Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Line-of-sight propagation

Line-of-sight (LOS) propagation is a fundamental mode of transmission in which electromagnetic signals travel directly from a transmitting to a receiving along a straight path, requiring an unobstructed line between the two points for effective communication. This form of propagation dominates at higher frequencies, particularly in the (VHF, 30–300 MHz), (UHF, 300–3000 MHz), and bands (above 3000 MHz), where waves behave more like rays due to their shorter wavelengths and reduced . The is limited by the radio horizon, which extends approximately 4/3 times the optical horizon because of bending the waves slightly downward, allowing distances up to several hundred kilometers for elevated antennas but typically tens of kilometers over flat . Key principles of LOS propagation include the direct space wave, which follows the for free-space loss—calculated as L_{fs} = 32.44 + 20\log_{10}(f) + 20\log_{10}(d) in decibels, where f is in MHz and d is in km—and contributions from ground-reflected waves that can cause multipath interference. Reliable performance demands clearance of the first , a roughly ellipsoidal around the direct path with radius r = \sqrt{\frac{\lambda d_1 d_2}{d_1 + d_2}} (where \lambda is and d_1, d_2 are segment distances), to minimize losses from terrain or obstacles. Atmospheric factors, such as gradients (typically N = 301 N-units at ), introduce through super-refraction or ducting, leading to signal variations of 5–30 dB, while obstructions like buildings or vegetation can cause exceeding 20 dB. LOS propagation is essential for applications including broadcast television and radio, mobile cellular networks, satellite-to-ground links above 450 MHz, and fixed point-to-point relays for and short-haul systems, often operating up to 40 GHz with careful path engineering to mitigate impairments. Despite its limitations in non-line-of-sight environments, advancements in height, techniques, and error correction enable robust performance over urban and rural terrains.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Line-of-sight (LOS) propagation refers to the direct transmission of radio waves from a transmitter to a receiver along a straight path, requiring an unobstructed view between the antennas, akin to visibility with the naked eye or optical instruments. This mode is fundamental for electromagnetic waves in free space, where the signal follows the principles of geometric optics for high frequencies, minimizing scattering or bending unless influenced by environmental factors. In vacuum, electromagnetic waves propagate at the , approximately c \approx 3 \times 10^8 m/s, enabling near-instantaneous travel over the LOS path. The behavior is frequency-dependent: at lower frequencies below about 30 MHz, waves can diffract around obstacles or reflect off the for beyond-horizon communication, but above 30 MHz—encompassing VHF, UHF, microwaves, and mm-waves—LOS becomes the dominant mode due to reduced and negligible ionospheric reflection, as shorter wavelengths interact more directly with the path. Higher frequencies thus impose stricter LOS requirements, limiting range to the optical horizon unless augmented by relays or other techniques, assuming familiarity with the where these bands align with line-of-sight viability. The concept traces back to early optical telegraphy systems in the 1790s, pioneered by Claude Chappe's network in , which relied on visual signals transmitted via towers in direct line of sight for rapid messaging across distances. This principle was extended to radio by in his 1895 experiments, where he demonstrated over increasing ranges limited by line-of-sight paths, laying groundwork for electromagnetic signaling without wires. These foundational efforts established LOS as essential for reliable, direct communication in both optical and radio domains.

Electromagnetic Wave Behavior

Radio waves propagating in line-of-sight (LOS) conditions are transverse electromagnetic waves, characterized by oscillating electric and that are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of . These waves maintain their transverse nature in free space, enabling predictable straight-line travel between transmitter and receiver without significant bending, provided no obstacles intervene. Polarization describes the orientation of the vector in the wave, which can be linear (horizontal or vertical) or circular (right-hand or left-hand). In LOS propagation, proper alignment of transmitting and receiving polarizations is essential for maximizing signal strength, as mismatch—such as between linear and circular polarizations—can result in up to 20-30 dB of polarization loss, severely degrading the received signal. This effect arises because antennas are designed to efficiently couple with waves matching their polarization, emphasizing the need for consistent orientation in LOS links. The fundamental attenuation of radio waves in free space under ideal LOS conditions is quantified by the , which relates received to transmitted and system parameters: P_r = P_t G_t G_r \left( \frac{\lambda}{4 \pi d} \right)^2 Here, P_r is the available at the , P_t is the transmitted , G_t and G_r are the gains of the transmitting and receiving , \lambda is the , and d is the propagation . This equation assumes isotropic free-space propagation and highlights how scales with the square of the and inversely with the square of the , underscoring the importance of antenna gains in compensating for spreading losses over . Frequency significantly influences wave behavior in LOS propagation. At higher frequencies in the (UHF, 300 MHz–3 GHz) and (SHF, 3–30 GHz) bands, radio waves demonstrate enhanced , with scaling proportionally to the square of the (G \propto (f/c)^2, where f is and c is the ), allowing for narrower, beam-like patterns that concentrate energy toward the . However, these frequencies suffer increased atmospheric , primarily from oxygen (peaking around 60 GHz) and (peaking around 22 GHz and 183 GHz), which can add several dB/km of loss under standard conditions. In contrast, lower (VHF, 30–300 MHz) waves, while still dominated by LOS paths, permit slight around minor obstacles due to their longer wavelengths, though this effect diminishes reliability compared to the stricter LOS requirement at higher bands. Even in LOS scenarios, signal fading can arise from multipath propagation, where minor reflections from ground or nearby structures create secondary paths that interfere with the direct wave, causing constructive or destructive . This multipath fading is generally less severe in LOS than in obstructed environments, often manifesting as flat with depths of 10–20 , and can be mitigated through antenna height adjustments or techniques.

