Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Error message

An error message is a system-generated notification in that interrupts the user's with software or to alert them of a problem that has already occurred, such as an incomplete operation, incompatible input, or system failure, often including an explanation of the cause and guidance for resolution. In user interfaces, error messages serve to communicate issues clearly and constructively, helping users understand what went wrong without assigning blame, thereby facilitating quick recovery and reducing frustration. Effective error messages are essential for , as poor ones—such as vague phrases like "An error occurred"—can hinder problem-solving and erode trust in the system. They differ from warnings, which preempt potential issues, by focusing on post-occurrence remediation. Key principles for designing error messages emphasize brevity, specificity, and user-centered language: messages should describe the problem, its cause, and a practical solution, using plain terms free of technical jargon. is crucial, with placement near the error source, high-contrast indicators like bold red text, and formats varying by severity—such as inline banners for minor input errors or dialogs for faults. Best practices also include preserving user data to avoid re-entry, offering validation to prevent errors, and maintaining a positive tone to encourage resolution. Common types of error messages in computing include those related to file operations (e.g., "File not found"), permissions (e.g., "Access denied"), and input validation (e.g., "Invalid email format"), which appear across operating systems like Windows and applications like web forms. In programming environments, compiler or runtime error messages guide developers, often detailing syntax issues or exceptions, though they must balance detail for experts with accessibility for novices. Over time, advancements in user experience design, influenced by heuristics from the 1980s, have shifted error messages toward more helpful and empathetic communication.

Overview

Definition

An error message is a notification provided by software, , or systems to indicate an abnormal , such as incorrect or another operational problem, often including a description of the issue and potential resolution steps. This communication serves to alert users or operators to deviations from normal functioning, enabling diagnosis and correction. Error messages differ from , which signal potential risks or non-critical issues that may lead to errors if unaddressed but do not halt operations, and from status messages, which convey routine updates or changes in application state without indicating failure. For instance, a might advise of suboptimal input, whereas a status message reports like file upload completion. Error messages appear across various computing contexts, including operating systems that report system-level failures, applications displaying user input issues, browsers indicating loading or connection problems, systems signaling device malfunctions, and network protocols conveying transmission errors. These notifications ensure timely awareness in diverse environments, from personal to industrial controls. Basic classifications of errors triggering such messages include syntax errors, which violate language rules during ; runtime errors, occurring during program execution due to unforeseen conditions; and hardware faults, such as or malfunctions detected by system monitors.

Purpose and Importance

Error messages serve as critical notifications in software systems, alerting users to the occurrence of problems that disrupt normal operation, such as invalid inputs or system failures. Their primary purposes include providing diagnostic information to guide resolution, preventing the propagation of errors that could lead to further issues, and details for developers to analyze and address underlying causes. For instance, by clearly indicating the nature of an error and suggesting corrective actions, these messages enable users to troubleshoot independently, thereby maintaining workflow continuity. In , error messages play a pivotal role in enhancing efficiency and ensuring compliance with standards, such as those outlined in ISO 9241-110, which emphasize error prevention and recovery to support effective human-system interaction. They contribute to system reliability by facilitating early issue detection, with studies estimating that and error handling account for 50-75% of software project budgets, underscoring their economic importance. Moreover, well-designed error messages reduce support costs by empowering users to self-resolve issues, potentially lowering helpdesk interactions and associated expenses. Error messages are integral to broader error handling mechanisms that preserve system integrity, including constructs in programming languages. In , try-catch blocks allow developers to intercept and manage exceptions—events that disrupt normal program flow—ensuring graceful degradation rather than crashes. Similarly, employs try-except statements to catch and handle exceptions, them for post-analysis while preventing unchecked error escalation. These features not only mitigate risks to but also enable robust for forensic review. Regarding accessibility, error messages must use clear, compatible with screen readers to ensure usability for individuals with disabilities, aligning with (WCAG) that require identifiable and comprehensible error identification. This inclusivity prevents exclusion of users with cognitive or visual impairments, promoting equitable interaction and compliance with standards like WCAG 2.1 Success Criterion 3.3.1.

