Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

2001 anthrax attacks

The 2001 anthrax attacks involved the mailing of letters containing Bacillus anthracis spores to targets in the United States, causing five deaths and seventeen non-fatal infections from inhalational and cutaneous anthrax. The letters, postmarked September 18, 2001, for media recipients including offices of the New York Post, National Enquirer, and NBC News, and October 9, 2001, for U.S. Senators Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy, bore handwritten messages such as "09-11-01," "DEATH TO AMERICA," "DEATH TO ISRAEL," and "ALLAH IS GREAT," evoking Islamist extremism amid the recent September 11 attacks. The Federal Bureau of Investigation's Amerithrax investigation traced the spores to the Ames strain held at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland, and concluded in 2010 that USAMRIID microbiologist Bruce Ivins acted alone as the perpetrator, citing genetic matching to his flask RMR-1029, behavioral evidence, and his suicide in July 2008 shortly before anticipated charges. However, a 2011 National Academy of Sciences review of the FBI's scientific methods found that microbial forensics could not definitively attribute the attack material to Ivins' specific flask or exclude other laboratories with access to the widely distributed Ames strain, leaving unresolved questions about the evidence's exclusivity and contributing to persistent skepticism among microbiologists and investigators regarding the lone-actor determination. The attacks amplified post-9/11 bioterrorism fears, prompted enhanced U.S. biodefense measures, and exposed limitations in microbial attribution techniques reliant on genetic analysis amid potential laboratory access by multiple parties.

Background and Context

Biodefense Research Prior to 2001

The United States terminated its offensive biological weapons program in 1969 via executive order from President Richard Nixon, redirecting resources to defensive biodefense efforts aimed at countermeasures against potential adversarial use of pathogens like Bacillus anthracis. This shift aligned with the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), ratified by the US in 1975, which prohibited development, production, and stockpiling of biological agents for offensive purposes while permitting research for prophylactic, protective, or other peaceful objectives, including vaccine development and threat assessment. Defensive programs emphasized studying aerosolized anthrax dynamics, pathogenesis in primate models, and efficacy of protective equipment to inform military and civilian preparedness. The of B. anthracis, isolated on December 23, 1981, from a 14-month-old heifer that died in Sarita, , emerged as a key virulent isolate for studies due to its consistent lethality in inhalation models, surpassing earlier strains like Vollum in reproducibility for experiments. Shipped to the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at , —the primary US facility for high-containment infectious disease research—it was propagated for validation, testing, and exposure simulations to evaluate respirators and protocols. By the late , the was held in approximately 15 US laboratories and three foreign sites, often in lyophilized or liquid suspensions refined through serial passaging to enhance sporulation yields for challenge studies. USAMRIID's anthrax work built on the , licensed in 1970 for human use, with ongoing refinements through the and to address lot variability and booster requirements observed in field trials. Revelations from Soviet defector in 1999 detailed Biopreparat's massive offensive program, including genetically engineered strains resistant to vaccination, prompting accelerated US defensive R&D on detection assays and . Concurrently, a February 2001 National Defense Panel report warned of lax in US labs handling select agents like Ames , noting insufficient access controls and risks, as pathogens were routinely shared among researchers without rigorous tracking. These efforts occurred amid heightened proliferation concerns, including Iraq's documented during the 1980s Iran-Iraq War and the 1979 Sverdlovsk anthrax release in the USSR, which killed at least 66 and exposed covert offensive activities despite BWC commitments. Domestic research at sites like supplemented USAMRIID by testing non-pathogenic simulants for dispersal patterns, though live anthrax challenges remained confined to BSL-3/4 facilities to mimic weaponized dissemination scenarios for countermeasure validation. Pre-2001 funding, though modest compared to post-attack surges, supported genetic sequencing initiatives that later aided strain attribution, underscoring the dual-use nature of such work where refined spores suitable for inhalation studies paralleled attributes of potential bioweapons.

Post-9/11 Security Environment

The September 11, 2001, attacks on the and created an immediate atmosphere of national vulnerability, with U.S. intelligence and security agencies anticipating potential secondary strikes involving chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) agents. Al-Qaeda's prior statements on acquiring weapons of mass destruction amplified concerns over , as the group's operational sophistication demonstrated capacity for unconventional attacks beyond hijackings. This led to a surge in domestic alerts, with federal agencies like the FBI prioritizing threats from dispersed pathogens that could evade traditional border controls and exploit public infrastructure. The letters, postmarked September 18, 2001, emerged in this context of acute fear, initially interpreted by officials as a likely bioterrorist escalation tied to Islamist extremists rather than isolated domestic actors. systems, though pre-existing, faced unprecedented strain; the CDC reported heightened monitoring for aerosolized biological agents, while the U.S. Postal Service implemented emergency protocols amid disruptions to mail flow. Between September and December 2001, over 20,000 suspicious incidents were investigated nationwide, taxing laboratory resources and reflecting societal panic over everyday mail as a vector for mass casualties. Government responses emphasized rapid containment and deterrence, with President George W. Bush's administration allocating emergency funds—totaling over $1 billion by 2002—for biodefense enhancements, including antibiotic stockpiling (e.g., 100 million doses of by late 2001) and interagency task forces. Vulnerabilities in bioweapons research oversight became evident, prompting interim restrictions on select agents like , though full regulatory overhauls via the occurred later. This environment prioritized foreign-linked threats, influencing early investigative assumptions despite eventual evidence pointing to U.S.-based origins.

The Attacks

Mailing of Letters and Initial Discovery

The 2001 anthrax attacks involved two waves of letters containing spores mailed through the U.S. postal system. The first wave consisted of letters postmarked September 18, 2001, at a , postal facility, addressed to media outlets including at in and the editorial department, also in . These letters were likely deposited in a at 10 Nassau Street in , on September 17 or 18, 2001. Each contained a handwritten note reading: "09-11-01 / THIS IS NEXT / TAKE PENACILIN NOW / DEATH TO AMERICA / DEATH TO ISRAEL / ALLAH IS GREAT." A second wave of letters was postmarked October 9, 2001, also from Trenton, New Jersey, targeted at U.S. Senate offices in Washington, D.C., specifically Senators Thomas Daschle (D-SD) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT). These were mailed between October 6 and 9, 2001, from the same Princeton mailbox. The notes in these letters stated: "09-11-01 / YOU CAN NOT STOP US / WE HAVE THIS ANTHRAX. / YOU DIE NOW. ARE YOU AFRAID? / DEATH TO AMERICA / DEATH TO ISRAEL / ALLAH IS GREAT," with a fictitious return address of "4TH GRADE, GREENDALE SCHOOL, FRANKLIN PARK NJ 08852." The envelopes for both waves were traced to paper stock available at stores in Frederick, Maryland, and Hamilton, New Jersey. Initial discoveries stemmed from handling the contaminated mail, leading to early cases of anthrax infection before the letters themselves were fully identified. On October 3, 2001, Robert Stevens, a photo editor at American Media, Inc. (AMI) in —which received contaminated mail processed alongside the targeted media letters—was diagnosed with inhalational anthrax, marking the first confirmed case. Stevens died on October 5, 2001, prompting intensified scrutiny of mail at media outlets. The Brokaw letter was recovered by the FBI on October 12, 2001, after white powder was noticed in the NBC offices. The letter was discovered on October 19, 2001, similarly containing suspicious powder. The Daschle letter was opened on October 15, 2001, in the , confirming presence and leading to evacuations and quarantines. The Leahy letter was found later, on November 16, 2001, during a search of quarantined mail in a Washington, D.C., processing facility. These discoveries revealed the deliberate nature of the mailings, with spores finely milled for , though initial responses focused on containment and victim treatment amid heightened alerts.

Victims, Timeline, and Immediate Response

The anthrax letters were mailed in two batches from . The first set, postmarked September 18, 2001, targeted media outlets including the and anchor ; a similar letter likely reached American Media Inc. (AMI) in , though its envelope was not recovered. The second batch, postmarked October 9, 2001, was addressed to U.S. Senators and . Contaminated mail spread through postal facilities, leading to initial detections in early October: anthrax was confirmed in Robert Stevens on October 4, with his death the next day marking the first U.S. inhalation anthrax fatality since 1976; the Brokaw letter was recovered on October 12; the Daschle letter opened on October 15; and the letter found on October 19. The Leahy letter surfaced on November 16. The attacks resulted in 22 confirmed cases of anthrax infection—11 inhalational and 11 cutaneous—and five deaths, all from inhalational anthrax. Infections occurred via direct exposure to the letters or secondary contamination in mail processing sites like the Brentwood Postal Facility in Washington, D.C., and the Hamilton Postal Facility in New Jersey. The victims were:
NameAgeOccupation/LocationDate of DeathNotes
Robert Stevens63Photo editor, AMI, Boca Raton, FLOctober 5, 2001First confirmed case; symptoms began late September.
Thomas L. Morris Jr.55Postal worker, Brentwood PO, DCOctober 21, 2001Inhalation anthrax from contaminated mail sorting.
Joseph P. Curseen Jr.47Postal worker, Brentwood PO, DCOctober 22, 2001Died alongside Morris; facility closed October 23.
Kathy T. Nguyen61Hospital worker, New York, NYOctober 31, 2001Exposure source unclear; handled contaminated mail.
Ottilie Lundgren94Resident, Oxford, CTNovember 21, 2001Likely exposed via cross-contaminated mail; no direct link to letters.
Cutaneous cases included media employees and a child of an ABC producer, with positive tests reported October 12–18. The (FBI) launched the Amerithrax Task Force immediately after Stevens's death, involving 25–30 full-time agents who conducted thousands of interviews, issued over 5,750 subpoenas, and collected environmental samples from affected sites. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) deployed over 350 staff to six epicenters, coordinated Laboratory Response Network testing of more than 120,000 samples, and issued guidelines for and . measures included closing contaminated facilities like AMI's building (October 8) and Brentwood (October 23), distributing antibiotics such as and for prophylaxis to over 10,000 potentially exposed individuals (initially 60 days, extended to 100), and conducting mass screening clinics. The FDA approved for post-exposure use on , amid challenges like delayed diagnoses, prophylaxis side effects reducing compliance to about 40%, and inter-agency coordination strains.

