Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ulu

An ulu (Inuktitut: ᐅᓗᐃ, plural: uluit) is a traditional semi-lunar knife originating from the , , and other Indigenous peoples of , , and , primarily used by women for domestic tasks such as and butchering animals, cleaning , filleting , and even building igloos. Its distinctive design features a curved, single-beveled blade—historically crafted from polished or for sharpness and durability—and a handle made of , , , or wood attached above the blade's center, enabling a rocking motion that reduces strain during repetitive cutting. Archaeological evidence indicates that uluit date back over 4,500 years, with early forms developed by Alaskan Native peoples as essential survival tools in the harsh environment, where they facilitated food preparation and hide processing critical to community sustenance. Historically, the ulu was a woman's knife, often received by girls as they came of age and carried into as a personal , with handles sometimes intricately carved with symbols or motifs reflecting the maker's . Following contact with European traders in the , traditional blades were largely replaced by for greater longevity, while handles incorporated materials like caribou , preserving the tool's ergonomic form amid modernization. Today, uluit continue to hold profound cultural significance as symbols of resilience, women's strength, and matrilineal heritage, appearing in contemporary , Arctic Winter Games competitions, and everyday use by all genders in both traditional and adapted forms.

Etymology

Origin of the Name

The term "ulu" derives from the language, written in syllabics as ᐅᓗ, where it directly translates to "woman's knife." This nomenclature underscores the tool's traditional association with , who employed it extensively in daily tasks. The term emerged within Inuit languages alongside the tool's development in cultures, with archaeological evidence indicating that the earliest uluit date back to approximately 2500 BCE. These ancient implements, initially crafted from stone, represent one of the oldest known knife designs in the region, tying the linguistic origin to the invention and widespread adoption of the ulu in prehistoric society. The gendered designation in the name reflects the traditional division of labor in Inuit communities, where women primarily handled food preparation, , and —tasks for which the ulu was ideally suited—while men focused on and larger game processing with different tools. This cultural distinction highlights the ulu's role as a symbol of female agency and expertise in sustaining household and community life.

Regional Terminology

The term "ulu" exhibits variations across Inuit dialects and related indigenous languages, reflecting linguistic diversity in the Arctic regions while maintaining a core association with the traditional semi-circular knife. In the Nunatsiavummiutut dialect spoken in Nunatsiavut, northern , , the singular form is rendered as uluk, adapting the root to local . Similarly, in , the East Greenlandic dialect used by the people, the tool is known as sakiaq or saakiq, highlighting dialectal shifts in vowel and consonant sounds particular to eastern Inuit speech. Geographic mapping of these terms aligns with specific cultural and linguistic boundaries. In West Greenland, among the people, the standard term remains ulu, consistent with broader usage and emphasizing continuity in the western Arctic. By contrast, Alaskan communities, speaking Iñupiaq, predominantly use ulu or the variant uurak, tying the nomenclature to North American traditions from the region southward. These distinctions underscore how the tool's name travels with migratory and trade histories, yet adapts to regional phonetic patterns. Beyond , neighboring Athabaskan groups in employ distinct terminology, such as tlaabaas in , referring to the semilunar akin to the ulu. This term appears in Athabaskan linguistic records, illustrating borrowing where non-Inuit adopted similar tools but integrated them into their own lexical systems. In modern contexts, colonial languages like English have influenced terminology adoption, with "ulu" becoming a standardized English in communities and global discourse, often supplanting or supplementing local variants in educational and commercial settings due to historical contact and documentation by explorers and administrators.

Design and Materials

Blade Characteristics

The blade of the ulu features a distinctive semi-circular or fan-shaped design, often described as semi-lunar or crescent-shaped, which enables a characteristic rocking motion during use. This curved form, with a straight base and slightly concave shoulders in many examples, allows for efficient, repetitive cutting actions by pivoting the along its arc. The overall promotes stability and leverage, distinguishing the ulu from straight-edged knives. Blade sizes vary significantly to suit different functions, typically measured by the radius of the , ranging from 5 cm to 30 cm. Smaller blades with a 5 cm are compact and suited for fine work, while medium-sized ones around 15 cm provide versatility for everyday tasks. Larger blades reaching a 30 cm accommodate more demanding applications, such as heavy material processing. The cutting of the ulu blade is typically curved and single-beveled in traditional designs for efficient one-sided , though examples are often double-beveled for balanced cutting and ease of maintenance; though some historical examples exhibit serrations along the or for enhanced on fibrous materials. These variations allow adaptation to specific cutting needs without altering the core rocking functionality.

