Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Lessepsian migration

Lessepsian migration refers to the unidirectional influx of marine species, mainly thermophilic organisms of Indo-Pacific origin from the Red Sea, into the Mediterranean Sea via the Suez Canal, a phenomenon named after Ferdinand de Lesseps, the French diplomat and engineer who oversaw the canal's construction and opening in 1869.^[1] This artificial pathway has facilitated one of the most significant bioinvasions in modern marine history, with the migration predominantly favoring Red Sea species due to the canal's salinity gradient and the Mediterranean's cooler, less nutrient-rich conditions.^[2] Over the past 150 years, more than 1,000 alien species—predominantly fish, mollusks, crustaceans, and other invertebrates—have been introduced, establishing populations primarily in the eastern Mediterranean's Levantine Basin.^[3] The process began slowly after the canal's inauguration, with the first documented Lessepsian fish species, such as Lagocephalus spadiceus, recorded in the 1930s, but accelerated in the late 20th century due to canal dredging, the 1965 completion of the Aswan High Dam (which reduced Nile freshwater inflows and increased salinity), and rising sea temperatures from climate change.^[4] As of 2024, Lessepsian migrants constitute the majority of non-indigenous species in the eastern Mediterranean, with the number continuing to grow—including 18 new fish species recorded since 2020—with notable examples including the bluespotted cornetfish (Fistularia commersonii) and the silver-cheeked toadfish (Lagocephalus sceleratus), which have proliferated rapidly and spread westward.^[3]^[5] Ecologically, these invasions have reshaped food webs through competition, predation, and habitat alteration, often displacing native species like the salema (Sarpa salpa) while enhancing biodiversity in warming waters; economically, they pose challenges such as gear damage from pufferfish and health risks from toxic species, yet provide fishery benefits from commercially viable invaders like rabbitfish (Siganus spp.).^[3] Ongoing climate warming is projected to intensify this migration, potentially transforming the Mediterranean into a more tropical ecosystem and prompting shifts in conservation strategies toward ecosystem resilience rather than strict native species protection.^[3]

Background and History

Definition and Naming

Lessepsian migration refers to the translocation of marine species across the Suez Canal, predominantly from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, representing a significant human-induced biogeographic event. This process, also known as the Erythrean invasion—a term derived from the ancient Greek name for the Red Sea, Erythraean Sea—primarily involves unidirectional movement northward, driven by environmental gradients such as salinity and temperature differences that favor Red Sea biota over Mediterranean species. While rare bidirectional exchanges occur, termed anti-Lessepsian migration, the overwhelming flux is from the Indo-Pacific realm via the Red Sea into the Mediterranean.^[1]^[3] The term "Lessepsian" honors Ferdinand de Lesseps, the French engineer who spearheaded the Suez Canal's construction and its official opening in 1869, which inadvertently created this invasion corridor by linking previously isolated marine ecosystems. Coined in the mid-20th century by marine biologist Francis D. Por in his seminal work on the subject, the nomenclature underscores the anthropogenic origins of the phenomenon, distinguishing it from natural dispersal mechanisms. The Erythrean invasion label, meanwhile, emphasizes the source region and has been used interchangeably in early scientific literature to describe the influx of Red Sea species.^[1] In scope, Lessepsian migration encompasses over 1,000 recorded alien species by 2025, predominantly thermophilic invertebrates and fishes adapted to warmer waters, with the majority establishing populations in the eastern Mediterranean. This tally reflects ongoing introductions since the canal's inception, though limited pre-canal natural seepages through the Isthmus of Suez may have allowed minor exchanges of biota prior to 1869. Fundamentally, the process hinges on the Suez Canal as an artificial waterway that bridges two distinct biogeographic provinces: the Indo-West Pacific (via the Red Sea) and the Mediterranean-Atlantic, eliminating a longstanding terrestrial barrier and enabling continuous faunal interchange.^[3]^[6]

Construction of the Suez Canal

The construction of the Suez Canal began on April 25, 1859, under the direction of French diplomat Ferdinand de Lesseps, who had secured a concession from Egyptian authorities in 1854 to form the Suez Canal Company.^[7] The project involved excavating a sea-level waterway across the Isthmus of Suez, spanning approximately 193 kilometers from Port Said on the Mediterranean to Suez on the Gulf of Suez in the Red Sea.^[7] Completed after a decade of labor-intensive digging, primarily by hand and forced labor, the canal officially opened on November 17, 1869, without locks due to its level alignment with the seas, which facilitated passive water exchange driven by density differences and tidal influences, as well as species transport via ship hulls and ballast water.^[8] Initially, the channel measured about 8 meters deep, 22 meters wide at the bottom, and up to 61 meters wide at the surface, limiting it to smaller vessels but establishing a direct marine corridor.^[8] Prior to construction, the Mediterranean and Red Seas were separated by a natural land barrier across the isthmus, with depressions such as Lake Timsah serving as intermittent freshwater or dry basins but allowing only negligible seepage that prevented significant marine connectivity.^[9] The canal's hydrological profile featured a salinity gradient, with higher levels in the southern sections near the Red Sea—influenced by the hypersaline Bitter Lakes—and decreasing northward toward the Mediterranean, where initial freshwater inflows from the Nile River moderated conditions.^[1] However, the completion of the Aswan High Dam in 1970 drastically reduced Nile discharges into the Mediterranean, eliminating this freshwater dilution and causing the Bitter Lakes to revert to hypersaline states similar to the Red Sea, thereby altering the gradient to favor ingress from the southern end.^[10] Subsequent modifications have enhanced the canal's capacity and hydrological uniformity. The 2015 New Suez Canal project, completed in one year, added a parallel 35-kilometer channel, deepened the overall waterway to 24 meters, and widened sections to accommodate larger vessels, effectively doubling transit capacity while reducing former barriers like the Bitter Lakes' extreme salinity divide through increased water volume and flow.^[11] These changes boosted northward water transport by approximately 60%, further homogenizing conditions along the route.^[9] In the 2020s, ongoing dredging initiatives, including post-2021 blockage expansions, have widened key segments by up to 40 meters and deepened them to 22 meters in areas like the Great Bitter Lake, minimizing remaining navigational and hydrological obstacles.^[12]

Early Observations of Migration

The earliest documented instances of species migrating from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea via the Suez Canal emerged in the early 20th century, with the first confirmed Lessepsian fish being the hardyhead silverside Atherinomorus forskalii, recorded in 1902 along the Levantine coast. This species, native to the Red Sea, was noted in trawl surveys off the Egyptian and Israeli coasts, highlighting the initial biological incursions following the canal's completion in 1869. Early observations also encompassed invertebrates, including reports of foraminifera and mollusks from the Red Sea in Mediterranean waters during the same period, though some attributions have since been revised to reflect native or pre-canal distributions.^[13] A pivotal milestone occurred with the Cambridge Expedition to the Suez Canal in 1924, which systematically surveyed the canal's biota and adjacent seas, documenting the presence of several Red Sea ("Erythrean") species capable of traversing the waterway. This expedition's findings, published in subsequent reports, included the first Mediterranean record of the marbled spinefoot Siganus rivulatus from Israeli shores in 1924, confirmed in a 1927 publication by Hugo Steinitz. These efforts underscored the canal's role as a conduit for marine life, with initial reliance on trawl and dredge surveys in the Levantine Basin revealing underestimation due to sparse pre-1930s sampling.^[14]^[15] Post-World War II scientific surveys in the 1950s marked a surge in observations, driven by expanded ichthyological research along the Egyptian and Israeli Mediterranean coasts, where over 20 fish species of Red Sea origin were noted by 1960. These studies, led by researchers like Adam Ben-Tuvia, linked increased detections to post-1930s modifications in the canal's hydrology, including salinity adjustments that reduced barriers to marine ingress from the hypersaline Bitter Lakes.^[16]^[17] The phenomenon gained formal recognition with the coining of the term "Lessepsian migration" by F.D. Por in 1969, honoring Ferdinand de Lesseps, the canal's engineer; this terminology was elaborated in Por's seminal 1978 monograph, which synthesized early data and emphasized the unidirectional influx from the Red Sea. Ben-Tuvia's concurrent work further formalized the concept for fishes, attributing pre-1970 underestimations to limited geographic and temporal sampling in the eastern Mediterranean.^[18]

Mechanisms and Patterns

Directionality and Pathways

Lessepsian migration exhibits a strong unidirectional bias, with over 95% of documented invasions occurring from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea via the Suez Canal. This asymmetry arises from variable but predominantly northward surface currents in the canal, driven mainly by seasonal sea level differences (Red Sea typically higher by 20-40 cm), combined with hypersaline barriers in the southern canal sections that deter most less euryhaline Mediterranean species. These conditions facilitate passive northward drift of planktonic larvae and eggs from the Red Sea while limiting reverse migration. Westward migration remains rare due to hypersaline barriers in the canal's southern sections, which deter most Mediterranean species lacking sufficient euryhalinity.^[19]^[3]^[4] The primary pathways for Lessepsian migrants involve the Suez Canal itself, spanning approximately 120-200 km, where larval drift through its waters serves as the main natural vector for initial transit. Secondary anthropogenic vectors include ballast water discharge and hull fouling on ships transiting the canal, which can transport attached or entrained organisms. Upon entry, the Bitter Lakes function as critical initial settlement zones, their hypersaline conditions (up to 50 parts per thousand) acting as a filter that favors euryhaline species capable of tolerating extreme salinities before further dispersal. Once established in the eastern Mediterranean's Levantine Basin, secondary spread occurs via coastal currents, such as the counter-clockwise circulation patterns that distribute propagules westward along the shoreline.^[3]^[4]^[20] Migration occurs in distinct phases, beginning with pioneer species that colonize via passive drift shortly after canal openings or modifications. Early colonizers, such as the benthic foraminifera Amphistegina lobifera, exemplify this phase, leveraging high dispersal ability through planktonic stages to establish footholds in the canal and adjacent lakes. Subsequent phases involve broader establishment and expansion, with rates influenced by canal infrastructure changes. Quantitative patterns reveal arrival peaks in the 1920s-1930s following initial canal deepening and a resurgence post-2015 after the canal's expansion, which doubled its capacity and enhanced flow. By 2025, approximately 1,000 successful Lessepsian establishments have been documented, predominantly in the eastern Mediterranean, underscoring the ongoing scale of this biogeographical process. Recent monitoring as of 2025 reports 18 additional Lessepsian fish species in the Mediterranean over the previous five years, underscoring continued influx.^[21]^[3]^[4]^[5]

