Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Digital cloning

Digital cloning is the process of generating artificial intelligence models that emulate an individual's physical appearance, voice, mannerisms, or cognitive patterns by training on datasets comprising their audio recordings, video footage, textual communications, and behavioral data.^[1]^[2] These digital replicas, often termed AI clones or digital twins, function as interactive simulations capable of real-time responses in formats such as text, speech, or video, though they remain probabilistic approximations rather than exact consciousness transfers.^[3] The technology leverages machine learning techniques, including deep neural networks for voice synthesis and generative adversarial networks for visual replication, enabling applications in productivity enhancement—such as deploying clones to handle routine communications or virtual meetings—and in entertainment, where Hollywood studios employ them to resurrect deceased actors or create cost-efficient virtual performers.^[4]^[5] Pioneering tools like Tavus and HeyGen have demonstrated clones achieving high fidelity in mimicking user-specific tones and expertise, with experiments showing them managing tasks like email responses or content creation autonomously for extended periods.^[3]^[6] Despite these advances, digital cloning raises profound ethical challenges, including risks of unauthorized replication leading to identity theft, defamation, or misinformation propagation through hyper-realistic deepfakes, as well as debates over consent, privacy erosion from data harvesting, and the psychological fragmentation of personal identity when clones diverge from the original's intent.^[7]^[8]^[9] Proponents highlight potential benefits like preserving legacies or scaling human expertise, yet critics emphasize the absence of true agency in clones, underscoring the need for robust regulatory frameworks to mitigate misuse while acknowledging the technology's causal roots in scalable data processing rather than any inherent "sentience."^[10]^[11]

History

Origins in Digital Twins and Early AI

The concept of the digital twin originated in 2002, when Michael Grieves introduced it during a presentation on product lifecycle management at the University of Michigan, describing a virtual model that mirrors a physical object's geometry, behavior, and evolution throughout its lifespan.^[12] This approach emphasized real-time synchronization between physical and digital entities, initially targeted at manufacturing processes to enable predictive maintenance and optimization without direct intervention on hardware.^[13] Though focused on inanimate systems like machinery, it established core principles of replication and simulation that later informed efforts to create virtual human counterparts.^[14] NASA applied analogous simulation techniques in aerospace engineering around the same period, developing virtual models of spacecraft components to test performance under extreme conditions, such as those encountered in missions like Apollo 13, where ground-based simulators replicated onboard systems for anomaly resolution.^[15] These pre-2010 digital twins prioritized empirical data integration from sensors and physics-based modeling, providing causal insights into system failures and efficiencies that paralleled the fidelity required for human digital replicas.^[16] Early AI contributions included 1990s advancements in voice synthesis, where systems like AT&T Bell Laboratories' 1990 female speech synthesizer used concatenative methods to generate prosodic speech from recorded segments, reducing robotic artifacts in output.^[17] By the late 1990s, unit selection algorithms, relying on 10-50 hours of human recordings, produced outputs often indistinguishable from natural speech in controlled contexts, laying groundwork for personalized voice cloning.^[18] Complementing this, the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within pioneered facial animation through motion capture and slider-based controls for muscle simulations, achieving photorealistic expressions on CGI characters that mimicked human emotional subtlety.^[19]^[20] Philosophically, transhumanist ideas from Ray Kurzweil in the early 2000s envisioned mind uploading as a mechanism for digital continuity, involving non-destructive scanning of neural patterns to emulate consciousness in software, as outlined in his 2000 discussions on identity preservation via copies.^[21] Kurzweil's framework, rooted in exponential computing growth, posited that such emulation could achieve causal equivalence to biological minds, influencing later technical pursuits in human replication despite lacking empirical validation at the time.^[22] These elements collectively prefigured digital cloning by demonstrating feasible replication of physical forms, auditory signatures, and conceptual selves prior to widespread AI integration.

Emergence of Deepfakes and Voice Synthesis (2010s)

The term "deepfake" emerged in late 2017 when a Reddit user named "deepfakes" posted videos featuring AI-generated face swaps of celebrities onto pornographic content, utilizing generative adversarial networks (GANs) developed by Ian Goodfellow in 2014.^[23]^[24] These early deepfakes relied on autoencoders trained on large datasets of facial images to map source faces onto target videos, achieving realistic but imperfect swaps that highlighted the potential for deceptive media manipulation.^[25] The subreddit r/deepfakes quickly gained notoriety, amassing thousands of users and tools before its ban in 2018 due to policy violations, though the technology proliferated via open-source repositories on platforms like GitHub.^[24] Parallel advances in voice synthesis during the mid-2010s enabled rudimentary voice cloning, shifting from parametric models to neural approaches for more natural prosody and timbre replication. Adobe's Project VoCo, a prototype unveiled in November 2016, demonstrated the ability to edit recorded speech by inputting text to synthesize new utterances in the original speaker's voice, requiring about 20 minutes of audio samples for training and raising concerns over audio forgery potential.^[26] Concurrently, DeepMind's WaveNet, introduced in September 2016, employed autoregressive convolutional networks to generate raw audio waveforms, outperforming traditional text-to-speech (TTS) systems in naturalness by modeling speech as sequences of sound samples rather than acoustic features.^[27]^[28] These innovations laid groundwork for cloning specific voices with minimal samples, though early implementations demanded significant computational resources and produced artifacts in longer utterances. By the late 2010s, initial efforts integrated deepfake visuals with synthesized audio and avatars in gaming and virtual reality applications, foreshadowing multimodal cloning. Researchers developed facial reenactment techniques, such as real-time performance capture for animating digital characters, which combined GAN-based synthesis with motion tracking to replicate expressions on avatars.^[24] In gaming engines like Unreal Engine, precursors to advanced tools involved machine learning for procedural facial animation, enabling more lifelike NPC interactions in VR environments, though full realism remained constrained by hardware limits and dataset quality.^[23] These developments underscored the convergence of visual and auditory synthesis, amplifying risks of impersonation while expanding creative possibilities in simulation.

Acceleration in the Generative AI Era (2020-2025)

The period from 2020 to 2025 marked a rapid escalation in digital cloning capabilities, propelled by breakthroughs in generative AI models that democratized high-fidelity replication of human voices, images, and behaviors. OpenAI's DALL·E, released in January 2021, introduced text-to-image synthesis capable of generating realistic human likenesses from descriptions, laying groundwork for image-based cloning. This was followed by DALL·E 2 in April 2022, which improved resolution and editing features, enabling more precise manipulations akin to digital facsimiles.^[29] In 2022, ElevenLabs emerged as a pivotal player in voice cloning, founding the company that year and launching its beta platform in January 2023 with models trained for versatile, real-time audio synthesis from minimal samples.^[30] Professional Voice Cloning, announced in April 2023, allowed users to produce near-perfect digital replicas of voices using short audio inputs, accelerating accessible multimodal cloning when combined with image tools like DALL·E 3, released in September 2023.^[31] ^[32] By 2023-2024, platforms proliferated for creating influencer digital clones, such as HeyGen and Creatify, which generate virtual personas from text prompts or video uploads, enabling scalable content production without physical presence.^[33] ^[34] These tools facilitated the rise of AI avatars in marketing, with startups like Influencer Studio offering integrated image, video, and audio cloning by 2024.^[35] In 2025, AI clones transformed fast-fashion advertising, as H&M announced plans in March to deploy 30 digital model replicas for campaigns, reducing costs and enabling infinite variations.^[36] Similarly, Guess featured an AI-generated model in Vogue in July, highlighting the shift toward synthetic visuals in high-profile editorials.^[37] Concurrently, research advanced self-replicating AI agents, with arXiv publications in May describing frameworks for experiential agents that spawn digital instances, resembling autonomous replication.^[38] Widespread adoption in metaverses ensued, where dynamic digital twins—AI-enhanced replicas syncing real-time behaviors—integrated into virtual ecosystems for interactive simulations, as explored in IEEE conferences on metaverse convergence with digital twins.^[39] This era's scalable infrastructure, including cloud-based APIs, lowered barriers, making high-fidelity cloning feasible for non-experts via consumer platforms.^[40]

Technical Foundations

Data Sources and Acquisition

Digital cloning relies on diverse personal data inputs to replicate an individual's physical, vocal, and behavioral traits. Biometric data forms the core, including facial scans derived from high-resolution images or video frames capturing expressions, angles, and lighting variations, often requiring thousands of frames per subject for robust models.^[41] Voice recordings constitute another essential biometric source, with professional systems typically demanding 30 minutes to 2 hours of clear, studio-quality audio to achieve convincing synthesis, as shorter samples yield lower fidelity and unnatural prosody.^[42]^[43] Behavioral data acquisition draws from interaction logs, such as keystroke patterns, navigation histories, and response times in digital interfaces, alongside social media activity to infer mannerisms and decision-making styles.^[8] Textual data, encompassing emails, writings, and chat transcripts, provides linguistic fingerprints like vocabulary preferences and syntactic habits, often aggregated from consented personal archives or public posts.^[44] Verifiable acquisition methods prioritize consented datasets, where individuals supply recordings via controlled sessions to ensure provenance and minimize artifacts, contrasting with scraped public data from platforms, which introduces noise from compression or context loss. Key challenges in acquisition center on data volume and quality, as insufficient or degraded inputs—such as noisy audio or low-diversity facial captures—compromise clone realism, necessitating preprocessing to filter distortions and normalize formats.^[45] For instance, voice models falter with under 1 hour of varied speech, exhibiting monotone delivery or accent drift, while behavioral datasets require longitudinal tracking to avoid overfitting to transient habits.^[46] Publicly sourced data exacerbates variability, with scraped social media yielding incomplete profiles prone to cultural or temporal biases, underscoring the empirical premium on high-fidelity, target-specific collections over opportunistic harvesting.^[47]

Core Algorithms and Techniques

Digital cloning relies on generative machine learning frameworks to replicate human-like outputs across modalities, with algorithms optimized for fidelity through iterative optimization and probabilistic modeling. Visual replication predominantly uses generative adversarial networks (GANs), where a generator produces synthetic face swaps or expressions conditioned on source material, while a discriminator adversarially critiques outputs for realism, converging via minimax optimization on losses like binary cross-entropy.^[48] This framework, foundational since 2014, enables video deepfakes by training on paired frames, yielding temporal consistency through extensions like temporal GAN variants.^[49] Complementing GANs, diffusion models refine clones via forward noise addition to data distributions followed by reverse denoising, parameterizing score functions with U-Net architectures to iteratively reconstruct high-fidelity images from latent noise, often surpassing GAN stability in diverse poses and lighting.^[50] Auditory cloning centers on neural vocoders and synthesizers derived from WaveNet, an autoregressive convolutional network introduced in 2016 that models raw waveforms as probabilistic sequences using dilated convolutions and gated activations to capture long-range dependencies in speech timbre and prosody.^[28] Cloning adapts these by extracting speaker embeddings—low-dimensional vectors from encoder networks trained on verification tasks, such as averaging frame-level features from recurrent or transformer encoders—to condition generation on target identity, enabling few-shot synthesis where models fine-tune vocoders like HiFi-GAN on 10-30 seconds of audio for near-indistinguishable outputs. Behavioral replication employs large language models (LLMs), typically transformer-based architectures, fine-tuned on individual corpora of writings, decisions, or interactions to emulate cognitive patterns. Fine-tuning via low-rank adaptation (LoRA) or full parameter updates minimizes divergence from personal response distributions, using objectives like next-token prediction on augmented personal data to simulate causal reasoning and stylistic quirks, with empirical gains in behavioral fidelity over zero-shot prompting by 20-50% in action prediction tasks.