Propagation Path and Geometry

Direct Wave Path

In line-of-sight (LOS) propagation, the direct wave path refers to the unobstructed, straight-line trajectory of electromagnetic waves from the transmitter to the , requiring optical visibility between the antenna apertures. This is determined by the heights of the transmitter (h_t) and (h_r) antennas above the local , ensuring that the line connecting the antennas does not intersect significant obstacles. The optical visibility criterion is established by drawing tangent lines from each antenna to the Earth's surface, confirming that the path remains above the horizon and clear of intervening . The fundamental signal attenuation along this direct path in free space is quantified by the free-space path loss (FSPL), which arises from the geometric spreading of the wavefront and the inverse relationship with wavelength. The FSPL in decibels is given by: \text{FSPL (dB)} = 20 \log_{10}(d) + 20 \log_{10}(f) + 20 \log_{10}\left(\frac{4\pi}{c}\right) where d is the distance between antennas in meters, f is the frequency in hertz, and c is the speed of light (approximately $3 \times 10^8 m/s). This formula, derived from the Friis transmission equation, highlights the quadratic dependence on both distance and frequency, meaning higher frequencies (e.g., microwave bands) experience greater loss over the same path length, necessitating careful link budgeting for reliable communication. To maintain the integrity of the direct wave , terrain clearance is essential, requiring the line-of-sight to avoid interruptions from natural or man-made obstacles such as hills, buildings, or vegetation. Path profiles, constructed using digital elevation models or site surveys, graphically depict the vertical cross-section of the path, allowing engineers to identify potential blockage points and adjust heights or locations accordingly. For instance, in links, profiles ensure that the direct ray clears by at least the first radius to minimize diffraction losses, though full details on zone clearance are addressed elsewhere. Antenna design plays a critical role in optimizing the direct wave path by concentrating transmitted energy and enhancing reception along the intended trajectory. Directional , such as parabolic dishes commonly used in LOS systems, provide high gain (typically 20–40 dBi) and narrow beamwidths (e.g., 1–10 degrees), focusing power to overcome and reduce from off-path directions. These antennas align precisely with the line-of-sight geometry, enabling reliable point-to-point links over tens of kilometers in clear conditions.

Fresnel Zone Considerations

In line-of-sight () , are a series of concentric ellipsoids surrounding the direct wave path between transmitter and receiver, within which secondary wave paths can interfere constructively or destructively with the primary signal. These zones arise from the of electromagnetic waves around obstacles, with each successive zone representing paths where the path length difference from the direct path is an integer multiple of half the ; the first is the innermost and most critical for maintaining , as it encompasses the majority of the energy contributing to the received signal. Visually, these ellipsoids are widest at the midpoint of the path and taper toward the endpoints, forming a football-like shape in three dimensions that expands with increasing and path length. The radius r of the first at any point along the is given by
r = \sqrt{\frac{\lambda d_1 d_2}{d_1 + d_2}},
where \lambda is the , d_1 is the distance from the transmitter to the point, and d_2 is the distance from the point to the (with d_1 + d_2 as the total ). Higher-order zones have radii scaled by \sqrt{n} for the n-th , but obstructions primarily the first , with secondary impacts from outer zones in longer paths where cumulative becomes significant. In microwave links, which operate at frequencies typically between 1 and 40 GHz, these zones are particularly relevant due to the directive nature of the antennas and the need for reliable high-capacity transmission over distances up to tens of kilometers.
Obstructions encroaching into the Fresnel zones disrupt the phase coherence of arriving waves, leading to destructive and signal through . Partial blockage of the first zone causes phase cancellation, weakening the signal and potentially introducing ; for instance, full obstruction can result in losses exceeding 20 dB, while even minor intrusions degrade the in sensitive applications like point-to-point relays. To mitigate this, clearance criteria require that at least 60% of the first remain unobstructed, which results in negligible loss (typically less than 1 dB) under normal atmospheric conditions and ensures near-free-space performance. Full clearance (100%) is ideal for minimal , especially in paths longer than 30 km, though reduced clearance (down to 0% for grazing incidence over isolated obstacles) may be acceptable with predictive modeling to account for tolerable loss; for grazing incidence (0% clearance), the loss is approximately 6 dB.

