Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Galeomorphi

Galeomorphi, also known as Galeomorphii, is a superorder of cartilaginous fishes within the class Chondrichthyes that encompasses the majority of extant shark species, totaling approximately 347 species across 23 families and four orders: Heterodontiformes (bullhead sharks), Orectolobiformes (carpet sharks), Lamniformes (mackerel sharks), and Carcharhiniformes (ground sharks).^[1]^[2] These sharks are distinguished by key morphological features including a nictitating lower eyelid, two dorsal fins (though one family may have a single dorsal fin), an anal fin, five gill slits, and a mouth positioned subterminally or nearly terminally that often extends past the eyes.^[3]^[4] Galeomorph sharks display remarkable diversity in body size, ranging from diminutive species like the pygmy ribbontail catshark (Eridacnis radcliffei) at about 24 cm in length to gigantic forms such as the whale shark (Rhincodon typus), which can exceed 12 meters.^[2] They occupy a broad array of habitats worldwide, from freshwater rivers and brackish estuaries to deep-sea environments, though they are absent from the polar Arctic regions dominated by squalomorph species.^[5]^[2] This superorder includes ecologically and economically significant species, such as the great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) in Lamniformes, known for its apex predatory role, and the diverse requiem sharks in Carcharhiniformes, which comprise over 280 species and are among the most widespread and commercially fished sharks.^[6]^[1] Phylogenetically, Galeomorphi forms one of the two primary clades of neoselachian sharks, alongside Squalomorphi, with molecular and morphological evidence supporting their monophyly and divergence from a common ancestor around 180 million years ago during the Early Jurassic.^[1]^[7] Their evolutionary success is attributed to adaptations like advanced jaw suspension mechanisms and versatile feeding strategies, ranging from filter-feeding in the whale shark to active hunting in species like the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier).^[3] Conservation concerns are prominent, as many galeomorph species face threats from overfishing, habitat degradation, and bycatch, leading to vulnerable or endangered status for iconic members across IUCN assessments.^[8]

Overview

Definition and Etymology

Galeomorphi is a superorder of cartilaginous fishes within the subclass Neoselachii, encompassing all modern sharks except those belonging to the superorder Squalomorphi, such as dogfish sharks and their relatives.^[9] This group represents the majority of extant shark diversity, with approximately 360 species across four orders.^[10] Galeomorph sharks are characterized by advanced morphological features, including a specific jaw suspension and fin structure, distinguishing them from other elasmobranchs. The hierarchical classification of Galeomorphi places it within the kingdom Animalia, phylum Chordata, class Chondrichthyes, subclass Elasmobranchii, and infraclass Neoselachii.^[9] This superorder includes the orders Heterodontiformes (bullhead sharks), Orectolobiformes (carpet sharks), Lamniformes (mackerel sharks), and Carcharhiniformes (ground sharks).^[11] The name "Galeomorphi" was coined by ichthyologist Leonard J. V. Compagno in 1973, derived from the Ancient Greek word galeós (γαλεός), meaning "shark," combined with morphḗ (μορφή), meaning "form" or "shape," reflecting its composition of shark-like elasmobranchs. The temporal range of Galeomorphi extends from the Early Jurassic period, with the oldest known fossils dating to approximately 200 million years ago, to the present day.^[12]

Diversity and Distribution

Galeomorphi comprises approximately 360 living species (as of 2021) distributed across 23 families and more than 60 genera, representing the dominant superorder of modern sharks.^[10] These species are organized into four orders, with Carcharhiniformes accounting for the majority at 292 species, followed by Orectolobiformes with 45 species, Lamniformes with 15 species, and Heterodontiformes with 9 species.^[10] This biodiversity reflects the superorder's adaptive radiation into diverse ecological niches, though recent assessments indicate ongoing pressures from overfishing and habitat degradation affecting many taxa.^[13] Galeomorph sharks are predominantly marine inhabitants, occupying environments from shallow coastal waters and coral reefs to the open ocean and deep-sea habitats exceeding 2,000 meters in depth.^[2] While most species are strictly oceanic, a few exhibit remarkable euryhaline capabilities, such as the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas), which routinely migrates into freshwater rivers and estuaries, sometimes traveling hundreds of kilometers upstream.^[14] Their global distribution spans all major ocean basins, but diversity peaks in the tropical Indo-Pacific, where warm, productive waters support high species richness, particularly among carcharhiniform and orectolobiform taxa.^[15] Biogeographic patterns within Galeomorphi emphasize dominance in tropical and temperate zones, where over 80% of species occur, driven by favorable temperatures and prey availability.^[16] Representation in polar regions remains minimal, with no galeomorph species endemic to Arctic or Antarctic waters and only occasional vagrants recorded in subpolar areas, likely limited by cold intolerance and reduced productivity.^[2] This latitudinal gradient underscores the superorder's evolutionary ties to warmer climates, with lower diversity in higher latitudes reflecting historical and physiological constraints.^[13]

Taxonomy and Phylogeny

Taxonomic History

Prior to 1973, sharks were classified under the subclass Selachii without recognition of superorders, relying primarily on external morphological features such as the number of gill slits, body shape, and fin positions to delineate groups.^[11] Influential early works, including Theodore Gill's 1893 synopsis of fish families and subfamilies, emphasized these traits to organize elasmobranchs into higher categories based on perceived primitiveness or advancement.^[17] Similarly, Henry Bigelow and William Schroeder's 1948 comprehensive catalogue of western North Atlantic sharks reinforced this approach by detailing species identifications and familial groupings without proposing superordinal divisions.^[18] The superorder Galeomorphi was formally established by Leonard Compagno in 1973 through a cladistic analysis of living elasmobranchs, grouping sharks based on shared morphological synapomorphies such as hyostylic jaw suspension, a protrusible upper jaw, the presence of an anal fin, and specific patterns in fin structure and skeletal elements. This proposal divided Selachii into two major superorders—Galeomorphi and Squalomorphi—reflecting natural phylogenetic clusters derived from detailed examinations of crania, jaws, gill arches, and musculature, marking a shift from traditional phenetic classifications to a more evolutionary framework.^[11] Subsequent revisions in the 2000s incorporated molecular phylogenetic data, which largely corroborated the monophyly of Galeomorphi while questioning the monophyly of some families within orders like Carcharhiniformes based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene analyses. For instance, studies using ribosomal RNA sequences supported the superorder's core structure but highlighted debates over basal placements. Today, Galeomorphi is widely accepted in authoritative taxonomic databases like the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS).^[9] More recent phylogenomic analyses, including whole mitogenome studies as of 2023, continue to robustly support the monophyly of Galeomorphi and the proposed ordinal relationships.^[19] Taxonomic debates have centered on the placement of extinct groups like Synechodontiformes, initially considered potential basal galeomorphs due to dental and skeletal similarities but later viewed as stem neoselachians outside the crown-group superorder. This uncertainty underscores the transition from pre-cladistic systems, which often conflated fossil and extant forms based on superficial traits, to modern integrative approaches combining morphology and molecules.^[11]

