Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

AT4

The AT4 is a , man-portable, single-use 84 mm unguided recoilless anti-tank weapon system developed in and manufactured by . Designed for use, it fires a fin-stabilized () from a disposable fiberglass-reinforced , enabling effective engagement of armored vehicles, bunkers, and low-flying at ranges up to 300 meters. The system emphasizes simplicity, with a striker-fired mechanism and integrated sights for rapid aim-and-fire operation by any trained soldier, while the confined-space variant incorporates a saltwater countermass for safe firing in enclosed environments. Originating from the 74 mm Pansarskott m/68 system used by the in the 1960s, the AT4 was developed by Försvarets Fabriksverk (FFV) in the late 1970s as a more capable successor, with prototypes tested by 1982 and full production beginning in 1985. It gained international prominence when adopted by the as the M136 in 1987, leading to over 600,000 units delivered to U.S. forces alone and more than 1 million produced globally. Combat-proven in conflicts including the , , and , the AT4 has been supplied to over 20 countries, such as the , , , and , underscoring its role as one of the most widely used light anti-armor systems worldwide. Key specifications include a total weight of approximately 6.7 kg for the (7.5 kg for confined-space ), an overall length of 1,020 mm, and a of 290 m/s, with armor penetration ranging from 400 mm to over 600 mm of rolled homogeneous armor (RHA) depending on the . The weapon features plastic range-adjustable sights and compatibility with optics, while its minimum arming distance of 10 meters enhances safety during urban operations. The AT4 family includes several variants optimized for specific threats: the AT4-CS () for enclosed environments, AT4-CS ER (extended range) reaching 600 meters, AT4-CS HP (high penetration) for heavily armored targets, and specialized rounds like the AT4 AST (anti-structure) for bunkers or the AT4 HE (high explosive) for personnel and light vehicles. These adaptations maintain the core disposable design, ensuring low logistics burden and high reliability in diverse operational scenarios.

History

Etymology

The name "AT4" derives from the abbreviation for "anti-tank" combined with the numeral 4, while also functioning as a phonetic play on the weapon's 84 mm , with "eighty-four" serving as a for "A-T-4" in English . This dual interpretation highlights the system's primary anti-armor purpose without implying advanced features like guidance. In defense , such caliber-referenced identifiers maintain continuity with prior systems, exemplified by the Pansarskott m/68—a 74 mm disposable adopted in 1968 and later succeeded by the AT4 in 1986 as Pansarskott m/86. The "Pansarskott" prefix, meaning "armor shot," underscores this tradition of straightforward, function-based labeling for light anti-tank weapons. By evoking "anti-tank" through its acronym and sound, the AT4 designation emphasizes its design as a man-portable, single-use system optimized for engagement of armored targets via unguided projection, prioritizing ease of deployment over reusability or precision targeting.

The AT4 originated as a successor to the Swedish Pansarskott m/68, known as the , a disposable 74 mm recoilless anti-tank weapon introduced in the late that suffered from limited effective range of around 100 meters and insufficient armor penetration against modern tanks. Developed to address these shortcomings, the AT4 increased the to 84 mm while retaining the single-use, man-portable design for use. Key development work commenced in the late under FFV Aerotech, a division of the Swedish defense firm Försvarets Fabriksverk (now part of ), aiming to enhance effectiveness and minimize hazards through improved and venting systems. Prototypes underwent initial testing in during 1981 and 1982, demonstrating superior performance in penetration and reliability compared to the . In 1983, the U.S. Army evaluated the AT4 alongside five other anti-tank systems—including the British , German , French , Norwegian M72E4, and Israeli —during trials at from April to July, where it excelled in ease of use, accuracy, and armor defeat capabilities. This led to its selection to replace the aging , with formal U.S. adoption as the M136 Light Anti-Armor Weapon in 1987 following minor modifications to sights, slings, and bumpers for American specifications. By , global production had surpassed 1 million units, primarily driven by U.S. and demand. In response to post-2020 demand surges from conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine war, Saab secured an Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity contract in August 2024 valued at up to US$494 million with the U.S. Army to ramp up production of AT4 variants for NATO allies.

