Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Virginia Regiment


The Virginia Regiment was a provincial infantry unit raised by the Colony of Virginia in 1754 under Governor Robert Dinwiddie to counter French military advances and allied Native American raids along the western frontier during the early stages of the French and Indian War. Initially commanded by Colonel Joshua Fry, the regiment came under the leadership of Lieutenant Colonel George Washington after Fry's death en route to operations in 1754, marking Washington's first significant independent command.
The regiment's soldiers, drawn primarily from Virginia militia volunteers and enlistees, engaged in initial skirmishes such as the and the subsequent defense and surrender at Fort Necessity, which ignited broader Anglo-French hostilities. Companies from the Virginia Regiment also formed part of the colonial contingent in General Edward Braddock's 1755 expedition against , enduring heavy losses in the ambush that resulted in Braddock's defeat and highlighting the challenges of European-style warfare in North American terrain. , serving as a volunteer , organized the retreat, preserving remnants of the force. Promoted to full in 1755, Washington commanded the enlarged in constructing a chain of forts and conducting ranger operations to protect settlers from Indian depredations, though plagued by supply shortages, desertions, and inadequate British support. The unit's most notable success came during the 1758 , where Virginia Regiment detachments contributed to the advance that forced the French evacuation of , securing the Ohio Valley for British interests without a major battle. Washington resigned his commission later that year amid frustrations with colonial assembly pay disputes, after which the regiment was gradually disbanded as hostilities waned, leaving a legacy in forging American military experience and Washington's path to future leadership.

Formation and Organization

Establishment and Initial Authorization

The Virginia Regiment was established in 1754 as Virginia's first dedicated provincial infantry unit, formed in response to French encroachments and allied Native American raids in the Ohio Valley that threatened colonial expansion and security. Lieutenant Governor , exercising executive authority in the absence of the royal governor, initiated the regiment's creation by drawing from the existing and issuing commissions to officers, marking a shift toward a more organized, professional force beyond ad hoc levies. Dinwiddie commissioned Joshua Fry as the regiment's initial colonel in early 1754, tasking him with assembling and leading troops for frontier defense and potential coordination with British regular forces. The subsequently endorsed this effort through appropriations and acts enabling recruitment, though primary impetus stemmed from Dinwiddie's directives amid the colony's urgent strategic needs at the outset of the . Initial enlistments targeted 300 men, equipped for expeditionary service against French positions.

Structure and Administrative Framework

The Virginia Regiment operated as a provincial force raised and maintained by the colonial , distinct from local militias in its full-time status and extended operational commitments. Initially authorized by Governor Robert Dinwiddie in February 1754, the regiment consisted of two ranger companies, each numbering approximately 100 men, tasked with frontier scouting and defense against and Native incursions. Officers included a major commanding the force, with each company led by a , and , supported by sergeants, corporals, and privates; commissions were issued by the , emphasizing loyalty to and colony. Following the defeat of General Edward Braddock's expedition in July 1755, the enacted legislation in August to expand and reorganize the regiment into 16 companies totaling about 1,500 men, allocating £40,000 for recruitment, pay, arms, and provisions. , appointed colonel and commander-in-chief of Virginia's forces, oversaw a hierarchical structure comprising a , two majors, an , , , and at the regimental level, with individual companies retaining the standard captain-led organization of 80–100 enlisted men. This framework enabled detachment of companies to a chain of frontier forts, such as Fort Loudoun at , for static defense while maintaining central administrative control under the governor's council. Administratively, the regiment relied on colonial funding through treasury warrants and legislative appropriations, with responsible for musters, payrolls, and supply requisitions submitted to the Burgesses and Commissary General. Persistent challenges included delayed payments—soldiers often received in depreciated —and shortages of , , and , prompting 's repeated appeals for enhanced authority and resources to sustain discipline and effectiveness. By 1756–1757, operational needs led to adaptations, such as forming specialized detachments for and carpenter companies for fort , reflecting the regiment's evolution from a linear model to a more versatile frontier force while remaining subordinate to British strategic direction.

Recruitment and Manpower

Enlistment Practices and Incentives

The Virginia Regiment initially recruited volunteers through appeals to county officials and direct enlistment efforts led by officers like , who raised an initial force of approximately 300 men in early to secure the Forks of the Ohio region. Enlistments were typically for fixed terms, often one year, distinguishing the regiment's provincial regulars from short-term local call-ups. To meet authorized strengths, such as the 1,000 men expanded by the in August 1755, quotas were assigned to counties, with shortfalls filled by drafting able-bodied men from rosters when voluntary responses proved insufficient. Financial incentives formed the core of recruitment appeals, including guaranteed pay for the enlistment duration—contrasting with unpaid or sporadically compensated militia service—and provisions for arms, though recruits often enlisted without required personal equipment like clothing or firearms. Governor Robert Dinwiddie's February 19, 1754, proclamation allocated 200,000 acres east of the Ohio River as bounties to attract settlers and soldiers, effectively promising future land grants to participants in frontier expeditions, which targeted economically marginal frontiersmen and the "idle poor" willing to risk service for potential rewards. Post-war land bounty certificates were issued to veterans for their service, reinforcing these pre-enlistment enticements with tangible claims on Virginia's western territories. Despite these measures, enlistment faced persistent challenges, as low relative pay and the regiment's grueling duties—marked by exposure, irregular supplies, and high rates—deterred candidates, compelling to repeatedly the colonial government for better terms and coercive drafts to sustain manpower. Officers received commissions partly based on their success in raising companies, but systemic shortages persisted, with documenting in 1757 returns that recruiting efforts yielded only partial fills amid widespread reluctance. This reliance on mixed voluntary and drafted enlistment reflected the colony's limited coercive authority over a dispersed prioritizing agrarian survival over imperial defense.

Composition and Demographics

The Virginia Regiment was composed predominantly of white males of European descent, reflecting the demographics of colonial Virginia's frontier population during the . Officers were typically drawn from the planter elite and gentry families, providing leadership rooted in social prominence and landownership, while enlisted ranks filled with volunteers and draftees from the lower socio-economic strata, including laborers, frontiersmen, and former indentured servants seeking bounties or land incentives. Eligibility targeted free white males aged 16 to 50, though muster rolls recorded individuals as young as 15 and as old as 60, with a midspan age around 27 years in 1757 samples. Enlisted men's origins emphasized regional mobility within , with analysis of a 1757 company under (n=85) showing 32% born in , 33% in , 25% in , and 7% in Ireland, alongside minor representation from , , , and ; this distribution underscores recruitment from adjacent colonies and recent British immigrants over deep-rooted tidewater Virginians. Occupations skewed toward agrarian and manual labor, with 40% in (including 36% listed as or farmers, likely denoting smallholders or laborers), 18% carpenters, and others as sailors, coopers, or sawyers, indicating a force "heavily seeded with men at or near the bottom of society" rather than prosperous yeomen. was low among privates, and physical stature averaged 5 feet 6.33 inches, consistent with colonial working-class norms. Non-European participation was negligible in the regiment's core ranks, limited by colonial laws and recruitment practices favoring white Protestants; while Virginia's militia included some free blacks and mulattoes, provincial forces like the prioritized white enlistees for frontier service, with no substantial Native American or enslaved African integration documented. High turnover, including desertions exceeding 20% annually, reflected the precarious demographics of transient, economically marginal recruits unaccustomed to disciplined campaigning.