Types

Common Error Messages

Common error messages serve as fundamental indicators of issues in environments, alerting users to problems ranging from unavailability to limitations. These messages are ubiquitous across browsers, operating systems, and applications, often sharing similar triggers and resolutions despite platform variations. Understanding their meanings helps users diagnose and address faults efficiently, reducing frustration and downtime. One of the most recognized universal examples is the "Not Found" error, a standard client-side response in protocols indicating that the cannot locate the requested , whether a webpage, image, or endpoint. Common triggers include mistyped s, deleted or relocated resources without proper redirection, or misconfigurations such as incorrect paths. To resolve it, users should verify the for spelling errors, search the for the content, or contact the administrator if the issue persists; developers can implement custom 404 pages with navigation aids or use status code 410 for permanently removed items. In file systems, the "File not found" or equivalent "No such file or directory" message appears when an attempts to a nonexistent , a staple across operating systems from Windows to variants. Triggers typically involve incorrect file paths, accidental deletions, or typos in commands and scripts. Basic fixes include double-checking the path syntax, confirming the file's existence via listings (e.g., using in or in Windows), or restoring from backups if the file was removed. This error is encountered frequently in everyday tasks like running executables or loading documents, contributing to common user scenarios in system logs. "Out of memory" errors signal that an application or has exhausted available , preventing allocation for new operations and potentially leading to crashes or slowdowns. Primary causes encompass memory leaks in software, running multiple resource-intensive programs simultaneously, or limitations like insufficient installed . Resolutions involve closing unused applications to free resources, optimizing code to reduce usage (for developers), or adjusting such as increasing /pagefile size; in severe cases, upgrading is recommended. These errors are widespread in multitasking scenarios, with analyses showing they arise from both application-specific issues and overall system pressure. "Access denied" messages denote permission restrictions, blocking read, write, or execute actions on files, folders, or system resources due to inadequate user rights. Common causes include file encryption (e.g., via Encrypting File System in Windows), insufficient group memberships, or protective policies like read-only attributes. To fix, users can run the operation as an administrator, modify permissions through file properties (e.g., right-click > Properties > Security in Windows), or decrypt files if applicable; system administrators may need to adjust ACLs or ownership. This error is routine in multi-user environments, often logged as a top permission-related issue in OS diagnostics. These messages exhibit cross-platform prevalence, adapting to each system's conventions while conveying similar concepts. In Windows, critical failures like memory or driver issues trigger the (BSOD), displaying stop codes such as "MEMORY_MANAGEMENT" for RAM faults or "IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL" for interrupt conflicts, often requiring hardware checks or driver updates. macOS equivalents include kernel panics, presenting messages like "Your computer restarted because of a problem" due to hardware faults or incompatible software, resolvable by resetting the System Management Controller or booting in . In Linux distributions, errors mirror Unix standards, such as "Permission denied" (error code 13) for access issues or "Out of memory: Killed process" when the OOM killer terminates resource-hogging tasks, commonly viewed via dmesg or /var/log/messages for debugging. These messages underscore their role in routine computing.

Domain-Specific Error Messages

Domain-specific error messages are customized notifications that arise within particular technical domains, incorporating specialized terminology and contexts to aid users in diagnosing issues unique to that field. These messages differ from general errors by leveraging , such as database locking mechanisms or protocols, to provide actionable insights tailored to the . In database systems, error messages often reference concurrency issues like s, where transactions conflict over locks. For instance, MySQL issues the message "ERROR 1213 (40001): found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction" when detects a deadlock and rolls back the affected transaction to resolve the impasse. Similarly, in networking protocols, / stacks generate "Connection timed out" errors (corresponding to errno ETIMEDOUT in implementations) when a SYN packet receives no response within the retry timeout period, typically after 3 minutes of retransmissions. In mobile applications, location services may display "GPS signal lost" notifications when the device fails to maintain fixes, as seen in Android's , prompting users to check environmental factors like obstructions or permissions. For video games, save operations can fail with messages like "Save Data Corrupt" on platforms such as , indicating file integrity issues during storage writes that require restoration from backups. These messages adapt to their contexts by blending technical with user-friendly explanations to balance precision and accessibility. In programming, a "" error alerts developers to memory writes exceeding allocated bounds, often manifesting as a runtime in C but flagged explicitly by tools like AddressSanitizer with messages such as "heap-buffer-overflow WRITE of size X". This informs low-level debugging while suggesting mitigations like bounds checking, making it suitable for experienced users without overwhelming novices. Variations occur across development tools and services, reflecting their operational scopes. errors in C++, such as GCC's "undefined to 'function_name'" during linking, indicate missing object files or libraries, guiding through proper build configurations. In web APIs, RESTful services return HTTP 429 "Too Many Requests" when clients exceed rate limits, including headers like Retry-After to specify wait times, as defined in RFC 6585. Modern frameworks like use error boundaries—class components that catch rendering errors in child trees—to display descriptive fallbacks, such as "Something went wrong," instead of crashing the application, with optional logging via componentDidCatch. The evolution of these messages has shifted from cryptic numeric codes in early systems, such as those used in compilers of the , to descriptive natural-language text in contemporary tools, driven by emphasizing readability factors such as reduced and clear . This progression, spanning over 50 years of and interpreter diagnostics, prioritizes user comprehension to minimize time, as evidenced in studies analyzing message effectiveness for novices.

