Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Insect repellent

Insect repellents are substances intended to deter , such as mosquitoes, ticks, and flies, from landing on or biting and animals, typically applied topically to or , or used in spatial forms like coils or mats to create protective barriers. These products function as pesticides by masking scents, interfering with insect sensory receptors, or creating volatile screens that avoid, rather than killing the pests outright. Regulated by agencies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), insect repellents must undergo rigorous testing for safety and efficacy before registration, ensuring they provide reliable protection when used as directed. The primary purpose of insect repellents is to reduce the risk of vector-borne diseases transmitted by biting arthropods, including , dengue, , , , and . By preventing bites, these repellents have been instrumental in efforts, particularly in endemic regions, where they complement strategies like insecticide-treated nets and habitat management. EPA-registered repellents are proven safe and effective for , including pregnant and individuals, when applied correctly, though effectiveness varies by concentration, environmental factors like sweat or , and target . Modern insect repellents trace their origins to ancient practices using natural plant extracts like citronella and smoke from fires, but synthetic formulations emerged during World War II to protect soldiers from insect-borne illnesses. The most widely used active ingredient, N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET), was developed in 1946 by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and remains a gold standard for long-lasting protection, repelling mosquitoes and ticks for up to several hours at concentrations of 20-30%. Other key synthetic options include picaridin (effective for 8-14 hours against mosquitoes) and IR3535 (similar to DEET in duration but milder on skin), while natural alternatives like oil of lemon eucalyptus provide shorter protection (up to 6 hours) and are derived from plant sources. Permethrin, a synthetic pyrethroid, is commonly applied to clothing rather than skin for extended repellency against ticks and mosquitoes.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

Insect repellents are substances, either chemical or natural, designed to deter such as mosquitoes, ticks, and flies from landing on or biting humans and . These products are typically applied topically to the skin, clothing, or surrounding environments to create a barrier that reduces the likelihood of insect contact without necessarily eliminating the insects themselves. The primary purpose of repellents is to protect individuals from vector-borne diseases transmitted by biting s, including , dengue, , , and . By preventing bites, repellents play a crucial role in , particularly in regions where these diseases are endemic. According to the , vector-borne diseases affect over 17% of the global population and cause more than 700,000 deaths annually, with mosquitoes serving as the principal vectors for many of these illnesses. Unlike insecticides, which are formulated to kill upon contact or ingestion, repellents function by masking human scents or creating an aversion response that discourages from approaching. This distinction is important for targeted , as repellents focus on personal protection rather than broad-spectrum population control. Common examples include synthetic agents like and natural options like .

Mechanisms of Action

Insect repellents primarily exert their effects through interference with the olfactory systems of , disrupting their ability to detect hosts. Many repellents act by masking or overriding attractive scents, such as , which are key cues for host-seeking behavior in blood-feeding arthropods like mosquitoes. This interference occurs at the level of odorant receptors (ORs) and odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) in the insect's antennae, where repellents compete with or inhibit the binding of attractants, thereby preventing activation of sensory neurons. Another key mechanism involves spatial repellency, where volatile repellent molecules create a vapor around the treated area, confusing ' host-seeking by altering their of gradients. This leads to disorientation or avoidance without direct contact, as the repellent vapors activate avoidance-specific receptors or broadly desensitize olfactory neurons. In addition to olfactory disruption, some repellents form a physical barrier on the skin surface, deterring from landing or probing by altering the tactile or chemical cues upon contact. The duration of protection provided by repellents is closely tied to their volatility, determined by and rates, which influence how quickly the active compounds disperse into the air. Repellents with lower s, such as ( of 0.00167 mmHg at 25°C), evaporate slowly, forming a sustained that extends protection time to several hours. For instance, interacts with mosquito ORs and OBPs to inhibit responses to host odors, with its low rate contributing to prolonged efficacy compared to more volatile compounds. Mechanisms can vary by type; in mosquitoes, repellents predominantly rely on olfactory masking through vapor-phase actions on ORs, effectively deterring approach from a distance. In contrast, ticks often respond more to repellency, where the compound acts directly on gustatory or chemoreceptors upon landing, prompting immediate withdrawal without strong reliance on olfaction.

Effectiveness

Factors Influencing

The efficacy of insect repellents is significantly influenced by environmental conditions, which can accelerate the or dispersal of active ingredients. High temperatures increase the rate of volatile repellents, shortening their protective duration. levels also play a role, as excessive can dilute topical applications. can further diminish efficacy by dispersing repellent vapors away from , particularly in windy environments. Additionally, exposure to sweat, , or from removes or dilutes the repellent layer, with being a primary factor in reducing protection time during physical activity. Insect-related factors contribute to variability in repellent performance across species and populations. Different mosquito genera exhibit distinct sensitivities to repellents due to differences in olfactory receptor responses. For example, Culex mosquitoes show high repellency rates to common synthetics, often achieving over 90% protection with standard formulations. Population density amplifies challenges, as higher insect numbers increase the likelihood of contact despite deterrence, while behavioral adaptations—such as host-seeking persistence in malaria vectors—can lead to reduced overall efficacy in high-risk areas. User-related variables, including application practices and individual physiology, directly impact how long and how well a repellent works. The concentration of the is a key determinant; synthetic repellents at 10-30% typically provide 2-6 hours of protection against mosquitoes, while 30-50% formulations extend this to 8-12 hours, though higher levels do not proportionally increase duration beyond a . Proper application amount—around 1 gram per square meter of —ensures even coverage, but under-application reduces by 40-60%. Reapplication is crucial, recommended every 4-8 hours depending on conditions, to maintain a consistent barrier. Individual factors like or metabolic rate can influence attractiveness to , indirectly affecting repellent needs, while may alter absorption rates, though evidence on specific types (e.g., oily vs. dry) remains limited. No insect repellent achieves 100% effectiveness, as can occur even with optimal use, where land or probe despite the presence of the agent, particularly after initial periods. This limitation underscores the need for integrated strategies, such as combining repellents with and environmental controls, to enhance overall .

Testing and Evaluation Methods

Laboratory testing of repellents primarily employs controlled bioassays to assess under standardized conditions. The arm-in-cage is a widely used method, where a volunteer's treated is exposed to a containing host-seeking es, and the complete time (CPT) is measured as the duration from application until the first confirmed bite. This approach allows for repeatable evaluations of repellent performance against specific mosquito species, such as , by recording mosquito landings or bites at fixed intervals. Complementary lab protocols include dose-response assays to determine metrics like the effective dose for 50% repellency (ED50), which quantifies the minimum concentration required to deter half of the s from landing, often calculated via probit analysis of landing inhibition data. For instance, ASTM E951 outlines procedures for ED50 estimation in mosquito repellency screening, enabling comparisons across formulations without human exposure variability. Field testing extends laboratory findings to real-world scenarios, particularly in insect-endemic regions, to evaluate repellents under natural environmental pressures. These trials involve human subjects applying repellents and monitoring bite incidence over time in areas with high vector density, often calculating percentage repellency as the reduction in bites compared to untreated controls. The World Health Organization (WHO) provides detailed guidelines for such evaluations against Anopheles species, recommending semi-field or outdoor setups with exposure periods up to several hours to assess protection duration and onset of repellency. For ticks, bioassays adapt similar principles, using treated skin patches exposed to questing nymphs in controlled outdoor arenas to measure detachment rates or feeding inhibition. Regulatory standards ensure consistent and reliable data for product approval, with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) mandating protocols that integrate both lab and field methods for repellents targeting mosquitoes and ticks. As of 2025, EPA guidelines require efficacy demonstrations through human-baited arm-in-cage tests for initial screening and field trials in vector-prevalent sites, emphasizing metrics like CPT and ED50 to establish minimum performance thresholds. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) aligns with EPA protocols, recommending registered repellents based on verified testing against key vectors. These frameworks, updated through 2025 human studies review board evaluations, incorporate ethical considerations for volunteer safety and data reproducibility. Challenges in repellent testing arise from inherent variability, particularly across strains, which can alter behavioral responses and lead to inconsistent CPT or ED50 values due to genetic differences in host-seeking . For example, laboratory-reared strains may exhibit reduced repellency sensitivity compared to wild populations, complicating extrapolations to field conditions. Recent advancements from 2023 to 2025 have addressed some variability through standardized in bioassays, enhancing the reliability of EPA and WHO protocols for global .

