Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Basque grammar

Basque grammar encompasses the structural rules that govern the formation of words, phrases, clauses, and sentences in the Basque language (Euskara), a non-Indo-European language isolate spoken primarily in the Basque Country spanning northern Spain and southwestern France. It is characterized by its agglutinative morphology, where words are formed by stringing together morphemes, primarily suffixes, to express grammatical relations, resulting in a rich system of declension and conjugation. Unlike most European languages, Basque employs an ergative-absolutive alignment in its case marking and verbal agreement, treating the subjects of intransitive verbs and objects of transitive verbs similarly (as absolutive), while marking transitive subjects distinctly (as ergative). A hallmark of Basque syntax is its basic subject-object-verb (SOV) word order, which allows for considerable flexibility due to the language's head-final structure and the use of postpositions rather than prepositions. The verbal system is polypersonal, with finite verbs agreeing in and number with up to three arguments: the , direct object, and indirect object, as seen in forms like ekarri d-i-zu-t ('I brought it to you'). Basque lacks grammatical in nouns and pronouns, relying instead on lexical or derivational means to indicate or sex, and it features allocutive , where verb forms vary based on the gender or familiarity of the addressee. Nominal includes at least five core cases, including ergative (-k), absolutive (unmarked), and dative (-ri), including several locative cases such as inessive (-n), allative (-ra), and ablative (-tik), along with numerous locative postpositions for precise spatial expressions. These features contribute to Basque's typological uniqueness, setting it apart from neighboring through its absence of systems, ergative patterning, and intricate , while also exhibiting in certain intransitive verbs that align actively or inactively. (Euskara Batua), developed in the , unifies dialectal variations into a standardized for and media, preserving core traits like its five-vowel phonemic inventory and distinctive contrasts (apical versus laminal). Ongoing linguistic research highlights Basque's resilience and evolution, including influences from contact with on its syntax and .

Nouns and noun phrases

Definiteness, articles, and quantifiers

In Basque, is marked morphologically through suffixes attached directly to the stem, rather than by separate words as in many . The definite article appears as the suffix -a in the singular and -ak in the plural, but it is fully visible only in the absolutive case (the unmarked nominative form); in other cases, it interacts with case endings, often becoming less distinct. For example, etxe-a means "the house" (absolutive singular), while etxe-ak means "the houses" (absolutive plural). This suffixed form of the article is a distinctive feature of noun phrases, integrating into the core of the . Indefiniteness, by contrast, lacks a dedicated and is typically expressed by the bare without any , or by combining the with the ("one") to indicate "a" or "an" in singular contexts. For instance, etxe alone can mean "a house," while etxe explicitly translates to "a house." Proper nouns generally do not take the definite , remaining unmarked for , as in Irune etorri da ("Irune has arrived"). This absence of a separate indefinite simplifies indefinite phrases, relying on context or quantifiers for further specification. Quantifiers in Basque noun phrases function as determiners that precede the noun and do not agree in gender or case with it, though some require the definite article suffix for integration. Universal and distributive quantifiers like guzti ("all"), bakoitz ("each"), and gehien ("most") obligatorily co-occur with the definite determiner, forming compounds such as guzti-ak ("all the [plural]") or bakoitz-a ("each the [singular]"). In contrast, vague quantifiers like asko ("many"), gutxi ("few"), and zenbait ("some") typically appear without a determiner, as in ume asko ("many children") or zenbait gizon ("some men"). Numerals, such as hiru ("three"), also precede the noun without agreement, e.g., hiru txori ("three birds"), except in certain Western dialects where bat ("one") and bi ("two") may follow. This system allows quantifiers to modify the noun phrase flexibly while maintaining the language's agglutinative structure. Historically, the Basque definite article -a originated from an ancient pronoun, a paralleled in where Latin demonstratives like ille evolved into articles (e.g., el). However, Basque's suffixed form represents a further unique among European languages, as it has become an obligatory enclitic integrated into rather than a standalone word. This evolution likely occurred independently in Proto-Basque, predating significant Romance influence, though contact may have reinforced the shift.

Number and plurality

In Basque, number is morphologically marked on nouns primarily through singular (unmarked) and plural forms, with an additional indefinite category that does not distinguish between singular and plural. The plural is typically formed by adding the -ak to the , as in gizon '' becoming gizonak 'men', liburu 'book' becoming liburuak 'books', and mendi 'mountain' becoming mendiak 'mountains'. This applies uniformly across most nouns and adjectives in a single declensional , though some stems exhibit irregularities such as adjustments or minor alternations to avoid phonological clashes. The indefinite plural is expressed using the quantifier batzuk 'some', which derives from bat 'one' combined with a collective element and functions to indicate an unspecified plural quantity without definiteness. It declines like other determiners, for example, absolutive etxe batzuk 'some houses', ergative etxe batzuek 'some houses (agentive)', dative etxe batzuei 'to some houses', and genitive etxe batzuen 'of some houses'. This form interacts with number by enforcing a plural interpretation on the noun while remaining neutral on exact count, often appearing in contexts requiring generic or partitive reference. Basque lacks grammatical dual or trial numbers, relying instead on cardinal numerals combined with singular or plural forms for such specificity, as in bi gizon 'two men' or bi gizonak 'the two men'. Collectives, which denote a unified group rather than discrete individuals, are formed derivationally using suffixes such as -kune, as in gizonez kune 'group of men', or by with nouns like talde 'group', as in musikatalde 'music group'. Semantically, these differ from simple plurals like gizonak by emphasizing collectivity or social aggregation as a single entity, often implying or shared , whereas plurals highlight multiplicity without inherent unity. Dialectal variations affect plural formation, particularly in Gipuzkoan, where simplifications occur such as reduced vowel or alternative realizations of -ak in certain phonological environments, leading to forms like shortened stems in rapid speech. The definite , when attached to plurals, follows the -ak as -ak (e.g., liburuak 'the books'), integrating number marking with . Western dialects may use a proximate plural -ok with animates, e.g., gizonok 'these/the men (near)'.

