Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Doomscrolling

Doomscrolling denotes the compulsive scrolling through digital feeds dominated by negative news and distressing content, often on social media platforms or news aggregators, which heightens emotional unease including anxiety and a sense of impending catastrophe.^[1]^[2] The behavior leverages innate negativity bias, where humans prioritize threat-related information for survival, but in modern contexts, algorithmic curation perpetuates endless exposure to alarming updates, fostering a cycle of rumination and helplessness.^[3]^[4] Emerging prominently during the 2020 COVID-19 crisis, doomscrolling correlates with elevated psychological distress, including existential anxiety and pessimism, as documented in cross-cultural studies linking it to traits such as neuroticism and fear of missing out.^[5]^[1] Surveys reveal its commonality, with approximately 31% of U.S. adults reporting regular engagement, rising among youth amid pervasive smartphone use and 24-hour news cycles.^[6] While adaptive in evolutionary terms for vigilance against dangers, unchecked doomscrolling disrupts sleep, amplifies stress responses, and may contribute to broader misanthropic outlooks, underscoring the need for mindful consumption limits.^[7]^[4]

Etymology and Definition

Origins of the Term

The term "doomscrolling," a portmanteau combining "doom" with "scrolling" to describe the compulsive consumption of negative online news, first gained documented usage on Twitter in 2018. An early instance appears in a tweet from October 30, 2018, by user @theo, stating: "Taking a break from doomscrolling and being inundated with things and stuff."^[8] This predates its broader popularization, though isolated precursors like "doom scrolling" may trace to 2013 in niche social media contexts, lacking the compound form's modern specificity.^[9] The phrase proliferated in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, as lockdowns amplified social media engagement with crisis-related content. Academic analyses, such as a University of Florida study, attribute its origins to 2018 Twitter usage, noting explosive growth amid heightened uncertainty.^[10] Dictionary recognition followed, with Merriam-Webster logging the first known printed use in 2020, reflecting retrospective inclusion rather than invention.^[11] No single individual is credited with coining it; rather, it emerged organically from user-driven online lexicon, distinct from journalistic inventions like those claimed in some pandemic-era reports.^[12]

Defining Characteristics and Scope

Doomscrolling refers to the compulsive consumption of predominantly negative online news or content, typically via social media platforms or news feeds, despite awareness that it exacerbates emotional distress such as anxiety or sadness.^[1] This behavior involves persistently scrolling through updates on crises, disasters, or alarming events, often extending into excessive durations that disrupt daily functioning.^[13] Unlike general news consumption, doomscrolling is characterized by its focus on distressing material and the inability to disengage, even when it heightens feelings of helplessness or fear.^[14] Key traits include an initial intent to stay informed or prepared for threats, which evolves into habitual checking driven by fear of missing out or algorithmic reinforcement of negative content.^[5] It manifests as a form of problematic media use, akin to elements of internet addiction, where users prioritize real-time negative updates over balanced or positive information.^[15] Empirical measures, such as the Doomscrolling Scale, quantify this through self-reported tendencies like frequent exposure to bad news inducing worry, correlating with traits like neuroticism and social media dependency.^[1] In scope, doomscrolling predominantly affects younger demographics, including adolescents and young adults, who report higher engagement with social media news feeds.^[1] Studies indicate its prevalence surged during events like the COVID-19 pandemic, with surveys linking it to broader patterns of information overload and mental health declines across general populations.^[16] While not classified as a formal disorder, research associates it with outcomes like elevated depression risk and physical symptoms such as sleep disruption, underscoring its role in maladaptive coping amid pervasive digital access to unfiltered negativity.^[17]^[1]

Historical Context

Pre-Digital Analogues

Yellow journalism in the late 19th-century United States exemplified an early analogue to compulsive negative news consumption, as publishers prioritized sensational accounts of crime, corruption, and catastrophe to maximize readership. The intense competition between Joseph Pulitzer's New York World and William Randolph Hearst's New York Journal involved exaggerated headlines and illustrations—such as those featuring the "Yellow Kid" comic strip—that amplified public fixation on alarming events, including the 1898 explosion of the USS Maine, which fueled war fervor despite scant evidence of Spanish involvement. This approach propelled circulations skyward; Pulitzer's paper grew from fewer than 15,000 daily copies in 1883 to over 1 million by 1898, indicating widespread reader compulsion driven by negativity rather than balanced reporting.^[18]^[19] In Victorian Britain, penny dreadfuls served a parallel role, offering cheap, serialized tales of gore, vice, and retribution that hooked working-class audiences, particularly youth, into habitual overconsumption. These pamphlets, priced at one penny and spanning series like Sweeney Todd, provided escapist yet lurid narratives of moral downfall and violence, prompting critics to decry their role in fostering addictive reading patterns and skewed perceptions of danger. Publishers churned out millions of copies annually in the 1860s–1880s, with boys often prioritizing these over schoolwork, leading to moral panics akin to later concerns over media effects.^[20]^[21] Radio broadcasts during global conflicts offered another pre-digital parallel, as listeners in the 1930s–1940s fixated on dire updates amid rising tensions. Pre-World War II airings, such as Orson Welles's 1938 War of the Worlds adaptation, exploited anxiety over invasions, causing some to mistake fiction for fact and tune in obsessively; wartime news bulletins similarly drew families to radios for casualty reports and setbacks, reinforcing a cycle of seeking threatening information despite emotional toll.^[22] This pattern underscores a longstanding human inclination toward negativity in mass media, predating algorithmic feeds but amplified by accessible formats.^[23]

Emergence in the Digital Age

The compulsive scrolling through negative online content characteristic of doomscrolling became structurally possible in the mid-2000s with the advent of infinite scrolling and mobile web technologies. Infinite scrolling, invented by interface designer Aza Raskin in 2006, eliminated traditional pagination by dynamically loading additional content as users reached the bottom of a page, a feature initially developed to enhance user experience but later recognized for promoting extended sessions.^[24] ^[25] This design was rapidly adopted by social media platforms, such as Twitter (launched in 2006), which implemented endless feeds to sustain user attention amid real-time information flows. Smartphone proliferation accelerated the behavior's emergence by enabling constant, pocket-sized access to these feeds. Between 2010 and 2015, smartphones supplanted basic cell phones in widespread use, shifting news consumption from scheduled desktop sessions to habitual mobile checking, often exceeding dozens of daily interactions.^[26] Concurrently, social media evolved into dominant news aggregators; by 2018, nearly two-thirds of internet users encountered breaking news via platforms like Facebook, where algorithmic curation favored emotionally provocative—frequently negative—posts for higher engagement.^[27] Empirical data underscores how these elements converged to normalize prolonged exposure to distressing material. Analyses of millions of social media posts reveal that negative, emotional content spreads more rapidly than neutral or positive equivalents, as platforms' metrics incentivize virality over balance, drawing users into self-reinforcing loops of consumption.^[28] This digital infrastructure, devoid of natural stopping points, transformed episodic information seeking into a pervasive habit, distinct from pre-digital news habits limited by print or broadcast schedules.^[29]