Handle Features

The handle of the ulu knife features a distinctive T-shaped or top-mounted , positioned to the blade and centered above its , which allows users to apply downward force directly onto the cutting surface for enhanced leverage and improved compared to side-handled knives. This ergonomic minimizes the risk of slippage and hand during repetitive motions, as the orientation aligns the user's naturally with the rocking cut central to ulu use. Handle length varies to suit different tasks, with shorter versions prioritized for precision work such as detailed filleting or , where fine control is essential. Longer handles provide greater leverage for power cuts on tougher materials like sinew or , enabling efficient processing with less physical effort. These variations ensure compatibility with blade sizes ranging from small (under 10 cm) for intricate tasks to larger (over 15 cm) for heavy-duty applications. The attaches to the via the through riveted or wedged methods, creating a secure that maintains balance during rocking cuts and withstands the stresses of traditional subsistence activities. Riveting involves driving metal or bone pins through aligned holes in the and , while wedging uses tapered inserts to lock the components firmly, both approaches distributing weight evenly to prevent tipping. This construction promotes stability, allowing the ulu to pivot smoothly on its curved edge without compromising user control.

Material Composition

Traditional ulu blades were primarily crafted from or other local stone materials, which were shaped through percussion flaking and grinding to form a sharp, crescent-shaped edge suitable for cutting tasks in harsh conditions. These blades were hafted into handles using natural methods such as friction wedging into slots, securing with pitch glue, or binding through drilled holes with sinew or other organic ties to ensure stability during use. Handles for traditional ulus were typically made from readily available Arctic resources, including caribou antler, horn, , bone, or wood, providing durability and ergonomic grip for prolonged handling. In contemporary ulu construction, blades have shifted to high-carbon or to enhance retention, resistance, and overall , allowing for more versatile and long-lasting tools compared to fragile stone. Handles now incorporate modern materials like for strength and aesthetics, for a nod to tradition, or for lightweight affordability and ease of production, making ulus accessible beyond indigenous communities. These changes reflect adaptations to industrial manufacturing while preserving the tool's functional core. Sourcing for ulu materials emphasizes sustainability, particularly following the 1972 Marine Mammal Protection Act, which restricted commercial trade in walrus ivory but permitted its use by Alaska Native artisans for cultural purposes, prompting alternatives like fossilized ivory, antler, or synthetic substitutes to avoid depletion of Arctic wildlife populations. Regional availability in Arctic environments continues to influence choices, with local stone, bone, and antler prioritized for authenticity, while imported steels and plastics address limitations of scarce natural resources in remote areas.

Uses

Traditional Applications

The ulu served as an essential tool for women among and other Arctic Indigenous peoples in processing animal resources critical to survival in the environment. Primary applications included skinning animals such as caribou and to obtain hides for and , as well as preparing those hides by scraping and cutting them to remove fat and hair, making them suitable for into garments. Women also used the ulu for butchering and , efficiently filleting and portioning them for storage or immediate consumption, which facilitated through drying or freezing in communal settings where families shared the labor of preparing meals from hunted game. Beyond animal processing, the ulu supported a range of household tasks that underscored its versatility as an all-purpose implement. It was employed for trimming , both for and preparing furs by removing unwanted from skins before them into boots, parkas, or tents. Additionally, women scored or blocks with the ulu to shape them precisely during construction, aiding in the creation of stable shelters during seasonal migrations or hunts. As a predominantly women's tool in pre-20th century societies of and other , the ulu was integral to the household economy, empowering women to manage key aspects of subsistence living from hunting aftermath to daily sustenance. This role reinforced divisions of labor, where women's expertise with the ulu ensured the community's against harsh conditions by transforming raw materials into vital resources like and stores.

Modern Adaptations

In contemporary kitchens, the ulu has gained popularity among chefs and home cooks beyond its origins, valued for its rocking motion that facilitates efficient chopping and mincing. Professional chefs often employ it for tasks such as dicing vegetables, mincing herbs, and filleting , integrating it into food preparation in urban and non-Arctic settings where its curved blade allows for precise, controlled cuts, often used with a compatible chopping block. This adaptation stems in part from modern material updates, such as blades paired with ergonomic handles, enhancing durability for everyday use. Beyond culinary applications, the ulu has been adapted for various crafts and hobbies. It also functions as a popular item, often handmade with decorative elements such as engraved handles or artistic engravings, appealing to tourists seeking cultural artifacts that blend functionality with aesthetic value. The ulu's cultural resonance persists in institutional contexts, notably as the symbol for medals in the , a event for youth that began in 1970 and awards gold, silver, and bronze ulu-shaped medals to recognize athletic achievements in sports and traditional games. Additionally, it features prominently in modern , where artists incorporate ulu motifs or create sculptural representations to evoke themes of heritage and resilience, displayed in galleries and collections worldwide.

