Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Apocalyptic predictions

Apocalyptic predictions are forecasts or prophecies asserting the imminent occurrence of cataclysmic events that would culminate in the destruction or radical transformation of human civilization, often framed within religious , pseudoscientific extrapolations, or ideological alarmism. These claims have persisted across millennia, from ancient Mesopotamian omens to medieval Christian and modern secular variants involving nuclear annihilation, , or environmental tipping points. Empirically, apocalyptic predictions demonstrate a consistent pattern of inaccuracy, with hundreds of specific dates and scenarios proclaimed throughout history—such as the Millerites' expectation of Christ's return in 1843–1844, Hal Lindsey's 1980s nuclear tied to biblical , or Paul Ehrlich's 1970s doomsaying—failing to materialize as described, underscoring a near-zero success rate attributable to overreliance on selective rather than robust causal mechanisms. This track record highlights how such predictions often amplify transient anxieties or serve motivational purposes within communities, yet they recurrently falter against the resilience of adaptive human systems and unpredicted technological advancements. Notable controversies arise from their societal impacts, including resource misallocation during anticipated crises—like Y2K preparations yielding no systemic —or the psychological toll of repeated disappointments, as seen in the of 1844, which fractured religious movements without validating the forewarnings. Despite these failures, apocalyptic narratives endure due to their in times of , though truth-seeking demands prioritizing verifiable over unsubstantiated timelines, revealing biases in prophetic sources that favor dramatic inevitability over probabilistic .

Definition and Classification

Core Concepts and Terminology

Apocalyptic predictions denote assertions of forthcoming events that portend the total destruction or irreversible transformation of human civilization, often framed as culminating in , , or existential reset, with an emphasis on imminence and irreversibility. These forecasts typically invoke mechanisms such as cosmic upheaval, pandemics, technological singularities, or environmental collapse, distinguishing them from routine risk assessments by their scale and finality. The term apocalypse originates from the apokalypsis, signifying "unveiling" or "," and refers to prophetic disclosures of concealed realities, particularly visions of end-time tribulations and resolutions revealed through divine or supernatural means. In broader usage, it connotes cataclysmic finales to history, as in the biblical Book of 's imagery of seals, trumpets, and bowls unleashing global woes. , derived from eschatos ("last"), encompasses the doctrinal or philosophical inquiry into ultimate destinies, including , judgment, , and the world's terminus, serving as the intellectual framework for many apocalyptic narratives. Apocalypticism describes the worldview anticipating an abrupt, epochal rupture—often within the prophet's or believer's lifetime—marked by conflict between forces of , culminating in vindication for the righteous and punishment for the wicked. This contrasts with gradualist eschatologies by prioritizing sudden intervention over incremental progress. Key subtypes include , the expectation of a prolonged era of or (e.g., a literal or symbolic ) succeeding catastrophe, as articulated in traditions via Revelation 20:1-6. Secular analogs employ terms like existential risk, denoting low-probability, high-impact threats—such as impacts or engineered pandemics—that could preclude humanity's long-term flourishing, a concept formalized in risk analysis frameworks since the early . Distinctions persist between prophecy (divinely inspired utterance, often symbolic and conditional) and prediction (time-bound forecast, empirical or speculative), though apocalyptic variants frequently blend them, yielding testable claims prone to disconfirmation upon deadline passage. Doomsday serves as a colloquial synonym for the prophesied judgment day, evoking irreversible finality across cultural motifs from Norse Ragnarök to Mayan calendrical resets. Pseudoscientific elaborations introduce terms like cataclysmic pole shift or Nibiru encounter, repurposing astronomical or geological ideas without evidentiary support.

Religious and Eschatological Variants

Religious eschatological predictions envision the termination of the current cosmic or historical order through divine orchestration, culminating in , , or states, as articulated in sacred texts across major faiths. These variants typically feature precursor signs—such as moral decay, natural upheavals, or adversarial figures—preceding a decisive eschaton, them from secular forecasts by their theological framing of rooted in divine will rather than naturalistic mechanisms. In , apocalyptic expectations center on the Book of Revelation's depiction of the , marked by wars, famines, plagues, and the rise of the , followed by Christ's , the defeat of evil at , a millennial kingdom, final judgment, and new heavens and earth. Premillennial interpretations, prevalent among evangelical groups, anticipate a pre-tribulation of believers before these events, as described in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18. Specific date-setting, such as Harold Camping's 2011 prediction of the rapture on May 21 followed by global destruction on October 21, exemplifies recurrent failures in this tradition, where interpretive flexibility sustains belief despite empirical disconfirmation. Islamic eschatology outlines minor signs of the Hour (al-Saa'ah), including widespread immorality, false prophets, and societal breakdown, escalating to major signs like the emergence of the , the deceptions of Dajjal (a one-eyed figure), the descent of (Jesus) to slay him, the sun rising from the west, and cosmic disruptions heralding and divine reckoning on the Day of . These are derived from hadiths, such as those in , emphasizing accountability for deeds. Unlike cyclical models, this linear progression underscores finality, though historical claims of imminent signs, like 19th-century Babist assertions tied to the 1844 Hour, have not materialized as predicted. Jewish eschatology anticipates the "End of Days" (Acharit HaYamim) with the advent of the , who will ingather exiles, rebuild the Third , resurrect the dead, and usher in universal peace and knowledge of God, as prophesied in 2:2-4 and 37-39. Traditional sources like the ( 97a) suggest this occurs before the Hebrew year 6000 (circa 2239-2240 CE), preceded by "birth pangs" of intensified conflict and redemption. Messianic movements, such as Sabbatai Zevi's 17th-century claim, have historically faltered when unfulfilled, prompting rabbinic caution against date-specific prognostications. In , the current —initiated around 3102 BCE and spanning 432,000 years—represents progressive moral and spiritual decline, with predictions in the of shortened lifespans (to 50 years maximum), familial discord, environmental degradation, and rule by unqualified leaders. This age concludes with Vishnu's tenth , , who mounts a white horse to eradicate (unrighteousness) via global conflagration, restoring Satya Yuga's golden era. Such cyclical renewal contrasts Abrahamic finality, yet empirical observations of societal trends are invoked to affirm ongoing degeneracy without verifiable terminus, as the yuga's vast duration precludes near-term . Other traditions, like Zoroastrianism's foretelling of the savior purifying the world through molten metal amid final renovation, or Buddhism's Buddha emerging post-degeneration to teach anew, similarly integrate apocalyptic motifs tied to ethical . Across these variants, predictions often exhibit pattern-matching to contemporary crises, fostering through symbolic reinterpretation when timelines elapse.

Secular, Scientific, and Pseudoscientific Variants

Secular apocalyptic predictions typically arise from projections of resource scarcity, technological failure, or geopolitical conflict, eschewing supernatural elements in favor of materialist analyses. A prominent early example is Thomas Malthus's 1798 essay, which posited that exponential population growth would inevitably surpass arithmetic increases in food production, culminating in widespread famine, disease, and societal collapse unless checked by moral restraint or calamity. This Malthusian framework influenced subsequent forecasts, such as Paul Ehrlich's 1968 book The Population Bomb, which warned of hundreds of millions starving in the 1970s and 1980s due to overpopulation overwhelming agricultural capacity, particularly in India and China. Ehrlich's predictions, amplified by media and endorsed by figures like The New York Times, failed to materialize as the Green Revolution—advances in high-yield crops, fertilizers, and irrigation—doubled global food production and averted mass famine, with calorie availability per capita rising 25% from 1960 to 1990 despite population growth. Scientific variants draw on empirical models and observations to forecast existential threats, often with probabilistic assessments rather than certainties. In the , amid observed cooling trends post-1940s, a minority of climatologists, including some at the , speculated on anthropogenic aerosols potentially triggering a new within decades, though peer-reviewed literature showed no consensus for imminent glaciation and emphasized warming from CO2 as more likely. Contemporary scientific predictions include impacts; NASA's monitoring via the assesses near-Earth objects like , which will pass within 31,000 kilometers of Earth in 2029 but carries zero impact risk after refined orbital calculations, and Bennu, with a 0.037% chance of striking in 2182, potentially releasing energy equivalent to billions of bombs if realized. Other models project risks from supervolcanic eruptions or pandemics, as in the 2020 outbreak, but emphasize mitigation through vaccination and surveillance rather than inevitability. These differ from failed overpopulation alarms by incorporating adaptive human responses and updated data, yielding hazard probabilities typically below 1 in 10,000 annually for civilization-ending events. Pseudoscientific variants mimic scientific but rely on unverified claims, selective data, or , often gaining traction through media . The Year 2000 () bug, stemming from two-digit date coding in legacy software, spawned exaggerated forecasts of cascading failures in power grids, banking, and transportation, potentially causing societal breakdown; government reports estimated remediation costs at $100-600 billion globally, yet only minor glitches occurred on January 1, 2000, with no widespread collapse due to preemptive fixes. Similarly, claims of Planet Nibiru (or Planet X) colliding with Earth, popularized in the 1990s by ’s interpretations of ancient texts and Nancy Lieder’s alleged alien communications, predicted cataclysmic gravitational disruptions; these lacked astronomical evidence, as no such rogue body appears in telescopic surveys, and repeated date shifts (e.g., 2003, 2012, 2017) underscored their evasion. Such predictions persist in circles, exploiting public anxiety over real threats like variability, but diverge from rigorous by ignoring contradictory observations and falsification standards.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Instances

