Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Dieldrin

Dieldrin is a chlorinated cyclodiene organochlorine compound (C₁₂H₈Cl₆O) formed by the epoxidation of aldrin, serving as its active metabolite and functioning as a broad-spectrum contact and stomach insecticide. Introduced commercially in the late 1940s, it was extensively applied in agriculture for crop protection and in structural treatments against termites due to its efficacy against a wide range of pests. Despite its initial success, dieldrin's extreme environmental persistence—resisting degradation for years in soil and water—enabled through food chains, posing risks to non-target species including and , where it contributed to eggshell thinning and population declines. In humans, exposure primarily occurs via contaminated , leading to effects such as convulsions and potential carcinogenicity, prompting regulatory actions including a U.S. ban on most uses by the Environmental Protection Agency in 1974, with full prohibitions following due to these toxicities and ecological harms. Although production ceased decades ago, residual contamination persists in sediments and biota, underscoring ongoing monitoring needs.

Chemical Properties

Molecular Structure and Synthesis

Dieldrin is a chlorinated cyclodiene compound with the molecular formula C₁₂H₈Cl₆O. Its systematic chemical name is (1aα,2β,2aβ,3α,6α,6aα,7β,7aα)-1,2,3,4,10,10-hexachloro-1,4,4a,5,6,6a,7,7a-octahydro-6,7-epoxy-1,4:5,8-dimethanonaphthalene, often abbreviated as HEOD. The molecule features a bridged polycyclic structure with six chlorine atoms, an epoxide ring, and a norbornane-like framework derived from a Diels-Alder adduct. Dieldrin is primarily synthesized through the epoxidation of , its precursor compound lacking the functionality. This reaction involves the addition of an oxygen atom across the double bond in to form the characteristic bridge. Common laboratory methods employ peracids, such as or perbenzoic acid, under controlled conditions to achieve selective epoxidation while minimizing side products. Alternative approaches utilize in the presence of a tungstic . The epoxidation process was refined in the late 1940s as part of early research into cyclodiene insecticides, enabling efficient conversion of aldrin to dieldrin with high stereospecificity favoring the exo isomer. These methods, initially explored by chemical firms including Shell, established the foundational synthetic route still referenced in laboratory settings today.

Physical Characteristics and Stability

Dieldrin appears as a white to off-white crystalline solid at room temperature. Its melting point ranges from 176 to 177 °C, and it has a density of approximately 1.75 g/cm³. The compound exhibits low volatility, with a vapor pressure of 3.1 × 10^{-6} mmHg at 20 °C. Solubility in water is minimal, at 0.195 mg/L at 25 °C, while its high lipophilicity is evidenced by an octanol-water partition coefficient (log K_{ow}) of 6.2, facilitating dissolution in organic solvents and lipids. Chemically, dieldrin demonstrates substantial stability under various conditions. It resists effectively, with a reported exceeding 4 years in aqueous media. The compound remains stable against mild acids, alkalis, and exposure to light, showing no significant under these influences. In matrices, dieldrin persists for extended periods, with field observations indicating a of about 7 years for half-disappearance under ambient conditions. Although capable of slow , particularly upon direct sunlight exposure, its overall resistance to breakdown pathways underscores challenges in handling and storage, necessitating precautions against gradual volatilization in open air.

Historical Development

Discovery and Early Research

Dieldrin was discovered in 1948 by chemist Julius Hyman at Julius Hyman & Company in Denver, Colorado, during investigations into chlorinated polycyclic hydrocarbons as potential insecticides. This work built on Hyman's earlier synthesis of in 1944 and explorations of cyclodiene structures derived from Diels-Alder reactions of with chlorinated dienophiles, extending beyond (HCH) isomers to yield more stable, potent compounds. , the precursor to dieldrin via epoxidation, emerged from these efforts, with dieldrin formed by oxidation of aldrin's , enhancing its reactivity toward insect nervous systems. Initial laboratory evaluations in focused on insecticidal potency through and assays, revealing dieldrin's effectiveness at low dosages against a range of pests, including those showing resistance to earlier organochlorines like . Early toxicity tests demonstrated median lethal doses (LD50) for in the low milligrams per kilogram range via topical application or , outperforming in rapidity of knockdown and mortality rates, particularly for species such as houseflies and agricultural pests. These pre-commercial studies, conducted in controlled settings, confirmed dieldrin's via disruption of gamma-aminobutyric acid () neurotransmission in , though mammalian was also noted at higher thresholds (e.g., oral LD50 around 38 mg/kg). The compound was initially designated as HEOD (1,2,3,4,10,10-hexachloro-6,7-epoxy-1,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,4-endo-exo-5,8-dimethanonaphthalene) or Compound 497 in research notations, reflecting its structural novelty. Hyman's team secured patents for its synthesis and use, naming the "dieldrin" after the Diels-Alder reaction central to its precursor's formation, prior to commercial licensing. These foundational investigations laid the groundwork for its recognition as a broad-spectrum agent, though concerns over emerged even in early residue analyses.

Commercial Production and Scale-Up


Commercial production of dieldrin primarily involved the epoxidation of , synthesized via the Diels-Alder reaction between hexachlorocyclopentadiene and norbornadiene. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene was obtained through chlorination of , followed by cyclization and Diels-Alder adduct formation to yield aldrin, which was then epoxidized using peracids such as or with a tungstic oxide catalyst. Purification steps ensured high product purity, with industrial yields optimized for large-scale output, though specific energy efficiencies varied by facility.
Major manufacturers included Shell Chemical Company and Velsicol Chemical Corporation, with Shell acquiring J. Hyman & Co. in 1948 to initiate production at its , facility. Scale-up occurred rapidly in the , driven by demand for insecticides, leading to expanded facilities and process refinements for . Global output of and dieldrin combined peaked in the mid-1960s at approximately 20 million pounds (9 million kg) annually in the United States, with worldwide production exceeding this figure due to international operations. Production declined post-1970 amid regulatory pressures, with U.S. ceasing by 1974 as companies like halted operations. Overseas by continued briefly, but domestic facilities were fully shuttered, marking the end of large-scale industrial synthesis . By , all remaining uses tied to prior stocks were restricted, effectively concluding commercial viability.

Applications and Efficacy

Agricultural and Pest Control Uses

Dieldrin, often applied as its precursor which epoxidizes to dieldrin in , was widely used from the 1950s to the 1970s for pest control on crops such as corn, , and . Targeted pests included corn rootworms (Diabrotica spp.), wireworms (Agriotes spp.), cutworms, and seed corn maggots, with applications primarily via incorporation or seed treatments to protect and emerging . Typical application rates for corn ranged from 2.2 to 11.2 kg/ha of , while potato treatments used 2-4 kg/ha. In , dieldrin served as a against pests and early-season foliage threats like and cutworms, often integrated into pre-planting furrow treatments or broadcast applications followed by . For corn and potatoes, granular or emulsifiable formulations were incorporated into the top 15-20 cm of to subterranean larvae, providing protection lasting several months due to dieldrin's . These methods replaced shorter-lived organophosphates or earlier chlorinated hydrocarbons in regions with recurring pressures, as trials from the documented consistent control where prior options underperformed. Dieldrin also found application in structural pest management for , particularly subterranean (Reticulitermes spp.), through barrier treatments around agricultural buildings and storage facilities. Treatments involved emulsifiable concentrates at 0.5% (approximately 480 g/L) injected or trenched into perimeters, effective against foraging colonies in 1950s-1960s trials that highlighted its penetration and longevity compared to less persistent alternatives. persisted for years in humid soils, reducing structural damage in termite-prone farming areas.

