Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

BrainGate

BrainGate is an investigational brain-computer interface (BCI) system designed to restore communication, mobility, and independence for individuals with paralysis or severe motor impairments by translating neural signals from the brain into commands for external devices. The system features a silicon-based array of 96 microelectrodes on a 4 x 4 mm platform, surgically implanted into the motor cortex to record the electrical activity of individual neurons, which is then wirelessly transmitted and decoded by algorithms to enable intuitive control of technologies such as computer cursors, robotic arms, and speech synthesizers. Developed through a multidisciplinary consortium of clinicians, neuroscientists, and engineers, BrainGate represents a pioneering effort in neuroprosthetics, with clinical trials demonstrating its potential to achieve communication speeds of up to 90 characters per minute and precise manipulation of assistive devices.^[1]^[2] The BrainGate project originated in the early 2000s, building on foundational research in neural recording and decoding conducted at institutions like Brown University and Emory University, where innovations in chronic intracortical implants were advanced in the late 1990s. The first human implantation occurred on June 22, 2004, in Matthew Nagle, a 24-year-old quadriplegic due to spinal cord injury, who successfully used the device to control a computer cursor, play video games, and operate a robotic hand by imagining movements of his own hand. Led by principal investigators including John Donoghue and Leigh R. Hochberg from Brown University and Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School, the consortium expanded to include collaborators from Stanford University, Case Western Reserve University, and others, focusing on iterative improvements in electrode design, signal processing, and wireless transmission. By 2017, advancements allowed for fully implanted wireless systems in preclinical models, with first human use of wireless intracortical BCI demonstrated in 2021, paving the way for future generations of the technology.^[3]^[1]^[4] Clinical trials, initiated under the BrainGate2 pilot study (NCT00912041) in 2009 and still recruiting as of 2025, have enrolled 14 participants with conditions such as spinal cord injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and brainstem stroke, spanning over 12,000 implant-days from 2004 to 2021. Participants, aged 18 to 75 with median age 51, have used the system for daily activities, including typing emails, browsing the web, and controlling wheelchairs, with median implantation duration of 774 days and two individuals remaining active users as of 2021. An interim safety analysis reported 68 device-related adverse events, primarily minor skin irritations around the percutaneous connector, and six serious events (such as transient seizures in participants with prior brain injuries), with no intracranial infections, device explantations, deaths, or permanent disabilities attributed to the implant, indicating a favorable risk-benefit profile for long-term use; a 2025 study confirmed sustained performance in long-term users. Notable achievements include a participant with ALS achieving real-time speech synthesis from imagined handwriting at 62 words per minute and others demonstrating 3D control of robotic prosthetics for reaching and grasping tasks. Ongoing research aims to develop fully implantable, high-channel-count systems to further enhance performance and accessibility for those with locked-in syndrome or limb loss.^[5]^[1]^[6]^[7]^[8]

Introduction

Overview

BrainGate is an intracortical neural interface implant system designed to translate neural signals from the brain into commands for external devices, enabling individuals with severe motor disabilities to control computers, communication aids, and assistive technologies through thought alone.^[9] This brain-computer interface (BCI) technology aims to restore functional independence by decoding intended movements from brain activity, bypassing damaged neural pathways in the peripheral nervous system.^[10] The system primarily targets conditions causing paralysis, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), spinal cord injuries, stroke, and tetraplegia, where patients often experience profound limitations in mobility and communication.^[10] By focusing on these neurologic disorders, BrainGate addresses the needs of individuals who may be locked-in or have lost voluntary control over their limbs and speech. BrainGate operates as a collaborative consortium involving leading institutions such as Brown University, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Stanford University, Emory University, and the University of California, Davis, founded in the early 2000s to advance neuroprosthetic research.^[11] The general mechanism involves implanting a microelectrode array in the motor cortex to record single-neuron activity, which is then processed in real-time to enable precise control of external devices like cursors, robotic arms, or text generators.^[9]