Horizon Limitations

Geometric Horizon in Vacuum

In vacuum, the geometric horizon defines the maximum line-of-sight (LOS) distance for an observer or transmitter, constrained solely by the curvature of the Earth modeled as a sphere, without any atmospheric effects. This distance arises because the tangent line from the observer's height to the Earth's surface marks the farthest point where the direct ray remains unobstructed by the planetary bulge. For an observer at height h above the surface, the horizon distance d is given by the approximation d \approx \sqrt{2 R h}, where R is the Earth's mean radius of approximately 6371 km. The derivation follows from the applied to the formed by the 's center, the observer's position, and the tangent point at the horizon. Consider the as a of R, with the observer elevated by height h above the surface. The straight-line distance from the 's center to the observer is R + h, while the radial distance to the horizon tangent point is R. Thus, the horizontal distance d satisfies: d^2 + R^2 = (R + h)^2 Expanding the right side yields d^2 + R^2 = R^2 + 2 R h + h^2, so d^2 = 2 R h + h^2, and therefore: d = \sqrt{2 R h + h^2}. Since typical or eye heights satisfy h \ll R (e.g., h on the order of meters versus R in thousands of kilometers), the h^2 term is negligible, simplifying to d \approx \sqrt{2 R h}. This geometric model assumes a perfectly and neglects any , making it applicable equally to optical visibility and high-frequency where is minimal. For practical LOS links involving two antennas, the total horizon distance is the sum of the individual horizons from each : d_{\text{total}} \approx \sqrt{2 R h_t} + \sqrt{2 R h_r}, where h_t and h_r are the heights of the transmitting and receiving antennas, respectively. This assumes both are above a smooth spherical surface with no intervening obstacles. For example, with equal heights of h_t = h_r = 10 m, each horizon is approximately d \approx \sqrt{2 \times 6371 \times 0.01} \approx 11.3 km, yielding a total d_{\text{total}} \approx 22.6 km.

Earth Curvature Effects

The 's introduces a bulge in the surface profile between two antennas, effectively creating an obstacle that limits line-of-sight () for paths where antennas are at low elevations. This bulge represents the height by which the 's surface rises above the straight-line between the transmitter and receiver, calculated as the of the approximating the 's sphere. For a path of total length d, the bulge height b at a point a distance x from the transmitter (with d - x from the receiver) is given by the b(x) = \frac{x (d - x)}{2 R}, where R is the Earth's radius (approximately 6371 km). At the midpoint (x = d/2), this simplifies to b = \frac{d^2}{8 R}. This geometric effect assumes a smooth spherical Earth without atmospheric refraction. For typical microwave or VHF/UHF links, the bulge becomes significant over distances exceeding 10-20 km, obstructing the direct wave and first Fresnel zone. For a 50 km path under standard conditions (using effective Earth radius a_e \approx 8500 km to account for typical subrefraction), the midpoint bulge is approximately 37 m, requiring elevated antennas, towers, or passive repeaters to maintain clear LOS and avoid diffraction losses. Longer paths amplify this effect; for instance, over 100 km, the bulge can exceed 150 m, often dictating the use of hilltop sites or relay stations in path design. If the bulge partially obstructs the path, knife-edge diffraction can provide a mitigation, where the signal bends over the effective obstacle via Huygens-Fresnel principle, though with additional loss typically 6-20 depending on clearance ratio. Full , however, demands vertical clearance of at least 0.6 times the first radius above the bulge to minimize impairments. Path profiling tools integrate this bulge calculation with the geometric horizon distance d_h = \sqrt{2 R h} (from the prior vacuum model) to determine total feasible range, ensuring the straight-line path clears both endpoint horizons and intermediate curvature.