Cases

Basque features an ergative-absolutive case alignment, a system that patterns the subjects of intransitive verbs and the direct objects of transitive verbs together under the absolutive case, while marking transitive subjects with the ergative case. This alignment emphasizes the patient or theme role across clause types, contrasting with the nominative-accusative systems of Indo-European languages, where subjects of both transitive and intransitive verbs share the nominative case. In Basque, the absolutive case carries a null morpheme (∅), as seen in mutil-a ("the boy" ABS), which serves as the subject in intransitive clauses like Mutil-a etorri da ("The boy has arrived") or as the object in transitive clauses like Irakasle-ak mutil-a ikusi du ("The teacher has seen the boy"). The ergative case, marked by the suffix -k, applies to agents of transitive verbs, as in mutil-ak ("the boy" ERG) in Mutil-ak liburua irakurri du ("The boy has read the book"). The core cases also include the dative, marked by -ri (with epenthetic -r after vowels), which encodes recipients, beneficiaries, or experiencers as indirect objects. Syntactically, the dative functions in ditransitive constructions or as a secondary argument, agreeing with the verb for and number. For example, Liburua mutil-ari eman dio irakasle-ak ("The gave the book to the ") features mutil-ari ("to the " DAT), where the ergative marks the (irakasle-ak), the absolutive the (liburua), and the dative the recipient. These core cases underpin Basque's syntactic structure, with the absolutive serving as the unmarked for agreement and . Local cases handle spatial, temporal, and manner relations, stacking onto the noun stem after the definite article. The inessive (-n) denotes static ("in," "at," or "on"), as in etxe-n ("in the ") from Etxean bizi naiz ("I live in the "). The allative (-ra) indicates goal-directed motion ("to" or "toward"), exemplified by etxe-ra in Etxera noa ("I go to the "). The ablative (-tik) marks source or origin ("from" or "out of"), as in etxe-tik from Etxetik irten naiz ("I have left the "). The terminative (-raino) specifies an ("up to" or "as far as"), such as herri-raino in Herri raino joan gara ("We went up to the town"). These cases exhibit , extending from spatial prototypes to temporal (e.g., ostiral-tik "since ") and manner uses, and they form sets distinguished by proximity to the speaker: proximate forms (near, e.g., with -n for immediate ) versus remote (far, e.g., adjusted allative or ablative for distant goals/sources), often interacting with animate/inanimate distinctions in realization. For animates, local cases typically use periphrastic constructions with genitive and postpositions (e.g., gizonaren ganean 'near '), while direct suffixes apply mainly to inanimates; plural animates use special forms like -engan. The , realized as -ik or -rik, expresses partiality or indefiniteness, typically for objects in negative, , or existential contexts, functioning syntactically like the absolutive but with indefinite reference. It highlights incomplete affectedness, as in Ogirik ez dut ("I don't have any ," where ogirik is "bread" PART) or Libururik irakurri al duzu? ("Have you read any book?"). This case underscores Basque's sensitivity to aspectual and quantificational nuances in object roles. Partitive differs by : -ik after , -rik after vowels. Overall, Basque cases encode semantic roles such as agent (ergative), patient/theme (absolutive), recipient (dative), and various locative relations (local cases), driving syntactic functions like argument licensing and agreement. The system displays split-ergativity conditioned by tense: present tenses maintain robust ergative alignment across verb classes, while past and irrealis tenses shift toward accusative patterns for third-person patients, as in progressive periphrastics where subjects uniformly take absolutive (e.g., Emakume-a ogi-a jaten ari da "The woman is eating the bread," with emakume-a ABS). This tense-based split distinguishes Basque from uniformly ergative languages and aligns it partially with Indo-European accusative tendencies in non-present contexts.

Declension paradigms

Basque noun declension follows agglutinative patterns where suffixes for number and case attach to the stem, often incorporating the definite -a (singular) or -ak (). The system features two main paradigms for inanimate nouns, determined by phonological properties of the stem-final sounds—consonant-final vs. vowel-final—affecting attachment of suffixes like the partitive (-ik vs. -rik) and ablative (-etik vs. -tik), with epenthetic vowels or consonants as needed. Animate nouns follow similar patterns for core cases but use distinct forms or periphrastic constructions for local cases, especially in the singular. These paradigms ensure consistent suffix stacking for complex forms, such as combining allative and ablative to yield etxe-rat-ik 'away from toward the house'. Phonological adjustments, such as deletion of the definite -a before vowel-initial suffixes (e.g., mendia-z > mendiz 'with the mountain'), are common in actual forms. The core cases (absolutive, ergative, genitive, dative, ) and selected local cases (inessive, locative-genitive, allative, ablative, partitive) are marked differently in singular and plural, with the definite integrated into the form. Indefinite forms lack the article and often do not distinguish singular/plural morphologically, relying on or verb agreement. Below are representative paradigms for each type in the definite forms, drawn from standard Central varieties. Note that actual pronunciations reflect vowel deletion and (e.g., mendi-a-ri > mendiri). For animates, local cases in singular are typically periphrastic (genitive + postposition).

Consonant-final stem (e.g., gizon 'man', animate)

This paradigm applies to stems ending in consonants (other than -r, -l, -n), with partitive -ik. Local cases for singular animates use genitive + postposition (e.g., gizonaren ganean 'in/near the man'); plural uses direct suffixes.
CaseSingularPlural
Absolutivegizon-agizon-ak
Ergativegizon-akgizon-ek
Genitivegizon-arengizon-en
Dativegizon-arigizon-ei
gizon-ezgizon-ez
Inessivegizon-aren ganeangizon-engan
Locative-Genitivegizon-aren gandikogizon-engandiko
Allativegizon-aren ganaragizon-engana
Ablativegizon-aren gandikgizon-engandik
Partitivegizon-ikgizon-ik

Vowel-final stem (e.g., mendi 'mountain' or liburu 'book', inanimate)

This paradigm is typical for inanimate nouns ending in vowels, with partitive -rik and epenthetic -e- in some plural local forms. Liburu follows the same pattern as mendi, with no separate class needed. Suffixes attach after -a/-ak, with -a often deleted before vowels.
CaseSingularPlural
Absolutivemendi-amendi-ak
Ergativemendi-akmendi-ek
Genitivemendi-arenmendi-en
Dativemendi-rimendi-ei
Instrumentalmendi-zmendi-ez
Inessivemendi-nmendi-etan
Locative-Genitivemendi-komendi-etako
Allativemendi-ramendi-etara
Ablativemendi-tikmendi-etatik
Partitivemendi-rikmendi-rik
Animate local cases differ from inanimate ones, particularly in plural forms, to reflect human reference; for example, the inessive plural uses -engan (gizon-engan 'among/in the men') instead of -etan, and the allative uses -engana (gizon-engana 'to the men') rather than -etara. This distinction applies primarily to local cases and avoids using standard inanimate forms for animates in most dialects. Compound cases extend the basic paradigms through suffix combination. The prolative case, marked by -tzat, indicates role or means (e.g., liburu-tzat 'as a book', gizon-tzat 'as a man'). The destinative case, formed with -rako, denotes purpose or destination (e.g., etxe-rako 'for/toward the house', mendi-rako 'for the mountain'). These are added to the stem or basic case forms, allowing further stacking (e.g., gizon-ez-tzat 'as by means of the man'). The adverbial suffix -ko derives relational or genitive-like forms from nouns, often functioning adjectivally (e.g., gaur-ko 'today's', from gaur 'today'; gizon-ko 'the man's'). It attaches to the stem and can combine with cases (e.g., etxe-ko-ra 'toward the house's'). Indefinites like bat 'one' and batzuk 'some' follow adapted paradigms without the definite article. For bat: absolutive bat (indefinite), bat-a (definite singular); ergative bat-k; dative bat-ri; partitive bat-ik. For batzuk (plural indefinite): absolutive batzuk, ergative batzu-k, dative batzuei, reflecting partial plural marking. Pronouns and demonstratives exhibit irregular declensions but align with the general system. Personal pronouns include ni 'I' (absolutive ni, genitive nire, dative niri, ergative nik) and hi 'you (singular)' (absolutive hi, genitive zure, dative zuri). like hau 'this' (near speaker) decline as hau (absolutive), honen (genitive), honi (dative), honetan (inessive), following the vowel-final paradigm with proximal adjustments.

