Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Armbrust

The Armbrust (German for "crossbow") is a disposable, single-shot recoilless anti-tank weapon developed in West Germany during the late 1970s by Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm as a lightweight, man-portable system for infantry use against armored targets. It employs a 67 mm unguided shaped-charge projectile propelled by a counter-mass mechanism involving opposed pistons and plastic "cookies" to neutralize recoil and exhaust gases, enabling safe discharge from confined spaces with a backblast danger zone of just 80 cm. Weighing 6.3 kg and measuring 850 mm in length, the launcher features a preloaded composite tube with integrated sights and a folding pistol grip that doubles as a safety. Key operational characteristics include an of 300 meters and armor penetration capability of approximately 300 mm, making it suitable for short-range engagements in or indoor settings where traditional pose risks due to backblast. The design's low and minimal launch flash further enhance its utility for concealed firing positions. Exported to multiple countries including , , and , the Armbrust achieved limited adoption among conventional forces but appeared in small numbers with insurgent elements in conflicts across Bosnia-Herzegovina, , and other regions. Production ceased after the , with the system overshadowed by guided alternatives, though its innovative recoil mitigation influenced subsequent disposable launcher designs.

Development

Historical context and requirements

The Armbrust was conceived in 1972 by Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm (MBB) through a private venture aimed at producing a lightweight, man-portable anti-armor system optimized for combat in densely built-up urban environments, where traditional recoilless weapons were constrained by hazardous backblast zones extending several meters behind the launcher. This initiative reflected broader War-era imperatives for infantry units, particularly in , to equip second-line or specialized forces with disposable anti-tank tools capable of engaging Soviet-style armored threats without exposing operators to detection or injury in confined settings like buildings or narrow streets. Existing systems, such as launchers or recoilless rifles, generated significant rearward exhaust that precluded indoor firing and increased vulnerability in close-quarters battles anticipated along the Central European front. Core design requirements emphasized a recoilless with negligible backblast—limited to a safe zone of about 1 meter—and the ability to fire as close as 80 cm from a wall, enabling use in enclosed spaces without structural damage or risk to nearby personnel. Additional priorities included drastic reductions in launch signature, encompassing minimal noise (comparable to striking metal with a hammer), flash, and smoke, achieved via a modified counter-mass system using flakes to contain gases within the barrel. The weapon was specified for single-use disposability, weighing under 7 kg fully loaded, with a 67 mm designed to penetrate at least 300 mm of rolled homogeneous armor at ranges up to 300 meters, prioritizing tactical surprise and operator safety over reusability. These features extended applicability beyond conventional to counterterrorist operations, , and national police units requiring low-collateral urban engagement options.

Design and testing phase

The Armbrust was developed by Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm (MBB) in during the late 1970s as a response to requirements for a man-portable, low-signature anti-tank weapon capable of engaging Soviet armored vehicles in confined urban environments. The core innovation centered on a recoilless launch mechanism inspired by the principle, employing dual pistons within a disposable fiberglass tube: the forward piston propelled the 67 mm (HEAT) projectile, while the rear piston ejected a counter-mass of shredded polymer flakes or plastic/metal rods to neutralize recoil, minimizing backblast to a safe distance of approximately 1 meter behind the firer. This design eliminated the need for a large venturi or open breech, reducing flash, noise, and infrared detectability compared to conventional systems like the , while enabling firing from enclosed spaces without significant overpressure hazards. Key ergonomic and operational features refined during the design phase included a foldable that doubled as a , piezoelectric impact ignition for reliable propellant initiation, and an integral side-mounted optical sight for quick . The featured folding fins for stabilization and a shaped-charge designed to penetrate up to 300 mm of rolled homogeneous armor at effective ranges of 300 meters, with a maximum of 1,500 meters. Development emphasized lightweight construction, resulting in a total system weight of 6.3 kg and length of 850 mm, prioritizing portability over reusability. Testing focused on validating the 's gas and counter-mass efficacy to ensure operator safety and weapon reliability under simulated combat conditions, including indoor firings and urban scenarios. Trials confirmed the system's low-blast profile, with gases confined within the sealed barrel until , producing negligible external signature. By 1980, following successful evaluations of prototype performance against armored targets, the Armbrust transitioned to production readiness, demonstrating superior confinement-fire capabilities for forces while addressing limitations of prior recoilless designs prone to hazardous backblast.