Design and Operation

Operation

The operation of the AT4 follows a simple, step-by-step firing sequence optimized for quick use by infantry personnel. The operator begins by cradling the weapon in the left arm and removing the transport safety pin, which disarms the initial safety lock. Next, the flip-up iron sights are extended and adjusted for range, typically calibrated to a point target at 300 meters using the front post sight and rear peep aperture. The weapon is then shouldered with the rubberized stop extended against the right shoulder, aimed at the target, and the cocking lever is pulled rearward to arm the mechanism while holding down the forward safety button; finally, the trigger is pressed to ignite the propellant charge, propelling the projectile forward while the back blast danger zone—extending approximately 40 meters rearward in a 90-degree fan—must remain clear of personnel, equipment, or obstructions to prevent injury from heat, blast, and debris..pdf) The AT4's recoilless design relies on a countermass to neutralize forces, employing plastic blowout plugs at the rear of the launch tube in the standard to vent gases rearward and maintain balance during firing. This allows the 1,020-millimeter-long, 6.7-kilogram weapon to be handled portably without significant kickback to the user. In the AT4-CS confined-space , the plastic plugs are replaced by a saltwater solution countermass, which absorbs much of the energy and minimizes toxic gas production, enabling safer discharge in urban or enclosed areas with reduced risk to nearby personnel. Safety features emphasize prevention of accidental through a multi-layered system, including the transport that blocks the firing mechanism until removed, the forward button that must be depressed to allow activation, and the cocking that arms the firing rod only when intentionally positioned. As a single-use disposable , the fiberglass-reinforced tube is non-reloadable and is discarded entirely after firing to preclude reuse or mishandling..pdf) Due to the AT4's intuitive design and minimal mechanical complexity, training requirements are limited to basic familiarization, focusing on safe handling, sight alignment, and control, typically completed in a single session for qualified personnel. However, instruction places strong emphasis on hazards, requiring operators to verify clear zones and adopt proper stances—such as kneeling or prone positions—to mitigate risks, particularly in confined urban environments where obstacles can amplify blast effects..pdf)

Technical Specifications

The AT4 is a , disposable, single-use featuring a recoilless launcher tube preloaded with an 84 mm fin-stabilized () cartridge. Its design emphasizes portability and simplicity, with the entire unit constructed from a fiberglass-reinforced tube for durability and reduced weight, allowing one to carry and employ it without specialized beyond basic familiarization. The fixed round incorporates a rocket motor using a double-base formulation, providing initial propulsion via a confined backblast while the warhead achieves stable flight through rear-fins. Key performance parameters include an of 300 meters against point targets such as armored vehicles and up to 500 meters for area targets, with a of 290 m/s for the standard projectile. The warhead delivers penetration of approximately 400 mm of rolled homogeneous armor (RHA), sufficient for defeating light to medium armored threats while producing and effects beyond the armor. The system operates reliably in extreme conditions, from -40°C to +60°C, and has a certified of 20 years under proper storage.
SpecificationStandard AT4AT4-CS Variant
Length1,020 mm914 mm
Mass6.7 kg8 kg
Caliber84 mm smoothbore84 mm smoothbore
Effective Range300 m (point), 500 m (area)300 m (point), 500 m (area)
Muzzle Velocity290 m/s220 m/s
These specifications highlight the AT4's balance of lethality and ease of deployment in operations, where the launcher's disposable nature eliminates reloading or maintenance post-firing.