Design and Format

Structure and Components

Error messages in computing systems are typically composed of several core components that provide structured information about failures or issues. The error code serves as a unique identifier, often numeric or alphanumeric, to pinpoint the specific problem; for example, in HTTP responses, a three-digit status code like 500 indicates an internal server error, while in POSIX-compliant systems, symbolic constants such as EACCES represent permission denied errors. Accompanying the code is descriptive text, known as the reason-phrase in HTTP or retrieved via functions like strerror() in POSIX, which offers a human-readable explanation of the issue, such as "Internal Server Error" or "Permission denied." Severity levels further classify the error's impact, distinguishing between fatal errors that halt execution and recoverable ones that allow continuation; in Windows COM interfaces, a high-order bit in the HRESULT code denotes success or failure severity, and in syslog formats, a numerical severity value from 0 (emergency) to 7 (debug) is encoded within the priority field. Suggested actions complete the core structure, guiding users or systems on resolution, such as a "Retry" button in graphical interfaces or inline instructions in log entries. In graphical interfaces (GUIs), messages incorporate visual and auditory elements to enhance noticeability and accessibility. Icons, such as exclamation marks, signal the presence of an , often paired with bold text to draw without relying solely on color for users with visual impairments. These appear in pop-up dialogs for critical issues or inline banners for less severe ones, ensuring the overlays relevant content without obscuring input. Auditory cues, like beeps, provide non-visual , though their use has diminished in modern systems to avoid annoyance in shared environments. In command-line interfaces (CLIs), such as those using , messages follow a structured format with a header, , , and free-form text, facilitating machine parsing and without visual embellishments. Localization ensures error messages adapt to diverse users, supporting multiple languages and cultural contexts through (i18n) practices. Standards like enable consistent display of text across scripts, preventing garbled characters in non-Latin languages. Cultural adaptations adjust phrasing for politeness or idiomatic expression, while i18n libraries handle translations; for instance, ICU's MessageFormat supports locale-specific pluralization and gender in error descriptions. Technically, error messages are encoded as , often with placeholders for dynamic content insertion to maintain efficiency and . Placeholders like "%s file not found" or "{0} not found" allow substitution of variables (e.g., filenames) at runtime, integrated via i18n libraries such as ICU, which manage resources separately from for easy localization. This approach avoids hardcoding sensitive details, briefly referencing by omitting paths or internals that could expose vulnerabilities.

Best Practices

Effective error messages prioritize clarity and brevity to ensure users quickly understand and resolve issues without frustration. Guidelines recommend using simple, human-readable language that avoids technical unless it is essential for the , such as in specialized software where terms like "" are standard. Messages should be limited to one or two sentences, precisely describing the problem— for instance, instead of a vague "An error occurred," specify "The file exceeds the 5MB upload limit." This approach aligns with established heuristics that emphasize error prevention and recognition, reducing and improving task completion rates. To empower users, error messages must provide actionable next steps and maintain a positive, non-blaming tone, framing issues as system feedback rather than user faults. For example, a message like "Your internet connection appears to be interrupted—please check it and try submitting again" guides resolution without phrases such as "invalid input" that imply carelessness. Constructive suggestions, such as offering to auto-correct or linking to help resources, further enable quick fixes, as seen in form validations that preserve user data and propose alternatives. This user-centered strategy not only boosts satisfaction but also minimizes abandonment. Testing and iteration are crucial for refining error messages, involving methods like to compare variations and usability studies to gather direct . Developers and designers should incorporate error-tracking tools such as , which logs occurrences and user interactions for analysis, or to monitor drop-off points tied to errors. By applying a scoring rubric that evaluates visibility, tone, and helpfulness, teams can iterate based on real-user data, ensuring messages evolve with observed pain points— for example, adapting generic alerts to context-specific ones after identifying frequent triggers. This iterative process, rooted in empirical UX research, leads to measurable improvements in error . Inclusivity requires error messages to comply with (WCAG), particularly Success Criterion 3.3.1, which mandates that automatically detected input errors be identified and described in text accessible to screen readers. Messages must include suggestions for correction where feasible, per WCAG 3.3.3, such as "Enter a valid like [email protected]" to aid users with cognitive or visual impairments. For web interfaces, incorporate alt text for error icons (e.g., "Warning: Invalid date") and ensure compatibility with voice-over tools by associating descriptions with form fields via attributes. These practices enhance usability for diverse audiences, preventing exclusion and aligning with legal standards.