Production and initial adoption

Production of the Armbrust began in under Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm (MBB) in the late , after development efforts that started in 1970 and concluded by the mid-1970s. The disposable launcher was designed as a man-portable anti-tank weapon with minimal backblast and , enabling safe firing from enclosed spaces. Despite its origins, the adopted the in limited numbers, preferring reusable systems like the for broader deployment. Initial widespread adoption occurred through exports in the early 1980s to NATO-aligned and Asian nations, including , , , , and the , where its urban combat suitability proved advantageous. In 1988, MBB transferred to Singapore's Chartered Industries, which continued under license and integrated the weapon into its forces before phasing it out for in the 2000s. Overall across contractors exceeded 67,000 units by 2022.

Design and technical features

Recoilless mechanism and counter-mass system

The Armbrust employs a recoilless launch mechanism based on the Davis gun principle, utilizing a counter-mass system rather than traditional gas venting to neutralize recoil. Upon ignition of the propellant charge, high-pressure gases drive dual opposed pistons within the launch tube: the forward piston accelerates the 67 mm projectile out of the muzzle, while the rear piston propels an equal-mass countermass rearward. This countermass consists of approximately 5,000 shredded plastic flakes, ensuring momentum conservation with negligible net force on the launcher. The gases remain contained within the post-firing, trapped between the pistons and baffled structures that halt their motion, thereby eliminating backblast and enabling safe discharge from confined spaces without risk to the or nearby personnel. The countermass, ejected at low from the rear, dissipates through fragmentation and air resistance, further minimizing signature effects such as flash, noise, and detectability. This closed-breech design contrasts with open-vented recoilless rifles, providing enhanced safety and . Engineering analyses confirm the system's efficacy, with the equal masses of (approximately 3.2 kg including ) and countermass achieving near-perfect cancellation, as validated in developmental testing phases. The launch tube withstands the internal pressures without deformation, supporting the disposable nature of the weapon.

Launcher construction and ergonomics

The Armbrust launcher features a disposable tube constructed from fiberglass-reinforced composite materials, designed for single-use operation to simplify and reduce maintenance requirements. This construction provides a structure weighing 6.3 kilograms overall, with a total length of 850 millimeters, enabling portability without excessive burden. The tube houses the , pistons, and counter-mass components internally, with the outer casing offering structural integrity during launch while minimizing for reduced detectability. Ergonomically, the launcher incorporates a pistol-grip firing mounted below the for stable shouldering and intuitive control by a single operator. An integral side-mounted sighting unit, positioned on the left for right-handed users, facilitates quick without altering firing posture. The design includes a folding to compact the for transport, enhancing field mobility, while the absence of significant backblast—due to the counter-mass ejection—allows safe firing from enclosed spaces as small as 3 meters by 3 meters, improving tactical flexibility in or confined environments. The piezo-electric ensures reliable ignition with minimal mechanical complexity, reducing user demands. Overall dimensions, including a of approximately 75 millimeters, contribute to balanced handling and minimal profile during carry or concealment.

Projectile and warhead specifications

The Armbrust fires a 67 mm unguided launched via a recoilless , with the optimized for anti-armor and anti-personnel roles. The standard configuration uses a high explosive anti-tank () shaped charge , which achieves penetration of up to 300 mm of rolled homogeneous armor (RHA) at standoff distances typical of its . This capability stems from the 's focused energy forming a high-velocity metal upon . Alternative warhead variants include a high (HE) fragmentation type for engaging soft targets such as or light vehicles, and an inert training round for non-lethal practice. The weighs approximately 1 kg, including the and sustainer elements, and exits the muzzle at 210 m/s. Effective firing range extends to 300 m, beyond which accuracy diminishes due to ballistic trajectory limitations without advanced guidance.
SpecificationValue
Caliber67 mm
Projectile weight1 kg
210 m/s
type (standard)Single
Armor penetration300 mm RHA
300 m

