Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Christian pacifism


Christian pacifism is the conviction within that violence, including participation in warfare, contradicts the example and commands of Jesus Christ, particularly his injunctions to love one's enemies and turn the other cheek as articulated in the (Matthew 5:38–48). This position interprets teachings, such as Romans 12:17–21 urging non-retaliation and peacemaking, as establishing a normative ethic of non-resistance to evil for believers. Emerging prominently among early Christians, who largely refused military service prior to the fourth century despite Roman persecution, pacifism waned after Emperor Constantine's conversion and the church's integration into state power, giving way to just war doctrines formulated by figures like . Revived during the 16th-century Radical Reformation by Anabaptists, who faced severe persecution for rejecting oaths, magistracy, and violence, Christian pacifism became institutionalized in historic including the , (Religious Society of Friends), and , which emphasize discipleship through nonviolent witness and communal separation from worldly powers. These groups have historically produced conscientious objectors, alternative service providers during conflicts like , and advocates for , though their stance has drawn criticism for perceived impracticality against existential threats, such as totalitarian regimes, where empirical outcomes of non-resistance often involved martyrdom or subjugation rather than deterrence. Remaining a minority perspective amid broader Christian acceptance of defensive force under just war criteria—rooted in interpretations of holy wars, Roman 13's affirmation of governing authority bearing the sword, and pragmatic realism—pacifism persists through theological emphasis on eschatological peace and the transformative power of suffering love, influencing modern nonviolent movements while contending with charges of selective biblical that overlooks divine sanction of coercion in scripture.

Definition and Principles

Core Tenets and Theological Basis

Christian pacifism maintains that in any form, including warfare, , and coercive force, contradicts the essence of discipleship to Christ. Its foundational tenets emphasize absolute non-resistance to evil, the of enemies, and the active pursuit of over retaliation. These principles reject consequentialist justifications for , asserting instead that no end, however noble, warrants harming others, as true power lies in vulnerability and rather than domination. Theological grounding derives primarily from ' ethical instructions in the , where he declares, "Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also" (:39, ESV), interpreted by pacifists as a directive against personal or institutional . This extends to the imperative to "love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you" (:44, ESV), framing enmity as an opportunity for transformative love rather than combat. Pacifists further cite the Beatitude "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called " (:9, ESV) as elevating nonviolent mediation to a hallmark of divine sonship. At its core, the position rests on : believers must imitate ' nonviolent path, exemplified by his refusal to summon legions of angels during arrest (:53) and his submission to , which pacifists view as paradigmatic triumph over evil through self-sacrificial love, not retaliation. This imitation precludes Christians from wielding the sword, echoing ' assertion that "those who live by the sword die by the sword" (:52, ESV). Early theologian (c. 185–254 AD), in Contra Celsum, reinforced this by arguing Christians contribute to imperial defense through and moral example, not military enlistment, as physical warfare conflicts with spiritual allegiance to Christ. Eschatologically, pacifism anticipates God's reign advancing through non-coercive means, as clarified, "My is not of this world. If my were of this world, my servants would have been fighting" (John 18:36, ESV), prioritizing over human instruments of force. This framework positions the as a counter-cultural community modeling ethics amid worldly conflict.

Distinction from Related Concepts

Christian pacifism fundamentally rejects all forms of warfare and violence as incompatible with the teachings and example of Christ, in contrast to the , which permits Christian participation in armed conflict provided it adheres to strict criteria such as legitimate authority, just cause, right intention, proportionality of means, and reasonable chance of success. These criteria, articulated by theologians like Augustine in the early 5th century and refined by in the 13th century, allow for defensive wars or those aimed at restoring peace, whereas pacifists argue that no war can meet such standards without violating the Sermon on the Mount's imperatives to love enemies and renounce retaliation. While both traditions seek to constrain violence—pacifism through absolute abstention and just war through regulated recourse—they diverge on whether violence can ever serve divine justice, with pacifists viewing it as a presumption against God's sovereignty over judgment. Unlike secular or general , which often rests on utilitarian, humanitarian, or rational-ethical grounds such as the futility of or , Christian pacifism derives its absolutism from theological convictions rooted in scriptural mandates and Christ's nonviolent life, positioning as antithetical to discipleship and the kingdom of . For instance, pacifists like in the or modern Anabaptist thinkers emphasize imitating ' rejection of the sword (Matthew 26:52), framing as an eschatological witness rather than a pragmatic strategy for societal reform. This ecclesial commitment extends beyond individual to communal practices of , distinguishing it from broader pacifist movements that may accommodate state or prioritize over divine imitation. Christian pacifism exceeds mere conscientious objection, which typically involves a personal refusal to bear arms or serve in combat roles—often permitting —while potentially affirming the legitimacy of itself under certain conditions. Pacifists, by contrast, oppose categorically as an institution, not just individual involvement, viewing it as a systemic that must prophetically resist rather than selectively of via legal exemptions. Historical examples, such as during who pursued total non-cooperation over accommodated service, illustrate this doctrinal depth, rooted in church covenants rather than isolated moral scruple. It also differs from nonviolent resistance movements, such as those led by Mahatma Gandhi or Martin Luther King Jr., which employ strategic confrontation, civil disobedience, and moral suasion to achieve political ends without physical harm, potentially endorsing coercive tactics like economic boycotts or mass arrests that pacifists may see as implicitly violent. Christian pacifism prioritizes non-resistance and enemy love as transformative witness, often eschewing even non-lethal force in self-defense, as evidenced by early church fathers like Tertullian (c. 200 CE) who barred soldiers from baptism altogether, in favor of suffering injustice as Christ did. This inward-focused ethic critiques activist nonviolence for risking prideful agency over surrendered trust in God's vindication.

Biblical Foundations

Pacifist Interpretations of Scripture

Pacifist interpreters emphasize teachings on and enemy love as establishing a binding ethic for Christian discipleship, viewing these as direct commands rather than mere ideals. Central to this perspective is the , where instructs followers to "not resist the one who is evil" and to "turn the other cheek" when struck (:39), prohibiting personal retaliation even under aggression. This is coupled with the command to "love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you" (:44; cf. Luke 6:27-28), extending the love ethic to adversaries and rejecting as incompatible with imitating God's impartial . Jesus' beatitude "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God" (Matthew 5:9) is read as elevating active pursuit of reconciliation over conflict resolution through force. His own example reinforces this: during his arrest, after Peter struck the high priest's servant, Jesus rebuked him, stating, "All who take the sword will perish by the sword" (Matthew 26:52), which pacifists interpret as a principled disavowal of lethal self-defense or offensive violence by disciples. Jesus' refusal to summon angelic armies or resist his execution (Matthew 26:53) further models voluntary endurance of injustice without coercion. Apostolic epistles extend these principles. Paul urges believers to "bless and do not curse" persecutors, to "repay no one evil for evil," and to "overcome evil with good" (:14, 17, 21), framing nonretaliation as essential to living peaceably amid hostility. Similarly, 1 Peter 2:21-23 cites Christ's silent suffering and entrusting himself to under unjust treatment as the pattern for slaves and all believers facing abuse. Other texts, such as 1 Corinthians 4:12-13 (cursing yet blessing persecutors) and 12:14 (pursuing peace with everyone), underscore communal nonviolence as a hallmark of holiness. Pacifists often portray the cross as the interpretive key to Scripture, where ' suffering love triumphs over evil without violence, disclosing God's noncoercive sovereignty and calling disciples to emulate this "way of the cross" (Matthew 16:24; cf. Revelation 13:10). This forms a of history in which the vindicates nonviolent faithfulness, rendering reliance on the sword antithetical to allegiance. Old Testament passages depicting divine-sanctioned violence, such as conquest narratives, are typically contextualized as preparatory for Israel's theocratic phase, superseded by ' inauguration of a nonviolent eschatological community; prophetic hopes like "they shall beat their swords into plowshares" ( 2:4) anticipate fulfillment in the church's peacemaking. Texts like :4, granting the state's sword-bearing authority, are distinguished from individual or ecclesial ethics, with pacifists arguing that Christians must prioritize ' counter-imperial servant model ( 10:42-45) over worldly power structures.