Security Implications

Vulnerabilities in Error Messages

Error messages pose significant security risks by potentially disclosing sensitive information about the underlying system, enabling attackers to gain insights that facilitate further exploitation. These vulnerabilities often arise from verbose or unfiltered outputs that reveal internal details such as file paths, software versions, database schemas, or even source code snippets. For instance, stack traces in PHP applications can expose the physical file structure of the server, PHP version, and exception details, providing attackers with a map of the application's internals. Such disclosures aid in reconnaissance during common exploits, where attackers probe for weaknesses like . Verbose error messages, such as those stating "Invalid query" accompanied by query fragments, can hint at the database structure or syntax, allowing attackers to refine payloads for successful injection. This information leakage transforms error handling from a debugging tool into a for targeted attacks, as attackers use the details to enumerate vulnerabilities without direct access. In the Top 10 2025, these issues are classified under A02:2025 – Security Misconfiguration and the new A10:2025 – Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions, where improper configurations and error handling permit detailed error messages like stack traces to be returned to users, exposing technology versions, implementation details, and sensitive data such as database schemas or user information, amplifying the risk of broader breaches. Real-world incidents highlight these dangers, particularly in early web servers where default 500 Internal Server Error responses often leaked internal addresses or server configurations, enabling attackers to map network topologies or identify misconfigurations for lateral movement. Similarly, unhandled exceptions in production environments have routinely exposed paths and versions, as seen in various setups, underscoring the persistent threat even in modern systems.

Mitigation Strategies

One effective approach to mitigating vulnerabilities in error messages, such as information exposure through detailed stack traces, involves environment-based handling where generic messages are displayed to end-users in production environments, while detailed diagnostics are restricted to internal logs accessible only by administrators. For instance, applications can be configured to output a simple message like "An error occurred" to users, ensuring that sensitive details like database queries or file paths are logged securely without public exposure. This separation maintains operational security by preventing attackers from gaining insights into system internals during live deployments. Configuration adjustments in popular frameworks further enhance secure error handling by disabling verbose outputs in production. In .NET applications, developers should set the customErrors mode to "On" or "RemoteOnly" in the web.config file to suppress detailed error pages for remote users, displaying custom error pages instead. Similarly, for with , debug modes must be avoided, and custom error-handling middleware should be implemented to catch exceptions and return sanitized responses, such as using a global handler that logs full traces internally but responds with minimal information to clients. These practices prevent inadvertent leaks from development tools or unhandled exceptions. Adhering to established standards like CWE-209 from provides a foundational guideline for error message generation, recommending that messages contain only minimal, audience-appropriate details while logging comprehensive information securely to avoid persistence of sensitive data in accessible outputs. Tools such as the errorhandler middleware in can be employed judiciously in development but disabled in production, favoring custom implementations that align with these guidelines. To balance with , techniques like correlation ID-based logging allow users to receive a safe error summary accompanied by a , which developers can then use via secure portals to retrieve full error traces from protected logs. This method enables efficient without compromising sensitive information, as the ID correlates request flows across systems while ensuring logs remain inaccessible to unauthorized parties.

