Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Foundation for Defense of Democracies

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) is a Washington, D.C.-based nonpartisan 501(c)(3) research institute founded shortly after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks by Clifford D. May, with a mission to strengthen U.S. and counter threats from adversaries such as authoritarian regimes, terrorist organizations, and illicit financing networks. FDD conducts in-depth , produces timely analyses, identifies illicit activities, and offers actionable recommendations to policymakers across multiple U.S. administrations, focusing on areas including non-proliferation, sanctions enforcement, cyber defense, and . The organization houses specialized centers on and political power, economic statecraft, and deterrence, drawing on expertise from former government officials, leaders, and scholars to promote robust defense strategies for democratic nations. Notable for its activist approach, FDD has influenced U.S. debates, particularly through advocacy for stringent sanctions on and critiques of agreements like the JCPOA, which it argued failed to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions and regional aggression. Funded primarily by private individual and foundation donations without accepting contributions from foreign governments, FDD maintains operational independence while providing and briefings to , the executive branch, and allied governments. Its work has been cited by senior officials, including endorsements for its scholarship on emerging threats.

Founding and Early Development

Establishment in Response to 9/11

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) was established shortly after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks by Clifford D. May, a former journalist and expert, along with a group of philanthropists and policymakers motivated by the need to counter threats to democratic societies from global . Originally incorporated in April 2001 as EMET, an organization focused on enhancing Israel's image, FDD pivoted its mission in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 to emphasize the defense of pluralistic democracies against jihadist ideologies and their state sponsors. This rapid reconfiguration reflected a causal recognition that the attacks demonstrated the urgency of addressing not only tactical but also its underlying ideological drivers. From its inception, FDD prioritized actionable policy research to inform U.S. and allied responses to security challenges, including strategies to promote democratic values and as bulwarks against authoritarian and extremist ideologies. Early efforts focused on analyzing the nature of non-state and their enablers, such as states, to advocate for robust countermeasures that went beyond military action to encompass ideological warfare. This foundational orientation positioned FDD to contribute analyses on the global , underscoring the attacks' role in catalyzing a dedicated institution for long-term vigilance against threats to open societies.

Evolution of Organizational Focus

Following its establishment in late 2001 in direct response to the , the Foundation for Defense of Democracies initially concentrated on efforts, analyzing jihadist networks and strategies to combat non-state actors responsible for mass-casualty attacks. This early emphasis reflected the immediate empirical threats posed by and affiliated groups, with FDD producing analyses on terrorist financing, ideological drivers, and U.S. policy responses to degrade such capabilities. By the mid-2000s, FDD broadened its scope to address state sponsors of terrorism, particularly Iran and Syria, amid revelations of Iran's covert nuclear activities and Syria's support for proxy militias. Research shifted toward nuclear proliferation risks, ballistic missile developments, and the efficacy of sanctions regimes to curb these states' destabilizing behaviors, as evidenced by FDD's assessments of Iran's arsenal expansions and advocacy for tightened economic pressures. This evolution aligned with causal links between state-enabled proliferation and heightened regional instability, prioritizing empirical data on illicit transfers and evasion tactics over isolated terrorist incidents. In the , FDD incorporated emerging domains such as cyber threats from adversaries including , , and , producing reports on state-sponsored , information operations, and tools like and illicit finance in . Concurrently, dedicated programs examined 's military modernization and 's influence campaigns, reflecting observable escalations in hybrid threats that blurred lines between conventional and warfare. Entering the 2020s, FDD launched its Air and Missile Defense Program on April 22, 2025, to counter proliferating hypersonic and ballistic threats from peer competitors, building on prior analyses. This period also saw publications advocating weapons transfers and security assistance to allies facing aggression, including detailed assessments of arming against Russian incursions and bolstering Taiwan's defenses amid Chinese coercion. These adaptations underscore FDD's responsiveness to quantifiable shifts in global threat vectors, from asymmetric terrorism to integrated state challenges.

Mission and Strategic Objectives

Core Principles and Research Approach

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) centers its work on defending democratic values through rigorous, actionable research that identifies threats from adversaries, including jihadist terrorism, authoritarian regimes like , and illicit finance networks enabling proliferation and . This approach prioritizes causal analysis of empirical evidence—such as on terrorist activities and regime behaviors—over conformity to dominant orthodoxies or interpretations that may downplay such dangers. FDD's underscores the defense of and free nations by generating policy options grounded in verifiable data, aiming to strengthen U.S. without ideological preconditions. FDD employs a multidisciplinary , drawing on experts from , , , , and backgrounds to produce timely analyses and investigative reports. Key methods include open-source tracking of threats, as exemplified by the Long War Journal's documentation of jihadist operations, and integration of foreign language proficiencies for direct source evaluation. This contrasts with reliance on secondary narratives from biased institutional sources, favoring primary data to inform strategic countermeasures against existential risks to democracies. Independence forms a foundational , with FDD explicitly rejecting donations from foreign governments to avoid external influence and maintaining a posture through bipartisan collaborations across U.S. administrations. Complementary activities such as strategic communications and educational initiatives amplify research findings, fostering informed public and policy discourse on and sanctions efficacy.

Commitment to Nonpartisanship and Independence

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) maintains a policy of declining donations from foreign governments to preserve organizational independence from external influence, relying instead on contributions from domestic philanthropists and foundations. This approach, reiterated in FDD's public statements and event transcripts since at least 2019, aims to insulate its research from the policy agendas of foreign entities. FDD has provided policy research and testimony to administrations across party lines, including those of , , , and , focusing on sanctions, deterrence, and strategies. Executive Director , for instance, has advised officials in each of these administrations on bipartisan congressional matters related to threats. This cross-administration engagement underscores FDD's emphasis on issue-based analysis over partisan alignment, with expertise shared through congressional testimonies exceeding 20 instances on topics like policy. Critics have alleged partisan leanings toward hawkish or neoconservative positions, yet FDD's advocacy demonstrates empirical consistency in opposing policies perceived as , predicated on documented patterns of adversary non-compliance rather than electoral cycles. For example, FDD's opposition to the 2015 (JCPOA) stemmed from Iran's verifiable breaches, including undeclared nuclear activities and failure to fully adhere to safeguards, which the deal's sunset clauses and verification gaps failed to adequately address. This stance persisted through the Obama-era negotiations and into subsequent critiques of JCPOA revival efforts under Biden, prioritizing deterrence against Iran's nuclear advances—such as exceeding low-enriched uranium stockpiles post-2019—over diplomatic concessions. Such positions reflect a threat-centric , evaluating policies against historical data on behavior rather than administration affiliation.

