection without relying solely on software defenses, enhancing overall system reliability.

Key Components

Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) relies on a combination of , firmware, and software components integrated into compatible platforms to establish a secure foundation for . The core includes processors that TXT, beginning with the Core microarchitecture, such as Core 2 Duo processors introduced in 2006, which incorporates specialized instructions and security extensions for protected execution environments. These processors work in conjunction with chipsets featuring enhanced security capabilities, such as for Virtualization Technology (VT) and directed I/O (VT-d), to isolate and protect system resources from potential compromises. A critical hardware component is the (TPM), typically integrated as a discrete chip or firmware-based solution, with TXT supporting versions 1.2 and 2.0. The TPM serves as a secure storage for cryptographic keys, platform measurements, and policies, enabling the sealing of sensitive data to specific platform configurations to prevent unauthorized access or tampering. Firmware elements include Authenticated Code Modules (ACMs), which are digitally signed binary modules provided by and loaded into the processor's for secure initialization. These modules, such as the SINIT ACM, ensure the authenticity and integrity of the boot process by verifying before execution, preventing modifications from untrusted sources. On the software side, the Measured Launch Environment (MLE) forms the initial trusted codebase, comprising critical stubs from the operating system or that are measured and verified prior to full system launch. The MLE establishes a protected space where subsequent software can operate with assured integrity. These components exhibit key interdependencies: the 's GETSEC instruction interacts with ACMs to invoke secure operations, while the TPM provides persistent storage for keys and measurements generated during interactions between the , ACMs, and MLE, ensuring cohesive across the . The TPM's role in handling measurements supports the overall verification of platform state by the other elements.

History and Development

Origins and Introduction

Trusted Execution Technology (TXT), originally known as LaGrande Technology, was first announced by in September 2003 during the Intel Developer Forum as a key component of the company's vision for secure computing platforms. This initiative aimed to integrate hardware-level protections to safeguard against software-based attacks, building on emerging standards like the (TPM). The development of TXT was motivated by the escalating threats of the early , including the rise of rootkits that could compromise system firmware and potential escapes where could break out of boundaries to infect host systems. These vulnerabilities, exemplified by early demonstrations of rootkits like Blue Pill in , highlighted the need for robust hardware-enforced integrity checks to prevent attacks on the platform's process and environment. By , renamed LaGrande to and began showcasing prototypes at industry events to demonstrate its capabilities in establishing a dynamic root of trust. TXT first became commercially available in hardware in 2007, integrated with second-generation platforms and chipsets such as the Intel 965 Express, and later the Q45 chipset and Nehalem-based Core i7 processors, enabling enhanced security features for business-oriented systems. It was prominently featured as part of the platform, targeting enterprise PCs to provide remote manageability and protection against at the hardware level. Early adoption of included collaborations with to bolster drive encryption; in supports TPM-based protection, which can be enhanced by TXT measured launches if configured, for improved key protection upon its 2009 release. Additionally, distributions began prototyping secure boot mechanisms using TXT through the open-source tboot project, which facilitated measured launches of kernels and monitors starting around 2008.

Evolution and Milestones

During the mid-2010s, enhanced TXT by integrating it with (TPM) 2.0, beginning with the Skylake processor generation released in 2015, which introduced firmware-based TPM 2.0 support via Intel Platform Trust Technology (PTT). This update improved compatibility and security for measured launches, allowing TXT to utilize advanced cryptographic features of TPM 2.0 for attestation and sealing operations. Concurrently, support for the Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) was strengthened, enabling TXT to operate more seamlessly with modern boot processes and modular architectures prevalent in processors from Skylake onward. Open-source initiatives advanced TXT accessibility in 2019 with the release of the TrenchBoot project, which provides a Linux-based implementation for dynamic root of trust measurement (DRTM) using 's measured launch environment. Developed collaboratively by contributors including and Apertus Solutions, TrenchBoot replaces proprietary bootloaders like Intel's tboot, facilitating secure kernel launches and integration with hypervisors while supporting local and remote attestation. This effort democratized DRTM for open hardware and software ecosystems, emphasizing isolation and verification without reliance on closed-source modules. In the 2020s, TXT gained compatibility with broader frameworks, serving as a foundational technology for protecting within virtualized environments, though it increasingly complemented newer innovations like Trust Domain Extensions (TDX). A notable open hardware advancement occurred in 2022 when Dasharo firmware added support for TXT on platforms like 7010 and 9010, incorporating modifications for measured boot and attestation, including integration with tools like CHARRA for remote verification. This enabled TXT usage in customizable, non-proprietary systems, enhancing for privacy-focused operating systems such as . Key events in 2019 included disclosures of vulnerabilities in , such as Intel Security Advisory INTEL-SA-00164, which identified a potential information disclosure issue involving and Processor Graphics, affecting certain platforms and allowing unauthorized access to protected memory regions. responded with updates and patches to mitigate these risks, recommending system administrators apply them alongside TPM and configurations to restore chain-of-trust integrity. As of 2025, TXT sees limited new hardware support amid Intel's shift toward TDX for advanced , with focus instead on software patches for systems through projects like ongoing TrenchBoot enhancements in kernels. In 2025, Intel continued issuing microcode updates addressing vulnerabilities in TXT-supported platforms, while projects like TrenchBoot saw further integrations for DRTM. Nevertheless, adoption persists in for security, where TXT enables attested environments on resource-constrained devices to protect against firmware tampering in distributed networks.

Architecture

Hardware Requirements

Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) requires specific components to establish a secure execution , including processors with built-in extensions, compatible chipsets for interfacing, and integrated or discrete Trusted Platform Modules (TPMs) for cryptographic operations. These elements work together to enable measured launches and protected execution modes, ensuring platform integrity from hardware initialization. Processor support for TXT begins with the Core microarchitecture, introduced in 2006 with Intel Core 2 Duo processors. Initial support was provided in client platforms via Intel vPro technology starting in 2007. It encompasses subsequent microarchitectures including Nehalem-based Intel Core i-series processors from the first generation (e.g., Core i7-900 series) onward, as well as server-oriented Intel Xeon processors such as the E5 and E7 families. These CPUs incorporate specialized instructions, including the GETSEC[SENTER] opcode for initiating secure enter mode and GETSEC[SEXIIT] for secure exit and initialization, which facilitate the dynamic root of trust measurement. Additionally, processors must support Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x with Extended Page Tables) and Secure Mode Extensions (SMX) to isolate execution environments. Chipset requirements include Intel's 4 Series (e.g., Q45) and subsequent generations, which provide the necessary I/O capabilities and security features. Earlier implementations relied on the ICH9 southbridge for interfacing with the TPM via the (LPC) bus, ensuring secure communication between the CPU and cryptographic hardware. Modern platforms integrate these functions into unified chipsets supporting (SPI) for firmware storage. TPM integration is essential for , typically via a discrete TPM 1.2 or 2.0 chip compliant with Group specifications, or a firmware-based TPM (fTPM) in newer CPUs starting from Skylake. The TPM stores platform measurements and secrets, enabling attestation of the boot process. flash memory is required for secure / , protecting from tampering. System prerequisites encompass a 64-bit x86 , at least 2 GB of system memory to accommodate TXT heaps and modules (with specific contiguous allocations for the SINIT Authenticated Code Module, typically 192-320 KB), and / settings that enable TXT functionality, including loading of signed Authenticated Code Modules (ACMs). Compatibility is limited to platforms; TXT is not supported on or architectures due to its reliance on Intel-specific opcodes and extensions. Furthermore, as of 2024, plans to end support for Skylake (6th generation, 2015) processors in releases after 8.x, potentially affecting TXT functionality in virtualized environments and necessitating hardware upgrades for continued compatibility.

