Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Electronic lock

An electronic lock is a locking device that operates by means of an electric current to control the engagement or disengagement of a physical locking mechanism, such as a bolt, latch, or electromagnet, thereby granting or denying access to secured areas without relying solely on mechanical keys.^[1] These systems typically integrate electronic components like control units, power sources, and user interfaces—such as keypads, biometric scanners, or RFID readers—to verify credentials and actuate the lock.^[2] Unlike traditional mechanical locks, electronic locks can be standalone or networked, enabling features like remote monitoring and programmable access.^[1] The development of electronic locks traces its roots to the late 19th century, when American inventor James Sargent created the first time lock in 1873, primarily for securing bank vaults and safes by releasing at preset intervals.^[3] Modern electronic locking technology advanced significantly in the 1950s and 1960s in the United States, initially for high-security facilities like government buildings and military installations, where electric solenoids and circuits replaced purely mechanical systems.^[4] A key milestone came in 1969 with the invention of the electromagnetic lock by Sumner Saphirstein, which uses an electromagnet to hold a door securely until power is interrupted or credentials are validated.^[5]^[6] By the late 20th century, the integration of microprocessors and wireless technologies expanded their use into commercial and residential settings, evolving from rudimentary keypad systems to sophisticated smart locks connected via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi.^[7] Electronic locks encompass several types, each suited to specific applications and security needs. Electromagnetic locks, often called maglocks, employ powerful electromagnets to secure doors and are commonly used in access-controlled environments like offices and hospitals due to their fail-safe design that releases during power failures.^[1] Electric strikes integrate with existing door hardware to release the latch upon authentication, providing flexibility for egress in retail and educational facilities.^[8] Electronic deadbolts and latches function as drop-in replacements for mechanical versions, supporting motorized operation for keyless entry in homes and hotels.^[2] Advanced variants include biometric locks using fingerprint or facial recognition, RFID-based systems for card or fob access, and smart locks controllable via mobile apps, which are increasingly applied in multifamily housing and self-storage units.^[9] These locks offer notable advantages, including enhanced convenience through keyless entry and remote management, improved security via audit trails that log access events, and scalability for integration with broader access control systems.^[2] For instance, programmable electronic locks allow administrators to issue temporary credentials and track usage without physical rekeying, reducing operational costs in large-scale deployments like corporate campuses.^[1] However, they also present challenges, such as dependency on reliable power sources—necessitating battery backups or fail-secure configurations—and vulnerability to electronic tampering if not properly secured against hacking.^[10] Despite these, the global access control market, which includes electronic locks, was valued at USD 10.62 billion as of 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 15.80 billion by 2030, reflecting their widespread adoption in modern security infrastructures.^[11]

History and Development

Early Inventions

The roots of electronic locks trace back to the late 19th century, with American inventor James Sargent patenting the first time lock in 1873 for securing bank vaults and safes. This device used a clock mechanism to release at preset intervals, marking an early integration of timed electronic control with locking mechanisms.^[3] The development of electronic locking mechanisms gained further momentum in the post-World War II era, particularly during the 1950s and 1960s, as institutions like banks and offices adopted solenoid-integrated electrical circuits for remote door unlocking. These systems allowed centralized control over access points, enhancing security in high-traffic commercial environments by enabling operators to release locks electrically without physical keys.^[12] A pivotal early invention was the electromagnetic lock, designed in 1969 by Irving Saphirstein, founder of Locknetics. This device employed a solenoid to create a magnetic field that securely held doors closed, offering a non-mechanical alternative with holding forces up to 1,500 pounds and fail-safe operation that released upon power loss. Initially installed at venues like the Montreal Forum, it marked a significant shift toward reliable, electrically powered door retention for perimeter security.^[13]^[14] Key patents from this period facilitated the transition to electromechanical systems, exemplified by innovations in electrically operated deadbolts that combined solenoid actuation with traditional bolt mechanisms for remote control. These designs, emerging in the late 1960s, allowed for programmed unlocking via electrical signals, bridging mechanical reliability with emerging electronic controls in institutional settings.^[5] By the 1970s, the advent of computing technology profoundly influenced lock design, introducing microprocessor-controlled systems that enabled programmable logic for access timing, code verification, and integration with broader security networks. These early digital controls laid the groundwork for more sophisticated electronic locks, prioritizing efficiency and adaptability in commercial applications.^[7]

Evolution to Digital Systems

The integration of microprocessors into electronic locks during the 1980s marked a significant shift from electromechanical systems to digital ones, allowing for programmable access and enhanced functionality. Leading manufacturers like Schlage and Yale pioneered this evolution, with Yale introducing an advanced programmable electronic door lock system in 1982 designed for commercial and residential use.^[15] These innovations built on early electromagnetic principles, enabling locks to process user inputs and manage access permissions without mechanical keys, thus laying the groundwork for more sophisticated digital control.^[16] By the 1990s, the industry saw widespread adoption of standardization efforts through organizations like the Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association (BHMA) in collaboration with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), focusing on electronic locks to ensure interoperability and consistent performance. The ANSI/BHMA A156 series, which includes specifications for electrified locking devices and input mechanisms, began addressing key aspects such as cycle testing, electrical ratings, and compatibility protocols during this decade.^[17] This standardization was crucial for integrating digital locks into broader building management systems, promoting reliability across diverse applications.^[18] The 2000s brought the advent of internet-connected locks, transforming electronic systems into networked devices capable of remote monitoring and control. A notable milestone was the early development of wireless smart locks, such as the 2003 Gateman Rose digital door lock, which incorporated connectivity features for enhanced user convenience.^[19] Kwikset contributed to this trend around 2006 with innovations in keyless electronic deadbolts, aligning with the growing emphasis on smart home integration.^[20] Cybersecurity regulations, including the UL 294 standard for access control system units, profoundly influenced digital lock development by mandating tests for line security, endurance, and resistance to tampering—essential for protecting networked devices against both physical and emerging digital threats.^[21] First established in the 1970s and revised over time, UL 294 ensured that digital locks met rigorous performance criteria, fostering trust in their deployment within secure environments.^[22]

Principles of Operation

Core Components

Electronic locks rely on a combination of hardware and software elements to convert electrical signals into mechanical actions for securing or releasing a door. The primary actuation mechanisms are solenoids or electric motors, which physically move the lock's bolt, latch, or strike to engage or disengage. Solenoids, often used in electric strikes and electromagnetic locks, generate a magnetic field when energized to pull or push a plunger, enabling quick linear motion for locking or unlocking.^[23] Electric motors, common in deadbolts and smart locks, rotate a cam or gear assembly to extend or retract the bolt, providing precise control suitable for repeated cycles.^[23] These actuators typically operate on low-voltage direct current to ensure safety and efficiency in building environments.^[24] At the heart of processing is the microcontroller, a compact integrated circuit that manages the lock's logic, including signal interpretation from inputs and commands to actuators. It verifies authorization signals—such as those from brief authentication triggers—and executes the appropriate response, often running embedded firmware to handle timing, error detection, and state management.^[23] Power supplies provide the necessary electricity, either through batteries for standalone units (typically lasting 6 months to 2 years with alkaline or lithium cells) or hardwired low-voltage systems for networked installations, often backed by uninterruptible power supplies to prevent failures.^[23] Sensors detect the lock's status, such as door position, bolt extension, or tamper attempts, using reed switches or Hall effect devices to feedback operational data to the microcontroller for real-time monitoring.^[25] Relays and associated circuits play a crucial role in interfacing low-power control signals with high-power actuators, amplifying and isolating the electrical paths to prevent damage from voltage spikes. In typical setups, a relay coil is energized by the microcontroller's low-voltage output (e.g., 5V), closing contacts to deliver power to the solenoid or motor.^[26] These systems commonly require 12-24V DC for operation, with field-selectable options to match building infrastructure, ensuring compatibility while minimizing energy use—solenoids often draw 0.4A holding current at 24V DC.^[24]^[27] Software elements, primarily firmware stored in the microcontroller's non-volatile memory, govern the lock's operational logic, including sequence timing and fault responses, with write cycles limited to around 100,000 for reliability.^[28] For networked locks, interfaces like the RS-485 protocol enable multi-device communication over distances up to 1,200 meters, supporting half-duplex data exchange at baud rates from 4,800 to 115,200 bps for centralized control in access systems.^[28] Configurations vary between fail-safe and fail-secure modes to balance security and safety: fail-safe designs unlock upon power loss (default unlocked state, power required to lock), ideal for emergency egress like stairwell doors, while fail-secure modes remain locked without power (default locked, power to unlock), suited for high-security areas with mechanical overrides.^[29] Electromagnetic locks are inherently fail-safe, whereas electric strikes can be configured for either via solenoid polarity.^[30]

