Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Varroa

Varroa is a genus of parasitic mites in the family Varroidae, order Mesostigmata, class Arachnida, known for species that infest honey bees of the genus Apis.<grok:render type="render_inline_citation"> 0 </grok:render> The most economically significant species, Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman, 2000), is an external ectoparasite that feeds on the fat bodies of both adult and developing honey bees, primarily the Western honey bee (Apis mellifera L.), and is regarded as the world's most devastating pest of managed honey bee colonies. Native to , where it originally parasitized the Eastern honey bee ( Fabr.) with limited impact due to the host's natural resistance mechanisms such as grooming and hygienic behaviors, V. destructor shifted to A. mellifera in the mid-20th century, leading to its rapid global spread as an . Adult female mites are reddish-brown, oval-shaped, measuring 1.00–1.77 mm in length and 1.50–1.99 mm in width, while males are smaller, yellowish, and spherical at 0.75–0.98 mm long. The mite's includes a , where it attaches to adult bees for dispersal and feeds on their fat bodies, lasting 4.5–11 days in summer or up to 5–6 months in winter, followed by a reproductive phase in brood cells where females enter capped cells to lay eggs, producing on average 1–2 daughters per cycle, with full development taking 6–7 days for worker brood and longer for drones. The impacts of V. destructor on honey bee biology are profound, as mite feeding weakens bees by reducing their weight by 5–20%, shortening adult lifespan (e.g., from 27.6 days unparasitized to 8.9 days with two mites), and impairing development, foraging, and immune responses. Critically, the mite acts as a vector for debilitating viruses, including Deformed Wing Virus (DWV), Acute Bee Paralysis Virus, and others, amplifying viral loads through saliva containing immunosuppressive proteins like chitinase and Varroa toxic protein, which exacerbate symptoms such as deformed wings, paralysis, and colony collapse. Untreated infestations can lead to colony losses exceeding 80–90% within 1–3 years, contributing to billions in annual economic damages worldwide and factors in phenomena like Colony Collapse Disorder, with U.S. losses reaching 51% in 2019–2020 and approximately 55.6% in 2024–2025. Management of Varroa relies on (IPM) strategies, including chemical miticides (e.g., pyrethroids and organophosphates, though resistance is widespread), non-chemical methods like brood trapping and screened bottom boards (reducing mites by up to 14%), and for resistant bee stocks exhibiting enhanced grooming or hygienic behaviors that remove parasitized pupae. In 2025, the U.S. EPA approved Norroa, the first RNA-based treatment for Varroa mites. Monitoring via techniques such as sticky boards or alcohol washes is essential, with economic thresholds around 3,000 mites per colony to prevent irreversible damage. Other Varroa species, such as V. jacobsoni and V. rindereri, primarily affect Asian species with lesser global impact on apiculture.

Taxonomy and Description

Genus Overview

Varroa is a genus of parasitic mites belonging to the family Varroidae in the order Mesostigmata, class Arachnida, and phylum Arthropoda, primarily parasitizing species of the honey bee genus Apis. The genus name derives from the Roman scholar Marcus Terentius Varro (116–27 BCE), who documented bee pests in his agricultural writings, Rerum Rusticarum. These mites represent a severe threat to global apiculture, as they weaken honey bee colonies by feeding on their fat bodies (a nutrient-rich tissue) and transmitting debilitating viruses, contributing significantly to colony collapse disorder (CCD)._ The economic toll is substantial, with Varroa infestations linked to billions of dollars in annual losses worldwide due to reduced pollination services and colony replacements. For instance, in the United States during 2024–2025, beekeepers reported the loss of approximately 1.6 million managed colonies, largely attributed to Varroa-related factors. The most economically impactful species within the is , which causes the disease known as varroosis in Apis mellifera colonies.

Morphology

The adult female Varroa mite possesses an oval, dorsoventrally flattened body, typically measuring 1.00–1.77 mm in length and 1.50–1.99 mm in width, with a reddish-brown coloration that darkens with age and feeding. This flattened shape allows the mite to fit snugly between the abdominal sclerites of its host. The are specialized piercing structures used to penetrate host tissue for feeding on tissue._ The mite has four pairs of ambulatory legs, each terminating in claws and empodia that provide strong adhesion for clinging to the host's during phoretic dispersal. Sexual dimorphism is evident in Varroa mites, with adult males being considerably smaller at 0.75–0.98 mm in length, pale yellowish in color, and spherically shaped with longer, more slender legs compared to females._ Males are non-feeding, relying on nutrients acquired during the nymphal stage, and have a short lifespan of only a few days; their chelicerae are modified into structures suited for sperm transfer rather than piercing. Key anatomical adaptations support the mite's parasitic lifestyle, including peritremes for respiration—chitinized, elongated structures located laterally above the third pair of coxae that surround the stigma and facilitate gas exchange even when submerged in host fluids. In females, a genital orifice on the ventral surface, positioned between the base of the fourth pair of legs, enables egg deposition during reproduction. Ventral setae and the leg empodia further aid phoretic behavior by enhancing grip on adult bees for transport between hosts. The developmental stages of Varroa mites show progressive morphological changes. Protonymphs are circular and transparent white, measuring approximately 0.63–0.68 mm in length and 0.74–0.78 mm in width, with eight functional legs and pointed chelicerae; at this stage, the cuticle is soft and unsclerotized, and males and females are indistinguishable externally without dissection. Deutonymphs adopt an oval shape similar to adults, growing to 1.0–1.2 mm in length and 1.1–1.7 mm in width, with increased sclerotization of the exoskeleton for rigidity and reduced setae density compared to protonymphs, marking the final preparatory phase before the adult molt.

Species

The genus Varroa comprises four recognized that parasitize honey bees, primarily in the genus Apis, with distinct host preferences and geographic ranges shaped by historical host-switching events. These were delineated through morphological and molecular analyses, particularly mitochondrial DNA sequencing of the CO-I , revealing genetic distinctions among haplotypes previously grouped under V. jacobsoni. No new have been described since 2000, though ongoing genetic studies identify variants within V. destructor associated with host resistance mechanisms in bees. The following table summarizes the four species, their primary hosts, and key geographic associations:
SpeciesPrimary HostsGeographic Distribution
V. destructorA. cerana (native), A. mellifera (adapted via host-switching)Cosmopolitan in regions with A. mellifera colonies; native to Asia; absent from some isolated areas such as Western Australia and certain islands as of 2025.
V. jacobsoniA. cerana (specific); limited records on A. mellifera in Papua New GuineaSoutheast Asia (e.g., Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia); introduced to Papua New Guinea.
V. rindereriA. koschevnikoviBorneo (Indonesia and Malaysia)._
V. underwoodiA. ceranaSouth Asia (India, Nepal); also reported in far eastern Russia, South Korea, and parts of Indonesia.
V. destructor is distinguished by two main mitochondrial haplotypes—the Korean (K) lineage, which predominates globally and is highly virulent on A. mellifera, and the Japanese (J) lineage, more restricted to parts of and the —arising from separate host-switching events from A. cerana in the mid-20th century. These haplotypes reflect adaptive enabling widespread , making V. destructor the primary agent of varroosis in managed colonies. In contrast, the other species remain largely host-specific to Asian Apis species without significant global spread. Recent genetic research highlights variants within V. destructor populations linked to differential reproduction rates in resistant bee strains, underscoring ongoing evolutionary pressures.

