Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Typing

Typing is the process of inputting alphanumeric characters and symbols into a device, such as a typewriter or computer keyboard, by pressing keys with the fingers to produce printed or digital text.^[1] This mechanical or electronic action enables efficient written communication, documentation, and data entry, transforming handwriting's limitations into faster, more uniform output.^[2] Originating in the 19th century with the development of typewriters, typing has become a fundamental skill in modern computing, where keyboards replicate and extend typewriter designs to facilitate digital interaction across devices like computers, smartphones, and tablets.^[3] The history of typing traces back to early attempts at mechanized writing, with the first patent for a typewriter-like device filed in 1714 by English inventor Henry Mill, though no working model was produced.^[4] Practical innovation arrived in the mid-19th century, when American inventor Christopher Latham Sholes developed the first commercially successful typewriter in 1868, featuring the QWERTY keyboard layout to prevent mechanical jamming by separating common letter pairs.^[5] Marketed by Remington in 1873 as the Sholes & Glidden Type-Writer, this machine revolutionized office work by enabling rapid text production, initially at speeds up to 20-30 words per minute, and was soon adopted for business correspondence, literature, and legal documents.^[6] By the early 20th century, electric typewriters emerged in the 1930s, reducing physical effort, while portable models, patented in 1892 by George Canfield Blickensderfer, made typing more accessible outside offices.^[7] With the advent of computers in the mid-20th century, typing evolved from analog printing to digital input, as typewriters gave way to electronic keyboards integrated into terminals and personal computers by the 1970s and 1980s.^[3] The QWERTY layout persisted due to path dependency, despite alternatives like Dvorak designed for efficiency, allowing seamless transition from typewriters to systems like the IBM PC in 1981.^[8] Today, typing encompasses touch typing—a technique where users memorize key positions to type without looking, achieving speeds of 40-100 words per minute for experts—and is essential for professions in writing, programming, data analysis, and education.^[9] Keyboarding skills, defined as efficient motor coordination for text entry, support cognitive development and digital literacy, with studies showing their correlation to improved self-regulated learning in students.^[1] Despite advancements in voice recognition and AI-assisted input, manual typing remains a core human-computer interface, underpinning global information exchange.^[10]

History

Early Typewriters

The typewriter's origins trace back to the mid-19th century, when American inventor Christopher Latham Sholes, along with collaborators Carlos Glidden and Samuel W. Soulé, developed a practical mechanical writing machine to address the inefficiencies of handwriting in business correspondence.^[6] On June 23, 1868, they received U.S. Patent No. 79,265 for their device, which featured a keyboard arranged in a piano-like layout and used typebars to imprint characters on paper via an inked ribbon.^[11] This invention marked a pivotal shift from manual penmanship to mechanized text production, though initial prototypes were cumbersome and limited to uppercase letters only.^[12] Subsequent development led to key innovations, including the QWERTY keyboard layout in the improved design, introduced around 1872-1873 to mitigate mechanical jamming caused by the typebars striking the platen too closely together.^[13] By rearranging the keys—placing common letter pairs like "q-w" and "e-r" farther apart—Sholes aimed to slow typists just enough to prevent arm collisions, thereby improving reliability over earlier alphabetical layouts that frequently jammed during rapid use.^[14] This configuration, patented in subsequent improvements, became the foundation for standardized typing interfaces.^[11] The first commercially viable typewriter emerged in 1873, when E. Remington and Sons, a firearms and sewing machine manufacturer, acquired rights to Sholes' design and began production of the Sholes and Glidden Type-Writer (later marketed as the Remington No. 1) on March 1 in Ilion, New York.^[6] Priced at $125 (equivalent to about $3,500 in 2025 dollars)—this model featured a 44-key QWERTY keyboard but could print only uppercase letters.^[15] By the 1880s, typewriters had gained widespread adoption in American businesses, particularly in law firms, newspapers, and government offices, where they streamlined document replication and reduced reliance on scribes.^[16] This technological shift played a crucial role in professionalizing secretarial work, creating demand for trained operators and opening office roles to women, who comprised the majority of typists by the decade's end due to the machine's perceived suitability for "feminine" precision tasks.^[17] Early adoption was driven by efficiency gains, with businesses reporting up to fivefold increases in correspondence output compared to handwriting.^[18] Despite these advances, early typewriters faced significant mechanical limitations that constrained speed and accuracy, including heavy key resistance requiring forceful strikes and frequent typebar jamming even with QWERTY's safeguards.^[19] Typical typing speeds hovered around 20-30 words per minute for proficient users, far below modern standards, due to the device's reliance on manual leverage and lack of ergonomic features like visible typing or adjustable carriages.^[20] Initial training methods emphasized basic key location and finger placement through repetitive drills, often using printed manuals that focused on accuracy over velocity to build muscle memory amid these hardware constraints.^[21]

Keyboard Evolution

The transition from mechanical to electric typewriters began in the 1930s, marking a significant advancement in typing efficiency by incorporating electric motors to power key actions and reduce physical effort. IBM entered this market in 1933 through the acquisition of Electromatic Typewriters Inc., which enabled the production of powered models that automated carriage return and typebar movement. By 1935, IBM released the Electromatic Model 01, its first fully electric typewriter, which used a single motor to control all typing functions and allowed for faster operation compared to manual predecessors. In the 1940s, IBM expanded this line with models like the Executive, which incorporated improvements in durability and speed for office use. The introduction of computer keyboards in the 1960s coincided with the development of standardized character encoding, fundamentally transforming typing from analog to digital input. The American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII), first published in 1963 by the American Standards Association (now ANSI), provided a 7-bit encoding scheme for 128 characters, enabling consistent data transmission between teletypes, computers, and peripherals. Early computer keyboards, such as those on the Teletype Model 33 ASR terminal introduced in 1963, adhered to ASCII standards and featured QWERTY layouts adapted for electronic output, paving the way for integration with mainframe systems like the IBM System/360. Subsequent decades saw innovations in keyboard construction and design that addressed durability, ergonomics, and portability. Membrane keyboards emerged in the late 1970s and gained widespread adoption in the 1980s, particularly with affordable home computers like the Sinclair ZX80 and ZX81, where thin, flexible layers of conductive material replaced mechanical switches to lower costs and enhance spill resistance. In the 1990s, ergonomic designs proliferated in response to rising repetitive strain injuries among computer users, with split keyboards becoming commercially available around 1992; these divided layouts, such as the Microsoft Natural Keyboard, allowed hands to rest in a more neutral position to reduce wrist deviation. Post-2000, virtual keyboards revolutionized mobile typing by projecting on-screen layouts via touch interfaces, as exemplified by the iPhone's multi-touch implementation in 2007, which eliminated physical keys and enabled gesture-based input on smartphones. The influence of computing further entrenched certain layouts while spurring alternatives. The QWERTY arrangement, originally designed for typewriters, was standardized on personal computers with the IBM PC's release in 1981, whose 83-key keyboard set the de facto layout for compatible systems and ensured backward compatibility with existing typing practices. Amid this dominance, the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard, patented by August Dvorak in 1936, proposed an alternative arrangement that clustered frequently used letters on the home row to minimize finger travel and claimed up to 20-40% efficiency gains over QWERTY based on motion studies.