Development Goals

The primary development goals of the BrainGate project center on restoring independence for individuals with paralysis or severe motor impairments by enabling direct thought-based control of assistive devices, such as computers, robotic limbs, and communication tools. This approach aims to facilitate activities like typing, cursor navigation, and device operation solely through neural signals, thereby enhancing autonomy in daily tasks for those with conditions including tetraplegia, locked-in syndrome, and spinal cord injuries.^[9]^[6] In pursuit of a long-term vision, BrainGate seeks to evolve toward fully implantable, wireless neural interfaces that integrate seamlessly into everyday life without external tethers, supporting chronic, 24/7 use. These advancements are intended to extend beyond medical restoration, potentially enabling non-medical applications such as enhanced cognitive interfaces through broader brain research innovations.^[9]^[12] User-centered design principles underpin the project, prioritizing safety with low rates of adverse events observed over 20 years of data from clinical feasibility studies, alongside longevity for multi-year device functionality and adaptability to individual variations in neural signal patterns. This focus ensures intuitive, reliable performance tailored to users' evolving needs, such as recalibrating for stable control over extended periods.^[6]^[13]^[9]^[14] Beyond direct user benefits, BrainGate contributes to neuroscience by advancing the decoding of motor intentions from cortical activity, informing potential future extensions like speech restoration through neural signal translation and sensory feedback mechanisms to simulate touch or proprioception. Recent advances as of 2025 include real-time speech synthesis from imagined inner speech at speeds exceeding 60 words per minute, further progressing toward fully restorative communication. These efforts also support neurotherapeutics, such as analyzing neural patterns for epilepsy management, fostering wider impacts in brain-machine interface technologies.^[15]^[16]^[12]^[17]^[18]^[19]

Technical Aspects

Implant Design

The BrainGate implant centers on the Utah Array, a silicon-based microelectrode array developed by Blackrock Neurotech, consisting of 96 to 100 electrodes arranged on a 4 mm by 4 mm platform.^[1] Each electrode is a shank approximately 1.5 mm long, designed to penetrate the upper layers of the primary motor cortex to record neural activity from populations of neurons.^[20] The array is inserted using a pneumatic inserter that applies controlled force to embed the electrodes into the cortical tissue, enabling chronic recording of extracellular action potentials and local field potentials.^[1] Surgical implantation of the Utah Array involves a minimally invasive craniotomy, typically measuring about 5 cm by 5 cm, performed to expose the target region in the motor cortex.^[21] The procedure is conducted under general anesthesia, with the array positioned on the cortical surface and secured via the pneumatic insertion tool.^[21] Following insertion, the array connects through gold wires to a percutaneous pedestal, which is affixed to the skull using titanium screws for long-term stability.^[1] After implantation, patients undergo a recovery period of several weeks, during which initial tissue healing occurs before neural recordings are reliably initiated.^[22] The design has evolved from fully wired configurations, where signals transmit via cables from the pedestal to external processors, to partially wireless systems. In 2021, BrainGate researchers introduced a high-bandwidth wireless transmitter—a compact, head-mounted unit weighing 1.5 ounces—that connects directly to the existing electrode array pedestal and relays neural data to decoding systems without tethering cables, achieving transmission rates up to 48 megabits per second from 200 channels.^[23] This advancement maintains signal fidelity comparable to wired setups while improving user mobility during tasks like cursor control.^[23] To promote biocompatibility and long-term performance, the electrodes feature platinum tips for low-impedance neural recording and a parylene-C coating on the silicon shanks to reduce inflammatory responses and gliosis at the tissue interface.^[1] These materials contribute to signal stability, with viable recordings sustained for years in clinical participants, as evidenced by over 17,000 array-implant days without intracranial infections.^[1]