Activation and Control Processes

The activation sequence in an electronic lock commences with the reception of an authentication signal through the user interface, such as a keypad entry, RFID scan, or biometric input, which is captured by the lock's sensor or receiver.^[31] This signal is then routed to the microcontroller for verification, where it is compared against pre-stored credentials or patterns to confirm authorization.^[31] Upon validation, the control unit delivers an electrical pulse to the actuator—often a solenoid or DC motor—prompting mechanical engagement to retract or extend the bolt or latch. Solenoids, as primary actuators, enable rapid response times, typically ranging from milliseconds to 0.5-2 seconds, ensuring swift unlocking for authorized access.^[32]^[33] A feedback loop follows, employing position sensors to verify the mechanism's state and relay confirmation signals to the system, allowing for status updates or error detection.^[34] Control processes regulate the lock's operational states, including timed release functions that maintain the unlocked position for a configurable duration—commonly 5-30 seconds—before automatic relocking to balance convenience and security.^[35] In integrated access control environments, anti-tailgating protocols monitor door status and user flow post-authentication, using sensors to detect multiple entries on a single credential and either delay release or activate restrictions to prevent unauthorized follow-through.^[36] Power management protocols in battery-powered electronic locks minimize drain through deep sleep modes, where the microcontroller and peripherals consume as little as 2.5 µA in standby, activating only on detected signals via low-power wake-up interrupts.^[37] Techniques like periodic low-energy signaling, such as Bluetooth Low Energy advertising at intervals of 500 ms or longer, further extend battery life to over four years under typical usage with four AA cells.^[37] Electronic locks often integrate with external alarm systems, where failed verification attempts or tampering detection—such as excessive force on the mechanism—trigger immediate alerts, including audible alarms or notifications to centralized security monitoring.^[38]

Types of Electronic Locks

Electromagnetic Locks

Electromagnetic locks, also known as maglocks, operate by using an electromagnet to generate a magnetic field that securely holds a ferrous strike plate attached to the door, providing fail-safe locking that releases upon power interruption.^[39] The design typically consists of a coil-wound electromagnet mounted on the door frame and a matching armature plate on the door, creating a bond strong enough to resist forced entry without mechanical components that could wear over time.^[40] Holding forces commonly reach up to 1,200 pounds (544 kg), with some models exceeding this for high-security applications, ensuring robust performance in perimeter and interior door control.^[41] Variants include surface-mounted installations, where the lock is visible and attached externally for straightforward retrofitting, and mortise-mounted shear locks, which are concealed within the door frame for aesthetic and tamper-resistant setups.^[42] Fire-rated models must comply with NFPA 80 standards for fire doors and other opening protectives, requiring listing by a nationally recognized testing laboratory to ensure release during fire alarms while maintaining integrity.^[43] These locks often incorporate monitoring features, such as door position sensors or bond detection circuits, to verify secure engagement and alert for potential shear forces or separation.^[40] Power consumption for electromagnetic locks is typically continuous at 24 V DC, drawing between 0.5 A and 1 A depending on the model and holding force, allowing integration with standard access control power supplies.^[44] A common issue is residual magnetism, which can cause the strike plate to stick after power cutoff, but this is mitigated through built-in delayed release or instant degaussing circuits that gradually reduce the field for clean separation.^[45] Authentication methods, such as keycards or biometrics, trigger the power interruption to release the lock, facilitating controlled access.^[40]

Electric Strikes

Electric strikes are electromechanical devices installed in door frames that enable remote or controlled release of a mechanical latchbolt, facilitating secure entry while integrating with access control systems. The core mechanism involves a solenoid that, when energized, retracts or pivots a spring-loaded keeper—a metal component that normally captures and holds the latchbolt of the door lock in place—allowing the latchbolt to pass through and the door to open without fully retracting the bolt itself.^[46] This design maintains the integrity of the existing mechanical lock while providing electrical actuation, typically producing an audible buzz as feedback during operation.^[47] Electric strikes are classified primarily by their fail-safe and fail-secure configurations, which determine the door's state during power loss. Fail-secure strikes remain locked without power, ensuring security in normal conditions but requiring manual override for egress, and are mandated for fire-rated doors to prevent unintended unlocking during outages.^[48] In contrast, fail-safe strikes unlock upon power failure, prioritizing free egress in emergencies but potentially compromising security. Most models operate on 12VDC or 24VDC power supplies, with 24V preferred for lower current draw—typically 0.2A to 0.5A depending on the model and voltage—to reduce heat generation and wiring demands.^[49] For example, a common strike might draw 0.28A at 12VDC or 0.14A at 24VDC while providing up to 770 pounds of holding force.^[49] Installation of electric strikes varies by door type and lock configuration, with mortise strikes recessed into the frame for a flush fit and compatibility with mortise or cylindrical locksets featuring up to 3/4-inch latchbolts.^[50] Rim strikes, conversely, mount on the surface and suit rim exit devices or outswing doors, often requiring minimal frame modification.^[51] Both types align with ANSI/BHMA standards for centerline latch entry and may include optional sounders—integrated buzzers or monitoring modules—for audible or electronic feedback on strike status, such as latch engagement.^[52] In applications, electric strikes excel in monitored entry systems for commercial and institutional settings, where they integrate with access controls, keypads, or card readers to grant authorized entry while allowing seamless egress via request-to-exit (REX) buttons or motion sensors that momentarily energize the strike.^[53] This setup supports high-traffic environments like offices or hospitals, providing real-time monitoring of door status to detect tampering or forced entry.^[52] As a complementary option to electromagnetic locks for holding doors closed, electric strikes focus on latch release for active control.^[54]

Electronic Deadbolts and Latches

Electronic deadbolts and latches represent a core category of motorized locking mechanisms designed for standalone door security, where an electric signal triggers the extension or retraction of the locking bolt or latch. These devices typically employ DC motors or linear actuators to drive the bolt mechanism, converting electrical energy into mechanical motion to secure or release the door. The bolt in a deadbolt model extends fully into the door frame upon activation, providing robust resistance against forced entry, while latches offer a similar but more compact function suited to frequent use.^[55]^[56] The operation involves the motor or actuator generating rotational or linear force to move the bolt, with a standard throw length of 1 inch for deadbolts to ensure adequate engagement with the strike plate. Torque output in these actuators generally ranges from 50 to 100 in-lbs to overcome resistance from the door alignment or weather seals, allowing reliable performance in residential and light commercial settings. Upon successful authentication—such as via keypad entry—the motor engages for a brief period (typically 1-2 seconds) to fully extend or retract the bolt, after which the system powers down to conserve battery life.^[57]^[58] Key features include auto-relocking timers that automatically re-engage the bolt after a short delay, commonly set between 3 and 5 seconds following door closure or unlocking, to prevent accidental unsecured states. Additionally, manual override keys are integrated into the design for emergency access, allowing physical key insertion to bypass the electronic system in cases of power failure, low battery, or malfunction, ensuring compliance with life-safety codes. These overrides are typically housed in the exterior escutcheon and use standard pin tumbler cylinders compatible with rekeying services. Strikes serve as enhancers for these mechanisms by providing a hardened steel receiver that reinforces bolt alignment and resists tampering.^[59]^[60]^[61] Durability is evaluated against BHMA standards, with Grade 1 electronic deadbolts and latches required to undergo cycle testing simulating extensive use, often exceeding 200,000 operations under load to verify long-term reliability without degradation in bolt throw or motor function. This testing includes repeated extensions and retractions with applied force, ensuring the components withstand environmental factors like temperature fluctuations and vibration. High-grade models incorporate sealed electronics and corrosion-resistant materials to maintain performance over years of operation.^[62]^[63] Deadbolts prioritize high security through their full 1-inch bolt extension, which locks rigidly into the frame to deter picking, drilling, or prying attempts, making them ideal for exterior doors exposed to potential break-ins. In contrast, latches feature a shorter throw (typically 1/2 to 3/4 inch) and incorporate spring-loading for quicker, automatic engagement upon door closure, facilitating smoother operation on interior or frequently accessed doors without sacrificing basic security. This distinction allows deadbolts to serve as primary safeguards, while latches support secondary functions in multi-point locking setups.^[23]^[64]