Historical and Cultural Impact

Notable Examples

One of the most enduring error messages in computing history is the poorly translated phrase "All your base are belong to us," which appeared in the opening cutscene of the 1989 Japanese video game Zero Wing and gained prominence in its 1991 European release. This Engrish line, stemming from a literal translation of the Japanese script, became an internet meme in the late 1990s through Photoshop edits and video remixes, symbolizing the humorous pitfalls of localization in early gaming. In the 1990s, Microsoft Windows users frequently encountered the generic error dialog "This program has performed an illegal operation and will be shut down," a response to general protection faults in Windows 95 and 98 that often provided little diagnostic detail beyond suggesting contact with the software vendor. This message, while technically referring to memory access violations rather than criminality, contributed to user frustration and became a cultural shorthand for unreliable software in the pre-crash-reporting era. The HTTP status code 418 "I'm a ," defined in RFC 2324 (1998) and reaffirmed in the April Fools' RFC 7168 (2014), originated as a satirical element in the Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol, where servers refuse coffee-brewing requests by declaring themselves teapots. This whimsical error code highlights the IETF's tradition of humor in standards documentation and has been playfully implemented in web servers to denote absurd client requests. The bug, or millennium bug, exemplified widespread cultural anxiety over date misinterpretation, where two-digit year representations risked systems parsing "00" as 1900 instead of 2000, potentially triggering errors in financial, governmental, and infrastructural software. This fear, amplified by media coverage in the late , led to global expenditures exceeding $300 billion on remediation efforts and heightened public awareness of software vulnerabilities, though actual disruptions on January 1, 2000, were minimal due to preemptive fixes. Error messages related to date overflows during testing phases further fueled doomsday scenarios in popular discourse. For instance, the phrase "All your base are belong to us" evolved into a popular , inspiring on that critiques technology while fostering community humor. The Y2K bug, meanwhile, became a cultural punchline in media and public discourse, demonstrating how potential errors can transcend technical contexts to influence online and . The Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) in Windows, first prominent in Windows NT (1993) and refined through the 2000s, prompted significant user experience improvements; by Windows 10 (2015), it incorporated QR codes linking to diagnostic tools and error reporting, reducing opacity and aiding troubleshooting over the original cryptic stop codes. Similarly, macOS kernel panic screens, introduced in Mac OS X 10.0 (2001) with verbose text dumps and evolving to the gray "panic" overlay in 10.2 Jaguar (2002), influenced Apple's shift toward more user-friendly restarts and crash logs in later versions, emphasizing accessibility in error handling. These cases underscore how notorious errors have driven industry-wide adoption of clearer, actionable feedback mechanisms.

Evolution in Computing

In the early era of from the to the , error handling relied heavily on punch-card systems and mainframe computers, where messages were typically cryptic numeric or alphanumeric codes output to operators via console lights, printouts, or teletypewriters due to the absence of interactive user interfaces. For instance, the , introduced in 1964, used system completion codes like 0C7 (indicating a data exception) and wait state codes displayed on control panels, requiring specialized operator training to interpret and resolve issues such as hardware faults or invalid instructions. These codes, often referred to as "SOCK" errors in OS/360 environments (e.g., S0C1 for operation exceptions), prioritized machine efficiency over user comprehension, reflecting the batch-processing paradigm where users submitted jobs remotely and awaited results without real-time feedback. The shift to graphical user interfaces in the 1980s and 1990s marked a transition to more accessible error messaging through dialog boxes and natural language descriptions, beginning with pioneering systems like the Xerox Alto in 1973. The Alto's software, such as the Press File (FrP) editor, displayed error messages directly in a user window for issues like formatting failures, integrating them into the bitmap display for immediate visibility without halting the system entirely. This approach influenced commercial GUIs, notably the Apple Macintosh launched in 1984, which introduced icon-based alert dialogs, including the infamous "bomb" icon for system errors, accompanied by explanatory text like "Sorry, a system error occurred" to guide non-expert users toward basic troubleshooting steps such as restarting.) From the 2000s onward, the rise of web and standardized error communication, particularly through HTTP status codes defined in RFC 2616 for HTTP/1.1 in 1999, which provided numeric codes (e.g., 404 Not Found, 500 Internal Server Error) with descriptive phrases for server-client interactions. These codes enabled consistent error propagation across distributed systems, allowing browsers and apps to display user-friendly interpretations, such as "Page not found" instead of raw numerics. In mobile and web applications, adaptive messaging has evolved to incorporate for personalization, analyzing user context to suggest tailored resolutions, like rephrasing inputs for failed searches. Looking to future trends, predictive error handling leverages to anticipate and preempt issues, as seen in tools like in , which uses to detect syntax errors or typos and auto-suggest fixes in , such as correcting "cont x = 5" to "const x = 5". Similarly, voice assistants like Apple's deliver contextual error responses, such as "Sorry, I didn't understand that—can you try again?" via spoken feedback, adapting to user history and environmental factors to minimize frustration in hands-free scenarios.