Biology

Life Cycle

The life cycle of Varroa destructor consists of two primary phases: the phoretic phase, during which adult female mites disperse and feed on adult honey bees, and the reproductive phase, which occurs within capped brood cells and is essential for population increase. In the phoretic phase, mated adult female mites attach to the bodies of adult bees, primarily nurse bees, and feed on their hemolymph for sustenance and dispersal to new brood cells or colonies. This phase typically lasts 5 to 11 days when brood is present, but can extend up to 5-6 months during winter or broodless periods, depending on brood availability and colony conditions. The reproductive phase begins when a gravid , known as the foundress, invades an uncapped brood cell containing a mature , typically around one day before capping for worker brood, two to three days for brood, and longer for brood. After the cell is capped, the foundress resumes feeding on the developing and initiates egg-laying approximately 60 hours post-capping. The reproductive period lasts about 9 days in worker brood cells, 12 days in brood cells, and up to 16 days in brood cells, aligning with the host's pupal development timeline. The developmental stages of V. destructor include the egg, larva, protonymph, deutonymph, and . Eggs are laid sequentially by the foundress: the first is unfertilized and develops into a haploid , while subsequent eggs (2-5 total) are fertilized and develop into diploid females via arrhenotokous . The larval stage is hexapod, followed by the protonymph stage, which is octopod and can occasionally become phoretic if the fails; the deutonymph stage produces reproductive females, culminating in the stage upon emergence with the host . Offspring development takes approximately 5.5-6 days in worker brood and 7.5-8 days in drone brood, with male mites maturing first to with siblings before emergence. A single foundress typically produces 2-6 per reproductive cycle, though only mated deutonymphs survive to become reproductive adults, with about 70% survival rate overall. This results in exponential within colonies during periods of abundant brood, as each viable can initiate new cycles. Environmental factors, particularly temperature, significantly influence the ; optimal and occur at 30-35°C, with lower temperatures slowing rates and reducing offspring viability.

Reproduction

exhibits a specialized reproductive strategy adapted to its parasitic lifestyle within brood cells. occurs exclusively inside capped brood cells, where adult males, emerging first from the foundress female's initial haploid egg, inseminate their sisters or females from other foundresses at a fecal accumulation site. This process is triggered by volatile compounds such as released by females, with durations typically bimodal at 3 or 6 minutes, and females often engaging in if multiple males are present, storing up to 35 spermatozoa to support 1.5–3 reproductive cycles. Males die shortly after due to their short lifespan and inability to feed independently. Oviposition begins approximately 60–70 hours after the brood cell is capped, initiated by chemical signals from the developing . The foundress lays her first unfertilized , which develops into a haploid male via (haplodiploid sex determination), followed by 2–5 fertilized female eggs at roughly 30-hour intervals. Female offspring develop over about 5.8 days, while males take 6.6 days, with the entire reproductive phase synchronized to the host's to allow mated daughters to emerge with the adult . Fecundity varies significantly by host brood type, with foundresses producing an average of 1.8 mature daughters in worker cells compared to 3.0 in drone cells per reproductive cycle. Over a female's lifetime, which may span up to seven cycles under optimal conditions, she can produce around five fertile female offspring in total, though this is limited by host availability and mite density. Several factors influence reproductive success, including a strong preference for drone brood due to longer cell attractiveness (up to 40 hours versus 20 hours for workers) and chemical cues like methyl palmitate. Multiple infestations per cell reduce egg laying and increase offspring mortality, while nutritional dependence on the host's tissue provides essential for egg production and . Temperatures above 36.5°C impair egg viability and overall fecundity, as mites are sensitive to deviations from the brood cell's optimal 34–35°C range. Recent research highlights the polygenic basis of reproductive rates, with studies identifying key genes such as ptch1, ap-1, and vg1 that, when silenced via RNAi, significantly increase infertility by 57–78% through disruptions in oocyte maturation, vitellogenesis, and embryogenesis pathways like Hedgehog and JNK signaling. These findings underscore the genetic complexity underlying Varroa's reproductive efficiency and potential targets for mite control.

History and Distribution

Discovery

The Varroa mite was first discovered in 1904 by entomologist Anton Cornelis Oudemans in , , where it was observed parasitizing the Asian honey bee, . Oudemans named the mite Varroa jacobsoni in honor of the specimen collector, E. Jacobson, based on its morphological characteristics as a new and species of parasitic acarine. This initial identification established V. jacobsoni as an obligate ectoparasite primarily associated with A. cerana in its native Southeast Asian range. Early scientific investigations into the mite's distribution began in the , particularly through Soviet studies that documented its spread across Asian regions on A. cerana hives. The first detection of the mite on the , Apis mellifera, occurred around 1952 in the of the USSR. By the , the mite was increasingly recognized as a significant pest in A. cerana colonies, with the first published report of the host shift to A. mellifera in in 1962–1963. This period also saw the mite's entry into , with the first confirmed case in in 1967, likely via contaminated queen bees from . In the 1980s, further host shifts to A. mellifera occurred more widely across , exacerbating the mite's impact as beekeepers moved European honey bee stocks into endemic areas. Until this decade, Varroa infestations remained largely confined to , but exports of infested A. mellifera colonies facilitated its emergence beyond the continent. A pivotal taxonomic advancement came in 2000, when David L. Anderson and John W. H. Trueman reclassified the mite lineage parasitizing A. mellifera as a distinct species, , based on morphological, molecular, and reproductive evidence distinguishing it from the original V. jacobsoni on A. cerana.

Global Spread

The spread of , the primary species affecting Western honey bees (), began in the mid-20th century following its host shift from the Eastern honey bee () in . Initially detected on A. mellifera in the USSR around 1952, likely via the transport of infected A. cerana colonies to the region, the mite rapidly expanded westward through during the 1970s and 1980s. By 1967, it had reached , marking the first confirmed incursion into mainland Europe and prompting widespread alerts among apiculturists. This early European dissemination was facilitated by international bee trade and migratory practices, leading to detections across the continent by the late 1970s, including in in 1977. The mite's expansion continued into the during the same period, entering via in the early 1970s and reaching by 1972 through inadvertent imports of infested queens and packages from . In , V. destructor was first identified in the United States in 1987, introduced via commercial shipments of bees from to apiaries, despite measures. From these entry points, it proliferated northward and southward, becoming established across both continents by the early . Key vectors included the global trade in queens, colonies, and equipment, as well as natural swarming events that allowed mites to disperse between and managed hives; lapses at ports further accelerated this process. In , the reported its initial detection in 1992, linked to imports from infested continental sources. Further incursions marked the mite's advance into , with confirming V. destructor in 2000 after smuggling of infected hives bypassed protocols. , long protected as the last major landmass free of the parasite, faced its first detection in in June 2022 at the , traced to illegal imports. The infestation quickly escalated, spreading to in August 2024, in March 2025, the Australian Capital Territory in April 2025, and in September 2025, driven by bee movement and inadequate containment. As of November 2025, V. destructor has achieved a , infesting populations across , North and , , and much of eastern in , with the exception of isolated regions such as the Isle of Man, , the , and , which maintain strict import bans to remain mite-free. In , the national response shifted from eradication to long-term management in February 2024, with programs extending until February 2026 to build resilience through training and monitoring. The 2024-2025 period has seen widespread establishment across eastern , severely impacting feral populations and posing risks to pollinator-dependent , with early surveys indicating elevated colony mortality rates amid ongoing dispersal.