Variations

Regional Styles

The ulu knife exhibits distinct regional styles shaped by the cultural and environmental contexts of Indigenous Arctic communities, including and , across , , and . These variations primarily manifest in blade shape, handle attachment, and overall ergonomics, reflecting adaptations to local hunting practices, available materials, and daily tasks. In , Yupik communities refer to the tool as uluaq, with styles similar to those of the but adapted to local resources. In the style from , the blade features a central cutout or notch, allowing both ends of the curved edge to fit into the for balanced rocking motion during use. This , often with a slightly offset made from caribou or , facilitates efficient and chopping, particularly suited to the diverse subsistence activities in Alaskan environments. The Canadian style, prevalent in the western and eastern regions, typically employs a single stem attachment where the blade's center inserts into the handle, creating a versatile tool for general-purpose cutting. Blades here may be triangular in the west or pointed at the ends in the east, with handles crafted from caribou horn, , or , emphasizing durability for tasks like filleting fish and preparing hides across Canada's varied terrains. In , the style of the west and the style of the east share broader blades with pronounced curved edges, optimized for processing and other mammals central to local diets. These designs often incorporate iron or steel blades with wooden or handles, as seen in examples from the Ammassalik region, where the broader form aids in efficient of thick layers. These stylistic differences stem from adaptations to local resources and ecologies; for instance, narrower blades predominate in the barren interior lands of regions like the Canadian central Arctic, where precision cutting of smaller and scarce vegetation is prioritized over the heavier processing needs of coastal seal-hunting communities.

Specialized Types

Miniature ulus, often featuring blades around 5 cm (2 inches) in length, are specialized variants designed for precision work such as sewing and detailed carving. Known as kimaqtuut in some Inuit dialects, these small tools form part of traditional sewing kits, where they are used to cut sinew thread or outline patterns on animal skins like or caribou hides. Their compact size allows for intricate tasks, and many contemporary examples double as decorative items, showcasing carved handles from or that reflect cultural motifs. Large ulus, with blades exceeding 30 cm (12 inches), cater to demanding physical labor beyond everyday cutting. These robust variants are employed for heavy-duty activities, including butchering large game animals and preparing substantial quantities of meat, where the extended blade provides leverage for efficient processing. Additionally, their sturdy suits tasks like chiseling or snow blocks for construction or storage, leveraging the curved edge for forceful downward strikes. Such oversized designs, though less common than standard models, underscore the adaptability of the ulu form to intensive outdoor demands in environments.

History

Ancient Origins

The earliest archaeological for the ulu, a semi-circular essential to toolkits, consists of stone blades recovered from sites across the region, dating back over 5,000 years. These artifacts, primarily crafted from , chert, flint, or through grinding or chipping techniques, have been unearthed in village sites, shell heaps, and graves associated with early cultures. Such findings indicate the ulu's role as a foundational implement in early societies, with examples including drab blades, often found in contexts suggesting association with female tool use. The invention of the ulu emerged as a practical response to the demands of frozen meats, hides, and other resources in subzero conditions, where straight-edged tools proved inefficient for scraping and cutting tough, icy materials. Predating the introduction of metal tools by millennia, these early stone versions relied on locally abundant materials like , which could be shaped into durable, curved blades for versatile applications without requiring advanced . This design innovation allowed for effective one-handed operation while seated, optimizing labor in confined shelters during long winters. Early distribution of ulu-like stone blades spanned from to , reflecting the migratory patterns of early groups who carried and refined the tool across vast territories. These implements evolved from simpler end-scrapers and bifacial knives used in preceding lithic traditions, gradually adopting the distinctive semi-lunar form that enhanced cutting efficiency on curved surfaces like hides. Artifacts from sites in , , and demonstrate this progression, with ground slate examples showing perforations for to bone or wood handles via friction or lashing.

