Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Decision support system

A decision support system (DSS) is an interactive human–computer system that supports decision makers rather than replaces them, utilizing data and models to address semi-structured and unstructured problems, with a focus on decision over . These systems aid managers and knowledge workers in organizational settings by providing tools for judgment-based tasks that cannot be fully automated. Unlike systems, which handle routine operations, DSS emphasize flexibility and interactivity to solve ill-structured problems. The core components of a DSS typically include a for storing and retrieving , a for analytical models and simulations, and a for seamless interaction. Additional elements may encompass knowledge bases for expert insights and communication tools for collaborative . These components integrate to draw on systems and broader organizational , enabling informed choices in complex environments. The history of DSS traces back to the 1960s, when early model-driven systems emerged, such as Michael S. Scott Morton's 1967 dissertation on management decision systems. The 1970s saw theoretical advancements, including Keen and Scott Morton's 1978 book Decision Support Systems: An Organizational Perspective, which formalized the field. By the 1980s, the proliferation of personal computers and spreadsheets like VisiCalc (1979) accelerated adoption, alongside the development of executive information systems (EIS) as noted by John Rockart in 1979. The 1990s marked further evolution with data warehousing, online analytical processing (OLAP), and web-based DSS, expanding their scope to include business intelligence. DSS are classified into several types based on their primary focus, including data-driven systems that leverage large datasets for querying and reporting, model-driven systems that emphasize optimization and simulation, knowledge-driven systems akin to expert systems for rule-based advice, document-driven systems for managing unstructured , and communication-driven systems to facilitate group decisions. Hybrid and web-based variants have become prominent, incorporating advancements like and big data analytics to enhance support in modern applications.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

A decision support system (DSS) is an interactive, computer-based designed to assist or organizational activities. It integrates , analytical models, and user-friendly interfaces to help managers address semi-structured or unstructured problems, where solutions cannot be fully predefined or automated. This definition emphasizes the system's role in supporting rather than replacing human judgment, enabling users to explore alternatives through flexible querying and tools. The primary purpose of a DSS is to enhance the of decisions by delivering timely, relevant, and actionable tailored to the decision context. By facilitating what-if analyses and scenario simulations, it allows users to evaluate potential outcomes without real-world risks, thereby improving foresight in dynamic environments. Unlike transaction processing systems, which focus on routine operational tasks like and record-keeping, DSS target analytical needs at strategic, tactical, and operational levels, aiding managers in complex problem-solving. Key benefits of DSS include increased decision accuracy and speed through data-driven insights, reduced costs via virtual testing of strategies, and greater adaptability to uncertain or evolving business conditions. These systems promote better and , ultimately contributing to without enforcing rigid procedures.

Key Characteristics

Decision support systems (DSS) are distinguished by their , enabling users to engage in real-time, user-driven queries and receive immediate through dynamic interfaces that allow control over the sequence of operations and data exploration. This interactive nature facilitates iterative processes, where users can refine analyses without requiring extensive programming knowledge. For instance, DSS often incorporate "what-if" scenarios that respond instantaneously to user inputs, enhancing the decision-maker's ability to test hypotheses efficiently. A core trait of DSS is their flexibility, which allows adaptation to diverse decision contexts, user preferences, and evolving organizational needs by supporting varied sequences of activities and quick reconfiguration of models or inputs. This adaptability is evident in how DSS can handle both routine and novel problems, accommodating different managerial styles through customizable interfaces and modular components that evolve over time. Unlike rigid systems, DSS prioritize responsiveness to changing environments, enabling seamless shifts between analytical tasks. DSS achieve effectiveness through the of multiple components, seamlessly combining , analytical models, and human judgment to provide holistic support for decision processes. This synthesis draws from databases for factual inputs, model bases for simulations, and user expertise via intuitive dialog systems, creating a unified platform that augments rather than automates judgment. Such integration ensures that decisions benefit from both quantitative rigor and qualitative insights, as seen in systems that blend internal records with external knowledge sources. Particularly suited for semi-structured decisions, DSS excel in addressing problems that lack predefined algorithms or complete information, bridging the gap between fully structured routine tasks and unstructured strategic challenges by leveraging models to explore uncertainties. These systems support ill-structured scenarios common in management, such as under , where human complements computational to generate viable options. By focusing on generation rather than optimization alone, DSS aid in framing and reframing complex issues without imposing strict procedural constraints. To broaden accessibility, DSS emphasize user-friendliness, featuring graphical user interfaces, , and supportive tools like menus and to empower non-technical decision-makers with minimal training. This design philosophy prioritizes ease of use, ensuring that end-users—often managers without programming skills—can interact directly and derive meaningful outputs, such as visual dashboards or simplified reports. Consequently, DSS promote widespread adoption by reducing barriers to engagement while maintaining analytical depth.

Historical Evolution

Origins and Early Developments

The theoretical foundations of decision support systems (DSS) emerged in the mid-20th century, particularly through studies at the Carnegie Institute of Technology (now Carnegie Mellon University) on organizational decision-making. In the 1950s and 1960s, Herbert A. Simon and colleagues developed key concepts such as bounded rationality, which challenged classical economic models of perfect rationality by emphasizing that decision-makers operate under constraints of limited information, time, and cognitive capacity, leading to "satisficing" rather than optimizing behaviors. Simon's work, including his 1955 paper on behavioral models of rational choice, laid the groundwork for understanding how computational tools could augment human decision processes in complex organizations. This research highlighted the need for systems that support semi-structured decisions in business settings, influencing the design of early DSS prototypes. In the 1960s, early model-oriented systems began to take shape, drawing heavily from and (OR) methodologies for optimization and planning. Researchers developed computerized quantitative models to assist managers with recurring decisions, such as and , using techniques like and . These systems were often standalone applications focused on analytical modeling rather than integrated , reflecting the era's emphasis on mathematical tools to handle uncertainty in decision environments. Pioneering efforts, such as those by R.C. Raymond in , systematically explored how such models could enhance managerial planning on early computing platforms. The rise of these systems was closely tied to advancements in computing technology during the 1960s, including the proliferation of mainframe computers like the , which enabled and early interactive s. Software for , such as general-purpose languages adapted for modeling (e.g., early versions of FORTRAN-based tools), allowed organizations to test decision scenarios virtually, bridging theoretical models with practical application. A key figure in this period was Michael S. Scott Morton, whose 1966-1967 research at and Harvard explored interactive computer-based support for decisions, culminating in his influential 1971 book Management Decision Systems. Scott Morton's work demonstrated how mainframe systems could facilitate manager-model interactions, paving the way for more formalized DSS in subsequent decades.