Atmospheric Influences

Refraction Mechanisms

Atmospheric refraction in line-of-sight (LOS) radio propagation occurs due to spatial variations in the tropospheric , which causes radio waves to bend continuously toward regions of higher refractive index density. This bending follows the principles of geometric , where the ray path in a stratified medium adheres to : \sin \theta_1 / \sin \theta_2 = n_2 / n_1, with \theta denoting the angle of incidence and n the ; in a continuously varying medium, this results in a curved with radius of curvature \rho^{-1} \approx -(1/n) (dn/dh) \cos \phi, where h is and \phi is the grazing angle. Such effectively extends the LOS range beyond the geometric horizon by aligning the wave path more closely with Earth's . The refractive index n of the troposphere is close to unity and depends primarily on atmospheric pressure P, temperature T, and water vapor pressure e: n = 1 + N \times 10^{-6}, where the refractivity N = 77.6 \frac{P}{T} + \frac{3.73 \times 10^5 e}{T^2} - 5.6 \frac{e}{T} (with P in hPa, T in K, and e in hPa). Water vapor pressure e relates to relative humidity H (in %) via e = (H/100) \times e_s, where e_s is the saturation vapor pressure. In a standard atmosphere, the vertical gradient is typically dn/dh \approx -39 \times 10^{-9} m^{-1} (or dN/dh \approx -39 N-units/km), reflecting the exponential decrease in refractivity with height due to decreasing pressure and increasing temperature lapse. These gradients lead to distinct refraction effects: super-refraction occurs under temperature inversions where dn/dh < -39 \times 10^{-9} m^{-1}, enhancing downward bending and extending LOS distances; sub-refraction arises from steep temperature lapses with dn/dh > -39 \times 10^{-9} m^{-1} (or even positive), reducing bending and shortening effective range. In extreme cases, such as strong inversions over water or coastal areas, ducting forms when dn/dh < -157 \times 10^{-9} m^{-1}, trapping waves within atmospheric layers and enabling propagation well beyond normal LOS, sometimes over hundreds of kilometers. Refraction effects are largely independent of frequency for radio waves from VHF to millimeter bands, but they are more pronounced at lower frequencies like and compared to optical wavelengths, where the refractive index gradient is weaker relative to wave scale, making bending negligible for horizon calculations. Ducting, however, imposes a maximum trapping frequency that increases with duct thickness and gradient strength, limiting utility at very low frequencies while favoring microwave bands (e.g., 8-16 GHz in 5-15 m ducts).

Effective Earth Radius Model

The effective Earth radius model simplifies the analysis of atmospheric refraction in line-of-sight propagation by approximating curved ray paths as straight lines over an enlarged Earth surface, facilitating horizon distance calculations. This approach defines an effective Earth radius R_e = k R, where R is the actual Earth radius (approximately 6371 km) and k is the effective Earth radius factor given by k = \frac{1}{1 + R \frac{dn}{dh}}, with n as the atmospheric refractive index and \frac{dn}{dh} its vertical gradient. Under standard atmospheric conditions, where \frac{dn}{dh} \approx -3.9 \times 10^{-8} m^{-1}, k = \frac{4}{3}, extending the effective propagation range by about 15% relative to the geometric horizon in vacuum. The refracted horizon distance under this model is calculated as d_{\text{ref}} \approx \sqrt{2 k R h_t} + \sqrt{2 k R h_r}, where h_t and h_r are the antenna heights above the surface at the transmitter and receiver, respectively. This formula arises from the geometric tangent length to the effective Earth curvature, treating refracted rays as linear paths over the modified spherical geometry. The factor k varies significantly with tropospheric conditions: sub-refraction (shallower negative gradient than standard, dn/dh > -3.9 \times 10^{-8} m^{-1}) yields k < \frac{4}{3} (often around \frac{2}{3}); normal refraction maintains k \approx \frac{4}{3}; and super-refraction (steeper negative gradient, dn/dh < -3.9 \times 10^{-8} m^{-1}) produces k > \frac{4}{3} (sometimes exceeding 10), enabling beyond-horizon propagation via trapping. These changes exhibit seasonal and diurnal patterns, with higher k values typically during humid or inversion-prone periods, as determined from radiosonde-derived refractivity profiles. In radio link design, the model is integral to predictions and coverage planning, where k = \frac{4}{3} serves as a baseline but site-specific adjustments account for variability. P.834 outlines methods to derive k from refractivity gradients influenced by , altitude, and seasonal climate data, ensuring reliable estimates for terrestrial systems.

Impairments and Mitigations

Common Propagation Impairments

Line-of-sight (LOS) propagation signals are susceptible to various environmental and man-made impairments that introduce , , and beyond basic geometric constraints. Atmospheric impairments, such as and turbulence-induced , primarily cause and rapid signal fluctuations. Terrain and clutter effects lead to shadowing, while multipath reflections result in patterns. Additional factors like , solar noise, and issues further degrade performance.

Atmospheric Impairments

Rain is a major attenuator in LOS microwave links, where water droplets absorb and scatter radio , with attenuation increasing at higher frequencies and rain intensities. The specific attenuation due to , \gamma_R (in dB/km), is modeled as \gamma_R = a R^b, where R is the rain rate (mm/h), and coefficients a and b depend on frequency f (GHz) and polarization; for example, at 10 GHz and horizontal polarization, a \approx 0.012 and b \approx 1.26, leading to total path attenuation A_R = \gamma_R \cdot d_{eff} for effective path length d_{eff} (km) under moderate rain rates of 20-50 mm/h, which can reach 3-12 dB over 10 km links. Atmospheric turbulence causes , manifesting as rapid signal fluctuations due to refractive index variations from temperature and humidity gradients, particularly in clear-air conditions over long paths. These effects are more pronounced above 10 GHz and can induce fades of 1-5 dB with timescales of seconds, though they are generally negligible below 40 GHz for most terrestrial systems.