Techniques

Hunt-and-Peck

Hunt-and-peck typing, also known as two-finger typing, is a method where the typist uses one or two fingers, typically the index fingers, to visually locate and strike individual keys on the keyboard while constantly looking down at it.^[22] This approach involves breaking down words into letters, searching for each key's position, and selecting a finger to press it, relying heavily on working memory and visual guidance rather than muscle memory.^[23] Unlike more advanced techniques, it does not assign specific fingers to fixed key positions and limits the use to a maximum of two fingers per hand.^[23] Historically, hunt-and-peck was the dominant typing method in the era of early typewriters, which were mechanically heavy and not designed for rapid, multi-finger input, making systematic training unnecessary or impractical for most users before the widespread adoption of typing education in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Prior to formalized keyboarding instruction, this visual-search technique was the standard for novice and casual typists, with average speeds ranging from 27 to 35 words per minute (WPM), depending on whether copying text or typing from memory.^[24] These speeds reflect the method's reliance on deliberate key location, which plateaued without further skill development.^[24] One key advantage of hunt-and-peck is that it requires no formal training, allowing beginners or infrequent users to produce text immediately without learning complex finger placements, making it suitable for short messages or occasional input tasks.^[22] This accessibility stems from its intuitive, top-down control process, where each keystroke is independently planned.^[22] However, the method's limitations include significant visual distraction, as constant keyboard gazing reduces focus on the content, and increased cognitive fatigue during extended sessions due to the high working memory demands of searching and selecting keys for every character.^[23] Prolonged use can lead to slower overall productivity compared to touch typing, with inter-keystroke intervals averaging 233 milliseconds versus 194 milliseconds for multi-finger methods, exacerbating strain over time.^[23]

Touch Typing

Touch typing is a standardized method of typing on a QWERTY keyboard without looking at the keys, relying on muscle memory and precise finger placement to achieve efficient text entry.^[25] The core principles center on the home row positioning, where the fingers of the left hand rest on the keys A, S, D, and F, with the right hand on J, K, L, and the semicolon (;).^[26] Each finger is assigned specific keys: the left pinky handles A and associated keys, the ring finger S, the middle finger D, and the index finger F along with keys to its left and right; the right hand mirrors this with the index finger on J, middle on K, ring on L, and pinky on ;.^[27] Tactile markers, such as raised bumps on the F and J keys, serve as reference points to align the index fingers correctly without visual guidance.^[28] The training process for touch typing originated in the 1880s with step-by-step drills introduced in typing schools, pioneered by figures like Frank Edward McGurrin, a stenographer who developed the method and taught classes emphasizing home row exercises before progressing to other keys.^[29] These drills typically begin with repetitive practice on home row letters, introducing two new keys per session while maintaining proper posture and finger curvature, gradually building to full sentences.^[30] Modern training has evolved to include software like TypingClub, which offers structured online courses with interactive lessons, games, and progress tracking to reinforce muscle memory through consistent, gamified practice.^[31] One key benefit of touch typing is its ability to achieve speeds of 40 to 100+ words per minute (WPM) for proficient users, far surpassing methods that rely on fewer fingers.^[32] It reduces errors by leveraging proprioception—the body's sense of position and movement—to enable accurate key location without visual confirmation, minimizing cognitive load and physical strain during extended sessions.^[33] Full touch typing courses extend beyond letters to include variations such as the number row and symbols, where fingers maintain home row assignments but reach upward: for instance, the left index finger types 4, 5, R, T, F, V, G, and B, while using the shift key for corresponding symbols like $ and %.^[34] This comprehensive approach ensures versatility in producing numeric and punctuation-heavy text, such as in data entry or coding, while upholding the blind-typing foundation.^[35]

Hybrid Methods

Hybrid typing methods combine elements of hunt-and-peck and touch typing, involving partial memorization of the keyboard layout and selective use of the home row while occasionally peeking at the keys for less familiar characters.^[36] This approach typically employs fewer than ten fingers, often 2 to 6, allowing typists to focus primarily on the screen rather than the keyboard.^[36] It is particularly common in informal settings where full touch typing training is not prioritized, as well as for users adapting to non-standard keyboard layouts.^[37] Representative examples include "two-finger touch" typing, where index fingers handle most keys with some home row anchoring, and adaptive techniques employed by gamers or programmers who integrate keyboard shortcuts alongside visual searching for symbols.^[38]^[39] These methods facilitate quicker transitions for individuals with pre-existing habits, such as partial finger placement without strict non-visual adherence. Hybrid methods gained popularity in 20th-century offices prior to the standardization of full touch typing in the 1920s, when competitive practices and formal training emphasized the ten-finger technique.^[40] Typists using these approaches commonly achieved speeds of 30-60 words per minute (WPM), sufficient for many clerical tasks without extensive practice.^[41] The primary advantages of hybrid methods lie in their balance of moderate speed improvements over pure hunt-and-peck while requiring less intensive training than full touch typing, making them accessible for office administration students and self-taught users.^[42] However, they remain less optimal than pure touch typing for achieving peak efficiency and accuracy in prolonged sessions.^[36]

Thumbing

Thumbing, a typing method optimized for mobile devices, emerged with the advent of smartphones featuring compact keyboards designed for thumb use. The BlackBerry, introduced by Research in Motion in 1999, popularized thumb typing through its physical QWERTY keypad, enabling users to compose emails and messages efficiently while on the move. This approach gained further traction with the launch of the iPhone in 2007, which introduced a virtual touchscreen keyboard integrated with predictive text to anticipate and correct user input, reducing errors on the smaller display.^[43]^[44] The core technique involves bilateral thumb alternation, where users hold the device with both hands and tap virtual keys using their thumbs in a rhythmic, alternating motion. This method leverages the natural positioning of thumbs for reach across the screen, often enhanced by gesture-based inputs such as swipe-to-type, exemplified by Swype introduced in 2010, which allows continuous finger sliding over keys to form words without lifting.^[45]^[46] Typical typing speeds for thumbing range from 20 to 40 words per minute (WPM), with two-thumb users averaging around 38 WPM in controlled studies, approaching but still below desktop keyboard rates of about 52 WPM. These speeds are notably influenced by software aids like autocorrect, which can boost performance by minimizing manual error corrections, and haptic feedback, where subtle vibrations confirm key presses, improving accuracy and overall input rate.^[47]^[48] Despite these advancements, thumbing faces challenges from the compact nature of virtual keys, leading to the "fat finger" problem where imprecise touches result in higher error rates due to finger occlusion and motor inaccuracies on touchscreens. Adaptations such as one-handed modes, which shift the keyboard layout to one side of the screen for easier thumb access on larger devices, help mitigate reach issues but often at the cost of reduced speed compared to two-thumb use.^[49]^[50]^[51]

Performance Measurement

Words Per Minute

Words per minute (WPM) is the standard metric for measuring typing speed in alphanumeric text entry, calculated as the number of characters typed divided by 5 (to approximate a word, including spaces) and then divided by the time taken in minutes.^[52] This formula standardizes measurement across languages and texts by treating a typical English word as five characters, allowing consistent comparisons of performance.^[53] Measurement protocols typically involve timed tests where participants transcribe predefined text, with gross WPM including all keystrokes to measure raw output speed and net WPM excluding errors to assess effective throughput.^[54] Benchmarks indicate that average touch typists achieve around 40 WPM, considered sufficient for general productivity, while professional typists often exceed 60 WPM.^[55] These tests emphasize sustained performance over short bursts to reflect real-world usage. Typing speed is influenced by factors such as practice and keyboard layout. Extensive practice, including daily exposure and years of consistent use, significantly boosts WPM; for instance, university students with over 10 years of practice and 2+ hours of daily typing average 80 WPM, compared to 54 WPM for those with less exposure.^[56] Keyboard layouts also play a role, with the Dvorak layout claimed by proponents to enable 20-40% faster speeds than QWERTY through reduced finger travel, though empirical studies report more modest gains of 2-6%. Historically, early typists using hunt-and-peck methods on initial typewriters achieved speeds of 20 WPM or less, akin to handwriting rates, but proficient touch typists in the late 19th century reached 20-30 WPM with training.^[5] Modern averages have risen to 35-50 WPM for regular computer users, reflecting widespread keyboard familiarity and ergonomic improvements.^[57]