Public Health and Vector Management

Dieldrin was utilized in mid-20th-century initiatives for , primarily through indoor residual spraying (IRS) to combat malaria-transmitting mosquitoes in and during the 1950s and 1960s. In , forested areas underwent dieldrin treatment until 1960 as part of broader vector suppression efforts. East African pilot projects employing dieldrin house spraying from the 1950s onward achieved marked reductions in vector density and incidence. In , applications occurred in Indonesia's region to manage aconitus, though resistance limited long-term viability. Dieldrin demonstrated superior potency to against species, necessitating lower IRS dosages—0.1 g/m² versus 2 g/m² for —while providing extended residual protection. Field trials against resting mosquitoes yielded nearly complete mortality, often surpassing 95% kill rates on treated surfaces. Protocols typically featured 1-2% emulsions or dust formulations applied to interior walls, ensuring efficacy for months against endophilic vectors. In non-malarial vector management, dieldrin supported locust control campaigns in , with large-scale aerial and ground applications commencing around 1955 under the Australian Plague Locust Commission. These efforts targeted plague locust (Chortoicetes terminifera) swarms in outbreak-prone arid zones, leveraging the insecticide's persistence for preemptive suppression until bans curtailed its use.

Demonstrated Effectiveness and Agricultural Benefits

Dieldrin demonstrated substantial efficacy as a , particularly against root-feeding pests such as corn rootworms (Diabrotica spp.) and wireworms (Agriotes spp.), which cause significant stand loss and reduced vigor in crops like corn and potatoes. Applied via incorporation at rates of 2.5–22 kg/ha or as seed treatments, it acted through contact, ingestion, and limited fumigant effects, providing broad-spectrum control of soil-dwelling insects that alternatives often failed to match in persistence. Field applications in the U.S. during the and effectively mitigated root damage, preserving crop stands and supporting yield stability in infested areas where untreated losses could exceed 20% from larval feeding. The compound's environmental persistence, with a soil half-life of approximately 4–7 years, enabled single-season or multi-year protection without repeated applications, enhancing cost-effectiveness relative to short-lived organophosphates or carbamates that required frequent re-treatment. This reduced labor, equipment, and material inputs, saving farmers substantial expenses—estimated in the millions annually across major row crops—prior to the development of resistant strains in the late . In regions with heavy pest pressure, such as the Midwest U.S., dieldrin's reliability minimized economic losses from replanting or diminished harvests. During the green revolution period (1960s–1970s), dieldrin contributed to agricultural productivity gains by ensuring consistent insect control in staple crops like and , bolstering amid expanding cultivation. Its use in seed dressings and soil treatments helped avert potential yield shortfalls from unchecked pests, with post-restriction analyses indicating that replacements could result in national corn yield reductions of at least 1%, and higher locally in high-risk fields, underscoring its prior role in loss prevention.

Environmental Dynamics

Persistence and Degradation Pathways

Dieldrin exhibits high environmental persistence, particularly in soils, where laboratory and field studies report half-lives ranging from approximately 2 to 25 years, influenced by factors such as , content, moisture, and microbial activity. In temperate soils, half-lives are commonly around 5–7 years, with slower degradation under conditions that limit microbial processes, while aerobic environments facilitate limited breakdown. This longevity is evidenced by detections of dieldrin in sediments and soils decades after its phased-out use, as documented in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency assessments of sites. Degradation primarily occurs via microbial mechanisms, with chemical pathways like photolysis playing a minimal role due to dieldrin's structural stability under exposure. Microbial transformation involves oxidation, , hydroxylation, and , yielding metabolites such as 9-hydroxydieldrin and dihydroxydieldrin, though complete mineralization to CO₂ proceeds slowly and incompletely. conditions further retard these processes, as reductive dechlorination is inefficient for the epoxidized structure of dieldrin compared to its precursor . In water and sediments, persistence mirrors soil patterns, with half-lives exceeding years under low-oxygen regimes, contributing to long-term residue accumulation. Recent research highlights potential for enhanced degradation through bacterial consortia, such as those involving and species, which can accelerate breakdown in low-carbon soils via co-metabolic pathways, though field-scale efficacy remains limited without engineered interventions. These findings, from 2022 genomic and metabolic analyses, underscore microbial diversity's role in but confirm dieldrin's inherent resistance, with degradation rates often below 10–20% annually in untreated environments.

Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification

Dieldrin's high , with a log Kow of 6.2, promotes its partitioning into -rich tissues across organisms, driving independent of metabolic processes. This compound enters primarily via passive across cell membranes, leveraging its nonpolar nature to cross lipid bilayers without requiring or carrier proteins. In , empirical bioconcentration factors (BCF) from typically range from 3,000 to 15,000, yielding log BCF values exceeding 3.5 and reflecting equilibrium partitioning into tissues at concentrations far above ambient levels. Specific measurements include BCFs of 12,500 in guppies and 13,300 in sculpins exposed under laboratory conditions. Biomagnification occurs as dieldrin transfers through food webs, with concentrations increasing by factors of 1 to 16 across trophic levels due to efficient dietary assimilation and retention in . In predatory birds, such as eagles, residues exceed those in prey by multiples consistent with 2-5-fold amplification per level in monitored systems. Monitoring data from the 1970s revealed dieldrin levels in avian species 10 to 100 times higher than in surrounding soils, attributable to cumulative uptake via contaminated prey and soil invertebrates. Earthworms, as intermediate trophic links, exhibited concentration factors of approximately 17 relative to soil, further elevating exposures for insectivorous birds.

Metabolism in Biota

In mammals, dieldrin undergoes hepatic metabolism primarily through oxidation by cytochrome P450 enzymes, yielding 9-hydroxydieldrin as the major metabolite. This hydroxylation occurs via hydrogen abstraction at the C-9 position followed by rapid radical rebound, a process characteristic of P450-mediated monooxygenation. The metabolite is subsequently conjugated and excreted mainly via bile into feces, with minimal urinary elimination. Due to dieldrin's lipophilicity and slow biotransformation rate, its biological half-life in humans averages 369 days (range: 141–592 days) following cessation of exposure. In plants, dieldrin uptake from soil is limited owing to its strong adsorption to organic matter and low water solubility, resulting in low bioavailability. Once absorbed, plants metabolize it via phase II conjugation reactions, primarily with sugars or , to form polar conjugates that facilitate or , though dieldrin's stability restricts extensive degradation. In insects, occurs through mixed-function oxidases, but resistance to dieldrin is predominantly conferred by target-site insensitivity via mutations in the RDL subunit of the (e.g., A302S), rather than elevated metabolic rates, as evidenced by limited from oxidase inhibitors like sesamex. Microbial transformation of dieldrin in biota, often via cometabolism, involves bacteria such as species, which can produce metabolites including trans-aldrin diol through epoxide ring opening or further oxidation. These processes are intracellular and strain-dependent, with release of metabolites occurring upon cell lysis, and are generally slow due to dieldrin's chlorinated epoxy structure resisting complete mineralization. Fungi like exhibit similar cometabolic activity, yielding diol derivatives as primary products.

Health and Toxicity Profile

Acute Toxicity Mechanisms

Dieldrin induces acute toxicity predominantly via antagonism of GABA_A receptors in the , where it binds to the site on the , preventing GABA-mediated chloride influx and causing membrane depolarization and neuronal hyperexcitability. This disruption of inhibitory underlies the characteristic convulsions observed following high-dose exposure, as the chlorinated cyclodiene structure facilitates stable binding that prolongs channel blockade beyond normal synaptic activity. Empirical studies from the mid-20th century, including models, demonstrate that this mechanism manifests rapidly, with fine tremors appearing within 1-2 hours of oral dosing and progressing to clonic-tonic seizures at lethal levels. In laboratory rats, the median oral lethal dose (LD50) for dieldrin ranges from 37 to 46 mg/kg body weight, varying by strain, vehicle (e.g., oil suspension), and age, with younger animals showing slightly reduced sensitivity in some assays. Acute dermal LD50 values are higher, at 50-195 mg/kg, reflecting slower absorption through skin compared to gastrointestinal uptake. Symptoms in acutely exposed mammals include initial hyperactivity, , and to stimuli, escalating to uncontrolled convulsions and if untreated, as documented in controlled tests from the and . This antagonism is more pronounced in due to differences in receptor subunit composition and blood-brain barrier permeability, rendering dieldrin highly potent against arthropods at concentrations orders of magnitude lower than mammalian LD50 thresholds, which aligns with its design as an . case reports of accidental high-level exposure corroborate animal findings, with onset of , , and seizures occurring within hours, though survival rates improve with prompt intervention like barbiturates.