Behavior and Parasitism

Host Interactions

Varroa destructor mites engage in phoresy, a dispersal where adult female mites attach to the bodies of honey bees using their legs, primarily targeting nurse bees due to their frequent movement within the hive. This attachment facilitates intra-hive dispersal and inter-colony spread, as infested nurse bees transport mites to new brood cells or during swarming events. Nurse bees are preferentially selected because of their high activity levels and proximity to brood, enhancing mite reproduction opportunities. During both phoretic and reproductive phases, Varroa mites feed by piercing the bee's soft tissues with their , targeting the in both developing pupae and adult bees. In pupae, mites externally digest and consume tissue, a nutrient-rich essential for immunity and , leading to direct physiological damage and by depleting immune-related proteins and . On adult bees, feeding involves consuming tissue, which further weakens the host by depleting this vital responsible for immunity and energy storage, exacerbating immune suppression. Varroa mites manipulate host physiology through salivary secretions injected during feeding, which contain proteins like chitinases and cystatins that suppress the bee's and prolong wound openness. These components inhibit production and increase susceptibility to secondary infections, with studies showing reduced expression of immune genes in infested pupae. Additionally, mites exhibit a behavioral for entering brood cells already containing a founding female, allowing multiple mites to share resources and boost in infested pupae. The primary hosts of are the (Apis mellifera) and the Eastern honey bee (), with the mite having originally evolved on A. cerana before adapting to A. mellifera. Infestations on other Apis species, such as A. dorsata or A. florea, are rare and typically non-reproductive, while attachment to bumble bees (Bombus spp.) occurs experimentally but does not sustain mite populations in nature. Recent 2025 research highlights synergistic effects between Varroa infestation and exposure, where mites amplify pesticide-induced neural damage, leading to memory impairment in honey s and causing s to forget food source locations. This interaction disrupts circadian rhythms and learning, shortening bee longevity and vitality beyond individual stressor effects.

Disease Transmission

Varroa destructor primarily acts as a vector for key honey bee viruses, including (DWV), acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV), and Kashmir bee virus (KBV). These viruses replicate within the mite's tissues, particularly the salivary glands for DWV variants like DWV-B, where infected gland tissue enables oral back to parasitized bees during feeding. For ABPV and KBV, the mites facilitate transmission through detection of viral peptides in their bodies, though replication in salivary glands is less confirmed compared to DWV. This vector role transforms Varroa from a simple parasite into a biological amplifier of viral pathogens, exacerbating colony decline. Transmission occurs via two main modes: horizontal, where mites directly inject viruses into bees during hemolymph feeding, and vertical, where infected mother mites pass viruses to their offspring during reproduction within brood cells, which then transmit to emerging bees. Horizontal transfer is the dominant pathway in infested hives, as mites move between hosts and feed multiple times, rapidly spreading viruses like DWV across adult bees and pupae. Vertical transmission sustains viral persistence across generations of mites and bees, ensuring long-term circulation within colonies. The synergy between Varroa feeding and intensifies disease impact; mite hemolymph extraction weakens bee immunity, suppressing antiviral responses and allowing viruses like DWV to replicate at exponentially higher levels. In heavily infested colonies, DWV prevalence often exceeds 90%, with viral titers increasing up to a million-fold compared to uninfested hives, driving overt symptoms and mortality. This interaction creates a loop where not only delivers viruses but also creates optimal conditions for their proliferation. Beyond viruses, Varroa indirectly contributes to bacterial and fungal infections by compromising bee health, though it does not directly vector these pathogens. For instance, weakened become more susceptible to secondary bacterial invaders like Melissococcus plutonius, the causative agent of European foulbrood, without evidence of mite-mediated bacterial transfer. Similar secondary effects apply to fungal pathogens, where Varroa-induced stress heightens vulnerability but no direct occurs. Recent 2025 USDA findings highlight high viral loads from Varroa-transmitted DWV and ABPV as a primary driver of U.S. colony losses, with commercial beekeepers reporting approximately 62% overwintering mortality in 2024–2025, particularly severe in operations.

Varroosis

Symptoms

Varroosis manifests in observable symptoms at both the individual and levels, primarily resulting from the parasitic feeding of mites and the viruses they transmit, such as (DWV). In individually affected honey bees, common signs include deformed or crumpled wings, which impair flight and capabilities. Infested bees often exhibit crippled or shortened abdomens due to nutrient depletion from mite feeding. Additionally, the lifespan of worker bees is significantly reduced; normally lasting about six weeks in summer, it can drop by approximately 50% to around three weeks in heavily infested individuals. At the colony level, varroosis leads to noticeable population declines, with rapid loss of adult bees and reduced brood production resulting in a spotty or irregular brood pattern. Queens may fail to lay eggs consistently, contributing to further weakening of the structure. When mite infestation exceeds 20% of the bee , it often triggers colony collapse, characterized by high mortality at the entrance and bees crawling unable to fly. Beekeepers can identify early signs through thresholds like the economic injury level of 1-3 mites per 100 bees, beyond which intervention is typically required to prevent severe damage. Visual cues include increased mite fall observed on sticky boards placed beneath the , indicating rising rates. The progression of symptoms follows a seasonal pattern, with slow mite build-up during and summer due to limited reproduction opportunities, accelerating rapidly in the fall as brood rearing peaks and overwintering bees emerge vulnerable. Varroosis is closely linked to colony collapse disorder (CCD), where high mite loads exacerbate viral infections leading to sudden adult bee disappearance. Recent observations from the 2024-2025 U.S. beekeeping survey reported an estimated 55.6% loss of managed colonies, with extreme regional collapses attributed to elevated mite populations combined with high viral loads and emerging miticide resistance.

Pathophysiology and Impact

The ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor inflicts damage on honey bees (Apis mellifera) primarily by feeding on their fat body tissue, a critical organ responsible for nutrient storage, metabolism, and immune function, rather than hemolymph as previously thought. This feeding behavior leads to nutrient depletion and significant weight reduction in infested bees, typically 10-20% in workers and up to 25% in some cases, impairing their development and longevity. Additionally, the consumption of fat body suppresses the bee's immune response, including reduced titers of vitellogenin—a multifunctional protein essential for immunity, reproduction, and overwintering survival—leaving hosts more vulnerable to secondary stressors. Secondary effects exacerbate the direct physiological harm through synergies with pathogens vectored by the . V. destructor transmits viruses such as (DWV), which, in combination with , amplifies replication and virulence, leading to severe developmental abnormalities in pupae, including undersized adults with malformed wings and reduced . These interactions destabilize the host's antiviral defenses, contributing to accelerated decline beyond what either factor alone would cause. Ecologically, V. destructor has driven sharp declines in wild populations, disrupting networks and contributing to in native flora dependent on these pollinators. In regions like , where the mite was detected in 2022 and has since spread to , , , the Australian Capital Territory, and as of 2025, projections indicate a high risk of near-total of feral colonies by 2026, potentially eliminating a key vector for wild plant reproduction and altering ecosystems. Economically, Varroa infestation results in global annual losses to the industry estimated at $200-500 million, stemming from colony mortality, reduced honey yields, and increased management costs. In , significant colony losses are projected following the mite's spread, threatening over $1 billion in pollination-dependent , including crops like almonds and avocados. Long-term, V. destructor serves as a primary driver of (CCD) through its role in viral proliferation and immune compromise, fundamentally altering apiculture worldwide.

