Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Carbaryl

Carbaryl, chemically known as 1-naphthyl N-methylcarbamate with the molecular formula C₁₂H₁₁NO₂, is a synthetic that functions as a reversible inhibitor of , disrupting nerve impulse transmission in . It is applied as a contact and stomach poison for broad-spectrum control of pests including , , and caterpillars on crops such as fruits, , and ornamentals, as well as in and residential turf management. First synthesized in 1953 and commercially introduced by in 1958 under the trade name Sevin, carbaryl rapidly became one of the most widely used insecticides in the United States and globally due to its efficacy and relatively low persistence in the environment compared to organophosphates. While carbaryl demonstrates moderate to mammals, causing cholinesterase inhibition at high exposures, empirical data indicate low carcinogenic potential in standard assays, though chronic effects include potential developmental and in animal models. It exhibits high to non-target organisms, particularly aquatic invertebrates, , and pollinators like honey bees, leading to significant ecological concerns. Regulatory controversies have centered on its impacts on , with the U.S. Agency issuing biological evaluations and proposals since 2021 to reduce risks through buffer zones, application restrictions, and use limitations, reflecting causal links between runoff exposure and population declines in sensitive taxa.

History and Development

Discovery and Synthesis

Carbaryl, systematically named 1-naphthyl N-methylcarbamate, was first synthesized in 1953 by chemist Joseph Lambrech at the Corporation as part of a targeted effort to develop novel esters from derivatives. The synthesis involved reacting with to form 1-naphthyl chloroformate, followed by amination with to yield the product, a method reflecting first-principles esterification of carbamoyl groups onto phenolic substrates for potential biological activity. This approach built on earlier explorations of carbamates as alternatives to organophosphates, prioritizing compounds with reversible enzyme interactions to address post-World War II demands for broad-spectrum insecticides amid rising pest resistance to chlorinated hydrocarbons like . The development rationale emphasized structural modifications to esters, aiming for inhibition that decarbamylates spontaneously in mammals, contrasting the irreversible by organophosphates and offering a theoretical edge through shorter duration of action. Union Carbide's internal screened variants, with carbaryl emerging from a set of six experimental carbamates designed for insecticidal potency. Early laboratory assays at confirmed carbaryl's efficacy against diverse species, demonstrating rapid knockdown and mortality attributable to cholinesterase disruption, as measured by reduced enzyme activity in exposed arthropods. These tests validated the compound's contact and stomach poison properties, establishing its potential as a versatile agent prior to scale-up considerations.

Commercial Introduction and Early Use

Carbaryl was first introduced to the commercial market in 1958 by Corporation under the trade name Sevin, marking its entry as a broad-spectrum designed for agricultural . The compound's development addressed the need for an effective alternative to organochlorine insecticides like , which were facing increasing scrutiny for persistence in the environment. Initial formulations targeted key crops such as , where it provided rapid knockdown of chewing and sucking , facilitating its quick uptake by growers seeking reliable yield protection. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) granted initial registration for carbaryl in 1959, primarily for use on , enabling widespread domestic application and setting the stage for expanded labeling on , fruits, and orchards throughout the . This period saw rapid adoption driven by the insecticide's versatility, short residual activity, and compatibility with practices emerging in post-World War II . By the early , Sevin ranked among the top three insecticides in U.S. domestic , reflecting annual usage volumes in the millions of pounds as agricultural expansion intensified demands for efficient crop protection. Early exports complemented domestic growth, with roughly half of U.S. production shipped internationally by 1972, supporting in developing regions amid rising global food production needs. Carbaryl's integration into farming practices during the aligned with broader agricultural intensification, including high-yield crop varieties and mechanized operations, where it helped mitigate losses from pests like boll weevils in and in vegetable fields, thereby bolstering output in key U.S. growing areas. Its role in early non-agricultural applications, such as turf and ornamental , further diversified its market penetration, though agricultural uses dominated initial volumes and economic impact.

Chemical Properties

Structure and Production

Carbaryl possesses the molecular C₁₂H₁₁NO₂ and is known systematically as 1-naphthyl N-methyl. Its core structure features a ring substituted at the 1-position with a methylcarbamate moiety (-OC(O)NHCH₃), where the naphthyl group provides rigidity and the carbamate linkage facilitates ester-like reactivity. Industrial production of carbaryl predominantly employs the direct reaction of with () in an organic solvent, often with a base catalyst such as triethylamine to neutralize the HCl byproduct and drive formation. This process yields carbaryl with high efficiency, typically exceeding 90% in optimized conditions, though exact industrial yields vary with scale and purification steps. The reaction proceeds via of the phenolic oxygen to the , forming the ester rapidly at moderate temperatures around 20-40°C. Historically, synthesized carbaryl via an alternative phosgene-based route involving and to form in situ, followed by reaction with ; this was phased out between 1973 and the 1980s in favor of the direct process to reduce environmental from chlorinated byproducts. Modern manufacturing incorporates advanced and to minimize impurities such as unreacted naphthol or products, ensuring technical-grade purity above 98% as per regulatory specifications. Global production capacity supports ongoing demand, with market valuations indicating sustained output in the range of thousands of metric tons annually as of 2024.

Physical and Chemical Characteristics


Carbaryl appears as a white crystalline solid. Its melting point is 142 °C, and it decomposes before boiling. The density is approximately 1.2 g/cm³ at room temperature.
Carbaryl exhibits low solubility in water, ranging from 40 to 120 mg/L at 25–30 °C, which influences its formulation and application methods. Its vapor pressure is negligible, less than 5.3 mPa at 25 °C, indicating low volatility and minimal tendency to evaporate under standard conditions. These properties contribute to its stability during storage and handling in solid forms. Chemically, carbaryl is susceptible to , with rates highly dependent on . At neutral 7, the hydrolysis half-life is 10–16 days, whereas at pH above 8, it decreases to hours or less under alkaline conditions. occurs in aqueous solutions, with a reported of 21 days under laboratory exposure to . These degradation pathways inform assessments for formulations exposed to moisture or sunlight. Common formulations include wettable powders, which disperse in for spray applications, and granules for incorporation, both leveraging carbaryl's inherent for extended shelf life when properly stored. Wettable powders maintain through inert carriers that prevent catalytic decomposition, ensuring consistent performance.

Mechanism of Action

Biochemical Interactions

Carbaryl, a methylcarbamate, interacts with (AChE) by transferring its carbamoyl group to the serine residue (Ser-203 in vertebrate AChE) at the enzyme's , forming a covalent carbamylated complex. This temporarily blocks the step in AChE's , drastically reducing the enzyme's ability to hydrolyze and causing synaptic accumulation of the , which underlies overstimulation. The reaction follows Michaelis-Menten-like kinetics, with the bimolecular rate constant (k_i) for carbamylation typically on the order of 10^4 to 10^5 M^{-1} min^{-1} in purified systems. The inhibition is reversible due to spontaneous decarbamylation, where hydrolyzes the carbamoyl-serine bond, regenerating active AChE. Decarbamylation half-lives for carbaryl-inhibited AChE range from 15 to 40 minutes , varying with , , and source; for instance, reactivation rate constants reach 1.9 h^{-1} (half-life ≈22 minutes) in AChE assays, enabling near-complete recovery within hours absent ongoing exposure. This contrasts with inhibitors, whose phosphorylated adducts undergo slower hydrolysis or aging, often exceeding days for reactivation. Empirical confirm the process's first-order dependence on the carbamylated intermediate concentration. In vitro studies reveal species-specific variations in AChE sensitivity to carbaryl, driven by differences in carbamylation efficiency and decarbamylation rates. erythrocyte AChE exhibits an IC_{50} of approximately 4.8 μM for carbaryl, comparable to values for certain AChEs (e.g., 10-30 μM in or preparations), though enzymes often show modestly higher k_i due to structural divergences in the active gorge. Selectivity partly stems from these kinetic disparities, with slower decarbamylation in target insects prolonging inhibition relative to mammals, where ancillary factors like carboxylesterase-mediated further mitigate effects; however, pure AChE assays underscore modest direct sensitivity differences across taxa.

