Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Breadwinner model

The breadwinner model, commonly referred to as the male breadwinner model, denotes a household structure in which the husband functions as the primary or sole earner in the paid labor market, supporting a dependent wife engaged in unpaid domestic labor such as cooking, cleaning, and child-rearing, with children exempted from productive work to focus on education.^[1] This paradigm emphasizes economic specialization by gender, with the male's wage ideally sufficient to sustain the family unit independently of additional incomes from spouses or offspring.^[2] It gained prominence in 19th-century Western working-class households amid industrialization, coinciding with rising male wages that reduced opportunities for female and child employment, and reached its zenith in the mid-20th century across many developed economies.^[1]^[2] Historically rooted in patriarchal ideologies and state policies that reinforced male market exclusivity—such as family allowances tied to male employment—the model facilitated the nuclear family's expansion by enabling prolonged childhood dependency and maternal homemaking, though it was never universally dominant, varying by class, region, and ethnicity even in Europe and the Americas.^[1]^[2] Its decline accelerated from the 1960s onward, driven by women's increasing labor force participation, stagnant real wages, and policy shifts promoting gender equality and dual-earner arrangements, resulting in hybrid "one-and-a-half" or fully dual-income models in most OECD countries by the early 21st century.^[1]^[3] Empirically, adherence to breadwinner norms has been associated with heightened marital instability risks during male unemployment, reflecting causal pressures on family dynamics from unmet provider expectations, while sole male breadwinning correlates with poorer psychological well-being and health outcomes for men compared to shared earning scenarios.^[4]^[5] Controversies persist over its legacy, with critiques—often from sociology and gender studies literature—portraying it as constraining female autonomy and perpetuating inequality, though such analyses frequently overlook pre-industrial egalitarian work patterns and the model's alignment with observed sex differences in occupational preferences and productivity specialization; conversely, lingering norms at societal levels predict lower family satisfaction, underscoring tensions between traditional structures and modern economic realities.^[6]^[7]

Definition and Principles

Core Elements and Variations

The breadwinner model centers on a specialized division of labor within the household, where one adult partner—historically and predominantly the husband—serves as the primary or sole earner through full-time paid employment, providing financial support for the spouse and children, while the other partner—typically the wife—focuses on unpaid domestic tasks, childcare, and homemaking.^[8]^[9] This structure promotes economic complementarity, with the breadwinner's market specialization enabling the homemaker's investment in non-market production, such as meal preparation and child supervision, which data from time-use studies indicate can enhance overall family resource allocation when aligned with comparative advantages in skills and preferences.^[4] Empirical evidence from 19th-century Britain documents how industrialization reinforced these elements by shifting male labor to factories, concentrating family income in male wages and marginalizing female market work to preserve household efficiency amid rising living costs.^[10] Variations arise from adaptations to labor market changes, policy incentives, and cultural shifts. The one-and-a-half earner model, observed in Scandinavian and other European contexts, modifies the traditional form by having the male partner work full-time and the female engage in part-time employment, allowing partial income contribution from women while preserving substantial caregiving specialization; this hybrid correlates with moderate fertility rates and supported by targeted childcare policies as of 2014 analyses.^[8] Dual-earner variations, where both partners pursue comparable paid work, erode strict specialization but have become dominant in dual-income households, comprising 62% of EU families by 2001 data, often necessitating external childcare and linked to higher work-family conflict in longitudinal studies.^[11] Female breadwinner configurations, inverting roles with women as primary earners, occur in approximately 29% of U.S. heterosexual couples as of 2019 census-derived estimates, disproportionately among higher-educated or minority groups, though associated with elevated separation risks when norms favor male provision.^[4]^[12]

Theoretical and Evolutionary Foundations

The evolutionary foundations of the breadwinner model arise from fundamental sex differences in reproductive biology and parental investment. Robert Trivers' 1972 parental investment theory posits that females, facing higher minimum costs of reproduction—including nine months of gestation, lactation, and initial offspring care—evolve greater choosiness in mate selection, prioritizing males capable of providing resources, protection, and genetic quality to enhance offspring survival.^[13] ^[14] This dynamic fosters male strategies centered on status competition and provisioning, as evidenced by cross-cultural mate preference studies where women consistently value financial prospects and ambition in partners more than men do.^[15] Ancestral environments amplified these patterns through division of labor: men's average 50-60% greater upper-body strength and higher risk tolerance suited them for hazardous hunting of large game, yielding high-calorie but intermittent returns, while women's physiological constraints tied them to foraging near camps and continuous child supervision, minimizing mobility risks during pregnancy and nursing.^[16] These biological imperatives underpin the model's persistence, as they align with observed sex differences in occupational preferences and caregiving: women show stronger inclinations toward nurturing roles involving people-oriented tasks, while men gravitate toward thing-oriented, resource-acquiring activities, patterns traceable to Pleistocene adaptations rather than solely cultural imposition.^[16] Empirical data from hunter-gatherer societies, comprising 90% of human history, reveal cooperative but sex-differentiated subsistence, with men contributing 60-80% of calories via hunting in many groups, supporting the provider-nurturer complementarity essential to pair-bond stability and child viability.^[17] Sociological theory formalizes this through Talcott Parsons' functionalist framework, which views the breadwinner-homemaker division as stabilizing the nuclear family unit within industrial societies. Parsons argued that the husband's instrumental role—focused on external achievement, economic provision, and goal-oriented adaptation—complements the wife's expressive role of internal emotional integration, socialization, and tension management, ensuring equilibrium between family subsystems and broader social structures like the economy and polity.^[18] ^[19] This specialization, per Parsons' 1951 analysis, mitigates role overload in modern isolation from extended kin, promoting efficient resource allocation amid rising occupational demands post-Industrial Revolution.^[20] Economic models extend these foundations via Gary Becker's household production theory, which treats marriage as a production unit where spouses allocate time based on comparative advantages to maximize joint utility. Becker's 1965 framework highlights that biological differences—such as women's higher aptitude for child-rearing due to maternal instincts and physical suitability—combined with market wage disparities, lead to efficient specialization: men in paid labor as breadwinners leveraging strength and risk preferences, women in unpaid home production yielding goods like meals and childcare indivisible from market inputs.^[21] ^[22] This yields scale economies, with specialized households producing 20-30% more output than non-specialized ones in Becker's simulations, grounded in empirical wage and fertility data from 1960s U.S. censuses showing married women's market participation inversely tied to child numbers.^[23]

Historical Development

Pre-Industrial and Early Forms

In prehistoric hunter-gatherer societies, which characterized human social organization for approximately 95% of Homo sapiens' history until the Neolithic Revolution around 10,000 BCE, a sexual division of labor emerged as an early precursor to the breadwinner model, driven by biological differences in reproductive roles and physical capabilities. Ethnographic studies of contemporary forager groups, such as the Hadza of Tanzania and the Ache of Paraguay, indicate that men predominantly pursued big-game hunting and fishing—activities demanding high mobility, strength, and risk tolerance—contributing 20-50% of caloric intake through nutrient-dense but variable protein sources, while women focused on gathering edible plants, small game, and childcare, often providing the majority (up to 70%) of reliable carbohydrates due to constraints from pregnancy, lactation, and infant carrying.^[24]^[25] This specialization enhanced household efficiency by leveraging sex-specific advantages, with men's provisioning tied to mate competition and women's proximate child investment, though recent archaeological evidence from tool burials and skeletal markers suggests some flexibility, including female participation in hunting in at least 79% of studied foraging societies.^[26]^[27] With the advent of agriculture during the Neolithic period (circa 9000-3000 BCE), this division intensified in early farming communities, as evidenced by grave goods and enthesopathies (musculoskeletal stress markers) from sites like those in Central Europe, where males were interred with woodworking, butchery, and plowing tools indicative of field labor and animal husbandry, while females associated with grinding stones and domestic implements for food processing and textile production.^[28] In these subsistence economies, men's roles expanded to capital-intensive tasks like tilling with draft animals and defending land, yielding surplus for trade or storage, whereas women's labor centered on household maintenance, dairying, and supplementary cultivation, reflecting causal adaptations to plowing's physical demands and women's ongoing reproductive burdens.^[29] This pattern persisted into Bronze and Iron Age agrarian systems, where family units operated as integrated production enterprises, but gendered task allocation prefigured male-centric external provisioning. In pre-industrial medieval and early modern Europe (circa 1000-1800 CE), peasant households exemplified rudimentary breadwinner dynamics within extended or nuclear family structures, where men served as primary tillers and providers of cash crops or market goods, performing heavy plowing, harvesting, and livestock management that accounted for the bulk of field output, while women contributed through weeding, gleaning, brewing, spinning, and childcare—tasks comprising up to 40% of household income in proto-industrial sidelines like textile putting-out systems.^[30]^[2] Court records and manorial accounts from England and France reveal women actively participating in agricultural labor alongside men, yet societal norms and legal customs, such as coverture under English common law from the 12th century, reinforced men's authority over family economy and external dealings, with women's work often undervalued or confined to domestic spheres to prioritize reproduction.^[31] By the 16th-17th centuries in Britain, rising male artisan wages and guild restrictions began eroding female market participation in urban settings, hinting at proto-breadwinner shifts even before full industrialization, though rural families remained collaborative production units reliant on all members' labor for survival.^[2]^[17]

Rise During Industrialization

The breadwinner model, characterized by a male primary earner supporting a non-working wife and children, gained prominence in Western societies during the 19th-century Industrial Revolution as urbanization and factory-based production separated workplace from home. Prior to industrialization, agrarian and artisanal households integrated economic production within the family unit, where men, women, and children all contributed labor, often in complementary roles without a strict division of wage-earning responsibilities.^[32]^[33] This shift intensified from the 1830s onward in Britain, where mechanized industries drew men into full-time wage labor outside the home, rendering domestic production less viable and elevating the home as a sphere for women's unpaid reproductive labor.^[34]^[35] Empirical data from 19th-century Britain reveal that early industrial families often relied on multiple earners, including women and children in textiles and mining, to achieve subsistence, with male wages alone insufficient until the mid-century.^[10] However, real male wages rose steadily from the 1850s, enabling a gradual expansion of the male breadwinner system, particularly among skilled workers and the emerging middle class, where by 1870-1900, family income adequacy increasingly depended on the husband's earnings alone.^[2]^[32] Legal reforms, such as Britain's 1842 Mines Act barring women and children under 10 from underground work and the 1833 Factory Act limiting child labor, further facilitated this transition by reducing supplementary family incomes and reinforcing gendered spheres.^[2] In the United States, similar patterns emerged post-1820s with textile mills initially employing women, but by the late 19th century, cultural ideals of separate spheres—men as providers, women as homemakers—solidified amid rising male manufacturing wages and urban growth, making the breadwinner model a normative aspiration across classes.^[35] This development was not uniform; working-class persistence of dual earners challenged the model's universality until wage gains and social pressures aligned in the century's latter decades.^[10] Overall, industrialization's spatial and economic disruptions, coupled with wage dynamics, catalyzed the model's rise as an efficient adaptation to new labor markets, though ideological influences from evangelical and bourgeois reformers amplified its cultural entrenchment.^[36]^[2]