Apocalyptic predictions in ancient Near Eastern texts often framed cosmic disorder as reversible through . The Shulgi Prophecy, referencing the Ur III king (r. 2094–2047 BCE) but composed around the 12th century BCE, describes cycles of royal downfall, foreign invasion, and eventual restoration under a just ruler, presented as revealed foresight. Similarly, the Marduk Prophecy, an Assyrian composition from 713–612 BCE, portrays the god 's statue being removed from , triggering widespread famine, fratricide, lawlessness, and ecological collapse, followed by his return ushering in prosperity and enemy defeat. Jewish apocalyptic literature developed amid Hellenistic-era crises, with the —scholarly consensus dates its final form to circa 165 BCE during IV's desecration of the —depicting visions of four successive empires (Babylonian, , , ) ending in divine judgment, the annihilation of oppressors, and of the righteous. These texts emphasized deterministic historical progression toward eschatological vindication rather than cyclical renewal. Early Christian writings inherited this framework, expecting Christ's parousia within living memory, as in Paul's letters circa 50 urging vigilance amid perceived "birth pains" of the end (1 Thessalonians 4:13–5:11). By the late 2nd century , Montanist prophets in Asia Minor proclaimed new revelations of imminent , including Jerusalem's rebuilding as the . Patristic calculations, drawing from chronologies, projected the world's end around the 6,000th year , roughly 500 , influencing expectations through Augustine's era. Medieval apocalypticism surged with crises like the and Mongol invasions. (c. 1135–1202), an Italian abbot, divided history into three overlapping ages mirroring the (to Christ), (to 1260), and (post-1260 renewal)—foreseeing the Antichrist's rise circa 1260, followed by evangelical orders ushering a monastic without coercive hierarchy. During the (1347–1351), brotherhoods, originating in and spreading to and , organized mass processions of self-whipping to atone for sins, interpreting the plague as apocalyptic scourge and their penance as accelerating divine mercy or judgment. These movements, peaking in 1349 with thousands participating, dissolved under papal condemnation by 1350, having incited antisemitic pogroms amid unfulfilled eschatological hopes.

19th to Mid-20th Century Predictions

In the early , Baptist preacher William Miller calculated that the Second Coming of Christ would occur between March 1843 and March 1844, based on his interpretation of the 2,300-day prophecy in Daniel 8:14, which he dated from 457 BCE using the and a . 's lectures attracted tens of thousands of followers, known as Millerites, who anticipated the "cleansing of the sanctuary" as the earth's purification through Christ's return and the resurrection of the dead. When no event materialized by the initial deadline, Miller revised the end date to , 1844, drawing up to 100,000 adherents who sold possessions, gathered on hilltops, and prepared for ascension; the failure, termed the , led to widespread disillusionment, financial ruin for some, and the dissolution of many congregations, though it spurred denominations like Seventh-day Adventism, which reinterpreted the event as Christ's heavenly ministry beginning rather than a literal earthly advent. Other 19th-century predictions included those from figures like Joanna Southcott's followers, who after her 1814 death propagated sealed prophecies foretelling apocalyptic upheaval and the return of biblical patriarchs by the 1830s, culminating in failed expectations that fractured the sect. In , prophetess Nongqawuse's 1856 visions demanded the slaughter of cattle and crops to hasten ancestral resurrection and the expulsion of white settlers, promising a paradisiacal renewal; adherence led to over 40,000 deaths from when the prophecy failed, devastating the population without any supernatural intervention. These episodes reflected a pattern of religious fervor during the Second , where biblical and millenarian expectations drove mass movements, often ending in rationalization or schism rather than fulfillment. Entering the 20th century, secular fears amplified apocalyptic anxiety, as seen in the 1910 apparition of , when spectroscopic analysis revealed gas in its tail— passed through it harmlessly on May 18-19—prompting sensational reports of global asphyxiation or poison sufficient to end life. Astronomer speculated that the tail's 15 million miles could envelop the planet in toxic vapors, fueling public hysteria with sales, suicides, and church attendance spikes, though scientists like dismissed lethal risks due to the gas's dilution in vast space. Religious groups interpreted the comet as a harbinger of judgment, exacerbating fears rooted in historical comet omens rather than empirical threat, as no observable harm occurred despite the tail's traversal. Religious groups like the Bible Students (precursors to ) under predicted 1914 as the culmination of "Gentile Times" from Luke 21:24 and , foreseeing , the overthrow of earthly governments, and Christ's visible kingdom establishment, as detailed in the 1889 publication The Time Is at Hand. The onset of in 1914 led to reinterpretation as an invisible heavenly enthronement rather than earthly apocalypse, with subsequent predictions for 1918 (end of the church's harvest) and 1925 (resurrection of Abraham, , and others to usher in paradise) under Joseph Rutherford also failing, prompting doctrinal shifts while publications like Millions Now Living Will Never Die (1920) had claimed the end within . These unfulfilled dates, tied to pyramidology and chronological Bible calculations, resulted in membership fluctuations but reinforced a framework of ongoing "last days" without specified endpoints by mid-century.

Late 20th Century Predictions

In the late 20th century, apocalyptic predictions shifted toward secular frameworks, emphasizing , resource exhaustion, and as harbingers of . These forecasts, often disseminated through scientific reports, books, and media, projected imminent global crises within decades, driven by exceeding planetary limits. Prominent examples included warnings of mass starvation, industrial halt, and climatic reversals, which gained traction amid post-World War II population booms and the energy crises. Biologist Paul Ehrlich's 1968 book asserted that would overwhelm food supplies, stating, "The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now." Ehrlich, a Stanford professor, based this on Malthusian principles amplified by projections of unchecked demographic expansion in developing nations, predicting widespread s by 1980 that would destabilize civilizations. Similar alarms echoed during the first in 1970, where ecologist Paul Ehrlich and others forecasted annual deaths of 100 to 200 million by 1980, alongside assertions that "the world will be starving to death" due to depleted and fertilizers. The 1972 report , commissioned by the and authored by MIT researchers and colleagues, employed the computer model to simulate interactions among , output, , and . Its "business as usual" forecasted peaking and around 2030, followed by abrupt decline into collapse by mid-century, but earlier interpretations highlighted risks of systemic breakdown by 2000 from and non-renewable material shortages. The report warned that "the basic mode of the world's demographic-industrial system is growth, but the finite nature of the earth constrains growth," urging radical policy shifts to avert overshoot and crash. Climatic doomsday scenarios also proliferated, particularly in the . Media outlets like Newsweek's 1975 cover story "The Cooling World" amplified concerns from some scientists about a global temperature drop since the , predicting food shortages, disrupted monsoons, and advancing glaciers that could render swaths of farmland unusable within decades. Author Lowell Ponte's 1976 book The Cooling extended this to foresee billions of deaths by 2050 from and societal upheaval triggered by an impending , citing solar variability and as causal factors. Although peer-reviewed showed more studies favoring warming (44 papers) than cooling (7) from 1965–1979, these predictions influenced public discourse and policy debates on . The 1980s AIDS epidemic spurred fears of a modern plague extinguishing populations, with early projections estimating millions of U.S. cases by 1990 and potential global spread to heterosexual majorities. warned in of an "explosive" increase, while some epidemiologists invoked comparisons to the , anticipating unchecked transmission absent behavioral changes. By 1985, U.S. AIDS deaths reached thousands annually, fueling apocalyptic rhetoric about inevitable societal breakdown from workforce decimation and healthcare overload.

