Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ethnic hatred

Ethnic hatred refers to the profound and often visceral animosity directed at individuals or collectives defined by their ethnic affiliation, encompassing negative stereotypes, dehumanization, and propensities for aggression that stem from evolved psychological adaptations favoring in-group cohesion amid out-group rivalry.^[1] This predisposition, observable across cultures and epochs, arises from ancestral conditions of intergroup competition over scarce resources, mates, and territory, where coalitional aggression enhanced reproductive fitness, particularly among males.^[2]^[3] Empirical analyses reveal its persistence in modern settings, frequently amplified by proximate triggers such as elite incitement of identity-based fears, institutional fragility, and socioeconomic pressures that heighten perceptions of zero-sum ethnic rivalries.^[4]^[5] While capable of fueling escalatory violence—from pogroms to large-scale ethnic conflicts—ethnic hatred also reflects adaptive realism in environments where ethnic boundaries correlate with differential threats, challenging narratives that frame it solely as irrational aberration rather than a baseline human response to group-level selection pressures.^[6]^[7]

Definition and Conceptual Framework

Core Definition

Ethnic hatred refers to intense emotional hostility and prejudice directed toward individuals or groups based on their perceived membership in an ethnic category, defined by shared elements such as common ancestry, cultural traditions, language, religion, or national origins.^[8] This animosity typically involves negative stereotypes, dehumanization, and a sense of existential threat to one's own ethnic in-group, distinguishing it from milder forms of bias through its potential to motivate collective aggression or exclusionary policies.^[9] Unlike personal enmities, ethnic hatred is inherently intergroup, amplifying individual resentments via social categorization that frames the out-group as inherently inferior or dangerous.^[10] Scholars emphasize that ethnic hatred often emerges not from immutable biological traits but from constructed perceptions of ethnic difference, which can be exacerbated by political elites or media through narratives of historical grievances or resource competition.^[11] Empirical studies indicate it correlates with elevated rates of intergroup violence when paired with opportunity structures like weak institutions, as seen in cases where elite manipulation fans latent tensions into mass mobilization.^[12] While overlapping with racism—particularly when ethnic boundaries align with racial ones—ethnic hatred more explicitly incorporates cultural and ancestral markers, allowing for fluidity in group definitions over time.^[13] This distinction underscores its basis in social identity rather than solely phenotypic traits, though both phenomena share psychological roots in in-group favoritism and out-group derogation.^[14] Ethnic hatred is differentiated from racism in that the former centers on animosity toward groups defined by cultural, linguistic, historical, and ancestral affinities—elements of ethnicity—rather than primarily on biological or phenotypic traits emphasized in racial categorizations.^[15] Although the concepts frequently overlap, particularly when ethnic boundaries align with racial perceptions, ethnic hatred manifests distinctly in intra-racial conflicts, such as those among Slavic groups in the Bosnian wars, where cultural and historical narratives fueled hostility despite shared racial heritage.^[16] Racism, by contrast, often incorporates beliefs in inherent racial hierarchies, extending to systemic discrimination predicated on physical differences.^[14] In contrast to xenophobia, which involves fear or disdain directed at foreigners or perceived outsiders based on their foreign origin, ethnic hatred targets specific ethnic collectives regardless of national boundaries or immigration status.^[17] Xenophobia may arise from cultural unfamiliarity or economic competition with immigrants, but lacks the targeted ethnic animus seen in domestic intergroup rivalries, such as Hutu-Tutsi hostilities in Rwanda, where both groups shared national citizenship yet diverged along ethnic lines constructed through historical and social distinctions.^[18] This specificity underscores ethnic hatred's roots in perceived kinship-based threats, not mere otherness. Ethnic hatred also diverges from nationalism, which entails preferential attachment to one's nation-state and its institutions, potentially inclusive of multiple ethnicities under a civic framework.^[19] While ethno-nationalism can instrumentalize hatred by equating national identity with a dominant ethnicity, excluding others, pure nationalism does not inherently require active hostility; ethnic hatred, however, embodies overt antagonism toward ethnic out-groups, often amplifying conflicts when nationalist mobilization politicizes ethnic grievances.^[20] For example, post-colonial ethnic wars in the 1990s frequently blended nationalist aspirations with underlying ethnic animosities, but the hatred itself derived from group competition over resources and power, beyond patriotic fervor.^[19] Unlike general prejudice, which comprises cognitive biases or negative stereotypes applicable across social categories, ethnic hatred denotes an intensified, emotionally charged hostility conducive to collective action or violence against an ethnic target.^[14] Prejudice may remain latent or individual, whereas ethnic hatred often involves dehumanizing narratives that justify aggression, as in pogroms or ethnic cleansings driven by accumulated resentments over perceived historical injustices.^[21] This escalation distinguishes it from milder intergroup biases, aligning it more closely with phenomena like sectarian hatred, though the latter pivots on religious doctrine rather than ethnic heritage—despite frequent co-occurrence in conflicts where identity layers compound.^[22]

Evolutionary and Biological Underpinnings

In-Group Bias and Kin Selection

Kin selection, an evolutionary mechanism proposed by W. D. Hamilton in 1964, posits that individuals are more likely to engage in altruistic behaviors toward relatives whose genetic relatedness justifies the inclusive fitness gain, formalized as Hamilton's rule: the benefit to the recipient (B), weighted by the coefficient of relatedness (r), must exceed the cost to the actor (C), or rB > C.^[23] This principle underlies nepotism, where aid is directed preferentially to kin sharing alleles by descent, enhancing the propagation of those genes even if the actor forgoes direct reproduction.^[24] Empirical observations in primates and humans support this, with cooperation levels correlating positively with genetic similarity, as seen in studies of resource sharing among related individuals where assistance diminishes as relatedness falls below thresholds implied by Hamilton's rule.^[25] In-group bias emerges as an extension of kin selection when social groups exhibit sufficient genetic assortment, mimicking kinship structures and fostering preferential treatment of group members over outsiders.^[26] Mathematical models demonstrate that in-group favoritism evolves under conditions of limited dispersal and phenotypic cues signaling shared ancestry, such as language or appearance, which proxy for relatedness and promote cooperation within the group while reducing it externally.^[24] This bias is not mere cultural artifact but rooted in adaptive responses to ancestral environments where groups formed around kin clusters, as evidenced by experimental paradigms showing heightened prosociality toward arbitrary in-groups when framed with kinship-like cues, outperforming reciprocity-based explanations alone.^[27] Applied to ethnic groups, in-group bias manifests as ethnic nepotism, where populations sharing recent common descent—typically marked by endogamy and geographic isolation—function as extended kin networks, yielding marginal but cumulative inclusive fitness benefits from favoritism.^[28] Pierre L. van den Berghe, in his sociobiological analysis, argues that ethnic solidarity originates from such primordial ethnies as enlarged kin groups, with ethnocentrism representing nepotism scaled to larger units where average relatedness, though low (e.g., r ≈ 0.002–0.01 for continental-scale ethnicities based on Fst genetic differentiation metrics), still incentivizes boundary maintenance and resource allocation preferences over out-groups.^[29] Experimental evidence confirms this, with participants in economic games allocating more resources to co-ethnics than strangers, an effect amplified by kinship priming and persisting even absent material incentives, suggesting an evolved heuristic for detecting extended genetic interests.^[30] However, for expansive modern ethnicities, pure kin selection weakens due to diluted r values, prompting debates on supplementary mechanisms like cultural group selection enforcing nepotistic norms, though baseline bias from ancestral kin cues remains empirically detectable in intergroup allocations.^[29] This evolutionary foundation contributes to ethnic hatred by framing out-groups as non-kin competitors, where in-group cohesion heightens vigilance against threats, potentially escalating to derogation when intergroup rivalry activates spiteful strategies that indirectly boost relative kin fitness.^[31] Cross-cultural data, including historical patterns of alliance formation and conflict, align with models where in-group favoritism evolves alongside out-group antagonism under high-stakes competition, as altruism within yields net gains only if offset by denying rivals equivalent access.^[26]

Genetic Influences on Group Preferences

Behavioral genetic research, primarily through twin and adoption studies, indicates that genetic factors contribute substantially to individual differences in group preferences, including preferences for one's own ethnic or racial in-group and aversion toward out-groups. These studies compare monozygotic twins, who share nearly 100% of their genes, with dizygotic twins, who share about 50%, to partition variance into genetic, shared environmental, and non-shared environmental components. Heritability estimates for traits related to prejudice and ethnocentrism—proxies for negative group preferences—typically range from 30% to 50%, suggesting that genetic influences explain a meaningful portion of why some individuals exhibit stronger in-group favoritism or out-group hostility than others, independent of family upbringing.^[32]^[33] Specific evidence comes from analyses of racial and ethnic attitudes. In the Minnesota Twin Study, involving over 1,000 twin pairs, ethnocentric attitudes—defined as favoring one's own racial group and distrusting others—showed a heritability of 53%, with genetic factors outweighing shared environment in explaining variance; for a measure of racial resentment, heritability reached 79%.^[34] Similarly, the Jena Twin Study in Germany, with data from 452 twin pairs, estimated heritability at around 40% for generic prejudice toward ethnic minorities, with genetic influences overlapping substantially with those for authoritarianism and social dominance orientation—traits linked to intergroup bias.^[35] These findings imply that innate predispositions may amplify group preferences under certain conditions, contributing to ethnic hatred when out-group perceptions trigger evolved mechanisms like kin recognition or threat detection.^[36] Genetic effects on group preferences often correlate with broader personality dimensions, such as low openness to experience (heritability ~50%) and high conscientiousness, which twin studies link to conservative ideologies favoring in-group cohesion.^[37] Gene-environment interactions further modulate these influences; for instance, polymorphisms in the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR) interact with perceived out-group threat to heighten intergroup bias, as shown in experimental studies where environmental cues of danger amplified genetic predispositions toward exclusionary attitudes.^[38] However, no genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet identified specific loci for ethnic prejudice, reflecting its polygenic nature and the dominance of non-shared environmental factors (e.g., personal experiences) in the remaining variance.^[39] While these genetic underpinnings do not determine behavior fixedly—cultural norms and socialization can suppress or exacerbate them—they underscore a biological basis for why group preferences persist across societies, challenging purely learned explanations for ethnic animosities.^[32]

Historical Development

Pre-Modern Instances

In the Neo-Assyrian Empire (911–612 BCE), ethnic hatred underpinned systematic deportation policies targeting conquered populations to eradicate group cohesion and prevent rebellions rooted in kinship and cultural identity; kings like Tiglath-Pileser III and Sargon II relocated tens of thousands from regions such as Israel and Syria, resettling them amid alien groups to dilute ethnic loyalties and foster imperial assimilation.^[40]^[41] This practice, documented in royal annals and archaeological evidence, reflected a causal understanding that ethnic homogeneity enabled resistance, leading to the near-total erasure of certain Levantine identities, such as the ten tribes of Israel deported en masse around 722 BCE.^[42] Classical antiquity saw ethnic animosity escalate in the Roman-Jewish wars (66–135 CE), where Roman forces and civilians harbored deep prejudice against Jews as an obstinate ethnic minority perceived as despising humanity (odium humani generis), fueling massacres and enslavements; during the siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE, Titus's legions killed over 1 million Jews and destroyed the Second Temple, while the Bar Kokhba revolt (132–135 CE) ended with Hadrian's ethnic cleansing policies, including renaming Judea to Syria Palaestina to sever Jewish ties to the land.^[43]^[44] Roman sources like Tacitus and Suetonius attest to this hatred, portraying Jews as superstitious and misanthropic, a view that justified punitive measures beyond mere political suppression.^[45] Medieval Europe witnessed recurrent ethnic hatred against Jews, often intertwined with religious pretexts but driven by perceptions of them as perpetual alien outsiders; the Rhineland massacres of 1096, sparked by People's Crusade mobs, resulted in the slaughter of 2,000 to 12,000 Jews across cities like Mainz, Worms, and Speyer, with attackers forcing conversions or deaths amid chants of "Christ-killers," reflecting grassroots ethnic resentment amplified by economic debts to Jewish lenders.^[46]^[47] Contemporary Hebrew chronicles, such as those by Solomon bar Simson, detail the savagery, including mass suicides by victims to evade forced baptism, underscoring the hatred's intensity beyond ideological fervor.^[48] Similar pogroms recurred during the Black Death (1348–1351), with Jews scapegoated for well-poisoning in over 200 European locales, leading to burnings and expulsions that halved some communities, as economic scapegoating merged with longstanding ethnic stereotypes propagated by church doctrines.^[44] In the Indian subcontinent, pre-modern ethnic hatred manifested in recurrent Hindu-Muslim polities' clashes from circa 1000 to 1850 CE, where a dataset of 1,200 conflicts shows violence probability rising 20–30% after Muslim conquests established rival ethnic-religious states, often involving temple destructions and forced conversions as assertions of dominance over indigenous Hindu majorities.^[49] These wars, chronicled in Persian and Sanskrit sources, stemmed from incompatible identity frameworks and resource competitions, predating colonial influences and illustrating how ethnic boundaries hardened under imperial expansions, with peaks during Delhi Sultanate incursions (e.g., 12th–13th centuries) that razed over 80 major Hindu sites.^[49]