Peak in the Post-WWII Era

The breadwinner model reached its zenith in Western societies, particularly the United States, during the 1950s and early 1960s, when a majority of married-couple households adhered to the paradigm of a male primary earner supporting a non-working wife and dependent children. In the 1950s, approximately 65 percent of children under age 15 lived in homes featuring a married breadwinner father and homemaker mother.^[37] By 1960, around 70 percent of U.S. households consisted of a breadwinner father, homemaker mother, and at least two children, reflecting widespread economic viability for single-earner families amid postwar prosperity.^[38] This structure was underpinned by high male labor force participation rates exceeding 80 percent for men aged 25-54, coupled with median family incomes that rose sharply, enabling one wage to sustain household needs including homeownership and child-rearing.^[39] Low female labor force participation, especially among married women, reinforced the model's dominance; in 1950, only 34 percent of all women were in the labor force, with rates for married mothers of children under six even lower, at roughly 12 percent, as cultural expectations and policy incentives prioritized domestic roles for wives.^[40]^[41] The postwar economic boom, fueled by industrial expansion, the GI Bill's support for veteran education and housing, and suburban migration, created conditions where male wages alone could afford middle-class stability, with real median family income for young men peaking at $48,500 (in 1973 dollars) by the early 1970s.^[39] Government policies, such as tax deductions for dependents and limited welfare provisions assuming male provision, further institutionalized the model, while the baby boom—peaking at 4.3 million U.S. births in 1957—intensified focus on family-centric living.^[42] This era's prevalence extended beyond the U.S. to Europe, where similar patterns emerged in countries like the United Kingdom and West Germany, with over 60 percent of households in male breadwinner configurations by the mid-1950s, driven by reconstruction economies and traditional gender norms.^[43] Empirical data from census records indicate that single-earner households accounted for the modal family type, contrasting sharply with prewar diversity and foreshadowing later shifts; for instance, U.S. Census analyses show that by 1960, two-thirds of children were raised in such male-led units, correlating with low divorce rates around 2.2 per 1,000 population in 1960.^[44]^[45] The model's peak thus represented a convergence of economic affluence, demographic trends, and social reinforcement, rendering it the normative arrangement for nuclear families until cultural and labor market changes began eroding it in the late 1960s.

Empirical Advantages

Economic Specialization and Household Efficiency

The breadwinner model promotes economic specialization by enabling spouses to divide labor according to comparative advantages, with one partner focusing on market employment to generate income and the other on household production, thereby enhancing overall household efficiency. This division aligns with Gary Becker's 1965 framework in "A Theory of the Allocation of Time," which models households as producers of final commodities using market goods and allocated time inputs, where specialization maximizes output by concentrating efforts in domains of relative productivity strength. Differences in human capital—often accumulated through career investments for market work or domestic skills for home production—amplify these advantages, leading to higher total household welfare when non-market outputs like childcare and meal preparation are valued equivalently to paid labor.^[46]^[21]^[47] Empirical patterns from time-use data substantiate this efficiency, showing persistent specialization in traditional households: U.S. married men aged 35-44 exhibit labor force participation rates near 95%, devoting minimal time to housework (about 11 hours weekly), while married women allocate around 16 hours to domestic tasks alongside lower market engagement (74% participation). Monetizing unpaid household production underscores its scale; incorporating it into U.S. GDP measures would have added approximately $3.8 trillion in 2010, equivalent to about 25% of reported GDP, with single-earner configurations capturing this value directly without the added costs of outsourcing or divided attention in dual-earner setups. One hour of home production empirically substitutes for $5.20 in market consumption spending, implying that full-time homemaking (roughly 40 hours weekly) generates substantial non-market utility, often exceeding the net gains from secondary spousal earnings after deducting childcare, commuting, and tax burdens.^[47]^[48]^[49] Supporting evidence includes the documented male marriage wage premium, estimated at 10-40% across studies, which arises from the breadwinner spouse's ability to invest undividedly in career capital while the partner handles home demands, boosting household earnings potential. Theoretical validations, such as Pollak's conditions for household technologies, confirm that efficiency requires specialization when spousal time inputs are substitutable or exhibit constant returns, conditions met in many empirical contexts despite modern shifts toward less rigid divisions. While selection into marriage complicates causality, fixed-effects analyses reveal diminishing but persistent specialization effects on earnings gaps, affirming the model's productivity edge over non-specialized alternatives.^[50]^[47]^[51]

Family Stability and Lower Divorce Rates

Empirical analyses of U.S. marriage cohorts reveal that couples following the breadwinner model, characterized by the husband as the primary or sole earner, experience substantially lower divorce risks than those with reversed or equal earning dynamics. In marriages formed between 1990 and 2018, the probability of divorce by 2021 was 2.9% for households where the husband earned more than $38,000 annually above his wife—a figure encompassing non-employed wives—marking the lowest risk across income configurations.^[52] By comparison, the risk climbed to 8.4% when the wife out-earned her husband.^[52] Parallel patterns emerged in earlier cohorts (1960-1989), with a 1.2% divorce risk in high male-earner disparities versus 3.3% in female-earner dominance, indicating persistence of this association over decades.^[52] These findings, drawn from the Survey of Income and Program Participation, underscore how pronounced male breadwinning correlates with marital longevity, potentially due to specialized roles minimizing intra-household tensions and elevating the perceived costs of separation for dependent spouses.^[52] Conversely, female breadwinner arrangements consistently show elevated instability. Studies report divorce rates up to 50% higher in couples where women out-earn male partners, with role reversals fostering resentment, overload, and conflict over traditional expectations.^[53] In single-income households specifically, female breadwinners face divorce rates twice that of male breadwinners (54 versus 20 per 1,000 marriages), highlighting the model's stabilizing effect when aligned with male provision.^[54] Such outcomes align with economic theories positing that financial independence reduces barriers to exit, whereas dependence in breadwinner setups incentivizes investment in relational endurance.^[55] Cross-national data reinforces this link, with nations upholding strong breadwinner norms exhibiting among the lowest global divorce rates. India (0.01 per 1,000 population) and Vietnam (0.2 per 1,000) maintain near-negligible dissolution rates, attributable in part to cultural emphasis on male provision and familial interdependence, contrasting sharply with higher rates in egalitarian or dual-earner dominant societies like the U.S. or Russia.^[56] ^[57] Historically, the U.S. male breadwinner model's zenith in the post-World War II era (1940s-1960s) coincided with divorce rates of approximately 9-10 per 1,000 married women, far below the 1980s peak exceeding 22 amid surging female labor participation and norm erosion.^[58] Beyond raw divorce metrics, the breadwinner model enhances overall family stability by clarifying divisions of labor, which surveys link to reduced approval of dissolution and lower separation risks during male unemployment—norms valuing provision buffer against economic shocks.^[59] ^[7] This configuration's emphasis on complementary roles fosters resilience, as evidenced by lower instability in traditional setups compared to egalitarian ones prone to renegotiation strains.^[60] While critics attribute stability to coercion rather than mutual benefit, data-driven assessments prioritize observable outcomes: sustained unions yielding greater household coherence over ideologically driven alternatives.^[52]^[53]

Positive Child and Long-Term Societal Outcomes

Children raised in breadwinner households, where one parent—typically the mother—provides full-time home-based care, exhibit superior cognitive development compared to those in dual-earner families relying on non-maternal childcare. A longitudinal analysis using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) found that maternal employment during a child's first year was associated with lower cognitive scores at age 3, with effects persisting even after controlling for family income, maternal education, and home environment; children of non-employed mothers scored approximately 0.1 to 0.2 standard deviations higher on standardized tests.^[61] Similarly, findings from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care revealed that maternal employment exceeding 30 hours per week by the ninth month correlated with reduced cognitive performance at 36 months, independent of childcare quality, underscoring the causal role of maternal availability in early brain development.^[62] Behavioral and emotional outcomes also favor the breadwinner model, with reduced incidence of externalizing problems such as aggression and conduct disorders. Research drawing on NLSY data indicated that early and extensive maternal employment heightened risks for behavioral difficulties, while full-time maternal care promoted greater emotional security and fewer anxiety-related issues in preschoolers.^[63] Longitudinal tracking through adolescence in the NICHD cohort further linked higher maternal sensitivity—facilitated by reduced employment demands—to attenuated negative effects from alternative care arrangements, resulting in better peer relations and academic engagement by high school.^[64] On a societal scale, the prevalence of breadwinner families correlates with enhanced long-term stability, including lower violent crime rates and improved economic productivity. Analyses of U.S. metropolitan data demonstrate that communities with higher proportions of intact two-parent households—often breadwinner-structured—experience up to 20-30% lower homicide and assault rates, attributing this to the model's reinforcement of paternal investment and maternal nurturing, which fosters prosocial development and reduces intergenerational delinquency.^[65] Econometric studies confirm that children from such families achieve higher educational attainment and labor market success in adulthood, contributing to reduced welfare dependency and sustained GDP growth; for instance, a one-standard-deviation increase in family stability metrics predicts 5-10% gains in cohort-level human capital formation.^[66] These patterns hold across cohorts from the post-WWII era through the 2000s, with peer-reviewed models isolating family structure from confounding socioeconomic factors.^[67]