Software and Firmware Elements

The firmware layer for Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) primarily involves the Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) or Basic Input/Output System (BIOS), which must support TXT enablement to initialize the for a measured launch. UEFI/BIOS authenticates and loads Authenticated Code Modules (ACMs), such as the Startup ACM (S-ACM), signed by , and measures the Static Root of Trust into (TPM) Configuration Registers (PCRs) 0-7 during the pre-boot phase. This firmware also allocates the TXT heap—a contiguous region for storing Launch Control Policy (LCP) data and other structures—and configures types via Memory Type Range Registers (MTRRs) before invoking the GETSEC[SENTER] instruction. The SINIT ACM, a chipset-specific module, verifies configuration, authenticates the Measured Launch Environment (MLE), and ensures an acceptable for secure execution, requiring at least 320 KB of aligned below 4 GB. The (ME), part of the converged ecosystem, contributes to platform initialization by providing runtime security services, including support for TPM (fTPM) and integration with TXT-enabled processes on compatible platforms. Operating system support for relies on integration with TPM for measured . In Windows, TXT enhances features like for full-volume encryption and for secure virtualization through System Guard Secure Launch, which verifies the boot integrity using TXT measurements to protect against and hypervisor attacks. Linux kernels from version 2.6.33 onward support TXT via tboot, an open-source trusted that performs measured and verified launches as a pre-kernel module, compatible with distributions such as SUSE 11 SP2, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, and Ubuntu 10.10. Measured hypervisors like integrate TXT to enable secure domain launches, with patches supporting processors for dynamic root of trust establishment in virtualized environments. Development tools for TXT include the Intel TXT Measured Launch Environment Developer's Guide, which details MLE architecture, initialization pseudocode, LCP policy creation, and error handling for building custom MLEs that support features like Virtual Machine Extensions (VMX). For attestation, APIs such as those in the Trusted Computing Group (TCG) Software Stack (TSS) 2.0 provide interfaces to TPM commands like TPM2_Quote for quoting PCR values, enabling remote verification of TXT measurements; the TCG IF-TPM specification defines low-level access for TPM interactions in TXT contexts. Configuration of TXT involves BIOS/UEFI settings to enable TPM and TXT, followed by bootloader modifications for secure handoff. Model-Specific Registers (MSRs), such as IA32_MTRR_DEF_TYPE and IA32_APIC_BASE, are loaded with predefined values during GETSEC[SENTER] execution to establish protected memory regions. Bootloaders like GRUB chainload tboot or similar shim loaders, which verify the LCP policy and hand off control to the MLE, ensuring a chain of trust from firmware to OS kernel. Vendor integrations extend TXT capabilities for remote management. 's Integrated Dell Remote Access Controller (iDRAC) supports TPM-based remote host attestation, allowing verification of TXT measurements over the network for server integrity checks. HPE's Integrated Lights-Out (iLO) enables TXT through BIOS configuration and integrates with TPM for attestation workflows, facilitating remote policy enforcement and verification in environments.

Security Mechanisms

Platform Measurements

Platform measurements in Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) involve the capture and storage of integrity metrics for platform components through cryptographic hashing, ensuring that the system's configuration remains unaltered from trusted states. These measurements are primarily handled by the (TPM), which uses Platform Configuration Registers (PCRs) to immutably record hashes of , software, and configuration data. TXT distinguishes between static measurements, taken during the initial boot process by the Core Root of Trust for Measurement (CRTM), and dynamic measurements, performed during a late launch initiated by the GETSEC[SENTER] instruction without a full system reset. Static measurements typically cover and components, while dynamic ones include the operating system and applications, all hashed using algorithms such as or SHA-256 to provide collision-resistant integrity checks. The TPM's PCRs serve as the core storage mechanism, with specific registers designated for operations. PCRs 17 through 23 are reserved for dynamic measurements in : PCR 17 records the root of trust establishment, including the SINIT Authenticated Code Module (ACM) and Measured Launch Environment (MLE); PCR 18 captures policy details and configuration authorities; and PCRs 19-23 hold additional dynamic elements like OS-specific data or reserved extensions. Measurements are extended into these PCRs using a chaining operation that prevents retroactive alterations, defined by the formula: \text{PCR}_{\text{new}} = \text{HASH}(\text{PCR}_{\text{old}} \Vert \text{measurement}) where \Vert denotes concatenation, and HASH is SHA-1 (producing 20-byte digests) or SHA-256 (32-byte digests), ensuring each new measurement incorporates the prior state. This process begins with the CRTM measuring itself into PCR 0 during static boot, then extends to dynamic phases. The SINIT ACM acts as the primary measurement agent for pre-OS dynamic integrity checks, loaded into isolated memory and executed in to verify and the platform state. It measures the CRTM version and status, the MLE (which encompasses the initial trusted code segments like the or ), and associated policy elements, detecting tampering through validation and comparisons against expected values. If discrepancies are found—such as unauthorized modifications to or memory—the SINIT ACM halts the launch, preventing execution in a compromised environment. These measurements are stored in the TPM's PCRs via secure localities 3 or 4, protecting against software interference. For verification, the attestation process generates quotes from the PCR values, signed by the Attestation Identity Key () to enable remote parties to confirm the platform's without revealing keys. A , produced via the TPM's Quote command, includes selected PCR digests and a for freshness, allowing challengers to compare against known good configurations. The , certified through the TPM's endorsement key infrastructure, ensures the quote's authenticity, facilitating trust establishment in distributed systems. These platform measurements form the foundation for extending a , as detailed in subsequent mechanisms.