References

  1. [1]
    Error-Message Guidelines - NN/G
    May 14, 2023 · Error message: A system-generated interruption to the user's workflow that informs the user of an incomplete, incompatible, or undesirable ...
  2. [2]
    Error Messages in Windows 7 - Win32 apps | Microsoft Learn
    Feb 7, 2022 · Error messages in Windows 7 alert users of problems that have already occurred. In contrast, warning messages alert users of conditions that might cause ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] ISO/IEC/IEEE 24765-2010(E), Systems and software engineering
    Dec 15, 2010 · ... definition that is suitable for general application. In those ... error message. 1. a message that the application gives when incorrect ...
  4. [4]
    Understanding Success Criterion 4.1.3: Status Messages | WAI - W3C
    Not all examples in the preceding general techniques use status messages to convey warnings or errors to users. A role of "alert" is only necessary where a ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] D ~&F~:¥.i~d f~
    on Human-Computer Interaction, eds. Donald A ... No one seems to know what ~his message means ... Computer professionals can improve the quality of error messages ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Introduction to Computers, Programs, and Java
    Programming Errors: syntax, runtime and logical errors/bugs. 2. Page 3. (c) ... • Internally, computer software is used to convert decimal numbers into ...
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    18.1. Hardware Errors and Error Sources - UEFI Forum
    A hardware error is a recorded event of a hardware malfunction. Error sources alert OSPM to errors, such as processor machine check exceptions.
  9. [9]
    On Designing Programming Error Messages for Novices
    May 8, 2021 · Programming error messages play an important role in learning to program. The cycle of program input and error message response completes a ...
  10. [10]
    User Notification | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) | W3C
    In particular, error messages should be easy to understand and should provide simple instructions on how they can be resolved. Success messages are also ...Overall feedback · Listing errors · In-line feedback · After submit
  11. [11]
    ISO's dialogue principles (2020) - DialogDesign
    The ISO standard 9241-110 from 2020 defines seven dialogue principles: #1: Suitability for the user's tasks #2: Self-descriptiveness#2: Self-Descriptiveness · #4: Learnability · #6: Use Error Robustness
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Lesson: Exceptions (The Java™ Tutorials > Essential Java Classes)
    This section covers how to catch and handle exceptions. The discussion includes the try, catch, and finally blocks, as well as chained exceptions and logging.What Is an Exception? · The catch Blocks · Catching and Handling · The try Block
  15. [15]
    8. Errors and Exceptions — Python 3.14.0 documentation
    The most common pattern for handling Exception is to print or log the exception and then re-raise it (allowing a caller to handle the exception as well):.8. Errors And Exceptions · 8.2. Exceptions · 8.5. Exception Chaining
  16. [16]
    Usable and Accessible Form Validation and Error Recovery - WebAIM
    Jan 13, 2021 · The first step is to inform the user that an error is present. This error message should be visible, informative, and directly accessible. One ...
  17. [17]
    Landscape of API Traffic - The Cloudflare Blog
    Jan 26, 2022 · Successful response codes (200, 201, 301 and 302) account for 91% of HTML and 97% of API requests, while 4XX error codes (like 400, 403, 404) ...
  18. [18]
    Troubleshoot Out of Memory issues - ASP.NET - Microsoft Learn
    Feb 11, 2025 · This article helps you troubleshoot Out of Memory errors in ASP.NET. ... The following information outlines common causes of OOM conditions and ...
  19. [19]
    Bug Checks (Stop Code Errors) - Windows drivers - Microsoft Learn
    Jul 23, 2025 · The bug check screen displays the stop code error, such as CRITICAL_PROCESS_DIED. When the module name of the currently executing code is ...
  20. [20]
    Frequency distribution of error messages - ACM Digital Library
    Which programming error messages are the most common? We investigate this question, motivated by writing error explanations for novices.Missing: studies prevalence
  21. [21]
    [PDF] The Landscape of Text-Based Programming Error Message Research
    ABSTRACT. Diagnostic messages generated by compilers and interpreters such as syntax error messages have been researched for over half of a century.Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Error Message: Save Data Corrupt / Save File Corrupt
    The information in this article can help you when the system is displaying the error message "Save Data Corrupt" or "Save File Corrupt."
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    Buffer Overflow Attack - OWASP Foundation
    Buffer overflow errors are characterized by the overwriting of memory fragments of the process, which should have never been modified intentionally or ...
  26. [26]
