Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Lake Oroville

Lake Oroville is a in Butte County, , formed by the impoundment of the behind , an earthfill 770 feet high—the tallest in the United States—whose began in 1961 and was completed with the topping out of the in 1967. With a maximum storage capacity of approximately 3.5 million acre-feet, it functions as the largest in California's State Water Project, dedicated to (including 750,000 acre-feet reserved for that purpose), water storage for delivery to via the Sacramento-San Joaquin , hydroelectric power generation through pumped-storage facilities, , and enhancement of fish and wildlife habitats. As the principal storage facility of the State Water Project, which supplies water to over 27 million people and irrigates millions of acres of farmland, Lake Oroville plays a critical role in managing the variability of snowmelt and rainfall for regional and energy production. The reservoir's operations are influenced by seasonal , with high inflows during wet years necessitating spillway releases and low levels during droughts, such as in 2021 when water levels dropped sufficiently to shut down the associated hydroelectric plant. A defining event in the reservoir's history occurred in February 2017, when heavy precipitation caused erosion damage to both the main and emergency spillways of , leading to the evacuation of approximately 188,000 downstream residents due to fears of potential ; subsequent investigations attributed the incident partly to human errors in , , and rather than solely . This crisis prompted extensive spillway reconstruction costing over $1 billion and underscored vulnerabilities in aging infrastructure despite the dam's engineering feats.

Location and Geography

Geological and Topographical Context

Lake Oroville occupies a topographic depression in the northern foothills, primarily within , at an approximate elevation of 935 feet (285 meters) near the site. The basin encompasses narrow, steep-sided canyons and valleys carved by the and its tributaries, including the North, Middle, and South Forks, which converge upstream of the dam. This rugged terrain, typical of the transitional zone between the Central Valley lowlands and the higher , features elevations rising to over 2,000 feet (610 meters) along the surrounding ridges, enabling a surface area of about 19,500 acres (7,890 hectares) at full pool while maximizing storage through submergence of elongated arms. Geologically, the site lies within the Foothills metamorphic belt, underlain by the Smartville ophiolite complex, a remnant of ancient thrust onto continental margins during . This formation includes steeply dipping, strongly foliated metamorphic rocks such as dark grey and , with associated ultramafic and intrusions, providing a competent foundation for the after excavation of and core trenches to expose unweathered material. Alluvial deposits of , , and from the Formation, containing and metamorphic clasts, overlie the in valley fills, while auriferous gravels and older basalts occur in elevated areas like to the north. The regional reflects tectonic uplift and fluvial , with lineaments such as scarps and benches along the west shore indicating faulting or differential in the ophiolitic rocks. Seismic hazards arise from proximity to active faults, though the dam's design accounts for moderate ground motions on this foundation of variably weathered , which in some areas proved less resistant to due to fracturing and jointing.

Surrounding Region and Accessibility

Lake Oroville lies in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada mountains in Butte County, northern California, approximately 75 miles north of Sacramento. The reservoir is impounded by Oroville Dam on the Feather River and is encompassed by the Lake Oroville State Recreation Area, which spans oak woodlands, grasslands, and steep canyons characteristic of the transition zone between the Sacramento Valley and the Sierra Nevada. The surrounding region includes rural communities, agricultural lands, and wildlife habitats, with the city of Oroville located about 5 miles southwest of the dam and Chico roughly 25 miles north. Accessibility to Lake Oroville is primarily via State Route 70, a major north-south highway paralleling the Feather River, which connects to State Route 99 and Interstate 5 for regional travel. From SR 70 in Oroville, State Route 162 (Oroville Dam Boulevard) provides direct eastern access to the dam and recreation area entrances, including Lime Saddle after approximately 6 miles and Loafer Creek further along. Multiple public access points feature boat ramps operational at varying reservoir elevations—such as five lanes down to 853 feet—and trailheads for hiking and equestrian use, managed by the California Department of Water Resources and State Parks. The Oroville Municipal Airport accommodates general aviation, while Sacramento International Airport, about 90 miles south, serves commercial flights.

Engineering Features

Dam Design and Specifications

Oroville Dam is a zoned earthfill structure featuring an inclined impervious core of clay and plastic for seepage control, flanked by semi-pervious zones, random earthfill, and pervious rockfill shoulders for and load distribution. The embankment incorporates internal systems, including drains and toe drains, to manage surfaces and uplift pressures inherent to its zoned design. Key structural dimensions include a height of 770 feet (235 meters) above the foundation, a crest length of 6,920 feet (2,110 meters), and a crest elevation of 922 feet (281 meters) above mean sea level. The crest width measures 80 feet (24 meters), narrowing to a maximum base width of 3,570 feet (1,090 meters), with the embankment volume exceeding 77 million cubic yards of material sourced primarily from nearby quarries and borrow areas. The dam's outlet works consist of low-level river release facilities embedded within the , comprising towers, steel-lined conduits, and a stilling , with a design of approximately 1,274 cubic meters per second (45,000 cubic feet per second) for operational releases and drawdowns. infrastructure includes a gated service (Flood Control Outlet) with eight radial gates, a chute 3,055 feet (930 meters) long and 178.8 feet (54.5 meters) wide at the headworks, engineered for peak s up to 250,000 cubic feet per second (7,100 cubic meters per second). An auxiliary unlined emergency , located adjacent to the main , provides overflow during extreme flood events exceeding the service 's limits.

Reservoir Capacity and Infrastructure

Lake Oroville serves as the principal storage reservoir for the State Water Project, with a total capacity of approximately 3.5 million acre-feet (4.3 billion cubic meters), including allocations for multiple uses such as , , , , and in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The flood control zone reserves 750,000 acre-feet, typically maintained between elevations of 840 and 901 feet to accommodate inflow surges during wet periods. In 2021 and 2022, the California Department of Water Resources refined its operational capacity estimate to 3,424,753 acre-feet using updated topographic surveys accounting for and bathymetric changes, representing a minor reduction from prior figures but with negligible impacts on overall functionality. At full pool elevation of 901 feet (275 meters) above , the spans a maximum surface area of 15,500 acres (6,300 hectares) and features 167 miles (269 kilometers) of shoreline, supporting extensive recreational facilities including , , and . The maximum depth reaches about 690 feet (210 meters) near the face. Storage below the conservation pool elevation of 840 feet (256 meters) primarily supports long-term and environmental releases, while upper zones prioritize . Key infrastructure enabling reservoir operations includes the , a zoned earthfill embankment standing 770 feet (235 meters) high—the tallest of its type in the United States—and impounding the near its confluence with the . Appurtenant structures comprise a main (Flood Control Outlet) with eight radial gates and a concrete-lined chute for controlled releases up to design flood capacities, supplemented by an unlined emergency for overflow during extreme events. Outlet works feature low-level river valves and a central tower structure for selective withdrawals, feeding the underground Edward Hyatt Power Plant via three penstocks for hydroelectric generation. Adjacent Thermalito facilities, including the forebay and afterbay dams, provide pumped-storage re-regulation, enhancing operational flexibility with a combined generating capacity exceeding 700 megawatts. These elements collectively ensure reliable storage, conveyance to downstream aqueducts, and integration with the broader State Water Project network.