Scriptural Arguments Against Pacifism

Opponents of Christian pacifism argue that the depicts explicitly commanding wars as acts of divine judgment and justice, such as the conquest of Canaan in 6–12, where Israelite armies were instructed to destroy certain cities under direct divine mandate, indicating that lethal force can align with 's will in contexts of moral necessity rather than inherent . Similarly, Deuteronomy 20 outlines regulations for holy war, including total destruction of idolatrous nations, which pacifist interpretations often typologize as symbolic but which non-pacifists view as establishing a for retributive ordained by against unrepentant . These narratives, spanning events around 1400–1200 BCE as per traditional biblical chronology, underscore that pacifism cannot be a universal ethic without dismissing scriptural continuity, as the same who abhors (Exodus 20:13) authorizes its use by agents of His justice. In the New Testament, Romans 13:1-4 describes governing authorities as "God's servant, an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer," explicitly granting them the right to "bear the sword," a reference to capital punishment and coercive force, which implies that Christians in civil roles may participate in such functions without sin. This passage, written by Paul around 57 CE, distinguishes personal vengeance (forbidden in Romans 12:19) from state-sanctioned retribution, countering pacifist claims that all violence contradicts Christ's kingdom by affirming institutional violence as divinely instituted for societal order. Jesus' instruction in —"if you don't have a , sell your and buy one"—is cited as evidence against absolute non-resistance, suggesting preparedness for self-protection amid , especially as it follows warnings of hostility and precedes the arrest where disciples possessed two swords (). Though pacifists interpret this figuratively for prophetic fulfillment (Isaiah 53:12), non-pacifist holds that affirmed armament for defense, not aggression, as He rebuked misuse () but did not discard the weapons. Additionally, John the Baptist's counsel to soldiers in :14—"don't extort money... be content with your pay"—endorses their continued without , implying combat roles compatible with around 28 . Passages like Matthew 5:38-42 on address insults and non-lethal aggression, not defensive protection of life or innocents, as Himself drove money-changers from the with a whip (John 2:15), modeling zealous resistance to sacrilege without pacifist restraint. :1-8, part of Solomon's circa 935 BCE, declares a "time for and a time for ," reinforcing that non-violence is contextual, not categorical, against blanket pacifist readings that prioritize ethics over the full canon. These arguments collectively maintain that Scripture permits discriminate force under authority, rejecting as an overextension of to all spheres.

Historical Development

Early Church and Pre-Constantinian Era

In the first three centuries of , prior to Emperor Constantine's in 313 AD, church leaders predominantly opposed Christian participation in , citing conflicts with core teachings on non-retaliation and inherent in military practices. Early apologists emphasized ' commands in the , such as loving enemies and (Matthew 5:38-44), interpreting them as prohibiting violence. This stance was reinforced by the army's requirements for pagan oaths, sacrifices to gods, and laurel crowns symbolizing victory under imperial deities, which Christians viewed as incompatible with monotheistic worship. Tertullian, writing around 197-211 AD, articulated a firm rejection of military involvement in works like Apology and On the Crown, arguing that Christians could not swear allegiance to Caesar over Christ or engage in killing, as "Christ, in disarming Peter, disarmed every soldier." He defended a Christian soldier's refusal to wear a victory crown, asserting that military service offered no exemption from martyrdom and rivaled Christian loyalty. Similarly, Origen, in Against Celsus (c. 248 AD), countered pagan critic Celsus by explaining that Christians contributed to the empire through prayer and moral example rather than arms, fighting a spiritual battle against evil rather than physical foes. Origen maintained that bearing the sword contradicted Christian ethics, though he allowed converted soldiers to remain if they avoided bloodshed. Despite these teachings, archaeological and textual evidence indicates some Christians served in the before 313 AD, often as converts who continued prior enlistments in non-combat capacities or under lax enforcement of pagan rituals. Instances include military martyrs like Julius the Veteran (c. 304 AD), executed for refusing idolatrous practices, suggesting tolerance for existing service but prohibition on new recruits. Church discipline, as reflected in documents like the Apostolic Tradition attributed to Hippolytus (c. 215 AD), required soldiers to renounce killing or face , underscoring a normative pacifist ethic amid practical exceptions. This pre-Constantinian consensus prioritized as essential to Christian witness under persecution, viewing state violence as a pagan domain.

Imperial Christianity and Medieval Period

Following the in 313 AD, which legalized Christianity under Emperor , the faith's integration into the Roman imperial structure marked a significant departure from pre-Constantinian emphases on , as church leaders increasingly accommodated military participation to support state stability. 's conversion and policies, including his role in the in 325 AD, elevated Christianity's public role, prompting theological justifications for Christians in the legions amid ongoing barbarian threats and internal heresies. This era saw a pragmatic erosion of earlier prohibitions on killing, with figures like of praising 's Christian warfare as divinely sanctioned, though outright persisted among some ascetics. Augustine of Hippo (354–430 AD) formalized the just war tradition in works such as Contra Faustum (c. 400 AD) and The City of God (413–426 AD), arguing that wars could be morally permissible if waged by legitimate authority for defensive purposes or to correct grave wrongs, with the intent to achieve peace rather than vengeance. Augustine's framework responded to Manichaean pacifist critiques and Visigothic invasions, positing that love for neighbor could necessitate coercive force against aggressors, thereby prioritizing ordered society over absolute nonresistance. This doctrine effectively supplanted stricter nonviolent interpretations dominant before 313 AD, as evidenced by increasing Christian enlistment rates post-Theodosius I's establishment of Christianity as the state religion in 380 AD. In the medieval period, dominated ecclesiastical thought, with (1225–1274) systematizing it in (1265–1274) by specifying criteria including just cause, right intention, proportionality, and discrimination between combatants and noncombatants. The Church's endorsement of , beginning with Urban II's call at Clermont in 1095 AD, exemplified this shift, framing offensive holy wars against perceived threats like Muslim expansion as justifiable under Augustinian principles. Efforts to mitigate feudal anarchy, such as the Peace of God (c. 975 AD onward) and Truce of God (c. 1027 AD), imposed seasonal and social restrictions on violence—prohibiting attacks on clergy, pilgrims, and peasants while sparing certain days—but these were regulatory measures to preserve social order, not rejections of warfare itself. Pacifist sentiments survived marginally among dissenting groups, such as the (founded c. 1170s), who emphasized and amid persecution, though their views were deemed heretical by mainstream authorities. Overall, imperial and medieval Christianity prioritized realist governance and defense of , rendering full pacifism anomalous and often suppressed, as the institutional church allied with monarchs in conflicts like the (1075–1122 AD) and Reconquista wars.

Reformation and Modern Revivals

During the Protestant Reformation, Christian pacifism found renewed expression among the Radical Reformers, particularly the Anabaptists, who interpreted the as prohibiting all forms of violence, including self-defense, warfare, and coercive governance. The , adopted by Swiss Anabaptist leaders on February 24, 1527, codified this rejection of the sword in its seventh article, asserting that it belongs to the realm outside Christ's perfection and that believers must not wield it against any, even evildoers, as vengeance is God's alone. This stance stemmed from a direct application of ethics, viewing the magistrate's as incompatible with discipleship, in contrast to the just war endorsements by and Calvin. Anabaptist communities, such as those led by , faced execution and dispersal for these views, with over 2,000 Swiss Anabaptists killed by 1530, yet the confession influenced surviving groups' nonviolent ethos. Post-Reformation, pacifism endured marginally among Anabaptist offshoots like the Mennonites, but saw limited broader revival until the early modern era with the emergence of the Church of the Brethren in 1708, founded by Alexander Mack in Schwarzenau, Germany, which mandated baptismal vows of nonresistance and refusal of military service as core to following Christ. The Brethren's 1770 Dunkard Confession reinforced this by prohibiting oaths, magistracy, and bearing arms, drawing on Anabaptist precedents while emphasizing feet-washing and love feasts as pacific alternatives to societal violence. Similarly, the Quakers, formalized in the 1650s under George Fox, revived nonviolent testimony through their 1661 Declaration, refusing all wars and capital punishment based on Christ's command to love enemies. These groups maintained pacifism amid Enlightenment wars, with Brethren enduring fines and imprisonment during the American Revolutionary War, where approximately 1,000 faced property seizures for non-participation. In the , theological revivals reinvigorated amid and social reform, exemplified by Adin Ballou's manifesto Christian Non-Resistance, which argued from Scripture that defensive violence contradicts the and apostolic nonretaliation, advocating instead and suffering injustice. Ballou, a Universalist minister, founded the New England Non-Resistance Society in 1838 with 20 initial members, including , linking to anti-slavery without endorsing violent uprisings like John Brown's 1859 raid. This era saw pacifist principles influence peace societies, such as the American Peace Society (1828), which by 1840 claimed 50 auxiliaries and cited biblical precedents against war, though membership peaked at around 2,500 before declining amid the . The 20th century marked a significant expansion of Christian pacifism, with pacifist self-identification rising among Protestants beyond traditional , driven by reactions to industrialized warfare and totaling perhaps several million adherents by mid-century. The 1935 conference of Historic Peace Churches—, Brethren, and —formalized intergroup cooperation on , issuing statements against militarism that informed over 12,000 U.S. conscientious objectors during . Catholic contributions grew via Dorothy Day's (1933), which housed pacifist principles in voluntary poverty and opposition to both world wars, hosting 30 houses by 1941 and influencing figures like . These revivals emphasized empirical witness over abstract theory, with pacifists enduring imprisonment rates up to 80% among Brethren draftees in 1917-1918, underscoring causal links between and rejection of state violence.