Error Metrics

Typing errors are broadly categorized into substitutions, where an incorrect key is pressed in place of the intended one (e.g., typing "teh" instead of "the"); insertions, which add unintended characters; and deletions, which omit required characters.^[58] These error types can be further distinguished as uncorrected, meaning they remain in the final output, or corrected, where the typist uses mechanisms like backspace to fix them during entry.^[59] In large-scale analyses of over 136 million keystrokes, substitutions proved the most common at 1.65%, followed by deletions at 0.80% and insertions at 0.67%.^[58] A fundamental metric for quantifying typing errors is the error rate, typically calculated as the percentage of erroneous characters relative to the total input. This is often computed using the minimum string distance (MSD), based on the Levenshtein edit distance, which represents the minimum number of insertions, deletions, or substitutions needed to align the produced text with the intended text. The formula is:

\text{Error Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{MSD}(P, T)}{\max(|P|, |T|)} \right) \times 100

where P is the presented (intended) text, T is the transcribed (produced) text, and | \cdot | denotes string length.^[60] This approach accounts for error severity beyond simple counts, as a single substitution might require multiple edits if it affects alignment. Uncorrected error rates using MSD are commonly reported, providing a normalized measure that remains bounded at 100%.^[59] For expert touch typists, uncorrected error rates typically range from 0.7% to 2%, with faster typists exhibiting lower rates due to practiced motor control and error detection.^[58] In standard QWERTY keyboard evaluations, average error rates hover around 1.8% under minimal correction conditions.^[59] These benchmarks highlight the trade-off between speed and accuracy, as errors directly diminish effective throughput. To incorporate error impact on overall performance, an adjusted words per minute (WPM) metric penalizes raw speed by accuracy, calculated as adjusted WPM = WPM × (1 - error rate). This yields a more realistic measure of net text production, emphasizing that high gross speeds with elevated errors (e.g., 5% rate reducing effective output by 5%) undermine productivity.^[59] In usability testing, error metrics extend to behavioral indicators like backspace frequency, which quantifies correction efforts and reveals cognitive load during entry. Studies show typists average 2.29 backspace uses per sentence, with 90% of errors corrected via such edits, informing interface designs that minimize overlooked inaccuracies.^[58]

Numeric Entry

Numeric entry in typing refers to the input of digits, codes, and numerical sequences, often requiring specialized techniques distinct from alphanumeric text due to the emphasis on speed, accuracy, and repetitive patterns. This form of typing is prevalent in professional settings where numerical data dominates, such as financial records or computational tasks. Unlike general text entry, which measures performance in words per minute, numeric entry focuses on keystrokes per minute (KPM) to account for the absence of spaces or letters.^[61] Key contexts for numeric entry include data entry in accounting and spreadsheets, programming where numerical values and codes are inputted, and telephony for dialing sequences or PIN entry. In data entry roles, operators handle large volumes of figures, such as transaction amounts or inventory counts, benefiting from dedicated hardware. Programming involves entering constants, indices, or coordinates, often interspersed with symbols, while telephony typically uses compact keypads for quick number input during calls or configurations.^[62]^[61] Numeric keypads, commonly known as 10-key pads, provide a calculator-like layout on the right side of standard keyboards, enabling faster input than the top-row numbers on QWERTY layouts. The 10-key pad arranges digits 0-9 in a 3x3 grid with 0 below, plus operators like +, -, *, /, and Enter, allowing efficient right-hand operation. In contrast, top-row numbers require shifting hands from the home row (ASDF-JKL;), leading to greater finger travel and reduced speed, particularly on compact keyboards without a numpad.^[61]^[63]^[64] The primary technique for numeric entry is ten-finger 10-key typing, which positions the right hand with the index finger on 4, middle finger on 5 (identified by a raised bump), and ring finger on 6 as the home keys. From this base, the index finger reaches 1, 4, and 7; the middle finger covers 2, 5, and 8; the ring finger handles 3, 6, 9, decimal point, and multiplication; the thumb presses 0; and the pinky manages addition, subtraction, and Enter. Fingers return to home after each stroke to minimize movement, promoting touch typing without visual reference. This method contrasts with hunt-and-peck on top-row numbers, where users often glance at keys, slowing performance.^[61]^[65]^[66] Expert typists on 10-key pads achieve speeds of 100-200 KPM, with averages around 133 KPM (8,000 keystrokes per hour) for proficient users and up to 200 KPM (12,000 KPH) for advanced operators; top performers exceed 333 KPM (20,000+ KPH). On QWERTY top-row numbers, speeds are notably lower, typically 50-100 KPM, due to ergonomic inefficiencies like extended reaches. These rates surpass alphanumeric baselines, where 40-60 words per minute equate to roughly 200-300 characters per minute including spaces. Accuracy remains critical, with errors deducting from net scores at a rate of 10 KPH per mistake.^[61]^[65]^[63] Common error patterns in numeric entry include transposition, where adjacent digits are reversed (e.g., entering 983 as 938), often due to visual fatigue or haste in high-volume tasks. Such mistakes are prevalent in numerical sequences longer than two digits and can propagate in calculations if undetected. Other issues arise from operator fatigue or poor posture, but transposition accounts for a significant portion of inaccuracies in data-heavy environments.^[67]^[68]^[69] Applications of numeric entry span historical accounting practices and modern tools. In the 1920s, bookkeeping machines like the Remington Model 85 incorporated ten-key digit rows for ledger entry, establishing early standards for numerical throughput in financial records, though formalized speed benchmarks emerged later with computerized systems. Today, it is essential for spreadsheet software like Microsoft Excel, where rapid input of formulas and values enhances productivity in finance and analysis. In programming, 10-key techniques facilitate efficient code writing involving arrays or metrics.^[70]^[71]^[62]

Research Methods

Text Entry Studies

Text entry studies encompass empirical research designed to investigate typing behaviors, cognitive processes, and usability factors across various input devices and contexts. These studies typically employ controlled experiments, where participants perform timed transcription or composition tasks under standardized conditions to measure performance variables such as movement times and error patterns.^[72] Observational studies, conducted in real-world settings like offices, capture natural typing behaviors through motion capture, keystroke logging, or video analysis to reveal strategies employed by users in everyday workflows.^[73] The historical evolution of text entry studies traces back to the 1980s in human-computer interaction (HCI), when research focused on desktop keyboard layouts and early graphical interfaces, emphasizing the transition from typewriters to digital input.^[74] Pioneering work applied principles like Fitts' Law to predict movement times in HCI, such as for target selection.^[75] By the 1990s, studies expanded to pen-based and mobile computing, evaluating novel techniques such as Graffiti handwriting recognition through controlled trials that assessed initial usability and practice effects.^[72] Post-2010, with the proliferation of smartphones and wearables, research shifted to mobile and emerging interfaces like virtual reality (VR), incorporating longitudinal experiments to compare thumb-based input against traditional methods, including recent meta-analyses of experiments from 1990-2024 and advancements in XR text entry techniques.^[76]^[77] Key findings from these studies highlight the role of cognitive load in text input, where smaller key sizes on mobile devices increase movement difficulty and mental effort, as quantified by Fitts' Law applications showing higher intercepts in task completion times for precision-demanding interfaces.^[75] Device comparisons reveal that desktop keyboards support higher efficiency due to larger targets and familiar layouts, while mobile touchscreens impose greater cognitive demands from visual search and finger coordination, often leading to adaptive strategies like one-handed thumbing.^[74] User performance varies by experience level; observational data indicate self-taught typists achieve comparable speeds to trained users by relying on visual feedback and fewer fingers, underscoring the importance of proactive keystroke preparation.^[73] Learning curves in text entry demonstrate rapid initial gains followed by plateaus, with alternative layouts like split fixed-angle keyboards showing steeper improvements (90.4% learning rate) compared to chord keyboards (77.3%), reflecting differences in physical versus cognitive adaptation demands.^[78] Interface impacts are evident in how predictive text and auto-correction reduce cognitive load on mobile devices, enhancing overall usability in real-world scenarios, though controlled experiments note persistent challenges with error recovery in dynamic environments.^[76] Recent bibliometric analyses from 2018–2022 confirm a focus on soft keyboards and mobile contexts, with studies emphasizing interface adaptations to improve user performance across diverse devices.^[79]