Types of Insect Repellents

Synthetic Repellents

Synthetic insect repellents are man-made chemical compounds designed to deter insects such as mosquitoes, ticks, and flies from approaching or biting humans and animals. These repellents work primarily through olfactory disruption, masking human scents or creating an aversive barrier on the skin or surfaces. Unlike natural alternatives, synthetic options are engineered for consistent performance and are rigorously tested for efficacy against a wide spectrum of pests. The most prominent synthetic repellent is (N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide), developed in 1946 by USDA researchers as a broad-spectrum agent. Formulations typically contain 20-50% , providing protection durations of 4-12 hours depending on concentration and environmental factors, with efficacy peaking around 50% concentration against mosquitoes and ticks. (also known as icaridin), a piperidine-based compound, offers comparable or longer-lasting protection—8-14 hours in 20% formulations against ticks—while exhibiting less odor and reduced skin irritation compared to . IR3535, an amide-derived repellent, is noted for its suitability in pediatric applications with no age restrictions, delivering several hours of protection at 20% concentrations against mosquitoes. , a synthetic , is primarily applied to and gear at 0.5% concentration, where it not only repels but also kills on contact, maintaining effectiveness through multiple washes. These compounds provide key advantages, including high efficacy across diverse insect species and stability in various formulations such as lotions, creams, and sprays, which enhance user compliance and longevity of protection. Aerosol formulations allow for even, rapid application over larger areas like clothing, while non-aerosol options like pump sprays or lotions offer precise, targeted use with potentially less inhalation risk. In 2025, Health Canada's proposed re-evaluation of DEET under PRVD2025-09, which, if finalized, would support the continued registration of over 200 associated products, affirming their safety and ongoing utility despite the availability of natural alternatives.

Natural Repellents

Natural repellents are derived from plant materials and have been used for centuries to deter , offering an alternative to synthetic options with potentially lower environmental persistence. These repellents primarily work by masking human scents or irritating insect sensory receptors, though their performance varies based on concentration, formulation, and environmental conditions. Common plant-based sources include , extracted from grasses such as , which provides protection against mosquitoes for approximately 2 hours at effective concentrations. Oil of lemon eucalyptus (OLE), derived from the leaves of Eucalyptus citriodora, contains para-menthane-3,8-diol (PMD) as its active ingredient and is approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for use, offering up to 6 hours of protection against mosquitoes and ticks when formulated at 30% concentration. oil, sourced from cataria, features as the key compound responsible for its repellent properties, achieving over 95% repellency against mosquitoes in laboratory tests. In 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registered 2-undecanone, a compound naturally occurring in wild tomatoes ( hirsutum), as an active ingredient in the Mimikai product line, marking the first new botanical repellent approval in over two decades and providing extended protection comparable to traditional synthetics. These repellents are typically obtained through or solvent extraction to yield essential oils, which can be used directly, incorporated into soaps, lotions, or candles, or purified into isolates for targeted formulations. However, their composition exhibits significant variability due to factors like , growing conditions, and harvest timing, which can affect potency and consistency across batches. In general, natural repellents provide shorter protection durations of 1 to 4 hours compared to many synthetic counterparts, with often less consistent due to and under or . A 2025 Consumer Reports evaluation highlighted that while OLE performs reliably, many products labeled as "natural" with other essential oils underperform in real-world tests against mosquitoes and ticks. Emerging research from 2023 to 2025 focuses on to enhance phyto-repellents, such as encapsulating essential oils in nanoparticles for improved , controlled release, and prolonged without altering their natural origins. These innovations aim to address limitations in duration and consistency by protecting active compounds from environmental breakdown.

Safety and Health Considerations

Effects on Humans

Insect repellents, particularly synthetic ones like , are generally safe for human use when applied as directed, with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concluding no significant health risks from typical exposure. However, can cause mild irritation, such as rashes or redness, in some individuals, though these effects are uncommon and resolve upon washing. Eye exposure to may lead to or burning, necessitating warnings to avoid application near the eyes or mouth. Neurological effects from are exceedingly rare; for instance, seizures linked to its use occur at a rate of approximately 1 per 100 million applications since 1960. Other synthetic repellents exhibit lower irritation potential. Picaridin typically causes minimal skin or eye irritation compared to , making it suitable for broader use, including on sensitive skin. Similarly, IR3535 is mild and often recommended for individuals with sensitive skin, though it can still irritate eyes if contacted directly. Natural repellents, such as those containing , pose risks of in susceptible people, characterized by itchy, red rashes due to components like . Ingestion of natural oils should be avoided, as it may cause gastrointestinal upset or more severe symptoms like . Special considerations apply to vulnerable populations. For children, DEET concentrations should not exceed 30% to minimize absorption risks, with the endorsing this limit for safety. Pregnant and breastfeeding individuals can safely use EPA-registered repellents like or picaridin, as confirmed by 2025 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, with no evidence of harm to the or when used properly. Long-term studies, including those reviewed by the EPA, show no carcinogenic effects from exposure. As of November 2025, while no major confirmed new human health risks have emerged for common repellents, emerging research suggests potential concerns, such as endocrine-disrupting effects of on hormones and bone health in children, or links to carcinogenicity like from high occupational exposure; these are under investigation, with the EPA (as of May 2025) still finding no risks of concern when used as directed. Ongoing emphasis on proper application—such as avoiding broken skin and washing off after use—to further reduce any potential absorption.

Toxicity to Non-Target Animals

Insect repellents, particularly synthetic pyrethroids like , pose significant risks to non-target such as due to their neurotoxic effects, often resulting in severe clinical signs including muscle tremors, seizures, and potentially fatal outcomes from even small exposures. are especially vulnerable because they lack the liver enzymes necessary to metabolize efficiently, leading to rapid onset of symptoms like , , and coma when they groom treated fur after incidental contact with dog-specific products. In contrast, is generally safe for at recommended low doses, as they possess the metabolic capacity to break it down without adverse effects, though excessive application can still cause mild . DEET, a widely used synthetic repellent, exhibits moderate toxicity to aquatic organisms, including , where it can disrupt function and induce at environmentally relevant concentrations, though it degrades relatively quickly in . For terrestrial non-target animals, DEET presents low risk to birds, with only slight acute oral toxicity observed in avian species, and is practically non-toxic to mammals like and under typical exposure scenarios. Among natural repellents, essential oils such as are highly toxic to pets like dogs and cats when ingested or absorbed through the skin, causing symptoms including lethargy, vomiting, incoordination, and tremors; as little as 7-8 drops can be fatal due to its disrupting cellular membranes. , derived from lemongrass, carries a lower overall risk to terrestrial pets but should be avoided near aquatic environments, as it can harm and through in water bodies if misapplied. Veterinary reports from 2020 to 2025 document numerous cases of exposures to insect repellents, with spot-on products accounting for a significant portion of toxicities, including a retrospective study of 42 cats showing an 81% (34/42) with prompt and but highlighting the need for immediate veterinary . Essential oil exposures in dogs and cats have also risen, often from household diffuser misuse, resulting in gastrointestinal upset and neurological signs. of most repellents in food chains remains minimal, as compounds like and exhibit moderate to rapid degradation in soil and water, limiting transfer to wildlife and . To mitigate these risks, product labeling plays a crucial role, with regulations requiring clear warnings against use on for permethrin-containing items and species-specific instructions to prevent cross-contamination in multi-pet households. Pet owners are advised to select repellents formulated exclusively for their animal's species, apply them in isolated areas, and monitor for early signs like excessive salivation or tremors to enable timely .

