Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Gaza Flotilla

The Gaza Freedom Flotilla refers to a series of maritime convoys organized by activist coalitions, including the Free Gaza Movement and later the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, to deliver humanitarian supplies to the by sea and thereby challenge Israel's naval , which was imposed in following Hamas's violent of the territory amid ongoing attacks on Israeli civilians. These efforts, beginning with small-scale voyages in 2008 that occasionally reached Gaza shores, evolved into larger operations but largely failed to breach the blockade post-2010, serving more as political protests than effective aid mechanisms given alternative land routes for verified supplies. The most defining event occurred on , 2010, when naval commandos intercepted a six-vessel —carrying over 10,000 tons of and roughly 700 passengers from more than 40 countries—approximately 72 nautical miles from in . Aboard the lead ship, Mavi Marmara, organized by the Turkish group IHH, passengers mounted violent resistance against boarding forces using knives, metal bars, and other improvised weapons, capturing and wounding several soldiers before live fire was employed in response, resulting in nine passenger deaths (eight Turkish nationals and one dual American-Turkish citizen) and dozens of injuries on both sides. The UN Secretary-General's Palmer Committee of subsequently ruled the blockade lawful under as a proportionate security measure to curb arms flows to militants, criticized the flotilla organizers for reckless provocation, but faulted for excessive force and inadequate non-lethal options during the operation. Subsequent flotillas, including attempts in 2011, 2015, and as recently as 2025, have faced similar interceptions, with organizers often linked to Hamas through coordination and funding, underscoring persistent controversies over maritime rights, blockade enforcement, and the blend of humanitarian intent with ideological confrontation. While proponents frame these voyages as non-violent challenges to an inhumane siege, empirical assessments highlight minimal aid delivery relative to risks posed, including pre-planned violence and exploitation by Gaza's governing authorities for propaganda.

Background and Context

Origins of the Israeli Naval Blockade

In June 2007, Hamas militarily seized control of the from forces affiliated with the Palestinian Authority through a week of intense intra-Palestinian clashes that resulted in over 100 deaths, including combatants and civilians, culminating in 's complete ouster of officials and security personnel by June 15. This violent coup displaced the Palestinian Authority's governance in , establishing —a designated terrorist organization by , the , and the —as the de facto ruling authority. In response, intensified existing restrictions on , declaring the territory a "hostile entity" in September 2007 and imposing a comprehensive that included naval elements to curb the influx of weapons and dual-use materials. The naval component was formally declared on , 2009, amid escalating rocket fire, but originated from the immediate post-takeover security measures aimed at preventing maritime smuggling routes exploited by to import arms, explosives, and construction materials for and cross-border tunnels. Prior to 2010, Gaza-based militants, primarily and allied groups, had launched over 10,000 and mortars toward Israeli civilian areas, causing widespread disruption and casualties in southern , with documented hits totaling at least 8,000 by late 2008 alone. The blockade's rationale centered on enforcing a against transfers to , which permits in non-international armed conflicts through naval blockades to interdict vessels bound for enemy-controlled territory, provided the blockade is formally declared, non-discriminatory, and proportionate. This aligns with provisions in the San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea (1994), which authorizes belligerents to establish blockades for security purposes during hostilities, including inspection and diversion of suspect vessels, without requiring a traditional state of . Israel's measures were calibrated to target military flows, as evidenced by intercepted shipments of advanced weaponry components via sea, while allowing humanitarian goods through coordinated land channels.

Control of Gaza by Hamas and Security Threats

Hamas seized control of the in June 2007 following a violent with forces, establishing unchallenged governance over the territory and expelling elements aligned with the leadership. This takeover consolidated 's authority, enabling it to direct military operations, resource allocation, and border policies without oversight from rival factions. Hamas has been designated a terrorist organization by , the (initially for its military wing in 1997, with broader sanctions following), and the due to its bombings, rocket attacks, and explicit ideological commitment to armed struggle against . The group's 1988 founding articulates a core objective of obliterating , stating that "Israel will exist and will continue to exist until will obliterate it," while framing the conflict in religious terms that reject coexistence. Hamas's tactics, including the documented placement of rocket launchers and weapons storage in densely populated areas, have been cited as exploitation of human shields to deter counterstrikes and maximize scrutiny on casualties. Post-2005 , and allied groups escalated rocket and mortar attacks on Israeli communities, with nearly 2,700 projectiles fired from September 2005 to May 2007 alone, causing civilian deaths, injuries, and widespread disruption. By 2010, cumulative launches since disengagement exceeded several thousand, including longer-range Grad rockets that reached major cities like and , necessitating fortified shelters and economic mitigation measures in southern . Concurrently, developed extensive tunnel networks originating in , used for smuggling arms and explosives from and for cross-border incursions into , posing direct threats to border communities through surprise attacks and kidnappings. These subterranean routes facilitated the influx of advanced weaponry, bypassing land checkpoints. To counter maritime smuggling routes exploited by , imposed a naval in October 2007, shortly after declaring a hostile entity in response to the Hamas coup, aiming to interdict arms transfers that complemented tunnel-based supply lines. Empirical evidence includes the 2009 interception by the of the Iranian-flagged vessel Francop (also known as the ), which carried hundreds of tons of weapons—including rockets, mortars, and anti-tank missiles—destined for via , underscoring Iran's role in arming and the 's role in prevention. Such seizures demonstrated that sea routes enabled the delivery of sophisticated munitions capable of enhancing Hamas's offensive capabilities against , justifying sustained naval enforcement alongside ground and air monitoring to maintain security without full territorial reoccupation.

Humanitarian Aid Channels Prior to Flotillas

Prior to the 2010 Gaza Flotilla, to the was channeled primarily through Israeli-controlled land crossings, including for cargo and for limited passenger and medical transfers, under security protocols to screen for dual-use materials that could support militant activities. , the principal goods crossing, facilitated the entry of thousands of tons of approved supplies monthly after inspections by Israeli authorities, with operations resuming and expanding post-2008 conflict. For instance, on February 9, 2009, 83 trucks delivered 1,531 tons of supplies via following the IDF's Cast Lead operation. From January 18, 2009, to June 5, 2010, over one million tons of entered through these routes, including food, medical supplies, and fuel, averaging substantial monthly volumes under Israeli oversight. Israel coordinated aid deliveries with international organizations such as the Relief and Works Agency () and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), ensuring verified humanitarian items reached Gaza without compromising security restrictions on non-essentials. , which managed distribution of staples like to over 750,000 refugees, relied on clearances from Israeli authorities at crossings like for bulk imports, with daily requirements exceeding 270 tons of alone by early 2011, reflecting established pre-flotilla patterns. The ICRC participated in facilitating medical aid and family reunifications via , alongside monitoring compliance with humanitarian standards during inspections. These mechanisms prioritized essentials while barring items like materials susceptible to diversion for tunnels or weaponry. Data from 2008-2009 indicated that caloric needs were met despite import limits on non-humanitarian goods, with Israeli policy setting a minimum of 2,279 calories per person daily to avert , as calculated in security-ministry documents assessing food consumption patterns. This threshold, derived from nutritional analyses, supported adequate intake of permitted s like grains and dairy, underscoring that land channels provided a viable, inspected alternative to unvetted sea routes for sustaining basic humanitarian requirements.

The 2010 Gaza Flotilla

Organization and Key Participants

The 2010 Gaza Flotilla was organized primarily by the Turkish Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (IHH), an Islamist-leaning founded in 1992 and led by Bülent Yıldırım, its president since 1995. IHH coordinated with the Free Gaza Movement, a smaller activist group focused on challenging maritime restrictions to , and the European Campaign to End the Siege on , along with affiliated entities such as Ship to Gaza Greece and Ship to Gaza Sweden. These groups formed a loose coalition under the umbrella of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, emphasizing delivery while publicly framing the effort as resistance to Israel's naval blockade. IHH, which has distributed aid in conflict zones including Bosnia, Chechnya, and Afghanistan, has faced repeated allegations of channeling funds to extremist groups; French intelligence reports from the 1990s and 2006 identified IHH operatives purchasing weapons for jihadists and supporting al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan, while Israel banned the group in 2008 for documented ties to Hamas financing. Yıldırım, a vocal critic of Israel, addressed flotilla participants in Istanbul on May 19, 2010, urging them to resist boarding by Israeli commandos and predicting their humiliation of any such forces. The organization's motivations blended aid provision with political activism aligned with Islamist networks sympathetic to Hamas governance in Gaza. The flotilla attracted approximately 700 participants from over 30 countries, including Turkish nationals, European left-wing activists, American citizens, and individuals from , , and , reflecting a mix of humanitarian volunteers, journalists, politicians, and ideological sympathizers. Motivations varied, with some citing genuine concern over Gaza's humanitarian conditions and others expressing with Palestinian resistance, though IHH's dominance underscored an underlying Islamist agenda evident in pre-departure praising armed struggle. Funding details were not publicly disclosed, but reports indicated reliance on private donations raised in , with opaque contributions potentially including support from networks linked to Erdoğan's Justice and Development Party, which provided logistical facilitation such as port access in despite Israeli offers to transport the conventionally.

Ships Involved and Declared Cargo

The 2010 Gaza Flotilla consisted of six vessels organized primarily by the Turkish Foundation for and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (IHH) and the Free Gaza Movement, departing from ports in and on May 30, 2010. The flagship was the Mavi Marmara, a Turkish-flagged measuring approximately 93 meters in length and capable of carrying over 1,000 passengers, though it had around 581 people aboard focused more on activists than . Other notable vessels included the smaller Irish-flagged yacht Challenger I, operated by the Free Gaza Movement, and the Greek-flagged Eleftheri Mesogeios (also known as ), intended for aid transport; the remaining ships were smaller support vessels from Turkish and international groups. Organizers declared the flotilla carried approximately 10,000 tonnes of valued at around $20 million, including food staples like , , and ; medical supplies such as bandages and antiseptics; and construction materials like , rods, and prefabricated housing panels, all purportedly to address shortages in . No coordination was sought with authorities for inspection or delivery, despite Israel's public offer on , 2010, to allow the ships to dock at port for security screening and subsequent transfer of verified aid to via land crossings. Post-seizure inspections by authorities revealed discrepancies with the declared : the Mavi Marmara transported negligible , primarily passengers and minimal supplies, while overall findings showed limited perishable or urgent items sufficient for immediate humanitarian needs, with the bulk comprising non-perishable construction materials classified as dual-use goods under Israel's policy—potentially repurposable for military infrastructure like tunnels or bunkers, including items such as and metal reinforcements restricted without prior approval. Confiscated materials also included non-humanitarian items like approximately 10,000 doses of the anti-viral drug Tamiflu (noted as outdated or unnecessary for Gaza's reported needs) and organizational equipment such as tents and generators; Israel ultimately transferred verified to Gaza after screening, but organizers disputed the assessments as overly restrictive.