Progressive Criticisms and Data-Driven Rebuttals

Allegations of Gender Rigidity and Oppression

Critics from feminist perspectives allege that the breadwinner model enforces gender rigidity by institutionalizing a binary division of labor, wherein men are positioned as primary wage earners in the public sphere while women are relegated to unpaid domestic work and childrearing in the private sphere, thereby constraining personal choice and adaptability.^[68] This structure is portrayed as inherently patriarchal, granting men authority over household decisions and economic resources, which purportedly sustains male dominance and subordinates women's agency.^[17] Such allegations often frame these roles as socially imposed rather than emergent from biological or evolutionary differences, with proponents arguing that they perpetuate inequality by naturalizing women's exclusion from professional advancement.^[68] Radical feminist theory extends this critique by positing the breadwinner family as a site of systemic sexual oppression, where women's dependence on male providers fosters vulnerability to exploitation and limits their pursuit of self-determination outside familial obligations.^[69] For instance, scholars contend that the model's emphasis on spousal specialization discourages women's workforce participation, historically resulting in lower lifetime earnings and pension accumulations for females, as observed in mid-20th-century Western societies where over 60% of married women in the U.S. were full-time homemakers by 1960.^[1] These claims, frequently advanced in gender studies literature—a discipline characterized by predominant left-leaning ideological frameworks that may undervalue cross-cultural empirical variations in family outcomes—assert that rigid adherence to the model stifles egalitarian potential and entrenches oppression through cultural norms rather than mutual consent.^[68]^[17] Proponents of these allegations further argue that the breadwinner paradigm intersects with broader patriarchal systems to normalize women's subordination, citing historical policies in welfare states that subsidized male sole-breadwinner households, such as family allowances tied to paternal employment in post-war Europe, as mechanisms that reinforced gender hierarchies.^[1] This view holds that deviation from prescribed roles incurs social stigma, exemplified by critiques of "traditional" expectations that pressure women into homemaking despite evolving economic demands, thereby hindering collective progress toward gender fluidity.^[69] However, such interpretations often derive from theoretical frameworks prioritizing deconstruction of power dynamics over longitudinal data on household satisfaction or stability under the model.^[68]

Dependency and Vulnerability Claims

Progressive critics, including feminist scholars, argue that the breadwinner model entrenches women's financial dependency on male earners, thereby amplifying vulnerability to economic coercion, restricted autonomy, and heightened risks in marital dissolution or spousal death. This perspective posits that homemakers lack independent earning power, making them susceptible to tactics such as sabotaging employment opportunities or controlling household finances, which perpetuate power imbalances.^[70] ^[71] Such claims often draw from analyses of gender roles, where the model's historical emphasis on male provision is seen as confining women to unpaid domestic labor, exacerbating poverty risks for female-headed households post-separation.^[72] Empirical data, however, challenges the inevitability of heightened vulnerability, revealing that breadwinner-model adherence correlates with superior marital stability, thereby minimizing exposure to divorce-related economic shocks. Studies indicate that female breadwinner arrangements, which invert traditional roles, experience elevated union dissolution rates—often 20-50% higher—due to strains on established gender norms and relational dynamics, suggesting the model's structure fosters endurance rather than fragility.^[60] ^[73] While post-divorce living standards decline more sharply for women overall (45% versus 21% for men), this disparity is mitigated in stable breadwinner families by lower separation probabilities; married stay-at-home mothers, despite comprising a higher share of poor households (15% versus 3% for working counterparts), benefit from intact partnerships that pool resources effectively.^[74] ^[75] Regarding intramarital risks like domestic violence, assertions of amplified vulnerability from dependency lack robust causal linkages specific to breadwinner structures; instead, broader socioeconomic stressors, such as unemployment or low household income, drive abuse prevalence, with no evidence that traditional specialization inherently elevates rates over dual-earner models.^[76] ^[77] Longitudinal analyses further underscore that the model's emphasis on complementary roles enhances overall family resilience, countering narratives of systemic entrapment by prioritizing empirical outcomes over ideological presumptions.^[78]

Empirical Counter-Evidence on Well-Being and Functionality

Data from the General Social Survey (GSS), a long-running representative sample of U.S. adults, show that married mothers aged 18-55 report the highest happiness levels among women, with 40% classifying themselves as "very happy" compared to 25% of married childless women and 22% of unmarried mothers.^[79] This pattern holds in recent waves, including 2022 data, where married mothers are nearly twice as likely to report frequent happiness as unmarried women without children (35% vs. 17%).^[80] Such outcomes align with breadwinner model households, where spousal specialization often prevails, contradicting claims that these arrangements systematically erode female subjective well-being. Further GSS analyses demonstrate that stay-at-home mothers have nearly identical self-reported happiness to working married mothers, with both groups showing similar probabilities (around 30-35%) of being "very happy" on a 0-2 scale, and no significant gap in life satisfaction metrics.^[78] Over 50% of mothers under 55 in integrated World Values Survey and GSS data agree that homemaking is as fulfilling as paid employment, with stay-at-home mothers reporting slightly higher job satisfaction by 2012.^[78] These findings persist after controlling for selection effects, such as education and income, suggesting intrinsic satisfaction from family-focused roles rather than imposed dissatisfaction. Cross-national evidence from the 2013 EU-SILC survey across 27 European countries (N=25,745 mothers) reveals homemakers with young children (<3 years) report happiness rates comparable to or exceeding full-time employed mothers (76.7% vs. 77.4%) in low maternal-employment contexts like Germany, where traditional roles remain normative.^[81] For school-age children, homemakers in countries like Austria and Spain score higher on happiness (58.8% overall homemaker rate vs. varying employed), indicating contextual functionality where cultural support for specialization enhances maternal well-being over universal employment mandates. Regarding family functionality, adherence to male breadwinner norms correlates with robust household stability; longitudinal data link male unemployment—violating the model—to elevated separation risks (hazard ratios up to 1.5-2.0 times higher in norm-strong societies), implying that fulfilled specialization sustains marital cohesion and reduces conflict compared to dual-earner strains.^[4] Children in non-breadwinner households exhibit poorer physical outcomes, including 1-2 cm shorter adult height and 10-20% higher chronic health risks, underscoring the model's role in intergenerational functionality.^[82] These patterns hold in large-scale panels, prioritizing causal economic specialization over egalitarian alternatives that may fragment roles without equivalent well-being gains.

Drivers of Decline

Cultural and Ideological Shifts

The breadwinner model faced significant challenges from the ideological currents of second-wave feminism, which emerged in the early 1960s and emphasized women's autonomy, workforce participation, and rejection of traditional domestic roles as inherently limiting.^[83] Betty Friedan's 1963 publication The Feminine Mystique articulated widespread dissatisfaction among middle-class women with homemaking, framing it as a source of psychological malaise and catalyzing demands for expanded opportunities beyond the family sphere.^[83] This movement promoted an ideology of gender neutrality in roles, arguing that separate spheres based on biological sex differences perpetuated inequality, thereby encouraging dual-earner households over male specialization as providers.^[84] Public attitudes toward the male breadwinner model eroded concurrently, with survey data indicating a marked decline in endorsement of the traditional family structure where husbands focus on earning and wives on homemaking. In the United States, support for women prioritizing family over career dropped from 57% in 1986 to 27% by 2016 among women, with men's support declining from 55% to 32% over the same period, reflecting broader cultural normalization of egalitarian ideals.^[85] This shift was amplified by educational institutions and media, which increasingly portrayed traditional roles as outdated and oppressive, prioritizing individual fulfillment and career achievement over familial specialization.^[86] The 1960s countercultural revolution further undermined the model by championing individualism, sexual liberation, and skepticism toward authority, including patriarchal family structures, fostering a view of marriage as a partnership of equals rather than complementary roles.^[86] Ideological advocacy for these changes often overlooked empirical evidence of household efficiency from specialization, instead emphasizing moral imperatives of equality derived from philosophical rather than data-driven premises.^[87] By the 1970s, these influences had permeated policy discourse, associating the breadwinner model with regressive gender norms amid rising emphasis on personal autonomy.^[88]

Economic and Policy Pressures

Rising costs of housing, education, and healthcare have outpaced wage growth for many households, compelling families to rely on dual incomes to maintain living standards once achievable on a single breadwinner's earnings. For instance, median home prices in the United States adjusted for inflation rose from approximately $150,000 in 1970 to over $400,000 by 2023, while real median male earnings stagnated around $60,000 (in 2023 dollars) over the same period, eroding the purchasing power of single-income arrangements. Deindustrialization further exacerbated this by displacing male-dominated manufacturing jobs, with U.S. manufacturing employment falling from 19.5 million in 1979 to 12.8 million by 2023, reducing stable, high-wage opportunities that historically supported the breadwinner model. These structural shifts in labor markets increased economic precariousness, prompting households to supplement male earnings with female labor to offset income volatility and secure against downturns.^[1] Government policies have amplified these economic imperatives by subsidizing alternatives to homemaking, effectively tilting incentives toward dual-earner configurations. Childcare subsidies, such as those under the U.S. Child Care and Development Fund, have demonstrably boosted maternal employment rates; a 10% increase in state subsidy expenditures correlates with a 0.7% rise in mothers' employment, enabling families to forgo single-income dependency on home-based care.^[89] Similarly, family-friendly measures like paid parental leave and tax credits for working parents in OECD countries have facilitated women's sustained workforce participation, with evidence showing these interventions increase female labor supply by reducing the opportunity cost of employment over homemaking.^[90] In the European Union, tax system reforms away from breadwinner-favoring income splitting toward individual taxation have diminished fiscal support for single-earner couples, imposing higher effective marginal rates on second earners in some cases but overall promoting gender-neutral labor participation that undermines the model's viability.^[91] Welfare and transfer policies introduce additional distortions, creating phase-out cliffs that penalize incremental earnings from a second household member while assuming dual incomes in eligibility calculations. For low- to middle-income families, benefits like the Earned Income Tax Credit phase out sharply as household income rises, often rendering the net gain from a spouse's part-time work minimal or negative, yet the availability of subsidized childcare and employment supports shifts the calculus toward workforce entry regardless.^[92] This policy environment, combined with explicit governmental emphasis on boosting female labor force participation—evident in U.S. strategies targeting women's economic security through expanded work supports—has accelerated the breadwinner model's erosion by framing single-income households as economically suboptimal.^[93]^[94]