Standalone and Programmable Locks

Standalone electronic locks operate independently without requiring connection to a central system or external wiring, making them suitable for residential doors where simplicity and self-sufficiency are prioritized. These devices typically rely on battery power, such as four AA alkaline batteries, which provide a lifespan of up to two years under normal usage conditions, eliminating the need for hardwiring and allowing easy installation on standard door preparations.^[65]^[66] Programmable features in these locks enable users to customize access through onboard non-volatile memory, supporting storage for 100 to 500 unique user codes that can be added, deleted, or scheduled directly via the lock's interface. Many models also include audit trail capabilities, logging over 1,000 access events with timestamps to track entries and support security reviews without external software. These locks often integrate with basic deadbolt mechanisms for reliable physical security, using electronic actuators solely for the unlocking process.^[67]^[68] Passive variants of standalone locks further enhance independence by requiring no internal power source for the locking function, relying instead on mechanical springs or gravity for secure engagement while employing electronics powered momentarily by an external key or token for unlocking. This design ensures functionality in power-constrained environments and reduces maintenance, as the lock remains secure even if electronic components fail.^[1]^[69] Representative examples include the Schlage Sense smart deadbolt, which uses Bluetooth for initial setup and ongoing code management through a companion app, accommodating multiple user codes while maintaining a battery-powered, wire-free operation ideal for home use.^[70]

Authentication Methods

Code-Based Systems

Code-based systems in electronic locks rely on user-entered numerical or alphanumeric sequences via keypads to authenticate and authorize access, providing a keyless alternative to traditional mechanical locks. These systems typically employ a numeric keypad where users input a personal identification number (PIN), which is verified against stored credentials within the lock's microcontroller. Upon successful verification, the lock disengages its internal mechanism, often integrating with electromagnetic or motorized actuators to retract the bolt or latch.^[71] The core mechanisms of code-based electronic locks feature keypads supporting PINs of varying lengths, commonly 3 to 8 digits, to balance usability and security.^[66] Many models accommodate multiple code hierarchies, including master codes for administrative functions like programming or resetting the system, user codes for routine access, and temporary codes that grant short-term entry, such as one-time use or time-limited expiration up to several days.^[72] For instance, temporary codes can be programmed to expire after a single use or a predefined period, enhancing flexibility for scenarios like guest access in residential or commercial settings.^[73] Security in these systems may include basic encryption or obfuscation for stored codes to protect against unauthorized extraction from the device's memory. To mitigate brute-force attacks, locks implement anti-tampering protocols, such as temporary lockouts after multiple incorrect attempts, during which the keypad becomes unresponsive for a period. This delay mechanism significantly increases the time required for exhaustive guessing, rendering simple trial-and-error impractical.^[74] Variants of code-based locks differ primarily in input interface: mechanical keypads use physical buttons for numeric entry only, offering durability in high-traffic environments but limited to digits.^[75] In contrast, touchscreen keypads enable alphanumeric passphrases, allowing longer, more complex inputs like combinations of letters and numbers for enhanced entropy without increasing entry time.^[76] Touchscreens also support gesture-based or virtual layouts, though they may require periodic cleaning to prevent smudges from revealing patterns.^[77] The widespread adoption of code-based electronic locks traces back to the 1970s, when they first appeared in commercial applications such as hotel safes, replacing mechanical dials with electronic keypads for faster and more reliable guest access.^[78] This innovation, pioneered in hospitality settings, laid the groundwork for broader integration in residential and institutional security.

Token and Keycard Systems

Token and keycard systems serve as portable physical credentials in electronic locks, providing a reliable authentication method by presenting a unique identifier to a reader device that verifies access rights. These systems are integral to access control, where the token or card encodes user-specific data that interfaces with the lock's controller to grant or deny entry. Unlike inherent biometric traits, tokens offer the advantage of easy issuance, revocation, and transferability, making them suitable for environments requiring scalable security. Key types of tokens and keycards include magnetic stripe cards, proximity cards, and smart cards. Magnetic stripe cards, typically using low-coercivity materials, store data on a stripe read via a swipe mechanism across a reader head, allowing for simple encoding of user information.^[79] Proximity cards operate at 125 kHz frequency, enabling contactless reading through embedded RFID tags that transmit data when held near the reader.^[80] Smart cards, adhering to the contactless ISO 14443 standard at 13.56 MHz, incorporate microchips for more complex data storage and processing, supporting advanced features like multi-application use.^[79] Readers for these systems commonly employ the Wiegand protocol to transmit credential data securely to the access control panel, a de facto standard that serializes bit streams over two-wire interfaces for reliable communication. Read ranges vary by type but generally fall between 1 to 4 inches for proximity and magnetic stripe readers, ensuring precise and intentional presentation while minimizing accidental activations.^[81]^[82] Security in token and keycard systems relies on unique identifiers to prevent unauthorized duplication, with common formats including 26-bit and 37-bit Wiegand structures that encode facility codes and user IDs.^[83] Advanced protection against cloning is achieved through encryption chips in smart cards, utilizing algorithms like AES-128 or DES to authenticate the credential mutually with the reader.^[84] These features reduce vulnerabilities like eavesdropping, though older magnetic stripe cards remain susceptible to physical wear and simpler duplication methods. In office environments, token and keycard systems dominate access control adoption, with industry surveys from the early 2020s indicating that approximately 70% of workers rely on keycards or fobs for entry, underscoring their prevalence over emerging alternatives like mobile credentials.^[85] This widespread use highlights their cost-effectiveness and compatibility with legacy infrastructure, though integration with code-based systems can provide supplementary non-token authentication options.

Biometric Systems

Biometric systems in electronic locks utilize unique physiological or behavioral characteristics of individuals for authentication, offering a high level of security by verifying identity without physical keys or codes. These systems integrate sensors that capture biometric data, process it through algorithms to create templates, and compare it against stored references to grant or deny access. Common implementations focus on fingerprints, iris patterns, and facial features, each employing specialized hardware to ensure reliable verification in access control scenarios.^[86] Fingerprint scanners are among the most prevalent biometric methods in electronic locks, typically using optical or capacitive sensors. Optical scanners illuminate the finger with light and capture a digital image of the ridges and valleys via a camera, while capacitive scanners detect electrical differences in the skin's surface using an array of capacitors to form an image. These technologies achieve low false acceptance rates (FAR), often below 1 in 50,000, making them suitable for secure residential and commercial applications.^[87]^[88]^[89] Iris recognition employs near-infrared (near-IR) cameras to capture detailed images of the iris, the colored ring around the pupil, which features complex patterns unique to each eye. The near-IR illumination enhances contrast for high-resolution imaging even in varying lighting conditions, enabling non-contact verification from a short distance. This method is favored in high-security electronic locks due to its resistance to spoofing and stability over time.^[90] Facial recognition in electronic locks relies on 2D or 3D imaging to analyze key facial landmarks such as the distance between eyes, nose width, and jawline shape. 2D systems use standard cameras for basic image matching, while 3D approaches incorporate depth-sensing technologies like structured light or infrared to create a spatial map, improving accuracy against photos or masks. These systems support touchless access, ideal for hygiene-focused environments.^[91]^[92] Integration of biometrics into electronic locks involves extracting features from captured data to form compact templates stored locally or in secure modules. For fingerprints, minutiae points—such as ridge endings and bifurcations—are identified and encoded, resulting in templates typically around 512 bytes in size to minimize storage needs while retaining essential uniqueness. Matching algorithms, often minutiae-based, align and compare these points between the input and stored template, completing verification in under one second on embedded processors. Iris and facial systems similarly generate templates from pattern features, using correlation or machine learning models for rapid comparison.^[93]^[94]^[95] Accuracy in biometric electronic locks is evaluated through false acceptance rates (FAR), where an unauthorized user is incorrectly granted access, and false rejection rates (FRR), where a legitimate user is denied. Fingerprint systems commonly exhibit FARs below 0.01% and FRRs around 1%, while iris recognition achieves even lower rates, often FAR <1 in 1,000,000, due to the iris's high entropy. Facial recognition varies, with 3D systems reducing FAR to under 0.1% compared to 2D's higher vulnerability. Multi-factor hybrids, combining biometrics with tokens like keycards, enhance overall reliability to 99.9% by layering verifications, as the combined error rate drops exponentially.^[89]^[90]^[91]^[96] Handling biometric data raises significant privacy concerns, necessitating compliance with regulations like the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which classifies biometrics as special category data requiring explicit consent or another stringent legal basis for processing. Systems must implement measures such as on-device template storage to avoid transmitting raw images, conduct data protection impact assessments, and ensure secure deletion of templates upon user request, thereby mitigating risks of breaches or misuse in electronic lock deployments.^[97]^[98]

