Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Insect ecology

Insect ecology is the study of the interrelationships between insects and their environments, including abiotic factors such as temperature, humidity, and climate, as well as biotic interactions with other organisms like competitors, prey, predators, and hosts.^[1] As the most diverse group of animals on Earth, insects comprise approximately one million described species, with estimates of total species around 5.5 million (range 2.6–7.2 million), and they dominate terrestrial ecosystems by forming the foundation of food webs and influencing biodiversity through their abundance and adaptability.^[2] These small yet ubiquitous organisms, numbering up to 10 quintillion individuals globally, exhibit remarkable evolutionary adaptations that enable them to thrive in nearly every habitat, from forests and grasslands to urban areas and aquatic systems.^[3] Insects play pivotal roles as keystone species in ecosystems, driving essential processes such as pollination—which supports over 85% of wild flowering plants and 75% of leading food crops—decomposition of organic matter, nutrient recycling, and biological control of pests through predation and parasitism.^[4] For instance, beetles and other detritivores accelerate the breakdown of dead plant and animal material, facilitating soil fertility, while predatory insects like dragonflies and lacewings regulate populations of agricultural pests, reducing the need for chemical interventions.^[4] These ecosystem services, performed predominantly by native insects, were valued at approximately $57 billion annually in the United States as of 2006, underscoring insects' contributions to agriculture, clean water, air quality, and overall environmental stability.^[5] However, less than 1% of insect species are considered pests that impact human activities, highlighting their overwhelmingly beneficial influence.^[1] Contemporary insect ecology also addresses pressing global challenges, including rapid population declines—exceeding 75% in some regions like Germany over the past few decades, with recent 2025 studies indicating varied rates (e.g., over 70% in certain protected areas) and highlighting the unknown status of 99% of species—driven by habitat destruction, pollution, invasive species, pathogens, and climate change, which threaten biodiversity and the sustainability of these critical services.^[4]^[6]^[7] Research in the field adopts an ecosystem approach, integrating evolutionary processes to examine how insects respond to environmental changes at multiple scales, from individual behavior and population dynamics to community interactions and large-scale ecosystem functioning, including their roles as herbivores, pollinators, seed dispersers, and detritivores that actively shape landscapes.^[8] This holistic perspective emphasizes conservation strategies to mitigate declines and preserve insects' irreplaceable contributions to planetary health.^[9]

Overview and fundamentals

Definition and scope

Insect ecology is the scientific study of interactions between insects—whether considered individually, in populations, or as communities—and their abiotic and biotic environments, encompassing factors such as climate, soil, predators, and other organisms.^[10] This field examines how these interactions influence insect survival, distribution, and evolution, integrating principles from biology, environmental science, and ecology to understand patterns at multiple scales.^[11] The scope of insect ecology spans physiological responses to environmental stressors, behavioral adaptations to resource availability, population dynamics driven by reproduction and mortality, community-level interactions among species, and ecosystem-wide processes like nutrient cycling and pollination.^[12] A key emphasis lies in the unparalleled diversity of insects, with over 1 million species described to date, representing approximately half of all known extant species, alongside their rapid reproductive rates that enable swift population responses to environmental changes.^[13] These attributes allow insects to occupy diverse niches, from terrestrial soils to aquatic sediments, amplifying their role in ecological processes across global biomes.^[3] Insects' unique biological traits profoundly shape the focus of ecological studies, including their chitinous exoskeleton that provides protection while constraining growth through molting, complete or incomplete metamorphosis that separates larval and adult life stages for resource partitioning, powered flight capabilities unique among invertebrates that facilitate dispersal and evasion, and small body sizes that enable exploitation of microhabitats inaccessible to larger organisms.^[14] These features contribute to insects' adaptability and ubiquity, influencing research on topics like habitat fragmentation and climate resilience.^[15] Historically, insect ecology emerged from early observations of insect-plant interactions, notably Charles Darwin's pioneering work in the 1860s on orchid pollination by insects, which demonstrated coevolutionary dynamics and the adaptive significance of floral structures for insect-mediated fertilization.^[16] In modern contexts, the field has integrated molecular tools, such as genomic sequencing, to track long-distance migrations of species like the brown planthopper, revealing windborne dispersal patterns and invasion risks with unprecedented precision.^[17]

Ecological significance

Insects form the foundational base of most terrestrial and freshwater food webs, comprising the majority of animal biomass on land and serving as primary prey for vertebrates such as birds, bats, reptiles, and small mammals.^[18] This dominance in biomass, estimated at approximately 0.15 gigatons of carbon for terrestrial arthropods (with insects as the largest component), underscores their role in energy transfer across trophic levels, where they support higher predators and maintain ecosystem productivity.^[19] Additionally, through pollination, insects facilitate plant reproduction, linking primary producers to herbivores and beyond in these networks.^[20] Insects provide essential ecosystem services that sustain global environmental health and human agriculture. Animal pollination by insects supports approximately 75% of leading food crops worldwide, contributing to the production of fruits, vegetables, nuts, and seeds vital for nutrition and food security.^[20] Decomposition by insects such as beetles and flies accelerates nutrient cycling by breaking down organic matter, returning essential elements like nitrogen and phosphorus to soils and preventing waste accumulation.^[5] Predatory insects, including ladybugs and parasitic wasps, offer natural pest control by regulating herbivore populations, reducing the need for chemical interventions and preserving crop yields.^[5] Furthermore, burrowing insects like ants and termites enhance soil aeration and structure, improving water infiltration, root growth, and microbial activity in ecosystems.^[5] Insects are central to global biodiversity, particularly in tropical regions where over 80% of all insect species occur, driving evolutionary processes through interactions like herbivory and pollination that promote plant and insect speciation.^[21] These dynamics, exemplified by coevolutionary arms races between plants and their insect herbivores, have historically fueled diversification in biodiversity hotspots, with seminal studies highlighting how such interactions accelerate adaptive radiations in the tropics.^[18] This concentration of insect diversity reinforces ecosystem resilience by supporting complex food webs and genetic variation. The ecological roles of insects yield significant economic and health impacts for humanity. Positively, honey production by bees generates a global market value exceeding $9 billion annually, providing food, medicine, and income for millions.^[22] Conversely, crop damage from insect pests imposes substantial costs, with invasive insects alone accounting for at least $70 billion in global economic losses each year through reduced agricultural output and control measures.^[23] These impacts highlight the dual nature of insects in human well-being, balancing benefits against challenges in managed landscapes.

Population ecology

Dynamics and regulation

Insect population dynamics are often modeled using adaptations of classic growth equations to account for their typically discrete generations, where reproduction occurs in synchronized pulses rather than continuously. The exponential growth model in discrete time is expressed as N_{t+1} = R N_t, where N_t is the population size at generation t and R is the finite rate of increase (net reproductive rate per generation), assuming unlimited resources and no mortality beyond reproduction.^[24] This model applies well to early stages of insect outbreaks, such as aphids colonizing new host plants, where populations can double or more per generation under favorable conditions.^[25] As populations approach resource limits, growth shifts to logistic regulation, adapted discretely as N_{t+1} = N_t + r N_t \left(1 - \frac{N_t}{K}\right), where r is the intrinsic growth rate and K is the carrying capacity defined by habitat constraints like food availability.^[24] For insects with non-overlapping generations, such as many defoliators, this form captures density-dependent slowing of growth due to intraspecific competition, preventing indefinite expansion.^[25] More complex variants, like the Hassell model N_{t+1} = \frac{R N_t}{(1 + (N_t / K)^b)}, further refine this for aggregation or varying competition intensities observed in insect aggregations.^[26] Density-dependent regulation intensifies as populations grow, with predation, parasitism, and resource competition exerting stronger control at higher densities. Predators like birds and small mammals increase their impact proportionally with prey abundance, while parasitoids lay more eggs in dense host clusters, leading to higher infection rates.^[27] Resource competition manifests as reduced larval survival when foliage quality declines under heavy defoliation. A prominent example is the spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana), whose outbreaks in North American conifer forests are regulated by density-dependent predation from birds and parasitism from wasps, which suppress populations once they exceed low-density thresholds, though outbreaks persist if these forces lag behind rapid larval growth.^[28] Density-independent factors, such as weather extremes, impose mortality irrespective of population size, often overriding regulatory mechanisms during critical life stages. Harsh winters or sudden frosts can kill overwintering eggs and pupae across all densities, while summer droughts desiccate habitats and reduce host plant vigor. For instance, prolonged droughts significantly lower aphid (Aphis fabae) fecundity and survival by stressing host plants like beans, leading to mass die-offs even in low-density populations.^[29] Many forest insect populations exhibit cyclic fluctuations, with outbreaks recurring every 10-12 years due to interactions between prey density and predator responses. The spongy moth (Lymantria dispar) exemplifies this in eastern North American forests, where larval outbreaks defoliate oaks periodically, followed by crashes driven by delayed predator increases. These cycles align with predator-prey oscillations modeled by the Lotka-Volterra equations:

\frac{dx}{dt} = \alpha x - \beta x y, \quad \frac{dy}{dt} = \delta x y - \gamma y

where x is prey (spongy moth) density, y is predator density, \alpha and \gamma are intrinsic growth and death rates, \beta is the predation rate, and \delta is the predator conversion efficiency; the resulting neutral cycles capture the boom-bust pattern observed in spongy moth data spanning decades.^[30]^[31]

Life history strategies

Insect life history strategies encompass the evolutionary trade-offs that shape reproduction, development, and survival to optimize fitness in varying environments. These strategies balance resource allocation between growth, maintenance, and reproduction, influencing population persistence through adaptations to environmental predictability and pressures. A fundamental dichotomy in insect life histories is the contrast between r-selection and K-selection, which reflect adaptations to unstable versus stable environments, respectively. r-strategists, such as mosquitoes, exhibit high fecundity, producing thousands of offspring with minimal parental investment and short lifespans to capitalize on ephemeral resources.^[32] In contrast, K-strategists like periodical cicadas prioritize fewer offspring with higher survival probabilities, featuring extended dormancy periods—up to 17 years underground—and synchronized mass emergence to overwhelm predators.^[33] These strategies influence population dynamics by promoting rapid colonization in r-selected species and stable persistence near carrying capacity in K-selected ones.^[34] Metamorphosis types further diversify insect life histories by altering developmental vulnerability and resource use. Holometabolous insects, such as butterflies, undergo complete metamorphosis with distinct larval (feeding-focused), pupal (transformative), and adult (dispersal and reproduction) stages, allowing niche separation that reduces competition and enhances survival across life stages.^[35] Hemimetabolous insects, like grasshoppers, experience incomplete metamorphosis, with nymphs gradually resembling adults through wing pad development, resulting in overlapping habitats and higher molt-related vulnerabilities but faster progression to reproductive maturity.^[36] This developmental plasticity affects overall life history by modulating exposure to predators and environmental stressors during growth.^[35] Bet-hedging strategies, such as diapause and semelparity, enable insects to cope with temporal uncertainty. Diapause, a dormancy state triggered by seasonal cues like photoperiod, allows overwintering in various stages (e.g., eggs or larvae), with prolonged diapause in some individuals spreading emergence risk across years to hedge against unfavorable conditions; stochastic models demonstrate that mixed diapause durations (1-2 years) outperform fixed strategies in variable environments.^[37] Semelparity, exemplified by mayflies, involves a single, intense reproductive event followed by death, concentrating resources into high offspring output during brief adult phases to maximize fitness in short-lived opportunities.^[38] These approaches enhance resilience but limit flexibility compared to iteroparity. Central to these strategies are trade-offs, notably between fecundity and longevity. In aphids, iteroparous reproduction—multiple brooding cycles—allows sustained offspring production over extended adult lifespans, but resistance to parasitoids imposes costs, reducing fecundity (e.g., resistant clones produce fewer progeny) while potentially extending survival through immune investments.^[39] Semelparous species forgo longevity for peak fecundity, as seen in mayflies where adults live mere days post-emergence to allocate all energy to one reproductive burst.^[38] Such trade-offs underscore how insects evolve to balance immediate reproductive gains against long-term survival under ecological constraints.^[39]

Community ecology

Trophic roles

Insects occupy diverse trophic roles within ecosystems, functioning as primary consumers, secondary consumers, and detritivores that facilitate energy flow and nutrient cycling. These roles are defined by their feeding guilds, which determine their positions in food webs and contributions to ecosystem stability. Decomposers, herbivores, carnivores, and parasites/omnivores each influence biomass turnover and trophic dynamics in unique ways, with insects collectively processing vast amounts of organic material annually.^[19] As decomposers, insects such as dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) and termites (Isoptera) play a critical role in breaking down dead organic matter, including plant litter, wood, and animal feces, thereby recycling nutrients back into the soil for primary producers. Dung beetles burrow into manure pats, fragmenting and burying them to accelerate decomposition, which enhances soil aeration and microbial activity while reducing pathogen persistence. Termites, often in symbiosis with gut microbes, degrade cellulose-rich materials like fallen wood and leaves, contributing to litter breakdown in forests and grasslands. Soil invertebrates, including these insects, can increase litter mass loss by up to 35% compared to microbe-only decomposition across biomes, underscoring their importance in carbon and nutrient cycling. Although exact global contributions vary, arthropods like termites and beetles facilitate the processing of a substantial portion of terrestrial detritus, supporting soil fertility and plant regrowth.^[40]^[41]^[40] Herbivorous insects, or phytophages, represent a major consumer guild that directly impacts plant communities by feeding on foliage, stems, roots, and seeds, thereby regulating vegetation structure and diversity. Caterpillars (Lepidoptera larvae) are exemplary chewers that defoliate leaves, while specialized feeders like gall wasps (Cynipidae) induce plant galls for protection and nutrition, altering host physiology. Globally, insect herbivory can remove 15–30% of leaf area in favorable conditions, exerting bottom-up pressure on plant biomass and influencing succession patterns. These interactions channel energy from producers to higher trophic levels, with phytophagous insects comprising a diverse array that includes both generalists and specialists tied to single plant families.^[42]^[43]^[42] Carnivorous insects serve as predators, exerting top-down control by preying on herbivores and smaller invertebrates, which stabilizes population dynamics and prevents outbreaks. Ladybugs (Coccinellidae), such as the seven-spot ladybird, voraciously consume aphids and other soft-bodied pests, reducing herbivore densities in agricultural and natural settings. Dragonflies (Odonata) are aerial hunters that target flying insects like mosquitoes, consuming thousands per individual and regulating aquatic and terrestrial prey communities. In ecosystems, such predators can suppress pest populations by up to 73% on average, enhancing biodiversity and crop yields through cascading effects on lower trophic levels.^[44]^[45]^[46]^[44] Omnivorous and parasitic insects bridge multiple trophic levels, consuming both plant and animal matter or deriving nutrients directly from hosts, which facilitates cross-level energy transfer. Omnivores like certain ground beetles (Carabidae) feed opportunistically on prey and plant detritus, aiding in both predation and decomposition. Ectoparasites, including fleas (Siphonaptera) and lice (Phthiraptera), attach to vertebrate hosts to suck blood or feed on skin, extracting nutrients that are subsequently transferred upward when parasites are consumed by predators. Parasites overall dominate trophic interactions, comprising links in 78% of food web connections and modulating energy flow by altering host behavior and mortality. This nutrient shuttling supports ecosystem resilience by integrating disparate food chains.^[47]

Food web interactions

Insect food webs in aquatic systems often display high connectance, characterized by dense linkages among species due to the central role of basal resources like stream mayflies (Ephemeroptera), which channel energy from algae and detritus to a broad array of consumers including fish, amphibians, and predatory invertebrates. These mayflies, primarily herbivorous or detritivorous as nymphs, support nutrient flux between aquatic and terrestrial realms upon emergence, enhancing overall network integration in streams and rivers.^[48] In contrast, terrestrial insect food webs tend toward compartmentalization, with interactions partitioned by factors such as body size or habitat strata, as observed in belowground communities where microbial and detrital pathways dominate separate energy channels from predator-prey dynamics. This structure, evident in soil-based networks, promotes modular energy flow and limits propagation of disturbances across the web.^[49] Ants function as keystone species and ecosystem engineers in many insect-dominated food webs, reshaping network structure through intensive soil turnover that alters resource availability and habitat heterogeneity for other taxa. Globally, ants excavate up to 13 tons of soil per hectare per year in some ecosystems, facilitating nutrient cycling and creating microhabitats that support diverse detritivores, herbivores, and predators, thereby increasing web connectance in engineered patches.^[50] Their activities, as detailed in foundational work on ecosystem engineering, extend beyond physical modification to influence trophic interactions by promoting plant growth and invertebrate diversity within affected zones.^[51] Trophic cascades in insect food webs arise prominently from herbivore outbreaks, such as those of locusts (e.g., Schistocerca gregaria), which devastate plant cover and biomass, cascading upward to diminish resources for granivores, insectivores, and higher predators like birds and small mammals. These outbreaks, exacerbated by low plant nitrogen content from overgrazing,^[52] can reduce crops by up to 80-100% in affected areas, disrupting the basal support for multi-level consumers and altering predator-prey balances across landscapes.^[53] Such dynamics highlight how insect herbivores can drive top-down and bottom-up effects simultaneously in arid and grassland ecosystems, though examples like the Yellowstone wolf reintroduction—once cited for trophic cascades—remain debated in recent studies as of 2025.^[54] Insect food webs exhibit elevated resilience compared to some vertebrate-dominated systems, attributable to high functional redundancy among taxa, particularly generalist predators that employ complementary prey selection to maintain stability amid fluctuations. Molecular analyses of agroecosystem webs reveal that predator communities sustain pest control through overlapping diets, buffering species loss and enhancing persistence against environmental stressors.^[55] Nonetheless, vulnerability persists to shifts by generalist predators, which can intensify pressure on rare or specialist herbivores during resource scarcity, potentially destabilizing compartments.