19th and 20th Century Escalations

In the 19th century, the consolidation of nation-states and the ideology of ethnic nationalism within crumbling multi-ethnic empires precipitated escalations from localized prejudices to widespread organized violence. The French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars had earlier disseminated ideas of popular sovereignty tied to shared ethnicity and language, but by mid-century, these fueled irredentist movements in the Habsburg, Romanov, and Ottoman domains, where dominant groups sought to purge or assimilate minorities perceived as barriers to homogeneity.^[50] In Eastern Europe, this manifested in intensified anti-Jewish pogroms; following the assassination of Tsar Alexander II on March 1, 1881, by a revolutionary group including Jewish members, over 200 anti-Jewish riots erupted across southern Russia, Ukraine, and Poland between April and December 1881, resulting in at least 40 deaths, thousands of injuries, rapes, and property destruction affecting some 160 communities.^[51] Official inquiries attributed the violence to economic envy and rumors of Jewish ritual murder, though state inaction and occasional police complicity suggested tacit endorsement, marking a transition from sporadic riots to semi-coordinated campaigns that displaced tens of thousands and reinforced Pale of Settlement restrictions.^[52] These patterns recurred in the Ottoman Empire, where Christian minorities' reform demands clashed with pan-Islamic consolidation under Sultan Abdul Hamid II. The 1894-1896 Hamidian massacres targeted Armenians amid agrarian unrest and Russian influence fears, with irregular Hamidiye cavalry and mobs killing an estimated 80,000 to 300,000 Armenians across eastern Anatolia, displacing survivors and destroying over 2,000 villages.^[53] Economic competition over land and taxation exacerbated hatred, as Armenian commercial success fueled Muslim resentment, while state propaganda framed demands as separatism. In parallel, colonial imperialism exported ethnic hierarchies; Germany's 1904-1908 suppression of the Herero and Nama uprisings in South West Africa involved scorched-earth tactics and concentration camps, exterminating 65% of the Herero population (around 50,000-65,000 deaths) and 50% of the Nama (around 10,000), justified as racial inferiority doctrines amid resource grabs.^[54] The early 20th century saw further intensification through total warfare and revolutionary upheavals, amplifying ethnic animosities into genocidal policies. The 1903-1906 pogroms in the Russian Empire, triggered by revolutionary unrest and the 1903 Kishinev massacre (49 Jews killed, over 600 injured), escalated to over 600 riots by 1906, claiming at least 3,000 Jewish lives amid civil disorder, as Cossack units often joined mobs scapegoating Jews for economic woes and tsarist failures.^[51] In the Balkans, the 1912-1913 wars pitted a Slavic-Muslim alliance against Ottoman rule, unleashing mutual ethnic cleansings: Bulgarian, Serbian, and Greek forces expelled or massacred Muslim Albanians, Turks, and Pomaks, while Ottoman retreats involved atrocities against Christians, resulting in 1-1.5 million displacements and tens of thousands dead, as nationalist fervor overrode alliances for territorial purification.^[55] This volatility presaged the 1915 Armenian Genocide, where Young Turk policies amid World War I mobilized ethnic Turkish militias to deport and slaughter 1-1.5 million Armenians, driven by pan-Turkic homogenization, wartime paranoia over Russian alliances, and pre-existing hatreds from 1890s massacres, framing Armenians as existential threats.^[53] Such events, often enabled by modern railroads for rapid mobilization and telegraphs for propaganda, elevated ethnic hatred from communal clashes to state-orchestrated extermination, setting precedents for 20th-century total conflicts.^[56]

Post-1945 Conflicts

The Partition of India in August 1947, dividing British India into independent Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan, precipitated one of the largest episodes of ethnic violence in modern history, as Hindus, Sikhs, and Muslims turned on each other in retaliatory massacres amid mass migrations of approximately 14-15 million people. Communal riots, train massacres, and forced expulsions resulted in deaths estimated at between 200,000 and 2 million, with widespread abductions and rapes exacerbating the humanitarian catastrophe.^[57]^[58] The 1947-1948 civil war in Mandatory Palestine, triggered by the UN partition resolution allocating territories for Jewish and Arab states, devolved into mutual atrocities between Jewish and Arab militias, including village massacres and urban bombings that killed thousands and displaced over 700,000 Palestinians in what became known as the Nakba. Arab irregulars and later armies from neighboring states targeted Jewish communities, while Jewish forces like the Haganah conducted operations to secure territory, leading to the depopulation of hundreds of Arab villages amid heightened ethnic fears on both sides.^[59]^[60] In Nigeria, ethnic pogroms against the Igbo population in the Hausa-dominated north in 1966, killing tens of thousands, escalated into the Biafran War (1967-1970), as Igbo leaders declared secession to escape perceived Hausa-Fulani dominance and resource inequities. Federal forces blockaded Biafra, causing famine that claimed the majority of an estimated 1-3 million deaths, predominantly Igbo civilians, in a conflict rooted in pre-existing tribal rivalries intensified by oil wealth disputes.^[61]^[62] The dissolution of Yugoslavia from 1991 onward unleashed inter-ethnic warfare among Serbs, Croats, Bosniaks, and others, with systematic ethnic cleansing campaigns by Serb paramilitaries and army units aiming to create homogeneous territories. In Bosnia alone (1992-1995), over 100,000 perished, including the Srebrenica massacre in July 1995 where Bosnian Serb forces executed more than 8,000 Bosniak men and boys, an act later prosecuted as genocide by international tribunals.^[63]^[64] Sudan's Darfur conflict, erupting in 2003, pitted government-supported Arab Janjaweed militias against non-Arab ethnic groups such as the Fur and Masalit, driven by land scarcity and Arab supremacist ideologies, resulting in 300,000-500,000 deaths from violence, starvation, and disease, alongside the displacement of over 2.5 million. The campaign involved village burnings and mass rapes targeting specific ethnic identities, with the U.S. government formally designating it genocide in 2004 based on systematic intent to destroy these groups in whole or part.^[65]^[66] These post-1945 eruptions, often amid decolonization or state fragmentation, demonstrated how artificial multi-ethnic states fostered suppressed hatreds that surfaced violently when power vacuums or elite manipulations—such as propaganda framing rivals as existential threats—eroded restraints, leading to dehumanizing campaigns despite emerging international norms against such aggression.^[67]

Psychological and Cognitive Drivers

Dehumanization Processes

Dehumanization in ethnic hatred refers to the psychological process whereby members of one ethnic group perceive members of another as possessing diminished human qualities, such as reduced capacity for emotions, cognition, or moral agency, thereby facilitating intergroup antagonism and violence.^[68] This perception often manifests through metaphors likening outgroups to animals, machines, or vermin, which strip away attributions of shared humanity and evoke disgust or contempt rather than empathy.^[69] Empirical studies indicate that such attributions correlate with diminished neural activation in brain regions associated with mental state inference when viewing outgroup faces, suggesting a cognitive mechanism rooted in impaired perspective-taking.^[70] Two primary forms of dehumanization underpin these processes: animalistic, which denies uniquely human traits like self-reflection and culture, and mechanistic, which strips away warmth and emotional depth.^[71] In ethnic contexts, animalistic dehumanization predominates, as evidenced by experimental paradigms where participants exposed to outgroup members described via subhuman imagery endorse greater support for aggressive policies, with effect sizes indicating moderate to strong impacts on attitudes toward harm.^[72] This operates through reduced empathic concern and moral exclusion, where outgroup suffering is discounted as less consequential, though research distinguishes this from mere prejudice by showing dehumanization uniquely predicts instrumental violence—goal-directed harm—over retributive acts driven by anger alone.^[73]^[72] Reciprocal dynamics amplify dehumanization in ethnic hatred, including metadehumanization, where an ingroup's belief that the outgroup views them as subhuman triggers mutual denial of humanity, escalating conflict spirals.^[74] Longitudinal analyses of intergroup tensions reveal this pathway mediates aggressive behaviors independently of general hostility, with surveys in conflict zones showing perceived outgroup dehumanization predicting retaliatory attitudes at rates up to 40% higher than baseline bias measures.^[75] However, empirical scrutiny challenges unidirectional causation, as participation in ethnic violence can retroactively intensify dehumanizing perceptions, forming a feedback loop rather than a linear precursor, as observed in post-conflict attributions where perpetrators rationalize acts through amplified subhuman framing.^[76] While blatant dehumanization exerts outsized effects on violence endorsement compared to subtle biases, its necessity for ethnic hatred remains debated, with some studies finding intergroup preferences explain harms without full dehumanization, particularly in low-intensity conflicts.^[77]^[78] Cross-cultural experiments confirm that explicit subhuman labels increase willingness to inflict pain by 20-30% in controlled settings, yet real-world applications often blend with propaganda, where repeated exposure normalizes these processes absent overt psychological priming.^[79] This interplay underscores dehumanization's role as both a driver and justifier of ethnic animosities, contingent on contextual cues like threat perception.^[80] Social identity theory, formulated by Henri Tajfel and John Turner in 1979, explains how individuals categorize themselves and others into social groups, deriving self-esteem from favorable comparisons between their in-group and out-groups, which fosters in-group favoritism and out-group derogation.^[81] In ethnic contexts, ethnic membership serves as a potent social category due to its visibility and heritability cues, such as physical appearance and cultural markers, leading individuals to internalize ethnic identities that prioritize group loyalty over individual traits.^[82] Tajfel's minimal group experiments in the 1970s, where participants allocated resources based on arbitrary labels, revealed discriminatory bias emerging solely from categorization, without prior conflict or real differences; this effect intensifies with ethnic groups, where historical narratives reinforce perceptions of inherent superiority or inferiority.^[83] Intergroup dynamics arise from these identity processes, particularly when out-groups are perceived as threats to in-group status or resources, prompting behaviors like stereotyping and hostility to affirm positive distinctiveness.^[84] Realistic conflict theory, developed by Muzafer Sherif based on his 1954 Robbers Cave field study involving boy scouts divided into competing teams, demonstrates that realistic competition for scarce resources—such as food or prizes—generates intergroup animosity, including name-calling and raids, while shared superordinate goals mitigate it.^[85] For ethnic hatred, this manifests when groups vie for land, jobs, or political control, as resource scarcity heightens zero-sum perceptions; Sherif's framework, distinct from mere identity needs, emphasizes objective conflicts of interest driving ethnocentrism. Empirical research supports these mechanisms in ethnic settings: a 2021 meta-analysis of children's ingroup biases found social categorization reliably produces favoritism, with ethnic primes eliciting stronger effects than neutral ones due to developmental salience of kinship-like cues.^[86] Studies in competitive economic scenarios, such as lab-based public goods games with ethnic manipulations, show participants allocating fewer resources to ethnic out-groups, especially under high-stakes scarcity mimicking real-world pressures like immigration-driven job competition.^[87] When ethnic identity salience increases—via priming or threat—out-group derogation rises, as measured by implicit association tests and behavioral choices, indicating cognitive processes convert perceived group threats into hatred.^[88] These dynamics persist because ethnic groups often embody enduring, ascriptive ties, rendering identity-based conflicts resistant to short-term interventions absent resolved competitions.^[89]

Precipitating and Intensifying Factors

Resource Competition and Economic Pressures

Realistic conflict theory posits that intergroup hostility, including ethnic animosity, emerges from competition over scarce resources such as territory, employment, or economic opportunities, fostering perceptions of zero-sum gains where one group's advancement threatens another's survival.^[90] This framework, derived from experimental evidence like Muzafer Sherif's 1954 Robbers Cave study, demonstrates how initially neutral groups develop prejudice and aggression when vying for limited prizes, a dynamic extensible to ethnic divisions where cultural markers solidify coalitions for resource defense.^[91] Empirical meta-analyses confirm that both resource scarcity and abundance correlate with elevated conflict risk, as abundance incentivizes predation while scarcity amplifies survival threats, often along ethnic fault lines.^[92] Economic downturns intensify these pressures by heightening perceived threats to livelihoods, prompting ethnic in-groups to scapegoat out-groups for job losses or welfare strains, though direct causation to violence remains debated in some datasets.^[93] For instance, a 2016 Yale study on economic shocks in Indonesia found that negative income surprises targeting minority regions increased anti-minority violence, as complementarities between groups eroded under scarcity, leading to ethnic targeting rather than generalized unrest.^[94] Similarly, cross-national analyses link resource concentration in minority-held areas to civil war onset, where ethnic majorities perceive minority wealth as a barrier to equitable access, fueling mobilization for redistribution through conflict.^[95] Historical patterns underscore this mechanism without implying inevitability; in Darfur, Sudan, from the early 2000s, desertification reduced arable land by up to 20% in a decade, exacerbating pastoralist-farmer clashes that Arab militias exploited against non-Arab groups, framing resource grabs as ethnic purification amid population pressures.^[96] In theoretical models, ethnicity serves as a commitment device in resource contests, enabling intra-group trust and exclusion of rivals, which sustains hatred beyond immediate scarcity as groups anticipate future competitions.^[97] While institutional quality can mitigate escalation, weak governance in ethnically diverse economies often amplifies zero-sum perceptions, as seen in econometric models where ethnic fractionalization interacts with resource dependence to predict violence intensity.^[98] These dynamics reveal ethnic hatred not as primordial but as a rational response to material stakes, resolvable through superordinate goals or resource expansion rather than identity appeasement alone.^[99]

Cultural Incompatibilities and Identity Clashes

Cultural incompatibilities manifest when ethnic groups' deeply ingrained norms, values, and practices—such as attitudes toward authority, gender roles, religious observance, and social hierarchy—clash in shared spaces, fostering mutual resentment and escalating to hatred. Empirical measures of cultural distance, incorporating linguistic, religious, and normative divergences, predict elevated risks of interethnic conflict; for example, in sub-Saharan Africa, ethnic groups exhibiting greater cultural distance from ruling elites experience higher probabilities of civil war onset, with data from 1960–2010 showing such distances explaining up to 20% of variance in conflict incidence beyond economic or political factors.^[100]^[101] These clashes intensify under proximity, as incompatible customs challenge each group's sense of moral order, prompting defensive identity reinforcement and dehumanization of outgroups whose behaviors are perceived as threats to cultural integrity.^[102] In diverse societies, such incompatibilities erode social cohesion, as demonstrated by Robert Putnam's analysis of over 30,000 U.S. respondents across 41 communities, where higher ethnic diversity correlated with reduced trust—not only between groups but within them—leading to decreased civic participation, neighborliness, and altruism by approximately 10–20% in high-diversity settings compared to homogeneous ones.^[103] Putnam termed this "hunkering down," where residents withdraw from collective life amid unfamiliar norms, amplifying identity-based animosities; longitudinal data suggest short-term declines persist without strong assimilation pressures, though long-term integration can mitigate effects in historically immigrant nations like the U.S.^[104] Migration exacerbates these dynamics when inflows from culturally distant regions introduce stark value discrepancies, as evidenced by World Values Survey data from 1981–2014 revealing that recent immigrants to Western Europe and North America from predominantly Muslim or traditional societies hold views diverging significantly from hosts on secularism (e.g., 70–90% opposition to homosexuality vs. 10–20% in native populations) and gender norms (e.g., support for sharia law at 40–60% among some migrant cohorts vs. near-zero among natives).^[105] Such gaps fuel identity clashes, with surveys across 49 countries in 2017–2020 indicating majority public agreement (over 50% in most nations) that immigration heightens social conflict risks due to these normative frictions, particularly in Europe where parallel societies form around incompatible practices like clan-based honor codes conflicting with individual rights frameworks.^[106]^[107] Identity clashes further precipitate hatred by framing cultural differences as existential threats, activating in-group favoritism and out-group derogation; anthropological studies link this to "honor cultures" prevalent in Middle Eastern and Latin American ethnic groups, where perceived insults to collective identity provoke retaliatory violence at rates 2–5 times higher than in "dignity cultures" of Northern Europe or North America, per cross-national homicide data adjusted for socioeconomic controls.^[108] In multicultural settings, failure to enforce convergent norms allows persistent incompatibilities—such as demands for religious exemptions from secular laws—to breed reciprocal grievances, sustaining cycles of ethnic tension absent deliberate boundary enforcement or assimilation policies.^[109]