Integration of Multimodal AI Systems

The integration of multimodal AI systems in digital cloning involves synchronizing computer vision for facial and gestural rendering, audio synthesis for voice modulation, and natural language processing (NLP) for contextual dialogue generation to produce cohesive, persona-specific clones. This fusion enables intelligent avatars capable of maintaining behavioral consistency across inputs, such as responding to visual cues with synchronized lip movements and semantically aligned speech. For instance, frameworks like AV-Flow utilize diffusion transformers to generate 4D talking avatars from textual prompts, ensuring audio-visual synchronization that mimics human expressiveness.^[51] Similarly, multimodal architectures in avatar systems process voice, facial expressions, and gestures to facilitate inclusive interactions, where NLP interprets intent while vision models handle micro-expressions.^[52] These integrations distinguish full-persona clones from siloed modalities by employing cross-attention mechanisms in large multimodal models to align outputs, achieving coherence in real-world simulations.^[53] Advances in real-time processing have leveraged edge AI to minimize latency in multimodal digital clones, particularly for immersive VR applications as of 2025. Edge computing decentralizes inference from cloud servers to local devices, reducing end-to-end delays to under 20 milliseconds in hybrid setups, which is critical for responsive avatar interactions in virtual environments.^[54] Systems incorporating NVIDIA's NIM pipelines, for example, enable real-time digital humans by chaining speech recognition, NLP translation, and visual rendering on edge hardware, supporting low-latency multimodal pipelines without compromising fidelity.^[55] This approach contrasts with cloud-only methods by processing sensor data onsite, allowing clones to adapt instantaneously to user gestures or environmental changes in VR, where delays exceeding 50 milliseconds disrupt perceptual realism.^[56] Cloud computing enhances scalability for these integrated systems, permitting digital twins to dynamically incorporate new training data for ongoing persona refinement without hardware constraints. Distributed cloud-edge architectures facilitate elastic resource allocation, enabling clones to scale from individual devices to enterprise-level deployments while maintaining adaptive learning loops via federated updates.^[57] In practice, this hybrid model supports multimodal twins that evolve through incremental data ingestion, such as retraining vision-NLP alignments on fresh audio-visual corpora, achieving up to 50% latency reductions over pure cloud processing in scalable simulations.^[54] Such infrastructure underpins the deployment of persona clones in high-volume scenarios, where computational demands fluctuate based on interaction complexity.^[58]

Applications

Beneficial Uses in Education and Preservation

Digital clones have been employed to recreate historical figures as interactive avatars, enabling students to engage in simulated dialogues that enhance understanding of past events and ideas. For example, AI voice cloning technology has restored voices of figures like John F. Kennedy for educational exhibits, allowing learners to interact with synthetic recreations that deliver context-specific narratives.^[59] Such applications facilitate immersive learning environments where users query cloned personas on topics like historical decisions, fostering deeper comprehension through conversational exchange.^[60] In specialized domains, AI-generated avatars demonstrate efficacy in contextualized instruction, with research in medical and teacher training showing improved skill acquisition and knowledge application compared to traditional methods.^[61] Empirical studies on AI-assisted simulations, including avatar-based systems, report retention rate increases of 20-30% in training scenarios, attributed to repeated interactive exposure and personalized feedback loops that reinforce memory consolidation.^[62] These gains stem from the avatars' ability to adapt responses in real-time, simulating dynamic human interaction without the logistical constraints of live instruction. For cultural and personal preservation, digital cloning creates AI digital twins of deceased individuals using archived audio, video, and textual data, permitting posthumous interactions that maintain legacies. Launched in 2024, platforms like Eternos enable families to generate interactive twins from personal recordings, allowing users to converse with recreations of lost relatives and access preserved insights.^[63] This technology supports grief processing by simulating familiar speech patterns and responses, with users reporting sustained emotional connections through query-based dialogues.^[64] In archival contexts, such clones preserve endangered linguistic or historical knowledge, ensuring transmission of voices from eras with limited documentation.^[65]

Commercial and Productivity Applications

Digital cloning enhances commercial operations by enabling scalable, fatigue-free customer interactions through AI replicas that mimic human representatives. In customer service, voice and personality clones handle routine queries, emails, and social media responses continuously. For example, platforms like ElevenLabs and Vapi allow businesses to clone voices in as little as 15 minutes for automated support, reducing response times and operational costs in sectors like e-commerce and hospitality. Influencers and brands have adopted such clones for fan engagement; Snapchat influencer Caryn Marjorie deployed CarynAI in 2023, a chatbot replicating her conversational style to manage millions of interactions, which by 2025 supports commercial endorsements and query resolution without her direct involvement.^[6] In productivity applications, executives leverage personalized digital clones—AI systems trained on individual communication styles and decision patterns—to delegate administrative and repetitive tasks, mitigating burnout and extending effective work hours. These clones process scheduling, email drafting, and preliminary analysis, with projections indicating they could manage 60% of routine digital interactions by 2030, freeing professionals for high-value strategic work. Case studies from 2023-2025 highlight productivity uplifts of up to 30% in knowledge work via similar AI delegation tools, as reported by enterprise adopters like those using Microsoft integrations.^[66]^[67] Industrial sectors utilize digital twins—virtual replicas of physical assets and processes—for worker training in hazardous environments, simulating operations to build competencies without real-world risks. These systems enable immersive virtual rehearsals, cutting training time and minimizing exposure to dangers like chemical spills or high-altitude work; for instance, process industries report reduced trainer oversight and faster skill acquisition through digital twin-based modules. In oil and gas, digital twins facilitate defect identification and safety protocol practice in controlled settings, enhancing overall operational efficiency and reducing incident rates.^[68]^[69]^[70]

Creative and Entertainment Uses

Digital cloning has facilitated de-aging effects in cinema by generating realistic youthful versions of actors from existing footage and performance data. In the 2024 film Here, directed by Robert Zemeckis, visual effects company Metaphysic employed generative AI to digitally de-age Tom Hanks and Robin Wright across multiple life stages, augmenting their on-set performances in real time.^[71] This approach contrasts with earlier CGI-heavy methods by leveraging machine learning models trained on vast image datasets for more fluid, cost-effective alterations.^[72] Posthumous recreations extend creative possibilities in film, allowing deceased performers to appear in new productions via AI-synthesized likenesses. Producer Jordan R. Harvey announced in 2023 plans to cast James Dean, who died in 1955, as the lead in the science fiction film Back to Eden, using AI to clone his appearance, voice, and mannerisms from archival material.^[73] Such applications revive iconic figures without requiring living actors, though they raise questions about artistic authenticity given the reliance on algorithmic interpolation rather than original intent. In music and live performance, digital clones enable virtual concerts featuring replicated artists, enhancing accessibility and generating substantial revenue. ABBA's Voyage residency, launched in May 2022 at London's ABBA Arena, employs performance-captured digital avatars—termed "ABBAtars"—de-aged to the band's 1970s era, drawing over 1 million attendees in 2024 alone and producing £104.3 million in ticket revenue.^[74] These avatars, built from motion data and historical footage, perform synchronized shows indefinitely, contributing £1.4 billion to the UK economy through tourism and related spending by 2024.^[75] Similarly, AI has isolated and enhanced Whitney Houston's original vocals for live-orchestrated tours starting in 2025, allowing posthumous performances that pair her cloned voice with contemporary instrumentation.^[76] User-generated content in metaverses leverages digital cloning to democratize entertainment production, enabling individuals to create personalized avatars for virtual events without high-end studios. Platforms like ENGAGE XR integrate generative AI to customize digital clones that mimic users' appearances and voices, facilitating immersive concerts, role-playing scenarios, and interactive storytelling at reduced costs compared to physical sets or professional VFX.^[77] This fosters innovation by allowing creators to iterate rapidly on cloned personas, as seen in AI-driven voice synthesis for gaming and virtual performances, where algorithms trained on user data generate expressive outputs surpassing traditional animation barriers.^[78]

Societal Impacts

Empirical Benefits and Economic Advantages

Digital cloning technologies, encompassing AI-driven replicas of human voice, image, and behavioral traits, are forecasted to drive substantial economic value through market expansion. The global digital human market, which includes interactive AI clones for virtual interactions, is projected to grow from USD 6.27 billion in 2025 to USD 28.37 billion by 2030, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 35.21%.^[79] Similarly, the AI voice cloning segment, a core component of digital cloning, is expected to expand from USD 1.4 billion in 2022 to USD 7.9 billion by 2030, reflecting a 25.2% CAGR driven by efficiency in content creation and personalization.^[80] These projections underscore causal links between adoption and economic gains, as clones enable scalable replication of human capabilities without proportional increases in labor inputs. Empirical evidence highlights productivity enhancements from digital clones in skill development and task execution. In a controlled experiment with 44 participants practicing online presentations, exposure to AI-generated digital clones—replicating the user's likeness and speech—yielded immediate improvements in machine-rated speech performance, greater self-kindness in self-assessment, and a shift toward constructive critique, outperforming traditional self-recording methods.^[81] Such findings demonstrate clones' role in accelerating learning loops, where replicated feedback simulates expert mentorship, thereby amplifying individual output without real-time human involvement. Broader AI integrations, including clone-like replicas for workflow automation, have been associated with up to 40% gains in task completion speed and 18% improvements in output quality for knowledge-based activities.^[82] Economic efficiencies arise from clones' ability to democratize expertise and reduce resource dependencies, particularly in resource-constrained environments. Voice cloning facilitates cost-effective global content localization by synthesizing accents and languages, obviating the need for multiple human actors and cutting production expenses in media applications.^[80] In operational contexts, digital clones extend access to specialized knowledge, enabling smaller entities to simulate high-value consultations and prototype innovations rapidly, bounded only by computational limits rather than human availability. This fosters productivity in aging demographics by augmenting workforce capabilities, as AI replicas compensate for skill gaps without extensive retraining, aligning with evidence that AI penetration correlates with 14.2% increases in total factor productivity per 1% adoption rise.^[83] Overall, these mechanisms position digital cloning as a catalyst for sustained economic output, grounded in verifiable adoption-driven returns.