Interspecific relationships

Positive interactions

Positive interactions in insect ecology encompass interspecific relationships where at least one species benefits without harming the other, including mutualism, commensalism, and neutralism. These interactions contribute to ecosystem stability by enhancing resource availability, protection, and nutrient cycling. Symbiotic associations, in particular, often involve close physical or physiological ties that have evolved to support insect survival in nutrient-poor or hazardous environments.^[56] Mutualism represents a key form of positive interaction, where both species derive benefits. A prominent example is the pollination mutualism between bees and flowering plants, which has coevolved over millions of years to ensure reproductive success for both. Bees collect nectar and pollen for food, inadvertently transferring pollen between flowers, which enables plant fertilization and seed production. This relationship exemplifies diffuse coevolution, where multiple bee species interact with diverse plants, driving adaptations like floral scents and colors that attract pollinators.^[57]^[58] Another classic mutualism occurs between ants and certain plants, such as acacia trees, where ants provide defense against herbivores in exchange for food and shelter. In Mesoamerican ecosystems, species like Pseudomyrmex ferrugineus inhabit swollen thorns of Acacia species, aggressively patrolling and removing browsers, which significantly reduces leaf damage and enhances plant growth. This protection is crucial in herbivore-rich environments, with ants responding to threats via chemical signals and vibrations, illustrating the dynamic nature of these partnerships.^[59] Commensalism involves one species benefiting while the other remains unaffected. In some cases, birds utilize insects or their structures without imposing costs, such as certain birds incorporating insect silk or abandoned nests into their own constructions for added stability. For instance, some avian species line nests with spider silk from insects, gaining durable, elastic material that helps secure the structure against wind and predators, while the silk-producing insects experience no detriment.^[60] Symbiosis, a subset of positive interactions, includes intimate associations like endosymbiosis, where microbes reside within insect hosts to provide essential nutrients. In aphids, the bacterium Buchnera aphidicola lives intracellularly in specialized cells called bacteriocytes, synthesizing essential amino acids absent from the phloem sap diet of these insects. This provisioning allows aphids to thrive on imbalanced plant diets, with genomic studies revealing coordinated gene expression between host and symbiont for amino acid transport and metabolism. Facilitation, another symbiotic dynamic, occurs when insects modify habitats to benefit others; for example, ground-nesting bees aerate soil and promote floral diversity through pollination, indirectly creating richer nectar and pollen resources for co-occurring pollinators in fragmented landscapes.^[61]^[62]^[63] Neutralism, where species coexist without influencing each other, is less common but evident in complex communities like soil microbiomes. In soil ecosystems, many insect larvae and microbial taxa, such as certain collembolans and non-interacting bacteria, share microhabitats without competition or facilitation, following neutral ecological processes that explain community assembly patterns. These rare interactions highlight the baseline coexistence in diverse subterranean environments, where neutrality allows stable diversity without direct benefits or costs.^[64]^[65]

Negative interactions

Negative interactions among insects encompass a range of harmful interspecific relationships, primarily involving exploitation, predation, and resource conflicts that reduce fitness for at least one participant. These interactions often arise in shared habitats where resources like food, space, or hosts are limited, leading to direct or indirect antagonism. Unlike positive interactions that confer mutual benefits, negative ones impose costs such as mortality, reduced reproduction, or growth inhibition, shaping community structure and population dynamics. Competition represents a key negative interaction, where co-occurring insect species contest limited resources, potentially leading to exclusion or reduced abundance of one or both. Exploitative competition occurs when one species depletes shared resources, depriving others, as seen in bark beetles where aggressive colonization of trees by species like the Douglas-fir beetle (Dendroctonus pseudotsugae) limits access for competing woodboring beetles such as cerambycids, suppressing outbreaks in fire-damaged forests.^[66] Interference competition, by contrast, involves direct behavioral antagonism, such as territorial aggression or chemical interference, which can prevent resource access; for instance, phytophagous insects like aphids may physically displace rivals through combing behaviors or secretion of alarm pheromones that deter competitors.^[67] Predation and parasitoidism exemplify exploitative negative interactions where one insect consumes or ultimately kills another for sustenance or reproduction. Predatory insects, such as lady beetles (Coccinellidae) preying on aphids, directly reduce host populations by consuming multiple individuals over their lifetime. Parasitoidism is particularly lethal, with wasps in the family Ichneumonidae laying eggs inside or on host larvae like caterpillars, where emerging larvae feed on the host's tissues, leading to its death; this process can alter host odor profiles, further aiding predator avoidance by the parasitoid offspring.^[68] Amensalism, a one-sided negative effect, occurs when one species harms another without deriving benefit, as in burying beetles (Nicrophorus spp.) that secrete antimicrobial compounds onto carrion to suppress competing microbes, inhibiting bacterial growth and preserving the resource for beetle larvae.^[69] Mimicry serves as a strategy for defense evasion in negative interactions with predators, allowing some insects to exploit the learned avoidance behaviors of predators toward defended models. In Batesian mimicry, palatable species resemble toxic or unpalatable models to gain protection; for example, hoverflies (Syrphidae) mimic the coloration and patterns of stinging wasps (Vespidae), deceiving bird predators and reducing attack rates on the mimics.^[70] Müllerian mimicry involves multiple defended species converging on similar warning signals, reinforcing predator aversion through shared experiences, as in Heliconius butterflies where co-mimics display congruent aposematic patterns to enhance mutual protection against predators, though this imposes costs on naive predators via reinforced toxicity learning.^[71] Plants impose negative interactions on insect herbivores through allelopathy-like chemical defenses, producing secondary metabolites that deter feeding or cause toxicity. For instance, glucosinolates in Brassicaceae plants are hydrolyzed into isothiocyanates that repel or intoxicate generalist herbivores like flea beetles (Phyllotreta spp.), reducing herbivory damage and limiting insect population growth on host plants.^[72] Cannibalism, while typically intraspecific, emerges as a density-dependent negative interaction in crowded populations, where individuals consume conspecifics to alleviate resource scarcity. In flour beetles (Tribolium confusum), high densities trigger larval and adult cannibalism of eggs and pupae, regulating population size and preventing overexploitation of flour resources, with genetic variation influencing cannibalistic rates and overall fitness.^[73]