Hydroelectric Power Generation

The Edward Hyatt Powerplant, an underground hydroelectric pumping-generating facility excavated into the rock of Oroville Dam's left abutment, constitutes the principal power generation component associated with Lake Oroville. Constructed between 1964 and 1967, it houses three reversible pump-turbines capable of producing 645 megawatts of by releasing from the through penstocks into the . In pumping mode, the plant utilizes off-peak electrical power from the grid to return from the downstream Thermalito Afterbay to Lake Oroville, enabling pumped-storage operations that support peak-demand generation. As part of the broader Oroville Facilities Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 2100), which encompasses the Hyatt Powerplant alongside Thermalito-area facilities such as the Thermalito Pumping-Generating Plant and Thermalito Diversion Dam Powerplant, the system achieves a combined licensed capacity of 762 megawatts. These facilities collectively generate an average of 2.2 billion kilowatt-hours annually, contributing significantly to California's electrical grid by providing flexible, dispatchable hydropower for load balancing and renewable energy integration. Generation output varies with reservoir levels, inflows, and operational priorities like flood control and water supply; for example, during the 2020–2021 drought, Hyatt operations were curtailed to as low as 20% capacity before temporary shutdown in August 2021 to preserve storage, with resumption occurring in January 2022 at reduced outflows of approximately 900 cubic feet per second yielding 30 megawatts.

Historical Development

Planning and Construction (1950s-1960s)

The planning for Oroville Dam originated from the need to address chronic flooding and water supply shortages in , exacerbated by major floods in the basin during the early 1950s. In 1951, California State Engineer A. D. Edmonston proposed the Project as a precursor to the broader State Water Project (SWP), envisioning a large multipurpose dam near Oroville on the to provide , water storage for irrigation and urban use, and hydroelectric power. This plan was revised in 1955 to incorporate additional infrastructure like the and Aqueduct, reflecting engineering assessments of regional and growing demands from Southern California's population boom. Legislative momentum built in response to devastating 1955 floods, which caused widespread damage and highlighted the inadequacy of existing levees. In 1957, the passed an flood-control measure allocating $25 million for initial preparations, including the relocation of the and State Highway 70 (now ) to clear the reservoir footprint. Further planning involved geological surveys and feasibility studies from 1956 onward, evaluating the 's and for an earthfill embankment design, which was selected for its cost-effectiveness and suitability to the narrow canyon topography despite challenges like variable foundation materials. The Burns-Porter Act, approved by voters as Proposition 1 in November 1960 with a narrow margin of 173,944 votes, authorized $1.75 billion in bonds for the SWP, enabling full funding for Oroville Dam as its northern anchor. Construction commenced in May 1957 with preliminary work on railroad tunnels and diversions to facilitate river diversion and site access, employing diamond-core drilling and geophysical surveys unusual for the era to map subsurface conditions. Major dam site excavation and placement began in 1961 under the oversight of the Department of Water Resources, utilizing two temporary diversion tunnels to reroute the during pours. The project involved moving approximately 81 million cubic yards of earth and rock, with over 13 million pounds of reinforcing steel and 509,600 cubic yards of concrete for auxiliary structures like the spillways and power plant. Despite interruptions from floods in 1964—which the partially completed structure successfully mitigated—and a 1964 train derailment in a construction tunnel, the reached its full 770-foot height by October 1967, with the dam declared complete on , 1967, at a total cost of about $123 million. Dedication occurred on May 4, 1968, marking the reservoir's operational start as Lake Oroville.

Early Operations and Expansions

The Oroville Dam was dedicated on May 4, 1968, marking the transition to initial operational phases for Lake Oroville as part of the (SWP). Reservoir filling commenced shortly thereafter, with the lake reaching its initial full capacity of approximately 3.5 million acre-feet in July 1969. Early operations focused on integrating flood control, water storage for SWP deliveries, and hydroelectric generation, managed by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) in coordination with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) guidelines for basin flood management. The dam's primary outlet works and were tested during this period to handle inflows from the North, Middle, and South Forks of the , preventing downstream flooding while reserving space for winter storm runoff—typically maintaining reservoir levels below 850 feet elevation from November to May. Hydroelectric operations began promptly with the activation of the Edward Hyatt Powerplant, an underground facility at the dam's base completed in 1967, which generated its first power in 1968 using water released through three turbines with a combined capacity of 1,150 megawatts. This plant, the largest underground powerhouse in the U.S. at the time, routed via 4,000-foot-long penstocks to produce peaking for the state's , with initial outputs supporting SWP demands. Concurrently, the Thermalito Diversion Dam's powerplant, operational from 1968, added 3.4 megawatts by harnessing releases for fish flow maintenance in the lower . These facilities enabled reversible operations, where excess energy pumped between the Thermalito Forebay (completed 1968) and Afterbay (completed 1968) for storage and recapture, optimizing efficiency during variable demand. Expansions in the late and early enhanced the Oroville-Thermalito Complex's capabilities. The Oroville-Thermalito Pumping-Generating , constructed from to , became operational in , featuring two reversible pump-turbines that could generate megawatts or lift feet for reuse, thereby extending power production and supporting SWP exports southward via the pumping system. This addition allowed greater flexibility in managing diurnal load fluctuations and integrating with downstream canals, with initial tests demonstrating the ability to re-regulate tailwaters from the Hyatt . By 1973, full integration of these components had established the complex as a key node for flood attenuation—reducing peak flows by up to 90% during early storm events—and reliable baseload power, though operations were constrained by ongoing environmental assessments for fish passage and impacts from inundation of 15,500 acres upstream.

Hydrology and Operations

Water Inflows, Storage, and Releases

The primary inflows to Lake Oroville originate from the system, encompassing the North Fork, Middle Fork, and South Fork tributaries that drain a spanning the western slopes of the . These unregulated streams deliver water primarily through snowmelt-driven flows in spring and rain-fed peaks during winter storms, with inflow volumes fluctuating markedly based on precipitation; historical records show extremes from near-zero during severe droughts to peaks over 100,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) during events. Minor direct contributions come from small local creeks entering the reservoir arms, but the accounts for the vast majority of the unregulated natural inflow, which the Department of Water Resources (DWR) adjusts in operational models to estimate "natural flow" for planning. The reservoir's storage capacity totals approximately 3.54 million acre-feet at full pool elevation of 901 feet, including 3.54 million acre-feet of maximum operating storage for water supply and hydropower, plus an additional 750,000 acre-feet reserved exclusively for flood control above the 840-foot seasonal restriction level. DWR maintains this flood space under U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) guidelines to accommodate anticipated winter-spring inflows, releasing water preemptively if projections exceed safe levels; for instance, storage is held below 840 feet from November 1 to May 31 to reserve space for up to 2 million acre-feet of potential floodwater. Sedimentation has reduced usable capacity by about 3% (roughly 36 billion gallons) as of 2024, though DWR assessments indicate minimal operational impacts. Releases from Lake Oroville occur through multiple outlets managed by DWR for flood risk reduction, hydroelectric generation, and downstream supply. The Edward Hyatt Pumping-Generating Plant handles primary outflows for power production (up to 13,400 cfs via three turbines) and transfers to the Thermalito Pumping Plant for export via the State Water Project aqueduct, while the main (designed for 250,000 cfs, service capacity 150,000 cfs) and auxiliary activate during high inflows to prevent overtopping. Low-level river outlets and the Thermalito route controlled flows to the below, typically maintaining minimums of 800-1,000 cfs for environmental needs but surging to 50,000-150,000 cfs during flood operations, as seen in peaks during wet years. These releases balance inflow variability, with annual outflows roughly matching long-term averages adjusted for losses of about 100,000-200,000 acre-feet yearly.