Ammunition and Variants

Projectiles

The AT4 launcher is compatible with several types of 84 mm fin-stabilized projectiles, each designed for specific tactical roles ranging from anti-armor engagements to and area suppression tasks. These warheads are preloaded into disposable launch tubes, ensuring simplicity and reliability in field use. The primary warhead types include (HEAT), high-explosive dual-purpose (HEDP), and specialized variants such as high-penetration (HP), anti-structure tandem (AST), extended range (ER), and high-explosive (HE). The employs a mechanism to defeat armored vehicles, achieving of up to 440 mm of rolled homogeneous armor (RHA) at 0° obliquity. This is accomplished through a liner that collapses under to form a high-velocity metal , which erodes and pierces the . Beyond the initial , the produces significant after-effects, including spalling—where fragments from the inner armor surface are driven into the vehicle's interior—and potential incendiary damage from superheated gases and molten metal. In contrast, the warhead combines armor defeat with anti-personnel fragmentation, penetrating up to 150 mm RHA while dispersing over a wider area for effectiveness against light vehicles, , and soft targets. It features a dual-mode that allows impact or delayed detonation, enhancing its utility in breaching structures or engaging grouped personnel. This makes the HEDP particularly versatile for scenarios where threats include both protected assets and exposed troops. Specialized projectiles address niche operational needs. The HP variant enhances anti-armor performance in confined spaces, offering penetration around 420 RHA at effective ranges up to 300 m, with reduced back-blast for indoor firing. The AST warhead uses a tandem charge configuration to first suppress reactive armor or barriers before delivering a follow-through blast optimized for bunkers and fortified positions in environments, effective at 200 m. For longer engagements, the ER projectile extends the effective range to 600 m while maintaining high penetration of approximately 460 RHA, suitable for standoff attacks on mobile targets. Additionally, the HE warhead focuses on area suppression, producing airburst or fragmentation effects up to 600 m (or 1,000 m in airburst mode) to neutralize behind cover without significant armor-piercing capability. All AT4 projectiles incorporate or proximity fuzes for reliable initiation upon , with a mechanism activating at approximately 1,000 m to minimize risks. Warhead designs prioritize standards, using stable explosives to reduce accidental hazards during transport and handling.

Variants

The AT4 has evolved through several variants to address diverse operational needs, including urban environments, extended ranges, and precision targeting, while maintaining its core 84 mm caliber and disposable design. The , designated M136 by the U.S. , was adopted in as a lightweight anti-armor weapon for use, featuring a (HEAT) warhead compatible with the baseline projectile for penetrating up to 400 mm of rolled homogeneous armor. Introduced in the early , the AT4-CS () variant enhances urban combat suitability by incorporating a saltwater-filled countermass and foam to minimize and , allowing safe firing from enclosed spaces as small as 1 meter deep by 1.5 meters high. This model measures 914 mm in length and weighs 7.5 kg, making it about 10% shorter but slightly heavier than the M136 due to the countermass, while retaining compatibility with standard projectiles for anti-armor roles. Building on the AT4-CS, the AT4-CS RS (Reduced Sensitivity) was developed in the late 2000s and adopted by the U.S. Army in the 2010s, featuring a reduced-sensitivity for safer handling and a saltwater countermass to further limit effects in confined areas. The AT4-CS ER (Extended Range) is a separate configuration with an integrated booster, extending the to 600 m while weighing under 9 kg, and supports specialized projectiles such as for improved behind-armor lethality. The XM919, selected under the U.S. Army's Individual Assault Munition program in 2024 under a $494 million indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract, is a multi-role evolution of the AT4-CS with tandem options for defeating light armor and structures, while maintaining confined-space firing compatibility. Initial deliveries commenced in 2025 to replace legacy single-use systems and reduce logistical burdens. Earlier experimental variants included the AT8 bunker-buster from the late , which adapted the AT4 launcher with a high-explosive dual-purpose () derived from the Mk 153 for breaching fortified structures, though it was not selected for full in the U.S. Defeat Munition program. Similarly, the AT12-T, a guided 120 mm prototype tested in the early , aimed to provide top-attack capabilities but was cancelled in the due to development challenges and shifting priorities toward unguided disposable systems. By 2025, over 1 million AT4 units across all variants had been produced, with ongoing efforts to standardize shoulder-launched munitions promoting interoperability among allied forces.