Coevolution and adaptations

Coevolutionary processes

Coevolutionary processes in insect ecology involve reciprocal evolutionary changes between insects and other organisms, such as plants, parasites, or mutualists, driven by natural selection and leading to specialized interactions. These dynamics often manifest as escalating adaptations where one species' traits exert selective pressure on another, resulting in ongoing evolutionary "arms races." In insects, short generation times—typically ranging from weeks to months—facilitate rapid coevolution compared to longer-lived taxa, allowing genetic changes to accumulate quickly across populations. Fossil evidence indicates that such plant-insect interactions date back at least 100 million years, coinciding with the major radiation of angiosperms around 140-100 million years ago and the diversification of Lepidoptera.^[74] A prominent example of coevolutionary arms races occurs between herbivorous insects and their host plants, where plants evolve chemical defenses and insects counter with detoxification mechanisms. For instance, many plants produce cyanogenic glucosides that release hydrogen cyanide (HCN) upon tissue damage to deter herbivores, a defense that has evolved independently across numerous lineages. In response, aphids such as the bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi) have developed enzymatic pathways, including rhodanese and β-cyanoalanine synthase, to detoxify HCN by converting it into less toxic compounds like thiocyanate or alanine, enabling them to feed on cyanogenic hosts without lethal effects.^[75] This reciprocal escalation exemplifies the escape-and-radiate model proposed by Ehrlich and Raven, where plant defenses drive insect specialization on novel hosts, promoting biodiversity in both groups.^[76]^[77]^[78] Host-parasite dynamics further illustrate coevolution through the Red Queen hypothesis, which posits that species must continuously evolve to maintain fitness against rapidly adapting antagonists. In butterflies, such as species in the family Pieridae, interactions with parasitoid wasps (e.g., Cotesia spp.) drive genetic resistance in host larvae, while parasitoids evolve enhanced virulence factors like polydnaviruses to suppress host immunity. Experimental evolution studies show that these interactions lead to fluctuating selection, with rare host genotypes gaining advantage as parasites adapt to common variants, resulting in cycles of resistance and counter-resistance over just a few generations. This rapid turnover underscores how insect short generation times amplify Red Queen dynamics, contrasting with slower coevolution in vertebrate systems.^[79]^[80] Pollinator-flower specificity represents another key coevolutionary arena, where insects and plants co-adapt for efficient mutualistic interactions, often resulting in high trait matching. Orchids in the genus Ophrys exemplify sexual deception, evolving floral structures and scents that mimic female bee pheromones and morphology to lure male pollinators into pseudocopulation, ensuring pollen transfer without rewards. These specialized traits vary geographically, forming a "geographic mosaic" where local selection pressures—such as pollinator availability or predation—drive divergent coevolution across landscapes, as described in Thompson's framework. For example, in European Ophrys populations, floral volatiles align closely with regional bee cuticular hydrocarbons, promoting pollinator fidelity and reproductive isolation. Such mosaics highlight how spatial heterogeneity shapes coevolutionary outcomes in insect-pollinator systems.^[81]^[82]^[58]

Defensive adaptations

Insects have evolved a diverse array of defensive adaptations to counter biotic threats such as predators and parasites, primarily through chemical, morphological, behavioral, and cryptic mechanisms that enhance survival rates. These adaptations often function in concert, allowing insects to deter attacks, evade detection, or retaliate effectively. For instance, chemical defenses involve the production and deployment of toxic or repellent substances, while morphological traits alter physical appearance to signal unpalatability or blend into surroundings. Behavioral strategies leverage social or migratory actions to reduce vulnerability, and cryptic adaptations rely on concealment to avoid encounters altogether. These traits are particularly pronounced in insects facing high predation pressure, such as those in open habitats or with conspicuous life stages.^[83] Chemical defenses form a cornerstone of insect protection, often involving potent toxins synthesized endogenously or sequestered from food sources. Wasps, for example, utilize venom composed of enzymes, peptides, and bioactive compounds like phospholipase A2 to immobilize prey and deter colony invaders, with the venom's complexity enabling rapid paralysis and inflammation in predators.^[84] Similarly, ladybugs (Coccinellidae) produce alkaloids such as coccinelline in their hemolymph, which they reflexively release as sticky droplets from leg joints during predation attempts; these alkaloids taste bitter and induce vomiting in vertebrates, providing a reliable deterrent.^[85] Aggregation and alarm pheromones also play a defensive role, as seen in social insects like aphids and bees, where volatile compounds signal nearby threats, prompting group dispersal or coordinated attacks to overwhelm predators and minimize individual risk.^[86] Morphological adaptations emphasize structural modifications that either conceal or advertise defenses. Camouflage in stick insects (Phasmatodea) exemplifies crypsis, with elongated bodies, twig-like textures, and mottled brown or green coloration mimicking plant stems to evade visual predators such as birds and lizards.^[87] In contrast, aposematism employs bold warning coloration, as in monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus), whose orange-and-black wings signal the presence of cardenolide toxins sequestered from milkweed hosts, educating predators like birds to avoid them after a single unpleasant encounter.^[88] Behavioral defenses involve dynamic responses that exploit mobility or sociality for protection. Bees exhibit group mobbing, where workers collectively harass intruders—such as hornets—through stinging, biting, and enveloping them in a vibrating heat ball that raises temperatures to lethal levels, effectively neutralizing the threat without excessive individual sacrifice.^[89] Long-distance migration serves as an escape strategy in species like monarch butterflies, which undertake annual journeys of up to 3,000 miles from North America to Mexican overwintering sites, evading seasonal predators and harsh conditions while conserving energy through clustered roosting.^[90] Cryptic adaptations further enhance concealment by integrating insects into their microhabitats. Burrowing behaviors in soil-dwelling insects, such as certain beetle larvae (e.g., wireworms), create hidden refuges that shield them from surface predators, with compact body shapes and hardened exoskeletons facilitating rapid submersion during threats.^[91] Leaf mimicry in katydids (Tettigoniidae) provides another layer of crypsis, where flattened wings and veined, irregularly shaped bodies imitate damaged foliage, rendering them nearly indistinguishable from background vegetation and reducing detection by visually hunting predators.^[92]

Environmental influences

Habitat and distribution

Insects occupy a vast array of habitats worldwide, spanning terrestrial and aquatic environments. Terrestrial habitats include diverse ecosystems such as forests, where insects thrive in the understory and canopy layers, and deserts, where species like darkling beetles (Tenebrionidae) have evolved physiological adaptations to extreme aridity and temperature fluctuations. Aquatic habitats encompass freshwater systems like streams, ponds, and lakes, supporting orders such as Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Odonata (dragonflies), and Trichoptera (caddisflies), which utilize submerged vegetation, sediments, and rocky substrates as primary sites for larval development. Microhabitats, including leaf litter in forest floors and soil layers, provide critical refugia and resources for a substantial portion of insect diversity by offering moisture, food, and protection from predators.^[1]^[93]^[94]^[95] Insect distribution patterns exhibit strong latitudinal gradients, with species richness peaking in tropical regions near the equator and declining toward the poles, a phenomenon attributed to higher energy availability, stable climates, and historical evolutionary time in the tropics. For instance, the majority of estimated insect species occur in tropical latitudes, contrasting with lower diversity in temperate and polar zones. Island biogeography theory, formalized by MacArthur and Wilson, has been effectively applied to insect assemblages, predicting species richness (S) as a function of island area (A) and isolation via the equation S = cA^z, where c is a constant and z is the scaling exponent (typically 0.2-0.3 for insects); empirical studies on archipelagoes like the Hawaiian Islands confirm that larger, less isolated landmasses support more insect species due to enhanced colonization and reduced extinction rates.^[96]^[97]^[98]^[99] Dispersal mechanisms play a pivotal role in shaping insect distributions, enabling colonization of new habitats while being constrained by geographic barriers. Active dispersal via flight allows winged adults, such as butterflies and bees, to traverse landscapes over distances of several kilometers, while passive methods include wind transport of lightweight eggs or small insects like aphids, and phoresy, where mites or pseudoscorpions hitch rides on birds or larger insects to bypass unsuitable terrain. Natural barriers, including mountain ranges like the Andes or Himalayas, fragment distributions by limiting flight paths and creating isolated populations, as evidenced by distinct insect faunas on either side of such topographies.^[100]^[101]^[102] Endemism is particularly pronounced in biodiversity hotspots, where geographic isolation fosters unique evolutionary radiations. Madagascar is estimated to host over 100,000 endemic insect species—representing more than 90% of its arthropod fauna—due to its long history of separation from other landmasses, which has allowed for specialized adaptations in isolation.^[103] Such high endemism underscores the vulnerability of these populations to habitat loss, emphasizing the importance of protected areas in maintaining global insect diversity.