Environmental Impact

Synthetic insect repellents, such as , exhibit moderate persistence in the environment, with the compound frequently detected in effluents due to its widespread use and entry through domestic and recreational activities. In systems, demonstrates a ranging from days to weeks under typical conditions, facilitating its degradation via microbial processes and , though this persistence contributes to low-level in surface waters and sediments. Despite its relatively low potential in organisms—owing to moderate and rapid —chronic exposure from runoff can accumulate in sensitive ecosystems, potentially altering microbial communities and nutrient cycles. Natural repellents, including oils derived from plants like lemon eucalyptus (), offer environmental advantages through enhanced biodegradability, breaking down more rapidly in and water compared to synthetic counterparts, often within hours to days via enzymatic and . This rapid degradation minimizes long-term residue accumulation and reduces the risk of trophic transfer in food webs. Beyond direct persistence, insect repellents exert broader ecological effects, including sublethal impacts on pollinators such as bees, which may avoid treated areas or experience reduced foraging efficiency due to olfactory disruption from volatile compounds in sprays and lotions. Sustainability efforts in repellent development are shifting toward green chemistry principles, emphasizing formulations with safer solvents and biodegradable carriers to curb environmental runoff and minimize aquatic inputs. As of 2025, no major global bans on common repellents have been enacted, but regulatory bodies continue to monitor potential endocrine-disrupting effects through ongoing screening programs, focusing on long-term ecosystem implications rather than immediate prohibitions. Recent 2025 studies have further explored DEET's potential as an endocrine disruptor, including effects on aquatic species, though conclusive evidence remains limited.

Application and Usage

Methods of Application

Insect repellents are commonly applied directly to the using formulations such as lotions, sprays, or wipes to create a protective barrier against . These products should be spread evenly over exposed , taking care to avoid sensitive areas like the eyes, , and open wounds, as recommended by authorities to minimize risks. For water-based activities, repellents labeled as water-resistant can maintain efficacy for up to 80 minutes during or sweating, but reapplication is necessary afterward to restore protection. Treating and gear with repellents like provides longer-lasting by impregnating fabrics, which can endure through approximately six washes or several weeks of use depending on exposure conditions. This method involves spraying the solution onto items in a well-ventilated area and allowing them to dry completely before wearing; direct application to on treated clothing is not advised, as is designed for fabric binding rather than dermal contact. Area repellents, intended for spatial in outdoor or indoor settings, include mosquito coils, vaporizers, and mats that release active ingredients like pyrethroids into the air to deter from a defined zone. These devices are typically ignited or heated to disperse vapors, offering protection over areas up to several square meters for 4-12 hours per use, though efficacy varies with wind and ventilation. Ultrasonic devices, which emit high-frequency sounds purportedly to repel , have seen market growth in 2025 driven by consumer demand for non-chemical options, but scientific reviews indicate limited evidence of effectiveness against most . Specialized forms of repellents include wearable devices such as clips, bracelets, or patches that release repellents gradually, providing targeted protection for several hours without manual reapplication. Advances in technology allow for long-acting formulations where active ingredients like are enclosed in microscopic capsules, enabling controlled release over extended periods—up to 12 hours or more—while reducing skin irritation through slower absorption.

Best Practices and Recommendations

When selecting an insect repellent, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends using EPA-registered products containing , picaridin, IR3535, or oil of lemon eucalyptus (OLE) for application to skin, while is advised for treating clothing, gear, and tents to enhance protection without direct skin contact. The choice of should consider user preferences, such as picaridin's lower odor and less greasy feel compared to , which can make it more comfortable for prolonged use. Concentrations matter for duration: for instance, 20% or picaridin typically provides 4-10 hours of protection against mosquitoes, depending on environmental factors like heat and humidity, while higher levels up to 30% extend efficacy for extended exposure. If using or lotions, them first and allow 15-30 minutes for absorption, then repellent on top just before outdoor activities. This prevents and ensures proper efficacy of both products. Combining repellents with protective —such as long sleeves, pants tucked into , and permethrin-treated fabrics—can reduce reliance on applications and lower overall exposure. Special precautions to vulnerable groups: repellents should not be used on infants under 2 months old, opting instead for physical barriers like and nets; for children, only to exposed and , avoiding hands, eyes, and mouth. Tailoring recommendations to specific scenarios improves outcomes; in malaria-endemic areas, higher concentrations of (up to 30%) are prioritized for longer-lasting protection against mosquitoes, often paired with insecticide-treated nets. For tick-prone regions, such as wooded or grassy areas, daily skin and clothing checks are essential alongside repellents, with on gear providing up to 6 weeks of residual activity against ticks like species. In 2025, updated guidance from sources like emphasizes picaridin's advantages over for everyday use due to its without the strong scent or skin residue, while cautioning against overhyping natural repellents, as essential oil-based products often provide shorter protection (1-2 hours) compared to synthetics.

Regulations and Guidelines

Approval and Registration Processes

In the United States, insect repellents are regulated as pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) overseeing the registration process to ensure safety and efficacy. Applicants must submit comprehensive data on product chemistry, toxicology, environmental fate, and efficacy, including laboratory and field studies demonstrating protection against target insects like mosquitoes and ticks. Toxicology studies encompass acute, subchronic, and chronic exposure assessments to evaluate risks to humans, while efficacy data must show the product performs as claimed without posing unreasonable adverse effects. Labeling requirements specify active ingredients, usage directions, precautionary statements, and first-aid instructions, all reviewed to prevent misuse. For conventional synthetic repellents, the full registration process typically takes 1-3 years, involving EPA's detailed scientific review and potential public comment periods. Natural repellents qualify for a streamlined pathway, which accelerates approval due to lower risk profiles; for instance, 2-undecanone, derived from wild tomatoes, received EPA registration as a active ingredient, enabling faster market entry for products offering up to 4 hours of protection. Post-registration, the EPA mandates surveillance through adverse incident reporting and periodic reviews every 15 years to monitor ongoing safety. In the , insect repellents fall under the Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR, Regulation (EU) No 528/2012), administered by the (ECHA) and national authorities, requiring approval of active substances before product authorization. Data submissions mirror U.S. requirements, including toxicological profiles, exposure assessments, and efficacy trials against vectors like mosquitoes, with risk assessments evaluating human health, animal, and environmental hazards. High-risk actives, such as certain pyrethroids with persistent endocrine effects, face bans or strict restrictions if they fail to demonstrate acceptable risk-benefit ratios; for example, the EU has prohibited ethoxylates in biocides due to their environmental toxicity. The BPR authorization timeline generally spans 1-3 years for active substance inclusion in the , followed by national product approvals that may add 6-18 months, with mutual recognition options to streamline multi-country entry. Post-market surveillance involves mandatory reporting of serious adverse effects and renewals every 10 years, ensuring compliance with evolving safety standards. As of 2025, U.S. developments include novel actives like , a grapefruit-derived compound registered by the EPA in 2020 through CDC-EPA collaboration, reflecting ongoing priorities. Globally, harmonization efforts under the (WHO) and international bodies aim to align data requirements and mutual recognition agreements, reducing duplicative testing; for instance, WHO's 2025 prequalification of spatial repellent devices, including the first two products Mosquito Shield and (both by SC Johnson), promotes standardized evaluations for malaria-endemic regions.