Technological Evolution

The adoption of metal blades marked a significant advancement in ulu construction during the , facilitated by trade interactions between communities and whalers and traders. Prior to this period, blades were primarily crafted from or other stones, but the influx of and through enabled the replacement of these materials with more robust alternatives. This shift occurred as vessels increasingly ventured into waters for , exchanging metal goods for local resources and introducing tools that better withstood the demands of daily use. By the late 19th century, metal had become widely incorporated into ulu designs, with communities adapting imported steel, including repurposed saw blades, to fit traditional shapes. This transition enhanced the tool's cutting efficiency and resistance to wear, allowing for finer control in tasks like skinning and food preparation. Slate blades were largely replaced by steel by the early 1900s. Archaeological and ethnographic records indicate that metal availability grew steadily through ongoing trade networks, leading to near-universal adoption by the early 20th century. In the , refinements in ulu production emerged through factory manufacturing in regions like and , where high-carbon and blades were mass-produced to achieve superior sharpness and extended longevity. Companies such as Grohmann Knives Ltd., established in in 1961, began crafting ulus with precision-ground steel edges that maintained keenness longer than earlier handmade versions, reducing the frequency of resharpening required in harsh environments. Similarly, The Ulu Factory in , founded in 1975, industrialized the process using automated grinding and techniques, resulting in blades that balanced with the profile essential for ergonomic handling. These developments improved overall performance without altering the core semicircular form. Globalization from the early 1900s onward promoted standardized ulu designs by integrating traditional ergonomics with industrial production methods, such as uniform steel tempering and handle molding. This fusion allowed for consistent quality across wider markets while retaining the tool's multifunctional utility, as seen in exported models that combined antler-inspired handles with factory-forged blades. Such facilitated broader accessibility, bridging craftsmanship with modern .

Commercial Development

In the early , collections of uluit began appearing in museums outside the , reflecting growing interest in artifacts. communities have historically sold authentic versions featuring handles carved from or bone. These sales provided economic opportunities for and Native artisans, though production remained largely handmade and localized until regulatory changes. International ivory trade bans, particularly those affecting under U.S. and Canadian wildlife laws starting in the late 20th century, curtailed the use of traditional materials in commercial products, prompting a shift toward sustainable alternatives. This impacted Native carvers who relied on legal tusk sales for livelihoods, leading to reduced market access for ivory-handled souvenirs. Since the 1970s, modern manufacturers in and have scaled up production of legal ulu variants, emphasizing high-carbon or blades paired with handles from , wood, or bone to comply with restrictions while preserving functionality. The Ulu Factory in , exemplifies this transition, starting in a small garage over 50 years ago and expanding into a 12,000-square-foot facility producing thousands of units annually for global distribution, including antler-handled models that appeal to both tourists and culinary users. Canadian producers, such as those crafting caribou antler-handled ulus in communities, have similarly focused on ethically sourced materials to support Indigenous economies. In 2024, this commercial landscape faced scrutiny when U.S.-based company Totchop introduced mass-produced "ulu-inspired" plastic knives marketed for child-safe food preparation, sparking protests from leaders and artisans who decried it as cultural appropriation without community consultation or benefit-sharing. A petition launched by resident Ekpak Robinson garnered over 200 signatures, with elders like Joe Karetak emphasizing the ulu's sacred role in heritage and calling for respect in commercial adaptations. Totchop acknowledged the design's origins on its website but did not respond to criticism, highlighting ongoing tensions between global markets and rights.

Cultural Significance

Role in Indigenous Societies

In traditional Inuit societies, the ulu held central economic importance as a versatile tool primarily used by women for essential tasks that sustained household and community needs. Women relied on the ulu for food preparation, employing its semi-circular blade to efficiently cut meat from caribou or seals and fillet fish, which facilitated the processing and sharing of scarce Arctic resources vital for daily sustenance. In clothing production, the ulu was indispensable for scraping fat, membranes, and hair from animal skins such as sealskin or caribou hide, a labor-intensive process that prepared materials for sewing warm, waterproof garments like parkas and boots, thereby supporting the family's protection against extreme cold. Additionally, women used the ulu for camp maintenance, such as trimming snow blocks to construct or repair igloos, contributing to the upkeep of temporary shelters during seasonal migrations or hunts. The ulu's role extended beyond utility into social transmission, serving as a key element in the intergenerational transfer of knowledge and skills within families. Typically passed down matrilineally from relatives to younger women, the ulu symbolized the honoring of and , with recipients learning its use through hands-on in domestic settings. This family-based acted as a of acquisition, where girls observed and practiced techniques for , cutting, and crafting, reinforcing cultural practices and expertise essential to household autonomy. By enabling these multifaceted women's roles, the ulu significantly impacted community survival in the harsh climate, promoting self-sufficiency long before . Its efficiency in processing , hides, and allowed small family groups to thrive independently, reducing reliance on external resources and fostering resilience against environmental challenges like prolonged winters and limited daylight. This tool's integration into daily life underscored women's contributions to collective well-being, ensuring the viability of nomadic or semi-nomadic lifestyles centered on hunting and gathering.