Insecticidal Mode

Carbaryl exerts its insecticidal effects by reversibly inhibiting the enzyme (AChE) in the , through carbamylation of the enzyme's active serine residue, which prevents the breakdown of the neurotransmitter . This inhibition results in acetylcholine accumulation at synapses, leading to persistent of cells, overstimulation, blockage of , muscle spasms, , and eventual death. The process aligns with first-principles of , where unchecked synaptic activity disrupts coordinated motor functions essential for feeding, movement, and respiration. As both a contact and stomach poison, carbaryl penetrates the cuticle or is ingested, targeting a broad spectrum of pests including chewing like lepidopterous larvae, , and grasshoppers, as well as sucking pests such as and leafhoppers. Empirical dose-response studies demonstrate high potency, with topical LD50 values as low as 1 μg per and LC50 of 0.14 g active ingredient per liter for southern after 48 hours exposure, reflecting effective lethality at microgram-to-milligram doses per body weight depending on and application . Insect resistance to carbaryl has emerged through genetic mechanisms such as enhanced metabolic detoxification via elevated or activity, and target-site alterations rendering AChE less sensitive to inhibition. These adaptations, selected by repeated exposure, were first documented in various pest populations in the and have since intensified in species like and , underscoring the evolutionary pressures from intensive agricultural use.

Applications and Efficacy

Agricultural and Crop Protection Uses

Carbaryl serves as a broad-spectrum contact in , targeting chewing and sucking pests that damage foliage, fruits, and ears of major crops. It is registered for use on to control boll weevils and bollworms, apples against codling moths and , corn for earworms and armyworms, soybeans for and , and such as tomatoes and potatoes for a range of leaf-feeding including flea and . These applications prevent direct feeding damage and secondary infections, preserving marketable yield quality in high-value and staple commodities. In the United States, carbaryl is applied to millions of acres of farmland annually, with roughly 50% of treated acres dedicated to apples, pecans, and , reflecting its concentration on specialty and row crops vulnerable to episodic outbreaks. Usage patterns emphasize pre-harvest timing to align with pest life cycles, such as targeting overwintering larvae in apple orchards or mid-season adults in cotton fields. Formulations for agricultural deployment include emulsifiable concentrates, wettable powders, and dusts, predominantly applied as foliar sprays via ground boom sprayers or aerial methods in volumes of 2 to 25 gallons per acre to ensure canopy penetration. Soil drench applications occur less frequently, mainly for basal treatments in ornamentals or young transplants, but are adapted for certain field scenarios to target root-feeding pests. In programs, carbaryl functions as a selective chemical tool, deployed only upon exceeding economic thresholds established through , thereby complementing biological controls and cultural practices to curb and non-target impacts. Field trials integrating carbaryl have documented density reductions of 70-90% in treated plots, correlating with verifiable protections against losses from unchecked infestations in crops like apples and .

Non-Agricultural and Residential Applications

Carbaryl is employed in residential settings to manage pests on , home gardens, and ornamental plants, including fleas, ticks, grubs, , and spiders. Consumer products such as Sevin Insect Killer granules or are broadcast over turf areas using a spreader at rates specified on labels, typically followed by watering to activate the without runoff. Spot treatments are recommended for targeted applications, limiting coverage to infested areas to minimize material use. In outside , carbaryl functions as a labeled adulticide for mosquitoes in outdoor environments, though its adoption in municipal abatement programs remains limited. For management in residential yards and non-crop areas, granular formulations containing carbaryl are applied to foraging trails or mounds, often as part of broadcast or perimeter treatments to reduce colony activity. Forestry applications involve direct spraying of carbaryl solutions onto tree bark to deter infestations, with formulations designed for adhesion and penetration in wooded non-agricultural sites. Residential turf maintenance similarly utilizes carbaryl for broad-spectrum control of sod webworms, chinch bugs, and other turf-infesting , with products applied post-mowing for optimal efficacy on grass shorter than 3 inches.

Empirical Evidence of Effectiveness and Economic Benefits

Field trials have demonstrated carbaryl's efficacy in reducing pest damage across various crops, with applications achieving significant control of target insects and corresponding yield protections. For example, 0.2% carbaryl dust applied at intervals of 3 to 11 weeks after sowing effectively managed pests such as caterpillars and beetles, resulting in yield increases of 79.89 kg/ha compared to untreated controls. In grasshopper management on rangelands, operational-scale applications of carbaryl bait reduced treatment costs by 66% through targeted reduced-agent-area strategies while maintaining high pest mortality rates and preventing forage losses. Carbaryl's integration into IPM programs leverages its short environmental persistence, with a soil half-life of about 4 days under aerobic conditions, which limits residue buildup and facilitates rotation with other controls to delay resistance development. This property contrasts with more persistent insecticides, enabling quicker recovery of beneficial organisms and sustained ecosystem services in crop fields without long-term soil contamination. Studies confirm carbaryl's role in preventing resistance when alternated in sequences, supporting overall program longevity and efficacy in vegetables, fruits, and field crops. Economically, carbaryl contributes to averting yield losses from insect pests, which can reach 15-33% in unmanaged vegetable and horticultural production systems. In the U.S., where pests threaten up to 70% of corn yields without intervention, insecticides like carbaryl underpin broader pesticide benefits that lower production costs and boost farmer profits through enhanced crop quality and volume. Projections for scenarios excluding effective insecticides indicate substantial welfare losses in key commodities, underscoring carbaryl's value in maintaining food security and agricultural output, particularly in regions reliant on its broad-spectrum action for diverse pests. Global usage patterns reflect this, with carbaryl enabling productivity gains in developing agriculture by filling gaps where alternatives underperform.