Labor Market Transformations

The shift from manufacturing to a service-oriented economy in advanced nations has eroded the economic viability of the male breadwinner model by diminishing high-wage, stable jobs traditionally held by men without college degrees. In the United States, manufacturing employment peaked in 1979 and has since declined sharply due to automation, offshoring, and technological advancements, with total jobs falling from about 19.5 million in 1979 to around 12.8 million by 2023, even as productivity rose. This deindustrialization disproportionately affected less-educated men, whose labor market prospects worsened significantly between 1973 and 2015, with employment rates for prime-age non-college men dropping amid stagnant real wages. A 10% decline in local manufacturing employment since 2000 correlated with an 18% drop in men's wages and a 4.6 percentage point reduction in employment rates for men aged 21-55 from 2000 to 2017.^[95]^[96] Concurrent wage stagnation for middle- and lower-skilled men has heightened the financial pressures on single-earner households, rendering the breadwinner model insufficient for maintaining prior living standards. Real median wages for full-time male workers have grown minimally since the 1970s, with non-college men's earnings flat or declining in inflation-adjusted terms, while household expenses like housing and education have escalated. Prime-age male labor force participation fell from 96.6% in 1965 to 88.2% in 2015, reflecting reduced job availability in male-dominated sectors and a shift toward flexible but lower-paying service roles. These trends have compelled families to rely on dual incomes, as a single male wage increasingly fails to support a middle-class lifestyle, evidenced by the rise in dual-earner households from about 30% in 1960 to over 60% by 2020.^[97]^[98] Women's expanded labor force participation, driven by educational gains and market demand in expanding sectors like healthcare and professional services, has further accelerated the model's decline by normalizing two-income dependency. Female prime-age labor force participation in the US climbed from 43% in 1970 to 77.6% by 2023, with married women entering the workforce en masse post-1960s, often in response to husbands' earnings shortfalls. This "quiet revolution" in female employment integrated family labor supply decisions into broader economic necessities, reducing the prevalence of stay-at-home spouses from over 70% of married women in 1960 to under 30% today. Empirical analyses link these shifts to structural labor market polarization, where cognitive and service jobs favor women's skill profiles, sidelining traditional male roles and undermining the specialization inherent to the breadwinner arrangement.^[99]^[100]^[101]

Consequences of Erosion

Heightened Family Instability and Breakdown

The erosion of the male breadwinner model, marked by rising female labor force participation and the prevalence of dual-earner households, correlates strongly with elevated rates of marital dissolution in the United States. Divorce rates per 1,000 population increased from 2.2 in 1960 to a peak of 5.3 in 1981, coinciding with women's labor force participation rising from approximately 38% in 1960 to 52% by 1980, as nonfarm employment opportunities expanded and reduced economic dependence on marriage.^[102] ^[103] This temporal alignment suggests that greater female economic independence lowers the financial costs of separation, enabling spouses—particularly women—to exit unions more readily.^[55] ^[102] Empirical analyses confirm that deviations from breadwinner norms heighten instability risks. Couples where wives contribute 40-59% of family earnings exhibit lower marital commitment compared to those adhering closer to traditional divisions, with divorce probabilities rising as wives' relative earnings increase beyond parity.^[104] ^[105] In dual-earner arrangements, a husband's dominant earning role remains protective; marriages where men provide the majority of income (e.g., 70% or more) face 20-50% lower dissolution risks than those with more equal or reversed earnings, based on longitudinal data from cohorts spanning 1968-2013.^[52] ^[106] Male breadwinner expectations further mitigate separation during male unemployment, as adherence to these norms sustains union stability even amid job loss, per European panel data analyses.^[4] The introduction of unilateral no-fault divorce laws across U.S. states from the late 1960s onward amplified this instability by removing evidentiary burdens for dissolution, contributing to a near-doubling of divorce rates post-adoption and facilitating family breakdowns independent of spousal consent.^[107] ^[102] Consequently, single-parent households—predominantly headed by mothers—surged from 9% of families with children in 1960 to 27% by 2020, paralleling these shifts and entailing heightened economic precarity, with custodial mothers often retaining only 50-75% of pre-divorce household income.^[108] ^[109] Female breadwinner couples, now comprising about 30% of marriages with children, exhibit 10-40% higher separation risks than male breadwinner or balanced dual-earner pairs, underscoring the model's role in fostering enduring partnerships.^[110]^[106]

Detrimental Child Development Impacts

The erosion of the breadwinner model has correlated with greater reliance on non-maternal child care arrangements, such as daycare, which longitudinal data indicate is associated with elevated behavioral problems in children. The NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, tracking over 1,300 children from infancy through adolescence, found that greater quantities of non-maternal care—particularly more than 30 hours per week—predicted higher levels of externalizing behaviors, including aggression and disobedience, as reported by caregivers and teachers at ages 4.5 and 15.^[111] These effects persisted into adolescence, with children in extensive early non-maternal care exhibiting poorer social competence and impulse control, independent of family socioeconomic status or maternal sensitivity.^[112] Maternal employment, a key driver of such care arrangements in dual-income households, has been linked to modest cognitive deficits in children, particularly when occurring in the first three years of life. A National Bureau of Economic Research analysis of panel data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth showed that maternal work during infancy reduced child cognitive test scores by approximately 0.1 to 0.2 standard deviations, effects attributable to reduced direct parental investment rather than selection biases.^[67] Similarly, a meta-analysis of 69 studies encompassing maternal employment's distal associations with child outcomes reported small but significant negative links to behavioral adjustment, with early full-time work exacerbating risks for attention problems and achievement gaps.^[113] Family instability accompanying the model's decline, including higher divorce rates and single-parent households, contributes to heightened emotional and conduct disorders. Children in single-mother families face roughly twice the risk of externalizing behaviors and internalizing issues like anxiety compared to those in intact two-parent homes, per analyses of national datasets controlling for income and parental education.^[114] Longitudinal studies of divorce effects reveal persistent impacts, with affected children displaying 20-30% higher rates of psychological maladjustment into adulthood, including depression and substance use, as tracked over 10-20 years in cohorts from the U.S. and U.K.^[115]^[116] These outcomes stem from disrupted attachment, reduced paternal involvement, and economic stressors, amplifying vulnerabilities in non-traditional structures.^[117] The erosion of the breadwinner model correlates with elevated rates of family fragmentation, including divorce and unwed childbearing, which generate substantial economic costs through heightened public expenditures. A 2008 analysis estimated that family fragmentation imposes at least $112 billion annually on U.S. taxpayers, covering categories such as cash welfare, tax credits, food assistance, housing subsidies, Medicaid, juvenile and criminal justice systems, and remedial education.^[118] These costs arise partly from reduced household earnings stability and increased dependency on government support, as fragmented families exhibit lower average incomes independent of other factors.^[119] Single-parent households, a frequent outcome of such fragmentation, face poverty rates markedly higher than intact two-parent families, amplifying fiscal burdens. In 2022, approximately 30% of U.S. single-parent families lived below the federal poverty level, compared to 6% of married-couple families.^[120] This disparity persists even after controlling for employment, with single-mother families comprising 80% of single-parent units and relying disproportionately on welfare programs.^[121] The transition from breadwinner structures to dual-earner or single-earner models in unstable homes has thus contributed to stagnant or declining family incomes in non-intact units, straining public resources.^[122] Socially, the decline fosters fragmentation by undermining intergenerational ties and community interdependence, yielding splintered social classes and reduced cohesion. Empirical data indicate that intact families—often aligned with breadwinner norms—optimize child outcomes and societal stability, whereas fragmentation correlates with broader disruptions like political polarization and weakened civic bonds.^[123] In dual-earner dominant contexts, single parents encounter elevated relative poverty risks, exacerbating class divides.^[124] Additionally, assortative mating in dual-earner couples has intensified household income inequality since the 1960s, as high-earning pairs consolidate advantages while low-earning ones lag.^[125] These dynamics promote individualism over collective family roles, correlating with diminished social trust and higher isolation rates.^[126]

Role Reversals

Emergence of Female Breadwinners

The proportion of U.S. households with children under age 18 where mothers serve as the sole or primary breadwinner rose from less than 11% in 1960 to a record 40% by 2013, reflecting a marked shift away from the traditional male breadwinner model.^[127]^[128] This increase encompasses both single-mother households, where women by default assume full financial responsibility, and dual-earner couples where wives outearn husbands; the former category expanded due to rising rates of unmarried births and divorce, while the latter grew amid women's advancing education and occupational gains.^[128] Among married couples, the share where wives are the primary or sole earner climbed from 5% in 1972 to 16% by 2023, with the overall trend showing women outearning spouses in 29% of marriages when including equal-earner arrangements.^[129] This reversal in married households accelerated post-1970s, coinciding with women's labor force participation surging from 43% in 1970 to over 57% by 2020, driven by expanded access to higher education and professional fields.^[129] By 2015, 42% of all mothers qualified as breadwinners, contributing at least half of family earnings, up from 14% in 1967.^[130] The emergence was uneven by demographics: college-educated women led the trend, with 20% of childless married women outearning husbands by 2023 compared to 15% of mothers, while less-educated and minority women more often headed single-parent breadwinner families.^[131] Longitudinal data indicate over 70% of contemporary U.S. mothers will at some point contribute 61% or more of household earnings, underscoring the normalization of female financial primacy across life stages.^[132] These shifts, while empirically tied to economic necessities and policy changes like no-fault divorce laws enacted in the 1970s, have prompted scrutiny of underlying family stability, though causal links remain debated in peer-reviewed analyses.^[133]

Stability and Well-Being Challenges in Reversed Models

Empirical studies indicate that marriages where the wife is the primary earner exhibit elevated divorce risks compared to traditional male breadwinner arrangements. For instance, data from U.S. couples show that when wives outearn husbands by as little as $5,000 annually, the divorce probability increases, with overall rates up to 50% higher in female breadwinner households.^[134] Recent analyses confirm women as primary earners face two to three times higher likelihood of divorce, though this gap has narrowed for marriages formed in the 1990s to approximately 4% higher than male breadwinner couples.^[135]^[136] These patterns persist even in dual-earner contexts, where female primary earners experience greater union dissolution risks than sole male breadwinners, potentially due to unmet expectations around gender roles.^[60] Relationship satisfaction also declines in reversed models. Research reveals reduced marital happiness when wives earn more, with "very happy" reports dropping in such couples.^[137] Partners perceive higher strain, and external observers rate these unions as less stable, exacerbating internal tensions.^[138] Men, in particular, report distress tied to diminished provider status, preferring non-employment for wives over breadwinning roles to avoid psychological burden.^[139] Well-being outcomes reflect these strains, with mental health diagnoses rising for both spouses when wives outearn husbands, effects more pronounced in men.^[140] The primary earner role correlates with stress from financial worries, contributing to broader mental health issues, though women's outcomes show mixed resilience amid added pressures of balancing provision and family duties.^[141]^[142]