International Standards and Recommendations

The (WHO) provides key guidelines for insect repellents in malaria-endemic regions, prioritizing active ingredients such as and IR3535 for personal protection against bites, particularly in tropical efforts. These recommendations emphasize repellents as a complementary measure to insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying, advising their use after in high-transmission areas to reduce risk. Regional guidelines exhibit variations in preferred ingredients and usage restrictions. In , picaridin is often favored alongside for its odorless profile and lower irritation potential, with health authorities recommending concentrations up to 20% for effective protection against local vectors like mosquitoes. In , a proposed re-evaluation in 2025 by proposes the continued registration of DEET-based products, permitting their use under existing label directions that limit concentrations to 30% overall and impose age-specific restrictions for children, such as one daily application of 10% or less for those aged 6 months to 2 years. International harmonization efforts include the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for classifying and labeling , which standardizes pictograms, signal words, and precautionary statements on repellent packaging to communicate risks like skin irritation or environmental persistence uniformly across borders. In 2025, WHO updated its vector control recommendations to conditionally endorse spatial repellents, including those with natural active ingredients like plant-derived pyrethroids, for prevention in developing countries where access to synthetic options is limited. Disparities in regulations highlight differing risk tolerances; the enforces stricter limits under the Biocidal Products Regulation, capping concentrations at 50% in authorized products and prohibiting higher levels in consumer formulations to minimize exposure risks, whereas the permits registrations up to 100% with fewer concentration caps, reflecting a more lenient approach focused on .

Alternatives to Chemical Repellents

Physical and Behavioral Methods

Physical and behavioral methods offer non-chemical strategies to deter bites, primarily by limiting and creating barriers against vectors like . These approaches emphasize practical modifications to , surroundings, and daily habits, serving as effective complements or alternatives to chemical repellents in various settings, from outdoor activities to environments. Wearing protective is a foundational physical method that reduces to biting . Long-sleeved shirts and long pants made from tightly woven fabrics minimize the surface area available for bites, while light-colored garments are less attractive to many species, which are drawn to darker shades. Studies indicate that such clothing can reduce bites by approximately 50% compared to shorter, lighter attire in conditions. Although permethrin-treated fabrics enhance protection, untreated options still provide substantial barrier effects through physical coverage alone. Barriers such as nets and window screens further prevent access. Untreated nets, when properly tucked and maintained, act as a mechanical shield during , offering protection rates of around 40-50% against transmission in community trials, though insecticide-impregnated versions achieve 70-90% efficacy by combining barrier and lethal effects. Window screens with fine mesh (typically 1-1.5 mm openings) effectively block entry into homes when installed on doors and windows, suppressing indoor populations and reducing biting rates, as demonstrated in urban interventions where screened houses showed dramatic declines in prevalence. Behavioral adjustments target activity patterns and breeding sites to lower encounter risks. Avoiding outdoor activities during dawn and —peak biting times for many es—significantly cuts exposure, aligning with to reduce potential bites in high-risk areas. Eliminating standing from containers, gutters, and low-lying areas disrupts breeding cycles, with consistent source reduction efforts proven to decrease local populations by targeting larval habitats. Using fans creates air currents that hinder flight, as these weak fliers struggle against even moderate wind speeds; tests show fans can reduce landings in outdoor settings.

Biological and Integrated Approaches

Biological control methods utilize living organisms to target insect pests, particularly , at vulnerable life stages such as larvae, offering targeted and environmentally selective alternatives to broad-spectrum chemical repellents. (Bti), a naturally occurring soil bacterium, produces toxins that are ingested by mosquito larvae in standing water, disrupting their digestive systems and leading to death before they mature into biting adults. This microbial agent has been employed for over 30 years in larval control programs, proving effective against species like and without harming non-target aquatic life such as or amphibians. Similarly, introducing , such as the ( affinis), into water bodies like ornamental ponds or artificial containers allows these species to consume large numbers of mosquito larvae—up to 100 per day per fish—thereby reducing breeding sites in urban and suburban settings. Native alternatives, including and small , serve comparable roles in natural water habitats, enhancing ecological balance while suppressing mosquito populations. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) represents a holistic strategy that integrates biological controls with modification and judicious use of minimal chemical interventions to manage insect vectors sustainably. In IPM frameworks, actions such as eliminating standing water sources are combined with biological agents like Bti applications and fish introductions, prioritizing non-chemical tactics to minimize environmental disruption. As of 2025, urban programs, including those in major cities like , emphasize IPM to address vector-borne diseases amid growing urbanization, incorporating surveillance, community education, and targeted biological releases for efficient resource use. This approach extends to , where planting like grass, lemongrass, and lavender—rich in essential oils—can deter adult mosquitoes from resting or ovipositing in yards, complementing larval controls without sole reliance on synthetic repellents. Emerging biological innovations include the release of genetically modified mosquitoes, such as those developed by , which incorporate self-limiting genes that prevent female offspring from surviving to adulthood, thereby suppressing wild populations. Field trials in and other regions have demonstrated population reductions of up to 96% in targeted mosquitoes, significantly lowering disease transmission risks in endemic areas. These methods build on IPM principles by integrating genetic tools with for precise, localized control. The advantages of biological and integrated approaches lie in their and ability to mitigate , as they target specific life stages without pervasive chemical residues. The endorses integrated vector management, including biological controls, as a core strategy for dengue prevention, promoting its adoption to enhance efficacy and reduce long-term reliance on synthetic agents in disease-endemic regions.

History and Developments

Historical Evolution

The use of insect repellents dates back to ancient civilizations, where natural methods were employed to ward off biting . As early as 4500 BC, ancient Egyptians applied plant-based extracts, such as , , or from and , to deter mosquitoes and other pests. In around 3000 BC, dried herbs were burned to produce smoke that repelled mosquitoes, a practice documented in historical texts. Indigenous groups in and other regions similarly relied on animal fats, such as grease or fat, smeared on the skin to create a barrier against , with historical accounts from the describing these as effective for along coastal areas. Mud applications were also common among various to physically block bites, often combined with local plants for added efficacy. By the , plant-derived repellents gained wider recognition, particularly in where citronella oil from grasses had been used traditionally and began to be standardized for broader application. In the early , efforts to formalize these natural options accelerated; for instance, oil of citronella was refined and tested systematically in the , leading to its adoption by military forces like the before . The push for synthetic alternatives intensified during due to high rates among troops—approximately 695,000 cases reported in U.S. forces alone—which prompted the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to screen thousands of compounds. This effort culminated in 1946 with the development of (N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide) by USDA researchers for military use, marking a pivotal shift toward chemical repellents effective against disease vectors. Following the war, transitioned to civilian markets, with commercial availability approved by regulators in 1957, enabling widespread personal use and contributing to post-war public health initiatives. This expansion aligned with global control efforts, including the World Health Organization's Malaria Eradication Program launched in 1955, which integrated repellents alongside insecticides like to reduce transmission in endemic regions. By the 1960s, growing environmental concerns—fueled by publications like Rachel Carson's (1962)—highlighted risks of synthetic chemicals, leading to the initial regulatory framework under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) of 1947, which was strengthened through amendments and the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970 to oversee safety, including repellents. The 1970s saw a resurgence in natural extracts amid these chemical concerns, with research reviving plant-based options like neem and oils as safer alternatives to synthetics, driven by toxicity worries and the 1972 DDT ban in the U.S. This period laid the groundwork for balanced approaches in repellent development, emphasizing efficacy against while minimizing ecological impact.