Leadership and Personnel

Key Executives and Their Backgrounds

Clifford D. May serves as the founder and president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), a position he has held since the organization's establishment immediately following the , 2001 terrorist attacks. With a career spanning roles as a reporter, foreign , and editor at and other outlets, May has reported from over 30 countries, including , , , and , providing firsthand insights into global security challenges. He holds master's degrees in international affairs and from , along with an undergraduate degree from . May's advocacy in stems from this reporting experience and his leadership in directing FDD's focus on threats. Mark Dubowitz is the chief executive officer of FDD, overseeing its strategic operations and policy initiatives. Prior to joining FDD in 2003, Dubowitz worked as a venture capitalist and technology executive; he earned a in international from University's , a , and an MBA from the . Dubowitz heads FDD's Center on Sanctions and Illicit Finance and is widely recognized for his expertise in , particularly those targeting Iran's nuclear program and global threat networks, influencing U.S. "maximum pressure" campaigns during the administration. He has testified over 20 times before and advised multiple U.S. administrations on sanctions policy. Jonathan Schanzer acts as FDD's , managing the work of its scholars and experts on and issues. His background includes serving as a terrorism finance analyst at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, where he tracked and disrupted funding streams to and . Schanzer previously researched at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and the , authoring books such as State of Failure on Palestinian leadership and Hamas vs. Fatah on intra-Palestinian conflicts. This experience informs FDD's broader research direction, including on military and emerging threats, through oversight of specialized programs.

Notable Fellows and Contributors

FDD's fellows draw from diverse expertise in operations, nonproliferation, and intelligence, enabling detailed empirical assessments of global threats. These researchers produce analyses grounded in firsthand operational experience and technical data, focusing on regions like the and programs addressing missile proliferation and jihadist networks. Lt. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Conricus, a senior fellow specializing in military dynamics, served 24 years in the as a commander and international spokesperson. His work examines tactics in , including strategies and post-conflict challenges, drawing on operational insights to evaluate risks and options. Major General (Ret.) Amir Eshel, another senior fellow, leverages his prior roles as Israeli Air Force commander and Director General of Israel's Ministry of Defense to analyze aerial defense needs and Iranian nuclear vulnerabilities. From 2020 to 2023, Eshel oversaw defense procurement and research, informing FDD reports on confronting Tehran's weaponization efforts through integrated missile defenses and intelligence-driven strikes. Olli Heinonen, senior advisor on science and nonproliferation, applies his 27 years at the , including as deputy director general, to scrutinize Iran's uranium enrichment and undeclared sites. His assessments highlight discrepancies in IAEA reporting, such as over 400 kg of 60% unaccounted for, underscoring risks of covert weaponization. Senior fellows Bill Roggio and Thomas Joscelyn direct FDD's Long War Journal, providing daily tracking of , Taliban, and ISIS activities based on and field reporting. Their mappings of Afghan insurgencies and testimonies on jihadist threats to the U.S. emphasize persistent safe havens and the need for sustained monitoring. Ivana Stradner, a , critiques international agreements like the UN Cybercrime Treaty, arguing it enables authoritarian regimes such as and to suppress under cybercrime pretexts, based on treaty text analysis and state misuse patterns. This work supports FDD's broader push for U.S. opposition to provisions lacking protections for cybersecurity research.

Funding and Financial Operations

Sources of Revenue and Major Donors

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) relies predominantly on contributions from private individuals and U.S.-based foundations for its , with no reported government or significant foreign sources in its financial disclosures. In 2023, FDD generated $23.9 million in , of which the vast majority consisted of direct contributions supporting its operations as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. This model has sustained organizational growth since its founding, drawing from philanthropists aligned with pro-democracy and priorities. Notable foundation grants include $10.745 million from the in 2011, which represented a substantial portion of that year's influx, alongside $1.075 million from the and $1.341 million from the . More recent contributors encompass the , which provided grants as documented in FDD's grant recipient records. Historical support has come from figures such as mortgage industry executive , whose donations exceeded $1.8 million in the organization's early years, facilitating expansion without reliance on international entities. These private U.S. sources underscore FDD's financial independence from state actors.

Financial Transparency and Growth Metrics

In fiscal year 2023, the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) reported total assets of $31.7 million, total expenses of $25.4 million, and of $23.9 million, reflecting sustained operational capacity amid program expansion. As a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt , FDD adheres to IRS disclosure mandates by submitting annual filings, which provide detailed breakdowns of revenue sources, expenditures, and net assets, ensuring public for its activities. These forms, accessible via platforms like and Cause IQ, confirm no material irregularities in reporting and support a high accountability score from evaluators such as , based on audited financials and governance practices. Financial growth metrics demonstrate scalability: assets increased from $7.3 million at the end of to $31.7 million in , paralleling heightened investments in and without debt accumulation, as total liabilities remained at $6.2 million in the latter year. This trajectory aligns with staffing growth to 71 employees by , enabling broader programmatic reach in response to evolving threats.

Core Activities and Programs

Counterterrorism Initiatives and Long War Journal

The Long War Journal, a project of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies launched in , functions as a dedicated outlet for empirical, real-time tracking of jihadist threats through original reporting, data aggregation, and visual aids such as maps of territorial control and strike locations. Edited by Bill Roggio, a senior fellow at FDD, it delivers daily updates on activities by , the (ISIS), and the , cataloging specifics like suicide assaults, leadership assassinations via drone strikes, and operational expansions across regions including , , and . For example, it has mapped over 400 districts under Taliban control in as of 2021, highlighting persistent insurgent gains despite U.S. operations. Post the 2011 death of , the Journal's reporting demonstrated 's ideological resilience and affiliate proliferation, countering assessments of the group's terminal decline by documenting ongoing plots, releases, and alliances such as the Taliban- . It tracked ISIS's global offshoots, including ISIS-Khorasan Province's attacks in exceeding 100 claimed operations by 2020, and in the Arabian Peninsula's complex assaults killing dozens of Yemeni forces as recently as October 2025. The Journal's analyses prioritize jihadist primary sources—such as Ayman al Zawahiri's directives on deception tactics and global ambitions—to elucidate causal drivers rooted in Salafi-jihadist doctrine, rather than peripheral factors like or . This focus has illuminated enduring vulnerabilities, including the Taliban's hosting of training camps in eastern documented through U.S. intelligence and militant media, underscoring the limitations of kinetic strikes without ideological confrontation. FDD experts via the platform have testified to on these dynamics, arguing for sustained vigilance against underreported networks.

Iran-Focused Research and Advocacy

FDD's Iran Program conducts in-depth research on the Iranian regime's nuclear program, revealing through analysis of seized 2018 nuclear archives that pursued a structured weapons effort under the Amad Plan, including designs for five 10-kiloton warheads and production facilities like the Shahid Boroujerdi site for metal components essential to implosion-type devices. These findings underscore 's pre-JCPOA covert activities, which involved dividing Project 110 into clandestine components without civilian cover. The program critiques the 2015 (JCPOA) for imposing reversible restrictions with built-in sunsets that expired by 2025, failing to dismantle 's industrial-scale enrichment infrastructure or address ballistic missiles, while amassed over 400 kilograms of 60% in facilities like Fordow and as of October 2025, per IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi's assessments. FDD advocates "maximum pressure" sanctions to counter these advances, arguing diplomacy absent enforcement enables breakout timelines under six months for a crude device, and has pushed for IAEA resolutions declaring in breach of non-proliferation obligations after eight years of unresolved investigations into undeclared sites and weapons work. Investigations into sanctions efficacy evaluate tools like oil export curbs, recommending intensified to degrade regime revenue amid evasion via shadow fleets and proxies, while exposing illicit finance networks that launder funds for and . On human rights, FDD documents regime abuses, including protest crackdowns, supporting U.S. sanctions on 29 targets in September 2023 and additional designations in 2024 for entities tied to and repression. Assessments of feasibility highlight internal vulnerabilities, endorsing Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi's July 2025 Iran Prosperity Project emergency plan for post-Khamenei transition, which outlines phased democratic reforms and economic stabilization to facilitate a non-theocratic government.