Wireless and Proximity Systems

Wireless and proximity systems in electronic locks utilize radio frequency identification (RFID) and other contactless technologies to enable authentication without physical contact, allowing users to unlock doors by presenting a tag or device within a specific range. These systems operate primarily on high-frequency (HF) RFID at 13.56 MHz for near-field communication (NFC), which supports short-range interactions typically limited to 1-10 cm to ensure precise proximity detection and minimize unauthorized access from afar.^[99]^[100] In contrast, ultra-high-frequency (UHF) RFID systems, operating in the 860-960 MHz band, extend the effective range up to 10 meters, making them suitable for applications requiring broader coverage, such as gated entrances or larger facilities, though they demand careful calibration to balance convenience and security.^[101]^[102] Keycard readers, as precursors to these wireless versions, transitioned from contact-based magnetic stripes to RFID-enabled proximity detection for faster and more hygienic access.^[103] Prominent protocols in these systems include MIFARE, developed by NXP Semiconductors, which facilitates encrypted communication between tags and readers compliant with ISO/IEC 14443 standards. MIFARE tags support secure read/write operations at data rates ranging from 106 kbps to 848 kbps, enabling efficient data exchange for authentication while incorporating cryptographic protections like AES encryption in variants such as DESFire EV2.^[104]^[105] Implementations often involve key fobs embedding RFID chips or mobile phone applications leveraging Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) at 2.4 GHz, which provides a practical range of 10-50 meters depending on environmental factors like obstacles and interference. BLE integration allows remote unlocking via smartphones, enhancing user convenience in residential and commercial settings while maintaining low power consumption for battery-operated locks.^[106]^[107] To counter vulnerabilities such as relay attacks—where signals are intercepted and retransmitted to mimic legitimate proximity—modern systems employ rolling codes that generate unique, one-time challenges for each authentication session, preventing replay of captured data. Additionally, mutual authentication protocols ensure both the lock and the credential verify each other's legitimacy before granting access, often using symmetric keys or public-key cryptography to thwart man-in-the-middle exploits.^[108]^[109]^[110]

Applications and Security Considerations

Residential and Commercial Uses

In residential settings, electronic locks such as smart deadbolts enable homeowners to control access remotely through mobile apps, allowing users to lock or unlock doors from anywhere with an internet connection.^[111] These devices often integrate with video doorbells for enhanced monitoring, as seen in systems like the August Wi-Fi Smart Lock paired with the August Doorbell Cam, which provides real-time video feeds alongside keyless entry.^[112] This setup supports features like auto-locking and activity notifications, improving convenience for daily use while maintaining compatibility with standard single-cylinder deadbolts found in most homes.^[111] For commercial applications, keycard systems are widely used in offices to manage employee access and track entry patterns, enabling administrators to monitor who enters specific areas via audit logs.^[113] These systems reduce key management costs by eliminating the need for physical keys and frequent rekeying; for instance, a property with 50 doors can save over $3,000 annually in rekeying expenses alone through remote deactivation of lost cards and centralized control.^[114] Proximity or badge-based variants facilitate efficient employee tracking without disrupting workflows, often integrating briefly with code-based authentication for added layers of verification.^[113] A notable case study involves the adoption of electronic locks in short-term rental platforms like Airbnb, where hosts use smart locks to generate temporary guest codes for self-check-in, automating access without physical key exchanges.^[115] This has driven market growth, with the global smart lock sector reaching $2.38 billion in 2023, fueled by rising demand in residential and commercial sectors for such convenient solutions.^[116] Installation of electronic locks varies between retrofitting existing structures and incorporating them into new builds, with retrofit options like the August Smart Lock designed to overlay standard deadbolt hardware without full replacement, minimizing disruption and costs for older homes or offices.^[112] In new constructions, integration is simpler as wiring and compatibility can be planned from the outset, ensuring seamless alignment with door frames and existing security infrastructure, though both approaches require verifying deadbolt dimensions for optimal fit.^[111]

Institutional and High-Security Applications

In institutional settings such as schools and hospitals, electronic locks are deployed to balance security with life safety requirements. Classroom doors often incorporate delayed egress systems, which hold the door locked for 15 seconds after activation to prevent unauthorized exits or intrusions while complying with International Building Code (IBC) provisions that mandate immediate release upon fire alarm or power failure. These systems enhance campus safety by deterring truancy or theft without compromising emergency egress. In hospitals, biometric access controls, including fingerprint or iris scanners, secure nurse stations and medication dispensing areas, ensuring only authorized staff can access sensitive patient data and controlled substances, thereby reducing risks of unauthorized entry and supporting HIPAA compliance.^[117]^[118] High-security applications in correctional facilities like prisons utilize advanced electronic locking mechanisms to maintain control and prevent escapes. Electromagnetic locks, which rely on powered magnets to secure doors without mechanical components, are commonly integrated into mantrap configurations—interlocking entryways that trap potential intruders between two doors for verification. These setups adhere to federal standards, including General Services Administration (GSA) guidelines for high-security locks and UL 752 Level 3 ballistic resistance ratings for doors in high-risk areas, ensuring durability against forced entry attempts. Such systems provide remote monitoring and fail-safe release during emergencies, aligning with Department of Homeland Security recommendations for physical access controls in detention environments.^[119]^[120] Scalability is a key feature in these institutional and high-security deployments, enabling centralized management of large-scale operations. Networked electronic lock systems, such as LenelS2's OnGuard platform, support over 1,000 doors across multiple sites through integrated software that handles access levels, event logging, and real-time alerts for thousands of users. This enterprise-grade architecture allows administrators to program schedules, integrate with video surveillance, and scale from single facilities to nationwide networks without hardware limitations per controller.^[121]^[122]

Advantages and Vulnerabilities

Electronic locks offer several key advantages over traditional mechanical systems, primarily through enhanced management capabilities and user convenience. Remote management allows administrators to grant or revoke access instantly via software, eliminating the need for physical rekeying and enabling real-time control from anywhere.^[123] Audit logs provide detailed records of entry attempts, supporting compliance and forensic analysis in security-sensitive environments.^[124] Additionally, these systems significantly reduce incidents related to lost physical keys; for instance, a survey of electronic key management users reported a 94% average decrease in lost keys within the first year, with 68% achieving zero losses.^[125] The absence of physical keys further enhances convenience, as users rely on codes, biometrics, or tokens that cannot be misplaced or duplicated easily. Despite these benefits, electronic locks are susceptible to specific vulnerabilities that can compromise their reliability. Hacking risks include signal jamming attacks on wireless models, where attackers disrupt radio frequencies like 433 MHz to prevent legitimate access; studies show such attacks succeed on up to 100% of lesser-known brand devices using inexpensive hardware.^[126] Power failures pose another critical issue, as battery depletion or outages can render locks inoperable unless designed with fail-secure or fail-safe mechanisms, such as electromagnetic variants that default to unlocked states during power loss.^[127] Comparative security assessments indicate that well-designed electronic locks resist physical defeat more effectively than mechanical ones, which can be picked in seconds to minutes, though electronics introduce protocol-based risks.^[128] However, standard electronic locks remain vulnerable to electromagnetic pulses (EMPs), which can disable circuits without shielding, potentially locking users out of secured areas.^[129] To address these vulnerabilities, several mitigation strategies are recommended and widely implemented. Two-factor authentication adds a secondary verification layer, such as a biometric scan alongside a code, significantly reducing unauthorized access risks.^[130] Regular firmware updates are essential for patching known exploits; for example, updates to Nuki smart locks in 2022 resolved multiple issues, including CVE-2022-32509, which allowed man-in-the-middle attacks due to missing SSL/TLS validation.^[131] These measures, when combined with robust encryption and physical hardening, help maintain the overall security edge of electronic systems over mechanical counterparts in controlled environments.

Emerging Technologies and Trends

Integration with Smart Ecosystems

Electronic locks integrate seamlessly with smart home ecosystems through wireless protocols that serve as the backbone for authentication and control, enabling connectivity to broader IoT networks for automated and remote management.^[132] Key protocols such as Z-Wave and Zigbee facilitate mesh networking, where devices communicate directly with each other to extend coverage and reliability without relying solely on a central hub. Z-Wave operates on a sub-GHz frequency, offering an indoor range of approximately 30 meters and up to 100 meters in open air, while Zigbee uses the 2.4 GHz band with similar indoor ranges of 10 to 100 meters, supporting up to 65,000 devices in a network. As of November 2025, Zigbee 4.0 enhances these capabilities with Sub-GHz support for longer range and direct smartphone setup for improved interoperability in lock systems.^[133]^[134]^[135] These protocols allow electronic locks to enable voice control via platforms like Amazon Alexa and Google Home, permitting users to lock or unlock doors hands-free through compatible smart speakers.^[136]^[137] Compatibility with major ecosystems further enhances functionality, particularly through platforms like Apple HomeKit, which supports geofencing for automatic unlocking based on the user's GPS location. For instance, when an iPhone approaches within a predefined radius of the home, the lock disengages via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi integration, providing hands-free entry while maintaining security through device verification. Similar integrations exist with Google Home and Alexa, allowing locks to respond to location-based triggers across Android and iOS devices.^[138]^[139]^[140] Advanced features include scene automation, where electronic locks coordinate with other smart devices for contextual responses, such as automatically securing all entry points when a home alarm activates. This integration ensures rapid execution, with typical latencies under 2 seconds for local network commands, minimizing delays in security scenarios.^[141]^[142] Market projections indicate growing adoption, with household penetration of smart locks expected to reach 17.1% by 2025, driven by IoT enablement in new installations as the overall smart lock market expands at a CAGR of 19.7% through 2030.^[143]^[144]