Major Milestones

The term "decision support system" (DSS) was first introduced by G.A. Gorry and M.S. Scott Morton in their 1971 paper, with Peter G.W. Keen and Michael S. Scott Morton providing a foundational organizational perspective in their 1978 book, which formalized DSS as interactive computer-based systems aiding managerial . The first dedicated academic forum for DSS research emerged in the late , including the ACM SIGBDP on Decision Support Systems held in , in January 1977, followed by the inaugural International on Decision Support Systems in , , in 1981, which facilitated the exchange of ideas on DSS implementation and theory. In the 1970s and , DSS evolved through integration with emerging database technologies and electronic , exemplified by , released in 1979 as the first commercial software for personal computers, which enabled rapid and what-if analysis for individual decision-makers. This period also saw the rise of executive information systems (EIS), spurred by John Rockart's 1979 on critical success factors, which highlighted the need for high-level dashboards delivering summarized to top executives, marking a shift toward user-friendly, reporting tools. Ralph H. Sprague's 1980 framework further structured DSS development by delineating three core components—dialogue, , and model management—providing a blueprint for building flexible, semi-structured support applications. Collaborative and distributed DSS emerged in the , with group decision support systems (GDSS) gaining prominence as networked tools for facilitating collective problem-solving in meetings, often using input to reduce , as explored in early implementations like the University of Arizona's PLEXSYS system. The advent of the in the mid-1990s enabled web-based DSS, allowing remote access to decision tools via browsers and integrating hyperlinked data for broader organizational use, exemplified by early platforms like those developed for . By the early 2000s, standardization efforts advanced through the comprehensive frameworks of Clyde W. Holsapple and Andrew B. Whinston, whose 1996 knowledge-based approach emphasized DSS as modular systems incorporating alongside data and models, influencing the transition to enterprise-wide DSS that spanned departments and supported strategic alignment. This era also reflected the profound impact of personal computers, which proliferated in the and democratized DSS access by empowering non-technical users with affordable hardware for running model-driven applications, thereby accelerating adoption from mainframe-centric environments to desktop-based ones.

Core Components

Data Management Subsystem

The data management subsystem serves as the foundational component of a decision support system (DSS), responsible for acquiring, storing, maintaining, and retrieving data to enable informed decision-making. It integrates data from diverse internal and external sources, ensuring availability in a format suitable for analysis without altering the underlying data structures. This subsystem operates independently of the analytical models, focusing solely on data lifecycle management to support strategic, tactical, and operational decisions. In modern implementations, cloud-based database management systems (DBMS) like Amazon RDS facilitate scalable storage and access. Core functions of the data management subsystem include collecting from systems, () systems, () platforms, and external feeds such as economic indicators or databases; storing this in centralized repositories for and ; and retrieving it efficiently through query mechanisms. It also encompasses cleaning to eliminate inconsistencies, duplicates, and errors—a process that often consumes a significant portion of data preparation efforts—and transformation via () procedures to standardize formats and resolve discrepancies, such as varying coding for categorical variables. Additionally, the subsystem supports ingestion from sources like sensors or web streams, alongside historical archiving for longitudinal analysis. Key elements involve from structured (e.g., relational tables) and unstructured sources (e.g., text documents or files), often using a as a unified repository that can scale to terabytes or petabytes for organizational use. Technologies such as management systems (DBMS) like or SQL Server facilitate storage and querying with structured query language (SQL), while ETL tools handle integration pipelines. For , the subsystem incorporates (OLAP) capabilities, allowing operations like drill-down, roll-up, and slicing on data cubes to reveal patterns without requiring ad-hoc modeling. Data dictionaries and directories further aid in management, ensuring users can locate and interpret data elements accurately. A representative example is the aggregation of sales data from point-of-sale systems and supplier inventories into a , where cleaning removes outliers and transformations normalize units (e.g., converting currencies), enabling retrieval for such as seasonal in retail environments. This process supports decisions like inventory replenishment without involving predictive algorithms.

Model Management Subsystem

The Model Management Subsystem () in a decision support system (DSS) serves as the analytical core, housing and orchestrating a collection of models that transform input into actionable insights for decision-makers. It comprises a model base—a repository of predefined or user-built models—and a Model Base Management System (MBMS), which handles the storage, retrieval, execution, and maintenance of these models to support . The MMS enables DSS users to apply quantitative techniques without needing deep programming expertise, focusing on problem-solving through model integration and experimentation. Contemporary tools include libraries like for building advanced models. Key functions of the MMS include model creation using building blocks like algorithms and languages (e.g., C++, Java, or specialized tools such as SPSS), execution via command processors that interpret user instructions, and integration to combine multiple models for complex analyses. The MBMS also ensures model consistency, updates obsolete components, and facilitates interfacing with external data sources, allowing seamless processing of inputs from the data management subsystem. Additionally, it supports model cataloging through a directory that lists model types, parameters, and availability, streamlining selection for specific decision contexts. These functions collectively enable the MMS to manage diverse analytical tools, including statistical, optimization, and forecasting algorithms, enhancing the DSS's capability to address semi-structured problems. The MMS accommodates various model types to handle different decision uncertainties. Deterministic models produce fixed outcomes based on precise inputs, such as optimization techniques; a prominent example is , formulated as: \max Z = c_1 x_1 + c_2 x_2 + \cdots + c_n x_n subject to linear constraints like a_{11} x_1 + a_{12} x_2 + \cdots + a_{1n} x_n \leq b_1 and non-negativity conditions x_i \geq 0, used to allocate resources efficiently in operations. models, in contrast, incorporate randomness and probability distributions to account for variability, such as in where outcomes depend on uncertain events. Simulation models replicate real-world processes through iterative computations; methods, for instance, generate random samples from probability distributions to estimate the range of possible results in scenarios like project risk evaluation, running thousands of trials to approximate expected values and variances. Model management within the MMS relies on solvers—specialized software for running algorithms—and tools for scenario analysis, such as what-if testing, where users alter parameters to observe impacts on outcomes without altering the underlying model base. This setup allows for and validation, ensuring models remain relevant through periodic maintenance and versioning. The MBMS enforces and access controls, preventing unauthorized modifications while promoting reusability across DSS applications. A practical example is financial forecasting models employing regression equations, such as multiple linear regression: \hat{Y} = \beta_0 + \beta_1 X_1 + \beta_2 X_2 + \cdots + \beta_k X_k where \hat{Y} predicts outcomes like sales revenue based on predictors X_i (e.g., market trends or advertising spend), derived from historical data to inform budgeting decisions in business DSS environments. This model type, stored in the MMS, supports by estimating coefficients through least-squares methods and enabling for .