Leadership and Command

Colonels and Successive Commanders

The Virginia Regiment's first colonel was Joshua Fry, appointed by the Virginia House of Burgesses on February 23, 1754, to lead the newly authorized provincial forces against French encroachments in the Ohio Valley. Fry, a and surveyor who had previously mapped the Virginia-North Carolina boundary, commanded the regiment during its initial organization and early expeditions. He died from illness on May 31, 1754, while en route to construct a fort at the Forks of the Ohio (modern ), leaving the unit under the temporary command of Lieutenant . Following the disastrous in July 1755, the reorganized and expanded the regiment, formally appointing as colonel on August 14, 1755. Washington, who had served as a major and since 1754, led the regiment in frontier defense, including the construction of fortifications and responses to Native American raids allied with the French. His command emphasized discipline and mobility, though plagued by supply shortages and high desertion rates. Washington resigned his commission on December 31, 1758, citing frustrations with colonial authorities over pay and provisions, shortly after the successful captured . In preparation for the 1758 Forbes Expedition, the regiment was divided into the First Virginia Regiment under and the Second Virginia Regiment under William Byrd III, a planter and member of the Governor's appointed to the role earlier that year. After 's resignation, Byrd III succeeded him as commander of the First Virginia Regiment in 1759, overseeing residual frontier duties amid declining hostilities. The units, reduced in strength, focused on patrolling and minor engagements until their disbandment in June 1763, following the that ended the Seven Years' War.
CommanderRankTenureKey Notes
Joshua FryColonelFebruary–May 1754Died in campaign; initial organizer.
Lieutenant Colonel (1754); (1755–1758)May 1754–December 1758Led post-Baddock reorganization and defenses; resigned over administrative disputes.
1758 (Second Regiment); 1759–1763 (First Regiment)Commanded Second Regiment in 1758; took over First after Washington's exit; oversaw wind-down.

Notable Officers and Washington's Role

George Washington assumed command of the Virginia Regiment upon the death of Colonel Joshua Fry on May 31, 1754, having been appointed lieutenant colonel earlier that year on February 25. As colonel, Washington led the regiment in frontier defense against French and Native American incursions, overseeing the construction of a chain of forts along 's western borders from 1756 to 1757. His leadership emphasized rapid response to raids, logistical improvements, and training provincial troops, though hampered by inadequate supplies and pay disputes with the Virginia . Washington resigned his commission on December 23, 1758, following the successful , citing frustrations with British command subordination and colonial military politics. Other notable officers included Major George Muse, appointed on March 15, 1754, who served as second-in-command early on and participated in initial engagements like the Jumonville Glen skirmish. Adam Stephen, commissioned February 25, 1754, advanced under 's command and later led detachments in defensive operations, eventually succeeding as colonel of the First Virginia Regiment in 1758. Andrew Lewis, also from the 1754 roster, contributed to frontier patrols and the , gaining recognition for tactical acumen in . Robert Stobo, captured at Fort in July 1754, provided intelligence during his French captivity that aided strategy. These officers, drawn from Virginia's planter and elite, exemplified the regiment's reliance on local amid provincial tensions.

Operations and Campaigns

Early Frontier Engagements (1754)

Lieutenant Colonel commanded a detachment of approximately 150 men from the Virginia Regiment in April 1754, marching into the to reinforce efforts against forces at the Forks of the Ohio and construct a fort there. The expedition followed the French seizure of a Virginia-sponsored at the Forks in late April, prompting Governor to direct Washington to secure the region amid escalating colonial tensions over territorial claims. On the night of May 27, 1754, led about 40 provincials and allied warriors under on a march, surprising a encampment in the following morning. The skirmish resulted in the death of Joseph Coulon de Villiers de Jumonville, whom the regarded as leading an armed scouting party, though accounts described the group as a diplomatic envoy bearing a to withdraw; roughly 10 to 14 were killed, with the survivors, including Jumonville's brother, taken prisoner. This clash, involving irregular tactics aided by Native allies, marked the Virginia Regiment's initial combat engagement and escalated hostilities, often cited as the spark of the . Retreating to the Great Meadows, Washington erected Fort Necessity with palisades and earthworks using his full force of around 300 to 400 men by early July. On , 1754, a French and Native force of approximately 600 under , Jumonville's brother, assaulted the position amid heavy rain that rendered muskets unreliable and flooded trenches, compelling Washington's capitulation after about two hours of fighting. British losses totaled 3 killed and 17 wounded, while French casualties remained unreported but likely light; surrender terms permitted the Virginians to withdraw with honors of war, though a disputed —allegedly mistranslated by Washington's interpreter—conceded the Jumonville action as an "assassination," fueling French reprisals and . These engagements exposed the Regiment's logistical vulnerabilities on the frontier, including supply shortages and reliance on inexperienced recruits, while highlighting Washington's aggressive initiative despite ultimate tactical reverses.

Braddock's Expedition and Aftermath (1755)