Chronic Effects and Epidemiological Evidence

Epidemiological studies on chronic dieldrin exposure in , primarily among pesticide manufacturing workers and applicators, have not demonstrated consistent dose-response relationships for major health outcomes, though associations with neurological disorders persist after accounting for partial confounders like co-exposure to other pesticides. Long-term cohort studies of workers with quantified lifetime exposures to /dieldrin showed no significant increases in overall mortality or cancer-specific mortality over follow-up periods exceeding 50 years, contrasting with animal data indicating hepatocarcinogenicity. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency classifies dieldrin as a probable (Group B2), relying on evidence of liver tumors in at doses of 10-40 mg/kg/day, but human occupational data reveal limited evidence of carcinogenicity without clear mechanistic links. Associations between dieldrin exposure and have been reported in case-control studies measuring serum levels, with higher dieldrin concentrations linked to elevated s; for instance, one analysis found an of 1.95 (95% : 1.26-3.02) per interquartile range increase in dieldrin, independent of other organochlorines. Meta-analyses of -exposed farmers, including those with dieldrin use, indicate s of 1.5-2.0 for , though specificity to dieldrin is challenged by mixed exposures and lack of prospective cohorts isolating causal effects. Neurological deficits, such as tremors and cognitive impairments, appear more prevalent among licensed applicators with self-reported dieldrin handling, but these findings are confounded by cumulative burdens and factors, with no definitive threshold established. Breast cancer signals from early epidemiological investigations suggested elevated risk with higher dieldrin levels in , including a seven-fold increase for estrogen receptor-negative tumors in one , but subsequent reviews highlight inconsistencies across studies, with no robust confirmation in larger populations or dose-response patterns. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry notes insufficient human data to establish chronic non-cancer effects like endocrine disruption, emphasizing that observed associations may reflect rather than direct , given dieldrin's long of approximately one year in humans. Overall, while animal models support neurotoxic and oncogenic potentials, human evidence remains associative and inconclusive, underscoring the need for disentangling dieldrin-specific effects from broader environmental interactions.

Wildlife and Ecosystem Impacts

Dieldrin exhibits high acute toxicity to avian species, particularly raptors, where sublethal dietary exposures lead to neurotoxic effects including convulsions and mortality. In prairie falcons (Falco mexicanus), consumption of dieldrin-contaminated prey at levels below acutely lethal doses has been linked to reproductive failures and population declines through impaired hunting behavior and direct poisoning. Field examinations of raptor carcasses in the United States revealed dieldrin as a cause of death in up to 13% of cases during peak usage periods in the 1960s, with residues in brain tissues exceeding 5 ppm often indicative of fatal poisoning. Aquatic ecosystems experience direct impacts from dieldrin runoff, resulting in die-offs due to its high in fats and rapid uptake via gills. toxicity tests across multiple report 96-hour LC50 values ranging from 1.1 to 41 μg/L for dieldrin, thresholds readily exceeded in contaminated surface waters near agricultural sites. Empirical observations in U.S. river basins, including the , documented massive kills—millions affected—from residues including organochlorines like dieldrin draining from treated farmlands, disrupting webs. Amphibians display heightened sensitivity to dieldrin, with embryonic exposure causing spinal deformities and elevated mortality through neurobehavioral disruptions. Studies on and larvae exposed to dieldrin concentrations as low as 8.7 μg/L report 50-90% mortality in affected cohorts, alongside reduced locomotion and feeding efficiency that cascade to population-level declines. , serving as primary prey, suffer similarly high mortality rates—often 80% or greater in and tests at environmentally relevant doses—exacerbating trophic disruptions by reducing at the base of food chains. Post-ban monitoring in the United States since 1974 has evidenced ecological recovery, with populations such as peregrine falcons rebounding as dieldrin-attributed mortality in examined specimens fell from 13% (1966-1970) to 3% (1975 onward), correlating with declining residue levels in prey and eggs. These trends underscore dieldrin's causal role in prior declines, though confounding factors like concurrent exposure necessitate cautious attribution in field data.

Regulatory Evolution

Initial Approvals and Usage Peaks

Dieldrin, the derivative of , entered commercial use as an in the United States during the early , building on aldrin's initial and registration in 1948–1949. It was registered for applications against soil-dwelling pests in major crops such as corn and , capitalizing on its persistence and efficacy superior to earlier alternatives like . Initial regulatory approvals under the U.S. Department of emphasized its selectivity—high to but relatively lower acute risks to mammals based on contemporary toxicity testing—which facilitated rapid market entry amid expanding postwar mechanized farming. Domestic production and usage of and dieldrin combined escalated sharply, peaking in the mid-1960s at approximately 9 million kilograms per year, driven by demand for control, , and agricultural applications. This surge aligned with the post-World War II agricultural boom, where intensified crop yields in the U.S. and globally necessitated broad-spectrum insecticides; dieldrin's stability in extended its protective duration, reducing reapplication frequency and boosting adoption rates. Internationally, the provisionally endorsed dieldrin in the 1950s–1960s for against and other public health pests, reflecting early assessments that prioritized its effectiveness in tropical environments over emerging long-term concerns. These approvals, grounded in field efficacy data from controlled trials, supported export growth and integration into in developing regions, with global usage paralleling U.S. trends until market saturation in the late 1960s.

Bans and International Restrictions

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) canceled registrations for most agricultural and non- uses of dieldrin in due to concerns over its persistence in the environment and in food chains, as evidenced by monitoring data showing residues in and human tissues exceeding safety thresholds. Remaining termite control applications were permitted under restricted conditions until a full ban on all uses took effect in 1987, following reviews of studies indicating carcinogenic risks in animal models. In the , dieldrin was prohibited for all applications under Council Directive 79/117/EEC, effective from 1981, with the measure extended by later regulations including 850/2004 to enforce bans and eliminate remaining stocks. This action aligned with empirical findings from environmental surveillance programs documenting dieldrin's long in soil (up to years) and its detection in systems at levels linked to reproductive failures in populations. Dieldrin was listed under Annex A (elimination) of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants in 2001, one of the original "" chemicals targeted for global phase-out upon the treaty's in 2004. The designation stemmed from UNEP assessments confirming its criteria as a POP: high persistence (log Kow >5, half-life >2 months), potential (BCF >5000 in fish), and evidenced by neurotoxic effects in mammals and eggshell thinning in birds at environmentally relevant exposures. Despite these restrictions, limited emergency uses persisted in certain developing countries, such as restricted termite control in , , and , as reported in international inventories, with phase-outs accelerating into the 2010s through Stockholm implementation aid programs disposing of stockpiles. No new production or intentional releases are permitted under the , though exemptions for pre-existing stocks were temporarily allowed to facilitate orderly transitions.

Regional Variations, Including Australia

In , restrictions on agricultural use of dieldrin and related cyclodiene pesticides were imposed in 1987, with full phase-out for most applications by the early , though domestic termite treatments persisted until 1995. Persistent soil residues remain a significant issue, particularly in , where dieldrin was widely applied to control pests in , , and crops; concentrations often exceed national guidelines even 30 years post-ban due to strong binding to , limiting microbial degradation. In the Gembrook area of during 1987-1988, dieldrin contamination affected 97 properties, leading to quarantines and restrictions to curb uptake into and . A 2024 incident in , , involved the detection of dieldrin and its metabolite in tissue samples from nine deceased Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen), which exhibited symptoms; while causation was inconclusive pending further forensic analysis, the findings highlighted potential ongoing environmental exposure from legacy sources. Australia maintains stringent maximum residue limits (MRLs) for dieldrin in produce and animal products, typically approaching for banned organochlorines to minimize human dietary exposure, enforced by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) and . Contaminated agricultural sites trigger mandatory assessments under state environmental protection authority guidelines, requiring remediation—such as soil excavation or capping—before rezoning or intensified use to prevent in crops and . Compared to some regions with cooler climates, degradation in Australian soils proceeds slowly despite higher temperatures potentially accelerating microbial breakdown, as evidenced by half-life estimates exceeding decades in organic-rich profiles; this underscores the role of local edaphic factors over climatic ones in dictating persistence.