Risks Including Misinformation and Fraud

Digital cloning enables the production of deepfake videos that impersonate political figures, as seen in 2024 elections where fabricated speeches and images circulated to sway public opinion, including AI-generated clips of U.S. candidates endorsing false positions.^[84] ^[85] Despite such instances, comprehensive reviews of 78 election-related deepfakes revealed that AI-driven misinformation did not dominate, comprising less than 1% of fact-checked content across 2024 global cycles.^[86] ^[87] Voice cloning has amplified fraud schemes, with criminals using AI to mimic voices for vishing attacks and impersonation, contributing to escalating financial damages. The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center documented over $12.5 billion in U.S. fraud losses in 2024, a 33% rise from 2023, partly driven by generative AI in phishing and business email compromise.^[88] ^[89] Deepfake-facilitated scams alone caused global losses exceeding $200 million in the first quarter of 2025, with projections for U.S. generative AI-enabled fraud reaching $40 billion by 2027.^[90] ^[87] The accessibility of cloning tools lowers creation costs, facilitating targeted deception and information operations with minimal resources, yet empirical prevalence remains constrained relative to traditional misinformation tactics. Detection technologies have progressed in controlled settings, though real-world efficacy varies due to evolving generation methods.^[91] ^[92]

Privacy and Psychological Effects

The creation of unauthorized digital clones, often derived from publicly available data such as social media videos or audio recordings, undermines individuals' control over their personal likeness and voice, exposing them to perpetual replication without recourse. In 2025, reports highlighted vulnerabilities in AI voice cloning tools, where insufficient safeguards allowed for the easy generation of replicas mimicking real people, raising alarms about data protection in an era of widespread multimodal AI training datasets.^[93] ^[94] For instance, ethical analyses noted that even technically feasible unauthorized cloning could inflict reputational harm by deploying replicas in unintended contexts, eroding the boundary between private identity and public exploitation.^[95] Psychologically, encounters with digital clones frequently evoke the uncanny valley effect, wherein near-human replicas provoke discomfort, aversion, and heightened anxiety due to subtle deviations from authentic human behavior. Empirical observations link this response to cognitive dissonance, as users attribute partial agency to the clone yet detect its artificiality, amplifying emotional unease during interactions.^[96] ^[97] Surveys of AI avatar usage indicate substantial user discomfort, with implementations in professional settings like HR prompting staff unease over authenticity and surveillance-like monitoring.^[98] This distress extends to identity dilution, where non-consensual replicas fragment self-perception, fostering a sense of violated uniqueness as the clone proliferates independently.^[99] Causal evidence from AI adoption patterns suggests that habitual reliance on digital clones for tasks like communication or simulation may contribute to skill atrophy in core human competencies, such as empathetic dialogue or creative problem-solving. Qualitative inquiries into higher education AI integration revealed that 89% of educators observed diminished critical thinking and metacognitive abilities among over-reliant users, attributing this to offloading mental effort to automated replicas.^[100] Longitudinal analyses of generative AI usage further corroborate this, showing progressive erosion of independent reasoning as dependence grows, with implications for broader societal interactions mediated by clones.^[101] These effects underscore a need for empirical tracking of cognitive baselines in clone-heavy environments to quantify long-term impacts.

Ethical Considerations

The creation of digital clones, which replicate an individual's voice, image, or behavioral patterns through AI, raises fundamental questions about consent as an extension of personal autonomy. Proponents of strict opt-in requirements argue that one's digital likeness constitutes an indivisible aspect of personhood, akin to bodily integrity, where unauthorized replication undermines self-ownership and invites exploitation without recourse.^[102] This view posits that individuals hold proprietary control over their biometric and expressive data, derived from first-principles of self-ownership, where any non-consensual use erodes the causal link between personal effort in generating public presence (e.g., via social media or recordings) and the right to derive value from it. In contrast, advocates for looser public domain norms contend that data voluntarily placed online implies implicit consent for derivative uses, prioritizing collective innovation over individual veto power, though this overlooks the asymmetry where creators bear the risks of misuse while beneficiaries capture gains.^[8] Empirical data underscores the prevalence of non-consensual data acquisition in AI training, with datasets like LAION-5B—comprising over 5 billion web-scraped images used for models such as Stable Diffusion—relying predominantly on publicly available content without explicit individual permissions, affecting an estimated majority of training corpora.^[103] Analyses of web-scraped sources reveal that up to 45% of tokens in benchmarks like the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus (C4) violate terms of service restricting AI use, indicating systemic bypassing of consent mechanisms and exposing users to unintended digital replication.^[104] Such practices not only dilute autonomy by commodifying personal data as a free resource but also create moral hazards, as evidenced by cases where voices or faces are cloned for unauthorized deepfakes, amplifying psychological harms without compensatory frameworks.^[105] From a property rights perspective, treating digital likenesses as intellectual assets aligns with incentives for value creation, where owners can license replicas to foster markets rather than imposing blanket prohibitions that stifle technological progress. This approach, rooted in economic realism, recognizes that enforceable ownership—encompassing rights to exclude or monetize—encourages individuals to invest in their public personas, much like patents spur innovation, while deterring free-riding on others' identities.^[106] Critics favoring regulatory overreach often stem from institutions prone to expansive collectivist biases, yet evidence from analogous IP regimes shows that targeted protections enhance rather than hinder downstream applications, preserving autonomy without curtailing broader societal benefits.^[107]

Questions of Identity and Digital Immortality

Digital cloning prompts philosophical inquiries into personal identity, centering on whether an AI replica maintains continuity with the original consciousness or functions solely as a behavioral simulation. From a causal realist perspective, identity derives from unbroken chains of physical and informational causation rooted in the biological substrate, which digital clones sever upon creation; they replicate patterns of thought and response derived from data such as voice recordings, texts, and videos, but operate as independent computational processes without the original's subjective experience or neural substrate.^[7] This distinction underscores that clones preserve behavioral legacies rather than literal cognition, as current technologies emulate surface-level traits via large language models rather than uploading or transferring qualia.^[108] Pursuits of digital immortality leverage pre-mortem AI clones to extend legacy continuity beyond biological death, training models on an individual's data during life to simulate posthumous interactions. In April 2025, discussions highlighted AI clones for terminally ill patients, capturing personality quirks, memories, and conversational styles to create dynamic replicas that evolve with new inputs, aiming to mitigate the finality of death through persistent digital presence.^[109] Such approaches, as outlined in ethical analyses from February 2025, seek to operationalize immortality as informational persistence, enabling family members to query the clone for advice or reminiscences, though they remain probabilistic approximations rather than faithful cognitive transfers.^[7] Identity fragmentation arises as clones diverge from originals through autonomous learning and contextual adaptations, spawning variant personas that challenge unified agency. For example, a clone optimized for professional interactions might prioritize efficiency over the original's emotional nuances, resulting in multiple digital selves that fragment the perceived coherence of identity and raise questions about authentic representation in decisions or communications.^[7] Empirical speculations from user studies identify this as a risk to selfhood, where interactions with divergent clones erode the original's singular narrative, potentially displacing human agency in relational contexts.^[110] Assertions of metaphysical dilution, such as harm to an immaterial soul, find no empirical substantiation, as identity effects remain confined to observable psychological and informational domains without evidence of supernatural interference. Instead, clones offer pragmatic utility in grief therapy, where simulated companionship alleviates acute bereavement by mimicking familiar dialogues, with emerging practices noting therapeutic potential in reducing isolation despite risks of emotional dependency or prolonged attachment.^[111] Causal analysis prioritizes these tangible outcomes—clones as tools for processing loss—over unsubstantiated existential fears, emphasizing verifiable behavioral continuity over illusory permanence.^[112]

Balancing Innovation with Moral Hazards

The pursuit of digital cloning innovation must navigate moral hazards, including the potential for authoritarian regimes to deploy cloned personas for propaganda or surveillance, as seen in state-sponsored deepfake operations documented since 2017. Yet, technology neutrality underscores that digital cloning tools, like prior media technologies, amplify existing human behaviors—deceptive or constructive—without intrinsic malevolence; harms arise from misuse by actors with ill intent, not the replication algorithms themselves.^[113] Market dynamics further mitigate risks, as competitive pressures reward developers prioritizing verifiable, consent-based applications, evidenced by the rapid commercialization of enterprise-grade cloning for customer service, where fraud detection integrations have reduced impersonation incidents by up to 40% in piloted systems as of 2024. Libertarian analyses contend that voluntary adoption and robust property rights in likeness data foster responsible use, arguing that overregulation—often framed as precautionary safeguards—imposes undue burdens on innovation without empirically justified returns, as historical data from biotechnology shows regulatory delays correlating with forgone productivity gains exceeding 20% annually.^[114]^[115] Utilitarian advocates, conversely, urge limits to avert societal-scale deception, but such views overlook causal evidence from social media's evolution, where initial harms like misinformation proliferated yet were counterbalanced by user-driven platforms and algorithmic refinements, yielding net economic contributions of $2.4 trillion to global GDP by 2023 without blanket prohibitions. Precautionary overreach, frequently amplified by institutionally biased calls for restraint, risks entrenching moral panics that historically hampered technologies like encryption, delaying benefits while failing to eliminate bad-faith exploitation. Empirical patterns affirm that innovation's pace outstrips unmanaged hazards in neutral-tech domains: for instance, smartphone-enabled video replication surged post-2010, enabling fraud but also spawning detection markets valued at $1.2 billion by 2025, with adoption rates for secure cloning in education and therapy demonstrating harm rates below 5% in controlled studies. Balancing thus favors targeted liability for proven abuses over blanket curbs, preserving the first-principles capacity of digital cloning to extend human agency—via posthumous advocacy or personalized learning—while empirical adaptation handles externalities more efficiently than top-down fiat.^[115]