Environmental Drivers

Lessepsian migrants from the Red Sea exhibit broad temperature tolerances that facilitate their establishment in the eastern Mediterranean, where summer surface waters often reach 25–30°C, aligning closely with the warmer conditions (typically 25–35°C) of their native habitat.^[22] This thermal affinity allows species such as the invasive foraminifer Amphistegina lobifera to tolerate temperatures exceeding 32°C, enabling rapid acclimation and survival in Levantine coastal waters that would stress cooler-adapted native Mediterranean biota.^[23] In contrast, lower winter temperatures in the Mediterranean (around 15–18°C) have historically limited the westward spread of many tropical Lessepsian fishes, though tolerant species like siganids thrive in the warmer Levantine Basin.^[24] Salinity variations along the Suez Canal have played a pivotal role in enabling migration, particularly through the Bitter Lakes, which initially formed a hypersaline barrier (up to 50–60 ppt) due to evaporation in their dry salt valley origins following the canal's opening in 1869.^[1] Over decades, inflow of Red Sea water (around 40 ppt) progressively diluted this barrier, reducing salinity to levels (35–45 ppt) that favor euryhaline Lessepsian species capable of osmoregulation across wide gradients, such as the ascidian Ciona intestinalis, which tolerates fluctuations from 20–40 ppt.^[25] This equalization eliminated a key physicochemical obstacle, allowing planktonic larvae and adults to traverse the canal without severe physiological stress.^[26] Biotic factors further promote post-migration establishment, including the relative scarcity of specialized predators in the eastern Mediterranean for Red Sea taxa, which often lack natural enemies in their introduced range and benefit from reduced predation pressure.^[27] Many Lessepsian species, characterized as r-strategists, exhibit high reproductive rates; for instance, broadcast-spawning siganid fishes like Siganus rivulatus release millions of eggs per female during extended spawning seasons (May–July), overwhelming potential mortality and ensuring larval recruitment.^[28] Additionally, rafting on anthropogenic floating debris, such as detached buoys and plastic litter, aids secondary dispersal of encrusting invertebrates like bryozoans and ascidians, transporting viable propagules across the Levantine Sea to suitable substrates.^[29] Habitat suitability in the shallow coastal zones of the Levantine Basin mirrors Red Sea niches, with seagrass beds (e.g., Posidonia oceanica meadows) and rocky reefs providing refuge and foraging grounds for herbivores and reef-associated migrants.^[4] These environments, extending to depths of 20–50 m, support Lessepsian fishes such as the marbled spinefoot (Siganus rivulatus), which exploit algal-covered reefs akin to their Indo-Pacific origins.^[30] Localized nutrient inputs, including occasional upwelling along the Israeli and Lebanese coasts, enhance primary productivity and bolster larval survival by increasing plankton availability for planktotrophic Lessepsian larvae.^[1] The initial salinity divide in the Bitter Lakes was overcome not only by dilution but also by the absence of major predatory barriers during early colonization phases, allowing pioneer species to establish without significant biotic resistance.^[1] This combination of reduced physicochemical hurdles and favorable biotic conditions has enabled over 100 Lessepsian species to successfully colonize the eastern Mediterranean since the mid-20th century.^[24]

Influence of Climate Change

Climate change has significantly accelerated Lessepsian migration by altering thermal conditions in the Mediterranean Sea, where surface temperatures have risen by approximately 1.3°C from 1982 to 2019, with further increases observed in the 2020s.^[31] This warming favors the establishment of thermophilic species from the Indo-Pacific via the Suez Canal, as reduced thermal barriers allow better survival and reproduction of heat-tolerant invaders.^[3] Studies from the early 2020s indicate that such temperature shifts have enhanced the competitive advantage of these migrants over native species, contributing to a notable uptick in successful invasions in the eastern Mediterranean.^[32] Range expansions of Lessepsian species have intensified due to these climatic changes, exemplified by the northward progression of the lionfish (Pterois miles), which reached central and northern areas like the Adriatic Sea by 2025.^[33] Warmer winters have improved larval survival rates for such species, enabling broader dispersal beyond traditional eastern limits into the central Mediterranean.^[4] Additionally, altered precipitation patterns have begun to reduce salinity gradients across the Suez Canal region, potentially facilitating easier passage for marine organisms.^[9] Projections under high-emission scenarios like RCP 8.5 suggest a substantial increase in Lessepsian introductions, with models forecasting dozens to hundreds of additional species by 2050 as warming continues to erode ecological barriers.^[34] Complementary isotopic analyses from 2025 reveal that native fish in the eastern Mediterranean are responding by expanding their trophic niches, adapting to the presence of invaders amid ongoing climatic pressures.^[35]

Ecological Impacts

Changes in Species Richness

Lessepsian migration has profoundly altered species richness in the Mediterranean Sea, primarily through the influx of non-indigenous species (NIS) from the Red Sea via the Suez Canal. By the early 1970s, fewer than 100 NIS were documented in the basin, but this number has surged to over 1,000 by 2025, with a significant proportion, estimated at around 40-50%, attributed to Lessepsian pathways, particularly in the eastern basin where they constitute about 82% of NIS as of 2024.^[36]^[37]^[3] Among these NIS, invertebrates constitute about 60%, including major groups like mollusks (222 species) and arthropods (188 species), while fishes account for roughly 17% (171 species).^[36] The eastern Mediterranean, especially the Levantine Sea, emerges as a biodiversity hotspot for these invasions, harboring over 800 NIS, far exceeding numbers in western or central regions.^[36] As of 2024, the total stands at approximately 1006 NIS, with continued introductions reported. This net increase in NIS has coincided with declines in native biodiversity, particularly in invaded coastal areas. Studies indicate a collapse in native species abundance in the eastern Mediterranean, with Lessepsian migrants contributing to homogenization and reduced endemic diversity; for instance, cold-affinity native fishes have shown marked decreases in biomass and distribution.^[38] In shallow habitats, endemic mollusks have experienced significant losses, with assessments reporting substantial losses, up to 95% reductions in native molluscan richness on shallow hard substrates due to competitive pressures and warming.^[3]^[38] Overall, native fish biomass in heavily invaded zones has declined significantly, with reports of up to 65% reductions in some reefs, as Lessepsian species now dominate local assemblages and fisheries catches.^[39]^[40] Invasion success varies, with around 30% of Lessepsian fish species succeeding in establishing populations and dispersing beyond the Levantine Basin, though rates are higher for thermophilic and reef-associated taxa adapted to Mediterranean conditions.^[41] The 2015 expansion of the Suez Canal accelerated this process by doubling the annual influx of potential migrants, enhancing connectivity between the Red Sea and Mediterranean.^[42] Monitoring efforts, supported by databases such as AquaNIS and the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS), track around 300 established Lessepsian species, revealing stark regional disparities—such as over 450 NIS in Israeli waters compared to fewer than 200 in Greek coastal areas.^[36]^[43] These tools underscore the Levantine Basin's role as an epicenter, where ongoing introductions continue to reshape taxonomic composition.

Competition and Displacement

Lessepsian migrants often engage in direct interspecific competition with native Mediterranean species through significant overlap in foraging resources and habitat preferences, such as shared macroalgal beds and seagrass meadows.^[44] This overlap is particularly pronounced among herbivorous fishes, where invaders like Siganus rivulatus exploit similar diets of seagrasses (e.g., Posidonia oceanica) and macroalgae as native species such as Sarpa salpa, leading to resource depletion for natives.^[44] Additionally, many Lessepsian fishes exhibit faster growth rates and higher reproductive outputs compared to natives, enabling them to dominate recruitment and biomass accumulation; for instance, S. rivulatus demonstrates up to 10% greater relative length growth at temperatures above 25°C, a threshold increasingly common due to warming.^[44] Aggressive foraging behaviors by invaders further reduce native recruitment by limiting access to suitable habitats and prey, as observed in rocky intertidal zones where Lessepsian limpets like Cellana rota outcompete natives through asymmetric interactions.^[45] A prominent example of such competition involves herbivorous siganids (Siganus rivulatus and S. luridus), which overgraze seagrasses and macroalgae, displacing native grazers like Sarpa salpa and contributing to the formation of algal barrens in coastal areas.^[44] These invaders have reduced native herbivore abundance in fisheries catches, with siganids comprising over 80% of herbivorous fish biomass in some eastern Mediterranean sites, thereby altering grazing dynamics and favoring the proliferation of less palatable algae.^[44] In the 2020s, observational studies in rocky reefs have documented significant displacement of native fish populations in invaded areas, linked to resource preemption by Lessepsian species.^[46] Evidence from field studies supports competitive exclusion as a key mechanism, including enclosure experiments and long-term monitoring that demonstrate reduced native body sizes and fitness in the presence of invaders; for example, native limpet Patella caerulea exhibits decreased growth with increasing prevalence of C. rota, leading to rapid replacement after over 15 years of coexistence at thermally stressed sites.^[45] Biomass shifts are evident in eastern Mediterranean fisheries, where Lessepsian species now account for 20-40% of total fish catch, reflecting their dominance over native stocks without evidence of full extinctions but with widespread functional extirpations in localized bays.^[4] These competitive effects are most intense in the Levantine Basin, where Lessepsian species concentrations are highest in shallow subtidal habitats (0-40 m), resulting in native mollusk richness dropping to as low as 5-12% of historical levels on hard and soft substrates, respectively.^[46] Impacts weaken westward toward the central Mediterranean, with invaders showing lower establishment rates beyond the Aegean due to cooler conditions and greater native resistance, though northward expansion continues along the Levantine coast from Egypt to Syria.^[4] While no complete native extinctions have been recorded, functional displacements—where natives persist at low densities without ecological roles—predominate in heavily invaded bays.^[46]