Global and Cultural Contexts

Persistence in Non-Western Societies

In regions such as the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), the male breadwinner model remains entrenched, with female labor force participation rates averaging around 19% in 2022, among the lowest worldwide, indicating that men continue to serve as primary household providers in the majority of families.^[143] This persistence aligns with cultural and religious norms, particularly in Islamic societies, where interpretations of Sharia emphasize men's financial responsibility for the family, limiting women's economic roles outside the home unless necessitated by extreme poverty.^[144] Empirical data from the World Bank and ILO highlight that even as female education levels rise—often surpassing men's in countries like Tunisia and Jordan—workforce entry remains constrained by societal expectations of domestic primacy for women, with only marginal increases in participation over decades.^[145] In South Asia, including India and Pakistan, traditional patriarchal structures sustain the breadwinner model, evidenced by India's female labor force participation rate of 32.8% in 2024, predominantly in informal or agricultural sectors that supplement rather than supplant male earnings.^[146] Cultural practices rooted in Hinduism and Islam reinforce gender specialization, with family systems prioritizing male inheritance and provision, as documented in cross-national studies on persistent son preference and household decision-making.^[147] Urbanization and policy efforts, such as India's self-help groups for women, have introduced dual-earner elements in some households, but surveys indicate that over 70% of married women still cite family obligations as barriers to full-time employment, preserving male dominance in income generation.^[148] Sub-Saharan Africa exhibits a mixed but resilient pattern, where female participation hovers below 60%, often in subsistence activities that do not erode the male breadwinner norm in formal or wage-based economies.^[149] Tribal and extended family systems, combined with patrilineal customs, maintain men's roles as primary providers, with ethnographic data showing that even in female-headed households—comprising up to 30% in some nations like South Africa—remittances or male kin support uphold traditional divisions.^[150] Economic pressures from resource scarcity reinforce this model, as women's labor is channeled into unpaid reproductive work, contrasting with Western dual-earner shifts and underscoring the causal role of pre-industrial cultural inertia in delaying convergence toward egalitarian structures.

Policy and Cultural Influences on Model Adoption

In post-World War II Western welfare states, policies often presupposed the male breadwinner model, with social insurance systems designed around stable male employment and dependent female homemakers, thereby reinforcing its adoption through normative and structural incentives.^[151]^[152] For instance, in the United States during the mid-20th century, progressive income tax brackets reaching up to 90% on high incomes under joint filing disadvantaged second earners in middle-class families, as additional spousal income pushed households into higher marginal rates, effectively subsidizing single-earner arrangements.^[153] This fiscal structure, combined with limited public childcare and employer-based benefits tied to male-headed households, sustained the model's prevalence until labor market shifts and policy reforms in the 1970s-1980s began favoring dual earners.^[154] Contemporary policies in select European nations have sought to counteract the model's erosion by explicitly promoting traditional family structures. Hungary's government since 2010 has implemented pronatalist measures, including lifetime personal income tax exemptions for mothers of four or more children (introduced in 2019) and full exemptions for mothers of three from October 2025, alongside housing subsidies and loan forgiveness for families with children, aiming to incentivize women's roles in childrearing over full workforce participation.^[155] These policies, framed as protecting the "traditional family model," have correlated with fertility rate increases from 1.23 in 2010 to 1.59 in 2021, though critics note their selective targeting of ethnic Hungarian middle-class families reinforces gendered divisions.^[156]^[157] In contrast, expansive parental leave and subsidized childcare in Nordic countries have accelerated shifts away from breadwinner norms toward dual-earner models.^[158] Cultural norms profoundly shape the breadwinner model's adoption, particularly in non-Western contexts where patriarchal traditions prioritize male provision. In East Asia, Confucian-influenced gender roles sustain moderate male breadwinner households, as seen in Japan where such arrangements remain prevalent amid long male work hours and societal expectations of female domesticity.^[159]^[160] In the Middle East, Islamic doctrines emphasizing male financial responsibility underpin the model's persistence, with high fertility and limited female labor participation in countries like Saudi Arabia reflecting these norms despite recent economic reforms challenging male job security.^[161]^[162] Empirical analyses indicate that lower education levels, religious adherence, and immigrant backgrounds from traditional societies correlate with stronger preferences for the model, as these factors embed expectations of male economic dominance and female caregiving, reducing deviations even under globalization pressures.^[163]^[59]

Contemporary Dynamics

COVID-19 Pandemic Disruptions and Temporary Revivals

The COVID-19 pandemic, beginning in early 2020, disrupted established family work arrangements through widespread lockdowns, school and childcare closures, and elevated unemployment rates, particularly challenging dual-earner households reliant on external care infrastructure. In the United States, these measures, implemented starting March 2020, compelled many parents to juggle remote work with full-time childcare, disproportionately burdening mothers who reduced paid labor hours or exited the workforce to manage home responsibilities.^[164]^[165] Empirical data reflect acute disruptions to maternal employment: the labor force participation rate for U.S. mothers with children under age 18 declined from 72.3% in 2019 to 71.2% in 2020, with a sharper drop from 67.2% to 64.0% in the initial pandemic phase, compared to fathers' rate falling from 94.6% to 91.4%.^[166]^[165] Women's overall labor force participation fell 2.5 percentage points from March to April 2020, driven by childcare demands amid school closures affecting over 50 million U.S. students.^[164] This shift amplified existing gender asymmetries, as mothers assumed 2.5 additional hours weekly on secondary childcare for school-aged children in 2020 versus 2019.^[167] These pressures prompted temporary revivals of the male breadwinner model in select contexts, with moderate re-traditionalization observed among opposite-sex couples in Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom during 2020–2021.^[168] Lockdown-induced childcare shortages encouraged some dual-earner pairs to revert to arrangements where fathers maintained primary employment while mothers prioritized homemaking, though such changes neither deepened pre-existing inequalities nor persisted uniformly across regions—contrasting with Italy, where female breadwinning rose 50% in Q2 2020 amid declines in male-led models.^[168]^[169] In the U.S., the narrower decline in fathers' participation relative to mothers' implied a short-term uptick in traditional configurations, reinforced by cultural tendencies toward gendered task division under crisis.^[165]^[170] Such revivals proved transient, as vaccine rollouts from late 2020 and reopening of schools and care facilities facilitated workforce re-entry; by 2023, U.S. mothers' employment share exceeded February 2020 levels by 1.9 percentage points, signaling a rebound from pandemic-era adaptations.^[171] Longitudinal analyses confirm these shifts were context-specific responses to acute disruptions rather than enduring structural reversals, with egalitarian arrangements largely resilient post-crisis.^[168]

Post-Pandemic Trends and Recent Empirical Findings

Following the initial disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic, which prompted temporary shifts toward traditional male breadwinning in some households due to job losses and childcare demands, post-pandemic data indicate limited persistence of such arrangements. A 2025 comparative study across Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom found moderate re-traditionalization in opposite-sex couples during the pandemic's first year, with logistic regression analyses of longitudinal data showing increased likelihood of male sole or primary earning roles amid lockdowns. However, this relapse was characterized as short- to medium-term, without exacerbating pre-existing inequalities in paid work division, suggesting a reversion toward pre-pandemic dual-earner norms as economies reopened.^[168] In the United States, recent surveys confirm the dominance of dual-earner models, with husbands serving as primary or sole breadwinners in just over half of opposite-sex marriages as of 2021 data analyzed in 2023, down from 85% in 1972 but stable post-2020. The share of marriages where spouses earn roughly equal amounts has grown to about 30%, while wives are primary breadwinners in 16% of cases, reflecting ongoing erosion of strict male breadwinner structures rather than revival. By 2023, approximately 45% of mothers were breadwinners—either sole earners in single-parent families or contributing at least half in married households—up from prior years, driven by women's labor force re-entry in sectors like healthcare and professional services.^[129]^[172]^[12] Empirical evidence from U.S. Census Bureau reports underscores broader household income recovery without a surge in single-earner configurations; real median household income rose 4% to $80,610 in 2023 from 2022, fueled by employment gains across both genders, though single-earner households with children comprise roughly one-third of married couples, predominantly male-led. Less-educated couples saw a pandemic-era uptick in single-worker setups, but post-2022 trends show stabilization or decline as dual participation resumed, with no systemic return to 1950s-style models. These patterns align with causal factors like persistent female workforce attachment and policy supports for work-life balance, countering narratives of enduring traditionalism.^[173]^[174]