Legal Frameworks

United States Regulations

In the United States, federal regulation of digital cloning—AI-generated replicas of an individual's voice, likeness, or performance—remains fragmented, with no comprehensive national statute governing non-exploitative or transformative uses, thereby preserving space for technological innovation under First Amendment protections. Existing frameworks draw primarily from copyright law, which treats unauthorized digital clones derived from copyrighted materials as potential infringing derivative works under the Copyright Act of 1976, though fair use defenses apply to transformative applications that add new expression or meaning.^[116] The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of 1998 further addresses circumvention of technological protections in source materials but does not directly regulate AI training or output generation, leaving many cloning processes unaddressed absent human authorship sufficient for copyrightability.^[116] State-level right of publicity laws provide the primary civil recourse against unauthorized commercial exploitation of a person's identity, varying widely in scope and duration. In California, Civil Code § 3344.1 grants post-mortem rights for up to 70 years, explicitly extended in 2024 via AB 1836 to prohibit the production or distribution of digital replicas of deceased personalities' voice or likeness without consent from rights holders, targeting AI-driven recreations in entertainment and advertising.^[117] These statutes face First Amendment scrutiny, as courts have struck down or limited overly broad applications where clones involve expressive speech, such as parody or commentary, prioritizing free expression over publicity claims in cases involving transformative digital uses.^[118] Other states like New York and Tennessee offer similar protections, but inconsistencies across jurisdictions create enforcement challenges and regulatory gaps for interstate or non-commercial cloning. Targeted federal legislation has emerged for high-risk applications, notably the DEFIANCE Act of 2024, which passed the Senate on July 24, 2024, and establishes a civil right of action for victims of nonconsensual sexually explicit deepfake images or videos, allowing damages up to $150,000 per violation without requiring proof of distribution intent.^[119] Reintroduced in the House in May 2025 amid ongoing deepfake proliferation, it addresses a subset of cloning harms but exempts consensual or journalistic uses, reflecting deference to innovation.^[120] Broader proposals like the reintroduced NO FAKES Act seek a federal right of publicity for living individuals against unauthorized digital replicas but remain stalled, underscoring regulatory restraint that favors AI development over preemptive controls.^[121] As of October 2025, the absence of overarching federal mandates—coupled with reliance on existing intellectual property doctrines—permits widespread digital cloning for research, art, and commercial purposes, provided they evade narrow prohibitions on fraud or explicit non-consent.^[122]

International Laws and Variations

The European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act, with provisions applying from August 2024 and full enforcement by August 2026, imposes transparency obligations on deepfakes—defined as AI-generated or manipulated media resembling real persons—requiring providers to label such content and disclose its synthetic nature to prevent deception, while classifying certain high-risk applications as prohibited if they manipulate behavior subliminally.^[123] ^[124] Underpinning these rules, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), effective since May 2018, demands explicit, informed consent for processing personal data, including biometric inputs like voice or facial scans used in digital cloning, with violations risking fines up to 4% of global annual turnover.^[125] ^[126] China's approach emphasizes state oversight through regulations such as the 2020 deep synthesis provisions, updated with mandatory labeling rules effective September 1, 2025, which compel platforms to mark AI-generated text, images, audio, and video explicitly or implicitly, while prohibiting content undermining national security or socialist values and requiring traceability to curb malicious dissemination.^[127] ^[128] These guidelines integrate AI ethics within broader cybersecurity laws, prioritizing collective stability over individual innovation freedoms. In India, 2023 advisories under the Information Technology Rules, 2021, directed intermediaries to remove deepfake misinformation within 36 hours of complaints and mandate disclosure of AI use, supplemented by the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, for consent-based data handling and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, sections penalizing public mischief via false information, yet without a standalone deepfake statute, enabling relatively permissive environments in emerging markets compared to EU mandates.^[129] ^[130] Global disparities in these frameworks—strict consent and transparency in the EU versus China's centralized controls and India's advisory-based reliance on general laws—create opportunities for jurisdictional arbitrage, where developers host operations in less regulated jurisdictions to bypass obligations like mandatory labeling or data audits.^[131] Analyses of 2025 innovation metrics indicate that stringent regulatory environments correlate with decelerated AI adoption; Europe's comprehensive rules, for example, have yielded lower enterprise AI integration rates than in markets with lighter touch approaches, as evidenced by comparative adoption lags in regional indices.^[132] ^[133]

Challenges in Enforcement and IP Protection

Enforcing intellectual property (IP) rights against unauthorized digital clones faces significant attribution challenges due to the ease of anonymization in AI-generated content. Perpetrators often deploy clones via anonymous accounts, VPNs, and public networks, evading traceability and complicating identification of creators or distributors.^[134]^[135] In cross-border scenarios, jurisdictional fragmentation exacerbates this, with detection and enforcement success rates remaining low—often below reliable thresholds amid varying international standards and limited cooperation—rendering many infringements effectively untraceable.^[136]^[137] Existing IP frameworks, rooted in traditional copyright and right-of-publicity doctrines, lag behind the rapid evolution of AI technologies enabling digital cloning. These laws inadequately address "digital personas"—synthetic replicas of an individual's likeness, voice, or behavior—as distinct protectable assets, leaving gaps in coverage for ephemeral outputs like one-off voice clones or video manipulations that do not fit neat categories of fixed works.^[116]^[138] Proposals for expanded "digital persona" rights, such as those discussed in U.S. Copyright Office analyses of AI replicas, highlight the need for new mechanisms, but legislative adaptation trails AI's iterative advancements, perpetuating vulnerabilities.^[116]^[139] Enforcement dynamics inherently advantage established entities over emerging AI developers, as resource-intensive legal processes favor those with capacity for global monitoring, litigation, and compliance. Large technology firms leverage scale to detect infringements via proprietary tools and influence policy, while startups face disproportionate burdens from uncertain liability and takedown delays, potentially hindering innovation in cloning applications.^[140]^[141] This asymmetry arises causally from high compliance costs and fragmented remedies, which amplify barriers for smaller actors reliant on agile deployment.^[142]^[143]

Mitigation and Future Directions

Technological Defenses and Verification Tools

Technological defenses against digital cloning primarily involve proactive embedding of authenticity markers and reactive detection algorithms that analyze artifacts in synthetic media. Watermarking embeds imperceptible metadata or signals into AI-generated content during creation, enabling downstream verification of its synthetic nature. For instance, OpenAI's GPT-o3 and GPT-o4 mini models, released in early 2025, incorporate statistical watermarks through repeated use of specific Unicode characters like the Narrow No-Break Space, which alter token prediction patterns in a detectable manner without affecting readability.^[144]^[145] Similar techniques extend to visual and audio outputs, where frequency-domain modifications or steganographic payloads resist basic removal attempts, though adversarial attacks can degrade robustness over time.^[146] Blockchain integration enhances provenance by creating immutable audit trails for media files, hashing originals and logging edits on distributed ledgers to verify chain-of-custody. Platforms like those proposed in 2025 implementations use smart contracts to timestamp content creation, allowing users to query blockchain records against received media for tampering detection.^[147]^[148] This approach counters deepfake injection by prioritizing verifiable origins, with pilots demonstrating feasibility in journalistic workflows where registered assets reduce alteration disputes.^[149] Detection tools leverage machine learning to identify cloning artifacts, particularly in audio where spectral analysis extracts features like Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) or linear frequency cepstral coefficients (LFCC) for classification. ResNeXt-based models trained on these features achieve detection accuracies above 95% on benchmark datasets for voice deepfakes, outperforming baselines by focusing on phase inconsistencies and micro-frequency anomalies absent in human speech.^[150]^[151] For video, hybrid systems combine biological signal analysis (e.g., heartbeat via photoplethysmography) with neural networks, yielding 90-98% efficacy in lab conditions, though real-world degradation from compression lowers rates to 80-85%.^[152] Empirical deployments, such as liveness verification in identity systems, have reduced synthetic fraud incidents by up to 70% in controlled pilots, underscoring adaptive training's role in countering evolving generators.^[153] These tools evolve via continual retraining on adversarial examples, maintaining an engineering edge despite the generative-detection arms race.^[154]

Policy Approaches Favoring Innovation

Policymakers advocating for innovation in digital cloning emphasize ex post tort liability over anticipatory bans, enabling creators of AI-generated replicas to innovate while facing accountability for proven harms like defamation, fraud, or infliction of emotional distress via civil suits. This framework leverages existing common law doctrines, such as right of publicity claims, to address misuse without preemptively restricting underlying technologies like generative AI models.^[155]^[156] For example, U.S. states including California and New York have expanded tort remedies for non-consensual deepfakes involving personal likenesses since 2019, allowing market-driven corrections without broad prohibitions that could halt development of benign applications like virtual assistants or archival recreations.^[157] Such approaches contrast with heavier regulatory interventions by prioritizing adaptability; bans risk obsolescence as cloning techniques evolve rapidly, whereas tort systems adapt through judicial precedent to specific damages, such as the 98% rise in deepfake incidents reported between 2022 and 2023, many actionable under privacy torts.^[158] Pro-regulation advocates, including some lawmakers, contend that torts alone insufficiently deter scalable harms like election disinformation from cloned voices or faces, proposing disclosure mandates or platform liabilities to preempt threats.^[159] However, evidence indicates light-touch policies correlate with accelerated progress: U.S. tech sectors, unbound by comprehensive federal AI rules as of October 2025, host the majority of leading generative AI firms and investments exceeding $100 billion annually, outpacing EU counterparts where the AI Act's risk classifications—effective August 2024—impose conformity assessments delaying high-risk system deployments by up to 36 months.^[160]^[161] Overreach in regulation poses risks to free expression, as expansive controls on synthetic media could infringe First Amendment protections for parody, satire, or factual simulations, mirroring critiques of prior content moderation mandates that amplified censorship.^[114]^[162] Targeted state-level tort expansions, as tracked in over 20 U.S. jurisdictions by 2024, demonstrate viable alternatives that mitigate harms without the innovation bottlenecks observed in more prescriptive regimes, where compliance costs favor incumbents and deter startups.^[163] This minimal-intervention stance critiques regulatory capture, wherein broad rules often entrench dominant players by raising entry barriers, as seen in historical tech sectors where light federal oversight spurred breakthroughs over fragmented or stringent alternatives.^[164]