Neural Signal Acquisition and Processing

The BrainGate system acquires neural signals using an intracortical microelectrode array, typically a 96-channel Utah array implanted in the motor cortex, which records extracellular action potentials, or spikes, from individual neurons. These signals are captured at a sampling rate of 30 kHz per channel after analog bandpass filtering (0.3–7.5 kHz) and digital high-pass filtering (250 Hz) to isolate high-frequency spike activity while attenuating lower-frequency local field potentials and other noise sources. Spike detection and sorting are performed by thresholding waveforms relative to background noise, yielding multi-unit activity that is binned into firing rates every 100 ms for subsequent analysis.^[24]^[25] The processing pipeline begins with amplification of raw signals via a headstage connected to the percutaneous pedestal on the scalp, followed by digitization and transmission to an external computer for real-time decoding. On the computer, neural firing rates from multiple units (typically 20–50 per session) are input into decoding algorithms that map population activity to intended movements, such as 2D cursor velocity. This pipeline enables low-latency output of control commands, with decoding updates at 20–30 Hz to support smooth interaction with assistive devices.^[24]^[25] Decoding in BrainGate primarily relies on linear models, such as the velocity Kalman filter, which estimates cursor kinematics by modeling neural firing rates as noisy observations of a linear dynamical system relating intended velocity states to multi-neuron activity. The filter uses steady-state gains for computational efficiency, converging to optimal estimates within seconds and reducing processing load by up to sevenfold compared to full Kalman iterations, while maintaining high correlation (r ≈ 0.99) with standard implementations. Machine learning adaptations, including recurrent neural networks like LSTMs, enhance user-specific tuning by learning nonlinear mappings from historical data, improving adaptability to signal variability across sessions without retraining from scratch.^[24]^[26] Over time, BrainGate arrays have shown stable or improving signal quality, with decoding signal-to-noise ratio (dSNR) increasing by an average of 0.34 across 1–7 years of implantation in clinical trials, attributed to refined implantation techniques and electrode materials. This stability supports control accuracies exceeding 90% in point-and-click tasks, such as target selection in Fitts-law paradigms, where participants achieve hit rates of 91–95% with selection times under 10 seconds.^[7]^[25]

Historical Development

Origins and Early Research

The origins of BrainGate trace back to the late 1990s, when Dr. Donald Humphrey at Emory University pioneered methods for chronic multi-electrode recording in the brain, allowing for stable, long-term acquisition of neural signals from multiple sites without significant tissue damage.^[27] This breakthrough addressed key challenges in neural interfacing, such as electrode stability and signal quality over extended periods, forming a critical technical foundation for implantable brain-computer systems.^[12] Building on Humphrey's innovations, a team of neuroscientists at Brown University, including John Donoghue and Mijail Serruya, initiated exploratory research around 2000 to decode motor cortex activity for controlling external devices.^[12] Their efforts focused on translating neural ensembles into actionable signals, leading to the development of the inaugural BrainGate prototype by 2003—a silicon-based array of 96 electrodes designed for precise implantation in the motor cortex.^[28] These foundational studies received early support from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which provided funding for proof-of-concept work and device refinement.^[12] In parallel, the team partnered with Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems, Inc., a 2001 spin-off from Brown University co-founded by Donoghue and Serruya, to advance commercialization and prepare for clinical translation.^[29] Pre-clinical validation occurred through animal studies, notably in rhesus monkeys, where the prototype demonstrated thought-based control of digital interfaces; by 2002, implanted arrays enabled a monkey to move a computer cursor on a screen using only neural signals from the motor cortex, achieving control accuracies comparable to natural arm movements. These experiments confirmed the system's ability to extract and decode intention-related spikes in real time, setting the stage for applications involving robotic actuators.^[12]