Objectives and Pre-Voyage Preparations

The primary stated objectives of the 2010 Gaza Flotilla were to deliver directly to and to challenge Israel's naval by reaching the territory's , which organizers characterized as an illegal requiring non-violent . The initiative, led by the Free Gaza Movement and the Turkish IHH, prioritized breaching the maritime restrictions over utilizing existing overland aid routes, with participants viewing the mission as a means to raise global awareness of 's isolation. Pre-voyage preparations encompassed logistical assembly of vessels and passengers in ports including , where the Mavi Marmara departed on May 28, 2010, alongside training in resistance measures. On the , participants received instruction in passive resistance techniques, non-violence protocols, and responses to potential detention, emphasizing symbolic defiance such as linking arms or sitting on decks to obstruct access. In contrast, some aboard the Mavi Marmara, organized by IHH, anticipated confrontation and preemptively adapted onboard items like railings into potential defensive tools, reflecting preparations for active ship defense beyond passive methods. Pre-departure gatherings in included rallies where activists chanted "" repeatedly and ", , oh Jews"—invoking a 7th-century Islamic battle against Jewish tribes—alongside expressions of intent to achieve martyrdom, signaling a orientation among segments of the group. The flotilla's approach evidenced intent to provoke an encounter by rejecting Israel's repeated offers to inspect and forward the cargo via port to under neutral oversight, as organizers insisted that direct arrival was essential to validate their blockade-breaking claim. To maximize , preparations incorporated elements, including journalists aboard ships like the Challenger 1 for satellite transmissions and planned live documentation of the voyage, aimed at framing any interception as evidence of enforcement aggression. This documentation strategy, coupled with the refusal of alternative aid delivery, prioritized political confrontation and narrative control over unencumbered humanitarian transfer.

The 2010 Israeli Raid

Israeli Warnings and Boarding Operation

Prior to the flotilla's approach, Israel had established the naval of on , , following Hamas's , and published advisories declaring the coastal area closed to all traffic under the until further notice, enforceable under as a proportionate response to security threats. As the six-vessel neared the zone in late May , authorities issued repeated diplomatic overtures and radio communications via VHF channels, urging the ships to alter course and divert to port for inspection of declared humanitarian , emphasizing that proceeding would violate the and risk . These warnings cited the 's for preventing to , with transmissions broadcast multiple times starting around 11 p.m. on (local time) as naval vessels shadowed the convoy, but the refused to comply. The boarding operation commenced in the early hours of May 31, 2010, after the flotilla entered the enforced area approximately 72 nautical miles from Gaza's coast, executed by naval commandos to enforce the blockade without prior lethal intent. To minimize visibility and resistance, the raid occurred under cover of darkness, with teams from helicopters onto the deck of the lead vessel Mavi Marmara while rigid-hull inflatable boats (RHIBs, or zodiacs) approached the smaller ships for surface boarding. Commandos were initially equipped with non-lethal tools, including paintball rifles loaded with paint rounds designed to mark and disperse resistors, stun grenades, and sidearms carried solely for , reflecting an operational plan prioritizing capture and control over fatalities. Live ammunition was authorized only upon confirmation of violent resistance threatening commando lives, per rules of engagement, after initial non-lethal methods proved ineffective against organized opposition. The tactical choice of nighttime insertion and graduated force aimed to secure the vessels efficiently while adhering to principles, as later affirmed in assessments validating the blockade's enforcement mechanism despite execution flaws.

Confrontations on the Ships

Israeli naval commandos boarded the five smaller vessels—Challenger I, Sfendoni, Gazze 1, Defne Y, and Eleftheri Mesogios—on May 31, 2010, encountering primarily passive resistance or compliance from passengers and crew, enabling rapid control without injuries or fatalities. On Gazze 1, soldiers accessed the ship via speedboats, and occupants offered no active opposition, allowing the vessel to be commandeered uneventfully. Similar outcomes occurred on Sfendoni and the others, where activists refrained from physical confrontation, contrasting sharply with events on the larger . The MV , a separate vessel attempting to reach days later on , 2010, was intercepted in and boarded without resistance; its 19 passengers and crew, who had publicly stated intentions of non-violent compliance, were diverted to port, where they signed papers shortly after. Across the flotilla, activists prepared for potential interception by donning gas masks against anticipated non-lethal measures like , while forces reported finding improvised tools such as slingshots, metal bars, and knives on board, which they alleged were readied for use against boarding teams. officials described these as evidence of premeditated tactics, bolstered by camera depicting groups assembling such items prior to the , though deployment was limited outside the primary confrontation site.

Specific Events on the Mavi Marmara

In the predawn hours of May 31, 2010, approximately 4:30 a.m., Israeli naval commandos initiated boarding of the Mavi Marmara by fast-roping from helicopters onto the vessel's upper deck in . The initial soldiers encountered immediate violent resistance from around 40 passengers, who used metal bars, clubs, knives, chains, and slingshots to assault them, disarming several and beating them severely before throwing some overboard. Accounts from the commandos describe being set upon by mobs chanting "Allahu Akbar," with blows targeted at the head, choking attempts, and dragging to lower decks, resulting in broken bones and internal injuries for multiple personnel. Among the injuries to the Israeli forces, one commando was stabbed, two were shot with their own seized pistols, and a total of nine sustained moderate to severe wounds from the coordinated attacks, which IDF-released video footage shows preceding any live fire from the boarders. The passengers' preparedness for violence included distributing gas masks, bulletproof vests, and weapons prior to contact, escalating the confrontation as activists wrested firearms and fired upon the commandos. Initial Israeli responses involved non-lethal options like paintball markers, tasers, and stun grenades, but these failed against the sustained assault, prompting warning shots after about 10 minutes and live ammunition roughly 30 minutes into the operation as a measure of self-defense against life-threatening threats. The ensuing led to the deaths of nine Turkish activists from wounds, with Turkish autopsies documenting a total of 30 bullets fired into them, including five head shots and multiple instances at (2-14 cm), patterns consistent with dynamic hand-to-hand engagements rather than executions. No conclusive forensic or video confirms passengers brought their own firearms aboard, though the wounding of soldiers by captured pistols indicates lethal escalation by activists prior to the full counter-response. The position holds that the commandos faced a premeditated attempt, necessitating lethal force to neutralize the immediate dangers and secure the by around 5:17 a.m.

Immediate Aftermath of the 2010 Incident

Casualties, Injuries, and Medical Response

Nine activists aboard the Mavi Marmara were killed during the boarding operation on May 31, 2010, all from wounds inflicted by commandos in response to violent . A tenth activist, Uğur Süleyman Söylemez, died in 2014 from complications of injuries sustained in the clash, bringing the total attributed deaths to ten. All fatalities occurred exclusively on the Mavi Marmara, with no deaths reported on the other flotilla vessels. Turkish forensic autopsies indicated the nine initial victims sustained a total of 30 bullet wounds, including five fatal head shots and instances of close-range fire, with some individuals shot multiple times (up to six). Israeli forensic examinations countered claims of execution-style killings, citing bullet trajectories and entry/exit wound patterns consistent with dynamic —where commandos faced attacks with knives, clubs, and other improvised weapons—rather than point-blank executions of prone or restrained individuals. Ten commandos were wounded during the operation, suffering injuries including two wounds (one from a captured ), stabbings, fractures from falls and beatings with metal bars, and concussions; one was in serious condition. Prompt by was provided to the commandos, with treatment administered en route to Israeli facilities. Medical response onboard the Mavi Marmara was initially handled by volunteer doctors among the passengers, focusing on and amid ongoing confrontations. Once control was secured around 5:30 a.m., forces deployed medics to stabilize wounded activists, administering before transporting approximately 31 injured passengers—many with severe injuries—to hospitals for and care, where some received treatment for pre-existing conditions that compounded their wounds.

Seizure of Cargo and Detentions

Following the completion of the boarding operation on , 2010, Israeli naval forces towed the six vessels to Port for processing. was systematically unloaded and subjected to security inspections to screen for , dual-use materials, or items prohibited under the naval , such as those potentially usable for military purposes. Verified humanitarian goods—including foodstuffs, clothing, medical equipment, and construction materials like from the MV —totaling thousands of tons across the ships, were cleared and forwarded to through the land crossing after confirmation of their non-threatening nature. Inspections of the MV Mavi Marmara uncovered numerous undeclared items among the passengers' possessions and onboard storage, including over 200 knives, axes, metal rods and bars, slingshots loaded with marbles, wooden clubs, gas masks, night-vision equipment, and canisters, none of which had been reported in the flotilla's pre-voyage manifests. These objects, often described by authorities as improvised weapons, contrasted with the organizers' claims of purely civilian aid transport, though no cache of firearms, explosives, or heavy armaments was identified during the searches. Of the 679 passengers and crew detained from the vessels, most were transported to inland facilities including the Beersheva detention center for identity verification, medical checks, and interrogations focused on their knowledge of the voyage's organization, funding, and conduct during the interception. Interrogations, sometimes conducted in multiple languages and documented via video, sought details on potential links to prohibited groups or intent to breach the forcibly. The majority signed orders after initial refusals by some, leading to their release and expulsion via within 48 hours to over 30 countries; a handful, including those linked to or weapon possession, faced prolonged holds of several days pending legal review before or minor charges.