Recent Innovations (Post-2020)

Recent innovations in repellents since 2020 have emphasized and biopesticide-derived compounds, technological enhancements for prolonged efficacy, and a shift toward environmentally sustainable formulations. One prominent development is the advancement of , a grapefruit-derived approved by the EPA in 2020 but with ongoing CDC-supported research and commercialization through 2025. , marketed under brands like NootkaShield, provides 4-6 hours of protection against mosquitoes and ticks by repelling and killing vectors such as those transmitting Zika and dengue, offering a safer alternative to synthetic chemicals due to its origin and low toxicity profile. Another key compound is Pyronz, a plant-based biopesticide submitted for EPA registration in October 2024 by Pyrone Systems Inc., with anticipated approval in 2026. Derived from advanced biosynthetic processes targeting insecticide-resistant pests, Pyronz aims to provide broad-spectrum control against mosquitoes and agricultural insects while minimizing environmental persistence and non-target effects. Technological integrations have expanded options for user convenience and efficacy. Wearable repellents, including ultrasonic bands, have seen market growth in 2025, with products like rechargeable wristbands claiming to emit high-frequency sounds to deter mosquitoes over extended periods without chemical application; however, their adoption reflects consumer demand for non-topical solutions despite mixed efficacy evidence. In parallel, nanotechnology has enhanced natural oil-based repellents, with 2023 studies demonstrating nanoemulsions and nanogels of citronella and eucalyptus oils that double protection duration—extending from typical 2-3 hours to 4-6 hours—by controlling volatile release and improving skin adhesion. Market trends post-2020 highlight a surge in all-natural, EPA-registered products, exemplified by Mimikai's 2025 launch of a -free spray using 2-undecanone, a compound from wild tomatoes providing up to 8 hours of mosquito protection and 4 hours against ticks, equivalent to synthetic benchmarks. Consumer preferences have increasingly favored picaridin over in 2025 reviews, citing its odorless, non-greasy application and comparable efficacy against mosquitoes and ticks. Research from 2024-2025 has prioritized climate-resilient formulas to counter rising vector populations amid , incorporating stabilizers that maintain repellent performance in high-heat and humidity conditions. Efforts to reduce environmental impact include biodegradable carriers, such as nanoparticles and plant-derived matrices, which degrade rapidly post-use, minimizing and compared to traditional petroleum-based vehicles.