The Virginia Regiment contributed provincial troops to Major General Edward Braddock's expedition against Fort Duquesne, which departed Fort Cumberland, Maryland, on June 10, 1755, with approximately 2,200 men, including 1,400 British regulars from the 44th and 48th Regiments of Foot and around 500 colonial provincials primarily from Virginia. George Washington, the regiment's colonel, joined as a volunteer aide-de-camp to Braddock, urging adaptations for frontier combat such as using light infantry and Native scouts, though Braddock largely dismissed these suggestions in favor of conventional European tactics. The Virginia contingent, experienced in irregular warfare, was positioned in the working parties and rearguard during the advance, which involved hacking a 12-foot-wide road through dense forests at a rate of about 2 miles per day. On July 9, 1755, about 10 miles from , Braddock's of roughly 1,459 men—comprising the , main body, and rearguard—crossed the twice and was ambushed by approximately 600 , Canadian, and Native American fighters under Captain Daniel Liénard de Beaujeu. The attackers exploited the narrow trail, firing from concealed positions in the underbrush, which devastated the tightly packed lines adhering to linear formations and volleys. Virginia provincials in the rearguard, under officers like Major Andrew Lewis, adopted more flexible tactics, taking cover behind trees and wagons to return fire effectively, though the overall command structure collapsed after heavy losses among officers—26 of 48 field-grade and staff officers killed or wounded. Four Virginia subalterns were among the slain. Braddock himself suffered multiple wounds, proving fatal, while had two horses shot out from under him and his coat pierced by bullets but emerged unscathed, rallying troops and aiding the wounded amid the rout that lasted about three hours. Total casualties reached 456 killed and 520 wounded, with and allied losses estimated at 23 killed and 16 wounded. Following the defeat, Washington assumed informal leadership of the disorganized retreat on , organizing the surviving 700-800 men into a defensive posture and overseeing Braddock's burial on along the Great Meadows road to conceal it from pursuers, with troops marching over the grave to erase traces. Braddock died that evening, and Colonel Thomas Dunbar, commanding the rear , assumed formal control but opted for a full withdrawal to Fort Cumberland by , destroying supplies and abandoning the campaign due to morale collapse and supply shortages rather than pressing forward. The disaster heightened frontier vulnerability in Virginia, prompting Governor and the to authorize £40,000 for defensive reinforcements, expanding provincial forces to 1,200 men organized into companies for patrolling and skirmishing. Washington was commissioned of Virginia's troops on August 14, 1755, tasked with rebuilding and leading the augmented regiment amid ongoing raids by Native allies of the . This reorganization shifted focus from offensive operations to static defense and small-unit actions, reflecting lessons from the expedition's tactical failures against guerrilla-style warfare.

Defensive Operations and Raids (1756–1757)

In 1756, Colonel directed the Virginia Regiment's efforts to construct a chain of approximately 23 small forts along the colony's western frontier, stretching from the to the , in response to intensified raids by French-allied and warriors. These fortifications, including Fort Loudoun at begun that year, served as garrisons and supply points to protect settlers, though many were rudimentary stockades manned by thinly spread detachments of the regiment's roughly 1,000 effectives covering over 350 miles of vulnerable borderlands. Washington personally inspected southern frontier sites in April and northern ones in October, criticizing inadequate support and fort conditions that left inhabitants exposed. Early in the year, the regiment attempted an offensive raid known as the Sandy Creek Expedition in February 1756, dispatching about 350 men under Major Andrew Lewis to strike Shawnee villages in the , but the force returned after a month due to starvation, harsh weather, and depleted game supplies without engaging the enemy. Defensive operations dominated thereafter, as Indian war parties conducted hit-and-run attacks on settlements; for instance, on April 18, 1756, a detachment under Captain John was ambushed near Great Cacapon, suffering 13 killed and several wounded in what became known as Mercer's Massacre. Washington responded by dispatching pursuing parties, but these rarely overtook the mobile raiders, hampered by the regiment's limited manpower and horses. A significant setback occurred on June 25, , when French and Indian forces overran Fort Vause in Augusta County, capturing 28 defenders and prompting the evacuation of nearby areas; reinforced adjacent posts and urged settlers to consolidate at forts, though he reported widespread despair among farmers facing relentless incursions. Raids tapered in late due to winter but surged again in summer 1757, penetrating as far as Lunenburg County and disrupting supply lines to , with the regiment's rangers and companies conducting patrols and minor skirmishes to deter further advances. Throughout, emphasized disciplined garrisons over aggressive pursuits, given the imbalance against elusive foes, while grappling with desertions and supply shortages that undermined morale.

Forbes Expedition and Fort Duquesne (1758)

The of 1758 represented the Army's third major effort to seize , the French stronghold at the Forks of the , during the . John Forbes, despite chronic illness, directed an advance of approximately 6,000 troops from bases in , including about 2,000 regulars from Highland regiments and provincial forces from , , , and . The expedition departed from Raystown (modern ) in August, constructing a new wagon road westward—bypassing the longer Braddock's Road used in 1755—to , a route shortened by roughly 35 miles through intermediate forts such as and . The Virginia Regiment, numbering around 1,000 men under Colonel , constituted the primary Virginia provincial force and operated from Fort Cumberland before joining the main column at Raystown on September 15. , commanding a brigade in the expedition's later stages, contributed to road-building, scouting, and frontier protection duties, though he advocated unsuccessfully for a swifter advance along Braddock's repaired path, citing the new route's logistical delays and vulnerability to French ambushes. In a letter to Virginia speaker John Robinson, Washington criticized the expedition's cautious pace, arguing it prolonged exposure to supply shortages and enemy raids while allowing French reinforcements to consolidate. Key engagements underscored the regiment's supportive role amid broader setbacks. On September 14, Major James Grant's reconnaissance near with 800 men, including some provincials, devolved into a disorganized , resulting in over 300 casualties and Grant's capture, as French and Native forces exploited the attackers' overextension. Forbes dispatched with a detachment to reinforce Captain , who had been separated during the retreat, though the skirmish highlighted the expedition's reliance on measured advances over aggressive probes. The regiment also participated in fortification efforts at Loyalhanna (near ), where a November 12 incident amid foggy conditions killed 35 soldiers and two officers, further straining and resources. By mid-November, Forbes's methodical strategy—emphasizing supply lines and alliances with and Catawba warriors—paid off as commander François-Marie Le Marchand de Lignery, facing dwindling supplies and Native defections, ordered Fort Duquesne's evacuation and destruction on 24. forces, including Washington's Virginians, arrived on 25 to find the fort in ruins, securing the Ohio Valley without a final battle and enabling construction of Fort Pitt in 1759–1760. This success marked Washington's final campaign under command; he resigned his colonelcy on December 31, 1758, amid frustrations over provincial soldiers' treatment relative to regulars and Virginia's reimbursement disputes. The Virginia Regiment's contributions, though overshadowed by logistical primacy, helped shift frontier control decisively toward .