Role of Propaganda and Elite Manipulation

Propaganda has historically served as a mechanism to intensify ethnic hatred by systematically dehumanizing targeted groups and framing them as existential threats, thereby lowering inhibitions against violence. In Nazi Germany, from 1933 onward, the regime's Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, led by Joseph Goebbels, disseminated materials portraying Jews as vermin and conspirators undermining the German nation, which facilitated widespread acceptance of discriminatory laws and eventual genocide during the Holocaust, where approximately 6 million Jews were killed between 1941 and 1945.^[110] This approach relied on repetitive messaging through films, posters, and newspapers to embed stereotypes, building on pre-existing antisemitic sentiments but scaling them into state policy. Empirical studies indicate such propaganda not only shaped public attitudes but also mobilized participation in atrocities by normalizing exclusion and aggression.^[111] In the Rwandan Genocide of 1994, Hutu extremists used radio broadcasts by Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM) to dehumanize Tutsis as "cockroaches" and incite immediate killings, with stations directing militias to specific locations and estimating that exposure to these signals increased participation in violence by up to 11% in affected areas, contributing to the deaths of around 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus over 100 days.^[112] Propaganda here exploited colonial-era ethnic classifications but amplified them through inflammatory rhetoric that portrayed Tutsis as invaders, fostering a causal link between media incitement and mass mobilization.^[113] Similarly, during the Yugoslav Wars (1991–1999), Serbian leader Slobodan Milošević's state-controlled media propagated narratives of historical grievances and Croatian/Muslim threats, fueling ethnic cleansing in Bosnia where over 100,000 died, including the Srebrenica massacre of 8,000 Bosniak men and boys in 1995.^[114] These cases demonstrate propaganda's role in transforming latent tensions into active hatred, often measured by spikes in hate speech correlating with violence onset.^[115] Elite manipulation compounds propaganda's effects by strategically deploying it to consolidate power amid political or economic instability, where leaders instrumentalize ethnic divisions to divert blame or secure loyalty rather than hatred arising spontaneously. In post-colonial African conflicts like those in Ghana, elites have mobilized ethnic identities for resource control, as seen in Bawku clashes where chieftaincy disputes escalated into violence through partisan rhetoric, resulting in hundreds of deaths since the 1990s.^[116] Sociological analyses argue this manipulation follows patterns where elites frame out-groups as threats during state weakening, as in Yugoslavia where Milošević revised historical narratives to portray Serbs as victims, enabling territorial grabs despite prior multi-ethnic coexistence under Tito.^[4] Evidence from comparative studies shows such tactics succeed when elites control information flows, but they require underlying cleavages; pure invention rarely sustains long-term hatred without empirical grievances like competition over land or jobs.^[117] This dynamic underscores causal realism: propaganda and elite actions do not fabricate ethnic animosities de novo but exploit and direct them toward violence for instrumental ends, as validated by conflict datasets linking leader speeches to intergroup killings.^[118]

Prominent Historical Cases

Antisemitism and the Holocaust

Antisemitism in Nazi Germany represented an extreme manifestation of ethnic hatred, rooted in racial pseudoscience that portrayed Jews as an existential threat to the Aryan race. Adolf Hitler, in Mein Kampf published in 1925, articulated Jews as a parasitic, racially inferior group responsible for Germany's defeat in World War I and economic woes, blending longstanding religious prejudices with modern biological racism.^[119] Upon the Nazi Party's seizure of power on January 30, 1933, antisemitic policies rapidly institutionalized this hatred, beginning with a nationwide boycott of Jewish businesses on April 1, 1933, which targeted approximately 9,000 Jewish-owned enterprises and marked the regime's intent to exclude Jews from economic life.^[120] Propaganda, orchestrated by Joseph Goebbels' Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, amplified dehumanization through state-controlled media, including films like The Eternal Jew (1940) that depicted Jews as vermin-like subhumans plotting world domination.^[110] The Nuremberg Laws, enacted on September 15, 1935, formalized ethnic discrimination by redefining citizenship on racial grounds: the Reich Citizenship Law stripped Jews of German citizenship, classifying them as subjects without rights, while the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor prohibited marriages and sexual relations between Jews and non-Jews, affecting an estimated 500,000 Germans of partial Jewish ancestry.^[121] These laws, justified as preserving "German blood," escalated isolation and violence, culminating in Kristallnacht on November 9–10, 1938, a coordinated pogrom where Nazi paramilitaries destroyed over 7,500 Jewish businesses, burned 267 synagogues, and arrested 30,000 Jewish men, resulting in at least 91 deaths and the imposition of a 1 billion Reichsmark fine on the Jewish community.^[120] By 1939, with the invasion of Poland on September 1, Jews in occupied territories were confined to ghettos, such as the Warsaw Ghetto established in October 1940, where over 400,000 people endured starvation and disease, with mortality rates exceeding 100,000 by mid-1942 due to deliberate privation.^[122] The invasion of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, initiated mobile killing operations by Einsatzgruppen units, which executed over 1 million Jews in mass shootings, often in pits like Babi Yar near Kyiv on September 29–30, 1941, where 33,771 were murdered in two days.^[123] This phase transitioned to industrialized genocide following the Wannsee Conference on January 20, 1942, where Reinhard Heydrich coordinated the "Final Solution" among 15 senior officials, planning the deportation and extermination of 11 million European Jews through labor camps and death facilities.^[124] Extermination camps like Auschwitz-Birkenau, operational from 1942, employed Zyklon B gas chambers, killing approximately 1.1 million people, predominantly Jews, by the camp's liberation on January 27, 1945.^[125] Other sites, including Treblinka (where 800,000–900,000 perished in 1942–1943), facilitated the systematic murder of two-thirds of Europe's Jewish population.^[123] Overall, the Holocaust claimed the lives of about 6 million Jews between 1941 and 1945, verified through Nazi administrative records (e.g., Höfle Telegram documenting 1.27 million killings by 1942), Allied investigations, and demographic analyses showing a 60–70% decline in Europe's prewar Jewish population of 9.5 million.^[126] ^[123] This genocide, driven by ideological conviction rather than mere wartime expediency, exemplified ethnic hatred's capacity for total annihilation when fused with state power, propaganda, and bureaucratic efficiency, as evidenced by SS leader Heinrich Himmler's 1943 Posen speeches affirming the extermination as a "glorious page" in history.^[122] Postwar trials, including Nuremberg (1945–1946), convicted key perpetrators based on these documents, underscoring the causal chain from antisemitic doctrine to mass murder.^[123]

Rwandan Genocide

The Rwandan Genocide, occurring between April 7 and mid-July 1994, exemplified extreme ethnic hatred as Hutu extremists systematically targeted the Tutsi minority and Hutu political moderates, resulting in an estimated 500,000 to 800,000 deaths over approximately 100 days.^[127]^[128] Hutu comprised about 85% of Rwanda's population of roughly 7 million, Tutsi around 14%, and Twa 1%, but these categories were not originally rigid ethnic distinctions; pre-colonial Rwanda featured fluid social identities based on occupation and status, with intermarriage common and no fixed biological separation.^[129]^[130] Belgian colonial administrators from the 1920s onward imposed racial classifications, favoring taller, narrower-nosed Tutsi as "superior" Hamitic descendants and issuing ethnic identity cards that institutionalized divisions, fostering resentment among the Hutu majority when Tutsis held administrative roles.^[130]^[131] Post-independence in 1962, Hutu-led governments reversed colonial hierarchies through violence, including pogroms in 1959 and 1973 that displaced tens of thousands of Tutsis to neighboring countries, solidifying mutual distrust as Tutsi exiles formed the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) guerrilla force.^[131] The 1990 RPF invasion from Uganda sparked a civil war, intensifying Hutu fears of Tutsi reconquest amid economic decline and refugee pressures, which extremists exploited to portray Tutsis as existential threats.^[131]^[132] State-backed propaganda, particularly via Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM), dehumanized Tutsis as "cockroaches" (inyenzi) and incited killings by broadcasting names, locations, and calls to arms, while Interahamwe militias—trained and armed by the Hutu regime—executed machete assaults and organized massacres.^[133]^[134] This rhetoric built on colonial-era stereotypes, framing ethnic identity as a zero-sum conflict where Hutu survival required Tutsi elimination, with elite manipulation channeling grievances into genocidal mobilization rather than negotiation.^[133] The genocide ignited on April 6, 1994, when a plane carrying Hutu President Juvénal Habyarimana was shot down near Kigali, an event immediately blamed on the RPF despite unresolved investigations into perpetrators.^[135] Within hours, Hutu soldiers assassinated moderate Hutu Prime Minister Agathe Uwilingiyimana and ten Belgian UN peacekeepers, while roadblocks manned by militias used identity cards to identify and slaughter Tutsis.^[135] Killings escalated rapidly: churches, schools, and marshes became mass graves, with rapes and mutilations widespread as tactics of terror; in areas like Gikongoro Province, Tutsi survival rates hovered around 25%, with women slightly higher at 29%.^[136]^[137] The RPF's advance from the north eventually halted the violence by July, capturing Kigali and ending the interim Hutu government, but not before ethnic hatred had propelled ordinary Hutus—under duress, fear, or indoctrination—into participation, underscoring how propaganda and institutional complicity can weaponize historical divisions into mass extermination.^[127]

Yugoslav Ethnic Wars

The Yugoslav ethnic wars, spanning 1991 to 1999, arose from the dissolution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia following the death of Josip Broz Tito in 1980, amid economic decline and the resurgence of suppressed nationalisms among its constituent ethnic groups, including Serbs, Croats, Bosniaks, Slovenes, Macedonians, and Albanians.^[138] Under Tito's communist regime, ethnic tensions rooted in World War II atrocities—such as Croatian Ustaše massacres of Serbs and Serb Chetnik reprisals—had been forcibly subdued through federal policies promoting "brotherhood and unity," but these did not eradicate underlying grievances over territorial claims, historical narratives, and demographic shifts, particularly Serb fears of minority status in newly independent republics.^[139] Political elites, notably Serbian leader Slobodan Milošević, exploited these sentiments starting in the late 1980s by invoking Serb victimhood, as in his 1989 Kosovo Polje speech commemorating the 1389 Battle of Kosovo and framing Albanian separatism as a threat, thereby consolidating power through nationalist mobilization rather than primordial hatreds alone.^[140] This instrumentalization of ethnicity, rather than inevitable ancient animosities, precipitated secessionist movements: Slovenia and Croatia declared independence on June 25, 1991, triggering brief conflicts with the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA), dominated by Serbs, while Bosnia-Herzegovina's 1992 referendum led to a tripartite war among Bosniaks, Croats, and Bosnian Serbs.^[141] Ethnic hatred manifested most destructively in systematic campaigns of expulsion, murder, and rape, termed "ethnic cleansing," primarily by Bosnian Serb forces under Radovan Karadžić and Ratko Mladić, backed by Milošević's Serbia, aiming to carve out contiguous Serb territories. In Croatia, Serb rebels, supported by the JNA, besieged Vukovar in August–November 1991, resulting in the massacre of over 200 patients from Vukovar hospital and displacing tens of thousands of Croats.^[138] The Bosnian War (1992–1995) saw the longest siege of a capital in modern history at Sarajevo, where Serb artillery killed approximately 5,000 civilians, alongside concentration camps like Omarska where thousands of Bosniaks and Croats endured torture and execution.^[64] Atrocities were not unilateral: Croatian forces under Franjo Tuđman conducted ethnic cleansing in Krajina (1995), expelling 150,000–200,000 Serbs, while Bosniak units committed reprisals against Serbs; however, the scale and intent of Serb-led operations, including the July 1995 Srebrenica genocide where over 8,000 Bosniak men and boys were executed, dwarfed others in systematic elimination of non-Serb populations.^[142] Milošević's regime supplied arms and funding to Bosnian Serbs, fostering irredentist ideologies of a "Greater Serbia" that portrayed Croats and Muslims as historical enemies, fueling paramilitary groups like Arkan's Tigers responsible for summary executions.^[143] The Kosovo conflict (1998–1999) intensified ethnic animosities between Serbs and the Albanian majority, with Milošević's security forces displacing over 800,000 Albanians through village burnings and mass killings, prompting NATO intervention in March 1999 after failed Rambouillet talks. Overall casualties across the wars are estimated at 130,000 to 140,000 deaths, with the Bosnian phase accounting for about 100,000, roughly two-thirds Bosniaks, though exact ethnic breakdowns remain contested due to incomplete records and politicized reporting; these figures derive from cross-verified demographic analyses rather than initial inflated claims.^[142] While media and some academic narratives emphasized "ancient Balkan hatreds," empirical reviews indicate that interethnic relations were relatively stable under Tito and that violence stemmed from elite-driven power struggles amid federal collapse, with propaganda via state media amplifying stereotypes—Serbs as genocidal aggressors, Croats as Ustaše heirs—to justify territorial grabs.^[5] The wars displaced over 2 million people, entrenching ethnic partitions via the 1995 Dayton Accords for Bosnia and UN administration in Kosovo, underscoring how manipulated grievances, not inherent incompatibility, causal chains led to mass violence.^[144]