Initial International Media Coverage

Following the on the Mavi Marmara on May 31, 2010, initial international media coverage emphasized global outrage, frequently framing the incident as an unprovoked "" or "deadly attack" against unarmed humanitarian activists. Outlets such as and Turkish broadcasters like TRT rapidly disseminated unverified footage from activists aboard the ship, depicting commandos being assaulted upon boarding but portraying the response as excessive force leading to the deaths of nine Turkish nationals. This narrative dominated early Arab and Turkish reporting, which highlighted the 's occurrence in and accused of aggression without immediate context on prior warnings or resistance encountered by boarding teams. Western media exhibited varied initial responses, with left-leaning publications like and focusing on protests and condemnation, describing the operation as sparking "international outrage" and drawing parallels to excessive military action. In contrast, security-oriented outlets and U.S. reporting often noted Israel's prior warnings to the flotilla to divert to Ashdod port and the presence of potential weapons like knives and metal bars among passengers. Israel's response was initially hampered by a domestic blackout imposed during the , delaying the release of counter-footage until hours later on May 31, when videos surfaced showing activists violently attacking descending commandos with clubs and throwing objects, including a . Public opinion polls conducted shortly after reflected this media divide, with a Rasmussen survey from early June 2010 finding 49% of Americans attributing responsibility for the deaths primarily to pro-Palestinian activists, versus only 19% blaming , indicating skepticism toward the activist narrative in U.S. audiences. Such splits underscored broader tendencies in coverage, where outlets sympathetic to humanitarian framing amplified unverified claims from flotilla participants, while those prioritizing security contexts awaited or highlighted evidence of premeditated resistance, revealing source dependencies that shaped early perceptions amid limited verified information.

Investigations and Legal Assessments

United Nations Palmer Report

The United Nations Secretary-General's Panel of Inquiry on the 31 May 2010 Flotilla Incident, chaired by former New Zealand Prime Minister Sir Geoffrey Palmer and including former Colombian President Álvaro Uribe, was established on 2 August 2010 to examine the events surrounding the Israeli interception of a flotilla bound for Gaza. The panel reviewed national reports from Israel and Turkey, written testimonies, video and audio recordings, forensic evidence, and witness statements to assess compliance with international law. Its report, released in September 2011, concluded that Israel's naval blockade of Gaza, imposed on 3 January 2009, was legal as a legitimate security measure in the context of an ongoing armed conflict, aimed at preventing weapons smuggling by sea amid rocket attacks from Gaza militants. The blockade met requirements under international humanitarian law, including effective enforcement, prior notification via notices to mariners, and proportionality, with negligible impact on Gaza's civilian population due to the absence of significant port infrastructure. The panel found that the flotilla, comprising six vessels carrying approximately 10,000 tonnes of aid and around 700 passengers, knowingly violated the blockade despite awareness of its existence and international advisories against challenging it by sea. While many participants were motivated by humanitarian intentions, organizers—particularly the Turkish group IHH—sought publicity through confrontation rather than using established land routes for aid delivery, acting recklessly and without legal right to resist enforcement. Evidence, including CCTV footage and passenger preparations with improvised weapons such as iron bars, chains, slingshots, and knives, indicated organized violent opposition to the boarding, with passengers attacking Israeli commandos upon descent onto the Mavi Marmara, resulting in injuries to soldiers, including gunshot wounds to two and the capture and mistreatment of three others. Forensic analyses confirmed multiple gunshot wounds among the nine deceased passengers, occurring in a chaotic close-quarters combat. Israel possessed the right under to board the vessels in to enforce the , but the panel determined the was excessive and unreasonable, particularly the resort to live without exhausting non-lethal options or providing clearer warnings, leading to unnecessary deaths and injuries. While initial boarding was justified, the operation's execution at approximately 64 nautical miles from the zone in predawn hours escalated risks, and no satisfactory explanation was offered for the lethal outcomes. Videos and audio intercepts supported claims of against imminent threats in the melee, yet the panel emphasized that force must remain minimal and proportional. Recommendations included expressing regret for the loss of life and establishing a joint trust fund for victims without formal apology, reviewing the 's continuation, easing land access per UN Security Council Resolution 1860, and prioritizing designated crossings for future aid; was urged to condemn passenger violence, discourage similar flotillas, and restore full diplomatic ties with .

Israeli and Turkish Inquiries

The Israeli Turkel Commission, formally known as the Public Commission to Examine the Maritime Incident of 31 May 2010, was established by Prime Minister on June 14, 2010, and chaired by retired Justice , with two international observers, former First Minister of and international law expert . Its report, released on January 23, 2011, determined that Israel's naval blockade of complied with as a proportionate response to arms smuggling threats, and that the interception of the flotilla 72 nautical miles from shore was lawful given the vessels' intent to breach it. The commission cleared Israeli Defense Forces () personnel of wrongdoing, citing video footage, soldier testimonies, and forensic analysis showing that commandos faced organized violence—including beatings with metal bars, stabbings, and attempts to throw them overboard—upon boarding the Mavi Marmara, necessitating live fire only after initial non-lethal measures like guns failed. The Turkel report emphasized the release of over 600 hours of raw video and audio evidence documenting the activists' preparations for , such as chants of violent intent and distribution of makeshift weapons, which it argued demonstrated an imminent threat rather than passive humanitarian resistance. It acknowledged operational errors, such as inadequate intelligence on the extent of resistance, but rejected claims of excessive force, attributing the nine deaths and injuries to defensive actions in a chaotic where at least 10 soldiers were wounded, two severely. Turkey's response included forensic autopsies conducted immediately after the incident, with results released on June 4, 2010, revealing that the nine deceased Turkish nationals on the Mavi Marmara had been shot a total of 30 times, with five victims sustaining five or six wounds each, including some entry wounds from distances of one meter or less and shots to the back of the head. A Turkish National Commission of Inquiry, formed on August 11, 2010, under the auspices of the , issued an interim report asserting that forces employed disproportionate and premeditated violence, characterizing the as a "military attack" in that violated and resulted in unlawful killings, while calling for international prosecution. The inquiries diverged sharply on the interpretation of ballistic evidence and force proportionality: Turkish forensics highlighted close-range shots as indicative of executions, whereas Israeli analysis, supported by 3D trajectory modeling in the Turkel report, aligned wound patterns with defensive firing amid activist assaults, dismissing point-blank claims as inconsistent with combat dynamics and noting the absence of Turkish examination of seized weapons or passenger aggression. The Turkish commission largely omitted evidence of passenger-initiated violence, focusing instead on alleged Israeli planning flaws, which Israeli sources critiqued as selective and politically motivated to amplify diplomatic tensions, contributing to Turkey's downgrade of relations, expulsion of the Israeli ambassador, and severance of military ties in September 2011.

International Court and Other Legal Actions

The (ICC) conducted a preliminary examination into the 2010 Gaza flotilla incident following referrals from Palestinian authorities and , focusing on potential war crimes aboard the Mavi Marmara. On November 6, 2014, ICC Prosecutor announced the closure of the examination, determining that the Rome Statute's jurisdictional requirements were not met, as the events did not constitute crimes within the Court's temporal and subject-matter scope, and neither (a non-State Party) nor relevant actors triggered . No formal or prosecutions ensued, despite activist for . In Turkey, prosecutors indicted four senior Israeli military officials—including former IDF Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi—in November 2012 for alleged crimes during the raid, seeking aggregate sentences exceeding 18,000 years per defendant under Turkish penal code provisions for murder and aiding terrorism. The case proceeded in absentia but was dismissed by an Istanbul court on December 10, 2016, following a normalization agreement between Israel and Turkey that included compensation payments to victims' families, rendering further proceedings moot. Israel characterized the trial as politically motivated "theater" lacking legal basis under international law. No convictions were secured against Israeli personnel. Private lawsuits filed by flotilla participants in European and U.S. courts, alleging unlawful and violations of , uniformly failed to yield judgments against . For instance, a 2016 U.S. District Court filing by survivors sought damages but advanced no further due to jurisdictional barriers and Israel's sovereign immunity defenses. Similarly, attempts in courts such as those in the and were dismissed on grounds of and lack of evidence establishing individual criminal responsibility. No charges were brought against flotilla organizers for or provocation, despite claims of organized resistance during boarding. Ongoing activist demands for or (ICJ) trials persist, but no binding international rulings have invalidated Israel's naval blockade in relation to the incident.

Subsequent Flotilla Attempts

Early Follow-Up Efforts (2011-2015)

Following the 2010 incident, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition organized Freedom Flotilla II in 2011, planning to depart from Greek ports with up to 10 vessels carrying and around 300 activists to challenge the . However, on June 30, 2011, imposed a sailing ban on the ships amid diplomatic pressure from and the , citing safety and concerns; several vessels, including a Swedish-owned ship, were sabotaged with damaged propellers allegedly by divers, preventing any from reaching en route to . Smaller-scale efforts continued in subsequent years, such as the Estelle in , a Swedish-flagged carrying 30 activists and including symbolic items like children's wheelchairs and books. On October 20, , naval forces intercepted the Estelle approximately 100 nautical miles from , boarding it without resistance from the crew, who complied peacefully; the vessel was diverted to port, where was offloaded and transferred to via land routes coordinated with authorities, which organizers rejected as insufficient to protest the blockade policy. Similar low-profile attempts in 2013 and 2014 were either deterred early or did not materialize into significant voyages reaching the blockade zone, reflecting reduced momentum and logistical challenges compared to 2010. In 2015, Freedom Flotilla III launched with four vessels from various European ports, but only the lead ship Marianne, carrying 18 activists including former Tunisian President , approached the blockade; forces intercepted it on June 29, 2015, in about 100 miles from , with commandos boarding without incident as passengers offered no violent resistance. The remaining boats turned back voluntarily after warnings, and Marianne's crew was detained briefly in before deportation, with onboard aid—symbolic medical supplies and letters—again routed through land channels, underscoring organizers' insistence on sea access despite available overland alternatives. These interceptions involved no casualties or major confrontations, contrasting the 2010 raid, as protocol emphasized warnings, non-lethal measures, and aid facilitation. The June 2016 Israel-Turkey normalization agreement, which included Israel's apology for operational errors in 2010 and $20 million in compensation to victims' families, temporarily suspended large-scale flotilla planning by key Turkish groups like IHH, easing bilateral tensions but not altering the blockade's enforcement.