User Interface Subsystem

The user interface subsystem, often referred to as the subsystem, serves as the primary human-computer layer in a decision support system (DSS), facilitating communication between the user and the system's data and model management components. It enables users to input queries, parameters, and preferences while receiving outputs such as analytical results and visualizations, thereby supporting iterative processes without requiring deep technical expertise. This subsystem is crucial for ensuring that DSS outputs from model executions are accessible and actionable, allowing decision-makers to explore scenarios dynamically. Key functions of the user interface include providing dialogue mechanisms for input and output, such as menu-driven selections, form-based , command languages, and query facilities that allow users to retrieve and manipulate information. Visualizations form a core output function, presenting model-generated results through graphs, charts, and reports to aid interpretation. For instance, interactive time-series charts or bar graphs enable users to drill down into data trends, fostering exploratory analysis. Prominent features encompass graphical user interfaces (GUIs) with elements like windows, icons, and pull-down menus to simplify , alongside dashboards that consolidate key metrics for at-a-glance monitoring. supports intuitive querying by interpreting unstructured user inputs, with significant advancements in recent years addressing challenges in handling . In group decision support systems (GDSS), collaborative tools such as shared screens and annotation enhance multi-user interactions. Design principles emphasize usability for non-expert , incorporating consistent layouts, minimal memory demands, and aesthetically pleasing elements to reduce . loops provide immediate, informative responses to actions—modest for routine tasks and detailed for ones—to build and guide corrections. handling prioritizes reversibility through functions and guided , anticipating common mistakes to maintain efficiency. These principles ensure the interface supports flexible, error-tolerant interactions tailored to decision-makers' needs.

Classifications and Types

Mode-Based Classifications

Decision support systems (DSS) can be classified based on their primary operational , which reflects the dominant resource or technology they emphasize to aid decision-making. This mode-based approach, proposed by , categorizes DSS into five main types: data-driven, model-driven, knowledge-driven, document-driven, and communication-driven. Each type prioritizes different elements, such as structured data access, analytical modeling, expert knowledge, unstructured , or collaborative interactions, to support specific decision processes. Data-driven DSS emphasize accessing and manipulating large volumes of structured data from databases or data warehouses to generate insights for decision-makers. These systems often incorporate tools like (OLAP) for multidimensional data querying and reporting, enabling users to explore trends and patterns without requiring deep technical expertise. For instance, executive information systems (EIS) or platforms allow managers to query historical sales data for . This mode is particularly useful in environments with abundant transactional data, such as or , where decisions rely on empirical evidence from large datasets. Model-driven DSS focus on the use of mathematical, statistical, optimization, or models to analyze decision scenarios, often with limited reliance on extensive data inputs. These systems provide interfaces for users to manipulate models, run what-if analyses, and evaluate alternatives, supporting standalone without real-time data feeds. Examples include optimization software for or tools like spreadsheets with embedded algorithms for . This mode excels in structured problems where algorithmic precision is key, such as or . Knowledge-driven DSS leverage specialized expertise encoded in rule-based systems, inference engines, or to deliver recommendations or diagnostic support. These systems mimic human reasoning by applying domain-specific bases to user queries, often in the form of "if-then" rules or decision trees. A classic example is an for that suggests treatments based on symptoms and guidelines. This mode is ideal for complex, unstructured decisions where human intuition is codified, such as in consulting or applications. Document-driven DSS center on the storage, retrieval, and analysis of unstructured or semi-structured documents, such as reports, emails, or , to inform decisions. They integrate search technologies, , and indexing to facilitate quick access to relevant information. For example, engines allow users to query internal policy documents or product specifications for checks. This mode supports knowledge-intensive tasks in organizations dealing with vast textual repositories, enhancing decision quality through contextual information synthesis. Communication-driven DSS prioritize collaboration and group interactions, using tools to facilitate shared among multiple users. These systems, often called group DSS (GDSS), incorporate features like video conferencing, shared workspaces, and asynchronous messaging to coordinate inputs and resolve conflicts. An example is a virtual meeting platform with and brainstorming tools for sessions. This mode is essential for distributed teams or organizations requiring on multifaceted issues, such as project prioritization.

Scope and User-Based Classifications

Decision support systems (DSS) can be classified based on their of application and the nature of user involvement, which determine how the system integrates into processes at , group, or organizational levels. These classifications emphasize the contextual deployment of DSS, distinguishing them from mode-based categorizations that focus on underlying resources like or models. refers to the breadth of decisions supported, ranging from targeted interventions to enterprise-wide operations, while user-based aspects highlight the number of participants and their interaction style with the system.

Individual versus Group DSS

Individual DSS are designed to assist a single decision-maker in analyzing problems and generating solutions tailored to personal needs, often providing flexible, standalone tools for independent use. For example, a spreadsheet-based financial model enables a manager to evaluate options without external input. In contrast, group DSS (GDSS) facilitate collaborative decision-making among multiple users, supporting interaction, consensus-building, and information sharing across distributed teams, such as in virtual meeting platforms for sessions. This distinction arises from the capacity to handle solitary versus collective decision processes, with group systems enhancing cooperation in geographically dispersed environments.

Specific versus Institutional DSS

Specific DSS, also known as ad-hoc DSS, target unique, non-recurring decisions by offering customized analyses for particular problems, allowing rapid deployment without extensive integration. An example is a query tool for investigating a one-time market anomaly. Institutional DSS, however, support ongoing, organization-wide decisions through standardized, integrated platforms that align with broader operational routines, such as systems for inventory management across departments. This classification, originating from Donovan and Madnick (1977), with Sprague and Carlson (1982) coining the term "specific DSS," underscores the difference between bespoke solutions for isolated issues and robust frameworks for institutional continuity.

Active versus Passive DSS

Passive DSS provide informational aids, such as visualizations or analytical outputs, upon request, leaving the and final decision entirely to the without suggesting specific actions. For instance, a reporting dashboard that displays trends exemplifies this type, requiring active engagement to derive insights. Active DSS, conversely, proactively generate decision recommendations or solutions based on predefined rules and analyses, automating parts of the process to guide toward optimal outcomes, like an algorithm recommending in . According to Hättenschwiler's , these types differ in the degree of autonomy versus discretion.

Hybrid Classifications

Cooperative DSS represent a approach, blending elements of passive and active systems by initially proposing solutions that users can review, modify, or reject through iterative , fostering a between judgment and computational power. This is particularly suited for institutional knowledge-driven applications involving groups, where the system refines outputs based on collective input, such as in collaborative tools that adjust predictions in during team discussions. Hättenschwiler positions cooperative DSS as an , balancing automated suggestions with user modifications to enhance decision quality in complex, multi-stakeholder scenarios. These scope and user-based classifications are further informed by criteria such as frequency of use and decision type. High-frequency, tactical decisions—often operational and short-term—favor institutional or passive DSS for routine efficiency, while low-frequency, strategic decisions—long-term and unstructured—benefit from specific, active, or group-oriented systems to handle and novelty. For example, daily scheduling might employ an institutional tactical DSS, whereas annual policy formulation could leverage a strategic group DSS.