Acceleration During Major Crises

The phenomenon of doomscrolling intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic, which emerged in late 2019 and escalated globally by March 2020, as quarantines and social distancing measures confined people indoors and prompted compulsive checking of online updates on infection rates, deaths, and policy changes.^[30] Comparative studies across countries documented a broad surge in news consumption during this period, particularly for television and online sources, with respondents in early 2020 surveys reporting heightened daily engagement driven by the crisis's immediacy and uncertainty.^[31] This spike aligned with the term "doomscrolling" entering mainstream lexicon, recognized by the Oxford English Dictionary as a word of the year in 2020 due to its prevalence in describing pandemic-era behaviors.^[2] Empirical data from longitudinal analyses revealed that frequent exposure to COVID-19-related social media content correlated with adverse mental health outcomes, including elevated depression and PTSD symptoms, with effect sizes strengthening for individuals with prior trauma histories.^[32] ^[16] For example, brief experimental exposures to such content in controlled studies mirrored real-world patterns of prolonged scrolling, exacerbating anxiety through repetitive negative stimuli.^[33] Patterns of news intake varied by demographics and pandemic phase, but overall frequency peaked in initial waves, with socioeconomically disadvantaged groups showing sustained high consumption amid disruptions to routine information sources.^[34] Parallel accelerations occurred in other crises, such as the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, where real-time social media feeds of warfare and geopolitical fallout fueled extended scrolling sessions, though quantitative spikes were less systematically tracked than during the pandemic.^[35] In electoral contexts, like the 2020 U.S. presidential race amid overlapping pandemic coverage, self-reported doomscrolling rose with polarized rhetoric and event-driven volatility, contributing to chronic stress in 40% of surveyed Americans who viewed politics as a persistent trigger.^[36] These instances underscore how crises amplify algorithmic promotion of alarming content, sustaining engagement loops beyond baseline habits, as evidenced by cross-national data on media overload during disruptions.^[37]

Psychological Underpinnings

Evolutionary Negativity Bias

The negativity bias refers to the psychological principle whereby individuals allocate disproportionate cognitive resources to negative stimuli compared to positive or neutral ones, a pattern observed across attention, memory, learning, and decision-making.^[38] This bias manifests empirically in faster detection of negative words or faces in visual search tasks, stronger amygdala activation to threats, and more durable recall of adverse events relative to beneficial ones.^[39] From an evolutionary standpoint, the bias likely conferred a survival advantage in ancestral environments where threats—such as predators, resource scarcity, or social exclusion—posed asymmetric risks: failing to detect a danger could result in death or injury, whereas overlooking a positive opportunity merely forfeited a potential gain.^[40] ^[41] Evolutionary models posit that negativity bias emerges when fitness functions are concave with respect to environmental states, meaning losses from negative outcomes outweigh equivalent gains from positives in reproductive success.^[42] For instance, in hunter-gatherer societies, heightened vigilance to dangers ensured avoidance of lethal hazards, a selective pressure absent for positives, as evidenced by comparative studies showing similar biases in primates and even simpler organisms prioritizing threat avoidance.^[43] Roy Baumeister and colleagues' comprehensive review of over 200 studies concluded that "bad is stronger than good" as a domain-general principle, with negative impressions, feedback, and interactions exerting greater influence than positives, attributable to this adaptive asymmetry rather than cultural artifacts.^[44] In the context of information processing, this bias amplifies the salience of negative news, fostering prolonged engagement as the brain treats potential societal or personal threats—mirroring ancestral dangers—with outsized urgency, even when risks are statistically low.^[45] Experimental data confirm that negative headlines boost consumption rates by approximately 2.3% per negative word, aligning with evolutionary preparedness for vigilance over complacency.^[45] While adaptive for survival in scarce, hazardous Pleistocene conditions, the bias persists in modern abundance, potentially maladaptively fueling habits like doomscrolling by overprioritizing remote negatives.^[46]

Cognitive Motivations

Doomscrolling is driven by the cognitive imperative to seek information as a means of reducing uncertainty, particularly during periods of ambiguity or crisis, where individuals compulsively consume negative content to anticipate potential threats and restore a sense of predictability.^[15] This motivation stems from intolerance of uncertainty, a cognitive trait that amplifies anxiety and prompts repetitive checking of news feeds to mitigate perceived informational gaps, even when the content exacerbates distress.^[47] Empirical studies during the COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, linked such behavior to vigilance-oriented information seeking, where participants reported heightened engagement with dire updates as a strategy to prepare for worst-case scenarios, though this often failed to alleviate underlying apprehension.^[15] Fear of missing out (FOMO) further propels doomscrolling, as cognitive processing of social connectivity incentivizes continuous monitoring of real-time developments to avoid exclusion from collective awareness or discourse.^[1] Research indicates positive correlations between FOMO and doomscrolling frequency, with smartphone ubiquity enabling perpetual access that transforms episodic checking into habitual loops, independent of the negativity of the content.^[10] This is compounded by confirmation bias, wherein users preferentially attend to and retain negative information aligning with pre-existing concerns, reinforcing selective exposure and diminishing openness to countervailing data.^[48] Cognitive novelty-seeking also underlies the pattern, as the brain's orientation toward new stimuli—rooted in attentional mechanisms—prioritizes alarming updates over mundane positives, fostering a cycle of compulsive refreshment despite awareness of emotional costs.^[5] Unlike mere curiosity, this drive is adaptive in evolutionary terms for threat detection but maladaptive in digital contexts, where algorithmic amplification sustains engagement without resolution. Longitudinal analyses reveal that such motivations persist beyond acute events, associating with traits like low self-control in information processing, leading to prolonged exposure even post-crisis.^[1]