Phylogenetic Relationships

Galeomorphi represents one of the two primary superorders within the subclass Selachimorpha (modern sharks), positioned as the sister group to Squalomorphi within the larger clade Neoselachii.^[20] This division is strongly supported by both morphological and molecular data, reflecting a basal divergence estimated to have occurred during the Jurassic period, marking the early radiation of modern shark lineages.^[21] Within Galeomorphi, phylogenetic analyses consistently place Heterodontiformes (bullhead sharks) as the basalmost order, serving as the sister taxon to all other galeomorphs.^[20] Orectolobiformes (carpet sharks) follows as the next successive sister group, with Lamniformes (mackerel sharks) and Carcharhiniformes (ground sharks) forming a derived sister clade that comprises the majority of galeomorph diversity.^[20] These relationships are corroborated by early morphological cladograms and more recent multigene molecular phylogenies, highlighting the progressive evolution from basal to more specialized forms.^[21] Key synapomorphies defining Galeomorphi include hyostylic jaw suspension, where the upper jaw is suspended from the hyomandibula and connected to the cranium via ligaments, facilitating protrusion and enhanced mobility during feeding.^[22] Most galeomorphs also possess a nictitating membrane, a protective third eyelid unique to this superorder among sharks, which shields the eye during prey capture.^[23] Additionally, the presence of two dorsal fins without spines in many taxa serves as a shared derived feature, contributing to stability in diverse aquatic environments.^[24] Despite broad consensus on major relationships, uncertainties persist, particularly regarding the monophyly of Carcharhiniformes, which molecular evidence suggests may be paraphyletic due to the basal placement of families like Scyliorhinidae (catsharks) outside core ground shark clades.^[25] Extinct relatives such as Palaeocarcharias, a Jurassic shark with affinities to basal lamniforms, further complicate interpretations by bridging living and fossil galeomorph diversity.^[26]

Morphology and Anatomy

General Characteristics

Galeomorphi, commonly known as galeomorph sharks, are characterized by a distinctive body plan adapted for aquatic life in marine and freshwater environments. All members possess a cartilaginous endoskeleton, which provides flexibility and buoyancy without the rigidity of bony structures, allowing for efficient swimming in diverse habitats. Their skin is covered in placoid scales, small tooth-like denticles that reduce drag and protect against abrasion, contributing to their streamlined torpedo-shaped bodies. Typically, they feature five gill slits on each side for respiration, with spiracles present in some basal forms to facilitate water intake near the eyes. A key sensory adaptation is the ampullae of Lorenzini, specialized electroreceptors concentrated around the head that detect electric fields from prey, aiding in navigation and hunting in low-visibility conditions. The fin structure of galeomorphs supports their active predatory lifestyle, with two dorsal fins providing stability and an anal fin for additional maneuverability. Pectoral fins are notably enlarged, functioning as hydrofoils to generate lift and enable gliding or turning during pursuits. Sensory systems are highly developed, including large eyes suited for low-light environments, nares (nostrils) often equipped with barbels in more primitive galeomorphs for enhanced chemosensation, and a lateral line system along the body that detects vibrations and pressure changes in the water. These features collectively enhance their ecological roles as apex or mesopredators. Size within Galeomorphi varies dramatically, ranging from small species like the pygmy ribbontail catshark (Eridacnis radcliffei) at about 24 cm in length^[27] to giants such as the whale shark (Rhincodon typus), which can reach up to 12 m (verified), with unconfirmed reports of individuals exceeding 18 m.^[28] Reproductive strategies are predominantly internal fertilization, with most species being viviparous—giving birth to live young nourished via a yolk-sac placenta—or ovoviviparous, where embryos develop within eggs retained in the mother until hatching. Some, particularly in the carpet shark group (Orectolobiformes), are oviparous, laying leathery egg cases for external development. This diversity in reproduction underscores their adaptability, though all modes ensure high survival rates for offspring in competitive marine ecosystems.