Architectures

General Architectures

Decision support systems (DSS) typically employ a basic tripartite architecture consisting of three primary subsystems: the subsystem, the model management subsystem, and the (or ) subsystem. The subsystem handles the storage, retrieval, and manipulation of relevant data from internal and external sources, while the model management subsystem provides access to analytical models, simulations, and optimization tools for processing that data. The subsystem facilitates interaction, enabling input of queries, parameters, and preferences, as well as the presentation of results in user-friendly formats such as graphs or reports. These subsystems are integrated through a central or component that orchestrates communication and ensures seamless data flow among them, allowing the DSS to support iterative decision-making processes. Ralph H. Sprague's 1980 three-level framework for DSS architectures operates at three distinct levels of technology to accommodate varying degrees of customization and development needs. At the highest level, a specific DSS serves as an end-user tool tailored to particular decision contexts, directly supporting users in applying models and data to real-world problems. The middle level involves DSS generators, which are builder tools or platforms that enable non-programmers to construct specific DSS by combining pre-built components and interfaces. At the lowest level, DSS tools consist of low-level utilities such as hardware, software primitives, or libraries that facilitate the creation of generators or specific DSS, providing foundational elements like database query languages or statistical algorithms. Common deployment models for DSS reflect evolving technological capabilities and organizational requirements. Standalone deployments operate on single machines or local networks, suitable for individual or small-team use where all components reside on one system. Client-server models distribute processing across client devices for interfaces and servers for and model management, enabling shared access and scalability in environments. Web-based deployments leverage technologies for remote access, often using browser-based interfaces and cloud infrastructure to support collaborative, multi- decision support across distributed locations. Interconnectivity among subsystems is achieved through standardized or protocols that enable efficient exchange and process . For instance, in a typical operational flow, a user query entered via the dialogue subsystem triggers calls to retrieve pertinent from the subsystem, which then feeds into the model management subsystem for execution and analysis, culminating in formatted output returned to the . This modular communication structure enhances flexibility, allowing subsystems to be updated or scaled independently while maintaining overall system coherence.

Specialized Frameworks

Specialized frameworks in decision support systems (DSS) extend general architectures by emphasizing specific techniques and tools tailored to particular needs. A seminal 1996 classification by Holsapple and Whinston identifies six primary frameworks based on the dominant mode of and : text-oriented, database-oriented, spreadsheet-oriented, solver-oriented, rule-oriented, and . These frameworks build upon foundational DSS components by integrating specialized software paradigms to handle diverse types and analytical requirements. Text-oriented DSS frameworks focus on processing and analyzing textual documents, such as reports or unstructured narratives, to support decisions involving qualitative and summarization. These systems employ techniques to index, search, and extract insights from large volumes of text, making them suitable for knowledge-intensive domains like legal or . Database-oriented DSS frameworks center on querying structured relational databases to generate ad-hoc reports and perform data-driven analyses. They enable users to interact with data through SQL-like interfaces, facilitating decisions that require aggregating and filtering large datasets, such as analysis in . Spreadsheet-oriented DSS frameworks leverage familiar tools like Microsoft Excel for modeling and what-if scenario simulations, allowing users to manipulate numerical data in grid-based formats for financial forecasting or budgeting. This approach democratizes DSS use by providing intuitive, formula-driven computation without requiring advanced programming skills. Solver-oriented DSS frameworks incorporate optimization algorithms to solve mathematical programming problems, such as linear or integer programming, for resource allocation and scheduling decisions. For instance, IBM's CPLEX solver integrates with DSS to handle large-scale linear programming models, optimizing objectives like minimizing costs in supply chain management while respecting constraints. Rule-oriented DSS frameworks utilize production rules or expert system shells to encode as if-then statements, supporting diagnostic or prescriptive decisions in areas like medical . These systems mimic human reasoning by applying rule bases to facts, inferring conclusions through forward or . Hybrid DSS frameworks combine elements from multiple orientations to address complex decisions that span data types and analysis methods, such as integrating rule-based with solver optimization for comprehensive . This integrative approach enhances flexibility and accuracy in multifaceted scenarios. Domain-specific frameworks adapt these orientations to particular fields, notably Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for spatial decision support. GIS architectures overlay analytical layers on geospatial data, enabling multi-criteria evaluations for or environmental impact assessments by combining /raster data with decision models. Over time, specialized DSS frameworks have evolved from monolithic structures, where all components were tightly integrated in a single application, to modular architectures deployed in environments. This shift promotes scalability, independent service updates, and integration with diverse data sources, as demonstrated in cloud-based group DSS that decompose functionalities into autonomous services for enhanced resilience and performance.

Applications

Business and Finance

Decision support systems (DSS) play a pivotal role in by enabling data-driven in dynamic commercial environments, where rapid analysis of trends, financial risks, and operational efficiencies is essential. In these sectors, DSS integrate analytical models, historical data, and inputs to support executives in optimizing and , often leading to enhanced profitability and . For instance, businesses leverage DSS to simulate various economic scenarios, allowing managers to evaluate potential outcomes without real-world experimentation. In inventory management, DSS facilitate through time-series models, which analyze historical sales patterns, seasonal variations, and external factors like economic indicators to predict future stock needs. These systems employ techniques such as (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average) models to generate accurate forecasts, helping firms minimize stockouts and overstocking while reducing holding costs. Such implementations have been shown to improve efficiency in supply chains. Financial planning within DSS frameworks supports break-even analysis and , providing tools to assess profitability thresholds and asset allocations under varying market conditions. Break-even analysis in DSS calculates the point at which revenues equal costs, incorporating variables like fixed expenses and price elasticity to guide pricing strategies and investment decisions. , often using mean-variance models pioneered by Markowitz, enables risk-adjusted returns by diversifying investments based on matrices derived from historical financial data. DSS-driven tools have been noted to improve risk-return profiles for institutional investors in simulated scenarios. In , DSS apply techniques for customer segmentation, clustering consumers into groups based on demographics, behaviors, and purchase histories to tailor campaigns and product offerings. Algorithms like within DSS platforms analyze large datasets from systems to identify high-value segments, enabling targeted promotions that boost conversion rates. DSS using have demonstrated improvements in in firms through personalized segmentation strategies. Prominent examples of DSS in include (OLAP) systems for sales reporting, which allow multidimensional data slicing and dicing to uncover trends in revenue streams across regions and products. In banking, tools such as credit scoring systems employ models within DSS to evaluate borrower creditworthiness, integrating variables like income and debt ratios to predict default probabilities. These applications have helped standardize credit decisions in . The impact of DSS in business and finance is evident in improved (ROI) through , where users simulate "what-if" analyses to test strategies against uncertainties like market fluctuations or regulatory changes. By quantifying potential ROI under multiple scenarios, DSS empower firms to prioritize high-yield initiatives.