Adjectives and attributive constructions

In Basque, adjectives typically appear in postnominal position when functioning attributively, following the noun they modify and agreeing with it in case and number through suffixed endings on the adjective itself. For example, the phrase etxe gorri-a means "the red ," where gorri-a (red-DEF) matches the definite singular form of the head noun etxe-a (-DEF). This agreement extends to other cases, such as the ergative, as in etxe gorri-ak liburua irakurri du ("The red read the ," in a literal sense for illustration). Unlike many , Basque adjectives do not inflect for , reflecting the language's lack of entirely. Adjectives also participate in definiteness marking within the noun phrase, adopting the definite article (-a) or its variants when the entire phrase is definite, similar to nouns. In predicative position, adjectives follow the copula izan ("to be") and require the definite article for agreement, as in etxe-a gorri-a da ("The is red"), where gorri-a agrees with the in definiteness and number. Attributive adjectives, by contrast, integrate directly into the noun phrase without a copula, maintaining the same morphological agreement but embedding within the structure, e.g., gauza interesgarri-a ("the interesting thing"). This postnominal order is robust across dialects, though preposed adjectives occur rarely in emphatic or archaic contexts. Possession in attributive constructions employs the genitive suffix -ren, which attaches to the possessor or to form a synthetic relation, distinct from free postpositions. For instance, -en liburu-a translates to "Jon's ," with -en (a variant of -ren after vowels) marking the genitive on the proper name . This construction agrees in case and number with the possessed , as in the plural -en liburu-ak ("Jon's s"). The relational -ko, however, derives adjectival modifiers indicating origin, , or , rather than strict , e.g., Paris-ko liburu-a ("the of " or "Parisian "). Dialects show preferences for synthetic genitive forms like -ren in central varieties, while peripheral dialects may occasionally favor periphrastic alternatives with postpositions for complex relations, though -ren remains the standard marker throughout. Comparative and superlative degrees of are formed morphologically, with the -ago indicating the and -en the superlative (or superlative), often combined with the standard of comparison introduced by baino ("than"). For example, handiago baino means "bigger than," as in etxe handiago baino da ("It is bigger than a "); the inflects for , yielding handiago-a in definite contexts. Superlatives use -en, e.g., handi-en-a ("the biggest one"). These forms precede baino in phrasal comparatives and maintain postnominal position in attributive use, such as etxe handi-en-a ("the biggest ").

Pronouns

Basque pronouns encompass , , , and indefinite forms, which inflect for case in alignment with the language's system, much like nouns. These pronouns lack gender distinctions, reflecting the absence of throughout Basque nominal morphology. Unlike many , Basque does not have dedicated third-person pronouns; instead, fulfill this role. Personal pronouns are used for first and second persons, with forms that mark number (singular/) and levels. The absolutive forms include ni (I), gu (we), hi (you singular informal), zu (you singular formal), and zuek (you plural, neutral politeness). Ergative forms add the suffix , yielding (I-ERG), guk (we-ERG), hik (you sg informal-ERG), zuk (you sg formal-ERG), and zuek (you pl-ERG, without additional marking). Dative forms typically end in -i, such as niri (to me) or zuri (to you sg). Allocutive forms distinguish in address: hi triggers informal allocutive verb agreement, while zu and zuek are used for formal or plural polite contexts, influencing verb morphology without altering the pronoun itself. Emphatic variants, like (I-EMPH) or zeu (you sg formal-EMPH), appear in focused or contrastive positions. For example, liburua irakurri dut means "I have read the book," where nik is the ergative .
Person/NumberAbsolutiveErgativeDative
1sgninikniri
1plgugukguri
2sg informalhihikhiri
2sg formalzuzukzuri
2plzuekzuekzuei
Demonstrative pronouns indicate spatial or discourse and double as third-person pronouns, declining for case and number like nouns. The basic series includes hau (this, proximal), (that, medial), and (that, distal), with plurals hauek, horiek, and haiek. For instance, hura serves as "he/she/it" in absolutive case, while hurak is ergative and hurari dative. Postpositional phrases combine with these, such as hura-rekin (with that/he/she/it). Emphatic forms like hauxe (this one-EMPH) emphasize specificity. An example is Hura etorri da ("He/she/it has arrived"). Interrogative pronouns query entities and inflect for case. Core forms are nor (who, absolutive), nork (who, ergative), nori (to whom, dative), and zer (what, absolutive), with zergatik (why) and zein (which) for alternatives. These follow noun-like declension patterns, as in Nori idatzi dio? ("To whom did he/she write?"). Indefinite pronouns express non-specific referents, often derived from interrogatives. Examples include norbait (someone), inor (anyone, typically in negative polarity contexts), edonor (whoever), ezer (something, or nothing with negation as ezer ez), and edozer (anything). Relative forms use the suffix -en to relativize, as in noren (whose) or embedded jakingo duen (who will know). For instance, Norbait etorri da means "Someone has arrived." Reflexive pronouns lack dedicated forms and instead employ buru-a ("head-the") combined with a possessive pronoun in the genitive, such as neure burua (myself, literally "my own head") or bere burua (himself/herself, "his/her own head"). These inflect for case, as in Bere buruari hitz egiten dio ("He/she speaks to himself/herself"). This construction underscores Basque's reliance on body-part nouns for reflexivity, without gender marking.

Postpositions

In Basque, postpositions are free-standing words that follow the or they govern, marking various relational functions such as , , instrumentality, and comitativity, in contrast to the bound case suffixes that indicate core like ergative or dative. Unlike case suffixes, which directly agglutinate to s, postpositions require the preceding to appear in a specific case, often absolutive for inanimates or ergative/dative for certain relations, as in etxe-a-rekin ("with the house"), where -a marks the absolutive case on the definite . This distinction ensures postpositions handle more peripheral or meanings, while case suffixes focus on argument structure. Many common postpositions derive historically from nouns, retaining nominal roots that inflect for case and number when used independently, such as -ondoren ("after," from ondo "end") or -aurretik ("before," from aurre "front"). The comitative postposition -kin ("with") exemplifies this, attaching to an to indicate accompaniment, as in lagun-a-rekin ("with the friend"), and it contrasts with the ergative -k, which marks transitive agents rather than tools or companions. Similarly, the instrumental postposition -z ("by/with [tool]") follows absolutive forms for means, as in giltza-z ("with the "), distinguishing it from agentive uses of the ergative. Locative postpositions frequently combine with local case suffixes to express spatial relations, such as -gain-ean ("on top of," combining the nominal root gain "top" with the inessive -ean), requiring the governed in absolutive or genitive as needed. Basic locative forms include -n ("in/on"), -ra ("to"), -tik ("from"), -rantz ("towards"), -raino ("up to"), and -ko ("of"), with distinctions: animates insert -ga (e.g., amaren gan "near the mother"), while certain inanimates use -ta (e.g., hiru liburutan "in three books"). These differ from pure local case suffixes (like inessive -an) by allowing more complex relational nuances through nominal derivation. Dialectal variations affect postpositional forms and grammaticalization degrees; for instance, some western dialects like Bizkaian show partial shifts toward preposition-like usage or reduced in certain contexts, though maintains strict postpositional order. Examples contrasting postpositions with suffixed cases include etxean ("in the house," using inessive -an) versus etxearekin ("with the house," postposition -kin on absolutive), highlighting how postpositions extend beyond core cases for specificity.

