Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Homefront

Homefront is a 2011 first-person shooter video game developed by Kaos Studios and published by THQ for Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 3, and Xbox 360 platforms.^[1] Set in an alternate 2027 timeline, the game portrays a United States invaded and occupied by the Greater Korean Republic following America's economic collapse, energy crises, and a war with North Korea that escalates into global domination by a unified Korean regime; players assume the role of Robert Jacobs, an American everyman turned resistance fighter engaging in guerrilla warfare against the occupiers.^[2] The single-player campaign, scripted by filmmaker John Milius—known for works emphasizing rugged individualism and anti-totalitarian themes—was structured as a concise, cinematic narrative spanning five to six hours, incorporating elements like propaganda broadcasts, civilian uprisings, and commandeering enemy vehicles for combat.^[1] Multiplayer modes supported up to 32 players with class-based gameplay, battle commands for dynamic objectives, and the unique Firestorm mode blending ground combat with air and vehicular assaults.^[1] While praised for its bold premise drawing loose inspiration from real geopolitical tensions, such as the 2010 sinking of the South Korean corvette ROKS Cheonan attributed to North Korea, the title faced criticism for derivative mechanics reminiscent of contemporary military shooters and technical issues at launch.^[2] Commercial underperformance, amid THQ's broader financial instability, led to Kaos Studios' closure shortly after release and the publisher's bankruptcy in 2012, stalling franchise expansion until Deep Silver acquired rights and issued Homefront: The Revolution in 2016 as an open-world sequel emphasizing resistance in occupied Philadelphia.^[3] The original's nationalist undertones and depiction of foreign occupation resonated with some audiences seeking alternatives to sanitized war narratives but drew accusations of insensitivity toward Asian stereotypes from select reviewers, though empirical sales data indicated modest reception rather than widespread controversy.^[1]

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Origins

The homefront refers to the civilian population and domestic economy of a nation at war, encompassing organized efforts to bolster military operations through manufacturing of armaments, conservation of materials, labor reallocation, and preservation of societal morale. This framework positions civilians as an extension of the war apparatus, distinct from frontline combatants, by channeling non-military resources into sustained logistical support.^[4] The concept crystallized during World War I, when the scale of mechanized conflict first demanded mass civilian participation beyond traditional soldiering; the term "home front" entered English lexicon by 1917, reflecting the integration of entire societies into prolonged hostilities.^[5] Prior eras featured wars largely confined to standing armies, but early 20th-century industrial advancements—such as machine guns, artillery, and supply chains—exposed the limitations of isolated military forces, necessitating homefront mobilization to match output with attrition rates.^[6] Causally, homefront efficacy determines war outcomes by amplifying material advantages, as superior domestic production enables overwhelming force ratios; historical data reveal that nations with robust civilian-driven industrial surges, such as the United States generating over 296,000 aircraft and 102,000 tanks in World War II, secured victories through sheer volumetric dominance over adversaries.^[7] This linkage underscores that logistical sustainment, rather than tactical brilliance alone, correlates empirically with success in total wars requiring indefinite resource flows.^[8]

Evolution Across Conflicts

The homefront concept first gained structured form during World War I in the United States, relying heavily on voluntary civilian participation to support the war effort after entry in April 1917. Liberty Bond campaigns mobilized public investment, raising over $21 billion through purchases by more than 20 million individuals via four drives and one Victory Loan between 1917 and 1919.^[9] The U.S. Food Administration, led by Herbert Hoover, coordinated voluntary conservation initiatives, including "wheatless Mondays" and "meatless Tuesdays," to boost agricultural exports without resorting to compulsory rationing or price controls.^[10] World War II marked a pivotal evolution to total mobilization, with mandatory mechanisms supplanting voluntary appeals amid the scale of global conflict following Pearl Harbor in December 1941. The Office of Price Administration enforced rationing starting with sugar in May 1942, extending to gasoline, tires, and other commodities by late 1942, backed by legal penalties for non-compliance.^[11] Economic structures shifted comprehensively, as civilian automobile production halted entirely in February 1942 to prioritize war materiel, enabling assembly-line innovations that propelled real GDP growth of 72% from 1940 to 1945 through unprecedented military output.^[12] This contrasted with World War I's partial industrial adjustments, reflecting causal demands of sustained multi-theater warfare that necessitated centralized allocation over ad hoc encouragement.^[13] During Cold War proxy conflicts, such as the Korean War (1950–1953) and Vietnam War (1965–1973 for major U.S. involvement), homefront structures de-emphasized broad economic retooling in favor of selective drafts and deterrence-focused preparations, avoiding the total-war footprint of prior eras. Civil defense assumed primacy against nuclear escalation risks, with the Federal Civil Defense Administration established in 1950 to promote shelter construction, evacuation plans, and public drills like "duck and cover" exercises in schools.^[14] Participation trended toward specialized readiness rather than universal mandates, incorporating emerging technologies like early warning systems amid ideological standoffs that precluded full mobilization. In post-9/11 asymmetric conflicts, including operations in Afghanistan (2001–2021) and Iraq (2003–2011), the homefront pivoted to counterterrorism resilience, leveraging an all-volunteer force and domestic security architectures over mass industrial or fiscal drives. The USA PATRIOT Act, signed October 26, 2001, institutionalized expanded surveillance and intelligence-sharing to mitigate internal threats, marking a structural reliance on legal and technological tools like data analytics for prevention.^[15] This era's prolonged engagements highlighted inefficiencies absent in World War II's compressed productivity surge, as decentralized financing via private contractors and digital platforms supplanted centralized bond-like campaigns, with limited GDP multipliers from sustained but non-total commitments.^[16]

Economic Dimensions

Industrial and Labor Mobilization

The War Production Board, established in January 1942, directed the rapid conversion of U.S. civilian factories to military output, prioritizing private sector execution through contracts and material allocations rather than outright nationalization. Automobile manufacturers, such as Ford and General Motors, halted civilian vehicle production by February 1942 and retooled assembly lines for tanks, aircraft engines, and jeeps, achieving full wartime capacity within months. This shift enabled the production of approximately 297,000 military aircraft between 1941 and 1945, alongside over 88,000 tanks and armored vehicles, demonstrating the adaptability of decentralized industrial incentives over centralized commandeering.^[17]^[18] Labor mobilization complemented these conversions, with campaigns like Rosie the Riveter promoting women's entry into factory roles to offset male enlistment shortages, filling millions of defense jobs by 1944. Major unions, including the AFL and CIO, committed to a no-strike pledge in December 1941 following Pearl Harbor, voluntarily suspending work stoppages for the war's duration in exchange for union security clauses and organizing rights in war plants. This agreement minimized disruptions, enabling 24-hour operations and widespread overtime—often 48-60 hour weeks—that sustained output surges without the inefficiencies of frequent interruptions seen in less coordinated systems.^[19]^[20] These adaptations yielded measurable economic gains, with U.S. real GDP rising 72% from 1940 to 1945, fueled by private firms responding to government procurement demands totaling over $300 billion in contracts. Unlike state-directed models in other belligerents, U.S. success stemmed from profit-driven innovation and priority systems allocating scarce resources to high-output producers, avoiding the bottlenecks of bureaucratic overreach. Empirical data underscores private enterprise's edge: firms like Boeing and Chrysler scaled production exponentially through voluntary efficiencies, outpacing pre-war forecasts and contributing to Allied material superiority without resorting to forced labor or total economic conscription.^[12]^[21]