    RFC 6585 - Additional HTTP Status Codes - IETF Datatracker
    429 Too Many Requests The 429 status code indicates that the user has sent too many requests in a given amount of time ("rate limiting"). The response ...Missing: exceeded | Show results with:exceeded
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    On Compiler Error Messages: What They Say and What They Mean
    Sep 29, 2010 · Programmers often encounter cryptic compiler error messages that are difficult to understand and thus difficult to resolve.
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    <errno.h>
    [E2BIG]: Argument list too long. [EACCES]: Permission denied. [EADDRINUSE]: Address in use. [EADDRNOTAVAIL]: Address not ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    Structure of COM Error Codes - Win32 apps - Microsoft Learn
    Feb 2, 2021 · COM error codes have a high-order bit for success/failure, a facility field, and a code field. The high bit is 0 for success, 1 for failure. ...
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Error Message Guidelines - Win32 apps - Microsoft Learn
    Jul 14, 2025 · Error messages should state what happened, why, and what the user can do. Avoid jargon, use simple sentences, and avoid making the user feel at ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  35. [35]
    Designing Better Error Messages UX - Smashing Magazine
    Aug 25, 2022 · Let's explore when error messages should live above input fields and why toast error messages are usually not a very good idea.Never Rely On Red Color... · Never Cover User's Input # · Wrapping Up #<|control11|><|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Auditory Feedback - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Auditory feedback refers to a type of sensory feedback commonly used in virtual environment systems. It involves the use of sound to provide spatial and ...
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
    Internationalization | ICU Documentation
    The standard process for creating globalized software includes “internationalization”, which covers generic coding and design issues, and “localization”.
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design - NN/G
    Apr 24, 1994 · Error messages should be expressed in plain language (no error codes), precisely indicate the problem, and constructively suggest a solution.Jakob Nielsen · Flat Design · User Control and Freedom · Visibility of System Status
  41. [41]
    10 Design Guidelines for Reporting Errors in Forms - NN/G
    Feb 3, 2019 · Summary: Help users recover from errors by clearly identifying the problems and allowing users to access and correct fields easily.
  42. [42]
    How to Improve Validation Errors – Baymard Institute
    Dec 14, 2023 · With better error tracking, sites can start by implementing “Adaptive Error Messages” for the two groups of validation errors that a) occur most ...
  43. [43]
    An Error Messages Scoring Rubric - NN/G
    Jun 18, 2023 · The error message should be free of spelling or grammar mistakes and should clearly communicate the problem in terms that users can understand.Visibility Guidelines · Low-Scoring Example... · High-Scoring Example: J...
  44. [44]
    Usability Testing of Inline Form Validation - Baymard
    Jan 9, 2024 · In practice, inline validation introduces several benefits over traditional error messages presented upon form submission. First, users are ...
  45. [45]
    Understanding Success Criterion 3.3.1: Error Identification | WAI - W3C
    The error must be indicated in text. Whether or not an error message provides users with sufficient information about the nature of the error, and what they ...Missing: warning | Show results with:warning
  46. [46]
    Understanding Success Criterion 3.3.3: Error Suggestion | WAI - W3C
    The intent of this Success Criterion is to ensure that users receive appropriate suggestions for correction of an input error if it is possible.
  47. [47]
    Stack Trace Disclosure (PHP) - Invicti
    An attacker can obtain information such as: PHP version. Physical file path of PHP files. Information about the generated exception and possibly source code ...
  48. [48]
    Testing for Stack Traces - WSTG - v4.1 | OWASP Foundation
    Stack traces are not vulnerabilities by themselves, but they often reveal information that is interesting to an attacker.
  49. [49]
    Understanding SQL Injection - Cisco
    ... SQL errors will greatly aid attackers in successfully exploiting a SQL injection vulnerability. The following example is an overly verbose error message:.
  50. [50]
    Lab: Visible error-based SQL injection | Web Security Academy
    In the response, notice the verbose error message. This discloses the full SQL query, including the value of your cookie. It also explains that you have an ...Missing: reconnaissance | Show results with:reconnaissance
  51. [51]
    A05 Security Misconfiguration - OWASP Top 10:2025 RC1
    Scenario #3: The application server's configuration allows detailed error messages, e.g., stack traces, to be returned to users. This potentially exposes ...
  52. [52]