Specialized Adaptations

Galeomorph sharks exhibit a protrusible upper jaw, a key innovation that enhances feeding efficiency by allowing the mouth to extend forward during prey capture, distinguishing them from the more rigidly fused jaws of squalomorph sharks. This kinetic mechanism, supported by specialized ligaments and muscles, enables rapid jaw protrusion to create suction or grasp elusive prey. In contrast to the subterminal mouths typical of squalomorphs, many galeomorphs possess a small terminal mouth positioned at the anterior tip of the snout, facilitating precise interception of fast-moving or evasive targets in diverse habitats.^[2]^[29] Respiratory adaptations in galeomorphs vary with lifestyle, reflecting their range from sedentary benthic forms to highly active pelagic hunters. Some species, particularly bottom-dwelling orectolobiforms like nurse sharks (Ginglymostoma cirratum), employ buccal pumping, where rhythmic contractions of the buccal cavity actively draw water over the gills, permitting respiration without continuous swimming. This is crucial for ambush predators that remain stationary for extended periods. Active swimmers, especially in Lamniformes such as mackerel sharks (Isurus spp.), exhibit high oxygen demands supported by regional endothermy, where vascular counter-current heat exchangers retain metabolic heat in red muscle and viscera, elevating tissue temperatures up to 10–21°C above ambient water to sustain elevated metabolic rates and prolonged bursts of speed.^[29]^[30]^[31] Camouflage strategies in galeomorphs leverage skin pigmentation and texture for survival, with mottled patterns prevalent in orectolobiforms like wobbegongs (Orectolobus spp.) and bamboo sharks (Chiloscyllium spp.), where irregular brown, yellow, and white blotches mimic benthic substrates such as coral reefs or sandy bottoms, aiding in ambush predation and predator avoidance. Pelagic species, including carcharhiniforms like blue sharks (Prionace glauca), display countershading with darker dorsal surfaces and lighter ventral sides, reducing visibility from above against the ocean floor and from below against surface light, a classic adaptation for open-water concealment.^[29]^[32] Locomotion in galeomorphs relies on the heterocercal tail, characterized by an asymmetrical caudal fin with a larger dorsal lobe, which generates thrust by directing hydrodynamic forces through the body's center of mass during undulatory swimming, enabling efficient propulsion and maneuverability. This tail configuration produces both forward momentum and lift, with quantitative wake dynamics showing that tail beats create a vortex ring that propels the shark while minimizing energy loss. Males across galeomorph orders possess paired claspers, modified extensions of the pelvic fins that facilitate internal fertilization by delivering sperm directly into the female's oviduct, an adaptation that protects gametes in aquatic environments and supports diverse reproductive strategies from oviparity to viviparity.^[33]^[34] Defensive traits include the nictitating membrane, a translucent third eyelid present in carcharhiniforms such as requiem sharks (Carcharhinus spp.), which can be drawn across the eye to shield it from injury during frenzied feeding or close-range encounters, preserving vision without fully closing the ocular aperture. Although absent in lamniforms, which instead retract their eyes into protective sockets, this membrane underscores the adaptive diversity within galeomorphs for maintaining sensory acuity in predatory contexts.^[29]^[35]

Evolutionary History

Fossil Record

The fossil record of Galeomorphi is limited by the permineralization challenges inherent to cartilaginous skeletons, which rarely fossilize completely, resulting in most evidence consisting of isolated teeth, denticles, and occasional vertebral centra or partial skeletons preserved in exceptional lagerstätten.^[36] This dentition-based record provides key insights into taxonomy and diversity but often complicates full morphological reconstructions.^[37] The earliest definitive galeomorph fossils belong to the order Heterodontiformes, appearing in the Early Jurassic approximately 200 million years ago, with genera such as Paracestracion documented from deposits in Europe, including England, France, and Germany.^[38] During the Mesozoic, galeomorph diversity expanded, with Orectolobiformes emerging in the Late Jurassic, exemplified by Pseudorhina alifera from the Solnhofen limestone in Germany. Lamniformes followed in the Early Cretaceous, represented by Palaeocarcharias from marine sediments in Europe and North Africa. Extinct groups like Synechodontiformes, spanning the Late Triassic to Early Jurassic and potentially representing stem-galeomorphs, further illustrate early neoselachian experimentation, with taxa such as Paraorthacodus known from European localities. In the Cenozoic, following the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K/Pg) boundary extinction, Carcharhiniformes underwent significant expansion and became the dominant galeomorph order, with diverse assemblages recorded from Paleogene and Neogene sites worldwide.^[39] Key localities include the Upper Cretaceous lagerstätten of Lebanon, such as Haqel and Hjoula, which yield well-preserved shark teeth and partial skeletons from pre-boundary faunas, and the Eocene Green River Formation in North America, preserving chondrichthyan remains including rays and rare shark elements in lacustrine deposits.^[40] Recent discoveries, such as the 2025 description of Pararhincodon torquis, a new Upper Cretaceous orectolobiform shark from the Chalk Formation in the UK, provide three-dimensional insights into neurocrania and stem-group relationships using computed tomography.^[41] The galeomorph fossil record highlights a trajectory from Mesozoic rarity to Cenozoic prominence amid varying preservation biases.

Origins and Diversification

The origins of Galeomorphi trace back to hybodont ancestors during the Permian-Triassic transition, when early neoselachian-like forms began to emerge amid the recovery from the end-Permian mass extinction.^[42] Hybodont sharks, dominant in Paleozoic seas, provided the stem lineage for modern elasmobranchs, with neoselachians—including Galeomorphi—showing initial diversification signals in Late Triassic deposits before the Jurassic recovery.^[43] Following the end-Triassic extinction, Galeomorphi underwent significant recovery and initial radiation in Jurassic marine environments, where expanding epicontinental seas facilitated the establishment of diverse coastal and open-ocean niches.^[44] Diversification within Galeomorphi was driven by several key ecological factors across geological epochs. Post-K/Pg boundary, niche partitioning among surviving lineages allowed Galeomorphi to exploit vacated predatory roles left by extinct marine reptiles and ray-finned fishes, enabling adaptive radiations into mid- and upper-trophic levels.^[45] The Cretaceous rise of teleost fishes as abundant prey further propelled evolutionary innovation, with Galeomorphi developing specialized dentition and locomotion for pursuing fast-swimming schools in expanding pelagic habitats.^[46] In the Paleogene, periods of ocean warming, including the Eocene thermal maxima, promoted habitat expansion and metabolic adaptations, correlating with increased species richness in tropical and subtropical realms.^[47] Notable evolutionary events marked Galeomorphi radiation. The evolution of regional endothermy in Lamniformes around 100 million years ago, evidenced in Late Cretaceous fossils like Cretoxyrhina, enhanced active hunting capabilities by maintaining elevated muscle temperatures for sustained bursts of speed in cold waters.^[48] A major diversification burst in Carcharhiniformes during the Miocene, approximately 20 million years ago, coincided with global coral reef expansion, providing complex habitats that supported speciation through habitat specialization and prey abundance.^[39] Extinction patterns remained minimal during the K/Pg event, with Galeomorphi exhibiting low family-level losses (around 10-17% for neoselachians overall) due to versatile diets and habitat flexibility, in contrast to more severe impacts on other marine vertebrates; contemporary declines, however, stem primarily from anthropogenic pressures like overfishing and habitat degradation.^[49] Molecular clock analyses, integrating fossil calibrations and genomic data, support a divergence from Squalomorphi during the Early Jurassic.^[7] This timeline suggests early Galeomorphi resilience through mass extinctions, setting the stage for their dominance in modern oceans.