Neurochemical and Behavioral Reinforcement

Doomscrolling engages the brain's reward system through intermittent dopamine release, which occurs in anticipation of and response to novel information, even when that information is negative. This neurochemical mechanism mirrors the variable reward patterns observed in addictive behaviors, where small dopamine surges accompany each scroll, fostering compulsive checking for updates. Research on similar scrolling behaviors indicates that these dopamine hits, coupled with algorithmic delivery of unpredictable content, contribute to tolerance and escalated use over time.^[49] The amygdala and limbic system amplify this reinforcement by prioritizing threat-related content, activating hypervigilance that evolutionarily favored survival but now sustains engagement with distressing news. Despite the emotional toll, the informational "reward" of potential updates—signaling reduced uncertainty—triggers dopamine feedback loops, making cessation difficult as the brain associates scrolling with adaptive vigilance. Studies link this to broader patterns in social media use, where negative stimuli paradoxically heighten motivation to continue due to the rewarding resolution of informational gaps.^[3]^[2] Behaviorally, doomscrolling operates on operant conditioning principles, particularly variable-ratio reinforcement schedules, where news updates arrive at irregular intervals akin to slot machine payouts, promoting persistent behavior resistant to extinction. Infinite scrolling interfaces eliminate natural stopping points, embedding the habit through repeated cue-response-reward cycles, as evidenced in analyses of social media engagement metrics showing prolonged session times driven by such unpredictability. Empirical data from user studies reveal that this reinforcement extends to news consumption, with daily scrolling exceeding three hours on average for over a billion individuals in 2020, correlating with heightened addiction-like symptoms.^[49]^[50]

Enabling Technologies and Media Dynamics

Algorithmic Curation and Engagement Metrics

Social media platforms utilize machine learning algorithms to curate user feeds by ranking content based on predicted engagement levels, drawing from historical data on user interactions including clicks, likes, shares, comments, and dwell time.^[51] These systems optimize for metrics that maximize session duration and retention, as prolonged exposure correlates directly with advertising revenue opportunities.^[52] In the context of doomscrolling, this curation dynamically surfaces material aligned with users' demonstrated preferences, often escalating toward content that sustains attention through emotional intensity rather than informational value.^[45] Empirical analyses reveal that negative or emotionally arousing content systematically outperforms neutral or positive equivalents in engagement metrics. A Stanford study of nearly 30 million posts across platforms demonstrated that negative news propagates virally due to heightened shares and views, as algorithms amplify items eliciting strong reactions.^[28] Complementing this, research in Nature Human Behaviour quantified how negative phrasing in headlines boosts consumption rates by up to 20-30% relative to positive counterparts, with algorithms reinforcing this by prioritizing high-interaction signals.^[45] Another investigation of online news sharing found negative articles receive 2-3 times more reposts on social media, incentivizing platforms to elevate such material in curated timelines.^[53] Platform-specific implementations exacerbate these dynamics, particularly on sites like Twitter (now X), where engagement-driven ranking explicitly favors out-group hostile and divisive posts—content users self-report as mood-degrading—leading to algorithmic loops that extend doomscrolling sessions.^[51]^[52] For instance, the algorithm's weighting of recency and interaction velocity ensures outrage-laden updates dominate feeds, even as users exhibit fatigue; this persists because aggregate metrics prioritize platform-wide retention over individual well-being.^[54] Such mechanisms, while effective for business objectives, embed a structural bias toward negativity, as neutral content rarely competes in raw engagement volume despite potential long-term user disutility.^[55]

Interface Design Elements

Infinite scrolling, a core interface feature in platforms like Twitter (now X) and Instagram, eliminates pagination breaks, enabling seamless, unending content consumption that aligns with users' tendencies toward negative news fixation.^[56]^[57] This design leverages variable-ratio reinforcement schedules, akin to slot machines, where unpredictable rewards—such as emotionally charged updates—prompt continued engagement without deliberate pauses.^[56] The American Psychological Association has identified infinite scrolling as particularly risky for adolescents, whose impulse control is underdeveloped, exacerbating compulsive checking of distressing feeds.^[58] Push notifications and auto-refresh mechanisms further entrench doomscrolling by delivering real-time alerts for breaking negative events, creating urgency that overrides users' satiety signals.^[58] Platforms employ these to re-engage users post-inactivity, with studies showing notifications increase session lengths by interrupting natural disengagement.^[57] Autoplay for videos and images ensures passive progression through content, minimizing friction and amplifying exposure to viral outrage cycles, where negative posts propagate faster due to heightened shares.^[28] Visual hierarchies, such as bold headlines and thumbnail previews optimized for thumb-scrolling on mobile devices, prioritize sensationalism to capture fleeting attention spans averaging under eight seconds per item.^[59] These elements, combined with lack of time or content counters in many apps, obscure cumulative exposure, fostering prolonged sessions documented to average over 30 minutes daily for heavy users during crises.^[2] European Digital Services Act regulations target such "dark patterns," including manipulative nudges that pressure continued scrolling, reflecting empirical links to diminished well-being.^[60]

Journalistic and Platform Incentives

News organizations operate under advertising-driven business models where revenue correlates directly with user engagement metrics such as page views, time spent on site, and click-through rates.^[61] This structure incentivizes the production of content that maximizes clicks, often favoring sensationalized or negative headlines over balanced reporting, as empirical analysis of online news consumption demonstrates that negative words in headlines boost click-through rates by 2.3% per additional word in an average-length headline.^[61] Such practices exploit human tendencies toward negativity, leading journalists and editors to prioritize stories evoking fear, outrage, or alarm—common hallmarks of doomscrolling triggers—over less engaging but substantively important topics, thereby perpetuating a cycle where audience retention sustains financial viability even as it amplifies disproportionate focus on crises.^[53] Clickbait techniques, prevalent in digital journalism since the mid-2010s, further align incentives with doomscrolling by crafting ambiguous or hyperbolic titles that promise dire revelations, drawing users into prolonged sessions.^[62] A 2023 study of media platforms found that clickbait's profitability stems from its ability to generate viral shares and repeat visits, with outlets across spectra adopting it to compete in fragmented markets, though this often erodes trust when content fails to deliver promised gravity.^[62] While some defend this as adaptive to audience preferences, the causal link to revenue models reveals a systemic prioritization of volume over depth, where negative framing not only secures immediate traffic but also feeds algorithmic amplification on referral platforms.^[63] Social media platforms amplify these journalistic incentives through algorithms optimized for user retention, which reward content eliciting high emotional arousal—predominantly negative—as it correlates with extended scrolling and interactions.^[28] Analysis of nearly 30 million social media posts by Stanford researchers in 2024 showed that emotionally charged negative news spreads virally, dominating feeds because platform objectives, tied to advertising impressions, favor metrics like dwell time over user well-being.^[28] This creates a feedback loop: outlets produce negativity-optimized content to exploit platform visibility, while platforms surface it to sustain engagement, with studies confirming negative articles receive higher shares and reposts, reinforcing the economic rationale despite contributing to compulsive consumption patterns.^[53] Platform executives have acknowledged such dynamics indirectly through adjustments like reduced outrage amplification, but core ad-based incentives persist, linking doomscrolling directly to profit maximization.^[28]