Contemporary Manifestations

Conflicts in Africa (e.g., Sudan, DRC)

In Sudan, ethnic tensions have fueled protracted violence, particularly in the Darfur region, where conflicts erupted in 2003 between non-Arab ethnic groups such as the Fur, Masalit, and Zaghawa and Arab-dominated Janjaweed militias backed by the government. These clashes, characterized by systematic killings, rapes, and village burnings, resulted in an estimated 300,000 deaths and displaced over 2.7 million people by 2010, with the International Criminal Court issuing arrest warrants for Sudanese officials on genocide charges. The Rapid Support Forces (RSF), successors to the Janjaweed, have continued targeting non-Arab communities, including ethnic cleansing campaigns against the Masalit in West Darfur during the 2023 civil war between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and RSF, which has claimed over 150,000 lives and triggered famine conditions. In 2025, the U.S. Secretary of State determined that RSF actions in Darfur constituted genocide, amid reports of mass graves and deliberate displacement of non-Arab populations.^[145]^[146]^[147]^[148]^[149] The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has experienced overlapping ethnic conflicts since the 1994 Rwandan genocide spilled over, with Hutu militias targeting Tutsi communities, exacerbating hatred between groups like Hema and Lendu in Ituri province and various factions in North and South Kivu. The Second Congo War (1998–2003), involving nine African nations and numerous militias, caused approximately 5.4 million deaths, many from ethnic-motivated massacres, disease, and starvation linked to resource competition in mineral-rich eastern provinces. Persistent violence, including M23 rebel advances backed by Rwanda and targeting non-Tutsi groups, has displaced millions and killed thousands annually; for instance, inter-communal clashes in Ituri from 2017 onward have featured Lendu militias slaughtering Hema civilians with machetes and guns, driven by land disputes and historical animosities. By 2025, armed groups in eastern DRC conducted surges of attacks, killing hundreds in ethnic-targeted assaults, amid broader failures of state control and foreign interference that perpetuate cycles of revenge and militia recruitment along ethnic lines.^[150]^[151]^[152]^[153]^[154] These conflicts illustrate how ethnic hatred in Africa often intertwines with weak governance, resource scarcity, and external meddling, leading to atrocities where militias exploit tribal divisions for territorial control; in both Sudan and the DRC, non-state actors have committed war crimes with ethnic selectivity, as documented by international tribunals, underscoring the causal role of identity-based mobilization in sustaining violence over decades.^[155]^[156]

Middle East Tensions (e.g., Israel-Palestine)

The Israel-Palestine conflict manifests ethnic hatred primarily through Arab and Palestinian rejection of Jewish self-determination in the historic Land of Israel, coupled with religiously motivated antisemitism and incitement to violence against Jews. Following the 1947 United Nations Partition Plan, which proposed dividing Mandatory Palestine into Jewish and Arab states despite Jews comprising about one-third of the population but owning less land, Arab leaders and the Arab Higher Committee rejected the plan outright, opting instead for war to prevent any Jewish state.^[157]^[158] This initiated the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, where invading Arab armies sought to eliminate the nascent Jewish state, resulting in the displacement of approximately 700,000 Palestinians amid the fighting, while Jewish communities in Arab countries faced mass expulsions and pogroms.^[159] In contemporary Gaza, under Hamas control since 2007, ethnic hatred is institutionalized through the group's founding charter, which frames the conflict as a religious struggle against Jews, invoking antisemitic tropes like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and declaring that "the Zionist invasion is a vicious invasion" aimed at eradicating Islam.^[160] Hamas's 2017 document retained core Islamist rejectionism, prioritizing "armed resistance" over negotiation, while glorifying jihad against Israel.^[161] This ideology fueled the October 7, 2023, attacks, where Hamas militants infiltrated Israel, killing 1,200 people—mostly civilians—in acts including mass shootings, sexual violence, and arson, while abducting over 250 hostages, marking the deadliest assault on Jews since the Holocaust.^[162]^[163] Palestinian public opinion polls reflect entrenched support for such violence; for instance, pre-October 7 surveys by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research showed 61% of Gazans and 53% of West Bank residents favoring "armed struggle" over negotiations, with post-attack polls indicating temporary spikes in Hamas approval to 71% in Gaza.^[164] Incitement exacerbates hatred across Palestinian institutions. The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) has documented systemic antisemitic propaganda in Palestinian Authority (PA) and Hamas media, education, and religious sermons, including school curricula portraying Jews as eternal enemies and summer camps training children in mock attacks on Israelis.^[165]^[166] PA payments to families of terrorists ("pay-for-slay") further incentivize attacks, with over $350 million annually rewarding violence, fostering a culture where martyrdom is celebrated.^[167] Repeated rejections of peace offers, such as at Camp David in 2000 where Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak proposed 91-95% of the West Bank, Gaza, and parts of East Jerusalem but was turned down by Yasser Arafat without a counteroffer, leading directly to the Second Intifada's 1,000+ suicide bombings, underscore a pattern of prioritizing maximalist demands over coexistence.^[168] While Israeli policies like settlement expansion contribute to tensions, the causal core of ethnic hatred lies in Arab irredentism and Islamist doctrine viewing Jewish sovereignty as an abomination, as evidenced by charters and actions rejecting partition equivalents multiple times (1947, 2000, 2008).^[169] This dynamic perpetuates cycles of terrorism and retaliation, with Gaza's 20,000+ rockets fired at Israeli civilians since 2001 illustrating proactive aggression rooted in hatred rather than mere response.^[170] Large-scale immigration to Europe and North America from culturally dissimilar regions, particularly since the 2010s, has generated ethnic frictions rooted in disparities in crime rates, welfare dependency, and social norms, fostering resentment among native populations toward immigrant groups. In Europe, the 2015 migrant crisis resulted in over 1.8 million asylum applications, predominantly from Syria, Afghanistan, and North Africa, straining resources and amplifying perceptions of cultural incompatibility.^[171] Incidents such as the New Year's Eve 2015-2016 assaults in Cologne, Germany, where more than 1,200 women reported sexual attacks largely by North African and Arab men, exemplified immediate backlash, contributing to a surge in support for anti-immigration parties like Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD), which polled over 20% in subsequent elections.^[171] These events, combined with ongoing overrepresentation of non-citizens in violent offenses—non-Germans comprising 41.8% of crime suspects in 2024 despite forming about 15% of the population—have intensified native ethnic animus, often framed as defensive reactions to perceived threats rather than unprovoked prejudice.^[172] In Sweden, official data from the National Council for Crime Prevention (Brå) indicate foreign-born individuals, who constitute around 20% of the population, account for disproportionate involvement in violent crimes, including 58% of rape convictions in recent analyses and five times higher suspicion rates for murder compared to native Swedes with two Swedish-born parents.^[173]^[174] This pattern, linked to gang violence and parallel societies in suburbs like Malmö, has eroded social trust, with public opinion polls showing over 60% of Swedes favoring stricter immigration controls by 2024. Similarly, in the United Kingdom, organized grooming gangs—predominantly of Pakistani heritage—exploited thousands of predominantly white working-class girls in towns like Rotherham and Telford from the 1990s to 2010s, with a 2025 national audit revealing institutional reluctance to investigate due to fears of racial profiling, resulting in at least 1,400 identified victims in Rotherham alone and fueling widespread native outrage.^[175]^[176] Such failures have heightened ethnic hatred, manifesting in protests and electoral shifts toward parties emphasizing cultural preservation. North American frictions mirror European patterns, driven by surges in unauthorized migration. In the United States, U.S. Customs and Border Protection recorded over 10 million migrant encounters at the southern border from fiscal years 2021 to 2024, including releases into the interior, correlating with spikes in transnational crimes like MS-13 gang activities and fentanyl trafficking, which claimed over 70,000 lives annually.^[177] Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested 73,822 noncitizens with criminal histories in fiscal year 2023, averaging four convictions per individual, many involving assault and drug offenses, straining urban areas like New York City, where migrant-related thefts and assaults prompted emergency declarations.^[178] Public sentiment reflects these pressures, with Gallup polls in 2024 showing 55% of Americans viewing immigration levels as too high, though concerns eased slightly post-2024 election amid enforcement shifts. In Canada, rapid intake of over 1 million immigrants annually by 2023 has led to housing shortages and rising visible minority-native tensions, including hate crime upticks, though official data underreports immigrant overrepresentation in certain urban violence. These dynamics have spurred ethnic hatred, with native groups citing empirical incompatibilities—such as honor-based violence and low assimilation rates—as causal factors, rather than abstract bigotry, prompting policy debates on border security and selection criteria.^[179]

Debates and Controversies

Innate Versus Learned Origins

The debate over whether ethnic hatred originates primarily from innate biological predispositions or learned social influences centers on evolutionary psychology and developmental studies, which indicate an interaction but with evidence favoring early-emerging, heritable biases rather than purely environmental acquisition.^[32]^[180] Proponents of innate origins argue that out-group suspicion evolved as an adaptive response to threats like resource competition and disease transmission in ancestral environments, supported by observations of intergroup aggression in chimpanzees, where raids on neighboring groups result in lethal violence akin to human tribal conflicts.^[181]^[182] This perspective posits that xenophobia, as a generalized wariness of unfamiliar groups, conferred survival advantages by prioritizing in-group cooperation over risky interactions with outsiders.^[180] Developmental research reinforces innate foundations, showing that preferences for own-ethnicity faces emerge in human infants as early as three months of age, with visual attention biases favoring familiar racial features over others, suggesting perceptual tuning shaped by prenatal or early postnatal exposure but rooted in evolved mechanisms for kin recognition.^[183] By six to nine months, infants exhibit explicit racial biases, associating positive traits with own-race individuals and negative ones with other-race peers, a pattern observed across diverse populations and resistant to immediate reversal through exposure.^[184] Twin studies further estimate moderate heritability for prejudice-related attitudes, with genetic factors accounting for 20-50% of variance in social dominance orientation and authoritarianism—traits linked to ethnic animus—beyond shared environments, indicating that while culture shapes expression, underlying dispositions are not solely learned.^[32]^[185] Arguments for learned origins emphasize cultural transmission, noting that specific ethnic hatreds vary widely across societies and can be attenuated through intergroup contact or education, as seen in reduced implicit biases following sustained diverse interactions in controlled experiments.^[186] However, such interventions often fail to eliminate baseline in-group favoritism, which persists even in blind individuals lacking visual racial cues, implying deeper cognitive roots beyond socialization alone.^[187] Critics of purely innate views, often from social psychology traditions, highlight how systemic narratives in media and academia may understate genetic influences due to ideological commitments against biological determinism, yet empirical data from heritability models and cross-species comparisons consistently show prejudice as an evolved predisposition amplified, rather than created, by learning.^[188]^[189] This interplay underscores that while explicit hatred requires cultural catalysts, the capacity for ethnic antagonism arises from innate heuristics for threat detection and group loyalty. Critiques of social constructivism in the context of ethnic hatred emphasize its tendency to overstate the malleability of ethnic identities and animosities while downplaying enduring biological and psychological predispositions. Proponents of constructivism, such as those influenced by instrumentalist or circumstantialist theories, argue that ethnic hatred arises from situational factors like elite manipulation or resource competition, rendering it amenable to reconfiguration through policy and education.^[190] However, primordialist scholars counter that ethnic bonds possess an affective, quasi-kinship quality rooted in perceived shared descent, making hatreds resistant to social engineering and prone to resurgence even after apparent reconciliation efforts.^[191] This view posits that constructivism's fluid model fails to account for the involuntary, "given" nature of ethnic attachments, as evidenced by the rapid re-emergence of communal violence in post-colonial states where artificial national identities were imposed.^[192] Evolutionary psychology offers a further challenge by framing ethnic hatred as an extension of adaptive mechanisms for coalitional aggression and in-group favoritism, evolved to protect genetic interests in ancestral environments. Rather than purely learned constructs, prejudices against out-groups correlate with perceived genetic distance, explaining phenomena like xenophobia as heuristic responses to threats from dissimilar coalitions.^[3] Critics argue that constructivism neglects such universals, evidenced across cultures and history, and instead attributes hatred solely to modern socialization, ignoring cross-species parallels in primate intergroup conflict. This perspective generates testable hypotheses, such as heightened ethnic solidarity under existential threats, which constructivist accounts struggle to predict without ad hoc adjustments.^[193] Empirical data from behavioral genetics reinforces these objections, with twin studies indicating moderate heritability for prejudice-related traits. For instance, analyses of monozygotic and dizygotic twins yield heritability estimates of 20-50% for negative attitudes toward racial or ethnic out-groups, suggesting genetic influences on social dominance orientation and authoritarianism that underpin ethnic animosities.^[32] These findings imply that while environment shapes expression, constructivism's environmental determinism overlooks polygenic contributions, potentially leading to overoptimistic interventions that ignore individual differences in susceptibility to hatred. Mainstream academic endorsement of constructivism, often prevailing in sociology and anthropology, may reflect ideological preferences against biological explanations, which have historically been stigmatized despite accumulating evidence from fields like evolutionary biology.^[185] In ethnic conflict resolution, constructivist-inspired policies—such as power-sharing or multicultural education—have frequently faltered, as seen in the Balkans where imposed civic identities dissolved into primordial cleavages amid security dilemmas. Primordialists advocate separation or security guarantees over reconstruction, arguing that constructivism's optimism ignores the "pathological" intensity of ethnic hatred, which mobilization theories alone cannot fully explain.^[194] Collectively, these critiques urge a causal realism integrating innate predispositions with situational triggers, rather than dismissing biology as reductive.^[195]