Healthcare and Other Sectors

Decision support systems (DSS) in healthcare primarily aid in diagnostic support, treatment planning, and by integrating patient data, clinical guidelines, and to enhance clinical outcomes. For example, for Oncology (2016–2023) was an artificial intelligence-based (CDSS) that analyzed patient records and to suggest treatment options for cancer patients; however, studies showed mixed results with concordance rates around 70% with clinician decisions, and it faced criticisms for inaccurate recommendations in some cases before its discontinuation in 2023. More recent CDSS, such as those from Tempus, use on genomic data for personalized recommendations and have gained FDA approvals as of 2025. Clinical decision support systems also facilitate detection by alerting healthcare providers to potential adverse effects from medication combinations, thereby reducing errors and improving during prescribing processes. In treatment planning, these systems optimize , such as bed management and staffing in hospitals, by demand based on historical and . In , DSS leverage geographic information systems (GIS) and weather data to enable prediction, helping farmers make informed decisions on planting, , and fertilization. These systems integrate spatial data, forecasts, and models to simulate outcomes under varying conditions, supporting sustainable farming practices and mitigation against environmental uncertainties. For example, GIS-based DSS analyze , composition, and meteorological patterns to generate precise estimates, allowing for targeted interventions that boost productivity while minimizing resource overuse. Public sector applications of DSS focus on policy simulation for urban planning, where they model scenarios to evaluate infrastructure development, land use, and environmental impacts. These tools incorporate demographic, economic, and spatial data to simulate policy outcomes, aiding decision-makers in creating equitable and resilient urban environments. In urban planning contexts, DSS facilitate collaborative simulations that test zoning changes or transportation upgrades, providing visualizations and quantitative assessments to inform stakeholder consensus. Environmental DSS extend these capabilities to disaster response, integrating real-time sensor , weather models, and geographic information to guide emergency operations and resource deployment. For instance, such systems support search-and-rescue efforts by predicting paths or spreads, enabling coordinated responses that minimize human and economic losses. Implementing DSS in these sectors addresses key challenges, including the handling of sensitive through robust protocols and navigating ethical decisions around and patient . In healthcare, ethical concerns arise from ensuring in AI-driven recommendations and protecting patient confidentiality amid data sharing requirements, prompting frameworks that prioritize and equitable access. These challenges are mitigated via and interdisciplinary oversight, balancing technological benefits with moral imperatives.

Development and Implementation

Tools and Frameworks

General-purpose tools form the foundation for developing decision support systems (DSS), enabling data handling, analysis, and visualization to support architectural components like and user interfaces. Spreadsheets such as are widely used for building interactive models, performing , and optimization tasks in DSS, often through features like Solver for constraint-based decision modeling. Databases like SQL Server provide robust storage and querying capabilities for large-scale data warehouses that underpin DSS, facilitating (OLAP) and complex queries essential for decision analytics. Analytics platforms including Tableau and Power BI enhance DSS by offering intuitive visualization tools for dashboards and real-time insights, integrating data from multiple sources to aid interpretive . Specialized frameworks accelerate prototyping and modeling in DSS development, particularly for data-intensive applications. In , libraries like support efficient data manipulation and preparation, enabling rapid integration of datasets into DSS prototypes for exploratory analysis. complements this by providing algorithms for predictive modeling within DSS, such as and to forecast outcomes and recommend actions. The open-source is a staple for statistical modeling in DSS, offering packages for advanced like time-series and to evaluate decision scenarios. Development environments streamline the creation and deployment of DSS, catering to varying levels of technical expertise and scalability needs. Low-code platforms such as Power Apps allow non-developers to build custom DSS applications with drag-and-drop interfaces, integrating forms, workflows, and data connectors for operational decision support. Cloud-based solutions like AWS SageMaker facilitate scalable DSS by providing managed workflows, from data preparation to model deployment, ideal for handling large datasets in enterprise environments. Integration of these tools into cohesive DSS often relies on to enable seamless data exchange and across components. APIs allow databases like SQL Server to feed real-time data into analytics platforms such as Power BI, while frameworks can pull from cloud services like SageMaker, creating unified systems that fulfill architectural requirements for modular data flow and extensibility.

Challenges and Best Practices

Developing decision support systems (DSS) encounters several significant challenges that can impede their effectiveness and adoption. issues, such as incompleteness, inconsistency, and inaccuracies in input data, often undermine the reliability of DSS outputs, particularly when relying on heterogeneous sources from systems or feeds. complexities arise from the need to connect DSS with existing architectures, where mismatched formats, protocols, and lead to delays and errors in data flow, exacerbating silos in organizational environments. User resistance is another barrier, stemming from concerns over disruptions, perceived threats to autonomy, and lack of in algorithmic recommendations, which can result in underutilization even after deployment. with poses additional hurdles, as exponential data growth strains computational resources and requires advanced processing to maintain performance without compromising or accuracy. Security and privacy concerns further complicate DSS implementation, especially when handling sensitive information in domains like healthcare and . Ensuring compliance with regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) demands robust measures to protect from breaches, including anonymization techniques and controls, yet challenges persist in balancing data utility with privacy preservation during analysis. In clinical DSS, for instance, integrating patient records raises risks of unauthorized or re-identification, necessitating and audit trails to meet GDPR's requirements for lawful processing and data minimization. To address these challenges, several best practices guide DSS development and deployment. Iterative prototyping allows for incremental refinement, enabling developers to test prototypes with real users early and adjust based on to align with practical needs. User involvement in is crucial, involving stakeholders throughout to foster ownership, reduce resistance, and ensure the system supports rather than hinders decision-making workflows. Validation of models through rigorous testing against historical data and simulations verifies accuracy and robustness, while ongoing maintenance—such as regular updates to algorithms and data pipelines—sustains long-term viability amid evolving requirements. Evaluating DSS success relies on key metrics that quantify impact beyond technical performance. Accuracy of outputs, measured by , , and overall rates, assesses how well recommendations align with ground-truth outcomes; for example, diagnostic DSS have achieved up to % accuracy in specific clinical tasks. (ROI) measurement incorporates financial metrics like cost savings from reduced errors or improved efficiency, with studies showing annual savings exceeding $700,000 in healthcare settings through optimized resource use, alongside qualitative indicators such as user satisfaction and adoption rates.

Advanced and Emerging Trends

Integration with AI and Machine Learning

The integration of (AI) and (ML) into decision support systems (DSS) has significantly enhanced their capabilities for , enabling more accurate forecasting through advanced algorithms such as neural networks. These models process vast datasets to identify patterns and predict outcomes, outperforming traditional statistical methods in complex scenarios like in . For instance, deep neural networks have been applied in DSS to improve prediction accuracy in time-series , allowing decision-makers to anticipate fluctuations or needs proactively. Natural language interfaces, powered by (NLP) techniques, further augment DSS by facilitating intuitive user interactions, such as through AI chatbots that interpret queries and deliver tailored insights without requiring technical expertise. These interfaces leverage transformer-based models to handle conversational inputs, enabling real-time querying of data repositories in platforms. In enterprise settings, such chatbots have significantly reduced query resolution time compared to graphical user interfaces, democratizing access to decision support for non-expert users. ML integration within DSS also incorporates automated and to refine data processing and uncover irregularities efficiently. Automated algorithms, such as recursive feature elimination combined with random forests, dynamically identify the most relevant variables from high-dimensional datasets, reducing model complexity while maintaining predictive power in assessment DSS. , often using unsupervised ML like isolation forests, flags outliers in , supporting applications such as detection in banking systems with high precision. In , recommendation engines exemplify this integration, employing and to personalize product suggestions, improving conversion rates through real-time user behavior analysis. Hybrid systems combine knowledge-driven approaches with expert AI, such as for image analysis in healthcare DSS, where convolutional neural networks integrate domain-specific rules with learned features to aid diagnostics like tumor detection from medical scans, achieving high sensitivity rates. These hybrids merge symbolic reasoning from knowledge bases with data-driven ML, enhancing reliability in high-stakes environments. As of 2025, the adoption of explainable AI (XAI) techniques, including SHAP values and , is increasing in DSS to provide transparent decision rationales, fostering user trust and in sectors like finance and medicine. Additionally, real-time ML deployment via enables on-device processing in IoT-enabled DSS, reducing latency to milliseconds for applications in autonomous , where updates models without central data transfer.