    CWE-209: Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive ...
    If an exception related to SQL is handled by the catch, then the output might contain sensitive information such as SQL query structure or private information.<|control11|><|separator|>
  53. [53]
    IIS leaks internal IP with an HTTP/1.0 request without a Host header
    Sep 22, 2021 · A security scan of our IIS 10 server revealed that it's disclosing the internal IP address of the server via the Location header when a request is made to a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Error Handling - OWASP Cheat Sheet Series
    Issues at the error handling level can reveal a lot of information about the target and can also be used to identify injection points in the target's features.Introduction · Context · Objective · Proposition
  55. [55]
    CustomErrorsMode Enum (System.Web.Configuration)
    The CustomErrorsMode enumerates the values you can use when setting the Mode property. These values define whether custom errors are enabled, disabled, or ...
  56. [56]
    Error handling - Express.js
    Express comes with a built-in error handler that takes care of any errors that might be encountered in the app. This default error-handling middleware function ...
  57. [57]
    Correlation IDs - Engineering Fundamentals Playbook
    Aug 22, 2024 · A Correlation ID is a unique identifier that is added to the very first interaction (incoming request) to identify the context and is passed to all components.
  58. [58]
    Investigate Issues with Ease by Adding a Correlation ID to your API
    This blog post describes how a correlation ID can be leveraged to easily find logs for further investigation.
  59. [59]
    Internetting – a user's guide: #2 All your base are belong to us
    #2 All your base are belong to us. How an obscure, badly translated Japanese video game sparked a Photoshopping craze – and became web history. theguardian.com.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    The Thirteen Greatest Error Messages of All Time - Technologizer
    Sep 18, 2008 · So I rounded up a baker's dozen of the most important error messages in computing history – from Does Not Compute to Abort, Retry, Fail to ...
  61. [61]
    RFC 7168 - The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea ...
    Apr 1, 2014 · The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA) (RFC 7168, April 2014) ... 418 I'm a Teapot . . . . . . . . . . .
  62. [62]
    Y2K bug | Definition, Hysteria, & Facts - Britannica
    Oct 16, 2025 · These computers could recognize “98” as “1998” but would be unable to recognize “00” as “2000,” perhaps interpreting it to mean 1900. Many ...Missing: misinterpretation | Show results with:misinterpretation
  63. [63]
    How Americans prepared for Y2K - NPR
    Dec 28, 2024 · At midnight on Dec. 31, a misinterpretation of "00" in the year 2000 might cause widespread errors leading to mass panic. The Clinton ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  64. [64]
    'All people could do was hope the nerds would fix it': the global ...
    Dec 28, 2024 · “Amid the hype and excitement around computers in the 90s, suddenly this is the dark side.” Midnight. 1 January 2000. 01/01/00. As the Queen and ...Missing: misinterpretation | Show results with:misinterpretation
  65. [65]
    So Long, Blue Screen of Death. Amazingly, You'll Be Missed - WIRED
    Jun 27, 2025 · After a long and storied history, the BSOD is being replaced. WIRED takes a trip down memory lane to wave goodbye to the iconic screen we all love to hate.
  66. [66]
    A brief history of kernel panics - The Eclectic Light Company
    Jul 27, 2024 · With Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar came the well-known panic display, in which a transparent grey curtain dropped down the display to reveal a multi- ...Missing: 2000s | Show results with:2000s
  67. [67]
    [PDF] IBM System/360 Operating System: Messages and Codes
    This publication lists the system completion codes, wait state codes, and messages produced by' IBM-supplied components of the operating system. The causes of ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] ALTO - . USER'S - Bitsavers.org
    When FrP detects an error, it displays an error message in the User window. If the error is fatal,. FrP waits for you to type any character and then aborts ...
  69. [69]
    System error dialog box - Apple Wiki | Fandom
    The system error dialog box appears when an unrecoverable error occurs in classic Mac OS, triggered by the error handler and showing a bomb icon.
  70. [70]
    RFC 2616 - Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1 - IETF Datatracker
    An origin server SHOULD return the status code 405 (Method Not Allowed) if the method is known by the origin server but not allowed for the requested ...RFC 2068 · RFC 7230 · RFC 7235
  71. [71]
    Code completions with GitHub Copilot in VS Code
    Copilot helps with simple mistakes like typos. It'll suggest fixes where letters are missing or swapped, like cont x = 5 or conts x = 5 , which should've been ...Inline suggestions · Next edit suggestions · Enable or disable code...
  72. [72]