Patterns of Failure in Predictions

Empirical Track Record of Religious Prophecies

Religious prophecies concerning apocalyptic events, such as the Second Coming of Christ or the final judgment, have frequently included specific timelines derived from scriptural interpretation, yet empirical examination reveals a pattern of non-fulfillment. Historical records document dozens of such predictions across Christian denominations and other faiths, where anticipated cataclysmic events failed to occur on the designated dates, leading to among adherents and subsequent doctrinal adjustments. This track record underscores the challenge of verifying prophetic claims against observable reality, as post-hoc reinterpretations often shift from literal expectations to symbolic or invisible fulfillments. One prominent early example is the Millerite movement in the United States, led by Baptist preacher William Miller, who calculated the return of Jesus Christ for October 22, 1844, based on interpretations of the . Miller's lectures attracted up to 100,000 followers by 1844, many of whom sold possessions in anticipation of the event. When the prophesied advent did not transpire, the episode became known as the , prompting schisms that birthed groups like the Seventh-day Adventists, who reframed the date as the commencement of Christ's heavenly ministry rather than an earthly return. The Watch Tower Society, predecessors to , issued multiple dated prophecies in the early that similarly lapsed. Charles Taze Russell and successor Joseph Rutherford anticipated the end of the present world system and the resurrection of ancient patriarchs by 1925, following earlier expectations for 1914 as the conclusion of and the establishment of God's kingdom on earth. Publications like The Time Is at Hand (1917 edition) explicitly tied 1914 to the "overthrow of earth's governments" and the battle of , yet global war persisted without , and 1925 passed without resurrections. A later forecast for 1975, linked to the completion of 6,000 years of , implied the imminent paradise earth but resulted in membership declines after non-occurrence. These adjustments involved redefining events as invisible heavenly shifts, preserving the interpretive framework despite empirical disconfirmation. In contemporary instances, broadcaster predicted the —believers' ascension to heaven—on May 21, 2011, followed by global destruction on October 21, 2011, based on numerological analysis of biblical timelines. Camping's campaign spent millions on billboards and broadcasts, reaching an estimated audience of millions, but no seismic or supernatural events materialized, as confirmed by global monitoring. Post-failure, Camping conceded miscalculation but maintained the spiritual judgment had occurred invisibly, before retiring from . Such cases illustrate a recurring dynamic where specific, testable predictions evade falsification through non-literal revisions.
PredictionDateGroup/ProphetExpected EventOutcome
Christ's ReturnOctober 22, 1844Millerites (William Miller)Visible advent and earth's purificationNo occurrence; reframed as heavenly event
End of Gentile Times/1914Bible Students (Watch Tower)Overthrow of governments, paradise begins ensued but no divine ; reinterpreted as invisible
of Patriarchs1925 (J. Rutherford)Abraham, return to earthNo resurrections; explained as premature
and DestructionMay 21, 2011Believers raptured, earthquakes worldwideNo events; claimed spiritual fulfillment
Across these and other documented cases, such as the 1806 Hen of of judgment via a laying hen inscribed with "Christ is coming," the absence of predicted physical manifestations—earthquakes, resurrections, or —contrasts with the specificity of the forecasts. While proponents cite fulfilled in broader historical senses, dated apocalyptic claims exhibit zero empirical success rate in literal terms, prompting toward future predictions absent extraordinary . This pattern aligns with causal expectations that verifiable prophecies should demonstrate beyond chance or .

Failed Secular and Environmental Forecasts

Secular apocalyptic forecasts, distinct from religious , often emerge from scientific or pseudo-scientific models projecting , , or environmental collapse leading to societal breakdown. These predictions typically rely on extrapolations of current trends without accounting for technological adaptation or human ingenuity, resulting in repeated failures. Prominent examples include mid-20th-century warnings of imminent global famines and exhaustion of non-renewable resources, which did not materialize due to agricultural innovations like the and market-driven substitutions. Paul Ehrlich's 1968 book exemplifies early secular doomsaying, forecasting that would trigger mass starvation in the 1970s and 1980s, with "hundreds of millions" dying in , and by the 1980s, and global food shortages persisting thereafter. Ehrlich, a Stanford , argued that outpaced food production, predicting England's potential burial under "piles of rubble" from famine-induced chaos. These outcomes failed to occur; global food production surged via high-yield crops and fertilizers, averting the predicted crises, while slowed through voluntary declines rather than . Ehrlich's track record includes similar unfulfilled bets, such as famines killing over 100 million by 1980, underscoring the pitfalls of Malthusian models that underestimate innovation. The 1972 Limits to Growth report, commissioned by the and modeled using the program, projected that in , industrialization, and resource use would lead to around 2000-2030, with depletion of key commodities like , metals, and farmland causing sharp declines in food output and industrial capacity. Authors and colleagues simulated scenarios where "business as usual" trends culminated in a "rather sudden and uncontrollable decline" in both and economic activity. By the early , however, resource prices had not spiked as forecasted— and prices fell in real terms—and global GDP and continued expanding, contradicting the model's halt in growth around 2010-2020; critiques attribute this to overlooked factors like technological substitution and efficiency gains. Environmental forecasts in the amplified apocalyptic rhetoric, with media and some scientists hyping based on observed temperature dips from the 1940s to , predicting a new within decades that would devastate and trigger mass migrations. Newsweek's 1975 article warned of shortened growing seasons slashing food production by 20% or more, potentially leading to famines; ecologist Watt claimed would end by 2000 due to cooling-induced barren lands. These dire scenarios evaporated as temperatures rebounded, with no ensuing; the cooling hypothesis stemmed partly from pollution effects that were mitigated by regulations, but the among climatologists leaned toward warming from CO2 even then, highlighting media exaggeration over empirical . More recent environmental predictions, such as Al Gore's 2009 assertion that new models indicated the could be "nearly ice-free" in summertime by 2014, fueled fears of rapid polar melt cascading into global disruptions like rising seas and . Gore referenced projections from scientists like Wieslaw Maslowski, suggesting ice extent below 1 million square kilometers within five years. As of 2025, summer persists annually, with September minima around 4-5 million square kilometers, far from ice-free conditions; while extent has declined since satellite records began in 1979, the timeline overestimated melt rates, partly due to natural variability like the Multidecadal Oscillation influencing short-term trends.
PredictionSource/DateForecasted OutcomeActual Outcome
Mass famines killing hundreds of millionsPaul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb/1968Starvation in Asia/Africa by 1980s; global food collapseFood production doubled; no mass die-offs; population reached 8 billion without Malthusian crisis
Resource depletion and industrial haltLimits to Growth/1972Collapse by 2000-2030; oil/food shortagesResource prices declined; GDP/population grew; no halt
Global cooling and ice ageNewsweek/1975; Kenneth Watt/1970Famine from shortened seasons; end of civilization by 2000Temperatures warmed; agriculture expanded; no ice age
Ice-free Arctic summerAl Gore citing models/2009Nearly ice-free by 2014Persistent ice minima ~4-5 million km²; decline ongoing but slower than predicted
These failures illustrate a pattern where models amplify linear extrapolations while discounting adaptive responses, such as policy shifts or inventions, leading to overstated timelines for ; despite biases in and amplification of , the empirical from predictions underscores the need for in long-range .

Explanations for Recurrent Failures

Recurrent failures of apocalyptic predictions arise primarily from the profound of socio-ecological and technological systems, which defy accurate long-term due to emergent properties, loops, and unforeseen variables. Expert predictions, whether religious or secular, often rely on simplified models that extrapolate observable trends without adequately incorporating human or systemic , leading to systematic overestimation of collapse probabilities. For example, environmental forecasts from the anticipated global famines by the and based on outstripping food supply, yet yields increased through hybrid seeds, , and fertilizers, averting disaster. A key methodological flaw involves assuming static conditions or linear progression toward , ignoring nonlinear adaptations such as interventions and innovation. In climate-related claims, predictions of ice-free summers by 2013 or rapid sea-level rises submerging islands by 2000 failed because models overstated melt rates and underestimated natural variability alongside human efforts like reduced emissions in developed nations. Similarly, Paul Ehrlich's 1968 forecast of hundreds of millions starving by the 1970s disregarded the and agricultural revolutions that stabilized food production . These errors persist because forecasters frequently discount countervailing forces, such as resource substitution or efficiency gains, which historical data shows routinely confound Malthusian limits. Religious eschatological predictions fail for analogous reasons: reliance on interpretive frameworks of ancient texts that permit subjective timelines but crumble against empirical timelines, as dated events like the Millerites' advent or Harold Camping's 2011 did not occur despite fervent calculations. Prophetic specificity invites falsification when contingencies—wars, plagues, or celestial signs—do not align precisely, yet vagueness in original sources allows recurrent reinterpretation without learning from disconfirmation. Institutional factors exacerbate recurrence, as funding and media amplification favor dramatic scenarios over probabilistic assessments; for instance, grant allocations in climate science prioritize high-impact risks, skewing toward alarmist outputs that undervalue evidenced in past averted crises like the 1980s reversal via the . Overall, these failures underscore that apocalyptic claims thrive on partial causal chains, neglecting the full spectrum of human-driven equilibria that have historically forestalled existential breakdowns.