Flood Control Mechanisms

Flood control at Lake Oroville is primarily managed through a seasonal reservation of storage space within the reservoir, as outlined in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Water Control Manual for Oroville Reservoir, established in 1970 and revised periodically. This flood control pool provides up to 750,000 acre-feet of capacity, with the bottom at elevation 848.5 feet, varying seasonally between October 15 and April 1 based on a wetness index derived from historical and forecasted hydrologic conditions: 375,000 acre-feet under dry conditions (index ≤3.5) and 750,000 acre-feet under wet conditions (index ≥11.0). The California Department of Water Resources (DWR), which operates the reservoir, maintains this space to accommodate inflows from the Feather River watershed during storms, preventing overtopping of Oroville Dam while minimizing downstream flooding. Controlled releases form the core operational mechanism, routed through multiple outlets to regulate outflows without exceeding downstream capacities, such as 150,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) immediately below the and 180,000 cfs on the upper . Primary pathways include the Flood Control Outlet (FCO), capable of up to 150,000 cfs under routine conditions and designed for peaks of 296,000 cfs at elevation 916.8 feet; the Edward Hyatt Powerplant, providing up to 17,000 cfs via three of its six turbines; and the River Valve Outlet System (RVOS) for selective low-level draws. Releases follow guidelines in the Water Control Manual's Flood Control Diagram, prioritizing rapid evacuation of encroached flood space while adhering to ramping limits—no more than 10,000 cfs increase or 5,000 cfs decrease per two-hour period—to avoid downstream or . If storage exceeds the main crest at 901 feet, the emergency spillway activates for uncontrolled discharge up to 350,000 cfs, though operations aim to avoid this threshold. DWR coordinates releases with USACE and local agencies, using real-time inflow forecasts and hydrologic models to balance attenuation with and power needs, particularly from October through June when federal mandates apply. Enhanced approaches, such as Forecast-Informed Operations (FIRO) piloted since the 2017 spillway incident, allow temporary storage increases above traditional reservations during low-risk periods, potentially freeing up to 120,000 acre-feet for other uses while preserving protection, as demonstrated in simulations for Oroville and coordinated reservoirs like New Bullards Bar. These mechanisms have historically attenuated major , such as those in the 1986 and 1997 events, by storing and metering peak inflows exceeding 300,000 cfs into manageable downstream flows. Lake Oroville's water levels fluctuate significantly due to variable inflows from the watershed, influenced by winter rainfall and snowpack melt, balanced against operational releases for , , and downstream under DWR management. Elevations typically draw down to around 800-850 feet by late summer for demands and flood space reservation, then refill in spring; interannual swings can exceed 200 feet, reflecting California's precipitation variability rather than long-term trends attributable to singular causes like anthropogenic without rigorous causal attribution. The reservoir operates between a minimum elevation of approximately 640 feet and full at feet, yielding a usable of about 3.5 million acre-feet (MAF), with a flood surcharge to 901 feet. Key historical records underscore these dynamics:
DateEventElevation (ft)Storage (% of capacity)
June 4, 1973Record maximum899.88~100% (3,536,000 AF)
September 2021Record minimum628.6322%
June 2023Full pool achieved900100%
May 16, 2025Near-full peak89799% (3.38 MAF)
The 1973 peak resulted from exceptional following a wet winter, while the 2021 low stemmed from prolonged conditions exacerbated by low inflows and high releases. DWR adjusted operational calculations in 2024 to 3.425 MAF based on updated bathymetric surveys accounting for , affecting percentage metrics but not physical storage. From 2023 to 2025, levels rebounded from lows amid consecutive wet s driven by atmospheric rivers. Winter 2022-2023 storms filled the to by June 2023, enabling substantial carryover into 2024. peaked levels again in early June 2024, though end-of-year storage declined relative to 2023 due to sustained releases. Early 2025 saw elevations climb to 897 feet by mid-May from and spring inflows, surpassing 122% of historical averages, before summer drawdowns for State Water Project allocations reduced levels to 794 feet (approximately 54% ) by early October 2025—still 90% of seasonal norms amid a drier start to 2025-2026. These cycles highlight in storage operations, with no evidence of systemic decline when accounting for management protocols and natural variability.

Major Incidents and Response

2017 Spillway Crisis

In early February 2017, following five years of , intense storms brought record rainfall to , rapidly filling Lake Oroville to near capacity and necessitating high-volume releases through the dam's infrastructure. On February 7, operators observed significant to the main service during discharges of approximately 52,000 cubic feet per second (cfs), revealing a 250-foot-wide and 50-foot-deep crater in the chute; releases were halted for inspection. Test releases resumed on at 20,000 cfs, but progressed with further as flows increased to 65,000 cfs by February 10, prompting preparations for the emergency . By February 11, the reservoir reached elevation 901 feet, overtopping the emergency for the first time in its history and initiating flows of up to 12,500 cfs; rapid headcutting erosion undermined the crest, threatening downstream debris flows. On February 12, accelerating erosion led state officials to mandatory evacuations at approximately 3:44 p.m. for about 188,000 residents in low-lying areas of , Yuba, and Sutter counties along the , citing imminent risk of catastrophic failure. Releases from the main were ramped up to 100,000 cfs to lower the reservoir, while helicopters dropped rock and cement on the emergency to mitigate further incision. Evacuation orders were downgraded to warnings on as inflows subsided and the level fell below 901 feet, ending emergency use; full rescission followed shortly thereafter, with no injuries or downstream flooding reported. Releases tapered from 80,000 cfs on February 16 to zero by February 27, dropping the lake to 843 feet; repairs commenced, including 1.24 million cubic yards of from the powerplant forebay. The incident incurred over $500 million in repair costs, escalating to approximately $1 billion in total damages including evacuation and lost power generation. A subsequent independent forensic investigation attributed the main spillway failure to uplift pressures from water injection through pre-existing cracks and joints in the slabs, exceeding their during high-velocity flows and initiating progressive of the underlying erodible, rock. Contributing factors included design deficiencies such as thin slabs over drains, inadequate preparation leaving in place, insufficient drainage systems prone to clogging, and long-term deterioration from unchecked cracking since the spillway's commissioning, compounded by ineffective past repairs. The report highlighted systemic operational shortcomings, including complacency toward like persistent drain flows and a lack of rigorous monitoring protocols, rather than solely the rainfall event, as root causes enabling the cascade to spillway activation.

Engineering Recovery and Forensic Analysis

Following the 2017 spillway incident, the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) commissioned an Independent Forensic Team (IFT) to investigate the causes, with preliminary findings released on May 5, 2017, identifying 24 potential physical contributors to the main damage, including structural, geologic, and operational factors. The final IFT report, issued January 5, 2018, concluded that the main spillway initiated on February 7, 2017, at approximately 52,500 cubic feet per second (cfs) due to uplift forces from pressurized water injecting through cracks and joints in the chute slab, exceeding the 15-inch-thick slab's capacity and causing cracking, spalling, and jacking near Station 33+00. This led to progressive headcutting downstream to Station 35+50, exacerbated by foundation crumbling around anchors and high drain flows from seepage, with initial failure linked to prior repair sites over herringbone drains. The report attributed root causes to design deficiencies, such as inadequate slab thickness, absence of waterstops at joints, single-layer , and insufficient foundation drainage redundancy; construction shortcomings, including poor foundation preparation with less than 50% exposure in areas and inadequate anchor embedment; and geological mischaracterization underestimating erodible weathered depths (22-44 feet) in the emergency spillway area. For the emergency spillway, activated for the first time on , 2017, at elevation 901 feet with peak flows around 12,500 cfs, erosion resulted from rapid headcutting over unprepared, fractured , , and formations, undermining concrete slabs via seepage and scour. Systemic failures included DWR's immature dam , overconfidence in , inadequate assessments dismissing plausible modes, normalization of chronic issues like cracking since 1969, poor inter-divisional communication, and insufficient regulatory oversight from agencies like FERC and DSOD, which prioritized extreme events over recurrent risks. In response, DWR initiated recovery in April 2017 by awarding a $275 million contract to Kiewit West for , focusing on addressing identified vulnerabilities. The main chute was reinforced with lining, rock anchors for stability, and sealed joints to prevent seepage; scoured foundation areas were filled using , a durable mix applied without forms to restore integrity over the eroded sections. The emergency received armoring with rock and aggregate delivered at up to 1,200 tons per hour via , alongside removal of 1.25 million cubic yards of to prepare stable surfaces. These modifications increased the main 's capacity to handle 270,000 cfs, enhancing resistance while integrating improved and monitoring systems. progressed rapidly, with the main fully operational by late 2018 and overall upgrades completed by October 2019, restoring full dam functionality without further incidents.