Variants and ammunition

Standard Armbrust configurations

The standard Armbrust configurations primarily encompass the anti-tank (AT) variant, equipped with a 67 mm (HEAT) designed to defeat armored targets through shaped-charge . This achieves up to 300 mm of rolled homogeneous armor (RHA) , enabling engagement of light to medium armored vehicles. The launcher in this configuration is a disposable, pre-loaded fiberglass tube, 850 mm long and weighing 6.3 kg, featuring a folding that doubles as a safety mechanism and simple for aiming. utilizes a counter-mass system, expelling polymer flake countermass rearward to counter with negligible backblast, permitting safe discharge in confined spaces with at least 0.8 meters clearance behind the operator. The deploys folding fins for stability, achieving an of 300 meters with a flat trajectory that enhances hit probability. An anti-personnel (AP) configuration supplements the AT model, substituting the HEAT with a high-explosive fragmentation (HE-FRAG) payload containing steel pellets for suppression, while retaining the same launcher and firing mechanism. These setups formed the core operational loadouts for Armbrust-equipped forces, prioritizing versatility in direct-fire anti-armor and light support roles.

Practice and specialized rounds

The Armbrust SC serves as the primary practice configuration, featuring a reloadable launcher paired with 17 mm subcaliber s that incorporate tracers and inert-filled warheads to simulate launch and flight without hazard. This setup enables cost-effective on weapon handling, aiming, and backblast safety, with the subcaliber round approximating the ballistic trajectory of the full 67 mm . Specialized rounds for the Armbrust include an anti-personnel (APERS) variant in 67 mm caliber, intended for suppressive effects against through fragmentation rather than armor penetration. The Armbrust P2 , weighing 1.2 kg, employs a tandem with a precursor charge to defeat explosive reactive armor, achieving greater effectiveness against modernized compared to the standard single-stage P1 at 1.0 kg. These options expanded operational flexibility beyond primary anti-tank roles, though production emphasized the baseline loading.

Operational history

Combat deployments and engagements

The Armbrust was deployed in combat during the (1978–1989) and the ensuing by various resistance factions opposing Vietnamese-backed forces. The Khmer People's National Liberation Armed Forces (KPNLAF), a non-communist group, relied on the Armbrust as their most effective anti-tank weapon in engagements against government armor and . The also utilized the system against Vietnamese troops and Cambodian government positions, with forces reporting seizures of Armbrust launchers from Khmer Rouge caches as early as 1989. In the breakup of , Croatian defense forces smuggled Armbrust launchers despite arms embargoes, employing them in defensive operations during the (1991–1995) to counter armored advances. Slovenian Territorial Defence units similarly acquired stocks for use in the (June–July 1991), where the weapon supported against Yugoslav tanks, though its shaped-charge warhead proved insufficient to reliably penetrate T-55 and armor, limiting its role to deterrence and morale effects rather than decisive anti-armor kills. Isolated instances of Armbrust possession by insurgents were documented in other conflicts, such as forces in Angola's , where troops captured launchers from rebel positions in the late 1980s, indicating potential employment against and mechanized units. However, detailed engagement records remain sparse, reflecting the system's niche adoption by smaller armies and irregulars rather than large-scale mechanized warfare.

Military exercises and training applications

The Armbrust's recoilless design, utilizing a counter-mass of fragmented to absorb propulsion forces, permits safe firing from enclosed positions such as buildings or bunkers, minimizing backblast hazards that complicate training with traditional rocket-propelled grenades. This feature supports realistic simulations and drills, enabling trainees to practice anti-tank engagements in confined environments without risking injury to personnel or requiring expansive open ranges. Dedicated training variants enhance its instructional utility. The Armbrust Ub employs inert, non-propelled for handling and sighting exercises, while the Armbrust SC offers a reloadable configuration for iterative dry-fire and simulated launches, promoting and procedural familiarity at reduced cost compared to live rounds. These adaptations align with the weapon's overall emphasis on , requiring only for effective use in squad-level anti-armor tactics. In adopting militaries, including those of and , the Armbrust integrated into routine anti-tank proficiency courses for and second-echelon units, where its low and minimal facilitated integration into broader exercises focused on armored threat neutralization. Its disposable, preloaded nature expedited deployment in rotations, allowing focus on tactical decision-making over complex weapon maintenance.