Resource Management and Fiscal Policies

Resource management on the home front during major conflicts involved centralized allocation of scarce goods through rationing systems to ensure equitable distribution and sustain war efforts, while fiscal policies like war bonds and taxation mobilized domestic savings without immediate inflationary spikes. In the United Kingdom, the "Dig for Victory" campaign, launched in October 1939, promoted home gardening on unused land, resulting in over 1.4 million allotments by 1943 that produced more than one million tons of vegetables annually, supplementing commercial supplies strained by naval blockades and import disruptions.^[22] Similarly, U.S. rationing under the Office of Price Administration (OPA), implemented from 1942, allocated points for commodities like meat, sugar, and tires, preventing speculative hoarding by limiting purchases to verified needs and capping prices to stabilize wartime economies.^[11] These mechanisms extended sustainability by redirecting civilian consumption toward military priorities, with rationing curbing excess demand that could exacerbate shortages. Fiscal policies complemented allocation by funding expenditures through debt instruments rather than unchecked money printing. In the U.S., war bond drives from 1941 to 1945 raised approximately $185 billion, covering over half of the $341 billion in total war costs, as households purchased E Bonds and others at discounts, deferring consumption and channeling savings into government coffers. This approach, alongside tax hikes under the Revenue Act of 1942 that doubled federal receipts, avoided hyperinflation by absorbing excess liquidity, though it imposed intergenerational debt obligations. Benefits included price stabilization—U.S. consumer prices rose only 29% from 1941 to 1945 under OPA controls, compared to potential doublings without intervention—and equitable burden-sharing, as bonds democratized financing beyond elite taxation.^[23] However, top-down controls revealed limitations, as persistent shortages incentivized black markets; in the U.S., illegal trading in rationed meat and gasoline flourished, with OPA investigations uncovering networks that evaded stamps and price ceilings, undermining official equity goals.^[11] In Europe, similar dynamics emerged, with French black markets for butter and fuel reflecting supply inelasticity despite rationing, where fixed quotas ignored local scarcities and fostered corruption.^[24] Postwar, while U.S. debt-to-GDP peaked at 106% in 1946, rapid growth and financial repression (low interest rates on bonds) reduced the burden to 23% by 1974, but lingering distortions included suppressed investment signals from price caps and fiscal rigidities that constrained reconstruction.^[25] These policies thus sustained short-term resilience at the cost of market inefficiencies, highlighting causal trade-offs between centralized equity and decentralized adaptability.^[26]

Demographic Shifts and Workforce Participation

The Second Great Migration during World War II accelerated population shifts, with approximately 1.5 million African Americans moving from the rural South to urban factories in the North, Midwest, and West between 1940 and 1950, drawn by wartime industrial demand for labor in sectors like steel and shipbuilding.^[27] This voluntary relocation, exceeding prior waves, reflected economic pull factors—such as wages doubling in northern manufacturing—over southern agricultural stagnation, though federal initiatives like the Fair Employment Practices Committee (FEPC) provided limited enforcement against discrimination rather than primary causation.^[28] Labor shortages from male enlistment drove broader workforce inclusion, expanding the female labor force by about 6.7 million workers from 1940 to 1945, raising women's share from roughly 25% to 36% of the total U.S. labor force and enabling full employment with unemployment dropping to 1.2% by 1944.^[29]^[30] African American participation also surged, comprising up to 25% of foundry workers by 1944, as war production imperatives overrode customary exclusions in defense industries.^[31] These shifts prioritized output over entrenched social barriers, with empirical data indicating market-driven necessities—such as acute shortages in munitions and aircraft assembly—outweighing policy mandates in mobilizing untapped labor pools. Rapid influxes fueled racial frictions over job competition and housing scarcity in northern cities, manifesting in violence like the 1943 Detroit riot, where 34 deaths stemmed from clashes between white residents and black migrants amid overcrowded facilities.^[32] Postwar demobilization reversed many gains: female participation fell sharply as 2-3 million women exited by 1947, influenced by returning veterans' preferences, cultural norms favoring domestic roles, and economic contraction in war sectors, underscoring the transient nature of wartime expansions tied to exogenous demand shocks rather than enduring structural reforms.^[29] Similarly, black unemployment rose amid reconversion, with housing covenants and union exclusions perpetuating disparities, as peacetime markets reverted to prewar equilibria without sustained intervention.^[33]

Daily Life and Community Dynamics

During World War II, daily routines on the American home front were profoundly altered by measures such as blackouts and rationing, which enforced communal discipline and vigilance. Blackouts, implemented nationwide to simulate air raid preparedness, required households to extinguish lights and cover windows from dusk until dawn, disrupting evening activities and fostering a sense of shared purpose among neighbors who enforced compliance through block wardens.^[34] ^[35] These practices, while initially met with cooperative spirit, contributed to fatigue as prolonged restrictions limited social gatherings and normalcy.^[36] Community-driven initiatives like victory gardens and scrap drives strengthened local bonds and self-reliance. By 1944, approximately 20 million such gardens—planted in backyards, vacant lots, and public spaces—yielded about 8 million tons of produce, accounting for roughly 40 percent of the nation's fresh vegetables and reducing pressure on commercial supplies.^[37] ^[38] ^[39] Scrap collection campaigns, involving door-to-door gatherings of metals, rubber, and paper, similarly engaged entire neighborhoods, turning resource scarcity into collective action that enhanced solidarity.^[40] Home canning emerged as a key innovation, with output peaking at over 4.1 billion jars in 1943 through family and community centers, preserving garden yields and promoting adaptive skills amid food shortages.^[41] Yet these adaptations masked significant hardships that strained family and community ties. Gasoline rationing limited most families to 3 gallons per week, curtailing travel and isolating rural or distant households from urban support networks.^[42] Separations due to military service and war-related relocations exacerbated emotional tensions, with correspondence and limited visits highlighting domestic disruptions. Private charities, such as local aid groups and church networks, often bridged gaps in government provisions, providing supplemental food and morale-boosting events where official efforts fell short.^[43] Empirical indicators of morale reflected this duality: early war enthusiasm drove high participation in home front activities, but Gallup surveys by 1944-1945 revealed widespread reports of garden maintenance alongside growing weariness from sustained austerity.^[44] Overall, these dynamics cultivated resilience through grassroots innovation, though persistent scarcities tested communal endurance without fully eroding it.^[45]