Empirical Effects

Psychological and Emotional Impacts

Doomscrolling is associated with elevated levels of psychological distress, including heightened anxiety and reduced overall mental well-being, as evidenced by cross-sectional analyses in multiple studies.^[1] A 2022 study developing the Doomscrolling Scale found that higher doomscrolling tendencies correlated with increased depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms, alongside lower life satisfaction and positive affect.^[1] Similarly, research during the COVID-19 pandemic indicated that doomscrolling behaviors mediated greater emotional distress, characterized by intense anxiety, fear, and uncertainty, particularly among individuals engaging in prolonged consumption of negative online content.^[15] These impacts extend to exacerbated symptoms in vulnerable populations; for instance, individuals with preexisting depression or anxiety report worsened conditions from doomscrolling, as it amplifies rumination and negative emotional spirals.^[64] A 2024 validation of the Doomscrolling Scale in a Chinese sample confirmed significant positive associations with depression (r = 0.45), anxiety (r = 0.52), and smartphone addiction, suggesting a broader pattern of emotional dysregulation tied to compulsive negative news exposure.^[65] Empirical data from these peer-reviewed sources highlight correlations rather than direct causation, underscoring the need for longitudinal research to disentangle bidirectional influences between doomscrolling habits and emotional states. Emotionally, doomscrolling fosters pervasive feelings of overwhelm, sadness, and helplessness, often disrupting sleep and concentration due to sustained activation of the body's stress response.^[2] Harvard Health reports that constant exposure to distressing news elevates cortisol levels, contributing to chronic fatigue and irritability over time.^[2] While these effects are consistently observed across demographic groups, heavier users—particularly younger adults spending over 2 hours daily on news feeds—exhibit stronger negative outcomes, with self-reported well-being scores dropping by up to 15-20% in affected cohorts.^[1]

Broader Behavioral and Cognitive Consequences

Doomscrolling has been empirically linked to diminished self-control and conscientious behaviors, with studies showing negative associations between doomscrolling tendencies and conscientiousness (r = -.168, p < .01), potentially leading to reduced productivity and habit disruption.^[1] ^[66] High engagement correlates with social media addiction (r = .358, p < .01) and fear of missing out (r = .377, p < .01), fostering compulsive checking patterns that extend into daily routines.^[1] Behaviorally, prolonged sessions contribute to sedentary lifestyles, exacerbating physical inactivity and its downstream health effects.^[2] Cognitively, doomscrolling reinforces negative thought patterns and rumination, amplifying psychological distress (r = .391, p < .01) that mediates reduced life satisfaction (β = -0.191) and mental well-being.^[1] ^[66] It correlates with heightened depression severity (r = -0.42, p < .01) and anxiety, while mediating bidirectional relationships between insomnia and depression (62.5% mediation from insomnia to depression; 47.5% reverse), suggesting cycles of cognitive impairment including poor concentration and distorted risk perception.^[65] ^[2] Negative ties to extraversion (r = -.169, p < .01) and agreeableness (r = -.213, p < .01) imply broader social cognitive shifts toward withdrawal and pessimism.^[1] Cross-sectional evidence predominates, limiting causal inferences, though mediation analyses indicate doomscrolling as a pathway for sustained cognitive biases and behavioral inertia, with calls for longitudinal research to clarify long-term trajectories.^[1]

Evidence from Longitudinal Studies

A two-wave longitudinal study conducted in 2025 examined the interplay between doomscrolling and social media addiction among adolescents, revealing positive and significant bidirectional relationships over time, whereby higher levels of social media addiction at baseline predicted increased doomscrolling at follow-up, and vice versa.^[67] This suggests that habitual negative news scrolling may reinforce addictive patterns in platform use, potentially exacerbating vulnerability in younger users whose brains are still developing impulse control mechanisms. The study, published in the Journal of Addictive Diseases, underscores the need for further multi-wave research to disentangle temporal precedence, as self-reported measures may confound causality with shared variance in underlying traits like trait anxiety. In a broader examination of media consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic, a 10-wave longitudinal survey of over 8,000 German adults from 2020 to 2022 found that baseline frequency of media use, including news portals often featuring negative content, prospectively predicted elevated pandemic-related anxiety one year later, as well as greater daily life limitations due to anxiety at multiple follow-ups spanning two years.^[68] While not isolating doomscrolling per se, the patterns align with algorithmic feeds prioritizing alarming updates, showing no significant prospective links to general depression but highlighting directional effects from consumption to specific anxiety outcomes. Convenience sampling and correlational design limit generalizability, yet the extended timeframe strengthens evidence over short-term snapshots. Longitudinal data on general social media engagement, which frequently involves scrolling through negativity-biased content, further implicates extended exposure in mental health trajectories. Analysis of U.S. youth aged 12-15 from the PATH study (waves 1-3, 2013-2016) demonstrated that spending more than three hours daily on social media conferred elevated relative risks for internalizing problems, including depression and anxiety: adjusted relative risk ratios of 1.60 (95% CI: 1.11-2.31) for 3-6 hours and 1.78 (95% CI: 1.15-2.77) for over six hours, compared to non-users.^[69] These findings, from a nationally representative cohort, imply cumulative risks from prolonged scrolling sessions, though they aggregate platforms without parsing negative news subsets; reverse causation (e.g., distressed youth seeking more media) cannot be fully ruled out without experimental controls. Overall, while direct longitudinal evidence on doomscrolling is nascent and predominantly associative, it converges with proxy indicators of sustained negative media immersion fostering heightened emotional distress over months to years.