Operational History

Operators

The AT4 was originally developed and adopted by the in 1986 as a primary anti-tank for units. The designated the AT4 as the M136 and integrated it into service starting in the late 1980s, with Saab delivering over 600,000 units to U.S. forces by 2017; operational guidance is provided in U.S. Army Training Manual TM 3-23.25, which details its use by individual soldiers for anti-armor and anti-personnel roles. In August 2024, the U.S. Army awarded Saab an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract valued at up to $494 million for additional AT4 systems over five years. Ukraine received over 10,000 AT4 units through post-2022 military aid from the and allies, including 6,000 systems provided by the U.S. in a March 2022 package to support defensive operations against armored threats. France adopted the AT4 in the mid-1980s for light anti-armor roles and placed a follow-on order in December 2022 through the for an undisclosed quantity valued at approximately €24 million. Other notable military operators include the , , and , which have integrated the AT4 into their anti-tank capabilities since the ; became a customer in with a contract for the AT4CS AST variant to equip army and units in scenarios. The AT4 is in service with more than 30 countries worldwide, primarily through exports managed by . In February 2024, the ordered an undisclosed number of AT4 systems valued at €63 million for distribution to member nations, with deliveries scheduled through 2027. Limited instances of AT4 use by non-state actors, such as insurgents in conflicts, have occurred through captured stockpiles from state forces.

Combat Use

The AT4 saw its first major combat deployment during the 1991 , where U.S. employed the weapon against Iraqi armored forces, including T-55 tanks, in engagements such as the near the border. integrated the M136 AT4 into their anti-armor tactics alongside other handheld systems, contributing to the defeat of Iraqi incursions and the liberation of territory in urban and open environments. The system's portability allowed units to rapidly engage light and medium armor in close-quarters fighting, demonstrating high reliability in desert conditions. In the and wars from 2003 to 2021, coalition forces, particularly U.S. and , used the AT4 extensively for assaults on vehicles, bunkers, and fortified positions. During the Second in November 2004, American troops fired the weapon in house-to-house combat to suppress insurgent-held structures and disable improvised armored threats, marking one of the most intense urban applications of the system. Its disposable design proved advantageous in high-tempo operations, enabling soldiers to prioritize mobility over reloading under fire. Since the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Western nations have supplied thousands of AT4 launchers as part of packages to Ukrainian forces, who have deployed them against armored columns in key battles. The weapon played a role in the defense of in early 2022 and the Kharkiv counteroffensive later that year, where Ukrainian used it to target fighting vehicles and assets in forested and . Open-source reports indicate the AT4 contributed to the destruction of hundreds of vehicles alongside other anti-tank systems, though exact attributions vary due to mixed use with weapons like the . As of late 2024, Ukrainian forces have begun repurposing AT4 warheads as improvised munitions for FPV drones to extend their utility in the conflict. The AT4 has also appeared in other conflicts, including the , where Israeli Defense Forces incorporated it into ground operations against positions, and the in the , where opposition rebels utilized captured or supplied units to counter regime armored advances. Tactical evaluations from these engagements highlight the AT4's effectiveness against infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs) and lighter armor, penetrating up to 400-500 mm of rolled homogeneous armor, but reveal limitations against modern main battle tanks equipped with explosive reactive armor (ERA), where top-attack or tandem warheads from systems like the are preferred. Recent lessons emphasize integrating the AT4 with spotters for , enhancing its utility in drone-saturated battlefields by allowing to engage beyond line-of-sight threats.