Chain of Trust

The chain of trust in Trusted Execution Technology (TXT), as implemented by , establishes a secure boot process by sequentially verifying the integrity of platform components from the hardware root through software layers, ensuring that each stage authenticates the next before proceeding. This process begins with the Core Root of Trust for Measurement (CRTM), typically embedded in the platform's or , which serves as the immutable starting point for trust establishment during system reset. The CRTM measures the code and configuration, extending these measurements into the (TPM) via Platform Configuration Registers (PCRs), creating a cryptographic record of the platform's state. Subsequent layers build upon this foundation: the , once verified, measures the OS loader (such as a ), which in turn measures the Measured Launch Environment (MLE), often a or operating system . Each component performs hash-based of the next layer's code and data, comparing these against predefined "known good" values—either static hashes or dynamic policies—to confirm . If any measurement deviates from the expected value, the launch process aborts, preventing execution of tampered software and maintaining the of the . This sequential verification ensures that trust propagates reliably without gaps, as each stage only releases control after attesting the successor. A critical aspect of the chain is the sealing mechanism provided by the TPM, which binds sensitive data or secrets to specific states representing the verified chain. During the trusted launch, the MLE can seal keys or configuration data using the TPM's sealing commands, which encrypt the data such that it can only be unsealed if the PCR values match the exact measurements recorded during the chain's establishment. This prevents unauthorized access to sealed secrets unless the entire chain remains intact, enabling persistent protection across reboots or resume from states. For instance, in systems using tboot as the OS loader, the sealed data includes memory range MACs (Message Authentication Codes) that are verified upon S3 resume to detect any post-launch alterations. The Late Launch variant, facilitated by the Dynamic Root of Trust for Measurement (D-RTM), introduces flexibility by allowing the chain to initialize post-boot, excluding early firmware components from the for scenarios like virtualized environments. Triggered by a secure instruction such as GETSEC[SENTER], this mechanism resets relevant processor state and PCRs before measuring the MLE, enabling measurements after initial platform setup while still enforcing the sequential hash verification flow. This approach is particularly useful for measured hypervisors, where pre-launch components need not be part of the . Overall, the chain of trust provides robust guarantees by cryptographically linking measurements across layers, effectively mitigating man-in-the-middle attacks during that could inject or modify code undetected. By relying on hardware-enforced and TPM-attested hashes, it ensures that the launched environment reflects only authorized configurations, with any breach in the sequence halting the process to preserve system security.

Dynamic Root of Trust

The Dynamic Root of Trust for Measurement (DRTM) in Intel Trusted Execution Technology () establishes a fresh root of trust through a processor-initiated reset mechanism, utilizing the GETSEC[SENTER] instruction to transition the CPU into a known good and clear any prior system compromises. This approach creates a measured launch environment by dynamically verifying platform components at runtime, independent of the system's initial . The process begins when the GETSEC[SENTER] instruction is executed, placing the processor in SENTER mode and loading the SINIT Authenticated Code Module (ACM), a chipset-specific signed by . The SINIT ACM then authenticates itself and measures critical platform elements, such as the chipset configuration, without relying on potentially compromised or components. These measurements are extended into the (TPM) to form a that can be attested remotely. Compared to static roots of trust, DRTM offers advantages by excluding pre-launch software from the (TCB), resulting in a smaller that resists persistent embedded in or bootloaders. It also enables late-stage trust establishment, allowing verification after initial system operation, which enhances flexibility in environments prone to long-term compromises. DRTM has been supported since TXT 1.0, with the GETSEC[SENTER] instruction integrated into processors for server platforms. For open-source implementations, TrenchBoot provides a framework that leverages Intel TXT's DRTM features to perform secure launches, succeeding earlier tools like tboot and enabling direct measurement without proprietary intermediaries. The specific sequence involves authenticating the SINIT ACM, measuring the and other hardware states, and extending those hashes to the TPM for persistent storage and verification.

Launch Process

Measured Launch Environment

The Measured Launch Environment (MLE) in Intel Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) refers to a trusted software entity, such as an or , that serves as the initial authenticated code loaded after the execution of the GETSEC[SENTER] instruction following the Dynamic Root of Trust for Measurement (DRTM). This environment forms the core of the and is measured into specific (TPM) (PCRs), namely PCR 17 for the MLE hash, SINIT digest, and related Launch Control Policy (LCP) elements, and PCR 18 for authority signatures and policy details. The launch process for the MLE begins post-DRTM with the loading of the SINIT Authenticated Code (AC) module and the MLE into system memory. The GETSEC[SENTER] instruction then synchronizes all processors, authenticates the chipset-signed SINIT module, measures the MLE using cryptographic hashes like SHA-256, and transfers control to the MLE with a defined CPU , such as CR0.PG=0 for paging disabled. Upon gaining control, the MLE performs initialization tasks including setup of paging, the (GDT), and (IDT), followed by waking remaining logical processors via GETSEC[WAKEUP]. Additionally, the MLE conducts further measurements of the runtime environment, extending values such as LCP elements, TPM non-volatile () information, and Secure Trusted Module () hashes into the relevant PCRs to capture the full launch . Policy enforcement during MLE launch relies on the LCP, a verifiable policy stored in TPM NV RAM, which compares the measured values against pre-defined golden measurements to validate the MLE's and the . The module verifies the authenticated MLE against the LCP using supported algorithms such as RSASSA, aborting the launch if mismatches occur, such as with an outdated SINIT version or invalid state. This process may include optional remote attestation, where external verifiers quote 17 and 18 along with the TPM Event Log to confirm the MLE's trustworthiness without direct access to the system. Representative examples of MLE implementations include tboot, a legacy open-source pre-kernel module that leverages TXT for measured and verified launches of kernels or VMMs. Integration with Windows occurs through the OS loader or post-boot mechanisms, allowing the boot process to initiate an MLE for enhanced security during system startup. Following initialization and verification, the MLE hands off execution securely to the full operating system or a by configuring the Virtual Machine Control Structure (VMCS) and invoking VMLAUNCH to transition to the guest environment, ensuring protected continuity while optionally shutting down prior virtual machines. Data transfer during handoff uses the Heap with or sealing options, and any secrets are managed via TXT.CMD.SECRETS before being scrubbed to prevent exposure. TPM measurements are performed using appropriate localities (e.g., Locality 2 for MLE and Locality 3 for SINIT). Additional safeguards against attacks are provided by mechanisms like DMA Protected Ranges (DPR) and Protected Regions (PMR).