Logistics and Equipment

Uniforms and Armaments

The Virginia Regiment operated without standardized uniforms during its formation in 1754, as initial orders for coats and proved insufficient, leading many soldiers to wear civilian attire such as checked shirts and personal for the first year. By March 1755, shipments from provided the regiment with regimental coats featuring facings on lapels, cuffs, and turnbacks, paired with waistcoats and breeches; this attire became standard from 1757 onward, though adaptations like Indian-style clothing occurred during campaigns such as the 1758 . Deserter descriptions in 1762 confirmed the persistence of coats with turn-ups, reflecting provincial styling with cocked hats, neckstocks, , and leather . Officers' uniforms mirrored enlisted patterns but incorporated silver lace trim on blue coats cuffed and faced with scarlet, alongside blue breeches and silver gorgets for rank distinction. Breeches varied in color prior to 1755, and supply shortages often resulted in incomplete issuances, compelling reliance on personal or captured items. Armaments for the regiment primarily consisted of muskets, such as firelocks or fowlers suitable for service, with soldiers required to supply their own firearms, at least 12 rounds of , cartouche boxes, and sidearms like swords, cutlasses, or hangers under militia statutes. Powder horns supplemented scarce , and early expeditions like Fort Necessity in 1754 incorporated nine swivel guns as the sole , emphasizing light, mobile weaponry over heavy . Officers carried pistols and swords, but chronic shortages persisted, with repeatedly petitioning for arms imports amid inadequate colonial provisioning. Bayonets were issued where available, though the regiment's irregular nature favored versatile hunting rifles in some ranger detachments by the late 1750s.

Supply and Fortification Efforts

Following Edward Braddock's defeat in July 1755, assumed command of the Virginia Regiment in August 1755 and initiated efforts to fortify the colony's western frontier against French-allied Indian raids. In April 1756, proposed to Virginia's a chain of small forts spaced approximately 18 to 20 miles apart along the frontier from the to the River, intended as refuge points for settlers rather than offensive strongholds. A held at on July 10, 1756, formalized the plan, directing captains to oversee construction of stockades using local timber and labor from regiment troops and militia. By late 1756, at least eight such forts were under construction or completed, including rudimentary blockhouses like Fort Edwards and Fort Pleasant, though many proved hastily built and vulnerable to attack. A centerpiece of these efforts was Fort Loudoun in , which Washington personally designed as the regiment's headquarters; construction began in fall 1756 with regiment labor and local resources, featuring a star-shaped bastion layout completed by early 1757. These fortifications stretched roughly 300 miles, manned by rotating detachments of 50 to 100 men per post from the regiment's approximately 1,000 authorized strength, but maintenance strained limited manpower amid ongoing raids. The strategy shifted focus from large garrisons to dispersed defenses, yet Washington noted in that the forts offered only partial protection, as settlers often lived too far from them to reach safety in time. Supply lines for the regiment relied on overland wagon trains from eastern Virginia depots like and , but chronic shortages plagued operations due to inadequate legislative funding and logistical bottlenecks. Provisions such as , , and powder frequently ran low; for instance, the February 1756 Sandy expedition aborted after a month owing to depleted game and want of bread and wagons. deficits were acute, with recruits arriving without shirts, coats, shoes, or stockings, forcing to impress local supplies and appeal repeatedly to Governor for reimbursement. Pay arrears, sometimes exceeding six months, exacerbated desertions, as soldiers foraged or traded arms for food amid . Washington mitigated these issues by authorizing quartermasters to seize horses and wagons from reluctant settlers, though this sparked local resistance and threats against officers. In letters to Dinwiddie, such as one from October 11, 1755, he decried the poor quality of enlistees and governmental delays in provisioning, arguing that without stable supplies, the regiment could not sustain posts. By 1757, British subsidies under William Pitt eased some pressures, enabling better-equipped detachments for joint operations, but Virginia's provincial funding remained inconsistent, limiting the regiment's effectiveness until the in 1758.

Challenges and Internal Dynamics

Disciplinary Issues and Desertions

The Virginia Regiment experienced chronic disciplinary problems, particularly desertions, stemming from inadequate compensation, delayed payments, supply shortages, and the severe hardships of frontier campaigning during the . Soldiers, often recruited from lower socioeconomic strata with limited commitment to , frequently absented themselves to return to pursuits offering better immediate prospects, resulting in high attrition rates that reduced the regiment's effective strength. For instance, following General Edward Braddock's defeat on July 9, 1755, desertions surged amid demoralization and logistical failures, with Colonel reporting in that lax enforcement under civil rather than exacerbated the issue. In response to mounting indiscipline, the passed "An Act for Preventing Mutiny and " in April 1757, which subjected the —and associated companies—to formalized modeled on British precedents, including provisions for general courts-martial to try offenses like , , and disobedience. This legislation authorized punishments such as flogging, confinement in irons, or capital execution for egregious violations, aiming to instill order where prior reliance on civilian courts had proven ineffective. actively invoked these powers, convening courts-martial for deserters and mutineers, though enforcement remained challenging due to manpower shortages and the reluctance of officers to alienate enlistees further. Notable incidents underscored the tensions, including a 1757 mutiny attempt where a denounced regimental officers as "scoundrels" and boasted he could "drive the whole before him," prompting swift suppression to prevent wider unrest. Recruitment drives occasionally backfired, as seen when Captain McCarty in 1756 enticed deserters from the regiment with false promises of immunity and bounties, leading to pursue legal action against such inducements. Despite these measures, desertions persisted into 1758 during the , where arduous marches and inter-colonial rivalries compounded grievances, though Washington's insistence on rigorous drills and accountability mitigated outright collapse. Overall, these issues reflected the inherent difficulties of maintaining a provincial force without the coercive structures of regular armies, contributing to the regiment's reorganization and reduced authorized strength from approximately 1,400 men in 1756 to 1,000 by 1757.

Interactions with British Regulars and Native Allies

The Virginia Regiment, under Colonel George 's command from 1755 onward, frequently collaborated with British regular forces during major expeditions, though these interactions were marked by mutual frustrations over command structures and operational priorities. During General Edward Braddock's 1755 campaign against , Washington served as an unpaid , with the regiment reorganized per Braddock's orders into specialized units including ranger companies for frontier and two carpenter companies for tasks. British regulars, numbering around 1,400 from the 44th and 48th Regiments of Foot, viewed provincial troops like the Virginians as irregular auxiliaries lacking the discipline of European-style armies, leading to condescending attitudes that Washington later decried in correspondence. Tensions escalated during Brigadier General John 's 1758 expedition, where led approximately 1,000 provincials alongside nearly 2,000 regulars and other colonial militia. advocated for a swift advance along Braddock's old route, but opted for a more cautious, road-building approach from , prompting to privately label officers as "d[evil]s or something worse" in letters expressing irritation over perceived delays and disregard for colonial expertise. , in turn, viewed 's insistence as peevish, highlighting broader frictions where command insisted on the superiority of regular troops, denying a desired field equivalent to his provincial rank. These dynamics underscored the auxiliary role of the Virginia Regiment, which handled much of the frontier defense and raiding while regulars focused on formal sieges, contributing to the eventual abandonment of on November 25, 1758. Interactions with Native allies were pragmatic but limited, primarily involving recruitment of scouts for intelligence and skirmishing rather than large-scale coalitions. In Braddock's campaign, the expedition included Native scouts, with Lieutenant John Fraser of the Virginia Regiment serving as chief scout, though many allied warriors—estimated at around 50 from tribes like the and Catawba—deserted before the July 9 due to Braddock's rigid tactics and failure to incorporate . Washington's earlier alliances, such as with Haudenosaunee leader in 1754, informed the regiment's use of Native guides for frontier patrols, but Braddock's distrust of fighters exacerbated vulnerabilities to French-allied ambushes. By the , efforts to secure Native support intensified; warriors, numbering in the hundreds, joined as auxiliaries, providing scouting and participating in the advance, bolstered by the Treaty of Easton on October 26, 1758, which neutralized some Ohio Valley tribes. The Virginia Regiment integrated these allies for reconnaissance along supply lines, though cultural clashes and unpaid promises led to frustrations, including reports of warriors settlers in encampments. Such collaborations proved tactically valuable in avoiding major ambushes but were strained by parsimony in diplomacy and supplies, reflecting the regiment's role in bridging colonial and indigenous warfare styles amid ongoing raids by French-aligned tribes like the and .