Early False Leads and Misdirections

The anthrax letters contained handwritten notes with phrases such as "Death to America," "Death to Israel," and "Allah is Great," which initially directed suspicion toward Islamist extremists or state-sponsored actors like al-Qaeda, especially given the attacks' timing mere weeks after the September 11, 2001, hijackings. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) pursued this foreign terrorism hypothesis aggressively in the early months, conducting interviews with over 10,000 witnesses across six continents and exploring potential links to known bioterror programs. However, no credible connections emerged; genetic analysis of the Ames strain used in the letters traced it exclusively to U.S. laboratories, particularly the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland, and linguistic experts highlighted non-idiomatic phrasing (e.g., "Allah is Great" rather than the standard Arabic "Allahu Akbar") indicative of domestic origin rather than native Arabic speakers. Compounding the foreign lead, media reports in late October 2001 cited anonymous U.S. government sources claiming the presence of —a clay additive purportedly used by to weaponize —in the spore powder from the letter sent to Senator , suggesting state-level sophistication beyond lone actors. These assertions, disseminated by outlets like based on four separate "well-placed" officials, implied Iraqi involvement, as bentonite was said to enhance , though the reports acknowledged inconclusive testing at facilities like . The initially denied the finding, with spokesman stating no aluminum (a bentonite indicator) was detected, but the claims persisted in public discourse. Subsequent scientific examination by using (TEM) in 2002 revealed only naturally occurring silica on coats, with no bentonite or deliberate additives for weaponization, debunking the Iraq link and highlighting early analytical misinterpretations of silicon-oxygen signals. Domestically, the FBI's focus shifted by mid-2002 to , a virologist and former USAMRIID contractor, after his name surfaced eight times in initial tips due to his anthrax research background, access to relevant labs until 1999, and a June 2001 prescription for (Cipro), an antibiotic effective against . Searches of Hatfill's possessions uncovered anthrax handling protocols and a simulant powder, fueling suspicions of insider knowledge, and the FBI subjected him to intense surveillance, polygraphs, and leaks portraying him as a ""—a term then-Attorney General used publicly in June 2002. Despite this, Hatfill lacked access to the specific RMR-1029 flask of implicated, and microbial forensics excluded him; the pursuit ended without charges, leading to a $5.8 million from the U.S. government in 2008 for privacy violations and reputational harm. These leads diverted resources for years, delaying the pivot to USAMRIID microbiologist Bruce Ivins until genetic matches emerged in 2007–2008.

Anthrax Characteristics

Strain Identification and Genetic Mutations

The anthrax spores in the 2001 attack letters were identified as Bacillus anthracis of the through genetic analysis performed by Paul Keim's laboratory at . Using multi-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), researchers determined the genotype matched the , a subtype isolated from a diseased cow in in 1981 and widely used in U.S. research programs. This identification, confirmed by October 2001, shifted suspicion toward domestic sources, as the was primarily held in American laboratories rather than foreign ones. Subsequent MLVA and (AFLP) testing refined the genetic , linking the attack material to a specific sub-population within the maintained at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). Among approximately 15 domestic and three foreign repositories of material identified post-attacks, the FBI's analysis traced the matching genotype to flask RMR-1029, a working stock at USAMRIID containing spores derived from the original Ames isolate. Of over 1,000 B. anthracis samples examined in the FBI repository, only those originating from or contaminated by RMR-1029 shared the precise MLVA profile of the letters' anthrax. In early 2002, FBI microbiologists observed rare morphological variants in cultures grown from the attack letters, prompting whole-genome sequencing that revealed four specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)—mutations at positions pXO1-117, pXO2-61, pXO1-203, and pXO2-179—absent in the standard Ames reference genome. These SNPs appeared in the letter material and were detected in RMR-1029 isolates only after prolonged subculturing (approximately 36 hours), consistent with slow-emerging mutants rather than stable genetic markers. Testing of the FBI's extensive sample collection found that only eight isolates contained all four mutations, each directly traceable to RMR-1029 through documented transfers or potential cross-contamination within USAMRIID. The 2011 National Academy of Sciences review affirmed that the attack anthrax matched the RMR-1029 genotype based on MLVA and data but noted limitations: the mutations' rarity did not preclude independent emergence in other Ames cultures or undetected transfers from RMR-1029 to external labs, preventing conclusive proof that RMR-1029 was the attack source to the exclusion of all others. Despite this, the FBI maintained that the cumulative genetic evidence, combined with access controls and chain-of-custody records, strongly implicated RMR-1029 as the origin, with no viable alternative sources identified after exhaustive repository audits.

Preparation Method and Additives Disputes

The (FBI) concluded that the anthrax powder was prepared through standard microbiological techniques available in research laboratories, involving the growth of Bacillus anthracis spores in a nutrient-rich medium, followed by harvesting via , purification through repeated washing to remove vegetative cells and debris, and drying using equipment such as a lyophilizer or speed-vacuum concentrator. This process, estimated to require approximately 2-3 days for culturing and hours for drying, produced a highly concentrated preparation (over 99% pure spores by refractile count) with electrostatic and dispersible properties matching the attack material, without requiring specialized bioweapons facilities. The FBI replicated comparable powders in controlled tests, attributing the material's flowability to the spores' natural morphology and purification rather than mechanical milling or electrostatic deposition. Disputes centered on whether this method adequately explained the powder's advanced aerosol characteristics, including its fine particle size (1-1.5 micrometers), low clumping, and ability to remain suspended in air despite lacking a visible coating. Critics, including bioweapons experts, contended that such uniformity and stability implied more sophisticated processing, such as spray drying, ball milling, or incorporation of undisclosed dispersants to prevent aggregation—techniques typically linked to state-sponsored programs like those historically pursued by the Soviet Union or Iraq. For instance, early analyses suggested possible additives like polymers or silicates for enhanced dispersibility, based on the powder's behavior in postal sorting equipment and initial electron microscopy observations. The ' 2011 review of the FBI's scientific methods affirmed that no evidence supported the use of intentional additives, chemical coatings, or genetic modifications to improve , aligning with the FBI's findings of a relatively straightforward preparation. However, the highlighted limitations in physicochemical analyses, noting that the did not conclusively distinguish between lab and potentially more refined methods, as multiple U.S. facilities possessed similar capabilities and sample repositories showed inconsistencies in and tracking. These gaps fueled ongoing about attributing the exact preparation exclusively to suspect Ivins' flask RMR-1029, though non-scientific evidence bolstered the FBI's case.

Silicon Content and Bentonite Misinformation

Early analyses by the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) using detected elevated levels of and oxygen in the spores from the attack letters, with present inside the spore coats of approximately 65-75% of the examined spores. This finding initially prompted speculation that the silicon represented an added silica coating for weaponization, potentially enhancing dispersibility. Subsequent investigations, including transmission electron microscopy by Sandia National Laboratories, determined that the silicon was biologically incorporated into the spore coats during natural sporulation processes, rather than exogenously applied as a dispersant or coating. Virologist Peter Jahrling, who had earlier suggested weaponization based on preliminary data, publicly retracted that assessment following the Sandia results, aligning with the FBI's conclusion that the anthrax lacked evidence of sophisticated additives for state-level bioweapon enhancement. The 2011 National Academy of Sciences review confirmed silicon's presence in the spores but found no forensic evidence indicating intentional addition of silicon-based materials for weaponization, attributing it instead to endogenous incorporation consistent with biology. This refuted claims of artificial refinement, as the spore morphology and purity—lacking inert fillers—were inconsistent with advanced military-grade preparations. Parallel early media reports, including from , alleged the presence of bentonite—a silicon-rich clay purportedly used in Iraqi bioweapons programs—as an additive in the Daschle letter , fueling speculation of foreign state sponsorship. These assertions were disseminated without verification and later contradicted by federal testing, which detected no or similar clays; Director explicitly dismissed in favor of signatures on November 7, 2001. The , possibly sourced from unconfirmed government or intelligence channels, amplified narratives linking the attacks to despite the Ames strain's exclusive traceability to U.S. stocks. Such claims lacked empirical support and were undermined by the absence of additives in chemical analyses, highlighting vulnerabilities in early investigative sourcing amid heightened geopolitical pressures.