Later Initiatives and Freedom Flotilla Coalition (2016-2022)

The Freedom Flotilla Coalition organized the Women's Boat to Gaza initiative in 2016, deploying the vessel Zaytouna-Oliva with 13 female activists from multiple countries carrying symbolic , including children's toys and letters, to challenge the naval blockade. On October 5, 2016, naval forces intercepted the boat in approximately 40 nautical miles from , boarded it without reported violence using female commandos, and towed it to port. The activists, including laureate , were detained briefly before deportation; the aid cargo was offloaded and transferred to through official channels coordinated with the Strip's authorities. In 2018, the coalition launched the "Right to a Just Future for " flotilla with two vessels: Al Awda (carrying medical supplies for 50 tons of aid) and (with additional aid). The intercepted Al Awda on July 29 in 100 nautical miles from , boarding it amid reported resistance from crew members who claimed excessive force, though no fatalities occurred; the boat was diverted to . Freedom was seized on August 3 under similar circumstances, with 18 activists aboard detained and later deported after inspections. offloaded the verifiable aid for delivery to via land crossings, rejecting the flotilla's insistence on direct docking at Gaza's port as a violation of the enforced since 2007 to prevent . From 2020 to 2022, Freedom Flotilla Coalition activities at sea were suspended due to the global , which disrupted logistics and international travel for planned voyages like "For the Children of ." The coalition shifted to land-based advocacy and virtual campaigns highlighting the 's impacts, while preparing for resumption; no vessels departed during this period. These later initiatives emphasized non-violent symbolic protests, with interceptions consistently avoiding lethal force—deploying precision boarding teams and electronic warnings—resulting in zero fatalities across the 2016 and 2018 efforts, a departure from the 2010 incident's outcomes. Activists rejected and Greek proposals for alternative aid routing through ports like or , arguing such measures perpetuated the rather than dismantling it.

Recent Developments (2023-2025)

In 2024, following the escalation of the Israel-Hamas war after the , the Freedom Flotilla Coalition organized the "Break the Siege" mission, assembling at least three vessels—a and two passenger ships—in , , in April to attempt delivery of to . The effort involved participants from over 40 countries but was halted short of breaching the maritime blockade, with no vessels reaching . The Coalition's ": For the Children of " initiative followed, emphasizing aid such as baby formula, diapers, food, and medicine targeted at pediatric needs amid the conflict's civilian toll. The vessel departed Syracuse, , on July 13, 2025, with 18 crew members including activists, medics, and journalists, but naval forces intercepted it in on or around July 28, detaining participants and confiscating cargo without any aid reaching its destination. In September 2025, the Global Sumud Flotilla emerged as the largest such attempt to date, comprising 42 vessels from multiple international groups, including elements of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, loaded with around 250 tons of aid including food and medical supplies. Organizers framed it as a nonviolent challenge to the blockade during ongoing hostilities, which included renewed rocket launches toward . naval units intercepted all boats in between October 1 and 3, 2025, using methods including strikes on some, resulting in detentions and redirection of aid; a final was reportedly boarded around October 8. cited wartime security imperatives, including risks of vessels aiding militant activities, as justification for the blockades. None of these 2023-2025 flotilla efforts succeeded in delivering by to , with supplies instead channeled through expanded land routes coordinated via and , despite persistent conflict disruptions.

Controversies and Criticisms

Debates on Humanitarian vs. Political Motivations

Supporters of the Gaza flotillas maintained that their actions were driven by humanitarian imperatives, seeking to deliver directly to and draw attention to what they described as an illegal restricting essential supplies. Organizers, including the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, emphasized non-violent to challenge restrictions on maritime access, arguing that alternative land routes were insufficient due to oversight. Critics, however, argued that the flotillas' core motivations were political, aimed at provoking interception to generate condemnation and advance anti-Israel campaigns rather than efficiently providing . The 2010 flotilla, for instance, carried around 10,000 tonnes of supplies such as , , and materials, yet organizers rejected repeated offers to inspect the cargo at port and facilitate its transfer to via established crossings, which had already conveyed over a million tons of in the preceding 18 months. This refusal, replicated in subsequent efforts like the 2010 vessel and recent 2025 initiatives where proposals for unloading at nearby marinas or via were dismissed, prioritized symbolic confrontation over practical delivery, as could have reached without breaching the zone. Compounding these concerns, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition openly endorses the (BDS) movement, a Palestinian-led campaign explicitly designed to apply economic and political pressure on until it meets demands including ending the blockade and affirming a , which critics view as aimed at Israel's delegitimization rather than negotiation. , Gaza's de facto authority, has consistently praised flotilla attempts and demonstrated operational ties, with Israeli-seized documents from 2025 revealing direct coordination between flotilla leaders and figures, a pattern echoed in earlier efforts involving Muslim Brotherhood-linked coordinators. The disproportionate focus on live-streaming, amplification, and activist documentation—yielding extensive global coverage despite limited aid volumes in some missions—further underscores a strategy of media spectacle over substantive relief, as evidenced by coordinated updates across platforms during interceptions.

Legality of Force Used by Both Sides

The interception of the Mavi Marmara on May 31, 2010, involved commandos encountering organized upon boarding, including stabbings with knives, beatings with metal bars, and the use of slingshots and chairs as projectiles, which met the threshold for direct participation in hostilities under , permitting defensive lethal force. The presence of pre-positioned weapons such as axes, crowbars, and gas masks on deck indicated premeditated intent to resist enforcement of the , transforming what was claimed as passive into active confrontation that negated assertions of non-violence and justified escalation from non-lethal to lethal measures by boarding parties facing imminent threats to life. Under the Manual on Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea, resistance to a lawful —affirmed as legal in enforcement contexts—renders such opposition illegal, with participants losing protection as civilians if employing force beyond mere evasion, as evidenced by the activists' infliction of severe injuries on nine soldiers, including fractures and a near-fatal fall from the deck. This causal sequence, where initial compliance warnings were ignored and violence initiated upon contact, aligns with principles of necessity and , as soldiers' use of rifles and pistols transitioned only after disarming attempts failed against coordinated attacks. Critics, including some human rights assessments, have argued that certain Israeli shots—such as the nine fatal head and upper-body wounds documented in autopsies—exceeded , potentially violating rules against targeting non-threatening individuals, though dynamic close-range combat and the activists' prior lethal actions provide for such outcomes without establishing systematic excess. In contrast, the activists' deployment of improvised lethal weapons against descending troops constituted unlawful combatancy, forfeiting immunity and precluding claims of disproportionate response, as does not equate defensive enforcement with aggression when met with premeditated hostility.

Alleged Links to Extremist Groups and Propaganda Elements

The İHH (İnsan Hak ve Hürriyetleri İnsani Yardım Vakfı), the lead organizer of the 2010 Gaza flotilla, has maintained longstanding ties to radical Islamist networks, including support for global jihadist activities in regions such as Bosnia, Syria, and Iraq during the 1990s and 2000s. A 2010 assessment by Israeli intelligence highlighted İHH's funding and logistical assistance to these networks, alongside direct connections to , a designated terrorist organization by multiple governments including the United States and European Union. French authorities, in a 2006 investigation, described İHH as having "clear, long-standing ties to terrorism and Jihad," based on evidence of arms smuggling and militant financing traced to the group. These affiliations extend to ideological alignment with the , 's parent movement, which İHH leaders have publicly endorsed through joint events and funding channels. Several flotilla participants harbored personal links to extremist entities, including members of Turkish jihadist groups and Hamas sympathizers who boarded the Mavi Marmara with undeclared intentions to confront Israeli forces. Pre-raid audio intercepts captured by Israeli naval units included chants and declarations from activists expressing solidarity with Hamas, such as calls for "jihad" and praise for the group's resistance narrative, contradicting claims of purely humanitarian motives. Organizers, including İHH, coordinated with Hamas officials to publicize the voyage as a challenge to Israel's blockade, effectively amplifying the terrorist group's propaganda by framing the effort as defiance against perceived oppression. Post-raid narratives propagated by flotilla supporters relied on selectively edited videos that depicted Israeli commandos as initiating unprovoked violence, while omitting footage of activists' premeditated preparations, including the distribution of makeshift weapons like knives and metal bars on the Mavi Marmara deck. Israeli-released full recordings and forensic analysis later debunked myths of passive victims, revealing sequences where passengers assaulted descending soldiers with clubs and attempted to seize firearms, actions consistent with intercepted threats of martyrdom operations. These manipulations, disseminated via activist networks and aligned media, sustained a portrayal of the flotilla as a non-violent humanitarian mission, despite evidence of violence escalation by participants linked to radical ideologies. Critics, including security analysts, argue that the flotilla's high-profile spectacle diverted international attention from Hamas's internal mismanagement of aid inflows, where Israeli military assessments indicate up to 25% of humanitarian supplies entering Gaza via land crossings were diverted by the group for military use or black-market resale as of 2010. By prioritizing ations over established aid channels—which delivered thousands of tons of goods monthly through Israeli inspections—the initiative provided Hamas with propaganda victories that masked governance failures, such as resource hoarding for tunnel networks and rocket production amid civilian shortages. This dynamic, per reports from policy institutes, effectively bolstered Hamas's legitimacy without addressing verifiable inefficiencies in Gaza's aid distribution under its control.

