Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Inclusive language

Inclusive language refers to a set of communicative practices that aim to avoid words, phrases, or structures perceived by advocates as reinforcing stereotypes, exclusion, or bias against groups defined by characteristics such as gender, race, ethnicity, disability, or sexual orientation, often by substituting neutral or affirmative alternatives.^[1]^[2] Its proponents, including linguistic societies and style guides, assert that such adjustments promote respect and equity by emphasizing individual humanity over group identities, though empirical support for widespread psychological or social benefits remains limited and context-specific.^[3]^[4] Emerging from 20th-century social movements, including feminism and civil rights efforts, inclusive language gained institutional traction in the late 20th and early 21st centuries through adoption in academic guidelines, corporate policies, and public sector communications, with roots traceable to critiques of gendered pronouns dating back centuries but accelerated by modern identity politics.^[5]^[6] Key implementations include gender-neutral terms like "they" for singular unknowns—used historically since the 14th century—or rephrasings to desex professions (e.g., "firefighter" over "fireman"), intended to enhance perceived accessibility.^[7]^[8] Despite claims of fostering empathy and reducing marginalization, studies show mixed outcomes: while exposure correlates with self-reported well-being among transgender workers in select environments, broader attitude shifts by gender or occupation remain inconsistent, and less than 1% of typical text requires alteration, questioning scalability.^[4]^[9]^[10] Critics, including communication researchers, highlight risks such as reduced clarity for low-literacy audiences, alienation through desexed or euphemistic phrasing (e.g., "chestfeeding" over breastfeeding), and an illusion of progress that sidesteps deeper causal factors in inequality.^[11]^[12] Notable controversies center on enforcement, where mandates for preferred pronouns or terminology have sparked free speech challenges, exemplified by academic disputes and legal cases pitting compelled speech against personal conviction, often amplifying divisions rather than resolving them.^[13]^[14] Such tensions underscore debates over whether top-down linguistic prescriptions causally advance inclusion or instead prioritize ideological conformity, with peer-reviewed analyses warning of unintended exclusion for dissenting voices.^[15]^[16]

Definition and Principles

Core Definition

Inclusive language refers to a communicative style that seeks to acknowledge human diversity, convey respect across social identities, and minimize perceived exclusion or offense based on characteristics such as biological sex, race, ethnicity, disability, age, or sexual orientation.^[2] Proponents define it as promoting equal opportunities by favoring terms that avoid stereotypes or implied hierarchies, often replacing traditionally neutral or descriptive language with alternatives intended to be more sensitive, such as gender-neutral pronouns or person-first phrasing (e.g., "person with a disability" over "disabled person").^[17] This approach emerged prominently in the late 20th century amid social movements emphasizing equity, though its formal codification in style guides dates to the 1970s in academic and professional contexts, with expansions in the 2010s to address intersectional identities.^[18] Key principles include specificity in terminology to reflect varied identities without assumption, avoidance of deficit-based framing that emphasizes limitations over capabilities, and prioritization of individual agency in self-identification, such as using preferred pronouns.^[17] These guidelines, disseminated by organizations like the Linguistic Society of America and the American Psychological Association, emphasize that inclusive language should enhance clarity and empathy, yet empirical support for widespread psychological or social benefits remains limited, with studies primarily confined to niche groups like transgender employees showing modest correlations with well-being rather than causation.^[2] ^[4] Critics, including linguists and philosophers, contend that such prescriptions can impose ideological constraints on language, potentially reducing precision— for instance, by conflating biological sex binaries with fluid gender concepts unsupported by genetic evidence—and reflect institutional biases in academia toward progressive norms over descriptive accuracy.^[19] In practice, inclusive language operates prescriptively rather than descriptively, advocating changes like pluralizing or neutralizing gendered nouns in languages with grammatical gender, despite evidence that natural language evolution favors utility and convention over mandated equity.^[20] While intended to foster belonging, its adoption correlates with institutional DEI initiatives, where source credibility is often assumed without scrutiny for underlying political motivations, as seen in guidelines from entities with documented left-leaning orientations.^[17] Overall, it prioritizes perceptual equity over empirical verifiability, with less than 1% of English vocabulary typically affected by proposed reforms.^[10]

Historical Development

The use of gender-neutral pronouns such as singular "they" in English has historical precedents dating to at least 1375, as recorded in the medieval romance William and the Werewolf, where it served to refer to unspecified persons without implying male gender.^[7] ^[8] This practice persisted sporadically but lacked systematic advocacy until the 20th century, when linguistic critiques emerged alongside social equality movements. Early 20th-century proposals for neologistic pronouns, such as "e" or "thon" in the 1910s and 1920s, aimed to address perceived biases in binary forms but gained limited traction outside reformist circles.^[21] Systematic development of inclusive language principles accelerated during the second-wave feminist movement of the 1960s and 1970s, which identified generic masculine terms (e.g., "mankind" or "he" for humanity) as perpetuating gender hierarchies.^[22] ^[23] Feminist linguists and activists argued that such conventions reflected and reinforced male-centric worldviews, prompting calls for reform through alternatives like "humankind" or paired terms ("he or she"). The National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) formalized this shift in 1975 with its "Guidelines for Nonsexist Use of Language in NCTE Publications," which advised against male defaults and stereotypes in educational materials.^[24] ^[25] Concurrently, the American Psychological Association published "Guidelines for Nonsexist Use of Language" in American Psychologist in June 1975, emphasizing parallel treatment of genders in examples and avoiding occupational stereotypes.^[26] By the 1980s, these efforts expanded into publishing standards, with major houses like McGraw-Hill issuing internal guidelines for nonsexist visuals and terminology in educational content, influencing textbooks to depict diverse roles without bias.^[27] The Linguistic Society of America evolved its nonsexist usage recommendations into broader inclusive guidelines by the 1990s, incorporating racial and ethnic sensitivities.^[2] In the 21st century, inclusive language broadened to encompass disability (e.g., person-first phrasing like "person with a disability" emerging from 1980s advocacy), sexual orientation, and non-binary gender identities, driven by diversity training and style manuals updated post-2010 to include terms like "they/them" for individuals. ^[6] This evolution reflects institutional responses to civil rights advancements, though adoption varies by context and has faced pushback over perceived ideological imposition.^[28]

Linguistic Forms and Examples

In English

Inclusive language practices in English emphasize word choices designed to minimize perceived exclusion or offense related to personal characteristics, including sex, race, disability, and age, though empirical evidence on their impact on communication clarity or social outcomes remains limited.^[9] Organizations such as the Linguistic Society of America advocate for terms that acknowledge diversity without assuming uniformity, exemplified by replacing occupation-specific gendered nouns like "fireman" or "stewardess" with neutral equivalents "firefighter" or "flight attendant."^[2] Similarly, the United Nations guidelines recommend avoiding phrases like "mankind" in favor of "humankind" to extend applicability beyond males.^[29] A prominent linguistic form is the use of the singular "they" as a gender-neutral pronoun for individuals of unspecified or non-binary gender identity, a practice with roots in 14th-century English literature, such as in Chaucer's works, predating modern advocacy.^[8] This revival intensified in the late 20th century amid feminist linguistics, shifting from the 18th-century norm of defaulting to masculine generics like "he" for hypothetical persons, which was then viewed as inclusive of both sexes.^[30] Examples include sentences like "If a student forgets their homework, they may receive a warning," avoiding "his" or the awkward "his or her."^[17] Proponents argue this enhances precision in diverse contexts, but studies indicate it affects fewer than 1% of tokens in typical texts, with potential for referential ambiguity in complex sentences.^[10] In addressing disability, person-first constructions such as "person with a disability" or "individual with epilepsy" are promoted over identity-first terms like "disabled person" or "epileptic," purportedly to prioritize humanity over condition, as per American Psychological Association recommendations.^[17] For racial and ethnic references, guidelines suggest capitalizing "Black" when denoting cultural identity while lowercasing "white," and avoiding terms like "Oriental" in favor of "Asian" or specific nationalities, reflecting evolving preferences documented in style manuals since the 2010s.^[2] Age-related examples include "older adults" instead of "the elderly" to reduce paternalism.^[29] Critiques of these forms highlight risks to readability and tradition; for instance, mandatory gender-neutral alterations can disrupt idiomatic expressions without proven benefits to equality, as evidenced by resistance in surveys where attitudes toward such language correlate more with ideology than linguistic utility.^[19] Sources like APA guidelines, while influential in academia, originate from institutions with documented left-leaning biases that may prioritize prescriptive equity over descriptive accuracy.^[9] Empirical reviews show mixed acceptance, with actual usage trailing positive intentions, particularly in professional writing where clarity trumps stylistic mandates.^[20]