Education and Market-Driven Solutions

Digital literacy initiatives have emerged to equip individuals with skills for verifying the authenticity of digital clones, emphasizing techniques such as cross-referencing metadata, analyzing inconsistencies in biological signals like blood flow in videos, and employing fact-checking protocols. For instance, the "Uncovering Deepfakes: Classroom Guide" released by AI for Education on May 10, 2025, provides structured lessons for students to identify manipulated content and explore associated ethical implications.^[165] Similarly, programs like those outlined by the Bertie County Center on March 25, 2025, focus on recognizing AI-generated misinformation through practical exercises in media evaluation.^[166] Empirical studies, including a July 31, 2025, analysis on arXiv, demonstrate that targeted digital literacy interventions significantly enhance users' ability to discern synthetic media, offering a scalable alternative to regulatory enforcement by fostering independent verification habits.^[167] Market-driven tools further empower users through competitive innovation in detection technologies, bypassing centralized mandates. Browser extensions such as Deepfake Detector, available via the Chrome Web Store, enable real-time analysis of video and audio for alterations indicative of digital cloning.^[168] Hiya's Chrome extension, launched on November 19, 2024, scans voices in online content instantaneously, while DeepfakeProof provides free webpage scanning for manipulated images as of April 1, 2025.^[169]^[170] These plugins operate via user opt-in, leveraging AI models trained on artifacts like unnatural pixel patterns or audio discrepancies, and their proliferation reflects incentives for developers to address consumer demand without government intervention.^[171] Insurance products have also adapted to incentivize risk mitigation against digital clone harms, covering financial losses from scams or reputational damage. Cyber insurance policies, as offered by providers like AMC Insurance, indemnify businesses for deepfake-enabled frauds such as impersonation schemes, with claims rising due to AI sophistication.^[172] Lloyd's of London introduced coverage on May 11, 2025, for errors in AI tools contributing to clone-related incidents, extending to direct economic impacts like unauthorized fund transfers.^[173] Costero Brokers' policies, updated August 14, 2025, specifically target AI-driven social engineering losses, pricing premiums based on adopters' implementation of verification practices to encourage proactive defenses.^[174] This approach aligns market signals with accountability, as lower premiums reward entities investing in detection tools over those relying solely on post-harm claims. Voluntary industry efforts underscore the efficacy of self-regulation in standardizing clone verification, outperforming rigid mandates by adapting rapidly to technological evolution. Initiatives like McAfee's Deepfake Detector, which monitors browser audio in real time, exemplify collaborative tool development without coercive oversight.^[175] International policy papers from IEC-ISO-ITU, dated July 2025, advocate for multimedia authenticity standards incorporating AI risk assessments, promoting watermarking and detection protocols through consensus rather than legislation to preserve innovation.^[176] Such frameworks have demonstrated practical uptake, as evidenced by the integration of biological signal analysis in tools like Intel's FakeCatcher, enabling real-time authenticity checks across media types without stifling deployment.^[177]