References

[1]
The Rise and Decline of the Male Breadwinner Family? An ...
Central and Latin America, the male breadwinner family model was not universal: it was certainly not the dominant family model amongst the black/mulatto or ...
[2]
[PDF] Historical Origins of the Male Breadwinner Household Model
The model is said to have been established between the mid-19th and the mid-20th century in many countries. This essay begins with a brief survey of literature ...
[3]
[PDF] Breadwinner Models Revisited - University of Helsinki Research Portal
The one-and-a-half-breadwinner model means that the financial pressure on men is weaker than in the male-breadwinner-model, because women supplement the ...<|separator|>
[4]
Marriage and Masculinity: Male-Breadwinner Culture ...
Our results provide robust evidence that male-breadwinner norms are a key driver of the association between men's unemployment and the risk of separation.
[5]
Being the Primary Breadwinner is Bad for Men's Psychological Well ...
Sep 28, 2022 · Men's psychological well-being and health were at their worst during years when they were their families' sole breadwinner.
[6]
The male breadwinner nuclear family is not the 'traditional' human ...
Recent research has shown that high proportions of grandparents in Europe provide childcare for their grandchildren [44], as well as emotional support, advice ...
[7]
Lingering Male Breadwinner Norms as Predictors of Family ... - MDPI
The results strongly support the prediction that the male breadwinner norm at the societal level is detrimental to marital quality, while persons holding the ...
[8]
https://academic.oup.com/sp/article/21/1/50/1612146
[9]
3 - The male breadwinner model and women's entitlements as wives
The original assumption of the male breadwinner model as an intrinsic feature of the welfare state persists in a new guise. Now feminists suggest that the model ...
[10]
The Origins and Expansion of the Male Breadwinner Family
The transition from a family economy in which incomes were democratic- ally secured through the best efforts of all family members to one in which men ...
[11]
[PDF] farewell to the male breadwinner model - equal strategies to ...
Some 62% of households are now "dual income", making this life arrangement the most dominant form among women and men in the European Union[1].
[12]
Breadwinning Women Are a Lifeline for Their Families and the ...
May 9, 2025 · Black, Hispanic, Native American, and multiracial mothers are more likely to be breadwinners for their families than are white women, with ...
[13]
(PDF) Parental Investment Theory - ResearchGate
Nov 6, 2020 · This chapter outlines how Robert Trivers' Parental Investment Theory (PIT) has progressed from its original publication in Sexual Selection ...
[14]
Parental investment theory. - APA PsycNet
This chapter outlines how Robert Trivers' Parental Investment Theory (PIT) has progressed from its original publication in Sexual Selection and the Descent ...
[15]
Parental Investment Theory (Chapter 7) - The Cambridge Handbook ...
Jun 30, 2022 · As proposed by Trivers in 1972, Parental Investment Theory addresses sex differences that result from the trade-off between parenting and mating ...
[16]
Sex and Care: The Evolutionary Psychological Explanations ... - NIH
Apr 17, 2019 · The present article elucidates sex differences in terms of formal care occupational choices and care styles based on evolutionary psychological perspectives.
[17]
The male breadwinner nuclear family is not the 'traditional' human ...
May 3, 2021 · The emergence of the male breadwinner model pushed women into the home, where childhood was being re-interpreted as a period of consumption ...
[18]
Instrumental And Expressive Roles In Sociology - Simply Psychology
Feb 14, 2024 · Parson views the instrumental role are the contribution which men make to family life, as the main breadwinner and disciplinarian of the family.
[19]
7.3 Theoretical Perspectives on Marriage and the Family
The functionalist Talcott Parsons (1943) emphasized that in each family, there is a division of labour that consists of instrumental and expressive roles.
[20]
https://www.tutor2u.net/sociology/reference/classic-texts-talcott-parsons-the-social-structure-of-the-family-1959
[21]
Introduction to A Theory of the Allocation of Time by Gary Becker - NIH
Gary Becker's classic study, 'A theory of the allocation of time', laid the analytical foundations for the study of household production and the allocation ...Missing: breadwinner | Show results with:breadwinner
[22]
[PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES ALLOCATING HOUSEHOLD TIME
The critical assumption that leads to the specialization conclusion in Becker's Treatise on the Family is that spouses' time inputs are perfect substitutes in ...Missing: breadwinner | Show results with:breadwinner
[23]
Gary Becker's A Theory of the Allocation of Time
Becker's (1965) paper, 'A Theory of the Allocation of Time' revolutionised the modelling of household behaviour, by unifying Marshallian demand functions ...Missing: breadwinner | Show results with:breadwinner
[24]
The Myth of Man the Hunter: Women's contribution to the hunt ...
Jun 28, 2023 · Our hypothesis is that the majority (i.e., more than half) of hunter-gatherer communities do expect females to contribute to hunting strategies ...
[25]
Skills, division of labour and economies of scale among Amazonian ...
This article describes a theoretical framework for explaining the size and composition of foraging groups based on three principles: (i) the sexual division of ...
[26]
New evidence suggests sexual division of labor as farming arose in ...
Apr 14, 2021 · The analysis showed that people of male biological sex were buried with stone tools that had previously been used for woodwork, butchery, ...
[27]
Forget 'Man the Hunter' – physiological and archaeological ...
Nov 17, 2023 · Forget 'Man the Hunter' – physiological and archaeological evidence rewrites assumptions about a gendered division of labor in prehistoric times.
[28]
A sexual division of labour at the start of agriculture? A multi-proxy ...
Apr 14, 2021 · This work demonstrates the importance of integrating sexual division of labour into the research of the transition to the Neolithic and its social implications.
[29]
Subsistence activities and the sexual division of labor in the ...
Subsistence activities and the sexual division of labor in the European Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic: Evidence from upper limb enthesopathies · Results.
[30]
Women and Work in Preindustrial Europe - Project MUSE
Medieval peasant women did not spend much of their time producing from scratch the basic necessities for their families. Medieval society had very specialized ...
[31]
Spindles and Scales: Women at Work in Medieval Europe
May 28, 2025 · The manorial economy, which dominated much of medieval Europe, relied heavily on peasant labor, and women worked alongside men in the fields ...
[32]
The Origins and Expansion of the Male Breadwinner Family
Feb 20, 2009 · Families were heavily dependent on earnings. Poor relief formed much the largest part of other income, but this was unimportant for factory, ...
[33]
https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft8f59p261&chunk.id=0&doc.view=print
[34]
The Role of Women in the Industrial Revolution - UMass Lowell
Women were not paid for work in the home. With the availability of manufactured goods, a woman's role as producer within the home was reduced. The household ...
[35]
A New Social Order: Separations of Gender and Class
The separation of work from home had profound consequences for Americans' understanding of gender roles. Women became associated with an idealized domestic “ ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[36]
Modernization - Work, Family, Changes | Britannica
Industrialization radically disrupts this more or less autonomous family economy. It takes away the economic function of the family, and reduces it to a unit ...
[37]
The Changing Shape of the American Family — Maryland ...
In the 1950s, 65 percent of children were growing up in a home with a breadwinner father and a homemaker mother who were married to each other. Today, only 22 ...
[38]
Digital History
As recently as 1960, seventy percent of the households in the United States consisted of a breadwinner father, a homemaker mother, and two or more kids. Today, ...Missing: US | Show results with:US
[39]
Patriarchy, Power, and Pay: The Transformation of American ... - NIH
Median income for full-time employed young men more than doubled in the postwar era, to a peak of $48,500 in 1973. After that peak, young men's wages declined ...
[40]
[PDF] A century of change: the U.S. labor force, 1950-2050
In 1950, the overall participation rate of women was 34 per- cent. (See table 4.)
[41]
[PDF] Indicator 19. Mothers' Employment
The labor force participation rate of married women with children under 6 years old has been rising since 1950. Between 1970 and 1993, the participation rate ...
[42]
[PDF] American Population since 1940
This boom and bust pattern of population growth is one of the most dramatic and unanticipated developments of the post-World War II period with far-flung social ...
[43]
https://academic.oup.com/esr/article/31/2/230/2367436
[44]
Family Diversity Is The New Normal For America's Children
Sep 15, 2014 · With two-thirds of children being raised in male-breadwinner, married-couple families, it is understandable that people from the early 1960s ...Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
[45]
[PDF] Marriage and Divorce since World War II: Analyzing the Role of ...
As a consequence, single households gain the most from a decline in the price of purchased house- hold inputs. Thus, a fall in the price of purchased household ...
[46]
Gary Becker's a Theory of the Allocation of Time - Oxford Academic
Becker's (1965) paper, 'A Theory of the Allocation of Time' revolutionised the modelling of household behaviour, by unifying Marshallian demand functions for ...Abstract · Time for Becker · Some Econometric Issues · Time for Collectives
[47]
[PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES ALLOCATING HOUSEHOLD TIME
Although some of Becker's proofs appear to rely on households optimally adjusting spouses' stocks of market and household human capital, the specialization ...
[48]
What is the Value of Household Work? - Bureau of Economic Analysis
Jun 11, 2012 · The value of household production were included in gross domestic product (GDP), it would add approximately $3.8 trillion to the US economy in 2010.
[49]
Does home production replace consumption spending? Evidence ...
Our estimate of 5.20 dollars implies that increasing home production by one hour allows households to replace consumption spending worth 5.20 dollars. Since ...
[50]
Does Specialization Explain Marriage Penalties and Premiums?
Specialization is the dominant causal explanation in the literature for the higher wages earned by married men as compared to unmarried men (Chun and Lee 2001; ...
[51]
Selection and Specialization in the Evolution of Marriage Earnings ...
Aug 1, 2016 · We find that the marriage earnings gap fell for women in fixed-effect estimates, implying that the impact of specialization has diminished over time.
[52]
Husbands with Much Higher Incomes Than Their Wives Have a ...
Jun 1, 2023 · Those couples least likely to divorce were those where the husband had a much larger income than his wife, which includes couples where the wife ...
[53]
Divorce Rates Higher With Women Breadwinners - MKFM Law
Some research has identified that divorce rates are higher—up to perhaps even 50% higher—for couples where the female out-earns her male partner ...
[54]
Couples most likely to divorce have this factor in common - Fortune
Mar 13, 2025 · Further, in single-income homes with female breadwinners, the divorce rate is twice as high (54 vs. 20 per 1,000). Female breadwinners, the ...
[55]
[PDF] Money, Work, and Marital Stability - Scholars at Harvard
Conceptually, divorce occurs when at least one partner believes she will be better off divorced than remaining married; the risk of divorce depends on the gains ...
[56]
Divorce Rates in the World [Updated 2024]
Oct 1, 2025 · Countries With the Lowest Divorce Rate · Countries With the Lowest Divorce Rate · India – 0.01 per 1k; Vietnam – 0.2 ; Countries With the Highest ...
[57]
Divorce Rates by Country 2025 - World Population Review
Countries with the lowest divorce rates, like Sri Lanka and Vietnam, may reflect legal difficulties or societal barriers rather than marital satisfaction.
[58]
8 facts about divorce in the United States - Pew Research Center
Oct 16, 2025 · It has fallen more sharply in the past 15 years, to 14.4 divorces per 1,000 married women in 2023. Why has the divorce rate declined? One reason ...Missing: single- dual-
[59]
Male-Breadwinner Culture, Unemployment, and Separation Risk in ...