Advanced Innovations

Recent advancements in electronic lock technology are exploring quantum key distribution (QKD) to enable unhackable encryption for secure access control in IoT environments, such as smart grids where QKD authenticates communications against eavesdropping.^[145] This approach leverages quantum mechanics to detect interception attempts, providing information-theoretic security that classical methods cannot match.^[146] Complementing this, AI-driven anomaly detection is enhancing predictive security in electronic locks by analyzing access patterns to identify unauthorized attempts in real time. For instance, machine learning models integrated with facial authentication in smart door locks achieve up to 98% accuracy in detecting deviations from normal behavior, such as unusual access timings or failed verifications.^[147] These systems continuously learn from usage data, flagging potential breaches before they escalate and improving overall resilience in connected ecosystems.^[148] Behavioral biometrics represent another frontier, incorporating gait and voice analysis through embedded sensors to enable continuous, non-intrusive authentication beyond static traits like fingerprints. Gait recognition, for example, uses accelerometer data from door-integrated devices to verify users based on walking patterns, while voice analysis processes audio inputs for dynamic identity confirmation during approach.^[149] Such methods, often combined in multimodal systems, reduce reliance on physical contact and adapt to environmental variations for higher usability in residential and institutional settings.^[150] Sustainability efforts are addressing electronic waste through solar-powered locks that harvest ambient light to extend operational life, potentially lasting 5-7 years compared to traditional battery-dependent models requiring frequent replacements.^[151] Additionally, blockchain integration provides tamper-proof, distributed access logs by recording entries on a decentralized ledger, ensuring auditability without central vulnerabilities and enhancing trust in shared environments.^[152] Post-2020 research milestones include DARPA's initiatives on self-healing technologies for electronic hardware, such as the HEALICs program developing mixed-signal integrated circuits that autonomously detect and repair faults to maintain security in critical systems.^[153] The Red-C program further advances self-healing firmware for bus-based architectures, enabling rapid recovery from cyberattacks in embedded systems.^[154] These efforts build on smart ecosystem integrations to project more robust, adaptive lock mechanisms.