Major Milestones

The BrainGate system achieved its first major milestone with the implantation on June 22, 2004, in the first human participant, Matthew Nagle, a 24-year-old man paralyzed from the neck down due to a spinal cord injury sustained in 2001. Within months, Nagle demonstrated the ability to control a computer cursor on a screen and operate a robotic hand using only his thoughts, marking the initial translation of neural signals from the motor cortex into real-time device control. These demonstrations, including playing simple video games like Pong and opening/closing a prosthetic gripper, showcased the system's potential for restoring basic digital and prosthetic functionality.^[30]^[31]^[32] In 2006, early trial participants, including Nagle, extended these capabilities to home-based applications, enabling control of everyday devices such as televisions, email interfaces, and basic robotic systems through thought alone. This period highlighted the system's practicality outside clinical settings, with users achieving cursor navigation speeds comparable to able-bodied individuals and performing tasks like channel selection and message composition. These advancements were detailed in seminal research demonstrating stable, high-performance neural decoding for multidimensional control.^[33]^[34] A landmark achievement occurred in 2012 when a tetraplegic participant, Cathy Hutchinson, who had been unable to use her arms for 15 years following a brainstem stroke, used the BrainGate system to control a robotic arm for self-feeding tasks. Hutchinson successfully reached for, grasped, and drank from a bottle independently, completing the sequence in about 25 seconds with over 90% success rate across multiple trials. This demonstration, involving two participants with chronic tetraplegia, represented a breakthrough in three-dimensional reach-and-grasp movements via neural interface control of a neuroprosthetic device.^[35]^[36] By 2021, BrainGate reached a significant wireless milestone with the first human use of a high-bandwidth, percutaneous wireless brain-computer interface, allowing untethered transmission of neural signals. Two participants with tetraplegia, previously implanted with the wired system, utilized an external wireless transmitter to control computer cursors and tablet interfaces at home, achieving point-and-click accuracies and typing speeds equivalent to the tethered version. This transition to wireless operation, supporting up to 200 channels of broadband neural data, eliminated physical tethers and paved the way for greater mobility in BCI applications.^[37]^[38]

Clinical Applications

Initial Human Trials

The BrainGate pilot clinical trial, sponsored by Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems, was initiated in June 2004 under an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the intracortical neural interface in humans. The first implantation occurred on June 22, 2004, at Rhode Island Hospital in Providence, targeting 24-year-old Matthew Nagle with tetraplegia resulting from a C3-level spinal cord injury sustained three years earlier. This procedure involved surgically placing a 4 mm × 4 mm silicon-based microelectrode array with 96 electrodes into the primary motor cortex to record neural activity associated with intended movements.^[39]^[1]^[10] The initial cohort consisted of four participants, all adults aged 18–75 with quadriparesis due to spinal cord injury, brainstem stroke, or motor neuron disease, primarily focusing on individuals with tetraplegia from high-level spinal cord injuries (e.g., C3–C4 levels). These early enrollees were selected for their stable neurological conditions and ability to provide informed consent, with implants performed at clinical sites including Rhode Island Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital. The small group size allowed for intensive monitoring and iterative refinements to the system during the feasibility phase.^[1]^[13] Early results from 2006–2008 demonstrated proof-of-principle for neural control of external devices. The first participant achieved two-dimensional cursor control on a computer screen, enabling tasks such as opening and composing email, turning a television on and off, and operating a simulated prosthetic hand and multi-jointed robotic arm—all through imagined movements while engaged in conversation. Cursor velocities reached up to approximately 4 cm/s in controlled sessions, with accuracy sufficient for point-and-click interactions in a center-out reaching task. Subsequent participants replicated and extended these capabilities, including volitional control of cursor trajectory and discrete clicking for up to 1,000 days post-implant in one case.^[39]^[40]^[41] Safety data from the feasibility study indicated a favorable profile, with 68 device-related adverse events across 14 participants over 12,203 total implant days from 2004 to 2021, including only one localized skin infection treated with oral antibiotics and no intracranial infections or deep tissue issues. Serious adverse events were minimal, with none requiring device explantation, resulting in death, or causing permanent disability increase; minor complications like skin irritation around the percutaneous connector occurred in less than 5% of cases. By mid-2008, amid Cyberkinetics' financial challenges, the trial transitioned to an academically led IDE for the BrainGate2 Neural Interface System, expanding to multi-site evaluations while maintaining the core technology.^[1]^[13]^[10]