Programs on Emerging Threats (, , Cyber)

FDD's Program scrutinizes the Communist Party's (CCP) multifaceted challenges to U.S. interests, including illicit , global , and exploitation of Western legal systems. It emphasizes economic security vulnerabilities, such as Beijing's coercive tactics in the , where the CCP combines economic pressure, cyber operations, and sub-threshold military actions to undermine Taiwan's resilience without full-scale invasion. For instance, a 2025 FDD analysis outlined simulated attacks on Taiwan's energy sector, revealing how disruptions could cascade into broader societal and economic breakdowns, urging U.S. allies to bolster asymmetric defenses and diversification. The program has informed Taiwanese policy discussions, as evidenced by its delegation's 2025 meeting with , which stressed strengthening national defense alongside economic safeguards against coercion. The Russia Program investigates Moscow's illicit activities and strategies, producing analyses on tactics like shadow operations and political influence campaigns to erode Western cohesion. Following Russia's 2022 invasion of , FDD documented escalated hybrid efforts, including cyberattacks, , and weaponized migration at EU borders—such as Belarusian-orchestrated migrant surges in 2025—to exploit divisions and test NATO resolve. A September 2025 report detailed Putin's expansion of these "gray zone" actions against the West, recommending targeted countermeasures like enhanced intelligence sharing and sanctions on enablers to disrupt Russia's asymmetric advantages. This focus extends to Balkan , where FDD warns of operations fueling regional instability as precursors to broader . Through its Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation (CCTI), FDD critiques international frameworks vulnerable to authoritarian exploitation, notably issuing a memo against the UN as a "" for suppressing dissent. CCTI argues the —pushed by and since 2019—prioritizes state control over genuine cybersecurity, enabling regimes to criminalize opposition under broad definitions of "" while ignoring their own aggressions, like China's Volt intrusions or Russian campaigns. The center advocates U.S. opposition to preserve open internet norms and promotes resilient networks to counter China's progression to near-peer adversary status, capable of widespread U.S. infrastructure disruptions. Complementing these efforts, on Military and Political Power (CMPP) assesses deterrence doctrines tailored to authoritarian peer threats, prioritizing "deterrence by " over punishment to raise invasion costs through hardened defenses and rapid-response capabilities. In analyses of rising tensions as of , CMPP highlights congressional investments slowing the erosion of U.S. qualitative edges against and , while urging integrated strategies blending military posture with economic tools to sustain alliances and prevent miscalculation. This includes evaluations of axis cooperation—such as Sino-Russian military drills—and policy recommendations for bolstering deterrence amid contingencies.

Other Specialized Projects (Syria, Europe, Military Power)

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies maintains focused monitoring of through its analysis and the Long War Journal, emphasizing jihadist threats and regime transitions following the fall of in late 2024. In 2025, FDD reports highlighted operations against foreign jihadist fugitives, such as the Syrian government's pursuit of French -linked fighters in October, and the integration of Kurdish-led into structures amid ongoing clashes near in September. These efforts underscore persistent risks from groups like and exploiting post-Assad chaos, including and Hezbollah smuggling networks attempting resurgence. In , FDD collaborates with the affiliated Foundation for Democracy, which targets Islamist and within EU states through policy advocacy and research on terror financing and networks. EFD initiatives have included pushing for bans on Hezbollah-linked outlets and exposing Iranian criminal proxies operating across the , as noted in joint efforts with FDD on threats to . FDD's broader work complements this by analyzing EU sanctions on and cyber vulnerabilities in nations like the , where incidents rose 50% in 2025, advocating for transatlantic alignment against hybrid threats. FDD's Center on Military and Political Power evaluates U.S. defense capabilities in arming allies, as detailed in the April 2025 "" report, which assessed the feasibility of simultaneous weapons deliveries to , , and without mutual delays. The study examined 25 systems, including and drone defenses like batteries and missiles, concluding that aid to had not materially impeded supplies to or through mid-2025, based on production ramp-ups and stockpile data. This project stresses empirical metrics on aid efficacy, such as delivery timelines and combat impacts against shared adversaries like and .

Policy Influence and Achievements

Contributions to U.S. National Security Policy

FDD experts, including CEO , provided congressional testimony and policy briefings highlighting Iran's violations of nuclear restrictions and sanctions evasion under the (JCPOA), influencing the administration's withdrawal from the agreement on May 8, 2018, and the subsequent "maximum pressure" campaign of reimposed sanctions that reduced Iran's oil exports from 2.5 million barrels per day in 2018 to under 300,000 by mid-2020. This approach targeted Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps and affiliated networks, with FDD research documenting over 1,000 entities involved in illicit procurement for nuclear and ballistic missile programs, aiding enforcement of like EO 13846. On countering illicit finance, FDD's Center on Sanctions and Illicit Finance testified before committees on enhancing tools against funding and regime evasion, contributing to provisions in the 2017 Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), which imposed secondary sanctions on entities aiding Russian, Iranian, and North Korean proliferation activities. In 2020, FDD allocated $70,000 to lobby on related bills strengthening financial transparency and anti-money laundering measures for virtual assets used in sanctions busting. These efforts supported bipartisan legislation expanding Treasury Department authorities to disrupt networks financing groups like , with FDD reports identifying $700 million in annual flows to terror affiliates by 2023. Regarding cyber threats, FDD advocated for legislative reforms through involvement in initiatives like the Cyberspace Solarium Commission, whose recommendations influenced the 2020 and subsequent bills mandating improved information sharing between CISA and private sectors to counter state-sponsored attacks from and , including requirements for designating vulnerabilities. FDD policy papers urged to enact cyber-specific protections for ports and supply chains, leading to adopted measures in the 2022 NDAA for enhanced export controls on dual-use technologies amid rising incidents like the 2021 hack attributed to Russian actors. FDD's advocacy extended to China deterrence, with endorsed bills approved by the Foreign Relations on October 22, 2025, establishing sanctions frameworks against Chinese entities enabling military buildup and illicit tech transfers, building on Trump-era restrictions continued under Biden, such as 2024 semiconductor export limits that curbed 's access to advanced U.S. chips by over 50% in high-performance categories. These measures aligned with FDD analyses projecting 's AI and advances as threats to U.S. superiority unless countered by targeted .