Terrain and Clutter

Terrain features like hills and man-made clutter such as buildings, trees, and foliage obstruct the direct path, causing shadowing losses through or blockage, which can reduce signal strength by 10-20 or more depending on obstacle height relative to the path. In urban environments, clutter from dense structures introduces additional losses of 20-30 compared to rural settings with open terrain, where losses are typically under 10 ; for instance, partial blockage of the first by buildings can add 6 at frequencies. Obstruction of Fresnel zones exacerbates these impairments by increasing losses.

Multipath in LOS

Even in LOS conditions, reflections from ground, water bodies, or nearby structures create , leading to constructive or destructive that causes . This is modeled using the Ricean fading distribution, where the represents the ratio of the power in the dominant LOS component to the scattered multipath components; high K-factors (>10 dB) indicate LOS dominance with minimal fading, while lower values result in deeper fades up to 10-15 dB.

Other Impairments

Bird activity, such as flocks crossing beams, can cause transient of 10-40 dB lasting milliseconds to seconds, particularly during seasons in rural or coastal areas. interference affects low-elevation LOS links by overwhelming receivers with noise during solar radio bursts, potentially causing outages of several minutes at frequencies below 10 GHz. mismatch between transmit and receive antennas leads to losses quantified by the polarization loss factor (PLF), reaching up to 20 dB for orthogonal polarizations, though typically 3 dB at 45° misalignment in linear systems.

Techniques to Extend Range

One primary technique to extend the range of line-of-sight () propagation involves elevating heights through the use of towers or masts, which helps clear Earth's curvature bulge and maintain clearance over the first . By positioning antennas higher, the path inclination increases, reducing the impact of ground reflections and multipath fading while extending the geometric horizon. For instance, antennas should clear the highest obstacle by at least 60% of the first radius to approximate free-space conditions, with adjustments based on the for (typically 4/3 for median conditions). In temporary scenarios, -mounted or drone-based s can provide elevated platforms for signal , enabling coverage in challenging terrains like mountainous areas where fixed towers are impractical. A single with antennas at sufficient height has been shown to maintain for multiple ground stations over extended periods. Diversity methods further mitigate fading impairments in LOS links by exploiting variations in signal paths. diversity employs multiple antennas separated vertically (e.g., 3-23 meters) at transmitter and ends to select or combine signals from uncorrelated paths, yielding improvement factors that enhance reliability against multipath effects. diversity uses parallel channels at slightly offset frequencies to avoid simultaneous deep fades, while angle diversity adjusts antenna tilts to capture signals from different elevation angles. In modern systems, multiple-input multiple-output () configurations leverage in LOS environments, providing diversity gains exceeding 25 at low outage probabilities through antenna selection, particularly effective in personal area networks where diversity boosts capacity. Repeaters and bridge horizon limitations by segmenting long paths into shorter segments. Passive reflectors, such as large metallic surfaces placed on prominences, redirect signals around obstacles without power, enabling cost-effective extensions in areas where direct paths are blocked. Active amplify and retransmit signals, forming tandem networks with lengths over 40 km to minimize correlation between fades, while modification factors ensure overall performance. For ultra-long paths, augmentation acts as a space-based , extending terrestrial links globally by serving as high-altitude that overcome entirely. Adaptive techniques dynamically counteract residual impairments to sustain extended range. Beam steering with phased-array antennas allows real-time adjustment of the radiation pattern to maintain optimal alignment despite minor misalignments or atmospheric variations, using phase shifters for precise control in millimeter-wave LOS links. Error correction coding, such as forward error correction (FEC) with rates like 1/2, compensates for occasional fades or noise, enabling error-free transmission over distances up to several kilometers in high-frequency bands by operating near the Shannon limit. These methods collectively address common impairments like fading and diffraction, enhancing overall LOS system robustness.