Operators and procurement

Primary adopting nations

Singapore emerged as the primary adopting nation for the Armbrust, acquiring production and sales rights in 1986 from Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm through Chartered Industries of Singapore, later reorganized as ST Kinetics. This enabled sustained local manufacturing and integration into the Singapore Armed Forces, where the weapon's ability to fire safely in enclosed spaces with minimal backblast addressed operational needs in urbanized terrains. Production continued in Singapore into the 2000s, even as newer systems like the MATADOR began supplementing it. Belgium also ranked among primary adopters, with licensed production handled by PRB to equip its military forces and support NATO interoperability requirements during the Cold War era. The Armbrust's adoption in Belgium emphasized its role as a lightweight, low-signature alternative to traditional recoilless rifles. Although originating in West Germany, the Bundeswehr did not procure the Armbrust in significant quantities, opting instead for established anti-tank systems, which limited its domestic footprint despite initial development for German infantry needs. Export success followed, with notable adoption in Southeast Asian nations including Brunei, Indonesia, and the Philippines, reflecting preferences for the weapon's confined-space firing capability in tropical, urban-prone environments.

Export sales and usage patterns

The Armbrust achieved commercial success primarily through exports rather than widespread domestic adoption in , with production rights transferred to Chartered Industries of Singapore (now ) in 1986 for local manufacturing and regional marketing. This licensing arrangement facilitated penetration into Southeast Asian markets, where the weapon's low-backblast design suited urban and confined-space operations prevalent in the region's militaries. Overall production across all contractors exceeded 67,000 units by , reflecting steady demand from budget-conscious importers seeking a disposable alternative to reloadable systems like the Carl Gustaf. Key export destinations encompassed Southeast Asian nations such as , the Philippines, , , , and , alongside South American adopter and European users including , , and . These procurements typically involved anti-armor roles, with quantities varying by national inventory needs; for instance, integrated the 67mm Armbrust AT variant into its army's equipment roster for light anti-tank duties. Sales patterns emphasized affordability and simplicity, appealing to developing militaries during the 1980s-1990s arms market, though specific per-country volumes remain undisclosed in public records. Usage patterns highlighted the Armbrust's role in training exercises and limited combat, prized for safe indoor firing without endangering operators or structures. In the , Croatia received approximately 2,000 units in 1992 amid escalating conflict, deploying them against armored threats in urban battles like . Many operators have since transitioned to successors like , co-developed by , , and , with phase-outs accelerating post-2000 due to improved alternatives; completed replacement by 2004. Residual stockpiles persist in secondary roles or reserves in nations like and the .

Performance evaluation

Field effectiveness and penetration capabilities

The Armbrust employs a shaped-charge () designed to penetrate up to 300 mm of rolled homogeneous armor (RHA) equivalent, a capability validated through manufacturer testing and military evaluations. This level of penetration proved adequate against the thinner side, rear, or top armor of 1970s-1980s era Soviet-designed tanks like the T-55 (effective side armor ~100-200 mm RHA equivalent) or , enabling infantry teams to disable such vehicles from flanking positions at ranges up to 300 meters. The 's performance relies on a liner that collapses under to form a metal , though effectiveness diminishes against or composite armor arrays common in later upgrades. Field evaluations highlight the Armbrust's operational advantages in constrained environments due to its counter-shot principle, which uses a propellant-driven counter-mass (typically shredded or wax) to neutralize , resulting in a minimal backblast danger zone of about 1 meter and negligible during launch. This allows safe discharge from indoors or urban cover without risk to nearby personnel or structures, contrasting with backblast-dependent systems like the that require 10-20 meters of open space. The weapon's unguided rocket maintains a flat to its maximum of 300 meters, with a muzzle velocity of approximately 210 m/s, facilitating quicker and higher first-hit probabilities in close-quarters engagements compared to arcing projectiles. Combat deployments were limited, with small quantities documented in post-2003 among insurgent caches, though no confirmed uses against armored vehicles were reported, likely due to low proliferation and preference for more readily available variants. Earlier exports supported irregular forces in Southeast Asian conflicts, including against armor, but detailed after-action assessments of success or kill rates remain scarce in open sources. Against modern main battle tanks featuring frontal composite armor exceeding 600-800 mm RHA equivalent or explosive reactive armor (), the Armbrust's fixed 300 mm limits it primarily to vulnerability exploitation on less protected aspects, underscoring its role as a stopper for legacy threats rather than a front-line killer.