Recent Advances and Outcomes

In 2023, researchers advanced speech neuroprosthesis technology within the BrainGate2 clinical trial by implanting microelectrode arrays in speech-related brain regions, such as the ventral premotor cortex (area 6v) and Broca's area (area 44), enabling real-time decoding of neural activity into synthesized speech for individuals with paralysis due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This system achieved decoding speeds of up to 62 words per minute with a 9.1% word error rate on a 50-word vocabulary, tripling prior BCI speech rates and facilitating more natural communication through recurrent neural networks and language models.^[8] Building on this, a 2025 collaboration between UC Davis and the BrainGate consortium restored real-time speech to an ALS patient using the BrainGate2 system, where four microelectrode arrays implanted in speech-producing brain regions captured neural signals and translated them via AI algorithms into a computer-generated voice with a delay of just 25 milliseconds. The interface allowed the participant to produce intelligible speech with nearly 60% word accuracy, enabling conversational participation, intonation variations, and even simple singing, marking a significant step toward fluent verbal interaction for those with severe anarthria.^[18] Recent enhancements in decoding algorithms have enabled multi-dimensional neural control, allowing BrainGate participants to simultaneously operate two computer cursors in real-time using recurrent neural network-based decoders trained on bimanual movement intentions, achieving seamless coordination comparable to unimanual tasks. This capability extends to integrated control of assistive devices, including robotic limbs, where neural signals decode intent for concurrent cursor navigation and arm manipulation, supporting complex daily activities like reaching and grasping. Long-term implant stability has been demonstrated in some participants, with viable neural signals persisting for over 5 years—up to 7.6 years in one case—maintaining decoding performance (discriminable signal-to-noise ratio >1) across 35.6% of electrodes with only gradual decline, underscoring the durability of intracortical arrays for chronic use.^[42]^[7] Across BrainGate trials from 2004 to 2025, 14 participants with tetraplegia or ALS have received implants, with independent home-based BCI use achieved by about one-third, primarily for communication tasks showing success rates exceeding 90% in target acquisition and typing as of 2023. Restored functionalities have led to stable or improved quality-of-life measures, with patient and caregiver reports indicating that BCI benefits—such as enhanced social interaction—outweigh usage burdens, and no significant declines observed in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores attributable to the device.^[13]^[1]^[7]

Current Status and Future Prospects

Ongoing Trials

The BrainGate2 multi-center clinical trial (NCT00912041), initiated in 2009 and ongoing as of 2025, operates across seven sites and has enrolled adults with tetraplegia resulting from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), spinal cord injury (SCI), or brainstem stroke.^[13] The study emphasizes safety and feasibility of the intracortical neural interface, with over 14 participants implanted to date, and continues to recruit to expand this cohort.^[43] Protocol details include long-term follow-up periods extending several years post-implantation to evaluate device durability and neural signal stability, with average implantation durations exceeding two years in reported cases.^[1] Home use has been enabled for select participants through percutaneous wireless configurations, permitting independent operation of the system in everyday settings without continuous clinical supervision.^[38] Inclusion criteria specify individuals aged 18 to 75 years with clinically diagnosed motor neuron diseases or injuries causing persistent quadriparesis for at least 12 months.^[5] Enrollments in 2024 and 2025 have incorporated participants from varied backgrounds, such as a 45-year-old man with ALS at UC Davis Health, to enhance demographic diversity within the trial population.^[44] In 2025, a participant achieved real-time speech synthesis at 97% accuracy using a brain-to-speech interface.^[45] Ethical discussions have informed considerations for potential future extensions of invasive BCI protocols, such as BrainGate, to pediatric cases with severe neurologic impairments.^[46] The trial maintains its FDA Investigational Device Exemption (IDE G090003) status, supporting continued open-label, non-randomized evaluation of the BrainGate system.^[44]