Applications

Fixed wireless links represent a application of line-of-sight () propagation in , primarily employed for point-to-point backhaul to connect base stations to core networks or interconnect remote sites. These systems operate predominantly in frequency bands from 6 to 40 GHz, where LOS conditions enable reliable transmission over distances of 50 to 100 km, supporting capacities up to 10 Gbps per link through advanced modulation schemes like 1024-QAM and channel aggregation techniques. In rural and underserved areas, they provide an efficient alternative to fiber optics by leveraging LOS paths for high-throughput data transport without extensive trenching. Design of links emphasizes meticulous link budgeting to ensure robust performance under constraints, incorporating (FSPL), atmospheric impairments, and a fade margin typically set at 25 to 30 dB to achieve availability targets exceeding 99.99%. High-gain parabolic antennas with gains of 30 to 40 dBi are standard, focusing the beam to minimize dispersion and maximize signal strength over long hops, while diversity configurations ( or ) further mitigate multipath . Link planning often references the effective model with a of 4/3 to account for and extend the geometric horizon. Notable deployments include WiMAX-based LOS links for rural broadband, such as those implemented in Vietnam's suburban areas, where fixed wireless systems delivered multi-Mbps connectivity over 30-50 km to bridge digital divides without fiber infrastructure. These installations highlight advantages like rapid deployment in weeks versus months for cabling and cost savings of up to 50% in remote terrains, enabling quick scalability for broadband access. The evolution of links traces back to analog () systems in the , which supported voice and over multi-hop chains, transitioning in the 1980s to digital for higher efficiency. By the 2000s, adoption of /Ethernet protocols enabled seamless integration with packet-switched networks, culminating in modern mm-wave operating above 40 GHz for urban densification, offering 10-100 Gbps capacities over shorter LOS paths to support fronthaul in dense small-cell deployments.

Mobile and Cellular Systems

In line-of-sight () propagation, cellular systems in rural and suburban environments predominantly rely on direct paths between stations and mobile devices, enabling coverage radii up to 30 km at 900 MHz frequencies due to lower obstructions and favorable atmospheric conditions. This dominance of LOS paths minimizes signal from , supporting reliable voice and data services over large areas with deployments. In contrast, urban microcells, typically spanning 100-500 m, often operate under partial LOS conditions where over rooftops and building edges supplements the direct path, allowing propagation around minor obstacles while maintaining sufficient signal strength for high-density user support. Coverage prediction in these LOS-dominant scenarios frequently employs the Okumura-Hata model, an empirical formulation for urban environments with adaptations for suburban and rural areas via correction factors. For open rural areas, the path loss L in decibels is estimated as: L = 69.55 + 26.16 \log_{10} f - 13.82 \log_{10} h_b + (44.9 - 6.55 \log_{10} h_b) \log_{10} d - 4.78 (\log_{10} f)^2 + 18.33 \log_{10} f - 40.94 where f is the in MHz, h_b is the antenna height in meters, and d is the distance in km; this model, derived from extensive field measurements, provides accurate median predictions for LOS links up to several kilometers when corrections for mobile antenna height are applied. The adaptation for LOS emphasizes reduced environmental corrections compared to urban non-LOS cases, highlighting the model's utility in planning placements to achieve desired signal-to-noise ratios. Mobile dynamics introduce key challenges to LOS propagation in cellular systems, including Doppler shift caused by vehicle motion, given by f_d = \frac{v f}{c} \cos \theta, where v is the speed, f is the , c is the , and \theta is the angle between the velocity vector and the line to the ; this frequency offset, reaching hundreds of Hz at speeds, necessitates equalization techniques to mitigate inter-symbol . At edges, where LOS may extend beyond the radio horizon due to , frequent handovers are required to maintain , often every few seconds in high-mobility scenarios, straining network resources but ensuring seamless service transitions. In mobile contexts, LOS paths can also experience brief multipath from nearby reflectors, though this is less severe than in cluttered urban non-LOS settings. Contemporary applications leverage LOS propagation in 5G New Radio (NR) systems, particularly at mmWave bands (24-40 GHz), to deliver high-data-rate services in (V2X) communications and dense venues like stadiums, where direct paths enable gigabit speeds over short ranges. techniques, using phased-array antennas to dynamically steer narrow beams toward moving users, are essential for tracking LOS links in these scenarios, compensating for the high at mmWave frequencies and supporting applications such as real-time traffic coordination in V2X or immersive fan experiences in stadiums. These advancements, standardized in releases, prioritize LOS maintenance through rapid beam alignment, achieving up to 10 Gbps throughput in clear propagation conditions.

Broadcast and Satellite Communications

Line-of-sight propagation is crucial for broadcast television and radio, operating in VHF (30-300 MHz) and UHF (300-3000 MHz) bands via point-to-multipoint transmission from high towers, achieving coverage radii of 50-150 km depending on antenna height (100-300 m) and terrain, with signals following the radio horizon extended by . Satellite-to-ground links above 450 MHz, such as Ku-band (12-18 GHz) and Ka-band (26.5-40 GHz) downlinks from geostationary satellites at ~36,000 km altitude, rely entirely on paths, susceptible to atmospheric attenuation ( up to 10-20 ) but enabling global broadcasting and data services with high-gain dish antennas (20-40 dBi gain).