Environmental Impacts

Toxicity to Non-Target Species

Carbaryl exhibits high to honey bees (Apis mellifera), with topical LD50 values reported as 0.24 μg/bee in laboratory tests. Oral LD50 values for bees are similarly low, at approximately 0.18 μg/bee. This places carbaryl in the highly toxic category for pollinators under standard classifications (LD50 < 2 μg/bee). In aquatic environments, carbaryl shows moderate acute toxicity to fish, with 96-hour LC50 values ranging from 0.25 mg/L for sensitive species such as to 20 mg/L for more tolerant species like catfish. Toxicity to fish varies by species, water quality parameters, and exposure duration, but values generally fall between 1 and 10 mg/L for common test species like and sunfish. Birds display low to carbaryl, classified as practically non-toxic in standardized avian tests. Oral LD50 values exceed 2000 mg/kg body weight for species including mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos), bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus), and ringneck pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Sublethal effects occur in s at concentrations below acute LC50 thresholds, including impaired growth, reduced activity, altered feeding behavior, and diminished escape responses observed in large-scale experimental pond studies with species such as southern leopard frogs (Lithobates sphenocephalus). Field and laboratory data indicate reproduction impairment, such as delayed and endocrine-related transcript changes in tadpoles exposed during specific developmental stages. profiles vary by amphibian life stage, with early larval phases showing heightened sensitivity to behavioral disruptions.
TaxonTest TypeRepresentative ValueSpecies/ExampleSource
Honey beesTopical LD500.24 μg/beeApis mellifera
Fish96-h LC500.25–20 mg/LAtlantic salmon to black bullhead
BirdsOral LD50>2000 mg/kgMallard duck, bobwhite quail
AmphibiansSublethal (behavior/growth)<3% of LC50Treefrog tadpoles (Hyla spp.)
Exposure risks to non-target differ by life stage and environmental context, with pollinators experiencing amplified contact during crop blooming due to residue on flowers.

Environmental Fate and Persistence

Carbaryl primarily degrades in through microbial , with reported half-lives ranging from 7 to 28 days under aerobic conditions, influenced by , , and microbial activity. Adsorption to limits deep , with Koc values typically 100-300 indicating moderate mobility, though field dissipation can extend to 40-50 days in low-microbial environments. Volatilization losses are minimal due to low (approximately 5 × 10^{-5} mmHg at 25°C). In aquatic environments, carbaryl undergoes rapid photolysis upon exposure to sunlight, with half-lives of 2-21 days depending on pH and irradiation intensity; at neutral pH (7), hydrolysis contributes to a 10-16 day half-life, accelerating to hours at pH >8 but persisting over 400 days at pH 6. Microbial degradation further reduces concentrations in surface waters, often within days under aerobic conditions. Carbaryl exhibits low bioaccumulation potential, characterized by a log Kow of 2.36 and factors (BCF) of 14-75 in , insufficient for significant trophic . Its high water solubility (120 /L at 25°C) and moderate adsorption promote runoff during rainfall events, as evidenced by monitoring in agricultural watersheds like those in and , where detections in surface waters correlate with application timing and storm flows. The primary metabolite, , forms via of the ester and exhibits shorter persistence than the parent compound, degrading rapidly through further microbial oxidation or photolysis, with limited accumulation in environmental matrices. While is more toxic to certain and mollusks than carbaryl, its environmental concentrations from field applications remain below those causing acute effects in monitored systems.

Empirical Data on Ecological Effects

Field studies in watersheds have linked carbaryl runoff from agricultural and forestry applications to elevated mortality in endangered salmonids, with detections exceeding 0.1 μg/L correlating to behavioral impairments and reduced smolt survival in species like and . However, these associations are critiqued for confounding variables, including concurrent exposures to other pesticides, urban pollutants, and hydrological factors that amplify transport but obscure direct causality in observational data. High-exposure field scenarios, such as aerial spraying near apiaries, have resulted in acute honeybee losses, with documented die-offs exceeding 50% in untreated within 48 hours of overspray events due to carbaryl's contact toxicity (LD50 ≈ 0.2-0.6 μg/). Sublethal residues in and further impair larval development and , contributing to winter attrition rates up to 30% in affected apiaries, though integrated mitigation like buffer zones reduces incidence in controlled agricultural settings. Ecological modeling by the U.S. EPA yields risk quotients (RQ) >1 for over 1,000 federally listed terrestrial and aquatic species, indicating potential acute risks to endangered and vertebrates under modeled peak exposures from labeled uses, with RQ calculated as estimated environmental concentration divided by effect . These quotients highlight vulnerabilities in prey-dependent taxa, such as RQ values of 2.5-10 for aquatic macro in runoff simulations. Carbaryl's rapid degradation—half-life of 4-5 days in aerobic and 10-16 days in under field conditions—enables recovery, with experiments showing invertebrate community rebounding to 80-90% of baseline within 2-4 weeks post-application, unlike persistent alternatives like with multi-year residues. This transience mitigates chronic disruption in buffered applications, as evidenced by minimal long-term shifts in benthic diversity in monitored streams following single events.

Human Health Effects

Acute and Chronic Toxicity

Carbaryl induces acute toxicity in humans primarily via reversible inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), resulting in cholinergic overstimulation. Symptoms manifest rapidly after significant exposure, typically through ingestion or dermal absorption, and include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, excessive salivation, lacrimation, pinpoint pupils, blurred vision, dizziness, headache, muscle fasciculations, weakness, and sweating. In severe cases, particularly from misuse or accidental high-dose ingestion exceeding 50-100 mg/kg body weight, respiratory distress, seizures, and coma may occur, though such outcomes are rare due to the compound's relatively short duration of action compared to organophosphates. Human case reports document mild to moderate effects at estimated absorbed doses of 0.5-5 mg/kg, with cholinesterase inhibition serving as a sensitive biomarker; plasma AChE depression of 20-50% correlates with early symptoms, while red blood cell AChE inhibition exceeding 50% indicates higher risk.90837-5/fulltext) The U.S. EPA classifies carbaryl's acute oral toxicity as moderate (Category II, LD50 ≈ 250-500 mg/kg in rats, extrapolated to humans), with dermal and inhalation routes lower (Categories III-IV). For acute dietary risk assessment, the EPA derives a population-adjusted dose (PAD) from a (NOAEL) of 1 mg/kg/day in a developmental neurotoxicity study, where maternal effects included reduced body weight gain and offspring AChE inhibition at higher doses; this NOAEL incorporates a 10-fold uncertainty factor for interspecies and . Recovery from acute effects is generally prompt upon removal from exposure and supportive care, such as atropine administration to counteract muscarinic symptoms, due to carbaryl's rapid metabolism via and oxidation. Chronic toxicity from carbaryl exposure in humans is characterized by low incidence of persistent effects in occupational cohorts, where monitored applicators show transient AChE inhibition but minimal evidence of cumulative organ damage at typical exposure levels below 0.1 mg/kg/day. reveal dose-dependent effects including hepatic , renal tubular changes, and reproductive alterations (e.g., reduced in ) at dietary concentrations exceeding 10-30 mg/kg/day over 1-2 years, with NOAELs of 1-5 mg/kg/day in chronic feeding trials; these findings underpin the EPA's chronic reference dose (RfD) of 0.1 mg/kg/day, applying uncertainty factors to the rat NOAEL for liver/ . Epidemiological data from agricultural workers, including over 12,000 monitored cases, indicate rare progression to neuropathy or other long-term sequelae, with most resolving upon exposure cessation; one documented case of subacute involved excessive long-term dermal contact leading to persistent weakness and cognitive deficits, reversible after months of abstinence. 90837-5/fulltext) Overall, chronic risks remain below thresholds in regulated use, contrasting higher-dose animal models, though sensitive subpopulations (e.g., children) exhibit greater AChE sensitivity.