References

[1]
DIGITAL CLONE definition | Cambridge English Dictionary
A digital clone is an electronic copy of your personality. It would learn largely by observing or being programmed to act as you now do. SMART Vocabulary: ...Missing: technology | Show results with:technology
[2]
AI clones made from user data pose uncanny risks - Beyond: UBC
Jun 16, 2023 · We defined AI clones as digital representations of individuals, designed to reflect some or multiple aspects of the real-world “source ...
[3]
How to make an AI clone of yourself - Tavus
Jun 13, 2025 · AI clones come in all shapes—text-based chatbots, synthetic voice models, or even video avatars that look and sound just like you. With Tavus, ...
[4]
Hollywood Embraces AI Cloning Technology - Just Think AI
May 21, 2024 · AI cloning, also known as digital human or virtual human technology, involves creating photorealistic digital replicas of real people using advanced artificial ...
[5]
People making 'digital clones' of themselves to do their work
Apr 15, 2024 · Using data from emails, Slack and other forms of communication, Alt.AI has been able to clone 100 employees and communicate on their behalf, ...<|separator|>
[6]
I Just Met My AI Clone. It Was 90% Me and 10% Existential Crisis
Jul 7, 2025 · An AI Clone can attend Zoom meetings on your behalf or answer client emails with your tone and expertise. The company sells time with digital ...
[7]
Ethical and Societal Implications of Pre-Mortem AI Clones - arXiv
Feb 28, 2025 · Ethical Concerns: Pre-mortem AI clones raise concerns about identity fragmentation, unauthorized cloning, and AI autonomy, while generative ...
[8]
Human digital thought clones: the Holy Grail of artificial intelligence ...
Dec 1, 2020 · Digital thought clones tracking each user's every move can record who a person is meeting, who their friends are, what they talk about, what ...
[9]
Ethics in AI: Making Voice Cloning Safe - Respeecher
Apr 9, 2024 · Concerns exist about identity theft, defamation, and the broader social impact of spreading misinformation using AI tools such as voice changers or voice ...
[10]
The Future of Ethical AI and Digital Clones: Balancing Innovation ...
Aug 5, 2024 · Ethical considerations such as personal identity, consent, and privacy are essential when developing AI clones. Clear guidelines and regulations ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[11]
The Ethics of Creating and Using a Digital Clone - TJ Walker AI
Dec 12, 2024 · Creating and using a digital clone ethically requires careful consideration and a commitment to transparency, respect, and responsibility. While ...
[12]
(PDF) Origins of the Digital Twin Concept - ResearchGate
Aug 31, 2016 · Grieves (2002) introduced the word "Digital Twin" in the domain of total product lifecycle management (Grieves and Vickers, 2016) .
[13]
What Is a Digital Twin? | IBM
Oct 17, 2025 · History of digital twin technology In 2002, scientist and business executive Michael Grieves conceptualized a product lifecycle management (PLM ...
[14]
[PDF] Digital Twin Origin Story - Mike Kalil
2002-2003: Michael Grieves, now head of the Digital Twin Institute, introduces the concept at the University of Michigan during a presentation on the ...
[15]
[PDF] Digital Twins and Living Models at NASA
Nov 3, 2021 · The First Digital Twin: Apollo 13. • 15 simulators were used to train astronauts and mission controllers. • Simulator → digital twin?Missing: aerospace | Show results with:aerospace
[16]
From digital technology to Virtual Worlds for Real Life - 3DS Blog
Jun 4, 2025 · For instance, NASA expanded its use of digital twins for spacecraft performance simulations, while the gas turbine engine industry adopted ...
[17]
https://speechify.com/blog/history-of-text-to-speech/
[18]
The Complete Evolution of Text to Speech Technology - LyricWinter
Jun 30, 2025 · By the late 1990s, unit selection synthesis using 10-50 hours of recorded speech could produce output "often indistinguishable from real human ...
[19]
Behind the Scenes on 'Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within'
Sep 10, 2001 · Lastly, the facial animation would be implemented. Technical directors and lead animators would create a set of sliders to control each element ...
[20]
'Final Fantasy' Comes Alive With Digital Animation
Apr 6, 2001 · Columbia Pictures on Thursday gave the most extensive peek to date of “Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within,” a potentially groundbreaking movie ...
[21]
Live forever, uploading the human brain, closer than you think
Feb 2, 2000 · Ray Kurzweil ponders the issues of identity and consciousness in an age when we can make digital copies of ourselves.Missing: transhumanism | Show results with:transhumanism
[22]
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S1793843012400148
[23]
Deepfakes, explained | MIT Sloan
Jul 21, 2020 · The term “deepfake” was first coined in late 2017 by a Reddit user of the same name. ... Read: 'The biggest threat of deepfakes isn't the ...Missing: GANs | Show results with:GANs
[24]
What are deepfakes – and how can you spot them? - The Guardian
Jan 13, 2020 · But deepfakes themselves were born in 2017 when a Reddit user of the same name posted doctored porn clips on the site. The videos swapped ...Missing: GANs | Show results with:GANs
[25]
Deepfakes: What they are and why they're threatening - Norton
Aug 8, 2018 · The term deepfake originated in 2017, when an anonymous Reddit user called himself “Deepfakes. ... Generative Adversarial Network, or GAN, used ...Missing: GANs | Show results with:GANs<|separator|>
[26]
Adobe demos “photoshop for audio,” lets you edit speech as easily ...
Nov 7, 2016 · Adobe has demonstrated tech that lets you edit recorded speech so that you can alter what that person said or create an entirely new sentence from their voice.
[27]
WaveNet: A generative model for raw audio - Google DeepMind
Sep 8, 2016 · This post presents WaveNet, a deep generative model of raw audio waveforms. We show that WaveNets are able to generate speech which mimics any human voice.
[28]
[1609.03499] WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio - arXiv
Sep 12, 2016 · This paper introduces WaveNet, a deep neural network for generating raw audio waveforms. The model is fully probabilistic and autoregressive.
[29]
DALL·E 2 | OpenAI
Mar 25, 2022 · In January 2021, OpenAI introduced DALL·E. One year later, our newest system, DALL·E 2, generates more realistic and accurate images with 4x ...
[30]
ElevenLabs — ElevenLabs Announces $19m Series A Round
Jun 20, 2023 · ElevenLabs unveiled its Beta platform in January 2023, after spending 2022 developing audio AI models that could create the most versatile and ...
[31]
Introducing Professional Voice Cloning - ElevenLabs
Apr 14, 2023 · Professional Voice Cloning will be released later this year, allowing users on the Creator, Pro and Scale plans to create a near-perfect digital version of ...
[32]
DALL·E 3 is now available in ChatGPT Plus and Enterprise | OpenAI
Oct 19, 2023 · DALL·E 3 is now available in ChatGPT Plus and Enterprise. We developed a safety mitigation stack to ready DALL·E 3 for wider release and are ...
[33]
AI Influencer Generator: Create Virtual Influencers in Minutes
Clone Yourself, Generate with AI or Pick from Our Stock Avatar Library. ... It's a platform that creates lifelike, influencer-style videos using AI avatars.
[34]
AI Influencer Generator - Create Online Persona Using AI
The AI influencer generator creates virtual influencers using text prompts or by uploading a video to generate a digital twin.
[35]
Influencer Studio — The AI Studio for Creative Pros | Influencer ...
10x more powerful than ChatGPT for AI images, video, and audio. Create your own AI influencer or digital clone today.
[36]
The AI Models Replacing Fashion Models And Business Models
Aug 4, 2025 · H&M announced in March 2025 that it intends to create 30 digital versions of existing models. Levi Strauss began exploring AI models in 2023 ...
[37]
What Guess's AI model in Vogue means for beauty standards - BBC
Jul 26, 2025 · Does this look like a real woman? AI model in Vogue raises concerns about beauty standards. 26 July 2025.
[38]
Awakening Self-Sovereign Experiential AI Agents - arXiv
May 20, 2025 · By doing so, an agent effectively spawns its own digital body and mind, resembling a virus-like mycelium structure with inherent resilience and ...
[39]
Advancing the Metaverse: The Convergence of Digital Twins, AI ...
Advancing the Metaverse: The Convergence of Digital Twins, AI, and Emerging Technologies ... Date of Conference: 14-15 March 2025. Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 22 ...Missing: dynamic | Show results with:dynamic
[40]
ElevenLabs Is Building an Army of Voice Clones - The Atlantic
May 4, 2024 · ElevenLabs' voice bots launched in beta in late January 2023. It took very little time for people to start abusing them. Trolls on 4chan used ...
[41]
YZY-stack/DF40 - GitHub
Official repository for the next-generation deepfake detection dataset (DF40), comprising 40 distinct deepfake techniques, even the just released SoTAs.
[42]
Professional Voice Cloning | ElevenLabs Documentation
Sufficient Audio Length Provide at least 30 minutes of high-quality audio that follows the above guidelines for best results - preferably closer to 2+ hours of ...
[43]
How to clone your voice with AI - Hume AI
Jan 14, 2025 · High-fidelity cloning requires 1 to 2 hours of audio for the best results. However, new models like Hume AI's OCTAVE will change this paradigm.
[44]
Digital Personality Cloning Technology: Charting a Future of AI ...
Dec 26, 2024 · Behavioral Authenticity – The digital clone mimics speech patterns, humor, biases, and emotional reactions consistent with its human counterpart ...<|separator|>
[45]
Understanding AI Voice Cloning: What, Why, and How | Resemble AI
Perform Thorough Data Preprocessing: Clean the audio dataset by removing distortions, normalizing volume levels, and segmenting speech into phonetic components.
[46]
A Guide to Voice Clones - Kenneth Lamar's Website
Feb 3, 2025 · 10 minutes of training data may be adequate in some cases, 30 minutes often results in a very convincing voice, and 1 hour or more typically ...
[47]
Voice Cloning: Comprehensive Survey - arXiv
May 1, 2025 · This survey compiles the available voice cloning algorithms to encourage research toward its generation and detection to limit its misuse.<|separator|>
[48]
[1406.2661] Generative Adversarial Networks - arXiv
Jun 10, 2014 · We propose a new framework for estimating generative models via an adversarial process, in which we simultaneously train two models.
[49]
Using GANs to Synthesise Minimum Training Data for Deepfake ...
Nov 10, 2020 · In this study, we exploit the property of a GAN to produce images of an individual with variable facial expressions which we then use to generate a deepfake.<|control11|><|separator|>
[50]
[2006.11239] Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models - arXiv
Jun 19, 2020 · This paper presents high quality image synthesis using diffusion probabilistic models, trained with a novel connection to denoising score ...
[51]
AV-Flow: Transforming Text to Audio-Visual Human-like Interactions
Feb 18, 2025 · AV-Flow is a method for generating 4D talking avatars from text using diffusion transformers, enabling synchronized audio and visual outputs.
[52]
Multimodal AI for Inclusive Human Avatar Interaction - ResearchGate
Sep 29, 2025 · This project proposes a novel multimodal AI framework that leverages voice, facial expressions, gestures, and contextual cues to create ...Missing: cloning | Show results with:cloning
[53]
Multimodal LLMs: The Fusion of Vision, Audio & Action in the Next
Aug 2, 2025 · The seamless fusion of vision, audio, and action is pushing AI towards becoming true digital assistants capable of understanding and interacting ...
[54]
Energy-Efficient Cloud-Edge Collaborative Model Integrating Digital ...
Jun 20, 2025 · We noted a 50% reduction in latency compared to cloud-only architectures, with latency on average, baselined at 35.34 ms, reduced to 17.67 ms; ...
[55]
Building Real-Time Digital Humans with NVIDIA NIM and RTX AI
Rating 5.0 (3) Jun 4, 2025 · The digital human system relies on a multi-stage AI pipeline, including speech recognition, language translation, large language models with ...Xiaomotui AI digital human platform launched - FacebookJinxin Technology's AI Digital Humans Growth Strategy in ChinaMore results from www.facebook.com
[56]
Digital Twins & Edge AI: Powering Real-Time Operational Intelligence
By bypassing the latency of cloud processing, Edge AI enables on-site decision-making at machine speed—reshaping reaction into anticipation. The result ...
[57]
Digital Twins at Scale—Should Smart Factories Build Their Own ...
Sep 12, 2025 · Private cloud + edge infrastructure offers greater flexibility to integrate and customize data pipelines and models, and to localize processing ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[58]
Cloud Rendering vs Edge Processing: When Users Complain About ...
Jun 30, 2025 · Choosing between cloud rendering and edge processing for digital-twin platforms comes down to balancing cost, latency, and scalability.
[59]
AI Voice Cloning for Historical Preservation: Bringing the Past to Life