Investigation Process

Initial FBI Probe and Destroyed Archives

The FBI's Amerithrax investigation commenced after Robert Stevens, a photo editor at American Media Inc. in , died from inhalational anthrax on October 5, 2001, with the cause confirmed as infection by October 4, prompting an initial CDC and local probe that the FBI joined as suspicions arose. The scope intensified on October 12, 2001, when anthrax spores were identified in nasal swabs of media workers and in mail at and offices, linking cases to mailed letters containing powdered anthrax and notes referencing the . Early investigative efforts focused on mail tracing from postmarks in , on September 18 (media targets) and October 9, 2001 (senatorial targets), alongside environmental sampling and interviews exceeding 10,000 individuals, while securing U.S. laboratories amid post-9/11 panic. Forensic analysis by USAMRIID rapidly identified the as the , a laboratory-adapted subtype derived from a 1981 isolate from a cow and distributed to numerous U.S. facilities, narrowing domestic sourcing but complicating attribution due to its prevalence in government programs. Initial leads emphasized potential foreign terrorism, including connections, given the letters' anti-American rhetoric and timing, though parallel domestic scrutiny of scientists and labs began, with the FBI deploying specialized teams for bioforensic evidence collection. Concurrently, security-driven actions hindered evidence preservation: after FBI consultation, Iowa State University's National Veterinary Services Laboratories destroyed its comprehensive anthrax strain repository—accumulated over seven decades and including diverse global isolates—on October 11–12, 2001, to avert potential theft or accidental release amid bioterror fears. This archive, which housed reference samples valuable for genetic baseline comparisons, was eliminated just as the Ames strain's role emerged, prompting expert criticism that the hasty destruction compromised forensic capabilities by removing irreplaceable comparative material early in the probe. The 2001 anthrax attacks, occurring in the weeks immediately following the terrorist strikes, prompted widespread initial suspicions of foreign , with emerging as a primary focus due to the temporal proximity and the letters' explicit invocation of Islamist extremism. The envelopes contained handwritten messages in reading "," "," "," and "09-11-01" alongside the anthrax powder, phrasing that mirrored jihadist propaganda and suggested an intent to associate the mailings with 's ongoing campaign against the . President described the incidents as a "second wave of terrorist attacks" in a November 3, 2001, radio address, reflecting the administration's operating assumption of possible ties to international actors. White House Press Secretary stated on October 23, 2001, that investigators were pursuing connections to the 9/11 hijackers and broader international networks. Al-Qaeda's documented pursuit of biological weapons further fueled these suspicions, as the group had expressed interest in acquiring and weaponizing pathogens like to amplify its asymmetric threats against Western targets. The later confirmed al-Qaeda's efforts to develop a rudimentary bioweapons capability in by 2001, including experiments with crude production, though limited by technical expertise and resources. Terrorism expert Richard Spertzel speculated on October 19, 2001, that sympathizers of could be responsible, citing the attacks' potential to sow long-term disruption. echoed concerns about al-Qaeda's weapons of mass destruction ambitions, though without direct evidence linking the group to the mailings. Some reports, such as a March 23, 2002, claim by Christos Tsonas of possible cutaneous lesions on hijacker , raised theories of pre-attack testing or exposure among operatives, but FBI testing of hijacker remains and effects yielded negative results for . Suspicions also extended to under , given its established biological weapons program documented by inspectors, which included production and weaponization research in the and 1990s. Former CIA Director hypothesized Iraqi involvement based on the letters' lack of return addresses and Saddam's demonstrated hostility, while UN inspector Richard Butler suggested in October that might have transferred to al-Qaeda-linked terrorists, potentially via meetings between hijacker and Iraqi intelligence in . Media reports amplified claims of Iraqi-sourced additives, with citing anonymous sources on October 26, , that the contained —a clay used in Iraqi weapons programs—to enhance , though subsequent FBI and laboratory analyses found no such additive and identified the strain as the U.S.-specific Ames variant unavailable to foreign actors. Director noted on October 25, , that preliminary tests indicated the material did not originate from or , undermining state-sponsored theories despite the Bush administration's intensive efforts to establish a connection. The FBI's Amerithrax task force conducted global inquiries, including interviews on six continents and examinations of foreign labs and personnel with potential or Iraqi ties, but uncovered no evidence of overseas sourcing, access to the RMR-1029 flask of used, or operational links to the mailings. Linguistic analysis of the letters revealed non-native phrasing inconsistencies, such as "ALLAH IS GREAT" instead of the standard "Allahu Akbar," which some experts interpreted as deliberate rather than authentic jihadist authorship. By late 2001, the absence of foreign forensic matches—coupled with the anthrax's genetic profile tracing to U.S. military stocks—shifted focus domestically, though the initial foreign hypotheses influenced early policy responses and heightened alerts.

Domestic Person of Interest: Steven Hatfill

Steven , a virologist and biodefense consultant born on October 24, 1953, served as a researcher at the Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) from 1997 to 1999, focusing on and other pathogens. After leaving USAMRIID, he worked as a on bioweapons defense projects, including simulations of biological attacks. In early 2002, the FBI identified Hatfill as a "" in the Amerithrax investigation due to his expertise in biological agents and prior professional activities that included discussing mailed anthrax scenarios in training exercises before , 2001. Eight individuals independently suggested Hatfill to investigators in the first four months of the probe, citing his access to relevant strains and behavioral patterns observed by colleagues. Suspicion intensified because Hatfill had prescribed himself ciprofloxacin—a potent effective against —starting September 20, 2001, weeks before the letters' contents were publicly known to contain . Investigators noted alignments between his documented travels and the postmarks on the anthrax envelopes, such as a trip to near a mailing site, though no tied him to the letters. His home, vehicles, and storage units in were searched and swabbed for traces in 2002, yielding no spores or incriminating materials. Hatfill's eccentric personal habits, including owning equipment and conducting mock bioweapons drills, fueled perceptions of oddity among peers and agents, though these were consistent with his field of work. The FBI's focus on Hatfill involved extensive surveillance, including tailing him publicly and hiring a former girlfriend to surreptitiously record conversations, but yielded no forensic links to the attack strain, Ames, which Hatfill had handled only in non-weaponized forms during his USAMRIID tenure. Media leaks portraying him as the likely perpetrator, amplified by outlets citing anonymous FBI sources, led to professional ostracism; Hatfill lost contracts and consulting work by mid-2002. He publicly denied involvement in a June 2002 press conference and filed lawsuits against the Justice Department for Privacy Act violations and media for defamation. In June 2008, the Department of Justice settled Hatfill's Privacy Act suit for $5.82 million, comprising a $2.825 million and an of $150,000 annually for 20 years, without admitting liability but resolving claims of improper information disclosures. The settlement coincided with the FBI's shift to Ivins as the primary suspect, and on August 8, 2008, the Justice Department formally stated Hatfill was not involved in the attacks, exonerating him after over six years of scrutiny. The 2010 Amerithrax Investigative Summary later affirmed no evidence connected Hatfill to the mailings, highlighting investigative missteps in prioritizing him over lab records and genetic analysis.

Primary Suspect: Bruce Ivins Profile

was born on April 22, 1946, in , to Randall Ivins, a Princeton-educated , and Mary Ivins, a homemaker. He grew up in a family with pharmaceutical roots, as one ancestor had established a in the area in 1893. Ivins was married to Diane Ivins and had two children, a son named Andy and a daughter named Amanda; he maintained annual vacations with his brother Charles but had a reportedly estranged relationship with another brother, Tom. Ivins pursued higher education at the , earning a B.S. in in 1968, an M.S. in in 1971, and a Ph.D. in in 1976, all with honors. Following his doctorate, he conducted postdoctoral research at the before entering government service. In 1980, Ivins joined the Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at , , as a in the Bacteriology Division, where he worked for over 27 years until his death. His research focused on the genetics, immunology, and vaccine development for Bacillus anthracis, the bacterium causing , contributing to efforts to protect U.S. troops with improved vaccines. In 2003, Ivins and three colleagues received the Department of Defense's highest civilian honor for their advancements. By the late , he was among USAMRIID's senior scientists, handling high-security (BSL-3) work with the of anthrax in flask RMR-1029, which later became central to the FBI's investigation. Ivins died by suicide on July 29, 2008, at age 62, from an intentional overdose of acetaminophen leading to organ failure, shortly before federal charges were anticipated in the Amerithrax case.