Exposure Routes and Risk Assessments

Human exposure to carbaryl primarily occurs through dermal contact and incidental oral ingestion during occupational handling and application, with inhalation contributing minimally due to low volatility. Dermal absorption is slower than oral but remains significant for handlers without barriers, as carbaryl penetrates skin at rates supporting detectable urinary metabolites post-exposure. Dietary exposure via food residues is negligible, with USDA Pesticide Data Program (PDP) monitoring from 2016 onward detecting carbaryl in less than 1% of samples across commodities like apples, and average residue levels below 0.01 mg/kg when present, far under established maximum residue limits. Probabilistic risk assessments based on empirical field data indicate low human health risks, with margins of exposure (MOE) exceeding 100 for typical occupational scenarios involving dermal and oral routes after accounting for measured application rates and behaviors. Biomonitoring studies of applicators show urinary 1-naphthol (the primary metabolite) levels correlating with environmental measurements, typically ranging from 10-100 µg/g creatinine during active use without exceeding acute reference doses when standard practices are followed. For instance, greenhouse workers handling carbaryl exhibited absorbed doses below occupational exposure limits in most cases, with probabilistic models confirming risk quotients under 0.1 for non-cancer effects. Farmworkers represent a vulnerable due to repeated handling, yet (PPE) such as chemical-resistant gloves and coveralls reduces dermal exposure by 70-90% in field validations, lowering overall absorbed doses and urinary levels accordingly. Empirical data from applicator cohorts demonstrate that consistent PPE use maintains results within safe thresholds, emphasizing its role in mitigating route-specific risks over reliance on hypothetical maxima.

Carcinogenicity and Long-Term Studies

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies carbaryl as "likely to be carcinogenic to humans" based on evidence from animal studies, including increased incidence of hemangiosarcomas in male mice exposed to high doses. This classification relies primarily on rodent bioassays showing tumor formation at doses exceeding typical human exposures, with no consistent evidence of genotoxicity in standard assays. Human data, however, derive largely from occupational cohorts, where confounding factors such as co-exposures to other pesticides and lifestyle variables complicate causal attribution. The (AHS), a prospective of over 89,000 applicators in and followed since 1993, provides the most robust human evidence on carbaryl and cancer. In an updated analysis through 2017, intensive carbaryl use (e.g., >175 lifetime exposure-days) was associated with elevated relative risks (RR) for (third tertile vs. never users: RR ≈ 2.0, persisting after 5-year lag), , and suggestive increases for esophageal, tongue, and s, though trends were not always monotonic and risks attenuated at lower exposures. These findings indicate potential links in high-exposure scenarios but remain inconsistent across cancer sites and require replication, as earlier AHS phases showed null or weak associations (e.g., RR ≈ 1.1-1.5 for with lagged exposure). No large-scale meta-analyses specifically on carbaryl exist, but general reviews highlight the challenges of isolating effects amid multifactorial exposures. For dietary exposure, the EPA's 2007 assessment estimated lifetime cancer risk below 1 in 30 million, reflecting low residue levels on treated crops and rapid metabolism in humans. This contrasts with occupational risks, underscoring dose-dependency. Long-term studies on developmental and reproductive endpoints in humans are sparse and inconclusive. No direct evidence links carbaryl to birth defects or fertility impairment in population-level data, though one study of exposed workers reported sperm morphologic abnormalities and DNA damage, potentially indicating genotoxicity without establishing causality or population-level effects. Animal multigenerational studies show no reproductive toxicity at relevant doses, supporting limited human concern absent clearer epidemiological signals.

Regulatory Framework

Historical Approvals and Restrictions

Carbaryl was initially registered by the (EPA) in 1959 for use as an on , following submission of and data demonstrating of target pests with acceptable margins of safety under proposed labeling. Over the following decades, registrations expanded to over 300 products for agricultural, , and limited residential applications, supported by from field trials and residue studies showing effective without exceeding established tolerances when applied as directed. In the , EPA undertook reviews under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), including assessments of exposure monitoring from harvester field studies and poisoning incident data from 1966 to 1980, which confirmed carbaryl's safety at labeled rates for occupational users, with low incidence of adverse effects attributable to proper adherence to guidelines rather than inherent toxicity. These evaluations, incorporating pharmacokinetic and inhibition data from mammalian studies, led to retention of registrations with enhanced labeling for protective equipment, prioritizing risk mitigation through application practices over broad prohibitions. Regulatory approaches varied internationally, with the classifying carbaryl as Class II (moderately hazardous) based on acute oral toxicity metrics (LD50 of 500-5000 mg/kg in rats) and reversibility of effects in humans at therapeutic doses. In the , restrictions emerged in the early 2000s, culminating in the withdrawal of approvals for non-professional uses by 2006, driven by exposure modeling indicating elevated risks from misuse in home gardens and ornamentals, though agricultural applications persisted under stricter residue limits and re-evaluation protocols. Such targeted bans emphasized prevention of off-label overapplication, as evidenced by incident reports linking higher exposures to non-commercial settings, without deeming the compound unviable for controlled professional deployment.

Current Status and Recent Actions (as of 2025)

As of October 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues its registration review of carbaryl, with the Interim Registration Review Decision scheduled for completion in late 2025. This process incorporates assessments of risks to , including amendments to certain product registrations to mandate mitigations aimed at reducing potential adverse effects from labeled uses. In January 2025, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service released a draft Biological Opinion on carbaryl, proposing specific measures to avoid jeopardy to listed species and adverse modification of critical habitats, alongside risk reduction strategies for application sites. The EPA extended the public comment period on this draft beyond the initial February 6, 2025, deadline to allow broader input. In April 2025, the EPA announced implementation of protective actions informed by this opinion, such as label modifications for agricultural applications, while permitting continued use under revised conditions. No nationwide ban on carbaryl exists in the United States as of 2025, with over 60 products containing the remaining registered for various uses, including . At the level, California's of proposed in early 2025 to designate most carbaryl products as restricted materials, necessitating permits for purchase and use except for agricultural baits, as part of enhanced oversight. The continues routine surface water monitoring for pesticides, including carbaryl, to evaluate environmental compliance and impacts.

Controversies and Debates

Environmental and Advocacy Perspectives

Environmental advocacy organizations, such as Beyond Pesticides and allied groups including beekeepers and farmworker representatives, have urged the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to terminate all registrations of carbaryl due to its risks to pollinators and aquatic species. In a 2005 petition, fifteen such organizations highlighted carbaryl's acute toxicity to honeybees and its potential role in exacerbating colony stresses, advocating for immediate phase-out in favor of non-chemical or biological alternatives like Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and neem-based products, which exhibit lower non-target impacts. These groups emphasize a precautionary approach, arguing that unresolved data gaps on chronic sublethal effects justify restrictions even absent definitive causal links to phenomena like colony collapse disorder. Regarding aquatic ecosystems, environmental NGOs including the Pesticide Action Network (PAN) and have litigated against EPA approvals of carbaryl, contending that runoff contaminates waterways and endangers listed populations. A 2009 federal court ruling, influenced by such advocacy, mandated EPA consultations under the Endangered Species Act, finding carbaryl's use likely to jeopardize 22 salmonid species through direct toxicity and habitat degradation. Critics from these organizations describe carbaryl as part of a broader "toxic legacy" of insecticides persisting from the post-World War II era, with media coverage in outlets aligned with environmental causes amplifying narratives of widespread ecological harm from applications onward. affiliates have echoed these concerns in fact sheets, portraying carbaryl's persistence in sediments and as threats to , while pushing for over synthetic reliance.