Trophic and Food Web Alterations

Lessepsian migration has induced significant phase shifts in Mediterranean food webs, transitioning from invertebrate-dominated structures to those increasingly controlled by fish populations. Native ecosystems, particularly in the eastern Mediterranean, historically featured complex benthic communities reliant on herbivorous and detritivorous invertebrates for primary energy transfer. The influx of Red Sea species, many of which are voracious piscivores or mid-trophic predators, has disrupted these chains by preying on native invertebrates and smaller fish, leading to a reorganization where fish now dominate biomass at multiple trophic levels. For instance, the introduction of mid-trophic predators such as the bluespotted cornetfish (Fistularia commersonii) has altered native predator-prey dynamics by targeting juvenile native fishes and crustaceans, thereby reducing the abundance of intermediate consumers and amplifying top-down control.^[47] Stable isotope analyses provide key evidence of these alterations, revealing shifts in trophic niches and overall web simplification. Recent studies using δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N isotopes, benchmarked against pre-Lessepsian baselines reconstructed from historical sediment core data in the Levantine Sea, indicate that native species have expanded their isotopic niches in response to invader pressures, allowing some adaptation through dietary shifts. However, this comes at the cost of simplified food web structures, with increased piscivory levels across the assemblage, as Lessepsian fishes occupy and intensify mid- and upper-trophic roles previously held by less efficient native predators. These analyses underscore a homogenization effect, where diverse invertebrate-based pathways are compressed into fewer, fish-centric routes.^[47] At the ecosystem level, these trophic changes have cascading effects on biodiversity and productivity. Basal trophic levels have experienced reduced diversity, exemplified by algal overgrowth in coastal areas due to declines in native grazing invertebrates displaced by Lessepsian herbivores and predators. In pelagic realms, enhanced productivity has been observed through increased nutrient cycling driven by schooling Lessepsian planktivores. Conversely, benthic communities show heightened instability, with modeling indicating drops in infaunal diversity and increased susceptibility to anoxic events from altered detrital flows. Such imbalances highlight how Lessepsian invaders reshape energy flows, often favoring short-term biomass gains over long-term stability. Long-term trends from 1970s to 2020s, captured through dynamic food web modeling, illustrate a broader "tropicalization" of Mediterranean ecosystems, where warming waters facilitate more complex but less resilient structures dominated by Lessepsian species. Ecopath models simulating the eastern basin show a progression from stable, temperate webs to tropical-like configurations with higher connectivity among fish taxa, yet reduced overall stability. Fishery yields have correspondingly shifted, with Lessepsian species comprising over 60% of commercial catches in the Levant by the 2010s, reflecting a reorientation of energy toward harvestable piscivores at the expense of traditional invertebrate fisheries.^[4] These trends suggest ongoing trophic escalation, potentially amplifying vulnerability to future climate stressors.

Parasites and Pathogens

Lessepsian migration has facilitated the co-transport of non-native parasites and pathogens from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, primarily via infected host organisms traversing the Suez Canal. Digenean trematodes, for instance, are commonly co-introduced with Lessepsian fish hosts, such as the digenean Maculifer dayawanensis recorded in pufferfish species like Lagocephalus guentheri and Torquigener flavimaculosus.^[48] Studies on individual migrant species reveal the introduction of multiple parasite taxa, with nine metazoan parasites co-introduced alongside the bluespotted cornetfish Fistularia commersonii and three with the yellowmouth barracuda Sphyraena chrysotaenia, predominantly originating from Red Sea endemics.^[49]^[50] These introductions often align with the enemy release hypothesis, where invaders arrive with reduced parasite loads due to bottlenecks during migration, yet they serve as vectors for novel pathogens.^[51] The impacts on native Mediterranean biota include elevated infection rates in susceptible hosts lacking co-evolutionary adaptations, potentially leading to altered disease dynamics and population declines. For example, co-introduced parasites like the monogenean Pseudempleurosoma sp. and the copepod Nothobomolochus denticulatus in S. chrysotaenia have the potential for spillover to native congeners such as S. sphyraena, though direct infections remain limited in examined cases.^[50] In some instances, Lessepsian-mediated pathogen introductions, including viruses like nervous necrosis virus (NNV), show higher prevalence in migrant hosts compared to indigenous species, raising concerns for bidirectional transmission and increased vulnerability in native populations.^[52] General patterns observed in the 2020s link such introductions to localized native population reductions, with disease contributing to broader biodiversity shifts in the eastern Mediterranean.^[38] Notable cases highlight host-switching by introduced parasites, including myxozoans affecting shellfish and finfish in mariculture settings, where Lessepsian vectors exacerbate infection pressures. Helminth endoparasites like Anisakis typica have expanded westward via Lessepsian routes, correlating with warming trends and increased prevalence in native fish such as the European hake Merluccius merluccius.^[53] While invaders themselves exhibit parasite poverty due to the novelty of the Red Sea environment relative to their Indo-Pacific origins, they facilitate mass infection events in immunologically naive natives, occasionally resulting in mortalities.^[51] Monitoring efforts, guided by Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) protocols since the 2010s, emphasize systematic surveillance of co-introduced parasites to assess risks to fisheries, biodiversity, and human health. These include recommendations for tracking specific taxa like trematodes and monogeneans in Lessepsian hosts to detect spillover and inform mitigation.^[54]

Notable Examples

Invasive Fishes

Among the most prominent Lessepsian migrant fishes are the rabbitfishes of the genus Siganus, particularly S. rivulatus and S. luridus, which are herbivorous species that first entered the Mediterranean Sea in the 1920s via the Suez Canal.^[55] These species have since become dominant in the Levantine Basin, comprising a significant portion of the fish biomass on shallow reefs due to their efficient grazing on algae and adaptation to local conditions.^[56] Another key invasive piscivore is the bluespotted cornetfish (Fistularia commersonii), which experienced a dramatic population surge after its initial detection in 2000 off the Israeli coast, rapidly spreading westward and altering predator-prey dynamics in reef ecosystems.^[57] The biology of these invaders facilitates their success, including high fecundity that supports rapid population growth; for instance, female rabbitfishes can produce over 200,000 eggs per spawning event in large pelagic masses, enabling widespread larval dispersal.^[58] Similarly, the bluespotted cornetfish exhibits multiple spawning cycles with substantial egg output, contributing to its explosive expansion. Post-2015, many Lessepsian fishes, including cornetfish populations, have shown accelerated westward spread, reaching Tunisian waters by 2024 through stepwise colonization along coastal currents.^[59] This invasion has economic repercussions for fisheries, with Lessepsian species accounting for around 19% of fish individuals in some eastern Mediterranean trawl fisheries, often displacing higher-value native stocks.^[60] Recent monitoring efforts, such as the 2025 update to the CIESM Atlas of Exotic Fishes, document the addition of 18 new Lessepsian fish records since the previous edition (2020), highlighting ongoing northward shifts; for example, the lionfish Pterois miles has advanced into Croatian waters as of 2025, marking a significant poleward extension from its Levantine origins.^[5]^[61] Habitat suitability modeling further reveals that demersal Lessepsian species like the goldband goatfish (Upeneus moluccensis) are increasingly dominating soft-bottom habitats, where they exploit sandy and muddy substrates for foraging and reproduction, outcompeting native benthic fishes.^[62] A notable case contrast involves the native meagre (Argyrosomus regius), whose populations have declined sharply in the Levant due to habitat overlap and resource competition, contrasted with the thriving invasive narrow-barred Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus commerson), which has replaced it as a dominant pelagic predator and now forms a significant portion of commercial landings.^[54] This shift exemplifies how Lessepsian piscivores can intensify competitive pressures on native species, leading to broader trophic disruptions.^[63]