Execution in Trusted Mode

Once the measured launch environment (MLE) is established, execution in trusted mode commences within an processor environment provided by Intel's Safer Mode Extensions (SMX). The initiating logical processor (ILP) enters this mode via the GETSEC[SENTER] instruction, which authenticates the SINIT Authenticated Code (AC) module and sets CR4.SMXE to 1, disabling paging (CR0.PG=0) and configuring control registers (e.g., CR4=0x00004000) to isolate the processor state from external influences. This isolation masks interrupts, including INIT#, NMI#, SMI#, and external interrupts, by executing CLI prior to SENTER and halting remaining logical processors (RLPs) until they are explicitly woken via GETSEC[WAKEUP], ensuring no unauthorized disruptions during runtime. Runtime protections maintain the integrity of the trusted environment by enforcing sealed memory regions and restricted I/O . is protected using mechanisms such as Protected Ranges (DPRs), which cover up to 3 MB including the heap and SINIT AC module mapped as write-back (WB) via Type Range Registers (MTRRs), alongside Protected Regions (PMRs) and Protection Ranges (TPRs) verified by the MLE. VT-d technology blocks unauthorized attacks by restricting I/O device to protected regions, with the MLE validating MTRRs, memory maps, and configurations post-launch; additionally, Index/Data ports are undefined in this mode to prevent legacy I/O exploits. Attestation during execution is supported through continuous extensions to TPM Platform Configuration Registers (PCRs), primarily PCRs 17 and 18, which record hashes of the MLE and runtime events via the TPM Event Log (e.g., EVTYPE_MLE_HASH), enabling remote or local verification using TPM quotes at Locality 2. Supported workloads in trusted mode include secure OS kernels and trusted virtual machines (VMs), where the MLE acts as a hypervisor using VMX extensions to manage isolated guests with virtualized processor states and Global Descriptor Tables (GDTs). For instance, a "Trusted OS" can execute with isolated drivers, accessing the TPM at Locality 2 for operations like data sealing while processing in protected memory regions. Monitoring occurs continuously through TPM 2.0 event logs, which extend PCRs for runtime events such as memory mappings or policy changes, allowing the MLE to enforce the Locality Control Policy (LCP) and detect deviations. Exit from trusted mode is controlled to prevent leakage of sensitive data, invoked via GETSEC[SEXIT], which terminates SMX operations, scrubs protected memory (e.g., clearing secrets via LT.CMD.NO-SECRETS), shuts down , and restores the state for handover to the untrusted OS. This teardown unblocks interrupts, re-locks spaces, and optionally caps dynamic PCRs (e.g., PCRs 17-18) before resuming normal execution, ensuring cleanup of all transient trusted artifacts.

Applications and Use Cases

Enterprise Security

In enterprise environments, facilitates secure remote attestation, allowing administrators to verify the integrity of endpoints during boot processes to ensure compliance with organizational policies. This capability enables centralized endpoint management by providing cryptographic measurements stored in the , which can be compared against predefined baselines to detect tampering or unauthorized modifications before software execution begins. Integration with systems further enhances threat detection, as TXT-generated event logs and attestation reports from vendors like and are aggregated for real-time analysis, enabling proactive identification of firmware or compromises without interrupting operations. TXT supports key compliance standards essential for enterprise security, including NIST SP 800-147 for protection and secure mechanisms, which TXT implements through its measured launch environment to prevent unauthorized alterations. Additionally, by leveraging TPM , TXT aligns with requirements for cryptographic module validation, ensuring validated protection for sensitive data handling in regulated operations. These features aid adherence to sector-specific regulations such as DSS and HIPAA in and healthcare, as well as FISMA and GLBA in government settings. Deployments of TXT are prominent in enterprise servers to mitigate firmware attacks, with platforms like incorporating TXT-enabled settings that enforce pre-boot measurements and dynamic root of trust establishment. For instance, enabling TXT on systems requires TPM security activation, which verifies integrity against known good states, blocking execution if anomalies are detected and thereby preventing persistent threats like bootkit . Key benefits include reduced downtime from incidents, as TXT's early detection of compromises allows containment without full system rebuilds, potentially minimizing remediation efforts by up to 50% in virtualized environments through automated integrity checks. Furthermore, TXT enables automated policy enforcement within by integrating with management tools like HyTrust, where Launch Control Policies (LCP) restrict execution to authorized software, streamlining compliance in distributed networks. Adoption of TXT has been driven by needs for robust boot integrity in data centers handling sensitive information in and sectors, with ongoing utilization in hybrid work setups to support secure remote access and endpoint amid evolving threats. As of 2025, TXT continues to be utilized in platforms to protect financial data in enterprise environments.

Virtualization and Cloud Integration

Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) enables measured launches in virtualized environments by integrating with hypervisors to establish a dynamic root of trust, protecting against VM escapes through hardware-enforced isolation of virtual machine (VM) memory and state. Xen has supported TXT since version 3.2 via tboot, allowing the hypervisor to perform measured boots that verify the integrity of the host OS and guest VMs before execution. KVM, as a Linux-based hypervisor, leverages TXT through kernel modules and tboot for similar measured launches, ensuring that VM workloads start in a trusted state isolated from potential host compromises. Hyper-V supports TXT integration when enabled in BIOS, providing attestation for VM isolation, though it requires specific configuration to avoid conflicts with secure launch features. In , TXT serves as a precursor to modern paradigms by enabling remote attestation of platform integrity in infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) environments, laying the groundwork for -based workload protection. For instance, Confidential VMs use roots of trust for attestation to verify VM isolation and prevent unauthorized access in multi-tenant setups, though they primarily employ successors like Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) for enhanced encryption. This attestation mechanism allows cloud providers to confirm that TXT-enabled instances maintain a from boot, securing sensitive data processing without exposing it to the host . TXT integrates with container orchestration tools like to support attestation of container environments on trusted hosts via hardware primitives such as TPM. In , plugins like the Intel-contributed Trust Filter use TXT and the Open Attestation SDK to provision TXT-enabled instances, allowing administrators to filter and attest compute nodes for trusted VM scheduling. Practical applications of TXT in include secure multi-tenant hosting, where it facilitates isolated workloads in shared cloud infrastructures, as demonstrated in platforms like F5 VELOS that employ TXT for TPM-based attestation across tenants. In the 2020s, TXT has been applied to edge cloud scenarios for IoT data processing, enabling trusted execution of analytics on resource-constrained devices while attesting platform integrity to prevent tampering in distributed networks. Performance considerations for TXT in virtualized settings involve overhead during VM migrations due to the need to re-establish measurements and attestations, potentially increasing latency by requiring additional cryptographic operations. Late launch, or Dynamic Root of Trust Measurement (DRTM), mitigates this by allowing trusted environments to be initialized post-boot without a full platform reset, reducing migration downtime and enabling dynamic VM protection in cloud workloads. This approach minimizes overhead in multi-tenant scenarios, though frequent VM exits for attestation can still introduce up to several percent performance impact in high-throughput environments.