References

[1]
Electronic Locks: An Overview - TownSteel
Jul 1, 2022 · This lock classification uses an electrical current to lock or unlock a door. The electrical current sends power to an electromagnet, solenoid ( ...
[2]
What is an Electronic Lock?
### Summary of Electronic Locks from https://www.lockmanage.com/blog/what-is-an-electronic-lock/
[3]
The History of the Digital Door Lock
Jul 8, 2022 · The earliest version of the digital lock – which would open only at a pre-set time – was invented in 1873 by an inventor named James Sargent.
[4]
How did the electric lock come about? ~Its origin and evolution history
The history of electronic locks dates back about 70 years ago, to the 1950s and 60s in America. At the time, electronic locks began to be used in places that ...
[5]
A Brief History of Locks - From Catacombs to Modern Homes
Mar 29, 2021 · Invented in 1969 by Summer “Irving” Saphirstein, electromagnetic locks work by using a solenoid (running a current through one or more wires) ...
[6]
The Evolution of Home Security: A look Into Smart Locks - Yale
May 21, 2024 · The concept of electronic door locks traces back to the late 20th century, with rudimentary keypad and card-based systems emerging as ...
[7]
Electronic Locks | Maglocks, Electric Strikes & Other Types - Kisi
A comprehensive access control guide, including reviews, videos, and installation tips for electronic locks, like electric strikes and magnetic locks.
[8]
What are the Different Types of Electronic Locks | BE-TECH
Different Types of Electronic Locks · Electronic Door Locks · Electronic Padlocks · Electronic Deadbolts and Latches · Digital Fingerprint Locks · Bluetooth ...Different Types of Electronic... · How Does an Electronic Door...
[9]
[PDF] Permanent Magnet Locking (PerMagLock) System - LOUIS
Aug 6, 2019 · In reflection, the primary advantage of electromechanical locks is the option for either fail safe or fail secure, and the primary disadvantages ...
[10]
The Evolution of Access Control and Why It Matters More Than Ever
Sep 18, 2025 · In the 1950s and 60s, larger institutions like government agencies and industrial facilities began experimenting with early forms of electronic ...
[11]
[PDF] Electromagnetic Locks - Security Door Controls
Also in 1969, Locknetics founder Irving Saphirstein designed the first electromagnetic lock that received approval for locking perimeter doors after business ...
[12]
History of Locks | Vivint
Sep 19, 2022 · 1969: Summer Saphirstein designs an electromagnetic lock to be installed at the Montreal Forum. This technology allows for all of the doors ...
[13]
Yale introduces electronic lock - UPI Archives
May 4, 1982 · The Yale Security Group of Scovill Inc. Tuesday introduced an advanced, programmable, electronic door lock system, designed to provide the ...
[14]
Builders Hardware Goes Electronic – and Gets Put to the Test
When BHMA began specifying standards in 1969, the focus was not initially on electrified builders hardware. Since then, standards testing has undergone ...
[15]
ANSI/BHMA Standards for Builders Hardware
The widely known ANSI/BHMA A156 series of standards describes and establishes features and criteria for an array of builders hardware products including locks, ...Accredited Standards... · Product Grade Levels · BHMA® Product Numbering
[16]
Understanding BHMA Standards - The ANSI Blog
May 7, 2024 · BHMA currently sponsors over 40 separate standards, which cover several types of hinges, locks, door closers and related hardware, exit devices, ...
[17]
The evolution of smart access - Igloohome
Jul 14, 2019 · The early 2000s saw pivotal changes for the industry, especially in the APAC region. The release of the Gateman Rose digital door lock in 2003 ...
[18]
Kwikset® Locks Up 60 Years as an Industry Leader of Secure Door ...
Jan 4, 2006 · This year Kwikset® celebrates its 60th Anniversary and the revolutionary residential lock design that launched the company in 1946.
[19]
Decoded: Code Requirements for UL 294 – Standard for Access ...
Nov 5, 2015 · UL 294 is the Underwriters Laboratories Standard for Access Control System Units, which is used to evaluate the construction, performance, and operation of ...
[20]
Proper Application of UL Standards for Controlled or Delayed ...
Mar 5, 2021 · UL 294 covers access control units, and UL 1034 covers burglary-resistant electric locks. UL 294 can control UL 1034 certified locks.
[21]
How Do Electronic Door Locks Work? Types, Latches, and Pro Tips
### Summary of Core Components of Electronic Door Locks
[22]
[PDF] Schlage L-Series Electrified Lock Instructions - Allegion US
• Voltage: 12 or 24 VDC (maximum 26.4 V, minimum 10.8 V). • Peak current: 0.4 ... * Lock auto-detects GND, +12 or +24 V DC. 4-Pin. Lock. Connector. Harness.Missing: relays 24V
[23]
Basics of Safety Interlocks - DigiKey
Nov 10, 2022 · When integrated into guarding and deadbolting interlocks, solenoids are the input source for the latching mechanisms. Other such solenoid-based ...<|separator|>
[24]
Electrical Relay and Solid State Relays - Electronics Tutorials
Electronics Tutorial about the Electrical Relay and the Relay Switch Circuit including Solid State Relays and Input/Output Interface Modules.Missing: locks | Show results with:locks
[25]
[PDF] Von Duprin 78 & &5 Series Exit Device Catalog
• Solenoid rated for continuous duty at 24V DC 0.4 amps. • UL listed devices ... • Battery back-up board auto-selects voltage. • Fire alarm relay can be ...Missing: motors | Show results with:motors
[26]
[PDF] RS-485 - Keypad - Essex Electronics
Ideal for process control equipment and. SCADA systems, the KTP-485 Keypad is designed to provide bi-directional serial communications protocol in Hexadecimal.
[27]
Fail Secure vs. Fail Safe: Decoding Door Security Systems
Fail safe products are unlocked when power is removed. · Fail secure products are locked when power is removed. · Fail safe/fail secure refers to the status of ...
[28]
Fail Safe vs Fail Secure - And What Most People Get Wrong! - Kisi
Mar 6, 2025 · Fail-safe locks unlock when power is removed. Fail-secure locks unlock when power is applied.Fail safe vs fail secure locks · What is fail secure? · Common misconceptions...
[29]
US9695616B2 - Intelligent door lock system and vibration/tapping ...
An intelligent door lock system includes a drive shaft of a lock device and a circuit coupled to an engine with a memory. A vibration/tapping sensing device ...
[30]
Why Solenoids? Part 1 – Locking - Magnet-Schultz of America
Nov 5, 2024 · Quick Response Time: Solenoids respond almost instantly to electric current, allowing locks to engage or disengage quickly, which is essential ...Missing: sequence engagement
[31]
Electric Solenoid Locks - Reliable Security Solutions - Alibaba.com
Ideally, the lock should respond within milliseconds to ensure seamless user experience and synchronization with access control logic. Delayed or inconsistent ...Missing: sequence reception
[32]
https://magnet-schultzamerica.com/resources/blog/whysolenoidspart1/
[33]
Device Schedules Explanations and Use Cases
Auto-Lock Timer ... When Auto-lock is enabled, this setting determines the length of time the lock remains unlocked before re-locking. Range is 5 to 20 seconds.<|control11|><|separator|>
[34]
[PDF] 1.2 Delayed Egress Locks - Security Door Controls
The Exit Check® electromagnetic delayed egress lock is designed to delay egress through perimeter exit doors for 15 or 30 seconds.
[35]
https://support.remotelock.com/s/article/Device-Schedules-Explanations-and-Use-Cases
[36]
How Door Access Control Integrates with Alarm & CCTV Systems
Aug 6, 2025 · When unauthorized access is detected, alarms are triggered instantly. Access logs are shared in real time with alarm systems. Notifications are ...
[37]
Electromagnetic Locks | Securitron
MM15. 4,000 lbs. holding force, bracket mounted, magnetic electromechanical lock · $649 - $835 ; MCL. The compact versatile asset management cabinet locking ...Missing: design NFPA 80 residual
[38]
[PDF] Locking Devices Electromagnetic Locks - Security Door Controls
The 350 Narrow Line EmLock provides 1200 lbs holding force and failsafe access control for perimeter and interior doors that meets building security and fire.
[39]
Electromagnetic Locks (Maglocks) - Dormakaba
The magnetic strength of dormakaba's RCI electromagnetic locks creates a holding force of up to 1200 lbs. These features make RCI electromagnetic locks an ...RCI DE8310 Delayed Egress · RCI 8310/8320 MultiMag · RCI 8380 GateMag
[40]
[PDF] ELECTROMAGNETIC LOCKS - Security Door Controls
Apr 14, 2025 · Traditional electromagnetic locks are exposed (surface mount), whereas electromagnetic shear locks may be concealed, semi-concealed or surface ...
[41]
[PDF] Electromagnetic locks are a popular method to control the locking ...
Electromagnetic locks used on labeled fire door assemblies shall be listed or labeled for fire doors by a nationally recognized independent testing laboratory ...
[42]
Electromagnetic Locks | Securitron
What should I do if the Maglock has residual voltage when releasing? All Securitron maglocks are designed with an instant release circuit. As soon as the ...
[43]
Electromagnetic Locks Get "Smart" - Locksmith Ledger
Jul 1, 2015 · Then instant release electronic (degaussing) circuits were incorporated into electromagnetic locks to dissipate any residual magnetism. The ...
[44]
Electric Strikes 101: Secure Door Lock Solutions - Von Duprin
This keeper holds the latch bolt of the lockset or exit device until the strike is triggered to allow the latch bolt to be pulled through the keeper for access.
[45]
https://www.locksmithledger.com/electronics-access-control/article/12076457/mag-locks
[46]
[PDF] Decoded Fail Safe vs Fail Secure - When and Where
the electric strike is fail safe or fail secure. For electric strikes on fire-rated doors, fail secure strikes must be used because fail safe strikes do not ...
[47]
https://www.qualifiedhardware.com/electric-strikes-everything-you-need-to-know.html
[48]
[PDF] Electric Strikes - Security Door Controls
Locksets with ANSI centerline latch entry with up to 3/4" latchbolt. After releasing the latchbolt, the keeper returns to the locked position. • Mortise ...
[49]
3 Things Not to Miss When Selecting an Electric Strike - HES
The most advanced, modular electric strikes that work with every brand of cylindrical or mortise locks designed to work with a 4-7/8" strike plate. Where to Buy.Missing: sounder feedback
[50]
Monitoring Options for Electric Strikes - HES
These options provide real-time updates on the status of doors, such as whether they are securely closed or open, the strike is locked, and the latch is ...Missing: feedback | Show results with:feedback
[51]
Electric Strikes - Dormakaba
Electric strikes are intended for door security in commercial & industrial applications with heavy traffic that require access control systems.RCI F2164/2364 All-in-One · RCI 6 Series Centerline · RCI 7 Series Centerline