Agricultural and Economic Counterarguments

Agricultural producers and industry representatives argue that carbaryl remains indispensable in (IPM) programs, particularly for crops where alternatives are ineffective or unavailable due to pest or timing constraints. For instance, in production in , which accounts for 96% of national carbaryl use on the crop, it is applied to 48% of acres to control beetles, cutworms, and beetles during the vulnerable spear stage, where few other insecticides provide comparable efficacy without risking buildup in rotational partners. Similarly, in and fields, carbaryl targets soil-dwelling pests like cutworms and darkling on 12% and 32% of acres, respectively, preventing stand failures and yield reductions that alternatives fail to address adequately. In Canadian apple orchards, it serves as the primary chemical thinner, optimizing fruit set and size with no registered substitutes, thereby supporting through mode-of-action . Empirical data underscore carbaryl's role in safeguarding yields against substantial losses from uncontrolled pests. U.S. assessments indicate it protects against significant reductions in crop stands and quality for specialty like tomatoes and melons, where and damage can otherwise compromise entire harvests. As a plant growth regulator in apples, applied to 27% of (110,000 annually at 1.5 lbs per ), it enhances fruit uniformity and reduces the need for labor-intensive hand-thinning, directly boosting marketable output. In broader applications, such as control in rangelands, reduced-dose carbaryl formulations have demonstrated superior economic returns compared to standard treatments, minimizing treatment costs while preserving for . These benefits counter claims of redundancy by highlighting its targeted efficacy in scenarios where non-chemical or alternative controls fall short. From an economic standpoint, carbaryl delivers high returns on , with users deriving 3 to 24 dollars in benefits per dollar spent on agricultural through prevented losses and improved crop value. Discontinuation could result in 1-4% net declines for apple growers reliant on its function, alongside escalated labor and alternative chemical costs that exceed carbaryl's application expenses. Nationally, its annual use of 586,000 pounds across 405,000 acres supports productivity in high-value sectors, contributing to by averting yield shortfalls that would otherwise drive up commodity prices and strain global supplies. Industry analyses emphasize that such tools have historically enabled stable output amid rising pressures, arguing that overly restrictive measures risk undermining farm viability without commensurate gains elsewhere.

Scientific and Risk-Benefit Disputes

Scientific disputes surrounding carbaryl center on the reliability of predictive models for ecological impacts, particularly those assessing risks to . Laboratory-based extrapolations often overestimate field effects by assuming constant exposure levels and ignoring natural recovery dynamics, as evidenced by empirical observations of rapid rebound in non-target post-application. For instance, studies on communities in treated agricultural fields demonstrate that while initial toxicity occurs, populations recover within three weeks due to from untreated areas and reduced pressure, contradicting models that project long-term population declines without accounting for such . Methodological critiques highlight flaws in Endangered Species Act biological evaluations, where probabilistic assessments deem 97% of listed species adversely affected based on worst-case scenarios, yet fail to integrate site-specific mitigation data or observed field tolerances, leading to calls for hybrid modeling incorporating real-world variability over purely lab-derived thresholds. On human carcinogenicity, cohort data from the Agricultural Health Study (), involving over 89,000 pesticide applicators, reveal no overall cancer risk elevation from carbaryl exposure after adjusting for confounders such as , other pesticide use, and farming practices. While some analyses suggest associations with specific sites like or at high cumulative exposures (>175 days), these findings are attenuated when lagging exposure to account for disease and controlling for co-exposures to nitrosatable compounds or DNA-damaging agents common in agricultural settings. Recent updates from the indicate potential links to aggressive or cancers, but critics note persistent from unmeasured factors and the study's reliance on self-reported use, underscoring the need for mechanistic studies to distinguish causal effects from correlated exposures rather than deeming carbaryl inherently carcinogenic based on equivocal data. Risk-benefit evaluations emphasize carbaryl's role in , where low dietary and occupational exposure levels—often below thresholds of concern in monitored agricultural scenarios—yield substantial net reductions in crop losses from pests like codling moths and Colorado potato beetles. Empirical assessments by regulatory bodies conclude negligible human health risks under labeled use, with environmental benefits from targeted applications outweighing localized impacts when mitigations like buffer zones and application timing are implemented, as demonstrated by registrant-agreed label amendments that minimize runoff without broad prohibitions. These approaches support nuanced regulations favoring adaptive strategies, such as those in draft biological opinions, over blanket restrictions that ignore evidence of ecological recovery and the pesticide's efficacy in sustaining yields with minimal alternatives for certain pests.