Error Analysis

Error analysis in typing involves deconstructing the input process into distinct stages to distinguish between cognitive and mechanical sources of errors, providing deeper insights into user behavior and system design. The typing process can be broken down into planning, where the typist cognitively selects and sequences characters based on linguistic knowledge; execution, involving the motor act of pressing keys; and verification, a feedback loop that detects discrepancies between intended and produced output. This framework, proposed by Salthouse, highlights how errors arise at different levels: cognitive slips occur during planning, such as selecting the wrong character due to phonological similarity or memory lapses, while motor errors manifest in execution, like accidental key presses from finger slips or fatigue.^[80]^[81] To quantify these errors, researchers employ metrics that capture the overhead of corrections and inaccuracies. Keystrokes per character (KSPC) measures the total number of keystrokes, including corrections, divided by the number of characters in the final text, with typical values for skilled typists ranging from 1.1 to 1.2 to account for routine error handling.^[58] Higher KSPC indicates greater correction effort, often linked to motor errors requiring backspaces. Total error rate (TER) aggregates insertions, deletions, and substitutions relative to the number of input attempts, providing a holistic view of error prevalence across cognitive and motor stages. For instance, TER incorporates both uncorrected slips (e.g., unnoticed substitutions) and fixed errors, revealing how verification processes mitigate overall inaccuracy.^[59] Advanced techniques further refine error assessment by evaluating severity and correction patterns. The Levenshtein minimum string distance calculates the fewest insertions, deletions, or substitutions needed to align transcribed text with the intended input, offering a severity score that weights cognitive errors (e.g., multi-character slips) more heavily than isolated motor mishits. Backtracking analysis examines the sequence of correction actions, such as the frequency and depth of backspace usage, to model how typists navigate and resolve errors during verification, often correlating with KSPC increases from prolonged fixes. These methods enable precise dissection, as lower backtracking in skilled typists reflects efficient cognitive-motor integration.^[82]^[83] Such frameworks have practical applications in keyboard design, particularly through 1990s studies that analyzed layout-induced errors to optimize key arrangements and reduce motor slips. For example, evaluations of alternative layouts like Dvorak revealed patterns of substitution errors tied to finger travel distance, informing ergonomic adjustments that lowered TER by minimizing adjacent-key confusions in high-frequency digrams. These insights from error deconstruction continue to guide hardware improvements, emphasizing layouts that align with cognitive planning stages to curb both slip types.^[84]^[85]

Evaluation Tools

Logging software plays a central role in capturing keystroke data during typing research, enabling detailed analysis of input patterns and performance. Tools like Inputlog, a free keystroke logging program, record all keyboard actions, mouse movements, and pauses with timestamps, independent of the word processor used, and output metrics such as words per minute (WPM) and error rates.^[86]^[87] Similarly, OpenSesame, an open-source experiment builder for psychological studies, facilitates keystroke logging through its keyboard response items, which capture key press times and durations for timing-accurate typing tasks.^[88] Custom scripts, often implemented in Python or JavaScript, are also prevalent for tailored keystroke capture in controlled experiments, allowing researchers to log raw input events and compute derived metrics like WPM and errors.^[89] Simulators provide controlled environments for evaluating text entry techniques without relying on physical hardware, particularly useful for iterative testing. The Threaded Text Entry Metrics framework, developed by Soukoreff and MacKenzie in the early 2000s, serves as a foundational testbed for assessing typing performance through standardized phrase sets and error-corrected speed measures, simulating realistic transcription tasks.^[90] For mobile contexts, emulators like RoboType, an open-source simulator released in the 2020s, model virtual keyboard interactions with synthetic users, enabling large-scale evaluations of text entry speed and accuracy under varied conditions such as touch latency and autocorrection.^[91] Hardware tools extend data collection beyond basic keystrokes to include biomechanical and cognitive aspects of typing. Force-sensitive keys, equipped with thin sensors under keycaps, measure strike forces and dwell times to study typing dynamics and fatigue, as demonstrated in ergonomic studies where peak forces ranged from 0.5-3 N during prolonged sessions.^[92] Eye-tracking systems, such as head-mounted or screen-based devices, capture gaze patterns to identify visual search errors during typing, revealing that skilled typists fixate on the keyboard less than novices, with gaze closest to the text around 210 ms after key press.^[93] Post-2020 advancements incorporate AI-assisted analyzers that process keystroke logs for predictive modeling of errors and performance. Machine learning models, applied to features like pause ratios and burst lengths from tools like Inputlog, show limited predictive power for writing quality and error propensity based on correlational analyses.^[94] These analyzers, often built on frameworks like scikit-learn or TensorFlow, integrate with logging software to provide real-time insights, enhancing research into adaptive typing interfaces.

Keystroke Dynamics

Core Principles

Keystroke dynamics encompasses the analysis of timing and pressure variations in an individual's keystrokes, capturing unique behavioral signatures derived from typing rhythms on digital input devices such as keyboards.^[95] These patterns arise from the physiological and motor processes involved in typing, where each user's habits reflect distinct neural and muscular coordination.^[96] Core features include dwell time, defined as the duration a key is held down from press to release, and flight time, the interval between releasing one key and pressing the next.^[95] Pressure variations, measured via force applied during key presses, add another layer of individuality, often captured using sensors like piezo-electric elements.^[97] These dynamics are commonly modeled through digraph and trigraph latencies, which quantify the time intervals between consecutive or sequential key presses (down-down times) or releases (up-up times), highlighting rhythmic consistencies unique to each typist.^[95] Measurement focuses on extracting these temporal features with high resolution, typically 0.1 to 1 millisecond accuracy, to assess variability that serves as biometric entropy for user distinction.^[95] For instance, average dwell times range from 96 to 825 milliseconds across users, with intra-user consistency providing the entropy needed for reliable pattern recognition, while inter-user differences stem from inherent motor variability.^[95] The theoretical foundation of keystroke dynamics traces to the 1980s, originating in early security research that demonstrated typing rhythms as distinguishable identifiers among professional typists.^[98] Seminal work by Gaines et al. established this by analyzing statistical characteristics of keystroke timings, laying the groundwork for viewing typing as a behavioral biometric.^[98] This approach is influenced by motor control theories, which explain variations through neural pathways—such as the median, ulnar, and radial nerves originating from spinal roots C5-T1—that govern finger dexterity and hand coordination during keystrokes.^[96] Touch times (dwell) remain relatively stable as finger-specific constants, while air times (flight) vary based on key distances and learned muscle memory, underscoring the role of feedback systems in the supplementary motor area.^[96] Several factors modulate these patterns, distinguishing user-specific influences from device-related ones. User attributes like age and fatigue alter timing consistency, with older individuals or fatigued states showing increased variability in dwell and flight times due to declines in motor precision.^[95] In contrast, device factors such as keyboard type—mechanical versus membrane—or layout (e.g., QWERTY) affect overall rhythm by influencing actuation force and key spacing, thereby introducing systematic variations independent of the typist.^[95]