Contemporary Risks and Predictions

Geopolitical and Nuclear Scenarios

Geopolitical apocalyptic predictions have historically centered on the escalation of great-power conflicts into nuclear s, positing scenarios where (MAD) doctrines lead to global catastrophe. Since the development of atomic weapons in 1945, analysts have warned of chains of events—from proxy wars to direct confrontations—culminating in thousands of warheads detonating, causing immediate fatalities in the hundreds of millions followed by and . For instance, during the , simulations projected that a U.S.-Soviet could kill over 100 million initially, with and infrastructure loss amplifying long-term death tolls. These forecasts emphasized causal chains rooted in miscalculation, such as false alarms from errors or misinterpreted troop movements, which nearly triggered launches on multiple occasions between 1960 and 1980. A pivotal element in predictions was the "" hypothesis, advanced by and colleagues in 1983, which modeled from urban fires blocking sunlight and causing global temperature drops of 10–20°C for years, rendering impossible and leading to billions of deaths even in non-combatant nations. This theory influenced arms control debates and public opinion, contributing to the in 1987. Subsequent evaluations, however, revised the severity downward; studies in the and indicated milder cooling (1–5°C) for limited exchanges, with full-scale war effects still dire but not universally extinction-level, as atmospheric models showed dissipation faster than initially predicted. Real-world tests, like the 1991 Kuwait oil fires, produced negligible global climate impacts, undermining extreme claims and highlighting overreliance on unverified fire-injection assumptions. The ' , introduced in 1947, serves as a symbolic gauge of nuclear and existential threats, with its hands adjusted annually based on expert consensus. Set at 90 seconds to midnight from 2023 to 2024—the closest ever—it moved to 89 seconds in 2025, citing persistent nuclear modernization by the U.S., , , and others amid geopolitical strains. Critics argue the clock functions more as advocacy than precise forecasting, with adjustments often correlating to funding drives or political climates rather than empirical probabilities, as its vague methodology lacks falsifiable metrics and has trended alarmist without corresponding catastrophes. In contemporary contexts, Russia's 2022 invasion of has revived fears, with President issuing explicit threats of tactical weapon use if intervenes directly, aiming to deter Western arms supplies. Despite over 20 such red lines crossed—including long-range strikes into deployment has not occurred, as Moscow's coercion tactics failed to halt aid , per analyses of deterrence dynamics. U.S. and allied assessments peg the probability of Russian initiation below 5% under current conditions, attributing restraint to credibility and internal calculations against self-inflicted fallout. Similarly, tensions over involve Chinese expansion (projected 1,000 warheads by 2030) and U.S. commitments, but simulations emphasize conventional thresholds before crossing, with alliances like mitigating rather than provoking apocalypse. North Korea's arsenal adds rogue-state variables, yet its tests have prompted sanctions over . Overall, while arsenals totaling ~12,000 warheads sustain baseline risks—exacerbated by eroding treaties like New START's 2026 expiration—empirical deterrence has prevented predicted apocalypses despite crises like the 1962 or 2022 saber-rattling. Apocalyptic forecasts often amplify worst-case cascades without accounting for signaling, off-ramps, and rational actor constraints, as evidenced by the absence of use in over 70 conflicts since 1945. Think tanks stress accident prevention via improved command systems over fatalistic inevitability, underscoring that geopolitical friction heightens tension but rarely overrides incentives.

Technological and Existential Threats

Technological existential threats refer to scenarios where advanced technologies, such as (AI), , and , could precipitate or unrecoverable civilizational collapse, often framed in predictions by researchers in and risk analysis. These risks are distinguished from geopolitical or environmental ones by their reliance on rapid, uncontrolled innovation in human-engineered systems, where misalignment between technological capabilities and human values could amplify destructive potential. Proponents argue that the pace of development—evident in AI model scaling since 2012, where compute for training has increased by orders of magnitude—heightens the plausibility of catastrophic outcomes within decades. In , apocalyptic predictions center on the emergence of (AGI) or leading to loss of human control, termed "AI misalignment" or "x-risk." A 2023 survey of AI researchers estimated a mean probability of 14.4% for AI-induced , with estimates varying widely due to uncertainties in alignment techniques and deployment safeguards. , a pioneer in neural networks, assessed a 10-20% chance of AI causing by outpacing human oversight, citing rapid advances in large language models as of 2023. Earlier, a 2022 poll of experts placed the median extinction risk from AI at about 5% this century, reflecting subjective forecasts rather than empirical data, as no AGI has yet materialized. Critics, including AI researcher , contend that such fears resemble overblown concerns akin to early risks, prioritizing nearer-term issues like over speculative scenarios, given the absence of demonstrated superintelligent systems. Biotechnological threats involve engineered or enabling pandemics far deadlier than natural ones, with gain-of-function (GOF) research—enhancing pathogen transmissibility or lethality—cited as a vector for accidental or deliberate release. A 2025 report highlighted GOF experiments with pathogens like or coronaviruses, noting risks of lab leaks as seen in historical incidents, such as the 1977 H1N1 re-emergence, potentially scaling to existential levels via dual-use applications in bioweapons. Philosopher estimated engineered pandemics as contributing 3% to total existential risk, comparable to nuclear war, based on vulnerabilities in global biotech labs proliferating since the 2010s, where over 1,000 high-containment facilities operate amid lax oversight. Predictions warn of democratized tools like enabling non-state actors to design superviruses by 2030, though remains limited to theoretical models and near-misses, such as debated origins of linked to lab activities in 2019. Nanotechnology predictions invoke the "grey goo" scenario, where self-replicating nanomachines consume Earth's biomass, first articulated by Eric Drexler in 1986 but later moderated by him as improbable due to energy and design constraints. Assessments deem this low-credibility, with no viable pathway for molecular assemblers achieving exponential replication without human intervention, as current nanotech—focused on materials like carbon nanotubes—lacks autonomy for such catastrophe. Existential risk analyses, such as Nick Bostrom's 2002 framework, bundle nanotech with AI-biotech synergies but assign it marginal probability absent breakthroughs in molecular manufacturing, projected indefinitely due to physical limits like quantum effects hindering nanoscale precision. These forecasts, often from futurist circles, face skepticism for extrapolating unproven scalability, mirroring past overestimations of tech timelines. Overall, while these threats garner attention in and policy circles—evident in 2023 U.S. on —quantified predictions rely on expert elicitation rather than falsifiable tests, with probabilities clustered below 20% but diverging sharply across disciplines, underscoring the speculative nature amid institutional biases toward alarmism in academia. Empirical validation awaits technological maturation, emphasizing precautionary measures like international over unsubstantiated doomsaying. Environmental apocalyptic claims in the contemporary era predominantly center on anthropogenic climate change, forecasting scenarios of , mass extinctions, and uninhabitable regions by mid-century due to warming-induced tipping points such as thaw, collapse, and ocean circulation shutdown. These predictions, often amplified by and groups, assert that exceeding 1.5°C of warming—projected as likely by the under business-as-usual emissions—will trigger cascading failures in food systems, , and human habitability, with some sources estimating billions at risk of or . However, empirical observations indicate that while global temperatures have risen approximately 1.1°C since pre-industrial levels, the predicted catastrophic thresholds have not been breached, and adaptive capacities have mitigated many projected impacts. Prominent examples include forecasts of an ice-free summer by 2013–2018, as stated by former U.S. in 2009 with a 75% probability within 5–7 years, and echoed in 2008 reporting citing scientists' expectations for 2013 or sooner. These did not occur; satellite data from show sea ice extent averaging 4–6 million square kilometers in recent summers, with no ice-free conditions as of 2025, though volumes have declined from 1979 peaks. Similarly, claims of extinction due to habitat loss, promoted by groups like the in fundraising since the early 2000s, have proven unfounded; populations have grown from 17,000–19,000 in the 1960s to about 26,000 today, per International Union for Conservation of Nature estimates. Food security predictions have also faltered. Alarmist narratives, including 2014 MSNBC segments and statements from former President linking warming to inevitable global shortages, anticipated widespread crop failures and spikes by the 2020s. In reality, global agricultural output has set records annually, with calorie availability rising 20% since 2000, and extreme poverty-driven hunger falling from 20% to under 10% of the , driven by yield improvements and CO2 fertilization effects. observations further reveal a "greening" of , with global leaf area increasing by 5–25% since the , largely attributable to elevated atmospheric CO2 enhancing plant growth, countering fears in regions like the . Disaster vulnerability trends contradict escalation claims. Despite more reported weather events—due to improved detection and reporting—mortality and economic loss rates from climate-related disasters have declined sharply, with global death rates dropping 6.5-fold and losses 3-fold from 1970–2019, reflecting better infrastructure, early warning systems, and wealth-driven resilience. Forecasts of submerged island nations, such as the Maldives by 2018 per a 1988 UN official's warning, remain unfulfilled; despite sea-level rise of 10–20 cm since 1990, coral atoll elevations have kept pace through natural accretion, with no widespread inundation. These patterns suggest that while localized risks like heatwaves and sea-level rise persist, the apocalyptic framing often overstates causality and underestimates human adaptability, as evidenced by the absence of predicted systemic collapses despite emissions trajectories exceeding many models' assumptions. Peer-reviewed analyses of forecasting accuracy highlight that alarmist scenarios frequently rely on high-end assumptions without robust probabilistic validation, contributing to recurrent overprediction.

Psychological and Sociological Factors

Motivations Behind Apocalyptic Thinking

Apocalyptic thinking often serves as a psychological against existential , particularly the awareness of personal mortality. posits that reminders of death prompt individuals to cling to cultural worldviews offering symbolic or , such as eschatological narratives that culminate in after . Empirical studies link heightened to increased endorsement of fundamentalist beliefs, including apocalyptic scenarios that promise divine justice and eternal life for the faithful. In fundamentalist contexts, this manifests as a rejection of mundane historical progression in favor of "kairotic" time—an urgent, irregular temporal framework anticipating imminent cosmic resolution, thereby alleviating anxiety over individual agency and failure. The attraction also stems from the comfort derived from predictable threats amid . Neuroscientific research indicates that foreknowledge of danger, even catastrophic, engages the amygdala's circuitry but reduces overall distress by providing , as demonstrated in experiments where anticipated shocks elicited less anxiety than unpredictable ones. For those feeling powerless—often due to or societal mistrust—apocalyptic shifts blame to cosmic or conspiratorial forces, diminishing personal responsibility and fostering a sense of elite insight. Sociologically, apocalyptic motivations frequently arise from , where perceived gaps between societal expectations and lived realities—such as economic decline or cultural marginalization—fuel desires for total systemic overhaul. Classic formulations of this theory, applied to millenarian movements, argue that structural blockages to conventional advancement lead disadvantaged groups to envision utopian reversals, as seen in historical cases like cargo cults or revolutionary sects during eras of rapid upheaval. These beliefs enhance group cohesion by unifying adherents around shared prophetic interpretations of crises, reinforcing social bonds and leadership authority in the face of external threats. Cognitive predispositions further underpin these drives, with processing favoring holistic acceptance of vague prophetic patterns over critical dissection, and conceptual availability amplifying beliefs when or cultural cues highlight end-times . Dualistic worldviews, prevalent in apocalyptic frameworks, simplify complex realities into moral binaries of good versus evil, satisfying innate and the urge for redemptive violence against perceived adversaries. While such motivations yield emotional solace, they often persist despite empirical disconfirmation, as transforms failed predictions into validations of deeper spiritual truths.