Dissolution and Immediate Aftermath

Disbandment and Reorganization

The Virginia Regiment experienced multiple reorganizations throughout the to adapt to evolving threats, resource shortages, and operational demands. After the catastrophic defeat at the Monongahela on , 1755, which decimated the unit's ranks, the regiment was restructured in late 1755 into ten independent companies, including specialized ranger units for scouting and skirmishing, carpenter detachments for rapid fort construction, and mounted elements to improve reconnaissance and pursuit capabilities on the rugged . This shift emphasized defensive patrolling and over offensive maneuvers, reflecting lessons from Braddock's rigid tactics and Virginia's limited manpower. Further adjustments occurred in the late 1750s as the war transitioned toward British-led expeditions. Following the successful Forbes campaign in 1758 and Washington's resignation from command on December 23, 1758, Stephen assumed leadership of a downsized force focused on garrisoning frontier posts like Fort Pitt and Fort Loudoun. The regiment, previously expanded to sixteen companies during peak mobilization in 1756–1757, was reduced to approximately ten to twelve companies by 1759, prioritizing cost efficiency amid Virginia's strained finances and shifting reliance on provincial rangers for . These changes incorporated more Native American scouts and emphasized security, though persistent desertions and supply shortages hampered effectiveness. The regiment's final disbandment came in May 1763, shortly after the on February 10, 1763, formally ended major hostilities by ceding French Canada to Britain. Virginia's , facing postwar budget deficits and believing the French threat eliminated, refused further appropriations, ordering the unit dissolved despite warnings of residual Native unrest. Under Stephen's command until the end, the remaining personnel—numbering around 500 effectives—were mustered out without back pay for many, leading to grievances among veterans who had served since 1754. This abrupt termination exposed frontier vulnerabilities, as erupted in the same month, necessitating hasty recruitment of new ranger companies rather than a reformed .

Transition to Continental Forces

Following the on February 10, 1763, which ended the , the Virginia Regiment was disbanded on May 28, 1763, with its soldiers mustered out and officers granted land bounties as compensation for service. A small number of companies—approximately 200 men—were temporarily retained under captains like for frontier patrols against lingering Native American threats, but these detachments were dissolved by 1765 as British regulars assumed border defense responsibilities. This marked the formal end of the regiment as a standing provincial force, shifting Virginia's military reliance to local militias and assemblies rather than a centralized . Veterans of the Virginia Regiment, hardened by years of irregular warfare, scouting, and fort construction, carried practical experience into the escalating colonial tensions of the 1770s. , who had commanded the regiment from July 1755 until his resignation in December 1758 amid disputes over rank and precedence with British officers, emerged as a pivotal figure. His tenure had instilled lessons in , , and adaptation to frontier conditions, which informed his selection by the Second Continental Congress as of the Continental Army on June 15, 1775. Washington's prior role emphasized self-reliant provincial operations, contrasting with rigid British tactics, and positioned him to unify disparate colonial militias into a national force. Other regiment alumni contributed to Virginia's Revolutionary mobilization. For instance, officers like , who served as a under in 1756–1758, rose to in and commanded at the in 1777 before his death. Similarly, field-grade survivors influenced the organization of 's minuteman companies formed in 1774–1775 under the Virginia Association committees, which evolved into the state's first wartime regiments. By early 1776, had raised two regiments authorized on December 9, 1775, by the Virginia Convention—the First under and the Second under William Woodford—which were accepted into service on February 15, 1776, forming the nucleus of the Virginia Line. These units drew recruits from frontier counties familiar with the old regiment's garrisons, incorporating tactics like ranger-style patrols refined during the prior war. The regiment's dissolution thus bridged colonial provincial service to continental organization through rather than institutional continuity, as supplied 15 regiments to Army between 1775 and 1783, totaling over 27,000 men at peak strength. This personnel legacy mitigated early Continental deficiencies in and , though high rates—exacerbated by short enlistments and economic incentives—persisted from provincial precedents. Washington's elevation symbolized the transition, leveraging regiment-honed expertise to professionalize a amid Britain's professional forces.

Historical Legacy

Influence on American Military Tradition

The Virginia Regiment, under George Washington's command from February 1755 to January 1759, provided him with formative experience in commanding provincial forces during the , emphasizing the need for disciplined training, logistical planning, and adaptive in conditions. Washington, drawing from observations during the Braddock and campaigns, implemented rigorous and organizational reforms that elevated the regiment's professionalism, with officers asserting it rivaled British regular units in discipline and cohesion. These efforts, amid defending over 300 miles of Virginia's against repeated Native American raids, underscored the limitations of militia responses and fostered Washington's preference for standing, trained troops over irregular levies. This provincial experience directly informed Washington's approach to the Continental Army, where he applied lessons in , fortification strategies, and officer accountability to mitigate the chronic shortages and desertions that plagued early revolutionary forces. His frustration with militia unreliability during the 1750s campaigns reinforced a commitment to , evident in his 1783 "Sentiments on a Peace Establishment," which advocated for a small, peacetime supplemented by trained reserves—a blueprint influencing the U.S. military's post-Revolutionary structure under the . The regiment's legacy extended to civil-military norms, as Washington's orderly resignation of command in 1758 and 1763 exemplified subordination to civilian authority, a principle he later upheld by relinquishing dictatorial powers after the , thereby embedding republican oversight of the armed forces in American tradition. While the regiment itself disbanded in 1763 without direct to units, its emphasis on merit-based leadership and tactical flexibility against asymmetric threats prefigured elements of U.S. ranger and doctrines in subsequent conflicts.