May 26, 2021 · Our results provide robust evidence that male-breadwinner norms are a key driver of the association between men's unemployment and the risk of separation.
[60]
Are Female-Breadwinner Couples Always Less Stable? Evidence ...
The paper studies the association between partners' relative incomes and union dissolution among couples in France.Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
[61]
The effects of early maternal employment on child cognitive ...
May 1, 2002 · We investigated the effects of early maternal employment on children's cognitive outcomes, using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.
[62]
Maternal Employment and Child Cognitive Outcomes in the First ...
Jan 28, 2003 · Maternal employment by the ninth month was linked to lower cognitive scores at 36 months, especially with 30+ hours/week, even when controlling ...
[63]
Effects of maternal employment and child-care arrangements on ...
Employment in the 1st yr had detrimental effects on the cognitive and behavioral development of all children regardless of gender or poverty status.
[64]
Early Child Care and Adolescent Functioning at the End of High ...
Is the prediction of adolescent outcomes from early child care moderated by later maternal sensitivity? Results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and ...
[65]
Stronger Families, Safer Streets | American Enterprise Institute - AEI
Dec 13, 2023 · We find that cities are safer when two-parent families are dominant and more crime-ridden when family instability is common. The same story ...
[66]
Reassessing the Criminogenic Risk of the 'Broken Home': The ...
Nov 23, 2024 · There emerges a consensus within this literature that non-traditional family structures are associated with higher crime rates. Social ...
[67]
[PDF] Parental Employment and Child Cognitive Development Christopher ...
This study investigates the relationship between parental employment and child cognitive development using data from multiple years of the National Longitudinal ...
[68]
Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender
May 12, 2008 · Rubin's thought was that although biological differences are fixed, gender differences are the oppressive results of social interventions that ...
[69]
How Feminist Theories Challenge Traditional Family Structures
Mar 2, 2024 · Radical feminism, another critical feminist theory, extends the critique of the family by emphasizing the role of sexual oppression within ...
[70]
[PDF] Financial Freedom: Women, Money, and Domestic Abuse
For survivors of intimate partner violence, there are a number of barriers that dra- matically decrease the likelihood of liberation from the cycle of abuse.
[71]
Examining the impact of economic abuse on survivors of intimate ...
May 19, 2022 · Adams et al. found that coerced debt was significantly associated with greater odds of credit damage and financial dependency (meaning survivors ...
[72]
Unfolding the invisibility of women without men in the case of Turkey
Our claim here is, however, that the discriminatory nature of the societal values is to some extent hidden when women are living with a male breadwinner who is ...
[73]
female-breadwinner well-being 'penalty': differences by men's (un ...
Jun 5, 2023 · Abstract. This article examines the relationship between female breadwinning and life satisfaction in heterosexual couples.
[74]
The Economic Consequences of Gray Divorce for Women and Men
Sep 9, 2020 · Women experienced a 45% decline in their standard of living (measured by an income-to-needs ratio), whereas men's dropped by just 21%. These ...
[75]
Chapter 1: Comparing Stay-at-Home and Working Mothers
Apr 8, 2014 · Married stay-at-home mothers with working husbands are more likely than their working counterparts to be poor, 15% compared with 3%. As is true ...
[76]
[PDF] Economic Stress and Domestic Violence - UKnowledge
Intuitively, given that higher socioeconomic status is associated with lower risk of domestic violence, one would expect women who are employed and, therefore, ...
[77]
[PDF] Causes Of Domestic Violence - BYU ScholarsArchive
Major factors such as stress, low income or unemployment, abuse of alcohol, and low self-esteem can also cause domestic violence. Even minor factors such as a ...
[78]
Are Stay-at-Home Mothers Really Miserable?
Apr 21, 2022 · These effects are important to consider, since stay-at-home mothers have lower divorce rates and higher fertility rates.
[79]
Who Is Happiest? Married Mothers and Fathers, Per the Latest ...
Sep 12, 2023 · Among married women with children between the ages of 18 and 55, 40% reported they are “very happy,” compared to 25% of married childless women, ...
[80]
Married Mothers Nearly Twice as Likely to be 'Very Happy ...
Aug 26, 2025 · The study found that married mothers are the happiest group of women, outpacing single women, married women without children, and unmarried ...
[81]
None
### Summary of Findings on Maternal Happiness
[82]
Do Individuals Born into Households Without a Male Breadwinner ...
Nov 4, 2024 · Our results confirm that individuals born in households without a male breadwinner model were, on average, XX cm shorter, had a % higher likelihood of health ...
[83]
Second-Wave Feminism: History, Main Ideas, Impact
Second-wave feminism challenged stereotypes and gave voice to women who weren't fulfilled in traditional gender roles. Many sub-types of feminism emerged ...<|separator|>
[84]
Family Models in Social Science Research | SpringerLink
Apr 16, 2025 · The – already mentioned several times – classic traditional male breadwinner model is rooted in “an ideology of separate gender roles” (Ciccia ...
[85]
[PDF] Attitudes on Women's Roles in the Home: 1986-2016
• Declining support for the male breadwinner model occurred earlier for women than for men. The greatest decline for women occurred between 1986 and 1996.
[86]
The Evolution of American Family Structure | CSP Global
Jul 10, 2020 · The standard structure of the family in postwar America consisted of a breadwinner male, his wife who did household chores and looked after ...Missing: foundations | Show results with:foundations
[87]
(PDF) Changing Attitudes toward the Male Breadwinner, Female ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Declines in support for the male breadwinner, female homemaker family model in recent decades have been thoroughly documented, but research ...
[88]
Family Policies and the Weakening of the Male Breadwinner Model
Jul 28, 2017 · Policy change has followed a common trajectory moving away from support for the male breadwinner and towards the dual-earner household and to reconcile ...
[89]
Evidence of Impact for Child Care Subsidies
A 10% increase in Child Care and Development Fund subsidy expenditures led to a 0.7% increase in mothers' employment rate · $1,000 higher annual state subsidy ...
[90]
Women's labor force participation - IZA World of Labor
Family-friendly policies increase women's labor force participation, benefiting them, their families, and society at large.
[91]
Gender Equality and Taxation Policies in the EU - Intereconomics
The exemplary article explains the relevance of gender equality in taxation and the interdependencies with socioeconomic gender differences.
[92]
Work disincentives hit the near-poor hardest. Why and what to do ...
May 5, 2022 · Unfortunately, many of today's policies do not work well for low-income working families. True, the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), under which ...
[93]
United States Strategy on Global Women's Economic Security
The United States Government developed this first-ever interagency Strategy to advance Women's Economic Security globally.Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
[94]
“Expanding Economic Opportunity for Women and Families ...
May 13, 2014 · There are a variety of ways that federal policy can encourage women's labor force participation, among them tax credits and early childhood ...
[95]
[PDF] The Transformation of Manufacturing and the Decline in U.S. ...
Between 2000 and 2017, employment rates for men aged 21-55 fell by 4.6 percentage points and hours worked fell by over 180 hours per year. The declines in ...
[96]
The Declining Labor Market Prospects of Less-Educated Men - PMC
During the last 50 years, labor market outcomes for men without a college education in the United States worsened considerably. Between 1973 and 2015, ...
[97]
Men Without Work | American Enterprise Institute - AEI
job holders and job seekers) for prime-age men fell from an average of 96.6% in 1965 to just 88.2% in 2015. ( ...
[98]
Wage Stagnation in Nine Charts | Economic Policy Institute
Our country has suffered from rising income inequality and chronically slow growth in the living standards of low- and moderate-income Americans.Missing: dual | Show results with:dual
[99]
Women in the Workforce Need Family-Focused Policy
Oct 10, 2023 · Today's labor force participation rate of prime-age women, traditionally defined as those aged 25-54, is 77.6%—a full rebound from COVID-era ...
[100]
[PDF] The Quiet Revolution That Transformed Women's Employment ...
As married women began to enter the labor market in greater numbers, labor economists ana- lyzed female labor supply decisions in the context of the family unit ...<|separator|>
[101]
Full article: Structural labour market change, cognitive work, and ...
Technological change and globalization have caused unprecedented transformations of labour markets, resulting in a growing division between workers who ...<|separator|>
[102]
THE RISE OF DIVORCE AND SEPARATION IN THE UNITED ... - NIH
The rise of female labor-force participation and the increase in nonfarm employment are closely associated with the growth of divorce and separation.
[103]
Patterns of marriage and divorce from ages 15 to 55
And women's labor force participation rose substantially as they reached adulthood, from about 40 percent in the 1960s to about 60 percent by the mid-1990s.
[104]
Women's Economic Independence and the Probability of DivorceA ...
Aug 5, 2025 · According to Nock (2001), wives who are equal contributors (i.e., 40-59%) in terms of family earnings are less committed (defined as viewing ...
[105]
Trends in Relative Earnings and Marital Dissolution: Are Wives Who ...
Aug 29, 2016 · As women's labor-force participation and earnings have grown, so has the likelihood that wives outearn their husbands.
[106]
The Breadwinner Husband Still Matters in Marriage
Sep 7, 2016 · A vast body of research shows that a husband's employment still matters for marital stability. In both the early and later cohorts, about 90 ...
[107]
Re-examining the impact of no fault divorce
Recent studies have linked no-fault divorce with the steep rise in the rate of divorce over the last 25 years.Missing: breakdown | Show results with:breakdown
[108]
The Economic Status of Single Mothers
Aug 7, 2024 · Low earnings and high poverty among single mothers mean these children have a higher likelihood of living in poverty than children in married- ...<|separator|>
[109]
The impact of family structure on the health of children: Effects ... - NIH
Children living with married parents are less likely to be abused or neglected. In one study, the relative risk that children from a single-parent family would ...
[110]
Are Female-Breadwinner Couples Always Less Stable? - Ined
Female-breadwinner couples face a higher risk of union dissolution compared to other couple types. This result is robust to various definitions of female ...
[111]
[PDF] The NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
The NICHD study investigates the relationship between child care and children's development, examining how family, child, and care features link to ...
[112]
Do Effects of Early Child Care Extend to Age 15 Years? Results ...
The role of maternal education and nonmaternal care services in the prevention of children's physical aggression problems. ... NICHD Study of Early Child Care.
[113]
[PDF] Maternal Work Early in the Lives of Children and Its Distal ...
Jan 25, 2010 · The current meta-analysis elaborates the importance of early maternal employment and adds behavioral measures to the set of child outcomes.
[114]
Single Mother Parenting and Adolescent Psychopathology - PMC
Across numerous studies, children raised in single-mother families are at heightened risk for substance abuse, depression, anxiety, and externalizing behaviors ...
[115]
Children of divorce: recent findings regarding long-term effects and ...
The 10-year study revealed that the effects of divorce on children are often long lasting. Children are especially affected because divorce occurs within their ...
[116]
Longitudinal Studies of Effects of Divorce on Children in ... - Science
National, longitudinal surveys from Great Britain and the United States were used to investigate the effects of divorce on children.
[117]
Effects of Family Structure on Mental Health of Children - NIH
More emotional and behavioral problems occur in families disrupted by divorce than compared to other types of disruptions, for example, death of a parent.