Legacy Issues and Current Status

Ongoing Environmental Detection

In the , dieldrin residues persist in tissues, prompting continued under FDA action levels set at 0.3 (300 ng/g wet weight) for edible portions to screen for potential risks. Recent assessments confirm detections in various , though typically below action thresholds, underscoring the compound's environmental . In , dieldrin in agricultural remains detectable more than 30 years after its phase-out in the , with residues in rural Victorian sites exceeding national guidelines due to slow dissipation rates influenced by . Concentrations in legacy hotspots often range from 0.01 to 1 , binding tightly to particles and resisting natural attenuation. Post-2000 studies have traced dieldrin's atmospheric transport via particulate-phase volatilization and wind dispersal, followed by wet and dry deposition, enabling re-distribution to remote ecosystems even after primary emissions ceased. Such mechanisms sustain low-level global cycling, as observed in European air monitoring networks showing gradual declines in concentrations. Arctic biota exhibit declining yet persistent dieldrin burdens from long-range atmospheric and oceanic transport, with recent analyses (2014–2023) in marine mammals like killer whales revealing measurable levels amid overall temporal reductions of 1.5–5.2 years halving times in some indicators. These trends align with global monitoring data indicating residual presence without new inputs, though geographic biases limit comprehensive coverage.

Remediation Efforts and Recent Research

strategies employing microbial consortia have shown promise for degrading persistent dieldrin residues in contaminated s. Indigenous bacterial and fungal strains, such as those isolated from -exposed environments, facilitate dieldrin breakdown through enzymatic processes, with a 2022 review documenting enhanced degradation rates under aerobic conditions via genes encoding reductive dechlorination and ring cleavage. Field applications of these microbes, including treatments at obsolete sites, have reduced dieldrin concentrations by up to 50% in pilot studies, though scalability remains limited by heterogeneity and metabolite accumulation. Phytoremediation trials leverage plant uptake and rhizosphere microbial enhancement to mitigate dieldrin persistence. Greenhouse experiments with forage crops like tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) demonstrated significantly lower soil dieldrin recoveries—down to 20-30% of initial levels—after six months of growth, attributed to root exudates stimulating degradative microbes. A 2024 field evaluation across 27 plant species, including Cucurbita pepo varieties, quantified dieldrin phytoextraction efficiencies, with shoots accumulating up to 1.5 μg/g dry weight in high-accumulating cultivars, highlighting potential for site-specific implementation despite slow kinetics in aged contamination. Recent investigations into dieldrin's molecular impacts include its augmentation of signaling pathways, which disrupts lysosomal and linked to and neurodegeneration; however, direct causal contributions to disease endpoints require further validation beyond and models. Analyses of consumption advisories have critiqued their reliance on outdated thresholds, arguing that bioaccumulated dieldrin levels in U.S. freshwater pose underestimated risks to neural and , as evidenced by persistent detections exceeding 1 ppb in multiple basins. Technological advances in trace detection, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) optimized for and matrices, enable quantification of dieldrin at sub-ppb levels with limits of detection around 0.1 ng/mL, supporting precise monitoring of remediation efficacy. These methods, integrated with multi-residue protocols, have improved assessment of legacy sites by distinguishing dieldrin from co-contaminants like metabolites.

Debates on Risk-Benefit Reassessment

Epidemiological studies of workers with high occupational exposures to dieldrin, including those manufacturing or applying the , have generally failed to demonstrate increased cancer mortality or incidence, contrasting with animal data showing liver tumors in . A 1999 reassessment of cancer risks concluded that lifetime exposures did not elevate mortality rates beyond expectations, while long-term follow-up of exposed cohorts over 50 years reported no excess deaths. These findings have fueled arguments that regulatory classifications, which rely heavily on high-dose animal extrapolations using linear no-threshold models, may overestimate risks at environmental levels. A 2013 reevaluation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency lowered cancer slope factors for dieldrin by a factor of 2.3 and for (its precursor) by a factor of 5 compared to 1987 estimates, incorporating updated dose-response modeling and that showed no causal cancer link. Noncancer reference doses were similarly refined to 0.00008 mg/kg-day for dieldrin, based on benchmark dose analyses of neurological effects in , though worker studies found no persistent liver or functional damage from . Proponents of reassessment contend this supports a mode-of-action approach, emphasizing dieldrin's promotion of rodent-specific liver tumors via rather than relevant to s. Recent soil contamination case studies, such as in , detected dieldrin residues at levels yielding negligible noncarcinogenic hazard indices (0.11 for adults, 0.52 for children) and tolerable carcinogenic risks (around 3-4 × 10⁻⁵), suggesting legacy environmental persistence does not necessitate disproportionate remediation costs absent acute threats. Critics of stringent bans highlight dieldrin's historical efficacy against soil pests, , and crop insects, which bolstered agricultural yields when safer, broad-spectrum alternatives were scarce, potentially averting substantial economic losses in food production. However, advocates for upholding restrictions emphasize in and indirect pathways, arguing that even low-probability risks from persistent organochlorines outweigh benefits in an era of and less toxic substitutes. These tensions underscore calls for integrated risk-benefit frameworks that prioritize epidemiological evidence over precautionary animal models, particularly for legacy contaminants.

Controversies and Alternative Perspectives

Claims of Overregulation

Critics of dieldrin's regulatory restrictions argue that bans were driven by extrapolations from high-dose animal studies, which failed to account for species-specific metabolic differences and low human exposure levels, leading to overstated risks of carcinogenicity. Epidemiological data from occupationally exposed workers, including over 50 years of follow-up, show no significant excess cancer mortality or dose-response association, contradicting predictions of widespread human harm from historical usage. Similarly, population-level surveillance has not detected an epidemic of dieldrin-linked cancers post-exposure, despite millions of pounds applied in agriculture from the 1950s to 1970s, suggesting regulatory thresholds prioritized hypothetical risks over empirical human outcomes. Economic analyses indicate that discontinuing (which metabolizes to dieldrin) in U.S. corn production imposed substantial costs on farmers, with 1971 users facing an additional $31.5 million in expenses for alternative insecticides or $54.5 million without effective substitutes, potentially reducing yields against soil pests like corn rootworms. In regions reliant on dieldrin for persistent soil insect control, post-ban shifts to less stable alternatives necessitated higher application frequencies, elevating overall pesticide volumes and operational costs without commensurate efficacy gains. Industry reviews, including those from manufacturers like Chemical, highlighted dieldrin's role in pre-ban by enabling stable crop outputs amid pest pressures, arguing that regulatory decisions undervalued these productivity benefits relative to unverified long-term human hazards. Some toxicologists contend that low-dose efficacy against target pests was dismissed in favor of persistence concerns, ignoring dieldrin's targeted degradation in treated soils and its superiority over short-lived replacements in semi-arid or high-infestation scenarios. These perspectives, often from industry-funded but peer-reviewed assessments, posit that blanket restrictions reflected a precautionary bias, forgoing net societal gains in agricultural output documented in usage-peak eras, where dieldrin contributed to yield increases without corresponding health crises.