Limitations and Challenges

Technical Constraints

Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) is inherently constrained to Intel x86-64 processors equipped with specific hardware extensions, including Intel VT-x for virtualization and the Secure Execution Mode (SMX) for authenticated launches. These requirements limit TXT to compatible Intel chipsets and exclude non-Intel architectures, ARM-based systems, or older x86 variants without SMX support. Within the trusted execution environment, support for GPUs and peripherals is severely restricted to mitigate direct memory access (DMA) attacks; devices must operate within designated DMA Protected Ranges (DPR), Protected Memory Regions (PMR), or TXT DMA Protection Ranges (TPR), preventing unverified peripherals from accessing isolated memory during measured execution. Performance limitations arise primarily during the launch , where measurements, SENTER execution, and TPM introduce overhead that extends times by several seconds compared to boots, with impacts varying based on system complexity and policy configurations. For instance, TPM 2.0 commands for large objects and (MSR) swaps during VMX transitions can slow the process, while Maximum Agility policies exacerbate delays through extensive PCR extensions. In isolated execution, I/O bottlenecks occur due to enforced protections and restricted access to external devices, potentially reducing throughput for data-intensive workloads until the environment is fully attested. Compatibility challenges stem from TXT's reliance on modern firmware and security modules, leading to conflicts with legacy BIOS implementations that lack UEFI support or use deprecated features like TPM 1.2 and legacy PCRs (e.g., PCR 17/18). Intel has phased out legacy BIOS compatibility since around 2020, requiring UEFI Class 3 or higher for proper operation, which can cause boot failures or error states in mixed-mode environments. Operating system support is further limited post-Windows 11 rollout in 2021, as TXT demands TPM 2.0 and Secure Boot alignment; in May 2025, Windows 10 update KB5058379 caused boot failures and BitLocker recovery prompts on TXT-enabled systems due to secure boot conflicts, resolved by subsequent update KB5060533. Scalability issues in large-scale deployments primarily involve TPM provisioning complexities, such as establishing and managing Non-Volatile (NV) RAM indices (e.g., for policy data, PO for ownership), owner for index creation, and secure credential distribution across fleets. These processes demand a robust (PKI) to handle attestation and synchronization, with challenges amplified in multi-tenant environments where multiple Measured Launch Environments (MLEs) require distinct lists limited by LCP_MAX_LISTS and platform-specific constraints. Provisioning at scale also necessitates coordinated and SINIT ACM updates, as mismatched Chipset ID Lists or revoked legacy modules can propagate failures across clusters. Resource demands include dedicated memory allocations for the MLE, which must reside in the lower 4 GB of physical address space using (PAE) paging with 4 KB pages, plus additional space for page tables, Virtual Machine Control Structures (VMCS), and LCP data—typically requiring systems with at least 4 GB for stable operation without excessive . The SINIT Authenticated Code Module (ACM) alone needs 192–320 KB aligned in the lower 4 GB, while overall setup scales with MLE size. In server farms, TXT's measurement and isolation overhead contributes to elevated power consumption through prolonged CPU activity during launches and restricted power states in protected modes, though quantitative impacts depend on workload density and cooling configurations.

Security Vulnerabilities

Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) has faced several historical vulnerabilities that undermine its security guarantees. In , researchers demonstrated an on Intel TXT by hijacking the execution of the SINIT Authenticated Code Module (ACM) through manipulation of (SMM) handlers, allowing malicious code to compromise the measured launch environment before the dynamic root of trust is established. This exploit exploited the over-privileged nature of SMM on platforms at the time, enabling attackers with physical access to bypass TXT's integrity protections. Historical TPM vulnerabilities, such as side-channel s on key operations, have also impacted the reliability of TXT's attestation processes. In , chipset-level flaws in Intel's Converged Security and Management Engine (CSME) enabled SMM bypasses, potentially allowing attackers to evade TXT's protections by exploiting unpatched to access privileged memory regions. These vulnerabilities, affecting processors from the past five years, stemmed from design issues in the engine's interaction with SMM, permitting sophisticated attackers to defeat hardware-based security features like TXT without software modifications. Side-channel attacks pose ongoing risks to , particularly through cache-timing and disturbances that can alter or leak measurement data. Cache-timing attacks exploit variations in cache access times during 's measurement phase, potentially allowing inference of configuration details or manipulation of attested values from unprivileged code. Similarly, attacks, which induce bit flips in by repeatedly accessing adjacent rows, threaten the integrity of memory regions used for measurements; similar to demonstrations in SGX where such disturbances corrupt enclave data and trigger system lockdowns, these could affect though specific exploits remain undisclosed. These hardware-level side channels bypass 's software by leveraging physical properties of the underlying . Recent issues as of 2025 highlight persistent -related exposures in TXT components. update failures in the ACM have been reported to expose critical code modules, with CVE-2025-24305 involving insufficient control flow management in ACTM , allowing that may impact features. Additionally, integration risks arise from unpatched (ME) , where vulnerabilities like those in Intel-SA-00086 enable remote code execution that can interfere with TXT's if the ME remains exposed. Mitigations for these vulnerabilities primarily involve firmware patches and adherence to Trusted Computing Group (TCG) guidelines. Intel regularly releases updates to address ACM and ME flaws, such as those mitigating escalation paths in 2025 advisories, while TCG specifications recommend authenticated updates and restrictions to enforce robust deployment practices. These include isolating SMM handlers and validating measurements against hardware roots to reduce side-channel impacts. Overall, TXT remains effective against software-based attacks by providing a hardware-rooted , but it is vulnerable to hardware-level threats like side channels and exploits that require physical or privileged .