Potential Upsides and Counterarguments

Informational Vigilance and Preparedness

Doomscrolling, characterized by compulsive consumption of negative news, may stem from an adaptive negativity bias that evolved to enhance threat detection and survival in ancestral environments. Humans exhibit a stronger physiological response to negative stimuli, such as increased skin conductance and heart rate, compared to positive ones, as evidenced by cross-national experiments involving over 1,000 participants exposed to news stories.^[70] This bias prioritizes potentially harmful information, enabling early awareness of dangers like predators or resource scarcity, which conferred reproductive advantages.^[40] In contemporary settings, this mechanism can translate to heightened informational vigilance, where monitoring adverse events fosters a realistic assessment of risks, countering complacency.^[71] While excessive engagement often amplifies anxiety without proportional action, moderate exposure to negative news has been linked to improved situational awareness and proactive behaviors during crises. For instance, studies on social media use during the COVID-19 pandemic found that heightened situation awareness, triggered by negative content, mediated the adoption of preventive measures like mask-wearing and social distancing, as individuals perceived and responded to escalating threats.^[72] Similarly, negativity in news headlines drives greater consumption and retention, potentially equipping users with knowledge to prepare for foreseeable disruptions, such as economic downturns or natural disasters.^[45] This aligns with first-principles reasoning: accurate threat appraisal enables causal interventions, like diversifying investments amid geopolitical tensions reported in real-time feeds. Empirical evidence supports that informed vigilance from news consumption correlates with tangible preparedness outcomes, though doomscrolling's intensity risks diminishing returns. Research indicates that individuals with greater media exposure to risks exhibit elevated risk perception, prompting actions such as emergency planning or evacuation in hurricane-prone areas, where pre-event news monitoring reduced mortality rates by informing timely decisions.^[73] Proponents argue this counters "scary world syndrome" only if balanced, as unfiltered negativity sustains alertness without inducing learned helplessness.^[3] However, sources emphasizing harms, often from psychology journals, note that benefits accrue primarily from purposeful, limited intake rather than habitual scrolling, underscoring the need for discernment in source selection amid platform algorithms favoring sensationalism.^[5]

Critiques of Overstated Harms

Critiques of the psychological harms attributed to doomscrolling often highlight methodological shortcomings in existing research, such as heavy reliance on self-reported data prone to exaggeration and the predominance of correlational designs that fail to establish causality. For instance, a 2022 study developing a Doomscrolling Scale noted limitations including potential biases in self-assessments, which may inflate perceived negative associations with traits like neuroticism without proving direct harm.^[1] Similarly, broader analyses of digital overload, encompassing doomscrolling, argue there is scant empirical evidence linking excessive negative news consumption to persistent cognitive decline or mental fatigue, portraying such claims as more hyperbolic than substantiated.^[74] From an evolutionary standpoint, the compulsion underlying doomscrolling aligns with humanity's negativity bias, an adaptive mechanism that historically enhanced survival by prioritizing threat detection over neutral or positive stimuli, suggesting that moderate engagement may confer vigilance benefits rather than unqualified detriment.^[75] This bias, while capable of amplifying short-term stress, does not inherently equate to pathology; research indicates that individuals can engage with negative news mindfully—through self-regulated awareness and agentic strategies—without experiencing distress or dysfunction, challenging blanket assertions of inevitable harm.^[76] Proponents argue that fixed exposure limits overlook individual resilience, as mindful consumption correlates with reduced problematic use and lower psychological strain.^[77] Longitudinal evidence remains sparse, with many studies capturing transient emotional responses rather than enduring impacts, potentially overstating risks amid media amplification of anecdotal fears. A 2025 perspective emphasizes harmonious approaches to negative news, positing that harms arise more from passive, uncontrolled habits than the content itself, and that adaptive behaviors mitigate effects without necessitating abstinence.^[76] Critics of alarmist narratives, including those from academic commentators, contend that systemic biases in media and psychological discourse—favoring sensational negativity—exaggerate doomscrolling's role in societal anxiety, absent robust causal demonstrations from controlled trials.^[74]

Mitigation Approaches

Personal Agency and Habits

Individuals can counteract doomscrolling by establishing deliberate habits that constrain exposure to negative news feeds and redirect attention to productive pursuits. Empirical insights from psychological interventions for media overuse suggest that setting fixed time limits—such as allocating 20 minutes twice daily for news checks—effectively curbs prolonged sessions by fostering self-regulation and preventing habitual escalation.^[3] ^[78] Disabling push notifications from news apps and social platforms interrupts the reflexive checking cycle driven by intermittent reinforcement, as supported by studies on digital hygiene practices that link notification reduction to decreased compulsive use.^[79] ^[29] Curating personal feeds through unfollowing or muting accounts that prioritize sensationalism over substantive reporting further diminishes the influx of anxiety-inducing content, aligning with cognitive behavioral strategies to reshape information environments.^[80] ^[81] Behavioral substitution forms a core habit, where doomscrolling is supplanted by structured alternatives like physical exercise or skill-building activities, which observational data on media addiction recovery associate with sustained reductions in screen dependency and improved emotional resilience.^[15] ^[81] Cognitive awareness techniques, including pausing to label the urge as a transient impulse, draw from validated mindfulness protocols shown to interrupt automatic negative reinforcement loops in habit formation research.^[80] While randomized controlled trials specifically targeting doomscrolling are scarce, cross-sectional analyses of similar compulsive media behaviors indicate these personal interventions correlate with lower psychological distress levels, emphasizing the causal role of reduced exposure in alleviating symptoms.^[1] ^[15] Consistency in application, often tracked via journaling or app-based reminders, reinforces long-term adherence, as evidenced by self-reported outcomes in digital detox programs.^[82]