References

  1. [1]
    What is an Insect Repellent? | US EPA
    Jul 10, 2025 · Insect repellents are pesticides that make people less attractive to pests, but are not designed to eliminate them. Skin-applied repellents are ...
  2. [2]
    Find the Repellent that is Right for You | US EPA
    Sep 11, 2025 · You can choose by specifying the insect, protection time, active ingredient, or other product-specific information.Using Repellent Products to... · Using Insect Repellents Safely · Active ingredientMissing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    Preventing Mosquito Bites - CDC
    Aug 28, 2024 · When used as directed, EPA-registered insect repellents are proven safe and effective, even for pregnant and breastfeeding women. DEET.Missing: types | Show results with:types
  4. [4]
    Using Repellent Products to Protect against Mosquito-Borne Illnesses
    May 27, 2025 · Insect repellents are one part of a more comprehensive program to control mosquitoes that transmit diseases such as dengue or Zika.Missing: effectiveness | Show results with:effectiveness
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Insect Repellents Help Prevent Malaria and Other Diseases Spread ...
    Insect repellents protect from mosquitoes that spread malaria and other diseases, such as dengue, chikungunya, and Yellow fever.Missing: types | Show results with:types
  6. [6]
    Using Insect Repellents Safely and Effectively | US EPA
    Read labels, apply to exposed skin/clothing, avoid eyes/mouth, don't use on children's hands, and apply according to label instructions for effectiveness.Missing: types | Show results with:types
  7. [7]
    The enigmatic reception of DEET – the gold standard of insect ... - NIH
    Abstract · Introduction · Brief history of repellent use · Repellents that repel and those that do not · DEET's inception · Major natural and synthetic repellents in ...
  8. [8]
    Insect repellents: historical perspectives and new developments
    Active ingredients of currently available IRs include N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET), botanicals, citronella, and, the newest agent, picaridin.
  9. [9]
    The Efficacy of Some Commercially Available Insect Repellents for ...
    Oct 6, 2015 · Repellents with DEET as active ingredient had a prominent repellency effect over longer times and on both species.
  10. [10]
    Mosquitoes, Ticks, and Other Arthropods | Yellow Book - CDC
    Apr 23, 2025 · Topical repellents. Insect repellents registered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have been proven effective in reducing biting by ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  11. [11]
    [PDF] ATSDR DEET (N,N-Diethyl-meta-Toluamide) Tox Profile
    DEET is the common name for an insect and acarid repellent used to repel, but not kill, biting insects, mites, and ticks. DEET formulations are typically ...
  12. [12]
    Vector-borne diseases - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Sep 26, 2024 · It causes an estimated 249 million cases globally, and results in more than 608 000 deaths every year. Most of the deaths occur in children ...
  13. [13]
    Fighting the World's Deadliest Animal | Global Health - CDC
    Aug 12, 2025 · The mosquito is the world's deadliest animal. Spreading diseases like dengue, West Nile, Zika, chikungunya, malaria, and lymphatic ...
  14. [14]
    Insecticides | US EPA
    Feb 7, 2025 · Insecticides are chemicals used to control insects by killing them or preventing them from engaging in undesirable or destructive behaviors.Missing: repellent | Show results with:repellent
  15. [15]
    The mysterious multi-modal repellency of DEET - PMC
    Insect olfactory sensilla usually contain 2 or more olfactory receptor neurons that respond to distinct odors due to the different olfactory receptors they ...
  16. [16]
    Interactions of Anopheles gambiae Odorant-binding Proteins with a ...
    We show that 6-MH and DEET can compete for the binding of attractive odorants and in doing so disrupt the interaction that OBP1 makes with OBP4.
  17. [17]
    A Review of Arthropod Repellents | ACS Symposium Series
    Dec 13, 2011 · In addition, environmental factors such as temperature, wind, and humidity can affect repellent delivery systems, thereby influencing repellent ...
  18. [18]
    Insect Repellents Fact Sheet - National Pesticide Information Center
    Repellents with less than 10% of an active ingredient may only offer protection for short periods of time (1-2 hours). Sweat, water contact, and rubbing from ...How effective are common... · Can some people react to...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Mosquito and Tick Repellents - Cooperative Extension
    The longevity of protection afforded by the repellent will vary depending upon a number of environmental factors (Fradin and Day 2002; Barnard and Xue 2004) ...
  20. [20]
    The efficacy of repellents against Aedes, Anopheles, Culex and ...
    Oct 25, 2013 · Culex mosquitoes are easier to repel and all four repellents provided good protection. Few studies have been conducted on the tick species ...
  21. [21]
    Field Evaluation of Picaridin Repellents Reveals Differences in ...
    The heterogeneity in repellent sensitivity between mosquito genera and vector species could however impact the efficacy of repellents in public health programs.
  22. [22]
    Comparative Efficacy of Insect Repellents against Mosquito Bites
    These products were tested in a controlled laboratory environment in which the species of the mosquitoes, their age, their degree of hunger, the humidity, the ...
  23. [23]
    Repellents for Use on Skin | Red Book - AAP Publications
    DEET repels both mosquitoes and ticks. In general, higher concentrations of active ingredient provide longer duration of protection.Epa-Registered Repellents · Deet · Picaridin (kbr 3023)Missing: affecting | Show results with:affecting
  24. [24]
    Repellents for Application to Skin
    For the general public, factors to consider when purchasing a repellent include the amount of time you expect to be exposed to mosquitoes, the intensity of the ...
  25. [25]
    EWG's guide to bug repellents | Environmental Working Group
    Aug 14, 2023 · Choose a repellent with Picaridin at a 20 percent concentration, or DEET at a 20 to 30 percent concentration. Scientists have generally found ...
  26. [26]
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39433539/
  27. [27]
    Arm-in-cage testing of natural human-derived mosquito repellents
    Aug 20, 2010 · The control arm was inserted into a cage and the number of landings was recorded over 3 min. Then the treatment arm was inserted into the same ...
  28. [28]
    An in vitro assay for testing mosquito repellents employing a warm ...
    ... effective dose of deet that reduced landings to bite by 50% (ED50) at 0.95 microg/cm2 (5 nmol/cm2) and the corresponding ED95 at 4.12 microg/cm2 (21.5 nmol ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Laboratory Testing of Non-Commercial Mosquito Repellent ...
    The ED50 test method is used to determine the effectiveness of a repellent against different kinds of mosquitoes or to compare the effectiveness of different ...
  30. [30]
    Guidelines for efficacy testing of mosquito repellents for human skin
    Apr 21, 2009 · The purpose of these guidelines is to provide specific and standardized procedures and criteria for efficacy testing and evaluation of mosquito repellents for ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Science Review of a Protocol for Evaluation of Topically Applied ...
    This review assesses the scientific aspects of the proposed research for a product performance study to evaluate the efficacy of two skin-applied insect ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] April 3, 2025, EPA Human Studies Review Board Meeting Report
    May 9, 2025 · The research proposed in the protocol “Evaluation of Topically Applied Insect Repellent Products. Containing Oil of Lemon Eucalyptus (Citriodiol) ...
  33. [33]
    Characterisation of Anopheles strains used for laboratory screening ...
    Nov 5, 2019 · Potential new insecticides must be screened against a range of characterized mosquito strains to identify potential resistance liabilities. The ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Biting insects - a challenge for chemists | Feature | RSC Education
    The efficacy of insect repellents can be tested in many different ways. ... Many factors affect the results, and variations are found for different strains ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] March 25, 2025 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Materials for Review by ...
    Apr 2, 2025 · The proposed research is to test the efficacy of two new skin-applied insect repellent products against mosquitoes in the field, using human ...
  36. [36]
    The Long, Torturous Struggle with Mosquitoes - NIH
    Oct 19, 2016 · Initially, Bishopp asked Willard King to oversee the insecticide and repellent research at the USDA's Orlando laboratory. King was called to ...
  37. [37]
    DEET | US EPA
    May 27, 2025 · DEET (N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide) is the active ingredient in repellents, used to repel biting pests by making it hard for them to smell us.
  38. [38]
    Efficacy Test of KBR 3023 (Picaridin; Icaridin) - epa nepis
    The mean Complete Protection Time (CPT)(±sd) for KBR 3023 All-Family Insect Repellent Cream (20% Cream) was 15.3±0.3 hours (range 14.5 to 15.5 hours) against ...
  39. [39]
    About Permethrin-Treated Clothing and Gear | Mosquitoes - CDC
    May 14, 2024 · Permethrin is an insecticide that kills or repels mosquitoes. · Permethrin-treated clothing and gear can be worn to help prevent mosquito bites.
  40. [40]
    Repellent-Treated Clothing | US EPA
    Mar 6, 2025 · Permethrin is a broad spectrum, non-systemic, synthetic pyrethroid insecticide that targets adults and larvae of many species of biting, chewing ...Missing: IR3535 | Show results with:IR3535
  41. [41]
    Proposed re-evaluation decision PRVD2025-09, DEET plus related ...
    Oct 23, 2025 · Health Canada is proposing for public consultation the continued registration of DEET and associated end-use products registered for sale ...Missing: picaridin IR3535
  42. [42]