Environmental and Ecological Role

Climate Influences on Reservoir Dynamics

![Boats on Lake Oroville during the 2021 drought.jpg][float-right] The dynamics of Lake Oroville, California's second-largest by , are profoundly shaped by the region's , characterized by winters and arid summers, with in the [Feather River](/page/Feather River) watershed averaging around 50-60 inches concentrated from November to April. Inflows primarily derive from rainfall and in the and Cascade Ranges, leading to peak storage in spring and early summer followed by declines due to demands, generation, and . Drought periods, such as the 2012-2016 event, reduced storage to historic lows of approximately 245,000 acre-feet by early 2015, illustrating how multi-year deficits in directly curtail replenishment. El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycles exert significant interannual variability on inflows; El Niño phases typically enhance winter precipitation via intensified atmospheric rivers, boosting runoff and elevating storage, as observed in the 2023 water year when Lake Oroville reached full capacity earlier than average following strong El Niño conditions. Conversely, La Niña episodes correlate with suppressed rainfall and drier conditions, exacerbating drawdowns, with historical data showing reduced inflows during such years in . Anthropogenic amplifies these dynamics through increased atmospheric moisture, resulting in more extreme events; attribution studies indicate that warming has intensified Basin rainfall by 11-15% during atmospheric rivers, contributing to the 2017 spillway erosion incident where consecutive storms overwhelmed the . Rising temperatures accelerate snowmelt timing, shifting peak inflows earlier and heightening flood risks while elevating rates—estimated at 3-5 feet annually from the surface—further straining during dry periods. , influenced by episodic high-flow events, has diminished capacity by about 3% since impoundment began in , compounding climate-driven volatility in usable volume.

Wildlife, Fisheries, and Habitat Management

Lake Oroville supports both warmwater and coldwater fisheries, hosting species such as , , , , , , , and . The Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) stocks averaging 10 to 12 inches in length, which grow rapidly due to the reservoir's productive conditions, enhancing angling opportunities particularly in fall and winter for bass. Fisheries management includes monitoring salmon runs via a station installed in the near Oroville, tracking arrival timing and numbers; for instance, spring-run counts from April 16 to June 30, 2025, totaled 17,738 adults, while fall-run counts through September reached similar scales. The adjacent 11,800-acre Oroville Wildlife Area, managed by CDFW, features riparian woodland habitat along the and surrounding grasslands, supporting diverse wildlife including over 231 bird species such as great blue herons, cliff swallows, Canada geese, white-throated swifts, and wild turkeys, alongside mammals, raptors, and waterfowl observable via trails near the Lake Oroville State Recreation Area. The area permits , with expectations of 80 to 100 dove hunters on opening day in early . Habitat management efforts by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), CDFW, and partners focus on enhancing spawning and structure; in March 2025, teams installed structures using bundled recycled holiday trees in Lake Oroville and the Thermalito Afterbay to improve cover and substrate for . Additional projects include placing approximately 8,000 cubic yards of gravel in the for salmonid spawning grounds, completed in 2023, and ongoing invasive and inspections at Oroville facilities since 2025 to prevent impacts on habitats and . These initiatives aim to mitigate dam-related barriers to migration while balancing and demands.

Feather River Fish Hatchery Operations

The Feather River Fish Hatchery, located downstream of along the in , was established in the 1960s as part of the State Water Project to mitigate the impacts of the dam on anadromous fish migration. blocks access to historical upstream spawning habitats for species such as and , necessitating artificial propagation to sustain populations; the hatchery rears juveniles from collected adults to compensate for this lost natural production. Operations commenced in 1967 under the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), with funding and oversight provided by the Department of Water Resources (DWR). Adult fish are intercepted at the adjacent Fish Barrier Dam, constructed in 1962, which diverts and into collection facilities before they reach the impassable . Spawning occurs seasonally: fall-run from September to December, spring-run from May to August, and primarily from December to March. Eggs are fertilized, incubated in trays, and hatched fry are reared in raceways with controlled water flows from the ; juveniles are released as fry, smolts, or yearlings to support downstream migration and ocean survival. The facility includes an underwater viewing window for public observation of rearing fish, open from mid-September to June, 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Production targets prioritize fall-run , with annual goals often exceeding 12 million eggs; for instance, 12 million Chinook eggs were collected in 2019, meeting harvest objectives despite variable adult returns. mitigation requires releasing approximately 450,000 yearlings at a of 3 fish per pound annually. Spring-run Chinook production aims for at least 750 spawning pairs to achieve egg take goals, though returns have historically averaged lower than pre-dam levels of about 1,700 adults per decade. Releases include targeted stockings, such as 1.8 million Chinook fry into the by September 2025, with increased fall-run production planned for 2023 onward to bolster populations amid environmental stressors like . Operations adapt to hydrological conditions; low river flows prompt rescues, such as the relocation of 6.5 million young and 1 million during water shortages. A Monitoring installed by DWR in July 2023 in the low-flow channel enhances data on fish abundance, timing, and hatchery versus wild origin, informing . Summer maintenance, including after spring-run tagging in 2025, ensures facility readiness for fall spawning, with the reopening in September. These efforts support broader recovery, though success depends on river flows regulated by Oroville releases.

Recreation and Economic Impact

Public Recreation Activities and Facilities

Lake Oroville State Recreation Area, encompassing approximately 28,450 acres surrounding the , provides diverse public recreation opportunities managed primarily by in partnership with the Department of Water Resources. The lake supports up to 15,500 surface acres and 167 miles of shoreline at maximum elevation, enabling activities such as , , , , and horseback riding. Boating dominates water-based recreation, with facilities including full-service marinas like Bidwell Canyon (280 berths) and multiple boat ramps such as the 12-lane ramp (operational to 821 feet ), Bidwell Canyon (7 lanes to 850 feet), and Loafer Creek (8 lanes to 800 feet). , sailboating, water-skiing, rentals at Lime Saddle Marina, and other pursuits like and are accommodated, though ramp availability varies with water levels. Fishing is renowned for species including , largemouth and , , and , supported by the adjacent Fish Hatchery and a wheelchair-accessible at the North Forebay. Land-based options feature family and group at sites like Bidwell Canyon (75 sites), Loafer Creek (137 sites), and Lime Saddle (50 sites), alongside primitive, RV hookup, boat-in, and floating campsites accessible via water. Reservations for these are handled through ' system. An extensive trail network facilitates , , and use across the recreation area, complemented by , , and the Kelly Ridge Visitor Center, which includes interpretive exhibits and a 47-foot . features encompass wheelchair-friendly restrooms, showers, , and charging stations at select locations. Historically, the area has drawn over one million visitors annually, underscoring its regional popularity for outdoor pursuits.