Propaganda and Morale Management

Government Information Campaigns

The United States Office of War Information (OWI), established by executive order on June 13, 1942, and dissolved in September 1945, centralized federal efforts to disseminate information supporting the war effort through posters, films, radio scripts, and public speeches.^[46] These campaigns emphasized themes of sacrifice, victory gardens, scrap drives, and bond purchases, utilizing emotional appeals with realistic imagery to evoke patriotism and urgency, such as posters depicting Axis threats or heroic workers.^[46] By mid-1945, government agencies including the OWI had overseen the production of approximately 1.6 million posters from over 30,000 designs, distributed nationwide to factories, schools, and public spaces.^[47] Bond rallies, often featuring celebrities and government officials, formed a core technique, framing purchases as direct contributions to military success and tying them to personal duty.^[48] These efforts culminated in Americans buying $185.7 billion in war bonds, with 85 million participants out of a population of 131 million, equivalent to over $2,000 per person in 1940s dollars.^[48] Rationing campaigns, promoted via OWI materials and Office of Price Administration (OPA) directives, achieved widespread adherence, enabling sustained resource allocation for military needs despite shortages; for instance, gasoline rationing limited civilian use to essential travel, reducing consumption by up to 40% in some regions while minimizing widespread hoarding through public shaming and spot checks.^[11] Such initiatives demonstrably unified public behavior, correlating with low unemployment and peak industrial output, as voluntary enlistment in drives exceeded quotas in most cases.^[49] However, effectiveness stemmed not solely from ideological buy-in but from layered incentives: tax deductions for bond buyers, social pressures via community quotas, and legal penalties including fines up to $10,000 or imprisonment for violations like illegal trading on black markets, which persisted but remained marginal relative to overall compliance.^[11] Campaigns occasionally amplified threats—portraying enemies as barbaric to justify sacrifices—which cultivated fear and muted dissent, as seen in OWI guidelines discouraging defeatist reporting and prioritizing morale over unvarnished facts, though outright censorship was limited compared to Allied counterparts.^[46] Critics, including congressional investigations in 1943, argued these efforts bordered on manipulation by suppressing alternative views, such as isolationist critiques, through self-censorship among agencies and voluntary media cooperation, fostering an illusion of consensus absent deeper polling data on private sentiments.^[50] Empirical outcomes reveal causal realism in mixed motivations: patriotism drove initial surges, but sustained participation required enforcement mechanisms, debunking portrayals of unalloyed voluntarism, as evidenced by OPA prosecutions exceeding 300,000 cases for ration fraud by war's end.^[11]

Role of Media in Shaping Public Opinion

Radio broadcasts, particularly President Franklin D. Roosevelt's fireside chats, exerted considerable influence on home front public opinion by disseminating explanations of wartime policies through commercial networks. Roosevelt delivered 30 such addresses from March 1933 to June 1944, with peak wartime listenership approaching 60 million Americans, representing a substantial portion of the adult population. ^[51] These chats, aired on private stations, cultivated resilience and support for mobilization efforts by framing sacrifices as essential to national survival, distinct from formalized government propaganda organs. Cinema newsreels provided another commercial channel for reinforcing morale, screening edited footage of industrial output, bond drives, and selective battlefield successes to audiences attending theaters weekly. Weekly newsreel series, such as those produced from 1942 to 1946, reached millions by integrating home front narratives with war updates, amplifying perceptions of progress and collective efficacy without direct state scripting.^[52] Critics contend that media self-regulation under the Office of Censorship's voluntary code, issued January 15, 1942, skewed coverage by prohibiting details on troop movements, convoy losses, and certain atrocity accounts that might aid enemies or undermine resolve.^[53] ^[54] This code, adopted by press and broadcasters, emphasized omission over suppression, fostering narratives that overstated Allied advantages while underreporting setbacks, such as early Pacific defeats.^[53] Audience data from Hooper ratings correlated high radio penetration—over 90% of households by 1941—with shifts in sentiment, including enlistment increases following broadcasts of pivotal events like the December 7, 1941, Pearl Harbor attack, where volunteer rushes overwhelmed recruitment centers nationwide.^[51] Postwar analyses revealed instances of inflated operational claims in media reports, such as preliminary victory announcements later revised downward, which, alongside declassified details on casualties and strategic deceptions, prompted retrospective questioning of wartime journalism's veracity among historians and veterans.^[54]

Civil Defense and Security

Home Guard and Volunteer Efforts

In response to the threat of German invasion following the fall of France in June 1940, the United Kingdom established the Local Defence Volunteers (LDV) on May 14, 1940, rapidly renamed the Home Guard on July 22, 1940, as a voluntary force of civilians ineligible for regular military service due to age, occupation, or medical reasons.^[55] By 1943, membership peaked at over 1.7 million men, who underwent basic training in marksmanship, anti-aircraft duties, and sabotage prevention, often using privately owned firearms and improvised weapons in the absence of sufficient government supplies.^[56] These volunteers conducted local patrols, manned roadblocks, and guarded factories and airfields, supplementing regular forces without direct combat engagements but fostering community resilience and deterrence against potential paratrooper landings.^[57] The Home Guard was stood down on December 3, 1944, and formally disbanded on December 31, 1945, after the invasion threat receded.^[58] Similarly, in the United States, civilian volunteer initiatives emphasized personal initiative in coastal defense amid U-boat threats off the Atlantic seaboard. The Civil Air Patrol (CAP), founded on December 1, 1941, mobilized private pilots and aircraft owners for reconnaissance without reliance on conscription, growing to tens of thousands of members who flew over 24 million miles in unarmed patrols spotting enemy vessels.^[59] CAP crews reported 173 submarine sightings and conducted 57 attacks using small bombs or depth charges after initial radio alerts to naval forces, contributing to the protection of merchant shipping lanes despite limited armament and formal military integration.^[60] These efforts, alongside state-level volunteer guards in places like California, highlighted armed civilian preparedness and localized vigilance, building practical skills in observation and emergency response that bolstered national morale without supplanting professional armed services.^[61] Such grassroots organizations underscored the value of voluntary participation over mandatory drafts, enabling older or reserved workers to contribute defensively through self-armed units and ad-hoc training, which enhanced public confidence in homefront security amid resource constraints.^[62] Their primary legacy lay in sustaining civil preparedness and psychological fortitude, as patrols and drills deterred sabotage and invasion fears while preserving workforce continuity.^[63]

Internal Security Measures and Controversies

In the United States during World War II, internal security measures encompassed civil defense protocols such as air raid drills, mandated by the Office of Civilian Defense starting in early 1942. These drills, conducted nationwide through 1945, included mandatory blackouts, siren alerts, and evacuation simulations to simulate responses to aerial bombardment, with local wardens enforcing compliance by patrolling streets and fining violators for light leaks.^[64]^[65] Although the continental U.S. experienced only sporadic threats like Japanese balloon bombs in 1944-1945, which caused six deaths, the drills aimed to minimize casualties by instilling disciplined reactions, and federal assessments deemed them effective for public readiness despite causing occasional accidents during execution.^[66]^[67] A major controversy arose from the internment of approximately 120,000 persons of Japanese ancestry, two-thirds of whom were U.S. citizens, pursuant to Executive Order 9066 signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942. This policy, driven by unsubstantiated fears of espionage following the Pearl Harbor attack on December 7, 1941, compelled mass relocation from West Coast areas to inland camps like Manzanar and Tule Lake, often with minimal notice, leading to forced sales of homes, farms, and businesses at steep losses.^[68]^[69] Empirical evidence post-war revealed zero instances of sabotage or espionage by internees, as confirmed by military intelligence reviews and the absence of any related convictions, rendering the measure a precautionary overreach that inflicted economic damages estimated at $4 billion in 2017-adjusted values alongside documented family separations and trauma.^[68]^[70]^[71] The program's operational costs to the federal government exceeded initial projections, with later reparations under the 1988 Civil Liberties Act totaling over $1.6 billion disbursed to survivors by 1999, acknowledging the policy's lack of security justification.^[72] While proponents cited wartime exigencies, declassified records from the War Relocation Authority underscored that intelligence assessments, including FBI reports, had identified no broad threat from Japanese American communities prior to implementation.^[73]^[68] This disparity between perceived risks and realized null threat highlighted causal disconnects in decision-making, prioritizing mass action over targeted investigations despite lower incidences of Axis-linked activities among European-descent groups.^[70]

Criticisms and Debates

Government Overreach and Individual Liberties

The Espionage Act of 1917 criminalized actions or speech intended to interfere with military operations, including obstructing the draft or supporting U.S. enemies, with penalties up to 20 years imprisonment and fines of $10,000.^[74] This legislation, followed by the Sedition Act of 1918 which expanded prohibitions to include "disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language" against the government, flag, or military uniform, resulted in over 2,000 prosecutions during World War I, with approximately half leading to convictions.^[75] Notable cases included Socialist Party leader Eugene V. Debs, sentenced to 10 years for an anti-war speech in 1918, and numerous labor organizers and pacifists jailed for distributing leaflets questioning the draft.^[76] Proponents of the acts, including President Woodrow Wilson's administration, defended them as essential for preserving national unity and preventing sabotage amid wartime vulnerabilities, arguing that unchecked dissent could undermine recruitment and troop morale. Supporters cited the Supreme Court's "clear and present danger" standard in Schenck v. United States (1919), which upheld convictions by equating anti-draft advocacy to falsely shouting "fire" in a crowded theater, as justification for prioritizing security over absolute speech protections during exigency.^[76] Labor groups, through voluntary no-strike pledges coordinated with the government, reinforced this unity narrative, viewing suppression as a temporary measure to avoid industrial disruptions that could aid enemies.^[77] However, critics contended these laws constituted direct violations of the First Amendment by broadly stifling political opposition, with empirical evidence showing a sharp decline in socialist publications and public anti-war gatherings post-enactment, indicative of self-censorship and a chilling effect on discourse.^[78] Postwar scrutiny revealed overreach, as the Sedition Act's amendments were repealed in December 1920, and President Warren G. Harding issued pardons to hundreds of prisoners by 1923, acknowledging many sentences as disproportionate.^[79] Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's dissent in Abrams v. United States (1919) highlighted the acts' tendency to suppress ideas rather than imminent threats, influencing later judicial retreats from broad wartime curbs.^[76] During World War II, reliance on the Espionage Act persisted but with fewer sedition-focused trials; the Great Sedition Trial of 1944 indicted 30 individuals for alleged pro-Nazi propaganda, yet ended in mistrial due to the presiding judge's death, with most charges subsequently dropped, underscoring procedural limits on mass prosecutions.^[80] Defenders maintained such measures forestalled division without evidence of widespread home front collapse, while skeptics pointed to causal patterns where state-enforced silence favored conformity over robust debate, potentially weakening long-term resilience through untested private dissent mechanisms.^[81] The U.S. public debt held by the public rose from about 44% of GDP in 1940 to 106% by 1946, reflecting extensive wartime borrowing to finance mobilization without commensurate tax increases sufficient to cover expenditures.^[82] This escalation imposed enduring fiscal burdens, including higher interest payments that constrained postwar budget flexibility and contributed to debates over sustained government intervention in the economy.^[83] Price controls during the war mitigated immediate inflation but deferred adjustments, leading to pent-up demand and price surges upon relaxation, which compounded economic volatility during demobilization.^[21] Reconversion from war to civilian production triggered the 1945-1946 recession, as federal spending plummeted from $84 billion in 1945 to under $30 billion in 1946—a 65% cut—resulting in a 19% decline in real GNP and widespread unemployment peaking at 5.2% by mid-1946.^[84]^[85] Industrial retooling delays, particularly in consumer goods sectors like automobiles and appliances, prolonged shortages and hindered rapid absorption of demobilized workers, amplifying short-term hardship despite underlying productive capacity.^[86] Socially, wartime separations and role shifts led to elevated divorce rates post-1945, with over 600,000 divorces in 1946 alone—double prewar levels—stemming from strained reunions and altered family dynamics.^[87] Veterans encountered persistent readjustment challenges, including psychological trauma manifesting in higher rates of alcoholism, suicide, and employment instability; while the 1944 GI Bill facilitated education and loans for 7.8 million beneficiaries, it did not fully address underlying mental health needs, as evidenced by expanded Veterans Administration social work programs to handle crisis caseloads.^[88] Housing shortages exacerbated these issues, with millions facing overcrowding or substandard conditions into the late 1940s due to wartime construction priorities.^[89] Although military R&D produced civilian applications like the microwave oven, adapted from cavity magnetron radar technology, the war's commandeering of scientific talent and materials—diverting roughly 40% of federal R&D funding to defense—incurred opportunity costs by postponing private-sector innovations in areas such as consumer electronics and agriculture, where peacetime incentives might have yielded broader, less centralized progress.^[90]^[12] This resource reallocation disrupted long-term human capital development, as youth conscription and labor shifts interrupted education and skill accumulation, effects persisting in cohort-specific earnings gaps observed decades later.^[91]

Representations in Culture

Literature and Film

The 1942 American film Mrs. Miniver, directed by William Wyler and starring Greer Garson as the titular middle-class English housewife, portrayed the British home front during the early years of World War II, emphasizing family resilience amid air raids, evacuation of children, and personal losses. Adapted loosely from Jan Struther's 1940 novel compiled from newspaper columns in The Times, the film depicted rationing, makeshift shelters, and community solidarity, culminating in a village church service under rubble after a bombing.^[92]^[93] Released before full U.S. entry into the war, it influenced American public opinion toward supporting Britain, with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill reportedly valuing its propaganda effect as equivalent to deploying an additional 250,000 troops, though this attribution relies on anecdotal accounts from wartime officials.^[94] The film's achievements included humanizing civilian sacrifices, earning six Academy Awards including Best Picture on March 4, 1943, and grossing over $5.9 million domestically, which theaters leveraged alongside war bond sales drives that raised billions nationwide through cinema tie-ins.^[95] However, critics have noted its propagandistic elements, such as softening class tensions and understating the prevalence of black market activities—estimated to involve up to 10% of wartime goods in Britain despite official crackdowns—while idealizing stoic endurance over raw disillusionment or economic strain.^[96] In literature, works like Elizabeth Jane Howard's The Cazalet Chronicles series, beginning with The Light Years (1990) but drawing on wartime diaries, retrospectively captured home front rationing's gritty realism, including clothing coupons limited to 66 per adult annually and food allocations averaging 2,800 calories daily by 1942, often supplemented informally amid shortages.^[97] Cyril Hare's mystery novels, such as With a Bare Bodkin (1946), incorporated authentic details of billet-sharing and utility blackouts, reflecting the era's improvisational ethos without overt morale-boosting. These narratives achieved verisimilitude by grounding themes in causal hardships like supply disruptions from U-boat campaigns, which reduced merchant shipping by 7.2 million tons in 1942 alone, yet postwar analyses highlight how wartime publications often glossed over morale dips, with surveys showing 20-30% of Britons experiencing "war weariness" by 1943.^[98]^[99] Postwar satires, such as those emerging in the late 1940s, began critiquing home front myths of unity, revealing underlying disillusionment with rationing's persistence until 1954 and reconstruction delays, though direct film examples like Hue and Cry (1947) focused more on juvenile gangs amid bombed ruins than systemic failures. These shifts underscored a transition from wartime idealization to acknowledgment of unaddressed social fractures, including uneven burden-sharing across classes.^[100]