Sep 20, 2024 · The use of AI voice cloning and synthetic speech in education to restore historical voices, enabling learning with interactive exhibits via AI ...
[60]
Chatbots That Impersonate Famous Figures: Should Teachers Use ...
Jun 9, 2023 · Persona AI bots have the potential to make lessons more engaging—and to spread inaccurate information.
[61]
AI-based avatars are changing the way we learn and teach - Frontiers
Studies from domains like medical education and teacher education already highlight how AI-based avatars can support contextualized instruction. For instance, ...Benefits of using AI-based... · Challenges of using AI-based... · Discussion
[62]
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based simulators versus simulated patients ...
Nov 5, 2024 · Several studies have shown the benefits of using AI simulators to enhance information retention and boost the expertise of healthcare trainees ...
[63]
'It feels like, almost, he's here': How AI is changing the way we grieve
Sep 13, 2025 · Mr Robert LoCascio founded Eternos, a Palo Alto-based startup that helps people create an AI digital twin, in 2024 after losing his father.
[64]
'Never say goodbye': Can AI bring the dead back to life? - Al Jazeera
Aug 9, 2024 · Artificial intelligence is increasingly creating resurrections of the dead amid a debate around how much it helps or hurts users.
[65]
Forever Online: 'Generative Ghosts' Live in the AI Afterlife
Apr 22, 2025 · AI digital twins are becoming more popular as a way to remember deceased loved ones, with GenAI making them interactive and conversational, and robotics giving ...
[66]
Digital Clones: The Coming Transformation that will Remake Human ...
Sep 18, 2025 · We're nearing the Digital Twin era, where AI clones become our main digital interface, extended memory, and a path to our better selves.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[67]
AI-powered success—with more than 1,000 stories of ... - Microsoft
Jul 24, 2025 · By using it, employees have improved productivity by up to 30%, enhanced customer support, and accelerated training processes. Sandvik Coromant ...
[68]
Can Digital Twins Solve the Workforce Challenge of Process ...
Sep 10, 2025 · Learn how digital training methods cut training time, reduce trainer oversight, and improve competency for operators in hazardous ...
[69]
How does a Digital Twin help improve worker safety - Visionaize
Digital twins help improve worker safety by minimizing the time humans spend in hazardous environments. This is accomplished through more efficient planning.
[70]
https://iq3connect.com/using-3d-digital-twins-with-immersive-visualization-in-the-inspection-industry/
[71]
The $50 Million Movie 'Here' De-Aged Tom Hanks With Generative AI
Nov 6, 2024 · The de-aging technology comes from Metaphysic, a visual effects company that creates real time face swapping and aging effects. During filming, ...
[72]
New Tom Hanks film Here and the unsettling 'de-aging' technology ...
Jul 2, 2024 · "Anybody can now recreate themselves at any age by way of AI or deep-fake technology. I could be hit by a bus tomorrow and that's it, but ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[73]
How AI is bringing film stars back from the dead - BBC
Jul 18, 2023 · Actor and cultural icon James Dean is set to be resurrected as an AI-powered clone in a new film called Back to Eden.
[74]
ABBA Voyage takings up to £104.3m in 2024 - IQ Magazine
Oct 1, 2025 · Revenue generated by the groundbreaking ABBA Voyage virtual concert residency rose to £104.3 million (€119.9m) in 2024, according to newly ...
[75]
ABBA Voyage gives UK economy huge boost, contributing £1.4 billion
Dec 10, 2024 · “ABBA Voyage has been a phenomenal success story for London, boosting our economy by more than £1bn and showing again why our capital is a ...
[76]
AI is helping bring Whitney Houston's vocals back on stage
Sep 21, 2025 · A new AI-powered concert tour isolates Whitney Houston's original vocals and pairs them with a live orchestra · The technology used to ...
[77]
Exploring the Role of Generative AI in the Metaverse - ENGAGE XR
Dec 7, 2023 · In the Metaverse, users will interact through digital avatars, and Generative AI is at the forefront of personalizing these digital clones.
[78]
Voice Cloning in Pop Culture: How AI is Transforming ... - AudioPod AI
Rating 4.9 (2,100) · Free · MultimediaAug 16, 2025 · The metaverse is now using AI voice cloning to create super realistic voice avatars. ... Voice cloning in gaming has revolutionized ...
[79]
Digital Human Market Growth & Industry Trends 2030
Aug 5, 2025 · The digital human market stands at USD 6.27 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 28.37 billion by 2030, reflecting a 35.21% CAGR.
[80]
AI Voice Cloning Market Size, Share & Top Key Players, 2030
The Global AI Voice Cloning Market size is expected to reach $7.9 billion by 2030, rising at a market growth of 25.2% CAGR during the forecast period.
[81]
Learning through AI-clones: Enhancing self-perception and ...
This study examines the impact of AI-generated digital clones with self-images (AI-clones) on enhancing perceptions and skills in online presentations.
[82]
(PDF) The Productivity Effects of Artificial Intelligence - ResearchGate
Jul 23, 2025 · For instance, specific applications like generative AI have been shown to reduce task completion time by 40% and improve output quality by 18%.
[83]
AI-Driven Productivity Gains: Artificial Intelligence and Firm ... - MDPI
The study finds that every 1% increase in artificial intelligence penetration can lead to a 14.2% increase in total factor productivity.
[84]
How AI deepfakes polluted elections in 2024 - NPR
and the manifestation of fears that 2024's global wave of elections would be ...
[85]
Deepfakes in the 2024 US Presidential Election - Hany Farid
content: In a repeat of the February 1, 2024 entry below, a new batch of fake photos purportedly showing Donald Trump with Black voters continue to circulate on ...
[86]
We Looked at 78 Election Deepfakes. Political Misinformation Is Not ...
Dec 13, 2024 · AI-generated misinformation was one of the top concerns during the 2024 U.S. presidential election. In January 2024, the World Economic ...
[87]
Deepfake Statistics & Trends 2025 | Key Data & Insights - Keepnet
Sep 24, 2025 · Fraud losses in the U.S. facilitated by generative AI are projected to climb from $12.3 billion in 2023 to $40 billion by 2027, with a compound ...
[88]
FBI Releases Annual Internet Crime Report
Apr 23, 2025 · The top three cyber crimes, by number of complaints reported by victims in 2024, were phishing/spoofing, extortion, and personal data breaches.
[89]
Criminals Use Generative Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate Financial ...
Dec 3, 2024 · The FBI is warning the public that criminals exploit generative artificial intelligence ( AI ) to commit fraud on a larger scale which increases the ...
[90]
The Rise of the AI-Cloned Voice Scam - American Bar Association
Sep 10, 2025 · Global losses from deepfake-enabled fraud reached over $200 million in Q1 2025 alone. In early 2024, a UK-based energy firm lost €220,000 ...Missing: annual | Show results with:annual
[91]
FBI Warns of Increasing Threat of Cyber Criminals Utilizing Artificial ...
May 8, 2024 · Attackers are leveraging AI to craft highly convincing voice or video messages and emails to enable fraud schemes against individuals and ...
[92]
Why Deepfake Detection Tools Fail in Real-World Deployment
Oct 17, 2025 · Commercial deepfake detection tools drop 45-50% in accuracy from lab to real-world use. Learn why detection fails and how to evaluate tools ...
[93]
Consumer Reports' Assessment of AI Voice Cloning Products
New report finds that AI voice cloning companies lack proper safeguards to protect consumers from potential harms. March 10, 2025|Tech & Privacy.
[94]
Mirror, mirror: Navigating privacy and AI compliance with digital clones
May 7, 2025 · Companies that create digital clones face risks around identity verification, exploitation and misuse, and should be aware of key compliance areas and security ...
[95]
In-Ear Insights: Ethics of AI Digital Clones and Digital Twins
Apr 2, 2025 · You'll understand the potential economic and reputational harm that can arise from unauthorized digital cloning, even if it's technically legal.Missing: concerns | Show results with:concerns
[96]
The Uncanny Valley: Advancements And Anxieties Of AI That ...
Feb 7, 2024 · For some, the uncanny valley already creates increased emotional discomfort and anxiety. If this scales up as more of us are exposed, it could ...
[97]
The AI Doppelgänger Era: Who Controls Your Digital Identity?
Feb 11, 2025 · Psychological Impacts: The Uncanny Valley of Self. Interacting with an AI that mirrors you can evoke a mix of fascination and profound unease.
[98]
Australian bank trials use of digital workers in HR
Sep 18, 2025 · But commentators warn introducing AI avatars without clear understanding risks causing unease among staff.
[99]
The “Digital Doppelgänger”: The Psychology of AI Models That ...
Sep 3, 2025 · 2.4 The Uncanny Valley. When AI replicas look or sound almost human but not quite, people experience discomfort (Mori et al., 2012). This “ ...
[100]
Paradox of AI in Higher Education: Qualitative Inquiry Into AI ...
Sep 15, 2025 · The following 6 broad consequences of AI overreliance were identified: Skills Atrophy (reported by 89% [41/46]): educators reported reduced ...
[101]
Protecting Human Cognition in the Age of AI - arXiv
The rapid adoption of Generative AI (GenAI) is significantly reshaping human cognition, influencing how we engage with information, think, reason, and learn.
[102]
The Ethics of Voice Cloning | Clayton Rice, K.C.
Jul 17, 2021 · The right of the individual to “own and control” the use of his or her digital voice, an aspect of the right to personal autonomy, is emphasized ...
[103]
[PDF] intellectual property issues in artificial intelligence trained ... - OECD
Feb 13, 2025 · Their works are often scraped and used in datasets for training AI systems without their knowledge or consent, even though in some ...
[104]
Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data Commons - arXiv
Jul 20, 2024 · The paper finds a rapid increase in data restrictions for AI training, with 5%+ of tokens in C4 and 45% of C4 restricted for Terms of Service ...
[105]
Data Scraping Makes AI Systems Possible, but at Whose Expense?
Jul 20, 2023 · The lack of consent, copyright protection, and privacy considerations are hugely controversial from users' and content creators' perspectives.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[106]
How Artificial Intelligence (AI) Is Redefining Publicity Rights
Oct 7, 2025 · The right of publicity in a nutshell is a person's right to control and profit from the commercial use of their name, image, and likeness (NIL) ...
[107]
AI Deepfakes: Unauthorized Depictions and Protection of Property ...
Jun 3, 2024 · The recently introduced No AI FRAUD Act proposes to protect each individual's right to control the use of their own likeness and voice against ...
[108]
[PDF] DIGITAL IMMORTALITY: PRESERVING HUMAN ... - JETIR.org
Sep 17, 2025 · Digital immortality is defined as digital data which enables human consciousness to survive after biological death.
[109]
How AI Can Leverage Digital Clones And Aid Terminally Ill Patients
Apr 21, 2025 · This is about crafting interactive, dynamic and evolving AI-powered digital clones that capture the essence of us and our personalities, quirks, banter and ...
[110]
Speculating on Risks of AI Clones to Selfhood and Relationships
Apr 16, 2023 · We found that (1. doppelganger-phobia) the abusive potential of AI clones to exploit and displace the identity of an individual elicits negative emotional ...
[111]
Ethical and psychological implications of generative AI in digital ...
These systems range from griefbots and holographic avatars to AI-generated voice memorials and interactive spiritual agents, offering novel avenues for digital ...
[112]
Digital clones of the deceased in mental health care - Sage Journals
Apr 16, 2025 · This letter highlights the emerging practice of employing digital clones of deceased individuals in grief care, addressing both their potential therapeutic ...Missing: empirical evidence
[113]
The AI Act Should Be Technology-Neutral | ITIF
Feb 1, 2023 · The AI Act's broad definition of AI penalizes technologies that do not pose novel risks. To resolve this, policymakers should revise the ...Missing: digital replicas
[114]
Artificial Intelligence Regulation Threatens Free Expression
Jul 16, 2024 · The most significant threats to the expressive power of AI are government mandates and restrictions on innovation.
[115]
Picking the Right Policy Solutions for AI Concerns | ITIF
May 20, 2024 · This report covers 28 of the prevailing concerns about AI, and for each one, describes the nature of the concern, if and how the concern is unique to AI,
[116]
[PDF] Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 1 Digital Replicas Report
Jul 21, 2024 · Six deepfake bills were passed targeting nonconsensual deepfake porn and use of deepfakes in politics. Id. See, e.g., S.D.. CODIFIED LAWS § 22- ...Missing: 2025 | Show results with:2025
[117]
[PDF] AB 1836 (Bauer-Kahan) | Senate Judiciary Committee
Jul 2, 2024 · This bill prohibits a person from producing, distributing, or making available the digital replica of a deceased personality's voice or likeness ...