Future Directions

The evolution of decision support systems (DSS) is poised to emphasize autonomous, self-learning architectures that operate with minimal human intervention, enabling adaptive decision-making in dynamic environments. algorithms integrated into autonomous will allow DSS to continuously update knowledge from ongoing interactions, enhancing performance in areas like and industrial operations without requiring constant retraining. This shift toward self-directed agents, powered by , promises to transform DSS into proactive entities capable of predicting and executing decisions independently, as projected in reviews of advancements in Industry 4.0. Integration of () with will drive real-time DSS for instantaneous analytics, particularly in , where local at the network reduces and supports immediate operational adjustments. For instance, sensors feeding data to edge nodes enable and defect detection in assembly lines, as demonstrated in automotive and energy sectors. Future developments will incorporate at the edge alongside digital twins for virtual simulations, fostering energy-efficient and resilient ecosystems beyond 2025. Ethical considerations in DSS will increasingly focus on bias mitigation and sustainability to ensure equitable and environmentally responsible outcomes. Strategies such as pre-processing data debiasing, interpretable model designs, and regulatory frameworks will address algorithmic biases in AI-DSS, promoting fairness in high-stakes domains like healthcare and through interdisciplinary . Concurrently, principles will embed eco-friendly decision-making in DSS, as seen in dynamic systems using fuzzy methods to evaluate sustainable suppliers in circular economies, minimizing waste and carbon footprints via IoT and integrations. Post-2025 projections highlight the need for standardized metrics to balance performance with ethical and sustainable imperatives. Emerging trends include multimodal AI, , and to augment DSS capabilities. Multimodal models processing text, voice, and visuals will enhance contextual decision support, such as in healthcare diagnostics combining patient records, images, and spoken inputs for more accurate recommendations. Blockchain will facilitate secure in cognitive DSS by leveraging scalable platforms like 2.0, ensuring immutability and decentralized access for collaborative environments. will revolutionize complex optimizations in DSS, enabling rapid solutions to challenges in disaster management through advanced algorithms and cloud-accessible qubits, with scalability expected to broaden adoption after 2025.