Societal Responses and Consequences

Societal responses to apocalyptic predictions frequently involve collective mobilization, ranging from religious fervor and communal preparations to policy advocacy and economic stockpiling. In the case of the Millerite movement, followers anticipated Christ's return on October 22, 1844, leading thousands to liquidate assets and gather in anticipation; the subsequent "" prompted , with many rationalizing the failure through reinterpretations that birthed denominations like Seventh-day Adventists. Similarly, preparations for the millennium bug prompted global expenditures exceeding $300 billion on software fixes and contingency planning, reflecting widespread institutional anxiety over predicted systemic collapse, though no significant disruptions occurred. Failed predictions often yield varied consequences, including deepened commitment among adherents via mechanisms like those outlined in Leon Festinger's 1956 study When Prophecy Fails, where disconfirmation strengthens group cohesion through proselytizing and doctrinal revision rather than abandonment. Economically, such episodes foster niche industries; the doomsday prepping market, amplified by recurring alarms since the 2008 financial crisis and COVID-19, generated over $500 million annually in survival gear sales by 2017, driven by elite investments in bunkers and self-sufficient enclaves. Socially, persistent apocalyptic rhetoric correlates with heightened anxiety and polarization, as seen in environmental forecasts from the 1970s—such as Paul Ehrlich's 1968 famine predictions—that spurred regulatory overreach but eroded public trust when timelines lapsed, contributing to skepticism toward institutional warnings. In communities gripped by unfulfilled prophecies, psychological fallout includes in insular sects, where rigid adherence exacerbates isolation and strains, though broader societies typically demonstrate by reallocating resources post-failure without systemic rupture. Repeated non-events, as with over 50 documented eco-apocalyptic claims since 1970, have historically diminished alarmist credibility, fostering a cultural shift toward pragmatic over blanket .

Rational Skepticism and Analysis

Methodological Flaws in Predictive Models

Predictive models employed in forecasting apocalyptic scenarios, such as climate collapse, nuclear , or artificial intelligence-induced extinction, frequently exhibit methodological deficiencies that undermine their reliability. These models often rely on parametric assumptions derived from limited historical datasets, extrapolating trends into uncharted futures without adequately addressing systemic uncertainties. For instance, many incorporate Gaussian or thin-tailed probability distributions that systematically underweight extreme, low-probability events—known as "Black Swans"—which characterize true catastrophes due to their disproportionate impacts and unpredictability. argues that such modeling practices foster a false of precision by ignoring the fat-tailed nature of real-world risks, where rare outliers dominate outcomes, as evidenced by historical upheavals like market crashes or pandemics that defy equilibrium-based simulations. A core flaw lies in the overconfidence embedded in probabilistic forecasts, particularly for long-horizon existential threats. Professional forecasters, including those assessing geopolitical or technological risks, display calibration errors where stated confidence intervals exceed observed accuracy, often by factors of two to four for predictions spanning one to two years ahead, a bias that amplifies in rarer tail events. In existential risk domains, such as AI misalignment leading to , expert elicitations yield median probabilities around 5-10% by 2100, yet superforecasters—trained in probabilistic reasoning without domain-specific priors—assign far lower estimates, sometimes an smaller, highlighting how model-driven priors inflate catastrophe odds without empirical anchoring. This discrepancy arises from inadequate debiasing mechanisms, as low-probability/high-consequence scenarios resist standard techniques, perpetuating overestimation. Validation procedures in these models compound errors through to past data and insufficient out-of-sample testing, especially for non-stationary systems prone to feedback loops and human interventions. Apocalyptic forecasts rarely undergo rigorous prospective evaluation against counterfactuals, instead tuning parameters to hindcast known events, which masks brittleness when regimes shift—such as through unforeseen technological mitigations or behavioral adaptations absent from baseline assumptions. In modeling, for example, ensemble projections often diverge due to unquantified effects or feedbacks, yet alarmist interpretations selectively emphasize upper-bound scenarios without probabilistic weighting, leading to recurrent overpredictions of near-term extremes when compared to observational records. Moreover, models for geopolitical nuclear risks or pandemics overlook endogenous responses, like diplomatic deterrence or development, treating variables as exogenous despite causal interdependencies that historical near-misses (e.g., ) reveal as pivotal. These flaws are exacerbated by institutional incentives in and circles, where dramatic predictions garner and , incentivizing model over and discouraging falsification. Peer-reviewed critiques note that prediction studies in high-stakes fields suffer from poor handling of , with analyses often omitted or downplayed, resulting in outputs that appear definitive but collapse under perturbation. Empirical tournaments, such as those on existential risks, demonstrate that aggregated judgments outperform model-heavy expert by incorporating broader evidential bases, underscoring the need for hybrid approaches that prioritize causal mechanisms over correlative simulations. Ultimately, such methodological shortcomings render many apocalyptic models more akin to than robust , prone to amplifying alarmism absent complementary empirical scrutiny.

Verifiable Risks Versus Alarmism

Verifiable entail threats grounded in empirical observations, physical constraints, and probabilistic assessments derived from historical data or validated models, distinguishing them from narratives that amplify speculative scenarios or disregard countervailing factors like human adaptation and technological progress. Nuclear conflict represents a prototypical verifiable risk, with over 12,000 warheads deployed globally as of 2023, capable of inducing effects that could disrupt agriculture and cause billions of deaths through , as simulated in peer-reviewed climate models incorporating injection into the . Expert aggregations estimate the annual probability of nuclear war escalating to existential levels at around 0.01%, reflecting deterrence since 1945 alongside vulnerabilities from and accidents, such as the 1962 near-miss assessed at 1-in-3 to 1-in-10 escalation odds by participants. Artificial intelligence introduces verifiable risks through misalignment between advanced systems and human values, evidenced by real-world incidents like algorithmic biases in deployed models and scaling laws demonstrating unpredictable emergent behaviors in large language models trained on billions of parameters. A 2023 survey of 2,778 researchers yielded a median 5% estimate for risk from AI, with 38-51% assigning at least 10% probability to outcomes as severe as extinction, predicated on pathways like rapid self-improvement leading to uncontrolled optimization. However, methodological critiques highlight potential in such surveys, favoring respondents predisposed to high-risk views and underweighting near-term, observable harms like job displacement over remote apocalyptic scenarios. Climate change yields verifiable risks via measurable phenomena, including a 1.1°C global temperature rise since pre-industrial levels by and associated increases in frequency, such as heatwaves exceeding historical norms in regions like during 2022. Assessments frame these as contributing to global catastrophic risks through cascading effects like crop failures and , yet existential thresholds—total civilizational —remain low-probability, estimated at 0.001 or less this century, due to slow forcing mechanisms and adaptive interventions like emissions reductions achieving net-zero trajectories in models. arises when these are conflated with imminent , as in unfulfilled predictions of widespread uninhabitability by 2000 from 1970s analyses, which overlooked yield improvements and socioeconomic shifts. Distinguishing the two requires scrutiny of source credibility and predictive track records; institutional biases in and toward can inflate perceived urgency, as seen in overstatements of timelines ignoring empirical progress plateaus, whereas verifiable risks prioritize falsifiable metrics like failure rates in protocols. This delineation fosters targeted —enhancing command safeguards or research—over paralyzing , ensuring resources address causal chains with demonstrated potency rather than rhetorical excesses.