Technological and Regulatory Responses

Technological interventions to address doomscrolling primarily involve built-in device features and third-party applications designed to limit screen time, block distracting content, and promote mindful usage. Apple's Screen Time, introduced with iOS 12 in 2018, enables users to set daily limits on specific apps such as news aggregators or social media platforms, sending notifications when approaching thresholds and requiring manual overrides for continued access. Similarly, Google's Digital Wellbeing, launched in Android 9 in 2018, offers tools like app timers, focus modes that grayscale screens to reduce appeal, and "Wind Down" routines that dim displays and enable Do Not Disturb during bedtime hours to interrupt habitual scrolling. These features aim to counteract the infinite scroll mechanics that platforms employ to maximize engagement, which empirical studies link to heightened anxiety from prolonged exposure to negative news feeds.^[15] Third-party apps extend these capabilities with more aggressive blocking and gamification. Freedom, available since 2011, allows users to schedule blocks across devices for sites and apps prone to doomscrolling, such as Twitter or Reddit, with over 3 million users reported by 2023; a randomized trial found it reduced self-reported distraction by 59% compared to controls. Forest app employs a virtual tree-planting mechanic where sustained focus without phone use grows trees, while breaking to scroll "kills" them, fostering behavioral change through visual feedback; it has garnered over 10 million downloads by 2024. Other tools like Opal and No Scroll enforce strict session limits, with No Scroll specifically targeting "doomscrolling" by automating breaks after predefined scroll durations, backed by user testimonials of improved productivity but lacking large-scale peer-reviewed validation.^[83] Platforms themselves have experimented with algorithmic tweaks, such as Instagram's 2021 tests to prioritize positive content over sensational feeds, though adoption remains optional and effectiveness varies by user demographics. Regulatory responses focus on curbing addictive design elements that facilitate doomscrolling, particularly for vulnerable groups like minors, through mandates on algorithm transparency and feature restrictions. In the European Union, the Digital Services Act (DSA), enforced from 2024, requires very large online platforms to assess and mitigate systemic risks from recommender algorithms, including those amplifying harmful or anxiety-inducing content, with fines up to 6% of global revenue for non-compliance; this indirectly targets endless scrolling by demanding impact assessments on user well-being. The EU Parliament in 2023 advocated banning techniques like autoplay and infinite scrolls outright, alongside a "right to not be disturbed" limiting notifications outside designated hours.^[84] In the United States, New York's SAFE for Kids Act, signed June 20, 2024, mandates that social media firms disable "addictive" algorithmic feeds for users under 18 by default, requiring parental consent to enable them, marking the first state-level regulation of such mechanics amid evidence linking them to mental health declines; violations carry penalties up to $5,000 per case.^[85] Federally, the proposed Stop the Scroll Act, introduced in 2023 and reintroduced in 2025, seeks to prohibit platforms from using algorithms that prioritize engagement over user safety for minors, drawing on data showing average daily screen times exceeding 7 hours for teens.^[86] In the UK, a 2025 private member's bill initially aimed to enforce age-appropriate content filters and scroll limits for children but was diluted to emphasize parental controls before gaining government support, reflecting debates over enforcement feasibility.^[87] These measures prioritize empirical harms from longitudinal studies on adolescent scrolling but face criticism for potentially infringing on free speech or overlooking adult autonomy.^[88]

References

[1]
Doomscrolling Scale: its Association with Personality Traits ... - NIH
Oct 19, 2022 · Constant exposure to negative news on social media and news feeds could take the form of “doomscrolling” which is commonly defined as a habit of ...
[2]
Doomscrolling dangers - Harvard Health
Sep 1, 2024 · Doomscrolling is the habit of constantly scrolling online news headlines, which often blare bad news. Doomscrolling can lead to a wide range ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[3]
Doomscrolling Again? Expert Explains Why We're Wired for Worry
Apr 9, 2025 · The term describes a tendency to endlessly consume news and content that heightens feelings of anxiety, sadness or anger.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[4]
Doomscrolling evokes existential anxiety and fosters pessimism ...
Doomscrolling was associated with existential anxiety in both Iranian and American samples. Doomscrolling emerged as a significant predictor of misanthropy.
[5]
Doomscrolling: Stop the scroll, protect your mental health
Apr 18, 2024 · “When you think of the word doom, it has an evocative emotional response,” Dr. Sawchuk says. That lines up with the term's origins in 2020.
[6]
Gen Z Has a Doomscrolling Problem - Newsweek
May 11, 2025 · About 31 percent of American adults engage in doomscrolling regularly, according to a 2024 Morning Consult survey, with rates significantly ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[7]
The Dangers of Doom Scrolling | Psychology Today
Dec 21, 2024 · According to Harvard Health, doom scrolling can lead to several negative consequences, including poor mental health, disturbed sleep, and increased stress.
[8]
Doom's Creator Goes After 'Doomscroll' - WIRED
Nov 11, 2021 · The first use of doomscroll is often credited to a 2018 tweet: “Taking a break from doomscrolling and being inundated with things and stuff,” ...<|separator|>
[9]
How Doomscrolling Hurts Mental Health - Therapy Finder
Jul 20, 2022 · The first time the term “doom scrolling” appeared as a phrase was in 2013 in a post on Twitter by Sarah M. Anderson. Doomscrolling started ...
[10]
UF study finds 'doomscrolling' is a unique behavior
Jan 10, 2022 · The study found doomscrolling can be associated with a fear of missing out and constantly being connected online through smartphones. It remains ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[11]
DOOMSCROLL Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Word History. First Known Use. 2020, in the meaning defined above. Time Traveler. The first known use of doomscroll was in 2020. See more words from the same ...
[12]
'Misadventures Of Doomscroller' hopes to pull you away from ... - NPR
Aug 12, 2022 · Early on in the pandemic, a journalist named Karen K. Ho coined the term "doomscrolling." It caught on quick, striking a nerve for folks who ...
[13]
The dark at the end of the tunnel: Doomscrolling on social media ...
Doomscrolling refers to a unique media habit where social media users persistently attend to negative information in their newsfeeds about crises, disasters, ...
[14]
What Exactly Is Doomscrolling and How Does It Affect Us?
Sep 7, 2024 · Doomscrolling specifically relates to spending time in contact with disturbing news through social media. New research involving both the ...
[15]
Doomsurfing and doomscrolling mediate psychological distress in ...
Doomsurfing and doomscrolling mediate psychological distress in COVID‐19 lockdown: Implications for awareness of cognitive biases · Nitin Anand, MPhil, PhD.
[16]
Doomscrolling during COVID-19: The negative association between ...
The term “doomscrolling” was used to describe the supposed increase in negative affect that resulted from repeated scrolling through news stories on a mobile ...
[17]
Doomscrolling linked to poor physical and mental health, study finds
Sep 5, 2022 · New research suggests the compulsive urge to surf the web can lead to poor mental and physical health outcomes.
[18]
U.S. Diplomacy and Yellow Journalism, 1895–1898
Yellow journalism was a style of newspaper reporting that emphasized sensationalism over facts. During its heyday in the late 19th century it was one of many ...
[19]
Yellow Journalism | Definition and History | The Free Speech Center
Apr 7, 2025 · Yellow journalism refers to sensationalistic, salacious and sometimes slanted stories that newspapers present as objective truth.
[20]
Penny Dreadfuls: Late Nineteenth-Century Boys' Literature and Crime
Tales of this description, critics argued, were psychologically harmful in that they provided readers with excessive stimulation and a distorted view of the ...<|separator|>
[21]
How Gruesome Penny Dreadfuls Got Victorian Children Reading
Oct 22, 2021 · For London hatmaker Frederick Willis, reading penny dreadfuls while growing up eventually led to him picking up Shakespeare and Chaucer.Missing: compulsive | Show results with:compulsive
[22]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h0taqL0aKU
[23]
Why the news is so negative — and what we can do about it - Vox
Mar 22, 2023 · “Negativity bias,” the tendency for negative information and experiences to overwhelm the positive, kept coming up. As early as 1967, ...
[24]
There's an Alternative to the Infinite Scroll | WIRED
Sep 19, 2023 · It's easy to feel like there's no escape from doomscrolling. The classical Chinese handscroll suggests otherwise.
[25]
How the invention of infinite scrolling turned millions to addiction
Nov 16, 2020 · It's been 14 years since one technology engineer designed a simple app feature that changed the lives of millions and turned the use of social media into an ...
[26]
The Doomscroll Generation | Washington Monthly
Apr 2, 2024 · Haidt's answer is that between 2010 and 2015, basic cell phones were replaced by smartphones in most pockets, purses, and backpacks, creating ...Missing: emergence digital
[27]
How Social Media Has Changed How We Consume News - Forbes
Nov 30, 2018 · Social media has become the main source of news online with more than 2.4 billion internet users, nearly 64.5 percent receive breaking news from Facebook, ...
[28]
The Data Behind Your Doom Scroll: How Negative News Takes ...
Oct 25, 2024 · Analyzing nearly 30 million posts, Stanford scholars reveal how emotional, negative content fuels the viral spread of news on social media.
[29]
The age of doom scrolling – Social media's attractive addiction - NIH
Jan 31, 2023 · This research article focuses on the various positive and negative effects that social media may have on education and students.
[30]
Doomscrolling, Monitoring and Avoiding: News Use in COVID-19 ...
Jul 16, 2021 · Over the next year, 24/7 news coverage was dominated by reports from collapsing hospitals and closed down cities, grave government officials ...<|separator|>
[31]
Does a Crisis Change News Habits? A Comparative Study of the ...
Jul 21, 2021 · Our results show an overall rise of news use across countries, but only for some types of news media. We find an increase of TV news consumption, and a higher ...
[32]
Doomscrolling during COVID-19: The negative association between ...
Social media exposure was associated with increased depression and PTSD. This association was stronger for those with more severe maltreatment histories.
[33]
Brief exposure to social media during the COVID-19 pandemic
Oct 13, 2021 · Early evidence suggests that many people are spending time every day consuming COVID-related content—sometimes called doom-scrolling when one ...
[34]
Patterns of News Consumption during the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis
This study aimed to explore the frequency of COVID-19-related news consumption based on (1) phase of the pandemic, (2) socio-demographic characteristics, and ( ...
[35]
News media in crisis: a sentiment and emotion analysis of ... - Nature
Jun 28, 2024 · This study highlights the important role mainstream news media play in information dissemination and solution-focused reportage at the time of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[36]
How to Protect Your Brain from Election Stress
Jun 5, 2024 · Political polarization has worsened to the point where 40 percent of Americans describe politics as a chronic stressor, blaming it for ...Missing: major | Show results with:major
[37]
Media overload is hurting our mental health. Here are ways to ...
Nov 1, 2022 · The effects of reading or watching a lot of negative news coverage can harm both mind and body. ... Persistent anger, resentment, or anxiety ...
[38]
Bad is Stronger than Good - Roy F. Baumeister, Ellen Bratslavsky ...
Taken together, these findings suggest that bad is stronger than good, as a general principle across a broad range of psychological phenomena. References. Abbey ...
[39]
The negativity bias, revisited: Evidence from neuroscience ... - PubMed
Theoretically, the negativity bias provides an evolutionary advantage, as it is more critical for survival to avoid a harmful stimulus than to pursue a ...
[40]
Negativity Bias - The Decision Lab
Negativity bias is thought to have an adaptive purpose, helping us explore the environment and avoid potential threats. This evolutionary hypothesis is based ...
[41]
Negative Bias: Why We're Hardwired for Negativity - Verywell Mind
Nov 13, 2023 · Those who were more attuned to danger and who paid more attention to the bad things around them were more likely to survive. The evolutionary ...What Research Says · Examples · Where It Comes From
[42]
Negativity bias: An evolutionary hypothesis and an empirical ...
Negativity bias evolves when fitness is a concave function of state. Threat explanation of negativity bias unsound if based on incommensurate stimuli.
[43]
Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social ...
Such an evolution-based theory seems to imply that the negativity bias is innate, i.e., built right into our neural circuitry and consequently into our ...
[44]
[PDF] Bad Is Stronger Than Good
The notion that bad is stronger than good in social interactions received a fairly explicit test in a recent study. Exline and Baumeister (1999) had people play ...
[45]
Negativity drives online news consumption | Nature Human Behaviour
Mar 16, 2023 · We found that negative words in news headlines increased consumption rates (and positive words decreased consumption rates).
[46]
What Is The Negativity Bias and How Can it be Overcome?
Negativity bias refers to our proclivity to “attend to, learn from, and use negative information far more than positive information”What Is Negativity Bias? · Examples of Negativity Bias · How to Overcome the Bias
[47]
Beyond the Scroll: Exploring How Intolerance of Uncertainty and ...
This study explores the relationship between “doomscrolling”—the habit of consuming continuous negative news—and trait anxiety, while considering the ...
[48]
Doomscrolling and Anxiety: Neuroscience Edition
Jul 10, 2025 · What cognitive biases contribute to doomscrolling? Cognitive biases such as confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and negativity bias influence ...
[49]
Dopamine-scrolling: a modern public health challenge requiring ...
The neurobiological basis involves small doses of dopamine released with each scrolling motion, coupled with variable reward schedules, which can lead to ...
[50]
Social media copies gambling methods 'to create psychological ...
May 8, 2018 · “The rewards are what psychologists refer to as variable reinforcement schedules and is the key to social media users repeatedly checking ...
[51]
Engagement, User Satisfaction, and the Amplification of Divisive ...
Jan 3, 2024 · Twitter's engagement-based ranking algorithm amplifies emotionally charged, out-group hostile content that users say makes them feel worse about their ...
[52]
Engagement, user satisfaction, and the amplification of divisive ... - NIH
Twitter's engagement-based ranking algorithm amplifies emotionally charged, out-group hostile content that users say makes them feel worse about their ...
[53]
Negative online news articles are shared more to social media
Sep 16, 2024 · The literature strongly suggests that negativity bias influences the consumption of conventional news media. News consumers have long been ...
[54]
[PDF] Doomscrolling on Social Media Newsfeeds
Doomscrolling was less prevalent than anticipated, but variable. Tests of validity with survey panelists (N = 502) indicated that doomscrolling can be.
[55]
Negativity biases online: The interplay of individuals and algorithms ...
A considerable body of work finds evidence of negativity biases in news production and consumption. These biases have consequences for the reliability and ...
[56]
Why the infinite scroll is so addictive | by Grant Collins | UX Collective
Dec 10, 2020 · Why do you keep scrolling through social media feeds? Because the infinite scroll is designed to be addictive using a variable-ratio ...
[57]
Social media apps are 'deliberately' addictive to users - BBC
Jul 3, 2018 · Infinite scroll allows users to endlessly swipe down through content without clicking. "If you don't give your brain time to catch up with your ...
[58]
Major psychology group says infinite scrolling, other social media ...
Apr 15, 2024 · Social media features such as endless scrolling and push notifications are “particularly risky” to young people, whose developing brains are less able to ...
[59]
https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/infinite-scrolling
[60]
How Doomscrolling is Driving a New Era of Digital Regulation
Secondly, the DSA bans the use of so-called dark patterns: manipulative interface designs that trick or pressure users into making unintended choices. This ...Missing: elements encouraging
[61]
Negativity drives online news consumption - PMC - NIH
We found that negative words in news headlines increased consumption rates (and positive words decreased consumption rates).
[62]
[PDF] The Rise of Clickbait Headlines: A Study on Media Platforms from ...
Mar 29, 2024 · In every study, clickbait is represented as a negative form of journalism. ... Almost all the media are looking for profit with clickbait content.
[63]
Clickbait has become 'self-perpetuating cycle' drowning out genuine ...
Jul 21, 2025 · Here, journalist Mandy Gardner assesses the incentives behind the increasing prevalence of clickbait – and documents its effects on victims of ...
[64]
Doomscrolling: Breaking the Habit | University Hospitals
Jul 9, 2024 · It's called “doomscrolling” and it's very common. Anyone with a cell phone or computer can fall into the doomscrolling habit.<|separator|>
[65]
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the doomscrolling ...
Aug 19, 2024 · The revised Chinese version of the Doomscrolling Scale is valid and reliable, which can facilitate research in this field.
[66]
Psychometric analysis of the Italian Doomscrolling Scale
May 30, 2025 · Studies on doomscrolling have specifically shown that it can exacerbate feelings of distress and helplessness, amplifying the emotional impact ...
[67]
Doomscrolling and social media addiction in adolescents
May 16, 2025 · The analyses revealed positive and significant relationships between social media addiction and doomscrolling.
[68]
Viral Transmission? A Longitudinal Study of Media Use and Its ...
May 20, 2024 · The aims of the present study were to examine changes in media consumption over time and to analyze its prospective associations with psychological strain.
[69]
Associations Between Time Spent Using Social Media and ...
Sep 11, 2019 · Adolescents who spend more than 3 hours per day using social media may be at heightened risk for mental health problems, particularly internalizing problems.<|separator|>
[70]
Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological ...
Sep 3, 2019 · Reactions to video news content reveal a mean tendency for humans to be more aroused by and attentive to negative news. That said, there also is ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[71]
Why do we pay more attention to negative news than to positive news?
May 25, 2015 · It is evolutionarily advantageous to prioritise negative information, the argument goes, because the potential costs of negative information far ...<|separator|>
[72]
Exploring the Mediating Role of Situation Awareness and Crisis ...
Apr 28, 2022 · Social media use might influence the adoption of preventive behaviors through triggering situation awareness and fear.
[73]
The Scary World Syndrome: News Orientations, Negativity Bias, and ...
Jan 23, 2024 · Negativity bias is one of the most salient features of news reporting. According to cultivation theory, this bias can foster anxiety about ...
[74]
'Brain rot' and digital overload: more myth than menace
Nov 6, 2024 · There is a lack of evidence showing excessive doomscrolling of social media is responsible for the mental fatigue, lack of focus, and reduced cognitive ...
[75]
There's a Psychological Reason Why You Can't Stop Doom Scrolling
Sep 13, 2024 · When we doom scroll, the brain's amygdala begins to dominate our behavior as we are controlled by its emotional, survival-driven responses. This ...Missing: basis | Show results with:basis<|separator|>
[76]
How should we approach negative news in the media? A 'mindful ...
Jun 18, 2025 · The proposed approach is to consume negative news 'mindfully' and 'harmoniously', adopting an agentic mindset, rather than limiting exposure.
[77]
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1606604
[78]
Doomscrolling Is a Global Pastime. How Can You Stop?
Sep 25, 2020 · We set specific times in the day to work, exercise, and sleep. Why not set a social media time, too? Encourage your brain to deal with bad news ...
[79]
How to Stop Doomscrolling: 4 Proactive Tips - Positive Psychology
Sep 3, 2025 · 4 Proactive Tips to Kick the Doomscrolling Habit · 1. Set limits · 2. Turn off notifications · 3. Avoid specific sources · 4. Create digital ...
[80]
Doomscrolling: Why Can't We Stop? - Psychology Today
Feb 25, 2025 · Doomscrolling fuels anxiety, shortens attention spans, and distorts reality. Our brains crave bad news, but setting limits and mindful media ...
[81]
Stop Doomscrolling with CBT in 4 Steps
Aug 7, 2020 · CBT involves recognizing the problem, limiting access, replacing it with healthy behavior, and repeating the process to stop doomscrolling.Missing: studies individual
[82]
Reclaiming Our Minds: Mitigating the Negative Impacts of Excessive ...
Sep 9, 2024 · We define doomscrolling as obsessively consuming a stream of negative online content, fueled by algorithms that promote controversial posts.
[83]
No Scroll - Limit Screen Time on the App Store - Apple
Rating 4.6 (223) · Free · iOSNo Scroll is designed for professionals who want to reduce screen time, stay focused, and accomplish more. Willpower alone isn't enough to stop doomscrolling. ...Missing: mitigate | Show results with:mitigate<|separator|>
[84]
New EU rules needed to make digital platforms less addictive | News
Oct 25, 2023 · Calls for ban on addictive techniques like endless scrolling or automatic play. Introducing a digital “right to not be disturbed” and list of ...Missing: measures | Show results with:measures
[85]
New York governor signs bill regulating social media algorithms, in ...
Jun 20, 2024 · New York is the first state to pass a law regulating social media algorithms amid nationwide allegations that apps such as Instagram or TikTok ...
[86]
Stop the Scroll Act | Codify Updates
Sep 1, 2025 · In summary, the "Stop the Scroll Act" represents a proactive response to the mounting evidence of mental health risks linked with digital ...
[87]
Bill to stop children 'doom scrolling' to get backing | Politics News
Mar 7, 2025 · A Labour MP's bill to prevent children from "doom scrolling" on social media is expected to get government backing today, after its proposals were watered down.
[88]
Summary Social Media and Children 2023 Legislation
2023 legislation includes measures to protect children on social media, such as age verification, parental consent, and digital literacy courses.