Empirical Impacts and Vindicated Predictions

In May 2021, FDD analysis forecasted an intensified offensive exploiting U.S. troop reductions and security vulnerabilities, anticipating the group's methodical advance to dismantle government control and reestablish its , events that unfolded with the rapid capture of provincial capitals and by August. Following President Biden's April 2021 withdrawal directive, FDD's Long War Journal projected the government's collapse by summer's end due to the superior combat cohesion and intelligence networks, a timeline confirmed by the insurgents' nationwide takeover and the August 15 evacuation crisis. FDD's Long War Journal assessed in February 2018 that , despite losing its caliphate's core territories in and , retained operational resilience through sleeper cells, propaganda, and overseas branches, enabling future attacks rather than outright defeat; this was borne out by ISIS affiliates' territorial gains in Africa's , renewed Syrian incursions killing hundreds since 2019, and global plots including the 2024 Moscow concert hall assault claimed by the group. FDD reports post-2015 JCPOA highlighted Iran's unchecked proxy escalations and nuclear threshold advancements, warning that sanctions relief would fuel tests and support for , , and without behavioral restraint; subsequent developments included Iran's uranium enrichment to 60% purity by 2021—nearing weapons-grade—over 18 times the deal's cap, alongside proxy drone strikes on facilities in 2019 and Houthi disruptions from late 2023. FDD's April 2025 analysis urged accelerated U.S. arms transfers to allies confronting saturation from Iran-backed networks and salvos, predicting that bureaucratic delays would amplify vulnerabilities in real-time conflicts; this foresight aligned with intensified Houthi barrages on shipping and intercepts of over projectiles in April 2024, prompting U.S. policy adjustments for expedited Patriot and THAAD systems to and amid 2024-2025 threat spikes.

International Engagements and Alliances

In August 2025, the Foundation for Defense of Democracies organized a delegation visit to to assess cross-strait defense challenges amid escalating tensions with the . The delegation met with President on August 1, 2025, in , where discussions emphasized bolstering Taiwan's deterrence capabilities against potential aggression in the , , and . Key findings from the visit, released on August 11, 2025, underscored the urgency of enhancing between Taiwan and U.S.-aligned partners to counter Beijing's military buildup and gray-zone tactics. FDD fosters collaborations with security institutions and experts to advance shared interests in countering and Iranian influence. fellows like Jonathan Conricus, a former spokesperson for the , contribute analysis on threats, drawing from direct operational experience to inform joint threat assessments. These ties extend to advocacy for defense technology transfers, such as the U.S.-approved sale of Israel's Arrow-3 system to in 2023, which strengthens 's ballistic defenses against shared adversaries. In , FDD engages with stakeholders on military , warning in March 2025 of risks posed by divergent defense strategies that undermine alliance cohesion against Russian aggression. Through its International Organizations Program, FDD critiques and seeks to reform multilateral bodies like the , highlighting systemic biases favoring authoritarian regimes in forums such as the Human Rights Council and cyber policy discussions. In October 2025, FDD urged rejection of a proposed UN , arguing it could enable and to suppress dissent under the guise of combating online threats, based on of treaty drafts and historical UN patterns. The organization also conducts previews of UN sessions, as in September 2025, to expose politicized decision-making that erodes democratic norms, advocating for U.S.-led alternatives to prioritize security alliances over consensus-driven paralysis. These efforts promote educational initiatives on authoritarian resilience strategies, training allies to navigate IOs without compromising sovereignty.

Controversies and Criticisms

Accusations of Ideological Bias and Hawkishness

Critics from left-leaning and anti-interventionist perspectives have accused the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) of neoconservative ideological bias, particularly in its advocacy for robust U.S. military responses to global threats. SourceWatch, a project of the Center for Media and Democracy, has characterized FDD as a neoconservative organization that promotes U.S. wars and links to conservative think tanks, arguing that its post-September 11, 2001 founding and policy prescriptions reflect a predisposition toward interventionism rather than objective analysis. Outlets such as , affiliated with the Center for American Progress, have specifically criticized FDD's early rhetoric as alarmist and fear-mongering, pointing to events like an April 2002 forum where FDD warned of potential attacks on multiple American cities as exaggerating threats in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. On Iran policy, FDD has faced accusations of hawkishness for lobbying against the and pushing for options, with critics like those in and Responsible Statecraft labeling it a central node in an anti- neoconservative lobby that prioritizes confrontation over diplomacy. These claims often tie FDD's positions to funding from pro-Israel donors, as detailed in investigative reports on its early backers, suggesting that such support drives a selective focus on threats aligned with Israeli security interests rather than broader U.S. priorities. Such critiques frame FDD's emphasis on Iranian nuclear advancements—evidenced by International Atomic Energy Agency reports of uranium enrichment to near-weapons-grade levels since 2019—and sponsorship of proxy attacks on U.S. forces as ideologically driven warmongering, despite these actions constituting verifiable violations of international norms and direct challenges to American interests in the Middle East.

Claims of Islamophobia and Selective Focus

Critics from Muslim advocacy organizations and aligned media have accused the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) of Islamophobia, primarily citing its focus on Islamist extremism as evidence of anti-Muslim prejudice rather than security analysis. In a 2016 congressional hearing on Muslim Brotherhood networks in the United States, FDD Vice President Jonathan Schanzer testified about the group's infiltration of civil institutions, prompting accusations from Palestinian-American academic Hatem Bazian that the proceedings exemplified "McCarthyism and Islamophobia driving foreign policy," allegedly silencing Muslim voices through targeted scrutiny. Bazian's critique, published in outlets sympathetic to Islamist perspectives, portrayed FDD's evidence-based warnings on Brotherhood affiliates—such as their designation as terrorists by Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE—as irrational fearmongering against Islam itself. Similar allegations arise from FDD's documentation of Qatar's support for , a U.S.-designated terrorist rooted in ideology. FDD reports detail Qatar's provision of over $1.8 billion to since 2012, including annual stipends and hosting of its political leadership in since 2012, framing this as state-sponsored rather than benign diplomacy. and Qatari-aligned sources recast such advocacy—evident in FDD's push for designating a terror financier during the 2017 Gulf crisis—as selective Islamophobia, ignoring the empirical data on fund flows to groups like and . These claims often emanate from outlets like , which maintain ties to Turkey's government and its tolerance of figures, reflecting a pattern where scrutiny of is conflated with bias against 1.8 billion worldwide. On selective focus, detractors from groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) argue FDD's prioritization of jihadist threats—such as Brotherhood-linked media empires spanning affiliates and Turkish channels—demonstrates an obsessive anti-Islam lens, purportedly sidelining non-Islamist dangers. CAIR's reports, which have faced federal scrutiny for undisclosed connections, frame FDD's Islamism-specific analyses as emblematic of broader "hate" networks, while downplaying the organization's parallel empirical work on threats from authoritarian regimes like and . This narrative persists despite FDD's explicit distinctions between jihadist ideologies and normative Islamic practice, as articulated in its targeted critiques of transnational networks over indiscriminate religious condemnation. Such accusations, rooted in sources with ideological stakes in defending , underscore a tendency to equate evidence-led with , bypassing data on Islamist groups' self-avowed supremacist goals.