Balanced Weighing of Benefits Against Risks

Dieldrin's primary benefits stemmed from its as a persistent , enabling long-term protection of crops against soil-dwelling pests such as , wireworms, and root , which reduced agricultural yield losses that could otherwise reach 20-40% in untreated perennial crops like , bananas, and oil palm. This persistence minimized the frequency of reapplications compared to less stable alternatives, lowering labor and operational costs in resource-limited farming systems during its peak use from the 1950s to 1970s. In , dieldrin's application in eradication programs demonstrated high residual effectiveness against mosquitoes, contributing to significant reductions in transmission rates; a 1966 assessment noted it had saved millions of lives globally through campaigns, particularly in tropical regions where alternatives like pyrethroids were not yet viable. Counterbalancing these advantages, dieldrin's environmental persistence—half-life exceeding years in soil and decades in sediments—facilitated bioaccumulation in food chains, leading to quantified impacts on wildlife such as eggshell thinning in birds (e.g., declines in predatory species populations by factors of 10-50% in affected ecosystems) and acute toxicity in aquatic organisms at concentrations as low as 0.1 µg/L. Human health risks include neurotoxic effects from acute high-dose exposure, manifesting as convulsions and tremors at doses above 3-5 mg/kg body weight, though population-level epidemiology from exposed workers shows no consistent elevation in cancer incidence despite animal studies indicating liver tumors in mice at chronic doses of 10-50 ppm. Data gaps persist on low-dose chronic human exposure, with biomonitoring revealing body burdens up to 0.3 mg/kg in historically exposed groups but limited causal links to non-occupational disease outcomes. From a causal standpoint, dieldrin's net societal impact favored benefits in high-burden scenarios: in pre-alternative eras, it averted billions in crop value losses (analogous to broader organochlorine contributions estimated at $10-20 billion annually in by the 1960s) and prevented mortality exceeding 1 million deaths yearly in untreated areas. However, its bioaccumulative nature amplified risks in ecosystems with slow degradation, where wildlife population crashes outweighed localized gains, particularly absent integrated management. In developing contexts lacking scalable substitutes, the trade-off leaned positive for immediate human welfare—e.g., sustained food production and disease suppression—but shifted negative with emerging less-persistent options, underscoring persistence as both an efficacy enabler and a long-term liability.

Dissenting Scientific Views on Causality

Some epidemiological studies linking dieldrin to health outcomes, particularly in agricultural workers, have been criticized for factors, including simultaneous to multiple pesticides and correlated variables such as rural living or well-water consumption, which complicate isolating dieldrin's specific role. These studies often rely on self-reported or measures of without validation, leading to inconsistent exposure-response relationships and limited ability to establish beyond . Rodent bioassays showing liver tumors in mice following dieldrin administration have been challenged for poor predictivity to humans, as the tumors arise via constitutive androstane receptor () activation, which induces hepatocellular proliferation in mice but not in human hepatocytes or other species like rats, where no tumors occur. Human epidemiological data, including studies of exposed workers, report no observed liver tumors or increased cancer incidence attributable to dieldrin, supporting the view that this is species-specific and non-relevant for human . Similarly, for , animal models exposed to dieldrin fail to replicate selective dopaminergic neuron loss or other core pathological features of the human condition, undermining claims of direct causality. Regulatory no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) for dieldrin, derived from chronic at doses around 0.005 mg/kg/day and extrapolated with factors of 100 (10 for interspecies differences and 10 for intraspecies variability), result in acceptable daily intakes far exceeding typical environmental exposures, which are often orders of magnitude lower (e.g., <0.00005 mg/kg/day in general populations). This margin indicates that for adverse effects at ambient levels lacks empirical support, particularly when contrasted with stronger genetic risk factors for Parkinson's, such as mutations ( up to 20-fold in carriers), which interact with but independently drive susceptibility more robustly than associations (odds ratios typically 1.5–2).