Comparative advantages over predecessors

The Armbrust's primary innovation lay in its countermass recoilless propulsion system, which expelled approximately 5,000 plastic flakes rearward to neutralize , eliminating the backblast characteristic of predecessors like the and . This allowed firing from enclosed spaces, such as buildings or bunkers, without risk to the operator or nearby personnel from exhaust gases or , a limitation that exposed users of backblast-dependent systems to detection and injury in urban or confined environments. In contrast to the , which required a 20-30 meter clear zone behind the firer to avoid burns or blast effects, the Armbrust produced negligible noise and , enhancing and reducing the chance of counterfire. Earlier disposable launchers like the , while single-use like the Armbrust, relied on internal combustion that still generated some rearward blast and lacked the countermass mechanism, limiting their use in cover. The Armbrust's design thus prioritized operator safety and tactical surprise, addressing vulnerabilities evident in II-era weapons and rocket systems. Furthermore, the Armbrust achieved a flatter trajectory than many rocket-propelled predecessors, improving hit probability at its 300-meter effective range without the need for extensive ballistic correction. Compared to reusable recoilless rifles like the , which vented gases rearward despite their multi-shot capability, the Armbrust's disposable, preloaded format reduced weight to under 7 kilograms and simplified for units, trading reloadability for minimal and immediate readiness. These attributes made it particularly suitable for rapid deployment against armored threats in dynamic battlefields.

Limitations and operational shortcomings

The Armbrust's effective firing range against armored targets is limited to 300 meters, requiring operators to approach threats closely in open terrain, thereby increasing vulnerability to return fire from vehicle-mounted weapons or supporting . Beyond this distance, unguided flight path deviations due to wind, ballistic drop, and lack of advanced stabilization reduce hit probability, particularly against moving targets. Its shaped-charge warhead achieves of up to 300 mm of rolled homogeneous armor equivalent, adequate against lighter vehicles or side/rear aspects of 1980s-era tanks like the but inadequate against frontal plates exceeding 500 mm effective thickness or equipped with reactive armor (), as the single-stage charge lacks a precursor to defeat ERA tiles. This limitation became evident as armored threats evolved, rendering the system obsolete against post-Cold War main battle tanks without complementary capabilities like top-attack profiles. As a preloaded, disposable launcher, the Armbrust permits only one shot per unit, constraining sustained engagements and demanding extensive pre-positioned stockpiles for units, which elevates logistical burdens and per-shot costs relative to reloadable recoilless rifles such as the or RPG-7. Operators must carry multiple launchers to achieve volume of fire, adding weight—each unit weighs approximately 6.7 kg—and complicating mobility in prolonged operations. Simple iron sights and absence of fire-control optics further hinder precision in low-visibility conditions or against evasive targets, with training emphasizing static engagements over dynamic battlefield scenarios. While the confined-space firing capability (minimum 1-meter rear clearance) suits urban environments, the system's overall lack of modularity prevents upgrades, contributing to its replacement by multi-warhead successors like the Matador starting in 2004 among adopting forces.

Legacy and obsolescence

Influence on subsequent anti-tank systems

The Armbrust's primary innovation, a counter-mass system using frangible plastic counter-projectiles to neutralize and minimize backblast to approximately one meter, enabled safe firing from enclosed spaces and influenced subsequent disposable anti-tank designs prioritizing urban combat utility. This approach addressed limitations of traditional recoilless weapons like the or , which required larger backblast zones of 10-20 meters. The most direct successor, (Man-portable Anti-Tank, Anti-DOOR) 90 mm launcher, adopted and refined the Armbrust's mitigation principles in a joint German-- development program starting in 2000. Launched by (), (), and (), the MATADOR scaled up caliber from 67 mm to 90 mm for enhanced penetration—up to 500 mm of rolled homogeneous armor equivalent—while maintaining a confined backblast zone under two meters. It introduced multipurpose warheads for anti-personnel, anti-structure, and anti-tank roles, but retained the Armbrust's low and disposable, preloaded construction for simplicity and cost-effectiveness. By 2004, began phasing out the Armbrust in adopting militaries, such as Singapore's armed forces, where it addressed the original's modest 300 mm penetration against modern reactive armor. The design's emphasis on zero-backblast firing influenced broader trends in shoulder-fired anti-tank systems for , though guided missiles like the later dominated due to precision needs; the MATADOR's unguided, low-cost profile extended the Armbrust's legacy in export markets and secondary roles. No other major systems directly replicated the counter-mass mechanism at scale, as alternatives like the AT4 relied on softer launch techniques with residual backblast.