Invasive Invertebrates

Lessepsian migration has facilitated the introduction of numerous invertebrate species into the Mediterranean Sea, particularly crustaceans, mollusks, and ascidians, which have established populations and exerted ecological pressures on native biota. Among crustaceans, the Red Sea prawn Trachysalambria palaestinensis (Steinitz, 1932) stands out as an early and impactful invader, first recorded in the Mediterranean in 1932 near the Suez Canal entrance and subsequently spreading eastward.^[64] This species has outcompeted the native prawn Melicertus kerathurus in the Levant Basin and Turkish waters since the 1950s, leading to declines in local shrimp populations and shifts in nearshore fisheries.^[54] Similarly, other Lessepsian decapods, such as the swimming crab Charybdis hellerii, have proliferated in coastal habitats, altering predator-prey dynamics through their aggressive foraging behaviors.^[65] Mollusks represent one of the most diverse and numerically dominant groups of Lessepsian invaders, with around 100 species documented by the early 2020s, many establishing via planktonic larvae that enable rapid dispersal and colonization of new substrates.^[66] The predatory gastropod Thais clavigera (now classified as Reishia clavigera), introduced in the early 20th century, exemplifies this dynamic; it preys voraciously on native bivalves like oysters and mussels, contributing to reduced recruitment and abundance of indigenous shellfish in invaded areas.^[67] These mollusks often foul harbor structures and aquaculture gear, displacing native species in shellfish fisheries and causing operational challenges for coastal industries; for instance, dense aggregations of Lessepsian bivalves such as Brachidontes pharaonis have overtaken mussel beds, reducing harvest yields in the eastern Mediterranean.^[68] As benthic dominants, many of these invaders modify sediment dynamics—burrowing species like the Lessepsian crab Matuta victor increase erosion rates in shallow bays by destabilizing substrates and enhancing bioturbation.^[69] Ascidians, another key group, have become significant biofoulers in the Mediterranean, with Lessepsian species such as Herdmania momus attaching to artificial structures and aquaculture installations. These solitary or colonial tunicates form thick mats that impede water flow and increase drag on nets and cages, leading to substantial economic losses in bivalve farming through heightened maintenance and cleaning efforts.^[70] Recent monitoring has highlighted the northward spread of soft corals like Xenia umbellata, a Lessepsian alcyonacean first noted in the Mediterranean in 2008, with populations now extending into Aegean waters and potentially altering shallow reef communities through competitive space occupation. Overall, these invertebrates contribute to trophic alterations by integrating into food webs as both predators and prey, though their primary impacts stem from habitat modification and resource competition.^[71]

Other Taxa

Lessepsian migration has facilitated the introduction of various algal species into the Mediterranean Sea, where they often compete with native flora and alter benthic habitats. The red alga Acanthophora nayadiformis, originating from the Indo-Pacific via the Suez Canal, was first recorded in the eastern Mediterranean in the early 20th century and has since established widespread populations, contributing to shifts in macroalgal assemblages by forming dense mats that smother native species.^[72] Similarly, turf-forming red algae such as Acrothamnion preissii and Womersleyella setacea have invaded Levantine coastal areas, leading to significant alterations in native algal communities by overgrowing and displacing indigenous photophilic algae.^[73] Another example is Asparagopsis taxiformis, a rhodophyte with a new genetic lineage detected in the Mediterranean, which proliferates in shallow waters and potentially exacerbates habitat homogenization.^[74] Among protozoans, benthic foraminifera represent some of the earliest and most successful Lessepsian pioneers, with 44 valid alien species documented in the eastern Mediterranean. The larger symbiont-bearing foraminifer Amphistegina lobifera has achieved high establishment success, rapidly colonizing infralittoral meadows and outcompeting native foraminiferal assemblages through high reproduction rates and tolerance to varying salinities.^[21] These invaders, including soritids like Peneroplis pertusus and Sorites orbiculus, serve as indicators of tropicalization, with densities increasing in warming waters and altering sediment dynamics in shallow bays.^[75] A comprehensive survey identified 44 valid alien benthic foraminiferal species, highlighting their role in enhancing overall species richness while potentially reducing functional diversity in native communities.^[76] Polychaetes, though less dominant than fishes or mollusks among Lessepsian migrants, include several established species that modify infaunal habitats through tube-building and burrowing activities. For instance, the spionid Pseudopolydora paucibranchiata has invaded the Sea of Marmara and eastern Mediterranean shallows, where its mucus tubes disrupt sediment stability and facilitate shifts in associated invertebrate assemblages by increasing habitat complexity for opportunists while excluding sensitive natives.^[77] Overall, over 50 non-indigenous polychaete species have been recorded in the Mediterranean as of 2023, with most achieving established status, often leading to biodiversity declines in soft-sediment ecosystems.^[78] These worms exhibit high dispersal potential via larval stages but variable establishment success, influenced by substrate availability and predation pressures.^[79] Patterns among these other taxa reveal lower establishment rates compared to mobile invertebrates, typically ranging from 20-80% depending on the group, with foraminifera and algae showing high propagule dispersal but limited persistence in colder western basins. Planktonic forms, such as certain Indo-Pacific dinoflagellates, have entered via the canal and contributed to occasional blooms in the eastern Mediterranean, potentially amplifying eutrophication effects through toxin production and altered phytoplankton dynamics.^[80] While rare sightings of Red Sea vertebrates like sea turtles occur in the Levant, no established populations have resulted from Lessepsian migration, underscoring the selectivity of the phenomenon for smaller, sessile or vagile taxa.

Reverse Migrations

Anti-Lessepsian Migration

Anti-Lessepsian migration describes the infrequent westward translocation of marine species from the Mediterranean Sea into the Red Sea through the Suez Canal, representing a reversal of the dominant Lessepsian pattern. This phenomenon involves far fewer species than the eastward flow. Often, successful anti-Lessepsian migrants are euryhaline species tolerant of varying salinities, such as certain gobies and mullets, which can navigate the canal's brackish conditions.^[81] The rarity stems from environmental mismatches, including the Red Sea's higher temperatures and stronger native biota, which act as barriers to establishment.^[81] However, confirming true anti-Lessepsian migrants can be challenging, as some presumed cases, like the comber (Serranus cabrilla), have been found to pre-exist in the Red Sea prior to the canal's opening.^[82] Notable examples include the peacock blenny (Salaria pavo), a Mediterranean native that has established populations in the Gulf of Suez, and the sea star Sphaeriodiscus placenta, recorded in hypersaline lagoons near the canal's southern entrance.^[58] Another instance is the gastropod Chelidonura fulvipunctata, suggested as an anti-Lessepsian migrant based on molecular evidence linking Mediterranean and Red Sea populations.^[83] These cases highlight how euryhaline adaptations enable limited colonization, though high Red Sea summer temperatures (often exceeding 30°C) frequently prevent broader success by stressing less thermotolerant Mediterranean biota.^[81] Mechanisms driving anti-Lessepsian migration primarily involve human-assisted vectors like ship hull fouling and ballast water, alongside occasional larval drift counter to the canal's prevailing southward currents.^[84] The 2015 expansion of the Suez Canal, which increased shipping traffic and waterway volume, has coincided with heightened detection of such events, though overall numbers remain low compared to Lessepsian records.^[9] Unlike the primary direction, anti-Lessepsian migrants often exhibit reduced genetic diversity due to founder effects and small propagule sizes, limiting their adaptive potential in the recipient ecosystem.^[85] In the Red Sea, anti-Lessepsian species exert minimal ecological impact, largely due to competitive exclusion by established native fauna and unsuitable thermal regimes that hinder population growth.^[81] For instance, introduced fishes like Salaria pavo occupy marginal niches without displacing key trophic levels, contrasting the disruptive effects of Lessepsian invaders in the Mediterranean.^[58] This asymmetry underscores the directional bias in canal-mediated exchanges, shaped by biophysical gradients.^[86]

Bidirectional Exchanges

Since the expansion of the Suez Canal in 2015, which deepened and widened the waterway to accommodate larger vessels, there has been growing evidence of enhanced opportunities for two-way species movements between the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea.^[87] This modification has increased shipping traffic and altered hydrological conditions, potentially reducing barriers to reverse migrations.^[88] Notable examples include bacterial taxa exhibiting anti-Lessepsian patterns, with 15 genera such as Fluvicola, HTCC2207, and Persicirhabdus migrating from the Mediterranean into the Red Sea, and seven others like Marinobacter and Halomonas establishing stronger presences in the canal itself compared to the Mediterranean.^[89] Genetic studies of Lessepsian invaders near the Suez Canal reveal patterns of ongoing gene flow that could facilitate bidirectional exchanges. For instance, genomic analyses using thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in reef fishes like the marbled spinefoot (Siganus rivulatus) show low genetic differentiation (F_ST = 0.015) between Red Sea and eastern Mediterranean populations, indicating high connectivity and minimal bottlenecks during invasion.^[58] Similar low structure has been observed in other Lessepsian fishes, suggesting potential for interbreeding in transitional zones such as the Bitter Lakes, where salinity gradients have lessened over time due to canal modifications.^[58] These exchanges may alter local gene pools, particularly in the Red Sea, by introducing Mediterranean alleles into native populations. Observations of rare westward movements highlight the role of Mediterranean species in bidirectional dynamics. For example, the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris), a native Mediterranean predator, has been documented in the Red Sea and Suez Canal regions and may represent an anti-Lessepsian migrant. Climate warming is further reducing thermal barriers, enabling such westward flows by aligning temperature tolerances between basins; projections indicate that rising sea surface temperatures could expand suitable habitats for Mediterranean biota into the Red Sea.^[34] These bidirectional exchanges carry implications for forming novel ecosystems in both seas, as intermixing species may reshape community structures and biodiversity.^[89] Monitoring efforts increasingly incorporate environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to detect non-indigenous species signals along the canal, including in regions like Cyprus affected by Lessepsian influxes, allowing for early identification of reverse migrants and genetic introgression.^[90] Such tools are essential for tracking the evolving impacts of these exchanges on ecosystem function.