Verbs

Verb classes and structure

Basque verbs are broadly classified into two main types: synthetic and periphrastic, distinguished primarily by their morphological complexity and the means by which they express tense, , and . Synthetic verbs constitute a closed class of approximately 20 to 30 monomorphemic roots that inflect internally for person, number, tense, and without requiring an auxiliary, forming paradigms with over a finite forms each. Examples include jakin 'to know' and egon 'to stay', which conjugate directly, such as dakizu 'you know' from jakin. These verbs are relics of older and are increasingly restricted to literary or formal registers in modern usage. In contrast, periphrastic verbs, which form the vast majority of the verbal , combine a non-finite of the main root with a conjugated auxiliary—either izan 'to be' for intransitives or ukan 'to have' for transitives—to express more complex tenses and aspects. For instance, irten naiz 'I have gone out' uses the perfective irten from the root irten 'to go out' plus the first-person singular form naiz of izan. The morphological structure of synthetic verbs typically involves a bare augmented by suffixes for tense (e.g., for present, -n for ) and markers encoding , object, and sometimes allocutive features, resulting in agglutinative forms that pack multiple categories into a single word. Periphrastic structures, however, separate the lexical content into a participial form—marked for with suffixes like -tu or -n for perfective, or -tzen for imperfective—followed by the auxiliary, which carries the finite . Verb themselves are often monomorphemic and invariant, but some exhibit alternations; for example, the irregular synthetic verb joan 'to go' shows suppletion in its nominal form joate 'going', where the shifts to accommodate non-finite uses. Derivational morphology allows for the creation of new verbs from roots, particularly through inchoative and causative processes that alter valency and aspect. Inchoative derivations, which express a change of state or spontaneous becoming, often apply to adjectival or nominal bases using suffixes like -tu or -i-tu, as in gorri 'red' deriving gorritu 'to become red'. Causative derivations, conversely, increase valency by adding a causer argument, typically via the suffix -arazi (or dialectal -erazi), yielding forms like ikusarazi 'to make see' from the root ikusi 'to see'. These processes highlight Basque's productive word-formation strategies, where the resulting verbs integrate into either synthetic or periphrastic paradigms depending on the base. Dialectal variation significantly affects the inventory and usage of synthetic verbs, with central dialects exhibiting a marked in their number and frequency compared to peripheral ones. In central , many historically synthetic verbs have shifted toward periphrastic constructions, reflecting ongoing simplification and alignment with Romance influences, while eastern and western dialects preserve fuller synthetic paradigms for roots like joan 'to go'. Additionally, verb stems frequently participate in , particularly with the egin 'to do/make', which nominalizes actions in unergative expressions such as barre egin 'to laugh' (literally 'to do '), allowing for flexible periphrastic elaboration.

Synthetic conjugation

Synthetic conjugation in Basque refers to the finite inflection of a limited set of verbs, primarily around 20-30 common intransitive and transitive roots, which incorporate tense, , , and number markers directly onto the without an auxiliary. These synthetic forms contrast with the more productive periphrastic constructions and are used mainly for present and past tenses in everyday verbs like etorri 'come', joan 'go', ukan 'have', and izan 'be'. The is highly agglutinative, with affixes ordered as (/) + + (number/ + tense/ + /number + tense), allowing compact encoding of up to four arguments in transitive forms. In the present and future tenses, synthetic verbs mark person and number in the absolutive (subject for intransitives, object for transitives) and ergative (subject for transitives) via suffixes, with the third person singular often zero-marked. The first person singular uses -n, second singular -su (or variants like -zu in allocutive contexts), and third singular ; plurals extend with -en (first plural), -zue (second plural), and -e (third plural). For example, the verb ezan 'be' conjugates in the present as naiz 'I am', zara 'you (sg.) are', da 'he/she/it is', gara 'we are', zarete 'you (pl.) are', dira 'they are'. Transitive examples, such as ukan 'have', show combined marking: dut 'I have it' (1sg.erg + 3sg.abs), duzu 'you (sg.) have it' (2sg.erg + 3sg.abs), du 'he/she has it' (3sg.erg + 3sg.abs). Future intent is conveyed by the same forms or with potential -ke, as in nagoke 'I will stay'. The following table illustrates the present/future paradigm for the intransitive synthetic verb 'come' (absolutive marking):
PersonSingularPlural
1stnator (I come)gatoz (we come)
2ndzator (you sg. come)zatorzue (you pl. come)
3rddator (he/she/it comes)datoz (they come)
For transitive ukan 'have' (ergative subject, absolutive object), the paradigm includes dative extensions:
Erg.Abs/Dat1sg2sg3sg1pl2pl3pl
3sg.absdutduzududitugudituzuedituzte
3sg.datdiatdizudiodigutediguzuedie
Past tense forms build on the present by adding -n (or epenthetic -en after vowels), often with stem adjustments for intransitives, as in izan 'be': nintzen 'I was' (from naiz), zintzen 'you (sg.) were', zen 'he/she/it was', ginintzen 'we were', zineten 'you (pl.) were', ziren 'they were'. This -n suffix indicates past imperfective or perfective depending on , without separate . For ukan, past examples include nuen 'I had it', zenuen 'you (sg.) had it', zuen 'he/she had it'. Imperative moods use bare roots for singular affirmatives (e.g., etor 'come! sg.' from etorri) or add -te for plural/emphatic (e.g., etor zaitezte 'come! pl.'), with second person marking integrated. Prohibitives employ ez with the root, as in ez etor 'don't come!'. Negative synthetic forms generally require ez + subjunctive mood, which lacks tense marking and uses paradigms like naiznaizen 'that I be/not be', avoiding full indicative negation in synthetic contexts. Allocutive agreement appears in second person forms when addressing a familiar interlocutor, incorporating an indirect object marker for the addressee: -zu for familiar male, -zuen for familiar female (or polite variants), as in nago-zu '' (to familiar male) versus nago-zuen (to familiar female). This feature, unique to intimate speech, does not alter core person marking but adds hearer indexing, e.g., in ukan: duk ' has it' (to familiar male addressee, non-argument).

Periphrastic verbs

In Basque, periphrastic verbs constitute the primary means of expressing tense, , and for the majority of the verbal , as most lack full synthetic conjugation paradigms beyond a limited set of tenses. These constructions combine a non-finite derived from the with a finite that carries the inflectional load. The two main auxiliaries are izan ('to be'), used for intransitive verbs, and ukan ('to have'), employed for transitive verbs, reflecting the language's ergative-absolutive alignment in these forms. The formation of periphrastic verbs typically involves a marked for , such as the perfective -i (e.g., ikusi 'seen' from ikusi 'to see'), followed by the conjugated auxiliary. For intransitive verbs, the auxiliary izan agrees in and number with the single absolutive (the ). An example is irten naiz ('I went out' or 'I have gone out'), where irten is the perfective of the 'to go out' and naiz is the first-person singular form of izan. In contrast, transitive periphrastic verbs use ukan, which agrees with the absolutive object rather than the ergative , as in irten dut ('I took out' or 'I have taken out'), with dut agreeing with a third-person singular absolutive object. This agreement pattern exemplifies morphological ergativity in periphrastic tenses, where the auxiliary treats the of transitives and intransitives differently from nominative-accusative systems. Prospective and habitual aspects are formed using the suffix -ko on the verbal noun or participle, combined with an auxiliary to indicate future intention or repeated action. For instance, ikusiko dut ('I will see it') employs the prospective form ikusiko (from ikusi 'to see') with dut, the third-person transitive auxiliary, to express an upcoming event. Similarly, habitual readings arise in contexts like egiten dut ('I do it' habitually), though -ko can extend to iterative senses in certain dialects. Passive periphrasis is constructed with ukan plus a , often in a stative sense, where the agent may be expressed in the but is optional. An example is egin da ('it is done'), derived from the perfective participle egin of egin 'to do' with izan in some variants, or ukatzera forms for agentive passives like etxe hori aitak egina da ('that house is built by the father'), emphasizing result states over processes. Dialectal preferences influence the prevalence of periphrastic constructions, with western dialects (e.g., Bizkaian) relying more heavily on for a broader range of tenses and aspects, while eastern dialects favor synthetic forms and select izan over ukan for unergative verbs (e.g., dantzatu da 's/he danced' vs. central/western dantzatu du). This variation affects auxiliary choice and the overall analytic nature of verbal expressions in spoken .