Reasons for phase-out and modern alternatives

The Armbrust's phase-out accelerated from 2004 onward as militaries sought systems capable of countering evolving armored threats featuring explosive reactive armor (ERA), advanced composites, and improved mobility. Its unguided 67 mm projectile, with an effective range of 300 meters and penetration limited to approximately 300 mm of rolled homogeneous armor (RHA), proved insufficient against late-generation main battle tanks like the variants or upgrades encountered in post-Cold War conflicts. This obsolescence stemmed from the weapon's reliance on direct-fire kinetics without tandem charges or top-attack trajectories, rendering it vulnerable to active protection systems and spaced armor designs proliferating by the 1990s. Direct replacement efforts focused on enhancing the Armbrust's core advantages—low backblast for indoor firing and disposability—while addressing firepower deficits. The (RGW 90), a 90 mm recoilless system co-developed by (), (), and () from 2000, emerged as the primary successor, entering service around 2004 to supplant the Armbrust in inventories like Singapore's and Germany's. achieves 500 mm RHA penetration (effective behind in anti-tank mode), a 500-meter range, and multipurpose warheads for anti-structure or anti-personnel roles, enabling versatile urban operations without sacrificing the confined-space firing capability. Broader modern alternatives reflect a shift toward precision-guided munitions for reduced collateral and higher lethality. Systems like the (Next generation Light Anti-tank Weapon), adopted by over 20 nations since 2009, offer predicted line-of-sight firing with 500-meter range and top-attack warheads defeating via initial kinetic impact followed by detonation. For standoff engagements, fire-and-forget missiles such as the , fielded by U.S. forces since 1996 and exported widely, provide 2,500-meter ranges and for top-down attacks, minimizing exposure in high-threat environments. These advancements prioritize guidance integration and modular payloads over the Armbrust's simplicity, driven by operational data from conflicts like and highlighting the need for beyond-line-of-sight accuracy against dynamic targets.