Management

Chemical Treatments

Chemical treatments for Varroa destructor mites primarily involve synthetic and organic miticides designed to reduce mite populations in honey bee colonies while minimizing harm to bees and hive products. These treatments are most effective when integrated into an overall strategy, with application guided by mite to ensure timely intervention. Synthetic miticides, such as fluvalinate (marketed as Apistan), amitraz (Apivar), and coumaphos (CheckMite+), are applied via plastic strips hung between brood frames, typically remaining in the hive for 4-6 weeks to allow diffusion and contact with phoretic mites. These synthetic options have demonstrated knockdown efficacies of 85-95% in susceptible populations, though widespread has reduced their reliability in many regions, necessitating with other treatments to maintain effectiveness. miticides, approved for use in , include , , and . is administered through dribble (mixed with sugar syrup) or methods, achieving up to 90% during broodless periods when all mites are exposed on adult bees, but it does not penetrate capped brood cells. , delivered via gel pads like Mite Away Quick Strips, penetrates brood cappings to target reproducing mites, with ranging from 80-95% under optimal s (50-85°F). -based products, such as Apiguard trays, volatilize to kill phoretic mites, offering 70-90% but varying with strength, , and . Timing of chemical treatments is critical for success, with fall applications recommended after honey supers are removed and when brood levels are low to maximize mite exposure and minimize residues in . Treatments should be initiated when mite infestation thresholds are exceeded, such as 3% infested adult bees in fall or 1 mite per 100 bees in spring, based on sampling methods like washes. In 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved Norroa, an (RNAi)-based miticide containing the active ingredient vadescana, which targets Varroa-specific genes to disrupt mite reproduction without affecting bees. Classified as a but applied as a chemical treatment via liquid pouches placed in , Norroa demonstrated 95% in field trials, providing mite control for up to 18 weeks with one application. Overall, while chemical treatments offer 85-95% knockdown rates, rotating between synthetic, , and novel options like Norroa is essential to delay resistance development.

Non-Chemical Methods

Non-chemical methods for controlling Varroa destructor in honey bee colonies emphasize mechanical, biological, and cultural strategies that avoid synthetic chemicals, promoting with minimal residues in hive products. These approaches are often integrated into broader pest management frameworks to reduce mite populations proactively, particularly when combined with regular . While individual methods may achieve moderate efficacy, their strength lies in long-term application and , potentially reducing mite loads by 50-70% over time without contributing to issues associated with chemical treatments. Mechanical methods physically remove or trap mites from bees and brood. Drone brood trapping involves providing sacrificial drone frames, as Varroa mites preferentially infest larger cells for , allowing beekeepers to remove and destroy these frames periodically. Studies indicate this can reduce mite populations by up to 90% in simulations over a season, though field efficacy typically ranges from 65-97% when implemented consistently during peak brood periods. Similarly, or shakes dislodge phoretic s from adult bees by coating samples of bees (e.g., 300 individuals) with and shaking them over a surface, or using washes for more accurate counts and removal; these techniques achieve 29-70% mite reduction per application, with methods often reaching 80-90% dislodgement efficiency in controlled tests. Biological controls leverage natural substances or organisms to target s. Essential oils like , derived from plants, can be applied in non-formulated forms (e.g., as crystals or vapors) to disrupt mite behavior on adult bees without penetrating brood cells, offering 70-95% efficacy against phoretic mites in some applications while leaving no synthetic residues. However, their use requires careful temperature management to avoid stressing bees. Cultural practices modify hive management to limit mite reproduction and survival. Brood breaks, induced by temporarily removing the queen or refrigerating frames to halt larval development, deprive mites of host cells, significantly lowering populations—e.g., combining with other methods can increase mite mortality fivefold. Screened bottom boards facilitate natural mite drop by allowing fallen mites (from grooming or dislodgement) to exit the , reducing populations by 20-50% in studies compared to solid bottoms, especially when paired with sticky inserts for monitoring. Hive splitting divides strong colonies into smaller units, creating temporary broodless periods that interrupt the mite and distribute resources, effectively slowing infestation growth in new nucs. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) combines these non-chemical strategies for optimal results, emphasizing cultural resilience through practices like drone trapping, screened boards, and brood interruption to maintain mite levels below damaging thresholds. In , the 2025 Transition to Management program, running through 2026, supports beekeepers with workshops and resources focused on adoption, including cultural methods to build industry capacity post-eradication efforts. Overall, these methods provide sustainable, residue-free , best as adjuncts to , achieving 50-70% seasonal reductions while preserving health long-term.

Monitoring Techniques

Monitoring infestations in honey bee colonies is essential for , allowing beekeepers to detect rising mite populations before they cause significant harm and to evaluate the effectiveness of control measures. Accurate assessment relies on standardized sampling techniques that estimate mite density relative to bee numbers, typically expressed as mites per 100 bees. These methods help maintain infestations below damaging levels, preventing colony weakening and associated diseases. Direct counting techniques provide precise measurements of mite prevalence. Sticky boards, placed beneath the brood nest for 24 to 72 hours, capture naturally fallen or induced phoretic mites (those on adult bees), offering a colony-wide estimate of population trends; counts exceeding 60 mites per day often indicate the need for intervention. The alcohol wash method involves submerging a sample of approximately 300 adult bees in soapy alcohol to dislodge and kill mites, which are then counted; this yields high accuracy (nearly 100% mite recovery) and is considered the gold standard for quantifying infestation rates, with a 3% threshold (3 mites per 100 bees) signaling potential treatment. Indirect methods offer practical alternatives, particularly for non-lethal sampling. The sugar roll technique coats 300 bees with powdered sugar in a jar, shaking them to dislodge mites onto a white surface for counting; it achieves about 95% accuracy compared to alcohol washes and allows bees to be returned to the hive unharmed. Brood frame inspection involves uncapping drone or worker cells to visually count mites, revealing reproductive infestations; drone brood typically harbors higher densities (up to 3 times that of worker brood), making it a sensitive early warning tool. Commercial kits, such as pre-packaged alcohol wash or sugar roll supplies from suppliers like Dadant, simplify fieldwork, while apps like BeeScanning and MiteCheck enable photo-based mite detection and data logging for . Beekeepers are advised to monitor monthly from spring through fall, aligning with brood-rearing cycles when mite reproduction peaks. Treatment thresholds vary by bee type and season to balance health and economic viability. For worker bees, intervention is recommended at 1 per 100 bees (1%), while drone bees warrant action at 3 s per 100 due to their preference as hosts; apiary-scale economic models, such as those simulating across multiple , help optimize timing to minimize losses. Recent surveys underscore the consequences of inadequate . In the 2024-2025 , U.S. beekeepers reported 62% losses, with analyses attributing much of this to insufficient Varroa surveillance leading to untimely or ineffective treatments. Emerging digital sensors, like those in the BeeSentry system, promise automated, real-time to enhance detection in large operations.