Related Technologies

Comparisons with Contemporaries

(TXT), announced by in 2006 with initial availability on client platforms in 2008 and broader commercial adoption on server platforms starting in 2010, emerged alongside several contemporaneous mechanisms from 2008 to 2015, including AMD's Secure Virtual Machine (SVM), ARM TrustZone, and Microsoft's early (NGSCB). These technologies shared goals of enhancing platform integrity and isolation but diverged in architectural approaches, enforcement models, and target environments. Compared to AMD SVM, which debuted in 2006 as part of AMD-V virtualization extensions, TXT employs a Dynamic Root of Trust for Measurement (DRTM) via the SENTER instruction to enable late launch, allowing a fresh measurement and attestation of the boot environment without relying on potentially compromised firmware like BIOS. SVM similarly supports DRTM through the SKINIT instruction for late launch, bootstrapping a virtual machine monitor (VMM) or OS in a measured state, but it leans more toward static roots of trust in standard configurations, integrating with firmware for initial measurements. TXT provides stronger emphasis on full boot integrity by resetting the system to a minimal (TCB) and validating the entire platform state via TPM-stored hashes, potentially offering superior protection against persistent boot-time attacks, whereas SVM focused on isolation during the period, with later enhancements like Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) in 2016 adding VM guest memory protection from hypervisor compromise using hardware-backed keys—a capability that TXT evolved toward in successors like TDX. During the 2008-2015 , TXT relied on VT-d IOMMU for DMA protection. In contrast to TrustZone, introduced in 2004 with ARMv6 architecture and widely adopted in and systems by 2008, TXT shares partitioning for but is tailored to x86 platforms with a heavy reliance on TPM for and attestation. TrustZone achieves system-wide by dividing the CPU into secure (TrustZone) and normal worlds at the level, using a single bit (NS bit) to enforce access controls without needing external modules like TPM, making it more lightweight and integrated for resource-constrained devices such as smartphones. While both enable protected execution environments, TXT's focus on dynamic measured launches for and integrity suits scenarios, whereas TrustZone's static partitioning and secure ROM-based root of trust prioritize low-overhead, always-on security in mobile-oriented ecosystems. Early NGSCB, conceptualized in and prototyped around as part of the Trustworthy Computing initiative, overlaps with in supporting measured launches to verify platform integrity using TPM for attestation, aiming to isolate trusted applications from untrusted OS components. However, NGSCB was predominantly software-centric, employing an isolation kernel () and special CPU instructions for mode switching without deep hardware enforcement, whereas mandates chipset and CPU extensions like VT-x for robust, hardware-verified isolation that prevents software-based bypasses. NGSCB's vision evolved into features like but was never fully deployed as a standalone technology, limiting its impact compared to 's hardware-integrated rollout. A key differentiator across these contemporaries is TXT's dependence on Intel-signed Authenticated Code Modules (ACMs), such as the SINIT module, which are cryptographically verified by the CPU to ensure only authorized code initiates the trusted launch—potentially restricting ecosystem openness compared to more standards-based approaches in SVM and TrustZone, which leverage TCG specifications and interfaces without vendor-specific signing. Attestation portability in TXT relies on TPM quotes of platform measurements, enabling remote similar to SVM's TPM , but TrustZone's attestation often uses secure world protocols, and NGSCB's software-heavy model lacked standardized hardware attestation, reducing cross- . These variations highlight TXT's vendor-proprietary strengths in x86 boot security versus the broader, more flexible standards in rivals during the 2008-2015 period.

Successors and Modern Integrations

Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) serves as a boot-time complement to , providing a dynamic of trust measurement during platform initialization that enables secure enclave creation and runtime isolation for applications. This combination forms a full-stack (TEE), where TXT ensures the integrity of the launch process and SGX protects sensitive code and data in isolated memory regions post-boot. Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX), launched in 2023 with the 4th Generation Scalable processors, represents a direct successor to tailored for cloud virtual machines (VMs). Building on 's dynamic root of trust measurement (DRTM), TDX incorporates memory encryption via the Memory Encryption Engine (MEE) to protect VM guest memory from host and hypervisor access, enhancing confidentiality in multi-tenant environments. By November 2025, TDX has seen widespread adoption, with support integrated into major cloud providers like and Google Cloud, enabling scalable for AI and data workloads. In processors like (introduced in 2023), TXT integrates hybridly with SGX and TDX to support legacy boot-time security alongside modern enclave and VM isolation features. Open-source extensions, including Rust-based attestation verifiers, further enable TDX deployments by facilitating remote verification of trust domains in software ecosystems. Although TXT remains in a with limited new development, it continues as a foundational element for standards, influencing attestation protocols in successor technologies. Building on its contemporary roots, ARM's TrustZone has evolved into the Arm Confidential Computing Architecture (CCA) with Armv9-A in 2021, providing dynamic realms for confidential VMs in cloud environments, offering protections analogous to TDX as of 2025. Looking ahead, TXT's principles are phasing into Intel Platform Firmware Resilience (PFR) frameworks, which extend boot-time protections to runtime firmware recovery against attacks. PFR builds on TXT's measured launch concepts to provide authenticated updates and integrity checks for platform firmware, ensuring resilience in server environments.