Long-Term Impact

Effects on Israel-Turkey Relations

The 2010 Gaza flotilla raid precipitated a severe crisis in Israel-Turkey relations, with Turkey immediately expelling Israel's ambassador from Ankara and downgrading diplomatic representation to the chargé d'affaires level. Israel reciprocated by recalling its ambassador from Turkey and suspending military agreements, marking the nadir of ties that had already deteriorated since the 2008-2009 Gaza War. Diplomatic efforts yielded partial normalization in June 2016 through a memorandum of understanding, under which Israel agreed to pay $20 million in compensation to the families of the nine deceased Turkish activists and the injured, while Turkey committed to dropping all legal proceedings against Israeli personnel involved in the raid. The agreement facilitated the return of ambassadors and the reopening of embassies in both capitals, restoring formal ties amid mutual economic interests in energy and trade. Notwithstanding this reconciliation, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan maintained a consistently adversarial posture toward Israel, frequently invoking the Mavi Marmara incident in public speeches to criticize Israeli actions and rally domestic Islamist constituencies. This rhetoric persisted even as bilateral trade volumes grew, suggesting its instrumental role in Turkish internal politics rather than a barrier to pragmatic cooperation. Relations deteriorated sharply following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, with Erdoğan condemning Israel's response in Gaza as "genocide" and hosting Hamas leaders in Turkey, actions that underscored Ankara's alignment with the group designated as terrorist by Israel, the United States, and the European Union. In May 2024, Turkey suspended all trade with Israel, and by November 2024, Erdoğan announced the severance of all remaining bilateral ties, contrasting with Israel's concurrent normalization pacts with Arab states under the Abraham Accords framework.

Changes to Gaza Blockade Policy

Following the 2010 Gaza Flotilla raid, Israel announced on June 20 a policy shift to ease restrictions on non-military imports into Gaza, permitting a broader range of such as and previously banned under the stringent dual-use criteria. This adjustment, formalized in early July, lifted prohibitions on most consumer products while retaining controls on construction materials and other potential military assets to mitigate smuggling risks. By December 2010, further modifications enabled limited exports from Gaza, including agricultural produce, textiles, and furniture, routed through Israeli ports like Ashdod after security checks, aiming to revive local industry without compromising blockade enforcement. These evolutions prioritized security-permissible expansions, with aid approval rates rising as inspection protocols adapted to handle increased volumes; monthly truck entries through Israeli crossings averaged around 250-300 post-easing, up from pre-2010 restrictions that limited flows to essentials amid Hamas governance. However, no comprehensive blockade termination occurred, as recurrent threats—including over 4,500 rockets fired from Gaza in the 2014 conflict and similar escalations in 2021—necessitated sustained maritime and aerial controls to interdict arms imports. Subsequent flotilla challenges indirectly spurred procedural efficiencies, such as enhanced pre-shipment verifications and for aid delivery, but did not alter the core policy framework, which empirical data on intercepted weapons caches validates as responsive to causal security imperatives rather than yielding to external pressures. Truck inflows continued expanding through 2023, reaching pre-October averages of approximately 500 daily, countering claims of an unaltered "stranglehold" with verifiable logistics growth.

Broader Influence on Global Perceptions of the Conflict

The 2010 Gaza flotilla raid received disproportionate media attention that highlighted the activists' humanitarian claims while frequently omitting the blockade's origins in Hamas's 2007 takeover of Gaza and its use of the territory to launch over 8,000 rockets at Israel between 2005 and 2010. Coverage in mainstream outlets often portrayed the Israeli interdiction as an unprovoked assault on peaceful aid vessels, sidelining evidence of violent resistance aboard the Mavi Marmara, where commandos faced knives, clubs, and gunfire upon boarding. Empirical studies of print media found European newspapers more likely to criticize Israel disproportionately, attributing bias to editorial sourcing patterns favoring flotilla narratives over Israeli security briefings, whereas U.S. coverage showed relatively greater balance by including blockade justifications tied to arms . This selective framing amplified perceptions of the conflict as against , reinforcing a causal disconnect from Hamas's governance failures, including diversion of aid for military tunnels and munitions. In response, the incidents solidified Israeli domestic consensus on the necessity of maritime enforcement; a June 2010 poll revealed 59% of Israelis deemed the Gaza blockade more beneficial than harmful for security, with similar majorities endorsing the raid's execution despite international backlash. Among Americans, a contemporaneous Rasmussen survey indicated 49% blamed flotilla participants for the deaths, with only 19% holding Israel primarily responsible, reflecting sustained sympathy for Israel's self-defense amid ongoing threats. These counter-perceptions underscored a divide where flotilla publicity swayed opinion in Europe and Muslim-majority states toward viewing Israel as the aggressor, but reinforced resolve in Israel and pro-Western audiences to prioritize verifiable threats over symbolic gestures. Longitudinally, flotilla campaigns delivered scant direct aid— the 2010 convoy's claimed 10,000 tons of cargo was inspected, offloaded, and transferred to Gaza via official land routes under Israeli oversight, adding negligibly to the tens of thousands of tons entering monthly through crossings—yet entrenched a global narrative framing Palestinians as perpetual victims of siege, abstracted from Hamas's rejection of peace offers and use of civilian infrastructure for combat. This symbolic emphasis, rather than substantive relief, perpetuated skewed causal understandings, where blockade critiques overshadowed data on Gaza's economic dependencies and the regime's prioritization of militancy over development.