Defenses Against Criticisms and Evidence of Objectivity

FDD maintains a policy of not accepting donations from foreign governments, ensuring independence from external influence in its analyses. This stance aligns with its self-described nonpartisan approach, as evidenced by its provision of open-source research and expertise to administrations across party lines, including those of , , , and . Such bipartisan engagement underscores a focus on policy substance over partisan alignment, with FDD's government relations emphasizing issues that "transcend partisanship" through objective, research-driven recommendations. The organization's track record includes advocacy for empirically grounded measures, such as the "maximum pressure" sanctions campaign against initiated in , which FDD supported as a means to curb ambitions and funding for malign activities. These sanctions demonstrably reduced Iran's oil exports from a peak of approximately 2.8 million barrels per day in early to below 0.5 million barrels per day by mid-2020, limiting Tehran's revenue streams and validating the causal link between sustained economic pressure and behavioral constraints over diplomatic concessions alone. This outcome counters narratives favoring by highlighting how targeted restrictions disrupted Iran's export markets and repatriation of funds, without relying on unverified assumptions about regime responsiveness to incentives. Critics' accusations of narrow focus overlook FDD's extensive data-driven work on non-Middle Eastern threats, including detailed assessments of Chinese influence operations, Russian , and cyber vulnerabilities, which draw on verifiable rather than ideological priors. This breadth—spanning programs on emerging powers and transnational risks—demonstrates analytical rigor, as FDD's predictions, such as the escalation of Iranian nuclear activities post-JCPOA, have aligned with subsequent empirical developments like uranium enrichment beyond civilian thresholds. Selective critiques that amplify purported biases while disregarding these corroborated insights reflect inconsistencies in evaluators' standards, particularly given mainstream institutions' own documented skews in threat prioritization.