Implications for Multiculturalism and Policy

Ethnic hatred underscores fundamental tensions in multicultural policies that prioritize the preservation of distinct cultural identities over assimilation into a shared civic framework, often leading to reduced social cohesion. Empirical research, including Robert Putnam's 2007 study analyzing data from over 30,000 U.S. respondents across 41 communities, demonstrates a negative short-term association between ethnic diversity and interpersonal trust, with residents in diverse areas exhibiting lower generalized trust, fewer close friendships, and diminished community engagement—a phenomenon termed "hunkering down."^[196]^[197] This effect persists even within ethnic groups, suggesting that unmediated diversity erodes the social capital necessary to mitigate hatred, as groups retreat into tribal enclaves rather than fostering mutual understanding.^[198] In Europe, where multiculturalism has been state policy since the late 20th century, outcomes reveal heightened ethnic frictions, including parallel societies with limited intergroup interaction, elevated crime rates in immigrant-dense areas, and sporadic violence such as the 2005 French riots involving North African youth or grooming gang scandals in UK cities like Rotherham, where cultural separatism enabled exploitation.^[199] Leaders including German Chancellor Angela Merkel in 2010 and UK Prime Minister David Cameron in 2011 publicly acknowledged these policy failures, attributing them to multiculturalism's encouragement of segregation over integration, which has correlated with rising support for restrictionist parties and policy reversals.^[200]^[201] Such critiques, grounded in observable data rather than ideological preference, highlight how preserving incompatible norms—e.g., attitudes toward gender roles or authority—amplifies hatred by institutionalizing differences that first-principles analysis would predict erode reciprocal trust.^[202] Policy implications favor assimilationist strategies, which empirical comparisons show yield superior cohesion outcomes. For instance, countries like Denmark and the Netherlands, post-2000s reforms mandating language acquisition, civic education, and employment integration for immigrants, report higher naturalization rates (Denmark: 85% proficiency requirement compliance by 2020) and reduced welfare dependency compared to multicultural holdouts like Sweden, where persistent enclaves correlate with elevated violent crime (e.g., 2023 grenade attacks in migrant areas).^[203] Assimilation, by enforcing shared values and norms, counters ethnic hatred's causal drivers—perceived threats from unintegrated outgroups—more effectively than multiculturalism, which studies link to sustained identity conflicts and policy backlashes.^[204] This approach aligns with historical U.S. patterns, where generational assimilation diminished ethnic animosities, per economic mobility data from the early 20th century.^[205] Mainstream sources often underemphasize these findings due to institutional biases favoring diversity narratives, yet the data compel prioritizing verifiable integration metrics over unsubstantiated optimism.^[199]

Societal Consequences and Mitigation Efforts

Long-Term Impacts on Cohesion and Stability

Ethnic hatred, often escalating into conflicts or persistent animosities, erodes social cohesion by fostering intergroup distrust that endures beyond immediate violence. Empirical analyses of ethnic warfare reveal heightened ethnocentrism and reduced identification with broader societal groups, as individuals prioritize in-group loyalty amid perceived threats.^[206] In diverse settings without strong assimilative mechanisms, this manifests as a "hunkering down" effect, where residents exhibit lower generalized trust, diminished civic participation, and withdrawal from community activities, as documented in Robert Putnam's examination of over 30,000 U.S. survey respondents across communities varying in ethnic heterogeneity.^[198] Such patterns hold internationally; for instance, studies of post-conflict displacement in regions like sub-Saharan Africa show sustained hostility between former adversaries and displaced populations, perpetuating fragmented social networks.^[207] These dynamics undermine political stability, as ethnic cleavages incentivize zero-sum competition over resources and power, prolonging instability. In post-ethnic civil wars, peace durations are shorter when ethnic grievances remain unaddressed, with survival models indicating that inclusive political reforms—such as power-sharing—can extend stability, but only if they mitigate exclusionary ethnic mobilization.^[208] Historical cycles, like the reciprocal genocides between Hutu and Tutsi in Rwanda (1959–1962 precipitating Burundi's 1972 events) and subsequent escalations, illustrate how unresolved hatred entrenches divisions, hindering national unity and inviting recurrent violence. Many post-conflict states, such as those emerging from Yugoslavia's dissolution after 1991, fail full transitions to peace, retaining crisis-level fragilities due to entrenched ethnic veto points in governance.^[209] Economically, the legacies compound through disrupted cooperation and capital flight. Ethnic polarization correlates with 1–2% lower annual GDP growth in cross-country panels, as mistrust hampers trade, investment, and labor mobility across groups.^[210] In Uganda's 2002–2004 civil conflicts, intense ethnic violence broke intergroup trust, reducing cross-ethnic commerce by up to 30% and imposing persistent productivity losses.^[211] Overall, these impacts create self-reinforcing cycles: lowered cohesion begets policy gridlock, further entrenching instability, as seen in societies where ethnic stratification aligns with economic disparities, elevating conflict risk by 20–50% compared to homogeneous peers.^[212] Mitigation demands addressing root causal drivers like resource inequities, rather than superficial diversity promotion, to rebuild cross-cutting ties.

Legal Frameworks and International Responses

The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide establishes a foundational international legal framework by defining genocide as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, including killing members, causing serious harm, or imposing conditions leading to physical destruction. This convention, ratified by 153 states as of 2023, mandates punishment for direct and public incitement to commit genocide, linking ethnic hatred to atrocity crimes when it escalates to genocidal intent. While primarily focused on extreme outcomes, it has informed responses to ethnic hatred as a precursor, as evidenced by UN Special Adviser statements identifying hate speech targeting ethnic groups as a risk factor for genocide, such as in Rwanda in 1994.^[213] The 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), ratified by 182 states, directly addresses ethnic hatred by obligating parties under Article 4 to criminalize dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred, as well as acts of incitement to racial discrimination, violence, or hostility.^[214] This includes prohibiting organizations promoting such ideologies and ensuring remedies for victims, with the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination monitoring compliance through state reports and individual complaints. ICERD distinguishes ethnic hatred from mere expression by focusing on incitement, though enforcement relies on domestic implementation, leading to varied application; for instance, some states have invoked it in cases of anti-Semitic or anti-Roma incitement in Europe. Under the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, effective from 2002 and ratified by 124 states, ethnic hatred manifests as persecution within crimes against humanity when it involves the intentional deprivation of fundamental rights on ethnic grounds as part of a widespread or systematic attack on civilians.^[215] Article 7 specifies such acts, enabling prosecutions like those against figures in the Yugoslav conflicts for ethnic-based expulsions and killings.^[216] The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (1993–2017) applied similar principles, convicting individuals for instigating ethnic hatred through speeches that fueled the 1992–1995 Bosnian war atrocities. International responses include the UN Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech (2019), which promotes monitoring and countering incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence based on ethnicity without broadly prohibiting speech, emphasizing education and early warning systems. The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights issues guidance on prohibitions under Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), ratified by 173 states, which bans advocacy of ethnic hatred constituting incitement to hostility or violence. Critiques note limited effectiveness due to non-binding elements and state sovereignty issues; for example, a 2023 analysis highlighted enforcement gaps in addressing online ethnic incitement in conflict zones like Myanmar, where frameworks failed to prevent 2017 Rohingya violence despite warnings.^[217] Regional bodies, such as the European Court of Human Rights, have upheld convictions for ethnic hatred under the European Convention on Human Rights (1950), balancing free speech with prohibitions on incitement, as in cases involving denial of Armenian genocide claims.^[218] Overall, these mechanisms prioritize prevention through criminalization and monitoring, yet empirical data from UN reports indicate persistent challenges in prosecution rates, with only 12 genocide convictions by ad hoc tribunals since 1948.

Evaluations of Integration Strategies

Integration strategies aimed at mitigating ethnic hatred typically encompass assimilation, which prioritizes the adoption of the host society's dominant language, norms, and values; multiculturalism, which emphasizes the coexistence of separate cultural identities with minimal convergence; and selective integration models that combine economic incorporation with enforced cultural adaptation.^[219]^[220] Empirical assessments reveal that assimilation correlates with stronger social cohesion and reduced intergroup animosity, as shared cultural frameworks diminish perceived threats and foster mutual identification, whereas multiculturalism often sustains divisions by permitting parallel societies.^[204]^[221] Robert Putnam's 2007 study of over 30,000 U.S. respondents across 41 communities demonstrated that ethnic diversity inversely predicts social capital, with higher diversity linked to lower trust, reduced altruism, and weaker community bonds—even within homogeneous subgroups—potentially heightening ethnic frictions absent deliberate unifying efforts.^[197]^[222] This "constrict" effect persists in the short to medium term, as diverse settings prompt individuals to "hunker down," eroding the interpersonal ties necessary to counteract hatred.^[223] In Europe, multiculturalism's policy applications have yielded parallel structures exacerbating tensions; Sweden's approach, prioritizing cultural preservation over adaptation, led to integration failures by 2022, with Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson citing unassimilated immigrant concentrations as drivers of gang crime and societal fragmentation.^[224]^[225] Assimilation-focused policies demonstrate greater efficacy in curbing ethnic hatred through enforced convergence. Denmark's 1999 Integration Act mandates language proficiency, civics education, and geographic dispersal to avert enclaves, yielding higher second-generation immigrant employment rates (around 60% for non-Western origins by 2020) and lower welfare dependency compared to multicultural peers, alongside reduced ethnic spatial segregation.^[226]^[227] These measures promote causal realism in cohesion-building, as cultural homogeneity—evident in Denmark's emphasis on shared values—lowers perceived out-group threats, with quasi-experimental data showing decreased mobility toward ethnic clusters post-policy.^[228] However, persistent income gaps among third-generation immigrants underscore that full equivalence requires sustained enforcement, not mere diversity affirmation.^[228]^[219] Critics of multiculturalism, drawing from these outcomes, argue it overlooks innate human tendencies toward in-group preference, amplifying hatred via unbridged differences; assimilation, by contrast, aligns with evidence that common identity overrides ethnic priors, as seen in historical U.S. melting-pot successes where intermarriage rates exceeded 20% by the mid-20th century among European immigrants.^[221]^[229] While academic sources may underemphasize these failures due to ideological preferences for pluralism, raw metrics like Sweden's 2023 gang-related shootings (over 60 incidents) versus Denmark's lower immigrant crime disparities affirm assimilation's relative merits in preserving stability.^[224]^[230]