Management and Mitigation

Monitoring Efforts

Monitoring efforts for Lessepsian migration involve coordinated international and regional programs aimed at tracking the distribution and abundance of non-indigenous species entering the Mediterranean via the Suez Canal. The Mediterranean Science Commission (CIESM) has been a pivotal player since the early 2000s through its Atlas of Exotic Species in the Mediterranean, a multi-volume series documenting over 100 Lessepsian fish, crustaceans, and other taxa with detailed distribution maps and ecological notes to facilitate ongoing surveillance.^[91] Complementing this, the AquaNIS (Aquatic Non-Indigenous and Cryptogenic Species) database, developed under European initiatives, provides a centralized repository of verified records for Lessepsian migrants across European waters, enabling cross-border data sharing and trend analysis.^[92] Additionally, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has organized technical meetings, such as the 2010 Sub-Regional Technical Meeting on Lessepsian Migration in Nicosia, Cyprus, which established a Network of Experts to standardize monitoring protocols and assess fishery impacts, with subsequent reports updating species lists into the 2020s.^[4] A range of methods supports these initiatives, including citizen science applications that engage divers and fishers to report sightings, eDNA (environmental DNA) sampling for detecting low-abundance invasives without direct observation, and satellite-tracked fisheries data via vessel monitoring systems (VMS) to correlate catch patterns with species spreads.^[93]^[94] Annual Levantine Basin surveys, conducted by regional institutions like the Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, cover over 500 coastal sites using trawl and visual transects to quantify Lessepsian abundance, revealing shifts in community structure over time.^[4] As of 2025, updates to Lessepsian fish species lists include five new established populations and ten species with significant distribution expansions (at least 400 km) in the Mediterranean.^[5]^[95] Collaborative EU-Mediterranean projects, such as PERSEUS (Policy-oriented marine Environmental Research for the Southern European Seas), integrate remote sensing from satellites to monitor water quality and habitat changes that facilitate migrations.^[96] Data integration occurs through platforms like the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS), which logs over 1,000 entries on Mediterranean non-indigenous species, including Lessepsian taxa, to support early detection efforts particularly in the western Mediterranean where westward expansions are emerging. These centralized systems emphasize rapid reporting to enable proactive surveillance before widespread establishment.^[97]

Control Strategies

Efforts to control Lessepsian migration primarily focus on preventing further introductions through the Suez Canal and managing established populations in the Mediterranean Sea. One key preventive measure involves regulating ballast water discharge from ships transiting the canal, as mandated by the International Maritime Organization's Ballast Water Management Convention, which entered into force in 2017 and aims to minimize the transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens.^[98] This convention requires ships to use approved treatment systems to meet discharge standards, thereby reducing the risk of secondary vectors facilitating Lessepsian spread alongside the primary canal pathway.^[99] Structural modifications to the Suez Canal have been proposed to act as barriers to migration, leveraging salinity gradients similar to the historical role of the Bitter Lakes, which initially filtered species movement due to hypersaline conditions. Emphasis remains on maintaining natural hydrological barriers to impede tropical species ingress.^[24] Eradication and population control efforts target high-impact Lessepsian species, such as the silver-cheeked toadfish (Lagocephalus sceleratus), through intensive fishing programs in affected regions like Israel's Mediterranean coast. These initiatives, including subsidized targeted fisheries, have aimed to suppress populations by removing adults and juveniles, with management plans recommending ongoing culling to prevent further expansion.^[100] In parallel, marine protected areas (MPAs) employ zoning strategies to safeguard native biodiversity, incorporating no-take zones and active removal of invasives to mitigate competitive displacement, as demonstrated in assessments of Mediterranean MPAs vulnerable to Lessepsian fishes.^[101] Such actions complement broader MPA networks by prioritizing interventions against dominant invaders.^[102] Biological control approaches remain experimental, with limited trials exploring the reintroduction of native predators, such as sharks, to regulate herbivorous Lessepsian species like the dusky rabbitfish (Siganus luridus). However, these efforts face challenges due to the predators' own vulnerability and the risk of unintended ecological disruptions. Emerging technologies, including environmental RNA (eRNA) metabarcoding, are being tested for early detection of Lessepsian migrants, enabling targeted culling before establishment. At the policy level, the European Union's Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 provides a framework for preventing and managing invasive alien species (IAS), including the listing of several Lessepsian taxa such as Lagocephalus sceleratus on the Union list of species of concern, which mandates risk assessments, trade restrictions, and eradication protocols where feasible.^[103] This regulation supports coordinated actions across member states to address Mediterranean invasions. Additionally, bilateral cooperation between Egypt and Israel, building on their 1979 peace accord, includes joint monitoring of the Suez Canal to track and respond to species movements, with Egyptian authorities leading surveillance programs informed by shared data.^[104]

Challenges and Future Outlook

The expansion of the Suez Canal in 2015 has significantly accelerated Lessepsian migration rates, with non-indigenous species (NIS) establishment increasing by approximately 40% between 2010 and 2021, reaching nearly 1,000 NIS in the Mediterranean Sea, many of which are Lessepsian migrants.^[105] This heightened influx, averaging 15-16 new species per year in the eastern Mediterranean since 2000, outpaces existing control measures due to synergies with climate change, including rising sea surface temperatures that favor thermophilic Red Sea species and enhance their dispersal via altered ocean currents.^[105]^[86] Jurisdictional challenges further complicate management, as the absence of physical barriers along the canal spans multiple international borders, hindering coordinated enforcement across Red Sea and Mediterranean riparian states.^[4] Economic barriers exacerbate these issues, with Lessepsian species contributing substantially to fisheries revenues in the eastern Mediterranean—historically up to 40% of trawl catches in the 1980s, and continuing to stabilize local yields amid native species declines, as seen in species like Saurida undosquamis and Siganus rivulatus.^[4]^[106] However, dependence on these invaders creates resistance to eradication efforts, compounded by limited funding for cross-border cooperation between Red Sea and Mediterranean nations, which restricts joint monitoring and mitigation initiatives.^[107] Projections indicate ongoing environmental changes will lead to dozens of additional Lessepsian establishments by 2030, potentially resulting in "no-analog" ecosystems characterized by high ratios of alien to native species, fundamentally altering food webs and biodiversity in the eastern Mediterranean.^[105]^[3] Adaptive strategies, such as enhancing resilient marine protected areas (MPAs) through targeted monitoring, selective removals, and protection of natural predators, offer pathways forward, though their efficacy under future climate scenarios remains uncertain, with models predicting expanded invasion risks into central and western MPAs by 2050.^[102] Research gaps persist, particularly in understanding westward spreads beyond the eastern basin and the genetic impacts of invasions, including potential bottlenecks or preadaptations that enable rapid establishment without significant diversity loss.^[58] There is an urgent call for integrated climate-invasion models to better predict interactions between warming and migration dynamics, addressing these deficiencies to inform proactive management.^[86]

Comparisons with Other Invasions

Panama Canal Invasions

The Panama Canal, opened in 1914, has facilitated bidirectional exchanges of marine species between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, though successful trans-isthmian invasions remained limited for much of its history due to the freshwater barrier posed by Lake Gatún and the Gaillard Cut. In total, shipping through the canal has introduced numerous non-indigenous species (NIS) to the region, with at least 29 marine fish species recorded in the canal system by 2020, including examples such as the Pacific blue snapper (Lutjanus colorado) moving toward the Atlantic side.^[108] The canal's locks, which involve substantial freshwater mixing, initially restricted marine incursions, but the 2016 expansion—introducing new locks and increasing shipping traffic—has elevated salinity levels in parts of the system and boosted the influx of marine biota; as of 2024, marine fish comprise 76% of the biomass in Lake Gatún, up from 26% prior to the expansion.^[109] Recent 2025 studies indicate accelerated Pacific-to-Atlantic migration rates, with marine species now dominating the lake's fish community and raising risks of further interoceanic invasions.^[109] Lessepsian migration shares key similarities with Panama Canal invasions, particularly in the role of shipping vectors like ballast water and hull fouling, which transport larvae and fouling communities across biogeographic barriers.^[108] Both phenomena contribute to tropicalization, where warm-water species expand into recipient ecosystems, leading to competitive displacements in coral reef habitats; for instance, Pacific-origin jacks (Carangidae) and snappers (Lutjanidae) have begun outcompeting native Caribbean species in near-canal reefs. These parallels highlight how anthropogenic corridors amplify biodiversity shifts in tropical marine environments. However, Panama Canal exchanges differ in directionality and scale from the predominantly unidirectional Lessepsian flow (Indo-Pacific to Mediterranean). Invasions via Panama exhibit greater balance, albeit asymmetrical, with more species (e.g., 16 Atlantic vs. 8 Pacific fish detected via eDNA in the canal as of 2022) moving eastward due to prevailing currents and lock dynamics, contrasting the Lessepsian bias driven by anti-estuarine circulation.^[110] Vertebrate transfers are fewer overall—around 20-30 fish species have entered the canal compared to over 100 Lessepsian fish migrants—and climate gradients play a lesser amplifying role, as both oceans are tropical without the Mediterranean's warming trend favoring thermophilic invaders.^[108] The ecological impacts of Panama Canal invasions mirror those of Lessepsian migration, including biodiversity declines in the Caribbean through predation and resource competition, with native freshwater and reef species in Lake Gatún and adjacent waters facing displacement. Studies from the 2020s indicate accelerated Pacific-to-Atlantic migration rates following the 2016 expansion, raising concerns for further homogenization of tropical Atlantic biota.^[109]