Symbolism and Contemporary Debates

In Inuit lore, the ulu holds profound symbolic value as a representation of and , embodying the strength required for survival in the harsh environment. Traditionally associated with female roles in subsistence activities, the ulu is passed down through generations, signifying not only practical utility but also cultural continuity and the enduring power of to sustain their communities. This symbolism is vividly captured in and art, where the ulu appears as a motif of feminine agency; for instance, in sculptures like Kiugak Ashoona's Woman with Ulu Knife (1967), it depicts the dynamic spirit of engaged in daily life. Activist has described the ulu as more than a , calling it a "powerful symbol" tied to ancestral traditions and the of against historical challenges. Contemporary debates surrounding the ulu center on cultural appropriation, particularly the commercialization of its design by non-Indigenous entities, which Inuit communities argue dilutes its sacred heritage. In July 2024, Inuit groups protested against U.S.-based company Totchop for marketing mass-produced plastic "ulu-inspired" knives aimed at parents, viewing the products as exploitative profiteering without consultation or acknowledgment of Inuit origins. As of 2025, Totchop continues to sell and develop ulu-inspired products despite the ongoing concerns. Ekpak Robinson, an Inuk from Iqaluit, initiated a petition with over 200 signatures, stating, "They're not an Inuit-owned organization and they're reproducing our tools to make a profit off of it. That's why we're calling it cultural appropriation." Elders like Joe Karetak emphasized the need for courtesy in using Indigenous designs, while Pauktuutit Inuit Women of Canada warned that mass production shadows the ulu's role in keeping Inuit culture alive. These protests highlight broader tensions over intellectual property protections for Indigenous artifacts, though legal experts note the absence of specific safeguards for such designs. Preservation efforts since the have integrated the ulu into cultural revitalization programs and museum initiatives to reclaim and transmit its significance to younger generations. Organizations like the Inuit Art Foundation and community workshops, such as those by Agguaq, facilitate artists' study of historical ulu designs in museums to inspire contemporary and crafts, fostering a reconnection with ancestral knowledge. Programs in and the , including elder-led sessions at cultural centers like Pitquhirnikkut Ilihautiniq, teach ulu use alongside to promote language and skill retention, emphasizing its role in holistic cultural revival. Museums, including the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of the American Indian, house ulus as significant artifacts in collections that educate on , supporting ongoing efforts to prevent cultural erosion.

Canadian Regulations

In Canada, ulus are classified as traditional tools rather than prohibited weapons under , with a specific exemption established in the Regulations Prescribing Certain Firearms and Other Weapons, Components and Parts of Weapons, Accessories, Cartridge Magazines, Ammunition and Projectiles as Prohibited or Restricted (SOR/98-462), enacted in 1998. This regulation explicitly excludes the "aboriginal 'ulu' knife" from prohibitions on knives that open automatically or feature perpendicular blades, recognizing its utility in practices such as food preparation and skinning. As a result, possession, use, and domestic sale of ulus are generally permitted without restriction as long as they align with their traditional function. Cultural protections further safeguard ulus for use and commerce, particularly among communities, under frameworks like the Marine Mammal Regulations (SOR/93-56), which allow individuals to harvest for food, social, ceremonial, and purposes without a licence, up to four animals per year in specified regions. These regulations permit the sale and trade of legally obtained parts, including used in ulu handles, by and other persons within , supporting economic activities tied to traditional craftsmanship. However, restrictions apply to materials to comply with the (CITES, signed in 1973 and effective from 1975), prohibiting commercial trade in elephant and requiring permits for certain other ivories, though domestic use of in authentic ulus remains exempt for purposes. Enforcement of these regulations emphasizes protections against illicit trade in cultural artifacts, with violations under the Cultural Property Export and Import Act (RSC 1985, c C-51) punishable by fines up to $25,000 on or imprisonment for up to five years. Authentic ulus, produced and sold by artisans using permitted materials, are fully allowed for domestic circulation and personal use, distinguishing them from prohibited replicas or illegally sourced items. This framework balances cultural preservation with legal oversight to prevent exploitation while honoring ulus as integral to heritage.