References

  1. [1]
    AT4 Family | Saab
    Our AT4 family is one of the most successful anti-armour weapons ever. Lightweight, man-portable and fully disposable weapons, each is optimised for anyone to ...
  2. [2]
    AT4 Light Anti-Armour Weapon - Army Technology
    Jul 30, 2018 · The AT4 is an 84mm unguided anti-armour weapon manufactured by Saab Bofors Dynamics. It is effective in assaulting tanks and combat vehicles.
  3. [3]
    Saab Bofors AT4-CS Light Anti-Armor Weapon - Military Factory
    Page details technical specifications, development, and operational history of the Saab Bofors AT4-CS Light Anti-Armor Weapon Man-Portable Disposable ...
  4. [4]
    Saab AT4: over one million delivered, and the saga continues
    May 23, 2022 · As a curiosity, two are the possible origins of its name; Anti Tank 4 or eighty-four, the latter indicating the calibre. Production of the ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
  5. [5]
    The lethal technology of the Swedish Anti-Armor Weapons
    as in “A-T-4.” This weapon system is effective against ...
  6. [6]
    Swedish Military Designations
    Pansarbil, Pb, Armoured car ; Pansarskott, Pskott, Light anti-tank weapon ; Pansarvärnskanon, Pvkan, Anti-tank gun ; Pansarvärnskanonvagn, Pvkv, Tank destroyer.Missing: 68 | Show results with:68<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    FFV Pansarskott m/68 (Miniman) Man-Portable, Shoulder-Fired ...
    May 25, 2018 · The Miniman was officially succeeded in the Swedish Army inventory by the FFV AT4 anti-tank weapon system (detailed elsewhere on this site) ...Missing: convention | Show results with:convention
  8. [8]
    Ukraine's One-Shot Wonder Weapon: The AT4 - The Armory Life
    Sep 13, 2022 · Originally developed by Förenade Fabriksverken (FFV) and manufactured at their facility at Zakrisdal, Karlstad, Sweden, the AT4 took many design ...
  9. [9]
    The New 84mm AT4 - Small Arms Defense Journal
    ... AT4 is an 84 mm unguided, anti-armor weapon manufactured by Saab. In 1982, the AT4 was introduced into the US Army before the weapon was adopted by Sweden.Missing: origin homophone
  10. [10]
    Inert Anti-Tank AT4 Recoilless Weapon - RES Auction Services
    By 1999, the average unit cost of an AT4 was roughly $1,500, far cheaper than the main battle tank it was targeting worth several millions. No donations for ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    U.S. Army selects Saab's AT4 solution for Individual Assault ...
    The U.S. Army has awarded Saab an Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, which allows the U.S. Army to place orders for up to $494 million ...
  12. [12]
    FM 23-25: Light Antiarmor Weapons - APPENDIX A (SAFETY)
    The launcher's total backblast area extends 40 meters (44 yards) to the rear (Figure A-1) and is divided into two zones. During training, both should be marked ...
  13. [13]
    The U.S. Army and the AT4: An Enduring Partnership, Never ... - Saab
    Sep 11, 2023 · The AT4 was initially developed in Sweden, however, it was the United States that first adopted the weapon system, quickly becoming one of ...Missing: 1987 Aberdeen Proving Ground
  14. [14]
    CHAPTER 2 (M136 AT4, OPERATION AND FUNCTION)
    a. Transport Safety Pin. This pin blocks the firing pin from striking the cartridge percussion cap. To disengage this pin, pull it outward, then release it.
  15. [15]
    M136 AT4 - GlobalSecurity.org
    AT4 · AT4 Specifications · AT4 Pictures · AT4 References. M136 AT4 ... 1,020 mm (40 inches) Weight (Complete System) ... 84 mm. Muzzle Velocity............ 290 mps ( ...
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Propellant Residues Deposition from Firing of AT4 Rockets - DTIC
    Dec 13, 2009 · The AT4 rocket deposits 95g/round of nitroglycerin, with 73% of the original load remaining, indicating poor propellant burn efficiency.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Storage of Ordnance, Munitions and Explosives (OME) - GOV.UK
    Jan 11, 2013 · Thus a propellant with a shelf-life of 20 years would be reduced as follows: ... AT4 ammunition stored within the C Coy ISO storage area.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Combat proven, future ready - Saab