Other Global Examples

In North America, the introduction of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) to the Great Lakes exemplifies a canal-mediated invasion analogous to Lessepsian migration, occurring via the St. Lawrence Seaway since the late 1980s.^[111] Native to the Ponto-Caspian region, these bivalves were transported primarily through ballast water discharge from transoceanic vessels navigating the seaway, leading to rapid establishment and spread across all five Great Lakes by the early 1990s.^[112] Like Lessepsian species, zebra mussels exhibit strong fouling impacts, colonizing hard substrates such as water intake pipes, boat hulls, and native mussel shells, which disrupts infrastructure and alters benthic communities by outcompeting indigenous filter-feeders.^[113] This invasion has caused billions in economic damages through biofouling and ecosystem shifts, highlighting parallels in vector mechanisms and ecological consequences to canal-facilitated dispersals.^[112] In Europe, the round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) invasion into the Baltic Sea, initially via shipping ballast water and later spreading westward through waterways like the Kiel Canal connecting the Baltic to the North Sea, provides another comparable example of anthropogenic waterway-enabled species transfer. First detected in the Gulf of Gdańsk in 1990 and subsequently establishing populations in the canal and adjacent brackish waters by the 2010s, the round goby likely arrived from its Ponto-Caspian native range via maritime shipping.^[114] It preys on native invertebrates and small fish, reducing biodiversity in soft-sediment habitats.^[115] Thermal barrier reductions, akin to Mediterranean warming that facilitates Lessepsian advances, have been exacerbated by Baltic Sea temperature rises of approximately 1–2°C since the 1980s, enabling faster reproduction and range expansion of this euryhaline invader.^[116] In the Indo-Pacific, ship-mediated dispersals from the Coral Triangle to isolated regions like Hawaii mirror the vector dynamics of Lessepsian migration, with invasive octocorals such as Unomia stolonifera (pulse coral) serving as key examples. Originating from Indo-Pacific reefs, these soft corals have been transported via hull fouling and fragment attachment on vessels, establishing populations in Hawaiian waters since the early 2000s and spreading to sites like Pearl Harbor.^[117] They rapidly overgrow native corals through fragmentation and asexual reproduction, threatening reef biodiversity and ecosystem services in oligotrophic environments.^[118] Complementing these anthropogenic pathways, climate-driven range shifts in Australian waters have accelerated invasions, with at least 198 marine species—primarily fishes and invertebrates—exhibiting poleward redistributions at rates of up to 29 km per decade since 2003, driven by ocean warming of 0.5–1°C in southeastern coastal zones.^[119] These shifts parallel the warming-enhanced success of Lessepsian species by reducing thermal constraints on tropical biota.^[120] Recent 2025 reviews classify Lessepsian migration as a prototypical "canal-type" invasion, emphasizing the Suez Canal's role in overcoming biogeographic barriers for over 100 Red Sea species into the Mediterranean since 1869.^[86] In contrast, Arctic routes—lacking dedicated canals—rely predominantly on hull-fouling as the primary vector for potential invasions, with increasing vessel traffic through ice-free passages transporting fouling organisms like barnacles and algae, though establishment remains limited by cold temperatures and ice scouring.^[121] This distinction underscores how engineered waterways amplify invasion risks compared to open-sea shipping pathways.^[122]