Classification

Order Heterodontiformes

The order Heterodontiformes comprises the bullhead sharks, recognized as the most basal lineage within the superorder Galeomorphi based on molecular and morphological analyses.^[1] This order includes a single family, Heterodontidae, with one genus, Heterodontus, encompassing ten extant species.^[50] These sharks are small-bodied, typically reaching a maximum length of 1.7 m, and are characterized by their bottom-dwelling lifestyle, blunt heads with prominent supraorbital ridges, and a robust build adapted for life on the seafloor. Juveniles exhibit sharper dorsal fin spines compared to adults, enhancing their defensive capabilities during early life stages.^[51] Key morphological traits of Heterodontiformes include heterodont dentition, with small, pointed anterior teeth for grasping prey and enlarged posterior molars suited for crushing hard-shelled mollusks and other invertebrates.^[50] Both dorsal fins are preceded by spines that are reported to be venomous, serving as a defense mechanism against predators, though this has been primarily observed in handling incidents rather than natural envenomations.^[52] Reproduction is oviparous, with females depositing distinctive spiral-flanged egg cases in rocky crevices to protect developing embryos from currents and predators.^[51] Heterodontiformes are distributed across temperate and subtropical waters of the Indo-Pacific and eastern Pacific oceans, inhabiting continental shelves from shallow intertidal zones to depths of up to 500 m, often on rocky or sandy bottoms.^[50] Ecologically, these nocturnal sharks spend daylight hours hiding in crevices or under ledges, emerging at night to forage primarily on benthic invertebrates such as mollusks, crustaceans, and echinoderms, using their crushing dentition to access armored prey.^[51] Conservation concerns for Heterodontiformes stem largely from collection for the aquarium trade, which targets species like the horn shark (Heterodontus francisci) due to their hardy nature and manageable size in captivity, leading to localized population declines and vulnerability in some regions.^[53] While many species are assessed as Least Concern or Data Deficient by the IUCN, the limited range and low reproductive rates of these basal sharks underscore the need for regulated trade to prevent overexploitation.^[54]

Order Orectolobiformes

The order Orectolobiformes encompasses about 39 species across seven families, such as Orectolobidae (wobbegongs) and Rhincodontidae (whale sharks), representing a diverse group of sharks characterized by their ornate, carpet-like skin patterns that often provide camouflage on reef substrates.^[55] These sharks vary dramatically in size, with smaller species like certain bamboo sharks (Hemiscylliidae) reaching maximum lengths of around 70 cm, while the whale shark (Rhincodon typus) is the largest living fish, attaining up to 18 m. Many species feature prominent barbels and nasoral grooves around the mouth, adaptations that enhance chemosensory detection of prey in murky or complex environments. Morphologically, orectolobiform sharks share the galeomorph trait of two spineless dorsal fins and an anal fin, with small, terminal mouths positioned forward on the snout. Reproduction is predominantly ovoviviparous, though some families like Hemiscylliidae are oviparous, laying eggs in leathery cases. These features support their generally sluggish, bottom-oriented lifestyles, though variations exist across the order. Most species are confined to tropical and subtropical waters of the Indo-Pacific, favoring coral reefs, rocky bottoms, or inshore areas, while the whale shark undertakes pelagic migrations across all tropical oceans. Ecologically, feeding strategies range from passive filter-feeding in the whale shark, which sieves plankton and small nekton through its vast mouth, to ambush predation in wobbegongs, which employ rapid jaw protrusion and suction to capture benthic fishes and invertebrates from hiding positions.^[55]^[56] Conservation challenges are acute for several species, including the endangered whale shark, whose populations have declined due to incidental capture in fisheries, targeted finning, and vessel strikes, necessitating international protections like CITES Appendix II listing.^[57]

Order Lamniformes

The order Lamniformes, commonly known as mackerel sharks, encompasses approximately 15 extant species distributed across seven families, including the prominent Lamnidae (mackerel sharks) and the extinct Otodontidae (megatooth sharks).^[58] These sharks are characterized by their robust, spindle-shaped bodies, pointed conical snouts, and large, triangular teeth adapted for grasping and tearing prey.^[59] The great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), a representative of the Lamnidae family, exemplifies the group's potential size, reaching lengths of up to 6 meters.^[59] A defining feature of many lamniforms is regional endothermy, achieved through specialized vascular networks called rete mirabile, which act as countercurrent heat exchangers to retain metabolic heat generated by red muscle tissue.^[31] This adaptation elevates temperatures in key areas such as the cranium, eyes, and viscera by 7–10°C above ambient water, enhancing physiological performance in cooler environments.^[31] Their caudal fins are typically lunate and nearly symmetrical, facilitating high-speed propulsion, while reproduction is viviparous, with some species like thresher sharks (Alopias spp.) employing oophagy, where embryos consume unfertilized eggs for nourishment.^[60]^[61] Lamniforms exhibit a cosmopolitan distribution, inhabiting tropical to temperate waters worldwide, with many species favoring pelagic zones from the surface down to depths of 1,000 meters or more.^[62] As obligate ram ventilators, they must swim continuously to force water over their gills, a trait that underscores their active lifestyle and limits their ability to rest on the seafloor.^[63] Ecologically, they function as apex predators, preying on a range of fish, cephalopods, and marine mammals, thereby exerting top-down control on oceanic food webs.^[64] Conservation concerns loom large for lamniforms, many of which are classified as Vulnerable by the IUCN due to intense overfishing for fins, meat, and sport.^[65] The great white shark, for instance, receives protected status in regions like U.S. federal waters and parts of Europe, yet global populations continue to decline from bycatch and targeted harvest.^[66]