Evidence Linking Ivins to the Attacks

Genetic analysis conducted by the FBI identified the anthrax spores in the attack letters as deriving from the RMR-1029 flask, a specific subculture created and maintained by Bruce Ivins at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). This flask contained spores exhibiting four unique morphological mutations that matched those in the mailed , a combination found in none of the over 1,070 other samples tested from U.S. and international laboratories. Ivins submitted samples from RMR-1029 to the FBI in February 2002 that aligned with the attack material, though a subsequent April 2002 submission from the same flask lacked these mutations, raising questions about sample integrity. Ivins held primary custody of the RMR-1029 flask, stored in a walk-in cooler in his B-313 within USAMRIID's Building 1425, and possessed unrestricted access to the B3 biosafety suite containing equipment essential for spore production, including fermenters, centrifuges, and a lyophilizer for drying spores into a fine . As a senior with over two decades of experience in research, Ivins demonstrated expertise in cultivating and purifying high-concentration spore preparations, as documented in his laboratory notebooks describing RMR-1029 as achieving 99% refractile s with minimal contaminants—characteristics consistent with the unusually pure and concentrated in the letters. In the weeks preceding the mailings, Ivins recorded atypical late-night and weekend hours working alone in the B3 suite, totaling 31 hours and 28 minutes in September 2001 and 16 hours and 13 minutes in early October, without corresponding research tasks or explanations tied to ongoing projects. Specific instances included 2 to 2.5 hours nightly from to 16, aligning with preparation before the first mailing of September 18, and 1 to 3.5 hours nightly from September 28 to October 5, preceding the second mailing on October 9. The double-walled envelopes used in the attacks matched a type sold in bulk at post offices in , approximately 1.5 miles from Ivins' home and USAMRIID.

Behavioral and Consciousness of Guilt Indicators

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) identified several behaviors and statements by Bruce Ivins as indicative of consciousness of guilt in the 2001 anthrax mailings, including deviations from his routine, evasive responses to investigators, and actions suggesting awareness of impending scrutiny. These were interpreted by investigators as efforts to conceal involvement, though critics have attributed some to Ivins' documented mental health issues, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression, rather than deliberate culpability. Ivins conducted extensive late-night and weekend work in the B3 containment lab (B-313) at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) in the weeks preceding the mailings, logging 31 hours and 28 minutes alone during off-hours in September 2001 and 16 hours and 13 minutes in October 2001—patterns unprecedented before or after the attacks and unsupported by his research needs. He provided inconsistent explanations for these hours, initially claiming they allowed escape from home stresses but later admitting no scientific justification, despite contemporaneous emails indicating improving domestic circumstances. On September 17, 2001—within the presumed mailing window—Ivins took unexplained annual leave with no verifiable alibi. Post-mailing actions included unauthorized environmental sampling of his workspace in December 2001 and April 2002, where he detected anthrax contamination exclusively in his area (27% positive swabs versus 0.18% in broader surveys) but failed to report it, instead secretly decontaminating the site. Ivins submitted misleading RMR-1029 flask samples to the FBI in February and April 2002, with the latter lacking key genetic variants matching attack material, suggesting an attempt to obscure the flask's role. Under 24/7 surveillance in November 2007, following a search warrant, he discarded a book on secret codes (Gödel, Escher, Bach) containing references to codon usage—mirroring disputes over the spores' silicon content—and an article on DNA coding, then checked his trash at 1:00 a.m. in long underwear while peering into nearby woods, behaviors anomalous compared to prior trash disposals. Statements and communications further fueled suspicions: On September 26, 2001, Ivins emailed colleagues speculating that "Bin Laden terrorists for sure have and gas" and quoting Osama bin Laden's "death to all and all ," phrasing echoing the letters' threats. Shortly after early media reports on the attacks, he phoned a former colleague at home, stating he was "not well" and asking to "give his children a hug for him," interpreted by the FBI as a veiled admission amid rising panic. In sessions by July , as loomed, Ivins threatened to "take out" co-workers and investigators with a gun, smiling when questioned about his innocence. He expressed fears of revealing hidden involvement and sent a June equivocating, "If I found out I was involved in some way..." Counter-surveillance efforts included using bug detectors, testing monitoring via provocative self-s, and mailing packages under pseudonyms from distant locations, aligning with the attacks' evasion tactics. Ivins' by Tylenol overdose on July 29, , occurred days before anticipated charges, which the FBI cited as ultimate evidence of guilt awareness.

Controversies and Doubts

Scientific Uncertainties in Attribution

![RMR-1029 anthrax flask][float-right] The genetic analysis conducted by the FBI identified four specific mutations in the spores from the attack letters that matched those in the RMR-1029 flask maintained by Bruce Ivins at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). However, the (NAS) review in 2011 concluded that this genetic evidence alone could not definitively attribute the spores to RMR-1029, as the analysis did not account for potential or identical mutations in untested samples from other laboratories holding the . The NAS emphasized that comprehensive sampling from all relevant U.S. and international labs was incomplete, leaving open the possibility that the attack material derived from another source with similar markers. Morphological examinations revealed silicon-containing spheres in the letter spores, which the FBI attributed to natural silica uptake during sporulation or processing variations reproducible in Ivins' lab. Independent analyses, however, questioned the uniqueness of these features, noting inconsistencies between the silicon signatures in RMR-1029 samples and the attack material, potentially indicating unaccounted additives or external not explained by standard USAMRIID protocols. The GAO's audit further highlighted limitations in the validation of the FBI's statistical models for these morph assays, finding that the methods lacked sufficient rigor to exclude alternative origins with high confidence. Uncertainties persist regarding the preparation method, as the finely milled, highly concentrated powder in the letters suggested advanced and milling techniques beyond routine lab practices at USAMRIID, with no of Ivins employing such processes at the required scale. Peer-reviewed critiques have pointed out that while the FBI demonstrated replication of similar powders, the exact formulation—including potential stabilizers or anti-caking agents—remained unverified against Ivins' documented workflows, raising doubts about lone culpability without collaborative or external involvement. These gaps underscore that scientific attribution relies heavily on circumstantial integration rather than standalone empirical proof.

National Academy of Sciences Review Findings

In 2008, the commissioned the (NAS) to independently review the scientific methods and evidence used in the Amerithrax investigation, particularly the microbial forensics linking the anthrax spores to suspect Bruce Ivins. The NAS committee, composed of experts in , , and forensics, issued its report on February 16, 2011, focusing solely on the validity of the FBI's scientific analyses without assessing behavioral or . The review affirmed the overall rigor of the FBI's genetic sequencing but concluded that the scientific data could not definitively exclude other potential sources for the attack spores. The core finding centered on multilocus variable-number analysis (MLVA) and (SNP) genotyping, which identified four unique SNPs in the letter spores matching those in flask RMR-1029—a virulent subculture maintained by Ivins at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). The committee deemed these methods scientifically valid and the match highly probable, estimating the likelihood of an unrelated origin as extremely low based on the FBI's repository of over 1,000 Ames isolates. However, it emphasized that RMR-1029 had been shared with at least 100 researchers across multiple laboratories, including international ones, over years, meaning derivatives could exist elsewhere without direct traceability to Ivins. Thus, while consistent with Ivins' access, the genetics alone neither proved he was the perpetrator nor ruled out accomplices or alternative domestic sources. Regarding the spores' unusual silicon content—initially speculated to indicate sophisticated weaponization—the NAS found no evidence of deliberate additives like bentonite (a clay associated with Iraqi programs) or morphological engineering. Electron microscopy and elemental analysis showed silicon fused within spore coats, likely from natural uptake during growth in silica-containing media or post-exposure contamination, not intentional refinement for aerosolization. The report criticized some FBI practices, such as incomplete documentation of analytical controls and reliance on non-peer-reviewed MLVA without full genome sequencing at the time, though it validated the results against later whole-genome data. The FBI and Department of Justice responded in February 2011, arguing that the NAS findings reinforced their case when integrated with non-scientific evidence, like Ivins' late-night lab hours and issues, but acknowledged the review's scope limitations. Critics, including some microbiologists, noted the report highlighted gaps in proving Ivins produced the dry powder form independently, as USAMRIID protocols emphasized wet suspensions, fueling ongoing doubts about sole attribution. The NAS recommended enhanced standards for future biothreat forensics, including broader archiving and Bayesian probabilistic modeling to quantify source uncertainties.

FBI Methodological Criticisms and Oversight Reports

The U.S. (GAO) conducted a 2014 review of the FBI's genetic and statistical methodologies in the Amerithrax , identifying significant shortcomings in validation processes and analytical rigor. The GAO highlighted that the FBI's genetic assays, used to attack spores to RMR-1029 flask material from USAMRIID, lacked adequate blinded proficiency testing, with one key test exhibiting a 43 percent false negative rate due to insufficient controls and validation against diverse strains. Statistical methods for estimating the rarity of genetic mutations were criticized for relying on unverified assumptions about strain diversity and incomplete sampling from global repositories, potentially inflating the probability of a unique and understating alternative source possibilities. These gaps, according to the GAO, diminished the reliability of conclusions attributing the spores solely to the identified flask, though the did not invalidate the overall genetic findings. The (NAS), at the FBI's request, issued a independent review of the investigation's scientific approaches, affirming the soundness of core microbial forensics techniques like multilocus variable-number analysis (MLVA) but critiquing limitations in supporting methods. Physicochemical analyses failed to conclusively determine the spore preparation process, including unexplained elevated content in the attack material, which could indicate additives or growth conditions not replicated in FBI-controlled experiments. The NAS emphasized that genetic evidence from RMR-1029 could not exclude contamination from other labs handling the same parent strain, as historical transfer records were incomplete and no exhaustive survey of all potential U.S. and international repositories was performed prior to Ivins' identification as the sole perpetrator. While the review validated the FBI's use of external experts and sample handling protocols as generally acceptable for forensic standards at the time, it underscored the need for broader validation data to support attribution claims. The FBI and Department of Justice responded to the findings by asserting that methodological strengths, combined with non-scientific evidence like Ivins' access and behavior, justified closing the case in 2010, but acknowledged commissioning the review to enhance future microbial forensics protocols. Critics, including some microbiologists involved in biodefense research, argued that these oversight reports revealed systemic issues such as overreliance on circumstantial genetic matches without rigorous falsification testing, potentially reflecting investigative after initial foreign leads dissipated. No formal Department of Office of the Inspector General probe specifically targeted Amerithrax methodologies, though congressional hearings in questioned the FBI's handling of early evidence and amid post-9/11 pressures. These reports collectively prompted recommendations for improved interagency validation standards in biothreat investigations, influencing subsequent FBI guidelines on forensic statistics and blind testing.