References

[1]
Article Review: Lessepsian migration of zooplankton through Suez ...
Accordingly, Red Sea species invaded the Mediterranean biota and not vice versa; this phenomenon is known as the Lessepsian migration or erythrean invasion.
[2]
(PDF) Lessepsian migration: A continuous biogeographical process
Aug 7, 2025 · Lessepsian migration, which is the movement of animals from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea through the Suez Canal.
[3]
Lessepsian migration in the Mediterranean Sea in an era of climate ...
This region is also a bioinvasions hotspot with ca 1000 reported alien species, most thermophilic, introduced through the Suez Canal (Lessepsian migrants).
[4]
[PDF] report of the technical meeting on the lessepsian migration and its ...
This document is the final version of the Report of the Sub-Regional Technical meeting on the Lessepsian migration and its impact on Eastern Mediterranean ...
[5]
Lessepsian migration: a continuous biogeographical process
the joining of two biogeographical provinces. For over 120 years, ...Missing: connection | Show results with:connection
[6]
Canal History - SCA
The first concession, which granted Ferdinand de Lesseps the right to establish a company responsible for digging the Suez Canal, was issued on November 30th, ...
[7]
SCA - Canal Characteristics - Suez Canal Authority
Its depth was about 8 meters, its water are was 304 m 2 and the largest ship load that can pass through was 5000 tons, which was typical for ships sizes in ...Missing: locks currents
[8]
Possible implications of sea level changes for species migration ...
Dec 3, 2020 · ... Lessepsian migration, 145–188 (Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 2010). ... The marine caravan—the Suez Canal and the Erythrean invasion, 207–300 ( ...<|separator|>
[9]
Aswan Dam Alters Marine Ecology - The New York Times
Jun 7, 1970 · But in the last quarter century the fresh water and bitter lakes that had pre viously inhibited circulation be tween the Mediterranean and the ...Missing: gradient hypersaline
[10]
New Suez Canal - SCA
Construction of a new Canal from km 60 to km 95, in addition to deepening and widening of the Great Bitter Lakes by-passes and Ballah by-pass.Missing: barriers migration 2020s
[11]
The Suez Canal is being widened. Will it be enough to stop ... - CNN
May 31, 2021 · The 30-kilometer-long area will be widened by 40 meters (131 feet) to the east and deepened to 72 feet, up from 66 feet, according to the SCA.
[12]
Alleged Lessepsian foraminifera prove native and suggest ...
Nov 10, 2022 · The foraminiferal data were standard- ized and the occurrence of species reported as non- indigenous in the literature recorded (Table 1). The ...
[13]
First record of the Lessepsian fish Siganus rivulatus (Forsskål ...
Dec 20, 2020 · The marbled spinefoot, Siganus rivulatus (Forsskål&Niebuhr, 1775) was recorded for the first time in Izmit Bay, Sea of Marmara.
[14]
New records and range expansion of lessepsian migrants in the ...
Feb 10, 2010 · (1926) Cambridge Expedition to the Suez Canal in 1924. VI. Report on the Echinoderms. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 22 ...
[15]
[PDF] immigration of fishes through the suez canal!
IMMIGRATION OF FISHES THROUGH THE SUEZ CANAL! ADAM BEN·TuVIA2. ABSTRACT. The number of Red Sea fishes found in the eastern Mediterranean amounts to 36 species ...Missing: term | Show results with:term
[16]
Historical, Economical and Environmental Impacts of Suez Canal ...
The Suez Canal from space, showing the Great Bitter Lake in center after 2015 expansion [4]. Figure 5. Shows the Nile Delta in green and Suez Canal [3]. The ...Missing: 1970 | Show results with:1970
[17]
978-3-642-66728-2.pdf
The artificial and intermittent, historical "Pre-Lessepsian" shipping canal ... As every natural environmental phenomenon, canal migration is exposed to ...
[18]
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-66728-2.pdf
[19]
[PDF] The nature of the Lessepsian migration through the Suez Canal
The best criteria to decide if an animal can be considered a Lessepsian migrant is its very presence in the Bitter Lakes or elsewhere in the Canal system, ...
[20]
Invasion success of a Lessepsian symbiont-bearing foraminifera ...
Aug 3, 2023 · Among the most successful Lessepsian invaders is the symbiont-bearing benthic foraminifera Amphistegina lobifera.
[21]
Thermal Niche and Habitat Suitability in the Mediterranean Sea - PMC
Oct 16, 2025 · andromeda thrives within a narrow temperature range from 27.0°C to 34.0°C (Figure 1). ... “Lessepsian Migration in the Mediterranean Sea in an Era ...
[22]
Thermal tolerance and range expansion of invasive foraminifera ...
Mar 12, 2019 · However, the ability of this species to acclimate to 20 °C and its tolerance to temperatures above 32 °C will allow its invasion and ...
[23]
Suez Canal, Lesseps, Lessepsian Migration, Anti-Lessepsian, Red ...
Lessepsian Migration (LM), Definition: Migration across the Suez Canal (planned by Ferdinand de Lesseps); generally from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean, ...
[24]
[PDF] Temperature and salinity sensitivity of the invasive ascidian ...
Dec 30, 2015 · Numerous factors influence invasive ascidian recruitment, reproduction, and abundance; the two most significant being temperature and salinity.
[25]
Lessepsian migration between the Mediterranean and Red Seas via ...
Jul 6, 2015 · ... Lessepsian migrants (the term Lessepsian originated from Ferdinand de Lesseps, a French diplomat in charge of the canal's construction).
[26]
Feeding Strategies and Biological Traits of the Lessepsian Migrant ...
The common lionfish, Pterois miles (Bennett, 1828), is one of the most recent Lessepsian migrants into Mediterranean Sea.
[27]
(PDF) Reproductive cycles and spawning periods of two Lessepsian ...
Spawning occurred in June in S. rivulatus and fromMay to July in S. luridus. High temperature in summer appeared to be a limiting factor in the gonadal ...Missing: broadcast | Show results with:broadcast
[28]
The potential of large rafting objects to spread Lessepsian invaders
Mar 29, 2019 · This report highlights the potential for large rafting debris as a vector of the spread of non-indigenous biota within the Mediterranean Sea.
[29]
Temporal Fluctuations and Settlement Patterns of Native and ...
We provide here the first information on the abundance, settlement patterns and microhabitat use of settlers of two Lessepsian siganid species, ...
[30]
A Warming Mediterranean: 38 Years of Increasing Sea Surface ...
Aug 20, 2020 · A decadal trend in the warming rate of 0.35 °C/decade was found, with an accumulated warming of 1.3 °C from 1982 to 2019 in Mediterranean SST.
[31]
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/17/2687
[32]
Divers find Lionfish in Croatia, marking alarming record northward ...
Jun 7, 2025 · The invasive lionfish has reached a new northern record in the Mediterranean Sea. Scuba divers captured two specimens (Pterois cf. miles) in the Croatian ...Missing: shift | Show results with:shift
[33]
(PDF) Projected impacts of sea level rise by the year 2100 on major ...
Sep 25, 2025 · Projected impacts of sea level rise by the year 2100 on major infrastructures along the Mediterranean costs of Egypt. September 2025; Discover ...Missing: Suez Canal overwash
[34]
Climate change paves the way for a new inter‐ocean fish interchange
Sep 11, 2022 · We demonstrate that warming conditions are now weakening the climatic barriers that historically prevented these species from expanding further and moving into ...
[35]
Pre-Lessepsian isotopic niche spaces - eJournals
Jun 3, 2025 · We demonstrate that modern, indigenous Mediterranean fish have expanded their trophic niches beyond their pre Lessepsian migrations baseline foraging ecology.
[36]
Validated Inventories of Non-Indigenous Species (NIS) for ... - MDPI
Lessepsian species are also expanding their distribution towards the rest of the Mediterranean ... CIESM Atlas of Exotic Species in the Mediterranean. Vol. 1.
[37]
[PDF] Validated Inventories of Non-Indigenous Species (NIS) for the ...
Aug 25, 2023 · Temporal trends in the Mediterranean Sea are displayed for the 807 NIS taxa observed for the first time since 1970 (Figure 3a). The rate of new ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[38]
Native biodiversity collapse in the eastern Mediterranean - Journals
Jan 6, 2021 · We predict that, as climate warms, this native biodiversity collapse will intensify and expand geographically, counteracted only by Indo-Pacific ...
[39]
The dominance of non-indigenous species in the catch composition ...
Mar 8, 2023 · They also highlighted that the dominance of Lessepsian fishes showed an increase with an annual rate of 2.77 (LW-% (biomass)) per year ...
[40]
[PDF] Ecological correlates of dispersal success of Lessepsian fishes - HAL
Jan 5, 2024 · Overall, 30% of the Lessepsian species succeeded in colonizing the Mediterranean Sea. On average, the 43 Lessepsian species not included in the.<|control11|><|separator|>
[41]
More fish invade Mediterranean after Suez Canal expansion - News
Sep 8, 2020 · The recent expansion of the Suez Canal has accelerated the introduction of non-native marine organisms from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean, according to a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[42]
https://www.natureasia.com/en/nmiddleeast/article/10.1038/nmiddleeast.2020.93
[43]
The native Sarpa salpa and the invasive Siganus rivulatus
Global warming has facilitated the invasion of several Red Sea species in the Mediterranean Sea; a phenomenon known as Lessepsian migration.
[44]
Bad neighbors? Niche overlap and asymmetric competition between ...
In this study, we assess the potential for competitive interactions between native and Lessepsian rocky intertidal mollusks on the Israeli Mediterranean coast.
[45]
Native biodiversity collapse in the eastern Mediterranean - PMC - NIH
Lessepsian migration: the influx of ... competition among intertidal mussels promotes establishment of invasive species and displacement of native species.3. Results · (a). Quantification Of... · 4. Discussion
[46]
Parasites of pufferfish, Lagocephalus spp. and Torquigener ...
Lessepsian migration and parasitism: richness, prevalence and intensity of parasites in the invasive fish Sphyraena chrysotaenia compared to its native ...
[47]
Preliminary inventory of metazoan parasites of the Lessepsian ...
The Lessepsian migrant may potentially change the dynamics of native and invasive parasite-host interactions through parasite co-introduction and parasite ...
[48]
Lessepsian migration and parasitism - PubMed Central - NIH
Sep 14, 2018 · In this study, we investigated the role of parasites in the invasion of the Lessepsian migrant Sphyraena chrysotaenia in the Tunisian Mediterranean Sea.
[49]
(PDF) RELEASE FROM PARASITE INCREASED THE SUCCESS ...
Feb 22, 2019 · Our results suggest the loss of at least four parasite species of the Lessepsian fish during the migration to the Mediterranean Sea.
[50]
Indigenous versus Lessepsian Hosts: Nervous Necrosis Virus (NNV ...
The prevalence of NNV in 109 individual fish belonging to two indigenous and two Lessepsian species from the eastern Mediterranean Sea was determined. ... However ...
[51]
An update and ecological perspective on certain sentinel helminth ...
Oct 13, 2023 · The present review focuses on the diversity and ecology of specific marine trophically transmitted helminth endoparasites (TTHs) of the Mediterranean ...
[52]
[PDF] Non-indigenous species in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea
Numerous Lessepsian species have invaded the eastern Mediterranean Sea entering through the. Suez Canal, while others have expanded through the central and ...
[53]
Siganus rivulatus (marbled spinefoot) | CABI Compendium
The construction of the Suez Canal in Egypt has led to Lessepsian migration and natural dispersal of this species into the Mediterranean Sea. The species has ...<|separator|>
[54]
Shifts in Eastern Mediterranean Fish Communities - MDPI
... fish biomass [54,55,56], the presence of a distinct link between Lessepsian invasion and native species decline is difficult to establish. This might imply ...
[55]
Fistularia commersonii in the Mediterranean Sea: Invasion history ...
Aug 5, 2025 · commersonii invasion, indicating abiotic ... distribution of this species in its invaded range. Keywords Bluespotted cornetﬁsh Lessepsian.
[56]
the genomics of Lessepsian invaders in the vicinity of the Suez Canal
Dec 21, 2021 · In 1869, the opening of the Suez Canal, started a process of invasion from the Red Sea into the Mediterranean (termed Lessepsian migration, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[57]
Westward range expansion of the Lessepsian migrant Fistularia ...
Aug 7, 2025 · As of publication, eight Lessepsian fi sh species have reached the central Mediter- ranean, off the shores of Tunisia ( Bradai et al., 2004;Ben- ...
[58]
[PDF] Catch Composition of the bottom trawl fishery along the coasts of ...
Oct 25, 2014 · Lessepsian fish comprise 18.90% of all fish in terms of the number of species and 26.66% of the total fish catch. Introduction. The Northeastern ...
[59]
Update of Red Sea (Lessepsian) fish species in the Mediterranean ...
In the past five years, a total of 18 Lessepsian fish species were recorded, representing 12 families. Five of these have established ...
[60]
(PDF) Biomass of some lessepsian fish species in the soft bottoms of ...
In this study, the variation of the biomass of some lessepsian fish species by depth was investigated. For this reason, 15 bottom trawl operations were ...
[61]
BioGlobe - The Lessepsian Migration - A Tale of Ecological Impact ...