Resistance

Mite Resistance to Treatments

has developed to several chemical s used for control, posing significant challenges to colony management. This arises primarily through genetic adaptations that allow mites to survive exposures that would otherwise be lethal, leading to reduced treatment efficacy and increased viral transmission within . mechanisms and patterns vary by acaricide class, with pyrethroids like fluvalinate showing early and widespread issues, while formamidines such as amitraz have more recently exhibited variable globally. Key resistance mechanisms in Varroa include target site insensitivity and metabolic detoxification. Target site insensitivity, particularly for pyrethroids like tau-fluvalinate, involves mutations in the voltage-gated (VGSC) gene, such as the L925V kdr , which alters the and reduces acaricide penetration; this accounts for up to 92% of resistance at lethal concentrations in populations. Metabolic detoxification, observed with organophosphates like coumaphos, relies on monooxygenases (e.g., CYP4EP4 underexpression), which impair the activation of pro-insecticides into toxic forms, conferring over 200-fold resistance in affected populations; similar P450 upregulation aids in metabolizing multiple classes. These mechanisms often co-occur, enhancing overall survival. Resistance timelines reflect intensive acaricide use: fluvalinate resistance emerged in the 1990s across the and due to widespread application, rendering it largely ineffective by the early . Amitraz resistance was first documented around 2000 in the , with sporadic reports in by the mid-2000s, though it remained effective longer than pyrethroids; by 2025, resistance was confirmed in nearly all sampled mites from collapsed colonies. For organic acids, shows no confirmed resistance after 30 years of use, though some studies report reduced (10-50% in outliers) attributed to application factors rather than genetic ; emerging concerns include potential 10-20% efficacy drops in repeated applications per recent reviews. Lactic acid resistance risks are under evaluation, with 2025 assessments highlighting low but increasing potential due to mode-of-action similarities with , based on historical patterns of organic acid use. Contributing factors include overuse of single acaricides and incomplete treatments, which exert strong selective pressure favoring resistant genotypes; for instance, repeated amitraz applications without rotation have accelerated resistance in commercial operations. Global patterns show higher resistance prevalence in (e.g., widespread L925V mutations in and ) due to longer exposure histories, while patterns are more variable, with hotspots in and the Midwest linked to intensive but lower rates in remote areas. Surveys indicate substantial treatment failures attributable to , with up to 69% of Varroa samples resistant to pyrethroids like in recent and amitraz efficacies dropping to 68% in apiaries experiencing control failures. In 2025, USDA analyses linked resistance-driven mite survival to over 60% losses (1.7 million hives) nationwide, underscoring the scale of impact. Effective management emphasizes rotation, such as alternating amitraz with , to delay and allow susceptible genotypes to rebound; rotation has reversed amitraz in some populations within 2-6 years. Integration into (IPM) frameworks, combining monitoring for early detection and non-chemical tactics, further mitigates risks; 2025 studies warn of potential, recommending diversified applications to preserve efficacy.

Bee Resistance Mechanisms

Honey bees exhibit several natural resistance mechanisms against Varroa destructor mites, primarily through behavioral traits that disrupt the mite's reproductive cycle. Varroa-sensitive hygiene (VSH) is a key trait where worker bees detect and remove mite-infested pupae from brood cells, significantly reducing mite populations; in VSH-selected colonies, this behavior can achieve up to a 70% reduction in mite reproduction compared to unselected bees. Another natural defense is grooming, or auto-grooming, in which bees use their legs and mandibles to dislodge and kill mites on their bodies, with studies showing that high-grooming lines can remove 20-50% of phoretic mites. Breeding programs have amplified these traits to develop Varroa-resistant . The USDA's Pol-line, initiated in the , selectively breeds for suppressed reproduction (SMR), a mechanism where bees uncap infested brood cells, recapp them after removing or damaging , and thereby limit female offspring production to less than 1 per cell in resistant lines. VSH hybrids from these programs demonstrate 62% winter survival rates in untreated colonies, far exceeding the 10-20% survival in susceptible under similar Varroa pressure. The genetic basis of resistance is polygenic, with a 2024 genome-wide association study (GWAS) identifying 60 loci associated with VSH and SMR traits across diverse bee populations. Additional mechanisms include uncapping and recapping behaviors that target early-stage infestations, often combined with hygienic removal, leading to over 80% suppression of mite fertility in selected lines. Recent research from 2024 and 2025 highlights the role of learning and social transmission in trait inheritance, where nurse bees acquire and pass on detection cues for infested brood through colony interactions, enhancing resistance propagation without solely relying on . Progress in resistant stocks includes the Russian honey bee, imported from the Primorsky region and selected for natural tolerance, which maintains 50-70% lower infestations in field conditions compared to bees. The Hygienic stock, originally bred for disease resistance, also shows elevated VSH expression, contributing to reduced Varroa loads. In 2025 field trials across North American apiaries, hybrids incorporating these stocks achieved approximately 50% lower infestation rates after one year without interventions. Despite these advances, challenges persist, including trade-offs such as reduced honey yields (up to 20% lower in some VSH lines due to increased brood removal) and the need for coordinated global distribution efforts to prevent dilution of resistance genes through crossbreeding with susceptible populations. Ongoing international programs aim to standardize distribution and monitoring to sustain these traits worldwide.