References

  1. [1]
    Decision Support Systems | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
    Feb 28, 2020 · A decision support system is an interactive human–computer decision-making system that supports decision makers rather than replaces them, utilizing data and ...
  2. [2]
    A Brief History of Decision Support Systems - DSSResources.COM
    The history of Decision Support Systems covers a relatively brief span of years, and the concepts and technologies are still evolving.
  3. [3]
    Decision Support Systems (DSS) - UMSL
    Decision Support Systems have evolved over the past three decades from simple model-oriented systems to advanced multi-function entities. During the 1960's, ...
  4. [4]
    Decision Support System - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A decision support system is a computer-based information system that supports government, business or organizational decision-making activities.
  5. [5]
    Decision Support System (DSS) - Overview, Components, Types
    A decision support system (DSS) is an information system that aids a business in decision-making activities that require judgment, determination, and a sequence ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  6. [6]
    A Framework for the Development of Decision Support Systems - jstor
    By: Ralph H. Sprague, Jr. Abstract. This article proposes a framework to ... is a "Decision Support System." Unfortunately, neither the restrictive nor ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Decision Support Systems: Concepts and Resources for Managers
    “Decision Support System.” DSS are intended to improve and speed up the processes by which people make and communicate decisions. Thus, the emphasis in ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] : What are characteristics of a decision support system?
    Oct 5, 2005 · Their first characteristic is “DSS provide support for decision makers mainly in semistructured and unstructured situations by bringing ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Decision Support Systems - University of Pittsburgh
    Often when the system and its model are complex it is insightful for the decision maker to realize how the system variables are interrelated.Missing: key | Show results with:key
  10. [10]
    None
    ### Characteristics of DSS (Extracted and Summarized)
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Herbert A. Simon - Prize Lecture
    Summary. Thus, by the middle 1950's, a theory of bounded rationality had been proposed as an alternative to classical omniscient rationality, a significant.
  12. [12]
    Bounded Rationality - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Nov 30, 2018 · Herbert Simon introduced the term 'bounded rationality' (Simon 1957b ... What if instead any decision-making process is inherently bounded?Missing: Carnegie | Show results with:Carnegie<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Decision Support Systems - SpringerLink
    In the 1960s, pioneering work in building interactive systems at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, theory development by Simon and colleagues, and ...
  14. [14]
    Lesson 2 - History of DSS | PDF | Decision Support System - Scribd
    ACM SIGBDP Conference on Decision Support Systems in San Jose, CA in January 1977. Donovan and Madnick (1977) classified DSS as institutional or ad hoc.<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Brief History of Spreadsheets, v. 3.6 - DSSResources.COM
    Beginnings and the "Tale of VisiCalc". In 1961, Professor Richard Mattessich pioneered the development of computerized speadsheets for use in business ...
  16. [16]
    A Framework for the Development of Decision Support Systems
    Sprague, Ralph. 1980. "A Framework for the Development of Decision Support Systems," MIS Quarterly, (4: 4).
  17. [17]
    Group Decision Support System - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    GDSS have emerged as interactive computer-based systems facilitating the solution of unstructured problems by a group of decision makers, and information ...
  18. [18]
    Decision Support Systems: A Knowledge-based Approach
    Title, Decision Support Systems: A Knowledge-based Approach ; Authors, C. W. Holsapple, Andrew B. Whinston ; Edition, 10, illustrated ; Publisher, West Publishing ...Missing: framework | Show results with:framework
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Decision - Support Systems and Intelligent Systems
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 7th Ed. by'Braim: Turban ... Data Management Subsystem. 110. 3.7 The Model Management Subsystem. 115. 3.8 The ...
  20. [20]
    Decision Support and Executive Information Systems - UMSL
    Goal-seeking mode - Establishing the input factors necessary to achieve specified goals (usually with a decision support system). ... Data management subsystem ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Decision Support Systems Architectures
    According to Sprague and Carlson [Lu03], decision support systems would consist in the following components (Figure 1): data management.<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Decision Support System Concepts, Methodologies and Technologies
    Oct 15, 2019 · Decision Support System Concepts,. Methodologies and Technologies ... The Model Management Subsystem of a DSS is composed of the following.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Intelligent Decision Support Systems- A Framework - CORE
    A regular decision support system helps decision-makers to manipulate data and models. ... • Model Management Subsystem: The role of MBMS is analogous to that of ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] DSS Chapter 1
    Model Management Subsystem. ▫ Model base management system (MBMS). 3. User ... Why is this decision support system classified as a data-focused DSS? 2 ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Chapter 10 Building Model-Driven Decision Support Systems
    Users of a model-driven DSS, based on a linear programming model, can find input values that satisfy a set of simultaneous equations and inequalities. When ...
  26. [26]
    Monte Carlo Simulation Techniques in a Decision Support System ...
    This paper describes a group decision support system based on an additive multi-attribute utility model for identifying a consensus strategy in group decis.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] . Chapter 5 Designing and Evaluating DSS User Interfaces
    An effective user interface is one of the most critical components of any type of. Decision Support System, but it is especially important for systems that will ...
  28. [28]
    Design Principles for User Interfaces in AI-Based Decision Support ...
    Mar 2, 2022 · ... decision support system. Approaches from the field of ... user interface for decision support in hate speech detection can be designed.
  29. [29]
    Building Decision Support System User Interface
    Guidelines for Dialogue and User Interface design · Consistency: A decision support system software must look, feel and act similar throughout. · Reduce ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Supporting Decision-Makers: An Expanded Framework
    Five generic categories based on the dominant technology component are proposed, including Communications-Driven, Data-Driven, Document-Driven, Knowledge-Driven ...Missing: mode- classifications
  31. [31]
    (PDF) Understanding Data-Driven Decision Support Systems
    Aug 6, 2025 · Data-driven DSS is one of five major types of computerized decision support systems and the features of such systems vary across specific ...
  32. [32]
    Model-driven decision support systems: Concepts and research ...
    Model-driven DSS use algebraic, decision analytic, financial, simulation, and optimization models to provide decision support.Missing: mode- classifications
  33. [33]
    Decision Support System Driven by Thermo-Complexity - MDPI
    As reported in [4] a way to classify DSSs is if they are (i) document driven, (ii) model driven, (iii) communication driven, (iv) data driven, and (v) knowledge ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
    [PDF] . Chapter 8 Building Data and Document-Driven Decision Support ...
    Document-driven DSS are defined as systems that integrate “a variety of storage and processing technologies to provide complete document retrieval and. Page 2 ...
  35. [35]
    Decision Support Systems Classification in Industry - ResearchGate
    Aug 9, 2025 · This research has presented a discussion of related literature on decision support systems (DSS) and its role in production systems.
  36. [36]
    None
    ### Summary of Passive, Active, and Cooperative DSS Definitions per Hättenschwiler
  37. [37]
    (PDF) Decision Support Systems Architectures - ResearchGate
    This paper presents the main components of the decision assisting systems. Further on three types of architectures of these systems are described, analyzed, ...
  38. [38]
    Building Effective Decision Support Systems - Semantic Scholar
    Building Effective Decision Support Systems · R. Sprague, E. D. Carlson · Published 1982 · Computer Science.
  39. [39]
    Types of Decision Support Systems (DSS)
    DSS are interactive computer-based systems and subsystems intended to help decision makers use communications technologies, data, documents, knowledge and/or ...Missing: Daniel | Show results with:Daniel
  40. [40]
    Advances in Web-Based Decision Support Systems - ResearchGate
    Oct 6, 2021 · The Web-based DSS is a powerful method which can help users to identify data and accessible services as an online service on the Intranet.Missing: standalone | Show results with:standalone
  41. [41]
    Mathematical program solvers - IBM CPLEX
    Flexible, high-performance mathematical programming solvers for linear programming, mixed integer programming and more.
  42. [42]
    Spatial Decision Support Systems: Three decades on - ScienceDirect
    Spatial Decision Support Systems (SDSS) combine spatial and non-spatial data, the analysis and visualization functions of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), ...
  43. [43]
    Development of Cloud-Based Microservices to Decision Support ...
    May 5, 2020 · The paper proposes the idea of working cloud based decision support system BPsim.Web and this one consists of some set of services and tools.
  44. [44]
    Comparison of an oncology clinical decision-support system's ... - NIH
    Jan 31, 2021 · One tool that helps identify therapeutic options for individual patients with cancer is IBM(R) Watson for Oncology (WfO). WfO is an artificial ...
  45. [45]
    Clinical decision support systems-based interventions to improve ...
    CDSSs can help to reduce ADEs, medication errors, DDIs, improve patient safety, and medicine prescriptions.
  46. [46]
    An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and ...
    Feb 6, 2020 · A clinical decision support system (CDSS) is intended to improve healthcare delivery by enhancing medical decisions with targeted clinical knowledge.
  47. [47]