Climate and abiotic factors

Insects, being ectothermic organisms, rely on external environmental temperatures to regulate their body temperature, necessitating behavioral adaptations such as basking to achieve optimal conditions for physiological processes like flight and reproduction. For instance, butterflies frequently engage in basking by spreading their wings to absorb solar radiation, thereby elevating thoracic temperature to the 30–40°C range required for sustained flight, particularly in cooler mornings or shaded habitats.^[104]^[105] Critical thermal limits, defined by the critical thermal maximum (CTmax) and minimum (CTmin), exhibit substantial interspecific variation; tropical butterflies, for example, display CTmax values ranging from 47.1°C in Riodinidae to 51.3°C in Hesperiidae, with smaller, darker-winged species generally tolerating higher extremes due to enhanced heat dissipation or absorption strategies.^[106] This variation influences species distributions and vulnerability to temperature fluctuations, as species with narrower tolerance ranges, such as those in stable tropical environments, show limited plasticity in response to acute thermal stress.^[107] Rising temperatures associated with climate change have induced significant phenological shifts in insect populations, particularly earlier emergence and reproduction in spring-active species, disrupting life cycle timing. Meta-analyses indicate advances averaging 1–2 days per decade for many temperate insects, though rates vary; for example, spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) larval and adult emergence has shifted earlier by 1.1–1.4 days per decade across its North American range, driven by warmer spring conditions accelerating development.^[108] These shifts can extend active seasons for multivoltine species but risk phenological mismatches with food resources or predators, with stronger responses in species sensitive to cumulative degree-days.^[109] As of 2025, recent studies report accelerated poleward range shifts in various insect taxa in response to ongoing warming.^[110] Precipitation patterns, another key abiotic factor, profoundly affect insect survival, development, and distribution by altering humidity, flooding risks, and resource availability. Intense rain events can dislodge herbivorous larvae from host plants, reducing survival rates by up to 50% in exposed species like pierid butterflies, while prolonged droughts limit oviposition sites and increase desiccation stress in arid-adapted insects.^[111] Additional stressors include ultraviolet (UV) radiation, which induces DNA damage and oxidative stress in aquatic insect larvae, lowering survival in shallow-water species like mayflies; elevated salinity in coastal habitats compromises thermal tolerance in brackish-water invertebrates, including chironomid midges, by narrowing the viable temperature window; and reduced dissolved oxygen levels in warming waters exacerbate hypoxia in aquatic larvae, constraining metabolic rates and thermal limits to below 30°C in sensitive taxa like stoneflies.^[112]^[113]^[114] Recent studies from the 2020s highlight shifts toward increased nocturnal activity as a behavioral response to daytime heat stress under warming climates, with global meta-analyses revealing insect abundance 31.4% higher at night than during the day across diverse taxa and habitats. This pattern, particularly pronounced in warmer regions (e.g., up to 242% higher in riverine systems), aligns with thermal performance theory, where avoiding peak diurnal temperatures preserves energy and reduces desiccation risk, though ongoing climate change may compress viable nocturnal windows in tropical areas.^[115]

Human impacts and conservation

Insect declines and threats

In recent decades, insect populations worldwide have experienced substantial declines, with a meta-analysis of 166 long-term surveys indicating an average decline of 9% per decade (approximately 30% over four decades) in terrestrial insect abundance as of 2020.^[116] Similarly, a 2019 review estimated that insect biomass is declining at an average rate of 2.5% per year globally, based on three long-term monitoring datasets.^[117] In Germany, a prominent case study documented a 76% drop in flying insect biomass across 63 nature reserves from 1989 to 2016, highlighting the severity in protected areas.^[118] These trends contribute to broader biodiversity loss, with over 40% of insect species showing population declines and approximately one-third threatened with extinction according to a 2019 global assessment.^[117] More recent studies as of 2025 indicate continued declines, including a 60% drop in UK flying insects over 20 years and a 72% reduction in abundance in minimally disturbed ecosystems.^[119]^[120] Habitat loss and fragmentation, primarily driven by urbanization and agricultural expansion, represent the most significant threat to insect populations. Urban development has fragmented natural habitats extensively, isolating insect communities and reducing connectivity, which exacerbates local extinctions.^[121] For instance, conversion of forests and grasslands to urban or intensive agricultural land has degraded breeding and foraging sites for countless species. Pesticides, particularly neonicotinoids, further compound these pressures by causing sublethal effects on non-target insects, including pollinators; field studies have shown reductions in bee colony reproduction and foraging success by up to 30% in exposed areas.^[122] Invasive species also pose a major risk, outcompeting native insects for resources and altering ecosystem dynamics, as seen with introduced ants displacing endemic pollinators in various regions.^[123] Climate change synergizes with these anthropogenic threats, intensifying insect declines through altered environmental conditions. Rising temperatures have led to phenological mismatches, where insect emergence no longer aligns with plant flowering or prey availability, disrupting food webs and reducing reproductive success—for example, in butterfly-plant interactions. This warming effect is particularly acute in combination with habitat loss, amplifying vulnerability in already stressed populations. Monitoring these declines remains challenging due to significant gaps in data collection, especially in the tropics, which harbor approximately 80% of global insect diversity yet suffer from under-sampling compared to temperate regions. Sparse surveillance in biodiverse hotspots limits accurate assessment of the full extent of threats and hinders targeted interventions.

Conservation and management

Conservation efforts for insects emphasize the establishment and expansion of protected areas to safeguard critical habitats. Reserves and national parks preserve diverse ecosystems that support insect populations, particularly specialist species reliant on specific microhabitats such as old-growth forests or wetlands.^[124] The global 30x30 initiative, adopted under the Convention on Biological Diversity, targets the conservation of at least 30% of terrestrial and marine areas by 2030 to halt biodiversity loss, including for insects whose habitats often overlap with broader ecosystem protections.^[125] To enhance connectivity, ecological corridors—such as hedgerows, riparian buffers, and roadside verges—facilitate insect dispersal, gene flow, and adaptation to climate change, reducing fragmentation effects in agricultural landscapes.^[124] Rewilding initiatives, involving the reintroduction of native herbivores like large mammals in grasslands, promote habitat heterogeneity by altering vegetation structure, thereby boosting insect diversity and restoring food web dynamics.^[124] Integrated pest management (IPM) represents a cornerstone strategy for balancing agricultural productivity with insect conservation by prioritizing non-chemical controls. In the European Union, IPM is mandatory for professional users under the Sustainable Use of Pesticides Directive, emphasizing biological agents such as parasitoids and predators to suppress pests while minimizing harm to beneficial insects.^[126] For instance, releasing parasitoid wasps like Trichogramma species targets lepidopteran pests in crops without broad-spectrum insecticides, preserving natural enemy populations.^[126] The EU's Farm to Fork Strategy sets binding targets to reduce chemical pesticide use and risk by 50% by 2030, fostering agroecosystems that support higher insect diversity through reduced toxicity and enhanced ecological infrastructure like flower strips.^[127] These measures have demonstrated success in lowering non-target impacts.^[128] Effective monitoring and policy frameworks are vital for tracking insect populations and informing conservation actions. Citizen science platforms, such as iNaturalist, enable widespread data collection through user-submitted observations and image identifications, generating millions of records that reveal distribution patterns and phenological shifts for thousands of insect species.^[129] These datasets support real-time monitoring and contribute to global assessments, aiding in the detection of declines and the evaluation of interventions.^[129] International policies, including the Convention on Biological Diversity's post-2020 framework, integrate insect-specific targets within broader goals, such as enhancing genetic diversity and restoring ecosystems to benefit pollinators and other functional groups.^[130] Collaborative efforts, like those under the CBD, promote inclusive monitoring protocols that align with Sustainable Development Goals, ensuring insects are explicitly considered in national biodiversity strategies.^[129] Habitat restoration through pollinator gardens and agroecological practices further bolsters insect diversity by recreating essential resources. Pollinator gardens, planted with native wildflowers like Monarda fistulosa and Helianthus species, provide year-round nectar and pollen, increasing visitation by bees and butterflies while stabilizing plant-pollinator networks in urban and rural settings.^[131] Agroecology enhances on-farm biodiversity by diversifying crops, reducing tillage, and incorporating cover crops, which can elevate insect species richness by up to 30% compared to conventional monocultures.^[124] These approaches foster resilient ecosystems capable of withstanding disturbances, as diverse habitats buffer against pollinator losses observed in intensified agriculture.^[132] Emerging genetic interventions, such as selective breeding for climate-resilient strains in managed pollinators like bumblebees, aim to improve adaptability to environmental stressors, though their application remains limited to research contexts to avoid ecological risks.^[133]