Music, Radio, and Television

During World War II, music served as a primary vehicle for bolstering home front morale through patriotic and upbeat compositions, such as the Andrews Sisters' "Boogie Woogie Bugle Boy," a 1941 release that celebrated military life and achieved widespread popularity amid rationing and mobilization efforts.^[101] Radio programming complemented this by blending entertainment with war-themed serials and news bulletins, fostering a shared cultural experience that reinforced civilian resilience and support for the troops, as seen in broadcasts like holiday specials linking home listeners to overseas personnel.^[102] However, both mediums operated under voluntary and government-imposed censorship, with the Office of War Information and Office of Censorship reviewing content to avoid depictions of defeatism or excessive hardship, resulting in lyrics and scripts that prioritized escapism and unity over unvarnished critiques of shortages or sacrifices.^[53] ^[103] This approach, while effective in maintaining public cohesion, limited reflective discourse on domestic strains, as networks and sponsors self-policed to align with official narratives.^[104] In the postwar period, early television expanded representations of the home front's role through documentary series like NBC's Victory at Sea (1952–1953), which chronicled naval operations alongside industrial output and civilian contributions to the war machine, underscoring the linkage between domestic production and overseas triumphs without delving into administrative inefficiencies.^[105] This format marked an initial shift toward archival retrospection, drawing on footage to affirm collective achievement rather than probe lingering societal costs.

Video Games

Homefront (2011), developed by Kaos Studios and published by THQ, is a first-person shooter depicting a near-future occupation of the United States by the Greater Korean Republic, a unified North-South Korea that rises to superpower status amid American economic collapse and energy crises.^[1] The game's single-player campaign follows a resistance fighter in the occupied Western U.S., emphasizing guerrilla warfare and civilian hardships under military rule, with scripted events showcasing atrocities like public executions to underscore homefront vulnerabilities.^[106] Sales exceeded 1 million units worldwide within weeks of launch, with 375,000 sold on day one in North America alone and 2.4 million shipped globally.^[107] ^[108] Reception was mixed, with praise for its narrative penned by John Milius highlighting plausible risks of societal breakdown but criticism for implausible geopolitics, such as a resource-starved Korea achieving trans-Pacific invasion capabilities, and repetitive gameplay.^[109] ^[110] The sequel, Homefront: The Revolution (2016), developed by Dambuster Studios and published by Deep Silver, shifts to an open-world format centered on player-led resistance in occupied Philadelphia against the same Korean occupiers.^[111] Troubled by THQ's 2013 bankruptcy—leading to IP transfers from Crytek back to independent development—the game prioritizes emergent player agency in crafting weapons, recruiting allies, and disrupting supply lines, simulating homefront insurgency dynamics.^[112] However, it faced widespread criticism for technical instability, including frequent crashes, poor AI, and frame-rate drops, resulting in a "Weak" aggregate score of 48% from 83 critics.^[113] The narrative's exploration of occupation brutality was deemed superficial, with the premise again faulted for underestimating U.S. defensive resilience and over-relying on fictional state collapses, potentially reflecting speculative biases toward institutional fragility over decentralized civilian responses.^[114] ^[115] Both titles serve as interactive fiction probing homefront scenarios through player-driven choices, contrasting scripted invasions with resistance mechanics, yet their exaggerated premises—rooted in economic determinism rather than empirical military histories—invite scrutiny for prioritizing dystopian spectacle over causal realism in superpower declines.^[110] No peer-reviewed analyses exist, but contemporary reviews consistently note the games' utility in visualizing occupation tactics while highlighting narrative liberties that strain credibility against real-world deterrence factors like nuclear arsenals and alliances.^[109]

References

[1]
Homefront on Steam
In stock Rating 3.0 (2,054) Join the Resistance, stand united and fight for freedom against an overwhelming military force in Homefront's gripping single player campaign penned by John ...
[2]
Homefront (Video Game 2011) - IMDb
Rating 6.2/10 (1,370) Homefront is set in a future where America is occupied. Players choose to submit, fight, or join the invaders. It is an Action, Thriller, War game.
[3]
Buy Homefront®: The Revolution | Xbox
In stock 6–7 day deliveryHomefront: The Revolution is an open-world first person shooter where you must lead the Resistance movement in guerrilla warfare against a superior military ...<|separator|>
[4]
Home front - (AP US History) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations
The home front refers to the civilian sector of a nation at war, where the population supports military efforts and contributes to the war through various means ...
[5]
home front, n. meanings, etymology and more
The civilian life and population of a country which is engaged in military conflict elsewhere, regarded as another front in a consolidated war effort.
[6]
Home Fronts, Gender War and Conflict - Taylor & Francis Online
Jun 15, 2016 · It was during the First World War that the term 'home front' first entered the English language, as civilians encountered warships ...
[7]
Gearing Up for Victory American Military and Industrial Mobilization ...
Sep 12, 2017 · It has been a truism in military history that modern warfare involves the mobilization of the total economic resources of the nation.Missing: correlation empirical
[8]
How America's Industrial Production Helped Win World War II!
Apr 10, 2023 · American factories were able to produce more than enough tanks, airplanes, and other military equipment to help the Allies win the war.
[9]
Funding the War | Home Front Contributions | Over Here | Explore
Mounting four Liberty Loans drives and one Victory Loan drive, the U.S. government raised $20 billion with nearly one third coming from people making less than ...
[10]
Rationing (USA) - 1914-1918 Online
Oct 8, 2014 · The central goal of the U.S. Food Administration was to encourage citizens to limit individual consumption of vital foodstuffs without enacting ...3Home Front Food Control · 4The Obligation of Patriotic... · 5Consequences and...Missing: voluntary | Show results with:voluntary
[11]
Rationing | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
The government began rationing certain foods in May 1942, starting with sugar. Coffee was added to the list that November, followed by meats, fats, canned fish, ...
[12]
World War II in America: Spending, deficits, multipliers, and sacrifice
Nov 12, 2019 · The US became the 'arsenal of democracy' by producing a massive amount of military goods that raised real GDP by 72% between 1940 and 1945.
[13]
[PDF] from plowshares to swords: the american economy in world war ii
wartime peak, the U.S. economy grew at a remarkable rate. Frequently, it was described as a. "production miracle." In many ways it was the obverse of the Great ...
[14]
Duck and Cover: Civil Defense in Virginia in the 1950s
President Harry Truman established the Federal Civil Defense Administration (FCDA) in 1950 after the outbreak of the Korean War.
[15]
USA PATRIOT Act | FinCEN.gov
The official title of the USA PATRIOT Act is "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism ...Missing: homefront | Show results with:homefront
[16]
[PDF] ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES of WAR on the U.S. ECONOMY
Although GDP growth skyrocketed to over 17% in 1942, both consumption and investment experienced a substantial contraction.
[17]
How Detroit Factories Retooled During WWII to Defeat Hitler
America's largest industry shifted from making cars to bombers, tanks and more—at unparalleled speed.
[18]
World War II and the Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex
May 1, 1995 · Thanks to government investment and purchases, the infant aircraft industry soared to become the nation's largest, building 297,000 aircraft by ...
[19]
Women of the WWII Workforce: Photos Show the Real-Life Rosie the ...
Jun 11, 2019 · A U.S. government ad campaign to encourage women to enter the workforce featured a fictional icon "Rosie the Riveter," with the words, "We Can ...
[20]
No-strike Pledge, World War II - Encyclopedia.com
The no-strike pledge was a voluntary agreement made by AFL and CIO leaders to forego work stoppages for the duration of the war. The unions gained immediate ...
[21]
The American Economy during World War II – EH.net
To organize the growing economy and to ensure that it produced the goods needed for war, the federal government spawned an array of mobilization agencies which ...Missing: directives | Show results with:directives
[22]
Dig For Victory | Imperial War Museums
Millions of instructional leaflets were issued and by 1943 over 1.4 million people had allotments and were producing over a million tons of vegetables a year.
[23]
Price Controls, Black Markets, And Skimpflation: The WWII Battle ...
Feb 8, 2022 · It created a rationing system where the government assigned ration stamps to citizens.
[24]
Home Front Illicit Trade and Black Markets in World War II
Nov 16, 2023 · Rationing was the process by which the government limited access to items and materials needed for the war effort during World War II. It also ...
[25]
What Does History Reveal about Reducing the National Debt Burden?
Apr 6, 2023 · ... II reveals that economic growth and fiscal austerity (i.e., spending cuts and raising taxes) are two of the ways to reduce the debt burden.
[26]
Let's Not Romanticize World War II Price Controls - Cato Institute
Aug 11, 2022 · The flipside of the undercounting of inflation during the price control period is the severe overstating of it as markets normalized. That's ...
[27]
[PDF] The Second Great Migration
The advent of World War II contributed to an exodus out of the South, with 1.5 million African Americans leaving during the 1940s; a pattern of migration which ...
[28]
The Great Migration (1910-1970) | National Archives
Jun 28, 2021 · Approximately six million Black people moved from the American South to Northern, Midwestern, and Western states roughly from the 1910s until the 1970s.
[29]
The Rise and Fall of Female Labor Force Participation During World ...
Sep 7, 2018 · Roughly 6.7 million additional women went to work during the war, increasing the female labor force by almost 50 percent in a few short years.
[30]
Historical US Unemployment Rate by Year - The Balance Money
Dec 6, 2022 · The rate declined during several U.S. wars, particularly during World War II. ... The lowest unemployment rate in modern history was 1.2% in 1944.
[31]
Civil Rights: Minorities | The War | Ken Burns - PBS
Almost a million African Americans entered the industrial labor force during the war. By 1944 African Americans accounted for 25% of the workers in foundries.
[32]
[PDF] World War II and the American Home Front
75,000 people and enlisted the voluntary participation of another 300,000, mainly urban housewives and union activists, who checked the prices and quality ...
[33]
https://blog.dol.gov/2024/02/23/strengthening-america-at-home-black-workers-in-wwii
[34]
How the Home Front Became a Light During World War II Blackouts
The concept was simple yet profound: extinguish all artificial lights in cities and towns to obscure potential targets from enemy forces.
[35]
The Home Front War Effort | North Dakota Living
Oct 27, 2020 · Each city block had its air-raid warden and each town, even those unreachable by enemy planes in North Dakota, had its blackouts and practice ...
[36]
The American Homefront During WWII: Blackouts, Ration-books and ...
``Peterson's ability to capture the day-to-day routines, lives, and feelings of this period makes it easy to recommend this book to both academic and casual ...<|separator|>
[37]
Victory Gardens: Food for the Fight | The National WWII Museum
Nov 26, 2024 · Americans tended more than 20 million gardens of all sizes, in all settings (urban, rural, and even in Alaska), and harvested produce by the ...
[38]
By 1944, 40% of U.S. produce came from victory gardens.
Nov 2, 2023 · By 1944, a year before the end of the war, an estimated 20 million victory gardens had produced around 8 million tons of food for US troops and civilians.
[39]
America's Patriotic Victory Gardens - History.com
May 29, 2014 · In 1942, roughly 15 million families planted victory gardens; by 1944, an estimated 20 million victory gardens produced roughly 8 million tons ...
[40]
Records of History World War Two Series: The Homefront
Shortages, rationing, defense stamps, bond rallies, scrap paper collecting, salvage drives, blackouts, victory gardens - all were a part of life in America ...
[41]
How Did We Can? | World War II · Canning Through the World Wars
Home canning soared during World War II, reaching its peak in 1943, with over 4.1 billion jars canned in homes and community canning centers (Bentley, ...Missing: resilience | Show results with:resilience
[42]
The US Home Front During World War II - History.com
Mar 24, 2010 · On the home front during World War II, everyday life across the United States was dramatically altered. Food, gas and clothing were rationed.
[43]
[PDF] World War II and the American Home Front - NPS History
Dec 13, 2024 · Cover: Upper Left: Soldiers of the 65th Infantry training in Salinas, Puerto Rico. August 1941. Courtesy United States Army.<|separator|>
[44]
Gallup Vault: Victory Gardens Took Off in WWII
May 13, 2020 · Reports of gardening peaked in 1944 and 1945, with nearly six in 10 Americans saying they had planted vegetable gardens the previous year. After ...
[45]
Canning and Food Preservation on the World War II Home Front
Nov 16, 2023 · A collection of images documenting home-based canning and food preservation on the World War II Home Front. Notes. [1] United States ...Missing: resilience | Show results with:resilience
[46]
Powers of Persuasion | National Archives
Jun 6, 2019 · During WWII, persuasion used words, posters, and films. Posters appealed to emotions, and direct, emotional appeals with realistic pictures ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
[47]
WWII Propaganda Posters: A Look at Life on the American Home Front
By the mid 1940s, about 1.6 million posters from 30,500 designs had been produced in the United States. Most typically featured hand-drawn illustrations, such ...
[48]
World War II War Bonds | Sarah Sundin
Nov 28, 2022 · War bonds were sold at 75 percent of face value (a $25 bond sold for $18.75) and matured over ten years.
[49]
The American Home Front and World War II (U.S. National Park ...
Feb 26, 2025 · These articles explore life on the home front by looking at the things people invented, created, and used and the ways that everyday life changed.
[50]
Getting the Message Out | National Archives
Feb 6, 2023 · These were just a few of the thousands of posters produced and distributed by the Office of War Information (OWI) during World War II to ...
[51]
[PDF] "The Fireside Chats"—President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933-1944)
According to the Hooper radio ratings service, nearly 54 million people (of roughly 82 million adult Americans) tuned in to the broadcast. (Not surprisingly, ...
[52]
A Reel Story of World War II | National Archives
Jan 16, 2025 · This motion picture newsreel covers the Allied activities of the war (and one year of postwar events) from June 1942 through September 1946.
[53]
Communication: News & Censorship | The War | Ken Burns - PBS
A “Code of Wartime Practices for the American Press” was issued on Jan 15, 1942 giving strict instructions on proper handling of news. The code was voluntarily ...
[54]
[PDF] Secrets of Victory: The Office of Censorship and the American Press ...
that censorship would remain voluntary. On 15 January 1942, Price's Office of Censorship issued its first Voluntary. Censorship Code. The Code underwent four ...
[55]
What was the Home Guard? | Who Do You Think You Are Magazine
They were stood down with a parade in London on 3 December 1944. The whole Home Guard was officially disbanded on 31 December 1945.
[56]
1944 The 'Home Guard' Stands Down - Forces War Records Blog
Dec 2, 2019 · At its peak in March 1943 the Home Guard had numbered over 1,700,000 men and never fell below 1 million until the Home Guard was disbanded.Missing: formation | Show results with:formation
[57]
Timeline 1938-1945 - The Home Guard of Great Britain: ENTRY PAGE
Churchill inspects the 1st American Motorised Squadron of the Home Guard, founded officially last September. ... Home Guard membership peaks at 1,793,000. A ...
[58]
HOME GUARD (DISBANDMENT) (Hansard, 12 December 1945)
The necessary orders to effect this by 31st December, 1945, will now be issued. From that date members of the Force will cease to be liable to recall and ...
[59]
History of Civil Air Patrol
Their success in thwarting submarine attacks and safeguarding shipping lanes led President Franklin D. Roosevelt to issue Executive Order 9339 on April 29, 1943 ...
[60]
Guarding the Home Skies - Civil Air Patrol - America in WWII magazine
” Officially, the CAP is credited with spotting 173 submarines and attacking 57 of them with bombs or depth charges. At the start, CAP planes were unarmed.
[61]
Eyes on the Coast: Civil Air Patrol in World War II
Sep 10, 2025 · By the end of the coastal patrol CAP had flown over 86,000 missions, reported 173 U-Boats sightings, and dropped 82 bombs. They also reported 91 ...
[62]
Civil Air Patrol: A Story of Unique Service and Selfless Sacrifice
Dec 8, 2016 · The Civil Air Patrol (CAP) hunted Nazi U-boats, searched for the lost, saved lives, and reported enemy subs, and attacked 57 subs.
[63]
[PDF] The “Battle” for the - Congressional Gold Medal - Civil Air Patrol
The "battle" is for the Congressional Gold Medal, the highest US Congress honor, for CAP's WWII members for their service. CAP flew 24 million miles, spotted ...
[64]
Blackout drills – Central Pennsylvania prepared itself for enemy air ...
May 18, 2017 · Blackout drills in 1942 involved turning out lights to confuse enemy pilots during air raids. The first drill in Dauphin County lasted 20 ...Missing: 1942-1945 implementation effectiveness
[65]
Busy With The Blitz-Proofing - America in WWII magazine
Air-raid wardens supervised the blackout drills, cruising up and down neighborhood streets to make sure no light escaped the houses.Missing: 1942-1945 implementation effectiveness
[66]
Protecting the Home Front - American Rosie the Riveter Association
May 14, 2021 · Although no plane spotter ever spotted a plane, the U.S. government considered the blackouts and air raid drills successful. There were ...Missing: 1942-1945 implementation effectiveness
[67]
Surprise Blackouts Sweep the East Coast - Seton Hall University
Haskell, New York State director of civilian defense, called the test “an excellent performance.” However, the drills resulted in some fatalities and injuries.Missing: 1942-1945 implementation
[68]
Eighty Years After the U.S. Incarcerated 120,000 Japanese ...
Feb 11, 2022 · Yet by the war's end or in the years following, no Japanese American was ever convicted of sabotage or espionage. Japanese Americans lost their ...
[69]
Executive Order 9066: Resulting in Japanese-American ...
Jan 24, 2022 · This order authorized the forced removal of all persons deemed a threat to national security from the West Coast to relocation centers further inland.Missing: cost | Show results with:cost
[70]
Day of Remembrance — JACL
Feb 19, 2025 · No Japanese Americans were ever charged, much less convicted, of espionage or sabotage against the United States. Yet they were targeted ...Missing: interned | Show results with:interned
[71]
Farming Behind Barbed Wire: Japanese-Americans Remember ...
Feb 19, 2017 · With lost farms, homes and businesses, it's estimated that wartime incarceration cost Japanese-Americans up to $4 billion in today's values.
[72]
02-19-99 TEN YEAR PROGRAM TO COMPENSATE JAPANESE ...
Feb 19, 1999 · WASHINGTON, D.C. -- After paying out more than $1.6 billion to more than 82,250 persons of Japanese ancestry who were interned during World War ...
[73]
[PDF] Collection: Acle, Luis: Files Folder Title: Japanese-American ...
No person of Japanese ancestry was ever charged with or convicted of espionage or sabotage. But numerous Caucasians were charged and convicted as agents for ...<|separator|>
[74]
The Espionage Act of 1917 - Digital History
... convicted of obstructing the draft with $10,000 fines and 20 years in jail. Congress passed the Sedition Act of 1918, which made it a federal offense to use ...Missing: critics | Show results with:critics
[75]
Free speech wasn't so free 103 years ago, when 'seditious' and ...
May 13, 2021 · Many convictions. More than 2,000 people were prosecuted under the Espionage and Sedition acts during the war. About half were convicted, many ...
[76]
Espionage Act of 1917 (1917) | The First Amendment Encyclopedia
Aug 8, 2023 · ... Sedition Act of 1918. This new law led to similar convictions that were ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court in Debs v. ... Act of 1917 are ...
[77]
[PDF] Civil Liberties in America During World War I - National WWI Museum
Congress also passed the Espionage Act (1917) and the Sedition Act. (1918) to curb wartime dissent. In Schenck v. United States and Abrams v. United. States, ...
[78]
Americans Toss Lady Liberty Overboard During Crises | Cato Institute
The short-term effects of the wartime repressive apparatus, especially the Espionage and Sedition Acts, was extremely damaging to the fabric of American liberty ...
[79]
The Espionage Act's constitutional legacy
Aug 17, 2023 · By March 1921, Congress had repealed the Sedition Act amendments to the Espionage Act. The Espionage Act still survived in a peacetime form and ...
[80]
A Glimpse into the Sedition Case of 1944 - The Text Message
Aug 28, 2013 · Laughlin led to a long and drawn-out trial. This sedition case of 1944 came to an abrupt halt with the death of Justice Eicher on November 30th, ...Missing: overturned | Show results with:overturned
[81]
[PDF] Free Speech and National Security - Chicago Unbound
In calling for the first federal legislation against disloyal expression since the Sedition Act of 1798, he ... concern with this "chilling" effect that we ...
[82]
[PDF] Did the U.S. Really Grow Out of Its World War II Debt?
ABSTRACT: The fall in the U.S. public debt/GDP ratio from 106% in 1946 to 23% in 1974 is often attributed to high rates of economic growth. This paper examines ...
[83]
[PDF] FEDERAL DEBT IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Rising debt will impose a huge burden on future taxpayers and could trigger a financial crisis that will further undermine our prosperity. Historically, federal ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[84]
Stimulus by Spending Cuts: Lessons from 1946 - Cato Institute
Government canceled war contracts, and its spending fell from $84 billion in 1945 to under $30 billion in 1946. By 1947, the government was paying back its ...
[85]
[PDF] The Great Depression of 1946 - Mises Institute
The Great Depression of 1946 saw a 19% drop in real GNP in 1946, and a 22.7% drop from 1944-1947, with per capita output declining by more than one-fourth.
[86]
The Second World War and Its Aftermath | Federal Reserve History
The Federal Reserve controlled bond prices, reduced interest rates, and the monetary base expanded, leading to inflation. The monetary base increased by 149% ...
[87]
Readjustment & Postwar Life | American Soldier in WWII
A surge in marriages at the start of war was followed by a spike in divorces immediately after it. Housing shortages were pervasive, especially in areas of the ...
[88]
World War II and the Social Work Profession: The Veterans ...
Dec 7, 2022 · Chief among these was the recruitment of large numbers of social workers by the American Red Cross and the United Service Organizations, ...<|separator|>
[89]
Servicemen's Readjustment Act (1944) | National Archives
May 3, 2022 · This act, also known as the GI Bill, provided World War II veterans with funds for college education, unemployment insurance, and housing.
[90]
6 World War II Innovations That Changed Everyday Life - History.com
Apr 26, 2021 · 6 World War II Innovations That Changed Everyday Life. Radar, computers, penicillin and more all came out of development during the Second World War.Missing: spin- microwave opportunity
[91]
A Cohort of World War II Veterans - jstor
This study of World War II veterans examines some effects of war mobilization and its timing in the lives of men. Early entry into the armed forces (before age ...
[92]
Mrs. Miniver Builds the Home Front: Architecture and Household ...
Apr 14, 2018 · Mrs. Miniver was perfect as propaganda for the British because it was a story about a family, about the kind of people audiences would care about.
[93]
Mrs Miniver and Anglo-American Representations of Domestic Morale
By examining the popular images of gender and class during World War Two through an analysis of Mrs Miniver, this essay participates in the ongoing project of ...
[94]
MRS. MINIVER ('42) was a landmark film for the WWII effort, playing ...
MRS. MINIVER ('42) was a landmark film for the WWII effort, playing a part to influence the American public opinion to support Great Britain. Prime Minister ...
[95]
And the Oscar Goes to…: Mrs. Miniver | The Cinematic Packrat
Jul 4, 2014 · The 1942 film Mrs. Miniver takes some of the characters and subject matter from Struther's columns but is otherwise original in its story.
[96]
[PDF] propaganda, cinema and the american character in world war ii
1943, Box 1556, OWI Records. 15. Variety's weekly "National Box Office Survey" shows how popular war films were in both major cities and the country at large.<|separator|>
[97]
7 World War II Books Set on the Home Front - Julia Kelly
Oct 8, 2019 · 7 World War II Books Set on the Home Front · A Dangerous Crossing by Rachel Rhys · The Cazalet Chronicles by Elizabeth Jane Howard · After the ...
[98]
Books about the Home Front in WW2 – A List
Aug 9, 2022 · Two books by Cyril Hare deal with WWII on the home front - Tragedy at Law and With a Bare Bodkin (which is an entertaining account of life in a ...
[99]
Book Recommendations: The British Home Front During WWII
Nov 13, 2015 · First of all, we have a trio of books by Simon Garfield. They are We Are At War, Private Battles: How the War Almost Defeated Us, and Our Hidden ...
[100]
Home/Fronts: Contemporary War in British Literature, Drama, and ...
Home/Fronts Contemporary War in British Literature, Drama, and Film ... disillusionment for the soldiers in the film The Patrol (2013) (chapter 6.1.1 ...
[101]
World War II and Popular Culture | The National WWII Museum
Aug 10, 2018 · World War II touched virtually every part of American life, even things so simple as the food people ate, the films they watched, and the music they listened ...Missing: spikes | Show results with:spikes
[102]
Christmas on the Air—Wartime Radio Programs Revisited
Dec 25, 2020 · This changed Christmas Eve 1942, when a special program was broadcast to forge a link between the home front and servicemen in the war zones.
[103]
Radio Propaganda in World War II | Historical Spotlight | News
Radio was used for propaganda by both sides, with Germany using it to erode pro-British sentiment, and the US using the "you technique". Nazi Germany called ...
[104]
Censorship — MBC - Museum of Broadcast Communications
Radio censorship was less centralized; most radio programs were created (and self-censored) by sponsors and their advertising agencies. Networks and stations ...
[105]
Victory at Sea: Timeless Film, Soaring Music | New Orleans
Sep 8, 2020 · The groundbreaking 1952 television documentary "Victory at Sea" and its magnificent musical score marked an enduring tribute to the US Navy's role in winning ...
[106]
Victory at Sea - Wikipedia
Victory at Sea is a documentary television series about warfare in general during World War II, and naval warfare in particular, as well as the use of industry ...History · Music · Home media
[107]
Homefront Review - IGN
Rating 7/10 · Review by Colin MoriartyMar 15, 2011 · Homefront is certainly one of the most unique shooters I've ever played, driven by an ingenious and surprisingly well-fleshed out plot and a dark and dreary, ...Missing: reception | Show results with:reception
[108]
Homefront Sales Top 1 Million - IGN
Mar 24, 2011 · THQ continues to tout amazing Homefront sales. The publisher said today it has sold an estimated 1 million units to date.<|separator|>
[109]
THQ: Homefront Reaches 1M Sales, 2.4M Shipped - Game Developer
THQ's announced alternate history shooter Homefront has sold-through an estimated 1 million copies worldwide, with a total of 2.4 million units shipped to ...Missing: figures | Show results with:figures
[110]
Homefront review | Eurogamer.net
Rating 6/10 · Review by Dan WhiteheadSep 19, 2011 · The plot is as simple as it is implausible. North and South Korea are reunited and become a new superpower, just as America's economy collapses and bird flu ...
[111]
Just a game? Homefront's sick, stupid Korean invasion fantasy
Mar 29, 2011 · North Korea analyst Aidan Foster-Carter goes no holds barred on the recently released controversial video game: Homefront.Missing: premise | Show results with:premise
[112]
Homefront: The Revolution review – an ambitious, but flawed shooter
May 24, 2016 · With its open-world environment and emphasis on crafting, this is an interesting sequel, marred by glitches and frame rate issues.
[113]
Homefront: The Revolution - End of 2016 Discussions : r/Games
Dec 7, 2016 · It's development was really troublesome (THQ greenlit a sequel, then went bankrupt and sold everything. Homefront IP went to Crytek, who then ...Homefront: The Revolution is no longer a broken mess that runs at ...One of the biggest problems with Homefront the Revolution is its ...More results from www.reddit.comMissing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[114]
Homefront: The Revolution Critic Reviews - OpenCritic
Rating 48% (83) Homefront: The Revolution has been reviewed by 83 critics and currently has a 'Weak' rating. Read and browse them all to learn what the top critics in the ...<|separator|>
[115]
Homefront: The Revolution Review - GameSpot
Rating 5/10 · Review by Scott ButterworthMay 18, 2016 · Unfortunately, Homefront doesn't quite deliver on either one. Its attempts to explore those political themes feel clumsy and superficial. Its ...Missing: video | Show results with:video
[116]
Homefront: a game that stirs up yellow peril? - Star Tribune
Mar 10, 2011 · Homefront promises a compelling storyline that unflinchingly presents the brutal truths about the effects of war on civilians. But, the game's ...