Applications

Keystroke dynamics finds primary application in security systems for continuous user authentication, where typing patterns are monitored in real-time to verify identity throughout a session rather than at a single login point. One early example from the 1990s is the TypeSense system, a software-only solution developed by Deepnet Security that employs typeprint recognition to analyze keystroke rhythms for access control, integrating seamlessly with existing password mechanisms.^[95] Such systems typically achieve false acceptance rates (FAR) between 1% and 5%, balancing security with usability by rejecting unauthorized users while minimizing disruptions for legitimate ones; for instance, a study using support vector machines on free-text input reported an FAR of 3.47% with zero false rejections over 250 keystrokes.^[99]^[100] Beyond initial verification, keystroke dynamics supports user profiling to enable adaptive interfaces that adjust layouts, input methods, or feedback based on detected typing habits, such as speed or error tendencies, thereby personalizing user experience in software applications. In fraud detection, particularly for online banking, post-2010 integrations have leveraged these dynamics to identify anomalous sessions, where deviations in typing rhythm signal potential account takeovers; a 2013 analysis demonstrated its efficacy in enhancing e-banking security by flagging impostor behaviors during transactions without additional hardware.^[101]^[102] Commercial implementations like BioPassword, introduced in the early 2000s by BioPassword, Inc., exemplify practical deployment by hardening passwords through embedded keystroke analysis, achieving authentication via existing login processes on desktops and mobiles. However, challenges persist in cross-device accuracy, as variations in keyboard hardware or input methods can degrade performance, necessitating robust enrollment protocols to maintain reliability across environments.^[95] Looking ahead, the 2020s have seen keystroke dynamics integrated with artificial intelligence for multi-modal biometrics, combining it with gait analysis or facial recognition to form hybrid systems that improve overall accuracy in continuous authentication; recent frameworks using machine learning fusion report equal error rates below 2% in dynamic scenarios like mobile banking.^[102]^[103]

Ergonomics

Technique and Posture

Proper typing technique and posture emphasize ergonomic alignment to promote comfort and efficiency during keyboard use. According to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines, the workstation should be adjusted so that the elbows form an angle of 90 to 120 degrees, with upper arms close to the body and forearms parallel to the floor.^[104] Wrists should remain neutral and straight, in line with the forearms, avoiding extension or flexion while typing.^[104] Chair height must position the thighs parallel to the floor, with feet flat on the surface or supported by a footrest, ensuring the keyboard is at a height where hands hover slightly above it without shoulder elevation.^[105] These OSHA recommendations, developed from ergonomic principles in the 1990s and refined in subsequent eTools, aim to distribute workload across the body to prevent undue stress.^[106] Finger techniques focus on minimal force and natural positioning to reduce muscle tension. Typists should employ a light touch on the keys, allowing fingers to curve naturally over the home row without flattening or excessive extension.^[107] Pounding or striking the keys forcefully should be avoided, as this increases impact on joints and tendons; instead, keys should be depressed with just enough pressure for activation.^[107] This approach, recommended by the Hand and Wrist Institute, aligns with broader ergonomic practices to maintain fluid motion.^[107] For optimal results, thumbs rest near the spacebar, and all fingers remain relaxed rather than rigid. Training for posture awareness involves targeted exercises to build habitual alignment, adaptable to various typing methods. Simple routines include knuckle bends—extending fingers on a flat surface and folding them at the knuckles for several seconds—to enhance finger flexibility and awareness of tension.^[108] Hand squeezes using a small ball and gentle finger presses against resistance promote relaxation in the forearms and wrists, fostering neutral positioning during extended sessions.^[108] Back and arm stretches, such as reaching one arm overhead while the other supports the lower back, encourage overall spinal awareness.^[108] Adaptations for touch typing versus hunt-and-peck involve minimizing head and eye movement in the former by keeping hands stationary on home keys, while the latter requires extra vigilance to avoid slouching from frequent keyboard glances.^[109] Adopting these techniques yields measurable benefits in performance and comfort. Proper posture reduces immediate physical fatigue by distributing effort evenly, allowing typists to maintain sessions without rapid onset of strain.^[110] It supports sustained typing speeds exceeding 40 words per minute (WPM), the average for proficient users, by minimizing disruptions from discomfort and enabling consistent accuracy over time.^[111]

Health Impacts

Prolonged typing, particularly in occupational settings involving computers, is associated with several musculoskeletal conditions, including repetitive strain injury (RSI); for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), evidence suggests possible links though causation from typing is debated and limited. RSI encompasses a range of disorders affecting muscles, tendons, and nerves due to repetitive motions, with symptoms such as pain, stiffness, and weakness in the hands, wrists, arms, and shoulders. In office workers and typists, the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), which include RSI, has been reported as high as 71.9%, primarily affecting the lower back, wrists/hands, and shoulders.^[112] CTS, a specific compression of the median nerve in the wrist, was perceived as an epidemic in the 1990s amid rising computer use, though epidemiological studies indicate a prevalence of 1% to 5% in the general working population, rising to 5.6% in high-repetition, high-force jobs.^[113]^[114]^[115] Additionally, prolonged screen-based typing contributes to computer vision syndrome (CVS), characterized by eye strain, dryness, blurred vision, and headaches, with a prevalence of approximately 69% among regular computer users spending extended periods at screens as of 2023 meta-analyses.^[116] Key risk factors for these conditions include extended daily typing durations and suboptimal ergonomics. Studies from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the 2000s highlight that keyboard use exceeding 4 hours per day significantly elevates the risk of upper extremity WMSDs, with factors like repetition and awkward postures amplifying the effect.^[117] High typing speeds, often exceeding 60 words per minute (WPM), combined with poor posture—such as wrist extension or deviation—can increase key strike forces and muscle tension, further contributing to strain on the tendons and nerves.^[92]^[118] Psychological effects, though less studied, include heightened stress and reduced productivity from chronic discomfort, as reported in surveys of computer-intensive workers. In the 1990s context, the surge in CTS claims among typists was linked to increased office automation, though some analyses suggest diagnostic awareness and reporting biases played a role alongside genuine occupational exposures. Prevention strategies emphasize ergonomic interventions and behavioral adjustments supported by research. Regular breaks are crucial; the 20-20-20 rule—looking at an object 20 feet away for 20 seconds every 20 minutes—has been shown to alleviate CVS symptoms by promoting blinking and reducing visual fatigue.^[119] Adjustable furniture, including ergonomic keyboards, chairs with lumbar support, and monitor stands to maintain neutral wrist and neck positions, reduces strain, as evidenced by NIOSH guidelines that correlate proper setup with lower WMSD incidence.^[120] Software tools providing reminders for micro-breaks and posture checks can further mitigate risks, with studies demonstrating reduced symptom reporting among users who incorporate such prompts during prolonged sessions.^[121] In the post-2010 era, the shift toward mobile typing has introduced "text neck," a forward head posture strain from smartphone use, leading to neck pain and associated headaches. Prevalence of text neck syndrome among young adults and adolescents using mobiles for texting exceeds 70% in some cohorts, driven by repetitive thumb motions and sustained cervical flexion.^[122]^[123] This modern concern extends traditional typing risks to portable devices, underscoring the need for awareness of cumulative exposure across input methods.