References

  1. [1]
    Gaza aid flotilla incident - Report of the Secretary-General's Panel of ...
    Sep 2, 2011 · Nine passengers lost their lives and many others were wounded as a result of the use of force during the take-over operation by Israeli forces.
  2. [2]
    Israel, Blockade of Gaza and the Flotilla Incident
    The so-called Gaza Freedom Flotilla was carrying 10,000 tonnes of humanitarian aid and had set out from Istanbul in an attempt to break Israel's blockade of ...
  3. [3]
    The Gaza flotilla: Selected articles - Gov.il
    Jul 17, 2010 · But as the flotilla leaders themselves acknowledged, they also had a military one: to break the blockade of Gaza that Israel imposed in 2007.
  4. [4]
    Documents from Gaza show Hamas's 'direct involvement' with aid ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · In a statement, the ministry claimed that the documents “show a direct link between the flotilla leaders and the Hamas terrorist organization,” ...Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Report of the Secretary-General's Panel of Inquiry on the 31 May ...
    May 31, 2010 · On 31 May 2010 at 4.26 a.m. a flotilla of six vessels was boarded and taken over by. Israeli Defense Forces 72 nautical miles from land.
  6. [6]
    IDF forces met with pre-planned violence when attempting to board ...
    May 31, 2010 · In fact, flotilla leaders stated (Sunday, May 30) that violence was premeditated. IHH preparations for violent confrontation with IDF soldiers ...
  7. [7]
    The Gaza Flotilla: Facts and Official Reactions
    The Gaza flotilla was a well-thought-out provocation against Israel. The flotilla was falsely presented as an enterprise of humanitarian aid to a needy ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Dr Zaher Birawi and the Palestinian Return Centre (PRC)
    Particular scrutiny should be placed on links to the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, international fund transfers, and ideological partnerships with known Hamas ...
  9. [9]
    Hamas Seizes Broad Control in Gaza Strip - The New York Times
    Jun 14, 2007 · Hamas forces consolidated control over much of Gaza on Wednesday, taking command of the main north-south road and blowing up a Fatah headquarters in Khan Yunis ...
  10. [10]
    Hamas takes control of Gaza | Palestine - The Guardian
    Jun 15, 2007 · The week of violence between Hamas and Fatah has left almost 100 people, both gunmen and civilians, dead. Last night Mr Abbas, declared a ...
  11. [11]
    The HAMAS Terror Organization - 2007 update - Gov.il
    Jun 5, 2008 · In May 2007 Hamas initiated an escalation in rocket fire, attempting to end the violent confrontations with Fatah by deflecting the fire toward ...
  12. [12]
    24.7.07: The siege on the Gaza Strip - B'Tselem
    Jul 24, 2007 · In June 2007, Hamas took over power in the Gaza Strip. Since then, the area has been under siege. Following Hamas's takeover, Israel changed the movement ...
  13. [13]
    The Legal Basis of Israel's Naval Blockade of Gaza
    Jul 18, 2010 · In addition, the San Remo Manual of 1994 includes two conditions: first, the state which applies the blockade may decide where and when and ...The Sources of International... · When Is a Blockade Legal?
  14. [14]
    Rocket & Mortar Attacks Against Israel by Date - Jewish Virtual Library
    Sixteen rockets were fired from Gaza. Most were shot down or fell in open areas. One of the rockets struck a factory in Sderot, but no casualties were reported.
  15. [15]
    Rocket threat from the Gaza Strip, 2000-2007 - Gov.il
    Dec 16, 2007 · As of the end of November 2007, there has been a total of 2,383 identified rocket hits in and around the western Negev settlements, with the ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed ... - IIHL
    The rules set out in this document and any other rules of international humanitarian law shall apply equally to all parties to the conflict.
  17. [17]
    The Legal and Military Case for Israel's Naval Blockade of Gaza
    Aug 12, 2025 · The naval blockade of Gaza, imposed by Israel in January 2009, has been a contentious element of the longstanding conflict between Israel and ...
  18. [18]
    Hamas Takeover of the Gaza Strip (2007) - ECF
    Hamas Takeover of the Gaza Strip (2007). Date. 2007-06-10 to 2007-06-15. Share ... A short confrontation between Fatah and Hamas over control of the Gaza ...
  19. [19]
    Hamas - National Counterterrorism Center | Groups
    Contains many features across the full range of issues pertaining to international terrorism: terrorist groups, wanted terrorists, and technical pages on ...
  20. [20]
    What Is Hamas? | Council on Foreign Relations
    The Legacy of the 9/11 Attacks: Terror Threats Have Multiplied. Dozens of countries, including the United States, have designated Hamas a terrorist organization ...
  21. [21]
    Hamas Covenant 1988 - The Avalon Project
    The Covenant of the. Islamic Resistance Movement. 18 August 1988. In The Name Of The Most Merciful Allah. "Ye are the best nation that hath been raised up ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Hamas' use of human shields in Gaza
    Hamas, an Islamist militant group and the de facto governing authority of the Gaza Strip, has been using human shields in conflicts with Israel since 2007.
  23. [23]
    Palestinian Rocket Attacks on Israel and Israeli Artillery Shelling in ...
    From September 2005 through May 2007, Palestinian armed groups fired almost 2,700 rockets into Israel, killing 4 Israeli civilians, and injuring 75 ...
  24. [24]
    Palestinian tunnel warfare in the Gaza Strip - Wikipedia
    The IDF targeted 140 smuggling tunnels and 66 tunnels used for attacks during the 2012 Gaza War. ... Hamas Attack Tunnel Crossing From Gaza Into Israel". Haaretz.Smuggling tunnels · Củ Chi tunnels · Sponge bomb
  25. [25]
    Israel's "Blockade" of Gaza - Jewish Virtual Library
    In June 2007, Hamas staged a coup and seized control of Gaza from the PA. To prevent smuggling and the infiltration of terrorists, Israel and Egypt tightened ...
  26. [26]
    Victoria Affair - Wikipedia
    In 2009, the Israeli Navy intercepted the Iranian vessel Francop off the coast of Cyprus, carrying hundreds of tons of weapons.Missing: 2010 | Show results with:2010
  27. [27]
    Israel seizes ship with Iran arms for Gaza-Netanyahu - Reuters
    Mar 15, 2011 · Nine years ago, Israeli forces intercepted the merchant ship Karine-A in the Red Sea and brought it to the Israeli port of Eilat, where the ...Missing: 2010 | Show results with:2010
  28. [28]
    Increased humanitarian aid to Gaza after IDF operation, 9 Feb 2009 ...
    Feb 9, 2009 · 83 trucks delivered 1,531 tons of supplies to Gaza via the Kerem Shalom crossing. 1,000 units of blood on the Lebanese ship Tali that illegally ...
  29. [29]
    UNRWA hobbled by unwieldy customs procedures on Gaza border
    Mar 30, 2011 · UNRWA's food distribution to around 750,000 Palestinian refugees across Gaza is a massive operation, requiring more than 270 tons of flour daily ...Missing: delivery pre- land
  30. [30]
    2,279 Calories per Person: How Israel Made Sure Gaza Didn't Starve
    Oct 17, 2012 · The document calculates the minimum number of calories necessary, in COGAT's view, to keep Gaza residents from malnutrition.
  31. [31]
    Israel used 'calorie count' to limit Gaza food during blockade, critics ...
    Oct 17, 2012 · The Israeli military made precise calculations of Gaza's daily calorie needs to avoid malnutrition during a blockade imposed on the Palestinian territory.
  32. [32]
    “Red Lines” presentation released after 3.5-year legal battle: Israel ...
    The presentation includes detailed tables on food consumption in Gaza according to the type, weight and nutritional value of different foods.
  33. [33]
    IHH (Insani Yardim Vakfi) - Turkey - NGO Monitor
    Mar 17, 2025 · ... IHH's main objective to deliver humanitarian aid to all people and take necessary steps to prevent any violations against their basic rights ...
  34. [34]
    The Flotilla - ADL
    On May 31, 2010, after numerous warnings, IDF ... People on the other five ships in the flotilla did not react with violence to Israeli naval personnel.
  35. [35]
    The Gaza Freedom Flotilla: Human Rights, Activism and Academic ...
    Mar 2, 2012 · The Free Gaza Flotilla coalition consists of: The Free Gaza Movement; the European Campaign to End the Siege on Gaza; IHH—the Turkish Foundation ...
  36. [36]
    https://ict.org.il/the-mavi-marmara-metaphor/
  37. [37]
    VIDEO IHH Leader Tells Gaza Flotilla Activists to 'Throw IDF ...
    Jun 18, 2010 · "And we say: 'If you send the commandos, we will throw you down from here and you will be humiliated in front of the whole world," Yildirim ...Missing: Hamas | Show results with:Hamas
  38. [38]
    The Mavi Marmara Metaphor - ICT
    Jul 7, 2010 · The main organiser was Turkey's IHH, which has long-standing links with Hamas; the European end, according to IHH head Bulent Yildirim, was ...
  39. [39]
    Turkish funds aid group testing Gaza blockade - NBC News
    Jun 1, 2010 · The Free Gaza Movement used funds raised in Turkey to buy the Mavi Marmara, which was raided by Israelis during the "Freedom Flotilla ...
  40. [40]
    Sponsor of Flotilla Tied to Elite of Turkey - The New York Times
    Jul 15, 2010 · The charity behind the Gaza flotilla, which ended in an Israeli raid, had support from Turkey's governing party.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  41. [41]
    Deaths as Israeli forces storm Gaza aid ship - BBC News
    May 31, 2010 · The six-ship flotilla, carrying 10,000 tonnes of aid, left the coast of Cyprus on Sunday and had been due to arrive in Gaza on Monday.
  42. [42]
    Israel invites the international flotilla to unload its cargo in Ashdod port
    May 27, 2010 · The flotilla organizers are invited to dock at Ashdod port, to unload their cargo and transfer it to Gaza, after a security check.
  43. [43]
    Gaza: Lists of Controlled Entry Items Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Gov.il
    Jul 4, 2010 · 2. Dual Use goods and items: liable to be used, side by side with their civilian purposes, for the development, production, installation or ...
  44. [44]
    Israeli attack on Gaza aid flotilla - HRC 15th session - Report of the ...
    On 29 June 2009, approximately 20 nautical miles from the coast of Gaza, the Israeli Navy intercepted a boat called the “Spirit of Humanity” owned by the Free ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] FREE GAZA FLOTILLA - Public Intelligence
    May 27, 2010 · ❖ The flotilla organizers claim that the true objective of the flotilla is to provide the residents of the. Gaza Strip with humanitarian aid. As ...
  46. [46]
    Opinion | An Assault on Israel, Cloaked in Peace
    Jun 2, 2010 · This is why the organizers of the flotilla repeatedly rejected Israeli offers to transfer its cargo to Gaza once it was inspected for military ...
  47. [47]
    Israel's Deadly Raid On Gaza-Aid Flotilla Draws Protests - NPR
    May 31, 2010 · Israel said the raid came after a flotilla of aid ships failed to heed Israeli warnings to stop. Israel accused the flotilla of transporting ...
  48. [48]
    Israeli attack on Gaza flotilla sparks international outrage | Israel
    May 31, 2010 · Israeli navy stormed the Mavi Marmara, the flagship of a flotilla of vessels crewed by pro-Palestinian activists.
  49. [49]
    Israel: More Tactical Details on the Flotilla Raid - Stratfor
    Jun 1, 2010 · By claiming the Shayetet 13 commandos boarded the ship only intending to use paintball guns, and resorted to using their sidearms as a last ...
  50. [50]
    Israeli Raid On Gaza Flotilla Draws Anger - NPR
    May 31, 2010 · He said that Israeli soldiers were initially armed with paintball guns, but later returned with firearms. At least two guns were wrested away ...Missing: tactics | Show results with:tactics
  51. [51]
    An Ambush at Sea: Understanding the Gaza Flotilla Operation
    Jun 7, 2010 · ... flotilla ran the risk of potential violence. This risk would have ... IDF video also shows significant violent resistance by activists to ...
  52. [52]
    UN Palmer Report Affirms Legality of Israeli Naval Blockade of Gaza
    Sep 2, 2011 · The Israeli naval blockade of Gaza is legal. That is the most significant conclusion reached by a version of the Palmer Report posted on the New York Times web ...
  53. [53]
    Israeli Military Boards Gaza Aid Ship - The New York Times
    Jun 5, 2010 · On Friday, the Israeli and Irish governments reached an agreement to unload the vessel's cargo in Ashdod, in southern Israel, and transport it ...Missing: declared | Show results with:declared
  54. [54]
    Israel diverts Gaza aid ship Rachel Corrie to Ashdod - BBC News
    Jun 5, 2010 · The incident comes five days after nine people were killed in clashes when troops boarded a Turkish aid ship, prompting international criticism.
  55. [55]
    The Gaza flotilla: Videos - Gov.il
    Jun 18, 2010 · On August 16, 2010 the BBC broadcast a half-hour 'Panorama' program examining the 'Free Gaza' flotilla and the Israeli raid of the Mavi Marmara ...
  56. [56]
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/jun/04/gaza-flotilla-activists-autopsy-results
  57. [57]
    Soldier on 'Marmara': 'I thought I was going to die'
    Jan 23, 2011 · in the report, the Navy commando described how he was immediately lynched upon landing on the Mavi Marmara's upper deck after fast-roping ...
  58. [58]
    Gaza flotilla activists were shot in head at close range - The Guardian
    Jun 4, 2010 · Nine Turkish men on board the Mavi Marmara were shot a total of 30 times and five were killed by gunshot wounds to the head.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  59. [59]
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/comatose-turkish-man-injured-on-mavi-marmara-dies/
  60. [60]
    Autopsies reveal 9 men on Gaza aid boat shot, 5 in head - CNN.com
    Jun 4, 2010 · Ince said, "the gun was fired between 2 and 14 centimeters' distance from the victim's head." In one month, the forensic report will be ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Comatose Turkish man injured on Mavi Marmara dies
    May 24, 2014 · Uğur Süleyman Söylemez, 51, was left comatose after Israeli commandos were attacked and opened fire when commandeering the Turkish-flagged vessel.
  62. [62]
    MV Mavi Marmara - Wikipedia
    It is best known for its participation in the 2010 Gaza Freedom Flotilla and the deadly confrontation that took place on it during the Gaza flotilla raid. MV ...
  63. [63]
    Mavi Marmara | İHH Humanitarian Relief Foundation
    The UN Humanitarian Aid Commission, the International Red Cross Committee and many other NGOs declared the Gaza blockade imposed by Israel "illegal". This ...
  64. [64]
    Israel's Blockade of Gaza, the Mavi Marmara Incident, and Its ...
    Jun 5, 2010 · All of the ships were taken to Ashdod, where the passengers were detained and the cargo was unloaded, inspected, and trucked to the Kerem Shalom ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] The Public Commission to Examine the Maritime Incident of 31 May ...
    Jan 19, 2010 · was found on the Mavi Marmara, which apparently had been brought on board by the flotilla participants, including flares, rods, axes, knives, ...
  66. [66]
    Gaza flotilla activists to be deported - ynet
    Jun 1, 2010 · Sixteen of the 679 activists from the Gaza aid flotilla who were detained by Israel refuse to identify themselves. The political echelon has ...<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Gaza flotilla: Activists freed but not flown all the way home | Israel
    Jun 2, 2010 · Israel said it would deport 682 activists from more than 35 countries. Turkey is understood to have sent six planes, three of which were delayed ...Missing: processed interrogated
  68. [68]
    Flotilla: Gaza back in spotlight | News - Al Jazeera
    Dec 26, 2010 · The Israeli army's raid on the Mavi Marmara shocked the world and severely dented Israel-Turkey relations [EPA]. The world awoke on May 31 to ...Missing: framing | Show results with:framing
  69. [69]
    The Arab Media Reaction to the Raid on the Gaza Flotilla | Brookings
    Jun 7, 2010 · In the week since the May 31 raid on the Gaza-bound aid flotilla, the Arab media has focused much of its attention on what it has dubbed the ...
  70. [70]
    As it happened: Israeli raid on Gaza flotilla - BBC News
    May 31, 2010 · Reports and reaction as it happens after Israeli commandos storm a convoy of ships carrying aid to Gaza.Missing: organizers reject
  71. [71]
    Close-Up Footage of Mavi Marmara Passengers Attacking IDF ...
    May 31, 2010 · ... passengers were killed. The 'Free Gaza' Flotilla had publicly insisted on their non-violent intentions, however their violent attack on the IDF ...
  72. [72]
    Poll: 49% of Americans Blame pro-Palestinian Activists for Flotilla ...
    Jun 8, 2010 · Ramussen Poll: Only 19% of Americans Believe Israel Is to Blame for Clash Aboard Gaza-bound Aid Ship Mavi Marmara Last Week.
  73. [73]
    Sources of media bias in coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict
    Nov 10, 2016 · Sources of media bias in coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: the 2010 Gaza flotilla raid in German, British, and US newspapers.
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Report of the Secretary-General's Panel of Inquiry on the 31 May ...
    On 31 May 2010 at 4.26 a.m. a flotilla of six vessels was boarded and taken over by Israeli Defense Forces 72 nautical miles from land. The vessels were ...Missing: dual- | Show results with:dual-<|control11|><|separator|>
  75. [75]
    Israeli Panel Finds Deadly Flotilla Raid Legal - NPR
    Jan 23, 2011 · The Turkel Commission report determined that the Israel Defense Forces acted correctly during the raid on a Turkish ship trying to break ...
  76. [76]
    Israeli soldiers fired at Gaza aid flotilla in self-defence, says inquiry
    Jan 23, 2011 · "The IHH activists carried out the violence on board the Mavi Marmara by arming themselves with a wide array of weapons, including iron bars ...Missing: incident | Show results with:incident
  77. [77]
    Gaza flotilla attack: Autopsies reveal intensity of Israeli military force
    Jun 4, 2010 · Turkish authorities release results showing all nine victims were shot at least once and some fix or six times.
  78. [78]
    https://www.fidh.org/en/region/north-africa-middle-east/israel-palestine/questions-answers-on-icc-s-preliminary-examination-of-israel-s-2010
  79. [79]
    Rome Statute legal requirements have not been met
    ... jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court ("ICC" or the "Court") were committed on one of the vessels, the Mavi Marmara, when Israeli Defense Forces ...
  80. [80]
    ICC Prosecutor announces closing of examination of 31 May 2010 ...
    Nov 6, 2014 · ICC Prosecutor announces closing of examination of 31 May 2010 Israeli raid on Gaza flotilla – ICC press release/Non-UN document. Statement ...
  81. [81]
    Q&A on ICC's preliminary examination of Israel's 2010 attack on ...
    Jul 28, 2015 · Q&A on ICC's preliminary examination of Israel's 2010 attack on humanitarian aid flotilla · International Justice · International Criminal Court ( ...
  82. [82]
    Turkish Court Charges Senior IDF Officials Over Gaza Flotilla Deaths
    May 28, 2012 · If they are convicted in absentia at the end of the trial process, which could take months if not years, the Turkish court could issue an order ...
  83. [83]
    Turkish Court Drops Case against Israelis over Gaza Flotilla Raid
    Dec 10, 2016 · Israel is already convicted,” he said. With the bilateral deal between Turkey and Israel, it will be very unlikely, if not impossible, for ...
  84. [84]
    Israel denounces Turkish trial of Israeli military chiefs as “political ...
    Nov 6, 2012 · Prosecutors are seeking prison sentences of more than 18,000 years for each of them. If the four men are convicted, the Turkish court could ...
  85. [85]
    Gaza Flotilla Survivors File New Lawsuit Against Israel in U.S. ...
    Feb 15, 2016 · Israel has refused to acknowledge responsibility and liability since the 2010 attack and has not paid any compensation to those directly ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  86. [86]
    No prosecution for Israel over flotilla raid despite 'reasonable belief ...
    Nov 6, 2014 · THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL Court will not launch a prosecution over Israel's raid on a Gaza-bound flotilla in 2010 in which 10 Turkish ...
  87. [87]
    Greece Bans Ships from Leaving Ports for Gaza Flotilla - VOA
    Jun 30, 2011 · They called the damage an act of sabotage committed by professional divers and blamed it on Israel. An Israeli foreign ministry official denied ...
  88. [88]
    Gaza flotilla ship 'sabotaged by divers' | News - Al Jazeera
    Jun 28, 2011 · A Swedish ship due to join an upcoming Gaza-bound aid flotilla has been sabotaged in the Greek port of Piraeus, organisers say.
  89. [89]
    Estelle intercepted: Israel navy stops Gaza-bound boat - BBC News
    Oct 21, 2012 · The Israeli navy intercepts a Finnish-flagged boat of pro-Palestinian activists trying to break the blockade of the Gaza Strip.
  90. [90]
    Freedom Flotillas: A history of attempts to break Israel's siege of Gaza
    Jun 9, 2025 · Freedom Flotilla III was launched in 2015 as the third major attempt by international activists to break Israel's naval blockade of Gaza.
  91. [91]
    Israel Intercepts First of Four 'Freedom Flotilla' Boats to Gaza
    Jun 29, 2015 · Israeli sailors intercepted a small boat carrying former Tunisian President Moncef Marzouki and 17 other activists sailing to Gaza to protest Israel's blockade.
  92. [92]
    Israel, Turkey strike deal to normalize ties - CNN
    Jun 27, 2016 · Israel and Turkey have reached a deal to normalize diplomatic relations, six years after an Israeli raid on a Gaza-bound flotilla left eight Turks and an ...
  93. [93]
    Israel intercepts boat seeking to break Gaza blockade - Al Jazeera
    Oct 6, 2016 · Israel's navy intercepted an activist boat seeking to break the country's decade-long blockade of the Gaza Strip, saying it was boarded without incident.
  94. [94]
    Israel intercepts protest vessel trying to break naval blockade of Gaza
    Oct 5, 2016 · The Israeli navy has intercepted a boat carrying female pro-Palestinian activists trying to break Israel's naval blockade of the Gaza Strip.
  95. [95]
    Intercepted at sea, women's boat to Gaza docks quietly in Israel
    Oct 6, 2016 · A boat full of women activists which was headed for the Gaza Strip before being intercepted and commandeered by the Israeli Navy on Wednesday has docked at the ...
  96. [96]
    Claims of violence as Israel deports crew of Gaza aid vessel
    Aug 2, 2018 · Most of those on board Al Awda, which means The Return in Arabic, were held in prison, while two Israelis on the vessel were released on bail.
  97. [97]
    Israel stops aid ship heading to Gaza – DW – 07/29/2018
    Jul 29, 2018 · Israel has intercepted a ship bringing humanitarian aid to Gaza on the grounds it was breaking international law.
  98. [98]
    Boat trying to break Gaza blockade seized by Israeli navy
    Jul 29, 2018 · The Israeli Navy on Sunday stopped a boat that was trying to break the maritime blockade of the Gaza Strip and started to tow the vessel to the port in Ashdod.
  99. [99]