International Restrictions

In the United States, ulu knives are prohibited as carry-on items by the (TSA) since the agency's establishment in November 2001 following the , which led to a blanket ban on knives and sharp objects in cabins to prevent potential weaponization. The ulu's distinctive semi-circular blade is classified under this general restriction on edged weapons, making it a frequently confiscated item at checkpoints, particularly for travelers from . While permitted in , this rule applies nationwide and extends to international flights departing from U.S. airports. Global trade in ulu knives with ivory handles, often crafted from tusks in indigenous communities, is regulated under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (). falls under CITES Appendix III, requiring export permits from the originating country—such as or the —for international shipment to verify legal acquisition and prevent overexploitation. These permits, issued by authorities like the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, must accompany authentic native handicrafts during export from regions, ensuring compliance with wildlife protection standards. In the , knife laws vary by member state but generally restrict public carry of fixed-blade tools like the ulu, viewing them as potential concealed weapons under national security statutes. For instance, in , fixed blades exceeding 12 cm are prohibited in public without justification, while allows exceptions for traditional or cultural utensils intended for legitimate use, such as culinary or artisanal purposes. Similar provisions exist in other EU countries, where ulus may qualify as cultural artifacts exempt from carry bans if documented as non-weapon items for or professional contexts, though import and possession still require adherence to local customs rules.