References

  1. [1]
    Dieldrin | C12H8Cl6O | CID 969491 - PubChem - NIH
    Dieldrin is an organochlorine compound resulting from the epoxidation of the double bond of aldrin. It is the active metabolite of the proinsecticde aldrin.
  2. [2]
    Dieldrin - American Chemical Society
    Jun 20, 2016 · Dieldrin is a chlorocarbon insecticide, an oxidized version of aldrin, used as an alternative to DDT, but is persistent and toxic to mammals.
  3. [3]
    ALDRIN/DIELDRIN - An Assessment of the Health Risks of ... - NCBI
    Aldrin and dieldrin, chlorinated cyclodienes, are broad-spectrum insecticides that are contact, stomach, and inhalation poisons.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Toxicological Profile for Aldrin/Dieldrin
    This profile characterizes the toxicologic and adverse health effects of Aldrin/Dieldrin, focusing on health and toxicologic information.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Health Effects Support Document for Aldrin/Dieldrin - EPA
    Dieldrin Chemical Structure. Dieldrin is formed by the epoxidation of aldrin with peracetic or perbenzoic acid (IARC,. 1974a). Some of ...
  6. [6]
    Dieldrin | ToxFAQs™ | ATSDR - CDC
    Exposure to aldrin and dieldrin happens mostly from eating contaminated build up in the body after years of exposure and can affect the nervous system.
  7. [7]
    Dieldrin - NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards - CDC
    Dieldrin is colorless to light-tan crystals with a mild chemical odor. It can cause headache, dizziness, and potential liver/kidney damage. It is a potential ...
  8. [8]
    Microbial Degradation of Aldrin and Dieldrin - PubMed Central - NIH
    Mar 29, 2022 · Aldrin and dieldrin have been reported to be highly toxic to humans and other non-target organisms, and so their use has gradually been banned ...
  9. [9]
    Functional Profiling Discovers the Dieldrin Organochlorinated ... - NIH
    Although the use of dieldrin has been banned or restricted in many countries, concern remains over its persistence in sediment and potential to bioaccumulate ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Dieldrin - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The formal chemical name of dieldrin is 1,2,3,4,10,10-hexachloro-6,7-epoxy-1,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-endo,exo-1,4:5,8-di-methanonaphthalene (HEOD).Missing: IUPAC | Show results with:IUPAC
  11. [11]
    Dieldrin - the NIST WebBook
    Dieldrin · Formula: C12H8Cl6O · Molecular weight: 380.909 · IUPAC Standard InChI: InChI=1S/C12H8Cl6O/c13-8-9(14)11(16)5-3-1-2(6-7(3)19-6)4(5)10(8,15)12(11,17)18/h2 ...
  12. [12]
    Aldrin and Dieldrin (EHC 91, 1989) - INCHEM
    Commercial production of dieldrin is believed to be through epoxidation of aldrin with a peracid (e.g., peracetic or perbenzoic acid), but an alternate ...
  13. [13]
    Dieldrin (Ref: ENT 16225 ) - AERU - University of Hertfordshire
    It is highly toxic to mammals with a high potential for bioaccumulation. It is a neurotoxin and probably a mutagen. Dieldrin has a moderate toxicity to birds, ...
  14. [14]
    The EFSA Journal (2005) 285, 1
    Feb 20, 2003 · The epoxidation of aldrin was obtained by reacting it with a peracid which mainly produces dieldrin and an acid by-product (Figure 2).
  15. [15]
    Dieldrin - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Dieldrin is classified as a chlorinated cyclodiene compound with the chemical formula C12H10Cl16O and a molecular weight of 380.92 (Fig. 1). As mentioned ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Toxicological Profile for Aldrin/Dieldrin
    Feb 21, 1989 · Aldrin and dieldrin are found in hazardous waste sites, and exposure can occur through contaminated water, food, and air, though no longer ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Toxicological Profile for Aldrin/Dieldrin
    Information regarding the physical and chemical properties of aldrin/dieldrin is located in Table 4-2. ... Vapor pressure at 20°C. 7.5x10-5 mmHgb. 3.1x10-6 ...
  18. [18]
    Dieldrin (PIM 575) - INCHEM
    3. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 3.1 Origin of the substance Synthetic 3.2 Chemical structure STRUCTURAL PICTURE: Molecular formula:C12H8Cl6O Molecular weight ...
  19. [19]
    A historical assessment of coastal contamination in Birch Harbor ...
    This is consistent with their discovery. Chordane and dieldrin were discovered by Julius Hyman in 1944, and 1948, respectively (NRCC, 1974). In Maine ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Aldrin and Dieldrin: A Review of Research on Their Production ...
    Aldrin and dieldrin were first formulated from a waste product of synthetic rubber, cyclopen- tadiene. Aldrin, dieldrin, and endrin are cyclo- dienes made by a ...
  21. [21]
    Dieldrin – Knowledge and References - Taylor & Francis
    Dieldrin is more toxic than DDT and HCH to insects, to other animals and to humans (highly hazardous; LD50 37 mg/kg). It has two main disadvantages: fairly ...
  22. [22]
    Dieldrin - CD3WD Project
    Systematic name: Dieldrin Chemical name: 1,2,3,4,10,10-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy-1,4 ... Synonyms, Trade names: Alvit, Heod, Compound 497, Octalox, ENT 16,225
  23. [23]
    Dieldrin - Introduction, MSDS, Technology, Processing, Patent ...
    Dieldrin was manufactured by the epoxidation of aldrin. The epoxidation of aldrin was obtained by reacting it either with a peracid or with hydrogen peroxide ...
  24. [24]
    [DOC] https://www.basel.int/Implementation/POPsWastes/Te...
    Dieldrin was developed by J. Hyman & Co. and licenced to Shell International Chemical Co. and Velsicol Chemical Company in the United States ...
  25. [25]
    Economic Assessment of Proposed Toxic Pollutant Effluent ...
    2.2.4 Aldrin/Dieldrin In 1974, the Environmental Protection Agency banned the agricultural use of aldrin/ dieldrin. At the time, the major uses of aldrin ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Technical guidelines - Basel Convention
    Jul 28, 2022 · The US EPA banned dieldrin in 1987 and production ceased that year. Dieldrin is listed in Annex A to the Stockholm Convention (“Elimination ...
  27. [27]
    186. Dieldrin (AGP:1970/M/12/1) - INCHEM
    In potatoes The treatment of potato soils at recommended rates (2-4 kg/ha) ... Application Aldrin + Dieldrin, Arithmetic kg/ha ppm No. of results Mean ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Ecological Soil Screening Levels for Dieldrin
    This document provides the Eco-SSL values for dieldrin and the documentation for their derivation. This document provides guidance and is designed to ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    [PDF] HUMAN EXPERIENCE WITH DIELDRIN IN MALARIA CONTROL ...
    Jun 28, 2016 · 1958) the use of dieldrin in world-wide public health programs, predominantly for malaria control, became increasingly important. Among the ...Missing: Asia | Show results with:Asia
  30. [30]
    [Malaria vector control in Cameroon: past, present, future. Reflections]
    At the same time, the whole forested area was also treated with dieldrin until 1960. Yaounde itself was not treated because it was free of anopheles and ...Missing: 1950s Africa Asia
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Malaria and dengue vector biology and control in Southern and ...
    Vector control in East Africa​​ Early pilot studies in the 1950s and 1960s using dieldrin, DDT and organophosphates for house spraying showed amazing success in ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Insecticide Use for Malaria Control in Central Java, Indonesia
    Dec 4, 1982 · In view of the complexity and difficulties of malaria control in Java due to the double resistance of An. aconitus to DDT and dieldrin, 5,7 the ...
  33. [33]
    A New Classification System for the Actions of IRS Chemicals ...
    Aug 8, 2007 · ... g/m2 recommended use equates to 564.2 nmoles/cm2) and dieldrin at 25 nmoles/cm2 (0.1 g/m2). Sheets of polyester netting(BioQuip®, Gardena ...Missing: m2 | Show results with:m2
  34. [34]
    Trials of residual Insecticides in Window-trap Huts against Malayan ...
    Jul 10, 2009 · Dieldrin and BHC when fresh gave complete or nearly complete kills of all species, but the rate of decline in the kills with time varied widely, ...
  35. [35]
    A Case Study of the Australian Plague Locust Commission and ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · The large scale introduction of Dieldrin in locust control around 1955 marked a turning point, as for the first time a persistent chemical ...
  36. [36]
    Pesticides for locust control - jstor
    insecticide dieldrin started to be used for locust control. Dieldrin was first used against grass- hoppers in the late 1940s and its use continued until the ...
  37. [37]
    The Use of Insecticides to Manage the Western Corn Rootworm ...
    Jan 28, 2021 · Ball H.J. Aldrin and dieldrin residues in Nebraska soils as related to decreasing LD50 values for the adult western corn rootworm—1962–1981.
  38. [38]
    Report of the Aldrin/Dieldrin Advisory Committee to William D ...
    Harris (1965) reported diazinon baits, Kepone baits, parathion granules and diazinon granules to be somewhat effective against wire- worms in sweet corn. These ...Missing: trials efficacy
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Contaminant Candidate List Regulatory Determination Support ...
    Aldrin and dieldrin have ranges of log Kow values from 5.68 to 7.4, and from 4.32 to 6.2, respectively, suggesting high potentials for bioaccumulation.
  40. [40]
    Dieldrin - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Dieldrin is a crystalline solid with a melting point of 176–177 °C. It has a vapor pressure of 5.89 × 10 −6 mm Hg at 25 °C, a log organic carbon partition ...
  41. [41]
    Microbial Degradation of Aldrin and Dieldrin: Mechanisms ... - PubMed
    Mar 29, 2022 · As members of the organochlorine group of insecticides, aldrin and dieldrin are effective at protecting agriculture from insect pests.