Assessments of Effectiveness and Criticisms

The Virginia Regiment, as Virginia's primary provincial force during the , garnered a positive reputation among British regular army officers for its effectiveness and relative compared to other colonial militias. British observers complimented the regiment's soldiers on their appearance, bearing, and appointment during joint operations, such as service in Charles Town, in 1757. Under George Washington's command from 1755 onward, the unit participated in key frontier defense efforts, including the construction of fortifications and the successful of 1758, which captured , demonstrating adaptability to on the Virginia frontier. Critics, including Washington himself, highlighted persistent weaknesses in discipline and retention, with desertions reaching significant levels due to inadequate pay, supply shortages, and short enlistment terms that prioritized short-term service over sustained campaigning. In a 1755 letter, attributed lax discipline to Virginia's military regulations, which lacked the stringency of models, leading him to advocate for harsher measures like lashing and executions for offenses such as mutiny and repeated desertion. During the 1754 Fort Necessity campaign, deserters undermined operations amid low supplies and hunger, while integration attempts with ranger companies in 1756 failed partly over incompatible discipline standards. Assessments of campaign performance were mixed; in Braddock's 1755 expedition, Virginia provincials, including regiment elements, showed greater familiarity with woodland tactics than British regulars, whom Washington later decried for "dastardly behavior" in breaking formation under , though overall colonial forces suffered high casualties and retreat. Virginia's faced criticism for fiscal parsimony, limiting the regiment's expansion and sustainment, which hampered its ability to beyond defensive roles. Historians attribute these shortcomings to the inherent limitations of provincial forces reliant on part-time enlistees and colonial legislatures, yet credit the regiment's endurance in protracted frontier service as a foundational experience for later organization.