Alternative Theories and Unresolved Questions

Despite the FBI's conclusion that Bruce Ivins acted alone, some experts have proposed that he may have had accomplices or been innocent, with the anthrax originating from classified U.S. government research programs or other unexamined sources within the community. Microbiologists Martin E. Hugh-Jones, Barbara Hatch Rosenberg, and Stuart Jacobsen contended in a 2011 paper that the presence of tin and in the spores indicated an advanced manufacturing process beyond Ivins' solo capabilities, as the material's refinement exceeded simple flask-derived production. These elements, initially pursued by the FBI as potential additives, were later dismissed without full , fueling of external involvement or from shared . Alternative theories have also revisited foreign actors, positing that adversaries like or could have acquired the through defection, theft, or intelligence channels, given pre-2001 reports of Iraqi bioweapons interest and Atta's documented inquiries into . However, the FBI maintained that genetic analysis uniquely tied the letters to U.S. lab stocks, rendering foreign sourcing improbable without evidence of domestic transfer. Critics, including Senator , expressed doubt over the dismissal of such links, citing the attacks' timing amid intelligence on jihadist biothreats. Unresolved questions persist regarding the production timeline and feasibility: genetic consultant Claire Fraser-Liggett noted the improbability of Ivins evading traceable DNA contamination during aerosolization, while microbiologist Henry Heine estimated 30 to 50 weeks for sufficient spore growth without industrial fermenters, conflicting with the FBI's compressed September 2001 window. No attack powder residues were found in Ivins' lab or home despite exhaustive searches, and multiple researchers at USAMRIID had access to flask RMR-1029, undermining exclusivity claims. Ivins' suicide on July 29, 2008, precluded trial, leaving motive—tied to funding boosts for biodefense—as circumstantial and his late-night lab hours unproven for powder creation. The National Academy of Sciences affirmed that scientific evidence linked the strain to Ivins' flask but could not conclusively rule out other sources or independent mutations, highlighting overstatements in the FBI's attribution.

Aftermath and Impacts

Contamination Cleanup and Health Consequences

The 2001 anthrax attacks contaminated multiple U.S. Postal Service facilities, including the Brentwood Processing and Distribution Center in , which handled letters to offices and was closed on October 21, 2001, after detecting Bacillus anthracis spores; decontamination involved vacuuming, HEPA filtration, and repeated fumigation with chlorine dioxide gas, rendering the facility operational again by December 2003. The Morgan Processing and Distribution Center in , which processed the initial letters, also required closure and remediation using similar gaseous methods after widespread spore detection in sorting equipment and air systems. The U.S. Department of Justice mail facility in , underwent vacuuming, liquid decontamination, and gas-phase chlorine dioxide treatment following confirmed contamination from cross-contaminated mail, with post-remediation sampling verifying spore reduction below actionable levels. Government buildings faced targeted cleanups led by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The , contaminated via the letter to Senator opened on November 16, 2001, was evacuated and treated with chlorine dioxide gas over 90 cycles from December 2001 to August 2002, incurring costs of approximately $27 million from EPA's allocation amid challenges from uneven spore distribution and validation testing uncertainties. The and other sites, including media offices like and the , employed liquid disinfectants, HEPA vacuuming, and , with total decontamination expenses across all affected sites estimated at $320 million, encompassing sampling, worker relocation, and disposal of contaminated materials. These efforts prioritized gaseous agents over liquids due to anthrax spores' resilience, though residual risk assessments highlighted potential for undetected viable spores in porous surfaces. Health consequences included 22 confirmed infections: 11 inhalational cases, of which 5 were fatal (Robert Stevens on October 5, 2001; Thomas Morris Jr., Joseph Curseen Jr., Kathy Nguyen, and Ottilie Lundgren in October-November 2001), and 11 cutaneous cases, primarily among postal and media workers exposed via cross-contaminated mail. Inhalational victims presented with flu-like symptoms progressing to and , treated with antibiotics like and supportive care, while cutaneous cases involved skin lesions responsive to antibiotics but risking dissemination in immunocompromised individuals. Over 30,000 individuals received with antibiotics and , averting widespread secondary infections but incurring substantial medical costs exceeding $200 million, dominated by self-initiated treatments amid public fear. Long-term effects persisted among survivors, with a one-year assessment of 14 adult inhalational and high-exposure cutaneous cases revealing chronic symptoms in over 80%, including fatigue, , joint and muscle pain, , and sleep disturbances, alongside elevated psychological distress scores and reduced compared to pre-attack baselines. Cutaneous survivors reported scarring and sensory changes at sites, while no evidence emerged of ongoing in exposed populations, though highlighted needs for extended regimens in vulnerable groups. Broader impacts included heightened anxiety and healthcare utilization for unrelated symptoms among prophylaxed individuals, underscoring gaps in communication during mass-exposure events.

Policy Reforms in Biodefense and Mail Security

In response to the 2001 anthrax attacks, which exposed vulnerabilities in the U.S. postal system as a vector for , the (USPS) implemented protocols for mail processing. Starting in late November 2001, mail bound for high-risk federal facilities in the Washington, D.C., area was rerouted to off-site facilities equipped with electron beam and systems to neutralize potential biological contaminants like spores. By the end of 2003, approximately 4,000 tons of letter mail and 200 tons of parcels had undergone this decontamination process. These measures, while effective against pathogens, raised concerns about residual radiation effects on mail integrity, prompting ongoing evaluations by the USPS and agencies like the (GAO). Broader mail security enhancements included the deployment of biohazard detection equipment in postal facilities and improved coordination with federal law enforcement through the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. The attacks, which resulted in contamination spreading via automated sorting machines, led to procedural changes such as enhanced screening for suspicious packages and the establishment of dedicated response protocols within the USPS. On the biodefense front, the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002, signed by President on June 12, 2002, represented a foundational legislative response, mandating registration and security for laboratories handling select agents like , the anthrax-causing bacterium. The Act allocated resources for improving state and local public health infrastructure, including grants for emergency preparedness, hospital surge capacity, and rapid diagnostic capabilities, directly addressing gaps revealed by the delayed detection of anthrax exposures in 2001. It also expanded the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to regulate biological agents and toxins, establishing the Federal Select Agent Program to oversee transfers and possession. Building on this, the Project BioShield Act of 2004, enacted on July 21, 2004, authorized $5.6 billion over 10 years to procure and stockpile medical countermeasures against agents, with a priority on and treatments. The legislation enabled the government to guarantee markets for developers of , antibiotics, and diagnostics, facilitating the acquisition of -specific countermeasures like stockpiles and next-generation , while streamlining emergency use authorizations. These reforms shifted federal strategy toward proactive stockpiling and research incentives, though implementation faced challenges such as procurement delays for new , as noted in subsequent GAO reviews.

Preparedness Enhancements and Research Shifts

The 2001 anthrax attacks exposed vulnerabilities in the U.S. (), including insufficient medical countermeasures for and limited laboratory diagnostic capacity, prompting rapid enhancements in . In response, the federal government expanded antibiotic stockpiles, acquiring doses sufficient for approximately 41 million people to enable against inhalation . departments and hospitals received targeted funding through the Office of Public Health Emergency Preparedness to bolster planning, surveillance, and response capabilities, marking a shift from reactive to proactive infrastructure. Legislative measures formalized these efforts, with the Project BioShield Act of 2004 authorizing $5.6 billion over 10 years to accelerate procurement and stockpiling of vaccines, antimicrobials, and diagnostics for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats, including anthrax-specific countermeasures. Signed into law on July 21, 2004, the Act enabled emergency use authorizations for unapproved products during crises and addressed procurement challenges with the existing , leading to contracts for next-generation vaccines like anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) alternatives. Subsequent expansions, such as the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act of 2006, further integrated into broader frameworks, emphasizing rapid deployment of countermeasures. Research priorities shifted markedly toward , with federal funding for such programs increasing nearly 11-fold from 2001 levels to $6.42 billion by fiscal year 2011, prioritizing pathogen detection, vaccine efficacy, and aerosolized spore mitigation. The attacks highlighted limitations in the Department of Defense's program, which had faced implementation delays pre-2001, spurring investments in improved inhalation models and post-exposure therapeutics beyond and . This funding surge facilitated advancements in recombinant protective antigen-based vaccines and monoclonal antibodies, though critics noted risks of dual-use research amplifying proliferation without proportional security gains. By fiscal years 2001–2005, allocations across agencies like the and Department of totaled billions, redirecting resources from natural disease research to engineered threat scenarios.