[52]
4200 Series Electric Strike - Von Duprin
It features a shallow back box, low current draw, field selectable voltage and fail safe/fail secure conversion without disassembly. Looking for more ...
[53]
Automating Smart Home Systems with Motor Drivers
The basic motor function in the smart lock is to control the position of the deadbolt or latch. In most systems, a brushed-DC motor is used for this application ...
[54]
Brush DC Motors for Smart Home Door Locks - NMB Technologies
Nov 22, 2024 · A DC brush motor can operate by simply applying a voltage to the terminals. When you reverse the current, the motor rotation reverses and when ...
[55]
B600 Series Grade 1 Deadbolts | Schlage Mechanical Locks
Their sleek, broadly angled trim ring in a shallow, 7/8" depth is offered in 10 finishes. With an impressive list of built-in security features and a wide ...
[56]
https://nmbtc.com/blog/brush-dc-motors-for-smart-home-door-locks/
[57]
https://commercial.schlage.com/en/products/mechanical-locks/b600-series-grade-1-deadbolts.html
[58]
Everything You Need To Know About Emergency Override ... - Vivint
Sep 5, 2024 · Yes, most smart locks come with a manual override function to guarantee you can always access your home in an emergency. These overrides are ...
[59]
https://www.b2btechsupply.com/sr-5203a-seco-larm-power-door-lock-interface-with-built-in-programmable-0-7-or-3-5-second-timer/
[60]
A Comprehensive Guide to Lock Grades - This Old House
Grade 1: most secure · Cycle Test: 800,000 cycles · Vertical Load Test: 360 pounds · Torque Test (Locked):. Knob: 300 pounds per foot; Lever: 700 pounds per foot.
[61]
Comparing smart lock quality & security? Look for these standards
Feb 4, 2025 · ANSI grade 1 locks are top-of-the-line products that (for deadbolts) must withstand 250,000 open/close cycles and 10 blows with a hammer ...
[62]
https://www.thisoldhouse.com/home-safety/118041/lock-grades
[63]
[PDF] CO-100 - Allegion US
4 AA batteries (standard off the shelf: included). Battery life. Up to 2 yrs with 4 AA batteries. Operating temperature. Exterior: -31° to 151°F (-35° to 66°C).
[64]
CO-100 Standalone Keypad Programmable Lock
Battery life - up to 2 years with 4 AA batteries; Exterior Temp: -31° to 151°F (-35° to 66°C); Interior Temp: 32° to 120°F (0° to 49°C) (battery); Humidity: 0 ...
[65]
EntryCheck® E75 Standalone Electronic Keypad
The SDC EntryCheck® E70 Series features Bluetooth enabled software and 10,000 event audit trails in two new models. EntryCheck® is a simplified solution ...Missing: 100-500 | Show results with:100-500
[66]
https://commercial.schlage.com/en/products/electronic-locks/co-100-standalone-keypad-programmable-locks.html
[67]
What's passive electronic lock? - EVOXS
A passive electronic lock lacks a power source or battery, using a key with a built-in battery to power the lock and unlock it.
[68]
Schlage Sense Works With
The Schlage Sense Smart Deadbolt with Bluetooth pairing technology was built to be incorporated into the leading home automation systems.
[69]
Guide to keypad door locks and access control systems - Avigilon
The PIN codes can be used to gain access via the standalone keypad device. Often, this is achieved by inputting a master access code, which eliminates the need ...
[70]
None
### Summary of PIN Code Lock Features (ASSA ABLOY)
[71]
How to Set & Change Code on Keypad Door Lock
May 30, 2022 · 5 Steps to Change Master Code on Keypad Door Lock · Step 1: Make sure that the door is open and unlocked · Step2: Touch the Keypad & Enter Codes.
[72]
[PDF] Development of a Centralized Electronic Lock System Based on 3G ...
An electronic lock system is something that preferably is centrally controlled. ... The salt for each pin code is generated every time a pin code is changed and ...
[73]
Can Keypad Locks Be Hacked? - Lockey Digital
Quality Bluetooth locks use encrypted communications that resist simple interception, typically employing AES-256 encryption—the same standard used by banks and ...
[74]
Blocking Brute Force Attacks - OWASP Foundation
The most obvious way to block brute-force attacks is to simply lock out accounts after a defined number of incorrect password attempts.
[75]
https://www.directdoorhardware.com/keyless-locks-electronic-vs-mechanical.htm
[76]
Electronic Keypad Locks: The Perfect Combination of Security and ...
This type of lock is the most common, where users unlock the door by entering a numeric or alphanumeric password on the keypad.
[77]
The Best Electronic Keypad Door Lock - The New York Times
May 6, 2025 · An electronic lock opens via a code entered into a keypad or touchscreen. It's keyless convenience but stops short of device connectivity. “They ...Who This Is For · How We Picked And Tested · The Competition
[78]
DIY History Lesson on the Evolution of Door Locks - Dorset India
May 23, 2025 · The 1970s saw the first electronic keypad locks in commercial settings, eliminating the need for physical keys altogether. Hotels were early ...Missing: deadbolt | Show results with:deadbolt
[79]
https://www.rfidcard.com/access-control-cards-explained-types-how-they-work-best-use-case/
[80]
Keycard Entry Systems | Kisi's Guide to Card Access
Often referred to as prox cards, swipe cards, and fobs, sometimes magnetic cards, RFID/NFC cards, and even simple ID cards. Despite the different names and the ...
[81]
Wiegand interface - Function overview - 2N
Aug 28, 2025 · Wiegand interface is a wiring standard for interconnecting readers and the access control system. There are basically two scenarios which ...
[82]
Wiegand: What Is It And How Does It Work With Access Control
May 27, 2024 · It also utilizes a Wiegand interface and offers a read range of 3 inches. This one is water resistant as well because it is housed in an IP55- ...
[83]
https://tagtixrfid.com/blogs/wiki/wiegand-26bit
[84]
HID Prox Card & RFID Smart Credentials - Higgins Corporation
High Security – Mutual authentication, AES 128, DES, and triple-DES data encryption and unique 56-bit serial number. Read/Write Functionality – Perfect for ...
[85]
2021 Access Control Trends: Worker Sentiments on Returning
Aug 5, 2025 · 68.7% office workers still use unsecure keycards, fobs and keys. 9% of people today use smartphones to access their workplace, the #1 choice ...Missing: tokens 2020s
[86]
A Review of Fingerprint Sensors: Mechanism, Characteristics, and ...
Jun 14, 2023 · This work presents several fingerprint acquisition techniques, such as optical capacitive and ultrasonic, and analyzes acquisition types and structures.
[87]
How Do Fingerprint Scanners Work? Optical vs Capacitive | Arrow.com
Feb 1, 2018 · The way an optical scanner works is by shining a bright light over your fingerprint and taking a digital photo.
[88]
Optical Vs Capacitive: Which Fingerprint Scanner is Right for You?
Oct 11, 2024 · In this blog, we'll explore the key differences between optical and capacitive fingerprint scanners, including how they work, their advantages and limitations.
[89]
The Error Rate Of Fingerprint Recognition Door Locks | Smonet News
May 24, 2024 · The error rate of secustone fingerprint door lock recognition can be classified under two categories: False Acceptance Rate (FAR) and False Rejection Rate (FRR ...Missing: multi- | Show results with:multi-
[90]
Biometric Access Control & Door Lock Systems: A Complete Guide
The initial image for biometric security using an iris door lock is based on the colorful part of the eye.Missing: near- | Show results with:near-
[91]
Best Facial Recognition Access Control Systems to Buy in 2025
Jan 15, 2025 · Facial recognition access control uses biometric tech to identify individuals by facial features, offering touchless, secure, and fast entry. ...
[92]
Biometric & Facial Recognition Access Control System Trends in 2025
Apr 1, 2025 · Modern facial recognition access control systems use infrared and 3D imaging to enhance performance in low-light environments. However, some ...
[93]
Using 'Minutiae' to Match Fingerprints Can Be Accurate | NIST
Mar 16, 2006 · Minutiae templates are a fraction of the size of fingerprint images ... The increased use and the desire to limit storage space needed ...
[94]
ISO/IEC 19794-2:2005/Cor.1:2009 Summary - Fingerprint templates
Minutiae are interesting points on the fingerprint, usually ridge endings and bifurcations. MINUTIA records span 6 bytes each and carry minutia position (MINX, ...
[95]
Robust Fingerprint Minutiae Extraction and Matching Based ... - MDPI
Jun 16, 2022 · The average execution time of the fingerprint recognition algorithm, including enhancement, feature extraction and matching, is about 674 ms ...<|separator|>
[96]
Multimodal Biometrics: The Future of Security - Anonybit
Jul 13, 2022 · Incorporating multimodal biometrics improves identity authentication accuracy and security by reducing false acceptance and rejection rates.<|separator|>
[97]
How do we process biometric data lawfully? | ICO
Biometric data is personal information. You must comply with data protection law when you process it. Explicit consent is likely to be the most appropriate ...In Detail · Can We Use Consent And... · What Other Special Category...
[98]
Biometric Data GDPR Compliance Made Simple
May 14, 2025 · Biometric data GDPR rules require explicit consent. Learn how to lawfully collect, process, and protect biometric data under GDPR.
[99]
[PDF] MIFARE Classic EV1 1K - Mainstream contactless smart card IC for ...
All command timings are according to ISO/IEC 14443-3 frame specification as shown for the Frame Delay Time in Figure 11. For more details refer to Ref. 3 and ...
[100]
13 .56 MHz High Frequency RFID Tags
Our HF (High Frequency) 13.56 MHz RFID tags have a read range of up to 1 to 12 inches, uses NFC protocol, and has a larger memory for storing data.
[101]
[PDF] Radio Frequency Identification Technology in the Federal Government
May 27, 2005 · There are four main frequencies used for RFID systems: (1) low, (2) high, (3) ultrahigh, and (4) microwave. Low-frequency bands range from 125 ...
[102]
Different Types of RFID Systems - Impinj
RFID systems throughout the world operate in ultra-high frequency (UHF) ... RAIN RFID has a read range of up to 10 meters (30 feet) and a faster data ...
[103]
[PDF] Technology Primer: Radio Frequency Identification
Systems coming on the market today operate in the UHF band, whereas older RFID systems typically use the LF and HF bands.
[104]
[PDF] MIFARE DESFire EV2 Fact Sheet
With MIFARE DESFire EV2, data transfer rates up to 848 Kbit/s can be achieved, making fast data processing possible. SECURITY AND PRIVACY. MIFARE DESFire EV2 ...
[105]
[PDF] High-performance ISO/IEC 14443 A/B frontend MFRC631 and ...
Jan 3, 2024 · The MFRC631 supports higher transfer speeds of the MIFARE product family up to 848 kbit/s in both directions. The MFRC631 supports layer 2 and 3 ...
[106]