References

  1. [1]
    An Empirical Critique of Two Versions of the Doomsday Argument
    Aug 7, 2025 · The result of testing some of these consequences is that both doomsday argumentsare empirically disconfirmed. Content may be subject to ...
  2. [2]
    Oops! 11 Failed Doomsday Predictions | Live Science
    Oct 19, 2011 · Oops! 11 Failed Doomsday Predictions · Mark Your Calendars ... · The Prophet Hen of Leeds, 1806 · The Millerites, April 23, 1843 · Mormon Armageddon ...
  3. [3]
    Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions
    Sep 18, 2019 · What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and science. More than merely spotlighting the failed ...
  4. [4]
    18 spectacularly wrong predictions made around the time of first ...
    Apr 21, 2019 · ... apocalyptic predictions” and many of those predictions were featured in his Reason article. ... Why Socialism Fails. March 30, 2023. Post. “Equal ...
  5. [5]
    Doomsday predictions rely on flawed climate models - Fraser Institute
    Feb 15, 2022 · But empirical evidence taken from the real world suggests that the IPCC's estimates of future warming are overstated, and what scientists have ...
  6. [6]
    What is apocalypticism? | GotQuestions.org
    Jan 11, 2022 · Apocalypticism is the belief that this world will end, usually in dramatic fashion as foretold in some prophecy.
  7. [7]
    Apocalyptic Prophecy: A Brief Cross-Cultural History – 1
    Oct 1, 2015 · The Greek term apocalypse refers to the end of time and is an idea that has haunted humanity for centuries across cultures.
  8. [8]
    The Difference Between Eschatology and Apocalypticism
    Oct 29, 2018 · “Apocalypsis” is Greek for “uncovering,” and indicates that an angel “uncovers” a vision, but this vision does not have to be eschatological.<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Glossary Of Terms | Apocalypse! FRONTLINE - PBS
    See premillennialism, below. Eschatology ... The belief that a chosen individual holds the key to a higher truth which will lead to salvation for his followers.
  10. [10]
    Glossary of End Times Terminology - Koinos Church
    Mar 25, 2022 · Eschatology – The study of the end times; the word is taken from the Greek word eschatos meaning last; the study of the last things or end times ...
  11. [11]
    glossary, eschatological, terms - Chalcedon
    Jul 1, 2005 · Etymologically, eschatology is “the study of the last things.” The term is drawn from certain Scriptural passages that speak of “the last days” ...
  12. [12]
    Top 10 Doomsday Prophecies - Science | HowStuffWorks
    Apr 16, 2024 · People continue to believe in doomsday predictions due to a combination of psychological factors, including the need for certainty in an ...
  13. [13]
    The Ancient Roots of Doomsday Prophecies and End of the World ...
    It is clear that fear is the driving factor behind the prophecies of doomsday throughout human history.
  14. [14]
    Apocalypse Now? How Ancient Theories Fuel Doomsday Predictions
    Sep 22, 2017 · Old myths about Planet X meld with biblical predictions for a Sept. 23 apocalypse.
  15. [15]
    Religions on the End of the World - History.com
    Nov 6, 2009 · The planet's major religions each have their own beliefs about the end of the world, the triumph of good over evil and Judgment Day. In ...
  16. [16]
    What is going to happen according to end times prophecy?
    May 1, 2025 · Christ will remove all born-again believers from the earth in an event known as the rapture (1 Thessalonians 4:13-18; 1 Corinthians 15:51-54).Surviving the end times · Questions about the End · What signs indicate that the...
  17. [17]
    Signs of the Hour - Islam Question & Answer
    Aug 28, 1998 · The Signs of the Hour are the signs that will precede Yawm al-Qiyaamah (the Day of Judgement) and indicate that it is nigh. The Hour (al-Saa'ah) ...
  18. [18]
    What Is the Jewish Belief About Moshiach (Messiah)? - Chabad.org
    This “end of time” remains a mystery, yet the Talmud states that it will be before the Hebrew year 6000. (The Hebrew year at the date of this publication is ...Missing: eschatology | Show results with:eschatology<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Does Judaism Believe in the Apocalypse? - Chabad.org
    So in answer to your question, if you're referring to the original meaning, then yes, Judaism definitely believes in the apocalypse—as in the coming of Moshiach ...
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    Malthusian Theory Has Always Been False - Quillette
    Sep 8, 2022 · Malthus said that population growth would outrun food supply, because population increases geometrically while food production increases ...
  22. [22]
    Paul Ehrlich: Wrong on 60 Minutes and for Almost 60 Years - FEE.org
    Jan 4, 2023 · In response to his failures, Ehrlich has said it's unlikely that another innovation like the Green Revolution can occur. But why? Ehrlich failed ...
  23. [23]
    THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC ...
    An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age.
  24. [24]
    Asteroid Apophis: Will It Hit Earth? Your Questions Answered.
    More observations refined its path around the Sun and excluded Earth, bringing the probability of a 2029 impact down to zero. What would happen if Apophis hit ...
  25. [25]
    Scientists predict devastation if asteroid Bennu strikes Earth in 2182
    Feb 6, 2025 · The impact of a Bennu-sized object - a medium-sized asteroid - on Earth's land surface would generate a powerful shockwave, earthquakes, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Humanity extinction by asteroid impact - ScienceDirect.com
    Based on Moon crater history and NEA observations, the probability of a giant impact is between 0.03 and 0.3 for the next billion years. However, as the warning ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] The Roots of Apocalypticism in Near Eastern Myth
    The apocalyptic predictions in apocalyptic literature come to the speaker through revelation. The predictions in the Shulgi and Marduk prophecies come from ...
  28. [28]
    The Marduk Prophecy - World History Encyclopedia
    Dec 14, 2016 · The Marduk Prophecy is an Assyrian document dating to between 713-612 BCE found in a building known as The House of the Exorcist adjacent to a temple in the ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] DANIEL 3 AND 5 AS HISTORIOGRAPHY - Yeshiva University
    The scholarly consensus on the book of Daniel is that it is the latest composition of the Hebrew Bible, dated to around 164 BCE. Its narra-.<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Apocalypse and Redemption in Early Christianity - Boston University
    apocalyptic texts while at the same time gaining a control over the enthusiasms they inspired. The date of the year 6000 prevailing in. Western tradition ...
  31. [31]
    Joachim of Fiore and the Apocalyptic Revival of the Twelfth Century
    Feb 28, 2020 · This chapter explores the contours of Joachim's ideas about the patterns of history, situating him and his works within the broader apocalyptic “revivalism” of ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Liturgical Processions in the Black Death - ScholarWorks at WMU
    Jun 5, 2017 · The rise of the Flagellant Movement is tied as intimately to the perceived failures of the Church as it is to the devastation of the plague.
  33. [33]
    American Adventism: The Great Disappointment
    Miller was reluctant to be more specific, but in January 1843, he announced that this Hebrew year—March 21, 1843, to March 21, 1844—must see the end of time.
  34. [34]
    The Great Disappointment - Grace Communion International
    On October 22, 1844, as many as 100,000 Christians gathered on hillsides, in meeting places and in meadows. They were breathlessly and joyously expecting ...
  35. [35]
    Top 10 Failed Apocalyptic Predictions - Listverse
    Sep 18, 2008 · Top 10 Failed Apocalyptic Predictions ; 10. Montanus ; 9. Charles Wesley ; 8. Jehovah's Witness Predictions ; 7. The Great Disappointment ; 6. Joanna ...Missing: century | Show results with:century
  36. [36]
    Apocalypse predictions have failed to come true, but another looms
    Their plan failed. But the majority of Xhosa didn't view the carnage and ask, “What were we thinking?” In fact, many concluded they hadn't slaughtered enough ...
  37. [37]
    The Comet Panic of 1910, Revisited | Science History Institute
    Jan 16, 2025 · Because when Halley's Comet returned in 1910, a wave of primal terror returned with it, sparking panic across the world.
  38. [38]
    Apocalypse postponed: how Earth survived Halley's comet in 1910
    Dec 20, 2012 · In 1910, the Earth was due to pass through the tail of Halley's Comet, sparking a public panic that apocalypse was coming.
  39. [39]
    Inside The Halley's Comet Panic Of 1910 - All That's Interesting
    and everyone from religious fanatics to news reporters stoked the fires of a global ...
  40. [40]
    False prophecies of the Jehovah's Witnesses - CARM.org
    Dec 5, 2008 · Jehovah's Witnesses have many false prophecies and predictions. They make ... 1914, 1918, and 1925, which disappointment lasted for a time.
  41. [41]
    1914 - Failed Watchtower prophecy - Falsified History - JWFacts
    Watchtower falsely predicted 1914 to be the “end” of the system of things, the conclusion of Armageddon and the start of the earthly paradise.
  42. [42]
    18 Spectacularly Wrong Predictions Were Made Around the Time of ...
    Apr 21, 2022 · Here are 18 examples of the spectacularly wrong predictions made around 1970 when the “green holy day” (aka Earth Day) started.
  43. [43]
    The Limits to Growth - Club of Rome
    The earth's interlocking resources – the global system of nature in which we all live – probably cannot support present rates of economic and population growth.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] The Population Bomb - Free
    The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Ehrlich-Population-Bomb-Ch1.pdf
    The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs ...
  46. [46]
    A Synopsis: Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update