References

  1. [1]
    Carbaryl | C12H11NO2 | CID 6129 - PubChem - NIH
    Carbaryl can cause cancer according to The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It can cause developmental toxicity, female reproductive toxicity and male ...Missing: discovery | Show results with:discovery
  2. [2]
    Carbaryl (EHC 153, 1994) - INCHEM
    Molecular formula: C12H11N02 Common name: Carbaryl (BSI) CAS chemical name: 1-naphthalenylmethylcarbamate (9CI) CAS registry number: 63-25-2 RTECS registry ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Carbaryl | EPA
    Carbaryl is an insecticide used on a variety of crops. Acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term) occupational exposure of humans to carbaryl has been ...
  4. [4]
    Carbaryl Fact Sheet - National Pesticide Information Center
    Carbaryl is practically non-toxic or slightly toxic to birds, and slightly to moderately toxic to mammals. However, it is moderately to highly toxic to fish and ...Missing: discovery | Show results with:discovery
  5. [5]
    Aquatic Life Criteria - Carbaryl | US EPA
    Carbaryl is an insecticide belonging to the N-methyl carbamate class of pesticides. After contact with or ingestion by aquatic organisms, the toxic mode of ...
  6. [6]
    Final National Level Listed Species Biological Evaluation for Carbaryl
    In March 2021, EPA released the final Biological Evaluation (BE) assessing risks to listed species from labeled uses of carbaryl. Listed species refers to ...
  7. [7]
    EPA Announces Multiple Actions to Protect Endangered Species ...
    Apr 9, 2025 · Carbaryl is an insecticide used on a variety of crops, including ... carbaryl. The NMFS and FWS biological opinions were issued after ...
  8. [8]
    EPA Proposes Improved Mitigation for Insecticide Carbaryl ...
    Dec 1, 2022 · EPA proposed measures to improve protections for human health and the environment, including endangered species, from exposures to the ...
  9. [9]
    The Rise and Decline of Temik - jstor
    Sep 27, 1985 · In 1953 Joseph Lambrech of the Union. Carbide Company invented the first ma- jor carbamate, Sevin, known generically as carbaryl. Because it ...
  10. [10]
    Aspects of Pesticidal Uses of Carbaryl on Man and the Environment
    Carbaryl is the common name for the active ingredient 1- naphthyl methylcarbamate. I.A. Synthesis Carbaryl is manufactured by the two processes described in ...
  11. [11]
    Pest management with natural products [1 ed.] 0841229007, 978-0 ...
    He asked his colleague Joseph Lambrech to make “six novelty carbamates” of which one was carbaryl (Sevin) (Figure 2) (6). Although this compound lacked ...
  12. [12]
    Carbaryl (Ref: UC 7744) - AERU - University of Hertfordshire
    Introduction & key dates. 1958, introduced by Union Carbide; 2007, withdrawn EU. Example manufacturers & suppliers of products using this active now or ...
  13. [13]
    Sevin: A Controversial Insecticide | Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
    We do know that carbaryl is quite toxic to honey bees, certain beneficial insects such as lady beetles, and parasitic wasps and bees, certain species of aquatic ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    Carbaryl | C12H11NO2 - ChemSpider
    Molecular formula: C12H11NO2. Average mass: 201.225. Monoisotopic mass: 201.078979. ChemSpider ID: 5899. Double-bond stereo. Wikipedia. Download .mol
  16. [16]
    Carbaryl - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    In the next step, methyl isocyanate was reacted with alpha-naphthol to produce carbaryl. The alternative route involves first reacting phosgene with alpha- ...
  17. [17]
    Synthesis and testing of the insecticide carbaryl - ACS Publications
    Carbaryl, 1-naphthyl-N-methylcarbamate, is synthesized from alpha-naphthol and triethylamine.<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Chapter: 5 MIC and Pesticide Production at the Institute Plant ...
    At the time the present study was initiated, it appeared that a modified MIC process for the synthesis of carbaryl would be restarted at the Institute plant.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] FAO SPECIFICATIONS AND EVALUATIONS
    The material shall consist of carbaryl, together with related manufacturing impurities, and shall be a white to cream-coloured crystalline powder, free from ...Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution
  20. [20]
    Carbaryl Market Size, Share, Insights & Forecast
    Rating 4.2 (77) Carbaryl Market size was valued at USD 1.2 Billion in 2024 and is forecasted to grow at a CAGR of 5.2% from 2026 to 2033, reaching USD 1.8 Billion by 2033. The ...Missing: volume | Show results with:volume<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    ICSC 0121 - CARBARYL - INCHEM
    Melting point: 142°C Density: 1.2 g/cm³. Solubility in water, g/100ml at 30°C: 0.004-0.012 (very poor) Vapour pressure at 20°C: negligible. Flash point: 193-202 ...
  22. [22]
    CARBARYL - EXTOXNET PIP
    Melting Point: 142 C [10]; Vapor Pressure: <5.3 mPa @ 25 C [10]; Partition Coefficient: Not Available; Adsorption Coefficient: 300 [10]. Exposure Guidelines ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life
    The rate of hydrolysis for carbaryl is highly influenced by pH. At pH 7 the half-life of carbaryl is 10-16 days, at pH above 8 the half-life is in the range.Missing: photodegradation | Show results with:photodegradation
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Carbaryl - National Pesticide Information Center
    $$ Carbaryl is degraded by photolysis in water, with a half-life of 21 days (22). $ Scientists observed that carbaryl in river water (pH 7.3 - 8), exposed to ...Missing: photodegradation | Show results with:photodegradation
  25. [25]
    US3535423A - Wettable powder pesticide concentrate
    Many of the mineral carriers catalytically decompose certain of the active ingredients and therefore must be deactivated to assure product stability.
  26. [26]
    Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors: Pharmacology and Toxicology - PMC
    The mechanism of carbamates induced inhibition of CESs is similar to the mechanism of hydrolysis of the enzyme natural substrates. The additional step is the ...
  27. [27]
    Characterization of acetylcholinesterase inhibition and energy ...
    Carbaryl is regarded as a reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor toward Daphnia magna. The overall inhibition rate of carbaryl is about 30 times lower than ...
  28. [28]
    Reversible inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by carbamates or ...
    Given a decarbamylation half-life of 15–30 min (Eckert et al., 2006b), 5% of active enzyme will appear in 1.1–2.2 min, respectively, a period that will almost ...
  29. [29]
    (PDF) Review Article - ResearchGate
    Sep 4, 2022 · safety when compared with others. Fortunately, the half-life for decarbamylation has been calculated to be 30-40. minutes. However, it is ...
  30. [30]
    Comparative Inhibition of Rodent and Human Erythrocyte ...
    Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition is a common measure of carbamate toxicity. ... bimolecular rate constants (Ki) are quite similar between species and ...
  31. [31]
    Pharmacological Actions of Carbamate Insecticides at Mammalian ...
    Carbamate insecticides, used industrially and domestically, are acutely toxic to insects and mammals due to reversible inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) ...
  32. [32]
    Carbaryl - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Methylcarbamate pesticides are toxic to insects and to vertebrates via reversible inhibition of cholinesterase. Toxicity is due to buildup of excessive amounts ...
  33. [33]
    Chapter VI: Insect Management - Aggie Horticulture
    It acts as both a contact and stomach poison to insects. It is slow acting, and in the presence of sun and air, its effectiveness is lost within a week after ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Molecular Structure - Carbaryl - EPA OSC Response
    Carbaryl is the common name for the chemical 1-naphthyl methylcarbamate (1). C Carbaryl belongs to a class of pesticides known as carbamates (2). C ...
  35. [35]
    Carbaryl: A Review of Its Use Against Bark Beetles in Coniferous ...
    Our objective was to encapsulate carbaryl's 30-yr history of successes and limitations against these beetles and to present appropriate safety and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Insecticide Resistance: Causes and Action Mode of ... - USDA NIFA
    Genetics and intensive application of insecticides are responsible for the rapid development of resistance in many insects and mites. Selection by an ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Mechanisms of Insecticide Resistance - The Bovine Practitioner
    The development of resistance is a product of the persistence of resistant (R) genes in the species genome and the interaction of these genes through a variety ...Missing: carbaryl timeline
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Carbaryl Summary Uses Health Effects Risks - Regulations.gov