Tense, aspect, and mood

Basque verbs encode , , and primarily through a combination of synthetic and periphrastic constructions, distinguishing it from due to its ergative alignment and limited synthetic paradigm. Tense marks temporal location relative to the speech event, with a basic non-past/past opposition realized differently in synthetic (limited to about 60 verbs) and periphrastic forms (productive for most verbs). conveys the internal temporal structure of events, such as completion or ongoing nature, often via non-finite participles combined with auxiliaries. expresses the speaker's attitude toward the proposition, including indicative for factual assertions and subjunctive for hypothetical or subordinate contexts. The tense system lacks a dedicated simple future; instead, non-past forms cover both present and future interpretations, with futurity inferred from context or modal elements. In synthetic conjugation, the non-past is unmarked (e.g., dago 's/he is/stays'), while the past uses suffixes like -n (e.g., zegoen 's/he was/stayed'). Periphrastic tenses employ participles plus auxiliaries izan 'to be' or ukan 'to have': non-past with present auxiliary (e.g., liburua irakurri dut 'I have read/I read the book') and past with past auxiliary (e.g., liburua irakurri nuen 'I had read/I read the book'). This results in a perfective reading in the past periphrastic, contrasting with the imperfective synthetic past. Aspectual distinctions are more robust in periphrastic verbs, which allow for perfective (completed events via -i or -tu , e.g., irten naiz 'I go out/I have gone out'), imperfective or progressive (ongoing via -tzen inessive, e.g., irteten naiz 'I am going out'), and habitual or prospective (via -ko nominalizer, e.g., irtenko naiz 'I will go out habitually/I am about to go out'). Synthetic forms are largely aspectually neutral, relying on context for interpretation. These aspects interact with tense: perfective is typical in past periphrastics, while imperfective suits ongoing or repeated actions across tenses. Moods include the indicative as the default for declarative statements, marked by zero or specific vowels in (e.g., dago indicative 's/he is'). The subjunctive appears in complements after (ez 'not'), purpose clauses, or wishes, using forms like -en or -ela (e.g., ez dakit non dagoen 'I don't know where s/he is'). Potential mood, expressing possibility or , inserts -te- or -ke- (e.g., irte dezaket 'I can/may go out'). combines with hypothetical -l- for unrealized scenarios (e.g., irten nintzake 'I would go out'). These moods primarily inflect the in periphrastics and neutralize some aspectual contrasts in subjunctive. Evidentiality, marking the source of information, emerges in certain periphrastic moods, particularly reported evidentials with -ela for (e.g., irten dela esan dute 'They say s/he has gone out'), which conveys epistemic distance and often aligns with in past tenses. This form integrates by softening assertions to reported , distinct from direct indicative claims. Tense, , and interact with and questions: negation with ez triggers subjunctive in clauses (e.g., ez dakit irten den 'I don't know if s/he has gone out'), while questions maintain indicative or potential moods but may shift for (e.g., interrogative Irteten zara? 'Are you going out?'). These categories thus adapt semantically to illocutionary force without altering core markers.

Agreement, person, and allocutivity

In Basque, verbs exhibit rich morphology that encodes and number features of their arguments, primarily through prefixes and suffixes on the auxiliary in periphrastic constructions or directly on synthetic verbs. The system is ergative-absolutive in , with the absolutive argument ( of intransitives or object of transitives) receiving primary marking, often via prefixes like n- (1SG) or z- (2SG), while ergative (transitive ) and dative (indirect object) arguments are marked secondarily through suffixes such as -gu (1PL ergative or dative) or -da- (3SG to 3SG dative). For instance, the auxiliary form n-du-gu encodes 1SG absolutive, 3SG dative, and 1PL ergative, as in Nik zuri liburua emango dizut ("I will give you the book"), where the verb agrees with all three arguments. In periphrastic verbs, which constitute the majority of tenses, absolutive is obligatory and appears closest to the root, with ergative and dative markers following in a fixed order, reflecting a hierarchy of prominence. Basque verbal agreement lacks gender marking entirely for syntactic arguments, focusing solely on person and number; plurality is indicated by suffixes like -e or -te in the ergative or dative slots when applicable. This results in forms that are neutral with respect to the gender of subjects or objects, such as du-t ("I have it," 1SG ergative, 3SG absolutive) regardless of the possessed item's referent. Number agreement applies distinctly to plurals, as seen in di-zki-gu ("we have them," 3PL absolutive, 1PL ergative), where the absolutive plural -zki- contrasts with singular - zero. A of is allocutivity, where forms incorporate markers for a non-syntactic addressee based on familiarity and levels, independent of whether the addressee is an . In the familiar hika register (used with close relations), allocutive markers distinguish the addressee's via suffixes like -k (masculine) or -n (feminine), as in du-k ("he/she/it has it," said to a male addressee) versus du-n (to a female). This contrasts with the polite zuka register, where forms like du-zu ("he/she/it has it," to a polite addressee) use a -zu without specification, even when the addressee is absent from the . For direct 2SG arguments, du-zu also marks ergative in the familiar sense ("you have it"), but allocutivity extends this to non-argument contexts, prohibiting overlap in the same to avoid . Allocutivity carries theoretical implications for understanding politeness as a grammaticized discourse feature, encoding social hierarchy and intimacy directly in the verb's morphology rather than through separate particles. It supports analyses positing an addressee projection in the clausal periphery, where allocutive clitics agree with pragmatic features of the speech act participant, influencing sentence processing and register choice in spoken Basque. This system highlights Basque's integration of interpersonal dynamics into core syntax, distinguishing it from languages where politeness is primarily lexical or prosodic.

Syntax

Basic clause structure and word order

Basque exhibits a Subject-Object-Verb (SOV) in neutral s, particularly in declarative sentences that answer broad questions such as "What happened?" In transitive clauses, the ergative-marked subject precedes the absolutive-marked object, which in turn precedes the ; for example, ek Miren ikusi du translates to " saw Miren," where Jonek is the ergative subject, Miren is the absolutive object, and ikusi du is the complex. Intransitive clauses follow an absolutive- (SV) pattern, with the subject in the absolutive case preceding the , as in Mirenek abestu du ("Miren sang"). This order aligns with Basque's ergative-absolutive case system, where the absolutive case (unmarked) is used for intransitive subjects and transitive objects, while the (-k) marks transitive subjects; case marking on arguments thus helps clarify roles even when varies slightly. Although SOV is the default, Basque word order is highly flexible due to its discourse-driven topic-comment structure, allowing variations such as Object-Subject-Verb (OSV) or Verb-Subject (VS) in non-neutral contexts without altering basic grammatical relations, as the rich verbal agreement and case morphology compensate for positional shifts. Adverbs typically appear in preverbal position to modify the verb, with manner adverbs preceding time adverbs when both are present; for instance, in Gizona eta gizartea ederki ezagutzen zituen atzo ("He knew man and society very well yesterday"), ederki (manner: "very well") precedes atzo (time: "yesterday"), both preverbal. This preverbal placement ensures adverbs integrate into the clause's focus domain without disrupting the core argument-verb sequence. Copular clauses in Basque employ the verb izan ("to be") to link with , distinguishing equative constructions (identity or classification) from locative ones (position or existence). In equative clauses, such as Zeru-a urdin-a ("The is blue"), izan appears as the form da following the absolutive and nominal or adjectival , both marked with the definite -a. Locative copular clauses often use egon ("to exist" or "to be located") instead, as in Liburu-a mahai-gainean ("The book is on the table"), where dago is the appropriate form of egon agreeing with the absolutive . Nominal and adjectival predicates require this copular even in the , integrating markers to reflect , number, and case; for example, Txakurr-a handi-a ("The dog is big") uses da without additional aspectual elements.