Media Coverage and Public Perception

The discovery of anthrax-laced letters postmarked September 18, 2001, to media outlets including NBC News and the New York Post, and subsequent mailings to Senators Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy postmarked October 9, dominated U.S. media coverage in the wake of the September 11 attacks. Reports emphasized the letters' handwritten messages invoking "Death to America, Death to Israel, Allah is Great," framing the incidents as likely extensions of Islamist terrorism. This narrative amplified fears of coordinated bioterrorism, with outlets like ABC News citing anonymous government sources claiming the spores contained bentonite, an additive purportedly used only by Iraq for weaponizing anthrax. Such speculation, echoed across broadcasts, contributed to public perceptions of state-sponsored threats, though federal tests later confirmed no bentonite presence and attributed additives to domestic processing methods. Public anxiety surged amid relentless reporting, prompting behavioral shifts such as avoidance of unopened mail and spikes in antibiotic purchases; Cipro demand rose dramatically as prophylaxis against inhalation . A poll conducted October 10-14, 2001, revealed 69% of respondents expressed concern over additional attacks, with 52% personally worried about exposure, though overall composure held without widespread panic. Health authorities distributed antibiotics to over 30,000 potentially exposed individuals, including postal workers and staff, while media coverage of the five deaths and 17 infections underscored vulnerabilities in mail systems and urban infrastructure. Constant telecast repetition heightened unease, likened by observers to exacerbating rather than contextualizing risks. As investigations pivoted to domestic sources, media scrutiny shifted to U.S. biodefense researchers, first targeting in 2002 with leaks portraying him as a suspect—claims later retracted after his exoneration and lawsuit settlement. Coverage intensified in 2008 following Bruce Ivins' suicide, with the FBI naming him the sole perpetrator in 2010 based on like late-night lab access and flask origins. Subsequent reporting highlighted evidentiary gaps, including the 2011 review questioning whether Ivins' strain definitively matched the letters absent silicon signature explanations, fostering public doubts about the lone-actor conclusion and reviving discussions of investigative overreach. This evolution reflected broader skepticism toward official narratives, influenced by the absence of a or direct forensic ties, and contrasted initial foreign-terror emphases with unresolved questions over alternative actors or accomplices.