References

  1. [1]
    The Ulu: A Non-Linear Object - Parsons School of Design
    The ulu is an ancient indigenous knife that derives from the Inuit in Northern Canada, Alaska, and Greenland and continues to be used today by contemporary ...
  2. [2]
    History of the Uluaq
    ### Summary of the Uluaq Knife
  3. [3]
    Transformation and Resilience in the Shape of an Ulu
    The tool has become a symbol of resilience—that is, emblematic of the ... Mason, The Ulu, or Woman's Knife, of the Eskimo (Washington, D. C. ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Ulu | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    May 24, 2018 · In Inuktitut, ulu (ᐅᓗ) means “woman's knife,” reflecting the historic use of the tool by female Inuit . Women used ulus for various domestic ...
  5. [5]
    The Ulu Knife: History, Design, and Cultural Significance
    Jul 22, 2024 · Archaeological evidence suggests that the earliest forms of the Ulu knife date back to around 2500 BCE. These ancient tools were crafted from ...Traditional Uses by... · Features of the Traditional Ulu... · Alaskan Ulu Knife
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Eskimo knife ulu
    The history of Uluit was found to date back to 2500 BC. It was believed that the knowledge of the ancestor is contained in the ulu and thus will also be ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    The Ulu: Chemistry and Inuit women's culture - University of Waterloo
    An ulu is a multi-purpose cutting tool with a semi-circular blade and handle, used by Inuit women for cleaning skins, cutting meat, and more.Missing: terminology variations
  9. [9]
    [PDF] August 2016 Artifacts of the Month Ulu Articles
    Aug 5, 2015 · Its blade is made of a deep symmetrical iron-based metal with a bi-beveled cutting edge, slightly concave shoulders, and a straight base. The ...
  10. [10]
    Best Ulu Knife: Background And Buyer's Guide - BLADE Magazine
    May 8, 2023 · History of the Ulu Knife. The Ulu knife has its origins as a traditional tool used by the Inuit, Iñupiat, Yupik, and Aleut people of Alaska ...The Ulu Knife Has Grown In... · History Of The Ulu Knife · Using The Ulu Knife
  11. [11]
    Alaskan Ulu Knife [Reviews and Buying Guide] - KnifeVerge
    Jun 24, 2023 · Its size varies and it's usually a reflection of its usage. For example, an Ulu with a 6-inch or so the blade is great for general purposes ...Quick Comparison Of Ulu... · Ulu Knife Reviews · 2. Ulu Knife Set (bowl+...
  12. [12]
    Ulu Knife Use in Western Alaska
    Archaeological evidence suggests that 1,200 years ago people began to spread inland throughout the delta and utilize the river systems for fish (Shaw 1998) ...
  13. [13]
    Ulu - Museum of Stone Tools
    'Ulu' in the Inuktitut language translates to 'womens knife'. It was used across the Arctic region of North America, and is particularly associated with the ...
  14. [14]
    Current Laws - Walrus Ivory
    Pacific walrus are protected by the Marine Mammals Protection Act of 1972. This federal law allows for Alaska Natives in coastal communities to harvest walrus ...Missing: ulu knife alternatives
  15. [15]
    Caribou Skin Clothing - Gates Of The Arctic National Park ...
    Aug 19, 2021 · ... ulu, a traditional women's knife (Anchorage Museum of Nunamiut woman cutting caribou hide with ulu, a traditional women's knife. Anchorage ...
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    Audio Student Staff Pick: Ulu Knife, Blog, Spurlock Museum, U of I
    Sep 15, 2022 · The flat, semicircular blade of this ancient tool makes it useful for skinning, cutting hair, or even making clothes. Successful use of this ...Missing: traditional | Show results with:traditional
  18. [18]
    Winter Artifacts in the Peabody Collections
    Jan 14, 2021 · The Ulu or “woman's knife,” was used by Inuit women as an all-purpose tool. Ulu's could be used to skin an animal, cut food, trim ice blocks ...
  19. [19]
    Nunamiut Caribou Skin Clothing and Tents - National Park Service
    Nov 2, 2021 · ... Nunamiut woman cutting caribou hide with an ulu, a traditional women's knife. Anchorage Museum of History and Art, Ward W ...
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    Alaska Ulu Knife - Arctic Spirit Gallery
    Archaeologists estimate the earliest ulu knives date back to 2500 BCE and were utilized in applications as diverse as skinning and cleaning animals, cutting a ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Alaska Ulu Knife And Cutting Chopping Board Souvenir Set ... - eBay
    Free deliveryMade in the United States, this set features a traditional Ulu knife and a cutting board, making it both a functional and decorative piece for display or use.
  24. [24]
    Arctic Winter Games - Alaska Magazine
    Mar 11, 2024 · For the first time in a decade, the Arctic Winter Games will be held in Alaska this March ... Winning athletes are given ulu medals. Photo ...
  25. [25]
    Golden Tuesday for Nunavut at Arctic Winter Games - Nunatsiaq News
    Mar 13, 2024 · Ulu-shaped medals wait for competitors to win them during the Arctic sports competition at the Arctic Winter Games in Wasilla, Alaska.<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    DECORATIVE UTILITARIAN OBJECT - Artefacts Canada
    ... Canada the blade more often is attached to the handle by a single stem in the centre. In the western areas of the Canadian Arctic the blade of the ulu ...
  28. [28]
    Ulu knife | National Museum of the American Indian
    Ulu knife ; Culture/People: Tunumiit [East Greenland] [Ammassalik] ; Previous owner: Nationalmuseet (National Museum of Denmark).
  29. [29]
    [PDF] the ulu, or woman's knife, of the eskimo - Smithsonian Institution
    In the matter of attaching the blade to the handle or grip the Eski- mo's mother wit has not deserted her. fitted into a socket or groove of the handle. Boas, ...Missing: PROSPECT summary
  30. [30]
    Alaska Ulu Knives and Pocket Knives - Fish Creek Company
    Small Bone Sewing Ulu. $94.00. Add To Cart. Small Ivory Sewing Ulu.