References

[1]
Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: the male warrior ...
The male warrior hypothesis argues that, for men, intergroup conflict represents an opportunity to gain access to mates, territory and increased status.
[2]
Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: the male warrior ...
Mar 5, 2012 · Here, we describe how male coalitional aggression could have affected the social psychologies of men and women differently and present ...
[3]
Evolutionary Psychology and the Explanation of Ethnic Phenomena
Evolutionary theory can recast thought, encourage new areas of research, and generate novel hypotheses about important issues in the ethnic conflict field and ...
[4]
[PDF] The Onset of Ethnic War: A General Theory
Oct 8, 2015 · Yet manipulation by the elite of ethnic identity, fear, and hatred is the most crucial process driving ethnic politics toward ethnic war.
[5]
[PDF] The Causes of Ethnic Conflicts - BYU ScholarsArchive
Jan 4, 2013 · Michael Brown, the author of “Causes of Internal Conflict: An Overview,” identifies four major causes of ethnic conflict: weak states, political ...
[6]
Evolutionary perspectives on intergroup prejudice - Oxford Academic
The basic starting point of evolutionary perspectives is that there may exist naturally selected psychological tendencies toward intergroup conflict (Darwin ...
[7]
https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-340
[8]
Race and Ethnic Categories: A Brief Review of Global Terms and ...
Ethnicity is defined as cultural factors such as language, religion, cuisine, ancestry, and nationality that specific communities share. Ethnicity is also ...
[9]
On Collective Responsibility: Thoughts Written During Air Raids ...
Jan 29, 2024 · The definition by which ethnic hatred would be hostility towards members of another ethnic group based on their belonging to that group is ...
[10]
Prejudice vs. Discrimination In Psychology
Sep 30, 2023 · Prejudice refers to an unjustified and negative attitude or belief towards a certain group of people based on their membership in that group.
[11]
[PDF] Revisiting Ethnic Framing in Conflicts: Challenging the Concept of ...
Mar 27, 2024 · ethnic hatred is usually constructed by considering the attitudes, discourses, and policies adopted by polit- ical and military elites or ...
[12]
[PDF] The Onset of Ethnic War: A General Theory
Oct 8, 2015 · Deploy mass media to fan ethnic hatred by (a) mythologizing the other group's real or fabricated crimes against one's own group as part of ...
[13]
A systemic approach to the psychology of racial bias within ...
May 18, 2023 · Overall, individual-level racial biases can lead to behaviours that transmit racial stereotypes at interpersonal and community levels, which ...
[14]
Racism, bias, and discrimination - American Psychological Association
Racism is a form of prejudice that generally includes negative emotional reactions, acceptance of negative stereotypes, and discrimination against ...
[15]
Differences Between Race vs. Ethnicity - Verywell Mind
Jan 30, 2025 · Race refers to dividing people into groups, often based on physical characteristics. Ethnicity refers to the cultural expression and identification of people.
[16]
Why We Need to Stop Talking About “Ethnic” Conflict
Dec 23, 2016 · Similarly, analysts tend to view the Bosnian conflicts as fueled by inter-ethnic hatred. ... ethnic animosity. Instead fear, power, and ...
[17]
Xenophobia vs. Racism: Explaining the Difference | Merriam-Webster
Xenophobia is the fear and hatred of strangers or foreigners, whereas racism has a broader meaning, including a belief that racial differences produce the ...
[18]
Countering ethnic hatred and its pedagogical approach in social ...
Jun 2, 2025 · Moreover, existing teaching models often fall short in guiding students to understand the root causes of ethnic hatred or in providing inquiry- ...
[19]
Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict - Belfer Center
Sep 22, 2025 · Most of the wars of the 1990s have been complex and bloody internal conflicts driven to a significant degree by nationalism and ethnic animosity ...
[20]
Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict - MIT Press
Most of the wars of the 1990s have been complex and bloody internal conflicts driven to a significant degree by nationalism and ethnic animosity.
[21]
View of What is Racism? Othering, Prejudice and Hate-motivated ...
Although hatred, prejudice and 'othering' are not the same thing, and do not have the same origins, they have become elided.
[22]
Racist and xenophobic hate crime | HCRW
Racist and xenophobic hate crime. Racism is prejudice or hostility towards a person's race, colour, language, nationality, or national or ethnic origin.Missing: animosity distinction
[23]
The evolution of human cooperation - ScienceDirect.com
Jun 3, 2019 · Kin selection leads to assortment when cooperators preferentially help those who share the same (cooperative) genes with them and those genes ...
[24]
Evolutionary models of in-group favoritism - PMC - PubMed Central
Mar 3, 2015 · In-group favoritism is the tendency to cooperate more with in-group members than out-group members, observed in both humans and animals.
[25]
Nepotistic cooperation in non-human primate groups - Journals
Nov 12, 2009 · As more evidence of nepotism has accumulated, important questions about the evolutionary processes underlying these kin biases have been raised.<|separator|>
[26]
Evolution of in-group favoritism | Scientific Reports - Nature
Jun 21, 2012 · In-group favoritism is a central aspect of human behavior. People often help members of their own group more than members of other groups.
[27]
[PDF] Kinship Cues as the Basis for Prosocial Behaviour in Groups
In this article, we focus primarily on the evolutionary mechanisms of kin selection. (and, to a lesser extent, on evolutionary mechanisms based on reciprocity).
[28]
Berghe's Sociobiological Approach to Ethnic Nepotism - jstor
A similar situation applies to ethnicity. Van den Berghe's idea is to regard ethnic groups as extended kin groups?ethnicity is extended kinship (1978b; 1986;.
[29]
Kin selection and ethnic group selection - ScienceDirect.com
It presents an alternative theory in which ethnic nepotism is socially enforced, and favored by ethnic group selection, a subtype of cultural group selection.
[30]
An experimental study of kin and ethnic favoritism - ResearchGate
Jan 26, 2019 · Experimental studies of favoritism and corruption typically examine such behavior among strangers, but ethnic and kinship ties have long ...
[31]
Evolutionarily stable in-group favoritism and out-group spite in ...
Aug 7, 2012 · Altruism or spiteful behavior have been derived and explained by evolutionary arguments in the context of kin selection and inclusive fitness ( ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[32]
Is Prejudice Heritable? Evidence from Twin Studies (Chapter 10)
Genetic explanations of human emotion, thought, and behavior have often been used to justify prejudice, rather than explain it.
[33]
A Twin Study into the Genetic and Environmental Influences ... - NIH
MZ twins are 100% genetically similar, whereas DZ twins are on average only 50% similar for segregating genes. At a crude level this means that if a trait is ...
[34]
Nature, Nurture, and Ethnocentrism in the Minnesota Twin Study
Mar 28, 2012 · The research here advances the argument that both socialization and genetic inheritance contribute to the development of ethnocentric attitudes ...
[35]
Heritability of Racial and Ethnic Pride, Preference, and Prejudice
Nov 1, 2015 · Orey, B. D. A., & Park, H. (2012). Nature, nurture, and ethnocentrism in the Minnesota Twin Study. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 15(01), 71- ...<|separator|>
[36]
Genetic Evidence for Multiple Biological Mechanisms Underlying In ...
Aug 9, 2025 · In this article, we report the first study (to our knowledge) of the genetic and environmental structure of in-group favoritism in the religious ...
[37]
Genetic Influences on Political Ideologies: Twin Analyses of 19 ...
Twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations.
[38]
Gene × environment interaction on intergroup bias: the role of 5 ...
Here, we examined how 5-HTTLPR and environmental factors signaling potential outgroup threat dynamically interact to shape intergroup bias.
[39]
[PDF] Common Heritable Effects Underpin Concerns Over Norm ... - MIDUS
genetic influences on in-group favoritism would be shared with influences on traditionalism. The genetic correlation between traditionalism and in-group ...
[40]
Neo-Assyrian Deportation and the Levant - ANE Today
Feb 16, 2021 · In the Assyrian sources, every instance of deportation is presented as a response to rebellion, a punishment for opposing the divinely ordained ...Missing: ethnic | Show results with:ethnic
[41]
Deportation in the Levant in the Age of Assyrian Hegemony
The Assyrian state is said to have deported people because it wanted to secure more laborers, populate strategic locations, quash resistance, or realize some ...Bodysnatching · Assyria, Land Of Outlanders · Dealing With Dissent
[42]
Assyrian Deportation and Resettlement: The Story of Samaria
Aug 8, 2019 · In 722 BCE., Assyria conquered the kingdom of Israel, and deported many of the residents of Samaria and its surroundings to other Assyrian provinces.Missing: ethnic | Show results with:ethnic
[43]
Why Were the Jews Persecuted? - History Today
We can see that hatred was felt by the local populations; but it was the leaders of the different societies which stirred up that hate, and their reasons for ...Why Were The Jews Persecuted... · Biblical Times · Persecution
[44]
Antisemitism in History: From the Early Church to 1400
The racial antisemitism of the National Socialists (Nazis) took hatred of Jews to a genocidal extreme, yet the Holocaust began with words and ideas: stereotypes ...
[45]
What did Nietzsche mean by "In Rome the Jew was considered ...
Nov 20, 2020 · Nietzsche agrees with the Romans that "the Jew" ("the priest", etc.) is guilty of hatred of the entire human race.
[46]
The Rhineland Massacres of the First Crusade - Medievalists.net
Feb 15, 2023 · Around the mid-twelfth century, a Jewish chronicler named Solomon bar Simson penned an account of events that had happened 50 years earlier ...
[47]
Genocidal Massacres of Jews in Medieval Western Europe, 1096 ...
The dissemination of conspiracy theories about Jews committing ritual murder, desecrating the Eucharistic host, or causing the plague also led to violence. Jews ...
[48]
The Rhineland Massacres of Jews in the First Crusade: Memories ...
Jan 5, 2013 · Nine hundred years ago, crusaders passing through the Rhineland on their way to Jerusalem attacked Jews in towns throughout the region surrounding Heidelberg.
[49]
[PDF] Precolonial Ethnic Violence
Nov 5, 2018 · We construct a new dataset of all conflicts between Hindu and Muslim polities from 1000–1850 A.D. and use it to generate an estimate of conflict ...
[50]
Nationalism, Ethnicity and Democracy: Contemporary Manifestations
In view of the continuing confusion surrounding such issues, self determination claims, especially when they lend themselves to violence, are likely to continue ...
[51]
Pogroms | Holocaust Encyclopedia
The term “pogrom” historically refers to violent attacks on Jews by local non-Jewish populations. Learn about pogroms before, during, and after the ...
[52]
Antisemitism in Late Imperial Russia and Eastern Europe through ...
Meir, and Israel Bartal, “Introduction,” in Dekel-Chen et al., eds., Anti-Jewish Violence, 1–2, 7; David Engel, “What's in a Pogrom? European Jews in the Age of ...
[53]
From a Fateful Revolution to the Dream of Pan-Turkism - EVN Report
Feb 27, 2021 · From a Fateful Revolution to the Dream of Pan-Turkism: Causes of the Armenian Genocide ... [9] Naimark, Norman M., “Fires of Hatred: Ethnic ...
[54]
[PDF] Blood for Soil - UN.org.
ethnic nationalism has had violent consequences. There is good reason to worry that the current surge will, too. THE ROAD TO VIOLENCE. Rising ethnic ...
[55]
The Balkan Wars and the Road to World War I: 1912–1914 | Serbia
A full-scale Albanian rebellion led by Hasan Prishtina and others erupted on 24 March 1912. By late July, the rebels had taken much of Kosovo including Priština ...
[56]
Nationalism, Historical Legacies, and Ethnic Cleansing in Europe ...
Jan 24, 2024 · Many European nation-states were historically homogenized through violent ethnic cleansing. Despite its historical importance, ...
[57]
Partition of 1947 continues to haunt India, Pakistan - Stanford Report
Mar 8, 2019 · The violence marked the crumbling of an old order and abdication of responsibility for minorities by all those with any kind of power. You have ...
[58]
Getting to the why of British India's bloody Partition - Harvard Gazette
Apr 6, 2018 · “This was not just mass hysteria violence. There was a high level of organization and lethality.” Results from the Partition project's more ...
[59]
History of the Question of Palestine - UN.org.
Arab demands for independence and resistance to immigration led to a rebellion in 1937, followed by continuing terrorism and violence from both sides. UK ...
[60]
[69] Report by the Central Intelligence, Agency - Office of the Historian
Arab reaction to the UNGA partition plan was prompt and violent. Strikes and ... Jews would have no alternative but to agree although Jewish violence would ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[61]
Remembering Nigeria's Biafra war that many prefer to forget - BBC
Jan 14, 2020 · In 1967, following two coups and turmoil which led to about a million Igbos returning to the south-east of Nigeria, the Republic of Biafra ...
[62]
Nigerian Civil War (1967-1970) - BlackPast.org
May 20, 2009 · Further anger over the murder of prominent Hausa politicians led to the massacre of scattered Igbo populations in northern Hausa-Fulani regions.
[63]
Genocide In Bosnia - Holocaust Museum Houston
Starting in April 1992, Serbia set out to “ethnically cleanse” Bosnian territory by systematically removing all Bosnian Muslims, known as Bosniaks.
[64]
Infographic: 30 years since the Bosnian War - Al Jazeera
Apr 6, 2022 · The international armed conflict that lasted from 1992 to 1995 led to a genocide that killed more than 100000 people.
[65]
Enormous Loss of Civilian Life - United States Holocaust Memorial ...
The Sudanese government and forces associated with it targeted entire ethnic groups, including the Dinka and Nuer in current-day South Sudan, and the Nuba of ...<|separator|>
[66]
Genocide In Darfur - Holocaust Museum Houston
Civil war has existed between the northern and southern regions of Sudan for more than a decade. The northern region, centered on the capital of Khartoum, ...
[67]
Five Major African Wars and Conflicts of the Twentieth Century
From the Nigerian Civil War to the Somali Civil War, these 20th Century conflicts submitted civilians to intense physical and psychological trauma.
[68]
https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-271
[69]
The dark psychology of dehumanization, explained - Vox
Mar 7, 2017 · The dark psychology of dehumanization, explained ... Reports of hate crimes against Muslims in the US are at their highest levels since 2001.
[70]
Dehumanization and mass violence: A study of mental state ...
To evaluate competing perspectives on dehumanization's relationship with mass violence, we examined the dehumanization of Jews in Nazi propaganda both before ...
[71]
Dehumanization and intergroup relations. - APA PsycNet
This chapter reviews the rapidly growing psychological literature on dehumanization. This literature has made tremendous strides toward a broad and deep ...<|separator|>
[72]
Dehumanization increases instrumental violence, but not moral ...
Jul 24, 2017 · Across five experiments, we show that dehumanization—the act of perceiving victims as not completely human—increases instrumental, but not moral ...<|separator|>
[73]
Social, psychological, and demographic characteristics of ... - PNAS
Perhaps dehumanization is a foundational characteristic of the pyramid of hate (72), which implicitly and explicitly supports the violent extremism at the tip ...
[74]
(PDF) They See Us as Less Than Human: Metadehumanization ...
Oct 1, 2025 · We document a dehumanization-specific pathway from metadehumanization to aggressive attitudes and behavior that is distinct from the path from ...
[75]
Psychological Barriers to Resolving Intergroup Conflict
Oct 15, 2019 · ... psychological mechanisms ... They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization.
[76]
Dehumanization and the Normalization of Violence - Items
May 21, 2019 · Finally, in my own research, I find that dehumanization is more often an outcome of participation in violence rather than a precursor.14Luft ...
[77]
The uniquely powerful impact of explicit, blatant dehumanization on ...
May 5, 2025 · ... Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 343–370.
[78]
Intergroup preference, not dehumanization, explains social biases in ...