Contributions to Regional Economy and Water Supply

Lake Oroville, with a storage capacity of 3.5 million acre-feet, functions as the principal for the northern segment of the (SWP), capturing inflows to enable downstream water conveyance via the Oroville-Tonasket Canal and other infrastructure. This storage supports average annual SWP deliveries exceeding 2.5 million acre-feet, with 43.6% (approximately 1.1 million acre-feet) allocated to agricultural across Central Valley counties and districts. These deliveries underpin $19 billion in annual agricultural output, including high-value crops in Kern County alone valued at $8.2 billion, sustaining 160,000 farmworker jobs statewide. Urban water supplies from Oroville-stored water, comprising 56.4% of SWP allocations (about 1.4 million acre-feet yearly), serve 27 million residents—66% of California's population—across 29 contractor agencies, facilitating residential, commercial, and industrial uses in metropolitan areas like and the region. The broader SWP service area, reliant on Oroville's contributions, generates an economic output of $2.25 trillion annually—equivalent to the world's eighth-largest —and supports 8.7 million full-time jobs across 800,000 businesses, with median household incomes 23% above the state average. These impacts stem from reliable water enabling expanded economic activity, though deliveries fluctuate with hydrological conditions, averaging below full entitlements of 4.23 million acre-feet due to environmental flows and droughts. Hydroelectric generation at the adjacent Edward C. Hyatt Pump-Generating Plant, utilizing Oroville releases, provides 644 megawatts of through three reversible pump-turbines, contributing to the SWP's total output while offsetting pumping costs and exporting surplus to California's . Combined with the Thermalito facilities, Oroville's powerplants deliver dependable up to 725 megawatts, supporting regional reliability and revenue that partially funds SWP operations, though annual varies with water availability—recent quarterly output reached 271 gigawatt-hours in early 2025. This bolsters the regional economy by reducing reliance on fossil fuels and stabilizing electricity costs for industries dependent on SWP water.

Controversies and Criticisms

Maintenance and Oversight Failures

The 2017 Oroville Dam spillway incident exposed longstanding maintenance deficiencies in the infrastructure managed by the Department of Water Resources (DWR), including inadequate repairs to known concrete degradation from during prior high-flow events in the and . These events caused pitting and cracking in the spillway chute slab, yet DWR opted for superficial patching rather than comprehensive reinforcement or redesign to mitigate recurring subsurface and joint failures. Investigations pinpointed a critical gap in ongoing : the lacked sufficient , such as pressure sensors or monitors, to detect progressive damage during operations exceeding design flows. On February 7, 2017, unchecked cracks allowed water injection beneath the slab, triggering uplift forces that accelerated chute failure at flows of approximately 54,500 cubic feet per second. Geological reports from the onward had documented unstable alluvial foundations prone to , but DWR maintenance protocols failed to incorporate erosion-resistant measures like improved or slab anchors, despite evidence of similar vulnerabilities in comparable structures. Oversight by regulatory entities, including the (FERC) and California's Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD), contributed through reliance on annual visual inspections that consistently rated the spillways as safe without mandating advanced forensic testing or load-specific modeling. The Independent Forensic Team's analysis described this as a "long-term " across DWR, regulators, and industry practices, marked by insufficient enforcement of Part 12D inspection standards for spillway integrity under extreme hydrologic loading. These lapses reflected institutional priorities favoring short-term operations over proactive risk mitigation, with DWR's deferred investments in upgrades—estimated at hundreds of millions prior to —exacerbating vulnerabilities amid California's variable patterns. Post-incident reviews by FERC highlighted the need for enhanced regulatory protocols, including mandatory hydraulic modeling and , to prevent recurrence.

Debates on Risk Management and Regulatory Burdens

The 2017 Oroville Dam spillway incident precipitated debates on the adequacy of practices at the facility, with forensic analyses attributing the primarily to the California Department of Water Resources' (DWR) long-term systemic shortcomings in oversight, maintenance, and engineering judgment, rather than isolated regulatory lapses. The Forensic Team (IFT) report emphasized that DWR's adherence to minimum regulatory requirements by agencies like the (FERC) proved insufficient to mitigate foreseeable , as known foundation instabilities and erosion vulnerabilities dating back to construction-era geology reports were not proactively addressed through enhanced internal assessments or upgrades. Critics, including policy analysts, highlighted DWR's "patch and pray" maintenance strategy—evident in repeated superficial repairs to spillway damage since the 1980s without comprehensive redesign—as a of causal , where short-term operational continuity overshadowed long-term structural integrity. Proponents of stricter regulatory frameworks argued that the crisis exposed gaps in prescriptive oversight, advocating for mandatory adoption of probabilistic to supplement compliance checklists, as recommended by the IFT to align dam operations with ethical responsibilities beyond federal mandates. However, counterarguments centered on regulatory burdens impeding agile , noting that Oroville's FERC relicensing process, which spanned from application in to approval in , entangled DWR in protracted environmental reviews and litigation over fish habitat and water flows, potentially diverting funds and attention from fortifications despite documented erosion risks. These delays, critics contended, exemplified how layered federal and state environmental statutes—such as the (NEPA) and (CEQA)—impose compliance costs exceeding $1 billion annually for water infrastructure operators statewide, fostering a bureaucratic culture that prioritizes documentation over empirical hazard mitigation. Post-incident recovery efforts underscored these tensions, as Governor Jerry Brown's 2017 expedited spillway reconstruction by streamlining permits, enabling completion of the main spillway by November 2017 at a cost of $1.1 billion, yet subsequent FERC audits revealed persistent deficiencies in DWR's modeling, such as underestimation of extreme scenarios. Debates persisted on whether amplifying regulatory stringency, as in California's post-Oroville dam safety reforms mandating annual reviews, would enhance or exacerbate burdens by increasing administrative overhead without addressing root causes like underfunding for —DWR's Oroville budget had stagnated relative to since the . evaluations, including GAO assessments, urged FERC to incorporate portfolio-wide analyses for projects, critiquing fragmented oversight where operators bear disproportionate compliance loads amid aging vulnerabilities. These discussions reflect broader causal realism in dam governance: empirical data from Oroville indicate that regulatory minimums alone cannot substitute for owner-driven, data-validated protocols, while excessive procedural hurdles paralyzing necessary interventions in a changing hydrological .