References

  1. [1]
    About FDD
    The Foundation for Defense of Democracies is a Washington, DC-based nonpartisan research institute focusing on national security and foreign policy.FDD Team · National Security Network · Advisors
  2. [2]
    Biography - Clifford May
    Biography :: Clifford May. ... May is the founder and President of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, created immediately following the 9/11 attacks ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Strategy for a New Comprehensive U.S. Policy on Iran - FDD
    The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) has developed a comprehensive plan for American policymakers and allies to support the Iranian people and ...
  4. [4]
    FDD | The Foundation for Defense of Democracies
    The Foundation for Defense of Democracies is a non-profit, non-partisan research institute focusing on foreign policy and national security.About · Jobs and Internships · FDD Team · Issues
  5. [5]
    Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc - GuideStar Profile
    The Foundation for Defense of Democracies focuses its efforts where opinions are formed and, ultimately, where the war of ideas will be won or lost: in the ...
  6. [6]
    Clifford D. May - FDD
    Clifford D. May is the founder and president of FDD, a nonpartisan policy institute focusing on national security created immediately following the 9/11/01 ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  7. [7]
    Foundation for Defense of Democracies - InfluenceWatch
    Foundation for Defense of Democracies is a Washington, D.C.-based policy institute that focuses its advocacy on national security and foreign policy issues. FDD ...
  8. [8]
    AIPAC, FDD websites erase all evidence of their Iraq War ...
    Mar 20, 2023 · The American Israel Public Affairs Committee and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies aren't responding to requests for comment about ...
  9. [9]
    The Little Think Tank That Could
    Aug 18, 2015 · The little think tank that could understanding the Foundation for Defense of Democracies' ideological affinity with the Israeli government.
  10. [10]
    Arsenal: Assessing Iran's Ballistic Missile Program - FDD
    Feb 15, 2023 · Following revelations about Iran's nuclear program in the mid-2000s ... Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Privacy Policy. P.O. Box 33249 ...
  11. [11]
    - BREAKING THE IRAN, NORTH KOREA, AND SYRIA NEXUS
    We should increase our sanctions to go after illicit transactions, weapons smuggling, and nuclear technology transfers. ... Foundation for Defense of Democracies, ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Understanding the Chinese Communist Party's Approach to Cyber ...
    The Center on Sanctions and Illicit Finance (CSIF) at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) works to expand the understanding of economic warfare in ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Kaspersky and Beyond Understanding Russia's Approach to Cyber ...
    Jun 12, 2018 · Foundation for Defense of Democracies, February 22, 2017. (http ... security field to combat “threats to Russia's safety.”44. This ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Air and Missile Defense Program - FDD
    FDD's Air and Missile Defense Program Launch. April 22, 2025 | 12:00 pm · View More Events. Copyright © 2025. Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Privacy ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Arsenal of Democracy: Arming Taiwan, Ukraine, and Israel ... - FDD
    ... Weapons It Needs,” Foundation for Defense of Democracies,. March 14, 2024 ... Ukraine aid will buy 18 HIMARS and weapons to 'disrupt' drones,” Defense ...
  16. [16]
    Foundation for defense of democracies - On Think Tanks
    Mar 13, 2025 · The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) is a policy institute focusing on foreign policy and national security. Founded in 2001 ...
  17. [17]
    Follow the Money: Exposing China's Influence Operations at ... - FDD
    Nov 24, 2020 · The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD), where I work, receives no foreign government funding. Understanding the totality of ...
  18. [18]
    A Conversation with CISA Director Jen Easterly - FDD
    Jan 15, 2024 · ... Foundation for Defense of Democracies. I'm Mark Montgomery, the ... As a point of pride and principle, we take no foreign government funding.
  19. [19]
    Iran's Nuclear Program: Ongoing Activities, Obligations, and Policy ...
    Jun 9, 2020 · Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) · FDD event audio ... We take no foreign government funding. In 2019, Iran sanctioned FDD ...
  20. [20]
    Shatter the Nations: ISIS and the War for the Caliphate - FDD
    Oct 21, 2019 · ... Foundation for Defense of Democracies. I'm pleased to welcome you to ... We take no foreign government funding, or corporate funding, and we never ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Mark Dubowitz - FDD
    Mark has advised the Bush, Obama, Trump and Biden administrations and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle and testified more than twenty times before the U.S. ...
  22. [22]
    Talk:Foundation for the Defense of Democracies - SourceWatch
    ... mission. But that ... ↑ Eli Clifton, Documents Shed Light On Those Underwriting The Foundation For Defense Of Democracies, Think Progress, 19 July 2011.<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Iran's Nuclear Disarmament - FDD
    Mar 14, 2025 · The JCPOA contained major flaws that rendered it ineffective as a means of preventing Iran from achieving a nuclear weapons capability. One of ...Missing: opposition | Show results with:opposition
  24. [24]
    Another Iran Deal? Looking Back and Looking Ahead - FDD
    Aug 18, 2022 · Returning to the JCPOA ... Israel's shadow war notwithstanding, the regime's nuclear advances have rendered a return to the old agreement futile.
  25. [25]
    Deterring Iran's Dash to the Bomb - FDD
    Aug 29, 2024 · ... sanctions immediately until Iran curtails its nuclear weapons program. ... Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Privacy Policy. P.O. Box 33249 ...
  26. [26]
    Hardline think tank despises Iran above everything else
    Aug 22, 2023 · FDD not only cheered Trump's reneging on the JCPOA, an agreement that had successfully capped the Iranian program; it privately pushed the Trump ...
  27. [27]
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/13/us/politics/mark-dubowitz-iran-deal.html
  28. [28]
    Jonathan Schanzer - FDD
    Dr. Jonathan Schanzer is the executive director at FDD, where he oversees the work of the organization's experts and scholars. Jonathan previously worked as ...Missing: leadership | Show results with:leadership
  29. [29]
    FDD Team
    Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Privacy Policy. P.O. Box 33249, Washington D.C. 20033. 202-207-0190. info@fdd.org · Media Center. Tweet; Facebook ...Mark Dubowitz · Advisors · Clifford D. May · Hussain Abdul-Hussain
  30. [30]
    Lt. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Conricus - FDD
    Jonathan Conricus is a senior fellow at FDD focused on the Middle East. He served in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for 24 years as a combat commander in ...
  31. [31]
    How Hamas's hostage tactic checkmated Israel's war strategy - FDD
    Oct 6, 2025 · Jonathan Conricus is a retired IDF lieutenant colonel, and Senior Fellow at the DC-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). He served ...
  32. [32]
    Major General (Ret.) Amir Eshel - FDD
    Major General (Ret.) Amir Eshel is a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). He is an accomplished fixed-wing and rotary-wing ...
  33. [33]
    FDD NAMES FORMER ISRAELI AIR FORCE COMMANDER AND ...
    Aug 10, 2023 · From 2020 to 2023, Amir served as the director general of the Israeli Ministry of Defense. He led defense procurement, research and development ...
  34. [34]
    Tehran Is Exposed - FDD
    Apr 23, 2025 · A Unique Opportunity to Confront the Iranian Nuclear Threat. Major General (Ret.) Amir Eshel. Senior Fellow · Eyal Hulata. Senior International ...
  35. [35]
    Olli Heinonen - FDD
    Dr. Olli Heinonen is a senior advisor on science and nonproliferation at FDD. He is the former deputy director general of the International Atomic Energy ...
  36. [36]
    Olli Heinonen - FDD
    Olli Heinonen · Iran's Nuclear Disarmament · Detecting and Halting an Iranian Weaponization Effort · The Curious Case of Iran's Destroyed Nuclear Site.
  37. [37]
    FDD's Long War Journal - A Project of the Foundation for Defense of ...
    US Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke with Iraqi Prime Minister Shia al Sudani on October 21, discussing the “urgency in disarming Iran-backed militias ...
  38. [38]
    Thomas Joscelyn | FDD
    Global Terrorism: Threats to the Homeland. Editor's note: Below is Thomas Joscelyn's testimony before the House Committee on Homeland Security. Chairman ...
  39. [39]
    https://www.fdd.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/fdd-memo-the-un-cybercrime-treaty.pdf.pdf
  40. [40]
    https://insidecybersecurity.com/daily-news/fdd-urges-us-push-back-un-cybercrime-treaty-citing-lack-protection-cyber-research
  41. [41]
    Foundation For The Defense Of Democracies Inc - Nonprofit Explorer