    Carbaryl is used in agriculture to control pests on terrestrial food crops, including fruit and nut trees (e.g., apples, pears, almonds, walnuts, and citrus), ...
  39. [39]
    Carbaryl - National Pesticide Information Center
    Mar 1, 2016 · It is commonly used to control aphids, fire ants, fleas, ticks, spiders, and many other outdoor pests. Many carbaryl products can be used on ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Carbaryl - P65Warnings.ca.gov
    Agricultural and commercial insecticides containing carbaryl are used on many plants and crops, including corn, soybeans, vegetables, and fruit and nut trees. ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Carbaryl: National and State Summary Use and Usage Matrix 1
    Feb 27, 2020 · In terms of total acres treated, approximately 50% of the acres treated with carbaryl are planted with three crops (apples, pecans, and ...
  42. [42]
    Carbaryl IRED Facts
    ... use include apples, pecans, grapes, alfalfa, oranges, and corn. Crops with the highest percent of acres treated include asparagus, okra, cranberries, apples ...Missing: USA | Show results with:USA
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Carbaryl 4L - CDMS.net
    Aerial Application: For adequate distribution, use at least 10 gallons of spray mixture per acre for application to tree and orchard crops or at least 2 gallons ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] commercial grounds maintenance insect control - UGA Extension
    carbaryl 4lb/gal L. 5 oz/gal. Other carbaryl formulations available. ... Can be used as a soil/basal drench or foliar spray. Make application after ...
  45. [45]
    Tree Fruit Spray Guide - Insecticides
    Carbaryl is highly effective in codling moth and Japanese beetle control. It is somewhat effective on several other insects, including aphids and leafrollers.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Carbaryl | USDA Forest Service
    Jan 5, 2007 · ... Carbaryl is an insecticide that kills insects by inhibiting the activity of acetylcholinesterase. (AChE), an enzyme that is important in the ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Sevin Lawn Insect Granules 10lb v3 copy - Unilog
    Apply this product directly to the lawn, home perimeter, or garden area. Water treated area as directed on this label. Do not water to the point of run-off. Do ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Fire Ant Control: The Two-Step Method and Other Approaches
    Acephate and carbaryl take about one day, while granular fipronil may take four to six weeks to eliminate colonies. Hot water, pyrethrins, and d-limonene ...Missing: non- | Show results with:non-
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Sevin 16oz Concentrate Label v20 - GardenTech
    Sevin® Insect Killer Concentrate per gallon of water per 250 sq ft area. For best results, apply after mowing (lawn should not be longer than 3 inches at the.Missing: residential | Show results with:residential
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    Efficacy of Different Concentrations on Sevin Dust Against Red ...
    Carbaryl at 0.2 percent applied 3, 5, 9 and 11 weeks after sowing provided the most effective control of both pests and increased the yield (79.89 kg ha–1) ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Field and Economic Evaluation of Operational Scale Reduced Agent ...
    Total treatment costs were reduced by 38% with malathion and 66% with carbaryl. Economic analysis showed the greatest benefit/cost ratio in 1997 was.
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Carbaryl - Canada.ca
    Mar 31, 2016 · Carbaryl is used on both agricultural and non-agricultural sites including feed crops, industrial oil seed and fibre crops, livestock, ...
  54. [54]
    Economic Effect of Insect Pest Management Strategies on Small ...
    Adoption of conventional threshold-based insect pest management by small-scale producers has the potential to increase production efficiency and value, as well ...
  55. [55]
    The Economic Benefits of Pesticides to Farmers & Society
    May 21, 2025 · One of the central tenets to producing crops is the control of pests that, when left unchecked, can reduce corn yields by up to 70%.Missing: carbaryl savings
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Pesticide Use in U.S. Agriculture: 21 Selected Crops, 1960-2008
    Pesticide use grew rapidly from 1960 to 1981, then slightly decreased to 516 million pounds in 2008.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Economic and pest management evaluation of the withdrawal of ...
    Dec 10, 2019 · Provided that alternatives paired with non-chemical management tools can control these and other pests so that there is no yield loss, the ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Acute toxicity of Neonicotinoids and Carbamete on Honey Bee Apis ...
    The. LD50 of clothianidin was 0.034Mg/bee. The LD50 values for imidacloprid and carbaryl were 0.085 and 0.243 Mg/ bee respectively (Table 2). Table 2. LD50 of ...
  59. [59]
    Carbaryl (HSG 78, 1993) - INCHEM
    PRODUCT IDENTITY AND USES 1.1 Identity Common name: Carbaryl Chemical structure: CHEMICAL STRUCTURE 1 Molecular formula: C12H11NO2 Common name: Carbaryl ...
  60. [60]
    A retrospective analysis of honey bee (Apis mellifera) pesticide ... - NIH
    Apr 7, 2022 · All available LD50 data, provided in S1 Table, were classified as either highly toxic (LD50 ≤ 2 μg/bee), moderately toxic (2 < LD50 < 11 μg/bee) ...Missing: exact | Show results with:exact
  61. [61]
    Carbaryl - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A variety of other carbamates were developed and marketed throughout the 1960s and 1970s. Examples include aldicarb, carbofuran, and carbosulfan (Baron, 1991).Missing: volumes | Show results with:volumes
  62. [62]
    [PDF] SAFETY DATA SHEET DREXEL CARBARYL 4L INSECTICIDE ...
    Mar 22, 2021 · Ecotoxicity: •. Moderate to highly toxic to fish. Extremely toxic to aquatic and estuarine invertebrates. Highly toxic to bees.
  63. [63]
    Effects of an insecticide on amphibians in large-scale experimental ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · Carbaryl exposure led to reduced survival as well as sublethal effects on growth, activity and feeding behavior, escape response swimming ...
  64. [64]
    Specific time of exposure during tadpole development influences ...
    Carbaryl acts as an endocrine disruptor later in tadpole development. Exposure at 16 weeks posthatching resulted in tail and brain transcript changes.
  65. [65]
    Tadpole swimming performance and activity affected by acute ...
    Acute exposure to sublethal toxicants such as carbaryl may not only affect immediate survival of tadpoles but also impact critical life history functions and ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Final Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment for Carbaryl ...
    Carbaryl can cause AChE inhibition (i.e., overstimulation of the nervous system) in humans resulting in nausea, headache, dizziness, anxiety, and mental ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] HOW LONG DO INSECTICIDE RESIDUES PERSIST?
    Carbaryl has a soil half-life of 7-28 days; plant surface residues (unspecified levels) usually last less than 14 days. • Microbial insecticides are those which ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] 98-1 Hazard Assessment of the Insecticide Carbaryl to Aquatic Life ...
    Hazards from carbaryl to aquatic life in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River system were assessed by comparing expected toxic effects with carbaryl concentrations ...
  69. [69]
    Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Carbaryl - epa nepis
    Three sources of water monitoring data that were considered in the carbaryl ... This study evaluated watersheds collecting potential surface water runoff ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] and 1-naphthol Concentrations in Willapa Bay Sediments
    While carbaryl itself is toxic to crustaceans, 1-naphthol is more toxic to fish, mollusks, and starfish than to crustaceans (Stewart et al., 1967).
  71. [71]
    Toxicity of carbaryl and 1-naphthol to four species of freshwater fish
    Sep 22, 1981 · Abstract. The toxicity of the carbamate insecticide carbaryl (Seven√) and its metabolite, 1-naphthol, to four species of fish was studied.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Biological Opinion on Pesticides Containing Carbaryl, Carbofuran ...
    Apr 20, 2009 · This Opinion assesses the effects of all pesticides containing carbaryl, carbohran, or inethomyl on 28 listed Pacific salmonids.
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Pesticide Contamination of Waters and Solutions to Protect Pacific ...
    Pesticides have profound effects on salmon and may be a serious factor in their decline. Pesticides can directly harm fish by killing them outright or by ...
  74. [74]
    Honey Bee Exposure to Pesticides: A Four-Year Nationwide Study
    To investigate honey bee exposure to pesticides, 168 pollen samples and 142 wax comb samples were collected from colonies within six stationary apiaries in six ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] aquatic life ambient water quality criteria for carbaryl - 2012 - EPA