Denominational and Group Adherents

Anabaptist and Mennonite Traditions

The Anabaptist movement, originating in Zurich, Switzerland, in January 1525 with the first adult baptisms led by and others, rejected and state coercion in religion, emphasizing voluntary faith and separation from worldly powers, including military service. From its inception, pacifism—termed Gewaltlosigkeit or non-resistance—formed a core principle, rooted in interpretations of the (Matthew 5:38-48) as mandating personal non-violence and forbearing evil rather than resisting it by force. Anabaptists viewed participation in warfare or magistracy as incompatible with discipleship, arguing that Christ's kingdom operates by spiritual sword (the Word) alone, not carnal weapons, and that believers must emulate his suffering servant example (; 1 Peter 2:21-23). The of 1527, drafted by and adopted by Anabaptists, codified this stance in its sixth article on "the sword," declaring that Christians cannot wield it for punishment or defense, as they are called to perfection under grace, not the fleshly ordinances of civil authority. The document explicitly prohibits Anabaptists from serving as magistrates, joining militias, or engaging in lawsuits, asserting: "All who go to war, or desire to take part in war... we say they are not aware that they are going against God." This confession, emerging amid persecution—over 2,000 Anabaptists executed by 1530 for rebaptism and non-resistance—distinguished peaceful Anabaptists from violent radicals like the of 1534-1535, which discredited the movement but prompted a pivot toward stricter non-violence. Menno Simons (1496-1561), a former Catholic priest who affiliated with Anabaptists around 1536, further systematized pacifist theology among Dutch and North German followers who became known as . In works like Foundation of Christian Doctrine (1539-1540), Simons argued that true believers renounce the sword entirely, citing Christ's rebuke to Peter (Matthew 26:52) and rejection of worldly kingdoms (John 18:36), while affirming civil government's role for non-believers under Romans 13. He condemned Münsterites as false prophets for blending faith with violence, insisting that the church's witness lies in patient suffering, community discipline, and evangelism, not coercion—principles that sustained Mennonite communities despite drownings, beheadings, and exiles, with estimates of 1,500-2,500 martyrs by 1561. The Confession of 1632, adopted by Dutch to unify doctrine amid internal debates, reinforced non-resistance in Article XIV, stating that Christians "cannot be members of the magistracy, nor hold any office or dignity therein," nor bear arms, as such roles demand oaths and force incompatible with Christ's commands to love enemies and forswear vengeance. This stance extended to refusing oaths (Article XIII) and magisterial swords, prioritizing church autonomy and mutual aid over state integration. By the 18th century, immigrants to , fleeing European wars, maintained these convictions; during the (1775-1783), thousands petitioned exemptions from militia drafts, facing fines and property seizures for non-participation. In the 20th century, Anabaptist-Mennonite pacifism manifested through conscientious objection, recognized under U.S. law since 1917. During World War I, approximately 138 Mennonites faced court-martial for refusing induction, with some imprisoned at Fort Leavenworth; in World War II, about 7,500 eligible Mennonite men opted for Civilian Public Service, performing forestry, hospital, and soil conservation work instead of combat, often at personal cost amid public suspicion. Mennonite Central Committee, founded 1940, coordinated relief efforts, embodying non-resistant service in post-war reconstruction, while upholding the tradition against police or self-defense violence, though debates persist on protective force in extreme cases like Nazi threats. Today, groups like Mennonite Church USA affirm this legacy in peacebuilding, with over 2 million global adherents prioritizing reconciliation over retaliation.

Quaker and Holiness Movements

The Religious Society of Friends, commonly known as , originated in mid-17th-century England amid religious and political turmoil, with establishing the movement around 1647–1650. A core tenet, the Peace Testimony, emerged from early Friends' interpretation of Christ's teachings, particularly the Sermon on the Mount's call to love enemies and turn the other cheek, as incompatible with violence or warfare. This conviction manifested in refusals to swear oaths, bear arms, or participate in military service, viewing such acts as denials of the indwelling "light of Christ" that compels inward transformation over outward conflict. The Testimony's formal codification occurred in 1660–1661, when Quakers presented a declaration to King Charles II stating their resolution to "live peaceably and quietly" without "fightings and wars against any men," even under threat of imprisonment or execution; over 4,000 Friends signed similar petitions by 1661, leading to widespread incarceration during subsequent conflicts like the Anglo-Dutch Wars. Rooted in empirical experiences of spiritual conviction rather than abstract philosophy, this stance persisted through the American Revolutionary War, where Quakers faced disownment or exile for neutrality, and into the 19th century, influencing abolitionism and anti-slavery efforts as extensions of nonviolent resistance. By the 20th century, Quakers' advocacy shaped legal conscientious objection in Britain (1916 Military Service Act) and the U.S. (1917 Selective Service Act), with Friends coordinating alternative service programs during both world wars, though internal debates arose over whether absolute nonviolence precluded all state cooperation. The Holiness movement, a 19th-century outgrowth of emphasizing "entire sanctification" or a eradicating sin's power, intersected with Christian pacifism through doctrines linking holy living to non-resistance and separation from worldly violence. Emerging in the 1830s–1840s via camp meetings and figures like , it spawned denominations viewing war as antithetical to the sanctified heart's purity, with military oaths or combat seen as defiling the believer's allegiance to Christ alone. Pioneering groups included the Wesleyan Methodist Connection, founded in 1843 to protest slavery and secret societies, which in 1844 declared the gospel "opposed to the practice of War in all its forms," prohibiting members from militia service or bearing arms as violations of covenant holiness. Early 20th-century Holiness bodies, such as the Church of God (Anderson, Indiana, est. 1881) and Pentecostal Assemblies of the World, similarly endorsed pacifism, with statements in 1917–1918 rejecting draft participation amid World War I; at least 12 Holiness denominations issued anti-war resolutions by 1917, framing enlistment as carnal rather than spiritual warfare. This ethic drew from Wesleyan perfectionism's causal logic: true holiness precludes killing, as evidenced by pre-WWI surveys showing over 80% of Holiness periodicals opposing military service. However, governmental coercion and cultural assimilation during 1917–1918 led most Pentecostal and larger Holiness groups to abandon formal pacifism by World War II, retaining only voluntary non-combatancy; smaller sects like the Allegheny Wesleyan Methodist Connection upheld it into the late 20th century, prioritizing scriptural literalism over national loyalty.

Other Groups Including Adventists and Jehovah's Witnesses

The upholds a non-combatant position on , permitting members to participate in supportive roles such as medical care and logistics while prohibiting the bearing of arms or direct involvement in killing. This approach, formalized since the , reflects a distinction from absolute pacifism, as Adventists affirm loyalty to civil government in defensive efforts through non-violent contributions. During , church administrators pledged resources including 178 facilities and the availability of 15,000 personnel for non-combatant duties, facilitating accommodations like observance for drafted members. Jehovah's Witnesses reject all forms of military service, including non-combat alternatives, on grounds of biblical mandates to forgo warfare and uphold political neutrality. Key scriptures invoked include Isaiah 2:4, envisioning the transformation of weapons into tools of peace, and Matthew 26:52, where instructs to return the sword to its sheath. This conviction prioritizes divine allegiance over state demands, fostering a global brotherhood that transcends national conflicts. Although their refusal aligns with pacifist outcomes, Witnesses disavow secular , framing opposition as religious duty rather than broad ethical aversion to force. Such stances have incurred ; Witnesses faced and execution for draft resistance during World War II, with thousands dispatched to concentration camps solely for non-compliance. Other denominations, including , exhibit comparable non-participation in armed forces, though individual and communal interpretations vary from strict refusal to selective exemption claims.

Applications in Conflict

World Wars and Conscientious Objection

During , approximately ,000 men in registered as conscientious objectors, with a significant portion motivated by Christian pacifist convictions rooted in biblical prohibitions against killing, such as . , adhering to their testimony against war, actively opposed the Military Service Act of 1916 introducing , with many young members applying for exemption and facing tribunals that often demanded proof of sincerity through alternative service or imprisonment. In the United States, the permitted exemptions for religious objectors but required , leading to tensions for pacifist groups like , whose members such as Guy O. Graber endured and labor in military camps for refusing even indirect support of war efforts. adherents, traditionally pacifist, navigated the draft by allowing individual conscience for the first time, though some faced excommunication risks or chose farm labor exemptions over combat. Objectors from these Historic Peace Churches—Mennonites, Quakers, and Brethren—often performed nonmilitary labor, such as road-building or forestry, but faced severe social ostracism, physical abuse in camps, and in , over 7,000 imprisonments, including hard labor sentences. While some integrated into or reconstruction units to align with mercy ministries, absolute pacifists rejected any war-related roles, viewing them as complicity in violence; this stance, grounded in Anabaptist traditions, prioritized separation from state militaries over national loyalty. In , the U.S. Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 formalized status for those with religious opposition to combat, registering about 72,000 men by 1947, predominantly from pacifist Christian denominations. The (CPS) program, negotiated by Peace Church leaders, assigned roughly 12,000 objectors—mainly , , and Brethren—to unpaid work in mental hospitals, , and medical research, including starvation experiments at the to study famine effects. These efforts contributed practically, such as in national parks, but objectors bore costs without wages, highlighting the tension between pacifist witness and societal utility. In , from 1939 prompted tens of thousands of Christians, including from evangelical and nonconformist backgrounds, to claim exemption, often serving in roles or facing tribunals that granted alternatives like agriculture amid heightened wartime scrutiny. , rejecting all military involvement on scriptural grounds against allegiance to earthly powers, refused both combat and , resulting in over 4,400 U.S. imprisonments and broader , including board denials and violence. In , Witnesses' pacifism led to approximately 10,000 arrests and concentration camp internment under purple triangles, where they could secure release by renouncing faith but maintained opposition, enduring execution for underground preaching. These cases underscore Christian pacifism's application through legal objection mechanisms, though outcomes varied by national policy and group absolutism, with Peace Churches adapting via service programs while Witnesses' total refusal amplified persecution risks. Postwar, such stands influenced selective service reforms but drew criticism for perceived disloyalty amid total war demands.

Post-1945 Conflicts and War Tax Resistance

In the (1950–1953), members of historic such as and continued to seek (CO) status under U.S. Selective Service laws, building on precedents from , though the number of registered COs was lower than in subsequent conflicts due to the war's shorter duration and rapid mobilization. These groups emphasized noncombatant alternatives, with some performing in mental hospitals or forestry projects, reflecting their commitment to pacifist service amid government pressures for participation. The (1955–1975) marked a peak in Christian pacifist resistance, with over 65,500 men performing as , exceeding numbers from prior drafts, as like the , , and advocated for 1-O or 1-W classifications that allowed non-military contributions such as medical aid or community development. , through the Mennonite Central Committee, dispatched volunteers to for reconstruction and relief efforts starting in the early , critiquing U.S. escalation while providing neutral aid to civilians on both sides, which positioned them to witness and oppose the war's destructiveness firsthand. similarly operated Quaker Service Vietnam programs from 1963, focusing on orphan care, refugee support, and , while issuing public statements against the war as early as 1965, aligning their actions with the historic testimony against violence. War tax resistance emerged as a complementary nonviolent among Christian pacifists post-1945, particularly as U.S. payers surged from 4 million in 1939 to 43 million in 1945 to fund military expansion, prompting Mennonite and Quaker leaders to withhold portions allocated to defense. In the late and 1950s, Mennonite publications like Gospel Herald documented cases of individuals refusing taxes deemed war-supporting, with the Mennonite Central Committee Peace Section recommending legal maneuvers such as income minimization to minimize contributions, viewing such resistance as fidelity to Christ's nonviolence amid militarization. By the Vietnam era, this practice intensified, with resisters facing IRS levies and wage garnishments—such as one Quaker's 2016 case of a $39 levy for unpaid war taxes plus penalties—but persisting as a symbolic protest, often coordinated through networks like the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee, which traced its roots to peace church traditions. These efforts underscored a principled separation from state violence, though they yielded limited policy impact and drew internal debates within pacifist communities over efficacy versus biblical mandate.

Contemporary Examples in 21st-Century Wars

In the (2003–2011), Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT), an ecumenical organization rooted in Anabaptist, Catholic, and Protestant pacifist traditions, deployed delegations to monitor abuses, particularly U.S. detention practices, and to bear witness against the violence of occupation. CPT members documented testimonies from families of Iraqi detainees and advocated for nonviolent alternatives to military intervention, operating in amid ongoing insurgency. In November 2005, four CPT workers—Tom Fox (American Quaker), Norman Kember (British Baptist), (Canadian Anglican), and Harmeet Singh Sooden (Canadian Sikh associate)—were kidnapped by Iraqi militants, who accused them of spying; Fox was executed in March 2006 after refusing evacuation, exemplifying CPT's commitment to staying with oppressed communities despite risks. The remaining hostages were rescued in a British-led operation in December 2005, highlighting the tensions between pacifist presence and wartime hostilities. Mennonite and other historic peace church groups, such as those affiliated with Mennonite Central Committee, opposed U.S. involvement in the on scriptural grounds, emphasizing ' teachings on (:38–48) and refusing combat roles or war tax funding. Mennonite Church USA's "Cost of War" campaign, launched in the 2000s, encouraged conscientious objection and redirected resources to , with members applying for alternative civilian service rather than deployment. Similarly, through protested the invasions, organizing vigils and advocacy against drone strikes and civilian casualties, viewing participation in offensive wars as incompatible with the "inner light" of . Individual conscientious objectors within the U.S. military provided stark examples during these conflicts. Army interrogator , a Mormon-turned-Evangelical Christian deployed to in 2004, applied for discharge in 2005 after concluding that his experiences revealed the futility of and a call to chaplaincy emphasizing reconciliation; his application was approved in 2007, though he continued ministering to soldiers until his death from in 2012. In 2008, Army Specialist Agustin Aguayo, citing deepened Christian convictions against killing post-deployment to , received honorable discharge as a following a federal court ruling, despite prior for missing a flight to . These cases, processed under U.S. allowing religious or moral objections, numbered over 500 applications from 2000–2010, with pacifist forming a subset amid the all-volunteer force's expansions. In the Afghanistan War (2001–2021), pacifist responses were less frontline-embedded but included advocacy and objection; CPT maintained a presence focused on support and anti-war witness, while groups like the organized resistance to U.S. escalation, framing interventions as imperial overreach contrary to Gospel nonviolence. , adhering to absolute neutrality, systematically refused service, with U.S. members exempted via Selective Service filings, avoiding the estimated 2,400 American combat deaths. These efforts underscore Christian pacifism's persistence in asymmetric conflicts, prioritizing prophetic dissent over strategic engagement.

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Theological and Biblical Challenges

Theological and biblical challenges to Christian pacifism center on interpretations of Scripture that affirm the legitimacy of coercive force under divine ordinance, particularly in restraining evil and upholding justice. Critics contend that pacifism imposes an anachronistic non-violence ethic, disregarding precedents where commands warfare, such as the Israelite conquest of in Joshua 6–12, where divine directives include the destruction of idolatrous nations to preserve holiness, with disobedience incurring judgment as in Saul's campaign against the Amalekites (1 Samuel 15:1–3). Pacifist often reinterprets these as symbolic or typological, but opponents argue this undermines scriptural consistency, as the same texts portray as a "" (Exodus 15:3) who uses instrumentally against moral corruption. New Testament passages further complicate pacifist claims by endorsing state authority's role in wielding the sword. In , Paul describes governing powers as "God's servant, an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer," explicitly granting them the sword for retribution, which pacifism must either spiritualize or subordinate to personal non-resistance (), creating tension between individual ethics and institutional duties. neither rebukes the centurion's military role nor his command structure when praising his faith (), and instructs soldiers to practice contentment rather than demobilization (Luke 3:14). Additionally, ' directive to acquire swords (Luke 22:36) and his violent expulsion of merchants from the with a (John 2:15) indicate tolerance for defensive or restorative force, countering readings of the () as universally prohibiting all violence. Theologically, just war doctrine, formalized by Augustine in Contra Faustum (c. 400 CE) and refined by Thomas Aquinas in Summa Theologica (II-II, q. 40, a. 1), synthesizes these texts into criteria requiring legitimate authority, just cause (e.g., redressing injury), and right intention (e.g., peace restoration), rejecting pacifism as insufficient for a depraved world where evil demands restraint. Augustine argued that loving neighbors entails defending the innocent from aggressors, as unchecked violence proliferates harm, while Aquinas stipulated that war, though regrettable, aligns with natural law when proportionate and discriminate. Critics like J. Daryl Charles assert that pacifism abdicates civic responsibility, rendering societies vulnerable to tyranny by denying the state's God-ordained coercive function.

Practical and Ethical Critiques

Critics of Christian pacifism contend that its absolute rejection of violence renders it practically ineffective against determined aggressors, as historical precedents demonstrate the necessity of armed resistance to halt atrocities. For instance, C.S. Lewis argued that history is replete with "useful wars" alongside useless ones, implying that pacifism overlooks empirical evidence of conflicts that prevented greater harms, such as the Allied defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II, which ended the regime's systematic extermination of approximately 6 million Jews and millions of others. Lewis further noted that pacifism thrives only in tolerant liberal societies, which aggressors exploit, potentially leading to totalitarian dominance if force is unilaterally renounced. Ethically, opponents assert that pacifism undermines the Christian imperative to protect the vulnerable, conflating personal forbearance with communal responsibility in a fallen world marked by persistent sin. critiqued pacifism for distorting Christ's command to by excluding force as an instrument of , arguing that human evil—evident in events like the unprovoked invasions of the —demands coercive measures to restrain wrongdoing, as affirmed in :4 where governing authorities "bear the sword" for retribution. This view holds that non-resistance enables aggressors to inflict unchecked suffering, rendering pacifists morally complicit in harms to innocents, contrary to biblical precedents like Exodus 22:2 permitting lethal or 4:14 urging armed protection of families. Such critiques extend to interpretations of ' teachings, where "turn the other cheek" (Matthew 5:39) is seen not as a universal ethic barring all force but as guidance for personal insults, inapplicable to defending third parties or upholding , as himself wielded a to expel temple desecrators (:15) and instructed disciples to acquire swords (Luke 22:36). Proponents of , drawing from Augustine and Aquinas, maintain that pacifism's idealism ignores causal realities of , where deterrence through strength—rather than unilateral —has empirically preserved societies from collapse, as liberal democracies' survival often hinged on readiness against expansionist threats.

Influence and Broader Context

Societal Impact and Policy Effects

Christian pacifism has significantly shaped policies on conscientious objection in the United States, where historic peace churches such as , , and the advocated for exemptions from military service. The first federal conscientious objector provision appeared in the 1863 during the , enacted at the urging of these groups to accommodate their religious convictions against bearing arms. During World War II, these churches collaborated with the government to establish the (CPS) program, which assigned approximately 12,000 conscientious objectors—predominantly from pacifist denominations—to non-combat roles, avoiding imprisonment for draft resisters while fulfilling societal duties. The CPS initiative yielded tangible societal benefits, including advancements in forest fire prevention, soil erosion control, flood management, and mental health care reform, as objectors staffed under-resourced facilities and pioneered humane treatment methods in psychiatric hospitals. Mennonite and Brethren participants, in particular, contributed to and infrastructure projects, demonstrating pacifism's compatibility with public service. Postwar, these efforts influenced broader policy expansions, such as the Supreme Court's 1965 ruling in United States v. Seeger, which broadened conscientious objection eligibility beyond traditional peace church membership to include deeply held ethical beliefs equivalent to religious ones, reflecting the cumulative pressure from pacifist advocacy. On the international stage, Quaker-led organizations like the (AFSC) have impacted and relief policies. Founded in 1917, the AFSC coordinated during and after world wars, earning the 1947 jointly with the British Friends Service Council for promoting reconciliation and nonviolent internationalism on behalf of worldwide. The AFSC's work has informed U.S. foreign policy debates, advocating through bodies like the Friends Committee on National Legislation for reduced military spending and ethical alternatives to armed intervention. Mennonite contributions extend to via Mennonite Disaster Service, which since has mobilized volunteers to rebuild homes and communities affected by natural calamities in the U.S. and , fostering resilience without reliance on coercive state mechanisms. These pacifist-driven initiatives have modeled nonviolent societal contributions, influencing policies toward volunteer-based service and conflict prevention, though their scale remains modest compared to mainstream military paradigms.

Relationship to Mainstream Christianity and Just War Doctrine

Mainstream , encompassing Catholic, Orthodox, and most Protestant traditions, predominantly endorses the just war doctrine as the ethical framework for evaluating military engagement, viewing it as compatible with biblical mandates to protect the innocent and uphold justice. This doctrine, formalized by Saint Augustine in the early fifth century, posits that war can be morally justifiable if waged by legitimate authority for a just cause, with right intention, proportionality, and reasonable chance of success, thereby reconciling Christian nonviolence ideals with the realities of governance and defense. In contrast, Christian pacifism, which rejects all violence including , remains a minority position, primarily upheld by Anabaptist-derived groups such as and Brethren, as well as and certain historic . The development of marked a departure from the more prevalent pacifist inclinations in the pre-Constantinian church, where many early Christians abstained from military service due to concerns over idolatry, oaths, and the act of killing, as evidenced in writings from figures like and . Augustine's framework emerged amid the Christianization of the after 313 AD, addressing the integration of believers into state roles, including soldiery, while insisting that love for neighbor could necessitate force against aggressors. Later refinements by in the 13th century emphasized discrimination between combatants and non-combatants, solidifying the doctrine's criteria and its dominance in ecclesiastical teaching. Pacifists critique as a pragmatic concession to worldly power structures, arguing it dilutes ' teachings against retaliation and enemy love, which they interpret as absolute prohibitions on violence. Mainstream proponents counter that neglects scriptural endorsements of coercive authority, such as :1-4, where governing powers bear the sword to punish evil, and precedents for defensive wars commanded by God. Ecumenical councils and papal encyclicals, from the Fourth in 1215 onward, have implicitly rejected absolute by affirming and defensive wars under just conditions, though modern documents like the 1993 Catholic bishops' statement The Challenge of Peace urge restraint and peacemaking as primary. In contemporary denominations, pacifism prevails in fewer than 5% of global Christians, concentrated in small sects like the (approximately 100,000 members) and historic totaling under 2 million adherents, while major bodies like the (1.3 billion members) and Southern (14 million) maintain just war as normative. This divergence underscores a tension: pacifism prioritizes personal discipleship and eschatological hope over temporal order, whereas mainstream views integrate dual citizenship in church and state, permitting limited violence to preserve societal goods amid fallen human conditions.

References

  1. [1]
    Pacifism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jul 6, 2006 · Pacifism is a commitment to peace and opposition to war. Our ordinary language allows a diverse set of beliefs and commitments to be held ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] An Overview of Four Traditions on War and Peace in Christian History
    HISTORY: Pacifism was the dominant stance for Christians from the time of Jesus until the late fourth and early fifth centuries. While some scholars conclude ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] From pacifism to just war theory : the development of Christian ...
    The key trait of early. Church pacifism, therefore, was sectarianism, not the ethical and moral grounds that pacifist scholars find in the writings of the New ...
  4. [4]
    A Practical Christian Pacifism - Religion Online
    Pacifism is surrender. "The pacifist viewpoint is appealing in principle, but in practice it means surrendering to the aggressor," is a charge heard often. " ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    Doing Violence to Scripture - Providence
    Jul 6, 2017 · Pacifism inevitably requires overruling the words and deeds of the God of Israel because it cannot accept that the just and holy God of the Old ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Christian Traditions of Peace: Just War and Pacifism
    In the following, I will outline (far too briefly) the history and main components of the just war theory and Christian pacifism. Shaping the discussions of.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  7. [7]
    What is Christian pacifism? - Peace Theology
    Jun 3, 2012 · The Bible, thus, provides a fourfold basis for pacifism: the love command, the calling to give loyalty to the counter-cultural community of God ...Missing: tenets | Show results with:tenets
  8. [8]
    Christian pacifism in brief - Peace Theology
    Dec 20, 2016 · The love command provides the central building block for Christian pacifism—both in the positive sense of establishing love as the highest ...Missing: proponents denominations
  9. [9]
    [PDF] CHRISTIAN PACIFISM AND JUST-WAR TENETS
    The key to the obedience of God's people is not their effectiveness but their patience (13:10). The relationship between the obedience of God's people and the ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  10. [10]
    (PDF) The Christian, the Church and Pacifism - the Sword or the Cross
    ... Christian pacifism. It might come as a surprise to many that for the first ... imitation of Christ and obedience to the injunction of the apostle Paul ...
  11. [11]
    Early Church Fathers on War, Violence, and Pacifism
    An examination of the earliest Christian teachings on violence will show that the church has historically taught that we should use only nonviolent methods.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Pacifism and Just War: Beyond the Stereotypes - Baylor University
    Both just war theory and pacifism share a desire to limit violence, but with a key difference. Just war theory is primarily a rule-based morality: it sets ...
  13. [13]
    Pacifism, Just War & the Gulf: An Exchange - First Things
    May 1, 1991 · In that respect just war is dependent upon the practice of the Christian community being fundamentally nonviolent. In other words, just war ...
  14. [14]
    A Defense of Christian Pacifism - Constantly Reforming
    Evangelical pacifism believes that violence and war, just like judgment and condemnation, belong to God and do not belong to his servants.
  15. [15]
    Militants for Peace | The Point Magazine
    Aug 11, 2025 · Pacifism becomes our eschatological Pledge of Allegiance. What Christian pacifism doesn't claim is that it's necessarily an effective strategy.
  16. [16]
    Pacifism and Conscientious Objection—Is There a Difference?
    Jehovah's witnesses are consistent in their claim. They are not pacifists, but are ministers and conscientious objectors on Scriptural grounds.
  17. [17]
    Reformed Christian Pacifism - The Puritan Board
    Feb 12, 2010 · From the time of Constantine to the present, pacifism has been a minority view in the Christian church.
  18. [18]
    Conscientious Objectors and Civilian Public Service in World War II
    Oct 16, 2020 · There were pacifists and those whose political beliefs kept them from service. Their options were to serve, find war work, or end up in jail if ...
  19. [19]
    Nonviolent Resistance and Pacifism are Not the Same Thing
    Are nonviolent resistance and pacifism the same thing? This post explains the difference between the two and provides some guidelines for nonviolence.
  20. [20]
    Christianity on war and peace: An overview - Thinking Pacifism
    Mar 15, 2018 · Christian views on war include pacifism, just war, and crusade. A revised view divides Christians into those negatively and positively disposed ...
  21. [21]
    Christian Pacifism in Brief | Peace Theology
    The Bible, thus, provides a fourfold basis for pacifism: the love command, the calling to give loyalty to the counter-cultural community of God's people over ...
  22. [22]
    Nonviolence: In Brief - Theology in the raw
    Jun 8, 2016 · Third, Jesus taught his followers to follow the same rhythm of nonviolence and enemy-love. “Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, ...
  23. [23]
    What does the Bible say about pacifism? | GotQuestions.org
    Oct 28, 2022 · Christian pacifists believe that following Jesus means doing only as He did, and He never promoted killing enemies (Matthew 5:44). They claim ...
  24. [24]
    Did Jesus Teach Pacifism? - Desiring God
    Jan 23, 2006 · The question of whether Jesus taught pacifism is complex, as it's hard to see how war aligns with biblical emphasis on forgiveness and love.
  25. [25]
    Does Christianity Require Pacifism?
    Christian pacifists also point to a foundational teaching of the Old Testament, citing the command, “You shall not kill,” found in the Ten Commandments. So how ...
  26. [26]
    War and the Christian | Reformed Bible Studies & Devotionals at ...
    All Christians are called to be "pacifists" in the sense that we are to love peace and pursue it. The use of the sword as a restraining device, though ...Missing: arguments | Show results with:arguments
  27. [27]
    What did Jesus mean when He instructed us to turn the other cheek?
    Jan 16, 2024 · Turning the other cheek does not imply pacifism, nor does it mean we place ourselves or others in danger. Jesus' command to turn the other cheek ...Missing: arguments | Show results with:arguments<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    What Does the Bible Say About War?
    A number of other Bible passages are cited in favor of the pacifist position, including Matthew 5:9, Romans 12:18-19, 2 Corinthians 10:3-4, 1 Peter 2:21-23, 3:8 ...
  29. [29]
    Was the Early Church Pacifistic? A Response to Paul Copan (#11)
    Jan 11, 2018 · The pre-Constantinian church was indeed pacifistic, notwithstanding the fact that it permitted soldiers to remain in military service after they converted.
  30. [30]
    CHURCH FATHERS: De Corona (Tertullian) - New Advent
    He declared that he had no liberty to wear the crown with the rest. Being urgently asked for his reasons, he answered, I am a Christian. O soldier! Boasting ...
  31. [31]
    Early Church Fathers on refusal of the sword - Prayer & Politiks
    TERTULLIAN (160–220)​​ § “Christ, in disarming Peter, disarmed every soldier.” § “Shall we carry a flag? It is a rival to Christ.”
  32. [32]
    Tertullian on Christians and the military - Gerald W. Schlabach
    Neither does military service hold out escape from punishment of sins, or exemption from martyrdom. Nowhere does the Christian change his character.
  33. [33]
    Origen: Why Christians Don't Go to War - Scroll Publishing Company
    Celsus urges us “to help the king with all our might, and to labour with him in the maintenance of justice, to fight for him; and if he requires it, to fight ...
  34. [34]
    Nonviolence in the Ancient Church and Christian Obedience
    First, when Christianity spread to the African army, many converts left the military service while others remained as soldiers. Second, congregations ...
  35. [35]
    Early Christian Pacifism? | Andrew Holt, Ph.D.
    Nov 9, 2014 · Early Christian writers acknowledged that Christians served in the Roman army and in some cases respected the right of the Roman state to use violence to ...
  36. [36]
    Christians in the Roman Army: Countering the Pacifist Narrative
    Apr 20, 2012 · Writing from Alexandria, Origen proposed a more systematic theory of Christian pacifism in his “Against Celsus.” Countering Celsus' charge ...
  37. [37]
    PACIFISM AND MILITARY SERVICE IN THE EARLY CHURCH - jstor
    which permitted military service, did not in pre-Constantinian times, receive a lot of support from the Fathers" (cf. Molland, p. 95). For a cridcal edition of ...
  38. [38]
    Were the Church Fathers Pacifists? - First Things
    Apr 28, 2010 · The answer is unequivocally “yes.” Writes Yoder: The answer of the pre-Constantinian church was negative; the Christian as an agent of God for reconciliation ...
  39. [39]
    Christian Pacifism and Constantine (Chapter 4)
    Constantine, the Roman Emperor, declared himself a Christian and recognized Christianity as a legal religion. From this point on a great change came over the ...
  40. [40]
    Christian Nonviolence and Church History - Plough Quarterly
    Nonviolent resistance to injustice, tyranny, and brutal dictatorship has had many astonishing successes. Gandhi's nonviolence defeated the British Empire.<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    History is Not Your Friend: Christian Pacifism and the Imagined Past -
    Jul 14, 2023 · Christian pacifism, as much associated with the contemporary political left as the former is associated with the contemporary political right, ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  42. [42]
    History of war ethics - BBC
    St Augustine was a 4th century Christian who lived in Algeria and Italy. He believed that the only just reason to go to war was the desire for peace. We do not ...
  43. [43]
    Just War Theory | Thinking Faith
    Oct 11, 2013 · This theory remains the primary moral framework for questions of military intervention by States, both for Christians and more generally.
  44. [44]
    The Death of Christian Pacifism - Juicy Ecumenism
    Oct 26, 2022 · There's one final factor in the decline of neo-Anabaptist Christian pacifism, which is the decline of Dispensationalist Christian Zionism.
  45. [45]
    Just War Theory - The Episcopal Church
    Proponents of just war theory claim that violent force should be used to protect innocent persons from attack. In contrast, pacifists maintain that war can ...
  46. [46]
    https://thinkingpacifism.net/2025/10/21/christianitys-accommodation-to-empire/
  47. [47]
    https://www.historyskills.com/classroom/ancient-history/peace-of-god-movement/
  48. [48]
    Pacifism in church history - Anabaptist World
    Jan 9, 2020 · There was a small pacifist tradition in the Middle Ages, but it existed only among fringe Christian groups.
  49. [49]
    Schleitheim Confession | Christian History Institute
    The Schleitheim Confession of the Swiss Brethren (1527). Introduced by ... The section on “the sword” teaches complete pacifism. What reasons does it ...
  50. [50]
    The Anabaptists and the Reformation
    It cured forever any revolutionary tendencies in the Anabaptist churches, driving them to an absolute pacifism which would not even allow self-defense.ORIGINS - The Swiss... · OTHER RADICALS... · EARLY ANABAPTISM...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    An Anabaptist Confession of Faith - GHDI - Document
    Drafted in 1527 as a union document, the Schleitheim Articles are the most famous Anabaptist statement of faith. The Articles are attributed to Michael Sattler ...Missing: pacifism | Show results with:pacifism
  52. [52]
    1991 Peacemaking – Annual Conference - Church of the Brethren
    The Church of the Brethren has been known as a people who have lived and sought peace. The denomination has consistently opposed war while pursuing peaceful ...
  53. [53]
    The Church of the Brethren and war, 1708-1941 - Internet Archive
    May 29, 2013 · A history of the Church of the Brethren and its stance on nonresistance and peace ... Peace, Pacifism, Non-violence, Religious aspects of War.
  54. [54]
    1970 War – Annual Conference - Church of the Brethren
    The Church of the Brethren believes all war is sin, seeks conscientious objection, and opposes using taxes for war purposes. They also cannot support military ...Missing: pacifism | Show results with:pacifism
  55. [55]
    Christian Non-Resistance - Adin Ballou
    I claim the right to offer the utmost moral resistance, not sinful, of which God has made me capable, to every manifestation of evil among mankind. Nay, I hold ...
  56. [56]
    Christian non-resistance, in all its important bearings, illustrated and ...
    Aug 6, 2008 · Christian non-resistance, in all its important bearings, illustrated and defended. by: Adin Ballou. Publication date: 1848. Publisher: Charles ...
  57. [57]
    02. A Christian Pacifist Perspective on War and Peace
    The twentieth-century saw Christian pacifism expand; surely a much higher percentage of Christians came to understand themselves as pacifists than had ever ...Missing: revival | Show results with:revival
  58. [58]
    Conscientious Objection – Peace - Church of the Brethren
    A conscientious objector, or CO, is someone who is opposed to serving in the armed forces and/or bearing arms on the grounds of moral or religious principles.Missing: pacifism | Show results with:pacifism
  59. [59]
    Was the Early Church Really Pacifist? - PCPJ
    Sep 5, 2020 · The early church – the church of the apostles and their disciples – was pacifistic. Even when a slight tolerance for violence emerged a few centuries later, ...
  60. [60]
    Menno Simons and the Sword - The Radical Resurgence
    Dec 13, 2024 · Menno Simons was a pivotal religious reformer who played a crucial role in the Anabaptist movement during the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century.
  61. [61]
    The Fearless Pacifist: Menno Simons (1496–1561) | Desiring God
    Oct 7, 2017 · Simons discovered that the devil had kept him from the Bible and true conversion, and now he was determined to be Satan's sworn enemy.Missing: resistance | Show results with:resistance
  62. [62]
    Life, writings, doctrine, images and links - Menno Simons.net
    (11) He believed that ministers should not be chosen by the church, but direct of God. The doctrine of non-resistance is not found in his extant writings.
  63. [63]
    [PDF] The Dordrecht Confession of Faith
    The Dordrecht Confession of Faith, adopted in 1632, confesses belief in one God, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and the restoration of man through Christ.Missing: pacifism | Show results with:pacifism
  64. [64]
    Would There be Peace Without Mennonites? - Anabaptist Historians
    Jun 15, 2017 · One example of this relates to the history of conscientious objection. I remember as a sixteen-year-old reading Noah Leatherman's published ...
  65. [65]
    Conscience and Conflict: Lewis County Mennonites and ...
    Dec 7, 2024 · During World War I, 138 Mennonite conscientious objectors were court-martialed throughout the country, according to a 2015 report in the ...
  66. [66]
    Our Anabaptist witness as Mennonites
    Feb 12, 2025 · As Mennonites, the words of Menno Simons have been an anchor, defining to whom we minister in our world. “True evangelical faith, cannot lie ...
  67. [67]
    The Complicated History of Anabaptist-Mennonite Nonresistance
    According to Ted Regehr, approximately 7,500 eligible Mennonite men identified as conscientious objectors and opted for alternative service during the Second ...
  68. [68]
    The Original Quaker Peace Testimony - Western Friend
    Thus the original Quaker Peace Testimony was not a product of rational persuasion, but an outcome of a transforming spiritual conviction. One becomes “dead to ...
  69. [69]
    Friends Peace Testimony - Quaker.org
    Early Quaker Statements ... A Declaration to Charles II 1660 This is the entire text of what most believe is the seminal statement of the Quaker peace testimony.
  70. [70]
    Peace in Faith and Practice: The Origins of Quaker Testimony on ...
    Feb 21, 2023 · This museum entry focuses on Quakerism, a branch of Christianity that emerged during the 17 th Century, amid the Civil War in England, and believes that God ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    "The Quaker Peace Testimony and its Contribution to the British ...
    This article attempts the first overview of the contribution of Quakerism to the British peace movement from its eighteenth-century origins to the present day.
  72. [72]
    An Historical Survey of Attitudes Toward War And Peace 1973
    This study attempts to examine the stance taken toward war and peace by groups within the "American Holiness Movement." In particular it attempts to ...
  73. [73]
    Unexpected Sites of Christian Pacifism: Holiness Edition
    Jun 4, 2014 · It turns out that principled pacifism is not the sole province of Mennonites. Beaman and Brian Pipkin have uncovered a wealth of documents that ...Missing: movement | Show results with:movement
  74. [74]
    Holiness Pacifist Groups - Jay Beaman's Christian Pacifism
    Holiness groups focused on sanctification, believed in a two-stage salvation, and produced pacifism, often objecting to war, and some were called "Holy Rollers ...
  75. [75]
    Brethren in Christ Weren't the Only “Holiness Pacifists” in the Early ...
    Jun 18, 2014 · ... Holiness and Pentecostal denominations and groups espoused a Christian pacifism similar to the forms of pacifism espoused by Mennonite ...Missing: movement | Show results with:movement
  76. [76]
    Peaceniks | Christian History Magazine
    Early Pentecostals were pacifists, believing war was useless and that the only important battle was for souls. Most denominations opposed war, though some left ...
  77. [77]
    World War II and the Seventh-day Adventist Church in the South ...
    Jan 29, 2020 · It pointed out that Seventh-day Adventists had always been non-combatant, not pacifist, since the American Civil War, carefully separating the ...
  78. [78]
    Why Don't Jehovah's Witnesses Go to War? - JW.ORG
    Jehovah's Witnesses are known worldwide for refusing to go to war. Does this make them a threat to society or governments? Learn why we don't go to war.
  79. [79]
    Why Jehovah's Witnesses Are Not Pacifists
    In all that history of almost six thousand years the record fails to show Jehovah's witnesses accusable of “opposition to war or to the use of military force ...
  80. [80]
    Christadelphians, the Police, and Doctors - Theology
    Dec 7, 2008 · While individual Christadelphians can be pacifists, the official position of our community is not a pacifist position.
  81. [81]
    Voices of the First World War: Conscientious Objection
    Around 16,000 men refused to take up arms or fight during the First World War for any number of religious, moral, ethical or political reasons. They were known ...
  82. [82]
    Quakers and World War I
    Quakers resisted the introduction of conscription in 1916 and many chose to register as conscientious objectors. A small but substantial number of young Quaker ...<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    Guy O. Graber, World War I conscientious objector
    Jan 8, 2024 · Graber's letters, journals and official documents detail the perils of being a conscientious objector (CO) in World War I.
  84. [84]
    The Brethren in World War I – Messenger Magazine
    World War I was the first time Brethren were permitted to respond to the draft with “individual conscience” rather than fearing excommunication from the church.Missing: pacifism | Show results with:pacifism<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    How prolific were conscientious objectors, and what percentage of ...
    Jun 15, 2020 · Selective Service records estimate that 72,354 men became conscientious objectors between 1940 and 1947. These men had to prove their sincerity ...
  86. [86]
    U.S. Conscientious Objectors in World War II
    Prior to the start of this peacetime draft, Quakers, Mennonites, and Brethren worked together to negotiate the provisions of the pending Selective Service law.
  87. [87]
    (H)our History Lesson: WWII Conscientious Objectors at Patapsco ...
    Aug 3, 2023 · During World War II, thousands of pacifists objected to military service because of their religious and moral beliefs. Some of them participated ...
  88. [88]
    Christians Refuse to Fight by Ian M. Randall - Plough Quarterly
    Aug 8, 2024 · When Britain introduced military conscription in 1939, tens of thousands of Christians declared they were conscientious objectors.
  89. [89]
    Jehovah's Witnesses - Center on Conscience & War
    Apr 21, 2012 · Jehovah's Witnesses are an international association of Christians who have been confronted with the issue of compulsory military service in many lands.
  90. [90]
    Conscientious Objectors and The World War Two Era
    Like many Americans, Brokaw described qualities such as patriotism, military service, and a sense of duty as admirable in America during and after World War II.Missing: UK | Show results with:UK
  91. [91]
    [PDF] The Reporter - Center on Conscience & War
    Dec 31, 2019 · Two years later, the Court upheld denials of citizenship to a pacifist minister and a nurse, establishing a clear precedent that conscientious ...
  92. [92]
    Peace and Service in Vietnam | The Civilian Public Service Story
    These stories of Vietnam Christian Service and Quaker Service Vietnam workers offer a small window into a broad and complex set of experiences.
  93. [93]
    Peace churches seek alternatives to draft - Wilmington Star-News
    Jun 20, 2005 · ... alternative service during the Vietnam War. About 65,500 actually performed alternative service. The rest, Dr. Mansavage said, either weren ...
  94. [94]
    Mennonites in Vietnam during the American War - Anabaptist Witness
    The Mennonites' ongoing presence in Vietnam gave them a unique platform from which to view and critique the development and expansion of the American war.
  95. [95]
    Peace Witness and Relief Efforts during the Vietnam War
    In the ensuing years, Quakers informally resisted the increasing US involvement in the war, but it wasn't until 1963 – when President Diem of South Vietnam was ...<|separator|>
  96. [96]
    War tax resistance started with the words of Christ and continues today
    Mar 22, 2018 · required to pay income tax increased from 4 million in 1939 to 43 million in 1945. In 1942, MCC Peace Section urged the government to issue ...Missing: history post- examples
  97. [97]
    Tax Resistance in “Gospel Herald”, 1946–1959 • TPL - Sniggle.net
    This is the seventh in a series of posts about war tax resistance as it was reported in back issues of Gospel Herald , journal of the (Old) Mennonite Church.
  98. [98]
    God and Caesar: On war tax resistance
    Apr 12, 2016 · After a few years, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) placed a levy on my wages for $39 for resisted taxes, interest, and penalties. It is clear ...Missing: 1945 examples
  99. [99]
    [PDF] War Tax Resistance at a Glance
    The modern American WTR movement can be traced back to World War II (1941-1945), when the U.S. government dramatically increased its military spending and its ...Missing: Christian | Show results with:Christian
  100. [100]
    [PDF] INCOME TAXES, WAR AND MENNONITES 1940–1993
    Mar 2, 2021 · War tax resistance, including legal options such as reduced incomes, helps bind us in spirit to our sisters and brothers in Christ who continue ...
  101. [101]
    Middle East | Profile: Christian Peacemaker Teams - BBC NEWS
    Nov 30, 2005 · In Iraq, the group's work has focused on the issue of Iraqi detainees held by US forces. This has involved taking testimonies from families of ...
  102. [102]
    118 days in captivity — a peacemaker's account
    Tom Fox, Harmeet Singh Sooden, Norman Kember and James Loney ...
  103. [103]
    The Witness of James Loney in “Captivity” - Father John Dear
    I went to Baghdad on a Christian Peacemaker Teams delegation in opposition to the institution of war. I was kidnapped by Iraqi insurgents who were fighting ...
  104. [104]
    Cost of War - Learn Pray Join | Mennonite Church USA
    Consider joining in conscientious objection to war taxes. Donate to MC USA's Peace Church Tax Fund, which provides funding for educational programs that address ...
  105. [105]
    Community Peacemaker Teams
    Community Peacemaker Teams builds partnerships to transform violence and oppression. Taking action for peace for over 35 years.Missing: Afghanistan | Show results with:Afghanistan
  106. [106]
    Joshua Casteel, Conscientious Objector, RIP - America Magazine
    Aug 27, 2012 · We were sad to learn today of the death of Joshua Casteel, a veteran of the Iraq War who sought early discharge as a conscientious objector.
  107. [107]
    Christian GI Ruled Conscientious Objector - CBS News
    Sep 24, 2008 · A federal judge has ordered the Army to grant conscientious objector status and an honorable discharge to a soldier who says he experienced ...
  108. [108]
    The Guide for Conscientious Objectors in the Military
    This document will help you understand the military's policy about conscientious objection so you can figure out if it applies to you.
  109. [109]
    What is the just war theory? | GotQuestions.org
    Jan 4, 2022 · Within biblical Christianity, just war theory is more likely to be rejected by those who favor a more pacifist interpretation of Scripture.Missing: arguments | Show results with:arguments
  110. [110]
    SUMMA THEOLOGIAE: War (Secunda Secundae Partis, Q. 40)
    in Hept., qu. x, super Jos.): "A just war is wont to be described as one that avenges wrongs, when a nation or state has to be punished ...
  111. [111]
    J. Daryl Charles: "Pacifism makes the world unsafe for everybody."
    J. Daryl Charles visits the Center for Faith and Culture to discuss just war theory. He critiques pacifism, and points to a better way.
  112. [112]
    C.S. Lewis and Pacifism: A Failure of the Imagination - Official Site
    Jun 27, 2011 · As well, Lewis sees pacifism as being built upon a materialistic worldview that assumes suffering and death are the greatest evils. A Christian ...
  113. [113]
    Why I am Peaceful but Not a Pacifist - BruceAshford.net
    Mar 6, 2020 · As Reinhold Niebuhr argued, pacifism distorts Christ's command to love by excluding large swathes of the biblical definition of true love. Love ...<|separator|>
  114. [114]
    [PDF] How Conscientious Objectors Killed the Draft
    Mar 13, 2020 · ABSTRACT. This Article argues that a key-but-overlooked factor in the Vietnam-era breakdown of the draft system was the Supreme Court's ...
  115. [115]
    The Legacy of Civilian Public Service | Peace Theology
    During World War II, about 12,000 young American men served their country performing service separate from the military in a program called Civilian Public ...
  116. [116]
    Patapsco Camp (WWII Civilian Public Service Site) (U.S. National ...
    Dec 16, 2024 · This World War II-era initiative provided an opportunity for meaningful wartime work for conscientious objectors who refused to enter the ...
  117. [117]
    United States v. Seeger (1965) - The National Constitution Center
    In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court upheld the federal law defining the scope of the rights of conscientious objectors.
  118. [118]
    American Friends Service Committee – Facts - NobelPrize.org
    The American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), founded in 1917, won the 1947 Nobel Peace Prize for their work in the international peace movement and ...
  119. [119]
    About MDS | Mennonite Disaster Service - Respond. Rebuild. Restore.
    MDS aims to restore hope by responding to disasters, rebuilding homes, and empowering volunteers in the U.S. and Canada.Missing: societal | Show results with:societal
  120. [120]
    Mennonite Contributions to International Peacebuilding
    Oct 31, 2023 · Here, essayists provide a thorough account of Mennonite initiatives to prevent, resolve, or transform conflict in a variety of settings. Part ...
  121. [121]
    [PDF] the rejection of military service by the early christians edward a. ryan ...
    42 It is clear, therefore, that Origen's outspoken hostility to the Christian soldier is also rooted in his horror of idolatry and licentiousness. The Apostolic ...
  122. [122]
    [PDF] THE RETURNING WARRIOR AND THE LIMITS OF JUST WAR ...
    Unlike pacifism, this tradi- tion teaches that war is a necessary and inescapable aspect of the human condition, and that Christians cannot escape from engaging.