Order Carcharhiniformes

The order Carcharhiniformes, known as ground sharks, represents the most diverse and ecologically versatile group within Galeomorphi, encompassing approximately 280 species across nine families, such as the requiem sharks (Carcharhinidae) and hammerhead sharks (Sphyrnidae). These sharks exhibit a wide size range, from small species like the pygmy ribbontail catshark (Eridacnis radcliffei) reaching about 24 cm in total length^[67] to larger forms such as the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) exceeding 4 m. Their bodies are generally slender and streamlined, adapted for agile swimming, with upper teeth often featuring serrated edges for grasping prey, while lower teeth are smaller and adapted for cutting. Characteristic features of carcharhiniforms include a nictitating membrane that protects the eye during feeding, the presence of an anal fin, and predominantly viviparous or ovoviviparous reproduction, where embryos develop internally and are nourished via a placental connection or yolk sac. Many species, particularly in the Carcharhinidae, possess a precaudal pit—a depression at the tail base—and a lateral keel on the caudal peduncle, enhancing hydrodynamic efficiency for bursts of speed during pursuits. These traits contribute to their success in varied environments, though some phylogenetic analyses suggest potential paraphyly within the order.^[68] Carcharhiniforms are ubiquitously distributed in coastal, shelf, and upper slope waters worldwide, from tropical to temperate regions, with most species favoring depths less than 200 m. A notable exception is the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas), which is euryhaline and routinely enters freshwater rivers and estuaries, sometimes traveling hundreds of kilometers upstream, such as in the Amazon and Mississippi systems, due to its exceptional osmoregulatory capabilities.^[69] Ecologically, these sharks are opportunistic predators, primarily feeding on teleost fishes, cephalopods, and crustaceans, with dietary shifts occurring ontogenetically—juveniles often targeting smaller invertebrates while adults consume larger prey. Social behaviors vary, with some species like the blacktip shark (Carcharhinus limbatus) forming schools for foraging or migration, whereas others, such as the tiger shark, are typically solitary hunters.^[70] Many utilize estuarine and nearshore nursery areas where salinity fluctuations and abundant food reduce predation risk for neonates, facilitating higher juvenile survival rates.^[70] Conservation challenges are acute for carcharhiniforms due to intense exploitation in global fisheries for meat, fins, and liver oil, leading to population declines across multiple species. Hammerhead sharks (Sphyrnidae), in particular, face severe threats from targeted finning and bycatch, with species like the great hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) and scalloped hammerhead (Sphyrna lewini) classified as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List, reflecting over 70% declines in some regions over the past three generations. Effective management requires international trade regulations and marine protected areas to mitigate ongoing pressures.

Ecology and Conservation

Habitats and Behavior

Galeomorphi sharks inhabit a wide array of marine environments, ranging from benthic zones on coral reefs and rocky substrates to fully pelagic realms in the open ocean, as well as continental shelves and coastal waters up to depths exceeding 1,200 meters in some species.^[71] Basal forms like those in Heterodontiformes are primarily restricted to shallow, nearshore littoral areas shallower than 100 meters, often favoring rocky crevices and caves for shelter, while Orectolobiformes predominantly occupy tropical to warm-temperate reefs and sandy bottoms from intertidal zones to about 200 meters. In contrast, Lamniformes and many Carcharhiniformes extend into deeper oceanic habitats, with species such as the whale shark (Rhincodon typus) and basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus) traversing vast pelagic expanses; certain pelagic members, including blue sharks (Prionace glauca), undertake daily vertical migrations, diving to depths of several hundred meters during the day and ascending to surface waters at night to follow prey distributions.^[72]^[73]^[58] Behavioral patterns among Galeomorphi vary from solitary and territorial lifestyles to gregarious schooling, reflecting adaptations to diverse ecological niches. Many species, particularly in Heterodontiformes and Orectolobiformes, exhibit nocturnal activity, resting in concealed spots during daylight hours and foraging actively at night to avoid diurnal predators and capitalize on invertebrate availability. Social structures range from the solitary, territory-defending behaviors of horn sharks (Heterodontus spp.), which maintain individual home ranges through aggressive displays, to the schooling formations seen in numerous Carcharhiniformes like blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus), which aggregate for hunting efficiency and predator avoidance. Migration is common, with seasonal movements for breeding often observed; for instance, requiem sharks (Carcharhinidae) travel to specific coastal nurseries to give birth, while some Lamniformes, such as shortfin makos (Isurus oxyrinchus), undertake long-distance migrations across ocean basins to track seasonal prey concentrations. Courtship rituals typically involve nipping, parallel swimming, or exaggerated postures, as documented in species like the lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris).^[72]^[73]^[23] Diets within Galeomorphi are predominantly carnivorous, with variations tied to phylogenetic position and habitat; basal taxa like Heterodontiformes specialize in durophagous feeding, using molariform posterior teeth to crush hard-shelled benthic invertebrates such as crabs, urchins, and mollusks, supplemented occasionally by small fish. Advanced forms in Lamniformes and Carcharhiniformes employ piercing and tearing dentition to capture fast-swimming teleosts, cephalopods, and even marine mammals, with apex predators like the great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) ambushing seals from below; scavenging is infrequent but occurs opportunistically in nutrient-poor environments. Filter-feeding represents a derived strategy in select Orectolobiformes and Lamniformes, where whale and basking sharks strain vast volumes of water to consume plankton, krill, and small nekton, processing up to 30 kilograms daily in the latter. Insectivorous habits are absent, though small crustaceans form part of diets in reef-dwellers.^[72]^[73]^[58] Ecological interactions highlight Galeomorphi's pivotal roles in marine food webs, often as apex or mesopredators that regulate prey populations and maintain biodiversity through top-down control. Many large species, including tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in Carcharhiniformes and lamnids, occupy top trophic levels, preying on a broad spectrum of vertebrates and invertebrates to shape community structures, while smaller forms like catsharks (Scyliorhinidae) serve as intermediate links in benthic chains. Commensal relationships are evident, with remoras (family Echeneidae) attaching to shark bodies for transportation and feeding on parasites or scraps, benefiting without harming the host. As high-order consumers, Galeomorphi species bioaccumulate natural toxins like tetrodotoxin from prey such as pufferfish, influencing toxin distribution in ecosystems. Sensory behaviors enhance foraging success, with electroreception via ampullae of Lorenzini allowing detection of hidden or bioelectrically active prey in murky waters, and acute chemosensory olfaction enabling long-distance tracking of blood or mating pheromones across currents.^[72]^[73]^[74]