    Summary charts: organization finances over time · Revenue. $23.9M (2023) · Expenses. $25.4M (2023) · Total Assets. $31.7M (2023) · Total Liabilities. $6.21M (2023).
  42. [42]
    Foundation For The Defense Of Democracies Inc | 990 Report
    J Blair And Tena Frank Foundation, PO BOX 135, PORTLAND, ME 04101, $5,000 ; Jewish Communal Fund, 575 MADISON AVENUE SUITE 703, NEW YORK, NY 10022, $655,260 ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  43. [43]
    Rating for Foundation for Defense of Democracies - Charity Navigator
    Rating 4/4 · Review by Charity NavigatorSource: IRS Form 990 (page 7), filing year 2023. IRS Published Data (Business Master File) - Data Available. Below are some key data points from the Exempt ...
  44. [44]
    Coalition, Iraqi forces launch Operation Phantom Strike
    Aug 13, 2007 · ... FDD's Long War Journal. Tags: Iraq. 16 Comments. Michael says: August 13, 2007 at 1:45 pm. Was waiting for “Phantom Lightning” or some new ...
  45. [45]
    Author Archives: Bill Roggio - Long War Journal
    Bill Roggio is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Editor of FDD's Long War Journal.
  46. [46]
    https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2025/10/al-qaeda-in-the-arabian-peninsula-kills-4-yemeni-soldiers-in-complex-suicide-assault.php
  47. [47]
    Al Qaeda is very much alive, and widely misunderstood
    Sep 11, 2018 · ... counterterrorism storm in South Asia is its relationship with the Taliban. This is perhaps the most underestimated aspect of al Qaeda's ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Al Qaeda 'gaining strength' in Afghanistan, U.S. Treasury says
    Jan 25, 2021 · ... Taliban as a victory for America's counterterrorism efforts. ... Qaeda-Taliban nexus, ISIS in Turkey, Islamic State in Turkey, Taliban.
  49. [49]
    Taliban 'reluctant to publicly break with al Qaeda,' Inspector General ...
    May 21, 2020 · ... Taliban's supposed counterterrorism assurances as part of the withdrawal accord. ... (ISIS-K), which opposes the Taliban, in mind. The IG ...
  50. [50]
    Analysis: Ayman al Zawahiri argues jihadists can't deceive America
    Oct 5, 2017 · In a new message, Ayman al Zawahiri holds up the Taliban-al Qaeda relationship as a model for jihadists around the globe.
  51. [51]
    Tag Archives: Al Qaeda in Afghanistan - The Long War Journal
    McKenzie questioned the Taliban's commitment to its supposed counterterrorism assurances. He pointed to al Qaeda's presence in eastern Afghanistan and ...
  52. [52]
    - THE PERSISTENT THREAT: AL-QAEDA'S EVOLUTION AND ...
    ISIS became the face of Islamist terrorism. The fact is during this time al ... al-Qaeda long after ISIS is gone. America's strategy to counter al ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] The Plan: Iran's Nuclear Archive Shows It Planned to Build Five ...
    2000s to manufacture five nuclear warheads at 10 kilotons each – Iran achieved much more than feasibility and scientific studies, which was in December 2015 the.
  54. [54]
    [PDF] The Shahid Boroujerdi Project for Production of Uranium Metal and ...
    The most likely purpose of this site was as a production-scale facility to manufacture uranium metal components for nuclear weapons, fulfilling Iran's long-time ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Breaking Up and Reorienting Iran's Nuclear Weapons Program1
    Project 110's work was being divided into two parts: a covert part with a secret structure and goals whose activities had no ostensible civilian cover story, ...
  56. [56]
    https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2025/10/20/iaea-chief-assesses-irans-enriched-uranium-stockpile-remains-inside-sites-destroyed-by-israel-and-u-s/
  57. [57]
    Amid New IAEA Reports, U.S. and E3 to Push Resolution Declaring ...
    May 31, 2025 · Iran has had nearly eight years to explain its covert nuclear weapons work to the IAEA and come into compliance with its legal non-proliferation obligations.
  58. [58]
    What Steps Must Iran Take to Construct Nuclear Weapons? - FDD
    Feb 19, 2025 · The Islamic Republic of Iran may require just six months to produce a crude nuclear explosive device. Tehran would need only a matter of days to enrich enough ...
  59. [59]
    FDD-NUFDI Joint Maximum Support Strategy: A New Direction for ...
    May 23, 2024 · 1. Review efficacy of U.S. government projects supporting the people of Iran. · 2. Enforce oil and petrochemical sanctions. · 3. Offer internet ...
  60. [60]
    Sanctions and Illicit Finance Archives - FDD
    Sanctions and Illicit Finance. Choose another issue. Afghanistan · Al Qaeda · Anti ... Iran Human Rights · Iran in Latin America · Iran Missiles · Iran Nuclear ...Missing: investigative work
  61. [61]
    U.S. Sanctions 29 Iranian Targets for Human Rights Abuses - FDD
    Sep 15, 2023 · Iran Iran Human Rights Iran Sanctions Sanctions and Illicit Finance. Topics: Topics: Iran Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps United States ...Missing: investigative | Show results with:investigative
  62. [62]
    U.S. Sanctions Key Iranian Human Rights Abusers - FDD
    Sep 20, 2024 · Iran Iran Human Rights Iran Sanctions Sanctions and Illicit Finance. Topics: Topics: Iran Tehran Iraq Barack Obama Islamic Revolutionary ...Missing: investigative | Show results with:investigative
  63. [63]
    The West must back Reza Pahlavi's Iran transition plan - FDD
    Aug 31, 2025 · This July, Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi unveiled the Iran Prosperity Project's Emergency Booklet at the National Cooperation Conference in ...
  64. [64]
    China Program - FDD
    The challenges posed by the CCP continue to mount: the fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic, massive human rights abuses, threats to American democratic allies ...
  65. [65]
    Combatting PRC Illegal, Coercive, Aggressive, and Deceptive ... - FDD
    Oct 7, 2025 · Taiwan sits at the epicenter of today's great-power competition. Beijing is waging a slow-motion campaign to coerce and condition the island ...
  66. [66]
    10 Takeaways From Simulated Attacks on Taiwan's Energy Sector
    enhanced by military pressure ...
  67. [67]
    President Lai meets delegation from US Foundation for Defense of ...
    Aug 1, 2025 · The FDD holds a key position among think tanks based in Washington, DC. In addition to conducting research on issues relating to US national ...
  68. [68]
    Russia Program - FDD
    FDD's Russia Program conducts in-depth research, produces insightful and timely analyses, identifies illicit activities, and provides policy options to combat ...
  69. [69]
    Putin is dangerously escalating his shadow war against the West
    Sep 14, 2025 · Following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russian intelligence has conducted hybrid war operations against the West with ...
  70. [70]
    Weaponized migration: Russia's hybrid war at EU borders - FDD
    Jul 23, 2025 · Ivana joins TVP World to discuss rising tensions on the Polish-Belarusian border and how Russia is weaponizing migration as part of its hybrid ...
  71. [71]
    https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2025/10/23/the-un-cybercrime-treaty-a-trojan-horse-for-suppressing-dissent/
  72. [72]
    Resilient Networks; Disruptions to Communications - FDD
    Oct 2, 2025 · China poses an unprecedented cyber threat to the United States, having evolved from a clear follower into a near-peer adversary capable of ...
  73. [73]
    Center on Military and Political Power - FDD
    FDD's Center on Military and Political Power (CMPP) promotes understanding of the defense strategies, policies, and capabilities necessary to deter and defeat ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Elevating 'deterrence by denial' in US defense strategy - FDD
    Feb 4, 2021 · A US defense strategy based more on deterrence by denial than on punishment is best suited for contemporary strategic challenges for several reasons.
  75. [75]
    Deterrence Amid Rising Tensions - FDD
    predominantly by Congress — over the past three years have served to slow the rate of reduction of U.S. and allied advantages, ...
  76. [76]
    https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2025/10/22/syrian-government-launches-operation-to-apprehend-wanted-french-jihadist-fugitives/
  77. [77]
    SDF moves forward with integration into new Syrian security forces
    Oct 17, 2025 · The Long War Journal - A project of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies ... Syria's main Kurdish commander said Thursday [October 17] ...
  78. [78]
    Renewed Fighting Between Kurds and Government Forces ... - FDD
    Sep 16, 2025 · Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and Syrian forces traded rocket artillery fire near Deir Hafir, east of Aleppo, on September 10.
  79. [79]
    UN report shows Islamic State and Al Qaeda exploiting post-Assad ...
    Aug 1, 2025 · The report also highlights the rising sectarian violence in Syria, most importantly, the massacres on the Syrian coast in March 2025, where HTS ...
  80. [80]
    The Quiet Return of Hezbollah's Smuggling Network in Syria - FDD
    Oct 1, 2025 · Hezbollah Still Uses Syrian Territory To Smuggle Weapons and Plan Terrorist Activities. Syrian authorities have thwarted dozens of attempts to ...
  81. [81]
    European Foundation for Democracy - FDD