References

  1. [1]
    Robert Dinwiddie (U.S. National Park Service)
    Jul 29, 2020 · Dinwiddie placed Washington in a position of leadership again in 1754, sending him west as lieutenant colonel of the Virginia Regiment, leading ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] VDF 200 - Virginia Defense Force
    The Virginia Regiment was formed by Governor Dinwiddie in 1754 out of the Virginia Militia. • Its commander was George. Washington.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] A Charming Field for an Encounter - National Park Service
    Fifty-four-year-old Joshua Fry, whom Dinwiddie had chosen to command the Virginia Regiment with the rank of full Colonel, was an Oxford-educated engineer ...
  4. [4]
    George Washington to Robert Dinwiddie, 10 June 1754
    Andrew Lewis (1720–1781), captain in the Virginia Regiment, came to the Virginia frontier from Ireland in 1732. He commanded a company at Fort Necessity and was ...
  5. [5]
    Ten Facts About George Washington and the French & Indian War
    Washington led the Virginia Regiment in Forbes' successful advance that captured Fort Duquesne. George Washington, who had been a part of two failed efforts to ...
  6. [6]
    The Seven Years' War in Virginia
    Feb 7, 2025 · In August 1755, the House of Burgesses authorized the formation of the Virginia Regiment, to be commanded by George Washington. Delaware headman ...
  7. [7]
    George Washington to Robert Dinwiddie, 4 August 1756
    When Braddock's army moved into Pennsylvania in June 1755, the Virginia frontier was laid open to Indian raids. On 27 June the House of Burgesses ordered that a ...
  8. [8]
    George Washington to the Officers and Soldiers of the Virginia …
    George Washington to the Officers and Soldiers of the Virginia Regiment of 1754, 23 December 1772.
  9. [9]
    Robert Dinwiddie (1692–1770) - Encyclopedia Virginia
    Robert Dinwiddie was a member of the governor's Council from 1742 to 1751 and then lieutenant governor of Virginia from 1751 to 1758.Missing: creation | Show results with:creation
  10. [10]
    Joshua Fry (ca. 1700–May 31, 1754) - Encyclopedia Virginia
    In 1754, at the beginning of the French and Indian War (1754–1763), Dinwiddie commissioned Fry colonel and head of the Virginia Regiment. Headed for the ...
  11. [11]
    An Act for raising levies and recruits to serve in the present ...
    In “An Act for raising levies and recruits to serve in the present expedition against the French, on the Ohio,” passed in October 1754, the General Assembly ...Missing: Regiment | Show results with:Regiment
  12. [12]
    George Washington in the French and Indian War
    The House of Burgesses authorized £40,000 to rebuild, enlarge, and equip the Virginia Regiment, which would be commanded by George Washington. Washington would ...Missing: founded | Show results with:founded
  13. [13]
    Orders, 18 September 1755 - Founders Online - National Archives
    2 All the Men of the Virginia Troops are to be formed into two Companies, which are to be commanded by Captains Savage and Bronaugh, 'till further Orders.
  14. [14]
    Colonial Militia in Virginia
    In contrast, the colony of Virginia relied upon the local militia for defense up to the start of the American Revolution. The Virginia colonists were not ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    Virginia Land Bounty Certificates for Service in the French and ...
    Dec 1, 2019 · For participation in the wars of the Colony of Virginia against the French and Indians, and for service rendered by the Militia in defense ...
  17. [17]
    Virginia Regiments in the Continental Army
    The 1st Virginia Regiment was authorized by the Virginia Convention of July 17, 1775, as a provincial defense unit composed of six musket and two rifle ...
  18. [18]
    Return of the Virginia Regiment, 1 January 1757 - Founders Online
    The return is in the hand of George Mercer with the signature and one addition in GW's hand. The category “Recruiting,” under “Effective Rank and File,” has ...Missing: incentives 1750s
  19. [19]
    Soldiers for Virginia: Who Served in the French and Indian War? - jstor
    This essay will examine the composi. Virginia Regiment in 1756 and 1757 and seek to discover wha willing to serve in the colony's army. Between 1754 and 1757 ...Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
  20. [20]
    a demographic survey of the continental army that wintered at valley ...
    The evidence from Virginia shows a great contrast between the birthplaces of soldiers in the French and Indian War and the Revolution. More than two-thirds.
  21. [21]
    Virginia Regiment | Military Wiki - Fandom
    White males between 16 and 50 were permitted to serve, although the regiment's size rolls report men as young as 15 and as old as 60 in the ranks, along with ...
  22. [22]
    A Social Profile of Enlisted Service in America's First Standing Army
    "Soldiers for Virginia: Who Served in the French and Indian War?" VMHB, XCIV. (i986), 307-328. The New York figures are based on an analysis of 2,405 soldiers.Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
  23. [23]
    French and Indian War veterans - Cvillepedia
    Nov 8, 2023 · Joshua Fry initially served as Commander-in-Chief of the Virginia Regiment in this conflict until his unexpected death in 1754 and subsequent ...
  24. [24]
    George Washington to the Officers of the Virginia Regiment, 10 …
    1. It is not known what day GW received the Address from the Officers of the Virginia Regiment, 31 Dec. 1758, to which this is a response ...
  25. [25]
    The Wastrel - richmondmagazine.com
    Dec 17, 2021 · Byrd in 1758 became colonel of the 2nd Virginia Regiment, and the following year, he succeeded George Washington as commander of the 1st ...
  26. [26]
    George Washington to William Byrd, 24 June 1758 - Founders Online
    Col. William Byrd marched with his regiment on 26 June. The plan was for Commissary Thomas Walker to send up the second convoy, or wagon train, of supplies in ...
  27. [27]
    The Virginia Provincial Regiments 1753-64
    This particular article concerns the Virginia Regiment, raised in that colony in 1754. To be accurate, Virginia raised three regiments, the first being down ...
  28. [28]
    Washington takes command of Continental Army in 1775 | Article
    June 15, 1775, Congress chose George Washington, a Virginian, to be commander in chief. Washington's military experience was perhaps greater than that of any ...
  29. [29]
    Colonel William Byrd, III (1728 - 1777) - Genealogy - Geni
    Sep 27, 2024 · The height of his career, however, was his appointment as commander of the Second Virginia Regiment during the Seven Years War. His ...
  30. [30]
    A Roll of the Officers and Soldiers in the Virginia Regiment of 1754
    A Roll of the Officers and Soldiers in the Virginia Regiment of 1754 ; George Washington, Lieutt Colo. Jany 25, Ditto ; George Muse, Major, March 15, Ditto.
  31. [31]
    Roster of Virginia Regiment - Fort Necessity National Battlefield ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · Roster of Virginia Regiment. These are the names of soldiers serving under George Washington during the Fort Necessity Campaign. ... 1754.Missing: founded | Show results with:founded
  32. [32]
    George Washington (1732–1799) - Encyclopedia Virginia
    Dinwiddie appointed Washington commander in chief of all militia forces in Virginia with authority over about fifty officers, many of them older and more ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Untitled - UCSB History Department
    The first adventure began in the spring of 1754, when the Virginia. House of Burgesses voted funds to raise a regiment of three hundred men to protect ...
  34. [34]
    Jumonville Glen - Fort Necessity National Battlefield (U.S. National ...
    May 20, 2024 · On the stormy night of May 27, 1754, Washington and about 40 men beganan all-night march to confront the French and learn their intentions. They ...
  35. [35]
    Jumonville Glen | American Battlefield Trust
    Feb 22, 2022 · His plan was to find a suitable place to wait for the rest of the Virginia Regiment to reinforce him, then retake the Forks. ... Fort Necessity.<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Battle of Fort Necessity (U.S. National Park Service)
    Nov 5, 2020 · Washington surrendered Fort Necessity to the French. One clause stated that Washington was guilty of the assassination of a French officer, Jumonville.
  37. [37]
    Fort Necessity Battle Facts and Summary | American Battlefield Trust
    Oct 17, 2025 · Outraged that the French dead at Jumonville Glen, which included his brother, lay unburied, de Villier immediately ordered an attack.
  38. [38]
    Fort Necessity: George Washington's First Defeat
    George Washington's first command resulted in a victory, a defeat, and a confession. Fortunately, it came in 1754, 21 years before the Revolution.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Washington, those he led, and Virginia on the threshold of world war ...
    Energized by his turn of fortune,. Dinwiddie immediately set about reorganizing the colony's defense. First, he resolved to disband the Virginia regiment and ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    The Braddock Campaign (U.S. National Park Service)
    May 8, 2024 · The British plan for 1755 was to simultaneously attack many French forts in North America. Braddock would lead the expedition against Fort Duquesne personally.
  41. [41]
    Battle of Monongahela 1755 – Braddock's Defeat - British Battles
    11 subalterns from the British Regiments and 4 from the Virginia Companies were killed. It is claimed that the force did not begin the retreat for three to ...
  42. [42]
    The Battle of the Monongahela, July 9, 1755