    A GIS-based framework for local agricultural decision-making and ...
    A supporting system providing accurate crop yield prediction would ensure that farmers have rational risk perceptions and could play a critical role in ...
  48. [48]
    GIS Based Decision Support Systems in Agriculture - ResearchGate
    GIS can be used to integrate and analyze spatial data on soil, weather, and other factors [8] . ML techniques can be used to analyze large datasets and develop ...
  49. [49]
    Developing a decision support system for sustainable urban ...
    Apr 16, 2025 · This research presents an innovative decision support system (DSS) aimed at tackling these difficulties through the application of machine learning and fuzzy ...
  50. [50]
    Sprawl decisions: A simulation and decision support tool for citizens ...
    The purpose of Sprawl Decisions is to design, build, and test (in both laboratory and real-world settings) simulations and decision support technologies.
  51. [51]
    A review of decision support systems and their applications: Heliyon
    Jun 15, 2024 · This paper provides a comprehensive summary of DSS applications to community resilience, emphasizing how the different modeling techniques are used in ...
  52. [52]
    Ethical implications of AI-driven clinical decision support systems on ...
    Dec 21, 2024 · While these systems promise improved efficiency and decision-making, they also raise significant ethical concerns. This study aims to explore ...
  53. [53]
    Ethical challenges and evolving strategies in the integration of ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · This paper examines the current state of AI in healthcare, focusing on five critical ethical concerns: justice and fairness, transparency, patient consent and ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Excel Solver Tutorial – Wilmington Custom Furniture - Project 2
    Purpose: Using Excel Solver as a Decision Support System: Optimization under constraints. To demonstrate the use of Excel Solver, we work on the following ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Database technology for decision support systems - USC, InfoLab
    A successful decision support system is a complex creation with ... soft SQL Server. Functions such as median, mode, rank, and percentile extend ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] DECISION MAKING TOOLS - UNCW
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM. GENERALLY COMBINE INTERNAL /. EXTERNAL SOURCES ... (Tableau). Graphical. Trends in a visual manner. Spreadsheets or. Presentation.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Using Business Intelligence for Data-Driven Insights - Purdue e-Pubs
    May 23, 2025 · The Power BI model demonstrated its utility as a decision-support system for construction industry stakeholders. By providing real-time ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Computational Decision Support System for ADHD Identification
    ADHD-Care decision support system (DDS). ... The classifica- tion module was based on the standard and prominent libraries such as pandas, NumPy and frameworks, ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] An Intelligent Decision Support System for Machine Learning ...
    There are tools that were created for this purpose, such as Weka, RapidMiner or Scikit Learn. ... Intelligent Decision Support System. Generally, a ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Decision support systems : a research perspective - DSpace@MIT
    Many of the ideas expressed in this paper belong as much to my colleagues at the Wharton School, 1978-79, as to myself. In particular, the concepts.Missing: oriented | Show results with:oriented
  61. [61]
    iSchool Capstone Archive - University of Texas at Austin
    Developing a User Interface for a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) ... I utilized software such as Power Automate, Microsoft Forms and Power Apps ...
  62. [62]
    MS Business Analytics Capstone Projects | University of Cincinnati
    The programming language/ tools used for this analysis are R, Tableau, and Amazon AWS Sagemaker. ... decision-support system to illustrate and measure the ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Decidio 2.0: Enabling Enhanced Collaborative Decision-Support ...
    Our platform enables integration of 3rd party platforms, APIs and bots to utilise Decidio 2.0's decision making process. We also introduce decision-guided ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] A Service-Oriented Architecture for Data-Driven Decision Support ...
    Jul 5, 2009 · ... decision support system being composed of many connected paths passing through data integration points. ... Although FIRM APIs do exist for ...
  65. [65]
    Challenges in Using Big Data to Develop Decision Support Systems ...
    Schneider & Seelmeyer [16] identified difficulties in using big data to develop DSS for social work in Germany, such as data quality issues and user resistance.
  66. [66]
    Challenges and Solutions of Integrating Decision Support Systems ...
    Jun 25, 2024 · DSS integration has inherent challenges, for instance, data source and nature, customization, and compatibility issues with pre-existing legacy systems.
  67. [67]
    Challenges and Potential Solutions for Big Data Implementations in ...
    There are challenges when implementing any Big Data program including exponential growth of data, special infrastructure needs, need for a trained workforce.
  68. [68]
    Achieving data privacy for decision support systems in times of ...
    Jan 10, 2022 · The decision support systems (DSS) are used to gather that records. The researchers access the patient's data through DSS and perform ...
  69. [69]
    Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems - NIH
    Nov 28, 2023 · There are several challenges in CDSS implementation, including data privacy concerns, system integration and clinician acceptance. While CDSS ...
  70. [70]
    Best Practices in Clinical Decision Support - NIH
    Eight best practice themes were identified as important: deliver CDS in the most appropriate ways, develop effective governance structures, consider use of ...Fig. 2 · Results And Discussion · A Starter Set Of Clinical...
  71. [71]
    An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and ...
    Feb 6, 2020 · A clinical decision support system (CDSS) is intended to improve healthcare delivery by enhancing medical decisions with targeted clinical knowledge.
  72. [72]
    Deep Learning and Neural Networks: Decision-Making Implications
    This interdisciplinary review examines the impact of deep learning on decision-making systems, analyzing 25 relevant papers published between 2017 and 2022.
  73. [73]
    Using clinical decision support systems to bring predictive models to ...
    Aug 15, 2020 · Advances in the field of predictive modeling using artificial intelligence and machine learning have the potential to improve clinical care ...
  74. [74]
    Developing chatbot system to support decision making based on Big ...
    However, AI based chatbots are capable of understanding natural language, not just pre-defined commands but get smarter as they interact more due to their ...
  75. [75]
    A survey on chatbots and large language models - ScienceDirect.com
    This survey paper provides a comprehensive overview in chatbot with the integration of LLMs, primarily focusing on the testing, evaluation and performance ...
  76. [76]
    A feature selection-driven machine learning framework for anomaly ...
    Apr 28, 2025 · This study presents a feature selection framework for anomaly-based attack detection systems by combining machine learning and heuristic algorithms.
  77. [77]
    (PDF) Decision Support Systems for Anomaly Detection with the ...
    ... The expansion of anomaly detection is significantly impacting various industries, enhancing productivity, security, and protection (Nguyen et al., 2022) .
  78. [78]
    Artificial intelligence and recommender systems in e-commerce ...
    Combining recommendation systems and AI in e-commerce can improve the user experience and decision-making. This study uses a method called bibliometrics to ...
  79. [79]
    Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support - PubMed Central
    Results : We selected 75 papers, 49 of which describe approaches in the data-driven AI area, 20 present purely knowledge-based DSSs, and 6 adopt hybrid ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] AI-Driven Decision Support Systems in Healthcare Integration
    Jun 15, 2025 · Machine learning algorithms demonstrate exceptional performance in healthcare applications, with deep neural networks achieving remarkable.
  81. [81]
    Explainable AI in Clinical Decision Support Systems - PubMed Central
    Aug 29, 2025 · The scope includes studies from 2018 to 2025 that implemented XAI in CDSSs using various techniques across diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment ...
  82. [82]
    AI-based decision support systems in Industry 4.0, a review
    Main components of a decision support system is shown in the Fig. 1 ... Expert Systems and Knowledge-Based Systems in AI-based Decision Support Systems.Ai-Based Decision Support... · 1. Introduction · 2. Data Integration And...
  83. [83]
    Advancing autonomy through lifelong learning: a survey of ...
    The combination of lifelong learning algorithms with autonomous intelligent systems (AIS) is gaining popularity due to its ability to enhance AIS performance, ...
  84. [84]
    IoT and Edge Computing for Smart Manufacturing - ResearchGate
    Oct 10, 2024 · This paper explores the synergy between IoT and Edge Computing, focusing on their combined architecture and the future trends driving innovation in smart ...Missing: DSS | Show results with:DSS
  85. [85]
    ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS AND BIAS MITIGATION IN AI DECISION ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · This article delves into the ethical consequences of AI decision-making systems with emphasis on the root causes and implications of algorithmic ...
  86. [86]
    A Dynamic Decision Support System for Sustainable Supplier ...
    The proposed DSS allows users to customize and weight their economic, social, and circular criteria with a fuzzy best-worst method (BWM) and select the most ...<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    (PDF) Multi-Modal AI Models: Combining Text, Vision, and Speech
    Aug 7, 2025 · By integrating multiple modalities, these models offer more robust, versatile, and accurate systems that can handle a wider range of tasks, ...
  88. [88]
    Blockchain-Based Secure Data Sharing Algorithms for Cognitive ...
    This study introduces a novel approach leveraging blockchain technology. The proposed system incorporates Ethereum blockchain 2.0 for scalable and efficient ...
  89. [89]
    Leveraging Quantum Computing for Enhanced Decision Support in ...
    Dec 17, 2024 · This chapter explores how quantum computing is integrated into disaster management DSS, focusing on optimizing resource allocation, improving ...