References

  1. [1]
    Oroville
    ### Key Facts About Lake Oroville
  2. [2]
    Oroville Reservoir and Thermalito Facilities | NCWA
    Work on the dam site began in 1961. The embankment was topped out in 1967, and the official dedication ceremony was held the next year. Hyatt Power Plant.
  3. [3]
    Lake Oroville full, but drought conditions not forgotten
    Jun 11, 2024 · Oroville Reservoir Level is at 899 feet elevation and current storage capacity is about 3.53 million acre-feet (maf), which is 100% of its ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  4. [4]
    Oroville Dam - Water Education Foundation
    Feb 11, 2014 · Oroville Dam is the tallest in the United States and impounds the largest reservoir in California's State Water Project, which brings water to 27 million ...
  5. [5]
    Amid drought, Lake Oroville hydroelectric power plant closes
    Aug 5, 2021 · The storms eroded the main and emergency spillways, limiting the reservoir's main tool to control the water level, which forced thousands of ...Missing: notable spills
  6. [6]
    Human Errors Contributed to Oroville Spillway Failure
    Mar 1, 2018 · Damage to the main and emergency spillways of the Oroville Dam in California, triggered in February 2017 by heavy rain that was part of Northern California's ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  7. [7]
    Revisiting the Oroville Dam Spillway Failure - American Rivers
    Mar 4, 2020 · It's been three years since our nation's tallest dam, Oroville Dam, partially failed, forcing downstream evacuations, environmental damage, and costly ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Lake Oroville Topo Map in Butte County CA - TopoZone
    Lake Oroville Information. Coordinates: 39.5371085°N, -121.4833014°W Approx. Elevation: 935 feet (285 meters) USGS Map Area: Oroville Dam
  9. [9]
    Oroville, CA: Middle Fork of the Feather River, Sierra Nevada Foothills
    The survey area consists of one polygon covering 208 square kilometers and centered along the Middle Fork Feather River, Sierra Nevada Foothills, California.Missing: basin | Show results with:basin
  10. [10]
    Some Geological Observations On The Oroville Dam - Forbes
    Feb 14, 2017 · The Oroville Dam is build on the Smartville ophiolite, consisting of dark grey, steeply-dipping and strongly foliated metamorphic rocks.
  11. [11]
    The enormous scale of the erosion problem at the Oroville Dam site
    Feb 14, 2017 · The geology at the spillway looks pretty interesting as it looks to be the Jurassic Smartville Ophiolite Complex, that is well written about in ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Geology of the Oroville quadrangle, California
    The Oroville quadrangle includes formations like the Calaveras, Oregon City, and Monte de Oro, with igneous rocks, and "Older basalt" and "auriferous gravels".
  13. [13]
    West Shore Lake Oroville Lineament Geologic Investigation ...
    A 10-km-long, north-south oriented zone of topographic lineaments including scarps, benches, and saddles identified on lidar coincide with possible northward ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] INDEPENDENT FORENSIC TEAM REPORT OROVILLE DAM ...
    Jan 5, 2018 · Strong ground motions sufficient to have caused damage. Page 10. Appendix C – General Site Geology, Seismicity, and Site Geological Conditions.
  15. [15]
    How 'Incompetent Rock' Led to the Oroville Dam Crisis | KQED
    Apr 7, 2017 · Amidst the Sierra's jumbled geology, a leading expert says Oroville's spillways were not built on the most solid rock.
  16. [16]
    Oroville - California Department of Water Resources
    Construction on the plant began in 1964 and was completed in 1969, with operations starting in 1968. Thermalito Diversion Dam Powerplant. Thermalito Diversion ...Oroville Spillways Recovery · Oroville Dam Safety... · Lake Oroville Recreation
  17. [17]
    Lake Oroville State Recreation Area - California State Parks
    From Highway 70, go east on Highway 162 (Oroville Dam Blvd.). Continue on Oroville Dam Blvd., turning right at Olive Hwy. (Highway 162), proceed approximately 6 ...Missing: geography | Show results with:geography
  18. [18]
    Lake Oroville Recreation - California Department of Water Resources
    Oct 17, 2025 · The best opportunities for use of the day use area are at reservoir levels from 900 down to about 850 feet. ... The eight-lane boat ramp shares ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Oroville Dam - California Water Library
    @North Fork Bridge Type - Concrete Arch Length - 1,011 Ft. Height Above Streambed - 162 Ft. Type - Eorthfill Height -71 Ft. Fill Volume • 1,600,000 Cu.Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  20. [20]
    The Oroville Dam 2017 Spillway Incident – Possible Causes and ...
    Dec 9, 2017 · General Dam Configuration. Oroville Dam is a zoned earth-fill embankment structure with a maximum height of 235 m (770 ft.) above streambed ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] ~ir-f1~r - Bureau of Reclamation
    Outlet and Spillway of Oroville Dam. I believe ... Oroville Spillway Outlet Works--Details. ... EMBANKMENT-DAM. Not to scale. N W. S Elev. 900. 0. Onginal.
  22. [22]
    Oroville Dam
    The dam releases an average of 2.8 million acre feet (MAF) of its total capacity of 3.5 MAF. Water deliveries made to Butte and Plumas County in northern CA and ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Oroville Dam Facts and Figures
    The lake reached full pool this year in June 2023. Lake Oroville reached a historic low elevation of 628.63 feet, only 22 percent of capacity, on Sept. 30, 2021 ...Missing: basin | Show results with:basin
  24. [24]
    Insights into the Oroville Dam 2017 Spillway Incident - ResearchGate
    Oct 16, 2025 · ... core on a concrete foundation, supplemented by zoned. earth-fill ... outlet's release capacity is approximately 1274 m. 3. /s. By chance ...
  25. [25]
    Oroville Spillways FAQ - California Department of Water Resources
    Phase One construction at Lake Oroville's emergency spillway is still underway, with construction of the underground secant pile wall expected to be completed ...
  26. [26]
    A key Calif. reservoir has permanently shrunk by 36 billion gallons
    Jul 2, 2024 · Lake Oroville's capacity has dropped by 3%, but the shrinkage should have 'minimal impacts,' the Department of Water Resources said.Missing: zones | Show results with:zones
  27. [27]
    Lake Oroville Info | Oroville Chamber of Commerce
    It has 167 miles of shoreline and more than 15,500 surface acres. The lake is 690 feet deep and within its depths are 3.4 million acre-feet of water. How big is ...
  28. [28]
    H-3 P-2100-185 - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    Feb 16, 2023 · 1. On January 29, 2018, as supplemented on February 13, July 16, August 1, and · 2. In February 2017, the main spillway of the project's Oroville ...
  29. [29]
    Oroville Facilities (P-2100)
    The hydroelectric facilities of P-2100 have a combined license capacity of approximately 762 megawatts, which produce an average of 2.2 billion kilowatt-hours ...
  30. [30]
    Hyatt Powerplant at Oroville Dam Resumes Operation
    Jan 4, 2022 · DWR anticipates an average outflow of about 900 cubic feet per second which will generate approximately 30 megawatts of power. As lake levels ...
  31. [31]
    History - California Department of Water Resources
    In May 1957 work began on the construction of two tunnels on the Western Pacific Railroad relocation to clear the site for the dam and reservoir. Appropriations ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] DESIGN EVOLUTION OF OROVILLE DAM 1956-68
    The cobbles were dominated by granitic rock, with a matrix of fine grained soils that could be used in the embankment core.
  33. [33]
    Oroville Dam: A look back at massive structure's construction - CTPost
    Feb 13, 2017 · The $123 million Oroville Dam project was finished Oct. 6, 1967, when the last truckload of 81 million cubic yards of dirt was dumped on the 770 ...
  34. [34]
    Oroville Dam Makes its own Earthquakes - Berkeley Seismology Lab
    Feb 16, 2017 · The reservoir was first filled to capacity in July 1969 - and nothing happened for almost six years. The seismic sensors did not record any ...
  35. [35]
    Upper Feather River Watershed
    The Upper Feather River Watershed includes all waters tributary to the Feather River from the headwaters in the Sierra Nevada crest downstream to Lake Oroville.
  36. [36]
    USGS Water-Year Summary for Site 11407000
    Maximum peak flows are river-only flows. See schematic diagram showing diversions and storage from Feather River at Lake Oroville available from the California ...
  37. [37]
    Feather River inflow to Oroville Reservoir, CA Update - TreeFlow
    Feather River inflow to Lake Oroville, CA. Source: California Department of. Water Resources. Adjustment: "Natural flow" record extensively adjusted to account