[118]
[PDF] The Taxpayer Costs of Divorce and Unwed Childbearing
Based on the methodology, we estimate that family fragmentation costs U.S. tax- payers at least $112 billion each and every year, or more than $1 trillion each ...
[119]
[PDF] A FIFTY-STATE SURVEY OF THE COST OF FAMILY ...
4 The 2008 Report found that family breakdown had cost American taxpayers $112 billion per year.
[120]
Child Well-Being in Single-Parent Families
Aug 1, 2022 · This post highlights the latest statistics and demographic trends involving children in single-parent families. It identifies some common hurdles facing these ...
[121]
Policy Levers to Support Single-Mother Economic Mobility
Apr 2, 2025 · Families led by single mothers make up 80 percent of single-parent households, motivating the focus on policies supporting single mothers.
[122]
Women As Economic Providers - Carsey School of Public Policy
Jun 30, 2015 · While dual-earner couple families are doing quite well in terms of income,1 family income has been stagnant or decreasing among single-earner ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[123]
[PDF] Fragmented Families and Splintered Classes
Yet as Pearlstein has documented, family fragmentation has plenty of costs, including lower national and personal incomes, as well as higher taxes and lost ...
[124]
Single Parents Competing in a Dual-Earner Society: Social Policy to ...
Nov 28, 2022 · I find that single parents face higher relative income poverty risks in countries with a large share of dual-earner households.
[125]
Earnings Inequality and the Changing Association between ... - NIH
Figure 2 shows that, among dual-earner couples, the correlation between spouses' earnings rose from . 08 in 1967–70 to . 23 in 2003–5, or almost tripled.
[126]
The Decadence of Western Society: what happens when we lose ...
Jun 26, 2023 · In Western societies, the decline of family values has lead to a more individualistic and fragmented society. The emphasis on personal ...
[127]
Moms Are Now Primary Breadwinners In 40 Percent Of Homes - NPR
May 29, 2013 · A record 40 percent of all households with children under the age of 18 include mothers who are either the sole or primary source of income for the family.
[128]
Breadwinner Moms | Pew Research Center
May 29, 2013 · Both groups of breadwinner mothers, married and single, have grown in size in the past five decades. Of all households with children younger ...
[129]
In a Growing Share of U.S. Marriages, Husbands and Wives Earn ...
Apr 13, 2023 · Dual-earner marriages have the highest income. Household economic well-being is often measured by household income and poverty. After ...Missing: net | Show results with:net
[130]
[PDF] Breadwinning Mothers Are Increasingly the U.S. Norm
In 2015—the year for which the most recent data are available—42 percent of mothers were sole or primary breadwinners, bringing in at least half of family.
[131]
American women are increasingly the breadwinner - Fortune
Apr 13, 2023 · The share of married women who are earning at least as much as their husbands has more than tripled in the last five decades.
[132]
Why Are So Many US Mothers Becoming Their Family's Primary ...
Dec 1, 2024 · More than 70% of contemporary U.S. mothers will become primary earners, defined as contributing 61% to 100% of their household's annual earnings ...
[133]
The Relationships among Breadwinner Role, Performance, and Pay
We evaluate the relationships among breadwinner role, performance, and pay. Differences in pay are present despite limited differences in performance.
[134]
Why Divorce Rate is Higher for Female Breadwinners
Rating 5.0 (45) Jun 22, 2022 · The study found that a woman making even $5,000 more a year than her husband was at greater risk of divorce.
[135]
Couples Are More Likely to Get Divorced If Woman Is Breadwinner
Mar 27, 2025 · Couples that earned more and had a dual income tended to be less likely to get divorced, the study found. However, the gap is shrinking, as ...
[136]
[PDF] Wives Now Outearn Their Husbands. They Also Stay Together Longer.
May 11, 2023 · Couples married in the late 1960s and 1970s were 70% more likely to divorce when wives earned the same or slightly more than their husbands ...Missing: historical era
[137]
Female Breadwinners are 50% More Likely to Divorce — Let's Talk
Aug 13, 2023 · The researchers show that the percentage of people who report being “very happy” with their marriage declines when a woman earns more money than her husband.
[138]
Women Who Outearn Husbands Face Higher Marital Strain, Study ...
May 5, 2025 · New research reveals that romantic relationships often suffer when women outearn their male partners. Even outsiders view these partnerships as less stable.
[139]
Couples in which the woman is the only earner report lower life ...
Jul 4, 2023 · We found that women's breadwinning carries such a heavy psychological burden for men that they would prefer she was not employed at all.Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
[140]
Wives Earning More Than Husbands Linked to an Increase in ...
Jan 8, 2025 · I find that the wife outearning the husband results in higher incidence of mental health issues for both spouses. The effect is more pronounced ...Does wife making more than husband contribute to relationship ...Relationship or marriage where the woman earns significantly more ...More results from www.reddit.com
[141]
Mental health, family roles and employment status inside and ...
These results suggest that the main breadwinner role could be associated with mental health problems through the stress and the worry about earning enough to ...
[142]
Navigating Financial Role Reversal: The Emotional Journey of ...
Nov 7, 2024 · Meanwhile, women who take on primary earning roles often feel a mix of pride and pressure, trying to balance career success with family ...
[143]
Women's Labor-Force Participation in the Middle East
Sep 19, 2023 · In 2022, the World Bank reported that women in the Middle East made up just 19 percent of the labor force—one of the lowest percentages in the ...
[144]
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan | Data
Labor force, female (% of total labor force) - Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan from The World Bank: Data.
[145]
Education and Working Women in MENA - Arab Barometer
Mar 4, 2025 · The gender gap in workforce participation across the Middle East and North Africa is among the largest of any region in the world.
[146]
Female labor force participation in South East Asia
The average female labor force participation in 2024 was 55.17%. Cambodia had the highest at 73.96%, and India the lowest at 32.8%.<|separator|>
[147]
Culture and the family - ScienceDirect.com
We review the persistent effects of different traditional family institutions and describe how cultural practices related to the family, such as son preference ...
[148]
Global Family Change: Persistent Diversity with Development - PMC
This article provides a broad empirical overview of the relationship between family change and socioeconomic development
[149]
[PDF] Women's Labor Participation in Africa - Yale Economic Growth Center
Although women represent more than 50 percent of that population, the female labor force participation rate (FLFPR) has lingered well below 60 percent, compared ...
[150]
Family Change in Global Perspective - PubMed Central - NIH
As a consequence, elders, especially men in traditional families, will lose influence over the direction of their children's lives and the choices they make.
[151]
[PDF] The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model: Implications for Work ...
But, crucially, the male breadwinner model also worked at the level of prescription.Missing: peak statistics
[152]
Gender and welfare state change - MIT Press Direct
This male breadwinner model family was widely accepted at the level of normative prescription by policy-makers and by people.<|separator|>
[153]
Historical Income Tax Rates and Brackets, 1862-2025
Aug 15, 2025 · Explore historical income tax rates and brackets over the years. Learn more about US federal income tax rates over time.
[154]
The Tax Benefits of Parenthood: A History and Analysis of Current ...
Feb 23, 2021 · Since 1917, tax filers with children have received ever-increasing federal income tax benefits. The tax benefits include deductions for each ...
[155]
Hungary's family policy: A future built on families
Apr 30, 2025 · From October 1, mothers raising three children will be fully exempt from paying personal income tax, regardless of age. Starting next year, ...
[156]
Family-Friendly Hungary: A Look at Family Policies, Demographic ...
Oct 16, 2024 · Hungary aims to be family-friendly, but its policies promote traditional gender roles and selective pronatalism, targeting middle-class, ...
[157]
Hungary only EU country protecting traditional family model
May 26, 2025 · Hungary is the only EU country protecting the traditional family model, the country's culture and innovation minister said Monday.
[158]
Adult Worker Model Typologies: Examining Work–Family Policies in ...
Yu S.W.K., Lo I.P.Y., Chau R.C.M. The policy measures used by the Hong Kong government to respond to the adult worker model and the male-breadwinner model.
[159]
[PDF] Diversity of Household Employment Patterns in East Asia:
In Japan, moderate male breadwinner households are prevalent, while full-time dual breadwinner households are dominant in Taiwan. On the other hand, male ...
[160]
Introduction to the special collection on family changes and ... - NIH
May 11, 2021 · ... breadwinner norm to emerging patterns of family behavior in East Asia. They illustrate specific ways in which East Asian families are shaped ...
[161]
Muslim women and human rights in the Middle East and South Asia
On the one hand, the literature review shows that the MENA region display unique gender characteristics such as patriarchy, high fertility, male-breadwinner ...Missing: norms | Show results with:norms
[162]
Gendered precarity in Saudi Arabia: Examining the state policies ...
Feb 27, 2024 · For Saudi men, state-driven policies exacerbate job insecurity and challenge traditional family ideology and the breadwinner model. However ...
[163]
A Socio-Structural Perspective on Family Model Preferences ... - MDPI
... breadwinner family model) and that socio-structural factors such as age, education level, immigrant condition, religious status and social class influence ...
[164]
The Pandemic, Child Care and Women's Labor Force Participation
From March to April 2020, women's LFP fell 2.5 percentage points. While much of the initial drop recovered quickly, it still remains notably below the rate ...
[165]
COVID Concerns and Partnered U.S. Mothers' Employment during ...
Nov 28, 2022 · Mothers' LFP rate went from 67.2 percent to 64.0 percent. For fathers, LFP fell from 94.6 percent to 91.4 percent. Although parents of young ...
[166]
Labor force participation declines for mothers and fathers in 2020
Apr 27, 2021 · The labor force participation rate for mothers with children under the age of 18 was 71.2 percent in 2020, down from 72.3 percent in 2019.<|separator|>
[167]
Many moms spent more time juggling child care, other tasks amid ...
Oct 11, 2022 · For mothers whose youngest child was age 5 to 12, average time spent on secondary care increased by about 2.5 hours from 2019 to 2020, from an ...
[168]
To the Fifties and Back Again? A Comparative Analysis of Changes ...
Apr 16, 2025 · This study investigates whether opposite-sex couples experienced short- and medium-term relapses into traditional breadwinning arrangements during the COVID-19 ...
[169]
[PDF] Retraditionalisation? Work patterns of families with children during ...
Oct 14, 2021 · During the pandemic, three types of couples declined (dual-worker couples; 'pure' male- breadwinner couples, where only men work; and 'modified' ...
[170]
Lockdown reinforces gender inequality and traditional roles
Jun 1, 2020 · Since lockdown, women have temporarily resumed traditional gender roles - from homeschooling to extra cooking - but campaign groups are warning ...
[171]
Mothers' employment has surpassed pre-pandemic levels, but the ...
May 6, 2024 · In 2023, about 24.2% of mothers reported working from home at some point in the prior week, with rates rising to 26.8% among mothers with whose ...
[172]
Pew Research Center Study Examines Breadwinner Status in ...
Apr 19, 2023 · Just over half of all marriages today have a husband who is the primary or sole breadwinner and 16 percent have a breadwinner wife. In 1972, the ...
[173]
Income in the United States: 2023 - Census Bureau
Sep 10, 2024 · Real median household income was $80,610 in 2023, a 4.0 percent increase from the 2022 estimate of $77,540 (Figure 1 and Table A-1). This is the ...
[174]
A COVID-19 labor force legacy: The drop in dual-worker families
Sep 8, 2022 · We find that less-educated couples became more likely during the COVID-19 pandemic to include only one labor force participant.Missing: single post