Information structure

Basque employs a topic-comment structure to organize information, where the topic—typically given or background information—precedes the comment, which conveys new or asserted content. Topics are often marked by left-dislocation, placing the topic phrase at the clause-initial position without case marking, or by the particle -la, which explicitly signals "as for" or "regarding" the topic. For instance, in Jon-la etorri da ("As for Jon, he has come"), -la detaches Jon as the topic, allowing the comment etorri da to provide the new information about his arrival. The rule in positions new or ive information immediately pre-verbal, adjacent to the verbal complex, to receive main and interpretive prominence. This pre-verbal slot ensures that the focused element is interpreted as exhaustive or corrective, often triggering adjustments in ; for example, a new object in prompts 3rd person singular on the auxiliary, as in Miren ikusi du Jonek ("It is Miren that has seen"), where du reflects 3rd person absolutive with the focused object Miren rather than higher-person features. In , neutral orders like Jonek Miren ikusi du place the first without on Miren. A classic illustration is Jon etorri da (" has come," neutral or with on via intonation/context for , as in response to "Who came?") Etorri da Jon ( on the event/verb, with postverbal as antitopic for given information, as in "He has come, "). Repeated topics, being given information, avoid the pre-verbal focus position to prevent unintended contrastive readings, instead appearing in left-dislocated or postverbal antitopic positions for discourse continuity. This rule maintains pragmatic by reserving the slot for rhematic elements, as seen when a previously mentioned entity like in subsequent clauses remains peripheral: Jonekin hitz egin dut, baina ez dut ikusi ("I spoke with Jon, but I didn't see him"), where Jon is topicalized without pre-verbal placement. Verbal focus, used for contrastive emphasis on the predicate, employs prefixal elements such as -h- or -u- in synthetic conjugations, or the affirmative particle ba- in analytic forms to assert the verb against alternatives. For example, ba etorri da emphasizes the arrival contrastively ("Indeed, he has come"), while synthetic forms like hauzkio (from hartu, "he takes it") incorporate -h- for heightened predicate focus in narrative contexts. Clause-initial verb placement serves narrative chaining or exclamative functions, signaling broad focus or surprise without a dedicated pre-verbal constituent. This order, common in , highlights the entire proposition, as in Etorri da! ("He has come!" exclamative) or sequential narratives like Joan da eta itzuli da ("He went and returned," linking events prosodically).

Negation

In Basque, negation is morphologically realized through the invariant particle ez ('not'), which functions syntactically as a pre-verbal element immediately preceding the finite auxiliary in periphrastic constructions or the synthetic verb stem itself. This placement triggers a characteristic word order shift in periphrastic verbs, where the auxiliary moves before the non-finite participle, distinguishing negative clauses from their affirmative counterparts. For instance, the affirmative sentence Emakumeak gizona ikusi du ('The woman has seen the man') negates to Emakumeak ez du gizona ikusi ('The woman hasn't seen the man'), with du (3rd person singular ergative-absolutive) serving as the auxiliary. In synthetic conjugation, negation simply prefixes ez to the inflected verb, as in Zuk ez dakizu ('You don't know'), where no auxiliary is involved and the form parallels affirmative synthetic paradigms except for the negator. Periphrastic negation often interacts with the , particularly in embedded or conditional contexts, where the auxiliary adopts subjunctive forms to convey hypothetical or non-realized ; for example, ez dut irten ('I didn't go out') uses the indicative auxiliary in main clauses, but irten ez ('if he/she hasn't gone out') employs the subjunctive bada. Negative items, functioning as indefinite pronouns or adverbs, are licensed under the c-command of ez and include forms like ezer ('nothing/anything'), inor ('nobody/anybody'), and inoiz ('never/ever'); a typical construction is Ez dut ezer ikusi ('I haven't seen anything'), where ezer occupies post-auxiliary position within the scope of . Constituent negation employs ez to target specific elements, such as Ez dut liburua irakurri ('I haven't read the book'), focusing denial on the object while maintaining clause-level structure. Multiple negation is grammatically possible but infrequent in standard usage, often involving ez combined with polarity items for emphasis, though it does not typically yield readings. Negation extends to interrogative and conditional structures without altering its core . In yes/no questions, ez combines with particles like al or ote to form tags, as in Ez al dator emakumea? ('Isn't the coming?'), where al softens the query. Conditionals integrate via subjunctive auxiliaries in the protasis, exemplified by Etortzen ez baduzu, deitu ('If you don't come, call'), embedding ez before the subjunctive auxiliary baduzu. In some dialects, particularly eastern varieties, may be softened for through additive particles like ala, yielding expressions such as ez ala ('not really' or polite denial), which mitigate direct refusal in .

Questions

In Basque, yes/no questions are formed without altering the declarative word order, maintaining the verb in final position, and are primarily distinguished by rising intonation at the end of the sentence. Dialectal particles may attach to the verb for emphasis: al in central varieties for straightforward questions (e.g., Emakumea etorri al da? "Has the woman arrived?") and a in eastern varieties (e.g., Eturri dea? "Has she arrived?"). The particle ote conveys uncertainty or tentativeness in such questions (e.g., Emakumea etorri ote da? "Has the woman arrived, I wonder?"), while ez ote combines negation with doubt (e.g., Emakumea ez ote dator? "Isn't the woman coming, perhaps?"). Wh-questions incorporate interrogative words such as nor ("who"), zer ("what"), and non ("where"), which appear in the preverbal focus position to highlight the queried element, with the verb remaining final and agreeing in person, number, and case with its arguments as in declaratives. For instance, Non dago liburua? fronts the wh-word for neutral emphasis ("Where is the book?"), with the subject "liburua" postverbal as antitopic. These interrogative pronouns inflect for grammatical case, such as nork (ergative "who") in Nork ikusi du gizona? ("Who has seen the man?"). Echo questions, often expressing surprise or seeking confirmation, employ the particle ote attached to the wh-word or verb, replicating the declarative structure with interrogative intonation. An example is Zer ote ari da haur hori? ("What on earth is that child doing?"), where ote underscores the speaker's astonishment. Embedded questions are typically marked by the suffix -(e)n on the finite verb, forming indirect interrogatives without changing the matrix clause structure, and may include the optional particle ea for real (intensional) questions (e.g., Badakit ea nor jin den "I know who has come"). Alternative embedded questions use edo ("or") to disjoin options (e.g., Nago ea sagarra ala udarea nahi duzu-n "I wonder whether you want the apple or the pear"), sometimes with -(e)netz for emphasis in discontinuous constructions. Polite forms in questions incorporate allocutive agreement on the verb to address the hearer respectfully, varying by : conservative southern varieties use gender-marked clitics like -k for familiar male addressees (e.g., Etortzen zara-k? "Are you coming?"), while innovative southern dialects extend allocutives to embedded interrogatives for (e.g., Ez z-aki-a-t [(ba)-z-etorre-(%k)-en ala ez] "Don't you know whether (he) is coming or not?"). In Zuberoan, however, allocutives are restricted to root declaratives and omitted in root questions.