We challenge the most prominent psychological model of dehumanization - infrahumanization theory - which holds outgroup members are subtly dehumanized by being ...
[79]
Intergroup Conflict and Dehumanization (Chapter 14)
Feb 20, 2025 · The author reviews the empirical literature on how dehumanization may function to prime, facilitate, and justify harm during intergroup conflict.
[80]
A social virus: Intergroup dehumanization and unwillingness to aid ...
Nov 30, 2021 · Dehumanization is the act of denying outgroup members human-like attributes (Haslam & Stratemeyer, 2016). It has been found to mediate relations ...
[81]
Social Identity Theory In Psychology (Tajfel & Turner, 1979)
Oct 5, 2023 · Social Identity Theory, developed by Henri Tajfel, explains how individuals define themselves based on their group memberships, such as nationality, religion, ...
[82]
Tajfel and Turner's Social Identity Theory | IB Psychology
Feb 16, 2017 · Henri Tajfel and John Turner devised their Social Identity Theory (SIT) in the 1970s to “supplement” Sherif's Realistic Conflict Theory (RCT).
[83]
Social Identity Theory (Examples, Strengths & Weaknesses) (2025)
... race or ethnic identity can lead to competition called ethnic conflict. For example, there is currently ethnic conflict in Myanmar between Buddhists and Muslims ...
[84]
The social identity approach: Appraising the Tajfellian legacy - Brown
Nov 6, 2019 · Social Identity Theorys primary focus on subordinate or stigmatized groups and its attempts to predict when they might (or might not) be ...<|separator|>
[85]
Realistic Conflict Theory: Psychology Definition, History & Examples
Realistic Conflict Theory explains that when groups compete over limited resources, it can lead to intergroup hostility and discrimination. It suggests that ...
[86]
Group Identity and Ingroup Bias: The Social Identity Approach
Sep 3, 2021 · This article discusses the social identity approach (social identity theory and self-categorization theory) for understanding children's ingroup biases in ...
[87]
Ethnic bias, economic achievement and trust between large ethnic ...
We examine the notion that outgroup discrimination by majority group members stems from stereotypes of minorities as economically unsuccessful.
[88]
Social Identity Theory Explained: Key Concepts And Applications
Dec 2, 2024 · Social identity theory has been instrumental in explaining intergroup conflicts, such as ethnic tensions, political divisions, or workplace ...
[89]
Sage Reference - Realistic Group Conflict Theory
Realistic group conflict theory (RGCT) states that competition between groups for finite resources leads to intergroup stereotypes, ...
[90]
Robbers Cave Experiment | Realistic Conflict Theory
Sep 27, 2023 · Realistic Conflict Theory. Realistic conflict theory posits intergroup hostility and conflict arise when groups compete for limited resources.
[91]
Resource Competition Theories - JOANE NAGEL, 1995
Although conflict in cultural divisions of labor tends to be organized along ethnic lines, with movements built out of ethnic organizations, the conflict can be ...Missing: pressures | Show results with:pressures
[92]
Natural resources and conflict: A meta-analysis of the empirical ...
Our results show that both resource scarcity and abundance are associated with a higher probability of conflict.
[93]
Reexamining the Link Between Economic Downturns and Racial ...
In this article, we reexamine the relationship between economic downturns and racial acrimony using more subtle indicators of racial animosity.
[94]
[PDF] Economic Shocks, Inter-Ethnic Complementarities and the ...
Sep 6, 2016 · As numerous studies have documented, minority groups remain targets of violence across many parts of the world (see Horowitz, 2001; Chua, 2004; ...
[95]
[PDF] Resource Concentration and Civil Wars
Civil wars are more likely when resource and ethnic group concentration are high, especially when a minority group's region is rich in resources. High regional ...Missing: pressures | Show results with:pressures
[96]
'The World's Worst Humanitarian Crisis': Understanding the Darfur ...
Feb 9, 2009 · Environmental degradation and competition over resources can be understood as principal causes of communal conflict in Darfur, but the ongoing ...
[97]
[PDF] On the Theory of Ethnic Conflict - Duke People
We present a theory of ethnic conflict in which coalitions formed along ethnic lines compete for the economy's resources. The role of ethnicity is to enforce ...
[98]
Role of ethnic conflicts, regularization and natural resource ...
This study finds the impact of natural resources, ethnic conflict and institutional quality on sustainable development.Missing: pressures | Show results with:pressures
[99]
Realistic Conflict Theory AO1 AO2 AO3 - PSYCHOLOGY WIZARD
But why do some outgroups attract hostility and discrimination but others are treated neutrally or even admired? For example, the British have some negative ...
[100]
Cultural Distance and Ethnic Civil Conflict
I show that civil conflict in Africa is explained by ethnic groups' cultural distance to the central government.<|separator|>
[101]
[PDF] Cultural Distance and Ethnic Civil Conflict - ifo Institut
Aug 8, 2023 · Most civil conflicts have taken place in Africa, and the deadliest have been fought along ethnic lines.1. Globally, civil conflict has caused ...
[102]
The biology of cultural conflict - PMC - NIH
Cultural conflict will occur only when the beliefs and traditions of one cultural group represent a challenge to individuals of another.
[103]
The Downside of Diversity - The Wilson Quarterly
Few concepts are more celebrated in modern America than racial and ethnic diversity. Yet casual talk-show racism and fierce hostility toward the current ...
[104]
Robert Putnam on the Negative Effects of Diversity
Sep 12, 2016 · While diversity does not necessarily increase inter-ethnic hatred,. “… inhabitants of diverse communities tend to withdraw from collective life, ...
[105]
Immigration Is Surging from Countries with Starkly Different Cultural ...
Nov 18, 2016 · The figures below use questions from the World Values Survey to illustrate the differences in cultural values between the United States and ...Missing: clashes | Show results with:clashes
[106]
Thinking Globally about Attitudes to Immigration: Concerns about ...
Jun 19, 2021 · Using the 2017–2020 World Values Survey (WVS) for forty-nine countries, we show that: in most countries, globally, citizens are more likely to ...Missing: clashes | Show results with:clashes
[107]
Links between perceived cultural distance in values and attitudes ...
Forest plot of the meta‐analysis of perceived cultural distance in self‐transcendence and migrant attitudes. ... International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4 ...
[108]
(PDF) Impacts-of-Culture-and-Cultural-Differences-on-Conflict ...
Cultural differences impact conflict prevention and peacebuilding in multicultural settings by constituting a barrier and a times instigating failures of these ...
[109]
Diversity and Conflict - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
In the course of human history, conflicts have plausibly altered the observed levels of diversity within ethnic groups, and the association between observed ...
[110]
Nazi Propaganda | Holocaust Encyclopedia
Nazi propaganda had a key role in the persecution of Jews. Learn more about how Hitler and the Nazi Party used propaganda to facilitate war and genocide.Nazi anti-Jewish propaganda · Ministry of Propaganda · Menu
[111]
How Nazi propaganda dehumanized Jews to facilitate the Holocaust
Dec 3, 2022 · A new study of speeches, pamphlets and articles from the period shows how German fascism denied Jewish people humanity to fuel hate and ...
[112]
[PDF] Propaganda and Conflict: Evidence from the Rwandan Genocide
This paper investigates the role of mass media in the spread of violence by estimating the effects of propaganda disseminated via radio during the 1994 Rwandan ...
[113]
The Media as a Tool of War: Propaganda in the Rwandan Genocide
May 9, 2014 · Propaganda played an active, supportive role in facilitating the atrocities, as well as an influential role in establishing the pre-conditions ...
[114]
Comment: Milosevic's Propaganda War
Feb 22, 2005 · ... hatred among Serbs by spreading "exaggerated and false messages of ... propaganda in other Yugoslav republics and its. after-effects ...
[115]
from ethnic cooperation to violence and war in Yugoslavia
The manipulation of ethnicity: from ethnic cooperation to violence and war in Yugoslavia ... Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict: The Case of Serbia.
[116]
Elite mobilisation and ethnic conflicts: evidence from bawku ...
Sep 15, 2022 · This led to competition over state resources and, many times, violent conflicts. For instance, elite politics was responsible for the conflict ...
[117]
Nationalist Conflict and Elite Manipulation in Serbia and India
An examination of elite manipulation in these cases shows that violence is instigated in two distinct ways – either by elites themselves (elite led violence) or ...
[118]
Case Studies of Ethnic Division, Escalation, and Violence – WMO
Nov 5, 2024 · Here, we will assess cases of ethnic or racial conflicts and how mediation failed or succeeded in resolving the conflict.
[119]
Antisemitism | Holocaust Encyclopedia
Jan 10, 2025 · Antisemitism is the prejudice against or hatred of Jewish people. This hatred was at the foundation of the Holocaust.Nazi Antisemitism · From the Early Church to 1400 · World War I
[120]
Antisemitic Legislation 1933–1939 - Holocaust Encyclopedia
Antisemitic Legislation 1933–1939 · antisemitism · anti-Jewish legislation · Nazi rise to power · Third Reich · legislation.Missing: factual | Show results with:factual
[121]
The Nuremberg Race Laws | Holocaust Encyclopedia
Sep 25, 2025 · The Nazi regime's Nuremberg Race Laws of September 1935 made Jews legally different from their non-Jewish neighbors. The laws were the ...
[122]
Introduction to the Holocaust
Sep 20, 2024 · Antisemitism, the hatred of or prejudice against Jews, was a basic tenet of Nazi ideology. This prejudice was also widespread throughout Europe.
[123]
How Many People did the Nazis Murder? | Holocaust Encyclopedia
Sep 26, 2023 · Behind the number of victims of the Holocaust and Nazi persecution are people whose hopes and dreams were destroyed. Learn about the toll of ...Missing: verified | Show results with:verified
[124]
Wannsee Conference and the "Final Solution"
The Wannsee Conference was a high-level meeting of German officials to discuss and implement the so-called “Final Solution of the Jewish Question” (mass ...
[125]
The Wannsee Conference - Yad Vashem
As a result, a network of extermination camps was established in which 1.7 million Jews were murdered in 1942-1943.
[126]
Holocaust Facts: Where Does the Figure of 6 Million Victims Come ...
Jan 27, 2022 · One of the most well-known, if not iconic, facts known about the Holocaust is the number of Jewish victims killed by Nazi Germany up through the ...
[127]
Rwanda genocide: 100 days of slaughter - BBC News
Apr 4, 2019 · In just 100 days in 1994, some 800000 people were slaughtered in Rwanda by ethnic Hutu extremists - how did the genocide happen?
[128]
Remembering the Rwandan genocide 30 years on - Al Jazeera
Apr 7, 2024 · It has been three decades since the April 1994 Rwandan genocide when members of the majority Hutu ethnic group killed an estimated 800,000 ...
[129]
Divided by Ethnicity - United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
In 1994, Rwanda's population of 7 million was composed of three ethnic groups: Hutu (approximately 85 percent), Tutsi (14 percent) and Twa (1 percent).
[130]
1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda - UN.org.
Under German rule, the existing hierarchy remained intact: Tutsi chiefs maintained order over the majority made up of Hutu lower classes. Read more. Africa 1897.
[131]
The Rwandan Genocide: How It Was Prepared : Context
The genocide in Rwanda, like all genocides, was a complex phenomenon that resulted from a combination of long-term structural factors as well as more immediate ...
[132]
What led to the genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda? | CMHR
Jun 26, 2019 · Learn how division, dehumanization and incitement of hatred set the stage for genocide.
[133]
Genocide: Ideology and Organization - Human Rights Watch
Organizers of the genocide used ideology to bring Hutu to fear and hate Tutsi. They then used the institutions of the state to transform the fear and hate.
[134]
https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/129/4/1947/1853091
[135]
Timeline: How Rwanda's genocide unfolded - Al Jazeera
Apr 14, 2014 · Timeline: How Rwanda's genocide unfolded. In the space of 100 days, at least 800,000 were killed in one of the most brutally efficient genocides ...
[136]
(PDF) The Death Toll of the Rwandan Genocide: A Detailed ...
Aug 6, 2025 · We find that Tutsi in Gikongoro had, on average, a 25% chance of surviving the genocide. The survival rate for women was only slightly higher than for men: 29% ...
[137]
The Death Toll of the Rwandan Genocide: A Detailed Analysis for ...
By subtracting the number of survivors from the estimated Tutsi population under the no-genocide scenario, we obtain an estimate of 500,900 Tutsi killed in the ...
[138]
The Breakup of Yugoslavia, 1990–1992 - Office of the Historian
The Serb minority in Croatia declared its own independence from the republic and its desire to join Serbia, sparking violence between armed militias. The JNA ...
[139]
[PDF] Ethnic Identity in Yugoslavia and its Role in the Balkan Wars of the ...
Factors of ethnicity including language and religion are widely cited as primary causes of the war. Yugoslavia consisted of three primary religions: Orthodox ...
[140]
Slobodan Milosevic | Biography, Facts, & Trial - Britannica
Slobodan Milosevic, politician who, as Serbia's president (1989–97), pursued nationalist policies that contributed to the breakup of the Yugoslav federation ...
[141]
The Myth of “Ethnic Conflict” - Columbia International Affairs Online
In Yugoslavia, once nationalists had gained the upper hand in Serbia, incentives for ethnic nationalism rose in Croatia, and “sister” Serb and Croat ...
[142]
[PDF] 1 THE 1992-95 WAR IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Feb 1, 2010 · All reliable lists of war related deaths, accessible to the OTP, ICTY, were used. The databases were matched with the 1991 Population Census (a ...
[143]
Milosevic "Bosnia and Herzegovina" - Initial Indictment
In addition, he openly espoused and encouraged the creation of a "Greater Serbia" by violence and other unlawful means, and actively participated in war ...
[144]
[PDF] Ethnic diversity, segregation, and the collapse of Yugoslavia
Jun 24, 2010 · The analysis strengthens refutations of the view that long standing ethnic hatreds were the root cause of the Yugoslav collapse and supports ...
[145]
Darfur, Sudan - | International Criminal Court
The ICC investigations regarding Darfur focus on allegations of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Darfur, Sudan, since 1 July 2002.Al Bashir Case · Abd-Al-Rahman Case · Banda Case · Abu Garda Case<|separator|>
[146]
Civil War in Sudan | Global Conflict Tracker
Apr 15, 2025 · As the civil war enters its third year, Sudan's two warring factions remain locked in a deadly power struggle. Death toll estimates vary ...
[147]
Sudan: Ethnic Cleansing in West Darfur | Human Rights Watch
May 9, 2024 · The crimes against humanity and widespread war crimes were committed in the context of an ethnic cleansing campaign against the ethnic Massalit and other non- ...
[148]
Darfur | Holocaust Encyclopedia
... for refugees from the Darfur region of neighboring Sudan. More information about this image. Darfur. Between 2003 and 2005, the government of Sudan, with the ...
[149]
Sudan war: A simple guide to what is happening - BBC
Jul 4, 2025 · It has led to a famine and claims of a genocide in the western Darfur region. More than 150,000 people have died in the conflict across the ...
[150]
Conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo | Global Conflict Tracker
Jun 9, 2025 · The First Congo War (1996–1997) began in the wake of the 1994 Rwandan Genocide, during which ethnic Hutu extremists killed an estimated one ...
[151]
5.4 million people have died in Democratic Republic of Congo since ...
A survey of mortality estimates that the ongoing humanitarian crisis has claimed some 5.4 million lives since 1998.
[152]
Democratic Republic of the Congo - World Without Genocide
Since 1996, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC; Congo) has been embroiled in violence that has killed as many as 6 million people.<|separator|>
[153]
Armed militia kill hundreds in eastern DR Congo - UN News
Aug 6, 2025 · Hopes for peace in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) have been shaken by a surge in brutal attacks on civilians by armed groups, ...
[154]
Why is the Democratic Republic of Congo wracked by conflict?