Challenges and Innovations

One major technical challenge in the BrainGate system involves electrode degradation over time, primarily due to the brain's foreign body response, including reactive gliosis that forms a glial scar around the implant. This process can lead to a gradual decline in signal quality, with studies from the BrainGate pilot clinical trials showing an average 7% reduction in electrode yield (from 41% to 34%) over the study period, alongside decreases in spike waveform amplitudes, though signal-to-noise ratios often remain stable. In long-term human implants lasting up to 7.6 years (mean 2.8 years across 14 participants and 20 arrays), impedance rises sharply post-implantation before stabilizing or declining due to potential insulation breakdown, contributing to variability in neural recordings. To address these issues, researchers have explored flexible electrode arrays that minimize mechanical mismatch with brain tissue, reducing gliosis and improving long-term stability, as well as AI-driven decoder adaptations that retrain models daily to recover and compensate for signal loss without recalibration.^[47]^[47]^[47]^[48]^[8] Safety concerns with BrainGate implantation include risks of infection and surgical complications, though interim data indicate a favorable profile comparable to other neural devices like deep brain stimulation (DBS). Across 33.43 person-years (12,203 implant-days in 14 participants), no intracranial or deep tissue infections occurred, with only one localized skin infection treated outpatient; overall infection rates remain below 1%, lower than the 3-5% seen in DBS meta-analyses. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were limited to six device-related cases (e.g., skin irritation, seizures), none requiring explantation, death, or permanent disability increase, yielding approximately 95% complication-free outcomes in monitored participants. Perioperative issues, such as fever or hypertension, affected seven cases, but rigorous protocols, including caregiver hygiene standards, have minimized broader risks.^[1]^[1]^[1]^[1] Emerging innovations in BrainGate focus on enhancing bidirectional functionality, including hybrid invasive-noninvasive approaches that integrate intracortical recording with peripheral haptic feedback to restore sensory perception. For instance, studies have demonstrated that providing tactile stimulation via vibrotactile devices during BrainGate-controlled tasks elicits sensory responses in motor cortex neurons, improving control accuracy and user embodiment without additional invasive components. Recent 2025 research has also explored decoding inner speech representations in the motor cortex of BrainGate participants.^[49]^[50]^[51]^[52] Looking ahead, BrainGate's scalability toward full-body prosthetics involves expanding multi-electrode arrays to decode complex, multi-limb movements, with projections suggesting that increasing channel counts to 1024 could achieve near-able-bodied control levels through AI-enhanced predictive modeling. By 2030, integration of advanced AI for anticipatory control—leveraging machine learning to forecast intentions from partial signals—could enable seamless whole-body neuroprosthetics, building on current upper-limb successes and addressing current limitations in multi-degree-of-freedom tasks.^[47]^[53]