  38. [38]
    New Bullards Bar and Oroville Dams Water Control Manual Update
    Construction first began in 1957 on relocating what is now Highway 70 and the Western Pacific Railroad. Work on the dam site began in 1961. The embankment ...
  39. [39]
    Lake Oroville Update - March 14, 2025
    Mar 14, 2025 · Lake Oroville is the largest storage facility in the State Water Project, providing flood protection while supporting environmental and water ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Lower Feather River Watershed
    The Lower Feather River Watershed begins from the waters behind the Oroville Dam, the tallest dam in the United States. The dam creates Lake Oroville, generates ...Missing: inflows | Show results with:inflows
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Redacted Oroville Water Control Manual, 1970
    Advance planning studies indicated tihat to control the standard project ... (Primary standard project storm centered on Feather River above Oroville Dam).
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Lake Oroville 2018/2019 Flood Operations Plan
    Nov 1, 2018 · Planned flood management releases from Lake Oroville are through the FCO, powerplant outlets, and river valve outlet system (RVOS). Key ...Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    New Report Shows Implementation of Forecast-Informed Reservoir ...
    Mar 13, 2025 · A new report released today shows that changes to reservoir operations at Lake Oroville and New Bullards Bar Reservoir can further reduce flood risk for ...Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Lake Oroville Storage
    Oct 1, 2025 · When the actual storage (blue line) is greater than the flood regulation rules storage (red line), Lake Oroville is encroached and is.
  45. [45]
    Water-Year Summary for Site 11406800 - water data. usgs - USGS.gov
    Usable capacity, 2,685,385 acre-ft, between elevations 640.0 ft, minimum power pool, and 900.0 ft, normal maximum pool. Dead storage, 852,192 acre-ft. Total ...
  46. [46]
    DWR is now using a new storage capacity total for water operations ...
    Jul 3, 2024 · DWR will begin using the new smaller capacity number of 3,424,753 acre-feet on July 1. The picture below is Oroville in 2021. You may recall the ...Missing: hydroelectric generation output
  47. [47]
    Lake Oroville continues to drop from lack of inflows
    Oct 8, 2024 · Lake Oroville's water level peaked early this year but has fallen drastically compared to 2023. By early June 2024, the lake had reached its capacity from snow ...
  48. [48]
    Lake Oroville is at 897 feet elevation and storage is approximately ...
    May 16, 2025 · Lake Oroville is at 850 feet elevation and storage is approximately 2.81 million acre-feet (MAF), which is 79 percent of its total capacity and ...
  49. [49]
    Lake Oroville Update - October 3, 2025
    Oct 3, 2025 · DWR and consultant staff perform watercraft inspections for ... Lake Oroville is at 794 feet elevation and storage is approximately ...Missing: CDEC | Show results with:CDEC
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Lake Oroville Storage (2025 Forecast)
    Oct. Nov. Dec. Elev ation (Feet). End of Month. Lake Oroville Storage. (2025 Forecast). 50% (50% Fall) Exceedence. 90% (90% Fall) Exceedence. Storage. (T. A. F. ).Missing: CDEC | Show results with:CDEC
  52. [52]
    [PDF] 2017 FEBRUARY OROVILLE SPILLWAY INCIDENT After Action ...
    Feb 7, 2017 · After five years of significant drought throughout California, the ground was not able to absorb the rain which quickly filled creeks, rivers, ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  53. [53]
    Oroville Spillways Incident Background
    Apr 27, 2017 · For the first time in the Oroville spillways history, the lake reached 901 feet and activated the emergency spillway, an uncontrolled concrete ...
  54. [54]
    None
    Below is a merged and comprehensive summary of the 2017 Oroville Spillway Incident based on all provided segments. To retain all details efficiently, I’ve organized the information into tables where appropriate (in CSV-like format for clarity), followed by narrative sections for causes, recommendations, and URLs. This ensures no information is lost while maintaining readability and density.
  55. [55]
    Researchers Identify Factor Behind 2017 Oroville Dam Spillways ...
    Jul 22, 2020 · In a February 2017 incident, failures in the spillways of Oroville Dam forced the evacuation of 188,000 people and caused $1 billion in damage ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  56. [56]
    Independent Forensic Team
    Preliminary findings were released on May 5, 2017, listing 24 physical factors that potentially contributed to the main spillway damage and four physical ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] INDEPENDENT FORENSIC TEAM REPORT OROVILLE DAM ...
    Jan 5, 2018 · The uplifted slab section exposed the underlying poor quality foundation rock at that location to unexpected severe erosion, resulting in ...
  58. [58]
    Rebuilding the Oroville Dam Spillways - Practical Engineering
    Dec 21, 2021 · To the northwest is the main spillway, also known as the Flood Control Outlet or FCO spillway. At the top are radial gates to control the flow.Missing: earthfill core<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Oroville Dam reopens just two years after the crisis - We Build Value
    Oct 16, 2019 · Most of the Californian dams were built between the 1960s and 1970s, and now require urgent maintenance work. ... Oroville Dam: repaired in record ...
  60. [60]
    Oroville Dam Emergency Spillway Recovery | SOCOTEC US
    By 2018, the spillway was fully reconstructed and emergency spillway upgrades were completed to final design specifications, including the construction of a ...
  61. [61]
    Lake Oroville Update - October 4, 2024
    Oct 4, 2024 · At the same time, the water that California does receive will arrive from more powerful storms, and hotter temperatures will mean less winter ...
  62. [62]
    El Niño inspires hope of 'major dent' in drought, but empty reservoirs ...
    Jan 22, 2016 · Lake Oroville is the largest reservoir ... The drought could persist, particularly if a dry La Niña system develops after this strong El Niño, as ...
  63. [63]
    New Water Year Underway, California Prepares for a Possible Wet ...
    Oct 4, 2023 · This past winter's storms provided a huge boost to the State Water Project. Lake Oroville levels recovered and had the single biggest increase ...Missing: La inflows
  64. [64]
    WINTER STORM CONDITIONS LEADING TO EXCESSIVE RUNOFF ...
    The opposite is true for negative MEI (La Niña), which tends to be associated with drier WYs in the. Southwest and wetter WYs in the Northwest (e.g.,. Redmond ...
  65. [65]
    Atmospheric River Precipitation Enhanced by Climate Change: A ...
    Feb 9, 2022 · We estimate that climate change to date results in ∼11% and ∼15% increase in precipitation over the Feather River Basin in Northern California.
  66. [66]
    Climate Change Identified as Contributor to Oroville Dam Spillway ...
    Mar 2, 2022 · A one-two punch of precipitation resulted in damage to Oroville Dam's main and emergency spillways pushing the second largest dam in California ...Missing: notable spills
  67. [67]
    California's Second Largest Reservoir Is Shrinking - Newsweek
    Jul 2, 2024 · Lake Oroville has lost 3 percent of its volume since it was created. Water officials attribute the loss to weather swings.
  68. [68]
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife - Facebook
    Apr 7, 2025 · The fish averaged 10 to 12 inches in length, and the hard- fighting, popular sport fish are expected to grow quickly given Lake Oroville's ...
  69. [69]
    Lake Oroville Update - August 29, 2025
    Aug 29, 2025 · With the installation of a fish monitoring station in the Feather River near Oroville, DWR can more accurately track the arrival timing, number, ...
  70. [70]
    Lake Oroville Update - September 26, 2025
    Sep 26, 2025 · Lake Oroville's water elevation has lowered enough to allow DWR to reopen the Lakeside Access Road, providing daily access to the Spillway Boat ...
  71. [71]
    Oroville Wildlife Area
    The approximately 11,800-acre Oroville Wildlife Area is primarily riparian woodland habitat along the Feather River and grasslands around the Thermalito ...
  72. [72]
    Bird checklists - Oroville Wildlife Area - Avibase
    The Oroville Wildlife Area checklist includes 231 bird species, with 5 introduced species, based on the best available information.Missing: mammals | Show results with:mammals
  73. [73]
    Bird List - Lake Oroville--Hwy 70 bridge, Butte, California ... - eBird