  42. [42]
    Microbial Degradation of Aldrin and Dieldrin - Frontiers
    Mar 28, 2022 · A large number of genomic and complex metabolic studies have confirmed that dieldrin degradation evolved in a low-carbon environment, which ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Toxicological Profile for Aldrin/Dieldrin
    Due to the high lipophilic nature of aldrin and dieldrin, they are likely absorbed via passive diffusion. 3.1.2 Distribution. Aldrin is rapidly converted to ...
  44. [44]
    Aldrin/Dieldrin: Ambient Water Quality Criteria - epa nepis
    Geometric mean bioconcentration factor for all species =3,238 Geometric mean whole fish bioconcentration factor - 15,482 Lowest residue concentration = 0.03 ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue ...
    For example, bioconcentration factors of 12,500 and 13,300 have been found for dieldrin in guppies and sculpins, respectively (Fisher, 1999). Dieldrin is ...<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Annex VI Preliminary guidance paper on bioaccumulation evaluation
    (ii) and (iii): The biomagnification factors for different trophic levels (zooplankton, invertebrates, fish, and mammals) are in the range of 1–16. Field ...
  47. [47]
    hazards to birds of soil applied ddt, dieldrin and heptachlor - jstor
    (3) DDE was most persistent, and in plots treated at 9-0 kg/ha its concentration remained constant at about 0-4 ppm in soil and about 7 ppm in earthworms.
  48. [48]
    Dieldrin - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    In mammals, two major metabolism routes of dieldrin seem to be predominant: (1) direct oxidation by cytochrome oxidases, resulting in 9-hydroxydieldrin; and (2 ...
  49. [49]
    Biotransformation Mechanism of Pesticides by Cytochrome P450
    Feb 21, 2020 · Specifically, 9-hydroxy-dieldrin as a hydroxylation product is formed via H-abstraction and essentially barrierless C-9 alkyl radical ...
  50. [50]
    Biotransformation Mechanism of Pesticides by Cytochrome P450
    Jun 15, 2020 · Specifically, 9-hydroxy-dieldrin as a hydroxylation product is formed via H-abstraction and essentially barrierless C-9 alkyl radical rebound in ...Missing: mammals | Show results with:mammals
  51. [51]
    [PDF] STUDIES ON RESPONSES OF NON-TARGET PLANTS TO ...
    Phase II processes give rise to the formation of soluble conjugates (mainly with sugars and amino acids). The major plant products involved in conjugation are ...
  52. [52]
    The metabolism of some cyclodiene insecticides in relation to ...
    By inference, dieldrin resistance is likewise independent of possible dieldrin detoxication, especially since sesamex does not synergize dieldrin against R- ...
  53. [53]
    Variations in the Insect GABA Receptor, RDL, and Their Impact on ...
    Oct 24, 2017 · The resistance to dieldrin (Rdl) gene encodes a subunit of the insect γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor. Cyclodiene resistance in many insects ...
  54. [54]
    (PDF) Microbial Degradation of Aldrin and Dieldrin - ResearchGate
    Degradation of dieldrin includes four pathways: oxidation, reduction, hydroxylation, and hydrolysis, with 9-hydroxydieldrin and dihydroxydieldrin as major ...
  55. [55]
    Some Factors Affecting Degradation of Organochlorine Pesticides ...
    These differences suggest that degradation of dieldrin is intraeellular and metabolites are released only by lysing the cell. Degradation of heptachlor. As with ...
  56. [56]
    Developmental exposure to the pesticide dieldrin alters the ...
    Jun 29, 2006 · Dieldrin exerts neurotoxicity primarily through inhibition of GABAA receptor-mediated chloride flux and subsequent hyperactivity of the nervous ...
  57. [57]
    Neurotoxicity of Pesticides - PMC - PubMed Central
    DDT is only moderately toxic (rat oral LD50 = 113 mg/kg)[60] and oral administration of 3.5 or 35 mg DDT/day to humans for up to 18 months did not cause overt ...Missing: LD50 | Show results with:LD50
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Toxicological Profile for Aldrin/Dieldrin
    A dermal LD50 of 60 mg/kg was estimated in rats following a single dermal exposure (Gaines 1960); as noted for aldrin, the animals were not restrained, oral ...
  59. [59]
    Dieldrin-Induced Neurotoxicity: Relevance to Parkinson's Disease ...
    The major symptoms of dieldrin poisoning in humans are headache, nausea, vomiting, convulsion, and coma. The acute lethal dose in humans is approximately 1.5–5 ...
  60. [60]
    Cancer mortality in workers exposed to dieldrin and aldrin: over 50 ...
    Apr 22, 2008 · In this report, dieldrin and aldrin were classified as probable human carcinogens. This classification was mainly based on evidence of ...Missing: chronic | Show results with:chronic<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Carcinogenicity Assessment of Aldrin and Dieldrin - epa nepis
    Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Significant Increase (p < 0.05) In all 3 "Also benign liver tumors In B6C3F1 and C57BL/6J mice (continued) "Authors suggest this ...
  62. [62]
    Persistent organochlorine pesticides in serum and risk of Parkinson ...
    Mar 29, 2010 · In these analyses, increasing dieldrin concentrations were associated with increased odds of PD (OR per IQR 1.95, 95% CI 1.26–3.02, p = 0.003).
  63. [63]
    Pesticide exposure and parkinsonism: A systematic review and meta ...
    Objectives: To investigate the risk for degenerative parkinsonism related to pesticide exposure through a meta-analysis of observational studies.
  64. [64]
    Association of Pesticide Exposure with Neurologic Dysfunction and ...
    Most studies of moderate pesticide exposure have found increased prevalence of neurologic symptoms and changes in neurobehavioral performance.
  65. [65]
    Organochlorine exposures influence on breast cancer risk and ...
    Women with the highest serum concentration of dieldrin had a more than seven-fold increased risk of developing an ERN breast cancer compared to women with the ...
  66. [66]
    Organochlorine exposure and risk of breast cancer - ScienceDirect
    Organochlorines such as dieldrin, which has oestrogenic effects, might increase the risk of breast cancer. Previous prospective studies have given ambiguous ...
  67. [67]
    Monograph: reassessment of human cancer risk of aldrin/dieldrin
    In 1987, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classified aldrin and dieldrin as category B2 carcinogens, i.e. probable human carcinogens, ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Eggshell Quality and Organochlorine Residues in Eggs of Merlins ...
    Dieldrin has also been implicated as a possible cause of eggshell thinning (Ratcliffe 1970). Sub-lethal levels of dieldrin consumed by Prairie Falcons, Falco.
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Toxicology 18 - Raptor Research Foundation
    The 332 TOXICOLOGY Page 5 percentage of deaths attributed to dieldrin decreased following a ban on its use (i.e., 13% in 1966–70, 6.5% in 1971–74, 3.0% in 1975 ...
  70. [70]
    Dieldrin - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Dieldrin is defined as a powerful neurotoxin that was used in insecticide applications and is linked to significant population declines in species such as ...
  71. [71]
    POISONS KILL FISH IN THE MISSISSIPPI; Millions Die of Pesticides ...
    A scourge of toxic synthetic chemicals is killing untold millions of fish in the Mississippi River basin. Pesticides draining from the farmlands of Missouri ...Missing: offs contaminated
  72. [72]
    The 12 initial POPs under the Stockholm Convention
    Used principally to control termites and textile pests, dieldrin has also been used to control insect-borne diseases and insects living in agricultural soils.
  73. [73]
    Understanding Environmental Contamination Through the Lens of ...
    Dieldrin has been implicated in the decline of global raptor populations. ... Population recovery of peregrine falcons in central Norway in the 4 decades ...
  74. [74]
    DDT and dieldrin: effects on resident Peregrine Falcon populations ...
    Dieldrin was detected in approximately half the eggs, but all except one egg (1.5 ppm) contained concentrations considered noncritical (<1 ppm). The degree of ...Missing: birds levels
  75. [75]
    Pesticide Fact Sheet: Aldrin - epa nepis
    EPA Shaughnessy Code: 045101 Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Number: 309-00-2 Year of Initial Registration: 1949 Pesticide Type: Insecticide Chemical Family: ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT ALDRIN AND DIELDRIN
    Use of aldrin and dieldrin to control termites continued until 1987. In. 1987 ... However, aldrin and dieldrin are no longer produced and no longer used.Missing: end | Show results with:end
  77. [77]
    085. Dieldrin (FAO/PL:1967/M/11/1) - INCHEM
    This pesticide was evaluated by the 1966 Joint Meeting of the FAO Working Party and WHO Expert Committee on Pesticide Residues (FAO/WHO, 1967).
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Aldrin and Dieldrin in Drinking-water
    Dieldrin is most commonly used to mean HEOD with a purity greater than. 85 ... Medmenham, Water Research Centre. WHO (1989) Aldrin and dieldrin. Geneva ...Missing: patent | Show results with:patent
  79. [79]
  80. [80]
    Dieldrin - OEHHA - CA.gov
    Jul 1, 1988 · All uses except termite control banned in US in 1974; all uses banned in US in 1987. Dieldrin. Soil Screening. Last CHHSL revision: 1/2005.Missing: registration | Show results with:registration
  81. [81]
    Listing of POPs in the Stockholm Convention
    Dieldrin. Listed under Annex A. Used principally to control termites and textile pests, dieldrin has also been used to control insect-borne diseases and ...The New POPs · The 12 Initial POPs · Specific Exemptions
  82. [82]
    [PDF] RIDDING THE WORLD OF POPS: A GUIDE TO THE STOCKHOLM ...