References

[1]
[PDF] The relationship between keyboarding skills and self-regulated ...
Literature review. Keyboarding skill, as a motor skill, is defined as the ability of learners to key in information into the memory of the computer with the ...
[2]
Keyboarding | New York State Education Department
Keyboarding, the ability to operate a keyboard efficiently while typing, is an important skill that allows students to write fluently and communicate more ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
Typewriters & Computers - History of the Office and Office Equipment
The history of typewriters and then computers is primarily thought of as a 19th and 20th century story, but their history goes back in time.
[4]
A Brief History of Typewriters - the Xavier University Personal Web Site
The concept of a typewriter dates back at least to 1714, when Englishman Henry Mill filed a vaguely-worded patent for an artificial machine or method for the ...
[5]
Early Typewriter History - MIT
Jul 16, 2001 · The first practical typewriter was invented by Christopher Latham Sholes, and was marketed by the Remington Arms company in 1873.
[6]
Production on the Sholes and Glidden Type-Writer Began
While the history of typewriter development can be traced as far back as the 16th century and Francesco Rampazzetto, it wasn't until the mid 19th century that ...
[7]
Today In History: Patent for the First Portable Typewriter | April | 2024
Apr 12, 2024 · On April 12th, 1892, George Canfield Blickensderfer (1850-1917) received a patent for the first portable typewriter which was light, economical, and ...
[8]
QWERTY forever: path dependency - Language Log
Apr 6, 2025 · One popular theory states that Sholes had to redesign the keyboard in response to the mechanical failings of early typewriters, which were ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[9]
Learn to Touch Type and Develop a Critical Skill - Laurus College
Dec 7, 2020 · Touch typing is simply the ability to type without looking at the keyboard. If you're reading this article, you're probably in the hunt and peck ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[10]
The Evolution of Typing: A Journey from Manual Typewriters to AI
Jun 3, 2024 · From manual typewriters to AI-powered assistants, each technological leap has contributed to a more efficient and productive work environment.
[11]
NIHF Inductee and Typewriter Inventor Christopher Sholes
The rearranged keys in the upper row formed the order QWERTY, and the design exists to this day. Sholes was born in Danville, Pennsylvania. As a young ...
[12]
Sholes & Glidden Desk Typewriter, Model No. 1, 1873-1876
Developed by Christopher Glidden in the 1860s and manufactured by the Remington arms company beginning in 1873, the Sholes & Glidden was the first commercially ...
[13]
The QWERTY Keyboard Will Never Die. Where Did the 150-Year ...
Feb 25, 2025 · One such invention was an early typewriter, which he and several of his colleagues patented in 1868. Their keyboard resembled a piano and ...
[14]
The Sholes & Glidden Type Writer, with the First QWERTY Keyboard
His invention with the QWERTY keyboard was the first machine to allow the operator to write faster than a person writing by hand.<|control11|><|separator|>
[15]
Almanac: The first commercially-successful typewriter - CBS News
Mar 1, 2020 · On March 1, 1873, the Remington company started making the first commercially-successful typewriter, marketed as the Sholes and Glidden (or Remington No. 1) ...
[16]
Artifacts Reflect Changes - Advanced Placement: U.S. History
In the 1880s, when the typewriter was first adopted in many offices, America was a country in the throes of rapid change. The way in which the typewriter ...Missing: secretarial | Show results with:secretarial
[17]
[PDF] Typewriter Adoption and Women's Economic Outcomes
May 23, 2025 · The typewriter replaced handwritten secretarial tasks—primarily per- formed by men—with standardized typewriting that became dominated by women.
[18]
The arrival of women in the office - BBC News
Jul 25, 2013 · The typewriter is almost obsolete in the modern office. But it played a crucial role in women's arrival in the workplace, explains Lucy Kellaway.
[19]
The User-friendly Typewriter - The Rutherford Journal
Early typewriters had issues with visibility, ergonomic keyboard design, and the acceptability of typed letters. The Remington No. 1 solved legibility and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[20]
[PDF] Typewriters and Tying Literacy in the United States, 1870s-1930s
As the 1880s progressed, the typewriter slowly replaced hand correspondence, found its way into offices and became a more firmly established piece of office ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[21]
The Typewriter – “that almost sentient mechanism” | Inside Adams
Mar 19, 2015 · ... Typewriting Efficiency for the Development of Accuracy, High Speed, and Ease of Operation which illustrated special finger exercises. A ...
[22]
[PDF] Automatic Control: How Experts Act Without Thinking
Jun 29, 2018 · Fingers and postures can be selected by other means, such as visual guidance in hunt-and-peck typing, but. I assume skilled typists rely on ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[23]
A little doubt saves many mistakes: Early and late error detection in copy-typing
### Summary of Hunt-and-Peck Typing from "A little doubt saves many mistakes: Early and late error detection in copy-typing" (2022)
[24]
[PDF] Effectiveness of Two Keyboarding Instructional Approaches on the ...
Oct 3, 2019 · Those who use self-taught hunt and peck technique can type up to 35 WPM, but they plateau at this level because of the need for visual feedback ...Missing: advantages | Show results with:advantages
[25]
Touch Typing: The Secret to Efficient and Pain-Free Typing
Jan 30, 2025 · Touch typing is a technique that relies on muscle memory to type without needing to look at the keyboard. Each finger is assigned specific keys.
[26]
What are the home row keys? | Touch-type Read and Spell (TTRS)
The little finger of the left hand sits on the A, the ring finger on the S, the middle finger on the D and the pointer on the F. The pointer of the right hand ...Tips For Learners · Who Benefits From Typing? · Touch-Type Read And SpellMissing: principles | Show results with:principles
[27]
Touch Typing Lessons Lesson 1: The Home Row - How to Type
Position your left hand so that your index finger is on f, your middle finger is on d, your ring finger is on s and your pinky is on a. Your thumb can rest on ...Missing: assignments | Show results with:assignments
[28]
Why Keyboards Have Bumps on the F and J Keys - MakeUseOf
Jun 2, 2023 · The bumps on the F and J are tactile markers that help you position your hands correctly on a keyboard without looking at the keys.<|control11|><|separator|>
[29]
History of Fast Typing and Old-School Techniques (Guest Post)
Sep 18, 2015 · The touch and type method, which means to type without looking at the keys, was invented by a court stenographer from Salt Lake City – Frank Edward McGurrin.
[30]
How Did Keyboarding Classes Start? - Spreeder
Mar 14, 2016 · Typewriter manufacturers like Remington started typing courses around 1880. Public schools in America introduced typing in high schools 15 ...
[31]
Learn Touch Typing Free - TypingClub
Learn touch typing online using TypingClub's free typing courses. It includes 650 typing games, typing tests and videos.
[32]
Typing Speed: How to Set Your Words-Per-Minute (WPM) Goal
Aug 29, 2022 · The average touch typist using all 10 fingers types over 50 WPM, roughly twice as fast as you can go with just two fingers. Keep in mind ...
[33]
The Science of Muscle Memory: How Your Fingers Learn to Type
Oct 23, 2025 · To build true muscle memory, your brain must learn to rely on tactile feedback (the feel of the keys) and proprioception (the sense of your ...
[34]
Take A Number: How to Type Numbers and Symbols - Typesy
Dec 11, 2012 · As you touch type symbols, it's important to use the same finger as you do when typing the respective numbers. When typing a symbol, remember ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[35]
Touch Typing Lesson 7: Symbols - How to Type
The first two symbols we will learn, & and *, are the secondary characters for the 7 and 8 keys, respectively. Type the & key by reaching up and to the left of ...
[36]
[PDF] Exploiting Video Calls for Keystroke Inference Attacks
Hybrid typing, as the name suggests, is a hybrid of hunt-and- peck and touch typing. Like touch typers, hybrid typers may have memorized the keyboard layout and ...
[37]
[PDF] An EMG and IMU Based Keylogging Side-Channel Attack - arXiv
Dec 4, 2021 · We distinguish between two typing styles: Touch typing and hybrid typing. The latter includes hunt-and- peck typists as well as typists with ...
[38]
4 Ways to Type, Ranked from Worst to Best
Sep 30, 2022 · Hybrid typing, the most common way to type, mixes different typing techniques together. People who use this technique look mostly at the screen, ...
[39]
How to Type Faster: The Complete Guide - Effectiviology
Another thing that you can do it learn to use a hybrid typing style. This involves integrating certain aspects of the traditional touch-typing system into ...
[40]