Threats and Status

Galeomorphi species face severe anthropogenic threats, with overfishing representing the primary driver of population declines across the subclass. Targeted fisheries for fins, meat, and liver oil, combined with incidental bycatch in commercial operations such as longline and gillnet fisheries, affect nearly all threatened species, serving as the sole pressure for approximately two-thirds of them.^[75]^[76] Practices like shark finning, where fins are removed and carcasses discarded at sea, exacerbate mortality rates, particularly for vulnerable species with low reproductive rates.^[77] Habitat degradation from coastal development and destructive fishing methods further compounds risks, disrupting essential nursery and feeding grounds in shallow coastal waters preferred by many Galeomorphi taxa. Pollution, including heavy metal contamination like mercury bioaccumulation in top predators, impairs reproductive health and increases toxicity in consumed species. Climate change poses emerging threats through ocean acidification, which alters prey availability by affecting calcifying organisms, and warming waters that shift migration patterns and exacerbate habitat stress.^[78]^[79] According to the IUCN Red List, approximately 31% of assessed shark species, including those in Galeomorphi, are threatened with extinction (as of 2021), with many others classified as Data Deficient due to insufficient population data.^[76] The 2024 IUCN report confirms that approximately one-third of sharks, rays, and chimaeras are threatened with extinction, with overfishing as the primary driver.^[80] Notable examples include the whale shark (Rhincodon typus), listed as Endangered owing to global declines exceeding 50% over three generations from fisheries and vessel strikes, and the great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), assessed as Vulnerable due to historical overexploitation despite regional recoveries. Around one-quarter of species remain Data Deficient, highlighting assessment gaps that may conceal additional threats.^[76] Conservation measures have intensified in response, with CITES Appendix II listings regulating international trade for hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna spp.) since 2014 to curb finning-driven declines. Marine protected areas and shark sanctuaries, such as the Bahamas' 2011 nationwide prohibition on commercial shark fishing covering 243,000 square miles, provide critical refuges that support population recovery. Finning bans, including the EU's 2003 regulation requiring fins to remain naturally attached and the U.S. Shark Conservation Act of 2010, have reduced waste and improved monitoring in key regions.^[81]^[82]^[83] Persistent research gaps impede effective management, including limited data on population genetics to delineate stock structures and evaluate connectivity, as well as inadequate strategies for bycatch mitigation in global fisheries. Approximately 20% of assessments are outdated, underscoring the need for regular reassessments to track ongoing pressures. Future prospects hinge on expanded sustainable fisheries practices, with evidence from well-managed regions like the U.S. indicating potential for recovery through reduced mortality and habitat protections.^[84]^[85]^[86]