Coordination and subordination

In Basque, coordination links clauses or phrases of equal syntactic status, primarily through overt conjunctions or asyndetic means. The main coordinating conjunctions are eta ('and') for additive relations, edo ('or') for disjunctive alternatives, and baina ('but') for contrastive connections. These conjunctions typically follow the subject-verb-object (SOV) order of the language and can connect both nominal phrases and full clauses. For instance, subjects may be coordinated asyndetically without a conjunction, relying on contextual parallelism, as in gizon emakume gehiago-k ('more men [and] women'), where the shared case marking (ergative -k) implies linkage. In clausal coordination, gapping or reduction occurs frequently due to the head-final SOV structure, allowing ellipsis of repeated elements like verbs or auxiliaries while preserving ergative-absolutive agreement. An example is Jon etorri da eta liburua irakurri du ('Jon came and read the book'), where the finite auxiliary da in the first clause is gapped in the second, and the shared subject triggers agreement on the second verb. Subordination embeds one within another, creating hierarchical dependencies, and relies heavily on non-finite verb forms and specific . are introduced by the -en ('that'), which marks finite or non-finite to function as arguments of predicates like of or . For example, espero nuen [etorriko zela]-en ('I expected that he would come') uses -en to subordinate the future irrealis form. also employ -en on non-finite to modify , often without a , as in [etorri den] gizon-a ('the man who came'), where the etorri den agrees in person and number with the head . These relatives can be restrictive or non-restrictive and integrate into the while maintaining the language's head-final order. Adverbial subordination employs dedicated markers for relations like , , and . Purpose clauses use the suffix , forming non-finite constructions to express intent, as in jan-tzeko etorri naiz ('I came to eat'), where nominalizes the for purposive . Conditional clauses prefix to the , indicating hypothetical scenarios, for example, ba- dator, pozik egongo naiz ('if he comes, I will be happy'), with attaching to the finite form while tense may be restricted compared to main clauses. For simultaneous actions in subordinates, the progressive non-finite form is common, as in irakurtzen dabiltzen bitartean ('while he is reading'), embedding the ongoing process adverbially. These strategies highlight Basque's preference for non-finite subordination, which avoids full agreement in embedded contexts to maintain syntactic economy.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Basque among the world's languages: a typological approach
    The central aim of this article is to characterize the Basque language from a typologi- cal point of view taking into account the results of latest research.
  2. [2]
    Ergativity in Basque - Oxford Academic
    This chapter provides an overview of ergative case and agreement in Basque by concentrating on their morphological and syntactic distribution as well as on ...
  3. [3]
    A grammar of Basque | Semantic Scholar
    This grammar of Basque is considerably more complete than any other existing grammar of the language, and the description is illustrated with fully-glossed ...
  4. [4]
    Standard Basque: A Progressive Grammar - MIT Press Direct
    The first modern pedagogically oriented reference to the grammar of standard Basque (Euskara Batua), in two volumes: Part 1 presents detailed grammar lesso.
  5. [5]
    Variation in the production of Basque ergativity: Change or stable ...
    Apr 19, 2024 · This study examines the extent to which the Basque ergative -k marker is undergoing change in the Basque Autonomous Community.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] A Brief Grammar of Euskara, the Basque Language
    ... definite article a in Euskara. Only when used as denominators of a set of elements can proper Nouns co-occur with demonstratives or the indefinite article.
  7. [7]
    THE NOUN PHRASE - Basque Language Institute - EHU
    5.2.Quantifiers that require a determiner. The quantifiers guzti 'all', bakoitz 'each', and gehien 'most' require the presence of a determiner, as shown in ...Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Overview of Basque quantificational elements - Artxiker
    Oct 15, 2010 · Generalized universal (co-intersective) quantifiers. D-Quantifiers: The Basque universal quantifiers are: guzti 'all', den 'all', oro 'all ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] a and bat Basque articles and recent contact theories | Artxiker
    Jan 6, 2009 · So far, I have made two points about Basque definite article –a: first, it has a demonstrative origin, and second, it has gone further in the ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The category of number in Basque: I. Synchronic and historical ...
    Oct 22, 2010 · The transformation of a demonstrative into an article has multiple parallels, the one of the Romance languages being just the nearest to Basque.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] The category of number in Basque - Dialnet
    The suffix is -ok both in the abs. and in the erg., and in the oblique cases the -o- replaces the -e-: gizon-on 'of us/you men', gizon-oi 'to us/you men', and ...
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    [PDF] -a and bat Basque articles and recent contact theories - Artxiker
    Oct 18, 2009 · 3.2.1 batzu: the Basque plural indefinite article. Basque crucially has a plural indefinite article batzuk 'some', morphologically based on ...
  14. [14]
    Latin affixes in Basque - AfBo: A world-wide survey of affix borrowing -
    (g/k)unde, ‑undia, ‑kune 'abstract noun: action, ability, social group ... A grammar of Basque; Mujika, Luis Mari 1982: Latina eta erromanikoaren eragina ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Light Nouns and Term Creation in Basque1 - Raco.cat
    This paper focuses on a set of Basque nouns, such as talde 'group', zati 'part' and mota 'type', which occur prototypically as N2 in a set of root compounds. ( ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] DERIVATIONAL PATTERNS IN PROTO-BASQUE WORD ...
    While Basque data in (14) suggest derivational marking of collective/mass nouns in Proto-Basque, it should be stressed that the semantic observations here ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Deriving morphological ergativity in Basque
    This paper considers how ergative alignment in Basque differs from that found in other ergative languages and how this system may be derived.
  18. [18]
    CASES AND POSTPOSITIONS - Basque Language Institute - EHU
    There are three grammatical cases in Euskara: Ergative, Dative and Absolutive. They are marked on the Noun phrases by the following endings or morphemes.
  19. [19]
    (PDF) Polysemy in Basque Locational Cases - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · The five locational cases of Basque are locative - n , ablative - ti(k) , allative - ra(t) , terminative allative - raino , and directional ...
  20. [20]
    (PDF) 2014 - "The split ergativity of Basque. Why is the present more ...
    The paper addresses the phenomenon of split ergativity in Basque, highlighting the distinctions between present and past/irrealis verb forms.
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Standard Basque - Euskadi.eus
    The Indefinite Locative Paradigm. 53. 3.5. The Declension of Place Names 57. 3.6. The Locative Paradigm for Animate Noun Phrases 60. 3.7. Temporal Use of ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Language and enaction - HAL-SHS
    Nov 19, 2008 · ... cases (the prolative, the comitative, the destinative…): etxerakoan “in the of to house” > “while going home”. Nominal arguments of the verb ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] A Brief Grammar of Euskara, the Basque Language
    This short grammar of Euskara covers sentences, noun phrases, cases, postpositions, verbs, and verbal inflection, aiming for a middle ground between detailed ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Basque Genitive Case and Multiple Checking∗ 36
    There aren't two types of DP genitives inside noun phrases. Basque doesn't have two different types of DP genitives (synthetic and periphrastic), and both.
  26. [26]
    Variation in the production of Basque ergativity: Change or stable ...
    Ergative/absolutive markings in personal pronouns. Personal pronouns. 1sg. 1pl. 2sg. 2pl. Absolutive ni gu zu zu-ek. Ergative ni-k gu-k zu-k zu-ek. Nevertheless ...
  27. [27]
    The syntax of Basque allocutive clitics | Glossa
    Sep 24, 2018 · First, in addition to addressee morphemes on the auxiliary, some Basque dialects maintain vocative pronouns.Introduction · Overview of allocutive clitics · The syntax of allocutive clitics · Notes
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Person and Number Inflection in Basque*
    As shown in (7), the emphatic version of the personal pronoun is grammatical only when focused, and the non-emphatic version is grammatical only when it is not ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] From free relatives to indefinite pronouns in Basque, or how ... - HAL