    Essential Oils as Repellents against Arthropods - PMC
    Sep 6, 2018 · Repellents, such as DEET, IR3535, and picaridin, have been proposed to act as olfactory agonists or antagonists, via modulating ORx activity, in ...
  43. [43]
    Insect Repellents - Poison Control
    When used at concentrations of 30%, PMD offers complete protection for 4-6 hours against ticks and several Aedes, Anopheles, and Culex species of mosquitoes. It ...
  44. [44]
    Repellency Assessment of Nepeta cataria Essential Oils and ... - NIH
    Feb 6, 2019 · The results indicate that all essential oil samples and their respective purified nepetalactone isomers were able to achieve greater than 95% repellency.
  45. [45]
    New brand Mimikai launches DEET-free insect repellent - SprayTM
    Jul 26, 2025 · Mimikai is one of the first new bug sprays to earn a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registration in 25 years, noted the firm, which ...
  46. [46]
    Chemical variability and insect repellent effects of lemon catnip ...
    This study is the first report of the activity of lemon catnip essential oil as an insect repellent and emphasized the importance of ecological conditions.
  47. [47]
    Do 'Natural' Insect Repellents Work? - Consumer Reports
    May 31, 2023 · CR's testing, for example, has repeatedly found that products with essential oils as the active ingredients don't repel bugs as long as many ...
  48. [48]
    5 Best Insect Repellents of 2025, Lab-Tested and Reviewed
    Apr 21, 2025 · We have over 50 repellents in our ratings and 20 recommended ones, so it should be easy to find a way to beat the bugs that's right for you.Insect Repellent Ratings · Lone Star Tick · How to Find a Mosquito Trap...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  49. [49]
    Phyto-insect repellents: A nanotechnology-based approach of ...
    This study aims to emphasize the benefits of alternatives, environmentally friendly repellents for insects, such as those derived from plant extracts.
  50. [50]
    Effective Mosquito Repellents: Myrcene- and Cymene-Loaded ...
    Aug 21, 2024 · This study introduces monoterpenes-based nanohydrogels for potential use as repellents against Aedes aegypti, the primary dengue vector worldwide.
  51. [51]
    Is DEET safe? Risks, side effects, and DEET alternatives
    Jul 28, 2023 · Products containing DEET are typically very low risk when people use them correctly. DEET can cause skin irritation in some people, but this is ...What is it? · Safety · Risks and side effects · DEET-free alternatives
  52. [52]
    How Safe Is Deet? | Insect Repellent Safety - Consumer Reports
    May 19, 2024 · Our testing indicates that products containing 25 to 30 percent deet typically provide at least several hours of protection. Any more than that ...
  53. [53]
    Citronella reaction
    Feb 8, 2024 · Citronellal and β-citronellol are known contact allergens with contact dermatitis associated with dermal exposure.
  54. [54]
    Is bug repellent bad for you? - UCLA Health
    Jul 7, 2022 · While a higher concentration may provide longer protection, it can also potentially increase the risk of side effects. Safe and effective ...
  55. [55]
    https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/environmental-health/promoting-healthy-environments-for-children/insect-repellents/
  56. [56]
    Clinical effects and outcome of feline permethrin spot-on poisonings ...
    Permethrin-based spot-on preparations are contraindicated in cats because of the high risk of toxicosis. The Veterinary Poisons Information Service (VPIS) is a ...
  57. [57]
    Feline permethrin toxicity: Retrospective study of 42 cases - PMC
    The clinical signs most commonly reported in cats (and frequency range reported) with permethrin toxicity in the veterinary literature include: seizures/ ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Protecting Your Cats and Dogs from Pesticide Poisoning
    Dog- to- cat transfer of permethrin can result in a neurotoxic reaction ... If you know the source of the poisoning, bring the label with you to help ...
  59. [59]
    Permethrin General Fact Sheet - National Pesticide Information Center
    Permethrin affects the nervous system in insects, causing muscle spasms, paralysis and death. Permethrin is more toxic to insects than it is to people and dogs.Missing: veterinary | Show results with:veterinary
  60. [60]
    Permethrin Spot-On Intoxication of Cats - PubMed Central - NIH
    Hallmarks of permethrin toxicity are muscle fasciculations and whole body tremors. ... Tremors are typically coarse, and sometimes progress to generalised motor ...
  61. [61]
    Aquatic life criteria derivation and ecological risk assessment of ...
    Jan 30, 2020 · Compared with other insect repellents, DEET exposure posed a moderate toxicity to aquatic species. Therefore, the exposure concentration of DEET ...
  62. [62]
    Fact Sheet: Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): DEET - epa nepis
    The available data characterize DEBT as slightly toxic to birds, fish, and aquatic invertebrates and as practically , nontoxic to mammals. Ecological ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] DEET: Problem Formulation in Support of Registration Review
    Nov 7, 2024 · DEET is slightly toxic to birds and practically non-toxic to mammals under acute oral exposures. A search of open literature studies from EPA's ...
  64. [64]
    Toxicoses From Essential Oils in Animals - Merck Veterinary Manual
    Key Points · Essential oils can be toxic to animals when inhaled or applied topically. · Cats and birds are at particular risk for essential oil toxicosis.
  65. [65]
    Tea Tree Oil - American College of Veterinary Pharmacists
    Apr 25, 2023 · As little as 7-8 drops (10-20 mL) applied to the skin may be fatal to both cats and dogs. Products with low concentrations (e.g. shampoos, body ...
  66. [66]
    Tea tree oil exposure in cats and dogs - The Veterinary Nurse
    Nov 2, 2018 · Exposure may cause ataxia, salivation, lethargy, coma and tremor. Dermal exposure to tea tree oil may also result in dermatitis as the oil is irritant to skin.
  67. [67]
    Pet-friendly mosquito repellents (that humans can use too)
    all of which can be harmful to animals if eaten ...
  68. [68]
    Companion animal exposures to potentially poisonous substances ...
    Sep 1, 2020 · Ingestion of pesticides, human and veterinary pharmaceuticals, and plants are the most common exposures implicated in accidental dog and cat ...
  69. [69]
    Adverse reactions from essential oil-containing natural flea products ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Specifically, cats exhibited agitation and hypersalivation, whereas dogs showed signs of lethargy and vomiting when exposed to plant-based flea ...
  70. [70]
    Assessment of the environmental fate and ecotoxicity of N,N-diethyl ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · The toxicity of DEET to species in the environment was found to be low, but requires further monitoring (Weeks et al., 2012) . The ...Missing: birds mammals
  71. [71]
    Pets and Pesticide Use Fact Sheet
    Pet owners can minimize the chance of their pet having a problem by following label directions, selecting lower toxicity pesticides, and minimizing the amount ...
  72. [72]
    Keep Pets Safe Around Pesticides - Defense Centers for Public Health
    Jan 2, 2024 · - Use products labeled for your animal species according to their size and weight. - Know the signs of toxicity, (e.g., excessive salivation, ...
  73. [73]
    Assessment of the environmental fate and ecotoxicity of N,N-diethyl ...
    In surface waters and soil, DEET degrades at a moderate to rapid rate (its half-life is measured in days to weeks). The small amounts of DEET retained in ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Toxicological Profile for DEET (N,N-Diethyl-Meta-Toluamide)
    The estimated half-life for this reaction is 5 hours, based on an estimated rate constant of. 2.5x10-11 cm3/molecule-second at 25°C (EPIWIN 2012). Direct ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Registration Review -Ecological Risk, Environmental Fate, and ...
    radical-mediated degradation with an estimated half-life between 10 to 15 hours. The bioaccumulation potential of DEET is low; it is neither a persistent, ...
  76. [76]
    Why Citriodiol? - Citrefine
    Exceeding the highest safety standards, Citriodiol® has low transdermal absorption, is GMO-free, organic and rapidly biodegradable, making it safe for the whole ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Murphy's Naturals Plant Based DEET Free Lemon Eucalyptus Oil
    Feb 28, 2024 · End use : Botanical repellent is a ready to use insect repellent. ... Citriodiol® is readily biodegradable. OECD 301F. Ethanol is readily ...
  78. [78]
    Essential oils are not "chemical free" or effective insect repellents.
    Jun 11, 2024 · ... overharvesting of plants, detrimental impacts to biodiversity. That ... Repellents do not kill ticks, but affect their sense of smell and taste.
  79. [79]
    Weak evidence base for bee protective pesticide mitigation measures
    Jul 17, 2023 · The most common mitigation measure tested was repellents designed to repel bees from visiting recently treated crops, with 12 publications.
  80. [80]
    Bio-pesticide applications may impair the pollination services and ...
    In field studies, the relative abundance, foraging rate and foraging speed of honey bees was significantly affected in different treatments even up to 2 days of ...
  81. [81]
    Atmospheric Microplastics: Inputs and Outputs - MDPI
    Primary MPs are used as microbeads in the production of personal care and cosmetic products (PPCPs), including deodorants, insect repellents, sunscreens, shower ...
  82. [82]
    Principles of Green Chemistry and Mosquito Control Products
    May 14, 2024 · Use Safer Solvents: Choosing safer solvents contributes to reducing environmental impact and human health risks. In mosquito control, this ...
  83. [83]
    The Greening of Pesticide–Environment Interactions - PubMed Central
    These pesticides meet the goals of green chemistry (i.e., they are safe, effective, and biodegradable with minimal environmental disruption) to varying degrees.
  84. [84]
    Pesticide News Stories | US EPA