References

  1. [1]
    Justice Department and FBI Announce Formal Conclusion of ...
    Feb 19, 2010 · The investigation into the 2001 anthrax attacks, which killed five individuals and sickened 17 others, has formally concluded.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Amerithrax Investigative Summary - Department of Justice
    Feb 19, 2010 · Amerithrax investigation.1 In the fall of 2001, the anthrax letter attacks killed five people and sickened 17 others. Upon the death of the ...
  3. [3]
    Science Alone Does Not Establish Source of Anthrax Used in 2001 ...
    Feb 15, 2011 · A National Research Council committee asked to examine the scientific approaches used and conclusions reached by the Federal Bureau of ...
  4. [4]
    Summary - Review of the Scientific Approaches Used during ... - NCBI
    Less than a month after the September 11, 2001, attacks, letters containing spores of anthrax bacteria (Bacillus anthracis, or B. anthracis) were sent ...
  5. [5]
    Review of the Scientific Approaches Used during the FBI's ... - NCBI
    The development and application of microbial forensics became an essential part of the scientific investigation in the hands of FBI investigators, who combined ...
  6. [6]
    BIOWAR - The National Security Archive
    ... Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, which banned the possession of biological weapons except for defensive research. Acting to maximize the anticipated ...
  7. [7]
    Unexpected Relations of Historical Anthrax Strain - PMC - NIH
    Apr 25, 2017 · This high identity was unexpected, as the Ames ancestor strain was isolated from a cow in Sarita, TX, in 1981, 64 years after the historical ...
  8. [8]
    Anthrax: a continuing concern in the era of bioterrorism - PMC
    Prior to the bioterrorism-related occurrence of inhalational anthrax in the USA in 2001, only one case had been reported in the country in the 20th century (33 ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Anthrax In America: - A Chronology and Analysis of the Fall 2001 ...
    Nov 14, 2002 · There was a delay of several months before the FBI subpoenaed laboratories working with the Ames strain of anthrax, requesting samples for.
  10. [10]
    Secret Reports: With Security Spotty, Many Had Access to Anthrax
    Oct 25, 2011 · The Sandia report emphasized that terrorists had obtained germs from research labs before. It cited a February 2001 National Defense ...
  11. [11]
    Anthrax attacks – 10 years later: Bioterror attack on US soil helped ...
    Oct 7, 2011 · Anthrax attacks - 10 years later: Bioterror attack on US soil helped accelerate Sandia's move into biotech and biosecurity arenas. BY RENEE ...
  12. [12]
    Biodefense Research Two Decades Later: Worth the Investment?
    Aug 1, 2022 · The 2001 US Amerithrax attack revealed shortcomings in medical countermeasure availability through the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS), the ...
  13. [13]
    Amerithrax or Anthrax Investigation - FBI
    Bruce Ivins, who took his own life before those charges ... concluded the investigation into the 2001 anthrax attacks and issued an Investigative Summary.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  14. [14]
    FBI — Ten Years After 9/11 and the Anthrax Attacks
    Oct 18, 2011 · The FBI assesses that some of those who plan to attack the homeland or U.S. interests abroad are interested in using biological agents or toxins ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Summary - Science and Security in a Post 9/11 World - NCBI - NIH
    The tragedy of September 11, 2001, the subsequent anthrax attacks, and ongoing terror threats internationally have markedly changed national and ...
  16. [16]
    Analysis of suspicious powders following the post 9/11 anthrax scare
    Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, SET Environmental, Inc., a Chicago-based environmental and hazardousmaterials management company received a large ...Missing: context | Show results with:context
  17. [17]
    [PDF] BIOTERRORISM Public Health Response to Anthrax Incidents of 2001
    Oct 15, 2003 · In the fall of 2001, letters containing anthrax spores were mailed to news media personnel and congressional officials, leading.
  18. [18]
    Anthrax Bioterrorism: Lessons Learned and Future Directions - PMC
    These funds are intended to strengthen capacity to respond to bioterrorism, other infectious disease emergencies, and other urgent public health threats.
  19. [19]
    History - Federal Select Agent Program
    Bioterrorism—A bioterrorism attack is the deliberate release of viruses, bacteria, or other biological agents used to cause illness or death in people, ...
  20. [20]
    Bioterrorism-Related Inhalational Anthrax: The First 10 Cases ... - CDC
    Identification of inhalational anthrax in a journalist in Florida on October 4, 2001, marked the beginning of the first confirmed outbreak associated with ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Amerithrax Investigative Summary - Department of Justice
    Sep 11, 2001 · 1 In the fall of 2001, the anthrax letter attacks killed five people and sickened 17 others. Upon the death of the first victim of that attack, ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Timeline: How The Anthrax Terror Unfolded - NPR
    Feb 15, 2011 · Seven days after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, anonymous letters laced with deadly anthrax spores began arriving at media ...
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    FBI Ends Nine-Year Probe Of Anthrax Attacks - NPR
    Feb 19, 2010 · The case has been controversial because the FBI initially believed a different Army researcher, Steven Hatfill, was behind the attacks. Hatfill ...
  25. [25]
    EXCLUSIVE: How the FBI Botched the Anthrax Case - ABC News
    Jun 30, 2008 · Last Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice agreed to pay $5,825,000 to Hatfill, whom former Attorney General John Ashcroft once described as "a ...Missing: false lead
  26. [26]
    Paul Keim: "We Were Surprised It Was the Ames Strain" - PBS
    Oct 10, 2011 · In October 2001, Northern Arizona University microbiologist Dr. Paul Keim identified that the anthrax used in the attack letters was the Ames strain.
  27. [27]
    Genetic sleuths rush to identify anthrax strains in mail attacks - Nature
    Oct 18, 2001 · More than 1,200 strains of B. anthracis have been identified around the world over the years, and the NAU laboratory has used AFLP (amplified ...
  28. [28]
    Microbiological and Genetic Analyses of Material in the Letters ...
    Work performed by Paul Keim and others well before the 2001 anthrax attacks ... MLVA ... strain genotype (Keim, 2002a). An expanded analysis of 15 MLVA loci (Keim ...
  29. [29]
    Summary | Review of the Scientific Approaches Used During the ...
    anthracis Ames from an undisclosed overseas site at which a terrorist group's anthrax program was allegedly located. This site was investigated by the FBI and ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  30. [30]
    [PDF] y& - FBI
    delineated by the postmark dates on the recovered letters. Letters used in the first attack were postmarked on 09/18/2001 and were focused to media ...
  31. [31]
    FBI says it easily replicated anthrax used in attacks - CIDRAP
    Aug 20, 2008 · Aug 20, 2008 (CIDRAP News) – The FBI, seeking to counter scientific skepticism on its investigation into the 2001 anthrax attacks, ...Missing: amerithrax controversy
  32. [32]
    FBI conclusions in anthrax probe meet skepticism - CIDRAP
    Aug 15, 2008 · The FBI has not made clear whether the powder was a simple preparation of dried anthrax spores or a much more sophisticated product with ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Anthrax-Report-Brief-Final.pdf - The National Academies Press
    In this report the committee reviews the scientific approaches used during the investigation, and evalu- ates whether the FBI reached appropriate scientific ...
  34. [34]
    FBI and Justice Department Response to NAS Review of Scientific ...
    Feb 15, 2011 · The committee confirmed the value of the emerging field of 'microbial forensics,' which proved significant in solving this case.
  35. [35]
    Anthrax Sleuthing - C&EN - American Chemical Society
    Dec 4, 2006 · ... anthrax spores in the Daschle letter and says it is silicon. (Iraq supposedly used bentonite in weaponizing anthrax.) Nov. 16: FBI finds ...Missing: false | Show results with:false
  36. [36]
    Bentonite - CBS News
    Aug 2, 2008 · ABC News' Brian Ross reported that four separate "well-placed" anonymous sources had told him that government tests showed traces of bentonite in the anthrax.Missing: letters | Show results with:letters
  37. [37]
    Investigation of Bioterrorism-Related Anthrax, United States, 2001
    In the United States, Bacillus anthracis infections have primarily occurred through exposure to infected animals or contaminated animal products such as wool (1) ...Missing: discoveries | Show results with:discoveries
  38. [38]
    Experts See F.B.I. Missteps Hampering Anthrax Inquiry
    Nov 9, 2001 · Last month, after consulting with the F.B.I., Iowa State University in Ames destroyed anthrax spores collected over more than seven decades and ...
  39. [39]
    Officials don't regret destroying their anthrax sample - Iowa State Daily
    The Veterinary Medicine Labs at Iowa State destroyed its entire collection of anthrax samples Oct. 11-12 in response to bioterrorism scares and security ...
  40. [40]
    Radio Address by the President to the Nation (Text Only)
    Nov 3, 2001 · Good morning. As all Americans know, recent weeks have brought a second wave of terrorist attacks upon our country: deadly anthrax spores ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    [PDF] THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT - GovInfo
    ... Attacks Upon the United States official government edition. For sale by the ... jihadist commanders.38 Al Qaeda helped Jemaah Islamiya (JI), a nas- cent ...
  42. [42]
    What is Known about Iraq's Biological Weapons Program
    Butler's former weapons inspectors told ABC News on October 26 that Iraq had used bentonite as an additive to keep anthrax particles small. Assessing the Iraqi ...
  43. [43]
    Ex-U.N. weapons inspector: Possible Iraq-anthrax link - CNN
    Butler, however, said Egyptian authorities believe that Iraq could have handed some anthrax over to one of the suspected terrorists in the ...
  44. [44]
    Gov. Ridge, Medical Authorities Discuss Anthrax
    Oct 25, 2001 · Q There was a report today that preliminary tests suggest that the anthrax could not have been produced in Russia or Iraq. GOVERNOR RIDGE: Could ...
  45. [45]
    U.S. Inquiry Tried, but Failed, To Link Iraq to Anthrax Attack
    Dec 22, 2001 · Bush administration's intense effort to find possible link between Iraq and anthrax attacks continues even after scientists determine that ...
  46. [46]
    The Wrong Man - The Atlantic
    May 15, 2010 · As it happened, at the time of the anthrax attacks, Hatfill was taking Cipro. Hatfill's eccentricity also generated suspicion among colleagues ...
  47. [47]
    Who is Steven Hatfill? - The American Prospect
    Jul 2, 2002 · Hatfill, who was employed as an Ebola researcher at USAMRIID from 1997 to 1999, has since worked as a government contractor who specializes in ...
  48. [48]
    A 'Person Of Interest' - Newsweek
    Aug 11, 2002 · Dr. Steven J. Hatfill, the American bioweapons researcher who has come under scrutiny by the FBI in connection with the anthrax attacks that ...
  49. [49]
    Lessons from the deadly anthrax attacks of 2001 - CNN
    May 5, 2024 · He later joined the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Forces squad I-41, the Weapons of Mass Destruction Unit. How It Really Happened Anthrax poisoning.
  50. [50]
    Dig Deeper: The Anthrax Investigation | FRONTLINE - PBS
    Oct 10, 2011 · Steven Hatfill, the scientist who soon became the FBI's primary suspect in its investigation into the attacks. It was not until August 2008 that ...Missing: false lead
  51. [51]
    Scientist Is Paid Millions by U.S. in Anthrax Suit - The New York Times
    Jun 28, 2008 · The settlement, consisting of $2.825 million in cash and an annuity paying Dr. Hatfill $150,000 a year for 20 years, brings to an end a five- ...
  52. [52]
    Justice Department Officially Exonerates Scientist in Anthrax Attacks
    Aug 8, 2008 · In June, the Justice Department agreed to the multimillion-dollar settlement with Dr. Hatfill to end the lawsuit he had brought alleging that ...
  53. [53]
    The anthrax killings: A troubled mind - Los Angeles Times
    May 29, 2011 · Bruce Ivins, born April 22, 1946, would eventually hear the story himself. His parents were a study in opposites. Randall, a pharmacist, was ...
  54. [54]
    American Anthrax Outbreak of 2001
    Aug 24, 2008 · Ivins was the son of a Princeton-educated pharmacist, and one of his ancestors had opened a pharmacy in town in 1893, according to a Web site on ...Missing: career | Show results with:career
  55. [55]
    Ivins' Estranged Sibling Believes Anthrax Allegations - NPR
    Aug 4, 2008 · Their father was a pharmacist and their mother was a homemaker in Lebanon, Ohio. Tom played football in high school, while Bruce ran cross- ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  56. [56]