    The disposable AT4 anti-armour weapons for short-range combat give soldiers the ability to defeat combat vehicles with high penetration and devastate their.
  20. [20]
    M136 AT4 - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 7, 2011 · The M136 AT4's warhead has excellent penetration ability and lethal after-armor effects. The extremely destructive, 440 gram shaped-charge ...
  21. [21]
    FM 3-23.25 Chapter 3 - GlobalSecurity.org
    M136 AT4, OPERATION AND FUNCTION ; Length, 460 mm (18 inches) ; Weight, 1.8 kg (4 pounds) ; Minimum Range ; Training. 30 meters (100 feet) ; Combat. 10 meters (33 ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Anti-Armor, Confined Space, Reduced Sensitivity (AT4CS-RS ... - DTIC
    Plugs may be installed on the rear of the counter mass such that in a thermal event, the plugs will melt, allowing the saline solution in the counter mass to ...
  23. [23]
    Saab Gets Big XM919 Shoulder-Fired Anti-Armor Launcher Order ...
    Aug 27, 2024 · The Army has said in the past that it hopes to begin fielding XM919s in 2025. ... On August 29, the Pentagon's daily contracting notice issued a ...
  24. [24]
    Shoulder Launched Munitions - PM CCS - JPEO A&A
    Shoulder-Launched Munitions (SLMs) are for engaging enemies and fortifications. Examples include the M136 AT4, M141 BDM, and XM919 IAM. The M136 AT4 is a ...Missing: RS T MP sources
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Multi-Purpose Individual Munition - Archived - Forecast International
    Sep 3, 2002 · The AT4E2 is defined as a dual-mode. Anti-Bunker and Anti-Armor Weapon. 3. AT8. This is a modified, heavier AT4 system integrated with the ...
  26. [26]
    NATO - Official text: Updated Defence Production Action Plan, 13-Feb.
    Jun 24, 2025 · The updated Plan supports Allies' efforts to accelerate the growth of defence industrial capacity and production through aggregating demand, ...
  27. [27]
    Saab Receives U.S. Army Order for AT4 Systems
    Oct 10, 2017 · "Since 1987, Saab has delivered more than 600,000 AT4s to U.S. forces. We are pleased to continue supplying this system and continue adapting it ...
  28. [28]
    US Army places IDIQ contract with Saab to supply AT4s under its ...
    Aug 30, 2024 · The US Army has awarded Saab an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract worth up to USD 494 million (EUR 447 million) over five years.
  29. [29]
    Fact Sheet on U.S. Security Assistance for Ukraine | The White House
    Mar 16, 2022 · 2,000 Javelin, 1,000 light anti-armor weapons, and 6,000 AT-4 anti-armor systems;; 100 Tactical Unmanned Aerial Systems;; 100 grenade launchers, ...
  30. [30]
    Saab Receives Order for AT4 from France
    Saab received an order in mid-December 2022 for the anti-armour weapon AT4 from the French Armament General Directorate (DGA).
  31. [31]
    Saab AT4 - SALW Guide
    It is a single-shot recoilless weapon and one of the most common light anti-tank weapons in the world. It is preloaded and after firing, the AT4 cannot be ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  32. [32]
    Saab wins AT4 anti-armour weapon contract from India - The Hindu
    Jan 20, 2022 · “The Indian armed forces are a new customer for AT4. This order includes the AT4CS AST, which can be fired from confined spaces such as from ...
  33. [33]
    Saab receives order for AT4 from NATO Support and Procurement ...
    Saab has received an order for the anti-armour weapon AT4 from the NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA). The order value is approximately EUR 63 million.Missing: exports operators
  34. [34]
    The Brutal 2004 Siege of Fallujah - Time Magazine
    Nov 22, 2004 · The young grunts defended themselves with all manner of fire, including AT4 antitank rockets, M-203 40-mm grenade launchers and TOW missiles ...
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    ONE MUNITION, MULTIPLE TARGETS - USAASC
    Aug 12, 2021 · Conversely, the M136A1 AT4 Confined Space provides Soldiers the capability to only defeat light armored platforms but can be safely fired from ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications