Drowning by Numbers
Drowning by Numbers is a 1988 British-Dutch black comedy-drama film written and directed by Peter Greenaway, centering on three generations of women named Cissie Colpitts who each drown their husbands in acts of marital rebellion, enlisting the aid of a sympathetic local coroner to conceal the crimes, all while the narrative incorporates the sequential appearance of the numbers 1 through 100 hidden within the visuals as a structural game.[1][2] The film stars Joan Plowright as the eldest Cissie Colpitts, Juliet Stevenson as her daughter, and Joely Richardson as her granddaughter, with Bernard Hill portraying the coroner Henry Madgett and Jason Edwards as his son Smut, who serves as a narrator and observer of the unfolding events.[3] Greenaway's screenplay draws on themes of death, ritual, and playful enumeration, enhanced by a haunting score composed by Michael Nyman, whose collaboration with the director became a hallmark of Greenaway's work.[2] Produced by Film4 and Allarts, the movie premiered at the 1988 Cannes Film Festival, earning the Best Artistic Contribution award while also receiving a nomination for the Palme d'Or, and it is celebrated for its meticulous, painterly cinematography and surreal narrative structure.[4][5]Background
Development
Peter Greenaway conceived Drowning by Numbers in the mid-1980s as a follow-up to his 1982 film The Draughtsman's Contract, drawing inspiration from fairy tales and games to explore pastoral themes and childhood memories in the English countryside.[6][7] The project emerged from Greenaway's desire to create a non-narrative structure centered on game-playing, reflecting his interest in formal constraints over traditional storytelling.[8] During the scriptwriting process, Greenaway incorporated a sequential count from 1 to 100, woven into the visuals and dialogue as an independent framework, alongside rules from traditional British pastimes such as cricket and skipping-rope games.[7] He crafted a highly detailed screenplay that allowed minimal improvisation, emphasizing games—moral, athletic, and mathematical—as a means to orchestrate the film's universe without relying on plot progression.[8][9] The film was funded through a collaboration involving Channel Four Films (via Film Four International), producers Kees Kasander and Denis Wigman, and Dutch co-producers including Allarts Enterprises and Elsevier Vendex Film.[10][11] Greenaway collaborated closely with cinematographer Sacha Vierny during pre-production to plan the visual style, developing a scheme of artificial lighting with 26 distinct sources—such as moonlight and firelight—evoking the painterly effects of artists like Caravaggio and Vermeer.[7] This approach blended natural and contrived illumination to achieve a lavish, clinical maximalism that complemented the film's thematic obsessions with order and decay.[8][9]Influences
Peter Greenaway's Drowning by Numbers draws heavily from literary traditions, particularly fairy tales that emphasize repetitive structures and themes of female agency and retribution. The film's narrative of three women named Cissie Colpitts, each enacting similar acts of drowning their husbands, echoes the triadic motifs common in Brothers Grimm fairy tales, such as the granting of three wishes, where female characters assert control through cunning and consequence.[7] Greenaway has cited these elements as inspirations, noting parallels to the three witches in Shakespeare's Macbeth and the three sisters in Chekhov's plays, which underscore retribution and familial cycles.[7] Additionally, the pastoral setting and themes of seduction and consequence reflect Victorian literary influences, including the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood's romanticized depictions of nature and morality in works by artists like John Everett Millais, who blended narrative depth with symbolic retribution in paintings such as Ophelia.[7] The numerical and game motifs in the film are rooted in British folklore and childhood traditions, transforming counting into a ritualistic framework. Numbers from one to one hundred appear sequentially throughout the scenes, inspired by traditional English counting games and the "painting by numbers" activity, which Greenaway described as a playful yet structured exploration of chronology and order.[7] These elements extend to games like skipping, hopscotch, and perverted forms of cricket, drawn from British folk customs that ritualize play as a means of navigating rules and chaos, evoking the folklore's blend of innocence and underlying menace.[7] Such motifs not only structure the film's three-part progression but also highlight folklore's role in encoding social and moral games. Visually, the film is profoundly influenced by Dutch Golden Age painting, achieved through cinematographer Sacha Vierny's meticulous compositions that emulate the era's still lifes and domestic scenes. Vierny's lighting and framing draw directly from Johannes Vermeer's use of soft, diffused light to illuminate intimate interiors, creating a sense of suspended time and materiality in shots of decaying objects like dead birds and wilting flowers, which symbolize mortality.[7][12] Broader references include Meindert Hobbema's landscapes for rural atmospheres and Caravaggio's chiaroscuro for dramatic contrasts, enhancing the film's tableau-like quality.[7] These influences stem from Greenaway's background as a trained painter, where he studied at Walthamstow College of Art and developed an obsession with mortality and bureaucratic order through symbolic representations of death and enumeration, themes recurrent in his shift from painting to film.[13][8]Production
Casting
The principal roles in Drowning by Numbers were cast with established and emerging British theater performers, reflecting director Peter Greenaway's deliberate choice to employ classically trained stage actors to embody the film's stiff, eccentric English archetypes and enhance its artificial, storybook aesthetic.[14] Joan Plowright portrayed the eldest Cissie Colpitts (Cissie 1), the grandmother figure whose performance drew on her extensive background in British theater. Juliet Stevenson played the middle Cissie Colpitts (Cissie 2), marking her film debut after a distinguished stage career. Joely Richardson assumed the role of the youngest Cissie Colpitts (Cissie 3), bringing a fresh presence to the generational trio of women central to the narrative.[15] In supporting roles, Bernard Hill was cast as the coroner Henry Madgett, a key figure navigating the film's bureaucratic and moral ambiguities, while Jason Edwards portrayed Madgett's son, Smut, adding a layer of familial tension.[4] Greenaway's selection process emphasized actors capable of delivering his precise, non-naturalistic script, with the three Cissies provided detailed dialogue that allowed only minimal additions like conjunctions to maintain the film's rhythmic structure.[8] The stylized dialogue posed challenges for the cast, as Greenaway restricted alterations to preserve the artificiality of his "anti-cinema" approach, requiring performers to adapt their theatrical training to a highly controlled, anticipatory verbal style that prioritized form over improvisation.[8] This method, while demanding, aligned with Greenaway's vision of cinema as a constructed tableau rather than a realistic medium.[14]Filming
Principal photography for Drowning by Numbers took place over the late summer of 1987, spanning September and October, in the coastal regions of Suffolk and Norfolk, England.[8] The production primarily centered on Southwold and its surrounding areas, including Walberswick, Thorpeness, and Blythburgh, utilizing beaches, fields, tidal estuaries, and local homes to capture a pastoral English landscape infused with an underlying eeriness.[16][7] The film was shot on 35mm film using spherical lenses, resulting in a 1.66:1 aspect ratio for its theatrical presentation.[17] Cinematographer Sacha Vierny, a frequent collaborator with director Peter Greenaway, employed deliberate framing and composition to evoke the works of Old Masters painters, blending natural and artificial lighting—often during the "magic hour" at dawn or dusk—to heighten the film's stylized, dreamlike quality.[18][19] Challenges arose from the seasonal shift into autumn, with falling leaves disrupting the intended summer aesthetic; production team members, including art students, meticulously glued foliage back onto trees to maintain visual consistency.[8] Water scenes, central to the narrative's drowning motifs, were filmed in the region's wet, flat terrains where sea and freshwater intermingle, capitalizing on water's photogenic properties despite variable coastal weather that complicated scheduling and continuity.[7] Greenaway's approach to production was highly controlled, with every shot pre-planned through detailed storyboards to ensure the film's intricate numerical and compositional structure.[20]Content
Plot
Drowning by Numbers centers on three women from the same family, all named Cissie Colpitts, who sequentially drown their husbands in a rural English coastal village, with the events explicitly numbered as the first, second, and third drownings. The narrative unfolds non-linearly, interweaving these murders with subplots involving the local coroner, Henry Madgett, and his son, Smut, against a backdrop where the numbers 1 to 100 appear progressively in the environment—on fences, clothing, food items, and even dead animals—to structure the story like a counted game.[21][22] The film opens with a young girl in a white dress skipping rope while counting and naming 100 stars in the sky, establishing the numerical motif. The eldest Cissie Colpitts discovers her husband Jacob's infidelity upon his drunken return home with another woman and drowns him in the bathtub (the first drowning). Distraught but determined, she visits Madgett, the village coroner with whom she has previously had an affair, and convinces him to rule the death an accidental drowning during a bath. Madgett, lonely and susceptible to her charms, agrees to falsify the report.[21][23][24] The middle Cissie Colpitts, the daughter of the first, grows frustrated with her husband Hardy's emotional and sexual neglect, as he prioritizes his work over their relationship. During a seaside outing, she drowns him by holding him under the waves (the second drowning). She too turns to Madgett for help, and he certifies this death as misadventure at sea, further entangling himself with the family through his growing attraction to her. Meanwhile, numbers continue to surface, such as 3 on hanging laundry and 78 and 79 painted on dead cows collected by Smut.[21][22][24] Parallel to the drownings, Madgett bonds with his young son Smut over elaborate games, explaining their rules in voiceover, including "Hangman's Cricket"—a surreal variant of cricket involving executions—and "Fox and Hounds," a pursuit game with strategic chases. Smut, preoccupied with mortality, photographs dead animals, paints sequential numbers on them, and develops an unrequited crush on the youngest Cissie Colpitts, leading him to a botched self-circumcision and, ultimately, his own suicide by hanging after mistakenly believing he contributed to one of the deaths. These subplots underscore the film's preoccupation with death and ritualistic play.[21][22][24] The youngest Cissie Colpitts, the granddaughter of the eldest and daughter of the middle, becomes pregnant by her husband Bellamy but resents his controlling nature and drowns him in an indoor swimming pool (the third drowning). Madgett once again conceals the crime, but his repeated favors for the women leave him increasingly isolated and exposed to scrutiny, including allegations related to Smut's disturbing photographs. In the climax, the three Cissie Colpitts unite in solidarity against Madgett's demands for reciprocation, manipulating the situation to their advantage as numbers culminate at 100 on a sinking boat. Madgett's fate is sealed by his complicity, facing potential legal repercussions, while the women walk away together, their bond unbreakable and the drownings unresolved.[21][24][22] The numerical motifs briefly referenced here highlight the film's game-like structure, with numbers appearing in 100 instances to frame the events without deeper analysis.[21]Cast
The principal roles in Drowning by Numbers are played by Joan Plowright, Juliet Stevenson, and Joely Richardson as the three generations of women named Cissie Colpitts, with Bernard Hill portraying the coroner Henry Madgett.[3] The husbands of the Cissies are portrayed by Bryan Pringle as Jake, Trevor Cooper as Hardy, and David Morrissey as Bellamy.[3] Supporting characters include members of the Madgett family, such as Jason Edwards as Smut, Madgett's son.[3]| Actor | Role |
|---|---|
| Joan Plowright | Cissie Colpitts 1 |
| Juliet Stevenson | Cissie Colpitts 2 |
| Joely Richardson | Cissie Colpitts 3 |
| Bernard Hill | Coroner Henry Madgett |
| Jason Edwards | Smut |
| Bryan Pringle | Jake |
| Trevor Cooper | Hardy |
| David Morrissey | Bellamy |
| Janine Duvitski | Marina Bellamy |
| John Rogan | Gregory |
| Jane Gurnett | Nelly |
| Joanna Dickens | Mrs. Hardy |
Artistic Elements
Style and Themes
Peter Greenaway's signature style in Drowning by Numbers is characterized by formal compositions and tableau vivant shots that evoke the precision of Dutch still-life paintings, creating a sense of stasis and deliberate artificiality.[26] The film's anti-narrative structure eschews conventional storytelling in favor of a cinema of ideas, employing taxonomic grids and painterly visuals inspired by artists like Vermeer and Caravaggio to layer meaning through visual symbolism rather than linear progression.[27] Static camera work and meticulous framing further emphasize this approach, transforming scenes into constructed vignettes that prioritize aesthetic order over dramatic momentum.[28] A central structural device is the numerical motif, where numbers from 1 to 100 appear sequentially in visual and auditory elements, such as on objects, in dialogue, and through counting games, serving as a deliberate construct to impose order and distantiation on the proceedings.[26] This progression ties directly to themes of counting as a metaphor for mortality, cataloging life's incremental steps toward death in a sardonic tally that underscores the film's existential rhythm.[7] Greenaway has described such systems as intentional devices to highlight the artificiality of cinematic form, transforming the narrative into a ritualized enumeration of human experience.[26] The core themes revolve around female empowerment, depicted through the three Cissie Colpitts women who assert agency by orchestrating their husbands' murders, subverting patriarchal norms in a post-Darwinian tale of ruthless survival.[28] An obsession with death permeates the work, treated matter-of-factly as a natural cataloged event intertwined with eros, while games and rules—such as Hangman's Cricket—represent attempts to impose order amid chaos, blending innocence with macabre play.[7] These elements culminate in a bleak morality play where moral boundaries dissolve, emphasizing the interplay of sex, violence, and existential futility.[28] Symbolism reinforces these motifs, with water embodying purification and rebirth alongside destruction, as the drownings serve both as acts of cleansing and inevitable demise in the film's watery landscapes.[27] Animals, such as the dead bird in the opening sequence, symbolize mortality and the fragility of innocence, while games evoke rigid rules that govern human behavior, mirroring the numerical structure's quest for control in a disordered world.[26]Music
The original score for Drowning by Numbers was composed by Michael Nyman in 1987 specifically for Peter Greenaway's film.[29] Nyman's music draws entirely from the slow movement (Andante) of Mozart's Sinfonia Concertante for Violin, Viola, and Orchestra in E-flat major, K. 364 (1779), adapting its core melody—the brief phrase closing the exposition—along with accented appoggiaturas and melodic figures into restructured harmonic and melodic progressions.[30][29][31] This adaptation was arranged for a chamber ensemble featuring strings, woodwinds (including piccolo, cor anglais, and bass clarinet), brass, piano, and no timpani, emphasizing a lean, contrapuntal texture suited to the film's intimate scale.[29] The score was performed by the Michael Nyman Band, Nyman's longstanding ensemble known for its precise execution of minimalist and post-minimalist works, and recorded and mixed at Lansdowne Recording Studios in London.[32][30] Key tracks, such as "Wheelbarrow Walk," exemplify the score's lively, marching rhythms that propel scenes of ritualistic play and movement, while others like "Drowning by Number 3" exploit the adapted Mozart melody's inherent pulse for moments of tension and release.[33][30] In the film, the music functions as a rhythmic counterpoint to the visuals, with repetitive sequences—such as the E-flat to B-flat progressions played in diminution and augmentation—mirroring the narrative's obsessive enumeration and game-like structures, thereby enhancing the thematic interplay of order and chaos without overpowering the dialogue or action.[30][29] This integration of auditory repetition briefly nods to numerical motifs in the scoring, underscoring the film's broader stylistic concerns.[30] The soundtrack album, Drowning by Numbers: Music from the Motion Picture, was released in 1988 by Virgin Records, compiling 13 tracks with a total runtime of 44:48.[34][33]Track Listing
The soundtrack album Drowning by Numbers: Music from the Motion Picture, composed by Michael Nyman and performed by the Michael Nyman Band, consists of 13 instrumental tracks.[33]| Track | Title |
|---|---|
| 1 | Trysting Fields |
| 2 | Sheep and Tides |
| 3 | Great Death Game |
| 4 | Drowning by Number 3 |
| 5 | Wheelbarrow Walk |
| 6 | Dead Man's Catch |
| 7 | Drowning by Number 2 |
| 8 | Bees in Trees |
| 9 | Fish Beach |
| 10 | Wedding Tango |
| 11 | Crematorium Conspiracy |
| 12 | Knowing the Ropes |
| 13 | Endgame |
Release and Reception
Premiere and Distribution
Drowning by Numbers world premiered at the 1988 Cannes Film Festival on May 20, where it entered official competition for the Palme d'Or.[4][35] The film received its theatrical release in the United Kingdom on September 2, 1988, distributed by Recorded Releasing.[35][36] In the United States, it had a limited release on April 26, 1991, handled by Prestige Films, a distribution label under Miramax.[35][37] As a co-production involving Film Four International, Elsevier-Vendex Film Beheer, Allarts Productions, and the BBC, contributing to its art-house orientation and restricted wide distribution.[36][16] Home media availability began with a DVD edition in 2003, followed by Blu-ray and 4K UHD releases in subsequent years; as of 2025, the film streams on platforms including Philo, Fandor Amazon Channel, and Midnight Pulp.[38][39][40]Critical Response
Upon its release, Drowning by Numbers garnered mostly positive critical reception, earning an 88% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 16 reviews. Critics frequently lauded the film's striking visuals and inventive structure, with Janet Maslin of The New York Times highlighting its "unmistakable" visual appeal and describing it as "visually fascinating," thanks to Sacha Vierny's lush cinematography of the English countryside.[22] The score by Michael Nyman was also widely praised for enhancing the film's playful yet morbid tone, integrating seamlessly with Greenaway's numerical motifs and black humor.[41] A Variety review celebrated the movie's metaphorical exploration of sex, death, and game-playing as a tribute to black humor traditions, set against an idyllic summer landscape, while commending the uniformly excellent performances, particularly from Joan Plowright, Juliet Stevenson, and Joely Richardson as the three Cissie Colpitts women.[42] Maslin further noted Greenaway's audacity in prioritizing visual and structural puzzles—such as the hidden numbers from 1 to 100—over conventional narrative, calling it a work that finds the director "in high comic form" despite its pervasive morbidity.[22] However, not all responses were enthusiastic. Roger Ebert awarded the film 2 out of 4 stars, praising its credible characters, ordinary dialogue, and beautifully photographed landscapes but faulting it for lacking emotional depth, as the quirky symbolic systems overshadowed any genuine character investment or narrative coherence.[21] Maslin echoed a sense of detachment, observing that the film's stylized approach tests audience patience and tolerance for outrage, rendering it more intellectually provocative than emotionally engaging.[22] In retrospective assessments, the film has experienced renewed appreciation, particularly following its 2023 4K UHD restoration and release by Severin Films, which has prompted fresh discussions of its themes, including feminist interpretations of the women's subversive conspiracy against patriarchal figures.[43] This has positioned Drowning by Numbers as a key example of Greenaway's early stylistic innovations, though some continue to view its cerebral detachment as a limitation.[44]Box Office Performance
The film achieved a worldwide gross of $477,828, with $424,773 earned in the US and Canada, primarily through limited releases in the US and UK markets.[1] The movie received a restricted art-house distribution, opening in just a few theaters in the US in April 1991 via Miramax, which limited its commercial reach. It underperformed relative to director Peter Greenaway's subsequent works, such as The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover (1989), which grossed $7,724,701 domestically.[45] Several factors contributed to its modest earnings, including its niche appeal as an avant-garde narrative driven by numerical motifs and stylized visuals, which appealed mainly to specialized audiences rather than mainstream viewers. Additionally, the film's US release in 1990 coincided with the rapid expansion of the home video market, which diverted audiences and revenue from theatrical runs of independent and art-house pictures.[46]Awards and Nominations
Drowning by Numbers garnered recognition at several international film festivals following its premiere. At the 1988 Cannes Film Festival, where it competed in the main competition, the film was nominated for the Palme d'Or and won the Prize of the Best Artistic Contribution, awarded to director Peter Greenaway for the film's innovative visual and narrative style.[47] The following year, it received the Audience Award at the Warsaw International Film Festival, reflecting its appeal to general audiences despite its unconventional structure.[5] In 1991, Greenaway was honored with the Golden Space Needle Award for Best Director at the Seattle International Film Festival, acknowledging his distinctive directorial approach.[5]| Award | Year | Category | Recipient |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cannes Film Festival | 1988 | Palme d'Or | Nominated |
| Cannes Film Festival | 1988 | Best Artistic Contribution | Peter Greenaway (Winner) |
| Warsaw International Film Festival | 1989 | Audience Award | Winner |
| Seattle International Film Festival | 1991 | Golden Space Needle (Best Director) | Peter Greenaway (Winner) |