Oct 29, 2024 · Decades of conflict have been fuelled by ethnic tensions, political rivalries, corruption and fighting for control of valuable natural ...
[155]
“The Massalit Will Not Come Home”: Ethnic Cleansing and Crimes ...
May 9, 2024 · The RSF and allied militias conducted a systematic campaign to remove, including by killing, ethnic Massalit residents, such as Ali, from El Geneina.
[156]
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Jul 15, 2025 · Attacks by armed groups and recurring inter-communal violence have threatened populations in the eastern provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC ...
[157]
Rejection of the UN Partition Plan of November 29, 1947, Was a ...
Nov 29, 2023 · From November 1947 to May 1948, the Arab countries could have reconsidered their decision and given birth to a second Arab state in “Palestine.
[158]
[PDF] The United Nations Partition Plan
The Palestinian Arabs and the surrounding Arab states rejected the UN plan and regarded the General Assembly vote as an international betrayal.
[159]
The Arab-Israeli War of 1948 - state.gov
Israel gained some territory formerly granted to Palestinian Arabs under the United Nations resolution in 1947. Egypt and Jordan retained control over the Gaza ...
[160]
Hamas Covenant 1988 - The Avalon Project
The Covenant of the. Islamic Resistance Movement. 18 August 1988. In The Name Of The Most Merciful Allah. "Ye are the best nation that hath been raised up ...
[161]
Hamas in Its Own Words | ADL
Jan 10, 2024 · Hamas: New Charter, Same Old Anti-Semitism ... On October 7, Hamas attacked Israel, slaughtering around 1,200 men, women, children, and infants in ...
[162]
October 7 attack | Israel, Gaza, Deaths, & Hostages - Britannica
The October 7 attack was an assault led by Hamas against Israel that killed about 1200 people. More than 240 people were taken hostage, and Israel launched ...
[163]
Israel at War: What You Need To Know | AJC
Following Hamas' October 7, 2023 massacre, the terror group is still ... Over 700 days after the deadliest attack on Jews since the Holocaust, there ...Missing: nature | Show results with:nature
[164]
PCPSR.org
Furthermore, findings show significant rise in support for the two-state solution accompanied by a drop in the preference for armed struggle and a rise in the ...
[165]
Support MEMRI's Fight Against Extremism
Oct 4, 2023 · Since its founding in 1998, MEMRI has exposed Palestinian expressions of antisemitism, incitement to violence, and other forms of hatred.Missing: hatred | Show results with:hatred
[166]
Palestinian Institutions Continue Vicious Incitement Against Israelis
Oct 26, 2015 · As part of a broader series documenting a systematic campaign of violent incitement, MEMRI ... Palestinian Authority also incite violence and ...
[167]
[PDF] Fact Sheet - The Palestinian Authority's Campaign of Incitement
... violence against Israel: Incitement against Israel persists in Palestinian television and radio broadcasts. The PA leadership has incited violence. Also ...<|separator|>
[168]
In Depth: Arafat Rejected Peace in 2000 | HonestReporting
This article will review the old and new evidence showing the tragedy of Arafat's “no” response to an attractive peace deal.
[169]
Understanding Hamas's Genocidal Ideology - The Atlantic
Oct 10, 2023 · ... Hamas Covenant or the revised charter that was issued in 2017? ... The reinforcement of historical anti-Semitic tropes and calumnies married to ...
[170]
Regional Terrorism Trends Before and After October 7
Following the attack, as the group engaged in direct conflict with Israel in Gaza, its recorded violent attacks surged to 480 incidents, yet the Israeli ...
[171]
Europe's Migration Crisis | Council on Foreign Relations
Syrians and Afghans made up the "lion's share" of migrants traveling from Turkey to Greece (primarily to the Greek islands of Kos, Chios, Lesbos, and Samos) in ...
[172]
How Germany downplays crime committed by foreign nationals - NZZ
Apr 10, 2025 · Recent statistics suggest that foreign nationals in Germany are significantly overrepresented as suspects in criminal offenses.
[173]
Immigrant Background and Rape Conviction: A 21-Year Follow-Up ...
Jan 6, 2025 · We found that 36.9% of the convicted individuals and 69.5% of the controls were Swedish-born with two Swedish-born parents. The odds of being ...
[174]
Swedish study confirms the connection between migration and ...
Aug 27, 2021 · According to the report, Swedes whose parents were born abroad are five times more likely to be suspected of murder and manslaughter than Swedes whose parents ...
[175]
Baroness Casey's audit of group-based child sexual exploitation ...
Jun 16, 2025 · The Home Secretary updated the House on the National Audit on Group-based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse ('grooming gangs') carried out ...
[176]
[PDF] National Audit on Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse
Jun 24, 2025 · Acknowledgements. Baroness Casey of Blackstock and team are grateful to all of those who gave their time and expertise during the course of ...
[177]
Criminal Alien Statistics Fiscal Year 2023
The following is a summary of U.S. Border Patrol enforcement actions related to arrests of criminal aliens for Fiscal Years 2017 - 2023.
[178]
Archived: ICE releases fiscal year 2023 annual report
May 29, 2025 · ERO arrested 73,822 noncitizens with a criminal history; those arrested had an average of 4 charges and convictions per individual, including ...
[179]
Surge in U.S. Concern About Immigration Has Abated - Gallup News
Jul 11, 2025 · After climbing to 55% in 2024, the percentage of Americans who say immigration should be reduced has dropped by nearly half to 30%. Sentiment is ...
[180]
Racism is not about “race” | Scientific Reports - Nature
Dec 15, 2023 · Unfamiliar individuals are viewed with suspicion across the entire animal kingdom. This makes evolutionary sense, as outsiders may carry ...
[181]
Chimpanzee study sheds light on evolutionary roots of xenophobia
Apr 19, 2022 · This review brings novel insights on the evolution of xenophobia and in-group cooperation, suggesting that parochial cooperation was most likely already ...
[182]
A historical evaluation of the disease avoidance theory of xenophobia
Dec 27, 2023 · We aimed to gather evidence to evaluate the disease avoidance theory of xenophobia by analyzing the narratives of European explorers from the15 th and 16 th ...
[183]
Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces - PMC
Overall the results obtained in Experiment 1 suggest that at birth, newborns display no spontaneous preferences for faces from own- or other-ethnic groups.
[184]
Infants show racial bias toward members of own ethnicity, against ...
Apr 12, 2017 · Six- to nine-month-old infants demonstrate racial bias in favour of members of their own race and racial bias against those of other races.
[185]
Is prejudice heritable? Evidence from twin studies. - APA PsycNet
In this chapter, we aimed to introduce prejudice researchers to research from behavioral genetics ... Kandler, C., Lewis, G. J., Feldhaus, L. H., & Riemann, R.
[186]
Racism isn't innate—here are five psychological stages that may ...
Sep 16, 2025 · Some scientists have suggested that racism is an innate human trait that evolved in the distant past. According to the evolutionary psychologist ...
[187]
Innate or Learned Prejudice? Turns Out Even the Blind Aren't Color ...
Sep 27, 2015 · None of us is color blind. Not even the blind, it turns out. That's according to the work of Osagie Obasogie, law professor at UC Hastings.
[188]
Research States That Prejudice Comes From a Basic Human Need ...
Dec 19, 2011 · Roets's conclusions suggest that the fundamental source of prejudice is not ideology, but rather a basic human need and way of thinking.
[189]
Is racism and bigotry in our DNA? - Research - University of Reading
Jun 11, 2020 · There is a genetic component to fear of others, but culture strongly influences attitudes, and we can choose to suppress such tendencies.Missing: GWAS | Show results with:GWAS
[190]
12 Ethnicity and Ethnic Conflict - Oxford Academic
The first scholarly response was simply that the decolonized states were new, but ethnic, or communal animosities—sometime also called national animosities—were ...
[191]
The Nature and Challenges of Ethnicity - jstor
After critically examining the main three conflicting theories on ethnicity, namely, primordialism, instrumentalism, and constructivism, and evaluating the ...
[192]
How Useful are the Main Existing Theories of Ethnic Conflict?
Aug 8, 2025 · Over the years, researchers have developed different theories of ethnicity that can be clustered into three schools of thought: Primordialism, ...
[193]
Evolutionary Psychology and the Explanation of Ethnic Phenomena
This article responds to those views and argues that evolutionary psychology shows great promise in contributing to the explanation of contemporary ethnic ...
[194]
[PDF] How Useful are the Main Existing Theories of Ethnic Conflict?
Mar 1, 2015 · Primordialism ignores the structural, economic and political processes within which these conflicts erupt (McKay, 2011) and implies that in ...
[195]
https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-171
[196]
The downside of diversity - The New York Times
Aug 5, 2007 · Putnam realized, for instance, that more diverse communities tended to be larger, have greater income ranges, higher crime rates, and more ...
[197]
The Downside of Diversity
Robert Putnam is a faculty associate at the Weatherhead Center and Peter and Isabel Malkin Professor of Public Policy. A Harvard political scientist finds ...
[198]
Does Diversity Create Distrust? - Scientific American
Nov 29, 2016 · In 2007 the Harvard professor Robert Putnam published a paper that appeared to challenge the benefits of living in a racially diverse society.
[199]
Immigration Diversity and Social Cohesion - Migration Observatory
Dec 13, 2019 · The empirical evidence from the US suggests a negative relationship between diversity and cohesion. The evidence from the UK and rest of Europe ...
[200]
The Debate Over Multiculturalism: Philosophy, Politics, and Policy
Sep 22, 2011 · In February 2011, French President Nicolas Sarkozy also called multiculturalism a failure ... political rhetoric around the perceived problems ...
[201]
If multiculturalism has failed, then what about integration?
Sep 5, 2025 · Then, in 2011, Prime Minister David Cameron famously declared that state multiculturalism has failed, in unison with Germany's Angela Merkel ...
[202]
THE FAILURE OF MULTICULTURALISM | Pandaemonium
Feb 17, 2015 · Thirty years ago, many Europeans saw multiculturalism – the embrace of an inclusive, diverse society – as an answer to Europe's social problems.
[203]
[PDF] Multiculturalism versus assimilation: Attitudes towards immigrants in ...
Data and Estimation. Table 1 shows the proportions of respondents in 18 Western countries, who favoured either assimilation or multiculturalism. Respondents ...
[204]
Full article: Assimilation and integration in the twenty-first century
Feb 3, 2024 · The classic accounts of assimilation treated assimilation as unidirectional, with those of immigrant origin changing to assimilate while the ...
[205]
What History Tells Us about Assimilation of Immigrants
Measuring cultural assimilation is a challenge because data on cultural practices—things like food, dress, and accent—are not systematically collected. But the ...
[206]
Identity conflict, ethnocentrism and social cohesion - ScienceDirect
This paper uses a novel dataset on ethnic warfare to shed light on how conflict affects social identification and cohesion.
[207]
Legacies of Survival: Historical Violence and Ethnic Minority Behavior
Aug 16, 2023 · Recent studies found that displacement increases hostility between perpetrators and displaced individuals, but there has been paltry research on ...
[208]
Sustaining the peace after ethnic civil wars - jstor
We explore factors that influence the duration of peace after an ethnic civil war. Results from series of survival models indicate that political and ...
[209]
Post-conflict societies - ArcGIS StoryMaps
Apr 23, 2024 · Many countries fail to complete their transition to peace, these post-conflict societies may be past war, but they are still in crisis.
[210]
How Ethnic Diversity Affects Economic Growth - ScienceDirect.com
This paper investigates the empirical relationship between ethnic diversity, polarization, and economic growth. Ethnicity is assumed to affect economic ...
[211]
[PDF] The cost of violence: Estimating the economic impact of conflict
Using data on Israeli-Palestinian conflict since the late 1980s, the researchers found that major escalations in violence led to significant declines in asset ...
[212]
Ethnic stratification: A new measure to predict social conflict | VoxDev
Jun 8, 2020 · A new index of ethnic stratification reveals that ethnic differences matter for conflict if, and only if, they coincide with economic differences.
[213]
Statement by the UN Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide ...
Jul 4, 2023 · The United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech, which notes that hate speech was a precursor to genocide, including in Rwanda ...
[214]
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial ...
(a) Shall declare an offence punishable by law all dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred, incitement to racial discrimination, as well as ...
[215]
[PDF] Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute with respect to the following crimes: (a) The crime of genocide;. (b) Crimes against humanity;. (c) ...
[216]
[PDF] Elements of Crimes - | International Criminal Court
Crime against humanity of persecution ... 5; see Official Records of the Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Kampala,.
[217]
A critique of the UN Strategy and Guidance on 'Hate Speech'
Dec 6, 2023 · This article critically reviews the UN Strategy and Guidance on Hate Speech as examples of practice and uses them as a springboard to engage with the current ...
[218]
[PDF] The Legal Framework for Addressing “Hate Speech” in Europe
• of author for Holocaust denial (incitement of hatred against Jews) Garaudy v France (2003) ... should be provided with training on standards on “hate speech”, ...
[219]
Differences Between Ethnic Minority and Majority Groups of Workers
Jul 16, 2019 · We tested a model on how assimilation and multiculturalism, endorsed at an organizational level, predict job satisfaction and intention to quit ...
[220]
[PDF] Multiculturalism, Assimilation, and Challenges to the Nation-State
Oct 20, 2009 · This review considers normative and empirical debates over citizenship and bridges an informal divide be- tween European and North American ...
[221]
[PDF] Multiculturalism: Success, Failure, and the Future
Since the mid-1990s, however, we have seen a backlash and retreat from multiculturalism, and a reassertion of ideas of nation building, common values and ...
[222]
Political Scientist: Does Diversity Really Work? - NPR
Aug 15, 2007 · A study conducted by Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam suggests that diversity hurts civic life and that differences can actually translate into ...Missing: conflict | Show results with:conflict
[223]
[PDF] Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century The 2006 ...
Ethnic diversity is increasing in most advanced countries, driven mostly by sharp increases in immigration. In the long run immigration and diversity are ...
[224]
Swedish PM says integration of immigrants has failed, fueled gang ...
Apr 28, 2022 · Sweden has failed to integrate the vast numbers of immigrants it has taken in over the past two decades, leading to parallel societies and ...
[225]
New report on Multiculturalism in Flames: Sweden's rude awakening
Oct 22, 2024 · Acknowledge the Failure of Multiculturalism: The report urges Sweden to recognize that multiculturalism has not succeeded in fostering unity ...Missing: ethnic | Show results with:ethnic
[226]
Denmark: Integrating Immigrants into a Homogeneous Welfare State
Nov 1, 2006 · At the same time, the benchmark of successful integration has always been one of successful individual inclusion and acculturation to the mores ...
[227]
Full article: Does enforcing dispersal policies prevent ethnic spatial ...
Sep 18, 2024 · We provide quasi-experimental evidence by evaluating the effects of the 1999 Danish Integration Act on the mobility of refugee households and ethnic ...
[228]
The life-cycle and opportunities of migrants and natives in the ...
Our findings indicate that second and third generation immigrants gradually assimilate with Danes but maintain a significant and persistent income gap, ...Research Paper · 1. Danish Migration Policies... · 3. Empirical Analysis
[229]
https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-288
[230]
In Denmark, who should do the work of integration?
Dec 27, 2022 · Fearing 'parallel societies,' authorities tell schools with high numbers of students from immigrant backgrounds to enroll more ethnic Danes, or risk shutdown.