References

[1]
Complete Mitochondrial DNA Genome of Nine Species of Sharks ...
The Galeomorphii was represented by four monophyletic orders (Figure 1a). The basal Heterodontiformes followed by Orectolobiformes and, sequentially, by the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[2]
Superorder Galeomorphii - Sharks of the World - Naturalis
Diagnostic Features: Very small to gigantic (24 cm to over 12.1 m in maximum total length) sharks with a subcylindrical or moderately depressed body. Usually ...
[3]
[PDF] 1. INTRODUCTION
Superorder Galeomorphi (galeomorph sharks) ... Often incorrectly termed nictitating membrane, a different, nonhomologous structure in terrestrial vertebrates.
[4]
[PDF] Chondrichthyes: Cartilaginous Fishes Superclass Gnathostomata
- Galeomorphi (4 orders) (“shark form”). - Squalomorphi (5 orders) (“dogfish ... • no nictitating membrane. • mouth extends well beyond eyes. • epipelagic ...
[5]
WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Galeomorphi
### Summary of Galeomorphi (WoRMS ID: 368410)
[6]
Full article: A new genus and species of extinct ground shark ...
We describe a new genus and species of extinct ground shark, Diprosopovenator hilperti, gen. et sp. nov. (Elasmobranchii, Carcharhiniformes), based on a single ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[7]
(PDF) Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras: The Status of ... - ResearchGate
small number of species are known to be genuinely wide. ranging. The best ... species vary from 1–300; see Compagno 1990; Dulvy and. Reynolds 1997 ...
[8]
World Register of Marine Species - Galeomorphi - WoRMS
Oct 16, 2008 · Galeomorphi ; Animalia (Kingdom) ; Chordata (Phylum) ; Vertebrata (Subphylum) ; Gnathostomata (Infraphylum) ; Chondrichthyes (Parvphylum) ...
[9]
Taxonomy - VertLife
The superorder Galeomorphii includes four orders: Carcharhiniformes (ground sharks), Heterodontiformes (bullhead sharks), Lamniformes (mackerel sharks), and ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
[10]
Changes in Shark Classification
The sharks remain divided into galeomorphs (including bullhead, mackerel, carpet, and ground sharks; equal to Galea of the previous phyletic scheme) and ...
[11]
A new basal galeomorph shark (Synechodontiformes, Neoselachii ...
Aug 6, 2025 · gen. Etymology. ThenameisderivedfromtheGreekwords“palios”. (ancient), ... Compagno LJV (1973) Interrelationships of living elasmobranches. In ...Missing: Galeomorphi | Show results with:Galeomorphi
[12]
[PDF] Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras
Species Number. Batomorphii. 668. Myliobatiformes. 237. Aetobatidae. 5. Aetobatus. 5 ... Galeomorphii. 361. Carcharhiniformes. 292. Carcharhinidae. 55.
[13]
[PDF] INTRODUCTION - IUCN Portal
Over time, the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species has been used to track the extinction risk status of sharks, rays, and chimaeras. Results paint a grim ...Missing: Galeomorphi | Show results with:Galeomorphi
[14]
Bull Shark - Texas Parks and Wildlife
Bull Shark. Carcharhinus leucas. Bull sharks are common off the coast of Texas ... Unlike most sharks, bull sharks can live in fresh as well as salt water.
[15]
Guide to Shark Identification - Orectolobiformes
The carpet sharks are a diverse group inhabiting coral and rocky reefs, with the greatest species richness occurring in the Indo-West Pacific region.
[16]
Shark mandible evolution reveals patterns of trophic and habitat ...
May 8, 2023 · We explored how rates of morphological evolution in the jaw correlate with habitat, size, diet, trophic level, and taxonomic order.
[17]
Gill, T. (1893) | Literature | Shark-References
Gill, T.; 1893; Families and subfamilies of fishes.; Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, 6, 125–138.
[18]
Bigelow, H.B. & Schroeder, W.C. (1948) - Shark-References
Bigelow, H.B. & Schroeder, W.C. (1948) Fishes of the western North Atlantic, Part I: Lancelets, Cyclostomes, Sharks. In J. Tee–Van, C.M. Breder, ...Missing: history Gill 1893
[19]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088875432300215X
[20]
Mesozoic elasmobranchs, neoselachian phylogeny and the rise of ...
In this article, we focus on the morphology of caudal fins in the order Lamniformes, a well-supported monophyletic shark group with a variety of caudal fin ...
[21]
Morphology and evolution of the jaw suspension in lamniform sharks
In previous studies the morphology of the jaw suspension has been shown to play a major role in the mechanism of upper jaw protrusion in elasmobranchs. The ...
[22]
Carcharhiniformes - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The status of Compagno's (1973) superorders is reviewed below. Squalomorphii—This superorder was composed of three orders, the Squaliformes (= “squaloids” sensu ...Missing: Galeomorphi coined
[23]
Systematics and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of the Enigmatic ...
Temporal and Spatial Distribution of the genus: Early Jurassic to Early Cretaceous of Europe and Russia.
[24]
Extensive paraphylies within sharks of the order Carcharhiniformes ...
The paraphyly of triakids appeared probable but more investigations are needed. In conclusion several independent morphological and molecular phylogenetic ...
[25]
The Upper Jurassic selachian Palaeocarcharias de Beaumont (1960)
Aug 9, 2025 · It is concluded that Palaeocarcharias must represent the oldest known lamniform. The body form of Palaeocarcharias is most closely comparable to ...
[26]
[PDF] Sharks, batoids, and chimaeras of the North Atlantic
... upper portion of the North Atlantic. Gyre, a clockwise rotating ocean gyre ... Galeomorphii. The superorder Squalomorphii includes the orders ...
[27]
Shark Biology | MCC - Micronesian Conservation Coalition
Some sharks are bottom dwellers, and have adapted to “buccal pumping”. Buccal pumping is the forcing of water over the gills by opening and closing the mouth.
[28]
Evolution and Consequences of Endothermy in Fishes
Endothermy is associated with higher standard metabolic rates, which may result from high aerobic capacities required by these high‐performance fishes to ...Missing: Galeomorphi | Show results with:Galeomorphi
[29]
Wobbegong shark – Works – collections.sea.museum/
They have a mottled pattern on their skin, which allows them to camouflage on the seafloor among rocks and seaweed where they can hide from danger and ambush ...
[30]
Function of the heterocercal tail in sharks - PubMed
An alternative model suggests that the heterocercal shark tail functions to direct reaction forces through the center of mass.
[31]
Sharks & Rays - Reproduction | United Parks & Resorts - Seaworld.org
Internal fertilization is a key adaptation for energy-intensive reproduction. ... Claspers are modified inner edges of the pelvic fins of male sharks and rays.
[32]
Lamniformes: Mackerel Sharks
15 species ... eyes without nictitating membrane; mouth subterminal, jaws extending well ...
[33]
Exceptionally preserved shark fossils from Mexico elucidate the long ...
Apr 24, 2024 · Here we describe newly discovered material from the early Late Cretaceous of Mexico, including complete articulated specimens with preserved body outline.<|separator|>
[34]
Evolution, development, and regeneration of tooth-like epithelial ...
Sharks and their relatives are typically covered in highly specialized epithelial appendages embedded in the skin called dermal denticles.
[35]
[PDF] Evolutionary relationships among bullhead sharks (Chondrichthyes ...
Bullhead sharks (Heterodontiformes) are the most ple- siomorphic galeomorphs (Naylor et al. 2012), with their remains first appearing in the Early Jurassic (c.
[36]
Combining palaeontological and neontological data shows ... - Nature
Dec 19, 2022 · The divergence time estimates indicate an origin of the crown Carcharhiniformes in the Early Jurassic (191.7 Ma, 95% HPD = 174.7–207.1 Ma) ...
[37]
Skeletal remains of the oldest known pseudocoracid shark ...
The skeletal remains are embedded in a single limestone slab recovered from the Sannine Limestone (Upper Cretaceous) of Haqel, Lebanon. Haqel is one of the most ...
[38]
Global shifts in species richness have shaped carpet shark evolution
Oct 21, 2021 · We find that carpet sharks species richness was greatest in shallow seas connected to the Atlantic Ocean during the Late Cretaceous, but that there was a ...
[39]
The Origin and Relationships of Early Chondrichthyans
Feb 2, 2016 · Elasmobranchs originated during the Devonian (419-358.9 Ma) ( Figure 1; Grogan et al., 2012) , potentially radiating into niches vacated by the ...
[40]
Cretaceous stem chondrichthyans survived the end-Permian mass ...