(PDF) The standardization of a technical practice: Typing (1883–1930)
By the 1920s, the ten-finger method became widely accepted through competitive practices and formal training, paralleling the rise of standardized keyboards, ...Abstract · Key Takeaways · References (28)
[41]
What Is a Good Typing Speed and Average WPM for Employees?
Jul 24, 2025 · Average typist: 40–50 WPM · Office workers: around 60 WPM · Data entry specialists: 60–80 WPM · Executive assistants: 70–100 WPM · Customer support ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[42]
[PDF] Insights into Why Some Office Administration Students are not ...
Perhaps by focusing and practicing just this hybrid typing style, students were able to reach their 35 nwpm. This OA study illustrates the potential ...
[43]
The Agony of 'BlackBerry Thumb' - WIRED
Oct 21, 2005 · The BlackBerry, which debuted in 1999, employs a full QWERTY keypad for thumb typing to automatically send and receive e-mail. About 2.5 ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[44]
Apple Reinvents the Phone with iPhone
Jan 9, 2007 · When users need to type, iPhone presents them with an elegant touch keyboard which is predictive to prevent and correct mistakes, making it ...
[45]
[PDF] How do People Type on Mobile Devices? Observations from a Study ...
They reported an average typing speed of 32.1 WPM. 74% of typing was done using two thumbs, only 12.7% with the right thumb and less than 3% for all other ...Missing: haptics | Show results with:haptics
[46]
Swype pioneered a new way to type on smartphones—now it's dead
Feb 20, 2018 · A beta Android app eventually arrived in 2010, but it was only available for download through Swype's website. It wasn't until 2013 that the ...
[47]
Ready, text, go: typing speeds on mobiles rival keyboard users
Oct 2, 2019 · Global test finds those using two-thumb technique can hit a blistering 38 words per minute.Missing: haptics | Show results with:haptics
[48]
The Limits of Expert Text Entry Speed on Mobile Keyboards with ...
Autocorrect reduces the time it takes to manually fix typing errors, which results in typing speed increase. However, recent user studies uncovered an ...
[49]
[PDF] Inaccurate input on touch devices relating to the fingertip
One of this problem is the so-called “fat finger problem”. This paper is about the problem that a finger touch on a touch surface decreases the precision, ...
[50]
[PDF] FFitts law: modeling finger touch with fitts' law
“Fat Finger” problem, and examining Fitts' Law for finger input. As a key input modality for touchscreens, touch input has been extensively studied by many ...
[51]
(PDF) Dynamic UI Adaptations for One-Handed Use of Large Mobile ...
Aug 7, 2025 · We present and evaluate dynamic adaptations for mobile touch GUIs. They mitigate reachability problems that users face when operating large ...
[52]
How WPM (Words Per Minute) and Accuracy are Calculated ...
Jul 30, 2024 · Here's how it's calculated: Formula: Gross typing speed = Total words typed ÷ Time in minutes. Word Definition: One "word" equals five ...
[53]
How to Calculate Typing Speed (WPM) and Accuracy
The gross typing speed is calculated by taking all words typed and dividing by the time it took to type the words in minutes. When calculating typing speed, a ...
[54]
How are Words Per Minute and Accuracy Calculated? - Type to Learn
Nov 8, 2022 · Below is the actual calculation. Total Number of Words = Total Keys Pressed / 5. WPM = Total Number of Words / Time Elapsed in Minutes (rounded ...
[55]
Typing Speed | Pedagogical Resources
Average speed, 40 wpm and over, 200 cpm and over ; Above average speed, 50 wpm and over, 250 cpm and over ; Productive speed, 60 wpm and over, 300 cpm and over.
[56]
Typing expertise in a large student population - PubMed Central - NIH
Aug 5, 2022 · Typing has become a pervasive mode of language production worldwide, with keyboards fully integrated in a large part of many daily activities.
[57]
Average typing speed infographic - Ratatype
The average typing speed is 41.4 wpm. Boys average 44 wpm, while girls average 37 wpm. The highest recorded speed is 216 wpm.The Fastest Typing Speed · Who Types Faster? · Any Typos?
[58]
[PDF] Observations on Typing from 136 Million Keystrokes
Insertion errors (typing an extra letter) and omission errors (leaving one out) were more common than substitution errors (replacing one character with another) ...
[59]
[PDF] Analysis of Text Entry Performance Metrics
2) Average Error Rate. The standard QWERTY keyboard has the lowest error rate with an average of 1.8%, while the stylus-based keyboard has the highest with ...
[60]
[PDF] Measuring Errors in Text Entry Tasks - York University
We propose a new technique based on the Levenshtein minimum string distance statistic for measuring error rates in text entry research.
[61]
Number Pad - How To Increase 10-Key Speed - Typing Lounge
May 6, 2024 · This tutorial will help you learn the numeric keypad and teach you how to masterfully operate the number pad to achieve a fast 10-key ...
[62]
10-Key Typing Guide For Faster Numpad Typing! - Macally Blog
Sep 5, 2023 · This guide is for you. We're going to go through the best ways to improve your speed through 10-key typing practice.Missing: experts | Show results with:experts
[63]
How To Improve Your Number Typing Skills | TopTypingTest
Your first lesson guide to the most comprehensive online decimal number typing exercises and number pad workouts.<|control11|><|separator|>
[64]
What Is the Home Row Keys? - Computer Hope
Jun 25, 2025 · The home row keys of the numeric keypad are 4, 5, and 6. To position your hand on the home row keys of the numeric keypad, place your right ...How to position fingers on... · What are the home row keys of...<|control11|><|separator|>
[65]
Ten Key Typing: How to Do It Quickly & Accurately - wikiHow
Ten-key typing makes it easier to enter strings of numbers, formulas, and symbols without having to use the number row at the top of your keyboard. Even though ...What is 10-key? · Touch Typing · 10-Key Typing Speeds · Increasing Your Speed
[66]
[PDF] The Touch Method for Numeric Keypads
The numeric keypad has a home row, which is the area in the middle of the keypad that includes the 4, 5, and 6 number keys. The. 5 key has a raised bump on it.
[67]
Transposition error definition - AccountingTools
Apr 11, 2025 · A transposition error occurs when two adjacent digits in a number are accidentally reversed during data entry. For example, entering $983 as $ ...
[68]
10 Most Common Data Entry Errors To Avoid
Jun 19, 2024 · When entering data, watch out for transposition errors where numbers or characters are accidentally reversed, leading to inaccuracies. Double- ...
[69]
Transposition Error: Definition, Example, And How To Correct
Nov 25, 2024 · A transposition error occurs when two digits are accidentally reversed during data entry, such as typing “72” instead of “27,” which leads ...
[70]
Remington Model 85 Bookkeeping Machine
The machine has a row of ten tabulator keys across the front, a row of digit keys behind them, a space bar behind this, and then three rows of a QWERTY ...
[71]
Accounting Tech through the Years: A Long Look Back | IMA
Jun 1, 2019 · Browsing through early issues of NACA publications, we can trace the evolution of the technologies used by financial professionals in the 1920s through today.
[72]
Chapter 4 Evaluation of Text Entry Techniques - York University
The focus in this chapter is the evaluation of text entry techniques. Our goal is, first, to build a case for the need for evaluation and, second, to lay out ...Missing: findings evolution
[73]
How We Type: Movement Strategies and Performance in Everyday ...
This paper revisits the present understanding of typing, which originates mostly from studies of trained typists using the ten-finger touch typing system.
[74]
Historical Overview of Consumer Text Entry Technologies
This chapter provides an historical overview of consumer text entry technologies. Textual information and communication are an essential part of lives and ...
[75]
Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer ...
Fitts' law is a model of human psychomotor behavior derived from Shannon's Theorem 17, a fundamental theorem of communication systems.
[76]
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Text Entry Studies
Apr 25, 2025 · This meta-analysis summarizes findings and effects from text entry experiments published from 1990 to 2024.Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution
[77]
Analysis of Alternative Keyboards Using Learning Curves
May 20, 2009 · Objective : To quantify learning percentages for alternative keyboards (chord, contoured split, Dvorak, and split fixed angle) and ...
[78]
[PDF] Text Entry Research - the last 5 years (2018-2022) - TEXT2030
ABSTRACT. In this paper, we present a bibliometric study of text entry research between 2018 and mid-2022. From this analysis, we identify the per-.Missing: methodologies | Show results with:methodologies<|control11|><|separator|>
[79]
Perceptual, Cognitive, and Motoric Aspects of Transcription Typing
This framework was used to integrate 29 distinct empirical phenomena related to transcription typing, including the multiple units of typing, the existence of ...
[80]