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    Traditional Inuit Preparation of Seal Skins - PIC&D
    Mar 26, 2021 · The next step is to remove the fat and blubber, this is done by laying the skin out flat on a board and scraping it clean with their ulu.
  33. [33]
    Newhm:g083 - Knife (ulu) - Creative Power
    Originally they were made out of thin shale slates, but after the Inuit began trading with European whalers and visitors, they were made with metals such as ...
  34. [34]
    ulu (knife) - Spencer Museum of Art
    The ulu, often called a woman's knife, is one of the most important items in an Inuit household. Ulus are used for preparing skins, cooking, sewing, and many ...
  35. [35]
    The Grohmann Story - Superior Outdoor & Kitchen Knives
    Grohmann Knives Ltd was formed in 1961 by the family, and in 1969 was run by one of Grohmann's daughters Berta and her husband Michael Babinec Sr. Berta ( ...Missing: ulu | Show results with:ulu
  36. [36]
    Factory History - High Quality Ulu Knives
    Our factory's history dates back to over two decades. We started off in a small, one-car garage on the east side of Anchorage.
  37. [37]
    Indispensable Ulu - Canada's History
    May 15, 2012 · The ulu was a must-have for every woman. This one was made in the early twentieth century in the area of Port Harrison, Quebec.Missing: factory 20th
  38. [38]
    Ivory Ban Hurts Alaska Natives Who Legally Carve Walrus Tusks
    Nov 24, 2016 · The state and federal measures are causing unintended consequences for Alaska Natives who legally hunt walruses and carve their tusks for a living.
  39. [39]
    This American company is selling 'ulu-inspired knives.' Inuit say ...
    Jul 18, 2024 · Inuit say an ulu-inspired knife, marketed for parents, is cultural appropriation and profiting off an Inuit design.Missing: shaped mounted perpendicular wrist leverage
  40. [40]
    Traditional Clothing | Indigenous Peoples Atlas of Canada
    The pieces were then cut out with a crescent-shaped women's knife (ulu) or a smaller knife with a wooden handle bent at an angle. Thread was made of sinew from ...Missing: roles | Show results with:roles
  41. [41]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  42. [42]
    Rory Voudrach: Uluit and Inuvialuit Resiliency - Inuit Art Foundation
    Dec 10, 2024 · The ulu itself is a symbol of Inuvialuit resiliency and our ingenuity as a people: a vital tool that has survived and been passed down through generations for ...
  43. [43]
    Taking Back the Knife: The Ulu as an Expression of Inuit Women's ...
    The ulu is an enduring object in the lives of Inuit women which has multiple meanings as both a tool and symbol of traditional subsistence activity.Missing: influence languages terminology
  44. [44]
    Seeing Myself Reflected in the Ulu of Kiugak Ashoona's Sculpture
    May 28, 2021 · Created in 1967, Woman with Ulu Knife (1967) expresses the captivating and dynamic spirit his sculptures are known for.
  45. [45]
    Sheila Watt-Cloutier on the ulu knife of Inuit women | CBC
    an Inuit woman's knife, and a powerful tool and symbol. The knife is used to skin animals and to cut and prepare food ...Missing: empowerment resilience art
  46. [46]
    A group of Inuit artists is travelling to museums to study traditional ...
    as well as old knife and Ulu designs that are on display in museums across the country.Missing: cultural programs
  47. [47]
    Cultural Reconnection | Pitquhirnikkut Ilihautiniq
    Annual workshops and cultural programs reconnect Inuinnait and ensure the transfer of knowledge from Elders and knowledge holders to the next generations.
  48. [48]
    Inuit Art, Culture, and Environment | Smithsonian Institution
    Three exhibitions explore the art, culture, and environment of the Inuit: From Kingait to Ulukhaktok: The Artist as Cultural Historian: The works on view ...
  49. [49]
    Regulations Prescribing Certain Firearms and Other Weapons ...
    Jun 4, 2025 · ... Criminal Code . 5 The components and parts of weapons, the accessories and the cartridge magazines listed in Part 4 of the schedule are ...
  50. [50]
    Marine Mammal Regulations ( SOR /93-56) - Laws.justice.gc.ca
    833, and the Walrus Protection Regulations , made by ... (c) the conservation and protection of marine mammals in Canada and in Canadian fisheries waters.Missing: ulu | Show results with:ulu
  51. [51]
    Cultural Property Export and Import Act ( RSC , 1985, c. C-51)
    Offences and Punishment · (a) on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding twelve months or to ...
  52. [52]
    Knives | Transportation Security Administration - TSA
    Knives: Carry On Bags: No Checked Bags: Yes Except knives with rounded-blades, blunt edges without serration/teeth such as butter knives, or plastic cutlery.
  53. [53]
    TSA shares Top 10 prohibited items discovered in travelers' carry-on ...
    Jan 23, 2024 · TSA shares Top 10 prohibited items discovered in travelers' carry-on luggage at Idaho airports in 2023 ; # 8. Lewiston. Ulu knife. This Alaska ...
  54. [54]
    Alaska Native Handicrafts/Marine Mammals | U.S. Fish & Wildlife ...
    Possess authentic Native handicrafts made from walrus ivory? Yes, (Alaska Native peoples may also make and sell authentic walrus ivory handicrafts), Yes. Take ...Missing: ulu knife Canada
  55. [55]
    Ivory in the Arctic | World Wildlife Fund
    Around the Arctic, many remote Indigenous communities depend on walrus for subsistence, cultural, spiritual, and economic purposes.Missing: ulu knife sourcing
  56. [56]
    Knife legislation in Europe: an overview - All4Shooters.com
    Jun 10, 2020 · Forbidden are automatic knives, throwing knives, throwing stars and knives disguised as other objects. When inside a vehicle, the following ...
  57. [57]
    Carry a knife in France, what the law says ? | Couteau Morta
    Oct 10, 2022 · It is officially prohibited in France to keep a knife on your person. But keep reading, because France adores adding exceptions to the rule.