    Dec 31, 2021 · Basque existential indefinite pronouns originate from correlative protases, built with n- or z- prefixes and bound remnants, and combine with ...
  30. [30]
    Language Basque - Grambank -
    "Nouns cannot in fact be directly inflected at all: in Basque, it is noun phrases, and only noun phrases, which can be inflected."
  31. [31]
    Regarding Basque postpositions and related matters - Academia.edu
    Some Basque generative linguists employ the term "postposition" also to refer to elements that are indisputably sufixes, such as -ra "to, allative", -tik ...
  32. [32]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  33. [33]
    [PDF] UC Berkeley - Dissertations, Department of Linguistics - eScholarship
    ... Basque 'postpositions'. The majority are themselves nouns with some case ... derived from nouns with phrasal complements, which, always come before the ...
  34. [34]
    THE VERB AND ITS MORPHOLOGY - Basque Language Institute
    These verbs that bring together the main verb and the inflection are called synthetic verbs in the Basque grammatical tradition, and the complex ones ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Tense in Basque* - Knowledge Base
    In this paper, I provide an analysis of the syntax and morphology of tense in Basque.1 In this language, there are two types of tenses: simple and compound.Missing: split- | Show results with:split-
  36. [36]
    Basque Language
    Basque morphology is primarily agglutinating and, mostly, of the suffixing type. Its native vocabulary is obviously different from those of Indo-European ...Missing: linguistics - - | Show results with:linguistics - -
  37. [37]
    A Brief Explanation of Basque Morphology
    Dec 13, 2000 · Basque is a highly inflected language that exhibits extensive agreement between nouns and verbs. It uses a large number of case markings.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  38. [38]
    (PDF) Verb-Deriving Processes in Basque - Academia.edu
    Moreover, verbs derived from them express a change of state that may also be expressed by the noun itself and a copula. These derived verbs pattern in some ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] LEXICAL CAUSATIVES AND CAUSATIVE ALTERNATION IN ...
    According to Dixon's (2000) list of criteria for classifying causative formations, Basque causatives can be characterised with regard to three features: (a) ...
  40. [40]
    Tense and Aspect in Basque - the Buber page
    When synthetically used, the synthetical verb is aspectually neutral in the past tense, as it is in the present. It does not interfere with the aspectual ...
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    [PDF] The order of affixes in the Basque synthetic verb
    In Gipuzkoan Basque (and in Batua) the plural suffix for this verb was -de, in Bizkaian dialect (with different affix order) -z. Gip.: Bizk.: *dago-de > daude.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  43. [43]
    [PDF] BASQUE VERBAL MORPHOLOGY - Euskaltzaindia
    Every Basque verb possesses a set of non-finite forms—infinitive, participles, verbal noun, and related forms; indeed, most verbs possess only such forms, being ...
  44. [44]
    (PDF) The Basque verb - Academia.edu
    There are three demonstrative pronouns in Basque, with first person, second person and third person deixis: this that (by you) that (by him/her/them) abs hau(r ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    [PDF] The Passive in Basque - Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics
    Most verbs of Basque are periphrastic; i.e. they obligatorily require an auxiliary that shows case and number agreement. The participle is marked for tense, ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] The Microparameter in Basque Participial Periphrases
    Finally, Eastern dialects require simple unergative verbs to combine with be, instead of have, unlike in central/western dialects (8). Outside the domain of ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Martin Haase - Tense and Aspect in Basque
    The Basque tense and aspect system is complicated by the co-existence of two conjugation types which allow for different oppositions.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  48. [48]
    [PDF] 38_Mood and modality in the Basque auxiliary_FINAL
    periphrastic inflection. Synthetic inflection is the old system (1), which is being gradually re- placed by periphrastic inflection (2). Classical Basque.
  49. [49]
    14 Karlos Cid Abasolo and Marta Carretero: Evidentiality in Basque
    ### Summary of Evidentiality in Basque (Periphrastic Forms like -ela)
  50. [50]
    [PDF] CASE ASSIGNMENT IN BASQUE Jose I. Hualde University of ...
    Basque Case Assignment. 69. ^The reflexive anaphor can appear in plural form when the antecedent is plural, in some dialects (cf. Euskaltzaindia 1985:106). 8.
  51. [51]
    (PDF) Case Marking in Basque - ResearchGate
    Aug 21, 2025 · Verb agreement can register the grammatical relations of up to three nominals in the clause, which are usually marked with ergative, absolutive ...Missing: person | Show results with:person
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    (PDF) Verb Agreement with Nonarguments : On Allocutive Agreement
    Jul 3, 2025 · This book presents a collection of articles which are representative of work being done on Basque at the moment from a generative perspective.
  54. [54]
    Basque allocutive agreement (Chapter 5) - The Syntax of Imperatives
    To express non-honorific address, Basque employs a different set of second person agreement morphemes and pronouns. These are shown in (3). The pronouns are ...
  55. [55]
    Addressee Identity and Morphosyntactic Processing in Basque ...
    In the familiar register hika, Basque has obligatory allocutive agreement, where verbal morphology represents the gender of a non-argument addressee. We ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Focus and Word Order in Basque∗ - Knowledge Base
    Nov 9, 2001 · With respect to basic clausal structure, I assume that all clauses contain a v head whose complement is VP (see Chomsky 1995, 2001, Marantz 1997) ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] BASQUE MANNER ADVERBS AND THEIR GENESIS*
    Manner adverbs can be loosely defined as those adverbs that characterize the way in which something is being done or happens.
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Basque complex predicates and grammar change - Dialnet
    This paper is based on the premise that changes in particular grammars are among the most universal phenomena in human language (Bybee et al., 1994).
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Valency and Argument Structure in the Basque Verb - Artxiker
    Mar 15, 2006 · ... Basque, they do not allow (lexical) causative ... causative-inchoative alternations that are not possible with prototypical verbs of the.
  60. [60]
    [PDF] The effects of focus typology on Basque structure: syntax, prosody ...
    The central aim of this thesis is to investigate focus constructions in Basque, a language whose word order exhibits a great degree of freedom, which, ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] A note 011 Focalization in Basque
    The aim of this paper 1 is to examine and interrelate three points of Basque grammar, viz.: word order, the value of the so-called assertive particle ha, ...
  62. [62]
    Information structure and syntax: two positions for focus in Basque
    Apr 30, 2020 · Abstract: This paper argues that 'free' word order in Basque arises from syntactic conditions on information structure.
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Sentence negation in Basque
    This paper presents an analysis of sentence negation in Basque!. Basque negative sentences show a differentpattern from non-negative ones with respect to ...
  64. [64]
    Syntactic analyses of discourse particles through the microvariation ...
    Dec 28, 2020 · This article examines the Basque discourse particle ote and its microvariation in eastern dialects 2 and discusses the issues mentioned above from a ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] On embedded interrogatives and related constructions in Northern ...
    Jun 14, 2013 · Preliminaries: direct questions. Basque naturally has yes/no questions, constituent (or wh-) questions, and alternative questions. Apart from ...
  66. [66]
    The formal heterogeneity of allocutivity | Glossa
    Sep 22, 2022 · These forms are also available in root interrogatives as in (2), where -eyo indicates that the sentence is polite and in root imperatives as ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] TYPOLOGICAL PASSPORT OF BASQUE AS A MINORITY ...
    Just like in English, the definite article in Basque harkens back to the demonstrative pronoun. Unlike English, however, where the article can trace its roots.
  68. [68]
    [PDF] A SYNTACTIC AND SEMANTIC APPROACH TO BASQUE ... - ADDI
    in fact a hallmark feature of non-clausal coordination in Basque, as illustrated in (i)-(ii). ... characterisations of the Basque subordinate complementiser -en.