    Carbaryl (1-naphthyl-N-methylcarbamate; C12H22NO2, CAS #63-25-2) is an insecticide, a molluscide, and is used to thin fruit in orchards, and it belongs to the N ...
  76. [76]
    Testing effects of pesticides on macroinvertebrate communities in ...
    Jan 24, 2019 · Carbaryl is a fast degrading toxicant and the calculated half-life of 38.3 h for dissolved carbaryl in all stream mesocosms is in accordance ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] chemicalWATCHFactsheet - Beyond Pesticides
    Regulatory History​​ Carbaryl (SevinTM) is said by EPA to be “ one of the most widely applied insecticides in the US,” since use began in 1959, with 10-15 ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Carbaryl. Human Health Assessment Scoping Document in Support ...
    Aug 26, 2010 · Carbaryl is moderately toxic by the oral route (Tox. Category II); but the acute dermal and inhalation toxicities are low (Tox. Categories III ...<|separator|>
  79. [79]
    Carbaryl (PIM 147) - INCHEM
    ... Molecular formula: C12H11NO2 Molecular weight: 201.22 3.3 Physical properties 3.3.1 Colour White to greyish 3.3.2 State/Form Solid-crystals 3.3.3 ...
  80. [80]
    carbaryl - GulfLINK
    In cases of occupational overexposure to carbaryl, mild symptoms are observed long before a dangerous dose is absorbed, which is why severe cases of ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Carbaryl (1-naphthyl methylcarbamate)
    Jun 23, 2014 · exposure to the pesticide chemical residue" for currently registered uses (USEPA, 2007a). ... toxicity of 10 pesticides using the mouse-sperm ...
  82. [82]
    Pesticide data program: 30 years of food residue data and trends
    Oct 30, 2022 · Carbaryl was detected in less than 1% of the 2016 apple samples, far below its 1994 level of 21%. PDP data suggest that fludioxonil replaced ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] PDP 2023 Annual Summary - Agricultural Marketing Service
    This Annual Summary report shows that when pesticide residues are found on foods, they are nearly always at levels below the tolerance, or maximum amount of a ...
  84. [84]
    Correlation of environmental carbaryl measurements with serum ...
    For the farmer applicator, the environmental levels of carbaryl would have been sufficient to determine that an exposure had occurred. However, biological ...Missing: biomonitoring | Show results with:biomonitoring
  85. [85]
    Assessment of absorbed doses of carbaryl and associated health ...
    Objective: This study was undertaken to estimate the absorbed doses of carbaryl and the associated health risks in a group of horticultural greenhouse workers ...Missing: quotients oral
  86. [86]
    Critical review of the role of PPE in the prevention of risks related to ...
    Goal: To review the scientific literature on protective clothing and their efficiency to reduce pesticide exposure. The review includes four areas: legislation ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Preventing Skin Exposure to Pesticides among Apple Growers and ...
    The effectiveness of PPE and PC in particular in reducing exposure in real exposure and work situations has not been fully established. The PC available in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  88. [88]
    Carbaryl use and incident cancer in the Agricultural Health Study
    Jun 27, 2025 · We provide novel evidence of associations between carbaryl exposure and specific cancers. There is a need for additional studies to confirm these findings.
  89. [89]
    Carbaryl use and incident cancer in the Agricultural Health Study
    In 2004, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classified carbaryl as “likely to be carcinogenic in humans,” based primarily on experimental studies ...
  90. [90]
    A Review of Pesticide Exposure and Cancer Incidence in the ... - NIH
    We reviewed epidemiologic evidence related to occupational pesticide exposures and cancer incidence in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) cohort.
  91. [91]
    Genotoxic Effects on Spermatozoa of Carbaryl-Exposed Workers
    Our findings suggested that carbaryl might induce morphologic abnormalities and genotoxic defects of spermatozoa among exposed workers.Missing: developmental | Show results with:developmental
  92. [92]
    Carbaryl: Decision Document - epa nepis
    ------- C. Regulatory History Carfaaryl was first registered for use in 1959 as an insecticide on cotton. With subsequent registrations, the total number of ...
  93. [93]
    Harvester Exposure Monitoring Field Studies (1980-1986) Volume 2
    1984 strawberry harvesters exposed to captan (Final Report to EPA, 1982) and carbaryl (Carbaryl Report to EPA, 1983). It also appears that vinclozolin ...
  94. [94]
    Banned and authorised - PAN Europe
    Table 2 presents pesticides banned or severely restricted in EU as a ... Carbaryl, Ban, Voted out 29/09/2006. Chlordane, Ban and export ban, 79/117/EEC ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Toxic Tradeoff
    The case of carbaryl illustrates. EPA's broad failure to fulfill this mission. ... Carbaryl Analysis of Risks to. Endangered and Threatened Salmon and. Steelhead.
  96. [96]
    EPA Releases Draft Biological Opinion for Carbaryl for Public ...
    Jan 7, 2025 · The draft biological opinion proposes measures to avoid jeopardy and adverse modification as well as reduce risks on carbaryl use sites.
  97. [97]
    EPA Extends Comment Period on Draft Biological Opinion for Carbaryl
    EPA released the draft biological opinion in January 2025 with a comment period that was set to close Feb. 6, 2025. EPA is extending the ...
  98. [98]
    Carbaryl Cancer Investigation - Paul LLP Trial Attorneys
    Jul 28, 2025 · The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) currently classifies carbaryl as “likely to be carcinogenic to humans.” Animal studies have shown ...Missing: classification | Show results with:classification
  99. [99]
    [PDF] DPR 19-003 Notice of Proposed Regulatory Action
    The proposed action will make all carbaryl products California restricted materials, with the exception of baits labeled only for agricultural use. SUBMITTAL OF ...
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Study 310: Surface Water Monitoring for Pesticides in Agricultural ...
    The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) has conducted annual monitoring of agricultural pesticides in surface waters throughout California since ...
  101. [101]
    [PDF] Statement of - Beyond Pesticides
    Jun 21, 2017 · Rather than adopt a precautionary approach when it comes to chemicals with unknown toxicity, EPA allows uncertainties and relies on flawed ...<|separator|>
  102. [102]
    PANNA: Sweeping Ruling Protects Salmon from Pesticides ...
    “This is a landmark decision that finally gives salmon relief from pesticides after a decade of agency inaction,” said Patti Goldman, the Earthjustice attorney ...
  103. [103]
    Poison Salmon? Sure, EPA Tells Agribusiness
    EPA's registration of pesticide products containing carbaryl and carbofuran jeopardize 22 listed Pacific salmonids and likely destroy or adversely modify the ...
  104. [104]
  105. [105]
    Carbaryl Fact Sheet - Sierra Club Canada
    Carbaryl has deleterious effects on a variety of wildlife including beneficial arthropods, birds, fish, earthworms, plants and bacteria. ... Toxicity to fish is ...Missing: discovery | Show results with:discovery<|separator|>
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Carbaryl Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision Case ...
    Nov 22, 2022 · Experimental start date May 14,2002, and termination date March 13,2003 (p. ... As part of its most recent registration decision for carbaryl, the ...
  107. [107]
    Toxic Effects of Carbaryl Exposure on Juvenile Asian Seabass ...
    Jul 10, 2024 · This pesticide plays an essential role in both increasing agricultural productivity and ensuring food security [4]. However, the extensive ...
  108. [108]
    Challenges with the current methodology for conducting ...
    Nov 17, 2022 · In that BE, the USEPA found that 97% of listed species were likely to be adversely affected including threatened and endangered aquatic ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  109. [109]
    Carbaryl exposure and incident cancer in the Agricultural Health Study
    Aug 14, 2007 · The formation of carcinogenic nitroso compounds ... Carcinogenic and cocarcinogenic studies with carbaryl following topical exposure in mice.
  110. [110]
    Carbaryl exposure and incident cancer in the Agricultural Health Study
    Oct 15, 2007 · Carbaryl was not associated with cancer risk overall. Relative to subjects who never used carbaryl, melanoma risk was elevated with >175 lifetime exposure-days.
  111. [111]
    Carbaryl use and cancer incidence in the agricultural health study
    Mar 22, 2024 · This study provides novel evidence of associations between carbaryl use, leukemia, and stomach cancer, as well as suggestive evidence of elevated risks of ...