    Most of the scenarios presented in Limits result in overshoot and collapse—through depletion of resources, food shortages, industrial decline, or some ...The 30-Year Update · World 3 · The Limits
  47. [47]
    How the "Global Cooling" Story Came to Be | Scientific American
    Jan 10, 2014 · Lou Dobbs on Fox News: "This cycle of science… if we go back to 1970, the fear then was global cooling. ... predicting just a couple decades ago ...
  48. [48]
    THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC ...
    Because Milankovitch's astronomical metronome was predictable over thousands of years, climate scientists could now begin talking about predicting the onset of ...
  49. [49]
    A Timeline of HIV and AIDS
    The 1985 figures show an 89% increase in new AIDS cases compared with 1984. Of all AIDS cases to date, 51% of adults and 59% of children have died. The new ...
  50. [50]
    AIDS Experts Predict the Epidemic's Future in Newsday
    May 29, 2001 · AIDS Experts Predict the Epidemic's Future in Newsday ... In the first of a three-part series commemorating the 20th anniversary of the first ...
  51. [51]
    The Confusing and At-Times Counterproductive 1980s Response to ...
    Dec 4, 2013 · By the end of the decade, in 1989, 27,408 people died from AIDS. In the years following the AIDS epidemic, medical research has given us a ...
  52. [52]
    William Miller and the Great Disappointment - Amazing Discoveries
    Oct 16, 2024 · A young Baptist farmer named William Miller (1782-1849) published a series of articles in the Baptist weekly newspaper, Vermont Telegraph, about the prophecies ...
  53. [53]
    The Watchtower and 1975: Jehovah's Witnesses' False Prediction
    Jun 3, 2016 · The Watchtower Organization predicted that the end of this system of things and the dawn of a new era of peace on earth would come in 1975.
  54. [54]
    Harold Camping, Doomsday Preacher, Says Prediction of Rapture ...
    Harold Camping, Doomsday Preacher, Says Prediction of Rapture Was Wrong, but Not About End of the World. Harold Camping now says he misread the signs about ...
  55. [55]
    Apocalypse not now: The Rapture fails to materialise - The Guardian
    May 21, 2011 · Christian doomsday prophet Harold Camping looks likely to be less than rapturous after his prediction that the world would end on Saturday failed to ...
  56. [56]
    Defuse the Population Bomb Narrative before It's Too Late
    Jan 5, 2023 · Ehrlich's lengthy record of failed apocalyptic predictions is perhaps evidence enough. From his worry that England might cease to exist by the ...
  57. [57]
    Gore predicts ice-free Arctic sea - Times Union
    New computer modeling suggests the Arctic Ocean may be nearly ice-free in the summertime as early as 2014, Al Gore said Monday ...
  58. [58]
    The End has Been Nigh for More than 50 Years Now - MacIver Institute
    Mar 13, 2024 · With a warmer-than-usual winter sparking a new round of climate change fearmongering, Dan O'Donnell runs down 50-plus years of failed doomsday predictions.
  59. [59]
    Celebrating 50 years of Failed Climate Predictions - AgWeb
    Doomsday Addiction: Celebrating 50 years of Failed Climate Predictions. Politicians, scientists, and celebs assure us the apocalypse is tomorrow, and if not ...
  60. [60]
    18 Spectacularly Wrong Apocalyptic Predictions Made Around the ...
    Apr 21, 2015 · Here are 18 examples of the spectacularly wrong predictions made around 1970 when the “green holy day” (aka Earth Day) started.
  61. [61]
    3 apocalyptic climate change predictions that failed to come true
    Apr 16, 2025 · 3 Apocalyptic Climate Change Predictions That Failed To Come True. Yes, the climate is warming. But, despite what you may have heard, we can ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  62. [62]
    10 Failed Doomsday Predictions | Britannica
    When the 1843 prediction failed to materialize, Miller recalculated and determined that the world would actually end in 1844. Follower Henry Emmons wrote, “I ...
  63. [63]
    Why Prophecy Fails…and Fails…and Fails… - James Tabor Blog
    Jul 5, 2022 · What about End Time prophecies and speculations? My question here is WHY apocalyptic expectations, predictions, and calculations always fail.
  64. [64]
    Future Babble: Why expert predictions fail and why we believe them ...
    Predictions fail because the world is too complicated to be predicted with accuracy and we're wired to avoid uncertainty.Missing: methodological | Show results with:methodological
  65. [65]
    Here's How Bad a Nuclear War Would Actually Be - Time Magazine
    Jun 29, 2023 · We obviously don't know how many people will survive a nuclear war. But if it's even remotely as bad as this study predicts, it has no winners, merely losers.
  66. [66]
    Nowhere to hide: How a nuclear war would kill you—and almost ...
    Oct 20, 2022 · Global average precipitation after a nuclear war would also drop significantly because the lower amounts of solar radiation reaching the surface ...
  67. [67]
    The nuclear mistakes that nearly caused World War Three - BBC
    Aug 9, 2020 · There are two kinds of error which can lead to a false alarm – technological and human (or, if we're really unlucky, both at once). A classic ...
  68. [68]
    When Carl Sagan Warned the World About Nuclear Winter
    It didn't hurt that their tactics were similar: in public statements, Sagan focused on the most extreme predictions for nuclear winter, just as Teller cherry- ...
  69. [69]
    Nuclear Winter Lite | Science | AAAS
    SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA--Nearly 25 years ago, astronomer Carl Sagan and other scientists predicted that a full-blown nuclear war between the United States ...Missing: evaluation | Show results with:evaluation
  70. [70]
    Does anybody remember the Nuclear Winter? | SGR
    The research on nuclear winter ... The prediction of nuclear winter was first published by a group headed by Carl Sagan in 1983 (TTAPS, 1983). The research group ...Missing: evaluation | Show results with:evaluation
  71. [71]
    2025 Doomsday Clock Statement - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
    Jan 28, 2025 · In regard to nuclear risk, the war in Ukraine, now in its third year, looms over the world; the conflict could become nuclear at any moment ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  72. [72]
    The Doomsday Clock is still at 90 seconds to midnight. But what ...
    Jan 24, 2024 · The Doomsday Clock is not a precise risk assessment, it's a flawed but powerful metaphor for the catastrophic risk humanity faces.
  73. [73]
    Doomsday Clock 2025: Scientists set new time - CNN
    Jan 28, 2025 · How accurate is the clock? ... Though the clock can't measure threats, if it sparks conversation and encourages public engagement in scientific ...
  74. [74]
    Forecasting Nuclear Escalation Risks: Cloudy With a Chance of ...
    Apr 17, 2025 · Serious tensions between the United States and China, Russia, and North Korea create the realistic possibility of a high-intensity conventional ...
  75. [75]
    Escalation Management in Ukraine: Assessing the U.S. Response to ...
    Russia's frequent manipulation of the risk of nuclear escalation failed, moreover, to deter the United States and NATO from gradually expanding their military ...
  76. [76]
    Nuclear war in Ukraine not likely | UNC-Chapel Hill
    Sep 10, 2025 · Nuclear war in Ukraine not likely. Despite Russian President Vladimir Putin's saber-rattling remarks, he won't deploy atomic weapons, says ...
  77. [77]
    Returning to an Era of Competition and Nuclear Risk - CSIS
    Sep 16, 2025 · Russia, China, and North Korea have all ramped up their nuclear threats, with the goal of gaining territory in Europe, the Indo-Pacific, and ...
  78. [78]
    Sino-Russian Alignment Stopping at the Nuclear Threshold - CEPA
    Aug 26, 2025 · Beijing is concerned about Moscow's use of nuclear coercion in the war in Ukraine. It reflects limits in the Sino-Russian alignment​,​ ...
  79. [79]
    Are AI existential risks real—and what should we do about them?
    Jul 11, 2025 · As AI researcher Andrew Ng is reputed to have said back in 2015, worrying about existential risk might appear to be like worrying about the ...Missing: biotech nanotech
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and ...
    In addition to well-known threats such as nuclear holocaust, the prospects of radically transforming technologies like nanotech systems and machine intelligence ...
  81. [81]
    Appendix: Quantifying Existential Risks - AI Safety Atlas
    Expert estimates vary dramatically, spanning nearly the entire probability range. A 2023 survey found AI researchers estimate a mean 14.4 percent extinction ...
  82. [82]
    Does AI pose an existential risk? We asked 5 experts
    Oct 5, 2025 · The “godfather of AI”, computer scientist and Nobel laureate Geoffrey Hinton, has said there's a 10–20% chance AI will lead to human extinction ...Missing: biotech nanotech
  83. [83]
    Oversight of Gain-of-Function Research with Pathogens: Issues for ...
    Jul 1, 2025 · Concerns over certain types of GOF research—specifically the risk of accidental release of a deadly pathogen and security risks associated with ...<|separator|>
  84. [84]
    Artificial intelligence challenges in the face of biological threats - NIH
    May 10, 2024 · Ord discusses existential risks, which are threats to the long-term ... This requires a careful risk–benefit analysis in gain-of-function ...
  85. [85]
    What is 'gain of function'? Why scientists are divided about the risk ...
    Jan 30, 2025 · What is 'gain of function'? Why scientists are divided about the risk and benefits of experimenting with deadly viruses.
  86. [86]
    What is the gray goo nightmare? - Science | HowStuffWorks
    Apr 16, 2024 · The "gray goo" scenario is a hypothetical doomsday concept involving self-replicating nanomachines consuming all organic matter on Earth, ...Missing: credibility | Show results with:credibility<|control11|><|separator|>
  87. [87]
    Grey Goo is a Small Issue - Center for Responsible Nanotechnology