Oct 29, 2013 · Our finding shows that this lineage survived mass extinctions most likely by habitat contraction, using deep-sea refuge environments during catastrophic events.Missing: origins hybodonts<|control11|><|separator|>
[41]
Diversification of the Neoselachii (Chondrichthyes) during the ...
The Neoselachii are a monophyletic group including all of the extant sharks and rays. They underwent rapid diversification throughout the Jurassic and ...
[42]
Tooth morphology elucidates shark evolution across the end ...
Aug 10, 2021 · Our study reveals a complex morphological response to the end-Cretaceous mass extinction and highlights an event that influenced the evolution of modern sharks.<|control11|><|separator|>
[43]
The extinction and survival of sharks across the end-Cretaceous ...
Jan 20, 2021 · Our results indicate that the global disparity of selachimorphs across the K/Pg extinction event was largely stable. Stasis is consistent with ...
[44]
An Analytical Approach for Estimating Fossil Record and ...
Modern selachians and their supposed sister group (hybodont sharks) have a long and successful evolutionary history. Yet, although selachian remains are ...
[45]
Regional endothermy as a trigger for gigantism in some extinct ...
Sep 22, 2017 · This work proposes that regional endothermy was present in otodontids and some closely related taxa (cretoxyrhinids), playing an important role in the ...
[46]
Neoselachian (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) diversity across the ...
We show that neoselachian sharks suffered a major extinction at the K/T boundary. Out of 41 families, 7 became extinct (17±12%). The proportional measure ...
[47]
Molecular phylogeny of Squaliformes and first occurrence of ...
Aug 16, 2015 · Our results suggest that the origin of luminous organs arose during the rapid diversification event that gave rise to the extant Squaliform families.Missing: Galeomorphi | Show results with:Galeomorphi
[48]
FAMILY Details for Heterodontidae - Bullhead, horn, or Port Jackson sharks
### Summary of Heterodontidae Family
[49]
[PDF] Order HETERODONTIFORMES - Bullhead sharks
Total vertebral count 106, precaudal count 68, monospondylous precaudal count 35, diplospondylous precaudal count 33, prefirst dorsal-fin spine count 13, and ...
[50]
Port Jackson Shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni (Meyer 1793)
Although not considered dangerous, the dorsal-fin spines are venomous and Port Jackson Sharks should be handled with care. They also have small sharp teeth ...
[51]
Horn Sharks, Heterodontus francisci - MarineBio Conservation Society
Although there is no commercial market for horn sharks, except for the aquarium trade, some are taken occasionally by fishers, usually in crab traps or in ...
[52]
https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/species/1982
[53]
Kinematic analysis of jaw protrusion in orectolobiform sharks
The wobbegong sharks (Orectolobidae) are specialized for jaw protrusion. ... (1973) Suction feeding by the nurse shark. Copeia 1973: 606–608. 10.2307 ...
[54]
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
**Summary for Whale Shark (Rhincodon typus):**
[55]
Lamniformes - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The Carcharhiniformes (Ground Sharks) are the most diverse and largest group of shark-like cartilaginous fishes, comprising eight families, 51 genera, and at ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[56]
NOVA Online | Island of the Sharks | Order Lamniformes - PBS
Appearance: Large, heavy-bodied sharks with fairly long, flattened or conical, pointed snouts, small to fairly large eyes, protrusible jaws with large, slender- ...
[57]
Development of the Lunate‐Shaped Caudal Fin in White Shark ...
Jan 6, 2018 · A recent phylogenetic analysis showed that the lunate-shaped caudal fin in lamnid sharks is derived from a strongly heterocercal tail (Kim et al ...
[58]
The Reproductive Biology of the Common Thresher Shark in the ...
Oct 4, 2013 · As in other Lamniformes, young are nourished through oophagy. The ... Alopiid shark species are viviparous and nourish their embryos by oophagy ...
[59]
Order LAMNIFORMES - Fishes of Australia
A diverse group of seven chondrichthyan families that includes a number of iconic and highly specialised sharks.Missing: count | Show results with:count
[60]
Oxygen utilization and the branchial pressure gradient during ram ...
Jan 1, 2012 · Lamnids and tunas are also obligate ram ventilators, meaning they depend on continuous swimming to force water through the gills. Relative to ...
[61]
Sex, size and isotopes: cryptic trophic ecology of an apex predator ...
White sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) are migratory, apex predators, which have undergone significant population declines across their range.
[62]
Atlantic Shortfin Mako Shark | NOAA Fisheries
As of July 5, 2022, U.S. fishermen may not land or retain Atlantic shortfin mako sharks. Product harvested before that date may be available in the U.S. ...
[63]
White Shark Conservation, White Shark Stewardship Project
White Sharks are listed on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List, as Vulnerable . White sharks are federally managed under the ...
[64]
Combining palaeontological and neontological data shows a ...
Dec 19, 2022 · Carcharhiniformes are the most speciose shark order with ~ 290 living species included in nine families (Fig. 1)42. Molecular data are ...
[65]
Branchial osmoregulation in the euryhaline bull shark, Carcharhinus ...
Sep 1, 2011 · The euryhaline bull shark, Carcharhinus leucas, is circumtropical in distribution, being found in coastal waters, brackish estuaries and FW ...
[66]
Shark nursery areas: concepts, definition, characterization and ...
May 14, 2025 · Based on ecological theory Heithaus (in press) suggested that juvenile sharks should aggregate to avoid predators if foraging times were short.
[67]
https://www.fishbase.se/summary/5919
[68]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9763247/
[69]
https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/214/17/2883/10494/Branchial-osmoregulation-in-the-euryhaline-bull
[70]
What is overfishing? | The Shark Trust
Aug 30, 2023 · Overfishing is the biggest threat to sharks: 100% of threatened sharks are impacted by overfishing. Overfishing is the only threat for 67% of shark and ray ...
[71]
Overfishing drives over one-third of all sharks and rays toward a ...
Nov 8, 2021 · The first global assessment (in 2014) concluded that one-quarter (24%) of species were threatened. Now, 391 (32.6%) species are threatened with ...
[72]
Ending shark finning - Marine Stewardship Council
Shark finning is removing fins before discarding the shark. MSC prohibits it, requires a Fins Naturally Attached policy, and has suspension for violations.
[73]
Human Threats on Sharks & Rays - Marine Megafauna Foundation
Sharks and rays face numerous threats from humans – climate change, overfishing, ocean pollution including plastics, tourism, and habitat loss threaten ...
[74]
Ecological Importance of Sharks | FIU Institute of Environment
These many and diverse contributions are under threat from overfishing, climate change, habitat loss, energy mining, shipping activities and more.
[75]
[PDF] CITES listing of shark species
The great and smooth hammerhead sharks were included because the specimens most frequently traded resemble those of the scalloped hammerhead to such an extent ...
[76]
Protecting the Bahamas Shark Sanctuary - Shark Conservation Fund
Apr 30, 2025 · The Bahamas protected all species of sharks in their Exclusive Economic Zone, the first nation in the Atlantic to take such a bold step for shark conservation.
[77]
Shark Management Laws | NOAA Fisheries
Nov 21, 2024 · The Shark Conservation Act requires that all sharks in the United States, with one exception, be brought to shore with their fins naturally attached.
[78]
Opportunities to enhance conservation success for sharks - Nature
May 16, 2025 · Shark conservation research is increasingly interdisciplinary and is well prioritised toward key threats that drive the decline of shark ...
[79]
Population genetics of four heavily exploited shark species ... - Apollo
Here, we investigate the genetic population structure of four commercially exploited shark species with different biological characteristics (Carcharhinus ...<|separator|>
[80]
Global Extinction Risk for Sharks and Rays Is High, United States ...
Dec 6, 2024 · Sharks Are In Rough Shape Globally · Extinction Risk Differs by Habitat and Region · Sharks and Ray Threats and Conservation Measures.