References

[1]
Interim Safety Profile From the Feasibility Study of the BrainGate ...
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are being developed to restore mobility, communication, and functional independence to people with paralysis.
[2]
First person to operate a mind-controlled robotic hand
On 22 June 2004 at New England Sinai Hospital, Massachusetts, USA, he underwent surgery to have a BrainGate experimental brain-computer interface attached to ...
[3]
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface ...
Safety continues to be evaluated, and short-term adverse events are studied. Phase 3. A phase of research to describe clinical trials that gather more ...Study Overview · Study Plan · Publications<|separator|>
[4]
Clinical trials show encouraging safety profile for brain-computer ...
Jan 13, 2023 · Researchers find the investigational BrainGate neural interface system has low rates of associated adverse events.
[5]
BrainGate - Turning Thought Into Action
A consortium of clinicians, scientists, and engineers developing brain-computer interfaces to restore movement and communication for people with paralysis.About Braingate · Clinical Trials · Join Our Team · Our Team
[6]
About Braingate
The BrainGate system uses a brain-implantable sensor to detect neural signals that are then decoded to provide control signals for assistive technologies. In ...
[7]
Affiliated Institutions & Supporters - BrainGate
Partner Institutions: Brown, Emory University, Harvard Medical School, MGH, Stanford School of Medicine, University of California, Davis DVA.Missing: consortium founded
[8]
About BrainGate
BrainGate, Inc. is a company with transformative neurotechnology that uses micro-electrodes implanted in the brain to let humans operate external devices.
[9]
Interim Safety Profile From the Feasibility Study of the BrainGate ...
This study provides Class IV evidence that the neurosurgically placed BrainGate Neural Interface system is associated with a low rate of SAEs.
[10]
Neuroscience - BrainGate
Recent scientific work has included studying how ensembles of single neurons represent and process sensory and motor information in the human cortex.Missing: contributions feedback
[11]
Speech Restoration - BrainGate
Our research team is developing a system to restore fluent communication for people that have lost the ability to speak.Missing: contributions intentions sensory feedback
[12]
Implanted cortical neuroprosthetics for speech and movement ...
Oct 24, 2024 · The first human implantation of a Utah microelectrode array was into the hand area of the primary motor cortex (BrainGate trial) [14].
[13]
An accurate and rapidly calibrating speech neuroprosthesis - PMC
Surgical implantation. The goal of the surgery was to implant four microelectrode arrays (NeuroPort Array, Blackrock Neurotech, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) ...Methods · Recording Array Implant... · ResultsMissing: procedure | Show results with:procedure
[14]
Brain–Computer Interfaces with Intracortical Implants for Motor and ...
A few weeks after implantation, the first signals could be recorded, and within 1.5–3 months the signal became stable.
[15]
Researchers demonstrate first human use of high-bandwidth ...
Mar 31, 2021 · BrainGate researchers demonstrated the first human use of a wireless transmitter capable of delivering high-bandwidth neural signals.
[16]
Efficient Decoding With Steady-State Kalman Filter in Neural ... - NIH
At the beginning of the BrainGate NIS pilot clinical trial, a linear decoder ... Our analysis establishes the utility of the steady-state Kalman filter for neural ...
[17]
Neural control of cursor trajectory and click by a human with ...
Here we examined these questions by assessing neural cursor control and BrainGate system characteristics on five consecutive days 1000 days after implant of a 4 ...
[18]
BCI decoder performance comparison of an LSTM recurrent neural ...
Dec 24, 2018 · BCI decoder performance comparison of an LSTM recurrent neural network and a Kalman filter in retrospective simulation. Authors:Tommy Hosman, ...
[19]
Long-term performance of intracortical microelectrode arrays in 14 ...
Jul 2, 2025 · Most high-performance demonstrations have used silicon microelectrode “Utah” arrays to record brain activity at single neuron resolution.
[20]
US6171239B1 - Systems, methods, and devices for controlling ...
Multisite recording from cells with these regions is best accomplished by a wire bundle electrode array, with the recording tips of the bundled wires located at ...
[21]
A BrainGate Timeline | News from Brown
Jun 10, 2009 · ... John Donoghue, director of the Brown University Brain Science Program. 2002. Researchers at Brown University show that signals from the brain ...Missing: history formation
[22]
Brain Power - MIT Technology Review
Apr 1, 2002 · Donoghue and his team launched Cyberkinetics in June 2001 to pursue that vision. The company is one of the first to arise from research into ...
[23]
Implanting Hope - MIT Technology Review
Mar 1, 2005 · A First Step Nagle is not the first human to operate an implanted BCI. In the late 1990s, neuroscientist Philip Kennedy, the cofounder and ...
[24]
Chip reads mind of paralysed man | Neuroscience - The Guardian