Perceptual, cognitive, and motoric aspects of transcription typing.
Reviews recent research findings concerning the skilled behavior of transcription typing in the context of a 4-component heuristic model.
[81]
Measuring errors in text entry tasks - ResearchGate
We propose a new technique based on the Levenshtein minimum string distance statistic for measuring error rates in text entry research.Missing: severity | Show results with:severity
[82]
Metrics for text entry research: an evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and ...
... error rate and keystrokes per character (KSPC). To overcome the weaknesses, a new framework for error analysis is developed and demonstrated. It combines ...<|separator|>
[83]
Typing Errors - Reason.com
Jun 1, 1996 · Dvorak claimed to have experimental evidence that his keyboard provided advantages of greater speed, reduced fatigue, and easier learning. These ...
[84]
KSPC (Keystrokes per Character) as a Characteristic of Text Entry ...
Aug 7, 2025 · In Mackenzie's research, the keystrokes per character (KSPC) could be reduced from 1.0 to 0.7 for an unambiguous keypad input, and to 0.5 for ...
[85]
Inputlog: Home
Inputlog is a keystroke logging program enabling you to observe writing process dynamics and collect fine grained data.
[86]
[PDF] Inputlog: A logging tool for the research of writing processes
Contrary to Trace-it and ScriptLog, Inputlog registers every keystroke and mouse movement independently of the word processor used. Inputlog is designed to log ...
[87]
Logging and reading data files - OpenSesame - Cogsci.nl
OpenSesame uses a logger item to log data, which are saved as CSV files. Data can be read using Python with pandas or DataMatrix.
[88]
Exploring the application of keystroke logging techniques to ...
In this paper, we provide an introduction to keystroke logging as a research tool and an overview of its applications in writing research.Missing: speed | Show results with:speed
[89]
Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques - ACM Digital Library
In evaluations of text entry methods, participants enter phrases of text using a technique of interest while performance data are collected.Missing: Threaded | Show results with:Threaded
[90]
Validating State-of-the-Art Virtual Keyboard Simulators with ...
May 28, 2025 · In this paper, we examine a state-of-the-art open-source simulator of text entry with virtual keyboards (RoboType), and present a comparison between empirical ...
[91]
Key Strike Forces and Their Relation to High Level of ... - NIH
In the present study, key strike forces were measured in a workstation environment with thin force sensors attached under specific keys, measuring the force ...
[92]
[PDF] A Benchmark and Analysis of Gaze Behavior during Typing
Jun 14, 2018 · ABSTRACT. We examine the relationship between eye gaze and typing, focusing on the differences between touch and non-touch typists. To en-.
[93]
Early prediction of writing quality using keystroke logging
Aug 24, 2021 · In this study, we investigate the use of keystroke analysis to predict writing quality throughout the writing process.
[94]
A Survey of Keystroke Dynamics Biometrics - PMC - NIH
Keystroke dynamics refers to the process of measuring and assessing human's typing rhythm on digital devices. Such device, to name a few, usually refers to a ...
[95]
(PDF) The physiology of keystroke dynamics - ResearchGate
Aug 9, 2025 · Biology has shown us that the separation of arm and finger motion is due to 3 long nerves in each arm; regulating movement in different parts of ...
[96]
Keystroke dynamics in the pre-touchscreen era - Frontiers
Dec 18, 2013 · The most applicable and investigated addition was that of keystroke pressure. Measures of pressure were achieved by making use of piezo-electric ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[97]
Authentication by Keystroke Timing: Some Preliminary Results - RAND
Authentication by Keystroke Timing. Some Preliminary Results. R. Stockton Gaines, William Lisowski, S. James Press, Norman Shapiro. ResearchPublished 1980.
[98]
https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R2526.html
[99]
Keystroke Dynamics: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications
Latency and HT: these timing features are used to create a template of a user and at the time of testing these features are compared to verify the user. Between ...
[100]
Strengthening E-Banking security using Keystroke Dynamics
This paper investigates keystroke dynamics and its possible use as a tool to prevent or detect fraud in the banking industry. Given that banks are constantly on ...
[101]
Enhancing security and usability with context aware multi-biometric ...
Aug 20, 2025 · In this paper, we present a novel continuous authentication system that integrates keystroke dynamics and gait biometrics through a multi-modalMissing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[102]
ai-powered behavioral biometrics for continuous authentication in ...
Aug 22, 2025 · We used this for the smartphone modality primarily. ○ Transformers: We conducted an experiment with a Transformer model for keystroke. dynamics, ...
[103]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394678864_AI-POWERED_BEHAVIORAL_BIOMETRICS_FOR_CONTINUOUS_AUTHENTICATION_IN_CYBERSECURITY
[104]
Office ergonomics: Your how-to guide - Mayo Clinic
May 25, 2023 · While you are typing, using a computer touchpad, or using a mouse or pointer, keep your wrists straight, your upper arms close to your body, and ...
[105]
eTools : Computer Workstations | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
### Summary of Guidelines on Proper Posture and Technique for Typing
[106]
Proper Typing Techniques to Help Avoid Hand Fatigue or Injury
Rest your hands lightly on the keyboard with your fingers curved naturally. ... Type with a light touch, and avoid pounding on the keys forcefully. Listen ...
[107]
How To Improve Posture - 15 Exercises - Typing Lounge
May 6, 2024 · Learning typing ergonomics can help improve posture and efficiency. These exercises will teach you how to improve posture and to reduce ...
[108]
Hunt and Peck Vs Touch Typing (10 fingers) | Typing.com Blog
Aug 29, 2022 · The average typing speed when using only two fingers is 27 words per minute (WPM) when copying and 37 WPM when typing from memory. The average ...What Is Touch Typing? · Typing Efficiency · Average Typing Speeds
[109]
https://www.typing.com/blog/hunt-and-peck/
[110]
9 Tips for Proper Typing Posture | Typing.com Blog
Aug 29, 2022 · Keep wrists straight and fingers curved over the keys, with thumbs hanging near the spacebar. Your wrists should be floating above and parallel ...Missing: awareness | Show results with:awareness
[111]
Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Office Workers in ...
The overall prevalence rate of WMSDs was 71.9% among these staff. The lower back, wrists/hands and shoulders were the most reported body regions for these ...
[112]
Carpal tunnel syndrome and the use of computer mouse and keyboard
This review examines evidence for an association between computer work and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
[113]
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Oct 29, 2023 · The incidence of CTS in the general population ranges from 1% to 5%. CTS is more prevalent in females than males, with a 3:1 female-to-male ...
[114]
Computer work and musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and ...
This review examines the evidence for an association between computer work and neck and upper extremity disorders (except carpal tunnel syndrome).
[115]
Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain among computer users working ...
Dec 30, 2022 · The neck pain (60.3%), lower back pain (59.5%), and shoulder pain (49.6%) were the most reported body regions affected by work-related MSD.Missing: sources: | Show results with:sources:
[116]
Digital eye strain: prevalence, measurement and amelioration - NIH
Apr 16, 2018 · Digital eye strain (DES), also known as computer vision syndrome, encompasses a range of ocular and visual symptoms, and estimates suggest its prevalence may ...Use Of Digital Devices · Measuring Des · Blinking And Squinting
[117]
Computer vision syndrome | AOA - American Optometric Association
At greatest risk for developing CVS are those persons who spend two or more continuous hours at a computer or using a digital screen device every day. Symptoms.Causes & Risk Factors · Treatment · Viewing The ComputerMissing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
[118]
The Revised Strain Index: an improved upper extremity exposure ...
... RSI is applicable to a wide variety of tasks including very low force and very high repetition tasks such as keyboard use. [Description provided by NIOSH]
[119]
Text Neck Syndrome: Disentangling a New Epidemic - PMC - NIH
Indeed, the unavoidable addiction to personal computers and cell phones for texting has contributed to the increase in the prevalence of neck pain.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[120]
Prevalence of text neck syndrome, its impact on neck dysfunction ...
The study found that 31.7% of students with text neck syndrome have mild neck disabilities, with a higher proportion of females (40%).Missing: post- | Show results with:post-