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Characteristics of point-to-point tropospheric propagation and siting ...
    of remote line-of-sight relays and terminals. This is one reason that line-of-sight propagation is not considered favorably for long- distance, military ...
  2. [2]
    Ham Radio Glossary - ARRL
    Line-of-sight propagation -- The term used to describe VHF and UHF propagation in a straight line directly from one station to another. Lower sideband (LSB) ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] HANDBOOK OF RADIO WAVE PROPAGATION LOSS, PART II (100
    Line-of-sight transmission over rough terrain can produce 'short-term multiple reflections that are referred to as multipath or fast fading. Multipath is ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Introduction to Wireless Electromagnetic Channels & Large Scale ...
    Hence, at very high frequencies (30 MHz or higher), the dominant mode of EM propagation is line-of-sight (LOS). For terrestrial communication, this means that ...
  5. [5]
    Anatomy of an Electromagnetic Wave - NASA Science
    Aug 3, 2023 · Photons carry momentum, have no mass, and travel at the speed of light. All light has both particle-like and wave-like properties. How an ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Terrestrial Propagation at LWA Frequencies
    May 2, 2008 · The efficiency of the ionosphere as a reflector of radio waves falls off sharply with increasing fre- quency. Above 30 MHz, efficient ...
  7. [7]
    A Vision of the Future | SPARK Museum of Electrical Invention
    Using a series semaphores, towers, and custom telescopes, Chappe and his brothers created a line-of-sight communications network that would soon total 556 ...Missing: optical | Show results with:optical
  8. [8]
    Polarization of Electromagnetic Waves - Radartutorial.eu
    Polarization is a property of transverse waves that refers to the geometric orientation of the oscillations of the corresponding wave.Missing: LOS | Show results with:LOS
  9. [9]
    Antenna Polarisation - Electronics For You
    Aug 15, 2016 · On line-of-sight (LOS) paths, it is most important that the polarization of the antennas at both ends of the path use the same polarization. In ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] A Note. on a Simple TransmissionFormula*
    FRIISt, FELLOW, I.R.E.. Summary-A simple transmission formula for a radio circuit is derived. The utility of the formula is emphasized and its ...
  11. [11]
    None
    ### Summary of Line-of-Sight Propagation Direct Wave Path Geometry from ITU-R P.1411-9
  12. [12]
    Free-Space Path Loss - Radartutorial
    ### Summary of Free-Space Path Loss (FSPL)
  13. [13]
    None
    ### Summary of Terrain Clearance and Path Profiles in ITU-R P.526-14
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Potentials for Navy Use of Microwave and Millimeter Line-of-Sight ...
    The transmitting and receiving antennas are 1-foot-diameter parabolic dishes. Their gain is given in table 5. The range of the link is 20 nau- tical miles ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Chapter 6 - Propagation Effects on Satellite Systems - NASA
    In analyzing propagation near the Earth's surface, what are referred to as ground waves are often separated into s ace waves and surface waves.
  17. [17]
    Facts About Earth - NASA Science
    With an equatorial diameter of 7,926 miles (12,756 kilometers), Earth is the biggest of the terrestrial planets and the fifth largest planet in our solar system ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] The Distance Formula in 2 Dimensions - Space Math @ NASA
    Jan 5, 1994 · Problem 2 - Use the Pythagorean Theorem to derive the formula for the LOS horizon distance, d, to the horizon tangent point given R and the ...
  19. [19]
    Distance to the Horizon - SDSU Astronomy
    OG ≈ sqrt ( 2 R h ). is the distance to the horizon, neglecting refraction. Numerically, the radius of the Earth varies a little with latitude and direction; ...
  20. [20]
    None
    ### Summary of Sections Related to Earth Curvature, Earth Bulge, or Effects on Line-of-Sight Propagation Due to Spherical Earth
  21. [21]
    [PDF] E445 Spring 2014 Lecture 1 Course TOPICS
    Figure 1–2 Propagation of radio frequencies. Signals bounce between the ... H = Height of earth bulge (in feet). D = Distance between antennas (in miles).<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    [PDF] VHF and UHF Path Loss Calculations for Amateurs
    Before the losses along any path can be calculated, it is necessary to draw a "Path. Profile" or section showing the line of sight between the antennas at each ...Missing: terrain propagation
  23. [23]
    None
    ### Summary of Refraction Mechanisms in Tropospheric Radio Wave Propagation (ITU-R P.834-7)
  24. [24]
    None
    ### Summary of ITU-R P.453-11: Radio Refractive Index Formula and Vertical Gradient
  25. [25]
    Module 3_1: Basic Refraction Principles
    Although space waves at close ranges are line-of-sight, at longer ranges vertical variations in pressure, humidity and temperature can have strong effects ...
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    [PDF] VARIATION OF RADIO REFRACTIVITY GRADIENT AND ... - URSI
    Near the earth's surface, dN/dh is about -39N/km which gives an effective earth radius factor, k = 4/3. This is referred to as normal refraction or standard ...
  28. [28]
    None
    ### Summary of Specific Rain Attenuation Formula from ITU-R P.838-3
  29. [29]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  30. [30]