References

  1. [1]
    Armbrust - Modern Firearms
    Armbrust ("Crossbow") grenade launcher was developed during late seventies by German company Messerschmitt-Bolkow-Blohm (MBB) as a short-range anti-tank weapon ...
  2. [2]
    MBB Armbrust (Crossbow) Recoilless Disposable Light Anti-Tank ...
    The MBB Armbrust shoulder-launched, man-portable rocket launcher appeared in the latter stages of the Cold War and delivered a 67mm ant-tank projectile.
  3. [3]
    Armbrust - anti-tank grenade launcher - GlobalSecurity.org
    Mar 6, 2022 · Type, dynamo-active with a cut-off of powder gases ; Length, 850 mm ; Weight, 6.3 kg ; Effective firing range, up to 300 m ; Armor penetration, up ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] ARCHIVED REPORT Armbrust - Forecast International
    The Armbrust firing system allows the operator to fire the weapon within an enclosed space, with the rear of the weapon as close as 80 centimeters (31.5 in) to ...
  5. [5]
    Armbrust (Crossbow) German 67mm Unguided Anti-Tank Recoilless ...
    Aug 7, 2024 · The Armbrust is a preloaded, disposable, shoulder-fired antitank weapon. It has a low signature and low IR (infrared) detectability and can be safely fired ...
  6. [6]
    Armbrust - Weaponsystems.net
    The Armbrust is a rocket launcher of German origin. It was developed in the mid 1970's by MBB. It delivers a similar performance as the American LAW.
  7. [7]
    Armbrust | Gun Wiki - Fandom
    The Armbrust is a disposable, single-shot, anti-tank weapon, a 67mm recoilless gun with a 300m range, made of cheap materials, and uses a shaped charge warhead.
  8. [8]
    67mm armbrust projected grenade - CAT-UXO
    The 67mm Armbrust is a man-portable, short-range, shoulder-launched, recoilless, single-shot, disposable launcher with a fin-stabilized, projected grenade.Missing: plastic | Show results with:plastic
  9. [9]
    Projectile, 67mm HEAT, ARMBRUST - Bulletpicker
    The apers projectile contains a fragmentation warhead consisting of steel pellets. The Armbrust SC uses a 17 millimeter subcaliber practice projectile with ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Projectile
    ARMBRUST, 67MM, HEAT. ARMBRUST, 67MM, APERS. ARMBRUST SC, 67MM, PRACTICE. GERMAN CARTRIDGES, 67-MM, HEAT AND APERS. (ARMBRUST). Projectile - 46. Page 47 ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] JPRS Report, East Asia, Southeast Asia. - DTIC
    May 20, 1991 · Khmer Rouge positions, the sources said. The fighting started on ... The KPNLAF's best anti-tank weapon, the German-made Armbrust has a very short.
  12. [12]
    Congress Curbing Bush's Ability To Aid the Cambodian Guerrillas ...
    ... using Armbrust shoulder-fired antitank weapons manufactured by a West German company. The Phnom Penh Government says it seized such weapons from the ...
  13. [13]
    DESPITE U.N. EMBARGO, WEAPONS FLOOD INTO BALKANS
    Feb 13, 1993 · Croatian forces also have acquired sophisticated, portable defensive weapons such as the German-designed, Singapore-manufactured Armbrust anti- ...
  14. [14]
    Patriotism for Sale
    During the war which followed in summer 1991, it turned out that Armbrusts had only propaganda and psychological value because they were too weak to penetrate ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Armbrust Recoilless anti-tank gun For the surname, see ... - Facebook
    Mar 8, 2024 · The firing system uses pieso-electric trigger. Folding pistol grip also serves as a safety, blocking the trigger system when folded forward.
  16. [16]
    Ukraine buys German Matador hand-held anti-tank grenade launchers
    Jun 28, 2022 · The Matador RPG has been in serial production since 2004 simultaneously in Singapore (ST Kinetics), Germany (DND) and Israel (Rafael) and was ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    List of equipment of the Indonesian Army - Wikipedia
    "Sage Green Digital" is the new field uniform featuring a digital camouflage pattern. The new pattern is planned to be adopted simultaneously on Oct 5, 2025 ...Military engineering vehicle · Anoa (armoured personnel... · Pindad Badak<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Balkan Strategic Studies: October 31, 1992. © GIS
    Oct 31, 1992 · May 1992: During the course of the month, Croatia was supplied with 1,010 Stinger SAMs, 2,000 Armbrust anti-tank rockets, 47,100 AK-47 ...
  19. [19]
    Memories of the Old Camo Uniform and Armbrust Weapon - Facebook
    Mar 9, 2024 · Weight: 6,3 kg. Effective range: up to 300 m. Armor penetration: 300 mm. Armbrust ("Crossbow") grenade launcher was developed during late ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Small Arms (Infantry Weapons) Used by the Anti-Coalition Insurgency
    (U) The most popular portable rocket launcher is obviously the Russian RPG-7. Many copies of the. RPG-7 can be found in Iraq, including the Iraqi produced Iraqi ...
  21. [21]
    Dynamit Noble MATADOR (Man-portable Anti-Tank, Anti-DOor)
    "A joint German-Israeli-Singaporean weapon, the MATADOR is an upgrade to the Cold War-era Armbrust AT system developed by West Germany.".
  22. [22]
    Matador | Weaponsystems.net
    The MATADOR is a modern era rocket launcher of German origin. It was developed in the late 1990's by Dynamit Nobel at the request of the Singapore Armed Forces.Missing: manufacturer | Show results with:manufacturer<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    MATADOR Israeli 90mm Man-Portable Anti-Tank Recoilless Gun
    Feb 19, 2025 · MATADOR Israeli 90mm Man-Portable Anti-Tank Recoilless Gun is an updated version of the German-Singaporean Armbrust design and operates on the same principles.
  24. [24]
    Wirkmittel-90 / Matador / RGW-90 - Program - GlobalSecurity.org
    Mar 16, 2023 · The development of this weapon began in 2000 and the MATADOR will eventually replace the German-Singaporean Armbrust Light Anti-tank Weapon, ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline