Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Current transformer

A current transformer (CT) is an used in electrical power systems to produce a secondary that is proportional to the primary current flowing through a high-voltage , enabling safe and accurate measurement or monitoring without direct contact with the high-current conductor. It operates on the principle of , where the primary current—typically a single turn or few turns in series with the line—generates a in a ferromagnetic , inducing a corresponding current in the secondary winding with many more turns, scaled by the turns (e.g., 1000:5 for primary to secondary amperes). This design ensures the secondary current remains low (commonly 1 A or 5 A) for compatibility with standard instruments like ammeters or protective relays, while the secondary must always be burdened to prevent dangerous open-circuit voltages from . Current transformers are essential for both metering and protection applications in electrical engineering. In metering, they provide precise current scaling for energy billing and load monitoring, with accuracy classes such as 0.2 or 0.5 indicating errors of 0.2% or 0.5% under rated conditions, adhering to standards like IEC 61869 that limit ratio and phase angle errors. For protection, CTs detect faults by handling transient currents up to 20 times the rated value without excessive , using classes like 5P20 where composite error remains below 5% during overcurrents, thus enabling rapid tripping to safeguard equipment. Key performance factors include the accuracy limit factor (), which specifies the multiple of rated current for reliable operation, and the burden rating (e.g., 15 ), representing the maximum load the secondary can drive without degrading accuracy. Common types of current transformers include wound CTs, where both primary and secondary windings are insulated coils on the core; bar-type CTs, utilizing the power conductor as a single-turn primary for high-current busbars; and toroidal or clamp-on CTs, which allow non-invasive installation by threading the conductor through a ring-shaped core. Construction typically features a high-permeability core to minimize excitation current and errors, with metering CTs designed to saturate at about 125% of rated current to protect instruments, while protection CTs use linear cores for fault response. Errors such as ratio deviation—caused by the magnetizing current reducing the transformed ampere-turns—and phase displacement are mitigated through core material selection and burden matching, ensuring overall system reliability in applications from substations to industrial panels.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

A (CT) is an designed to produce a secondary that is proportional to the primary , with the phase difference being small enough to allow accurate vector representation without significant error. It consists of a primary winding with few turns of heavy carrying the high from the power system, wound around a , and a secondary winding with many turns of finer wire that steps down the to a safe, measurable level. Typical current ratios include 100:1 or :5 amperes, where a primary of A produces a secondary of 5 A, facilitating compatibility with standard metering and protection equipment. The primary purpose of a current transformer is to enable safe and accurate , , and of high alternating currents in electrical systems, particularly in high-voltage environments where direct would pose risks. By scaling down currents proportionally, CTs allow with conventional instruments such as ammeters, watt-hour , and protective relays without requiring direct connection to the high-current . This provides between the high-voltage primary side and the low-voltage secondary side, protecting personnel and equipment from electrical hazards while ensuring precise data for system operation and fault detection. Key benefits include cost-effective current reduction for widespread use in substations and distribution networks, enhanced through electrical separation, and seamless compatibility with existing relays and , thereby supporting efficient system management. Current transformers emerged in the late as part of the broader development of to support the growing adoption of systems. Early innovations built on foundational transformer designs.

Operating Principle

A current transformer () operates on the principle of , as described by Faraday's law, which states that a changing induces an () in a . In a , the primary flowing through a —typically a single turn or the line itself—produces a time-varying magnetic flux in a ferromagnetic core that encircles the primary path. This flux links with the secondary winding, consisting of multiple turns wound around the core, inducing a proportional secondary voltage and, consequently, a secondary that flows through the connected burden. The core concentrates the magnetic flux to ensure efficient coupling between the primary and secondary circuits, enabling the CT to step down high primary currents to safer, measurable levels while maintaining electrical isolation. Under ideal conditions, assuming negligible losses and no magnetization effects, the secondary current I_s is inversely proportional to the turns ratio N, defined as the number of secondary turns to primary turns, such that I_s = \frac{I_p}{N}, where I_p is the primary current. This relationship arises from Ampere's circuital law, which equates the from the primary current to that of the secondary, ensuring I_p \cdot N_p = I_s \cdot N_s for N_p = 1 in typical bar-type primaries. The induced in the secondary winding balances the across the burden, given by V_s = I_s Z_b, where Z_b is the burden impedance, maintaining the proportional current output. In practice, a small magnetization component is required to establish and sustain the in the , drawn from the primary ampere-turns and slightly reducing the effective secondary . This is typically negligible in well-designed CTs operating below , comprising less than 1% of the primary for high-permeability materials, allowing the I_s \approx \frac{I_p}{N} to hold closely. The model represents the CT as an ideal with a magnetizing branch (impedance Z_m) across the secondary, accounting for , in series with the secondary winding and the external burden Z_b. The primary is modeled as a injecting I_p / N into this network, with the output voltage V_s = I_s (R_s + Z_b), where R_s is the secondary , illustrating the current division between the magnetizing path and the load. V_s = I_s Z_b This model highlights the CT's behavior as a current source, where the secondary current remains largely independent of the burden under normal operation, provided the total impedance does not cause excessive flux distortion.

Design and Construction

Core Materials and Windings

Current transformers (CTs) primarily utilize toroidal or bar-type cores constructed from high-permeability materials such as grain-oriented silicon steel or nickel-iron alloys to ensure efficient magnetic flux linkage while minimizing hysteresis and eddy current losses. Silicon steel, with its silicon content up to 3.2% by mass, offers low core losses through increased electrical resistivity and is favored for its high saturation flux density, typically ranging from 1.5 to 2 Tesla, allowing the core to handle peak currents without excessive distortion. Nickel-iron alloys, such as hypernik, provide even higher permeability at low inductions and low remanence, enabling rapid recovery from saturation and reducing residual magnetism that could affect accuracy. These materials are selected for their ability to concentrate magnetic flux effectively, with low remanence ensuring minimal hysteresis effects during operation. The windings in a CT are designed to facilitate precise current transformation through . The primary winding typically consists of a single-turn , such as a or passing through the core's central , which carries the high to be measured. In contrast, the secondary winding comprises multiple turns—often 100 to 5000—of insulated wire, wound uniformly around the core to distribute the evenly and achieve the desired turns for current reduction. This configuration ensures that the secondary is inversely proportional to the primary based on the turns , with the uniform distribution minimizing leakage and improving overall efficiency. CTs are categorized into window-type and wound-type based on primary winding construction. Window-type CTs, also known as or ring-type, feature a with a central through which the primary passes without direct winding, making them suitable for high- applications and easy installation around existing buss. Wound-type CTs, however, have the primary wound as multiple turns of heavy-gauge wire around the , similar to the secondary, which is ideal for low current ratios and provides flexibility in ratio adjustment but requires more complex assembly. -type CTs represent a variant where the primary is a rigid integrated into the , combining simplicity with robustness for inline installations. These designs prioritize low reluctance paths for , with materials ensuring high permeability to support accurate transformation across varying load conditions.

Insulation and Housing

Current transformers require robust insulation systems to prevent between the primary , , and secondary windings, as well as to isolate high voltages from circuits. Common insulation materials include epoxy resin for indoor and low-to-medium voltage applications, where it provides a solid, cast structure that encapsulates the windings and for and moisture . Oil-paper insulation, consisting of impregnated with paper, is widely used in outdoor and higher voltage oil-immersed current transformers, offering excellent properties and cooling capabilities. For high-voltage installations, SF6 gas insulation is employed in gas-insulated designs, providing superior arc-quenching and insulating performance in compact enclosures. Secondary windings are typically insulated with varnish or adhesive tape, such as or Nomex-based materials, to prevent inter-turn shorts and ensure reliable operation under load. Housing designs vary based on installation environment to provide mechanical protection and electrical isolation. Indoor current transformers are often enclosed in molded or metal cases, which offer compact, non-conductive protection suitable for controlled atmospheres in substations or panels. Outdoor units feature or bushings with integrated weatherproof seals, such as or composites, to shield against environmental exposure while maintaining high integrity; these housings support mounting on insulators or directly on busbars. The insulation must exhibit sufficient dielectric strength to withstand the primary system voltage, with high-voltage current transformers rated for up to 765 in extra-high voltage grids, ensuring no under normal or fault conditions. Insulation systems are tested for levels, typically limited to 10 pC or less at 1.2 times rated voltage for transformers with Um ≥ 7.2 , to detect early degradation and prevent long-term failures; these tests comply with IEC 61869-1 and IEC 61869-2 standards, which specify routine and type withstand voltage trials. Environmental adaptations enhance reliability across diverse conditions, with enclosures often featuring IP ratings such as for indoor units to protect against ingress and splashes, or IP65 for outdoor models to resist rain and contaminants. ranges under normal service conditions span -5°C to +40°C per IEC 61869-1, with extended ranges such as -40°C to +85°C available in specific designs for deployment in extreme climates, and some extending to -50°C for polar regions; these specifications align with IEC 61869 series guidelines for ambient influences on and integrity.

Performance Characteristics

Accuracy and Error Sources

The accuracy of current transformers (CTs) is quantified through standardized classes defined in IEC 61869-2, which specify the maximum permissible errors in current ratio and phase displacement at rated frequencies and burdens. For metering CTs, common classes include 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 3, where the numerical value represents the maximum ratio error in percent under normal operating conditions, ensuring precise energy billing and load monitoring. Protection CTs, in contrast, use classes such as 5P and 10P, which limit the composite error to 5% or 10% at multiples of the rated current (e.g., 5 or 10 times), prioritizing reliable fault detection over fine precision. Errors in CT performance stem from inherent physical limitations in the magnetic circuit and windings. Ratio error occurs primarily due to the magnetizing current needed to sustain the core flux, which causes the secondary current to deviate from the ideal inverse proportion of the primary current, typically resulting in a lower secondary output. Phase error is induced by eddy currents in the core material, which generate opposing fluxes, and by leakage flux that escapes the core and links unevenly with the windings, shifting the phase angle between primary and secondary currents by a few minutes. In protection CTs, composite error combines these effects under high fault currents, manifesting as the root-mean-square difference between ideal and actual secondary currents over a cycle, potentially compromising relay operation if exceeding class limits. To assess and ensure compliance, CTs undergo using transformers or high-precision comparators that compare outputs against known inputs at various currents and burdens. These methods, aligned with IEC 61869-2, involve injecting controlled primary currents and measuring secondary responses to determine deviations. The ratio error is computed via the formula: \text{Ratio error (\%)} = \frac{(K_n I_s - I_p)}{I_p} \times 100 where K_n denotes the nominal transformation ratio, I_s the measured secondary current, and I_p the primary current; this quantifies the proportional discrepancy directly supporting accuracy class verification. Contemporary designs mitigate these errors through advanced materials, notably amorphous alloys for the core, which exhibit low and losses—up to 70% reduction compared to silicon steel—thereby lowering magnetizing requirements and enhancing linearity. This enables precision metering CTs to achieve accuracies of 0.05%, far surpassing traditional limits for applications demanding sub-percent reliability, such as revenue-grade .

Burden and Saturation Effects

The burden of a current transformer (CT) refers to the total impedance connected to its secondary circuit, encompassing the resistance and reactance of devices such as meters, relays, and connecting leads, typically expressed in volt-amperes (VA) at a specified . This burden determines the secondary and influences the CT's overall performance, with typical ratings for metering CTs ranging from 1 to 20 VA to ensure accurate measurement under normal load conditions. For instance, standard metering burdens like B-0.1 (equivalent to 2.5 VA at 5 A secondary current) to B-1 (25 VA) are commonly specified to match the low-impedance requirements of metering . Saturation in a CT occurs when the magnetic flux density in the core exceeds the knee-point, typically around 1.8 T for cores, leading to a nonlinear response where the secondary (I_s) becomes distorted and fails to proportionally replicate the primary . The knee-point voltage (V_kp) is defined as the secondary terminal voltage at which a 10% increase results in a 50% rise in the , marking the onset of significant nonlinearity; it is calculated as V_kp = I_s × (R_burden + jX_burden), where R_burden and X_burden are the resistive and reactive components of the burden impedance, respectively. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced in protection CTs, where high fault amplify the , pushing the core into and causing clipping in the secondary output. The primary effects of saturation include severe distortion of the secondary current waveform, which can lead to underestimation of fault magnitudes and misoperation of protective relays, such as delayed tripping or false alarms in differential schemes. For example, during asymmetrical faults with DC offset, saturation may cause the relay to perceive an imbalanced current, potentially resulting in unintended breaker operations. To mitigate these issues, CTs can be designed with higher VA ratings to accommodate larger burdens without excessive voltage drops, thereby extending the linear operating range, or incorporate linear core materials like nanocrystalline alloys that delay saturation by maintaining higher permeability at elevated flux levels. Such approaches ensure reliable performance, particularly in high-burden protection applications.

Phase Shift and Ratio

In current transformers (CTs), the phase shift, or phase angle error, represents the angular displacement between the primary and secondary currents, primarily arising from the magnetizing reactance of the core and the resistive and reactive components of the secondary burden impedance. The magnetizing reactance introduces a component of current that is out of phase with the primary current, while the burden resistance and reactance further contribute to this displacement by affecting the secondary voltage drop. For metering applications, this phase shift is typically positive, meaning the secondary current lags the primary current by 0.1 to 2 degrees under normal operating conditions with standard burdens. The nominal transformation of a CT is expressed as the rated primary to secondary , such as 100/5 A or 600/1 A, indicating that the secondary is a scaled-down version of the primary for safe measurement. However, the actual ratio deviates slightly from this nominal value due to the magnetizing and core losses, with variations becoming more pronounced at non-standard frequencies; CTs are designed for 50 Hz or 60 Hz operation, where the magnetizing is optimized to minimize such effects. An approximate expression for the phase error θ in minutes is given by θ ≈ (180/π) × (X_m / Z_burden), where X_m is the magnetizing and Z_burden is the total secondary burden impedance; this highlights the inverse relationship between the error and burden magnitude for a fixed . Phase shift and ratio are measured using phase meters to directly compare the angular difference between primary and secondary currents or through analysis, which decomposes currents into for precise error quantification. In precision CTs, corrections for phase errors are achieved via auxiliary compensation windings, which inject a counteracting to nullify the introduced by the magnetizing component, ensuring accuracy within specified limits for high-fidelity applications.

Types and Applications

Standard Measurement Types

Metering current transformers (CTs) are designed for precise measurement of alternating current in power systems, emphasizing high accuracy and minimal error for applications requiring reliable data collection. These CTs adhere to international standards such as IEC 61869-2, which define accuracy classes for metering purposes, typically ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 to ensure errors remain below 0.6% under rated conditions. They feature low burden ratings, generally 1 to 5 VA, to maintain linearity and prevent excessive voltage drops across the secondary circuit when connected to metering instruments. Common current ratios include 200:5 A, allowing the secondary output to scale primary currents effectively for standard instrumentation. Bar-type CTs represent a compact variant of metering CTs, where the primary is a solid passing directly through the , forming a single-turn primary winding. This design is fully insulated and ideal for integration into assemblies, providing space efficiency without requiring additional enclosures. They support primary currents up to 4000 A, making them suitable for high-current monitoring in distribution panels and feeder circuits. Bushing-type CTs are integrated directly into the insulated bushings of transformers or circuit breakers, utilizing the central as the primary winding around a core. This configuration saves space and simplifies installation in confined areas, particularly for medium-voltage applications up to 72.5 . Their design ensures reliable performance in environments where external mounting is impractical, such as within substation equipment housings. In power systems, these standard metering CTs are primarily employed for revenue metering, where accurate current measurement is essential for utility billing and tracking. They also facilitate and quality analysis, detecting anomalies like harmonics or imbalances to support system reliability. Typical deployments include substations for aggregated load assessment and industrial panels for process control and efficiency optimization.

Protection and Special Types

Protection current transformers (CTs) are designed specifically for use in protective relaying applications, where the priority is reliable operation during fault conditions rather than high precision metering. These CTs typically fall into accuracy classes such as 5P and 10P under IEC 61869-2, indicating a composite error limit of 5% or 10% at rated , with protection-specific subclasses like 5P20 ensuring the error remains within limits up to 20 times the rated secondary for fault detection. They exhibit high burden , often rated up to 100 , to accommodate the impedance of relays and connecting leads without excessive or during overcurrent events. Common applications include overcurrent relays, which trip on excessive line currents, and relays, which compare currents across protected zones like transformers or generators to detect internal faults. Linear couplers and summation CTs represent specialized variants for integrating currents from multiple sources or detecting unbalanced conditions in power systems. Linear couplers, essentially air-core mutual inductors, generate an output voltage proportional to the rate of change of primary current (di/dt) and are used in busbar differential protection schemes, where they provide sensitivity to internal faults while avoiding saturation issues common in iron-core CTs. Summation CTs, on the other hand, combine secondary currents from multiple lines into a single output, facilitating measurement in multi-circuit configurations or enabling zero-sequence current detection in grounded systems for ground-fault protection. These devices are particularly valuable in grounding systems, where they isolate the vector sum of phase currents to identify neutral or earth faults without requiring separate neutral CTs. Protection CTs are engineered for superior transient performance to ensure accurate operation during rapid fault events, such as those occurring in less than one power cycle (typically 16-20 at 60 Hz). To achieve this, they incorporate low in their windings, which reduces phase angle errors and distortion during high-frequency surges or asymmetrical faults, allowing faithful reproduction of the primary for timely decisions. This design minimizes and supports linear response up to fault currents 20 times the rated value, preventing delayed or false tripping that could compromise system stability. Among special types, Rogowski coil CTs offer a non-saturating alternative for measuring high-frequency transients and pulsed currents in protection scenarios. These air-core devices, wound uniformly around a non-magnetic former, produce an output voltage directly proportional to the derivative of the primary current, eliminating magnetic saturation and enabling wide bandwidth operation up to several MHz for capturing fast transients like switching surges or lightning-induced faults. An integrator circuit is typically required to recover the current waveform, making them suitable for relaying in environments with high dynamic ranges. Optical CTs, utilizing the Faraday effect, provide another advanced option for digital substations by passing polarized light through a sensing medium exposed to the magnetic field around the conductor, rotating the light's polarization proportionally to the current without electrical isolation concerns. This fiber-optic approach supports direct digital output, enhances immunity to electromagnetic interference, and facilitates integration into IEC 61850-based automation systems for real-time protection and monitoring.

High-Voltage Variants

High-voltage variants of transformers are engineered for extra-high voltage (EHV) and ultra-high voltage (UHV) transmission systems, typically operating at voltages from 220 kV to over 800 kV, with specialized designs extending to 1100 kV in advanced applications. These transformers must provide accurate and signals while withstanding extreme electrical stresses, including high requirements and transient overvoltages. Standard designs for voltages up to 800 kV include tank-type configurations, where the core and windings are housed in a grounded metal tank for safety and . Condenser-type current transformers incorporate capacitive elements within the bushings to divide the voltage gradient evenly across the layers, enabling more compact constructions compared to fully inductive types. This approach reduces material usage and overall cost while maintaining high integrity, making it suitable for EHV applications where and weight are critical. For instance, condenser bushings use layered conductive foils embedded in solid to control distribution, preventing localized stress concentrations. In the 220–765 kV range, oil-immersed current transformers predominate, featuring high-quality and paper for superior performance and thermal cooling. SF6-gas insulated variants offer a more compact alternative, using gas for due to its excellent arc-quenching and properties, often integrated into gas-insulated (GIS) for substation efficiency. bushing designs are employed in these systems to achieve uniform distribution across multiple layers, minimizing partial discharges. Primary terminals are configured for either live- setups, in which the is at line potential and the core and secondary windings are insulated from ground, or dead- configurations, where the and enclosure are grounded and the primary conductor passes through insulating for enhanced safety in outdoor installations. Key design challenges in high-voltage variants include preventing , which can degrade over time; this is addressed through polished conductor surfaces, rings, and optimized shielding to ensure field uniformity. Thermal in extended insulators is managed via flexible or composite materials and expansion joints to accommodate variations without failure. In UHV applications, such as China's ±1100 kV UHVDC lines like the Changji-Guquan project, these transformers are integrated with GIS for reliable operation in long-distance transmission, supporting capacities up to 12 while meeting stringent accuracy and safety standards.

Safety and Compliance

Operational Hazards

One of the most critical operational hazards of (CTs) is the open-secondary , where the secondary is interrupted while the primary flows. This transforms the CT into an effective step-up , inducing extremely high voltages—often in the thousands of volts—across the open terminals due to the high turns ratio and the magnetizing attempting to maintain balance. Such voltages pose severe risks of electric to personnel, breakdown, arcing, and potential or if the energy discharges catastrophically. To mitigate this, unused CT secondaries must always be short-circuited with a low-impedance or dedicated shorting device before de-energizing the primary . Saturation of the CT core represents another significant hazard, occurring when primary fault currents exceed the transformer's design knee-point voltage, causing nonlinear in the secondary output . This can lead to inaccurate representation, resulting in false trips during normal or external faults, which may unnecessarily isolate healthy sections and contribute to cascading . Conversely, severe saturation may prevent detection of internal faults by underrepresenting the magnitude, allowing damage to propagate unchecked and potentially escalating to widespread blackouts or failure. These issues are exacerbated in schemes where precise reproduction is essential for or relays. Thermal runaway poses a risk during prolonged overloads, where excessive secondary heating exceeds the insulation's thermal limits, leading to , melting, or charring of materials. CTs are typically rated for 120% of nominal continuously under standard ambient conditions to accommodate minor overloads without excessive temperature rise, but sustained operation beyond this—such as during unbalanced loads or measurement errors—can initiate a vicious cycle of increased resistance and heat generation. For short durations, they withstand momentary overloads up to 500% of rated , but repeated or extended exposure risks insulation failure and propagation within the enclosure. Improper installation, particularly inadequate grounding of the secondary circuit, can induce ferroresonance—a nonlinear between the CT's and system —generating sustained overvoltages and overcurrents that stress and connected equipment. This phenomenon often arises in ungrounded or single-point grounded systems during switching operations or faults, amplifying voltages to destructive levels and risking arcing or heating. Historical incidents underscore these dangers; for instance, a 345 kV oil-filled metering CT in 2021 triggered an , shrapnel dispersal, oil ignition, and substation due to degraded of the oil.

Standards and Testing

Current transformers (CTs) are governed by international standards that ensure their design, performance, and reliability in electrical systems. The IEC 61869 series, introduced starting in 2007, provides comprehensive requirements for , including CTs, and has fully replaced the older IEC 60044 series, which dated back to 1966. Recent editions include IEC 61869-1:2023 for general requirements and IEC 61869-20:2025 for safety requirements in high-voltage applications (over 1 kV or 1.5 kV ). Specifically, parts like IEC 61869-1 outline general requirements, while IEC 61869-2 addresses additional specifications for current transformers. In the United States, ANSI/IEEE C57.13 establishes standards for CT ratings, including basic impulse insulation levels and accuracy classifications, along with detailed testing protocols. These standards define accuracy classes, such as 0.6 for metering applications, to ensure precise current measurement under specified conditions. Testing procedures for CTs verify compliance with these standards through a series of electrical and performance evaluations. Ratio and phase angle checks are conducted by applying a to the secondary winding and measuring the induced primary voltage or current to confirm the turns and angular displacement, ensuring the CT output accurately reflects the primary . Saturation curve tests involve progressively increasing AC voltage on the secondary until core saturation occurs, plotting the characteristics to assess the CT's response under high fault currents without excessive error. Impulse withstand tests simulate strikes using a 1.2/50 μs to evaluate , confirming the CT can endure transient overvoltages up to its rated basic impulse level. Temperature rise tests operate the CT at rated and up to 50% overload, monitoring winding and ambient to ensure thermal stability and prevent insulation degradation. Certification of CTs involves both type tests on prototypes and routine tests on units to validate integrity and manufacturing consistency. Type tests include demagnetization procedures to the and eliminate residual effects from prior operations, ensuring repeatable performance. measurements during high-voltage application must remain below 10 pC to confirm quality and minimize internal arcing risks. Routine tests encompass high-potential (hipot) testing at twice the rated voltage to verify withstand capability across windings and to . These processes, aligned with IEC 61869 and IEEE C57.13, culminate in by accredited bodies, confirming the CT meets and operational criteria. Post-2020 developments in standards have increasingly addressed cybersecurity for digital CT interfaces, particularly in smart grid applications where CT data is transmitted via networks like IEC 61850. Enhancements focus on securing low-power instrument transformers (LPITs) against cyber threats, including protocols and intrusion detection to protect measurement integrity. Additionally, there is growing emphasis on , promoting eco-friendly insulators such as natural fluids derived from vegetable oils, which offer biodegradability and reduced environmental impact compared to traditional mineral oils. These materials support carbon-neutral goals while maintaining performance in CT designs.

References

  1. [1]
    Current Transformer Basics and the Current Transformer
    A current transformer (CT) is an instrument transformer that produces a secondary current proportional to the primary current, converting it through a magnetic ...
  2. [2]
    Current Transformer: What is it? (And How Does it Work?)
    Feb 24, 2012 · A current transformer (CT) is an instrument transformer in which the secondary current is substantially proportional to primary current and differs in phase ...
  3. [3]
    Understanding Current Transformers: Types and Applications
    Aug 5, 2025 · But unlike power transformers that step up or step down voltages, a CT is designed for measurement and protection. It doesn't deliver power.
  4. [4]
    IEEE C57.13-2016 - IEEE Standards Association
    This standard defines the requirements for Class 1 instrument transformers. For instrument transformers of a nominal system voltage of 115 kV and above if Class ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Instrument Transformer Basic Technical Information and Application
    Likewise a designation of 400:5 amperes expresses the rating of a current transformer and means that when 400 amperes flow through the primary, 5 amperes ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] INSTRUMENT TRANSFORMERS I. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
    The following definitions deal with general and specific terms used in current transformers ... Current transformer, or group of three current transformers.
  7. [7]
    History of Transformers - Edison Tech Center
    1885 - William Stanley makes the transformer more practical due to some design changes: "Stanley's first patented design was for induction coils with single ...Missing: 1890s | Show results with:1890s
  8. [8]
    [PDF] NIST Technical Note 1473 Transformer-Like Devices for High ...
    Two laws of electromagnetic theory govern the fundamental principles of ... and current comparators: Faraday's Law of Induction and Ampere's Circuital Law.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Current Transformer Concepts - Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories
    CT EQUIVALENT CIRCUITS​​ A current transformer can be modeled as a constant current source where ratio current is injected into a magnetizing impedance in ...
  10. [10]
    The Essentials Of Current Transformers In Power Circuits (Theory ...
    Dec 3, 2018 · The transformer can be represented by the equivalent circuit of Figure 1, where all quantities are referred to the secondary side. Equivalent ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    Current transformers with nickel-iron cores - IEEE Xplore
    There has been developed recently a nickel-iron alloy called hypernik which has especially low hysteresis loss and high permeability at low inductions.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] 3% Silicon Steel Core Material
    It has a silicon content up to 3.2 mass %, which increases the electrical resistivity and reduces eddy current losses.
  14. [14]
    Why silicon steel is used for transformer cores - Pourleroi
    Aug 20, 2025 · Silicon steel has a high saturation flux density, up to about 2 Tesla. This is much higher than ferrite or amorphous metal alloys. That makes ...Silicon Steel Properties · Saturation Flux Density · Core Loss Reduction
  15. [15]
    DC-Compensated Current Transformer - PMC - NIH
    Jan 20, 2016 · The 140/100 × 20 mm core manufactured by NPAY has high permeability, low coercivity and low remanence. Due to this, it can easily recover from ...
  16. [16]
    Nanocrystalline Current Transformer Cores KY-CT141908
    ... low remanence, high rectangular ratio and high initial permeability. Permeability/Frequency relative change curve. Permeability-Frequency-relative-change-curve.
  17. [17]
    Current Transformer Basics: What You Need To Know About Current ...
    Jul 23, 2023 · It uses the actual cable or bus bar of the existing circuit as its primary winding, giving it a single turn type configuration. These are often ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] CT SEcondary Comparison White Paper Rev 1
    A CT transforms a primary input current into a secondary signal. The secondary signal can either be a voltage, typically 333 mV or a current, typically 5 amps.
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    Types of Current Transformers - Circuit Digest
    Mar 18, 2025 · Toroidal Core Current Transformers have a ring shaped core and the conductor passes directly through the center of the core. They don't have a ...
  21. [21]
    Current Transformers for Accurate Measurement & Protection
    Types of Current Transformers · Window-type Current Transformer (Toroidal CT or Ring CT) · Bar-type Current Transformer · Wound Current Transformer.
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Things to Know About Current Transformers
    May 15, 2025 · The three standard types of current transformers are toroidal, wound, and bar. Toroidal Current Transformer. These transformers do not have a ...
  24. [24]
    Which Core Types are Utilized in Toroidal Transformers?
    Jul 19, 2022 · Silicon-iron alloys are preferred for high-power transformers. Transformers made of nickel-iron are used in high-frequency applications. Tape ...
  25. [25]
    Understanding Current Transformer Accuracy Classes Under IEC ...
    Mar 13, 2024 · This blog will delve deep into the IEC 61869-2 standard and focus specifically on accuracy classes defined by CTs and their significance.Missing: insulation dielectric partial discharge
  26. [26]
    IEC Current Transformer Accuracy Class - Filipino Engineer -
    Oct 3, 2024 · Some common metering accuracy classes ( IEC ) are Class 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 3. The number refers to the maximum permissible percentage ratio ...
  27. [27]
    classification of protection current transformers in iec/bsen61869-2
    IEC61869-2/BSEN61869-2 commonly define protection current transformers in terms of composite error at an accuracy limit factor.
  28. [28]
    Why Current Transformers Have Errors: Understanding the Basics
    Mar 13, 2025 · The main source of error in current transformers is excitation current, also known as magnetizing current. When current flows through the ...
  29. [29]
    Understanding Errors in Current Transformers - EPR Magazine
    Jan 3, 2022 · In this article, we will understand various errors that are experienced in Current Transformer and also possible methods to compensate these errors.
  30. [30]
    What Do the 5P10 and 5P20 Mean in a Current Transformer?
    The 5P20 marking on a current transformer indicates that if the primary fault current is 20 times the rated current, the error will be 5%.
  31. [31]
    Review of Accuracy Assessment Methods for Current Transformers
    The comparative method, as standardized in IEC 61869-2, offers the highest achievable accuracy—often below ± 0.05% for ratio error and within ± 0.1′ for phase ...
  32. [32]
    Calibration and Accuracy of Split Core Current Transformers
    Dec 6, 2024 · Calibration is the process of comparing the CT's output to a reference standard and adjusting it to minimize errors. For split core CTs, ...
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    How Amorphous Core Transformers In Distribution Networks Cut No ...
    Jun 5, 2025 · Studies indicate that amorphous core transformers can reduce no-load losses by up to 70% compared to traditional silicon steel core transformers.
  35. [35]
    0.05 Class High Accuracy CT Standard Current Transformer for ...
    0.05 Class High Accuracy CT Standard Current Transformer for Calibration. Introduction Advantages 1. Higher Quality: We have a professional team with ...
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    [PDF] A calibration service for current transformers - GovInfo
    standard burden designations have no significance at frequencies other than 60 Hz. STANDARD BURDEN FOR CURRENT TRANSFORMERS. BURDEN. WITH 5-A SECONDARIES.
  38. [38]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  39. [39]
    Impact of CT saturation on overcurrent relays - IET Journals - Wiley
    Aug 23, 2018 · Fig. 9 shows that as the burden resistance increases, the CT saturation becomes more severe and distortion of the CT secondary current waveform ...Abstract · Introduction · Experimental setup · Experimental results
  40. [40]
    None
    ### Summary on Phase Shift in Current Transformers
  41. [41]
    Measurement Errors Due to CT Phase Shift
    Phase angle errors are more complex. The current transformer introduces a phase shift (or time delay) in the AC current signal, relative to the actual current.
  42. [42]
    Current Transformer – Construction, Phasor and Errors
    Jan 16, 2018 · For transformation ratio to be equal to turn ratio, α = δ =0. This means that there should not be any core loss in the current transformer and ...
  43. [43]
    Vector Diagrams | Powermetrix | Electric Meter Testing Equipment
    Mar 1, 2016 · Phase A voltage, or Va, lays on the primary “x” axis at 0° phase shift. Ia is laying on top of the voltage phasor at 0° as well, indicating ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] precision current transformer calibrations - up to 10 000 amps and ...
    An equal and opposite current from the balance control circuit is injected into the compensating winding to give null deflection of the detector. The error B is ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Differences & Similarities in IEC and IEEE Standards for Current ...
    “K” class CT also is classified in IEEE C57.13, it is same as class “C” but the knee point voltage must be at least 70% of the secondary terminal voltage, ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] The Basics of Current Transformers - NK Technologies
    Metering Accuracy CTs are rated for specified standard burdens and designed to be highly accurate from very low current to the maximum current rating of the CT.
  47. [47]
    CT's and PT's - Learn Metering
    Typical CT ratios are 200:5, 400:5, 600:5, 800:5 and so on. Again, what this means is that when the stated value of amps is flowing through the primary side of ...
  48. [48]
    Current transformer bar type - Newtek Electricals
    Bar type current transformers are mounted in-line with bus bars, fully insulated, and have a single turn primary conductor. They are designed for power ...
  49. [49]
    current transformer tropicalised 4000 5 double output for bars 52x127
    This current transformer, tropicalised for busbar, has a line rated current of 4000 A and a secondary current rating of 5 A. This current transformer do ...
  50. [50]
    Transformer bushing CTs - Megger
    A bushing type CT consists only of a toroidal-shaped core with a secondary winding. The bushing's centre conductor forms the single turn primary of the BCT.
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
    RevenueSense - GE Vernova
    Increases billing accuracy · Exceeds accuracy range for standard revenue metering · Simplifies CT selection and billing multipliers · Reduces inventory and part ...
  53. [53]
    Types, Operation, and Applications in Power Quality and Energy ...
    Feb 19, 2025 · Power Quality Monitoring: CTs are used to assess the quality of power by monitoring parameters such as harmonic distortion, load imbalances, and ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] SEL Current Transformers - Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories
    “P” designates protection class. IEEE Metering-Class Values Example 2.4-RF2 = 2.4 percent accuracy with a ratings factor of 2; that is, up to 2 times the rated ...
  55. [55]
    6 Electrical Tests for Current Transformers Explained
    May 12, 2017 · A CT ratio test can be performed by injecting a primary current and measuring the current output, or by injecting a secondary voltage and ...
  56. [56]
    TechTopics No. 91 - Siemens US
    Explore IEEE and IEC current transformer standards, comparing accuracy, specifications, and secondary CT performance for electrical industry professionals.<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Practical Aspects of Rogowski Coil Applications to Relaying
    For differential protection of busbars, linear couplers are typically connected in a voltage-differential circuit. For normal load or external-fault conditions, ...Missing: summation | Show results with:summation
  58. [58]
    What is Summation Transformer? - EEEGUIDE.COM
    Summation transformer are employed for converting 3-phase quantities into single-phase quantities. The basic arrangement summation transformer is shown in Fig.
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Sizing Current Transformers for Line Protection Applications
    Zocholl and D. W. Smaha, “Current Transformer Concepts,” proceedings of the 19th Annual Western Protective Relay Conference,. Spokane, WA, October 1992.
  61. [61]
    Optical Current Transformers - Arteche
    ARTECHE's SDO-OCT Optical Current Transformers are based on the Faraday effect that causes a change in the polarization angle of the light when it crosses a ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] OPTICAL CURRENT TRANSFORMER - Trench Group
    Measures electrical currents at high voltage potentials using the Faraday effect. Provides a wide dynamic range with a single turn primary bar by eliminating ...
  63. [63]
    Current Transformer IMB (36 - 800 kV) - Hitachi Energy
    The combination of different tank sizes, expansion systems, primary windings etc.,makes it possible to meet most customer requirements from 36 kV up to 800 kV.
  64. [64]
    Current Transformer (with internals) Explained - saVRee
    They are tightly wound and evenly distributed across the periphery of the core. The ends of the secondary windings are made accessible for external connection ...
  65. [65]
    Current Transformer TG (72.5 - 800 kV) - Hitachi Energy
    For the TG combination of SF6 gas insulation and with a composite insulator, offers several advantages: Explosion-proof design; Non-flammable; Absence of ...
  66. [66]
    LRGBJ-ZH Cascade Series Current Transformers – above 220kV
    Our cascade (double-decker) CT design operates at a higher voltage class from two assembled parts of lower voltage classes. They are generally used for voltage ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] IEC Oil Filled & SF6 Gas Current Transformers - Chess Controls
    Both oil filled designs utilize stainless steel expansion bellows. The SF6 gas insulated “top core” design utilizes SF6 gas for its insulating medium and ...
  68. [68]
    ABB's extra high voltage current transformers ensure safe, reliable ...
    Jun 29, 2016 · Three 800 kilovolt (kV) gas-insulated current transformers type TG safeguard power transmission through an extra high voltage link in the eastern United States.
  69. [69]
    Changji-Guquan UHVDC Transmission Project - NS Energy
    Feb 24, 2020 · ... -high-voltage direct current (UHVDC) transmission line in China is the world's first transmission line operating at 1100kV voltage.
  70. [70]
  71. [71]
    IEC and NEMA/IEEE ratings of current transformers (CTs) in medium ...
    Jan 26, 2020 · 1.9 Metering class. A metering class indicates the accuracy of the CT secondary current at 5 to 125% of rated primary current. Above this ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] TE'S CROMPTON INSTRUMENTS CURRENT TRANSFORMERS
    System voltage: 720V maximum. Test voltage: 3kV for 1 minute. System frequency: 50/60Hz. Overload withstand: 1.2 x rated current continuously.<|control11|><|separator|>
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Instrument Transformers - ABB
    Current transformer characteristics at special burdens can only be determined by an actual measurement. The test burden must duplicate the actual burden, ...
  74. [74]
    How system earthing keeps you and the network safe | EEP
    Jul 22, 2020 · 5. Avoid ferroresonance. Voltage transformers connected to an unearthed network can under particular circumstances create abnormal neutral-point ...
  75. [75]
    The IEC 60044 series replaced by the IEC 61869 series [40].
    International standard for ITs was the IEC 60044 series in 1966, and it was replaced by IEC 61869-1 as general requirements for all types of ITs since 2007.
  76. [76]
    Instrument transformers according to new IEC standards available
    Mar 19, 2015 · New standards IEC 61869-1, IEC 61869-2 and IEC 61869-3 fully replace previous standards IEC 60044-1, IEC 60044-2 and IEC 60044-6. An offering of ...
  77. [77]
    IEC 61869-6:2016
    Apr 27, 2016 · IEC 61869-6:2016 covers additional general requirements for low-power instrument transformers (LPIT) for a.c. and d.c. applications.
  78. [78]
    CT Accuracy Standards - Continental Control Systems, LLC
    Each of these accuracy classes specifies the limit for the TCF as a percentage, so class 1.2 means the CT TCF must be within 1.2% of ideal at 100% of rated ...
  79. [79]
  80. [80]
    [PDF] IEEE Std C57.13
    Jun 29, 2016 · The test code covers measurement and calculation of ratio and phase angle, demagnetization, impedance and excitation measurements, polarity ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Current Transformers: Standards and Ratings | Polycast
    Polycast testing capabilities include polarity, ratio and phase angle, saturation, temperature rise, open cir- cuit, induced, power factor, hipot, impulse, ...Missing: procedures | Show results with:procedures
  82. [82]
    Testing and Commissioning of Current Transformer
    Dec 19, 2024 · Testing of current transformer includes: insulation resistance, polarity, burden, magnetization curve, turns ratio and primary injection ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] IEEE Standard Requirements for Instrument Transformers
    Covers current transformers in which the leakage flux in the core of the transformer does not have an appreciable effect on the ratio(s) within the limits ...
  84. [84]
    Guide to Transformer Testing Standards
    Overview of the common tests performed on transformers, including Winding Resistance, Megger, Transformer Turns Ratio, Load-Loss, Leak Tests, and others.
  85. [85]
    Type Tests and Routine Tests of Transformer - Electrical4U
    May 10, 2013 · Type tests validate design, while routine tests confirm operational performance of individual units. Type tests are done on prototypes, routine ...
  86. [86]
    10 AND IEC 61869 –11 PASSIVE SENSORS AND THEIR ...
    IEC 61869-10/11 standards define requirements for low-power transformers (LPCT/LPVT) connected to IEDs, and the connection must not affect low voltage levels.<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    A Review of Cybersecurity Challenges in Smart Power Transformers
    Aug 6, 2025 · Our paper addresses this oversight by pioneering the examination of cybersecurity challenges presented by smart transformers. We introduce a ...
  88. [88]
    Transformers go green | IEC e-tech
    May 14, 2025 · Sustainable vegetable and seed oils are increasingly being used to insulate electric equipment and the IEC provides the standards.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  89. [89]
    Liquid insulation for sustainable transformers - PV Magazine
    Jun 10, 2025 · Liquid insulation is one of the ways of ensuring transformers – which convert electric power from high voltages to lower voltages – remain safe.