References

[1]
Insect Biology : A Primer
This primer covers insect anatomy, reproduction, growth, classification, and ecology. Insects are dominant, adaptable, and have a protective exoskeleton.
[2]
Numbers of Insects (Species and Individuals) | Smithsonian Institution
There are about 900,000 known insect species, with estimates of 2-30 million total, and 10 quintillion individual insects alive. In the US, there are about 91, ...
[3]
Why We Need Insects - The Huck Institutes (en-US)
Insects are keystone species that provide invaluable ecosystem services that extend beyond pollination, by providing biological control of pests.
[4]
Economic Value of Ecological Services Provided by Insects
Pollination, especially crop pollination, is perhaps the best-known ecosystem service performed by insects. McGregor (1976) estimates that 15% to 30% of the US ...Dung Burial · Pollination By Native... · Pest Control
[5]
Insect Ecology - ScienceDirect.com
This revised and expanded text looks at how insects adapt to environmental conditions while maintaining the ability to substantially alter their environment.
[6]
ESA Position Statement on Insects and Biodiversity
Ecological services that ensure clean air, clean water, nutrient cycling, pollination of crops and native plants, natural pest management, and robust food webs ...Summary · 'the Little Things That Run... · A Brief Overview Of Insect...
[7]
Insect Ecology - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Insect ecology is the study of interactions between insects and their environment, including other species and abiotic conditions.
[8]
(PDF) Insect Ecology - ResearchGate
Insect ecology is the study of how insects interact with the environment. The environment consists of both physical characteristics (abiotic) and other ...
[9]
[PDF] 1 Overview - Elsevier
Mar 17, 2011 · SCOPE OF INSECT ECOLOGY. Insect ecology is the study of interactions between insects and their environment. Ecology is necessarily a ...
[10]
Estimating Global Biodiversity: The Role of Cryptic Insect Species
Jun 16, 2023 · Insects make up roughly half of currently described extant species (across all groups), with ~1 million described species. Insect diversity is ...
[11]
Reasons for Success - ENT 425 - NC State University
In brief, these attributes include an exoskeleton, small body size, the ability to fly, a high reproductive potential, complete metamorphosis, and adaptability ...
[12]
Insect | Definition, Characteristics, Types, Beneficial, Pest ...
Oct 16, 2025 · Insects have segmented bodies, jointed legs, and external skeletons (exoskeletons). Insects are distinguished from other arthropods by their ...Metamorphosis · Distribution and abundance · Damage to growing crops · Thorax
[13]
History of Ecological Sciences, Part 40: Darwin's Evolutionary Ecology
Oct 1, 2011 · Darwin explained the interrelationships of red clover, humble bees, mice, and cats: only humble bees pollinate red clover, but field mice eat humble bees, and ...
[14]
The genomic history and global migration of a windborne pest
Apr 24, 2024 · Many insect pests, including the brown planthopper (BPH), undergo windborne migration that is challenging to observe and track.<|control11|><|separator|>
[15]
The biomass distribution on Earth - PNAS
May 23, 2018 · We assemble a census of the biomass of all kingdoms of life. This analysis provides a holistic view of the composition of the biosphere.Results · Materials And Methods · Uncertainty Estimation And...
[16]
[PDF] assessment on pollinators, pollination and food production - IPBES
The assessment concludes that 75% of our food crops and nearly 90% of wild flowering plants depend at least to some extent on animal pollination and that a high ...
[17]
The future of tropical insect diversity: strategies to fill data and ...
The estimates suggest that they make up around 80% of animals, and around half of all living species [1]. As such, insects are vital to the functioning of ...
[18]
Honey Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report, 2030
The global honey market size was valued at USD 9.01 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 13.57 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 5.3% from 2023 ...
[19]
Massive yet grossly underestimated global costs of invasive insects
Oct 4, 2016 · Taking all reported goods and service estimates, invasive insects cost a minimum of US$70.0 billion per year globally, while associated health ...
[20]
Population Growth - Biology 301
The model of exponential growth in discrete time follows from the assumption that each individual will have the same number of offspring on average (R), ...
[21]
Discrete-time analogs of the exponential and logistic models
For example, in monovoltine insects with a 1:1 sex ratio, R = Fecundity/2. The dynamics of this model is similar to the continuous-time exponential model.
[22]
Example 1 (Logistic Growth model) - Joseph M. Mahaffy
Apr 3, 2001 · Hassell modified this growth model (especially for insect populations) to use a rational function response (a rational updating function).
[23]
Bottom-up and top-down forces regulate spruce budworm ...
Although no significant difference in predator density was observed between habitats, both predation and parasitism rates were slightly higher in the forest.
[24]
Do natural enemies explain fluctuations in low‐density spruce ...
Jun 12, 2018 · We examined if parasitism and predation were likely to explain fluctuations in low-density spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana; SBW) populations.Missing: regulation | Show results with:regulation
[25]
Drought has negative consequences on aphid fitness and plant ...
Jul 28, 2021 · Plant physiological responses to drought can directly influence the population dynamics, fitness, phenology, and biology of herbivorous insects ...
[26]
[PDF] Long-term shifts in the cyclicity of outbreaks of a forest-defoliating ...
Oct 17, 2012 · Here, high predation rates could cause a strong Allee effect, further reducing gypsy moth population density. If predator density was generally ...Missing: Lotka- Volterra
[27]
[PDF] gypsy moth populations - USDA Forest Service
predator-prey interactions (Rosenzweig & MacArthur. 1963) can cause periodic cycles ... (1998) Forest type affects predation on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: ...Missing: Lotka- Volterra
[28]
r-selected and K-selected population growth strategies (video)
May 4, 2021 · r and K are two extremes for a range of population growth strategies. K-selected species, like elephants, are typically larger, live longer, and produce fewer ...Missing: review | Show results with:review
[29]
Bugs That Count | American Scientist
Of 1,500 cicada species worldwide, only a handful in the genus Magicicada are known to be periodical; all of them live in North America east of the Great Plains ...A Clockwork Insect · Missing A Beat · No Thank You, Not Another...Missing: K- | Show results with:K-
[30]
Life‐cycle control of 13‐ and 17‐year periodical cicadas
Aug 18, 2022 · Their semelparous life cycle with long periodicity is regarded as an adaptive strategy to secure reproduction by reducing predation risk (Lloyd ...
[31]
The Evolution of Insect Metamorphosis - ScienceDirect
Dec 2, 2019 · Metamorphosis in insects, though, seems more mysterious as their external exoskeleton hides the gradual changes occurring inside, and one only ...
[32]
The evolution of insect metamorphosis: a developmental and ... - PMC
Aug 26, 2019 · Our view of the evolution of the holometabolous life history from an unknown hemimetabolous ancestor is summarized in figure 6 (see also [4,13]) ...1. Introduction · (a). Developmental... · 5. Genetic Circuits...
[33]
Bet‐Hedging Diapause Strategies in Stochastic Environments
From stochastic models, we show that diversified bet‐hedging strategies (mixed strategies with emergence after 1 or 2 yr) are more fit than simple diapause ...
[34]
8.2: Semelparity versus Iteroparity - Biology LibreTexts
Apr 4, 2025 · A species is considered semelparous if it is characterized by a single reproductive episode before death, and iteroparous if it is characterized by multiple ...
[35]
trade-offs between immunity, fecundity and survival in the pea aphid
We provide evidence for a trade-off between the ability to resist parasitoid attack and fecundity in the pea aphid.
[36]
The global biomass and number of terrestrial arthropods - Science
Feb 3, 2023 · The global total annual arthropod prey is estimated at ≈500 Mt of dry biomass (see Supplementary Materials), including herbivorous arthropods as ...
[37]
The impact of invertebrate decomposers on plants and soil - Griffiths
Jun 15, 2021 · We explore the role of invertebrates as not simply facilitators of microbial decomposition, but as true decomposers, able to break down dead organic matter ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[38]
[PDF] DECOMPOSER INSECTS
Another potential benefit of dung beetle activity is the increase in pasture by the incorporation of organic matter into the soil and increases in soil ...
[39]
Global insect herbivory and its response to climate change
Jun 17, 2024 · When biotic and abiotic conditions allow, some insect herbivores can achieve high densities and remove more than 15%–30% of the ...
[40]
The global distribution of diet breadth in insect herbivores - PNAS
Dec 29, 2014 · Here, we use a global dataset to investigate host range for over 7,500 insect herbivore species covering a wide taxonomic breadth and ...
[41]
Predators control pests and increase yield across crop types ... - NIH
Mar 6, 2024 · Predators reduced pest populations by 73% on average, and increased crop yield by 25% on average. Surprisingly, the impact of predators did not ...
[42]
Predators | University of Maryland Extension
Mar 1, 2023 · The most common insect predators are in the beetle, true bug, lacewing, wasp, and dragonfly families, as well as some flies such as flower fly ...
[43]
Dragonflies are efficient predators that consume hundreds of ...
Mar 3, 2020 · Dragonflies are among the apex predators of the insect world and are considered to be responsible for regulating the numbers of many other ...Missing: top- control examples ladybugs
[44]
Parasites in food webs: the ultimate missing links - PMC
Parasites can be 15N-enriched (the parasite is at a higher trophic level than its host), similar in trophic level or 15N-depleted (the parasite is at a lower ...Missing: lice | Show results with:lice
[45]
Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) and Their Contributions to Ecosystem ...
Jun 14, 2019 · Mayflies not only move nutrients within aquatic ecosystems, but they also move nutrients between them. This may be important for maintaining a ...
[46]
Size compartmentalization of energy channeling in terrestrial ...
Jun 4, 2021 · The dominance of primary consumers over predators across the size spectrum implies compartmentalization of terrestrial food webs into size- ...
[47]
The abundance, biomass, and distribution of ants on Earth - PMC
Sep 19, 2022 · The effects of ants on nutrient decomposition, soil turnover, and perturbation can be enormous: they are estimated to excavate up to 13 tons of ...
[48]
[PDF] Organisms as ecosystem engineers
The purposes of this article are fourfold: (i) to define and to give examples of ecosystem engineering by orga- nisms; (ii) to develop a conceptual framework ...<|separator|>
[49]
High Redundancy as well as Complementary Prey Choice ... - Nature
May 23, 2018 · Our results show a high time-specific functional redundancy of the predator community, but also suggest temporally complementary prey choice.
[50]
Yellowstone Wolves and the Forces That Structure Natural Systems
Dec 23, 2014 · The reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone has provided fascinating insights into the ways species interactions within food webs structure ecosystems.
[51]
The evolution of plant–insect mutualisms - 2006 - Wiley Online Library
Sep 5, 2006 · Here we review evolutionary features of three prominent insect–plant mutualisms: pollination, protection and seed dispersal.Iii. Insect Pollination · Iv. Protection Of Plants By... · Vi. Discussion
[52]
Mighty Mutualisms: The Nature of Plant-pollinator Interactions
The majority of animal pollinators are insects; bees, butterflies, moths ... Yuccas, yucca moths, and coevolution: a review. Annals of the Missouri ...
[53]
Coevolution Between Food-Rewarding Flowers and Their Pollinators
Jan 13, 2010 · It is widely accepted that angiosperm flowers and their insect pollinators have influenced each other's evolution, but there is still ...Coevolution Between... · Darwin's Mechanistic Model · Geographical Patterns Of...
[54]
Disruption of an ant-plant mutualism shapes interactions ... - Science
Jan 25, 2024 · Protection by acacia ants is particularly effective at deterring lethal herbivory by elephants (Loxodonta africana), thereby stabilizing savanna ...
[55]
The acacia ants revisited: convergent evolution and biogeographic ...
Mar 15, 2017 · We investigate the evolutionary history behind the iconic ant/plant mutualism involving the P. ferrugineus group and swollen-thorn acacias in ...
[56]
The non-pollinating fig wasps associated with Ficus guianensis
Beyond pollinators, most of the 750 recognized Ficus species host a community of non-pollinating fig wasps (NPFW) ranging from 1 to 36 species that deposit ...Missing: commensalism | Show results with:commensalism
[57]
Chemical mediation and niche partitioning in non‐pollinating fig ...
Jan 30, 2007 · & Rasplus, J.Y. (1996) Non-pollinating Afrotropical fig wasps affect the fig–pollinator mutualism in Ficus within the subgenus Sycomorus.<|separator|>
[58]
Trading amino acids at the aphid–Buchnera symbiotic interface
Jul 23, 2019 · A transporter capable of transporting nonessential amino acids across the symbiosomal membrane of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum.
[59]
Aphid genome expression reveals host–symbiont cooperation in the ...
In aphids, the 10 essential amino acids are scarce in the phloem sap diet and are supplied by the obligate bacterial endosymbiont (Buchnera), which lives inside ...
[60]
The role of functional diversity and facilitation in small‐scale ...
Apr 18, 2021 · Our results showed that in small-scale habitat, plant diversity and resource availability significantly affected the abundance and diversity of pollinating ...
[61]
Bridging Ecology and Microbiomes: Applying Ecological Theories in ...
Apr 15, 2025 · For example, studies on Helicoverpa armigera caterpillars revealed that neutral theory explained most bacterial taxa distribution patterns, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[62]
Drosophila melanogaster microbiome is shaped by strict filtering ...
Neutrality in environmentally acquired microbiomes. The fly microbiome was surprisingly well predicted by neutral ecological dynamics (r2 = 0.96, Fig. 4) ...Missing: neutralism | Show results with:neutralism
[63]
Subcortical competitors may constrain bark beetle outbreaks ...
May 8, 2025 · These findings suggest that competition by woodboring beetles may suppress irruptions of Douglas‐fir beetle in fire‐injured forests.
[64]
INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTIONS IN PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECTS
Exploitative competition occurs when individuals, by using resources, deprive others of the benefits to be gained from those resources (153, 154). Interference ...
[65]
Parasitism causes changes in caterpillar odours and associated ...
Parasitism causes changes in caterpillar odours and bacterial communities, including the production of new volatile products and the presence of Wolbachia sp. ...
[66]
Antimicrobial strategies in burying beetles breeding on carrion - PNAS
Nov 18, 2008 · We found evidence for a strong detrimental effect of microbial competition on beetle reproductive success and larval growth.
[67]
Signals, cues and the nature of mimicry - PMC - NIH
In Müllerian mimicry, the mimic signals a fitness cost to the receiver, and the mimic's signal is non-deceptive. An example of Müllerian signal mimicry comes ...
[68]
The evolution of Müllerian mimicry - PMC - PubMed Central
It is now 130 years since Fritz Müller proposed an evolutionary explanation for the close similarity of co-existing unpalatable prey species.
[69]
Plant Allelochemicals as Sources of Insecticides - PMC - NIH
Glucosinolates are sulfur-containing compounds that serve as repellents for various insect pests. Glucosinolates are converted into isothiocyanates during ...
[70]
THE GENETICS AND EVOLUTION OF CANNIBALISM IN FLOUR ...
Cannibalism plays a major role in population regulation in Tribolium confusum, accounting for up to tenfold differences in population size between different ...
[71]
The genetic basis of a plant–insect coevolutionary key innovation
However, many biologists currently envision butterflies evolving 50 to 30 million years (Myr) after the major angiosperm radiation and thus reject ...
[72]
BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION - 1964
BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION ... This work has been supported in part by National Science Foundation Grants GB-123 (Ehrlich) and GB-141 (Raven).
[73]
Cyanogenesis in Arthropods: From Chemical Warfare to Nuptial Gifts
Cyanogenic glucosides are natural products widespread in the plant kingdom, and also known to be present in arthropods.
[74]
Cyanogenesis, a Plant Defence Strategy against Herbivores - NIH
Apr 10, 2023 · When a plant tissue is disrupted by an herbivore attack, cyanogenic substrates are brought into contact with degrading enzymes that cause the ...
[75]
Insect host–parasite coevolution in the light of experimental evolution
Oct 15, 2013 · Finally, in experimental host–parasite coevolution, both the hosts and the parasites are allowed to evolve and adapt to each other. There are ...
[76]
Asymmetry in host and parasitoid diffuse coevolution: when the red ...
Host-parasite coevolution: Evidence for rare advantage and time-lagged ... Insect parasitoids. JWD: Academic Press; 1986. pp. 169–200. [Google Scholar] ...Missing: butterflies | Show results with:butterflies
[77]
The evolution of imperfect floral mimicry - PMC - NIH
May 27, 2008 · A textbook case of mimicry in plants is pollination by sexual deception in orchids that mimic the female mating signals of one or a few insect ...Missing: coevolution mosaic
[78]
Coevolution: The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolutionary Arms Races
Dec 24, 2005 · Interacting species coevolve in different ways in different populations, often creating a geographic mosaic of traits and counter-traits. These ...
[79]
THE CHEMICAL ECOLOGY OF DEFENSE IN ARTHROPODS
The venoms of buthinine scorpions contain selective mammal toxins that are inactive on their arthropod prey (219-221). The venom of the harvester ant ...
[80]
Wasp Venom Biochemical Components and Their Potential in ...
Chemically, wasp venom possesses a wide variety of enzymes, proteins, peptides, volatile compounds, and bioactive constituents, which include phospholipase A2, ...
[81]
[PDF] Diet and chemical defence in ladybird beetles (Coleoptera
Aug 30, 2022 · However, the defensive value of pyrrolizidine alkaloids to ladybirds is still not investigated. Intraspecific diversity in autogenous chemical.Missing: ladybug | Show results with:ladybug
[82]
Insect alarm pheromones in response to predators: Ecological trade ...
Insect alarm pheromones are chemical substances that are synthesized and released in response to predators to reduce predation risk.
[83]
[PDF] Diverse adaptations in insects: A Review