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE): A Complete Guide - Novel Bits
Sep 6, 2022 · There are a few factors that limit the range of BLE, including: It operates in the 2.4 GHz ISM spectrum, which is greatly affected by obstacles ...
[107]
BLE – Bluetooth Low Energy to Tackle Ranges up to 50m
May 2, 2024 · Bluetooth LE uses the license-free 2.4 GHz band (ISM band) with 80 different 1 MHz channels between 2400 and 2483.5 MHz. ISM stands for ...
[108]
https://www.renesas.com/us/en/document/whp/defend-your-vehicle-against-relay-attack-defense-technology-against-latest-automotive-theft
[109]
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) Security and Privacy for IoT - eInfochips
Aug 4, 2023 · The Generic Access Protocol (GAP) for a BLE connection specifies two security modes and several security levels for each mode. There are four ...
[110]
[PDF] Relay Attacks on Passive Keyless Entry and Start Systems in ...
We demonstrate relay attacks on Passive Keyless Entry and Start (PKES) systems used in modern cars. We build two efficient and inexpensive attack ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[111]
August Wi-Fi Smart Lock | Secure Wi-Fi Lock | August Home
### Summary of August Wi-Fi Smart Lock Features
[112]
2019 Review August Smart Lock 3rd Gen - Postscapes
The August Smart Lock 3rd Generation gives you complete control of access to your home, in a sleek package. Unlike competitors, it fits on your existing lock.
[113]
Card Access System: Key Card Entry System & Door Locks - Avigilon
A key card access solution is a combination of card credentials, door card readers and locks that limit access to a building or space.
[114]
Are Smart Locks Worth the Investment? - RemoteLock
Jan 13, 2025 · For a property with 50 doors, switching to smart locks could save over $3,000 annually in rekeying costs alone. Factor in staff time saved by ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[115]
August Smart Lock Integrations | What Works With August?
### Summary of August.com Works With Integrations
[116]
Smart Lock Market Size, Share, Trends & Growth Report, 2032
The Smart Lock Market Size was valued at USD 2.38 Billion in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 8.71 Billion by 2032, at a CAGR of 15.58% during 2024-2032.
[117]
1010.1.9.8.1 Delayed egress locking system. - ICC Digital Codes
Delayed egress locking systems must deactivate upon fire/power loss, allow egress in 15 seconds (or 30 with exception), and have a sign stating "PUSH/PULL ...
[118]
Access Control Solutions for Hospitals and Healthcare Facilities - Kisi
Oct 21, 2024 · Therefore, hospitals deploy biometrics, using fingerprint or iris readers to allow entry into the restricted area. Biometric access control, ...
[119]
[PDF] Access Control Technologies Handbook - Homeland Security
Portals can be used singly or in sets to form mantraps as a delay device. Mantraps, as shown in Figure 3-6, are an arrangement of doors, usually forming a ...
[120]
[PDF] Physical Security Design Manual for Mission Critical Facilities
components, such as card readers, keypads, biometrics, and electromagnetic locks and ... doors, walls, and windows meeting a UL 752 Level 3 standard. 3.3.2 ...
[121]
OnGuard: Physical Access Control System | LenelS2
LenelS2's OnGuard™ physical access control provides an integrated and customizable security management experience. Scalable and easy to integrate.Missing: 1000 | Show results with:1000
[122]
[PDF] Security Series Panels
□ Support for 130 Doors (In/Out Readers for Each Door). □ Support for up to 32,000 Access Levels (Up to 128 per badge). □ 255 Holidays with grouping, 250 ...
[123]
Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007
[110th Congress Public Law 53] [From the U.S. Government Printing Office] [[Page 265]] IMPLEMENTING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE 9/11 COMMISSION ACT OF 2007 ...
[124]
Why Keyless Entry Systems Make for the Best Door Locks - Vivint
Aug 20, 2024 · These systems not only eliminate the need for physical keys but also provide flexibility with remote access and granular permission settings.
[125]
https://www.keytracker.com/ultimate-guide-to-electronic-key-management-systems/
[126]
The Ultimate Guide to Electronic Key Management Systems
Sep 2, 2025 · The reduction in lost keys provides another crucial security benefit, with a comprehensive survey of 50 KeyTracker clients revealing an average ...
[127]
Smart homes under siege: Assessing the robustness of physical ...
This paper deploys several attacks using popular wireless attack vectors (ie, 433 MHz radio, Bluetooth, and RFID) against domestic smart security devices.
[128]
Electronic vs Mechanical Locks: Which is Better? - Visioneers
Key Differences Between Electronic and Mechanical Locks ; Security, Advanced encryption and access logs. Vulnerable to hacking or power failures. Resistant to ...Missing: UL EMP
[129]
[PDF] Mechanical vs. Electronic Locks - Independent Security Evaluators
Oct 12, 2014 · Mechanical locks fall short compared to electronic locks in the three primary attack surfaces that the two types share: The lock, the key, and ...Missing: UL EMP
[130]
What's An EMP (And Can My Safe Lock Protect Against It)?
An EMP is a short burst of electromagnetic energy that can disable electronics. Sargent & Greanleaf and SecuRam locks are tested to protect against it.
[131]
How Secure Are Smart Locks? Biggest Smart Lock Security Issues
Dec 20, 2024 · Resolution: Regularly update the smart lock's firmware to patch vulnerabilities. ... Enable two-factor authentication (2FA) for added protection.Missing: mitigations CVE
[132]
Technical Advisory – Multiple vulnerabilities in Nuki smart locks ...
Jul 25, 2022 · The main goal was to look for vulnerabilities which could affect to the availability, integrity or confidentiality of the different devices, ...
[133]
Z-Wave vs. ZigBee - Security.org
Oct 28, 2025 · Z-Wave and ZigBee are two networks that connect smart home devices to each other as well as a mobile application. Here are the key similarities and differences.
[134]
Z-Wave Long Range: A Game Changer in Home Automation
In stockMay 29, 2024 · Z-Wave LR increases the transmission range between Z-Wave devices and has achieved up to 1.5 miles when using the Silicon Labs EFR32ZG23 device ...
[135]
https://www.theverge.com/news/822450/zigbee-4-0-suzi-smart-home-wireless-mesh-network-ble
[136]
Smart Locks For Google Home - Amazon.com
4.5 17K · 30-day returnsThis product is certified by Amazon to work with Alexa. This product can be controlled with your voice through Alexa-enabled devices such as Amazon Echo and ...
[137]
The Best Smart Locks of 2025 - Security.org
Sep 2, 2025 · Here we share popular smart locks that allow control with PIN touchscreens, a single tap, your voice, and mobile apps.
[138]
Yes, you can auto-unlock your smart lock with HomeKit ... - ZDNET
May 31, 2022 · Yes, you can auto-unlock your smart lock with HomeKit. Here's the workaround · 1. Open the HomeKit App and go to Automation. · 2. Tap on the Plus ...
[139]
Best Smart Locks of 2025: High-Tech Door Defenses - CNET
Oct 9, 2025 · These smart locks make it easy to bring your door online and manage it from anywhere. After testing the best smart locks on the market, ...
[140]
Yale Assure Lock 2 Plus with Wi-Fi and Apple Home Keys
In stock Rating 3.8 (52) - Apple Keys is also flawless on iPhone 15 Pro/Pro Max, iPhone 14, and the geofencing for auto unlocking is a solid feature as well! And if you have small ...
[141]
Varied delay when operating a Zigbee lock
Oct 26, 2023 · I've set up an automation to lock and unlock a door and sometimes it does it fairly quickly (1-2 second range) and sometimes it can take up ...Automation for the door lock - Home Assistant CommunityImprove my ZWave latency? - Z-Wave - Home Assistant CommunityMore results from community.home-assistant.ioMissing: smart latency
[142]
Smart Locks with Fire Alarm Integration: Enhancing Home Security ...
For example, if a fire alarm is activated, the smart lock will unlock to facilitate a safe evacuation. This integration can be achieved through protocols like ...Missing: scene latency
[143]
https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/smart-home/security/smart-locks/worldwide
[144]
Smart Lock Market Size And Share | Industry Report, 2030
The global smart lock market size was estimated at USD 2,770.1 million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 8,136.9 million by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 19.7 ...
[145]
Authentication of smart grid communications using quantum key ...
Jul 26, 2022 · Here we report the first use of quantum key distribution (QKD) keys in the authentication of smart grid communications.
[146]
Quantum Key Distribution - What Is QKD? How Does It Work?
May 15, 2023 · QKD is a method of distributing quantum-secure encryption keys between parties, and it's the backbone of quantum-safe networks. Rather than ...
[147]
Facial authentication based smart door lock system and anomaly ...
Proposed technique attained accuracy of 98%, mean average precision of 66%, False Acceptance Rate of 65%, False Rejection Rate 55%and mean square error of 53%.
[148]
AI-Powered Access Control & Analytics for Smarter Security
Feb 7, 2025 · AI enhances access control with real-time monitoring, anomaly detection, enhanced user authentication, and dynamic access permissions, ...<|separator|>
[149]
Step & turn—A novel bimodal behavioral biometric-based user ...
We design and develop a prototype of Step & Turn by exploiting two natural human behaviors: single footstep and hand-movement to authenticate the users.<|control11|><|separator|>
[150]
How does a biometric door lock work? - Keyplus
Jun 16, 2025 · Behavioral biometrics: Analyzing walking patterns or typing rhythms. Palm vein recognition: Using unique vein patterns under the skin. ...
[151]
How Do Smart Locks Get Power: 7 Types of Power - Eufy
Jul 10, 2025 · Features: Rechargeable smart locks use built-in rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, which can be charged via a USB cable or other ways. These ...Missing: standalone | Show results with:standalone
[152]
SmartBLock: a smart lock protocol over the Bitcoin blockchain
Jul 30, 2025 · This paper introduces “SmartBLock”, a novel protocol that integrates smart lock management with the Bitcoin blockchain.
[153]
HEALICs: Self-HEALing Mixed-Signal Integrated Circuits - DARPA
The technologies developed under this program also have the potential to significantly enhance the long-term reliability of DoD electronic systems. HEALICs ...Missing: 2020 | Show results with:2020
[154]
DARPA wants to create 'self-healing' firmware that can respond and ...
Jan 30, 2025 · DARPA wants to create 'self-healing' firmware that can respond and recover from cyberattacks. The agency's Red-C program seeks to build new ...Missing: 2020 | Show results with:2020