Named after Ferdinand de Lesseps, the visionary behind the construction of the Suez Canal, this migration has reshaped marine ecosystems, impacted fisheries, ...Missing: definition etymology origin
[62]
Trachysalambria palaestinensis Steinitz 1932 - Plazi TreatmentBank
Material examined. Israel. Haifa Bay: trawl, 15–20 m, 13.05.1997, 1 male cl 13.6 mm ( MNHN IU- 2014-7025 ) , 2 males cl 12.7–13.3 mm (MNHN IU-2014-7023), 1 male ...Missing: Lessepsian migration outcompeting Melicertus kerathurus
[63]
The Lessepsian Molluscs of the Mediterranean and their distribution ...
Aug 9, 2016 · In this work, 9 species of pelagic gastropods were studied during bottom trawling and net sampling for zooplankton of Akkuyu in Erdemli and ...
[64]
Mediterranean non indigenous species at the start of the 2020s
Aug 31, 2020 · Lessepsian migration and parasitism: richness ... Global trade will accelerate plant invasions in emerging economies under climate change.
[65]
World Register of Marine Species - Reishia clavigera (Küster, 1860)
Jun 2, 2009 · Reishia clavigera is a marine species in the genus Reishia, classified as Animalia, Mollusca, Gastropoda, and is a species.
[66]
A new lessepsian species in the western Mediterranean ...
Jan 28, 2009 · This study reports on population dynamics and growth of this invasive species inhabiting the southern Mediterranean. Our main objectives are: (a) ...Missing: gastropod predator
[67]
Alien crabs in the Mediterranean Sea: current status and perspectives
A researchers found out that there are more than 50 new NIS were documented in the Adriatic Sea since 2000, most of it occur in the north of the basin (Zenetos, ...Missing: erosion | Show results with:erosion
[68]
The impact of ascidian biofouling on the farmed Mediterranean ...
May 5, 2023 · In biofouling communities, ascidians are among the most damaging species, presenting severe threats, such as depressed growth rates and ...Missing: economic Lessepsian
[69]
Non‐indigenous molluscs in the Eastern Mediterranean have ...
Oct 27, 2021 · A large body of ecological theory predicts that non-indigenous species (NIS) are successful invaders if their niches overlap little with native taxa.
[70]
The recent migration of certain Indopacific algae from the Red Sea ...
Aug 9, 2025 · One example of long-term disagreement in the literature refers to the red macroalga Acanthophora nayadiformis. In the past, Aleem (1948) argued ...
[71]
Bacterial Taxa Migrating from the Mediterranean Sea into the Red ...
The Lessepsian migrants Acrothamnion preissii and Womersleyella setacea are turf algae; they are reported to cause serious alteration in the native communities ...
[72]
A new genetic lineage of Asparagopsis taxiformis (Rhodophyta) in ...
Jul 27, 2022 · Examples are the green alga Codium ... Keywords: Asparagopsis taxiformis, cox2-3 spacer, Lessepsian migration, Mediterranean Sea, seaweed.
[73]
Molecular Evidence for Lessepsian Invasion of Soritids (Larger ...
Among the Lessepsian invaders, are larger symbiont-bearing benthic foraminiferal species (LBF) that often serve as sensitive marine bioindicators of ecological ...Missing: pioneer | Show results with:pioneer
[74]
Alien and cryptogenic Foraminifera in the Mediterranean Sea
Nov 20, 2020 · Foraminiferal invasions: the effect of Lessepsian migration on the diversity and composition of benthic foraminiferal assemblage around Cyprus ( ...Missing: Erythrean | Show results with:Erythrean<|control11|><|separator|>
[75]
[PDF] polychaetes-from-the-northern-part-of-the-sea-of-marmara ...
Aug 24, 2022 · Three alien species (Polydora cornuta, Prionospio pulchra and Pseudopolydora paucibranchiata) were found at the shallow-water stations.
[76]
[PDF] Mediterranean Marine Science
Twenty-five alien polychaetes have been recorded, of which 21 established and four casual; this number also includes the putative Lessepsian species Nereis ...
[77]
Non-indigenous species (NIS) of polychaetes (Annelida: Polychaeta ...
Oct 10, 2017 · Finally, one species is considered a Lessepsian migrant that spread along the Mediterranean basin and eventually arrived to the Spanish coasts.Missing: paucidens | Show results with:paucidens
[78]
Endemic and Indo‐Pacific plankton in the Mediterranean Sea
Dec 20, 2005 · Of the 673 dinoflagellates cited in the Mediterranean, 87% were also reported in the Atlantic Ocean. Only 40 taxa (6% of the total) were ...
[79]
Climate Change and Lessepsian Migration to the Mediterranean Sea
PDF | This chapter explores the intricate relationship between climate change and Lessepsian migration to the Mediterranean region, shedding light on.
[80]
[PDF] 14 The Red Sea - Mediterranean link: unwanted - effects of canals
Migration is easier since the deepening of the Suez Canal which has removed the hyperhalinity of the Bitter Lakes as a barrier.
[81]
[PDF] The Suez Canal as a revolving door for marine species
Nov 22, 2016 · Key words: alien species, anti-Lessepsian migration, Chelidonura fulvipunctata, Gastropoda, Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea. In a recent paper ...
[82]
A novel marine bioinvasion vector: Ichthyochory, live passage ...
May 15, 2017 · In our historical analysis, we found 34 foraminiferal species in preserved Red Sea rabbitfish specimens, dating between 1967 and 1975. In ...Missing: early mollusks
[83]
Genetic bottlenecks and successful biological invasions: the case of ...
In this study, we show that the invading bluespotted cornetfish underwent a severe population bottleneck that reduced the genetic diversity of this immigrant.
[84]
The enlargement of the Suez Canal—Erythraean introductions and ...
Dec 13, 2016 · The Suez Canal is the main pathway of introduction of non-indigenous species into the Mediterranean Sea. The successive enlargements of the ...
[85]
For the Mediterranean, the Suez is a wormhole bringing in alien ...
Apr 21, 2020 · Some Lessepsian species may have positive impacts on the marine environment as well as the economy, says Katsanevakis. They can act as new food ...
[86]
Bacterial Taxa Migrating from the Mediterranean Sea into the Red ...
The Suez Canal paved the way for species migration from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea through Lessepsian migration, named after Ferdinand de Lesseps, ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
[87]
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON OCTOPUS VULGARIS (CUVIER, 1797 ...
Specimens from common octopus, Octopus vulgaris captured from the Red Sea and Mediterranean Sea showed significant differences in four of seven morphometric ...<|separator|>
[88]
eDNA metabarcoding of marine invertebrate communities at RO ...
Cyprus is subject to the Lessepsian migration of a large number of taxa of Indo-Pacific origin via the Suez Canal. Because of this, its marine ecosystem is ...
[89]
CIESM Atlas of Exotic Species in the Mediterranean
Many of these new species are of Indo-Pacific origin having reached the Mediterranean Sea through the Suez Canal: these so called "Lessepsian" migrants now ...
[90]
A massive update of non-indigenous species records in ...
Oct 24, 2017 · The route that a new species is transported through to a recipient region is treated as a “pathway.” In the Mediterranean Sea, in addition to ...Missing: mollusks | Show results with:mollusks
[91]
(PDF) Complementing underwater visual surveys with eDNA ...
Mar 12, 2025 · This study highlights the value of integrated eDNA-based monitoring in revealing seasonal biodiversity dynamics and ecological interactions ...
[92]
Citizen-science for monitoring marine invasions and stimulating ...
Oct 8, 2025 · Another recent and very useful early detection method is the environmental DNA metabarcoding (eDNA) ... Lessepsian migration. View full-text.
[93]
Policy-oriented marine Environmental Research in the Southern ...
Jul 14, 2016 · The PERSEUS project created an effective and innovative research-based governance framework able to bring together the scientists and decision-makers and the ...
[94]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335487817_Citizen-science_for_monitoring_marine_invasions_and_stimulating_public_engagement_a_case_project_from_the_eastern_Mediterranean
[95]
Ballast water management - the control of harmful invasive species
The BWM Convention requires that ballast water management systems used, to comply with the Convention, must be approved by the Administration taking into ...Missing: Lessepsian migration
[96]
[PDF] Current trends in ship movement via the Suez Canal in ... - REABIC
Jun 22, 2020 · We used statistical tests to determine whether the August 2015 expansion influenced shipping trends and discuss our findings with respect to ...Missing: rate | Show results with:rate
[97]
[DOC] Annex 10b Lagocephalus sceleratus Management.docx - CIRCABC
As a Lessepsian immigrant, already established in parts of the Mediterranean Sea and spreading unaided towards its western and northern basins, very little, if ...
[98]
Exploring the relationships between marine protected areas and ...
Oct 16, 2018 · Our findings suggest that complementary management actions, such as species-targeted removals, should be taken in MPAs to effectively control ...
[99]
Lessepsian fish invasion in Mediterranean marine protected areas
Nov 20, 2019 · Lessepsian fish invasion in Mediterranean marine protected ... This decision was mainly supported by the CIESM Atlas (http://www.ciesm ...
[100]
Revealing population demographics with environmental RNA
Mar 19, 2024 · This study elegantly demonstrates that eRNA can be used not only to detect invasive or endangered species but also to reveal population demographic information.Missing: Lessepsian migration
[101]
Regulation - 1143/2014 - EN - EUR-Lex - European Union
Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread ...Missing: Lessepsian | Show results with:Lessepsian
[102]
Experts say Mediterranean Sea altered by Suez Canal's invasive ...
Jan 16, 2020 · Egypt, which signed a peace accord with Israel in 1979 and recently ... Canal officials say they are closely monitoring species ...Missing: bilateral | Show results with:bilateral
[103]
[PDF] 2nd MEDITERRANEAN SYMPOSIUM ON THE NON-INDIGENOUS ...
In total,. 1011 non-indigenous species have been found in Mediterranean marine waters, of which 748 are currently considered established. The highest number of ...
[104]
Alien species stabilize local fisheries catch in a highly invaded ...
This suggests a lack of competitive exclusion of indigenous target species due to the proliferation of alien species. ... Lessepsian migration: the influx ...
[105]
[PDF] united nations environment programme mediterranean action plan
Apr 23, 2015 · With limited funding, it is necessary to prioritise actions for the prevention of new invasions and for the development of mitigation measures.Missing: cooperation | Show results with:cooperation
[106]
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/cjfas-2019-0065
[107]
[PDF] Great Lakes Shipping, Trade, and Aquatic Invasive Species
Lawrence Seaway has provided a route into the Great Lakes not only for trade ... The rapid spread throughout the Great. Lakes of the European zebra mussel ( ...Missing: invasion | Show results with:invasion
[108]
What are zebra mussels and why should we care about them?
They have spread rapidly throughout the Great Lakes region and into the large rivers of the eastern Mississippi drainage. They have also been found in Texas, ...Missing: Seaway | Show results with:Seaway
[109]
[PDF] The Introduction and Spread of the Zebra Mussel in North America
To date, all of the Canadian zebra mussel sightings have been within the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence drainage basin. Based upon atmospheric and surface water ...
[110]
(PDF) Causes and consequences of the round goby invasion in the ...
The round goby, one of the most widespread invasive fishes in the northern hemisphere, established in the Baltic Sea in 1990. My results show that the round ...
[111]
Full article: Predator and prey: the role of the round goby Neogobius ...
In the Baltic Sea, round gobies were first caught in the Gulf of Gdansk in 1990 (Skóra & Stolarski Citation1993, Citation1996) and had become one of the ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[112]
Round Goby: A story of invasion success in the Baltic. - OceanRep
Feb 24, 2016 · Here we present results of a chronological analysis of the round goby invasion in the eastern German part of the Baltic. We statistically ...
[113]
Hawaii Invasive Species Council | Unomia stolonifera
This species spreads through fragments which can be spread by boats and floating objects. Once re-attached it can grow on almost anything. (CNRH). IMPACTS:.
[114]
Navy Leads Effort to Protect Hawai'i's Marine Ecosystems from ...
Nov 27, 2024 · The invasive species, including the highly aggressive Pulse coral (Unomia stolonifera) and Kenya tree coral (Capnella spicata), are known for ...
[115]
Species on the move around the Australian coastline: A continental ...
At least 198 marine species, from 9 phyla, are redistributing their distributions, 87% of which are shifting poleward, in accordance with climate change.
[116]
Climate-Driven Range Shifts Are Rapid Yet Variable Among ...
Feb 24, 2021 · Here we utilise consistent datasets and methodologies to comparably analyse rates of climate-driven range shifts over 21 years for four ...
[117]
Ship Biofouling as a Vector for Non-indigenous Aquatic Species to ...
Feb 23, 2022 · This study indicates that commercial ships are an active pathway for the transportation of non-indigenous aquatic species to Canadian Arctic coastal ecosystems ...
[118]
Relative importance of vessel hull fouling and ballast water as ...
Our study demonstrates that hull fouling is a more important vector for transfer of nonindigenous species to the Canadian Arctic than ballast water.