    Op-eds. 1; 2. Copyright © 2025. Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Privacy Policy. P.O. Box 33249, Washington D.C. 20033. 202-207-0190. info@fdd.org · Media ...
  82. [82]
    Europe - FDD
    Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Privacy Policy. P.O. Box 33249, Washington D.C. 20033. 202-207-0190. info@fdd.org · Media Center.
  83. [83]
    Arsenal of Democracy - FDD
    Apr 7, 2025 · 保衛民主基金會（Foundation for Defense of Democracies, FDD）的最新報告探討了美國是否有能力同時武裝臺灣、烏克蘭與以色列這三個民主夥伴。報告 ...Missing: incorporation exact<|separator|>
  84. [84]
    U.S. AID TO UKRAINE HAS NOT MATERIALLY SLOWED ... - FDD
    Apr 7, 2025 · About the Foundation for Defense of Democracies: FDD is a Washington, DC-based, nonpartisan research institute focusing on national security and ...
  85. [85]
    US weapons support for Ukraine doesn't compete with Taiwan goals
    Apr 7, 2025 · A new report by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, shared exclusively ahead of publication with Defense One, says yes—for now. But, the ...
  86. [86]
    The Impact of Sanctions Two Years After U.S. Withdrawal ... - FDD
    May 6, 2020 · A sharp reversal followed the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA, with negative growth of 5.4 percent in 2018 and 7.6 percent in 2019. The economic ...
  87. [87]
    This Think Tank Is Pushing Regime Change in Iran—and the White ...
    Jul 12, 2018 · The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies helped kill the nuke deal, but it's not satisfied—it wants harsh new sanctions against any country ...Missing: renamed | Show results with:renamed
  88. [88]
    Foundation for Defense of Democracies Bills Lobbied - OpenSecrets
    Foundation for Defense of Democracies spent $70000 lobbying in 2020. See the bills it lobbied.
  89. [89]
    The Underside of the Coin: Illicit Finance Risks in Virtual Assets - FDD
    Feb 16, 2023 · ” Cryptocurrency also helps fund legal defenses and supplies for extremist groups. Last year, a Foundation for Defense of Democracies ...
  90. [90]
    FDD shows how CSC turned recommendations into actions that ...
    Oct 10, 2025 · According to industry observers, the report 'has reshaped U.S. cybersecurity strategy and policymaking.' CSC's success was fueled by the absence ...<|separator|>
  91. [91]
    Protecting U.S. Ports Requires Congress to Get Cyber-Specific - FDD
    Sep 9, 2025 · As cyber and supply-chain threats continue to plague the industry, the federal government needs to invest in its partnerships with port ...
  92. [92]
    https://www.fddaction.org/press-release/2025/10/22/senate-foreign-relations-committee-approves-fdd-action-backed-legislation-targeting-china-russia/
  93. [93]
    Biden Administration Hits China With New Limits on Access to ... - FDD
    Dec 3, 2024 · The Biden administration imposed further limits on the export of semiconductors and the equipment necessary to produce them.
  94. [94]
    FDD says export controls are the right tool for countering China on AI
    Sep 8, 2025 · These U.S. laws and regulations protect national security interests and promote foreign policy objectives by restricting the transfer of ...
  95. [95]
    Analysis: Predicting the coming Taliban offensive - FDD
    May 25, 2021 · The question isn't whether the Taliban will continue to wage its war against a weakened Afghan government to resurrect its Islamic Emirate of ...
  96. [96]
    Go-to-Zero: Joe Biden's Withdrawal Order and the Taliban Takeover ...
    Nov 14, 2023 · When President Biden issued the order on April 14, 2021, I predicted the Afghan government would collapse by the end of the summer. The Taliban ...Missing: capabilities | Show results with:capabilities
  97. [97]
    Analysis: ISIS hasn't been defeated - FDD's Long War Journal
    Feb 22, 2018 · While the Defense Department recognizes that ISIS and other “terrorist groups” will continue “to murder the innocent and threaten peace more ...Missing: predictions | Show results with:predictions
  98. [98]
    [PDF] A Dangerous New Iran Deal: Key Points for Congress | FDD Action
    Aug 19, 2022 · With the regime plotting to attack Americans in the homeland, why would the U.S. gift Iran a pathway to nuclear weapons and the resources needed.
  99. [99]
    Lai receives Foundation for Defense of Democracies delegation
    Aug 4, 2025 · President Lai Ching-te received a delegation from the Foundation for Defense of Democracies Aug. 1 in Taipei City, pledging to deepen ...
  100. [100]
    Findings and takeaways from FDD's recent delegation visit to Taiwan
    Aug 11, 2025 · August 11, 2025 | Media Call. Findings and takeaways ... I'm senior director of communications at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies ...
  101. [101]
    U.S. Green-Lights Israel's Arrow-3 Sale to Germany - FDD
    Aug 17, 2023 · The United States had signed off on a sale of Jerusalem's Arrow-3 ballistic missile defense system to Germany, clearing the way for Israel's largest defense ...
  102. [102]
    Bridging the Gap - FDD
    Mar 5, 2025 · This is a clear and present danger to NATO's interoperability and, in particular, the safety and security of the alliance's fifth-generation ...
  103. [103]
    International Organizations Program - FDD
    FDD's International Organizations Program (IOP) leverages FDD's regional and subject matter expertise within its centers on American power.Missing: engagements | Show results with:engagements
  104. [104]
    Previewing the UN General Assembly - FDD
    Sep 19, 2025 · We have returned to a Cold War-era model where we're in political warfare 24/7 in the Security Council. Our government has not shifted that ...
  105. [105]
    EXCLUSIVE: Documents Shed Light On Those Underwriting The ...
    Jul 19, 2011 · ... Roland Arnall contributed $1,802,000 between 2003 and 2004. Other notable, but less generous, donors included: media mogul and Democratic ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  106. [106]
    How the Anti-Iran Lobby Machine Dominates Capitol Hill | The Nation
    Jul 15, 2014 · Of that number, two neoconservative organizations dominated: FDD fellows made five appearances, and those from the AEI had four.<|control11|><|separator|>
  107. [107]
    First it was regime change, now they want to break Iran apart
    Now, neoconservative think tanks like the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) and their fellow travelers in the European Parliament ...
  108. [108]
    The neocons calling the shots over Iran | The Herald
    Jan 6, 2018 · As the central node in the Iran-hawk lobbying cabal the FDD has viewed scuppering the Iran nuclear deal as its primary objective for years now.
  109. [109]
    FDD congressional testimony: McCarthyism, Islamophobia driving ...
    ... Islamophobic representation. What we are witnessing is targeted killings in civil society, a strategy that attempts to silence Palestinian voices and ...
  110. [110]
    FDD congressional testimony: McCarthyism and Islamophobia ...
    May 9, 2016 · Jonathan Schanzer, vice president of the Research Foundation for Defense of Democracies, was a spectacle that qualified for the theater of the ...
  111. [111]
    “The Muslim Brotherhood's Global Threat” | Congress.gov
    The Muslim Brotherhood is a militant Islamist organization with affiliates in over 70 countries, including groups designated as terrorist organizations by the ...
  112. [112]
    [PDF] 10 things to know about hamas and qatar | fdd
    Qatar has enabled the terrorist organization Hamas politically and financially for decades. However, the tiny Gulf Arab state has successfully positioned ...<|separator|>
  113. [113]
    Reckoning Needed Between Terror-Sponsoring Qatar and United ...
    Jul 13, 2025 · Qatar has been a loyal patron to the terrorist group since 1999. The energy rich regime is more committed to the survival of its terror proxy in ...
  114. [114]
    [PDF] ISLAMOPHOBIA REPORT - CAIR-Ohio
    american-islamophobia; also see Erik Love's Islamophobia and Racism in America https:// ... “Foundation for Defense of Democracies.” Right Web. April 10, 2018.<|separator|>
  115. [115]
    https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2025/10/20/how-the-muslim-brotherhood-built-a-media-empire/
  116. [116]
    https://www.fdd.org/podcasts/2025/10/24/mariam-wahba-on-the-muslim-brotherhoods-media-empire/
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Islamophobia in the Mainstream
    Of these complaints,. 241 accounted for hate and bias incidents. Moreover, CAIR documented over. 500 complaints of anti-Muslim bias incidents in the first half ...
  118. [118]
    Government Relations - FDD
    Consistent with our organization's values, FDD believes these issues transcend partisanship and require objective, research-driven analysis and policy options.
  119. [119]
    The ebb and flow of sanctions on Iranian oil - Reuters
    Feb 6, 2022 · 2018. Iranian oil exports rise to 2 million bpd in 2016 and reach a peak of 2.8 million bpd in 2018. The United States under Donald Trump's ...<|separator|>
  120. [120]
    Trump's Enforcement of Oil Sanctions on Iran: 2025 is NOT 2019
    May 1, 2025 · Sanctions reduced Iran's oil production and exports, as shown in Figure (2). Production fell by 1.67 mb/d from May 2018 to October 2019, per ...
  121. [121]
    Issues | In-Depth, Accurate, & Timely Analyses - FDD
    FDD conducts in-depth research, produces accurate and timely analyses, identifies illicit activities, and provides policy options.