In Romance Languages

Romance languages, derived from Latin, feature grammatical gender systems that assign masculine or feminine forms to nouns, adjectives, and pronouns, complicating efforts to achieve gender neutrality.^[31] Inclusive language proposals in these tongues typically involve neologisms, dual forms, or modifications to avoid the generic masculine, which traditionally encompasses mixed or unspecified groups.^[32] These adaptations emerged prominently in the 2010s, driven by advocacy for non-binary inclusion, though linguistic purists argue they disrupt etymological and phonetic norms.^[33] In Spanish, inclusive forms often replace the masculine -o or feminine -a endings with -e or -x for neutrality, yielding terms like todes (all people, instead of todos/todas) or amigues (friends).^[34]^[35] Dual gender markers, such as niños y niñas (boys and girls), or neutral rephrasing like personas over gendered professions, serve as alternatives to avoid binary specificity.^[36]^[37] The Real Academia Española has critiqued these innovations, such as the @ symbol or -x, as non-standard and incompatible with spoken Spanish phonology.^[36] French inclusive writing, or écriture inclusive, employs the point médian (·) to denote both genders, as in étudiant·e·s (students), or doublets like citoyennes et citoyens (citizen women and men).^[38]^[39] Epicene words, unchanged by gender (e.g., personnes, adultes), and reformulated sentences using collectives further promote inclusivity without altering morphology.^[40]^[41] The Académie Française has opposed such practices, deeming them artificial and a threat to French clarity, especially in official contexts.^[42] Italian proposals include the schwa (ə), a neutral vowel sound, as in tuttə (everyone, versus tutti/tutte), alongside doubled forms like bambini e bambine.^[43]^[44] Advocates suggest avoiding the maschile sovraesteso (overextended masculine) by specifying genders or using neutral plurals, though implementation remains marginal due to phonetic challenges in pronunciation.^[45]^[46] Portuguese inclusive strategies mirror others, favoring dual forms (homens e mulheres) or neutral terms (pessoas) over the generic masculine, with some experimentation in -e endings for adjectives and nouns in informal activist circles.^[47]^[48] Official guides from bodies like the Portuguese government emphasize rephrasing to highlight diversity without neologisms, reflecting a conservative approach compared to Spanish or French variants.^[49]^[50]

In Other Language Families

In Germanic languages such as German, inclusive language reforms address the language's three grammatical genders by inserting symbols like asterisks, underscores, or colons into nouns and participles to denote inclusivity beyond the masculine default, as in "Student*innen" for students of all genders.^[51] This practice, promoted by institutions like the Goethe-Institut since the late 2010s, extends to pronouns with neologisms such as "xier" for non-binary reference, though it remains contested for disrupting readability and traditional grammar.^[52] By 2021, over 20 German cities, including Lübeck, adopted such forms in official communications, reflecting policy-driven adaptation amid public debate.^[51] Slavic languages, featuring masculine, feminine, and neuter grammatical genders with agreement across nouns, verbs, and adjectives, complicate neutral expression, often relying on epicene terms like "člověk" (person) in Czech or avoiding specification altogether.^[53] In Polish and Russian, non-binary individuals may prefer neuter or plural forms for self-reference, but verb conjugations tied to gender pose ongoing challenges, with limited standardized reforms as of 2023. Efforts in translation and content creation emphasize contextual neutrality over systemic change, given the languages' animate-inanimate distinctions that reinforce binary norms.^[53] In Semitic languages like Arabic, grammatical gender binaries permeate nouns, verbs, and pronouns, prompting inclusive adaptations such as the dual form "huma" (هما) for singular non-binary reference, bypassing masculine "huwa" or feminine "hiya" defaults.^[55] This approach, advocated in queer Arabic linguistics circles since the early 2020s, also involves listing both genders or using adjectives in neutral constructs, though root-based morphology resists easy neutralization.^[56] Formal Modern Standard Arabic lacks native neuter pronouns, leading to reliance on duals or plurals, with colloquial dialects varying by region but retaining strong gender marking.^[57] East Asian languages like Mandarin Chinese inherently support neutrality through the unisex third-person pronoun "tā" (written as 他 for male, 她 for female, or 它 for neuter but pronounced identically), enabling gender-agnostic usage without grammatical overhaul. Proposals like "X也" (X yě) emerged around 2023 for explicit non-binary pronouns, but traditional forms suffice for most inclusive contexts due to absent grammatical gender.^[58] Japanese and Korean, lacking noun classes, use particles or honorifics (e.g., Korean's gendered kinship terms like "oppa") that can be neutralized via generic alternatives such as "sempai" in Japanese or "nuna/hyung" adaptations, with social rather than structural barriers predominating.^[59]

Global Adoption and Policies

In Western Democracies

In the United States, federal agencies have implemented updates to official regulations and style guides to incorporate non-gendered pronouns and avoid biased terminology, as seen in the General Services Administration's Federal Management Regulation revision on August 22, 2024, which replaced gender-specific pronouns across administrative texts.^[60] Similarly, the National Institute of Standards and Technology issued guidance in April 2021 emphasizing inclusive language in standards and publications to enhance clarity and equity for diverse readers.^[61] These policies, often tied to broader diversity, equity, and inclusion frameworks, apply to government communications but have faced scrutiny for potential overreach in mandating linguistic changes without empirical validation of benefits.^[62] Canada's federal government released Guidelines for Inclusive Writing in 2022, designed for public service documents to eliminate discriminatory language and promote equity, with updates continuing through 2024 to address contexts like Indigenous and gender diversity.^[63] The Department of National Defence followed suit in October 2022 with resources encouraging terms that foster acceptance across the armed forces.^[64] Provincial governments, such as British Columbia, have adopted similar directives since January 2024, defining inclusive language as free from stereotypes and applicable to all official outputs.^[65] In the United Kingdom, the government published inclusive communication guidance in 2014, advising civil servants to use disability-neutral phrasing and avoid outdated terms in policy documents and public interactions, with ongoing application in digital services as of 2023.^[66] The Home Office developed internal benchmarks in November 2023 for content designers to integrate inclusive principles proactively.^[67] Australia's official Style Manual, maintained by the Department of Finance, includes a dedicated section on inclusive language, recommending culturally sensitive terms for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, gender diversity, and age groups in all government materials.^[68] State-level policies, such as Victoria's LGBTIQA+ guide updated February 2025 and New South Wales' emphasis on equity in digital communications, extend these practices to local administration.^[69]^[70] Across the European Union, institutions like the European Institute for Gender Equality have promoted gender-sensitive language since at least 2024, advocating alternatives to masculine generics in official texts to enhance visibility for diverse groups, though implementation varies by member state and often encounters resistance over grammatical traditions.^[71]^[72] These adoptions reflect bureaucratic initiatives influenced by equity agendas prevalent in public sectors, yet surveys indicate public wariness toward enforced linguistic shifts in democracies like the US, where preferences lean toward organic inclusivity over mandates.^[73]

United States

In the United States, inclusive language policies emerged prominently in the late 2010s and early 2020s as components of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, particularly in federal agencies, educational institutions, and corporations, though adoption has been inconsistent and subject to recent reversals. Federal guidelines, such as those from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued in April 2021, recommend inclusive phrasing in technical standards and publications to enhance clarity and avoid unintended exclusions, emphasizing terms that respect diverse identities without compromising precision. Similarly, the Federal Management Regulation was amended in August 2024 to replace gender-specific pronouns with gender-neutral alternatives in administrative language, aiming to promote equity in government operations. However, these efforts faced pushback; in March 2025, President Trump issued an executive order designating English as the official language of the United States, revoking prior mandates like Executive Order 13166 (2000) that required accommodations for limited English proficiency, thereby prioritizing national linguistic unity over expansive multilingual or identity-focused inclusivity measures.^[61]^[60]^[74] In education, inclusive language has been more systematically encouraged, often through style guides and institutional policies influenced by organizations like the American Psychological Association (APA), whose 2021 Inclusive Language Guide advises against terms perceived as marginalizing based on race, gender, or disability, promoting alternatives like person-first phrasing (e.g., "person with autism" over "autistic person"). Universities, such as the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, implemented policies in February 2024 requiring gender-inclusive language in official communications to foster welcoming environments, with non-compliance potentially affecting hiring or evaluations. K-12 and higher education systems integrated such guidelines into curricula and training, citing reduced bias in student interactions, though federal oversight shifted in January 2025 when the Department of Education moved to eliminate DEI programs, including those embedding inclusive language requirements, amid concerns over ideological overreach.^[17]^[75]^[76] Corporate adoption has relied on voluntary guidelines rather than mandates, with tech and professional firms like those following APA or internal DEI trainings advocating neutral terms (e.g., "chairperson" over "chairman") to mitigate legal risks under Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) anti-discrimination rules. For instance, English-only workplace policies remain permissible only if justified by business necessity, as blanket restrictions are presumed unlawful, balancing inclusivity with operational efficiency. Executive orders in 2025 targeted private-sector DEI, prohibiting federal contractors from mandatory trainings that classify individuals by race or sex in ways promoting division, indirectly curbing inclusive language enforcement tied to such programs. These policies, while widespread in progressive-leaning sectors, have drawn criticism for lacking empirical validation of benefits beyond self-reported surveys, with enforcement varying by company culture.^[77]^[78]