Feb 18, 2017 · Insects that look like their environment won't be seen by predators such as birds and lizards. Some insects look like sticks, leaves, and thorns ...
[84]
The price of defence: toxins, visual signals and oxidative state ... - NIH
Aposematic species, such as the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), signal their chemical defences to predators with conspicuous warning colours [2].
[85]
Honeybee communication during collective defence is shaped by ...
May 25, 2021 · In this work, we model each bee as a learning PS agent and the colony as an ensemble of agents that undergoes repeated encounters with predators ...Missing: mobbing | Show results with:mobbing
[86]
Monarch Butterfly Migration and Overwintering - Forest Service
Monarchs use a combination of air currents and thermals to travel long distances. Some fly as far as 3,000 miles to reach their winter home! Where Do Monarchs ...Missing: behavioral defenses insects mobbing<|separator|>
[87]
Activity and burrowing behaviour of wireworms (Agriotes spp.) in the ...
Burrowing through soil using their mandibles is an energetically taxing process for an insect, so it is likely an insect will produce a burrow of a diameter ...
[88]
Revisiting adaptations of neotropical katydids (Orthoptera - NIH
Jan 24, 2017 · Katydid morphological defenses include crypsis, mimicry, chemical defenses, spines, and a strong bite. Many katydids are visually cryptic, ...
[89]
Sustaining America's Aquatic Biodiversity - Aquatic Insect ...
Apr 21, 2025 · In North America, there are more than 8600 species of insects associated with freshwater environments during some part of their lives.<|separator|>
[90]
Freshwater Biodiversity and Insect Diversification - PMC - NIH
Aquatic insects spend one or more stages of their life cycle in the water, with the majority moving to terrestrial habitats as adults. They play important ...
[91]
[PDF] The Distribution and Abundance of Leaf Litter Arthropods in MOFEP ...
Of the 54 7 morpho- species identified, 10 contained 47 percent of the individuals found. Seven of these were. Collembola, primitive, wingless insects special-.
[92]
Latitude shapes diel patterns in insect biodiversity - PMC - NIH
Apr 30, 2025 · The proportion of nocturnal species in a community declines from a peak of 36% at the equator to 8% at 60° latitude, while the proportion of diurnal species ...
[93]
Scientists Map the Genetic Diversity of the World's Insects
Sep 27, 2023 · Insect species are most diverse in tropical regions near the equator. But new mapping based on mitochondrial DNA from millions of insects has ...
[94]
[PDF] Global determinants of the distribution of insect genetic diversity
In contrast to latitudinal diversity gradients for species richness in most taxa, insect ... Gaston, K. J. & Blackburn, T. M. The tropics as a museum of ...
[95]
https://www.fs.usda.gov/nrs/pubs/gtr/gtr_nc193papers/19_weaver_gtr_nc193.pdf
[96]
(PDF) Dispersal in Freshwater Invertebrates - ResearchGate
Examples of phoretic dispersal in freshwater invertebrates. (a) Statoblast of the bryozoan Cristatella mucedo. Gas-filled cells confer buoyancy, making floating ...
[97]
Experimental evidence for snails dispersing tardigrades based on ...
Apr 14, 2022 · Phoresy is an interaction in which a phoretic animal (termed also as a phoront) latches itself onto a host animal for the purpose of dispersal.
[98]
(PDF) Dispersal Capabilities Do Not Parallel Ecology and Cryptic ...
Sep 5, 2023 · They are either sedentary and remain confined to stable environments or passively disperse via phoresy and are capable of inhabiting a wide ...
[99]
8-20 Madagascar: A Biodiversity Hotspot - Duke Lemur Center
Madagascar is home to 100,000 species of insects, like the giraffe weevil and the net-throwing spider. While not all of Madagascar's insect species are as ...
[100]
Behavioural thermoregulation and the relative roles of convection ...
We describe how basking posture affects the core-body temperature of a butterfly. · In a wind tunnel, body orientation and wing angle affect convective heat loss ...
[101]
Monarch Butterfly (Danaus Plexippus) Thermoregulatory Behavior ...
Apr 1, 1988 · Shivering and basking can also achieve or maintain flight temperature during partly cloudly weather. Both behaviors delay the decline of ...<|separator|>
[102]
Tropical butterflies use thermal buffering and thermal tolerance ... - NIH
Jul 12, 2023 · Tropical butterflies with a stronger ability to thermoregulate have lower thermal tolerance, and vice versa. This implies that species adapt to climate change.
[103]
Meta-analysis reveals weak but pervasive plasticity in insect thermal ...
Sep 8, 2022 · We show that thermal limit plasticity is pervasive but generally weak: per 1 °C rise in acclimation temperature, critical thermal maximum increases by 0.09 °C.
[104]
Recent climate change strongly impacted the population dynamic of ...
This study investigates the shifts in the population dynamics of spruce budworm across its range in response to recent climate change.
[105]
Climate-induced phenology shifts linked to range expansions ... - NIH
Oct 24, 2019 · We show that phenology advances have resulted in increased abundance trends and range expansions in species with multiple reproductive cycles per year.<|separator|>
[106]
Rain downpours affect survival and development of insect herbivores
Abstract. Changes in the frequency, duration, and intensity of rainfall events are among the abiotic effects predicted under anthropogenic global warming.
[107]
Effects of UV radiation on aquatic ecosystems and interactions with ...
Nov 12, 2014 · Recent UV radiation exposure experiments in the laboratory showed that UV radiation caused DNA damage and oxidative stress in the larvae and ...
[108]
Influence of salinity on the thermal tolerance of aquatic organisms
Nov 25, 2024 · A review and meta-analysis of the effects of multiple abiotic stressors on marine embryos and larvae. Glob. Change Biol., 21 (2015), pp. 2122 ...
[109]
Respiratory control in aquatic insects dictates their vulnerability to ...
Oct 23, 2013 · Our work shows that oxygen limitation does shape the thermal tolerance of aquatic tracheates, and that respiratory control provides a predictive ...
[110]
Global meta-analysis reveals overall higher nocturnal than diurnal ...
Apr 15, 2024 · The higher overall (but variable) nocturnal activity in insect communities underscores the need to address threats such as light pollution and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[111]
Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases ... - Science
Apr 24, 2020 · The declines in terrestrial insect populations are indeed concerning, particularly given that insects compose ~80% of known animal biodiversity ...
[112]
than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass ...
Our analysis estimates a seasonal decline of 76%, and mid-summer decline of 82% in flying insect biomass over the 27 years of study.View Figures (9) · View Reader Comments · View About the AuthorsMissing: 2.5% 1977-2018
[113]
Insect decline, an emerging global environmental risk - ScienceDirect
Habitat loss by conversion to intensive agriculture is the main driver of the declines. Agro-chemical pollutants, invasive species and climate change are ...
[114]
Scientists' warning to humanity on insect extinctions - ScienceDirect
... 2019). A global meta-analysis of insect abundances revealed a 45% decline across two-thirds of the taxa evaluated (Dirzo et al., 2014). Yet, the specific ...
[115]
Solutions for humanity on how to conserve insects - ScienceDirect
Protected areas can be extended outside proclaimed borders using large-scale ecological networks of interconnected conservation corridors, which is highly ...
[116]
2030 Targets (with Guidance Notes)
The 2030 targets include reducing biodiversity loss, restoring 30% of degraded ecosystems, conserving 30% of land, waters and seas, and halting species ...Missing: insect | Show results with:insect
[117]
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) - Food Safety - European Union
IPM is one of the tools for low-pesticide-input pest management, and IPM must be implemented by all professional users.
[118]
EU Pesticide Reduction (Sustainable Use Regulation SUR)
It includesd EU wide targets to reduce the use and risk of chemical pesticides by 50% in 2030. This is line with the EU's Farm to Fork and Biodiversity ...
[119]
Integrated Pest Management: An Update on the Sustainability ...
IPM employs a combined approach, mixing cultural, biological, and physical control tactics, complemented by the strategic application of reduced-risk pesticides ...
[120]
Towards a toolkit for global insect biodiversity monitoring - PMC
May 6, 2024 · This theme issue showcases recent developments and state-of-the-art applications of these technologies, and outlines the way forward regarding data processing.
[121]
An Entomologist's Guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity
Apr 4, 2023 · The Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework has four overarching goals and 23 targets related to the 2050 Vision for Biodiversity: 1) enhancing ...
[122]
[PDF] Plant selection for pollinator restoration in seminatural ecosystems
Individual plant species play valuable roles in meeting restoration goals for pollinators. However, the selection of plant species for pollinator ...
[123]
Enhancing insect diversity in agricultural grasslands: the roles of ...
Dec 21, 2001 · Our study indicates that extensive management of grasslands can enhance both local and regional insect diversity in agricultural landscapes.
[124]
Can Gene Editing Increase Ecosystem and Species Resilience?
Nov 28, 2023 · CRISPR gene editing could improve species resilience by targeting traits, and there is evidence that targeted gene editing can help species ...