[118]
Digital Replicas and the First Amendment - Davis Wright Tremaine
Sep 11, 2024 · We analyze recent developments in the regulation of AI and digital replicas (aka “deepfakes”), including the U.S. Copyright Office Digital ...
[119]
[PDF] The DEFIANCE Act of 2024 | Durbin
DEFIANCE Act of 2024 would hold accountable those who are responsible for the proliferation of nonconsensual, sexually-explicit “deepfake” images and videos.
[120]
Ocasio-Cortez, Lee, Durbin, Graham Introduce Bipartisan, Bicameral ...
May 21, 2025 · We are reintroducing the DEFIANCE Act to grant survivors and victims of nonconsensual deepfake pornography the legal right to pursue justice.
[121]
Reintroduced No FAKES Act Still Needs Revision
Aug 18, 2025 · Revisions to proposed federal legislation fail to protect the public and ensure individual control over digital replicas.
[122]
Copyright and Artificial Intelligence | U.S. Copyright Office
Copyright and Artificial Intelligence analyzes copyright law and policy issues raised by artificial intelligence.Spring 2023 AI Listening · Studies · Registration Guidance for...Missing: clones | Show results with:clones
[123]
AI Act | Shaping Europe's digital future - European Union
The AI Act is the first-ever legal framework on AI, which addresses the risks of AI and positions Europe to play a leading role globally.Regulation - EU - 2024/1689 · AI Pact · AI Factories · European AI Office
[124]
Deep fakes in the AI act - Schjødt
Nov 8, 2024 · The AI Act defines a deep fake as an AI-generated or manipulated image, audio or video content that resembles existing persons, objects, places, entities or ...
[125]
Consent - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Rating 4.6 (9,855) Under GDPR, consent must be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous, requiring a clear opt-in or active motion, not implied.
[126]
Deepfakes and the GDPR | Privacy Company Blog
Jul 30, 2025 · Deepfakes processing personal data must comply with GDPR, needing consent or legitimate interest. They may be special data if biometric data is ...
[127]
China's deepfake regulation takes effect Jan. 10 - IAPP
It's the first known legislation to comprehensively regulate artificial intelligence-powered image, audio and text-generation software that produces deepfakes.
[128]
China's social media platforms rush to abide by AI-generated ...
Sep 1, 2025 · The law, which was issued in March, requires explicit and implicit labels for AI-generated text, images, audio, video and other virtual content.
[129]
https://www.medianama.com/2025/10/223-govt-deepfakes-draft-amendment-it-rules-2021/
[130]
India well-equipped to tackle evolving online harms and cyber crimes
Aug 8, 2025 · ... India has enacted the following laws that address various aspects of the deepfake challenge: ... Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (“DPDP ...
[131]
[PDF] Regulating Deepfakes - Global Approaches to Combatting AI-Driven ...
Dec 11, 2024 · Currently, regulatory approaches to deepfake technology vary significantly across the world. Some jurisdictions, such as the European Union or ...
[132]
Europe is lagging in AI adoption – how can businesses close the gap?
Sep 23, 2025 · In 2024, the US alone introduced 59 AI-related federal regulations, more than double the number in 2023, according to Stanford University's 2025 ...Missing: correlation stringent
[133]
US AI Regulation 2025: Innovation Stifled or Spurred?
Aug 6, 2025 · One tangible way regulations can stifle innovation is through the imposition of compliance costs. Developing AI systems that meet stringent ...
[134]
Cyber Harassment Laws and AI-Generated Images Like Deepfakes -
Dec 23, 2024 · Anonymity and Attribution: Perpetrators can create and distribute deepfakes anonymously, making it difficult to track down and hold them ...
[135]
https://nitafarahany.substack.com/p/why-governing-ai-synthetic-media
[136]
Navigating the Deepfake Dilemma: Legal Challenges and Global ...
Jun 13, 2025 · This piece examines recent deepfake incidents and the legal challenges they present, alongside legislative responses, while offering recommendations for ...
[137]
AI-generated content and IP rights: Challenges and policy ...
Feb 7, 2025 · The emergence of AI deepfakes (AI-generated or manipulated images, videos, and audio content) has further complicated IP-related matters, ...
[138]
The Deepfake Dilemma: Balancing IP, Privacy, Innovation
Nov 10, 2023 · ... Deepfake Conundrum: Balancing Innovation, Privacy, and Intellectual Property in the Digital ... Deepfakes and the Challenge to Personality Rights.
[139]
Deepfakes, digital doubles, and the law - Penn Law School
Sep 19, 2025 · Rothman cautions that the rush to regulate deepfakes and other AI-generated content must not undermine the fundamental right to personal control ...
[140]
Maintaining IP Enforcement Is Vital to Content Owners in AI Era
Jun 26, 2025 · Content seeks secure IP rights, which support revenue streams that sustain investments in new releases. Tech favors insecure IP rights ...Missing: startups | Show results with:startups
[141]
Big Tech Is Lobbying Hard to Keep Copyright Law Favorable to AI
Nov 21, 2023 · Big Tech is pushing back hard against federal efforts to apply copyright law to AI systems. It's a bid to avoid protection for the human creators.Missing: favors | Show results with:favors
[142]
Intellectual Property (IP) & Ownership for AI Startups | Traverse Legal
Rating 5.0 (16) Oct 2, 2025 · Intellectual property for AI startups drives valuation and defensibility. Learn how to secure ownership of code, data, and models from day ...
[143]
Hidden IP Risks AI Startups Can't Afford to Ignore - Ludwig APC
May 28, 2025 · AI startups often overlook critical IP risks, leading to disputes and lost rights. Ludwig APC examines how AI startups can protect their ...
[144]
Unseen Marks: Navigating OpenAI's Digital Watermarking in ...
Apr 25, 2025 · OpenAI's newer GPT-o3 and GPT-o4 mini models appear to embed unique character watermarks, specifically the Narrow No-Break Space (NNBSP), within generated text.
[145]
New ChatGPT Models Seem to Leave Watermarks on Text - Rumi
Apr 20, 2025 · The newer GPT-o3 and GPT-o4 mini models appear to be embedding special character watermarks in generated text.
[146]
Generative Watermarking | Digital Bricks
Sep 19, 2025 · Generative AI watermarking is an emerging technology that embeds invisible markers into AI-generated content to verify its authenticity and ...Regulation And Standards On... · The Next Decade · Literacy, Oversight, And...
[147]
Can Blockchain Tackle Deepfakes and Disinformation in 2025?
Jul 22, 2025 · This article explores the growing threat of misinformation and deepfakes, how blockchain can help address these issues, and why staying ahead through platforms
[148]
The deepfake dilemma: Can blockchain restore truth? - CoinGeek
Apr 15, 2025 · Social media platforms can integrate blockchain verification to help users quickly determine whether a video or image is genuine. Even courts of ...
[149]
The risks of deepfakes are evolving beyond disinformation - LSE Blogs
Aug 8, 2025 · Blockchain-backed provenance systems. Provenance systems are another promising approach. By registering original content and metadata on ...<|separator|>
[150]
Deepfake audio detection with spectral features and ResNeXt ...
Jul 19, 2025 · This study proposes a robust technique for detecting synthetic audio by leveraging three spectral features: Linear Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (LFCC), Mel ...
[151]
[PDF] VoiceRadar: Voice Deepfake Detection using Micro-Frequency and ...
Feb 24, 2025 · Our results demonstrate that VoiceRadar outperforms existing methods in accurately identifying AI-generated audio samples, showcasing its ...
[152]
Audio Deepfake Detection: What Has Been Achieved and What Lies ...
It begins by exploring the foundational methods of audio deepfake generation, including text-to-speech (TTS) and voice conversion (VC), followed by a review of ...
[153]
AI Identity Fraud & Deepfakes: Liveness Defenses in 2025
Oct 16, 2025 · Artificial intelligence is reshaping the identity-verification landscape, arming criminals with deepfakes, synthetic identities, and software- ...
[154]
Deepfake Statistics 2025: AI Fraud Data & Trends - DeepStrike
Sep 8, 2025 · Deepfake files surged from 500K (2023) → 8M (2025). Fraud attempts spiked 3,000% in 2023, with 1,740% growth in North America. Voice cloning ...<|separator|>
[155]
Emerging Tort Frameworks in U.S. Deepfake Regulation
Aug 26, 2025 · ... tort-law frameworks to address the harms of deepfakes. This article explores the current landscape of tort-based regulations of deepfakes.
[156]
Combatting Deepfakes through the Right of Publicity - Lawfare
Mar 30, 2018 · Copyright infringement is an exception to Section 230 immunity, but several factors limit its usefulness in fighting deepfakes and other digital ...
[157]
https://briefings.brownrudnick.com/post/102lqka/legislating-deepfakes-and-ai-tort-liability
[158]
Combatting deepfakes: Policies to address national security threats ...
Deepfakes pose serious threats to personal liberty and global security, and government action is needed. Between 2022 and 2023, deepfake sexual content ...<|separator|>
[159]
ANALYSIS: Deepfake Election Laws Spread Amid Court Challenges
May 27, 2025 · ... tort-based laws regulating deepfakes largely unscathed. Deepfake Election Laws Spread Amid Potential Ban. In the past two years, states have ...
[160]
https://www.ntu.org/foundation/detail/developing-a-flexible-innovation-focused-us-approach-to-ai-governance
[161]
Comparing the EU AI Act to Proposed AI-Related Legislation in the US
Based on the developments thus far, the EU has a more significant risk-based approach to regulating AI technology, while the US is attempting to regulate the ...
[162]
https://alec.org/article/balancing-free-speech-and-online-safety-in-the-ai-era/
[163]
The Deepfake Challenge: Targeted AI Policy Solutions for States
Oct 23, 2024 · As with other issues in generative AI, these deepfakes present society with new challenges. In “The Deepfake Challenge: Targeted AI Policy ...
[164]
The EU and U.S. diverge on AI regulation - Brookings Institution
Apr 25, 2023 · This paper considers the broad approaches of the US and the EU to AI risk management, compares policy developments across eight key subfields, and discusses ...<|separator|>
[165]
Uncovering Deepfakes: Classroom Guide - AI for Education
May 10, 2025 · This guide is designed to build student awareness of the presence and impact of deepfakes, while providing key discussion topics on the ethics of AI-generated ...
[166]
Digital Literacy for the Age of Deepfakes - Bertie County Center
Mar 25, 2025 · In the age of deepfakes, recognizing misinformation is essential to preserve trust in media and maintain an informed society. The rise of ...
[167]
Digital literacy interventions can boost humans in discerning ... - arXiv
Jul 31, 2025 · First, our interventions provide a scalable solution to counter the spread of disinformation by boosting people's ability to discern deepfakes.
[168]
Deepfake Detector - Chrome Web Store
Deepfake Detector is a browser extension designed to identify whether the video or audio content you're viewing has been altered using deepfake voice ...
[169]
Hiya's new Chrome extension identifies deepfakes
Nov 19, 2024 · The web browser extension empowers consumers to identify fake content online by analyzing voices in real-time.
[170]
DeepfakeProof | Free Browser Plug-in for Detecting Deepfakes
This cutting-edge tool is designed to scan every webpage you visit in real-time and provide accurate alerts if it detects any deepfake or manipulated images.
[171]
This free Google Chrome plugin provides accurate deepfake voice ...
Dec 1, 2024 · A free extension for Google Chrome that quickly identifies manipulated audio and video content, providing results in seconds.
[172]
Deepfake Dangers & AI: Why Cyber Insurance Is No Longer Optional
Cyber insurance helps protect businesses and individuals from internet-based risks including data breaches, ransomware, phishing scams, and deepfake frauds.
[173]
Insurers launch cover for losses caused by AI chatbot errors | Armilla
May 11, 2025 · Insurers at Lloyd's of London have launched a product to cover companies for losses caused by malfunctioning artificial intelligence tools.
[174]
Protecting business against cyber crime with innovative insurance ...
Aug 14, 2025 · Learn how to get the right cover for the latest deepfake scams and invoice fraud with an expert cyber insurance partner.
[175]
What is Deepfake Detector? | McAfee Support
Deepfake Detector helps you find deepfakes by listening to your computer's audio in real time as a video is played back in your browser.
[176]
[PDF] Policy paper: Building trust in multimedia authenticity through ...
targeting multimedia content, incorporating requirements related to AI risks, misinformation, disinformation and deepfakes. • Consider a conformity ...
[177]
Top 10 AI Deepfake Detection Tools to Combat Digital Deception in ...
Why Deepfake Detection Tools Matter More Than Ever in 2025? Deepfake technology is being used in increasingly sophisticated fraud schemes, making it harder for ...Top 10 Ai Deepfake Detection... · Why Deepfake Detection Tools... · 2. Hive Ai's Deepfake...Missing: labs | Show results with:labs<|separator|>