References

  1. [1]
    Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (Intel® TXT) Overview
    Intel TXT is hardware extensions enhancing security, protecting against software attacks and data integrity by enabling applications to run in their own space.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Intel Trusted Execution Technology
    Intel TXT is a hardware-based security technology built into Intel's silicon, designed to harden platforms from attacks and provide higher security in servers.
  3. [3]
    Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
    Jul 19, 2023 · Intel Trusted Execution Technology is a set of hardware extensions to Intel processors and chipsets that enhance the digital office platform with security ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Intel® Trusted Execution Technology - TrenchBoot
    Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) is a security technology under development by Intel and requires for operation a computer system with Intel® ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual
    ... Nehalem ... TRUSTED EXECUTION TECHNOLOGY (INTEL® TXT) INTERACTIONS ...
  6. [6]
    Activation Procedures for Trusted Platform Module 2.0 and Intel®...
    This document contains the steps to activate TPM 2.0 and Intel TXT within the Intel Server Board S2600 product family. TPM 2.0 Onboard not supported in China.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Intel® Trusted Execution Technology
    Introduction. Intel® Trusted Execution Technology† (Intel® TXT), formally code- named LaGrande, is a highly versatile set of hardware extensions.
  8. [8]
    IDF Fall 2003 -- Paul Otellini Keynote - Intel
    Sep 16, 2003 · The next "T" that's coming down the line is LaGrande Technology. LaGrande is focused on bringing enhanced security to the platform, hardware ...
  9. [9]
    Intel advances LaGrande architecture, gingerly | InfoWorld
    Sep 16, 2003 · Tuesday announced it was taking steps to ensure that its design for the next generation of computer security components, code-named LaGrande, ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (Intel® TXT) - kib.kiev.ua
    This provides the ability for a special code module, referred to as an authenticated code module (AC module), to be loaded into internal RAM (referred to as ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Intel® 4 Series Chipset Family Datasheet
    No computer system can provide absolute security under all conditions. Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (Intel® TXT) is a security technology under.
  12. [12]
    New Intel® vPro™ Technology Enhances Security, Adds Automatic ...
    Sep 23, 2008 · New Intel® vPro™ Technology Enhances Security, Adds Automatic Tune-Ups and Thinks for Itself. Download as PDF Sep 23, 2008 • 12:00 AM EDT. SANTA ...Missing: TXT Nehalem
  13. [13]
    Attacking Intel® Trusted Execution Technology - Invisible Things Blog
    Jan 5, 2009 · We have provided Intel with extensive description of the flaws in December 2008, and Intel is currently working on fixing those vulnerabilities.
  14. [14]
    intel_txt.txt - The Linux Kernel Archives
    Trusted Boot (tboot) is an open source, pre-kernel/VMM module that uses Intel TXT to perform a measured and verified launch of an OS kernel/VMM. It is hosted on ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Using the TPM to Solve Today's Most Urgent Cybersecurity Problems
    May 20, 2014 · • SecureView uses Intel TXT and the TPM to validate BIOS and the. Hypervisor at start. • You always know you started a trusted Hypervisor and ...
  16. [16]
    Intel Platform Trust Technology (PTT): TPM For The Masses | OnLogic
    Oct 2, 2023 · Intel Platform Trust Technology (PTT) architecture implements TPM in system firmware. To your operating system and applications, PTT looks and acts like TPM.
  17. [17]
    TPM 2.0 & Intel® TXT Activation Procedures for the Intel® Server ...
    This document contains the steps required to activate the Trusted Platform Module 2.0 (TPM) and Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (Intel® TXT) within the ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (Intel® TXT)
    Intel's technology for safer computing, Intel® Trusted Execution Technology. (Intel® TXT), defines platform-level enhancements that provide the building ...
  19. [19]
    Intel Trusted Execution Technology, open-source now!
    Nov 21, 2019 · We have everything open-source and documented it will lead to better understanding and integration for Intel platform security features.<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    TrenchBoot - How to Nicely Boot System w...
    TrenchBoot contributors are working to add SecureLaunch boot capability to the Linux kernel, making it capable of using Intel TXT or AMD SVM Secure Launch for ...
  21. [21]
    Intel® Confidential Computing Solutions
    Intel confidential computing solutions are designed to protect data in use with isolation, encryption and control, and verification capabilities.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  22. [22]
    A new source of trust for your platform - Dasharo with Intel TXT support
    Mar 17, 2022 · Intel Trusted Execution Technology is a feature of Intel CPUs and chipsets to perform trusted measurement of the operating system software.Missing: Haswell | Show results with:Haswell<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    INTEL-SA-00164
    Summary: A potential security vulnerability in Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) with Intel® Processor Graphics may allow information disclosure.
  24. [24]
    Intel Patches High Severity Flaws in Windows Graphics Drivers
    Mar 11, 2020 · Intel released security updates to address 27 vulnerabilities as part of March 2020 Patch Tuesday, with ten of them being high severity ...
  25. [25]
    From clicks to clusters: Confidential Computing expands with Intel TDX
    Aug 29, 2025 · To accommodate growing demand, we've expanded support for Intel TDX on the C3 machine series to 10 regions (and 21 zones,) and we are planning ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  26. [26]
    What Is Edge Computing? - Intel
    Edge computing accelerates data processing by moving compute closer to the edge of the network where data is generated. Learn more about edge computing ...Benefits Of Edge Computing · Examples Of Edge Computing... · Edge Computing Use CasesMissing: TXT | Show results with:TXT
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (Intel® TXT) Enabling Guide
    Mar 1, 2014 · This advances security to address key stealth attack mechanisms used to gain access to parts of the data center in order to access or compromise.<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Intel Skylake CPUs Reaching End of Support in Future vSphere ...
    Oct 14, 2024 · Intel will stop updates for Skylake CPUs by Dec 31, 2023. VMware will drop support after vSphere 8.x, requiring hardware refreshes.Missing: TXT pre-<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    [PDF] uefi-firmware-enabling-guide-for-the-intel-atom-processor-e3900 ...
    Intel TXE Firmware is the code executed by Intel TXE. It brings up TXE and exposes runtime security services such as firmware TPM (fTPM) and Intel® Platform ...
  30. [30]
    Security baseline (FINAL) for Windows 10 v1809 and Windows ...
    Secure Launch changes the way windows boots to use Intel Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) ... Hyper-V is enabled. [Update to this text, Dec 27 2018] ...
  31. [31]
    Trusted Boot download | SourceForge.net
    Rating 5.0 (1) · Free · SecurityMay 7, 2025 · Trusted Boot (tboot) is an open source, pre- kernel/VMM module that uses Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology (Intel(R) TXT) to perform a measured and ...
  32. [32]
    Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH][0/2] Intel(r) Trusted ... - Join mailing lists
    Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH][0/2] Intel(r) Trusted Execution Technology support: Overview ... hypervisor, since > it will be needed on shutdown/S3. ... measured ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] TCG Feature API (FAPI) Specification - Trusted Computing Group
    Jun 11, 2020 · The FAPI will automatically perform multiple read operations with the TPM if the NV index is larger than the TPM's TPM2_MAX_NV_BUFFER_SIZE.Missing: TXT | Show results with:TXT<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
    TCG Software Stack (TSS) Specification - Trusted Computing Group
    The TCG TPM 1.2 Main specification defines a subsystem with protected storage and protected capabilities. This subsystem is the Trusted Platform Module (TPM).
  35. [35]
    iDRAC 7.00.30.00 | Driver Details | Dell US