    Native and Naturalized (48) ; White-throated Swift Aeronautes saxatalis ; Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias ; Cliff Swallow Petrochelidon pyrrhonota ; Canada Goose ...Missing: mammals | Show results with:mammals
  74. [74]
    Lake Oroville Community Update -- Aug. 26, 2022
    Aug 26, 2022 · The Oroville Wildlife Area is a popular hunting location and CDFW expects 80 to 100 opening day hunters when Dove season opens on Sept. 1. For ...Missing: mammals | Show results with:mammals<|control11|><|separator|>
  75. [75]
    Lake Oroville Update - March 28, 2025
    Mar 28, 2025 · Current Oroville Reservoir Level: 870 feet elevation · Current Storage Capacity: 87 percent · Total Releases to the Feather River: 11,000 cubic ...
  76. [76]
    Lake Oroville Community Update - July 28
    Jul 31, 2023 · DWR's project will place approximately 8,000 cubic yards of gravel at multiple locations to improve spawning conditions. The project is ...
  77. [77]
    Lake Oroville Update - September 5, 2025
    Sep 5, 2025 · DWR launched its mandatory invasive mussel inspection program for the Oroville facilities – Lake Oroville, Thermalito Forebay, and Thermalito ...
  78. [78]
    Lake Oroville Community Update - September 1, 2023 - GovDelivery
    Sep 1, 2023 · The Department of Water Resources (DWR) has completed construction on a salmonid habitat improvement project in the Feather River near the Feather River Fish ...
  79. [79]
    CA WATER COMMISSION: Feather River Fish Hatchery
    May 16, 2019 · The Feather River Fish Hatchery is operated by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, who manages the fish spawning and rearing ...
  80. [80]
    Feather River Fish Hatchery
    The Feather River Fish Hatchery raises Chinook Salmon and steelhead, with an underwater viewing window (mid-Sept-June). Open 8am-3pm, located at 5 Table ...
  81. [81]
    Feather River Fish Hatchery - CalFish
    The Feather River Fish Hatchery will produce approximately 125,000 yearling Chinook for the Lake Oroville Inland Chinook fishery, while the remaining eggs are ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] 2022 – 2023 Annual Report Feather River Fish Hatchery - CalFish
    Hatchery operations began in 1967 and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) operates the facility under contract with DWR. The facility ...
  83. [83]
    Feather River Fish Hatchery meets salmon harvest goal; 12 million ...
    Feb 20, 2020 · Typically the hatchery processes 1,000 steelhead and takes 1-million eggs. “The steelhead run has been pretty good the last few years. It's ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Hatchery and Genetic Management Plan for Feather River Fish ...
    IHNV resistant species are now being planted in Lake Oroville(Coho salmon). ... and enhancement fall-run Chinook salmon and inland fish for Lake Oroville, CA ( ...
  85. [85]
    Lake Oroville Update - September 12, 2025
    Sep 12, 2025 · With their return, spawning activities are set to begin at the Feather River Fish Hatchery with the fish ladder opening on Monday, Sept. 15.
  86. [86]
    DWR and California Department of Fish and Wildlife will increase ...
    Dec 30, 2022 · DWR and California Department of Fish and Wildlife will increase the Feather River Fish Hatchery's production of fall-run Chinook salmon in 2023 ...
  87. [87]
    CDFW rescues 8 million young salmon, 1 million steelhead on ...
    Staff have relocated the 6.5 million fall-run and spring run Chinooks from the Feather River Hatchery in Oroville to the hatchery annex near the Thermalito ...
  88. [88]
    Feather River Fish Monitoring Station Provides Improved Population ...
    Aug 25, 2025 · The fish monitoring station will provide information on abundance, run timing, and origin (hatchery or natural) of steelhead and Chinook salmon ...
  89. [89]
    Summer maintenance begins at Feather River Fish Hatchery in ...
    Jul 3, 2025 · OROVILLE, Calif. - The Feather River Fish Hatchery in Oroville has wrapped up its tagging operations for adult spring-run Chinook salmon.
  90. [90]
    Lake Oroville State Recreation Area
    ### Summary of Public Recreation Activities and Facilities at Lake Oroville State Recreation Area
  91. [91]
    Community | Oroville, CA
    The California Department of Parks and Recreation reported over one million visitors to Lake Oroville State Recreation Area in 2005. The number of visitors ...Missing: boating | Show results with:boating
  92. [92]
    [PDF] The Economy of the State Water Project
    Dec 14, 2023 · Lake Oroville has a capacity of 3.5 million acre-feet, ... including energy generation, agricultural, residential, and commercial water supply.
  93. [93]
    State Water Project Drives California's Economy
    Dec 18, 2023 · This water supply supports an economy that provides 8.7 million full-time jobs, contains 800,000 businesses, and employs 160,000 farmworkers.Missing: GDP | Show results with:GDP
  94. [94]
    Power plant profile: Edward C Hyatt, US - Power Technology
    Oct 21, 2024 · Edward C Hyatt is a 644.1MW hydro power project. It is located on Feather river/basin in California, the US. According to GlobalData ...
  95. [95]
    Edward Hyatt (Oroville) Underground Power Plant | Vol 97, No 2
    The plant's 3 turbines and 3 pump-turbines have an installed capacity of 644 Mw. When operating along with the adjoining Thermalito powerplant 725 dependable Mw ...
  96. [96]
    Edward C Hyatt | Hydroelectric Power Plant in Oroville, CA - GridInfo
    Edward C Hyatt is comprised of 6 generators and generated 271.4 GWh during the 3-month period between February 2025 to May 2025. Plant Name, Edward C Hyatt.
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Root Causes Analyses of the Oroville Dam Gated Spillway Failures ...
    Jul 20, 2017 · This report documents our analyses of the Root Causes of the initial failure of the Gated. Spillway. Appendix A of this report provides ...
  98. [98]
    [PDF] The Oroville Dam 2017 Spillway Incident - Friends of the River
    Sep 30, 2017 · 1960s, long-term contracts were signed with public water ... 25 Lake Oroville Operations, Feather River, Final Report, Governor's ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] ferc after action panel assessment of oroville spillway incident ...
    Nov 23, 2018 · Section 2 includes comments on the IFT Report which relate to the causes of failures at the Service Spillway chute and erosion on the downstream ...
  100. [100]
    DSOD Inspection Reports - California Department of Water Resources
    All previous state, federal, and independent inspections of Oroville Dam and its spillways have concluded they are safe to operate.
  101. [101]
    Oroville Dam Service Spillway (P-2100)
    Jun 26, 2025 · Incident Description. Major damage occurred to the Oroville Dam Service Spillway during spillway operation on February 7, 2017.
  102. [102]
    [PDF] The 2017 Oroville Dam Spillway Incident – What Happened and ...
    Nov 14, 2018 · The Oroville Dam spillway incident was caused by a long-term systemic failure of the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), regulatory ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] the california department of water resources wins dishonor of ...
    Oct 17, 2017 · The Department of Water Resources proved itself an irresponsible and negligent owner of the Oroville. Dam in February 2017 when its failure to ...
  104. [104]
    The California Department of Water Resources Wins Dishonor of ...
    Oct 17, 2017 · In the wake of this catastrophe, construction began on the Oroville Dam in 1961, about 70 miles north of Sacramento. The reservoir, Lake ...
  105. [105]
    Hydropower delays pose grid threat as permits lapse - E&E News
    Sep 20, 2023 · California's Oroville Dam is among a dozen major hydroelectric projects that have been waiting over 10 years to receive a long-term permit from ...Missing: notable spills
  106. [106]
    What Can Happen When NEPA Is Ignored: The Oroville Dam - NRDC
    Apr 25, 2018 · As the Oroville dam demonstrates, gutting NEPA will only result in the construction of major infrastructure projects like bridges and dams ...
  107. [107]
    Governor Brown Issues Executive Order to Further Expedite Oroville ...
    Apr 6, 2017 · Brown Jr. today issued an executive order to further expedite the effort to repair the spillways at Oroville Dam before next winter, including ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  108. [108]
    How Oroville Is Changing Dam Safety in California
    Mar 28, 2018 · The scale and drama of the Oroville crisis jolted the state into action, resulting in a stream of safety reviews, forensic analyses, and policy changes.
  109. [109]
    [PDF] DAM SAFETY FERC Should Analyze Portfolio-Wide Risks - GAO
    Oct 5, 2018 · The February 2017 failure of key components of the Oroville Dam, part of a FERC-licensed hydropower project in California, highlighted the risks.Missing: hurdles | Show results with:hurdles