    Portrait Emerges of Anthrax Suspect's Troubled Life
    Jan 3, 2009 · Dr. Ivins, who had helped develop an anthrax vaccine to protect American troops, had spent his career waiting for a biological attack. Suddenly, ...
  57. [57]
    Two portraits of anthrax suspect - NBC News
    Aug 1, 2008 · Ivins is survived by his wife Diane and two adult children: a son, Andy, and a daughter, Amanda, as well as two brothers, Tom R. Ivins of ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  58. [58]
    [PDF] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT - Department of Justice
    Oct 31, 2007 · Ivins obtained a Bachelor of Science degree in Bacteriology in 1968, a Master of Science degree in Microbiology in 1971, and a Doctorate of ...
  59. [59]
    Q&A: Behind The Anthrax Investigations - NPR
    Aug 1, 2008 · The son of a pharmacist, Ivins graduated from the University of Cincinnati with a degree in microbiology. He received advanced degrees from ...<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    Different view of Ivins at service – The Press Democrat
    Ivins came to USAMRIID in 1980, specializing in the genetics and immunology of Bacillus anthracis. He was a recipient of the Defense Department's highest honor ...
  61. [61]
    Biodefence researcher linked to anthrax attacks - Nature
    Aug 1, 2008 · Last month, the US government agreed to pay more than $5.8 million to bioweapons researcher Steven Hatfill, who had been named early on as a “ ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  62. [62]
    New Evidence Adds Doubt to FBI's Case Against Anthrax Suspect
    Oct 10, 2011 · The FBI still insists it had the right man in Bruce Ivins, an Army biologist who committed suicide in 2008 before being charged with the mailings that killed ...
  63. [63]
    Scientist In Anthrax Case Dead Of Apparent Suicide - NPR
    Aug 1, 2008 · Bruce E. Ivins, 62, died Tuesday at Frederick Memorial Hospital in Maryland, according to an obituary in Ivins' hometown newspaper, The ...
  64. [64]
    Details of Ivins' death released in police report [audio] | Archive
    Jan 6, 2009 · An intentional overdose of acetaminophen led to kidney and liver failure and eventually death for Bruce Ivins, according to an investigation ...
  65. [65]
    FBI Responds to Science Issues in Anthrax Case
    Mar 6, 2009 · ... Ivins' RMR-1029 flask was identical. Ivins' RMR-1029 spore preparation had the same combination of anthrax mutations found in the letters.
  66. [66]
    Transcript of Amerithrax Investigation Press Conference (2008-08-06)
    Aug 6, 2008 · Second, as a renowned expert in the production and purification of anthrax spores, Dr. Ivins was one of a handful of scientists with the ...
  67. [67]
    Review of the Scientific Approaches Used during the FBI's ... - PubMed
    This report reviews and assesses scientific evidence considered in connection with the 2001 Bacillus anthracis mailings.
  68. [68]
    New Challenge to FBI's Anthrax Investigation Lends An Ear to Tin
    Oct 11, 2011 · ... case against Bruce Ivins, the deceased Army researcher who investigators hold solely responsible for the 2001 anthrax letter attacks. The ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    [PDF] ANTHRAX: Agency Approaches to Validation and Statistical ...
    Dec 19, 2014 · anthracis samples for the presence of certain genetic mutations. The FBI had previously collected and maintained these samples in a repository.
  70. [70]
    Microbial Forensics: What We've Learned from Amerithrax and Beyond
    The Amerithrax investigation into anthrax letter attacks in the USA forever changed the game in microbial forensics. Here we review the techniques used, ...
  71. [71]
    Review of the Scientific Approaches Used During the FBI's ...
    Less than a month after the September 11, 2001 attacks, letters containing spores of anthrax bacteria (Bacillus anthracis, or B. anthracis) were sent through ...
  72. [72]
    Poor methods weakened FBI investigation of 2001 anthrax attacks ...
    Dec 22, 2014 · FBI's investigation of the 2001 anthrax letter attacks that killed five people in the United States was marred by weak scientific practices and analytical gaps.
  73. [73]
    S.Hrg. 110-939 — OVERSIGHT OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF ...
    According to information released by the FBI, the material in the anthrax attack envelopes contained silicon. I understand that scientists at Sandia ...
  74. [74]
    Did FBI get wrong man for anthrax killings? - NBC News
    Oct 10, 2011 · ... F.B.I. as the perpetrator, Bruce E. Ivins, had help in obtaining his germ weapons or conceivably was innocent of the crime. Both the ...
  75. [75]
    Skeptics question FBI anthrax case - NBC News
    Aug 13, 2008 · Some believe the anthrax letters were part of a "false flag" covert operation, in which the U.S. government plotted against its citizens to win ...
  76. [76]
    Leahy doubts FBI in anthrax case; scientist admits error - CIDRAP
    Sep 19, 2008 · On Aug 6 the FBI announced its conclusion that Ivins was the sole perpetrator and released a number of documents, mostly search warrant ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  77. [77]
    FBI Faulted For Overstating Science In Anthrax Case - NPR
    Feb 15, 2011 · The scientific evidence alone is not enough to prove that microbiologist Bruce Ivins was the perpetrator of the anthrax attacks that killed five people in 2001.<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Remediation of Bacillus anthracis contamination in the ... - PubMed
    The US Department of Justice (DOJ) mail facility in Landover, Maryland, was contaminated with Bacillus anthracis spores as a result of the 2001 anthrax ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] GAO-03-686 Capitol Hill Anthrax Incident: EPA's Cleanup Was ...
    Jun 4, 2003 · EPA revised its November 2001 estimate of $5 million several times during the cleanup as the nature and extent of the contamination became fully ...
  80. [80]
  81. [81]
    Addressing residual risk issues at anthrax cleanups - PubMed
    In particular, it focuses on the 11 cases of inhalational anthrax resulting from the 2001 attacks and their impact on hazard identification activities. It also ...
  82. [82]
    Anthrax Postal Terrorism | Office of Readiness and Response - CDC
    Feb 21, 2024 · CDC activated its Emergency Operations Center (EOC) to support Anthrax Postal Terrorism. Postal mail. About the Response. Following the ...Missing: amerithrax foreign suspicions
  83. [83]
    Medical Spending for the 2001 Anthrax Letter Attacks
    Nov 12, 2018 · Costs associated with the self-initiated prophylaxis account for about $148 million, or more than 80% of total costs. This suggests that ...<|separator|>
  84. [84]
    One-Year Health Assessment of Adult Survivors of Bacillus anthracis ...
    Apr 28, 2004 · We found that many of the anthrax-infected survivors continued to report significant health problems, psychological distress, poor life ...
  85. [85]
    Irradiating the Mail: The Anthrax Attacks of 2001 - IEEE Spectrum
    Sep 29, 2021 · Weeks after 9/11, the U.S. Postal Service scrambled to neutralize anthrax-laced letters · E-beams and X-rays stopped the spread of anthrax spores.
  86. [86]
    Information on the Irradiation of Federal Mail in the Washington, D.C. ...
    Jul 31, 2008 · The irradiation process uses either a high-energy electron beam or X-rays to penetrate pieces of mail (mailpieces) and kill harmful organisms, such as anthrax.
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Irradiation Decontamination of Postal Mail and High-Risk Luggage
    At the end of 2003, about 4000 tons of letter mail and 200 tons of parcels had been sanitized since the process began late in 2001.
  88. [88]
    [PDF] GAO-04-239 U.S. Postal Service
    Sep 9, 2004 · The first cases of bioterrorism-related anthrax in the United States occurred in September and October 2001 when at least four letters.
  89. [89]
    The U.S. Postal Inspection Service Looks Back At the 20th ...
    These letters were sent via the U.S. Mail, and passed through automated sorting equipment inside the postal facilities where anthrax spores escaped. The ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] The U.S. Postal Service Response to the Threat of Bioterrorism ...
    Feb 11, 2002 · The deliberate mailing of Bacillus anthracis spores through the U.S. Postal. Service (USPS) has caused five deaths, twenty-two cases of anthrax, ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] PUBLIC HEALTH SECURITY AND BIOTERRORISM ... - GovInfo
    Public Health. Security and. Bioterrorism. Preparedness and Response Act of 2002. June 12, 2002. [H.R. 3448]. VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:43 Jul 03, 2002 Jkt ...
  92. [92]
    President Signs Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Bill
    ... Bioterrorism Response Act of 2002 in The Rose Garden Wednesday, June 12. "Last fall's anthrax attacks were an incredible tragedy to a lot of people in ...
  93. [93]
    H.R.3448 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Public Health Security and ...
    Summary of H.R.3448 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002.
  94. [94]
    Remarks on Signing the Project BioShield Act of 2004
    Jul 21, 2004 · First, Project BioShield authorizes $5.6 billion over 10 years for the Government to purchase and stockpile vaccines and drugs to fight anthrax ...<|separator|>
  95. [95]
    Project BioShield Act at 20 Years: Sustaining Is Important ... - ASPR
    Jul 22, 2024 · Signed into law on July 21, 2004, the Act allows the US government (USG) to accelerate development of medical countermeasures (MCMs) against chemical, ...
  96. [96]
    Twenty Years of Project BioShield - CSIS
    Jul 12, 2024 · The BioShield Act was signed into law in 2004, but it was really precipitated in the aftermath of the anthrax attacks in 2001.
  97. [97]
    GAO-08-88, Project Bioshield: Actions Needed to Avoid Repeating ...
    GAO-08-88, Project Bioshield: Actions Needed to Avoid Repeating Past Problems with Procuring New Anthrax Vaccine and Managing the Stockpile of Licensed Vaccine.
  98. [98]
    Biodefence research two decades on: worth the investment?
    The history of bioterrorism and biological warfare is intrinsically connected to scientific progress in infectious disease research.3 What began as the ...Missing: heightened | Show results with:heightened
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Failures of Project BioShield & Congressional Attempts to Remedy It
    There have been problems with the current anthrax vaccine. After the 2001 anthrax attacks, the health agency bought enough antibiotics for 41 million Americans, ...
  100. [100]
    Twenty Years After the Anthrax Terrorist Attacks of 2001: Lessons ...
    Oct 27, 2021 · This Viewpoint discusses the public health emergency preparedness response strategies instituted in the US after the anthrax attacks of 2001 ...
  101. [101]
    President Bush Signs Project Bioshield Act of 2004
    Jul 21, 2004 · First, Project BioShield authorizes $5.6 billion over 10 years for the government to purchase and stockpile vaccines and drugs to fight anthrax ...
  102. [102]
    The Anthrax Attacks 10 Years Later | Annals of Internal Medicine
    Oct 3, 2011 · Ten years ago, the United States experienced a deliberate act of bioterrorism, when anthrax spores were disseminated through the postal ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  103. [103]
    Background - The Anthrax Vaccine - NCBI Bookshelf
    In July 2000, in November 2000, and again in June 2001, DoD slowed the anthrax immunization program, focusing only on troops thought to be at greatest potential ...
  104. [104]
    Center for biosecurity at UPMC analyzes funding for U.S. ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · "Billions for Biodefense: Federal Agency Biodefense Funding, FY2001-FY2005," by Ari Schuler, appears in Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense ...
  105. [105]
    Troubling Anthrax Additive Found; Atta Met Iraqi - ABC News
    Detrick, Md., and elsewhere, discovered the anthrax spores were treated with bentonite, a substance that keeps the tiny particles floating in ...Missing: attacks | Show results with:attacks
  106. [106]
    Public Remains Steady in Face of Anthrax Scare
    Oct 15, 2001 · About seven-in-ten (69%) have some concern over new attacks, and better than half (52%) are at least somewhat worried that they or their ...
  107. [107]
    Bioterrorism and Anthrax: The Threat - CDC
    Apr 3, 2025 · Bacillus anthracis, the cause of anthrax, is a likely agent for a bioterrorist act. If there is an anthrax emergency, get treated quickly to ...Missing: contents | Show results with:contents
  108. [108]
    Anthrax and the US media - PMC - NIH
    As the number of anthrax cases in the United States rose last week—and as a biological attack by terrorists increasingly seemed the most likely cause—newspapers ...
  109. [109]
    FBI Closes Anthrax Case, Says Bruce Ivins Was Sole Culprit Behind ...
    Nearly a year-and-a-half after implicating US Army researcher Bruce Ivins in the anthrax letter attacks of 2001, the United States government has formally ...
  110. [110]
    FBI's 2001 Anthrax Attack Probe Was Seriously Flawed
    Dec 29, 2014 · One genetic test had a 43 percent false negative rate, casting doubt on conclusions, says U.S. oversight report.<|separator|>