    18.7 GHz tropospheric scintillation and simultaneous rain ...
    Feb 29, 2008 · We present experimental results on the relationship between rain attenuation and simultaneous scintillation, obtained with measurements of attenuation time ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Line-of-Sight Propagation in Urban Cluttered Environments
    These measurement points measured clutter losses ranging from 3 to. 7 dB. To the north of the measurement points is a large athletic field with no obvious ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Elevation Angle Characteristics of Clutter Loss in Urban Areas for ...
    In addition, clutter loss is 6 dB regardless of the frequency when a building covers half of the Fresnel zone. The elevation angle characteristics of clutter ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] The Ricean Factor: Estimation and Performance Analysis - NJIT
    The Ricean factor is the ratio of the direct (LoS) to scattered (diffuse) signal power, indicating link quality in wireless communications.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Ricean K-Factor Measurements and Analysis for Wideband High ...
    Ricean K-factor is a popular parameter to quantify the channel fading severity, which is defined as the power ratio of LOS components to multipath components.
  35. [35]
    Empirical Study on the Effect of Birds on Commercial Microwave Links
    Using real CMLs' data collected in Israel that were intersected with GPS data from tagged birds, we empirically associated measured attenuation in the signal in ...
  36. [36]
    Antenna Polarization: What It Is and Why It Matters - DigiKey
    Jul 28, 2022 · Polarization is one of the many aspects of EM energy propagation that can have varying degrees of impact or concern in an application and its antenna design.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Circular Polarization and Polarization Losses
    The main advantage of CP versus linear polarization is that CP eliminates polarization mismatch losses caused by Faraday's rotation and varies the squint angle ...
  38. [38]
    None
    ### Summary of Techniques to Extend Range in Line-of-Sight Propagation (ITU-R P.530-9)
  39. [39]
    Enabling connectivity for tactical networks in mountainous areas by ...
    Nov 24, 2018 · It is shown that a single relay with balloon mounted antennas can provide sufficient LOS coverage for all the squadron platoons during the whole ...
  40. [40]
    Measured Diversity Gains from MIMO Antenna Selection - IEEE Xplore
    We investigate the diversity gain of MIMO systems with antenna selection in measured propagation channels for wireless personal area networks.
  41. [41]
    Navy Satellite Communications | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute
    Very simply then, communication satellites serve as radio relay stations in space. As such, they extend the useful line-of-sight links for high data ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    Technology Review: Microwave backhaul boosted with multiband
    Multiband booster for backhaul. Radio-link bonding is a well-established method for microwave backhaul, enabling multiple radio carriers to be aggregated into ...
  45. [45]
    Evolution Trends of 5G Microwave Backhaul Transmission - ZTE
    Currently, the transmission capacity can reach 10 Gbps under the 2 GHz/256 QAM configuration. As higher-order modulation and CCDP/XPIC techniques are applied, ...
  46. [46]
    Microwave Technology - CableFree
    Microwave Links are a valuable tool in Mobile Carrier Backhaul: Microwave technology can be deployed to provide traditional PDH 16xE1/T1, STM-1 and STM-4 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  47. [47]
    [PDF] AN1629-Simple Link Budget Estimation and Performance ...
    Oct 28, 2013 · This application note describes a simple link budget analysis, measurement and techniques to evaluate the range and performance of wireless ...
  48. [48]
    Which type of antenna gives highest gain - DOLPH MICROWAVE
    Apr 13, 2024 · The ​​highest gain antennas​​ are typically ​​parabolic reflector dishes​​, achieving ​​30–50 dBi​​ in ​​C/Ku-band (4–18 GHz)​​.
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Broadband Access Technologies for Rural Connectivity in ...
    "WiMAX Enables Wireline Incumbent to Become. Leading Provider of Broadband Wireless Data Services in. Korea," Case study submitted to WiMAX Forum, 2007. [10].
  50. [50]
    (PDF) Innovative WiMAX Broadband Internet Access for Rural Areas ...
    This paper presents a case study of the proposed digital television based WiMAX wireless network to provide broadband Internet service in the suburban/rural ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] EVOLUTION OF MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS - A BRIEF ...
    Jul 12, 2011 · EVOLUTION OF MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS: A BRIEF HISTORY. 14. Page 15. The Migration from Analog to Digital Microwave Links. It's Been a Challenge ...
  52. [52]
    Bits to Beams – RF Technology Evolution for 5G mmwave Radios
    Nov 9, 2018 · This article is organized into 3 major topics. In the first section, we will discuss some of the leading use cases for mmwave communications.Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
  53. [53]
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Understanding mmWave for 5G Networks 1 - 5G Americas
    Dec 1, 2020 · The high free space pathloss or signal attenuation at mmWave frequencies necessitates proximity and line-of-sight (LOS) paths for establishing ...