References

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    Varroa, Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman (Arachnida: Acari
    Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman), is the world's most devastating pest of Western honey bees, Apis mellifera Linnaeus (Hymenoptera: Apidae).
  3. [3]
    Varroa mite - Carl Hayden Bee Research Center - USDA ARS
    Apr 5, 2023 · The Varroa mite (Varroa destructor) is an ectoparasite of the honey bee Apis mellifera L. Varroa is the most serious pest of honey bees ...
  4. [4]
    Varroa destructor and its impacts on honey bee biology - Frontiers
    Varroa destructor is considered one of the greatest threats to the health of the honey bee, A. mellifera.
  5. [5]
    (PDF) Assessing the Efficacy of Organic and Chemical Treatments ...
    Aug 11, 2024 · Varroa destructor infestations pose a significant global threat to ... named after him. While. the Asian honeybee (Apis cerana) was its ...
  6. [6]
    California honey bee ravaged by increasingly resilient mites
    Jun 24, 2025 · Between June 2024 and March 2025, 1.6 million colonies were lost, with commercial beekeepers reported losing an average of 62% of their colonies ...
  7. [7]
    USDA Researchers Find Viruses from Miticide Resistant Parasitic ...
    Jul 16, 2025 · In January 2025, commercial beekeepers began reporting severe losses in commercially managed operations.Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024
  8. [8]
    Varroa destructor : USDA ARS
    Dec 1, 2017 · The adult female Varroa is oval and flat, about 1.1 mm long and 1.5 mm wide, pale to reddish-brown in color, and can be seen easily with the ...
  9. [9]
    Biology and Management of Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata ...
    Jan 5, 2020 · Varroa destructor adult males are pale yellow in color, with oblong, triangularly shaped bodies (De Jong et al. 1982), and longer legs than ...
  10. [10]
    ULTRASTRUCURAL STUDY OF BEE LOUSE VARROA ... - PubMed
    ... Varroa destructor is ... respiratory structure (peritreme) is located laterally above Coxa III. Peritreme is a chitinized elongated area surrounding stigma ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Biology and control of Varroa destructor
    Respiration takes place by the peritreme, the common respiratory organ of ... and Varroa destructor. In: EurBee, Proceedings of the Second European ...
  12. [12]
    Morphological identification, prevalence, and infestation rate of ...
    The adult males and females of V. destructor are different based on body size, shape, legs, and color. The body size of females is larger than males. The legs ...
  13. [13]
    Varroa jacobsoni (Acari: Varroidae) is more than one species
    In a new classification V. jacobsoni is here redefined as encompassing nine haplotypes (mites with distinct mtDNA CO-I gene sequences) that infest A. cerana in ...
  14. [14]
    Allele Frequencies of Genetic Variants Associated with Varroa ...
    Jun 4, 2024 · Allele frequencies of genetic variants associated with varroa drone brood resistance (DBR) in Apis mellifera subspecies across the European continent.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Varroosis of honey bees (infestation of honey bees with Varroa spp.)
    Four obligate ectoparasitic species have been described: Varroa jacobsoni, V. underwoodi, V. rindereri and V. destructor (Figure 1). Two haplotypes of the.Missing: list | Show results with:list
  16. [16]
    Varroa mite – current situation - Agriculture Victoria
    Sep 9, 2025 · Update: Victorian Varroa control area order will be removed effective 11 September 2025 · What this means for beekeepers from 11 September 2025.
  17. [17]
    Varroa jacobsoni (Varroa mite) | CABI Compendium
    Nov 21, 2019 · Together with its original host, V. jacobsoni has been introduced to New Guinea and Solomon Islands. Although Australia used to be considered ...
  18. [18]
    of Varroa species infesting honey bees - Apidologie
    Feb 21, 1999 · rindereri remained inside the cells [13]. 4.1. Host range and distribution. V. rindereri has been only reported in colonies of A. koschevnikovi ...
  19. [19]
    Ectoparasitic Mites Varroa underwoodi (Acarina: Varroidae) in ...
    Feb 12, 2019 · Nevertheless, the genetic diversity of V. underwoodi is likely to increase chances for host shifts, even though opportunities for cross-species ...Missing: distribution | Show results with:distribution
  20. [20]
    The invasive Korea and Japan types of Varroa destructor ... - NIH
    Only two out of several known mitochondrial haplotypes of V. destructor have been found to be capable of reproducing on A. mellifera (Korea and Japan).
  21. [21]
    Varroa destructor: A Complex Parasite, Crippling Honey Bees ...
    In this review we examine varroa's biology, distribution, virus–vector dynamics, and honey bee selective breeding. (A) Contrary to previous beliefs, varroa ...
  22. [22]
    Understanding the Enemy: A Review of the Genetics, Behavior and ...
    Feb 7, 2022 · Abstract. Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) is arguably the most damaging parasitic mite that attacks honey bees worldwide.
  23. [23]
    Understanding the Enemy: A Review of the Genetics, Behavior ... - NIH
    Feb 7, 2022 · Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) is arguably the most damaging parasitic mite that attacks honey bees worldwide.
  24. [24]
    Varroa mite life cycle and reproduction - USDA ARS
    Jan 27, 2021 · Varroa reproduce in capped worker and drone brood cells. Mature female mites (called mother mites or foundresses) enter cells just prior to capping.Missing: scientific review
  25. [25]
    Varroa destructor feeds primarily on honey bee fat body tissue and ...
    Jan 15, 2019 · The life cycle of Varroa is separated into two distinct phases that focus on separate life stages of the bee: the reproductive (parasitizing ...Varroa Destructor Feeds... · Sign Up For Pnas Alerts · Results And Discussion
  26. [26]
    Assessing the role of key genes involved in the reproductive ...
    Jul 1, 2025 · In the present study, we investigated the functional relevance of six candidate genes potentially involved in Varroa reproductive success by ...
  27. [27]
    Managing Varroa Mites in Honey Bee Colonies
    This mite was first described on the Eastern honey bee (Apis cerana F.) from Java, Indonesia, in 1904. The mite was originally called Varroa jacobsoni Oudemans ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Varroa Mite, Varroa destructor (=jacobsoni) Anderson & Trueman ...
    A. mellifera L. worldwide (Zhang 2000). In 1951, the varroa mite was found in Singapore. In 1962-63, varroa was found on Apis m. mellifera in. Hong Kong and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Honey bee survival mechanisms against the parasite Varroa ...
    Honey bee survival with Varroa infestations is largely explained by resistance mechanisms. No common molecular pathways for resistance and tolerance were ...Review Article · 2. Literature Review Of... · 3. Review Of Studies Using...<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    New Asian types of Varroa destructor: a potential new threat for ...
    Of the eight known haplotypes of V. destructor on A. cerana, only Japan 1 (J1) and Korea 1 (K1) have successfully colonized A. mellifera (Anderson and Trueman, ...
  31. [31]
    Varroa: On The Move. - The Beelistener
    Dec 4, 2020 · Varroa was first reported in Bulgaria in 1967, Germany in 1971, and Romania 1975 (2). Romania and Bulgaria sent packaged bees to Tunisia and ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Mechanisms of Differential Toxicity between Honey Bee (<em>Apis ...
    Varroa destructor was first detected in the U.S.S.R. in 1952 after A. mellifera colonies were transported to Eastern Russia. Page 11. 2. Varroa likely ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Varroa Mite, Varroa jacobsoni Oudemans (Acari: Varroidae)¹
    SURVEY AND DETECTION: ETHER ROLL: The most widely used technique involves shaking 300 to 500 bees. (1/4 to 1/3 pint) from the center frame of the brood nest ...
  34. [34]
    Honey bee populations surviving Varroa destructor parasitism in ...
    We present a comprehensive literature review describing the spread of V. destructor and the honey bee populations occurring in Latin America (LA),<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Varroa destructor (Varroa mite) | CABI Compendium
    It was first detected in the USA in 1987 and has since spread to most of North America, with Sanford (2001) providing a full description of the introduction ...