Mar 31, 2005 · A severely paralysed man has become the first person to be fitted with a brain implant that allows him to control everyday objects by thought alone.
[25]
Mind Control - WIRED
Mar 1, 2005 · Nagle, a 25-year-old quadriplegic, is the first human fitted with the BrainGate Neural Interface. He can whip you at Pong without lifting a ...
[26]
Man Uses Chip to Control Robot With Thoughts - The New York Times
Jul 12, 2006 · A paralyzed man with a small sensor implanted in his brain was able to control a computer, a television and a robot using only his thoughts, scientists ...
[27]
Brain-computer link lets paralyzed patients convert thoughts into ...
Jul 12, 2006 · ... BrainGate ... This patient, who is unable to speak because of a brainstem stroke, can control a cursor with significantly greater stability than ...Missing: 90%
[28]
Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally ... - PMC
We demonstrate the ability of two people with long-standing tetraplegia to use NIS-based control of a robotic arm to perform three-dimensional reach and grasp ...
[29]
Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a ... - BrainGate
Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature. 2012 May 17; 485 (7398): 372-5. Partner Institutions. Brown Emory ...Missing: self- feeding
[30]
Researchers demonstrate first human use of high ... - BrainGate
Researchers demonstrate first human use of high-bandwidth wireless brain-computer interface. https://www.brown.edu/news/2021-03-31/braingate-wireless ...
[31]
Home Use of a Percutaneous Wireless Intracortical Brain-Computer ...
Here we report translation of a wireless broadband intracortical BCI system to human use ... BrainGate system for wireless control of communication devices ...
[32]
Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia - Nature
### Summary of BrainGate Implant Design
[33]
Paralyzed Man Uses Thoughts to Move a Cursor
Jul 13, 2006 · In a variety of experiments, the first person to receive the implant, Matthew Nagle, moved a cursor, opened e-mail, played a simple video ...
[34]
Neural control of computer cursor velocity by decoding motor cortical ...
Nov 17, 2008 · Neural control of computer cursor velocity by decoding motor cortical spiking activity in humans with tetraplegia.Missing: BrainGate | Show results with:BrainGate
[35]
A high-performance speech neuroprosthesis - Nature
Aug 23, 2023 · Interim safety profile from the feasibility study of the BrainGate neural interface system. Neurology 100, e1177–e1192 (2023). Article PubMed ...
[36]
First-of-its-kind technology helps man with ALS 'speak' in real time
Jun 11, 2025 · The brain-computer interface was able to translate the study participant's neural signals into audible speech played through a speaker very ...Missing: 2022 aphasia
[37]
https://www.braingate.org/researchers-demonstrate-first-human-use-of-high-bandwidth-wireless-brain-computer-interface/
[38]
Independent home use of a brain-computer interface by people with ...
Technical problems were rare. Patient and caregiver ratings indicated that BCI benefit exceeded burden. Quality of life remained stable. Of those not lost to ...
[39]
Long-term performance of intracortical microelectrode arrays in 14 ...
Jul 2, 2025 · Most high-performance demonstrations have used silicon microelectrode "Utah" arrays to record brain activity at single neuron resolution.
[40]
Long-term independent use of an intracortical brain-computer ...
Jul 7, 2025 · A 45-year-old man with paralysis and severe dysarthria due to ALS ('T15') enrolled in the BrainGate2 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number, ...
[41]
Use of Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Pediatric Neurosurgery
In this manuscript, we discuss the ethical considerations related to the use of invasive brain-computer interface in children with severe neurologic ...
[42]
[PDF] Long-term performance of intracortical microelectrode arrays in 14 ...
Jul 2, 2025 · (C) 6 month deltas in yield, up to six and a half years post-implant. Each point represents the mean. 5 . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International ...
[43]
Neural electrodes for brain‐computer interface system: From rigid to ...
Jan 12, 2025 · The design of flexible electrodes can effectively reduce mechanical damage to neural tissue and improve the accuracy and stability of signal ...
[44]
Effects of Peripheral Haptic Feedback on Intracortical ... - BrainGate
Effects of Peripheral Haptic Feedback on Intracortical Brain-Computer Interface Control and Associated Sensory Responses in Motor ... Speech Restoration.
[45]
Effects of Peripheral Haptic Feedback on Intracortical Brain ...
We aim to understand how haptic stimulation affects motor cortical neurons and ultimately, iBCI control.
[46]
Rapid calibration of an intracortical brain computer interface for ...
The participants in this study were enrolled in a pilot clinical trial of the BrainGate ... Closed-loop decoder adaptation shapes neural plasticity for skillful ...
[47]
The Recent Advances of Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neurological ...
Sensory rehabilitation through BCI remains underexplored but holds potential for improving motor and tactile impairments. Through the integration of BCI and FES ...