    Dec 21, 2020 · In April, Braddock met with some of the colonial governors in Alexandria, Virginia, and laid out his plans for the various expeditions and what ...
  43. [43]
    Battle of the Monongahela | George Washington's Mount Vernon
    Of the 1,459 men in Braddock's expedition, 977 were wounded or killed—including sixty-three officers. Although technically not in command, Washington earned ...
  44. [44]
    George Washington to Mary Ball Washington, 18 July 1755
    With the addition of officers and staff his figures were 456 killed and 520 wounded, or 976 casualties out of a force of 1,469 (Mackellar maps in Pargellis, ...
  45. [45]
    The End of Braddock's Life and March - War History
    Dec 13, 2024 · The Virginia House of Burgesses voted £40,000 to increase Virginia troop levels to twelve hundred, and Dinwiddie commissioned Washington as ...
  46. [46]
    Washington and the French & Indian War
    The Second Virginia regiment was constituted and raised under Colonel William Byrd III; it also was placed under Forbes. Forbes' mission was to lead an attack ...
  47. [47]
    Fort Loudoun - French and Indian War Foundation
    George Washington, colonel of the Virginia Regiment, was the commander responsible for protecting the back country from incursions by the French and Indian ...
  48. [48]
  49. [49]
    George Washington to Robert Dinwiddie, 9 November 1756
    18. The largest single concentration of soldiers in the Virginia Regiment were still being stationed at Fort Cumberland, and GW's second in command, Lt. Col.
  50. [50]
    Orders, 12 July 1756 - Founders Online - National Archives
    1755, n.6. Henry Russell was still in the Virginia Regiment when GW left it at the end of 1758 but had resigned before the regiment was disbanded in 1762.
  51. [51]
    Volume 4: Nov. 1756 – Oct. 1757 - The Washington Papers
    By November 1756, when this volume begins, Washington had been colonel of the Virginia Regiment, in charge of the colony's defenses for more than a year.<|control11|><|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Forbes Expedition | George Washington's Mount Vernon
    Colonel George Washington commanded the 1st Virginia Regiment in what was his final engagement while serving with the British Army. Reproduction of Fort ...
  53. [53]
    Letter from George Washington to John Robinson (September 1 ...
    In this September 1, 1758, letter from George Washington to Speaker of the House of Burgesses John Robinson, Washington criticizes the leadership of British ...
  54. [54]
    John Forbes' Wilderness Campaign - Washington's Trail
    A sharp skirmish ensued and General Forbes ordered Colonel Washington to take another detachment of Virginia troops and support Mercer.
  55. [55]
    Virginia Regiment
    The Virginia Regiment Uniform 1754-62. The provincial forces of Virginia during the French and Indian War era developed a reputation among the British ...
  56. [56]
    French & Indian War Blue & Red Regimental Coat - Veteran Arms
    In stockDuring the French & Indian War, numerous American (British) provincial units wore uniforms of blue with red lapels, cuffs, and turn-backs.
  57. [57]
    https://digital.library.pitt.edu/islandora/object/...
    ... Washington to be Colonel of the Virginia Regiment and Commander-in-chief of all the forces now raised or to be raised for the "defence of His Majesty's ...
  58. [58]
    Virginia Regiment equipment | fortloudounva - Wix.com
    The Virginia Regiment had different color breeches in 1755 and before. We discuss uniform differences and changes to the uniform.<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Guns of the Grunts - 1763
    Feb 2, 2013 · These included nine companies of Roger's Rangers, the Virginia Regiment (led by Colonel George Washington), and the New Hampshire Regiment. Arms ...
  60. [60]
    Historic Weapons Program - Fort Necessity National Battlefield (U.S. ...
    Aug 19, 2016 · During the Fort Necessity campaign of 1754, Washington's Virginia Regiment brought nine swivel guns that were the only artillery used at the ...
  61. [61]
    General Washington's Military Equipment
    Washington's military equipment included swords, pistols, a spyglass, a field bed, canteens, a headquarters tent, and a camp chest.General Washington's... · Military Uniform, C. 1789 · Flintlock Pistols
  62. [62]
    Firearms in Colonial Williamsburg
    Common firearms in Williamsburg included pistols, carbines, firelocks, muskets, fusees, and some rifles, along with swords and cartouch boxes.Types Of Fire-Arms In... · Vi. Guns · Ix. PistolsMissing: armaments | Show results with:armaments
  63. [63]
    George Washington to John Robinson, 27 April 1756
    In my last I omitted to observe one thing touching the defence of our Frontiers by a chain of Forts;1 and it is this. ... number of Forts will be increased to two ...
  64. [64]
    George Washington to Robert Dinwiddie, 25 June 1756
    At a council of war GW held at Fort Cumberland on 10 July to decide how and where the chain of forts should be built, it was agreed that Hog should begin ...
  65. [65]
    Virginia's Western "Frontier" Forts in the 1750's
    Washington recognized that forts located 20 miles from each other offered little protection to most settlers, who would be captured/killed before they could ...
  66. [66]
    A Letter to Dinwiddie | George Washington's Mount Vernon
    In August 1755, Virginia lieutenant governor Robert Dinwiddie appointed 23-year-old George Washington as commander of the Virginia Regiment.
  67. [67]
    George Washington to Adam Stephen, 18 November 1755
    1754 to Dinwiddie that discipline in the Virginia Regiment suffered because Virginia's ... regiment found guilty of mutiny, desertion, and disobedience.
  68. [68]
    The Virginia Ranger Companies, 1755- 1763 - History Reconsidered
    The Virginia Regiment and Militia were the other military organizations participating in the defense of western Virginia. The Ranger Companies were raised on an ...
  69. [69]
    Enclosure: Commission to Hold General Court-Martials, 18 July 1757
    ... 1757 Intituled “An Act for preventing Mutiny and Desertion,[”]1 it is among other Things enacted That if any Person being mustered or in Pay as an Officer ...
  70. [70]
    George Washington and Military Discipline
    Washington lamented when he believed military discipline was not being maintained, and made efforts to court martial offenders, especially in the officer core.Missing: disciplinary | Show results with:disciplinary
  71. [71]
    The People Involved in the French and Indian War
    Nov 22, 2021 · Colonel George Washington fought in a famous provincial unit: the Virginia Regiment. The condescending attitude of the British Army toward ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  72. [72]
    French and Indian War: Brigadier General John Forbes' Expedition
    Jun 12, 2006 · On November 11, 1758, Brigadier General John Forbes convened a council of war at his headquarters in Fort Ligonier, about 40 miles east of the ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Outacite Ostenaco and the Cherokee-Virginia Alliance in the French ...
    Ostenaco and other head warriors led numerous offensive campaigns deep into enemy territory, so the colonial military authorities could focus their attention on ...
  74. [74]
    Adam Stephen | George Washington's Mount Vernon
    With George Washington's return to command of the re-formed Virginia Regiment in September 1755, Adam Stephen resumed his place as the unit's executive officer ...Missing: disbandment | Show results with:disbandment
  75. [75]
    [PDF] The Virginia frontier, 1754-1763 - Internet Archive
    Aug 5, 2017 · Virginia Regiment, advised this course. But for some rea¬ son ... was given to disband the force in May, 1763. “ It broke up just when ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  76. [76]
    [PDF] The Continental Army
    The Continental Army now directs us to the basic military organization ... Virginia Regiment for October 1777 is typical of this type of document. It.
  77. [77]
    The Continental Army - U.S. Army Center of Military History
    Selection of George Washington as Commander in Chief. The next step was to select a commander in chief. George Washington of Virginia wanted the job. He had ...
  78. [78]
    Understanding the Creation of the U.S. Armed Forces
    Apr 10, 2007 · On the other hand, the Continental Army was akin to Washington's Virginia Regiment: just another in a long line of ad hoc, volunteer ...
  79. [79]
    Virginians in the Continental Army - Virginia Places
    Virginians initially served in the First Virginia Regiment, then the Continental Army, with 15 regiments supplied. Many were captured at Charleston, and some ...
  80. [80]
    Regimental History - First Virginia Regiment
    The First Virginia Regiment was authorized by the Virginia Convention of July 17, 1775 as a provincial defense unit composed of six musket and two rifle ...
  81. [81]
    Why Did George Washington Join the Revolution?
    In June 1775, Congress ordered General George Washington to take command of the Continental Army besieging the British in Boston. Despite having little ...Demotion · Volunteer · Tobacco<|control11|><|separator|>
  82. [82]
    Some Reflections on the American Military Tradition
    Washington had done all these by the time he received command of the so-called Virginia Regiment in 1755 and the task of defending the backcountry of the Old ...
  83. [83]
    In Defense of Fort Necessity — Why It's Time to Rethink George ...
    Mar 8, 2024 · Washington's supplies were low and his 400 men were hungry and weak from the labouring, most having gone days without food. Worse, deserters had ...
  84. [84]
    Edward Braddock | George Washington's Mount Vernon
    French attackers killed or wounded more than half of Braddock's men and decimated his officer corps. Sixty of the eighty-six officers were dead or wounded by ...