  36. [36]
    Varroa destructor: A Complex Parasite, Crippling Honey Bees ...
    By 1957, it had jumped hosts to A. mellifera in Japan, and by 1963 in Hong Kong. Its range expanded quickly through global honey bee trade – both legal and ...
  37. [37]
    Honey Bees Learn to Fight Deadly Varroa Mites - Civil Eats
    Jun 11, 2025 · The accidental introduction of Varroa destructor to North America in the 1980s has been a disaster for western honey bees. Starting in 2006 ...Missing: 1970s- | Show results with:1970s-
  38. [38]
    Varroa » APHA - National Bee Unit - BeeBase
    An adult female varroa mite. Varroa was first found in the UK on the 4th of April 1992. ... Severe infestations of Varroa may lead to parasitic mite syndrome.
  39. [39]
    The New Zealand experience of varroa invasion highlights research ...
    New Zealand and Australia were the last major beekeeping countries free of this parasitic mite until the year 2000, when V. destructor mites were discovered ...
  40. [40]
    Varroa mite (Varroa destructor) - Outbreak
    Apr 15, 2025 · Detection in Australia​​ In June 2022, varroa mite was detected in sentinel hives at the Port of Newcastle, NSW. Following a 14-month emergency ...
  41. [41]
    Varroa mite | Business Queensland
    Jul 3, 2025 · Varroa destructor is notifiable under the varroa mite biosecurity zone. It was detected in Queensland in March 2025 and will be managed using ...
  42. [42]
    Varroa mite - PIRSA
    Detection in South Australia. In September 2025, the first detection of varroa mite was been confirmed near Pooginook in the Riverland. A map showing the ...
  43. [43]
    Varroa mite transition to management
    As of September 2025, the mite has also been identified in the ACT, VIC, QLD and SA, although not in the same numbers as across NSW. Similar to NSW in the early ...
  44. [44]
    DEFA strengthens legislation to protect bees and biodiversity
    Jan 28, 2025 · 'The Isle of Man's bee population is currently free from Varroa, foul brood, Tropilaelaps mites, and the small hive beetle—diseases and ...
  45. [45]
    Bee sting: the varroa-mite incursion is a biosecurity warning
    Aug 19, 2025 · When the varroa mite was first detected in Australia in 2022, many outside the beekeeping and horticultural industries viewed it as a ...Missing: destructor | Show results with:destructor
  46. [46]
    2025 Australian Colony Loss Survey
    Sep 29, 2025 · To help keep track of varroa's spread, and stay ahead of emerging pests and disease challenges, an early warning system in the form of an annual ...
  47. [47]
    Honey bee (Apis mellifera) nurse bee visitation of worker and drone ...
    May 28, 2024 · The life cycle of Varroa destructor, the ectoparasitic mite of honey bees (Apis mellifera), includes a dispersal phase, in which mites attach to ...
  48. [48]
    Parasitic Mites - Honey Bee Health Guide
    During the phoretic phase, mated female mites attach themselves to adult honey bees (1), and are carried through the hive. They are often found on nurse bees ...
  49. [49]
    Varroa destructor feeds primarily on honey bee fat body tissue ... - NIH
    Jan 15, 2019 · Our work shows that they cause damage more directly. Varroa externally digest and consume fat body tissue rather than blood.Abstract · Fig. 2 · Fig. 3
  50. [50]
    Life-history stage determines the diet of ectoparasitic mites on their ...
    Jan 25, 2024 · Taken together, we propose a life stage-specific food theory for V. destructor: Adult mites feed mainly on the fat body of adult bees during the ...
  51. [51]
    A salivary chitinase of Varroa destructor influences host immunity ...
    To assess the impact of Vd-CHIsal silencing on honey bees, we studied the transcriptional response in bee pupae following mite artificial infestation.Missing: manipulation | Show results with:manipulation
  52. [52]
    Salivary Cystatin-L2-like of Varroa destructor Causes Lower ... - NIH
    Nov 27, 2023 · Cystatin Injection into Honeybee Pupae. We tested the injection of 400 ng of cystatin into pupal bees, referring to a previous report of ...
  53. [53]
    Viral communities in the parasite Varroa destructor and in colonies ...
    May 25, 2022 · Because of the absence of any genetic variation within the New Zealand haplotypes, it seems likely that there has been only one successful V.
  54. [54]
    Neonicotinoids and Varroa mites force a bee colony to forget the ...
    Aug 1, 2025 · NNs can adversely affect the immunity of queen bees and cause the re-development of the disease; they disrupt the circadian rhythms and sleep of ...Mite-Free Control (cr)... · Mite-Free Df/pollen Paste... · Mite-Infested Df/pp Colony
  55. [55]
    Direct Evidence for Infection of Varroa destructor Mites with the Bee ...
    Viruses, especially those transmitted by the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor, play a major role in the worldwide reported losses of honey bee colonies. The ...
  56. [56]
    In-depth proteomic analysis of Varroa destructor: Detection of DWV ...
    Sep 11, 2015 · We investigated pathogens in the parasitic honeybee mite Varroa destructor using nanoLC-MS/MS (TripleTOF) and 2D-E-MS/MS proteomics approaches.
  57. [57]
    Transmission of deformed wing virus between Varroa destructor ...
    Sep 23, 2022 · The role of varroa mites in infections of Kashmir bee virus (KBV) and deformed wing virus (DWV) in honey bees. Virology. 2005;342:141–9 ...Missing: ABPV salivary glands
  58. [58]
    Horizontal and vertical transmission of viruses in the honey bee ...
    In horizontal transmission, viruses are transmitted among individuals of the same generation, while vertical transmission occurs from mothers to their ...
  59. [59]
    Quantitative patterns of vertical transmission of deformed wing virus ...
    Mar 29, 2018 · DWV can be transmitted vertically or horizontally and evidence suggests that horizontal transmission via Varroa is associated with acute ...Missing: modes | Show results with:modes
  60. [60]
  61. [61]
    Towards a Stable Host–Parasite Relationship Between Honey Bees ...
    May 1, 2025 · An infestation has serious consequences for Apis mellifera . On an individual level, Varroa parasitism can lead to a body weight loss of 6.3%–25 ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  62. [62]
    Varroa destructor: how does it harm Apis mellifera honey bees and ...
    Jun 15, 2020 · Varroa also alters flying, homing and orientation abilities in foragers [51], which in turn, limits efficiency in their ability to collect ...
  63. [63]
    Varroa destructor parasitism and Deformed wing virus infection in ...
    Mar 6, 2024 · These results suggest that the effect of DWV on bees associated with Varroa feeding results in aberrant autophagy.
  64. [64]
    Haemolymph removal by Varroa mite destabilizes the dynamical ...
    Apr 17, 2019 · In particular, the viral infection in bees to which 2 µl of haemolymph were removed was approximately 10 times higher than that observed in bees ...Missing: intake | Show results with:intake<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Effect of Varroa on plant industries - Bee Aware
    When it does, Varroa mite is expected to progressively kill 95-100 per cent of Australia's wild honey bee population, greatly reducing the free pollination ...Missing: 2026 | Show results with:2026
  66. [66]
    Massive Honey Bee Colony Losses in 2025 - OneStop ESG
    May 26, 2025 · In 2025, up to 60% of managed hives were lost, with 1.6 million colonies lost, costing over $600 million, threatening $18 billion in crops.<|control11|><|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Varroa mite has been found in South Australia, what impact will it ...
    Sep 3, 2025 · Australia was the last continent to be free of the parasite, before it was again detected in New South Wales in 2022. Varroa mite has since been ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  68. [68]
    A benefit-cost framework for responding to Varroa - DAFF
    Dec 22, 2022 · Varroa is a serious threat to Australia. Unhindered spread could cause $0.63 to $1.31 billion in losses, while early eradication could yield $0 ...Missing: 2025 projections
  69. [69]
    (PDF) Honeybees and colony collapse disorder: understanding key ...
    Feb 20, 2025 · Among the major contributors to CCD are Varroa mites (Varroa destructor) ... The parasitic mite Varroa destructor is the primary factor ...
  70. [70]
    Varroa-Virus Interaction in Collapsing Honey Bee Colonies - PMC
    Mar 19, 2013 · Varroa mites and viruses are the currently the high-profile suspects in collapsing bee colonies. Therefore, seasonal variation in varroa ...