    Fear of runaway nanobots, or “grey goo”, is more of a public issue than a scientific problem. Grey goo as a result of out of control nanotechnology played a ...Missing: credibility | Show results with:credibility
  88. [88]
    grey goo is unlikely — LessWrong
    Apr 17, 2023 · Eh." We have no plausible evidence that any kind of efficent nanotech that could be used for a Gray Goo scenario is possible, and this post is ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Existential Risk and Rapid Technological Change - UNDRR
    Feb 18, 2023 · The problem consists of (1) building AI systems with goals in a way that prevent unintended consequences (specification); (2) ensuring the ...
  90. [90]
    2025 AI Safety Index - Future of Life Institute
    The Future of Life Institute's AI Safety Index provides an independent assessment of seven leading AI companies' efforts to manage both immediate harms and ...
  91. [91]
    Why do Experts Disagree on Existential Risk and P(doom)? A ... - arXiv
    Feb 23, 2025 · According to AI Impacts, roughly 40% of respondents indicated a >10% chance of catastrophic outcomes from AI progress. Other surveys also seek ...
  92. [92]
    Mitigating Risks from Gene Editing and Synthetic Biology: Global ...
    Oct 16, 2024 · Meanwhile, the global bioeconomy has exploded, presenting enormous opportunities but also potential risks. In 2023, the value of the worldwide ...
  93. [93]
    Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios
    Aug 1, 2022 · We outline current knowledge about the likelihood of extreme climate change, discuss why understanding bad-to-worst cases is vital, articulate reasons for ...
  94. [94]
  95. [95]
    Empirical evidence of declining global vulnerability to climate ... - NIH
    Results show a clear decreasing trend in both human and economic vulnerability, with global average mortality and economic loss rates that have dropped by 6.5 ...
  96. [96]
    The world has become more resilient to disasters, but investment is ...
    May 20, 2024 · The World Meteorological Organization found that deaths from climate and weather-related disasters decreased almost 3-fold from 1970 to 2019.<|separator|>
  97. [97]
    How Climate Scenarios Lost Touch With Reality
    ... source of error in projections of future climate change. Restoring integrity in climate science. The consequences of pervasive, implausible climate scenarios ...Missing: alarmism | Show results with:alarmism
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Research on Forecasting for the Manmade Global Warming Alarm
    Apr 3, 2011 · Despite repeated appeals to global warming alarmists, we have been unable to find scientific forecasts for any of ... credible source for ...
  99. [99]
    Terror Management Theory: History, Belief, and More - Psych Central
    Jun 14, 2022 · The terror management theory (TMT) states that people feel threatened by their own death and therefore adopt worldviews that allow them to find meaning and ...
  100. [100]
    Death and end times: the effects of religious fundamentalism and ...
    Jan 2, 2018 · According to terror management theory, the awareness of death motivates people to subscribe to cultural worldviews that offer some form of ...
  101. [101]
    [PDF] The Apocalyptic Imagination and the Fundamentalist Mindset
    Mar 20, 2017 · This article explores the psychological meanings of the apocalyptic ... population was wiped out, apocalyptic thinking more forcibly entered the ...
  102. [102]
    Psychology Reveals the Comforts of the Apocalypse
    Dec 18, 2012 · But why would anyone enjoy kindling this fearful response? Lissek suspects that some apocalyptic believers find the idea that the end is nigh to ...
  103. [103]
    Millenarianism - West - - Major Reference Works - Wiley Online Library
    Dec 4, 2017 · ... movements pervasive in social situations of perceived relative deprivation and the deprecation of a group's beliefs and lifeways by the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  104. [104]
    MILLENARIAN GROUPS AND THE WINNING PARADOX - War Room
    Jul 30, 2021 · The most widely accepted theory, relative deprivation, suggests that revitalization movements may occur when a significant proportion of a ...
  105. [105]
    Apocalyptic groups and socially disadvantaged contexts
    This study investigates the theory that apocalyptic texts originated in, and reflect the convictions and activities of socially disadvantaged groups on the ...
  106. [106]
    Remembrance of Apocalypse Past: The Psychology of True ...
    So, four psychological factors contributed to continued belief in the 2012 apocalypse: cognitive dissonance; dissociative tendencies; gestalt processing; and ...<|separator|>
  107. [107]
    [PDF] When Prophecy Fails
    Implication: Even expert predictions can fail when complex factors interact unexpectedly. Theories Explaining Prophecy Failure. 1. Cognitive Dissonance and ...
  108. [108]
    Doomsday Prep for the Super-Rich | The New Yorker
    Jan 22, 2017 · Some of the wealthiest people in America—in Silicon Valley, New York, and beyond—are getting ready for the crackup of civilization.
  109. [109]
  110. [110]
    The Impact of the Highly Improbable, by Nassim Nicholas Taleb
    “Black Swans” are momentous occurrences of unforeseen and unpredictable events, with significant consequences, often shaping the history of mankind.
  111. [111]
    Reviews of Taleb's Black Swan - MacTutor
    Taleb's most bitter critique is of modelling of risk and uncertainty using ... Abstract: This paper argues that Nassim Taleb's "black swan" argument ...
  112. [112]
    Nassim Taleb's “The Black Swan”
    Apr 9, 2007 · The book is about unexpected events (“black swans”) and the problems with statistical models such as the normal distribution that don't allow for these ...
  113. [113]
    Are Professional Forecasters Overconfident?
    Sep 3, 2024 · We find that for long horizons—between two and one years—forecasters are overconfident by a factor ranging from two to four for both output ...
  114. [114]
    Announcing "Forecasting Existential Risks: Evidence from a Long ...
    Jul 10, 2023 · Superforecasters predicted considerably lower chances of both catastrophe and extinction than did experts, but the disagreement between experts ...
  115. [115]
    AI existential risk probabilities are too unreliable to inform policy
    Jul 26, 2024 · How seriously should governments take the threat of existential risk from AI, given the lack of consensus among researchers?
  116. [116]
    Can overconfidence be debiased by low-probability/high ... - PubMed
    Feb 23, 2010 · The overall findings suggest that low-probability/high-consequence events could make people less overconfident and more rational and seem to ...Missing: forecasts | Show results with:forecasts
  117. [117]
    Predictive models: important problems and innovative methods - PMC
    In this Editorial, I highlight 4 papers that reflect methodological innovation and predicting something that matters 2–5 as well as a systematic review of ...
  118. [118]
    Does poor methodological quality of prediction modeling studies ...
    May 5, 2022 · Prediction modeling studies often have methodological limitations, which may compromise model performance in new patients and settings.Missing: flaws apocalyptic
  119. [119]
    Why experts and forecasters disagree about AI risk - 80,000 Hours
    Sep 16, 2024 · Our new interview with Ezra Karger on what superforecasters and experts think about existential risks · Sceptics tend to see change as gradual, ...
  120. [120]
    Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide - The BMJ
    Sep 3, 2024 · Empirical evidence suggests that published studies often have severe methodological limitations, which undermine their usefulness. This article ...Missing: flaws apocalyptic
  121. [121]
    Improving Judgments of Existential Risk: Better Forecasts, Questions ...
    Jan 6, 2022 · We show how to improve alignment by measuring facets of human judgment that play central roles in policy debates but have long been dismissed as unmeasurable.
  122. [122]
    Nuclear weapons - 80,000 Hours
    Estimates of the existential risk from nuclear war within the next 100 years range from 0.005–1%. We think the existential risk from nuclear war is around 0.01% ...
  123. [123]
    [PDF] Nuclear War as a Global Catastrophic Risk - Johns Hopkins APL
    Individual Estimates of the Probability of Nuclear War. Probability that the Cuban missile crisis could have escalated to (nuclear) war between 1 in 3 and ...
  124. [124]
    [PDF] Survey: Median AI expert says 5% chance of human extinction from AI
    Jan 4, 2024 · BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA: In a new survey of 2,778 AI experts, experts gave a median 5% chance that AI would cause human extinction.
  125. [125]
    [2401.02843] Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI - arXiv
    Jan 5, 2024 · Between 38% and 51% of respondents gave at least a 10% chance to advanced AI leading to outcomes as bad as human extinction. More than half ...<|separator|>
  126. [126]
    AI Survey Exaggerates Apocalyptic Risks - Scientific American
    Jan 26, 2024 · A speculative survey about AI's future may have been biased toward an alarmist perspective. By Chris Stokel-WalkerMissing: verifiable | Show results with:verifiable
  127. [127]
    Existential Risk Estimates / Sam Nolan - Observable
    Supervolcanic eruption, 0.0001 ; Stellar explosion, 0.000000001 ; Nuclear War, 0.001 ; Climate change, 0.001.
  128. [128]
    The existential risk space of climate change - PMC - PubMed Central
    Sep 12, 2022 · This paper intends to address this gap by scoping and defining existential risks related to climate change.
  129. [129]
    How not to estimate the likelihood of nuclear war - Brookings Institution
    Oct 19, 2022 · These estimations cannot take into account unobserved private efforts that are being made to decrease the chance of war.
  130. [130]
    Current AI risks more alarming than apocalyptic future scenarios ...
    Apr 23, 2025 · A new study by the University of Zurich reveals that respondents draw clear distinctions between abstract scenarios and specific tangible problems.