    Sep 11, 2023 · - Added support to append Apache configuration file to enhance transport security. - Added support for TPM Remote Host Attestation. Systems ...
  36. [36]
    Enabling or disabling Intel TXT support - HPE Support
    Intel TXT is supported in both TPM 2.0 and TPM 1.2 modes. Procedure. From the System Utilities screen, select System Configuration > BIOS ...Missing: Haswell 2013
  37. [37]
    TrenchBoot
    - **What is TrenchBoot**: A framework for building security engines to perform launch integrity actions, using Boot Integrity Technologies (BITs) to establish Roots of Trust (RoT) for system integrity confidence.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] NIST SP 800-147, BIOS Protection Guidelines
    All updates to the system BIOS shall either go through an authenticated BIOS update mechanism as described in Section 3.1.1 or use an optional secure local ...Missing: 140-2 | Show results with:140-2
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Cyber Resilient Security in Dell PowerEdge Servers
    The BIOS boot process uses Intel Boot Guard technology or AMD PSB technology that cryptographically verifies the BIOS code to be loaded. A verification failure ...
  40. [40]
    secure launch/firmware protection - Microsoft Q&A
    Nov 20, 2024 · As a result, Hyper-V itself may prevent Secure Launch or Intel TXT from running. Enabling Intel TXT requires configuration in the BIOS. You need ...
  41. [41]
    Azure Confidential Computing Overview - Microsoft Learn
    May 7, 2025 · Confidential computing protects data in use by performing computation in a hardware-based, attested Trusted Execution Environment.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Creating Trust in the Cloud - Intel
    This hardware-based approach helps you enjoy the benefits of cloud computing with a higher level of confidence in the security of your systems and workloads.
  43. [43]
    Securing applications at the Edge with Trusted Docker Containers
    Feb 27, 2020 · Mirantis has partnered with Intel to secure the last mile in Docker Enterprise Platform to hardware primitives in Trusted Platform Module (TPM).
  44. [44]
    IDF 2013: Enhancing OpenStack with Intel Technologies
    Sep 10, 2013 · ... Intel TXT and Trusted Boot. Together with the Open Attestation (OAT) SDK (available here), Intel has contributed a “Trust Filter” for ...Missing: Docker plugins<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Create a Secure Multi-Tenant Architecture with F5 VELOS
    Apr 25, 2024 · F5 implements the TPM chain of custody and attestation using the TPM 2.0 chipset, Linux Trusted Boot (tboot), and Intel TXT technology. The ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] CloudVisor: Retrofitting Protection of Virtual Machines in Multi-tenant ...
    Oct 23, 2011 · Intel TXT to late launch CloudVisor. Hash of CloudVisor is stored in ... The large amount of VM exits would bring notable performance overhead.
  47. [47]
    Intel Says "Bye to BIOS" by 2020 - AMI
    Nov 29, 2017 · Intel is phasing out legacy BIOS for security and development reasons, which may prevent running 16-bit OS and older hardware.<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Tpm, secure launch, intel txt - Microsoft Q&A
    Jan 3, 2025 · Hello, I'm having some issues with my laptop and I checked the status with hwinfo. Tpm: In hwinfo it says tpm on board is not supported in ...Missing: attestation service 2011
  49. [49]
    Windows 11 Requirements: Hardware Compatibility Check 2025
    Aug 18, 2025 · Verify Windows 11 compatibility with our comprehensive hardware checker. Covers TPM 2.0, processors, troubleshooting, and business migration ...
  50. [50]
    (PDF) Challenges for Trusted Computing - ResearchGate
    Aug 9, 2025 · The most challenging is deploying and managing the Public key Infrastructure (PKI) necessary to enable general use of the security services that ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] One-Stop Intel® TXT Activation Guide
    The utility can be run from EFI, Linux and Windows. The Intel SCU tool provides these benefits: •. Saving and restoring Firmware and BIOS settings to a binary/ ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Attacking Intel TXT via SINIT code execution hijacking
    In early 2009 our team presented an attack against Intel TXT that exploited a design problem with Sys- tem Management Mode (SMM) being over privileged on PC ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    [PDF] TPM-Fail: TPM meets Timing and Lattice Attacks - USENIX
    Nov 13, 2019 · Side-channel attacks are a potential attack vector for se- cure elements like TPMs. These attacks exploit the unregu- lated physical behavior of ...Missing: BEETLE sealing
  54. [54]
    5 years of Intel CPUs and chipsets have a concerning flaw that's ...
    Mar 5, 2020 · Virtually all Intel chips released in the past five years contain an unfixable flaw that may allow sophisticated attackers to defeat a host of security ...
  55. [55]
    A survey on the (in)security of trusted execution environments
    This paper provides an extensive analysis and categorization of existing vulnerabilities in TEEs and highlights the design flaws that led to them.
  56. [56]
    SGX-Bomb: Locking Down the Processor via Rowhammer Attack
    In this paper, we introduce the SGX-Bomb attack that launches the Rowhammer attack against enclave memory to trigger the processor lockdown.
  57. [57]
    INTEL-SA-01280
    Aug 12, 2025 · Intel is releasing firmware updates to mitigate these potential vulnerabilities. Vulnerability Details: CVEID: CVE-2025-20037. Description ...Missing: ACM | Show results with:ACM
  58. [58]
    Intel® Management Engine Critical Firmware Update (Intel-SA-00086)
    Intel-SA-00086 is a security vulnerability in Intel Management Engine firmware impacting certain PCs, servers, and IoT platforms. Intel provides updates, but ...Missing: unpatched | Show results with:unpatched
  59. [59]
    [PDF] TCG Guidance for Secure Update of Software and Firmware on ...
    Feb 10, 2020 · This document is TCG guidance for secure software and firmware updates on embedded systems, version 1.0, revision 72, published on February 10, ...
  60. [60]
    NGSCB: A Trusted Open System - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · We describe Microsoft's Next Generation Secure Computing Base (NGSCB). The system provides high assurance computing in a manner consistent ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] SoK: Hardware Security Support for Trustworthy Execution - arXiv
    Oct 11, 2019 · In “late launch” technologies (Intel TXT and. AMD SVM), the privileged TEE backed by hardware directly bootstraps an OS/VMM without relying on ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Intel SGX Explained - Cryptology ePrint Archive
    Intel SGX is a set of extensions for secure remote computation, aiming to provide integrity and confidentiality on computers with potentially malicious ...
  63. [63]
    Intel® Trusted Execution Technology for Server Platforms
    Intel TXT is a set of general hardware extensions for its dedicated processors and chipsets to enhance hardware security and help prevent software-based attacks ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Intel® Trust Domain Extensions
    In this paper we introduce Intel® Trust Domain Extensions (Intel® TDX). An architectural technology to deploy hardware-isolated, Virtual Machines (VMs) ...
  65. [65]
    Expanding Confidential Computing: Intel TDX on 4th Gen Intel Xeon ...
    Oct 15, 2025 · Expanding Confidential Computing: Intel TDX on 4th Gen Intel Xeon Now Available on IBM Cloud in Frankfurt.
  66. [66]
    Intel and Google Cloud launch confidential computing instances ...
    Oct 2, 2024 · Intel TDX is a hardware-based technology that enhances data privacy and security by creating isolated execution environments and, in doing so, ...
  67. [67]
    EAT profile for Intel® Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) attestation result
    Dec 13, 2024 · Intel® Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) introduce architectural elements designed for the deployment of hardware-isolated virtual machines ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Intel® Data Center Block with Firmware Resilience Solution Brief
    Intel® Platform Firmware Resilience (Intel® PFR) protects critical firmware during boot and runtime attacks. In the case malware is detected, Intel PFR will ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] PRIMERGY Server Security Overview
    Platform Firmware Resilience (PFR) ... Intel TXT helps to close an important security gap by providing evaluation of the launch environment and enforcing ...<|control11|><|separator|>