European Nations

In European nations, adoption of inclusive language—often emphasizing gender neutrality or avoidance of masculine generics—has been promoted through supranational guidelines from bodies like the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) and the Council of Europe, which issued directives in 2024 and earlier advocating for gender-sensitive phrasing in official communications to enhance visibility for diverse groups.^[71]^[79] The European Parliament has committed to gender-neutral language in its written and spoken outputs since at least 2024, influencing multilingual policy documents across member states.^[80] However, implementation at the national level remains uneven, with resistance in several countries citing linguistic integrity and cultural traditions over institutional mandates from Brussels-based entities, which some critics argue reflect ideological priorities rather than empirical linguistic necessity.^[81] France has actively opposed formalized inclusive language reforms, particularly those involving neologisms like the gender-neutral pronoun "iel" or median dots in written forms (e.g., Français·e·s). In November 2023, the French Senate approved a bill prohibiting such usages in official public documents, endorsed by President Emmanuel Macron, who described it as protecting the French language from "mutilation."^[81]^[82] The Académie Française, the authoritative body on French usage, has repeatedly condemned inclusive writing as an "aberration" threatening grammatical coherence, with no national mandate enforcing it despite sporadic academic or activist advocacy.^[83] In Germany, initial uptake in media and local administrations—such as inserting asterisks or colons in gendered nouns (e.g., Lehrer*innen for teachers)—peaked around 2021 but faced reversal by 2024-2025 amid public debate. Empirical analysis of over four million articles from 2000-2021 showed rising but limited use in media, affecting less than 1% of tokens overall.^[84]^[10] Bavaria enacted a statewide ban on inclusive forms in schools, universities, and public administration effective April 1, 2024, followed by federal Culture Minister Claudia Roth prohibiting asterisked plurals in August 2025, arguing language is not a "playground" for experimentation.^[85]^[86] The United Kingdom, outside the EU since 2020, maintains voluntary inclusive language guidance in the public sector, with the Government Digital Service issuing recommendations since 2014 to avoid terms implying disability stereotypes or gender biases in communications.^[66] The Civil Service Inclusive Language Guide, updated in September 2024, promotes neutral phrasing for workplace inclusivity but lacks statutory enforcement, focusing instead on empathy-driven adjustments without altering core linguistic structures.^[87] Northern European countries like Sweden have longer histories of neutral pronouns such as "hen," integrated since the 2010s in dictionaries and media, though without uniform policy mandates across Europe. Overall, while EU-level advocacy persists, national pushback highlights tensions between supranational standardization and sovereign linguistic norms, with adoption often confined to progressive institutions rather than widespread public or legal requirement.^[88]

Latin American Countries

In Latin American countries, where Spanish and Portuguese predominate, inclusive language primarily involves gender-neutral modifications such as substituting masculine endings (-o) with -e or -x (e.g., "todes" for "todos"), alongside efforts to avoid gendered binaries in official and educational contexts. Adoption has varied politically, with left-leaning administrations and institutions occasionally promoting it as a tool for gender equality, while right-leaning governments have increasingly imposed bans, citing linguistic distortion and ideological overreach.^[89]^[90] Argentina exemplifies this divide: prior to 2024, federal and local guidelines encouraged inclusive forms in public communication to combat stereotypes, but on February 27, 2024, President Javier Milei's administration prohibited their use in official documents, barring -e, -x, @, and superfluous feminine doublings to preserve standard Spanish norms.^[91]^[92] In Buenos Aires, a 2021 ordinance extended this restriction to city communications, reinforced by a 2022 prohibition in schools amid debates over pedagogical impacts.^[93]^[90] Similar prohibitions emerged elsewhere: on October 3, 2025, El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele banned inclusive terms like "amigue" and "compañere" in public schools, framing it as a rejection of gender ideology in education. Mexico's Chihuahua state followed on October 8, 2025, becoming the first to outlaw such language in public education, arguing it impoverishes communication and deviates from Real Academia Española standards; supporters emphasized clarity for students.^[94]^[95] In Uruguay, a 2022 legislative proposal by the Cabildo Abierto party sought to ban it in classrooms, reflecting broader conservative pushback.^[89] Chile and Brazil show more organic, non-mandatory usage: Chilean Spanish incorporates inclusive devices in activist and media spheres, but lacks nationwide policies, with studies documenting varied adoption without formal enforcement.^[96] In Brazil, feminist and LGBTQ+ movements advocate for Portuguese adaptations, yet no federal mandates exist, and resistance persists due to grammatical traditions.^[97] These patterns highlight inclusive language as a partisan flashpoint, with recent bans signaling a regional trend toward preserving linguistic conventions over progressive reforms.^[98]^[90]

Institutional Mandates

Various educational institutions have adopted policies requiring the use of inclusive language in syllabi, communications, and curricula to promote diversity and avoid perceived biases. For example, the University of Washington mandates that course syllabi incorporate inclusive language alongside information on disability services, as part of broader systemic changes to support diverse learners.^[99] Similarly, professional associations like the American Psychological Association issue guidelines urging the avoidance of terms deemed non-inclusive, such as those referencing biological sex without qualifiers, influencing academic writing standards.^[17] These policies often originate from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) frameworks prevalent in academia, though institutions like the American Psychological Association, embedded in environments with documented left-leaning biases, may prioritize ideological alignment over empirical linguistic evidence.^[17] However, such mandates have faced reversal amid shifting political priorities. In January 2025, the U.S. Department of Education initiated actions to eliminate DEI programs across educational institutions, citing violations of federal civil rights laws and aiming to refocus on merit-based criteria rather than language prescriptions.^[76] President Trump's executive order of the same month targeted DEI policies at colleges, declaring them potentially discriminatory and directing agencies to enforce biological sex distinctions in official language, countering prior emphases on gender-neutral or identity-affirming terms.^[100] An illustrative case occurred at the University of Kansas in July 2025, where administrators instructed faculty and staff to remove gender pronouns from email signatures to align with these federal directives and avoid compelled speech.^[101] In corporate environments, inclusive language guidelines typically manifest as recommended practices within human resources policies and training programs rather than enforceable mandates, with adoption varying by company culture and regulatory pressures. Employers are advised to use gender-neutral terms like "parent" instead of "mother/father" and to solicit pronouns, as outlined in frameworks from sources like Forbes, to mitigate legal risks under anti-discrimination laws such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.^[102]^[103] Large corporations, influenced by DEI consultants, often integrate these into diversity training; for instance, Berkeley Haas's playbook emphasizes inclusive phrasing to foster organizational growth, though empirical data on productivity gains remains limited and contested.^[18] Federal actions in 2025, including executive orders rejecting "gender ideology" in workplace policies, have prompted reviews of such guidelines among government contractors, prioritizing biological sex recognition over expansive identity language.^[104] Media outlets and corporate communications teams frequently reference style guides incorporating inclusive language, such as recommendations for singular "they" or avoiding terms like "mankind," but these are editorial preferences rather than universal mandates. The Linguistic Society of America provides guidelines for linguists to proactively adopt inclusive forms, influencing academic and media discourse, yet these reflect disciplinary norms potentially skewed by institutional biases toward progressive linguistics over prescriptive grammar traditions.^[2] Government agencies, like the City of Philadelphia, have issued official inclusive language guides in 2024 and 2025 for public communications, suggesting alternatives for identities and experiences to comply with equity objectives under local regulations.^[105] Despite proliferation, enforcement remains inconsistent, with recent U.S. policy shifts emphasizing factual accuracy in sex-based terminology across institutional sectors.^[106]

Education Systems

In higher education institutions, inclusive language guidelines have proliferated since the mid-2010s, emphasizing gender-neutral terminology, avoidance of terms perceived as ableist or culturally insensitive, and the use of preferred pronouns to foster perceived inclusivity. For instance, Yale University advises faculty and students to employ "first-year" instead of "freshman," "functional needs" over "special needs," and gender-neutral nouns in communications.^[107] Similarly, University College London promotes inclusive language in teaching to mitigate stereotypes, recommending phrases that acknowledge diverse identities without assuming binary gender norms.^[108] European universities, such as Radboud University in the Netherlands, issue comparable guides for writing and speaking, suggesting alternatives like singular "they" for unspecified gender and person-centered language for disabilities.^[109] These policies often appear in faculty handbooks, syllabi, and diversity training, though enforcement varies and public institutions face First Amendment constraints against compelling specific pronoun usage.^[110] In K-12 education, inclusive language adoption is more fragmented and recommendation-based rather than uniformly mandated, with teacher training programs increasingly incorporating modules on gender-neutral phrasing and pronoun respect since around 2020. The National Education Association, representing over 3 million educators, advocates for pronoun usage to affirm student identities and create "safe spaces," integrating such practices into professional development.^[111] However, by 2023, at least 18 U.S. states had enacted laws prohibiting schools from requiring teachers to use students' preferred pronouns if they differ from biological sex, prioritizing free speech protections over affirmation policies.^[112] A January 2025 U.S. executive order further directs federal agencies to withhold funding from K-12 schools promoting "gender ideology" indoctrination, including compelled language shifts, reflecting pushback against perceived overreach in public schooling.^[113] In contrast, some progressive districts, like those aligned with GLSEN models, encourage inclusive curricula that incorporate LGBTQ+ representation through language choices, though empirical data on widespread implementation remains limited.^[114] These educational policies often stem from institutional diversity offices influenced by progressive frameworks, yet systematic reviews indicate inconsistent application and potential conflicts with pedagogical neutrality, as academic sources promoting them frequently exhibit ideological alignment rather than rigorous causal evidence for improved outcomes.^[115] For example, while guidelines claim to enhance belonging, they rarely cite longitudinal studies isolating language effects from broader inclusion efforts, and resistance arises where such mandates encroach on expressive freedoms.^[3]

Corporate and Media Guidelines

Many large corporations, especially in technology and media, have incorporated inclusive language guidelines into internal policies and training programs, often as components of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) frameworks. Google's developer documentation guidelines, updated as of June 2025, advise against ableist terms like "cripple" or "insane," recommend gender-neutral phrasing such as "they" over assumptions of binary pronouns, and emphasize person-first language (e.g., "person with a disability" rather than "disabled person").^[116] Similarly, in open-source projects managed by Google, a 2020 policy mandates replacing exclusionary terms like "master/slave," "whitelist," and "blacklist" with alternatives such as "primary/replica" and "allowlist/denylist" to promote neutrality.^[117] Media organizations have revised style guides to align with inclusive language principles. The Associated Press (AP) Stylebook, influential in U.S. journalism, began capitalizing "Black" when referring to racial, ethnic, or cultural identity in June 2020, while advising against lowercase "white" to avoid implying equivalence; it also recommends avoiding dehumanizing labels like "the poor" in favor of more specific descriptors.^[118] The AP further updated in 2023 to discourage generalizing prefixes such as "the French" in favor of "French people" or contextual alternatives, aiming to humanize subjects.^[119] The BBC's editorial guidelines, while broader, include social media-specific advice for diverse representation, such as using neutral terms and avoiding stereotypes in visual and textual content.^[120] These guidelines typically involve mandatory training, with non-compliance potentially tied to performance reviews in DEI-focused firms; for example, some employers require inclusive phrasing in job descriptions, like "parent" over "mother/father" to accommodate varied family structures.^[102] However, amid legal challenges and cultural pushback, several companies have curtailed such mandates since early 2025, including Meta, Walmart, and Lowe's scaling back DEI commitments that encompassed language policies, citing tensions with merit-based practices and federal contractor requirements under the Trump administration.^[121] Google paused an automated "inclusive language" feature in its Docs tool in April 2022 after user complaints about overreach in flagging terms like "landlord."^[122]

Empirical Evidence on Effects

Claimed Benefits and Supporting Studies

Proponents of inclusive language assert that it promotes feelings of belonging and inclusion, particularly among transgender and nonbinary individuals, by signaling respect and validation through practices such as correct pronoun usage.^[4] A 2022 study using data from 453 transgender, nonbinary, or agender employees across 104 Australian organizations found strong positive associations between exposure to inclusive language—measured by self-reports and aggregate organizational practices—and multidimensional well-being scores on a 0-100 scale, with correct pronoun use linked to a 43-unit increase and misgendering to a 20-unit decrease.^[4] The analysis employed random-intercept multilevel regression models to account for individual and organizational variance, concluding that such language aids socioeconomic integration by enhancing belonging, though the voluntary, non-probabilistic sample may skew toward progressive workplaces.^[4] Inclusive language is also claimed to mitigate gender biases in cognitive associations with leadership roles. A 2021 experiment at Yale University examined the shift from "master" to "head" for residential college leaders, involving 341 students assessed via exemplar recall and face recognition tasks.^[123] Exposure to "master" increased recall of male exemplars beyond their actual incidence and improved recognition accuracy for men (measured by d' signal detection metric) compared to women, whereas "head" eliminated this disparity, suggesting institutional language changes can reduce gendered stereotypes in memory and perception.^[123] In occupational contexts, gender-inclusive formulations are said to elevate perceptions of women's representation without proportionally diminishing men's. A 2025 study with 145 French participants presented occupations in masculine generic or inclusive pair forms (e.g., "ingénieurs" vs. "ingénieurs et ingénieures"), using gender-separated 0-100 scales to estimate group proportions.^[124] Results showed increased estimates of women in masculine-stereotyped (from 19.9% to 24.2%) and neutral occupations (51.9% to 57.1%), with no change in feminine-stereotyped ones, while men's estimates declined only in neutral roles (57.5% to 51.3%), indicating context-dependent boosts to female visibility via non-ipsative representation.^[124] The mixed factorial design highlighted that inclusive language may counteract underestimation in male-dominated fields but requires separate gender metrics to avoid oversimplification from bipolar scales.^[124]

Skeptical Findings and Limitations

Empirical studies on inclusive language often suffer from methodological constraints that limit their generalizability. Many experiments employ small, homogeneous samples drawn from Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) populations, potentially inflating effects due to self-selection among ideologically aligned participants. Self-reported measures of bias reduction are prone to social desirability bias, where respondents express favorable views to align with perceived norms rather than reflecting true attitudinal shifts. Longitudinal data tracking sustained behavioral changes, such as improved diversity in hiring or reduced discrimination, remain scarce, with most research confined to short-term lab tasks assessing mental associations rather than real-world outcomes.^[9]^[19] Skeptical findings indicate that inclusive language does not consistently mitigate bias and may yield null or counterproductive results in certain contexts. For instance, manipulations using paired forms or neutral pronouns eliminate male bias in some occupational associations but fail to enhance women's visibility in stereotypically feminine roles, suggesting context-dependent efficacy at best. Broader critiques highlight a lack of evidence that gender-neutral terms address underlying prejudices, as resistance often stems from ideological convictions about binary sex rather than linguistic form, with no demonstrated causal link to prejudice reduction. In applied settings like healthcare, desexed language risks confusion, alienation of low-literacy audiences, and dilution of sex-specific guidance, potentially harming equitable communication.^[124]^[19]^[11] Systemic biases in academic research further undermine claims of robust support, as progressive leanings in psychology departments may favor studies confirming hypothesized benefits while underreporting null findings through publication bias. Criticisms of gender-fair language efficacy include arguments that it distracts from communication without empirical validation of necessity, particularly given biological sex binaries, and may threaten social identities without yielding proportional gains in inclusivity. These limitations underscore the need for rigorous, ideologically diverse replications to substantiate causal claims beyond correlational or contrived scenarios.^[19]^[125]

Controversies and Criticisms

Ideological Imposition and Free Speech Concerns

Critics of inclusive language policies argue that requirements to use gender-neutral pronouns or avoid biologically descriptive terms constitute compelled speech, imposing a particular ideological worldview on individuals and institutions at the expense of free expression. Such mandates, often enforced through workplace discipline, academic sanctions, or legal penalties, are said to prioritize subjective identity claims over objective linguistic norms, potentially chilling open debate on sex and gender issues. For instance, refusal to adopt preferred pronouns has led to professional repercussions, raising questions about whether these policies enforce ideological conformity rather than mere politeness.^[110] In Canada, psychologist Jordan Peterson gained prominence in 2016 by opposing Bill C-16, federal legislation passed in June 2017 that added "gender identity or expression" as protected grounds under the Canadian Human Rights Act and Criminal Code hate speech provisions. Peterson contended that the bill could criminalize deliberate misgendering by treating refusal to use neopronouns like "ze/zir" as discriminatory or hateful conduct, effectively mandating speech aligned with gender ideology. While the bill itself does not explicitly require pronoun use, human rights tribunals have since interpreted similar protections to penalize non-use in interpersonal contexts, validating concerns over indirect compulsion. Peterson's videos criticizing the bill amassed millions of views, highlighting fears that expansive anti-discrimination laws could suppress dissenting views on biological sex.^[13]^[126] The United Kingdom's Forstater v. Centre for Global Development case illustrates employment consequences for rejecting inclusive language norms. In 2019, researcher Maya Forstater lost her contract after tweeting that sex is immutable and cannot be changed, views incompatible with mandatory use of preferred pronouns for transgender individuals. An initial employment tribunal ruled in 2019 that her gender-critical beliefs did not qualify as protected philosophical beliefs under the Equality Act 2010, deeming them incompatible with human dignity. However, the Employment Appeal Tribunal overturned this in June 2021, affirming that such beliefs—held sincerely and coherently—merit protection akin to religious convictions, provided they do not harass others. Forstater was awarded £100,000 in 2023 for discrimination and victimization, underscoring how inclusive language expectations can override protected expression in professional settings.^[127]^[128]^[129] In the United States, pronoun policies in workplaces and schools have triggered First Amendment challenges under compelled speech doctrine, as established in cases like West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), which prohibits forcing individuals to affirm ideas they reject. Public employees, including teachers, have faced discipline for declining to use preferred pronouns; for example, in 2024, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that the state lacked a compelling interest to require a teacher to use male pronouns for a female student, protecting the educator's free speech and religious liberty rights. Private sector incidents include the 2025 firing of a Bath & Body Works manager in Utah for refusing to address a transgender colleague by preferred pronouns, citing conflict with her beliefs, and a Wisconsin man's dismissal from Generac for similar non-compliance. A federal court in May 2025 vacated portions of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's 2024 guidance interpreting Title VII to mandate pronoun use as part of anti-harassment obligations, citing overreach into protected expression. These cases reflect ongoing tensions, with critics arguing that federal and corporate DEI initiatives impose ideological uniformity, fostering self-censorship to avoid litigation or termination.^[130]^[131]^[132]^[133] Broader free speech advocates, including the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), contend that inclusive language mandates create a hierarchy where ideological conformity trumps viewpoint neutrality, particularly in public institutions. Empirical patterns show disproportionate enforcement against skeptics of gender ideology, with little reciprocity for accommodating traditional views on sex-based language, potentially eroding pluralistic discourse. While proponents frame these policies as anti-discrimination measures, detractors highlight their causal role in professional ostracism, as evidenced by tribunal data and legal filings, urging stricter scrutiny to preserve voluntary speech.^[110]^[134]