  71. [71]
    Varroa Mite Management Methods | VCE Publications | Virginia Tech
    Chemical Control: Chemical treatments for Varroa mites can be divided into two categories: “hard” and “soft” acaricides. The hard synthetic acaricides include ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Methods to Control Varroa Mites: An Integrated Pest Management ...
    Oct 5, 2025 · Economic or action thresholds vary, but are aimed at keeping mite levels below or around a mean abundance of 2 mites per 100 bees. This is a ...Missing: injury | Show results with:injury
  73. [73]
    [PDF] TOOLS FOR VARROA MANAGEMENT - Honey Bee Health Coalition
    Aug 9, 2015 · The most critical time to administer Varroa treatment(s) is after honey supers are removed (i.e., at or just after the. Population Peak phase).
  74. [74]
    Varroa mite alert from the Honey Bee Lab - Oregon State University
    The economic threshold to treat Varroa mites in general for temperate areas is considered to be about 3% or higher in fall, but as economic threshold depends ...
  75. [75]
    EPA Provides New Tool to Protect Honey Bees, Ensuring Safe and ...
    Sep 25, 2025 · EPA proposed to register Vadescana in May 2025 and took public comment on its proposal. The agency has also established a permanent tolerance ...
  76. [76]
    GreenLight Biosciences Launches Norroa, the First RNA-Based ...
    Sep 25, 2025 · EPA registration paves the way for beekeepers to combat a critical threat to pollinator health. BOSTON, Sept. 25, 2025 /PRNewswire/ ...
  77. [77]
    Varroa Mites - Texas Apiary Inspection Service (TAIS)
    Their original host is the Asian honey bee, Apis cerana, which, unlike Apis mellifera, has natural defenses against Varroa that come from evolving together ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s<|control11|><|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Simulation of Varroa mite control in honey bee colonies without ...
    We found that drone brood removal was very effective, reducing mites by 90% at the end of the first simulation year after the introduction of mites. This value ...
  79. [79]
    Varroa Mite Integrated Pest Management for Small-Scale ...
    The powdered sugar method is very effective at reducing phoretic mite load on adult bees between 29 percent to more than 70% (Aliano and Ellis 2005, Ellis et al ...
  80. [80]
    Varroa Mites | Bee Lab
    Varroa mites are parasites that harm bees by feeding on them and vectoring viruses. If unmanaged, they can cause colony death. Mites should be kept below 1 per ...Missing: economic injury
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Small hive beetle (Aethina tumida) oviposition behaviour in sealed ...
    Beetle oviposition rates into sealed brood cells were unaffected by the presence of Varroa destructor mites in the cell within a range of 1-4 mites per cell.
  82. [82]
    Inducing a summer brood break increases the efficacy of oxalic acid ...
    Dec 6, 2023 · The combination of vaporizing with OA and a forced brood break increased mite mortality by 5× and reduced mite populations significantly.
  83. [83]
    Influence of Varroa Mite (Varroa destructor) Management Practices ...
    Jan 11, 2017 · Varroa mite levels in the IPM group were managed using non-chemical control methods of screened bottom boards, trapping Varroa mites in drone ...
  84. [84]
    Manage varroa mite | Business Queensland
    Aug 1, 2025 · Varroa mite (Varroa destructor) was first detected in New South Wales in June 2022. In September 2023, the National Management Group ...
  85. [85]
    Varroa mite sampling with a sticky board - USDA ARS
    Jan 29, 2021 · Remove the screen from the board and count the number of mites. Sticky boards are useful for estimating the number of varroa mites in a colony.Missing: visual cue
  86. [86]
    Varroa Mite Testing & Management - Bee Lab
    Treat with oxalic acid dribble or vapor in late fall when bees are loosely clustered (about 40-50°F). Can use HopGuard®, but remove the strips before winter.Missing: thresholds | Show results with:thresholds
  87. [87]
    Refining the Mite Wash: Part 1 - Treatment Threshold and Solutions ...
    When to take action ... Your colonies will be much healthier and productive if you never allow the mite infestation level to exceed 6 mites per half cup of bees.
  88. [88]
    Comparison of Two Diagnostic Techniques for the Apis mellifera ...
    Jul 13, 2022 · The results demonstrate that the sugar roll technique is significantly more effective and safer than CO2 injection, allowing for a higher ...
  89. [89]
    Drones and Varroa: Part 2 - Scientific Beekeeping
    Dr. Zac Lamas presented some findings of great interest, regarding the distribution of varroa mites on drones as compared to that on workers.
  90. [90]
    Counting Varroa Mites: Essential Techniques for Beekeepers - Dadant
    In this blog post, we'll explore three effective methods for counting varroa mites: sticky boards, sugar rolls, and alcohol washes.
  91. [91]
    The MiteCheck App - Bee Culture
    Jun 18, 2019 · The MiteCheck app is designed to serve as an educational tool, teaching beekeepers how to properly monitor for mites. At the moment, there are ...
  92. [92]
    [PDF] TOOLS FOR VARROA MANAGEMENT - Honey Bee Health Coalition
    Aug 1, 2022 · IPM techniques can help beekeepers maintain varroa mite levels in colonies below 2 to 3 mites per 100 adult bees (i.e., a 2 to 3 percent ...Missing: injury | Show results with:injury
  93. [93]
    USDA pinpoints cause of recent mass honeybee collapse - DVM360
    Sep 17, 2025 · The 'worst bee die-off in US history' was caused by a virus-infected, miticide-resistant parasitic mites.
  94. [94]
    BeeSentry - ESA Space Solutions
    Nov 1, 2025 · BeeSentry provides beekeepers with a comprehensive Varroa mite monitoring and warning system. The system delivers real-time hive health data.
  95. [95]
    Varroa destructor resistance to tau‐fluvalinate: relationship between ...
    Sep 14, 2022 · In Varroa mites, resistance to tau‐fluvalinate is associated with the presence of mutations at the position 925 of the voltage‐gated sodium channel (VGSC).
  96. [96]
    Reduced proinsecticide activation by cytochrome P450 confers ...
    Feb 5, 2021 · We identified a coumaphos-resistant Varroa population that escapes toxicity by down-regulating the activating enzyme, a P450 monooxygenase.
  97. [97]
    Identification and functional characterization of CYP3002B2, a ...
    CYP3002B2 is the first detoxification enzyme shown to metabolize two major acaricides from different modes of action classes.
  98. [98]
    The Latest on Bee Mite Resistance to Pesticides - USDA ARS
    Over the last decade, the honeybee-attacking varroa mite has developed resistance to the pyrethroid pesticide fluvalinate. That has spurred interest in ...
  99. [99]
    Experimental parameters affecting the outcomes of amitraz ...
    Feb 16, 2024 · Detection of amitraz resistance and reduced treatment efficacy in the Varroa mite, Varroa destructor, within commercial beekeeping operations.
  100. [100]
    Miticide Resistance: Inevitable Fate or Manageable Risk?
    Jul 28, 2023 · In France, amitraz resistance in varroa mites has been reported after a relatively long period of use (25+ years). It occurs in “patches” ...
  101. [101]
    Risk factors associated with failures of Varroa treatments in honey ...
    The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with the treatment outcome achieved during autumn control of Varroa destructor. The mite ...
  102. [102]
    Investigation of resistance against to flumethrin using against Varroa ...
    Mar 21, 2024 · In the study, 69% of Varroa destructor samples showed resistance to flumethrin, with resistance rates varying between 51% and 94% across ...
  103. [103]
    Detection of amitraz resistance and reduced treatment efficacy in the ...
    Jan 17, 2020 · The Apivar® efficacy was 68% in apiary B. This apiary was experiencing a Varroa control failure because of high Varroa infestation levels (i.e. ...Missing: surveys percentage
  104. [104]
    [PDF] Varroa Resistance to Amitraz - Veto-pharma
    Feb 28, 2025 · Varroa resistance to amitraz means mites survive doses that were fatal, possibly from mutations, but is less persistent than other acaricides.
  105. [105]
    Methods to Control Varroa Mites: An Integrated Pest Management Approach
    ### Summary of Chemical Control of Varroa Mites (Source: https://extension.psu.edu/methods-to-control-varroa-mites-an-integrated-pest-management-approach)