    Covid-19 Archives - Freedom Flotilla
    After the global pandemic pause, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition is now set to resume our sailing to challenge the illegal, immoral and inhuman blockade of ...Missing: 2020-2022 | Show results with:2020-2022
  100. [100]
    Freedom Flotilla Coalition prepares for 2023 Actions
    After the global pandemic pause, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition has initiated plans to again sail to challenge the illegal, immoral and inhumane blockade of ...
  101. [101]
    Women's Flotilla Intercepted en Route to Gaza Docks in Israel
    Oct 6, 2016 · The Israeli navy intercepted the Zaytouna-Olivia, which sought to break the blockade on the Gaza Strip, without incident on Wednesday.<|separator|>
  102. [102]
    Break the Siege Fact Sheet - Freedom Flotilla
    How many vessels are part of the “Break the Siege” mission? There are at least three confirmed ships. One large cargo ship and two passenger ships.
  103. [103]
    Break the Siege - Freedom Flotilla
    Apr 26, 2025 · Break the Siege Explained. In April 2024, and roughly two hundred days into Israel's siege and genocidal violence, multiple ships were ...
  104. [104]
    Break the Siege of Gaza––update | Jewish Voice for Liberation
    The Break the Siege flotilla began in April 2024 with hundreds of participants from 40 countries arriving in Istanbul, Turkey, to set sail for Gaza.
  105. [105]
    Handala: For the Children of Gaza - Freedom Flotilla
    Handala: For the Children of Gaza Explained. In 2023 and 2024, 'Handala' sailed to ports across northern Europe and the UK, breaking through the media ...
  106. [106]
    Gaza Flotilla Activist Slams “Israeli Piracy on the High Seas” After ...
    Jul 28, 2025 · The Handala was sailing toward the besieged Palestinian territory with baby formula, diapers, food and medicine on board when Israeli forces ...<|separator|>
  107. [107]
    Freedom Flotilla to sail again with new mission - Peoples Dispatch
    Jul 12, 2025 · The Handala, carrying essential supplies including food and medicines, will begin its voyage from Italy on July 13, with 18 crew members on ...
  108. [108]
    A new Gaza flotilla is on its way; does Israel have the legal right to ...
    Sep 24, 2025 · According to a report by Reuters, the Global Sumud Flotilla is currently transporting around 250 tons of aid that it seeks to unload in Gaza to ...
  109. [109]
    Israel intercepts last Gaza Sumud flotilla vessel: What we know so far
    Oct 1, 2025 · Israeli forces have boarded and taken control of the Marinette, the final vessel headed towards Gaza as part of the Global Sumud Flotilla (GSF) ...
  110. [110]
    The Global Sumud Flotilla to Gaza: Everything you need to know
    Sep 1, 2025 · 2010 – Gaza Freedom Flotilla. In 2010, Israeli commandos raided the Mavi Marmara in international waters. They killed 10 activists and ...
  111. [111]
    Israeli Military Attacks Flotilla in International Waters
    Oct 8, 2025 · In one hour, eight boats were intercepted by the Israeli army : Abd Elkarim Eid, Alaa Al-Najar, Anas Al-Sharif, Gaza Sunbird, Leïla Khaled ...
  112. [112]
    Reaction to Israel's interception of the Global Sumud Flotilla - Reuters
    Oct 2, 2025 · The Palestinian Foreign Ministry spokesperson condemned the interception of the flotilla as a violation of international law, asserting that ...
  113. [113]
    The latest Gaza flotilla: What you may have missed - JNS.org
    Oct 6, 2025 · In response, it must be noted that before Oct. 7, 2023, no Israeli soldiers were in the Gaza Strip when Hamas launched its terrorist invasion.
  114. [114]
    What to know about the flotilla seeking to break Israel's blockade of ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · The flotilla is the largest attempt, in terms of the number of boats, to break Israel's maritime blockade of Gaza, which has now lasted 18 years ...
  115. [115]
    About Freedom Flotilla Coalition
    Israeli Theft of Gaza Resources and BDS Response ... The international Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) is a grassroots people-to-people solidarity movement ...Missing: ties | Show results with:ties
  116. [116]
    Gaza bound ship rejects offer, boarded with compliance of crew
    Jun 5, 2010 · The activists rejected this offer, and consequently, the Israeli Navy boarded the ship with full compliance of the ship's crew members, and redirected it to ...
  117. [117]
    Pro-Gaza flotilla charity says Israel blocking aid to be sent via Jordan
    Oct 10, 2025 · Israel is blocking 250 tons of aid for Gaza, including food, medical supplies and educational material, because of disagreements over its ...
  118. [118]
    FFC Frequently Asked Questions - Freedom Flotilla
    Since 2010, we have actively challenged Israel's illegal and inhumane blockade of Gaza by sea, continuing the powerful precedent set by the Free Gaza Movement, ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  119. [119]
    Muhammad Sawalha, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the second flotilla
    Jun 29, 2011 · The second flotilla is coordinated by Muhammad Sawalha, a senior Muslim Brotherhood figure connected to Hamas.<|separator|>
  120. [120]
    How the Gaza aid flotilla used cameras and data to win global ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · How the Gaza aid flotilla used cameras and data to win global attention ... The flotilla sent regular updates on X, Telegram and Instagram ...
  121. [121]
    Gaza flotilla is a publicity stunt driven by Hamas
    Sep 30, 2025 · The 'Global Sumud Flotilla' aims to break the Israeli blockade and deliver aid to Gaza, but suspicions arise about its true motives.
  122. [122]
    [PDF] The Gaza Flotilla Incident and the Modern Law of Blockade
    Jan 30, 2008 · According to Israeli figures, in 2009 there were 692 rocket/mortar attacks from Gaza on Israel's territory and 104 in January–october 2010.
  123. [123]
    https://www.fdd.org/analysis/op_eds/2023/11/16/turkeys-aid-organization-is-a-front-for-supporting-terrorism/
  124. [124]
    [PDF] IHH, which plays a central role in organizing the flotilla to the Gaza ...
    May 26, 2010 · As part of its connections with the global jihad it supported jihadist terrorist networks in Bosnia, Syria, Iraq, ... IHH links with global jihad ...<|separator|>
  125. [125]
    Controversial aims of the IHH organisation | E-010094/2010
    clearly linking the IHH with Al-Qaeda and worldwide Jihad.
  126. [126]
    Turkey's 'Aid' Organization Is a Front for Supporting Terrorism - FDD
    Nov 16, 2023 · For some “it's a humanitarian organization,” while for others, it is has been referred to as a “one-stop shopping spot for terrorism.” In ...
  127. [127]
    The Flotilla Story U.S. Media Won't Report - FAIR.org
    Jul 1, 2010 · Passengers from the Mavi Marmara released new footage of the Israel Defense Forces' deadly May 31 raid on the ship, which killed nine activists.
  128. [128]
    https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/turkey-israel-relations-after-october-7-layers-complexity-and-posturing
  129. [129]
    USAID analysis found no evidence of massive Hamas theft of Gaza aid
    Jul 25, 2025 · Those reports also show that Hamas has diverted up to 25% of aid supplies to its fighters or sold them to civilians, the Israeli military said, ...Missing: flotilla | Show results with:flotilla
  130. [130]
    The Gaza “Flotilla” Is Hamas Propaganda, Not Humanitarian Aid
    Oct 1, 2025 · This flotilla is not about food or medicine. It is about Hamas manipulating world opinion while continuing to invest in tunnels, rockets, and ...
  131. [131]
    Turkey-Israel Relations After October 7: Layers of Complexity and ...
    Oct 17, 2024 · Turkey and Israel maintain a complex and often fluctuating relationship marked by both cooperation and tension.
  132. [132]
    The Gaza Flotilla Raid and its Aftermath - CSIS
    Jun 3, 2010 · On May 31, Israeli commandos raided the Turkish ship Mavi Marmara in international waters resulting in the death of at least nine passengers.Missing: confrontations | Show results with:confrontations
  133. [133]
    Turkey & Israel: After the Raid
    Jun 4, 2010 · The recent flotilla incident is the culmination of a steep decline in Israeli-Turkish relations that started with the Gaza war in 2008 and 2009.Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
  134. [134]
    The Ships that Scuttled Turkey-Israel Relations: A Decade since the ...
    May 25, 2020 · The flotilla incident was and remains a main issue in attacks against Israel in Turkish public opinion.
  135. [135]
    Israel pays Turkey $20M compensation over Mavi Marmara
    Sep 30, 2016 · On Aug. 20, Turkish parliament approved a deal, involving Tel Aviv paying $20 million to the families of the victims as part of a normalization ...
  136. [136]
    Turkey ratifies deal with Israel – DW – 08/20/2016
    Aug 20, 2016 · Within 25 days, Israeli would pay a "lump sum" of $20 million (17.7 million euros) to Turkey as compensation for those killed, according to ...
  137. [137]
    Israel and Turkey end rift over Gaza flotilla killings - BBC News
    Jun 27, 2016 · Israel and Turkey have normalised relations, ending a six-year rift over the killing by Israeli troops of 10 Turkish activists on a Gaza-bound ship.
  138. [138]
    Israel and Turkey reach deal to restore relations | News - Al Jazeera
    Jun 26, 2016 · Deal comes six years after an Israeli raid killed Turkish activists on a flotilla seeking to deliver aid to Gaza. Israel apology to Turkey.
  139. [139]
    Understanding Turkey's response to the Israel-Gaza crisis | Brookings
    Dec 7, 2023 · Although Turkey and Israel normalized ties in 2022, relations have dramatically worsened since Hamas' October 7 attack and Israel's military ...
  140. [140]
    Turkey severs all relations with Israel, says Erdogan | Middle East Eye
    Nov 13, 2024 · Turkish-Israeli relations have deteriorated sharply since a meeting between Erdogan ... However, following the Hamas-led attack on Israel on 7 ...
  141. [141]
    Israel to Ease Gaza Land Blockade - The New York Times
    Jun 17, 2010 · Israel promised to ease the importation of some goods by land, a move seemingly designed to quell criticism.
  142. [142]
    Israel eases Gaza blockade - The Guardian
    Jul 5, 2010 · Israel today lifted its ban on most consumer goods entering Gaza, but maintained its limits on many building materials, which it said could be used to ...Missing: allowances | Show results with:allowances
  143. [143]
    Israel to allow exports from Gaza Strip to boost local businesses
    Dec 8, 2010 · Israel is to allow exports from the Gaza Strip in a move to help businesses devastated by the blockade imposed on the territory in June 2007.
  144. [144]
    Israel eases blockade, approves more Gaza exports
    Dec 8, 2010 · Under the new regulations, Palestinians will be able to export furniture, textiles and agricultural products, said Israeli military spokesman ...
  145. [145]
    Gaza crossings: movement of people and goods - OCHA oPt
    The following chart tracks the data available to the UN on the volume of incoming supplies once they have been loaded on the Palestinian side of any of the ...
  146. [146]
    Israel/Palestine, August 2010 Monthly Forecast
    Jul 30, 2010 · In mid-July, EU foreign affairs head Catherine Ashton visited Gaza and called for Israel to allow exports and freedom of movement for Gaza's ...<|separator|>
  147. [147]
    Hostilities in the Gaza Strip and Israel | Flash Update #21 - OCHA oPt
    Oct 27, 2023 · Prior to the hostilities, an average of 500 truckloads entered Gaza every working day. None of the aid trucks that have entered thus far ...Missing: 2010 COGAT<|separator|>