    ... Endocrine Disruption Now Available on the Web - Pesticide News Story ... Insect Repellents Can Protect Against Dengue - Pesticide News Story. January 6 ...
  85. [85]
    How to Prevent Mosquito and Tick Bites | Vector-Borne Diseases
    Jan 30, 2025 · Use an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-registered insect repellents. When used as directed, these repellents are proven safe and effective ...
  86. [86]
    The 4 Best Bug Repellents and Sprays of 2025 - The New York Times
    Jul 2, 2025 · According to the EPA-approved labeling, OLE doesn't last as long as DEET and picaridin. After testing, the biggest drawback for us was the ...
  87. [87]
    Best Insect Repellent Buying Guide - Consumer Reports
    May 3, 2024 · We recommend three 20 percent picaridin products and one 10 percent picaridin product, all sprays. But concentration matters.How Cr Tests Insect... · Deet · The Right Way To Apply...
  88. [88]
    Regulation of Skin-Applied Repellents | US EPA
    Jun 25, 2025 · EPA registration of skin-applied repellent products indicates that they have been evaluated and approved for human safety and effectiveness.
  89. [89]
    Data Requirements for Pesticide Registration | US EPA
    Mar 24, 2025 · These data requirements apply to anyone or any company that registers pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
  90. [90]
    Data Requirements for Pesticide Registration
    Nov 18, 2024 · Data must show that a product will work on a pest. If a product claims to work against a pest that is a public health pest, extra data are ...
  91. [91]
    Pesticide Labeling Questions & Answers | US EPA
    The precautionary statements required on a label are specified in Subparts D and E of 40 CFR Part 156. Further, EPA may require product specific precautionary ...
  92. [92]
    How to Register a Pesticide – A Guide for Applicants New to the ...
    Jan 15, 2021 · Obtain an EPA company number. Complete the application package. Submit the application package and pay the fee. Respond to any issues raised ...
  93. [93]
    Registration Review Process | US EPA
    EPA will review each registered pesticide at least every 15 years to determine whether it continues to meet the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, ...Missing: EU BPR insect repellent market
  94. [94]
    Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR) Explained - Solenis
    Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR, Regulation (EU) 528/2012) controls the sale and use of all types of biocidal products which are used to protect humans, ...Missing: repellents bans risk
  95. [95]
    Regulation on the supply and use of biocidal products
    The Regulation sets out rules for: Approving active substances in biocidal products. Authorising the supply and use of biocidal products.Missing: insect repellents
  96. [96]
    Press Kit: Nootkatone | Vector-Borne Diseases - CDC
    Apr 24, 2024 · On July 20, 2020, the EPA announced registration of nootkatone for manufacturing use into insecticides and repellents. CDC was instrumental in ...
  97. [97]
    WHO recommends spatial emanators for malaria vector control and ...
    Aug 13, 2025 · “The WHO conditional recommendation for spatial repellents is a significant step forward in providing access to a new malaria vector control ...
  98. [98]
    Malaria - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Dec 11, 2024 · Use mosquito nets when sleeping in places where malaria is present. Use mosquito repellents (containing DEET, IR3535 or Icaridin) after dusk.World malaria report 2024 · Guidelines · WHO Guidelines for malari · Vector control<|control11|><|separator|>
  99. [99]
    Kids Health Info : Insect repellents – guidelines for safe use
    DEET and picaridin are the most effective insect repellent ingredients. Insect repellents with up to 30 percent DEET or 10 per cent picaridin are suitable ...
  100. [100]
    Instructions for using mosquito repellent | Gouvernement du Québec
    Jun 6, 2024 · Using mosquito repellent: children 6 months to 2 years · Products with a DEET concentration of 10% or less indicated on label, 3 hours or less.
  101. [101]
    https://www.rch.org.au/kidsinfo/fact_sheets/Insect_repellents_guidelines_for_safe_use/
  102. [102]
    The Hidden Cost Of Europe's Insect-Repellent Law - C&EN
    Jun 2, 2014 · The hidden cost of Europe's insect-repellent law. Regulation will be expensive for industry and could limit choice for consumers, critics say.Missing: bans | Show results with:bans
  103. [103]
    Bti for Mosquito Control | US EPA
    Aug 8, 2025 · Bti is used to kill developing mosquito larvae by being applied to standing water where those larvae are found.
  104. [104]
    Larvicides | Mosquitoes - CDC
    May 14, 2024 · Bti is toxic to mosquito larvae, blackflies, and fungus gnats. Bti has been used for mosquito control for more than 30 years. Bti does not ...
  105. [105]
    Should You Use Mosquitofish to Control Mosquitoes? | JCVCD.org
    Jul 27, 2022 · Once placed in a water body, the mosquitofish immediately go to work eating mosquito larvae. One mosquitofish will eat as many as 100 larvae per ...
  106. [106]
    Some Small Native Freshwater Fish Recommended for Mosquito ...
    Recommended fish include Mudminnow, Killifish, Live Bearer, and Sunfish families. Small sunfish like bluegill, redear, and redbreast are also good mosquito ...
  107. [107]
    Success in Mosquito Control: An Integrated Approach | US EPA
    1. Remove Mosquito Habitats · Get rid of standing water in rain gutters, old tires, buckets, plastic covers, toys or any other container where mosquitoes can ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
  108. [108]
    [PDF] 2025 Comprehensive Mosquito Surveillance and Control Plan
    This plan summarizes New York City's Mosquito Control Program. The program's goal is to prevent New Yorkers from getting sick with mosquito-borne diseases.
  109. [109]
    Can Plants Repel Problematic Insects? - Clemson HGIC
    Jun 2, 2025 · Citronella plants, scented geraniums and lemongrass plants are also commonly touted as mosquito-repelling plants. Unfortunately, there is more to the story.
  110. [110]
    Oxitec Successfully Completes First Field Deployment of 2nd ...
    Jun 3, 2019 · First field trial achieved up to 96% suppression of target disease-transmitting mosquito populations in dense urban settings in Brazil.Missing: modified | Show results with:modified
  111. [111]
    Vector control - World Health Organization (WHO)
    The ultimate goal is to prevent the transmission of vector-borne diseases such as malaria, dengue, Japanese encephalitis, leishmaniasis, schistosomiasis and ...
  112. [112]
    The History of Mosquito Repellents - Repel Wearables
    Oct 9, 2024 · ... methods of mosquito repellent over the centuries. In ... As early as 4500 BC, ancient Egyptians used plant-based extracts to repel insects.Missing: smoke mud<|separator|>
  113. [113]
    Evaluating the efficacy of animal fats as insect repellents ... - NIH
    Jul 17, 2024 · ... insect repellents attributed to historic-period Native ... indigenous peoples of the Gulf Coast region used animal fats to repel mosquitos.Missing: mud | Show results with:mud
  114. [114]
    NMSU researchers test 300-year-old insect repellent strategies used ...
    Oct 28, 2024 · ... animal fats as insect repellents attributed to historic-period Native ... Indigenous groups to repel mosquitoes along the Gulf Coast of ...Missing: mud | Show results with:mud
  115. [115]
    Citronella Oil History & Benefits as a Natural Bug Repellent
    Aug 1, 2025 · By the 19th century, citronella oil began to gain prominence beyond Asia, particularly in Europe and the United States. One of its most ...
  116. [116]
    (PDF) History of Insect Repellents - ResearchGate
    Jun 17, 2016 · ... insect pests have become worldwide threat nowadays. Insecticides and repellents have been used as chemical treatments against insect pests ...
  117. [117]
    Vector control: a cornerstone in the malaria elimination campaign
    Aug 31, 2011 · Plants have been used since ancient times to repel/kill bloodsucking insects, and even today, in many parts of the world, people are using ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  118. [118]
    Summary of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
    Apr 25, 2025 · The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizes the EPA to regulate the distribution, sale, production, and use of pesticides and ...
  119. [119]
    [PDF] 2025 Jul 07 (1732): Insect Repellents - The Medical Letter
    Jul 7, 2025 · Maximum duration of protection against mosquitoes for repellents applied to exposed skin, according to protection times approved by the EPA for ...
  120. [120]
    Pyrone Systems Submits Pyronz™ Biopesticide for EPA Registration
    Oct 3, 2024 · Pyrone Systems has successfully submitted its biopesticide registration for Pyronz™ to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  121. [121]
    Ultrasonic Mosquito Repellent Bracelet - Amazon.com
    4.5 17K · 30-day returns2025 Upgraded Ultrasonic Repeller & Insect Indoor Repeller,Ultrasonic and Repellent for Roach,Rodent,Mouse,Bugs,Mosquito,Mice,Spider,Ant,3 Mode Switching,6 ...
  122. [122]
    Development of a Nanotechnology Matrix-Based Citronella Oil ...
    The nanoparticle lipid solid forms a repellent reservoir on the skin surface, releasing the active ingredients slowly through volatilization, extending the ...
  123. [123]
    Repellent efficacy of the nanogel containing Acroptilon repens ...
    Oct 9, 2023 · The nanogel with a protection time of 310 ± 45 min was significantly more potent than DEET (160 ± 17 min). It could thus be considered for future investigation ...
  124. [124]
    NC State Startup Mimikai Launches DEET-Free Insect Repellent
    Jun 2, 2025 · Mimikai's new, EPA-approved repellent was developed based on innovative research from NC State that leverages the natural power of wild tomato plants to repel ...Missing: post- 2020
  125. [125]
    Insect Repellents Industry Analysis and Outlook 2025-2030:
    Mar 19, 2025 · Insect repellents industry analysis and outlook 2025-2030: Regional trends highlight innovation, regulation, and growing demand for eco-friendly solutions.Missing: countries | Show results with:countries