Cultural Resistance and Backlash

In France, the Académie Française, the authoritative body safeguarding the French language since 1635, issued a vehement condemnation of inclusive writing practices in 2017, labeling them an "aberration" that posed a "mortal danger" to the language's clarity and historical structure by introducing non-standard forms like mid-dots and feminine agreement overrides.^[135]^[136] This stance reflected broader cultural concerns that such alterations undermine readability, pronunceability, and the binary grammatical rules inherent to Romance languages, with critics arguing that the traditional masculine form already serves as a neutral default in collective nouns.^[137] In November 2023, the French Senate approved a bill by a 73% majority to prohibit gender-inclusive writing in all official public documents, exams, and signage, signaling institutional pushback against what proponents viewed as ideological encroachment on linguistic norms.^[138]^[139] Italy's government under Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni enacted a nationwide ban on gender-neutral symbols such as asterisks, schwas, and other non-binary markers in public schools on March 21, 2025, directing educators to adhere strictly to traditional binary grammar as outlined by the Accademia della Crusca, Italy's linguistic authority.^[140]^[141] This policy, justified by the Education Ministry as necessary to avoid confusion and preserve the language's phonetic and morphological integrity, echoed cultural sentiments prioritizing heritage over imported progressive reforms, with Meloni's administration framing it as resistance to "woke" influences eroding national identity.^[142] Similar measures in Bavaria, Germany, restricted gender-sensitive forms in official communications starting March 2024, limiting their use to internal contexts and excluding them from legal texts to maintain precision and tradition.^[143] In Latin America, cultural backlash manifested in Buenos Aires' 2022 prohibition of gender-inclusive language in primary and secondary schools, reversing prior mandates amid parental protests and concerns over ideological indoctrination, which reignited debates on whether such terms like "todes" distort Spanish's gendered nouns and alienate native speakers.^[144] Terms such as "Latinx" faced rejection from Spanish-speaking communities, with surveys indicating low adoption rates—under 3% among U.S. Hispanics in a 2020 Pew Research poll—and criticisms that it imposes anglicized neologisms ignoring the language's phonetic rules and cultural continuity, effectively erasing generational linguistic ties.^[145] In Eastern Europe, Hungary's inherently gender-neutral language structure, lacking gendered pronouns, has fueled resistance to external inclusive mandates, with government policies since 2021 curtailing related educational content to protect traditional family norms and avert perceived Western cultural imposition.^[146] These instances highlight a pattern where resistance stems from empirical observations of linguistic disruption—such as reduced comprehension in altered texts—and a defense of endogenous cultural frameworks against top-down reforms often advanced by institutions with documented progressive biases.^[147]

Gender-Specific Debates

Inclusive language proponents advocate for gender-neutral terms and pronouns, such as replacing "he" with "they" or avoiding occupational titles like "chairman," arguing that gendered language perpetuates stereotypes and biases favoring men.^[148] A 2019 study found that using gender-neutral pronouns like "ze" in hypothetical scenarios reduced implicit biases toward men and improved attitudes toward women and LGBT individuals among participants.^[149] Similarly, a 2021 analysis of language in professional contexts suggested that gender-exclusive terms, such as masculine generics, can ostracize women and lower their motivation in exams or tasks.^[150] However, these effects are often measured in controlled, low-stakes settings, and causal links to real-world disparities remain unproven, with critics noting that correlation does not imply that language drives behavior rather than reflecting underlying cultural norms.^[151] Opponents, including gender-critical feminists, contend that gender-neutral inclusive language obscures biological sex differences, potentially undermining sex-based protections for women in areas like sports, prisons, and shelters.^[152] They argue that mandating preferred pronouns—such as "they/them" for individuals identifying outside binary sex—constitutes compelled speech that denies material reality, where sex is determined by chromosomes and reproductive anatomy, not self-identification.^[153] For instance, gender-critical perspectives highlight how replacing "mother" with "birthing person" in policy documents erases the unique role of female biology in reproduction, which has informed legal and social categories for centuries.^[154] Empirical scrutiny reveals limited scope for change: a 2024 analysis of English texts estimated that fewer than 1% of words would require alteration for gender inclusivity, suggesting minimal linguistic overhaul but disproportionate cultural emphasis.^[10] Legal challenges underscore free speech tensions, with courts examining whether employer or institutional mandates for preferred pronouns violate constitutional protections against compelled expression. In the U.S., a 2021 Sixth Circuit ruling in Meriwether v. Hartop held that a professor's refusal to use pronouns inconsistent with a student's biological sex did not constitute discrimination, prioritizing First Amendment rights over Title IX claims.^[155] Similarly, a 2025 federal appeals court decision upheld a Florida law barring teachers from using students' preferred pronouns without parental consent, rejecting arguments that it infringed on free speech by affirming state interests in child welfare and biological accuracy.^[156] These cases illustrate broader resistance, as surveys indicate men exhibit stronger opposition to gender-inclusive pronouns, associating them with higher sexism levels, though such attitudes may stem from adherence to grammatical norms or skepticism of ideological impositions rather than bias.^[157] ^[157] Skeptical findings question the net benefits of gender-neutral shifts. A 2019 critique argued that universal adoption of "they/them" could inadvertently reinforce stereotypes by diluting sex-specific language that aids cognitive categorization of real differences in strength, interests, and risks, potentially hindering adaptive behaviors.^[158] Longitudinal data from high-stakes exams in gender-neutral linguistic environments, such as Spain's 1990s reforms, showed no significant reduction in gender performance gaps, implying that language changes alone do not address deeper socioeconomic or biological factors.^[159] Gender-critical analyses further warn that prioritizing subjective gender identity in language risks conflating sex with feelings, which empirical psychology links to higher rates of gender dysphoria resolution through desistance rather than affirmation, challenging assumptions that inclusive terms foster mental health.^[125] Overall, while some studies report bias mitigation, methodological limitations—like reliance on self-reported attitudes over behavioral outcomes—and ideological biases in academia toward pro-inclusivity narratives temper claims of transformative efficacy.^[9]

References

[1]
INCLUSIVE LANGUAGE Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
Inclusive language definition: language that avoids the use of certain expressions or words that might be considered to exclude particular groups of people, ...
[2]
LSA Guidelines for Inclusive Language - Linguistic Society of America
Inclusive language acknowledges diversity, conveys respect to all people, is sensitive to differences, and promotes equal opportunities.
[3]
Why Inclusive Language Matters
Inclusive language is more than just avoiding the use of a few antiquated or offensive terms and phrases. It is about embracing communication that acknowledges ...
[4]
Exposure to Inclusive Language and Well-Being at Work Among ...
Feb 23, 2022 · This study has provided novel empirical evidence of positive effects of exposure to inclusive language among trans employees.
[5]
Inclusive language: What it is and how it is used - Repsol
Aug 28, 2024 · This form of communication has its origins in social and academic movements of the 20th century, starting with the feminist movement, which in ...
[6]
University of Texas Study Tracks History of Inclusive Language ...
Mar 22, 2022 · The study investigates two different ways in which language became more inclusive. One is what the study called the “deconstructed” approach, ...
[7]
A brief history of singular 'they' - Oxford English Dictionary
The Oxford English Dictionary traces singular they back to 1375, where it appears in the medieval romance William and the Werewolf. Except for the old-style ...<|separator|>
[8]
Tracing the history of gender-neutral pronouns
Jan 29, 2020 · Notably, the earliest recorded use of "they" as a gender-neutral personal pronoun dates back to the 14th century, found in a French poem titled ...
[9]
What affects people's use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive ...
Sep 7, 2025 · Their findings showed that women exhibited more positive attitudes toward gender-inclusive language than men. However, while women's mean scores ...
[10]
Less than one percent of words would be affected by gender ...
Oct 4, 2024 · Our results show that, on average, less than 1% of all tokens would be affected by gender-inclusive language.Missing: effectiveness | Show results with:effectiveness
[11]
Reconsidering “inclusive language:” Consequences for healthcare ...
Desexed language is likely to have an adverse impact on people with low health literacy and language skills, risk alienation, and cause confusion.
[12]
From the community: When inclusive language excludes
Oct 20, 2021 · Critics find the term derogatory and insulting, noting that it, along with phrases like “chestfeeding,” “human milk,” “front holes” and “vulva ...
[13]
Toronto professor Jordan Peterson takes on gender-neutral pronouns
Nov 4, 2016 · A Canadian university professor ignited controversy by refusing to use gender-neutral pronouns. Is he a villain or a victim?Missing: inclusive | Show results with:inclusive<|control11|><|separator|>
[14]
When Diversity and Inclusion Clash with Free Speech—and Why ...
Feb 20, 2020 · Jonathan Friedman discusses three cases where the principles of diversity, inclusion, and free speech have come into conflict.
[15]
Impulsive Censorship: Banning Words and Prescribing Expressions ...
Instead of achieving inclusivity, self-censorship initiatives like suggested language lists have been ridiculed, as attempts to censor innocuous words have ...
[16]
Full article: The exclusion of inclusion : A critical analysis of the use ...
Nov 6, 2023 · The use of inclusive language in development is crucial as it can actively challenge marginalising structures and processes. However, inclusive ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
[17]
Inclusive Language Guide - American Psychological Association
Empirical evidence affirms that gender is a nonbinary spectrum (Hyde et al., 2019). Inclusive language should reflect and respect gender diversity. It is ...
[18]
[PDF] Understanding Inclusive Language: A Framework - Berkeley Haas
Inclusive language has four principles: respect, effective communication, recognizing diversity, and continual improvement. It includes five key questions to ...
[19]
Four Dimensions of Criticism Against Gender-Fair Language
Jan 6, 2020 · This theme contained the arguments that gender-neutral pronouns are unnecessary because there are only two genders, that gendered language is ...
[20]
What affects people's use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive ...
Sep 8, 2025 · Despite the fact that the majority of findings indicate that gender-inclusive language is effective and feasible, gender-inclusive language use ...
[21]
Gender neutral - LGBTQIA+ Wiki - Fandom
The first notable use of gender neutral pronouns came in 1911 by Fred S. Pond, an insurance broker. They grew in popularity in January 1912, when Ella Fagg ...<|separator|>
[22]
What Is Gender-Inclusive Language And Why Does It Matter?
May 29, 2020 · Efforts to make the English language more gender-equitable have had a long history in the U.S. Important advances were made from the 1960s ...
[23]
Feminist language reform | Intro to Sociolinguistics Class Notes
Feminist language reform emerged in the 1970s as part of the second-wave feminist movement. It aimed to address gender inequalities by challenging ...
[24]
Statement on Gender and Language - NCTE
Oct 25, 2018 · Originally titled “Guidelines for Nonsexist Use of Language in ... Rethinking Sexism, Gender, and Sexuality. Rethinking Schools, 2016 ...
[25]
Guidelines for Nonsexist Use of Language in NCTE Publications.
Although directed specifically to editors, these guidelines for eliminating sexist language can be useful to all educators who help shape the language ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[26]
Guidelines for nonsexist use of language. - APA PsycNet
Guidelines for nonsexist use of language. Publication Date. Jun 1975. Language. English. Source. American Psychologist, Vol 30(6), Jun 1975, 682- ...
[27]
Language Planning and Sexual Equality: Guidelines for Non-Sexist ...
Guidelines for Creating Positive Sexual and Racial Images in Educational Materials. (96 pp). Google Scholar. McGraw-Hill Book Company. N.Y. (No Date).
[28]
The Origins of Inclusive Communications
Sep 16, 2024 · The foundations of inclusive communications can be traced to the human rights movements of the 20 th century as the era saw a growing recognition of the need ...
[29]
UNITED NATIONS Gender-inclusive language
Guidelines for gender-inclusive language in English. These Guidelines include a number of strategies to help United Nations staff use gender-inclusive language.
[30]
A brief history of gender neutral pronouns - BBC
Sep 22, 2019 · Examples of the singular "they" being used to describe someone features as early as 1386 in Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales and also in ...
[31]
Are Romance languages becoming more gender neutral?
Sep 11, 2020 · In most Romance languages, there are feminine and masculine gender marks for pronouns, nouns, adjectives, determiners, and demonstratives.
[32]
Hoffman: Gender inclusivity meets the Romance languages
Feb 27, 2023 · Spanish, French, Italian and Portuguese are the most commonly spoken Romance languages. There are regional dialects, such as Catalan, a form of ...
[33]
Romance languages are rooted in a binary vision of the world
Mar 26, 2021 · In France the first way of adopting inclusive writing is to use existing neutral forms where possible, for example, lectorat (the readership) ...
[34]
[PDF] INCLUSIVE LANGUAGE IN SPANISH
For example, “Les chiques van al colegio.” “Bienvenides a todes.” “Mis amigues y yo.” This also works for adjectives: Original: “Tu amigo es muy divertido y ...
[35]
Gramática de género en el español - Gender in Language Project
Mostramos las formas prescriptivas masculinas y femeninas, así como varias formas de géneros lingüísticos inclusivos (e.g. el género -x, el género -e) que ...
[36]
NACIONES UNIDAS Lenguaje inclusivo en cuanto al género - UN.org.
En español hay distintos mecanismos para marcar el género gramatical y el sexo biológico: a) terminaciones (chica/-o), b) oposición de palabras (padre-madre) ...
[37]
Lenguaje Inclusivo de Género | California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc.
En español, usted puede: Usar palabras o expresiones alternativas que no requieren el uso de palabras con género. Por ejemplo: "Cónyuge" en vez de "esposo ...
[38]
Écriture inclusive : exemples et définition - QuillBot
May 16, 2024 · On l'appelle aussi doublet. Exemple de double flexion en écriture inclusive Les citoyennes et les citoyens se pressèrent aux urnes.
[39]
Écriture inclusive : aide-mémoire – Clés de la rédaction
Procédés d'écriture inclusive ; Mots épicènes (noms, adjectifs et pronoms qui ne changent pas de forme selon le genre). Les adultes peuvent soumettre une demande ...
[40]
Ecriture inclusive. Cher·e·s lecteur·rice·s, déterminé·e·s à écrire ...
Exemples : « elles et ils partent », « les élèves », « les délégué·e·s de la classe », etc. Ne plus employer les antonomases du nom commun « femme » et « homme ...
[41]
Comprendre l'écriture inclusive | Centre d'aide en français écrit et oral
Procédés principaux, Définition, Exemples ; Noms collectifs, Un « nom neutre qui désigne un ensemble de personnes » sans en spécifier le genre (Office québécois ...
[42]
Qu'est-ce que l'écriture inclusive
L'écriture « inclusive », qui envisage de favoriser l'égalité des sexes en réformant la langue, ne laisse personne indifférent. Mais de quoi s'agit-il, ...
[43]
Linguaggio inclusivo: una panoramica - Treccani
Aug 7, 2021 · - quando necessario, enfatizzare il genere tramite genere doppio anziché usare il maschile esteso. Ad esempio: “i bambini e le bambine” (anziché ...
[44]
Linguaggio inclusivo. Tra shwa, maschile sovraesteso e parità di ...
Apr 18, 2025 · Negli ultimi anni sono nate diverse proposte per rendere l'italiano più inclusivo. Una delle più famose è l'uso dello schwa (ə), una vocale ...
[45]
Italiano Inclusivo – Una lingua che non discrimina per genere
L'italiano inclusivo è una proposta di estensione della lingua italiana per superare le limitazioni di una lingua fortemente caratterizzata per genere, ...
[46]
Parlare a tuttə o a chiunque? Il linguaggio inclusivo oltre lo schwa.
Aug 29, 2022 · Un linguaggio è inclusivo quando non esclude o discrimina nessuno sulla base di parametri come sesso, orientamento sessuale, identità di genere, ...
[47]
Linguagem inclusiva - Portal Gov.br
Jul 11, 2023 · A linguagem inclusiva busca reverter uma situação de discriminação e ocultação de grupos socialmente minorizados nas formas de comunicação.
[48]
Linguagem inclusiva — Manual de Comunicação - Senado Federal
A linguagem inclusiva evita o uso de palavras, termos e expressões que possam reforçar estereótipos, preconceitos ou discriminação.
[49]
[PDF] Manual de Linguagem Inclusiva - CIG
May 20, 2021 · Este Manual pretende ser um guia facilitador da comunicação institucional do CES, inspirando-se em orientações normativas nacionais e ...
[50]
[PDF] MANUAL LINGUAGEM INCLUSIVA
A linguagem inclusiva é uma ferramenta poderosa para promover a igualdade e respeitar a diversidade das pessoas e grupos sociais. É uma linguagem que não ...
[51]
Germany debates how to form gender-neutral words out of its ... - NPR
Oct 30, 2021 · Cities across Germany, including Lubeck, are now trying to use gender-neutral language by placing a colon or asterisk within words.
[52]
Gender-inclusive language in German teaching - Goethe-Institut
Language learning necessarily involves using nouns that refer to people. The German language traditionally adheres to a binary male/female gender construct.
[53]
Keeping Your Slavic Language Content Inclusive | Argos Multilingual
Jun 9, 2023 · He and Yulia also mentioned how some Slavic languages have gender-neutral words like “person” that are widely accepted regardless of gender.
[54]
(PDF) Ways of expressing gender neutrality / nonbinary in Slavic ...
Ways of expressing gender neutrality / nonbinary in Slavic languages, compared to English · Nonbinary people shouldn't be forced to create some unusual pronouns ...
[55]
VIEWPOINT: Develop Gender-Neutral Language in Arabic - The Hoya
هما and أنتما — are the most popular alternatives in Arabic. These ...
[56]
Gender Neutral Language in Arabic - Nassawiyat
Aug 6, 2022 · There are two common practiced methods used to make Arabic more gender inclusive. One is writing the pronoun, or the noun and its adjective in ...
[57]
The Ultimate Guide to Gender-Neutral Language in Arabic
Aug 28, 2021 · Gender-inclusive language in Arabic aims to address the underrepresentation of women in the language, challenging the traditional use of ...Why do we need gender... · How to be gender-inclusive in...
[58]
X也 Gender Neutral Pronouns in Chinese - Strommen
Oct 30, 2023 · Chinese lacks gender-neutral pronouns, but "他/她/TA" (tā) is used. "X也" (X yě) is a proposed gender-neutral pronoun, pronounced "X yě".
[59]
What do you say in Korean instead of “oppa” “hyung”, “nuna” or ...
Feb 28, 2021 · The short answer: Fraternal calling names (eonni, oppa, nuna, hyeong) are only used in relationships of personal affinity.
[60]
Federal Management Regulation; Updating the FMR With Diversity ...
Aug 22, 2024 · The FMR is being updated to replace gender-specific pronouns with non-gendered ones, and to correct minor grammatical and administrative errors.
[61]
NIST's Inclusive Language Guidance Aims for Clarity in Standards ...
Apr 29, 2021 · Use of inclusive language benefits readers not only by respecting them all equally, but also by avoiding potential gaps in understanding. Some ...
[62]
The importance of inclusivity in government agencies
Aug 9, 2024 · The federal government can create more welcoming environments for all individuals to improve public trust, engagement, and overall performance.<|separator|>
[63]
Inclusive writing – Guidelines and resources – Writing Tips Plus
Aug 16, 2024 · The Guidelines for Inclusive Writing are designed to help the federal public service and any other organization produce writing that is free of discrimination.Guidelines for inclusive writing · Resources for inclusive and...
[64]
Inclusive Language - Canada.ca
Oct 31, 2022 · Inclusive language includes words and phrases that can be used to help make all members of the Defence Team feel welcomed and accepted.
[65]
Inclusive language and terms - Province of British Columbia
Jan 26, 2024 · What is inclusive language? It's using language that's free from prejudice, stereotypes or discriminatory views of specific people or groups.
[66]
Inclusive communication - GOV.UK
Aug 14, 2014 · This guidance aims to help you to: communicate using inclusive language and know which words to use and avoid when writing about disability ...
[67]
Inclusive language by design
Nov 22, 2023 · We've created our own inclusive language guidance for designers at the Home Office, to use as a benchmark for content in our services.
[68]
Inclusive language | Style Manual
Inclusive language. Use language that is culturally appropriate and respectful of the diversity of Australia's peoples.Aboriginal and Torres Strait · Gender and sexual diversity · Age diversity
[69]
LGBTIQA+ inclusive language guide - Victorian Government
Feb 4, 2025 · This guide explains how to use language respectfully and inclusively when working with and referring to lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and gender diverse, ...
[70]
Plain and inclusive language | Digital NSW
Inclusive language promotes respect, empathy, and equity. It recognises and values diversity, helping create a more inclusive and welcoming environment for all, ...
[71]
Your Words Matter: A new guide on gender-inclusive language and ...
Dec 3, 2024 · The guide follows a gender-inclusive approach to language and communication by giving visibility to the needs and lived experiences of different groups of ...
[72]
First steps towards more inclusive language
The inclusivity scale in language: We normally recommend that you aim to favour the most inclusive form of language: gender-sensitive language. In certain ...
[73]
What Americans Think About the “Language Wars”
Dec 17, 2024 · People generally want to be inclusive, but many are wary of top-down dictates on what constitutes “correct” thinking.
[74]
Designating English as the Official Language of The United States
Mar 1, 2025 · In welcoming new Americans, a policy of encouraging the learning and adoption of our national language will make the United States a shared home ...Missing: inclusive | Show results with:inclusive
[75]
Policy on Gender Inclusive Language | University Policy Manual
Feb 19, 2024 · The purpose of this policy is to provide an inclusive and welcoming environment for all members of the University Community.Missing: education | Show results with:education
[76]
U.S. Department of Education Takes Action to Eliminate DEI
Jan 23, 2025 · The US Department of Education has taken action to eliminate harmful Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives.Missing: inclusive | Show results with:inclusive
[77]
Trump Declared English the Official Language. Can Employers Do ...
Apr 17, 2025 · Let's be clear: A blanket rule that forces employees to speak only English at all times is presumed illegal under EEOC guidelines. Why? Because ...
[78]
Trump's Executive Orders on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ...
President Trump issued a series of executive orders (EOs) targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in the public and private sectors.
[79]
[PDF] Guidelines for the use of language as a driver of inclusivity
These guidelines on the use of language as a driver of inclusivity are aimed at helping Council of Europe staff to communicate in a gender-inclusive way in ...
[80]
Inclusive Communication: Council Info and EU Publications
Apr 27, 2024 · The purpose of this document is to provide some guidance on language use and visuals, and give examples, based on the use of English, which are ...
[81]
France moves closer to banning gender-inclusive language
Nov 1, 2023 · The French Senate has voted in favour of a proposed law banning gender-inclusive language from official communications in France.
[82]
Macron Backs Ban on Gender-Inclusive French | Language Magazine
Dec 2, 2023 · In France, the Senate, including President Macron, has voted in favor of a proposed law banning the use of gender neutral and gender inclusive ...
[83]
No need to 'iel': why France is so angry about a gender-neutral ...
Dec 8, 2021 · The online edition of Le Robert, the famous French dictionary, chose to include the gender-neutral pronoun “iel” – a combination of the French pronouns “il” ( ...
[84]
The increase of gender-inclusive language in German media
Sep 16, 2023 · This study empirically measures the use of GIL in five media sources in Germany. Over four million articles from 2000 to 2021 are analysed.
[85]
Inclusive" language begins to regress in Germany - Omnes
Apr 9, 2024 · On April 1, a ban on the use of so-called inclusive language came into force in Bavaria, both in education (schools and universities) and in public ...
[86]
Germany, culture minister bans plurals with asterisks: 'language is ...
Aug 9, 2025 · As in Italy, gender-inclusive language with special characters (in Germany, asterisks, underscores, colon and capital “I” are used, while in ...
[87]
Civil Service Inclusive Language Guide - Finance-ni.gov.uk
Sep 27, 2024 · The guide aims to help colleagues understand the important role language plays in creating an inclusive workplace and how it can impact others.Missing: public | Show results with:public
[88]
Gender-Inclusive Communication: Trend or Conviction?
Oct 17, 2025 · Gender-inclusive language avoids masculine generics, resists stereotype-laden terms, and uses neutral alternatives, such as “chairperson” ...<|separator|>
[89]
“¡Hola a Todes!” Language Becomes a Political Battleground in ...
May 4, 2022 · In Uruguay, the far-right Cabildo Abierto proposed a bill that would ban inclusive language in the classroom, and in Nuevo León state in Mexico, ...
[90]
La ola de prohibiciones del lenguaje inclusivo en América Latina
Oct 17, 2025 · Nuevas políticas gubernamentales en América Latina han reactivado el debate en torno al lenguaje inclusivo. Lejos de tratarse de una ...
[91]
El Gobierno de Javier Milei prohíbe el uso del lenguaje inclusivo en ...
Feb 27, 2024 · El presidente de Argentina, Javier Milei, ordenó la prohibición del lenguaje inclusivo en la administración pública, según informó este ...
[92]
Milei anuncia la prohibición del lenguaje inclusivo y de “todo lo ...
Feb 27, 2024 · “No se va a poder utilizar la letra -e, la arroba, la -x y [se va a] evitar la innecesaria inclusión del femenino en todos los documentos”, ...
[93]
En las aulas de Buenos Aires, una batalla por el lenguaje incluyente
Jul 20, 2022 · La capital de Argentina prohibió el uso de lenguaje neutro respecto al género, reavivando un debate que vibra en todo el mundo.
[94]
Chihuahua is first Mexican state to ban inclusive language in schools
Oct 8, 2025 · The northern border state of Chihuahua has become the first state in Mexico to ban the use of inclusive language in public schools, ...
[95]
Inclusive Language Banned in Schools; This is the Only State in ...
Oct 8, 2025 · Thanks to an initiative by the PAN, a state in the Mexican Republic has banned inclusive language in schools for allegedly 'impoverishing ...
[96]
[PDF] Investigating the use of inclusive language in chile - Cronfa
This study explores and documents a variety of inclusive language devices (or gender-neutral language devices) used in contemporary Chilean Spanish, ...
[97]
The Movement to Make the Spanish and Portuguese Languages ...
Feb 22, 2021 · In Spanish and Portuguese, feminists and activists from the LGBTQIA+ movements suggest turning them into inclusive languages.
[98]
los países en los que se rechaza el lenguaje inclusivo (y por ... - BBC
Jun 30, 2022 · Te contamos quiénes prohibieron el uso de expresiones de género neutro -como "todes", "todxs" o "tod@s"- en la educación y por qué muchos ...
[99]
Systemic Changes at Partner Institutions - DO-IT - UW Do-It
It is mandated that syllabi at the university use inclusive language and provide information about services for students with disabilities. The Multi ...
[100]
Trump signs executive order targeting DEI policies at colleges
Jan 23, 2025 · The executive order declares that DEI policies and programs adopted by colleges and others can violate federal civil rights laws and directs ...
[101]
Mandate to Remove Pronouns from Electronic Communications
Jul 31, 2025 · The University of Kansas has instructed all faculty, staff, and student employees to remove gender-identifying pronouns from their email ...
[102]
An Employer's Guide To Inclusive Language - Forbes
Jun 22, 2023 · Embracing inclusive language within the workplace involves adopting practices concerning pronoun use and gender-neutral terms and avoiding language propagating ...Missing: mandates United
[103]
Conscious and Inclusive Language Guide for 2025 - Research.com
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI and Title VII): Prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This has led many employers ...<|separator|>
[104]
Trump's “Gender Ideology” Executive Order Meets the Workplace
Feb 12, 2025 · The Order takes aim at what it terms “gender ideology,” makes clear that the federal government will recognize only male and female biological sexes.
[105]
[PDF] Inclusive Language Guide 2024 - City of Philadelphia
Feb 11, 2025 · With any suggested edits, please contact: law@phila.gov. In this guide, we provide inclusive language suggestions for describing identities and.
[106]
Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism And Restoring ...
Jan 20, 2025 · My Administration will defend women's rights and protect freedom of conscience by using clear and accurate language and policies that recognize women are ...
[107]
Inclusive Language < Yale University
Yale's inclusive language guide advises using "first-year" for all entering students, "functional needs" instead of "special needs," "gender-neutral" nouns, ...
[108]
Using inclusive language in education | Teaching & Learning - UCL
Jul 21, 2023 · This toolkit highlights the significance of using inclusive language in order to promote inclusivity and break away from perpetuating stereotypes.
[109]
Inclusive Language Guide Radboud University
These guidelines contain examples and suggestions for inclusive language use. The guidelines focus on writing, but most can also be used when speaking.
[110]
Pronouns, free speech, and the First Amendment - FIRE
Can universities require students to use each others' specified pronouns? Not at public universities. Students do not lose their First Amendment rights when ...
[111]
Why Pronouns Matter | NEA - National Education Association
Oct 5, 2022 · Pronouns affirm gender identities and create safe spaces by referring to people in the way that feels most accurate to them.
[112]
Pronouns for Trans, Nonbinary Students: The States With Laws That ...
Jun 14, 2023 · Under the laws, teachers aren't required to use trans or nonbinary students' requested pronouns.
[113]
Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling - The White House
Jan 29, 2025 · Eliminating Federal funding or support for illegal and discriminatory treatment and indoctrination in K-12 schools, including based on gender ideology and ...Missing: language | Show results with:language
[114]
Model Local Education Agency Policies on Implementing Title IX
This document presents Model Local Education Agency (LEA) Policies on Implementing Title IX and other Federal Nondiscrimination Protections for LGBTQIA2S+ ...
[115]
Inclusive policies and practices in higher education: A systematic ...
Jan 22, 2025 · This systematic literature review examines research on inclusive policies and practices in higher education institutions published between 2001 and 2021.
[116]
Write inclusive documentation - Google for Developers
Jun 25, 2025 · This page is not an exhaustive reference, but provides some general guidelines and examples that illustrate some best practices for writing inclusive ...Avoid ableist language · Write about features and users...
[117]
Google's initiative for more inclusive language in open source projects
Nov 10, 2020 · The Google Open Source Programs Office (OSPO) created and posted a policy for new Google-run projects to remove the terms “slave,” “whitelist,” and “blacklist,”
[118]
Associated Press changes influential style guide to capitalize 'Black'
Jun 20, 2020 · The Associated Press has changed its influential writing style guide to capitalize the “b” in the term Black when referring to people in a racial, ethnic or ...
[119]
Opinion | Inclusive or Alienating? The Language Wars Go On
Feb 1, 2023 · The Associated Press Stylebook practically oozed good intentions in its tweet last week: “We recommend avoiding general and often dehumanizing 'the' labels.Missing: BBC | Show results with:BBC
[120]
Essential guides for diverse and inclusive social media - BBC
Essential guides for diverse and inclusive social media · A guide to strategy · A guide to creating and posting · A guide to language · A guide to accessibility.
[121]
Here Are All The Companies Rolling Back DEI Programs - Forbes
Apr 11, 2025 · Following Trump's lead, organizations including Walmart, Lowe's and Meta have announced they would scale back their commitments to diversity ...
[122]
Google pauses 'inclusive language' corrections - Washington Times
Apr 25, 2022 · Google is pausing a controversial “inclusive language” feature that it launched this month to correct writers who type what the company deems as politically ...
[123]
Institutional language change linked to reduced gender bias - PubMed
Gender inclusive language polices have potential to reduce gender biased thinking with applied significance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all ...
[124]
Does Inclusive Language Increase the Visibility of Women, or Does ...
Feb 5, 2025 · Using a pair form increases the visibility of women, but the impact on men varies depending on the gender stereotype of the occupation.Missing: effectiveness | Show results with:effectiveness
[125]
Ideological origins of resistance against gender‐inclusive language ...
Oct 22, 2024 · Gender is traditionally conceptualized as a binary construct, which is reflected in the use of binary-gendered third-person pronouns.Abstract · INTRODUCTION · STUDY 1: SPONTANEOUS USE · DISCUSSION
[126]
Jordan Peterson: The right to be politically incorrect - National Post
Nov 8, 2016 · I specifically objected to Bill C-16, a bill that has now passed second reading in the House of Commons, which adds “gender identity” and ...Missing: inclusive | Show results with:inclusive
[127]
Maya Forstater was discriminated against over gender-critical ...
Jul 6, 2022 · Researcher lost job at thinktank after tweeting that transgender women could not change their biological sex.
[128]
Maya Forstater: Woman gets payout for discrimination over trans ...
Jul 1, 2023 · A woman who lost out on a job after tweeting gender-critical views is to get a £100,000 payout after a decision from an employment tribunal.
[129]
[PDF] EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL - GOV.UK
MAYA FORSTATER. APPELLANT. (1) CGD EUROPE. (2) CENTER ... The Claimant holds gender-critical beliefs, which include the belief that sex is immutable and not.
[130]
Court Finds No Compelling State Interest in Forcing Teacher to Use ...
Feb 28, 2024 · The Supreme Court of Virginia, finding that the government had no compelling state interest in insisting that a teacher use masculine pronouns in referring to ...
[131]
Utah Bath & Body Works manager says she was fired over ...
Jul 9, 2025 · A former Bath & Body Works store manager in Layton, Utah, said she was fired after refusing to address a transgender employee by their preferred pronouns.
[132]
Wisconsin man fired for refusing to use preferred pronouns appeals ...
May 24, 2025 · Spencer Wimmer, a Wisconsin man, is asking the Trump administration to intervene after he says he was fired for refusing to use preferred ...
[133]
Court scraps EEOC guidance on pronouns, restrooms, and dress
May 23, 2025 · Trump appointee Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and vacated the portions of the Enforcement Guidance that addressed pronoun policies.
[134]
Preferred Pronouns | The First Amendment Encyclopedia
Jun 24, 2024 · Forcing use of a person's preferred pronouns has not reached the Supreme Court, but state courts have upheld religious rights of teachers.
[135]
French language watchdogs say 'non' to gender-neutral style | France
Nov 3, 2017 · The Académie Française, France's ultimate authority on the French language, is under fierce attack for describing gender-neutral text as an “aberration”.
[136]
Académie Française rejects push to make French language less ...
Oct 27, 2017 · On Thursday, the Académie Française released a fiery condemnation of attempts to make French more gender-inclusive with new spellings.
[137]
Inclusivity putting French language in 'mortal danger', claims l ...
Nov 15, 2017 · Unsurprisingly, however, the Académie française, commonly recognised as the “gatekeeper” of the French language, vehemently opposes inclusive ...
[138]
Senate ban on inclusive language: French experts give pros and cons
Nov 28, 2023 · Almost three-quarters of senators have voted in favour of a bill to ban gender-inclusive writing from all areas where French is legally required.
[139]
France revives culture war over bid to make language more gender ...
Nov 4, 2023 · “Inclusive writing weakens the French language by rendering it unreadable, unpronounceable and impossible to teach,” declared Pascale Gruny, one ...
[140]
Italy bans gender-neutral symbols in schools in latest culture clash
Mar 21, 2025 · Italy's education ministry on Friday instructed schools to ban the growing use of gender-neutral symbols, saying they were unclear and ...Missing: inclusive | Show results with:inclusive
[141]
Italy Reclaims Tradition with Ban on Gender-Neutral Symbols
Mar 25, 2025 · Italy's Ministry of Education banned gender-neutral symbols like the asterisk and schwa in schools on March 21, 2025.
[142]
Italy bans gender-neutral language in schools - Italianismo
Mar 21, 2025 · Italy's Education Ministry bans gender-neutral language in schools. Measure reignites debate on inclusion and identity in the country.
[143]
Germany's Bavaria cracks down on gender-sensitive language - DW
Mar 20, 2024 · The conservative government in the southern German state of Bavaria on Tuesday signed off on an amended regulation limiting the use of gender-sensitive ...
[144]
In Argentina, a Battle Over Gender-Inclusive Language in Classrooms
Jul 20, 2022 · The city of Buenos Aires blocked the use of gender-inclusive language in schools, reigniting a debate that is reverberating across the world.
[145]
Latinx: Inclusive Language or Cultural Erasure? | Independent Women
Sep 18, 2023 · By employing terms like “Latinx,” we inadvertently create a generational gap that excludes our grandparents from the discourse.
[146]
Dear Judith Butler... Hungarian is a gender neutral language. Why ...
Jun 24, 2024 · There are no gendered pronouns in Hungarian. No need for the woke badges. So, for a Hungarian, 'NO GENDER' really does mean 'no gender ideology' ...
[147]
What's in a word? How less-gendered language is faring across ...
Nov 4, 2023 · A contentious vote in the French senate is only the latest battleground in the culture war over inclusive language.
[148]
The effect of language on performance: do gendered ... - NIH
Apr 6, 2021 · In one recent study, it was shown that the use of gender-neutral pronouns reduces the biases in favor of traditional gender roles and categories ...
[149]
He, she, or ... ? Gender-neutral pronouns reduce biases – study
Aug 5, 2019 · Using a gender-neutral pronoun, it found, reduces mental biases that favour men, and boosts positive feelings towards women and LGBT people.
[150]
When He Doesn't Mean You: Gender-Exclusive Language as ...
Women reported less identification with the job after both reading and hearing gender-exclusive language than gender-inclusive or gender-neutral language. For ...
[151]
Gender-neutral language and gender disparities - CEPR
Aug 15, 2023 · It has been suggested that the use of gendered language reinforces gendered stereotypes and influences behaviour. This column investigates ...
[152]
The problem with 'preferred pronouns' - Feminist Current
Jul 28, 2021 · "They" is a non-gender plural pronoun. It is grammatically improper to use when referring to you. You, sir, are a "he". I get the "crooked ...Missing: perspective | Show results with:perspective
[153]
The Dangers of Compelled Speech - Alliance Defending Freedom
Oct 31, 2022 · Preferred pronouns One recent manifestation of compelled speech has been the mandatory use of pronouns contrary to someone's biological sex, ...
[154]
Presenting our pronouns: When feminist politics pull in different ...
Jan 30, 2023 · Some gender-critical feminists sometimes argue that pronoun sharing gives rise to compelled speech as people become obliged to concede to ...
[155]
The 6th Circuit Reached the Right Conclusion on “Preferred ...
Apr 1, 2021 · The court's decision is the first of its kind, and establishes a needed boundary against American culture's new, brutish sexual orthodoxy.
[156]
US appeals court endorses state ban on teachers' use of preferred ...
Jul 2, 2025 · A federal appeals court has ruled against a Florida teacher who challenged a state law forbidding transgender teachers from using their preferred pronouns.
[157]
A Sexist Language? Gender Differences in Attitudes and Use of ...
Apr 22, 2025 · We hypothesize that men are more negative toward gender-inclusive pronouns and use them less and that this is associated with higher levels of sexism among men.Missing: skeptical | Show results with:skeptical
[158]
Actually, We Should Not All Use They/Them Pronouns
May 3, 2019 · They argue that using the gender-neutral third-person pronoun “they” could reduce discrimination and bias in social situations, and even reduce ...
[159]
Gender-Neutral Language and Gender Disparities | NBER
Jun 22, 2023 · This study investigates empirically whether and how the use of gender-neutral language affects the performance of women and men in real high-stakes exams.Missing: debates specific inclusive evidence