    It allows member governments to register publicly for country-specific exemptions per- mitting them to use existing stocks of aldrin, dieldrin, and heptachlor.
  83. [83]
    Contaminated agricultural land | EPA
    Agricultural use of DDT was banned in 1986 and agricultural use of the cyclodienes (aldrin, dieldrin, heptachlor and chlordane) was restricted in 1987.
  84. [84]
    The Evolution of Termite Protection Chemicals in Australia: A Historical
    May 18, 2025 · From the early 1920's, organochlorine chemicals such as Dieldrin ... By 1995, these chemicals were banned in Australia for domestic use due to ...
  85. [85]
    Dieldrin and DDT soil contamination | Managing chemical residues
    Mar 1, 2022 · Dieldrin and DDT can contaminate soil for decades and can accumulate in agricultural produce and livestock.
  86. [86]
    Composition of soil organic matter drives total loss of dieldrin and ...
    Nov 15, 2019 · Current dieldrin and DDT residue concentrations were positively correlated with soil organic matter and clay contents. However, key indicators ...
  87. [87]
    1987-1988: The Dieldrin Contamination Issue: Gembrook (Vic)
    In Gembrook, 97 properties are reported to be effected by dieldrin (25% of the area), with a total of 228 properties having cattle on them.
  88. [88]
    Banned chemicals dieldrin, DDE detected in bodies of magpies
    Nov 12, 2024 · DDT was banned in the United States in 1972 and declared illegal to use in Australia in 1987. The World Health Organisation's website says ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  89. [89]
    Cootamundra magpie testing completed | EPA
    Nov 6, 2024 · Analysis of samples collected from nine deceased magpies in Cootamundra has returned inconclusive results.
  90. [90]
    EPA finds DDE and Dieldrin in Cootamundra's dead magpies
    Nov 5, 2024 · The NSW EPA found banned pesticides DDE and Dieldrin in dead magpies from Cootamundra, but the tests could not confirm the cause of death.
  91. [91]
    Chemicals in food - maximum residue limits
    Jul 14, 2023 · A maximum residue limit (MRL) is the highest amount of an agricultural or veterinary (agvet) chemical residue that is legally allowed in a food product sold in ...
  92. [92]
    Pesticides and veterinary residues
    Jul 16, 2020 · The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) sets maximum residue limits (MRLs) for agricultural and veterinary ...<|separator|>
  93. [93]
    Degradation of organochlorine pesticides in soils under controlled ...
    With the soil kept at a constant temperature of 30°C, degradation rates were much higher and the half-lives of all pesticides 3–5 times shorter than for the ...
  94. [94]
    Atmospheric concentrations and deposition of organochlorine ...
    Several long-term studies have shown that the concentration of OCPs in the atmosphere of the Northern Hemisphere has diminished over the last 10 years (Cortes ...
  95. [95]
    Assessment of persistent organic pollutants in killer whales (Orcinus ...
    Mar 1, 2024 · The rank order of concentrations of the top five contaminant classes was ∑DDT, ∑PCB, ∑CHL, ∑Toxaphene, and Dieldrin. Several emerging Arctic ...
  96. [96]
    Spatial and temporal trends of chlorinated epoxides in the ...
    Jan 10, 2024 · (1998) determined that the concentrations of dieldrin were decreasing by a factor of two every 1.5–5.2 years based on IADN data from 1990 to ...
  97. [97]
    A global review of the temporal and spatial patterns of DDT and ...
    Feb 1, 2023 · Dieldrin was created in the late 1940s as an alternative to DDT (Honeycutt and Shirley, 2014), with its use peaking in the 1960s and 70s ...
  98. [98]
    In Situ Remediation of Obsolete Chlorinated Pesticides Using a ...
    Sep 8, 2025 · Specifically, bioremediation of Aldrin and Dieldrin is reported possible with the application of indigenous microbial strains (Arora, 2020, ...
  99. [99]
    Preliminary note on potential use of forage crops for soil ... - PubMed
    After 6 months in the greenhouse, recoveries of dieldrin from soil planted with tall fescue and alfalfa were significantly lower than recoveries in unplanted ...
  100. [100]
    Dieldrin accumulation, distribution in plant parts and phytoextraction ...
    Jun 25, 2024 · It was widely used to protect crops between the 50's and the 70's, replacing DDT, before being banned for agricultural use in France in 1972 ( ...Missing: pests | Show results with:pests
  101. [101]
    Dieldrin Augments mTOR Signaling and Regulates Genes ...
    Our data demonstrate that dieldrin induces genes associated with cardiovascular dysfunction and compromised lysosomal physiology.
  102. [102]
    Dated science and fish advisories may be hurting brains - EHN
    Each time a fish eats a contaminated organism, most of the dieldrin transfers to the fish's fat. The same thing happens when a predator, whether otter or human, ...Missing: die- offs
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Mass Spectrometry Method for Determination of Aldrin and Dieldrin ...
    This study demonstrates that GC-MS is a powerful analytical technique for the simultaneous analysis of aldrin and dieldrin in serum. Furthermore, our results ...
  104. [104]
    Advancements in techniques used for identification of pesticide ...
    This paper discusses 96 papers on AI and sensor technology advancement in detecting pesticide residue on crops in a detailed manner with tabulated and ...
  105. [105]
    Aldrin and Dieldrin: A Reevaluation of the Cancer and Noncancer ...
    Nov 20, 2013 · Animal studies that examined the ability of aldrin and dieldrin to cause reproductive or developmental effects have reported conflicting results ...Missing: benefit debates
  106. [106]
    A study of exposure, health effects and mortality of workers engaged ...
    In this thesis an epidemiological study is reported on possible long-term health effects of exposures to the organochlorine insecticides aldrin and dieldrin ...
  107. [107]
    Mode of action of dieldrin-induced liver tumors: application to human ...
    Dieldrin is an organochlorine insecticide that was widely used until 1970 when its use was banned because of its liver carcinogenicity in mice.
  108. [108]
    A Dieldrin Case Study: Another Evidence of an Obsolete Substance ...
    Biodegradation rates are slower when POPs are adsorbed by soil [15,16] with the rate of desorption from soil organic matter (SOM) regulating degradation [17,18] ...<|separator|>
  109. [109]
    Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards
    Direct impact on humans. If the credits of pesticides include enhanced economic potential in terms of increased production of food and fibre, and amelioration ...
  110. [110]
    Risk–Benefit assessment of foods: Development of a ... - NIH
    Oct 20, 2022 · Our aim was to develop a harmonized, transparent, and documented methodological framework for selecting nutritional, microbiological, and toxicological RBA ...Missing: reassessment | Show results with:reassessment
  111. [111]
    Mode of action of dieldrin-induced liver tumors: application to human ...
    Jul 30, 2024 · Thus, there is no carcinogenic risk to humans. This conclusion is also supported by a lack of positive epidemiologic findings for evidence of ...Missing: epidemic | Show results with:epidemic
  112. [112]
    Cancer mortality in workers exposed to dieldrin and aldrin: Over 50 ...
    Objective: Dieldrin and aldrin, pesticides widely used until the 1970s, have been under suspicion of being carcinogenic. In this study, overall and ...
  113. [113]
    [PDF] Chemicals in Private Drinking Water Wells Dieldrin Fact Sheet
    The U.S. EPA has determined that dieldrin is a probable human carcinogen. Based upon the weight of evidence, dieldrin can be classified as a rodent carcinogen ...
  114. [114]
    Economic Impact of Discontinuing Aldrin Use in Corn Production
    But those farmers using aldrin in 1971 would have had added costs of $31.5 million when alternative insecticides were used and $54.5 million when alternative ...Missing: security | Show results with:security
  115. [115]
    Environment: The Dieldrin Dilemma | TIME
    Sep 2, 1974 · Shell says that there is no evidence that those results apply to humans; the EPA insists that dieldrin has “unreasonable and adverse effects on ...
  116. [116]
    Environment & Energy | News - Chemistry World
    Jul 15, 2011 · For dieldrin - an insecticide the EPA banned in 1987 - the agency relied on insufficiently sensitive tests. The EPA found dieldrin in only ...
  117. [117]
    Integrative assessment of multiple pesticides as risk factors for non ...
    Conclusion: Consideration of multiple exposures is important in accurately estimating specific effects and in evaluating realistic exposure scenarios. Full Text.
  118. [118]
    [PDF] Integrative Assessment of Multiple Pesticides as Risk ... - 24d.info
    Although multiple and simultaneous exposures are common in epidemiology and the situation regarding pesti- cides is not unique, they do require large numbers to ...
  119. [119]
    Evaluation of Epidemiologic and Animal Data Associating Pesticides ...
    dieldrin does not cause effects con- sistent with an animal model of PD. Pyridaben. Pyridaben and other inhibitors of mitochondrial complex I cause cell.Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  120. [120]
    [PDF] Toxicological Profile for Aldrin/Dieldrin
    Jan 1, 2018 · These substance-specific estimates, which are intended to serve as screening levels, are used by ATSDR health assessors to identify contaminants ...
  121. [121]
    Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis of Pesticide ...
    Genetic factors and environmental exposures, including pesticides, contribute to the risk of Parkinson's disease (PD). There have been few studies of gene ...
  122. [122]
    Lysosomal genes contribute to Parkinson's disease near agriculture ...
    Apr 25, 2024 · Epidemiologic studies have long shown that pesticide exposure is a risk factor for PD. To better understand genetic factors influencing PD risk ...